Legal AF by MeidasTouch - Trump Screws Up Big as AG James Shows Up for Criminal Case

Episode Date: October 24, 2025

Trump will rue the day he took on NY AG Leticia James, who turned the tables today with the Attorney General going on the attack against outmatched and outgunned and outwitted “loaner” federal prosecutors. Michael Popok reports on her arraignment, her fiery public comments in defense, and her filing MULTIPLE motions against Trump’s pet of a prosecutor Lindsey Halligan and his DOJ, including to gag the entire administration including Trump from speaking about the case. Check out the Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com Visit https://meidasplus.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At the Nissan All In Clear Out, there's nothing more chill than financing an award-winning Nissan for just 0%. Enjoy the soothing relaxation of zero stress, zero worries, zero indecision. Hurry in, because once they're gone, there will be zero left. During the Nissan All In Clear Out, get zero percent financing plus up to $500 bonus on some of our best-selling models. You have zero reasons to wait. Conditions apply. See your local Nissan dealer today. We got some breaking news, fast-moving news about Letitia James, the fighter, the New York Attorney General, who has been framed in a mortgage fraud indictment. She appeared in court today in Virginia, and she's already let the court know, and she's already filed multiple motions against the Department of Justice against Donald Trump against Lindsay Halligan.

And, in a little bit of turnabout as fair play, she's used a recent report by Anna Bauer, the journalist, in which Lindsay, Haligan contacted her sort of in the middle of the night and started texting her about the case as grounds for a motion to gag Lindsay Halligan if she even survives the first motion to have her removed as a prosecutor outright. This is the fighting Letitia James that Donald Trump feared. He should fear her. He's gone after the wrong person. The roles are now going to be reversed with the attorney general going after the prosecutor and hitting her with everything that she has. You're on the Midas Touch Network and Legal A.F. on this story. Let's talk about it. Lettisha James gets indicted because Donald Trump doesn't like her because she's gone after successfully

Donald Trump in over a hundred cases as attorney general, brought down Donald Trump and brought him low on a fraud case in New York, worked with the Manhattan DA on criminal prosecutions against Donald Trump, and now Donald Trump decides he's going to pay her back and get a pound of flesh. he gets Lindsey Halligan, who's only been a prosecutor for days, hours to obtain an indictment about mortgage fraud, about $118,000 house purchase in which she has her relatives living in there. There's no fraud. And even if there was, it's so minuscule. It's not, how could it ever be criminal? And Leticia James has been fighting ever since. And now she's filed two major motions I want to talk to you about right now. I'm going to stitch them all together with you. And one, I had the honor to interview Anna Bauer, the reporter that's at the heart of the motion for gag order because they focus it, its centerpiece of it, is Anna Bauer's reporting about getting contacted in the middle of the afternoon or middle of the evening by a triggered Lindsay Halligan who starts spilling the beans about the Letitia James prosecution,

doing everything she is not supposed to do in violation of rules of professional conduct, of local rules, violation of the Justice Manual, Department of Justice Manual. Now she's bought herself a motion for gag order in which they use Anna Bauer's reporting. And I'm going to show you a clip from my interview of Anna Bauer. Show you a clip of that interview is now at the centerpiece of that motion.

The first motion is a motion to dismiss because Lindsay Halligan has been improperly, illegally appointed to be the U.S. attorney, and therefore the motion he has for two things. complete dismissal of the indictment? And if their judge is inclined Jamar Walker, the judge, inclined to actually dismiss the indictment,

then to ban, to block, to enjoin to stop Lindsay Allegan from indicting anyone, from leading any prosecution. At least get her into the deep freeze. They'll talk about those two motions as well. I want you to first hear from Letitia James. Okay? And sort of

back-to-back clips. Here's the clip of her leaving the courthouse today after she went to court and said aloud herself, to the judge, Judge Walker, not guilty as to both counts. Here's Letitia James. This is not about me. This is about all of us. And about a justice system which has been weaponized.

A justice system which has been used as a tool of revenge. There's no fear today. No fear. No fear. No fear. No fear. No fear. No fear.

No fear. Because I believe that justice will rain down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream. This is like a campaign vibe out here when Letitia James just came out of the courthouse after pleading not guilty to that one count of bank fraud and that one count of making a false statement to a financial institution. She was met by this large crowd that was chanting, we stand with Tish. They're holding up signs of saying don't turn the federal judiciary into a kangaroo court. Just a swarm of supporters were out here as she exited the courtroom. And then as you saw came and spoke to the cameras, thanking everyone for coming here,

saying that they were lifting her up and saying that this was a vindictive prosecution. And now just moments after she was indicted, a fiery Letitia James takes to a public stage and pushes back against Donald Trump. See, she's allowed to talk. She's the defendant. And she's trying to get a fair trial. It's the prosecution who can't make extrajudicial comments. But right after being indicted, here's her on a stage at a political rally.

