Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth - The most successful AI company you’ve never heard of | Qasar Younis
Episode Date: March 8, 2026Qasar Younis is the co-founder and CEO of Applied Intuition, a $15 billion AI company that adds intelligence to cars, tractors, planes, submarines, and other vehicles—essentially, Tesla or Waymo wit...hout the hardware. He was previously COO of Y Combinator, started his career as an engineer at GM and Bosch, and was born on a farm in Pakistan.We discuss:1. Why the biggest AI revolution will play out in mining, farming, construction, and trucking over the next 5 to 10 years, not in software2. Why Qasar intentionally stayed under the radar for nearly a decade while building Applied Intuition, and why most founders shouldn’t do that3. The truth about China’s AI capabilities and why comparisons to American companies are fundamentally flawed4. The company values that drive Applied Intuition: speed above everything, laugh a lot, half the work is follow-up, never disappoint the customer5. The biggest lessons from Qasar’s stint as YC’s COO, including that the most successful companies show traction very early6. How reading old books is the best way to build taste—Brought to you by:Omni—AI analytics your customers can trustVanta—Automate compliance. Simplify security.Lovable—Build apps by simply chatting with AI—Episode transcript: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/the-most-successful-ai-company-youve-never-heard-of—Archive of all Lenny's Podcast transcripts: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/yxi4s2w998p1gvtpu4193/AMdNPR8AOw0lMklwtnC0TrQ?rlkey=j06x0nipoti519e0xgm23zsn9&st=ahz0fj11&dl=0—Where to find Qasar Younis:• X: https://x.com/qasar• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/qasar• Website: https://qy.co• Reading list: https://qy.co/books—Where to find Lenny:• Newsletter: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com• X: https://twitter.com/lennysan• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lennyrachitsky/—In this episode, we cover:(00:00) Introduction to Qasar and Applied Intuition(04:01) The optimistic vision: How AI will create abundance(08:49) Why anxiety about AI comes from misunderstanding—and how to fight fear with knowledge(12:58) The market sell-off explained(16:31) Self-driving cars: Why 30,000 annual deaths prove we need autonomy now(20:22) The spectrum of physical AI(28:00) How AI is coming just in time(33:26) Why comparing Chinese AI companies to American AI companies is a category error(39:12) Why Qasar finally joined Twitter after staying silent for a decade(45:08) Why successful companies almost always show early signs of traction(50:40) Applied Intuition’s core values(56:00) Why the company cleans its own office—and never spent a dollar of raised capital(58:50) Quasar’s reading philosophy(01:06:14) How to operationalize listening to naysayers(01:12:53) The importance of decisiveness(01:14:55) Removing emotions from decisions(01:19:02) Why most Silicon Valley CEOs don’t have great taste—and how to develop it—Referenced:• Applied Intuition: https://www.appliedintuition.com• Marc Andreessen: The real AI boom hasn’t even started yet: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/marc-andreessen-the-real-ai-boom• Elad Gil’s website: https://eladgil.com• Bosch: https://www.bosch.com• Berkshire Hathaway: https://www.berkshirehathaway.com• Naval Ravikant on X: https://x.com/naval• Y Combinator: https://www.ycombinator.com• Waymo: https://waymo.com/• Tesla: https://www.tesla.com• DeepSeek: https://www.deepseek.com• Rivian: https://rivian.com• Crate & Barrel: https://www.crateandbarrel.com• OpenClaw: https://openclaw.ai• Sam Altman on X: https://x.com/sama• Peter Ludwig on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/peterwludwig• What Steve Jobs really meant when he said ‘Good artists copy; great artists steal’: https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/what-steve-jobs-really-meant-when-he-said-good-artists-copy-great-artists-steal• 7 quotes on the power of reading from Charlie Munger: https://www.neil.blog/articles/7-quotes-power-reading-charlie-munger• Andreessen Horowitz: https://a16z.com• John Doerr on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-doerr-03248211• Gandhi’s quote: https://www.azquotes.com/author/5308-Mahatma_Gandhi/tag/truth#google_vignette• Steve Ballmer on X: https://x.com/Steven_Ballmer• General Motors: https://www.gm.com—Recommended books:• House of Huawei: The Secret History of China’s Most Powerful Company: https://www.amazon.com/House-Huawei-History-Powerful-Company/dp/0593544633• Maintenance: Of Everything, Part One: https://press.stripe.com/maintenance-part-one• The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told to Alex Haley: https://www.amazon.com/Autobiography-Malcolm-Told-Alex-Haley/dp/0345350685• High Output Management: https://www.amazon.com/High-Output-Management-Andrew-Grove/dp/0679762884• The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer: https://www.amazon.com/Emperor-All-Maladies-Biography-Cancer/dp/1439170916• Made in America: https://www.amazon.com/Sam-Walton-Made-America/dp/0553562835• My American Journey: https://www.amazon.com/American-Journey-Autobiography-Colin-Powell/dp/0679432965• Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies: https://www.amazon.com/Guns-Germs-Steel-Fates-Societies/dp/0393317552• Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed: https://www.amazon.com/Collapse-Societies-Choose-Succeed-Revised/dp/0143117009• SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome: https://www.amazon.com/SPQR-History-Ancient-Mary-Beard/dp/0871404230• A World Appears: A Journey into Consciousness: https://www.amazon.com/World-Appears-Journey-into-Consciousness/dp/198488199X—Production and marketing by https://penname.co/. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email podcast@lennyrachitsky.com.Lenny may be an investor in the companies discussed. To hear more, visit www.lennysnewsletter.com
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You decided to join Twitter recently.
You put out your first tweet.
Mark Andreessen, quote tweeted it and said,
this is the best AI CEO.
Nobody knows.
Our best work is done alone and quietly.
Every minute you're writing something for public consumption,
you're not focusing your very limited time
that you have on your customers and your product.
You're building a lot of the future that we're going to be living in.
What does the next couple of years look like?
Us solving some of these impossible problems like cancer
are directly going to be related to this AI boom.
Net suffering in humanity.
overall should go down significantly.
A thread that has emerged on this podcast
is that AI is coming just in time
to save us. The real impact of
AI in the next five to ten years
really is going to be in farming,
mining, construction.
These industries, they need autonomy.
And it couldn't come soon enough.
If you look at farmers, the average age of a farmer
is in their late 50s. What does that mean
in 10 years from now? There's a lot of anxiety
about what AI is going to do to the world.
The core root of fear is
misunderstanding. If you, at
home are very anxious about AI. The best thing that you can do is spend time to understand and you
will quickly see the limitations. Get to know it, then actively make the technology be used for good.
Today my guest is Kasser Yunus, co-founder and CEO of Applied Intuition. You have probably
never heard of Kasser or applied intuition. This is the most important under the radar AI company
and CEO that I've ever come across. It's a $15 billion company that has been growing quietly
over the last decade. What they do is they add AI to vehicles like cars, tractors, planes,
submarines, mining rigs, and a lot more. 18 out of the top 20 automakers are customers,
as well as the biggest global construction, mining, and trucking companies, also the Department
of Defense. They're basically Waymo or Tesla, but without the hardware. Kasser himself was
born on a farm in Pakistan, grew up in Detroit, started his career as an engineer at GM,
and then at Bosch, you then went on to start a couple companies before starting applied intuition.
