Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth - Building a world-class sales org | Jason Lemkin (SaaStr)
Episode Date: February 18, 2024Jason Lemkin created and runs SaaStr, the world’s largest community for B2B/SaaS founders, and is the managing director of SaaStr Fund, a $90 million venture capital firm specializing in early-stage... enterprise investments. He is also the mastermind behind two major tech conferences each year—one in the Bay Area, drawing in over 15,000 people, and another in Europe, with a crowd of more than 3,000 SaaS executives, founders, and entrepreneurs. Before SaaStr, Jason wore many hats: CEO and co-founder of EchoSign (later bought by Adobe), vice president at Adobe Systems, co-founder and president of NanoGram Devices Corp., vice president of NeoPhotonics, and a senior director at BabyCenter. In our conversation, we discuss:• How far you should go without a salesperson• Signs it’s time to hire salespeople• Why you need to hire two salespeople• How to compensate your salespeople• How to interview salespeople• When to hire a VP of Sales• How to prevent their flaming out• How to scale your sales org• How to improve the relationship between your sales and product teams• Much more—Brought to you by:• CommandBar—AI-powered user assistance for modern products and impatient users• Vanta—Automate compliance. Simplify security.• LinkedIn Ads—Reach professionals and drive results for your business—Find the full transcript at: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/building-a-world-class-sales-org—Where to find Jason Lemkin:• X: https://twitter.com/jasonlk• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonmlemkin/• Website: https://www.saastr.com/—Where to find Lenny:• Newsletter: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com• X: https://twitter.com/lennysan• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lennyrachitsky/—In this episode, we cover:(00:00) Jason’s background(06:18) The importance of sales in B2B businesses(11:23) Signs that you should start hiring salespeople(14:19) Attributes to look for in early sales reps(19:08) Hiring a VP of Sales(26:43) The role of a VP of Sales(30:06) Interviewing salespeople(45:16) Determining sales compensation and quota(53:34) Transitioning from 100% commission to a smaller percentage(56:58) Indicators of a hard-to-sell product(59:39) Scaling the sales organization(01:05:26) Understanding sales roles and titles(01:10:02) Product involvement in sales, and vice versa(01:20:32) Thoughts on product teams taking on P&L responsibilities(01:27:23) One thing founders can do to become better at sales(01:31:02) The ideal trial length for a free trial sales team(01:39:50) Closing thoughts(01:41:43) Lightning round—Referenced:• Marc Benioff on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marcbenioff/• Snowflake: https://www.snowflake.com/en/• Yamini Rangan on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/yaminirangan/• Salesforce: https://www.salesforce.com/• HubSpot: https://www.hubspot.com/• Twilio: https://www.twilio.com/• Cloudflare: https://www.cloudflare.com/• GitHub: https://github.com/• Columbo: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1466074/• What is Davos and why is it important? Your guide to the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting: https://www.euronews.com/next/2024/01/15/what-is-davos-and-why-is-it-important-your-guide-to-the-world-economic-forums-annual-meeti• Adobe: https://www.adobe.com/• Satya Nadella on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/satyanadella/• Glengarry Glen Ross on Prime Video: https://www.amazon.com/Glengarry-Glen-Ross-James-Foley/dp/B002NN5F7A• The Wolf of Wall Street on Prime Video: https://www.amazon.com/Wolf-Wall-Street-Leonardo-DiCaprio/dp/B00IIU9FQY• A step-by-step guide to crafting a sales pitch that wins | April Dunford (author of Obviously Awesome and Sales Pitch): https://www.lennyspodcast.com/a-step-by-step-guide-to-crafting-a-sales-pitch-that-wins-april-dunford-author-of-obviously-awesom/• Pipedrive: https://www.pipedrive.com/• Sam Blond on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sam-blond-791026b/• Gong: https://www.gong.io/• Zendesk: https://www.zendesk.com/• ZoomInfo: https://www.zoominfo.com/• Apollo: https://www.apollo.io/• Daniel Chait on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dhchait/• SAP: https://www.sap.com/• Lessons on building product sense, navigating AI, optimizing the first mile, and making it through the messy middle | Scott Belsky (Adobe, Behance): https://www.lennyspodcast.com/lessons-on-building-product-sense-navigating-ai-optimizing-the-first-mile-and-making-it-through-t/• VistaPrint: https://www.vistaprint.com/• Procore: https://www.procore.com/• Matt Mullenweg on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mattm/• Wordpress: https://wordpress.com/• SaaStr University: https://app.saastruniversity.com/collections/20252• From Impossible to Inevitable: How SaaS and Other Hyper-Growth Companies Create Predictable Revenue: https://www.amazon.com/Impossible-Inevitable-Hyper-Growth-Companies-Predictable/dp/1119531691• Pavilion: https://www.joinpavilion.com/• Top 10 Learnings about Free Trials with Tomasz Tunguz: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfQNJpnxmMw• The Terminal List on Prime Video: https://www.amazon.com/The-Terminal-List-Season-1/dp/B09HYNH8TK• Top Gun: Maverick on Paramount: https://www.paramountmovies.com/movies/top-gun-maverick• OpusClip app: https://www.opus.pro/• OnePlus Open smartphone: https://www.amazon.com/OnePlus-Dual-SIM-Unlocked-Smartphone-Hasselblad/dp/B0CHN7M531/• SaaStr conferences: https://www.saastr.com/events/• Marketo: https://go.marketo.com/about-marketo-landingpage-emea.html• Zoomtopia: https://zoomtopia.com/• Money20/20: https://us.money2020.com/• Shoptalk: https://shoptalk.com/• Jeff Lawson on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffiel/• Eric Kwan on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/erickwan/—Production and marketing by https://penname.co/. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email podcast@lennyrachitsky.com.—Lenny may be an investor in the companies discussed. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lennysnewsletter.com/subscribe
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Here's the mistake that 99% of founders and sales reps make.
We're not really selling in B2B.
We're solving problems.
Our job as sales reps in SaaS is to not sell a used car, okay?
We are selling a Tesla Model 3 performance.
It has competition.
I might not need it this week, okay?
But it's pretty darn good.
Let me help you get you into that Model 3 performance today.
And I've even got a special discount for the end of this month.
And let me just help you.
And I've spent four calls answering all your questions.
And I've explained to you all the things.
and why the supercharging network is better than the regular one that doesn't really work at the
charger near your house.
And I've got on Google and I've seen there's no charging network near your house.
There's only supercharges.
I kind of got you, don't I?
And that's the job of SaaS and sales because we're not selling commodities.
Today, my guest is Jason Lemkin.
Jason created and runs Saster, the world's largest community for SaaS and BDB founders.
He also runs two of the biggest town conferences every year, one in the Bay Area, which attracts over 50,
15,000 people and one in Europe with over 3,000 SaaS executives, founders, and entrepreneurs.
Before Saster, Jason was the CEO and co-founder of EchoSign, which he grew to over 100 million ARR,
and then sold to Adobe, where he ended up as a vice president of their web services business.
If you follow Jason on Twitter or LinkedIn, you know how much wisdom he has to share about all
aspects of building a successful SaaS business.
In our conversation, we focused on what I find most product leaders have the least experience
in, building a sales team.
We get very practical and tactical on how long you should wait to hire your first salesperson,
what your one to two first hire should look like, why you should actually hire two salespeople,
not just one initially, how to comp them, how to interview them, when it's time to hire a VP of sales,
how to avoid your salespeople flaming out and burning through all your cash.
We also get into how to make the product and sales relationship healthier,
including how to push back on sales and feature requests,
why your head of product should be super involved in your sales process,
how long you should make your trials,
why you should avoid annual contracts, and so much more.
Jason also shares advice for running a conference, which I found super interesting.
This episode went long because I just couldn't stop asking Jason questions,
but as a result, I'm excited to bring you this incredibly rich episode on building your sales team.
If you enjoy this podcast, don't forget to see.
subscribe and follow this podcast in your favorite podcasting app or YouTube.
This helps tremendously and I really appreciate it.
With that, I bring you Jason Lemkin after a short word from our sponsors.
Let me tell you about Command Bar.
If you're like me and most users I've built product for, you probably find those little
in-product pop-ups really annoying.
Want to take a tour?
Check out this new feature.
And these pop-ups are becoming less and less effective since most users don't read what
they say.
They just want to close them as soon as possible.
But every product builder knows that users need help to learn the ins and outs of your product.
We use so many products every day and we can't possibly know the ins and outs of everyone.
CommandBar is an AI power toolkit for product, growth, marketing, and customer teams
to help users get the most out of your product without annoying them.
They use AI to get closer to user intent, so they have search and chat products that let users
describe what they're trying to do in their own words, and then see personalized results,
like customer walkthroughs or actions.
And they do pop-ups too, but they're nudged.
are based on in-product behaviors, like confusion or intent classification, which makes
them much less annoying and much more impactful.
This works for web apps, mobile apps, and websites.
And they work with industry-leading companies like Gusto, Freshworks, Hashikorp, and launch
Darkly.
Over 15 million end users have interacted with CommandBar.
To try out CommandBar, you can sign up at Commandbar.com slash Lenny, and you can unlock
an extra 1,000 AI responses per month for any plan.
That's command bar.com slash lenny.
This episode is brought to you by Vanta,
helping you streamline your security compliance to accelerate your growth.
Thousands of fast-growing companies like Gusto, Com, Cora, and modern treasury
trust VANTA to help build, scale, manage, and demonstrate their security and compliance programs
and get ready for audits in weeks, not months.
By offering the most in-demand security and privacy frameworks such as SOC2, ISO-271,
GDPR, HIPAA, and many more, VANTA helps companies obtain the reports they need to accelerate growth,
build efficient compliance processes, mitigate risks to their businesses, and build trust with
external stakeholders.
Over 5,000 fast-growing companies use Vanta to automate up to 90% of the work involved with SOC2
and these other frameworks.
For a limited time, Lenny's podcast listeners get $1,000 off Vanta.
Go to vanta.com slash Lenny.
That's V-A-N-T-A-com slash Lenny.
to learn more and to claim your discounts. Get started today.
Jason, thank you so much for being here. Welcome to the podcast.
I'm so excited. Long time, what's the expression? Long time fan. First time dialer or something.
First time caller. Yeah, first time caller. I don't know if that exists in 20, 24 or not, but yeah,
that's me. So thank you so much for letting me come. It's absolutely my pleasure. I feel like
you're the kind of guy that I knew would be on this podcast eventually, and I'm glad that we're
finally doing this. I also feel like we can go in so many directions.
I feel like you have so many insights on so many parts of building a business, especially a B2B business.
But I thought it would be most interesting to dive deep into building your sales team,
essentially trying to help people figure out how to start their sales team, scale their sales team,
and all the elements they go into it. How does that sound?
I think it's great. I think it's an evergreen topic. But I think there remains a consistent set of confusion,
fears around how to build the sales team.
And it's evergreen.
The tools change.
And the pace has changed,
but the issues are like,
I love to dig into them.
Because we keep making the same mistakes as founders
and executives again and again and again.
100% agree.
It's such a black box to me,
sales.
I've never done sales.
And I'm always just like,
I have no idea what's going on here.
And so this is how I learned from folks like you.
Yes.
You touched on this now.
And I wasn't going to get on this,
but I think it'd be interesting,
just this question of, does everyone need a sales team?
Will you need a sales team if you're listening as a founder?
Yes.
Is it simply, if you're a B2B business, you'll need a sales team?
How does it should people think about, like, will I need a sales team?
If you truly build a self-serve product, you can either never have a sales team
or like Slack defer it or like Canva really defer it.
Okay, Canada didn't really build a sales team until they were well north of 500 million
revenue because it's epic self-serve, right?
Slack started all self-serve.
and by the time they went public,
the majority of their revenue was enterprise sales.
So you can sequence things.
You can have hybrid models like,
you know,
a third of Asana's revenue is still from self-serve
and two-thirds are from a self-serve motion.
So there's all different hybrid things.
The most important thing, though, I've found
is however you get those first 10, 15, 20 customers,
be honest.
Be honest.
And if they,
and if you've talked to them as a founder
and you know that they need a sales type
motion. They need effort to deploy it. They have questions about security. They have questions
about competition. They have onboarding requirements. And you say, hey, I don't like sales,
so I'm going to do a PLG motion. You will fail. One of the things that I've done with so many
founders over the years, and it shocks them at first is your first 10, 15, 50 unaffiliated customers,
the ones that find you from the ether, they are like the next 50, 100, 200,000. And you can either
embrace them or run for them. And too many product de-founders find that, hey, gosh, I'm going
to have to do sales and they exit it. They exit it. And I'll tell you, a company I invested in
18 months ago when things were easier, right, maybe 20 months ago. They were doing five million
in revenue, growing over 100% with the sales like motion. Things got harder. Things got harder
as they did for many of us. And they decided to fire the whole sales team. And now they're
doing less than one. From five million with beloved customers, if I told you the logos,
your jaw would drop, over five million, 20 months ago to one million today because they fired
the sales team because the founders didn't like sales. They thought it was icky. They didn't want to do it.
They were tired of doing it. And I can tell you several stories like this. So you've got to be
honest about the, sometimes we get it just right on day zero. Sometimes we know exactly how our company
is going to work or Lenny's podcast is going to work. We can predict the future perfectly. But I find in B2
a lot of times the industry we end up winning in, the segment of the industry, the type of
customer is not what we initially thought and either lean into it and be a success or run from
it because sales is icky and risk risk failure.
When you talk about being honest, what you need to be honest about is that you need
sales help to close customers.
Be honest about that.
Just be honest about, yes, the motion that it will take to get those first 10, 15, 20
customers. And if they were able to find you by putting their credit card and no one had to talk to them,
then that's your DNA today. It doesn't mean you won't go upmarket later, like a Slack or a Canva.
But if you can get them all to do that and you never have to talk to them, then get really good at
viral loops. Get really good at almost B to C type motions. Get really good at this kind of stuff
and higher growth hackers and do the whole B2C, almost B2C-ish motion, which we have at self-serve.
But if your first 10 customers come in and say, you know, Lenny, I'll pay you $5,000,
but you've got to solve this problem I have with online video.
That is not a self-serve motion.
It is not a self-serve motion.
And even worse, sometimes worse,
is your first 10 customers,
five of them sign up online,
but it takes a huge amount of effort for $19 a month.
And then five say they'll pay you $5,000 a month.
And some founders are like,
I'm going to work on the five that pay us $20 a month,
not the five that'll pay us $5,000 a year.