Go. You see, I know what it feels like to be attacked for just doing your job. But I also know what it feels like to overcome adversity. And so I stand on solid rock. And I will not be. bow. I will not break. I will not bend. I will not capitulate. I will not give in. I will not give up. You come for me. You got to come to all of us. All of us. Every single one of us. We're all in this together.

You see, I've learned to stand on the shoulders of my ancestors who've been before, who came before me and who weathered the storm. And despite being seared with scars, they survived. And if they can survive, so will we. So over the last few days, I've summoned their strength and their courage. And I will keep fighting for justice. I will keep fighting for New Yorkers. I will keep fighting the aggressive policies

of Washington, D.C., and I will not stop. That's who Donald Trump picked the fight with. That's a major mistake. Hey, everybody, Ben Myceles here from the Midas Touch Network. I wanted to let you know about my podcast partner, Michael Popak's new law firm. It's called the Popak firm. Michael Popak's pursuing his dream of starting his own law firm, really based on the popular

demand by all the Midas, Mighty, and Legal A-Fers who were approaching Michael Popak with their cases and saying, can you help us? And at that time, Popak was not able to. So he went out on his own. He started the Popak firm where he is now handling catastrophic injury cases like car accident cases, trucking cases, malpractice cases, big negligence cases, wrongful death cases. So if you or someone you know, have a case like this, the consultation with Popok's firm is free. Give them a call. See if you have a case. It's thepopokfirm.com, the Popok firm.com, or you can call 877 Popok A.F, P-O-P-O-K-A-F.

So 1-877 P-O-P-O-K-A-F. Give Michael Popak a call. And I'm really proud of you, Popak. Thanks for all the hard work you're putting in. So let me talk about the motion involving Anna Bowers reporting, who I just interviewed about 72 hours ago. Here's what they say in the motion to enforce rules, prohibiting the government's extrajudicial disclosure,

meaning outside the courtroom. This is on page two. What precipitates this motion now was a digital messaging exchange that occurred after the government brought charges between purported interim, I love the purported part, interim U.S. Attorney Halligan and Anna Bauer, a senior journalist for lawfare. She wrote an article called Anna, it's Lindsay, and an off and running with text messages, which we cover in my clip. The article in the text between the two are attached, as reported and as confirmed by the signal messages exchanged by Halligan and Bauer. It was Halligan who initiated the contact. It was

a stunning disclosure of internal government information. It went on for several days. It seemed to be triggered by some reporting Anna Bauer had made related to the New York Times. In fact, let me show you the clip of my interview with Anna Bauer just moments after, I think, the day her article was published. I think it's important to keep these things in mind.

So one is that it is normal for prosecutors and journalists to speak to each other. You know, prosecute, it's the kind of thing that that's how reporting happens, you know. So that's not strange, but there are a few things that are really abnormal here. One is that it's the sitting United States attorney who's one of the most high-profile prosecutors in the country who's already under immense scrutiny because of the circumstances in which she was put into this job and the cases that she is pursuing against Letitia James

and James Comey. The other is that she is reaching. out to me who, you know, I, I, it seemed that she was reaching out to me about these tweets I wrote that was summarizing someone else's reporting. Right. The New York Times in that case. The New York Times. And that New York Times story happened to be about grand jury testimony in the case that she was

overseeing, the Letitia James case. And it's very unusual for prosecutors to reach out to her. Porter unsolicited about an ongoing prosecution concerning something that touches on grand jury matters because, as, you know, you might, we might speak to later, there's rules and policies and laws around the protection of grand jury secrets. Which I'll be fair, Anna, when we get into the text, it looks like she does not understand the secrecy that is around grand jury material. Here's what the lawyers for Letitia James, led by Abby Lowell, how to say about all of that.

In initiating this conduct, contact, Ms. Halligan, page five, the lead prosecutor on the case commented on the credibility and the general strength of the evidence presented to the grand jury. She also commented more generally on the strength of the case, these extrajudicial statements and prejudicial disclosures by any prosecutor, let alone be U.S. attorney, run afoul of the rules of criminal procedure, the federal, the code of false. federal regulation, the local rules, the Department of Justice Manual, fair play, you name it. They then go off and say the courts recognize that leaking or disclosing this information by a government agent is often more egregious than the crime. Those agents are charged with investigating. It's worse than what Letitia James is being accused of. $18,000 mortgage fraud over 30 years. Here's what they say on page 11. Few, if any, interest under the Constitution are more fundamental than the right to

to a fair trial by impartial jurors, and an outcome affected by extrajudicial statements would violate that fundamental right. Her initial contact, then repeated exchanges with the journalist, Anna Bauer, you just saw. Two days after violating the charges appears to violate many of those rules. And here's what they want.