I love everything about this episode, and I am so excited to bring it to you.
Don't forget to check out Lenny's ProductPass.com for an incredible set of deals available
exclusively to Lenny's newsletter subscribers.
Let's get into it after a short word from our wonderful sponsors.
This episode is brought to you by Omni.
Many product teams today are in the process of debating how to ship AI analytics.
The hard part is obvious.
Having an LLM guess at SQL in production is a huge mess and just a bad idea.
Omni takes a different approach.
They have a semantic layer built in so that when you embed their analytics,
the AI actually knows your business definitions, not just your raw tables.
You can test queries, validate the reasoning, and lock down permissions before anything hits production.
If you want AI analytics in your product without building the whole stack from scratch,
check out Omni.co slash Lenny for a free three-week trial.
Companies like perplexity, DBT, and BusFeed use Omni to ship analytics their customers can trust.
That's OMNI.c-Lenny.
My podcast guests and I love talking about craft and taste and agency and product market fit.
You know what we don't love talking about?
Sock too.
That's where Vanta comes in.
Vanta helps companies of all sizes get complying fast and stay that way with industry-leading
AI, automation, and continuous monitoring. Whether you're a startup tackling your first SOC 2 or ISO-27-001,
or an enterprise managing vendor risk, Vanta's trust management platform makes it quicker, easier,
and more scalable. Vanta also helps you complete security questionnaires up to five times faster
so that you can win bigger deals sooner. The result? According to a recent IDC study, Vanta customers
slashed over $500,000 a year and are three times more productive. Establishing, establishing
trust isn't optional. Vanta makes it automatic. Get $1,000 off at banta.com slash lennie.
Castor, thank you so much for being here. Welcome to the podcast. Thanks for having me.
You're basically building a lot of the future that we're going to be living in and people may not even realize this.
And there's two sides. So this on the one side, let me ask you this question. If things go really well,
what does the next couple years look like for people with the emergence of AI, with physical AI?
What's a vision of the future?
Let me take the broader AI point and then the micro, the more specific one on physical AI.
Macro, I think, think about this like the Industrial Revolution, right?
So if you're sitting, let's see in the late 1800s, there's a lot of, you know, we can focus on a lot of bad things that happen because of industrial revolution, right?
You have child labor and you have monopolies emerging and you have abuse of, you know, wars end up happening.
But there's also, it's an almost, almost unimaginable present without the values and without the kind of benefits we got out of the industrial revolution, which is broader access to health care like we've never seen before.
Like access to goods, material goods, things like we take for granted, like heating and cooling your home.
There's this great YouTube kind of channel that focuses on POW letters from Jersey.
Germans who are seeing America in the early 40s and they're writing letters back to Germany
about what they're seeing as they're basically, you know, prisoners of war.
And they're kind of blown away that the towns that they roll by in these trains as they're
going to their POW camps are all lit up or that there's cars everywhere.
80% of German towns in World War II did not have electricity.
And that's kind of a mind-bending kind of thing because we just assume all this stuff,
all this technology is, you know, equally distributed.
So the positive version is these things that we, let's say folks who are wealthy or folks
who have access to technology, these things everybody has access to.
The fact like simply having somebody who's a coach to you and having that coach very specifically
to you, not a generic chat GPT that's giving fairly generic answers.
But this is a very powerful thing.
I think us solving some of these impossible problems like cancer are directly going to be related to this AI boom.
So I think net suffering in humanity, I think just like the Industrial Revolution overall should go down and should go down significantly.
And I'm a fundamental optimist in that view, that technology will bring that positivity.
In physical AI specifically, again, you know, when you have things like you have your own car and you,
You have the ability, you have your limbs and you have your senses and you can drive.
You take these kind of things for granted.
You jump in your car and you go to the store.
For somebody who maybe is disabled or somebody who doesn't have the money to afford a vehicle,
access to mobility that's nearly free or is free is a big deal.
And that like simple example of making self-driving cars free for everybody and how that would
change the planet, you live in Rwanda and you are two.
hours from the nearest hospital, that matters.
That's in a very, very true way.
And so I think a lot of, let's say, that negativity around AI comes from people who, frankly
speaking, are living in a very, very good existence.
And when you live on the other edge of society, yes, and I'm not like some naive person
who thinks that there's no downsides of technology.
We can discuss that.
But I just see there's a lot more positive.
So when you ask that question, what's the next?
get three to five years, what's the next 20 years? These things that we take for granted that are bad
suddenly are not there. And I think certain diseases, certain accessibility to basic, you know,
services suddenly start going away. One last example that is you take just the fact that you can
message people basically for free, you know, for people old enough. Like this is not the norm. We came from
Pakistan, we couldn't even communicate back to Pakistan because the long distance, you know,
was so expensive and so it was handwritten letters. Today, you can basically contact anybody on
the planet basically for free. There's obvious downsides for that. But there's lots of upsides
for that, which is being in touch with people that you care about and you love, basically for free.
And so I think AI has the ability to bring this abundance to many, many more people at a near
free, you know, free cost.
On the flip side of this, as you
pointed out, there's a lot of
anxiety about what AI
is going to do to the world, to jobs,
robots. They're like these
videos coming out of China with these robots
with nunchucks, like
the stock market. I feel, you know what?
I feel the Nunchuk Union is
up at arms with that.
How terrible?
Yeah. But it's, you know, it's
scary. And, you know, the market's reacting
more and more to just like, oh, wow.
these companies are maybe not going to survive long term.
Again, being at the center of this and building a lot of the stuff that will get us there,
how do you envision that couple of years playing out?
Are you optimistic?
What keeps you optimistic?
Any advice to people to help them kind of stay, you know, calm through this period?
So there are two separate things.
Anxiety around technical shift and then the public investors reacting to specific stocks they've
held to separate those things.
So let's talk about them separately.
And the first one, you know, the core root of fear is misunderstanding.
And I think if you at home are very anxious about the impact of AI in some variant on your own job,
the best thing that you can do is spend time to understand it.
And you will quickly see the limitations.
There are some great videos on YouTube, which are like, you know,
trying to get Gemini to understand what a cup is by just holding it upside down.
and it like really strut,
then to do it with, you know,
chat GBT.
So it's like if the,
if the revolution is coming,
you know,
the AI overlords have to first understand
like the top and bottom of a cup.
And so you realize that
you can see the video
of Nunchuk wielding humanoid
which are pre-programmed
and that costs $15 million to do that video.
Yeah, that is true.
It's not, it's not fake.
I'm not implying it's fake.
But it's also not what your brain
kind of fills
in the gaps. You see
Nunchuk robots and you just feel like
well the gap, these are sentient
beings that are at their own volition
rather than it's a bunch of motors that have been programmed to do
a certain thing. If you really want to be impressed
you go to a car factory and we've been
doing that for 25 years. We have
very, very advanced robots moving extremely
fast to build things.