And I find too many folks that don't like sales,
too many folks that have not had any life experience in a sales-led environment, flee from those customers,
and I've never seen that lead to success.
We're surprised who our niche is something.
We talk about nailing our niche, but sometimes we're surprised the niche that finds us.
There's a lot of startups I've invested in that start off product-led growth
and quickly realize this just isn't working, and many of them move to when you'd actually hire salespeople and start to go top-down.
And it can be most companies are a hybrid, right?
Even folks that are, even there's weird hybrids.
Like there's folks like Mongo and Snowflake.
Mongo has a, well, maybe Mongo is a much better example.
Mongo has a free, low-end version and there's open source too.
It's a little confusing.
And then there's not a lot in the middle.
And then there's a lot of big, right?
There's all different ways to combine a product-led or self-serve motion with saleslet.
And too many founders in the beginning think it's either-or.
It's not either-or.
So I think the big takeaway here is,
sales is not a question of if you're going to need a sales team, it's a matter of when.
The can of example is crazy. Maybe that's the longest anyone's. But they still have one. But they still have one now. I think Notion, I think at 10 million errors when they hired their first salesperson. Okay. That makes sense. So I think the question that leads to is what is a sign that you should start to hire your first sales person? Even if you hate sales, even if you think it's icky, even if you don't like it. As a founder, you've 95 times out of 100, you've got to
find a way at least to close the first 10 customers yourself. You've got to find a way.
And we could dig into how to do that if you don't like sales. The hack, though, is that even if
you don't like sales, customers love to talk to the CEO. The customers love it. And here's the
other thing as a founder, you're really good at the product in the market, hopefully even in the
early days. So what I mean, so what's important is even if you don't know how to do outbound, even if you
don't know how to send a cold email, even if you don't know how to do any of this stuff,
And even if you don't know how to ask for a check, even if you don't know how to open or close,
almost all founders are A plus middlers, A plus middlers, A plus middlers, right?
And before we started, you and I talked about podcast and content and immediately it was an A plus conversation, okay?
Maybe you don't know how to close a big sponsor.
Okay, I'm just, I'm just making that up.
And maybe you don't know how to find one.
But once you have someone in your spider web, lending the conversation you and I just had was A plus.
And any founder should be there by day one.
right by day one and and prospects love it they they don't if i if i want to buy serum i don't get to
talk to yamini at hubspot or mark betty off but i get to talk to you in your serum company it's
like magical for early adopters right so bear in mind no matter how bad you think you are as a
founder you're pretty good at the middle part of sales so find a way to get any prospects get
really good at the middle and then work up your courage work up your courage and find how to ask for
next steps and money what would it take lenny
How can we get going on Riverside?
What would it take?
We would love to have you, right?
What would it take to get you going next week?
You've got to learn that little motion,
but you don't have to learn all the stuff you think is smarmy
other than how to go from middle to just ask for how we can get going.
I like this term middlers.
So just to make sure I understand what that means,
like in the middle of the conference,
you're not great at initiating,
you're not great at closing,
but you could like talk about it.
Yeah, and this is where sales reps are terrible.
Most sales reps,
once you go beyond the five basic questions,
they can't tell you how a database works or how to eliminate hallucinations from your product
or how to do or how to do payroll in eastern southern Guam.
Like the sales rep,
we can talk about this.
They need help from the founders in the early days.
They need help from sales engineers or product people,
which is my favorite place to get the help as you scale.
But they need help.
The beauty to founders is they don't need help in the middle.
And you can be 10 times better in the middle than any sales rep at your bigger,
at your bigger competitor.
If you're running, I'm just making up CRM,
but if you're running a new CRM startup,
you can run circles around 98% of the sales reps
at Salesforce or HubSpot, right?
They have the brand, they have the partners,
they have the integrations,
but they cannot answer the questions you can answer.
Okay, so you close the first 10 customers.
What are other signs that,
okay, now is really the time we need to start hiring sales?
I think as soon as you've got those 10 customers
and more than 20% of your time is booked up
with customers, you need leverage.
You need leverage.
You've got to get, if you do it too early,
if you're not spending 20% of your time in sales
and 20% of your time in recruiting,
you're failing as a founder.
You need 20% of each, 20% in sales
and 20% recruiting.
Nothing else really matters at some level as a CEO,
maybe not as founders, but as CEOs.
But once you cross the 20%,
you need leverage or your calendar will die.
So you need to hire one rep,
and you've got to hire two
because otherwise there's no AB test.
You have to AB test humans.
You have to A, B, test humans.
You've got to hire two as hard as it is.
And there's just one sheet code to those first two.
There's one sheet code.
I talked to so many founders that screwed up their first sales hires,
and they always nod when they hear it.
Those first couple reps have to be people you would buy your own product from.
That's it.
Now, we can talk about other criteria.
We can talk about normalizing for deal size.
We can talk about industry expertise.
We can talk about all this kind of stuff.
But when you go out as a first time founder,
interview 30 reps and you're going to have to interview 30, okay?
And 20 are just going to break your brain because they don't do any work
and they don't do any prep.
And they didn't even go to your website.
And then eight of the next 10 are sort of okay,
but you know it's not really going to work,
but you might hire them if you get tired.
And if you're lucky one or two of them,
they're like magicians.
They ask the right questions,
which we could talk about.
Then take a pause and say,
look, no matter how strange their background was,
whatever they did,
It's not the right background.
It's not our same deal size.
It's not our industry.
They actually weren't very good at their last job.
They got let go at their last job.
But I would buy from Lenny.
I know.
I've been doing this for a year.
I bet every day I would buy from Lenny because Lenny just explained to me my product
and my customer's problems in a way that I actually believe.
Forget about what's on her LinkedIn or his LinkedIn.
I would buy from Lenny.
That rep always works because you can trust them with those leads.
Almost every first time founder,
hire someone because they worked it,
Twilio or Cloudflare or wherever and they talk to talk and they can say ACV and NR and
and and they can talk all these acronyms, none of which matter.
None of which matter.
And they get so, we all get attracted to logos on our resume.
And but in our gut, I always ask him, did you know that Jason was going to,
would you buy from Jason?
And like, you're right.
I wouldn't have bought.
I wouldn't have bought from Jason.
But he worked at Twilio.
So just wait, wait, and interview 30 sales reps.
however you find them through LinkedIn,
through use recruiters, use contingent recruiters.
It's exhausting.
Do everything.
Work your network.
And then be flexible in the beginning.
We're looking for pirates and romantics in the early days.
We are not looking for folks with massive sales operations teams and enabling teams.
You're looking for someone,
you're looking for that quirky one that's got a few extra IQ points that for reasons that make no sense has fallen in love with your little product that is so feature poor and does nothing.
But they love it.
They love it.
They love it.
Okay.
And my first rep I had like this back in the day, he had gotten let go by a prior startup.
And he was struggling and he was living in his brother's garage at the time.
This was not your number one person at Snowflake.
But of all the 30, he came in and what's now Adobe sign, Echo sign.
He described the whole problem.
He described how we would solve the problem for our customers in the early days of this category.
Right.
And it was clear whatever it took we needed him and whatever we needed to backfill, the garage or whatever,
this was the only one that could sell the product,
and he did it for a decade.
Close our first five-figure deal,
first six-figure deal,
first seven-figure TCV deal.
Didn't scale completely, right?
Inside of Adobe was harder to scale inside of a 20,000-person company
than it wasn't a six-person company,
but he was still there.
He still made that far to the journey,
but he was the only one that I knew could actually,
that I would buy my product from.
Not that I would buy something from,
but I would buy my product from.
And leads are so precious in the early days, right?
it's so hard to find leads.
That's the problem.
You hire this perfect person from Snowflake
and you have three leads a month
and you give him two and he doesn't close them.
Oh, your company's going to die.
Leads are so precious.
That's what folks don't get.
And so wait, and I know it's painful.
And I know most founders have hired this person
with the right LinkedIn that they wouldn't buy their product from.
Just keep interviewing.
Just keep you need that quirky pyridormatic
that loves your product and can sell it.
They're out there.
Amazing advice.
Wow.
There's so much there.
I'm going to follow a couple of threads there.
Okay.
In terms of the level, I know a lot of people make the mistake of going with a VP of sales pretty quickly.
What's your advice?
I know you talked about general attributes, but what's your advice for kind of the level and seniority of these first two hires?
Two things.
One that's evergreen and one that's maybe especially apropos for today's environment.
The evergreen one, which I've talked about for over a decade.
And I think folks that have been through it will see it,
which is you need two sales reps hitting quota, closing deals,
before you're ready to hire a manager for them.
Almost all VPs of sales,
their job is to take you from rep 3 to 300,
to take you from 3 to 300,
to take something that's just starting to repeat,
a script that's just starting to work,
leads that are just starting to come in,
and then take Lenny and Jason, the two reps I have,
as quirky as they are, they're crushing it, okay?
And then I'm going to hire,
a more heterogeneous type of person going forward.
I'm going to hire the person from Cloudflare into it.
I'm going to,
they can all be like Lenny and Jason.
They're pretty quirky.
But at least I can learn from them.
What's working?
What are the objections,
right?
How do we get around that feature gap?
Like we're one year,
we're two years old.
We got a lot of feature gaps.
Okay,
this integration doesn't quite work.
How do we box around those issues?
How do we sell our 10x feature?
Like,
because if you're a startup,
your product isn't very good.
Your software is not very good.
And you have a competitor,
but you have some 10x feature that is driving people to buy.
something you're doing that does not exist in the marketplace.
And the really good reps get insanely good at selling that.
And the folks off the street,
the new VPs sales often doesn't even understand the 10x feature.
It's too subtle.
It's too subtle why the fact that your product is localized in Portuguese
magically means you can win these deals.
Or I'm making up something that doesn't quite make sense.
So you need two reps that are hitting quota and then you hire VPs.
If you hire it before then, you're doing a Hail Mary.
It ain't going to work.
it never, ever, never, ever, ever, ever, ever works.
You're asking them to find product market fit to be the first rep, to be the second rep
and scale it all at the same time.
It's mission impossible to do all for at the same time, right?
So that's the biggest mistake is, Lennie, I can't get sales going at my company.
I can't do it, but I raised $4 million in my C plus round.
I'm going to go out and hire the VP of sales.
That VPS will not be there in eight months.
And you know what else?
Two million of the four will be gone because they'll never understand the product.
they will never understand.
And if there was one thing that,
there's so many things we could talk about,
but if there's one thing I could reinforce for this audience,
it's that,
you know,
that early sales team,
they've got to be product gurus for your product audience.
They've got to be product experts.
And later as you scale,
they can't be or you can't scale.
You know,
when I started,
when I came out of my own startup
and started interviewing other folks,
I remember I would interview a lot of folks at places like GitHub back in the day.
I'd be like,
do you have a technical background?
Like,
are you an engineer?
Have you ever built any software?
They're like,
No, I don't. I don't know. I don't know. I was curious how you could do it. But GitHub was so well established that it's 10 questions. It's 10 questions. And grab a sales engineer. It's 10 questions and grab it. So you got to be really good at 10. Then you grab a sales and that doesn't work in the early state startups. So you've got to find these sales folks that are a bit of products of aunts and dropping the VP of sales in that isn't a product savant, which is a big issue. That's all Mr. or Ms. process. This is the issue. They're all Mr. or Ms. process.
Okay. So the second point I wanted to make, and I was on the fence for years of when you hire a VP of sales, do they need to carry a bag? Do they need to sell themselves or not? Does it matter? Does it? And I wasn't sure for a long time. And the reason I wasn't sure for a long time is not that you don't want a VP of sales carrying a bag. And I do think a VP of engineering also should commit code. And carrying a bag, meaning closed sales themselves. Yeah, not just be a boss. Not just be a boss. And the reason I was on the fence was because I was like, well, listen,
And in theory, it's great.
But let's say you're a hot startup and you want to go from two to six this year.
Okay?
So I want to add four million of new bookings.
And let's say I can do 400K in quota per rep.
That means I got to have 10 refs.
She walks in with two.
I got, I'm at a race, aren't I?
I got to hire eight in the next six months to hit my plan.
And I got to put numbers on the board.
If I'm out there as an individual contributor or sales rep, I'm never going to hire eight people,
am I?
It's never going to happen.
So I used to say, I don't know if it matters.
But what I've learned the last 18 to 20 months when everyone has gotten lazy, Lenny, everyone in tech has gotten lazy is I see way too many VPs to sales that come in and never have any idea how to sell the product.
Never. Never. They only want to be managers. Now, whether they carry a bag or whether what they do is they join calls with the reps, right?
Whether they back fill the reps, you want your VP of sales in deals 20, 30 hours a week when they start. And I see VPs to sales today start. They're in no deals.
I'll go to a board meeting and BPS sales will be there two, three months and they'll have a logo on the word.
I'm like, how's it going with Airbnb?
And they'll be like, I don't know.
I got to ask John.
Doesn't know because isn't even in the deal.
Isn't even in the deal.
So I see this too often.
Another company I'm on the board on, I really like this VP of sales lot.
He joined and six months in, you know, sales were down from where the new bookings were down from where they were six months before.
And as he said, he was honest, he's like the big.
biggest problem is I feel like I didn't have time to learn this product. It's a complicated
product. It's more complicated than the product I last old than I just didn't have time.
Jason, this conversation is going exactly how I'd hoped. There's so much actionable advice here.
Let me try to summarize a little bit of the things you've said and then keep going. So let me know
what I'm missing here. I'm going to try to just highlight some of the important things you mentioned.
So in terms of when it makes sense to start hiring your first salesperson, a couple of things you shared
is you've closed the first 10 customers on your own as founders. And if you're supposed to
spending more than 20% of your time on sales and you need to start creating more leverage.
I'll throw in one other thing I've heard and just tell me if this is also true, that there's
kind of a repeatable process you've created, like you can sell consistently enough or you can tell
someone here's how I've been selling. Is that, is that right? Yeah, if you hire a VP of sales
before then, it's approaching 100% chance of failure. I see. So you can hire the first two reps
before you're like, here's a pretty good process that has worked from you a number of times.
Yeah, I mean, listen, as hard as hard as it is for a lot of founders to even get their arms around,
the reason is you've got to be that crummy first head of sales with them.
You've got to manage those reps.
You've got to be in the field with them.
You've got to be figuring it out before you can hire the person.
You just have to, even if you're terrible at it, because you're still going to be a good midler.
You're still going to be a good midler.