Says that she violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6E on page 13 about exculpatory evidence, that evidence that tends to prove the innocence of somebody. She crapped all over that evidence that would help Letitia James prove her case. And then she ran roughshod all over all the other rules. Here's what she wants. They want an order, this on page 17, prohibiting further government extrajudicial disclosures and investigative and case material. No more leaks. No more gag. No more speaking to the press,

Lindsay or anybody else, gag order. Requiring government counsel and agents in this case to obey all relevant federal laws. And I think this could also apply to Donald Trump because in the request, it says prohibiting further government disclosures. That would include Donald Trump directing government counsel to create and maintain a log of all contexts. The second motion that's been filed is very similar to the one that James Comey filed recently.

Now, this is going to take a step back in the arraignment. This is going for a very fast trial. You thought James Comey going to try, on the 6th or 5th of January, 2026 is fast. She's going to trial on the 26th of January. It's three months away. And that is advantaged defense. Because now the prosecutors who are outmatched and outmaned

and out brainpowered are going to have to like scramble to come up with all the documents they have to produce in order to comply with federal law. Lindsay Halligan, she sat in the third chair today. In my world, that means she's, She's superfluous. She's like, you know what on a bull, if you know what I mean. First chair, lead trial lawyer, not Lindsay Elegant.

Second chair, lead trial lawyer, or co-lead trial lawyer, not Lindsay Elegant. Third chair. Interested observer? That's where she sat. Rocking back and forth, barely saying a word in court. She had to import a guy from Missouri to handle the case in the Eastern District of Virginia because no one in her own prosecutor's office supports her. The new motion lays out in a stunning fashion, and I'll post it all on LegalAF Substack,

why under Section 28 U.S.C. 546, Lindsay Halligan, is illegally appointed. It's very simple. The U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia resigned the day of the inauguration. She was replaced by Pam Bondi under Section 546 by Eric Siebert, a Republican. He was nominated by the president named Trump to go be confirmed in the Senate. But when they found out, even though he's a Republican, that he was not going to violate his oath, his ethics, his conscience, and conjure up evidence that doesn't exist against Letitian James and James Comey, they fired him. Okay. Now, under 546, the judges of the Eastern District of Virginia picked the next U.S. attorney until Donald Trump can get a permanent replacement confirmed by the Senate.

But that's not what Pam Bondi did. She had a single-use ticket at the amusement park, and she tried to ride the roller coaster twice. Oh, I want to get back on the roller coaster. I want to name another person. You can't name another person. Sit down. And that was Lindsay Allegan. That is the problem.

So they want her barred and banned, and they want her not just the indictment dismissed, but if the judge isn't willing to dismiss the indictment, they want the entirety of everything that Lindsay Allegan does to be stayed and blocked, effectively taking away all of her powers as U.S. attorney to indict anyone or anything. That's what they're requesting, as a violation of 546. And they're right about 546. Now, will the Supreme Court ultimately decide whether that Congress's rule impinges on the president's power under Article 2?

Maybe. But for right now, this is a winning argument. It's been raised by James Comey in front of his judge and now in front of Jamar Walker. Now, it's not going to stay. these two motions are not going to be heard by the same judge in a little bit of a twist when you're challenging the disqualification or you're challenging the qualifications of a u.s. attorney and the person that would replace her if that motion is successful comes from a decision of the court of the judges of all that which is what happens under the statute they're disqualified because they got a conflict

right because it would be like yeah i'd like to replace lindsay holligan judge walker so he votes against her you know, in the ruling. So what happens is this is going to get sent, just like Comey's, to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge, Judge Diaz. Judge Diaz is going to decide to send it to a judge not named Jamar Walker, not in the Eastern District of Virginia. It's going to go to either North Carolina or maybe another district in Virginia. That judge will make the decision about that motion, about Halligan, about the gag order and her violation of it, an old Anna Bauer issue? Oh, no. That is going to go, that's going to go with Jamar Walker, right?

So I'm going to follow it all right here on the Midas Touch Network and on LegalAF. Hit the free subscribe button, LegalAF and Midas Touch. Until my next report, fast-moving story, come to LegalAF substack. Well, I'll report on this probably on an hourly basis. I'm Michael Popok. Can't get your fill of LegalAF. Me neither. That's why we formed the Legal AF substack.

Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court, filing or a oral argument. Come over to the substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do call, wait for it, morning AF.

What else? All the other contributors from legal layoff are there as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews. We got ad-free versions of the podcast and hot takes where legal A-F on substack.

Come over now to free subscribe.