And why are we don't, we have
anxiety about the car factory, but
we have anxiety about the Nunchuk robots
is because the human beings
doesn't like that gap, we understand the gap of a, you know, of a welding robot. You see,
oh, okay, that's a robot. It's been programmed to make this weld, but we don't know the technology,
we as and just as an individual human being living in, you know, in the world. You don't know how
that robot was made to do that nunchuck thing. And so you substitute that with anxiety and
fear. And so I would really implore you to, you know, kind of learn more about the technology.
And you start seeing the edges. Now, does that take away from the most fundamental,
thing that you're getting at, the string that you're pulling at, which is, like, is society
going to be fundamentally harmed and is this, you know, net, net bad for society? I think in any
technical shift, the emergence of WhatsApp, just as a example, there are people who are damaged
by that, literally companies that go away, but also humans who are damaged by the advent of that technology.
And so I think as members of society and as leaders in society, we can we can kind of move that funnel in whichever way, you know, technology first.
Remove the word AI.
AI is such a like emotional word because it's wrapped in these things you don't know.
And so that fear then kind of deforms.
So let's just say technology, you know.
So it's up to us to recognize this.
technology can be used for good and technology can be used for bad. And I think that's where
really the focus is. So get to know it and then actively make the technology be used for good
as a participant, whether you're a founder or all the way as an individual, you know,
employer citizen of a large company. Then on the second part of the question about, you know,
public investors and stuff, this is my, I don't have any, you know, particular research on this,
but this is what my guess is what's actually happened. Beyond being an engineer, which is my
my core identity for the lack of better word.
I was also, I did an MBA at Harvard.
And so that was the first time that this, let's say,
I didn't come from very, you know,
very, very kind of wealthy upbringings.
And this was the first time when I went to Harvard,
I saw like, you know, that world,
that world of people having like private jets and stuff.
It was a really eye-opening experience for me.
But the real world I was exposed to was high finance
and how high finance works.
And you might think, as I did, from far away,
that folks at hedge funds or at large, you know,
public equities funds are extremely nuanced and thoughtful.
And they are like, you know, on whiteboards with, you know,
extremely deep and, oh, maybe even theoretical math
to figure out should they buy or sell, you know, Figma.
And that's not actually how it works.
I mean, really what these folks are is, and in this specific case, I think what's happening is they are, they buy and sell stock. They are smart people and they do work hard. It's not to take that away. But they don't have a fundamental edge that you would assume that somebody who sits in, you know, skyscraper in New York has. And by the way, that's why retail investors have become such an active and kind of significant part of the market. So those folks have gone to AI consultants and have gone to people who are literally,
developers at these firms, and they'll do something like, hey, why don't you build me this app
in a week? And then, you know, this like consultancy will come back with an app, which kind of looks
like maybe a Figma or another, you know, some web app. And so that hedge fund manager, they're like,
well, and then, you know, if the company was sitting there, they would say, no, no, this is,
this just looks like my app, but this is actually not my app. It's not as deep. It doesn't have
all these things. There's integrations with all these other systems. But for the, in public,
investor buy, they're like, yeah, but it only took like a few weeks or a month to build this.
It took you 500 engineers a couple of years.
This AI thing could be real.
And the things I'm reading on X about like just vibe coding your way to replace, you know,
billion dollar companies that might be the case.
And the market immediately prices in that risk.
And that's where that selloff comes from.
That doesn't necessarily mean all of those.
I mean, just within the last 24 hours, I had a, uh, that's, I would, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I,
can't say his name, but like a very, let's say, a calibrated investor who said, this is the time
to buy because these companies are not actually going away. And so I think those are two,
anxiety within society and the sell-off are two very different things. They're motivated by different
things. They're part of the larger AI narrative, but I wouldn't conflate those two things.
It's not that the hedge fund investors, like, I'm worried about society, sell service now.
Like, it's, it's different than that. At least that's, at least that's,
my impression. This is the alpha we've been talking about. Time to buy. This is not investment advice.
Well, that's really good advice. I think the real advice is to fight fear, and I feel that anxiety,
especially when I go to Michigan and outside of people in the Silicon Valley bubble.
It's like just try to learn a little bit about the technology that you're afraid of, and then you'll
start seeing some of the edges. I love your point about how self-driving cars are essentially robots.
We don't call them that, but the robots. Absolutely.
And you see a non-track wheeling robot.
A self-driving car doing bad things could be very dangerous already.
And so that's a really good reframe that if you just think of it, it's just another robot,
and it's been really good for us.
And by the way, the self-driving thing, as an example, you know,
whichever way you slice the statistics that are available from self-driving companies,
they're supremely, supremely more safe than human drivers.
And I do believe in 20 or 30 years, not that much longer,
We'll look back and we'll kind of be like,
it's kind of like we think about child labor.
You know, in post-industrial revolution,
that was a normal thing.
You would send kids who were in middle school to go work.
It happens in third world countries today.
There isn't a lot of emotion behind it.
It does not consider to be exploitative
because you have no choice.
You know, everyone's just,
and I think we'll look back in 25, 30 years,
we're like, people would just like tired,
under the influence, you know,
after like extremely stressed going through a dramatic life you know experience and then they jump in
into a car like that that that that's it's it's it's crazy and and just for everyone everyone should
really emotional think about just in the United States over 30,000 people will die in the next
year from these accidents that like yeah the old Stalin line it's like uh you know a one death is a
tragedy, a million is a statistic. And we just let the statistic kind of go over ahead, like,
oh, it's 30,000 people. But if you ever have talked to a family of somebody who went through
a tragedy like a car accident, it's unbelievable. And, you know, you suddenly all the fear of
AI robots goes away and you really see that human impact and you realize, like, actually,
us driving doesn't make sense. And it's not for any other reason than literally people die.
I've become a huge, I have a Tesla and the self, I've just used self-driving all the time now.
Just like a few months ago, we got very good.
And it's, it used to be nerve-wracking.
And it's like, wow, this is much better than I.
And you're doing, you're not using, you're not doing driving as a job.
Imagine if you're a commercial truck driver or you work in a mine or you work, you know, like there, a little bit of intelligence, a helping hand in that very dangerous task.
It's incredible.
And I think there's something about the human brain where, you know, when you bring up that reality of like self-driving trucks, the immediate people are like, well, what about the trucking jobs?
Now, needless to say, we don't have enough people who want to do that job.
So leave that fact to the side.
I think the fact that you really focus on is the fact that people die from trucking accidents.
Like we can't, you know, throughout the baby with the bathwater.
And so I think I implore everybody, you know, who thinks about AI broadly and physical AI specifically to always recognize that your monkey brain is programmed because of thousands of years of being in, you know, hundreds of thousands of years of living out in the wild and being in the cave that when you hear the rustle in the bush, that is, you think it's a snake because that's what our ancestors were programmed.
So now when something new enters our psyche, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, you're.
view isn't, well, if mining, if mines became autonomous, well, wouldn't that lose jobs? It's like,
those are awful jobs that people die in. And the best evidence is that people don't want to work in
them. Like, that's the best evidence. Like, nobody's clamoring to go work in a mine in a remote area.
And so intelligence can help make that, you know, make that reality much, much better.