Okay, a few more things that stood out to me.
One is hire two sales reps immediately, not just one.
these reps, you need to interview about 30 people.
Eight will be pretty good, 20 will be terrible, two are going to be.
These are people you can see selling your product and you would buy from them.
And they're often very quirky and not maybe a traditional sales background.
They've never been VPs of sales essentially.
They're more like AEs and things like that historically, or maybe not even sales people historically.
Is that, is that right?
I think you will regret it if you don't hire these first couple sales reps that have a couple
years of experience if you're in B2B with B2B sales. They need a couple of years of experience and
they need a certain amount of maturity. And maturity is a real issue in any early hire because
we just don't have time to babysit people. There's no onboarding. There's no training. So they need
a couple years of experience. Ideally, something close to your deal size. We could chat about
why. That would be nice. And enough maturity that you can trust them with that lead. We can trust them
with your customer, right? Okay. And then you hire a VP of sales once you're ready.
to go from 3 to 300 reps.
Your advice is also give the VP of sales a bag slash a quota
slash they need to be doing sales themselves in today's world.
At least for a little while.
And more importantly, if they don't want to,
I think in today's world you've got to run from them.
Exactly whether they fully carry a quota, a half quota,
whether they backfield the sales team.
You want a salesperson.
And here's the thing, Lenny, you want a sale,
this is going to sound silly, but it's not.
Trust me on this for anyone watching listening.
You want a head of sales that actually wants to do sales.
And I got to tell you, and I'm still struggling with this myself, after the last three years or so, so many folks in all functions, we could talk about other functions too, okay?
But especially in sales, don't want to do sales anymore.
They don't want to do it.
They don't want to do it.
2021 was crazy because everything was too crazy.
There's too much money, too much going on.
2022 was the knife falling.
That was crazy too.
20203 was just hard.
Okay?
And whether it's burnout or whatever out or just too much of a too much change,
I would say I've probably interviewed for different reasons,
50 VPs of sales in the last 12 months.
I would say the majority don't want to do sales.
It's my first screening question.
And that's why they got to carry a bag because it proves they actually still care about the
crap.
And the best sales folks love sales.
a craft. They love money. Yes, they love money. And that does matter. Do not hire a sales
rep that doesn't like money. Trust me on this one. There's zero percent chance they'll work out
either. But they also like the craft. They like honing the script. They like beating the competition.
They like figuring out the counterfeit. They like figuring out the weapon and the 10x future.
They like working on a team. They like hunting. They love it. But then sometimes I just think
burnout is always a reality. But I just think that the last three years have been so yo-yoed
that folks are just, they're out.
They're out and don't hire them, no matter how smart they are.
And that's the test.
I'll tell you,
I talked with a really great DPS sales candidate that had worked with a top 10 tech
company.
And I asked him,
what he wanted to do in this next role?
And he's like,
yeah,
I got a great team.
I've got eight people that I can bring with me.
We're ready to lock and load.
I'm like,
okay,
well, let me tell you one of my views in today's world is that you've got to actually
visit more customers now,
not less.
In a distributed world,
that's more important to visit customers.
And he lived in the East Bay in Pleasanton in the East Bay,
which is maybe 20 minutes east of Oakland.
He said, I'm willing to visit customers,
but I won't go as far as the peninsula in San Francisco.
He's just happy at home.
He's happy at home, Lenny, and he don't want to sell.
And this guy has the best LinkedIn and the best references,
but you don't want to sell anymore.
He needs a job.
He wants to be a VP sales.
And I see this across the industry.
And I'm struggling to find answers.
And I think the biggest hiring,
we talked about a lot of tactical hiring mistakes
that you can make today in sales.
The biggest strategic mistake you can make today in sales,
because there's so many veterans.
There's so many folks that worked at Twilil and Mongo
and wherever pick any great company you want, right?
There's so many veterans out there.
You just can't hire the ones that don't actually want to sell anymore.
And there's too many.
There's too many.
You mentioned that you actually just asked them in the interview.
The first question is, do you actually want to sell?
What other questions do you ask for either,
Let's go through both.
You said you have these questions that you ask for the early hires and then the VP of sales.
What are some tips for people when they're interviewing these folks?
It's interesting.
VPS sales and VP of the VP of product, I look for the same answer.
One of the Colombo style questions I ask them, and I mean, it's barely even counts as a question,
is what do you want to do your first 30 days?
What do you want to do?
Actually, I usually ask, what do you want to do your first two weeks?
And in B2B, if I don't hear from the VP of sales or the VP of product that I'm going to go meet customers,
out. I'm out.
There's too many VPs of product, too, Lenny,
that don't want to meet customers anymore either.
The majority of VPs of products that I interview,
they don't, they don't say meet customers.
Every single great VP of product, chief product I've ever worked with in my entire career,
you know what the first thing they do in the first two weeks?
They'd like, leave me alone.
I'm going to go talk to 20 customers.
Leave me alone.
Leave me alone.
I'm going to go talk.
They don't want to sit out of meetings and look at PRDs
and talk out of their navel.
I'll get endless internal meetings.
All the best ones, they say they just leave.
They literally say somebody, leave me alone.
I will see you in two weeks.
I'm going to go meet with 20 class rooms.
And that's what product should do.
Sales, whether it's prospects or existing customers, it can vary, right?
But they should be like, my first day, I want to join five calls.
And when you hear that story of I don't want to travel out of Pleasanton,
or they say, here's what you're going to hear from the wrong person for anything,
even up to 50 million of revenue.
I'm going to spend that first month working on process.
I'm going to spend that first month getting Salesforce up and running.
I'm going to send the first month on territory planning,
Lenny, because with our three reps,
I really want to make sure we've nailed territories, right?
Lenny will do the south, Elaine will do the east,
Jason will do the west.
When you hear process, process, process,
from marketing, product, sales, customer success too,
boy, it's the death of customer success.
It's just people, and it's not that you don't need process.
It's even worse than it was than a few years ago.
And I know this is going to trigger some people, but the truth is they don't want to work.
They don't want to work.
They don't want to work.
I literally just got this LinkedIn email to work with me at Saster from this person who's reading Saster for eight years.
You're like, I want to run account management customer success for you.
Here's what you're doing wrong.
Here's how to do it.
I'm like, this is pretty good.
Right?
And I, and I, and I DMed her back.
I'm like, great.
To be honest, you realize that you're actually going to have to talk.
to customers and sponsors yourself in the beginning.
No response.
Just out.
Just out.
And that was the best one I got the last 30 days.
That was the best inbound that I personally got.
So I know it sounds triggering or critical,
but as founders,
we have to be honest that there's this vast pool of veterans
with great LinkedIn's and great resumes
that are so burnt out, Lenny.
And let's not blame them.
I know it sounds like I'm blaming them or being negative.
And I'm trying to not be negative.
I'm empathetic.
I am empathetic to the burnout.
but you can't hire these.
There's too many.
The industry is littered with the burnt out.
They're littered with it.
And if you hear a touch of cynicism,
if you hear anger,
if you hear I don't want to meet customers in any V.
And I'm going to say any VP of product, sales, marketing customers.
If they don't want to meet customers,
let's make it a 14-day test,
you know they're never going to want to meet customers.
These folks that don't want to do sales,
that are VPs of sales,
I imagine when you're further along, that's more okay.
because you don't need them to be doing sales, right?
They want to manage, optimize.
No, I see you shaking your head.
I mean, okay, you think, okay, there's an element, let's call it north of 50 or 100 million,
where for what's sometimes called commercial sales, SMB sales, it really is all process.
Okay.
So for sure, I agree.
But, you know, at Salesforce, they're trying to close $100 million plus deals.
You think that the sales leadership doesn't need to be in those deals?
You think they can just hit refresh on the dashboards and track them from home?
No, Mark Benioff today is still flying to meet customers.
He said the other day, why does Mark Beniof go to Davos, right?
He sits, and I've never been to Davos.
He sits at the same place at the top of some staircase, okay?
And Salesforce drops millions of dollars.
And he waits to meet customers, prospects, and partners in person all day because it's efficient.
Because it's efficient because he can do 50 or 100 customer or prospect meetings a day at Davos.
he's still doing it at 30-something billion in revenue, right?
So this idea that is there some truth at, at, like, for example, when I worked at Adobe back in the day,
it is true that Adobe, which was, you know, parts of the business, you know, sales literally was not dashboards.
Like, I get it.
Okay, at $4 billion, $10 billion in revenue.
But most of your audience is not ready to hire at $4 billion or $10 billion in revenue.
They're not ready to hire that person.
don't hire them, right?
I don't know.
Maybe Satya's listening.
You never know.
But I think on the sales side of the business, they're flying out to the big deals.
To close the loop on this thread, when you're interviewing the early sales reps, those first two quirky folks, what are some questions and ways to know if there may be a good fit?
You mentioned one of like you feel like you would buy from them.
Okay.
The one, really the simplest one.
And early in my career, I thought this was silly or hated it, this Glenn Gary Glenn Ross.
I don't know if it was Glenn Gary Glenn Ross or that toxic Leo movie about sales, which is still entertaining.
But what, yeah, one way another, Lenny, it's got to be sell me this pen.
But it's not sell me this pen.
It's sell me this app.
So I don't like surprises.
I don't like games.
I like to do this in a second interview or whatever.
Give them time.
And I don't like to judge too harshly.
But whether it's the first interview or the second, they got to sell you this pen.
they've got to put in the 30 minutes of work,
and maybe it's two hours.
But here's the thing.
Today's world,
you can go on YouTube or someone's website.
There's an explainer video for every product under the sun, isn't there?
I am shocked how many salespeople I have met,
Lenny, from SDR to SB of sales that by the time,
and I'm doing an interview for like a portfolio company.
This isn't a screen interview.
They haven't even watched an explainer video yet.
I could be the fifth or eighth interview,
and they don't know how the product works.
They have not even gone to the effort of searching YouTube or the homepage and watching it.
And forget about it.
Explain her videos enough.
But so many companies do webinars now and they publish them on that like really good stuff,
customer testimonials, right?
If you're a sales rep, you don't actually have to know how the web looks work or how to provision an API key.
But you need to know the product as well as that webinar that's on YouTube.
And 98 out of 100 folks won't bother an interview.
They won't bother.
They're just going to click on apply on the on the ATS and tell you,
hey, I recently stumbled upon whatever.
It looks like you have time to discuss, right?
But that one that actually does enough work and watches the video and then can sell
it to you.
And they're going to make mistakes.
They're not going to get it right.
But they have enough confidence with the core problem to be solved because here's
the mistake that 99% of founders and sales reps make.
We're not really selling in B2B.
We're solving problems.
And this is why so many people are struggling in 2024 because they can't solve their products.
As sales reps as companies, they can't solve big problems anymore.
Our job as sales reps in SaaS is to not sell a used car.
We are selling a Tesla Model 3 performance.
It has competition.
I might not need it this week, okay?
But it's pretty darn good.
And I'm going to help you understand, Lenny, because you're in the market for the car.
Why this is the best one.
I'm going to be honest about where it's not.
I'm going to answer all your questions.
I'm such an expert.
And then I'm Ashley Lenny.
When is that how much you have 280,000 miles on the Civic?
What?
Let me help you get you into that Model 3 performance today.
And I've even got a special discount for the end of this month.
And let me just help you.
And I've spent four calls answering all your questions.
And I've explained to you all the things and why the supercharging network is better than
the regular one that doesn't really work at the charger near your house.
And I've gone on Google and I've seen there's no charging network near your house.
There's only supercharges.
I kind of got you, don't I?
And that's the job of SaaS and sales because we're not selling commodities.
And that's why the best reps will also tell reps when not to buy their product.
As painful as that seems in tougher times in 2024, the best reps say, no, you know, we're not there yet.
We're not the right.
If you need this feature, if you need this integration, I want you back in six months when you use this big product that isn't that great.
But today, we're not the right solution for you.
That's the best ones do that.
They have the confidence to know, to close it.
And the rest of the world thinks this is like some sort of adversarial transactional thing, and it's not.
Software, I think hopefully all your audience would agree when it's done right.
Software is magical.
It solves incredible problems.
Incredible problems.
What Airbnb does, what Uber does, what SaaS.
Things solve.
I can track my customers.
I can automate my communications.
It's magical.
You shouldn't have to use boiler room tactics and use FARTT.
tactics when you have something, but it doesn't sell itself, except for a little while in late
2020, early 2021 that screwed the whole world up when products actually sold themselves.
I feel like this is a separate podcast we should do of just how to get better at sales and how to
sell, but I feel like that's its own hour of conversation. I did a great episode with April
Dunford where I don't know if you follow her stuff, but she essentially describes exactly your
approach of how people understand the market, like help them understand.
the entire landscape and then talk about your problem.
So anyway, we'll link to that episode.
It has a lot of good advice there.
In terms of this interview, selling me a pen approach,
to give people something very concrete to do.
Like, how do you actually set this up?
Is it like, sell me your product,
and then they put together a pitch for your team
and then like they pitch you on the product?
I'll tell you until like the boom,
until everyone in late 2020 got so desperate to hire anyone with a pulse,
almost everyone in sales had to come.
and they had during an interview process,
they actually had to do the pitch.
They would come and you used to do it in person with this screen.
You can do it on Zoom now.
It really doesn't matter.
But do it for real.
Do it for real.
And everyone would see.
And everyone in recruiting change,
people stopped doing reference checks.
They stopped doing these tests.
And they would just hire warm bodies late 2020.
I can tell you a funny story in a second.
And it was okay until it wasn't.
And our hiring processes have not reverted back to pre-March 2020.
And I think it's failing founders left and right.
I can't tell you, I would say 95% of the hiring I see out there.
People don't do reference checks anymore, Lenny.
And we can talk about when they work and when they don't.
But no one does them.
No one does them.
No, how you're going to invest so much.
Forget about the salary.
It doesn't really matter.
So much time.
Your time, your leads, your everything is so precious to bring
Jason into your company and you're going to go through all this recruiting process and you're
not even to do any reference checks. People don't even do reference checks and they don't,
they stop doing doing this demo because they were so worried the rap would go to Gusto,
we would go to deal or would go to remote. There was no time. I got to get like this SDR has 50
offers. Lenny, we got to hire this SDR with three weeks of experience. We've got to decide today.
And that's the way. And hiring does not come back. And you just, if those hires bounce,
not only is it bad for you,
but it's a disservice to the,
to the,
it's worse for the hire.
I mean,
that poor Cloudflare woman
that blew up,
right,
with the thing,
like there's so many issues
there we could dig into,
but,
it's all Cloudflare's fault
for hiring her.
Okay,
let's forget about that
actually didn't close a single deal.
Okay,
so objectively in sales,
should you retain your job
if you can't close a single deal?
Like,
I don't want to get into some of the triggering things,
but remember,
if you hire someone,
and they fail. It's all your fault. She didn't know what she was getting herself into.
No candidates can do enough diligence ever. There's not enough time. There isn't enough time.
And this is true all the way to the top. Right. And so as an investor or a board member,
it's funny. When I do interviews, I do this thing at the, I try to be the last interview sometimes.
And the founders don't want me to do it. They want me to sell, right? I want to be the last one.
And what I want to do is when Lenny, you've decided to join Ellen at her startup, right? At the end, I said, look, Lenny, you got, I've talked to Ellen.
you love you have the job. You've got the job. What I don't want you to do, Lenny, is bouncing three
months after. So let's slow down. Let's talk about the questions you haven't on your mind.
And let's have a safe space where we can make sure you're going to be happy and successful there,
right? And sometimes even the founders get mad at me for doing this because sometimes the candidate
bails. But I'm like, I know you're mad at me today, but this is, you know, it is your fault.
100% your fault if any of your hires fail.
Don't blame them.
And I'm guilty of this.
I get upset when people start and they don't give it.
They're all, right?
Or they don't do it or, you know, I mean, you know, what if you hired someone for your podcast and they decided, you know, I don't want to do the podcast this week.
I'm tired.
I'll do it next.
You're so mad at them.
But you should have seen it during the hiring process.
Right.
So tying it back, that's why you've got to do the selling me this pen.
You've got to before you hire the salesperson.
and have them sell your product for it.
Do the demo.
And if they need more time, give them more time.
Let them watch another demo.
Don't have them feel like it's a track or spook them.
Treat them the way you would like to be treated.
But if you skip this step, I mean, you know, it's, what's the point?
You're not helping them.
What I love about this process is it connects exactly to what you recommended you look for in these hires is,
would I buy my product from these people?
So this makes a lot of sense.
And you give them this assignment at home and they do work on this and they come in, right?
It's not like come to the office.
If you talk to a great transactional VP of sales, it's hiring tons of reps to do it.
Like, they'll make them do, if they're still doing this, they'll make you do sell the pen fast in the process.
They don't have time.
They're doing 20 interviews a week, 30 interviews a week.
You've got to sell me the spend.
But if you're a founder and you, and I'm talking about you've already talked to a bunch of candidates, you're down to one or two.
Make them tell them, look, this isn't a trick.
I'm not that great at telling my product yourself, right?
But I got to know that you're going to be happy and successful here.
So do a demo for me.
And if they want to do it, they're not a salesperson.
person.
They're not, and too many people went into sales, not.
The other weird thing about speed to be sales in good times is actually a lot of these
folks are not really what you might think of salespeople.
They can't do outbound.
They can't pick up the phone.
All they know how to do is to manage leads that come in and say, I want to buy today.
And you need those people too.
Okay.
And I'm not saying you don't need those people too.
But that's not always what we think of is sales.
Another black box for me and I think a lot of people with sales is comp.
and quota had actually set up their comp for your early hires and then had actually decide on a quota.
What advice do you have for figuring that out early on?
Like what percentage is commission, what percentage of salary, all that.
Yeah, everyone gets this wrong.
We worry, look, at scale when you're extremely mature, extremely mature and very profitable,
you really got to tweak this stuff very carefully.
Okay.
And we could talk about that if that's relevant.
But in the beginning, we get this all wrong.
What matters is, can a sales.
rep close more than they take home.
In the very beginning, that's all that matters.
It's just you selling, right?
The first three months of a new rep,
you're lucky if they can close as much as their take-home pay is, their OT, okay?
And so in the really early days, my early early-year-old-day comp plan is, look, your first three
months, you keep 100% of what you close.
Of course, that's not profitable for the business, but you've got to invest in them, right?
You keep 100% of what you close.
and if if you have enough going on your business,
usually that's enough to put to put supper on the on the stove.
And that's without a salary.
No, no, you pick an OTE, a salary.
But you got to, okay, let's step back for a minute.
You got to pay market.
You've got to pay market.
And this, in the early days, if you're bootstrapped or really,
and this stresses folks out, like, I just talked to this great rep,
but he wants 150K OT.
Right?
And in fact, it's a step down.
he had 170k at Slack, but he knows this isn't a startup.
He wants 100.
He might take 140.
And OTE is total comp.
Overall total comp.
And the founder panics.
I don't have a, I mean, I'm only making 60.
How can I pay 140?
Well, let's break it down for a minute.
First of all, let's be tactical.
It's usually 50-50, right?
50% base, 50% bonus for a sales rep.
So they're really only taking home a 70K base trying to make another 70.
Okay.
And then 70 divided by 12, help me do my math.
It's not quite $6K a month.
Well, maybe with taxes it is,
you're only paying $6K a month for a couple months
to see if this experiment works out.
You're investing $20,000.
You don't have $20,000 to do sales.
Then don't do sales.
If you can't find $20,000.
So people freak out too much about this top line number,
this base and bonus, the on target earnings OTE,
and they're not more practical about what am I committing to cash up front.
Two, you need a plan where it's a win-win.
So if this person makes 140, but ultimately a sales rep's got to bring in four to five times what they take home.
Okay. So that 140 is got to be 500, 600 or more.
The more enterprise you are, the bigger the multiple has to be and the higher the comp.
But it's got to be three to five X at a minimum, three X for small businesses, four X for midmarket five.
You've got to get there.
But you don't have to be there on day one and two.
When you get there, the reps should be accretive.
Shouldn't they be?
if they make 150 and they bring in 450,
unless your marketing costs are out of control,
which can happen,
but that's not sales fault,
is it?
If your marketing costs are reasonable
and you pay a sales rep 150 for closing 450,
if you engineer your plan right,
you should be smiling,
not frowning.
Where it gets tough is when you have a ton of folks not closing,
when you have a lot,
when you have a ton of folks not closing,
and you have extremely high marketing costs,
then it all breaks,
your cat breaks,
your payback period breaks.
But if you have inbound leads,
if you have demand and you have sales reps
that can sell you this pen,
they're going to be accretive lending because of that math.
And take the pressure up,
don't make them close 5X,
their take on their first quarter,
close 1X.
Let them put points on board.
Let them eat.
And so negotiating,
here's the point,
if you think about it,
negotiating someone down from a 150K OT to 130,
it's not going to make any difference.
You want them to close 600 or 700.
It's not going to matter.
At scale, does it matter for Mongo?
Maybe, right? Maybe.
But what you care about is how much more can they close than they bring in?
And then you, that's why you want them to make a lot of money.
You want them to be rich.
You want them to take home a lot for a whole bunch of reasons.
And so don't freak out about the acronym O.T.
What they take home.
Figure out what it's really going to cost you.
And would you buy from them?
And if you would, they're probably going to bring in more than they take home.
Right.
And on the marketing side, like in the early days, you're lucky if you can find
a marketing channel that is that accretive.
Amazing.
Okay.
So just to summarize, you start a salesperson with, say, 75K in salary and then say 75K
in expected sales.
And they take bonus, bonus from sales.
Bonus from sales.
And the idea there is they take 100% initially of their sales for the first month or two,
just to make it feel amazing.
They're making money.
See how they're doing.
don't put a lot of pressure on them.
And then the plan is over time, get it to a point where they're bringing into the business
four to five times what they're taking home in terms of the business.
I said expectations every month or two, we were going to revisit every quarter.
We're going to revisit your comp and quote it and adjust.
If you get it right, you never have to revisit it.
Not for years.
I mean, I'm using the same sales comp plan I have for a lot of years.
It still works.
Listen, you can make tweaks.
And you've got to listen.
And we're all human beings and people.
And again, remember your sales team has to eat.
They've got to eat, okay?
And you've got to be somewhat competitive.
But there's only so much you can tweak, Lenny.
I mean, they have to bring clothes more than they bring home, right?
And so you can make tweaks at the margin.
The problem is if you make too many tweaks to this model, you burn up all the cash.
You're trying to plug a leaky boat.
There's no point.
There's no point.
There's no point.
And remember, related to this, for a long time for most folks, unless you're
even if you're hyperfunded,
you're better off with fewer better reps
than more reps.
There is a stage when you get big enough
where this concept of capacity planning
really does matter.
Lindy,
if I got to go from 50 to 100 this year.
Okay,
I'm about at 50 million.
If each of my reps can do 500K,
I need 100, don't I?
Okay.
And literally, if you have 20,
you mathematically cannot hit the plan.
So there's a certain truth at scale.
In the early days,
this is a rookie error.
Like, I'd much rather have two reps,
each closing a million,
right then 20 wraps struggling to close 100k each like culturally it's terrible that there's no domain
knowledge in the company everyone's miserable everyone's fighting what you want to do in the early days is
concentrate your leads and your best closers at the same time bringing new people up but you've got
to concentrate your leads to your best closers and that means year two year three year four they
should be making a lot of money a lot of money sometimes too much I remember the first investment
I ever made was a company called pipe drive which sold for a billion and a half um you know a
SMBCRM and I put in the first sales rep there.
He used to work for me.
And the founders got mad at him.
They got mad at him because in three months he was making more than any of the founders.
They were pissed.
I'm like, guys, I know we're, we're, have different backgrounds and cultures, but this is what you want.
But it took him a long time culturally as self-served because Pipe Drive was 100% self-serve at
the time.
They'd never had a sales rep.
And I put the guy in.
And what he did was he, when he looked, all these self-served customers, he's like,
The company was about $2 million revenue at the time.
He's like, okay, who's bought more than one seat?
He just did a reverse sort, and he called them.
I remember he called AOL back in the day, and he's like, you guys have 20 seats of pipe drive.
Would you like to buy more for your sales team?
They're like, thank you very much.
We'll take 100 seats.
And he just went down the list, taking the top to the bottom.
And he took home like 20% of those deals.
Now that difference, that extra 80 seats at AOL, he brought it in.
So Kim keeping 20% of that is a great deal for the company, right?
But he was pretty good at it and he was the only person for a while.
So he made hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars when the poor company,
the founders were paying themselves like 50.
So your advice there is don't be sad if your salesperson is making tons of money.
If you architect the simple sales family talked about and they're making a lot of money,
you're making a lot of money.
And your equity is worth a lot of money.
Your equity is worth a lot of money, right?
When do you make that switch from they're taking home 100% of it they're selling?
to smaller percentage.
Look, some people are going to think it's goofy what I said about 100.
I just view it as a simple ramp.
I think you'd do it for one quarter max.
One quarter.
The problem is if you let this go for too long more than a quarter, like if you make it
too easy for long a quarter, the problem is the mediocre lean into it too much.
And that doesn't help.
And not only does it not help you, it doesn't help them.
You don't want to make mishires.
They're so damn.
I mean, you could have a whole podcast on just on mishires.
Like, it's probably the single most.
important thing in scaling startups is not hires. It's mishires. But it's a tragedy if you mishired
a rep, but you don't want them there six months. It's not good for them either. You want to support them.
You want to help them find a place where they're successful. And here's the quirky thing on the
mishires. And this is why that first guy hired was midpack at back. Like you less than midpack.
Here's the thing about sales is, you know, someone can be very good in certain sales environments and
completely fail in other ones. Completely fail. It's probably more buy. It's probably more
binary than any other function.
And so you got to find it before you hire them, but you also got to root it out fast
because those leads are too precious.
And it doesn't mean they won't go on to another company and be wildly successful,
but you could utterly fail.
And the one related point I'll give, if I had to be, if I had to throw one hint on
any of these reps, first 10 or V and VP of sales, one hint more than anything else, trust.
you got to hire someone whose last product was harder to sell.
This is so important.
This is a recipe for utter disaster.
If you take someone in sales and their last product was easier to sell,
they will have none of the skills to sell your product.
But this is the met,
and I'll give you an example in a second,
if you hire someone from something that was just a smidge harder,
a smidge harder to sell,
and they come into your company,
it's like they're on Mars.
It's like weight has been released from their feet.
They learned how to sell a harder product and get it done.
And then they come to you.
And the first example I had the first SDI hired was a guy named Sam Blonde,
who went on to be CRO at Brex and then now is a partner founders fund.
And we worked together from the very beginning, first SDR.
And he came, before that he was an SDR at a company called Intact,
which was bought for a billion, which was online financials, okay?
And back in the day, we know what the one thing people didn't want to put in their cloud was,
their financial statements.
Okay, it just wasn't trusted that.
There are some things you would trust to the cloud, like a CRM, but they'd be like,
these are my crown jewels.
I can't put these.
So he went from desperately trying to convince folks to do, to move a business process of the cloud.
They had no interest.
And he came to us.
And it was hard, but it wasn't that hard.
And he instantly was number one.
He went from SDR to S&BAE to midmarket AE to director of sales to head of this whole
because, I mean, there are many reasons he was great.
But he came to me and I said, Sam, why are you crushing it when everyone else
he was struggling?
He's like, this is much easier than intact.
So hire someone like that and don't make it, no matter how much you like them,
the sell me this pen thing, we'll control for it a bit, okay?
But when we give, we give in the hiring process, right?
We never get what we want.
Be very, very careful if the last product was easier to sell.
I love this advice.
What is the heuristic that the last product was harder to sell than yours?
what tells you that that's probably true.
Be very careful if it was more technical.
Very technical.
Some folks can go from a business process sale.
They can go from selling a gong or a sales offer and outreach
and they can go sell a complicated API to VPs of engineering
or VPs of product, but most can't.
Okay.
So more technical is a tough heuristic.
More competitive is a positive.
What really works, Lenny,
is if you hire someone from the number four in a space
and they did well.
You take someone that's number four in the space
and then you're number two in the space.
You think number two is really hard
because number one's crushing you,
but they're at number four in a space
where no one can tell the difference
between these products.
That's a great one, right?
So a space that's more competitive,
a space that is a positive,
more technical.
The other one related to technical
on the pure B2B side
is much more complicated business process.
Okay,
I see folks fail in B2B when they've sold us.
Yeah, it's hard, but they've sold a simple business process.
They go to something that's got a lot of integrations, a lot of complexity,
and a lot of business process change, and they just melt because it's too complicated.
They just melt, right?
Like there's a company I invested in.
It's doing over $20 million today.