People are seeing AI advance in all these different ways on the software side. They see all these
The model is being releasing.
It's driving 100% of people's code now.
What's really cool about you is you see the hardware side of this.
And I think one of the biggest changes to our lives will probably be robots walking around
doing things for us.
You have a sense of just how close we are just robots around us day to day?
So I would think about the framing here matters again on a spectrum.
So there are robots around us like Zumba's, you know, like they clean your carpet where
you're sleeping.
there's robots around you when you make a coffee.
That's an automated machine that is taking an input and doing a bunch of things based on what you need.
So what you're really talking about is how fast can go up that spectrum to where you have a robot that can take on lots of tasks with little guidance.
And the way that I would think about this is, let's say we're sitting in, this podcast is happening not in 2026, but 2006.
and you're asking me the same question about mobile.
And you say, well, mobile is coming.
This is remember pre-Iphone, which comes out in 07.
Everyone has got those flip phones.
So we have some, we have mobile.
It's not like a completely, you know, so we have some robots around us already.
But like it's like, so when are we going to, and you asked me in 2006,
when are we going to get that Star Trek phone that can do everything?
And I think at that time I would say, because I don't even know the iPhone is coming a year later,
I would say, well, Lenny, I don't know.
maybe it's one to five years.
And if it's not five years later that Uber, WhatsApp, Instagram, Snapchat are all products
and they're being consumed by many, many, many millions of people.
So what happens when you think about sitting in 2006 and why can't your brain figure out
that Instagram is coming?
Instagram is very hard to even conceive without phones that have an app store, have cameras
on both sides, are available.
generally available that lots of people have it.
And the fact that people are comfortable being on social networks.
In 2006, it's still an early thing.
This is pre-Twitter and Facebook is not that big.
And MySpace is, but it's not the same type of private kind of communication.
And so the point of making is I think it can come pretty fast,
but the way and the form factor will come is hard to pick,
just like it's hard to figure out Instagram is going to happen
because the intelligence in that point.
particular type of hardware, which will be generally available, that's a key word, generally available,
is really going to impact the use cases. So I think, like, the most obvious use cases that will come
early are going to be use cases where you get the most amount of bang for buck. And the bang for buck
is a car that drives itself or a mining robot, which is a mining vehicle, which is now intelligent.
And the reason is all that, you know, let's say engineering required to make this giant, you know,
machine that moves dirt has already been done. It's been done over the last, you know, 50, 60 years.
So then you're just importing a little bit of intelligence into it and leveraging everything else
that the, you know, companies and kind of people have developed. So I think, I mean, and I'm not just,
you know, pitching my own book. I mean, we're a physical AI company. I continue to believe that
I think our brain emotionally loves the humanoid concept because we're monkeys. And but actually,
just like more pragmatically,
it's actually just putting intelligence
into things that already exist all around us.
And I think,
and then once that happens,
then new applications will emerge,
which I think we'll talk about in five to seven years,
which we'll start seeing.
So let's just move forward five to seven years
and let's see what reality exists
and then maybe we can try to jump into the future from there.
I think generally speaking,
every single car company on the planet right now
is working on a product that's like a Tesla FSD product,
every single car company there, without exception.
Many, many companies are working in versions of that that would become fully autonomous
within a cheap sensor suite.
So the fundamental difference, just to simplify it all, the Tesla approach versus
the Waymo approach, just to really keep it simple, is the Waymo approach is lots of sensors
and lots of compute and maps.
And the Tesla version is very few sensors, no maps, no high-fidelity maps, and just
generalizing here, and cheaper compute, for the lack of better word.
And the Tesla version of a product, this is in the industry, is called an L2++ product,
is going to be available everywhere because it's literally cheaper and it doesn't require like HDMaps.
The Waymo product functions better in a geographically constrained area.
So you fast forward five years, both of these types of technologies will be much more ubiquitous.
L2++ and L4 will be much more ubiquitous, not only in the best,
Bay Area or in parts of China, but really globally.
There are companies working on this globally.
So now, I don't know if you remember, but nav systems used to be a big deal in cars.
You would pay thousands of dollars.
And nav systems are kind of the thing that everybody wanted.
We're at that moment for L2++ systems, where like people are willing to pay thousands of dollars
for a semi-automated vehicle.
It will not be a long time.
You're already seeing this happen in China where the downward pricing pressure for that
autonomous product, for the lack of better word, will become close to free. So now you fast forward
five to seven years and every car has some level of autonomy. So now you have to like mentally
live in that reality that everybody who's buying a car, they just get FSD with it. Now you start
seeing a different world because now the average person isn't wondering is self-driving in a company.
They use it all the time. They don't wonder our NAFs. And so what you have in NAV systems is a car play
emerges and Android auto emerges and it's very natural. People are like, oh, I have my phone. I just
plug it in and it wasn't a big revolution, but the car play in Android auto revolution is actually
huge. It brings free navigation and free applications to your car and it's fairly ubiquitous.
And so I think the next thing that happens in five to seven years is then full autonomy becomes
the thing that everyone expects. And so I think, and all of that, and you will see a clear decrease
in injuries and death because of that, because you have some intelligence help.
you help you drive it. Now, again, I'm using the consumer vehicle analogies just so people
can understand it. But this is the same in construction. It's the same in mining. It's the same in
defense. It's in every one of these verticals. There's these big physical machines that humans
are interacting with. That teaming up with that machine is the future. The productivity unlock
from just you looking at a machine, not like a sentient being, but almost like a physical agent
of something you're trying to accomplish
unlocks things that I think are very hard
to think about. So I love
you know, things like
Motebook and I love
the, let's say, open claw revolution that's happening for the
lack of a better word. But I think
the big impact, that's still
such a small part of society.
My barometer
of impact is like you go to
the Detroit airport and you sit in a gate and you look
around and you're like, how many people are using
open claw? And it's like, let me look it's like,
Like, you might be the only person who knows what that is.
And whereas everybody, they're living their lives.
And so it's like to them, actually the impact of AI is going to be in this physical, physical world.
I see you also have a, you have so, yeah, there you get out.
I'm a convert, open cloth.
There you go, perfect, perfect.
Peter's coming on the bot soon.
So I got some lobster class.
Yes, I think, I think the real impact of AI in the next five to 10 years really is going to be in farming.
in mining, in construction, in self-driving trucks, that's where you're going to have a real impact.
Though I think, I mean, I love the stuff that's happening on these platforms, but it's still segregated to,
like, frankly, developers and a small, very, very small part of society.
I wasn't planning to spend so much time here, but this is extremely interesting.
And I think it's important for people to hear from folks like you about where things are
heading, because as I said, everyone's just like, what is happening?
what is going to be my future.
The job piece is really interesting.
And a thread that has emerged on this podcast recently
is that people are afraid AI will take their jobs,
but in reality, AI is coming just in time to save us
because populations are declining, people are aging,
and we need something to help us there.
I know this is something Mark talked about
and you're really close to them.
Help us feel better about just how AI isn't going to take our jobs
and actually going to save us.
Yeah, I think, I think honestly speaking, these industries, like, they need autonomy.