And for some reason to simplify what they do, which is pretty complicated.
They called it the gong for X, okay?
The gong for X.
And it's great to get a VC meeting and a few of them.
But it's not even on their homepage.
Okay, it doesn't really make sense.
And the CEO had me listen to this senior sales exec he hired.
And the only thing he could tell the prospect was that they were gong for X.
And the prospect had asked, well, how does this deep integration with this business process flow and Zendesworks?
And how does this go over to saleswurst?
It's like, well, we're gone for X.
That $600,000 deal was lost.
Right, but maybe that works in some space, right?
I mean, and Gong's hard to sell today, too.
Don't give me wrong.
But you see my point.
It's just that simplicity, it's too complicated, right?
And I know it's not the perfect heuristic other than this technical thing, but the technical one, man, trust me, right?
The too many B to B type reps melt in B to D.
They just, they just melt.
They just selling to VP of Venge is a different, it's the same beast, but they don't suffer fools, do they?
not the VP of Engineers, I'm close.
They don't suffer fools.
I haven't heard this term B to D before.
Business to the developers.
To develop.
That's what it stands for.
Oh, interesting.
I haven't heard that term before.
Okay.
Let me zoom out a bit.
And I want to move on to a different topic.
But before we do that,
so we've talked about kind of these early days
of hiring your first two reps,
getting your VP of sales to help scale out the team.
To get people a sense of where this goes as the business scales,
what does the org evolution look like?
You have these two reps doing sales on their own.
then you have a manager.
What does it look like
over the next couple of phases
of the sales org?
Look, to simplify,
there's rules of eight.
So in sales,
I'm actually not sure
what the typical heuristic is
in product,
because product teams are leaner,
at least I hope I like it
when they're leaner.
But in sale,
the thing about sales is
there's no efficiency.
Like, if you have a sales
led motion,
half your company is going to be
in sales at 10 million error,
half your company is going to be in sales at $100.
It's one of the tough.
parts of the software model is that there's no, there's actually almost anti-efficiencies in sales.
The public companies are actually less, they have the higher tax than startups, believe it or
not, because they have so much market penetration. So you're going to need a lot of people.
And it's rules of eight. Eight SDRs, outbound reps need one manager, eight AEs, eight sales execs,
need a director above them. And then when you really scale, you know, eight directors,
you don't really ever going to have eight directors, but eight directors could have a VP or eight
reports. And so there's rules of eight. If you want to build an organization on it, it's all
rules of eight. For a while, for SDRs, thinking this was this high velocity entry level
position, people pushed it to 12. But the more folks I talk to today, the more I hear everyone's
reverted to eight. I'd rather have fewer SDRs having better conversations. And so it's just,
you can build your whole org with eights. That is way too easy of an answer. So the idea there is
you hire this VP of sales, then you hire six more.
eight sales reps, AEs.
So what happens next? You hire another
You just got to start hiring managers. Got it.
And then you scale eight reps.
And once you have eight AE scaled,
you know, you almost always
are going to start, a VP is going to already,
a good VP sales is already me hunting two directors,
two directors, whether they're just
split up normally, whether they're east west
is a classic way. Another way,
like you might have smaller and larger
customers. That's pretty standard, right? Commercial
and enterprise. But a good VP of sales
once you have, once she,
or he has eight reports,
we'll be bringing in two directors,
or maybe two VPs if they're an SVP.
There's a lot of title inflation today,
which doesn't bother me nearly as much
as a lot of other things we've chatted about.
I don't care what your title is
if you'll actually do sales or do work.
But yeah,
you need to bring in managers at eight.
And folks that can also,
a related point is a lot of founders
worry, when will my,
I really love my head of sales,
but she's a stretch.
Like most of them should be stretches.
If you hire the seasoned one,
they're not going to work.
So for 95 out of 100 of us, our first head of sales should be a stretch VP of sales.
And what that means is usually they were a director before that or a senior director or sort of a VP.
Okay.
But you should be cautious about hiring your first VP of sales for their first third VP of sales gig.
They're not willing to do the job anywhere you need a stretch.
And it's worth it for their career growth.
It's worth it for their personal growth.
It's worth it for the equity.
Right.
So you're going to hire a stretch.
That's an important tip right there.
But then you're going to be a little worried how far can Lenny go?
How far can, because, you know, I love Lenny, but he was a director for two years before this.
And this is his first rule.
And he did so good last year, but I'm worried Lenny's going to break.
Right.
I'm worried Lenny's going to break.
And related to this, the simple answer is Lenny will break if he can't source those directors under him.
You can scale forever as a sales leader if you can hire better managers under you.
And it's true of any functional area.
But what you'll see in sales is you'll see your.
stretch VPS sales drown when they never can hire better managers under them.
Right.
They'll end up doing some weird internal promotions, which you want.
You want to do internal promotions.
My rule is you want to promote 50% from within and hire 50% without fear managers.
But if you're really, the only people you can promote are just junior people on their team.
You can't find leaders.
You can't scale.
Right.
And so I do see this happen too frequently is a first time out of sales, does it.
And then they're like, here are my managers, Lorraine and Jason,
but they really were just reps for two years.
And they don't know how to do it.
So you have a whole bunch of people who don't know how to do it.
That's when the organization cracks.
Imagine a place where you can find all your potential customers
and get your message in front of them in a cost-efficient way.
If you're a B2B business, that place exists.
And it's called LinkedIn.
LinkedIn ads allows you to build the right relationships,
drive results, and reach your customers in a respectful environment.
Two of my portfolio companies, WebFlow and Census, are LinkedIn success stories.
Census had a 10x increase in pipeline with a LinkedIn startup team.
For WebFlow, after ramping up on LinkedIn in Q4, they had the highest marketing source
revenue quarter to date.
With LinkedIn ads, you'll have direct access to and can build relationships with decision
makers, including 950 million members, 180 million senior execs, and over 10 million
C-level executives.
You'll be able to drive results with targeting and measurement.
tools built specifically for B2B.
In tech, LinkedIn generate a 2-5x higher return on ad spend than any other social media
platforms.
Audiences on LinkedIn have two times the buying power of the average web audience, and you'll
work with a partner who respects the B2B world you operate in.
Make B2B marketing everything it can be and get $100 credit on your next campaign.
Just go to LinkedIn.com slash pod Lenny to claim your credit.
That's LinkedIn.com slash pod lenny.
Terms and conditions apply.
There's these terms that we throw around account executive reps.
It might be helpful just to give people a sense of like,
what does this actually mean when someone's an account executive?
Is that they're just sitting there calling and doing sales directly?
Whatever the key terms are for like the roles or the title might be helpful to quickly summarize.
Yeah, I think the two ones that are probably less obvious for folks that are new are SDR,
sales development representative and a account executive.
And SDR is generally, although I wish it wasn't,
is generally an entry-level position, often fresh at a school,
generally paid on the order of 60 to 80K, OT, and SAS, and U.S.-based SaaS,
and their job is to email for dollars, dial for dollars, and in many cases to screen,
inbound leads.
It's entry-level, and their job is to pass on a lead to a sales executive, an account
executive, an A-E.
And so not all companies have SDRs.
It's a longer topic, but pretty,
pretty much all the best teams have some type of SDR function now.
So that because we've learned we want to specialize.
We want openers opening and we want closers closing.
And so that's the rough idea of SDRs are openers in some cases.
And account executives are the more seasoned folks closing.
And, you know, it varies at compensation from account executives that are U.S.
based could be anywhere from like 90K to 200K depending on that's with base and bonus split at 50-50,
depending on whether they're hunting tiny deals or big ones.
that's the way an account executive works.
And I think what doesn't happen today, which made,
so those are the acronyms, I think you can figure,
people can figure out VP of sales,
that's vice president of sales.
I think a thing that's gone on in the industry
that founders expect now,
because there's so much discussion of it on LinkedIn and social media,
but I haven't found work is that an account executive
will magically be full-stack.
They will do outbound themselves.
They will develop,
they'll go use Zoom info and Apollo and develop a list themselves.
They will manage that outbound list themselves.
if they don't have enough inbound
or enough in their free time,
you know what they'll do letting in their free time?
They'll just do more outbound.
It doesn't.
You know what sales reps do in their free time today?
They sell real estate or courses.
Okay.
There is no,
if you want a tip for founders,
I know you want this full stack AE.
And they do exist when they're micromanaged
in certain high performance sales organizations,
but they don't exist in real life, right?
They're specialized.
So most AEs say want to be closers.
They want to be handed a lead.
I contact me a lead.
They want to work the lead and close.
pose a lead and you hire some SDRs to help generate more demand.
And so those are the basic acronyms.
What's hard for most founders, here's the tough part, most founders have enough stamina to
manage a couple of these AEs, these account executives, these folks to work the leads.
Most founders do not have the stamina to manage 10 kids fresh out of college that need to be
micromanaged on an hourly basis to call leads.
So very, very few founders themselves can manage a team of SCRs.
But if you can, it's like a superpower.
That was really helpful.
I did not know what exactly these terms represented.
And when you're hiring those first two reps, they should be the account executive level.
Yes.
Yeah.
And they'll do some outbound and they'll do some of this SDR work.
It's just ultimately people end up specializing.
What is the title for someone above the account executive as a director of sales?
Yeah, there's really no, you know, it's a meta topic.
I wish there were another career path for these ICs.
Okay.
This does exist in product.
It does exist in engineering.
Okay.
It should exist in sales.
But the truth is, it doesn't.
There is no senior SDR.
And for this outbumber and for this A.E.
This person closing, yes, you can go more enterprise and make more money.
But there isn't really a senior A.E.
track, but there should be.
It's unfortunate.
It should be.
Too many of these folks are looking for, they look to go into management for promotion.
when what they really should look for is to be a super icy,
and it's a shame that more folks don't try to implement a super IC role in sales.
But that's basically that the career path is in management, right?
And that's why another tip, another mistake that founders often make
is they hire the number one account executive at a hot company to be their head of sales.
It's not the same skills.
Most sales executives should not be managers.
They don't want to be managers.
They want to be individual.
They want to be highly paid individual contributors these days that mostly work from home and make a lot of money working 30 hours a week.
That does not lead, that does not naturally breed great management skills.
I want to shift directions a little bit and talk about product and sales.
A lot of listeners of this podcast are product managers or founders building products.
How involved should product managers be in sales?
And vice versa, how involved should sales be in the roadmap?
what's being built? I think in the best run B2B organizations that I've worked with in my own as well,
the great, at least the head of product, the VP of products are deeply involved in sales,
deeply involved in sales, deeply involved in sales. A company I invested in that's just crossing
60 million, they just had a meeting with who will be their largest customer. Okay.
and the head of product was there is that the board meeting was like,
thank God I was there because what they want to do with our product,
we sorted to.
We sorted.
The product does do it.
But what they want to basically do is deconstruct the product.
They don't actually want to use the back end and analytics and some other pieces,
but they don't really need the front end of the product.
If the head of product hadn't been there, that deal would have been lost.
Would have been lost.
An AE doesn't know that.
Even if an AE did know that, a sales rep didn't know that.
did know that, even if the VPS sales didn't know.
A VPS would not be empowered enough to stand up in a meeting and say,
I know what you want.
We can launch tomorrow on this and in 90 days, we'll tweak the UI so it does exactly what you want.
You want that in your big deals.
If you have that magical VP of product that truly owns the roadmap, owns it and has the gravitas for that meeting,
they become like the mini CEO in these meetings.
A lot of CEOs at scale, I've talked to, I was just talking with Daniel Chait at Greenhouse.
he does this, they're over 200 million.
When they have that head of product, they divide and conquer with the big customers.
And the CEO can do some, right?
And the VP of product can do others.
And sometimes the VP of VNG, if they're very producty, can also do that role too.
Like sometimes you get these three weapons.
In the old days, sometimes your VP of customer success could do this.
But unfortunately, and I know this is going to trigger some people, I don't see customer
success stepping up for this pseudo product role anymore.
And I see them shrinking more and more into process.
but that magical VP product,
they give you that scale,
that CEO level scale.
Can a product manager or director do that?
In my experience,
the best ones,
absolutely.
The mid-pack ones that are working on the color of the pixel,
I'd rather not have them in the deal.
You have to be empowered,
you have to be utterly fluent in the product,
the entire product,
right?
You have to be the one that knows how to connect the pieces
that don't ought to always connect themselves,
right? And you have to have the gravitas to work with a large customer to make commitments,
right? And so that deep knowledge and commitment, like it's hard below the VP of the VP of
it. I love it. They become one of the greatest strategic weapons of a BDB companies bringing
the product team because the VP of sales never quite goes that deep and can't make the
commits, right? And the CEO can't be everywhere. The bane of many product manager's
existence is the flip side of sales's involvement in product. Do you have any advice for
how you've seen the best SaaS companies handle requests from sales going into product,
how a product team should think about requests from sales and making that work.
I think this one is so simple, and I'm surprised people may get so complicated.
Okay.
I know we all release 28 times a day, okay?
But the reality is software still goes on quarterly release cycles no matter what we say.
Okay, business, your customers cannot process 88 releases a day.
Okay.
The maximum a customer can process is two big releases a year and maybe quarterly, right?
So let's simplify because that's how customers think.
Forget about how we build software.
Every quarter, give your head of sales a certain budget,
whether it's story points or 10% of the pie chart.
However you do it, give them a budget.
And when you do this, things will radically change.
They radically change because even the best VPs of sales,
they change like the wind.
On Monday, what they really need is the HubSpot integration.
And they're like, oh, my God, like, you know, we weren't going to do that for two years,
but I guess we could change everything on Monday.
But then on Wednesday, a new prospect comes in and, you know, we need SAP.
But we just spent two days specking out the, oh, you did SAP.
And then on Monday, it's sales force, right?
And it's not that sales isn't honest.
It's just the big deals, the big ones always, the tails wagging the dog.
And it's, it burns out the organization.
Okay.
Even with the best sales leaders, I find it burns out, especially because the stressful deals, like they overreact.
And they're not, as good as they are, they're not product people.
So they don't really know how to prioritize enforce rank.
If you say, okay, Lenny, my VPSL is great.
HubSpot, SAP, whatever you want, you've got 10% of the budget,
you've got 100 story points, whatever metric or heuristic you use,
but you've got to decide now each quarter.
And if you want to change during the course of quarter,
if you want to disrupt our whole engineering product team,
you can do it, but I understand there's a high cost,
and the later you do in the quarter, the less successful it's going to be
because we already started the HubSpot integration.
Like, not only will it demoralize the team,
but we're going to run out of, you already use your budget.
So when each, if you as a product,
I just don't see enough product leaders being objective here,
saying, listen, here's your budget.
You get it.
Period.
No one can take it from you.
No, you know, I guess the CEO can steal it if she really wants to,
but it's yours, VP of sales.
And it will, they will do the low balancing across their team.
They will do it.
They will listen and they'll say,
maybe I don't need that HubSpot integration after all.
Maybe, right?
Because what a VPSL should be doing is taking,
like a VPS, you can't, the product has to look,
Like, the COS look five years into the future.
Product has to look about two years into the future.
And you really can't ask a VPS sales to look more than 12 months into the future
because that's where they're next in the line.
But a good one will load balance feature requests across the year.
And they will listen to all that because they'll actually be in sales.
They'll actually be in deals.
And they'll be listening.
They'll realize, look, even though we're going to lose this deal to HubSpot,
I've gotten four SAP requests last.
I'm going to take that bet.
Even if I'm wrong, I'm going to take that bet.
You've got to give them that.
And you've got to talk about it every week and say,
look, here's your budget, Jane, here's your story points, your whatever, your 10%.
This is what we're currently, this is what we're building now for you, objectively,
and this is what we're currently planning for the next two quarters.
Would you like to change the ones for the next two quarters because we haven't committed any code yet?
And if you really want to change what's in process, you can't.
Otherwise, it's going to be hyper disruptive, right?
But you've got to at least pretend to be objective for sales.
If you're too emotional about it, you break the organization.
You've got to say, listen, I know we've already written 80% of the subset integration.
if you really need us to put us on the shelf and drop everything for a million dollar deal,
we're a startup, we'll do it.
But understand is this really, really what you want.
And if you involve them every week as a stakeholder, it magic happens.
I just don't see this.
I don't see the VP as a product that I work with.
I don't, maybe I'm not, I know not in all the staff meetings, but the meetings I'm in
and the board meetings, I don't see this back and forth happening.
This might be the same exact answer you just gave, but say you're a PM and a salesperson comes
to you, hey, we're about to close this deal.
we just need this one feature.
Can we just get this on the roadmap?
What's the best way to help that salesperson understand why it's not happening,
help them feel like, okay, I get it.
Is it exactly what you just said like, okay, we could change everything?
Here's the story points you have this quarter.
Well, are you assuming that PM is the header product or empowered enough to make the decisions?
I'd say, yeah, that PM could put something on the roadmap if they think it's important.
The reason I'm a little confused just because I want to get it right is I'm hearing,
what I'm hearing, which maybe isn't what you said.
What I'm hearing is a junior,
a junior IC rep is talking to kind of a more mid-level product person about the roadmap.
That's a bro,
and that's,
you want to have that.
That's like one of the reasons we actually go to the office because those discussions don't happen on Zoom letting.
They don't happen.
And you want those discussions to happen,
but you don't actually want them empowered.
You want them to say,
listen,
I will talk to my boss.
That's the right answer.
It's too confusing.
This stress between product and sales is a good thing.
It's a sign of a well-run B2B company when there is stress between product and sales.
It's a good sign.
It is a good.
If there's no stress, you're not in enough deals.
You're not in enough deals if there's no stress.
But the stress has to have enough process even in a startup that it doesn't break.
Because your question will the fact they can break organizations again and again, right?
People get people resented on either side, right?
And so this is one thing where the answer has to be, look, we can chat about it over lunch.
We can chat about this.
And actually, you've got a good idea, your individual contributor.
I'm going to tell my boss on Monday that I think we should do that.
I'm going to use a little social guy to say we should do this.
But you've got to push the decisions up.
That's as far as you're going to make a recommend.
Otherwise, instead of that one stressful conversation at the VP of the VP of,
you've got 100.
You've got 10 times, 10 times 100.
And again, they're fun lunch conversations, but they wreck you.
So the advice there is basically talk to your manager, I'll talk to my manager.
They need to hash this out.
It's not my call.
I think you've got to push it up
and I think you've got to force the VP of sales
and the VP of product to have this weekly meeting
about the budget. And that will force
them to have enough, just enough
organization on their team so that it can all
be surfaced up. Because that means they each
have to have a meeting with their team for 30 minutes
each week and say, I'm going to put it up on the whiteboard
guys to my sales team. I'm going to put it up on the white.
Like the sales team's going to say, and I've
been to many of these meetings where you force the sales
team to force rank what they want and you
end up, I can tell you, Lenny,
100% of the time in the sales meeting,
when you force, do a whiteboard force rank, you end up walking out with very different outputs
than when you start the meeting in sales 100% time. On the product side, you need to do the converse.
You just say, we owe sales 10% of our points. So we're going to put in a weekly, in our team meeting.
We're going to put in 15 minutes of our team meeting. And we're going to make sure we have the
priorities right from the sales team. Let's go over what I got from Linda. This is what she says.
Is she wrong? Should we do something? How can we help the sales team be even more discussed on?
What inputs is the team hearing? And they can raise their head and they say, look, I just had this all-way
conversation with Bobby, but honestly, Lenny, I can build a sub-spot integration in the day. What? I thought
it was really hard. No, I did it at my last company. And listen, actually, we can actually outsource it to Bob and Linda at this agency. I know for 20 grand, they'll build it next week. I'm like, that's a magical moment, right? That's a magical moment. But you got to each have these parallel meetings or it's just, it's just, it's just that good thing that tension can become a can become debilitating, right? We've all seen those fights, those almost fights that break out and they come from a place of passion, right?
but you got to have structure.
Great advice.
Another trend I've been noticing is that product teams are taking on P&L responsibilities
and revenue goals.
What's your sense of, is that good?
Is that bad?
How do you think about that for product teams?
You want everyone to be aligned on the big picture with a revenue goal for the end of the year.
Is the question, you mean having financial bonuses and stuff tied to hitting the plan?
More that their KPIs and their OKRs are essentially like this much revenue.
You need to drive this much revenue from your experiment.
from your product launches.
As you can see, I have a lot of opinions on things here that are data driven,
their live experience.
This one, I need another year in the oven.
And I'll tell you why.
I'll tell you why.
What happened the last 18 months is in customer success, which is, you know, in the old days,
it was related to product.
Now it's less so, which I think is unfortunate.
In customers in the last 18 months, this happened all across the industry.
24 months ago, customer success's goal was happy customers, measured in retention.
Sometimes NRR, like net retention with upsells, sometimes with GRR like just logos, how many logos say, that was your only job.
Happy customers.
Happy customers.
Then things got harder in many areas of B2B.
And every customer success team last year, their goal was revenue.
You need to bring in more revenue from existing base.
And it destroyed customer relationships.
It had, there is a leading public company.
I will not name them.
I'm a positive guy.
I will tell you a company we all have used for years loved.
And they did this to their customer success team.
And they came to us last year.
We paid $299 a month for this product for our team.
They asked us for $50,000 up front or said they would turn it off that day.
That week, maybe it was that week.
$50,000.
That's what happens when you weaponize.
And so customer success, I know this is going to trigger some people, but it is true when I talk to leaders.
Customer success got weaponized, and I don't like it.
Okay.
I don't like it as a product.
As if all founders are product people, I think.
I don't like it as a product because I think it's bad for customers.
That experience I got was horrific, wasn't it?
that 50,000 being told, and it got walked back.
And the fact that it got walked back is almost even worse because it wasn't true.
It was a threat, right?
And so do I want to weaponize the product team?
I want the product team aligned with revenue.
These are the tough decisions for founders, right?
But I think we're going to regret, to some extent, weaponizing teams that we don't need to weaponize.
Having said that, I will tell you, and again, no knock on Adobe, but when I was a VP at Adobe,
It was a long time ago.
When product was in another building in some cases, that was not great.
Okay?
And I love Scott and the whole team.
Like, it was a great experience.
But I can just tell you what I learned is that did not work for me as an agile guy,
like having groups that would like do this work in isolation.
And the problem was they would never talk to a customer, right?
So I know I want product constantly talking to the customer.
I know I want the VP of product with a lot of equity wanting to hit the bookings number
for the year.
Do I want your average PM weaponized and forced to bring in revenue?
from an experimental feature.
When everyone agreed, it's the test we're going to run.
Like, we only can run so many.
Like, you say, should we, should they have revenue for like new feature launches,
for new product expansions for new things?
Yes, but everyone's got to make that decision.
There aren't that many of us that have a thousand extra engineers sitting around
with nothing to do.
These are very, even the smallest experiment, no matter what it says on the internet,
again, that we release 100 times a day, I would argue bringing any product extension
to market, it's very expensive and risky because you're taking away from something
else, right? These are expensive decisions and if you punish people for the mistakes and product,
right, this is something that big companies are actually better at than startups, which is they
don't fire you if the new initiative fails, right? Because no one at a big company would ever
join the new initiative, right? There are exceptions, but no one at Adobe or Google would work on
the new product if you got fired if it didn't hit 100 million its first year. So one thing I saw
that was very, and I don't know how to bring the startups at,
My big company experience was it's liberating to some extent to let people fail up to a point, right?
It's liberating because the cost of failure in a startup is so high, isn't it?
It's just so high.
So I know that's not what the exact question.
And I asked me in the year, but my advice is just be careful that you don't weaponize functions.
I probably should have clarified.
I think this is mostly true in PLG companies where most of the growth is coming from product.
But I imagine the advice is still the same as like be careful putting too much pressure on the
product team to focus on. Well, that's how you get dark stuff. I mean, back in the day, I remember my
sister worked at VistaPrint for online business cards. And her entire job was to, I was to force people to
buy upsell of additional products on the checkout page they didn't want to buy. That was her whole
job. And she was paid a large variable comp to get people to buy third party products without
realizing in their checkout. And it worked. Like, that's all she did for three years was figure out
dark stuff, I mean, darkish, grayish stuff. So that when I bought my, my business card,
I also bought GoDaddy and 11 things that I didn't want.
It works, but it doesn't create a high NPS, does it?
The thing is, here's the thing that you have to think about.
You know, what's crazy lady now, and then talk to those folks is there's so many SaaS companies at a billion or more in revenue.
I just wrote up, you know, there's just a Prupor, which is SaaS for construction.
I just wrote up, it just crossed a billion in revenue, right?
So many folks are at a billion, cloud players cost a billion.
And the only way you can do that is if your revenue compounds.
In fact, in fact, I just, myself, I just interviewed Matt Mullenwig from WordPress 20 years.
He's been doing this.
And he said the number one thing he didn't understand at WordPress, at automatic, was the power of compounding.
So when you do these things that are customer hostile and a lot of us were under stress this last 12 days, they hit the numbers, right?
This is your job as founders.
You've got to load balance the fact that the cash has to last and my investors are mad with me.
but nothing matters in B2B that it compounds.
And some of this dark stuff you talk about on PLG,
it anti-compounds, right?
And I would say, and I would, let me flip it around.
So the magical thing at a high level that it compounds,
if you have a self-service model, a PLG model,
I actually think the number one most important metric is churn,
going to this churn, churn, churn, churn,
and when I meet any startup like for investing or anything,
if the churn is not top decile for a low-end product,
I'm always out.
It's almost unsolvable.
It's almost unsolvable.
This 3 to 4% a month churn rate that a lot of SMB stuff, it's almost unsolvable.
So, you know, I think that's where the energy should go is relentlessly bringing down churn so that 20 years from now, we all have billion dollar air companies.
That's what we want.
I have kind of a rapid fire set of questions before actually the lightning round.
So we'll see if we have time for all these things.
So I'm just going to have a bunch of random questions.
I'm going to fire Ian and see what comes up.
Sound good. Okay, cool.
Let's do it.
Okay. What is just one thing a founder or product leader can do to become better at sales?
The number one thing they can do, and this is very tactical, at the end of each meeting, because, again, both of them are good middlers.
The head of product and the founders are good demos.
They're good at talking shop.
They're good at talking in the industry.
They're good at talking workflows.
Learn.
This is the only school you have to learn.
Even if you're not comfortable asking for money, learn to ask for what's the next step, Lenny.
This is what all great salespeople have learned to do.
actually mediocre salespeople are terrible at this.
The best salespeople never leave a meeting without a next step.
The next step does not have to be a check.
Okay, if that's, don't break the relationship.
But what's the next meeting?
The next meeting might be, Lenny, is there someone else at your company that I could do a demo for?
People are lazy.
They don't want to do multiple demos.
But in 2024, we all have to demo multiple stakeholders.
In 2021, it was one stakeholder.
Now it's a four stakeholder sale.
So if you don't know what to ask at the end of the call, ask, who else can I,
who else?
Lenny, is there someone else?
I know you're excited to buy our product, but who else?
Is there someone else's an organization?
Can I help you?
Can I just do a demo?
A demo is not threatening, right?
Whatever the next step is, right?
Can we do?
Can we get what's the next step we can get on our books, right?
And listen.
And the best salespeople march deals step by step by step by step.
And then they put in the time.
They've done the demos.
They've done the pilot if they need to.
They've helped them get going.
They've helped them see the value.
And then if it takes six steps to say,
okay, now we've got five folks at the organization,
using it.
Here's the deal.
They love it, right?
What can we do, Lenny, to get going?
Can we get a contract sign so we can get going on February 1st?
It's just very natural.
And founders just end the Zoom.
And they wait.
They wait in their inbox for the next step to come, but it doesn't.
It rarely comes on its own.
That's the number one tip is make sure yourself and you log it in your CRM that you always
have a next step.
You don't have to be great at sales.
As long as you're moving the ball down the field, then get it into the red zone.
and then figure out to ask for the money.
But you don't have to ask for the money
until it's in the red zone.
Amazing.
While we're on this topic,
is there like a book or a course or anything
that you just recommend folks go to get better at sales?
Just like, is there some tactical?
Go read this thing.
It'll help you.
Or is it just, it's hard.
You're not going to figure it out reading a book.
I am a voracious reader.
If I only wanted to plug myself, right,
and I usually wouldn't,
two things that we have,
we have something called Saster University,
Saster.
It's free.