I mean, and it couldn't come soon enough, frankly speaking.
This is not like people are not fighting for those trucking jobs.
If you look at farmers, the average age of a farmer is in their late 50s, 58 or so.
What does that mean in 10 years from now?
That means many of those farmers are going to be retiring if they're not already retired.
and 20 years we have even a bigger, a bigger problem.
That, by the way, is every vertical is like that.
And, you know, my hypothesis here, but unlike, you know,
sometimes people say like, you know, McDonald's can't hire
or like, you know, the mind, local query can't hire
and where are all the people.
The people are still here.
I think they just, the trade-off is just not worth it anymore.
In the 1980s, in the 1990s,
doing the long-haul trucking job was what the family has to sacrifice.
the father not being there for for days and weeks on end and today that same working class family
has can make that decision and say you know what i will drive for uber door dash and i'm willing to do
that because i can turn that app off and pick up my kid and i prioritize that the that is where i think
this you know this uh this kind of intelligence kind of revolution in the real world is really i think
is going to fill those gaps in um rather than like an entire
industry is suddenly gone and it's just automated. This is, this is, this is, I don't believe that
future, mainly because the realities of actually, you know, replacing an entire industry with robots
is, is still, that's too complex. One day it will happen, but it's not happening anytime soon,
but the entire society will be different by that point. And I think, again, use the industrial
revolution as, as a good version. I, uh, the, you know, the earlier question, if I'm somebody
who is not in the AI ecosystem
and I have this anxiety
and how would I do?
Reading history books
is a great way to really
understand how society
deals with this and there's a lot of literature
because industrial revolution doesn't happen
like, you know, in the dawn of
Christianity where not many people are writing
and not many people are reading. Lots of people
are writing, lots of people are reading
in the last 150 years
and you can read both
the people who are,
impacted by the Industrial Revolution, people who are benefiting.
And writ large, it's a very positive experience.
And that doesn't mean there, again, their downsides, we should mitigate the downsides.
But the thing that we can't do, and this is maybe specifically as America or society as the global population as a whole, there's this impetus to say like, we got to pump this break on, again, don't say AI, say technology.
Pumped this break on technology.
The issue then is the American economy really ends up stuttering.
And that impacts the lowest end of the labor market way more than anybody else.
And so in the attempt to help the people who are the most marginalized, we actually hurt them the most.
And the statistics between Europe and America are, you know, have been, have been a pretty explicit.
But in the last decade, basically, the American economy is now, you know, grown at a much higher pace.
And that growth hasn't come from, you know, Detroit, Michigan.
That growth has come from Mountain View.
And it's come from Sunnyvale.
It's come from the Bay Area.
And which is another way of saying, it's because of new frontier technologies.
So putting breaks on frontier technologies because we're afraid of unintended consequences
will actually have real intended consequences on people who are trying to help them most.
And the reality is very, very fundamental in a future that does not take care of
the average worker and the average person in America will have much bigger problems.
So we need a solution that takes that into account.
But that solution isn't just pump the brakes, AI is bad, or frontier technology is bad or
whatever, you know, whatever thing that you don't like.
I think that that'll have really, really bad consequences.
One of the reasons that we don't pump the brakes is just fear of China and competition
with China, the Dunchuck robots, being a recent example.
of like, oh shit. And I have kind of a contrarian take on just how much of a threat
China is and how they're approaching things. The summary version of this is, I think the way
we recently read as a company, we read this book, House of Huawei, which is just a really
great, interesting book. And Huawei is a really amazing company for the reason that it makes
great technology. But the couple hundred thousand people that work at Huawei, about a quarter of them
are members of the Communist Party.
And Huawei's goal is not to grow profits or shareholders.
It's a private company.
It's really an extension of the state.
So literally the name Huawei means China's ambition.
So imagine if you had a company called, you know, MAGA,
and half of the company or a quarter of the company was a certain political party.
And they said, our goal isn't to make profits or to, our goal is just the expansion of,
it's not even a company anymore.
It's something else, right?
And so I think we incorrectly, when we specifically speak of Americans, we think about China,
we impart our understanding of markets and companies onto China.
So we think Huawei, since they make phones, they must be just like Apple.
It's like, no, no, no, actually, that's not like Apple at all.
And so I think the first thing I would implore everybody who thinks about China, especially
with anxiety in America, is you're not comparing companies to companies.
This is not apples to apples.
This is very, very different.
And so imagine instead of thinking Open AI is competing against, you know, Deepseek, you say OpenAAS competing against the Chinese government.
Instead of Apple competing against Huawei, Apple's competing against the Chinese government.
And you can even remove the word Chinese government.
Government is the best word to define what this organization is.
But it's not a for-profit, privately owned, independent group of people who are working on projects together, build products to market.
So that's the first very important thing.
You cannot treat China like another America or another Europe or another whatever.
Number two is if your goal isn't to make profits, you can do incredible research and it can be extremely
compelling.
But like we've seen, if the system is not sustainable, that's also not a company.
That's not sustainable.
Let me give a very stark example of that.
Chinese EVs are really lauded as being this exceptionally.
interesting product, right? And, and you constantly get the streamer of, I would say, fairly shallow
analysis, which says, look how good. China is like how bad Munich, Detroit, Tokyo, Solar, the other
other epicenters for automotive globally. There is a Chinese EV-like company in America. It's called Rivian.
Makes great products, but they lose a lot of money making those products. And therefore, the company is
not very highly valued.
I think if you said top 50
or top 100 companies in the Bay Area,
I'm not sure Rivian would even make that list.
And it's not that the products are bad
or the people at Rivian are incompetent
or they're not working hard. It's just the business is a tough business.
The EV business in automotive is a tough business.
So how can we hold these realities?
So we say, look how amazing these Chinese EV companies
are. Look how bad the home team is.
It's just because the home team is being assessed
for being a business.
It has to make profits.
and because it doesn't, it gets hammered by public investors.
The other thing is not even a company.
Now, if we do apples to apples, America just has to build great EVs.
That means Tesla and everybody else combined and we don't care about profits.
I think America would field some very good products and there would be wow products.
So the comparisons are really, really off.
And I think that creates an misunderstanding.
I think, you know, then the little maybe the most philosophical,
question. Can China succeed? And does that mean America has to fail or vice versa? If you believe
in open and free markets, you believe everybody can succeed in those markets. And that's been
proven for over 100 years. And I think what we're experiencing right now is how does China play
in that ecosystem? Because I said open and free markets, and those are not open and free markets.
And so, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you have to have an antagonistic relationship.
It certainly doesn't mean that China's incompetent. And it certainly doesn't mean that it's not,
doesn't warrant our attention and that are our kind of, let's say, focus.
But it's also not a one-to-one comparison.
I think we should be very careful in implying it's a one-to-one comparison.
And by the way, that, like, five-minute explanation is never going to get to the average person sitting at an airport in Detroit, Michigan, waiting for their flight.
They just, all they consume is China bad.
Like, it's like that, it's not like that.
It's not that simple.
It's way more nuanced.
This episode is brought to you by Lovable.
Not only are they the fastest growing company in history,
I use it regularly and I could not recommend it more highly.