There's a pretty good course
on getting learning about sales. It's not perfect, but it's pretty good. It just organizes a lot of
the stuff we're talking about and it's free. So I think it's pretty helpful. We actually wrote a book
called From Impossible to Inevitable that sold about 100,000 copies. I did almost none of the work,
although it's a lot of it's my content. Aaron Ross did it. It's actually really good. And it
interviews a lot of top sales leaders and goes through a lot of stuff we did. So I don't usually
hype it, but for 15 bucks, I think this, and actually I've never made one dog, I've never
gotten a check for these 100,000 copies. But I do think it's actually, the second edition is pretty
good. So I think if you like what we're talking about, the SAS University and the others,
I would say the flip, I would be very caught. I just typed my own course, which is free.
Like, I don't think I'm showing something if it's free. The book, I don't make a dollar on.
I'd be very cautious. And this is tough. Maybe this is something we can work on together.
Because there's so many courses and so many people selling stuff the last two years. Just be
cautious. Just be cautious. The last thing I will say is there is another community of call
Pavilion. And I do think it's great.
pavilion. It does have a lot of networking and stuff for sales and connecting sales with founders.
And I am a super fan of what they're doing. That one's worth investing. But be careful about Bob
and John's sales courses on the internet. There's just too many. Awesome. All right. We'll link to
all those things in the show notes. Next question. What is the ideal trial length for free trial
for sales team? Is it like 14 days a month, years? What do you recommend?
Tomas did a whole Saster presentation just on free trials and free trial legs.
It was really good.
But it was the one thing he didn't know, which I know just being an old-time
is the reason, one of the reasons we have 14-day trials on the internet is in the old days,
the Salesforce sales team, when they were S&B focused, wanted to close deals that month.
So they forced Salesforce to move from 30 to 40 days.
There was no evidence that was better for the customer.
There was no evidence that it got usage going or people.
They just wanted to close deals the same month.
And so by real, so that's something to be cautious about these metrics and be cautious that
they're, since we're talking to product folks, be cautious that they're customer-centric.
You know, that's a Salesforce, and the sales force is very enterprise now, but in the old days,
it pushed it to 14 days so the sales reps could make closed deals faster.
What we learned from Slack in Zoom until recently was infinite trials work pretty good.
So does Canva. Slack and Canva and until recently, Zoom, we're okay, waiting four years to
convert. And those are epic companies. Those are epic companies. And these are one of the things that
Only founders can make these decisions.
I wrote this post years ago saying,
who's your VP of free?
Because who's got a BP of free?
Do you know anybody that has a VP of free?
I got a VP of growth.
I got a VP of product.
But who, if you have this massive free base,
who's your VP of free?
I know almost no one that has a VP of free, right?
And usually it's some kind of collaboration between product and the CEO,
right?
They're the VP of free.
But even then, you need a VP of free.
We don't have one.
And so just think, there's no perfect answers,
but in a world where we're tightening,
nooses everywhere on trials or tritening nooses everywhere.
Be careful the advice you get.
Be careful the short-term advice.
For example, another related terrible piece of advice VCs give you is switch to annual
contracts.
This is terrible advice.
Terrible advice, Lenny.
Terrible advice from people who have never built products and aren't in the field.
Going to annual contracts on a spreadsheet looks great.
On a spreadsheet, it looks great.
You know what's better?
Letting customers pay they want to pay.
If it's you or me buying for ourselves, Lenny, you know, we're still going to put
it on a credit card, aren't we?
if it's our own personal, and we want to pay monthly, usually. We don't know. Even if it's,
we usually want to just try it monthly. Big companies want to pay annually because they have
procurement departments. Why force people to go the way they don't want to go? So just start,
this is a product audience. Product needs to be the voice of the customer. It's not so much
customer success as it used to be. It's not so much sales. You've got to be the voice of the customer
together with the founders and push these things. Think about every, I would do the longest possible
trial that is still customer-centric.
And understand there's tension.
Understand there's tension, right?
I say, anytime I'm in a board meeting where someone wants, where some VC says,
let's do annual for an S&B.
I'm like, no.
Show me the money.
Show me the evidence that this is better for the customer, right?
How many times have you gone to buy it something for yourself?
And it's like 19 bucks a month.
And that's annoying because it's an unseeked credit card charge.
But do you want to pay 240 up front?
I mean, maybe you do it for a Riverside or something you use all the time,
but some random product you just discovered.
You're just going to bounce.
Yeah.
So who's going to show the data in the bounce, right?
A related point for like in sales, no one does enough.
Everyone does these win-loss meetings, but no one talks enough about the deals they lost.
Everyone talks about the deals they won.
All the law, the tribal lore in sales is how we won the deal.
People should be spending more time talking about deals they lost than deals they won.
Right.
And same thing for this PLG motion, which if you make your, yes, I know, I give everyone a pass for
23.
Everyone who's growth plummeted and did things they shouldn't.
Did price increases they didn't earn?
Cut the free trials, hid their free additions.
I'm going to give you, look, you got to give your team a little stress relief, right?
So I'm giving every person I work with every portfolio, everyone, a one year pass.
But the pass is in the past.
We got to get back to being customer-centric and building businesses that have,
that builds to a $1 billion ARR on their own because they're wonderful business.
that are product-centric, right, that recur.
And every time you rip a customer off, you lose, you lose that relationships damaged, isn't it?
And, you know, a controversial thing I say to the product team, but I think this is the
right thing if you're going long is, look, everyone raised prices last year, as you know, right?
Everyone raised prices.
The question I asked folks is, did you earn it?
What feature did you show?
If you raised prices 8% last year, did you add 30% more value to your product?
you know in the old days pre pre this this crazy years you answer usually was yes people would wait up
they would wait a couple years right and that the whatever product from four years ago was so much
better it really was really had earned 1995 instead of what last year no one earned their price
increases no one came out with an amazing new addition an amazing new functionality that earned it
they just sent you an email saying you know you're paying more so we get one pass but
earn it, earn your price increase, have the longest free trial possible, own it. And this VP of free thing,
like, it's got to be founders working with product because no one else cares about the free. You can't
expect the sales team to care about free, can you? You can't expect the marketing team to care
about free, unless they can immediately monetize them, right, unless they can ram them into conversion.
People abuse their long tail in the last 18 months, but your long tail is your, these are your,
even if they don't convert that much, they're your advocates. I mean, how many people read your
newsletter, 500,000 people, right?
Almost 600,000.
Okay, 600,000.
Now, not all of them convert, do they?
No, no.
That's exactly how I look at it.
It's kind of the Brian Bellfres.
What about the 590,000 of them that love Lenny that don't convert, right?
If you over monetize them, then Lenny's empire, Lenny's community doesn't exist if you
over monetize them.
But when you bring in a VP of sales for Lenny and a VP of growth and you, like,
you can't expect them to care as much as much about that long tail as you, right?
I love your passion around this.
So what I'm hearing partly is you're a big fan of freemium, essentially, right?
And the benefits of product like growth where there's something you could just use indefinitely.
Or do you still think that's a trial where there needs to end at some point?
Or is it just like, no, premium is great in a lot of cases?
Listen, I'm a big fan of long tails when they work.
They don't always work for enterprise products.
I'm a big fan of delivering more value than you take out for your customers.
and I am a big fan overall of free because,
and I know you'll agree with me this,
every founder figures this out at some point,
free products are better software.
Products that cannot offer a free addition cut corners
because they don't have to be good at onboarding.
Products that do not have a free addition
have human beings that bridge the gap between buying and deployment.
And that's okay at service now,
and that's okay in certain products,
but the products are the best products invest the engineering cycles to have a free addition,
whether that's truly free, whether it's an extended free trial, whether it's a long tail
or a medium tail, the amount of all of your product is better if people can actually,
if you have a free addition, all of your, all your customers benefit, even your enterprise
customers benefit. They all benefit.
This idea of VP of free, I think technically it's probably the head of growth for a PLG company
or the person leading the self-serve part of the business.
But even in the organization I work with that have those structures, that that person is focused on monetizing that tale.
Who stands up for the 590,000 other readers of Lenny?
Who's their champion?
Yeah.
And you're 100% right.
That's exactly how I think about the newsletter.
There's this free audience and ideas over time.
They get convinced this is worth my money and let's give it a shot.
Yeah.
So yeah.
And your growth person, like let's say 1% converts.
I'm just making that up.
Going from 1 to 1.1 actually is a big deal at that.
that scale or 1.2, right? That's okay. But, but you've got to nurture the 490,000,
not spend all the calories just ramming the paid edition through, right? This, but only, it's,
it's a fun thing because once you hit a little bit of scale, this is part of your job as founders
and product leaders is who's going to be this VP of free? Like, it's not growth. I don't think
it's the growth team or something. Their two, their focus is, they got to get their goal.
Lenny, their goal is to get another half million out of the newsletter this year.
That's their bonus aside to it.
You think they're going to work on the free ones?
No chance.
Makes sense.
Oh, man.
There's so many things I can go into and want to go into.
I also want to let you go.
So with that, is there anything else, Jason, that you wanted to share before we get to our very exciting lightning round, anything you want to leave listeners with?
I think just make this the year of the customer, guys.
And I really think that sales has been under so much pressure.
the last 18 months. Customer success has changed. Product teams have to step up. This is your time
to do great things this year as product people. Be the voice of the customer, be the VP of free,
be the whatever, be the champion. Stick your neck out. Work harder, folks. Work harder. The funest part
of anything in startups is working hard. But in product, it's extra fun. By working harder,
you have the more fun conversations. Find the delight in product is making customers happy.
It's not worth it otherwise. It's otherwise. It's,
it's drudgery and it's endless PRDs and Gant charts and mindless discussions.
Make your customers happier this year.
You will be happy.
This is the year of product.
And we all get a pass for whatever,
whatever bad deeds we did or mediocre deeds we did in 2023,
get back and be the vanguarding our companies.
Startups need,
and bigger companies,
they need someone to inject energy again in many cases.
Energy has been lost.
And it would be great if product can do it and say,
listen,
let's do something like,
even if we're not exactly sure how to get more leads.
Even if we're not exactly sure what to do,
there's one thing under our control is the code we write and the product we ship.
Let's do three great things this year.
Let's just do them not good, great.
Let's do three great.
And what you will find is the whole company will respond,
including sales, including marketing,
if we start shipping great things,
few things inspire teams more than when you're shipping great products.
So be, if you weren't the leaders the last two years,
if you were being forced to weaponize your customer base,
somehow be the ship three great things this year that's my challenge ship three great things
and love this this is the year of product that might be the title of this podcast jason we've reached
our very exciting lightning round i've got six questions for you are you ready i'm worried about the
first one but go for it they're very non-surprising because they're always the same uh what are two
or three books you recommended most to other people uh that's the one i just want to take a pass i know
they're the same. I read, I read more than anybody else in the place, but I don't, I wish I had those
two great, great books that have changed my mind the last 12 months, but I, I, hopefully I've added
some value, but this one, I think I got to take a mulligan on. I don't have the perfect answer. Acceptable.
Acceptable answer. Is there a favorite movie or TV show that you really enjoyed? Oh, the terminal
list, the terminal list. The terminal list. Yeah, I'm not into that Chris Pratt. I'm not into
that goofy superhero movies he does. And I don't people like it, but the terminal list is pretty,
It's I got it.
It's written by this ex-Navy seal that like, I think tech people don't read the
everyone, but outside of tech reads this author, but Amazon did this thing to the terminal list.
And I think it's, it's the reason it gripped me, it's like this post, it's like a lot of tech is right now is like,
we're trying to do the right things, but are we doing the right things?
It's just confusing.
So this one, this one I couldn't put down the terminal list.
That was my favorite show.
The other one, you know, the one I liked that I couldn't believe, you want the second one, you'll be, even though as product people, Maverick.
And I'll tell you why, this movie Maverick, okay, you wouldn't, you wouldn't think I'd be a Maverick guy.
But the quality of this product, here's what, it was so high.
And it was, you remember, Maverick was supposed to come out before COVID, right?
And it was, and Tom Cruise said, no, he's like, this is gone, this is such a good product.
We're going to wait years for this thing to come out.
I'm like, I'm not going to like this.
I mean, cocktail was pretty good, but I'm not going to, but as a product, when I watched this movie three times from a product perspective, and to watch, just like software, when something is done that well, like no wasted calories, no way, like you see everything tie together.
That's the kind of software we love, right?
It just delights us when it works better than we expected.
So those are my two.
You also did all his own stunts, which I think is a good metaphor for the VP of product, maybe being involved in sales.
Actually, do the work.
Yeah, exactly. Oh, man. I'm stretching it. Okay, next question. You answered a few of these already, but do you have a favorite interview question that you like to ask when you're interviewing salespeople, especially?
I answered it, but I'll bring it up again in case you do it again, is what do you want to do your first 14 days to head of product or head of sales?
What do you want to do your first 14 days?
It's not a technical 30-day plan.
You don't have to do 28 slides.
It's what I call a Colombo question.
Not that I really watch Colombo, but Colombo was this old detective on TV who, I don't know if you ever, he would ask these dumb questions, right?
And then the murderer would thought Colombo was so dumb, but by the end of the episode, it would always incriminate himself because of the question.
So when I interview, I always do Colombo questions.
They're never tough ones, right?
They're always nice.
I don't know if I'm nice.
I'm honest.
But the interview,
but then I,
so,
so,
let me would you do
your first 14 days
with VP of product here?
And they don't want to visit customers.
Don't hire them for either
sales or product,
just don't hire them.
I've got the answer now.
That's exactly what I was going to say.
Next question.
What is the favorite product
that you have recently discovered
that you really like?
My two aren't really amazing,
but I'll answer them.
The one,
I,
I,
I love this Opus Clip app
for making
clips from video. I know you have a whole team, so you probably don't need it. But I produce a lot.
I mean, a lot of us do content, right? Whoever does it. I produce a lot of content. I don't have
enough time to do this. So the only AI tool that I've found helpful so far is OpusClipp,
which takes all of the incredible amount of YouTube content we have, force ranks it, and turns it
into 59 seconds clips. And I'm a case study on the website. I tried the early products. They were almost
there, right? But it's not, is it as good as a clip team? Right? Is it, no. But literally in
60 seconds, it can, what's interesting is it can do something I don't have time to. I could never
make YouTube clips. I could never make Instagram shorts. I could never make it. I couldn't,
it just would never happen. Right. It would never happen. And the fact that one product
enables you to do something at a minimum viable quality you couldn't do before, like I'm a super
fan. It's, it's, it's, it's pretty interesting. So that's my favorite. And my other one is,
this one. This is the folding phone that's finally as good as a normal phone. See, there's the
terminal list that I've got. Fold it up and it just works. That's wild. Ways the same as an iPhone.