If you've ever had an idea for an app but didn't know where to start,
Lovable is for you.
Lovable lets you build working apps and websites by simply chatting with AI.
Then you can customize it at automations and deploy it to live domain.
It's perfect for marketers, spinning up tools, product managers prototyping new ideas,
and founders launching their next business.
Unlike no-co tools, Lovable isn't about static pages.
It builds full apps with real functionality, and it's fast.
What used to take weeks, months, or years, you can now do over a weekend.
So if you've been sitting on an idea, now is the time to bring it to life.
Get started for free at lovable.com.
That's lovable.com.
So you decided to join Twitter recently, put out your first tweet.
Your first tweet was just like, hello, I'm going to start tweeting.
that tweet got like 2 million views.
Elon replied to you.
Mark Andreessen quote tweeted it and said,
this is the best AI CEO.
Nobody knows follow for free Alpha.
Elad Gill, famed investor,
describes you as the most successful,
most quiet company in AI.
And to me, this is really interesting
because most founders are told,
build in public, build a following,
be loud, get out there,
talk all the time about what you're doing.
You did the opposite. You were very into the radar, stayed quiet, build, build, build, and then decided later, okay, now time. It's time to talk about our story. So I think this counter narrative is really interesting. And I think we'll inspire a lot of founders to not feel like they have to do this. What was your philosophy of just staying quiet and then starting? Yeah, it's a great point. So number one, it was intentional. And I think if it was up to me, we would do that forever. I think we're very much inspired by folks more.
like a Berkshire Hathaway and less like, you know, let's say a Silicon Valley darling.
And the, I'll tell tell why I changed the views and then just, but before some founders
go and take that advice immediately without, without really thinking about it, I can do that
because I'm known in the ecosystem.
You know, I know these folks personally.
And so I don't need to have a brand out there that is getting Elad to, you know, remember me
think about me. And so if you're, you know, if I'm doing my first two companies, uh, were a lot
less known as before I really, you know, became a YC. So, you know, all of our company values can be
reduced these two words of radical pragmatism. So before you take the advice, make sure it applies
to your situation. One of the reasons, and of all, who's one of our investors and a friend, uh,
you know, says, you know, fame itself is like a tool and it's, and it's powerful. Now, if you don't
have a network and you can get a following, that's a fantastic way to get, you know, to recruit
people to your company, to recruit investors to your mission and then, of course, you know,
customers. And so, but for us, and I think, I think that wasn't a hard requirement, you know,
10, 10 plus years ago. The other thing is, I think Peter and I, you know, the old saying about life
is kind of like, you do things and then you rationalize the thing that you do, right? So I think
fundamental with Peter and I, we don't get a lot of, my co-founder, Peter, a lot of
of, we don't get a lot of emotional satisfaction out of doing very public things. And I think
if I was really to play armchair psychologist and really try to get to the root of why, beyond the
rational view, which is focus on your customers, focus on the product. Every minute you're doing
a podcast, every minute you're doing an ex post, every minute you're writing something for public
consumption, you're not focusing your very limited time that you have on your customers and your
product. And ultimately, that's the only thing that's going to produce and yield results.
But the, you know, the reality of the situation today, you know, 2026 is even a company like us
that's known or somebody like me is known in the ecosystem, you still want to get that
broader message on. That's what I talk a little bit, a little bit about on X. So it's a, it's,
it is definitely contrarian, but it's not just contrarian. But it's not just
contrarian for contrarian's sake. It plays a little bit of our of our own psychology.
And then I would say just to just to finish that thought there is, you know, I grew up,
you know, I'm an immigrant. I came to the U.S. from Pakistan when I was a kid,
have a little bit of a weird name. And you feel like, you know, anybody, I grew up in,
in Detroit, in Warren, Michigan specifically for all those at home. And when you feel that
you're a little bit on the edge of society or you're not maybe in the mainstream, and this is, you know,
resonates with some people. That's not as resonate with everybody. You feel very skeptical of the
mainstream because you're just on the outside for so long. And I think you can trace a bunch of
founders psychology to this feeling of being an outcast, actually. And so then you find yourself
in a situation where you're like the YC, you know, CEO of YC. And the narrative of I'm an outsider is like,
you know, I don't know if there's anything more inside than being, you know, the YC, CO, right?
So I think that reconciliation, I think over the, over my career also has, has had to happen,
which is like maybe that's just kind of a weird, weird kind of thing.
And so when I talked to, you know, Mark Andreessen, who's who really pushed me to go,
go online or Elad or whoever it is, their view is leave your baggage and your trauma, you know,
in the background.
And really, let's, let's think more pragmatically.
And the pragmatic thing here is whether I like to do these types of things or not,
fundamentally, it helps get the message out. And the message can be something very small in myopic,
like what's happening in physical AI and machines become intelligent, or much larger, which is
what's happening in society through this fundamental change that we're going through. I've had the
rare privilege or the experience of seeing the full economic spectrum. You know, I've really seen
the extreme ends of both sides. And truly, I've really seen the extreme ends of both sides. And truly, I
I really mean that. And so somebody like Mark, who is close to our company, says, well,
that's a, those are some ideas that are worth getting out beyond just, you know, you're there
promoting whatever some, you know, your company or something like that. And that I actually,
that I can get behind, which is like the debate and discussion about ideas and what's happening
to our society because of these technical changes. And, and so, you know, here I am.
Amazing. Okay. So there's a few threads I want to follow there.
One is you were, as you said, C-O at Y Combinator.
You saw a lot of startups up close.
This is your third startup on your own.
Something that I hear you talk about is that successful companies almost always show traction very early.
A lot of founders here are like, no, just keep trying to fighting and maybe it will be the next Figma notion four years in.
We'll figure it out.
What's your experience there and what's your advice to founders who aren't seeing traction early?
Nuances.
I mean, if I was starting another company, it would call nuance.
right? So I think what you're saying is correct. I continue to believe that. I think good companies tend to be to have traction fairly early and then just sustain it for a decade plus.
To the founders that's toiling, let's say you're listening and you're about two years into your company and you're maybe having a tough time building, getting money and building that first product that consumers or businesses really love, either through attention or dollars.
two years is the difficult time.
The heuristic that I would use is if I'm not,
if the information I'm getting from the market is not informing me on a more and more specific path,
I would consider resetting.
And what I mean by reset is oftentimes,
and this is wearing my YC hat,
seeing hundreds and thousands of companies,
is oftentimes as like the co-founding,
like literally the foundation upon which the house is built is not correct.
It's like imagine you built this house and every time you put a cup of water and it slides off the table and it falls on the ground.
And you keep adjusting the table.
It's like maybe the foundation is actually wrong.
The whole house is off kilter.
And that foundation might not only be your co-founders.
It could be the market that you're in.
It could be the phase of life that you're in and the amount of effort that you're willing to put into that thing in order to make it successful.
So there's a bunch of reasons that a company can fail.
And you have to be able to somehow say, I don't know what is the reason.
I'm just going to have to hard reset here.
One thing I would tell founders,
and I tell applied as creating a founder class in itself,
people who work at Applied Intuition are now starting their own companies.
You know, we have 1,000 plus engineers,
and over time they're starting their own firms.
And I say to all of them is,
just imagine the first time you're going to do startup
for the first three years, it's a zero.
Just rid yourself of the expectation
that it's going to be successful
and that you're really, you're a craftsperson,
And if this was a woodworking podcast and you said, you know, the first table that you built was, you know, what was wobbly, you wouldn't say, well, go work at Creighton Barrel.
You'd say, that's the first table.
We're going to keep at it.
Being a founder is its own muscle.
And you want to exercise that muscle.
But I think a lot of founders, especially earlier in their founding career, put such an incredible pressure on themselves to make it great.
out of the gate that they actually miss the thing that you're getting in that first round,
which is learning and building that muscle in the second third time.
And I think it's not random that my third company is the most successful company.
I think that's, I think, and you see that more often than not.
There are funds which are almost exclusively focused on multi-time founders, right, for this reason.
What I love about that advice is often the best ideas come from when you're, you have low
expectations, you're just playing around, you're just tinkering, you're not like, I'm going
to build the next great, I don't know, Google.
It's just you having fun.
And that's like how I found this world that I'm in right now, this path.
And Open Claw is a good example of that.
I think why that advice is so difficult is if you hear this and you're like, you know,
you're in the, you're in the proverbial war.
You're like, what the hell are these people talking about having fun?
This is hard.
And so you have to like hold these contrasting kind of or conflicting views in you had.
which is like, it's deeply very, very important, and you should give it your all, and it's also not that important.
And that's a really hard thing to reconcile and keep in balance.
And the way that you approached this company where you stay quiet, like that, I think helps a lot where you're not.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
It's it.
Like, you know, even like at YC, when I became COO, I told Sam Malm was a president.
And I told Sam, let's not announce this for like a year.
because, you know, if the partners don't want me to be CEO, it's not a successful thing.
I, you know, I don't have the pressure of the public scrutiny that, you know, why were you
CEO only for six months or something like that?
And I think you have to be very honest with yourself as a founder and as a human being,
that those things matter.
What people think about you matter and it impacts yourself.
And having the spotlight on you, you know, I always say it's very easy to pivot before you raise
money and before you have employees. Nobody cares. The moment you raise money and the more importantly,
the moment you hire employees, employees join a very specific mission. And you go and you walk into the
office and there's 10 of them. You say, guys, turns out this isn't wrong. We're going on a different
mission. Imagine if this was war. It's like, what the hell? We're attacking that hill and now we just
say that hill's not important. How do you know the next hill is important? And you as a lead, you lose a lot of
credibility. And it's not only for the superficialness of being a credible leader. It's a practical nature of
when you're very, very public,
the startup becomes your identity.
And then suddenly you're,
you're having to reconcile that actually that thing is not correct.
So it is one of our,
we have these core values in the company.
And early in the company,
you used to have this line which says,
our best work is done alone and quietly.
And I deeply believe that.
And so founders, I would think of it that way.
But it's for pragmatic reasons.
It's not like some just because it's cool to be under the radar.
It's, it's just allows you to maybe work in a bit more peace.
I love these core values you've shared so far.
This is the last one.
The best work is done alone quietly.
I'm so on board with that.
Radical pragmatism is the other one you shared earlier.
Are there, are there a couple more there?
These are, these are gems.
Yeah, we those are like I would say, the, the meta values.
We have very specific, let's say, operating principles.
And this is, this is real, as tactical as advice,
I can give to founders.
So we can,
to come up with your values
when you're getting a little bit of traction.
And the reason I say that is early enough
where you, and the way you come up with the values
is not like, what values should we have
like as philosophers?
No, no.
You should figure out why are we being successful?
Like literally write down the five to ten things
that are the reasons you are being successful.
And those become your values and you kind of re,
and so we did that.
And so our first one was going to speed above everything.
And it was like us being fast.
The second one is like, you know, never disappoint the customer.
Technical mastery, high output matters, like all the way down to like, you know,
ones that are not obvious, like laugh a lot.
That's been our core value from at the beginning of the company's history.
It's like when you're working in intense things, if you don't have the ability to keep grounded,
have perspective, laughter and humor also is a way to get subtle feedback and a slightly different taste than this sucks.
You can say it's not the best.
And that is slightly.
And so you're you're really creating the framework in which people are learning how to behave with each other within the company.
And so today the values really serve us as almost like they're like guiding principles.
And so, you know, we do new team meetings every week, Peter and I will meet all the new team members.
And we're almost always just talking about the values and some level of detail and depth.
Yeah.
Another value, half of the work is follow up.
Like just taking notes and following up.
That is the business.
it's not more complex than that.
Laugh a lot is my new favorite company value.
Yeah.
Sounds like a wonderful place to work.
And on the last piece there,
there's this book that just came out by Stripe Press about maintenance
and how valuable and underappreciated the maintenance part of work is.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
Yeah, I think like if there's a takeaway that you get from,
let's say, a bit of my philosophy on where we started the conversation around like why,
being promotional has all these negative connotations in it.
So I'm careful using that word, but why not be promotional?
It's because there's costs to everything.
And so if you can focus on the craft and making the product really, really good
and really listening to your customers, you have a much higher likelihood of success.
And then you can always then go and scale that.
A part of that is the thing that you're talking about.
maintenance or another version of, you know, my roots are in automotive engineering.
And automotive engineering is actually of exercise and quality.
That's really what it's, you're building these very complex machines at scale.
You know, people talk about rockets being really, very complex.
You only got to send up a rocket, even at the highest capacity, like once every couple of days.
You're making a car every 30 seconds and you have to make it extremely cheap and it's globally
competitive.
So you really get into the nuance and minutia of,
how a factory runs.
And a factory is about safety and maintenance.
There's not a lot of complex things.
It's just,
you know,
it's like when you break down,
what is being operationally,
you know,
strong.
Operational strong is keeping an eye
in a handful of things
and makes you're doing them really,
really good.
And I'm,
I'm one of those believers that,
you know,
there's this adage is a man who cannot command
himself is not fit to command others.
And it's like that maintenance aspect
is a part of that,
right?
It's like, if you maintain yourself and your own work, you maintain your team, you maintain
the company, the products are almost, they come out of all of that system.
And I think a lot of founders don't think about their company as a system or almost as a
machine.
But I would implore you to do that because then you really focus on the craft of the
machine and building the machine and making it more hygienic and making it more well-tuned.
Just like, you know, you'll meet people.
really love cars and they they really obsess about the maintenance of cars, you know, like,
like they will detail like underneath the driver's seat as somebody who details my own
cars.
Like, nobody's going to look at that, but it's under that same ethos of really caring a lot
about the craft and being, and frankly speaking, since you have a limited amount of time,
it's hard to really care about X and also making your, making your company's hygienic.
And there's different reasons at different points of your company that you should do different
things, but that's kind of a little bit of the ethos. I love how it keeps coming back to just
staying quiet, working, just working on the thing and not talking about it. Your point, last point there
makes me think of that the score takes care of itself. Yeah. Yeah, so Joe Montana is actually
one of our investors. In our series D post, the post was the valuation takes care of itself.