And so the reason it's cool is this has changed the way I do productivity. One plus. It's the
one plus. One plus. Yeah. It's the first one that's the same form factor, same weight, same. So there's
really no, there's no loss, right? And I just, you know, you can use, I can use my normal phone
here like I'm using. It's, it's a little funky, but it's the same. And then to be able to
do content to be able to check, to be able to do full email, full calendar,
full everything, like an iPad.
We see your Tesla where it's going.
I think it's parked.
That's very cool.
So it's basically like an iPad plus a phone in one.
Yeah, I probably use this 50% of the time of the iPad.
So that's it.
That is it.
The other ones that make sense to me.
Yeah, it's Android.
Amazing.
I had not seen that.
That is extremely cool.
Very cool.
Two more questions.
Do you have a favorite life motto that you often come back to share with
friends or family find useful in work or in life?
It's be kind.
When I reflect on my career, right, mistakes, it's when I don't think I'm mean.
I actually think I care more than most people on the planet.
I like to think I've helped a lot of people.
But it's not taking the time to be kind at times and not taking time to be kind when things
don't work out, not taking time to be kind when you leave a situation.
not taking time to be kind when maybe someone's done the wrong thing, right?
Not taking time to be kind to a customer that leaves, right?
I remember in the early days of Adobe Sign of Echo Sign,
we had a top tech customer,
and I killed myself to close this customer, right?
Famous, huge, huge tech company today.
And then our champion changed, right?
Champion changed, a big issue within software product,
and came in and brought in DocuSign instead of us.
And, man, I was just so mad.
I just tore into this guy.
The guy had actually had dinner at my house, right?
And he just did it because it was good for his own career, right?
And I was so mad.
But I broke the relationship forever, right?
That's just one random example.
And I just think there's so much advice to fire fast and to be relentless and do all these things, right?
But you've interviewed so many people, Lenny, right?
I mean, so many great leaders.
I haven't done what you've done.
But I've talked to almost all the top CEOs and SaaS, okay?
and they're kind.
It doesn't mean that they're soft.
They're not soft.
They make tough decisions every day,
but they are kind.
And so in this world where everyone feels like
they're getting ripped off or they're not paid enough
or I want,
you know,
founder pay for founder work.
This motto really,
it's troubling.
Everyone is founder pay for founder.
You want me to work more than 30 hours,
Lenny?
I need,
I need 30% of the company.
I need founder pay for founder work.
It's like, I hear you, but you will find that by being totally committed, going 110%,
and also finding a way to be kind, that will like endure across your whole career.
So I know it's true.
Because I think I'm good, but not always kind.
It's how I challenge myself all the time.
Be kinder in that conversation.
And the big epiphany, we already talked about it, the big epit, it shouldn't have taken
me this long to realize that any time an employee fails at your fault, be kind.
You hired them.
They never knew what they're getting themselves into.
If the job's too hard, if they lack the skills, if there's not enough budget, if there's not enough people, if it requires too many hours to work, you should have known that, not them. Be kind. Be kind to every single person on your team that doesn't work out. That's not just putting together an email spreadsheet and sending it out. Try, try hard or be there for them. Be kind. I love this. I know that you actually, your username on Twitter includes be kind in your actual. It's a reminder. It's a reminder. So you really back this up. Amazing. Okay. Final question.
you're on a giant conference Saster.
Yes.
First of all, just talk about what it is so people know and explore and check it out.
But the actual question is, what would surprise people most about running a conference like this,
things that they don't think about.
It goes into running a conference like this.
Any business, no matter how weird it is, that's at scale, like the best one in it,
like, it's always interesting, I think, for case studies, right?
The best, whatever, pick anything, the best cup maker, whoever it is,
Whoever makes the best, like this is not an interesting business, the Starbucks Cup on his own,
but the best person, I pretty much guarantee there's a good, good story there, right?
Saster is a community as well like you have.
We started this really early in 2011, 2012 for B2B founders back when that seemed like a weird thing to do.
Now it doesn't seem so weird.
So we built a lot of content and we started doing events and meetups.
I never did a meetup.
You do a lot of meetups, but when I did meetups, I never actually even been to one.
So I did meetups in 2012 and 2013, but like a thousand people can.
came to the meetups. That will make sense to you today, about a decade ago for B2B, it was pretty,
like people were like, why are all these people here? We thought there were six of us that cared
about B2B. So then we did a big event. We did a one day, Saturday annual in 2015 and 3,000 people
came, including in the evening. And so we just kept going. So we get about 10 to 12,000 people
together a year. What that means has changed. It's no longer novel. I'm not the only person
producing B2B content anymore. I'm not the only founder that sold their company, like in the old
days. There's plenty of much more successful founders and better. I certainly don't, I don't do
many, very many podcasts because I'm not a tenth, a hundredth as good as you. I do like one a quarter,
for example. But the events have become this meeting place for founders that have hit scale,
that are somewhere between one million and 20 million. And especially folks that aren't in Silicon
Valley, especially folks that aren't sitting in Hayes Valley or wherever that don't have a community.
And that surprised me in the beginning how many international folks would fly all the way to the Bay Area.
I remember this founder came from Perth, Australia for the first session.
I'm like, thanks for coming, but this is a lot of work for it.
He's like, I didn't come for you.
I came because there's no one like me in Perth.
So it's taken on a life of its own.
There's a lot of learnings.
I think, you know, it was, I didn't intend to do mass scale events.
I intended to just do meetups because I had a community like you do meetups.
So it was not, it was absolutely an accident.
The learnings are, it's extremely expensive.
It's extreme.
And it has this weird curve.
Okay, that's this weird curve.
And this is important because I think actually all founders, all startup should be doing events for their own customers, at least steak dinners. You should get your customers. If you get your customers and prospects together, you sell more. Get your customers and it does not need to be a million dollar or $10 million event. It can be roots prises. It can be whatever. Does not even be a fan. Just get them together. Just get them together. Just be steak though.
Yeah. Well, no, but steak does work. I mean, I'm not a big steak guy. It could be any dirt. Just something nice where they want to go. It just where they want to go. Your customers will sell your prospects for you.
Your customers will do the selling for putting them together.
When you do it really small, it's cheap because how much does that back room cost at the steakhouse, right?
It even costs, it's worth it if you get one big deal out of it, right?
And then you graduate and then you'll do like a meetup and like you'll do it at like someone's office.
Some tech company, they'll give it to you for free.
They have an extra office.
That costs nothing, right?
And then you're like, well, that one.
Well, we got 100, 200 people came to Lenny's thing at DigitalOcean.
And then you say, you know, I'm going to do an event.
And then you rent like a theater.
disused and these theaters are actually kind of cheap because like they're dark during the day.
Like there's not a lot going on and a lot of like, not movie theaters, but like, you know, music.
So those are cheap.
But then like you're like, well, there's only one stage and it smells like beer.
So like then the next year you do a hotel and a hotel's pretty expensive.
It's like half a million, 800,000.
And I hated hotels.
But you know what I learned from business model?
It's turnkey landing.
So your marketing manager can call up the Hilton in any city.
And in two weeks spool up, uh, some mediocre.
A.V. Some mediocre chicken wings and drinks, okay? And you and I don't like to go to the Hilton
that much, the ballroom C, we don't like to go to events in a month. But it turns out your
customers don't care. They want to be together and talk about your app, right? And then if you do
community like you do, you could probably charge a couple hundred dollars for tickets and get
some sponsors and bring in some revenue, right? And but then after Hilton Ballroom B, it costs like
$2 million to turn the lights on. And Saster annual, so our Europa event in London's in early June,
June 4th to 5th, please come if you want.
That costs $2 million to turn the lights on in London.
To turn the lights on in the Bay Area for 12,000 people in September, in the Bay Area,
which is the most expensive place, right?
It's $10 million to turn the lights on.
Holy shit.
It's $10 million to turn the lights on.
Now, I'm being a little expansive in what I mean by turn the lights on, but this is what
it's going to cost you.
It's going to cost you about $1,000 per attendee in the Bay Area or Las Vegas to have
a mass scale event, not smaller, not one day in Grand Ballroom B, but a multi-day event.
right the a b is 1.5 million the food and beverage is 1.5 million the tenting is $800,000 i can keep going
so once you get to like 20 30 40 million in revenue quietly there's public companies out there
they actually become they have software like margins at that scale but before that it's brutal right
and when i started doing these events i interviewed the head of it back before march 2020 when tech
companies did their own events they've pretty much given up which is an interesting side topic big
big ones, not small ones, but big ones.
By the interview, the head of events at everyone, right,
at Twilio and Marquetto and da-da.
And they all be like, well, how much, how'd the event go?
It all be the same.
Well, we brought in about 1.5 million revenue.
Oh, okay.
And we lost two million.
Everyone lost two million.
Every single one lost two million.
And you can see it in the financial state,
even Zoom in its scale just announced how much money they lose at Zoomtopia.
So it's a terrible business.
It has just, what I like to say is it has just economies of scale.
The Lenny's little free meetups.
cost zero, right? And then the one at Cloudflare's office costs zero and the one at Hilton B
maybe costs $200, but then it costs $1,000 per person at scale, right? Even more like Moscone,
like in San Francisco is probably the most money, so you're approaching $2,000 per person because you have
to buy about $15 to $20 million of hotel nights to do an event in Moscone, right? So I don't know if that's
a, I mean, it's a side topic, Lenny's side podcast of people that care, but this dis-economies of
scale, but there are a handful of public companies that do like Com Lions, Money 2020,
Shop Talk, a few others that are at Sastro's scale. And they cobble together these very profitable
public companies, but they all got to do at least 20 to 30 million because you've got to get
over a 10. And it's intimidating to get over a $10 million nut, right? And so what it means is we have
to spend like 14 to 16 months each year planning for Saster annual because it's not that fun if
you fall six or $8 million behind. That's what happened in March 2020. We were the first major
prevent to be canceled by COVID in March 2020.
The first one, RSA happened for security the week before, then we got canceled.
So we lost $10 million in one day.
And it took a long time to dig out of that whole letty, especially since we monetized like
nothing.
It took a long time.
But they're worth it.
And I know you don't do traditional events, but you do do meetups in your community.
And I know they're worth it.
I know they're worth it.
Bringing your customers together, bringing your community together.
And we talked about this offline before we started.
second tier, third tier events, I do not think are worth it because they do not attract the best people.
It's just a fact.
Most people, it turns out from our founders are our core ICP.
They go to two events a year on average, two events a year, okay?
And they'll do other steak dinners.
So if you go to one of the two that they're at, you just might bump into Jeff Lawson or Eric Juan or whoever, the next one.
They might be there.
That might be one of their two, but they don't go to number three through ten.
They don't go to the, so fine.
my role in general is people wonder, should I go to events?
Is it worth my time?
It's a waste of time.
I know you've thought about it.
And the irony is even though we produce events, I used to think that.
I didn't want to do events.
I just wanted to do meetups, right?
I was shy.
I just wanted to do meetups.
But then I learned over time that the best events bring the best vendors, the best executives,
the best everything together.
So pick the one or two best events in your industry.
And even if you're antisocial, try to go to one or two a year.
Go long.
It pays off.
It pays off, but maybe don't bother with the rest, even if they're ski slopes or they're fine.
The sub-scale, sub-scale just doesn't work for meeting and marketing to people.
It just doesn't work.
I said at the top of this podcast that there's a billion things that we could talk about,
and I think that's exactly what happened.
We can go in so many directions, and that alone was extremely interesting because people
want me to run a conference, and I really don't, and I really enjoy the mute-ups that we have now.
And we actually do have sponsors that cover drinks and food and things like that,
and they're very chill.
and I really love what happens at those things.
But yes, this is really good information.
Jason, I have two more questions for you that I asked everyone.
I think we went through a couple of these things,
but just real quick,
where can folks find you if they want to reach out
and maybe follow up on some of the stuff you talked about?
And how can listeners be useful to you?
In general, just go to this kooky URL Saster, S-A-A-S-T-R-com.
That's a way to access a lot of what we're talking about.
If they want to reach me to be transparent, I get a lot of impound like I'm sure you do.
It is to be honest, guys, it is hard to process the amount of inbound that folks get, right?
But I'll give you an insider tip.
Like, I do see almost all of it.
So if you want to reach me, if you just want like an hour of my time randomly, I don't have, I'm sorry.
Honestly, I'm sorry.
I don't have that hour of time.
Okay.
But if you want to interact lightly, I mean, I'm on Twitter all most days at Jason LK.
I'm on LinkedIn a lot.
Just search for me, Jason Lemkin.
LinkedIn's pretty cool.
I have 260,000 dollars.
We have really good conversations.
And I will tell you if you have a question,
like you really need some help in your business,
or you want to do a pitch,
if you send me the world's best email pitch,
I will read 100% of them.
Like track it.
Put it in Mix Max.
Put it in HubSpot.
You will see I will open that email if the title's good.
It doesn't mean I can respond.
I'm sorry.
No, Lennie can't respond.
But realize it is going to be read.
If you need a favor,
like a help. If you ask the question super discreetly, like Jason, here's the LinkedIn. I'm
Lenny. I'm trying to hire this person. I'm at four million error, doubling. Should I hire her?
There's a chance I'll look at that LinkedIn. I can tell you. Or if it's one question,
but if it's an hour or coffee, it isn't going to work. But it is going to get read.
So do that by email. Do it even by LinkedIn. I didn't use to read those LinkedIn emails.
But if it's really good, I will read it. And I probably respond to five or six of them a day.
I give the extent it's helpful. Free answers, free advice. I mean, not that I charge for anything.
But make it good.
Don't ask for coffee.
So many folks have written this.
The most important people in the world read email.
It's an open medium, right?
And a subset of those folks actually read their social media.
Even Elon Musk reads his, you know, before he bought Twitter, he read it.
You can access almost anyone in this industry.
Just be super strategic about how you do it.
Again, put yourself in your shoes.
Would you answer this?
Would you do this?
But I would say half this stuff gets open to red.
So I know that's a rambly answer.
But first, we talked about sales.
You can reach anybody in the world.
via email. It's magical.
I'm sorry for the many emails you might get from this podcast. That is actually really good
advice resonates deeply with me as well. Jason, thank you so much for being here.
Thank you for all the time, Lenny. I'm a super fan. It's great, great to be here and let me know
anything I can do to support you or your community going forward. I really appreciate that.
And the same in reverse. Bye, everyone.
Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple
podcast, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review,
as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more
about the show at lenniespodcast.com. See you in the next episode.