Like very much we fall into that category. And it's like, it's like, you know, sometimes people
will come to our office and they'll say, oh, like it's like such a clean office. You guys must have like
this giant cleaning staff.
And it's like, actually, we clean our office.
Just like in Japanese school, as I mentioned, I lived in Japan, like the students
clean their, clean their own schools.
We have a cleaning Zen every week and everyone cleans the area around them.
And I think it's important that, like, there's something about this ethos of like also,
like, not getting so wrapped up in your own narrative of like, I'm a Stanford software
engineer and I do AI.
It's like, clean up your desk.
So there's like some like basic things like that.
And I don't know what that larger philosophy is,
but it is a philosophy that we kind of drive towards.
And I think like, you know,
our claim to fame, which is kind of a crazy, you know,
reality is we've never spent any money we've ever raised.
You know, the history of the company,
which is kind of, it almost sounds like it's made up.
It's an absolute company is almost 10 years old,
you know, 1,000 engineers plus.
And so we're a functioning.
business without using capital that we've raised. And I think it's somehow connected to us cleaning
the office. I don't know how. Because you're saving all these cleaning costs. It all makes sense.
Yeah. Yeah. We still have people clean, but like we also are, like our employees also are aware of
their surroundings. And I think there's a direct line between like be quiet and alone and clean your desk
and well-written software. And I don't know what that thing is, but it's all falls in the same.
arc. I know you also have a no shoe policy for that same reason to think things can. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And it also
influenced Japan. I think the, you know, I worked there and we had a similar office set up. The other,
the other other other way to think about this maybe as again, I'm just trying to impart everything
I've known to founders because I feel like that's my, you know, that's who that's who that
information is so limited and everyone's kind of trying to make it up, frankly speaking. This is the
alpha. Yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly is I would implore you as a founder to really,
really try to take the best of Japan and the best of Germany, the best of China, the best of Detroit,
the best of Silicon Valley.
And, you know, I think sometimes people take that Steve Jobs line and they really, like, you know,
deform it where they say, like, great artist steel.
What he's really talking about is, like, the less magnanimous version of that is be humble
and learn from everything around you and as a leader and be well-rounded.
I think like reading is should be you know I there's a Charlie Munger line where he says I've never met anybody very very successful who doesn't read all the time and I like very much fall into that category as well.
And so if you like unpack why that is like why does reading a physical book make you a better founder?
Like I just like ask that question in the most direct way is I'm not reading you know if you especially my my ethos of reading is read old books.
don't read anything new.
Read old books because time is filtered out a lot of the noise.
So you get a lot of signal.
And in your life, you're going to, a thousand books, maybe you'll read, like in the best case scenario, you're going to read probably 50 to 100 books, which is kind of crazy for the average person.
So you're not going to read many.
So don't read low-quality content.
You read, there are true pillars of kind of human ideas out there.
you consume those ideas and then it's up to you to interpret how those ideas then reflect upon
the business that you're leading or the technology that you're developing. I absolutely believe
reading a book like Malcolm X's autobiography will make you a better founder and it's not,
again, it's like the whole cleaning Zen all the way to clean code. It's not directly one-to-one
related. I think we always want these very simple if-then statements. But I think being a well
founder where you understand society around you and history around you, that somehow makes
you build a better product. I don't know how and how to why, but I think it's absolutely true.
I do see a connection there. And then people like Charlie Munger who are not an AI founder,
obviously also believe that. And I think so there's some pattern there.
Like it's interesting. This is the same. It's a metaphor for LLMs. You feed all his data.
Somehow they become almost conscious. How does that happen? No one fully knows.
It's so interesting how similar you are to Mark Endries and your way of thinking and the way you consume content.
We're both bald.
There's a thread here.
Here's important ingredients to being really successful.
Yeah, I mean, Mark, I mean, you know, we're fortunate enough to choose, you know, our investors.
And that's a true privilege.
I didn't have that.
My first company, we spent years.
We didn't raise a dollar.
So I'd certainly appreciate it.
But, you know, if I've ever had like a mentor, you know, Mark would fall into that.
category. And I think before applied and we debated and talked a lot. And I think Mark is also
like that. He really consumes content actually outside of this little industry that we're in.
And then I think it makes him actually a better investor. Yeah. We'll point people to your website.
You have a list of the books that you recommend and love. And it's very long and very not what you
often see. I can't help but just ask, are there a few books that have most influenced your
think, getting most influenced your life.
Yeah, that list is, like, I've very thoughtful,
been thoughtful about that.
And the reason I use books like, you know,
the autobiography of Malcolm X as an example is,
I know that's not on the top of the list.
Everyone's going to, you know,
if I say high output management, classic Andy Grove,
you know, you guys know that.
So it's like partly is a book here.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
It's like partly the theatrics of also entertaining you,
but also giving you new information as a, as a listener.
I think like a good
the books I'm currently reading
this is kind of a random
you know,
a lot of books like I'm reading
the vibe coding book that came out
that were our whole company's reading that
which is a new book
and it kind of goes against my grain of my heuristic
but the emperor of all maladies
the cancer book
fantastic book I'm almost done with it
like I think it changes the way I think
like you read that and it changes
the way and I think that's the ultimate
test when a piece of material changes your existing framing on life.
This is, this is good.
In the LLM use, this is somehow related in the sense of diverse data makes your understanding
the world more rich and nuanced and therefore it's better.
But yeah, so like I'm always inspired to give like more wacky kind of examples rather
than than the obvious ones.
But the obvious ones that if I really wasn't, wasn't being theatrical, I think Sam Walton's book
Made in America's an unbelievable book. It's very, very good. He wrote it on his deathbed.
You know, My American Journey is also very good. Colm Powell's book. It's not on my website,
but it's, it's really good. You know, I'm somebody who tries to connect some of these dots from
like us being, you know, cave people to now like living in, you know, Silicon Valley working, you
You know, there's a venture-backed AI company founder.
And so books like Guns, Germs and Steel really are top of that list of fantastic, fantastic book or collapse, also same author.
So, yeah, but my point to founders is read the stuff.
You can still go to physical bookstores.
Read the stuff that is both old and well regarded and you know nothing about.
I often, when I'm trying to find the next book to read, like I remember the way I picked up SPT,
QR, which is the book on Roman history, was like, I was like, I don't actually know a lot about
Roman history.
I know the high level stuff.
So like, think about all the ideas in the universe, from philosophy to history to, you know,
Jainism, to the rise of, you know, Japan as a, as a feudal state.
Like areas you don't really know.
And then just find the best book in that space.
And I think you just start filling in the blanks.
And so often I, that's kind of like the way that I grok the ecosystem is like,
What don't I know anything about?
And let me find the best piece of material in that.
And yeah, it doesn't work well.
I like that.
So Mark's philosophy is this barbell strategy of only today news like X and 10 years ago books.
I love that you're like, no, just like upside down to you almost.
Just only.
Yeah.
I mean, you know, Mark was a heavy influence in me getting on X.
So, you know, he's, he's propagated that.
That view.
The thing that I really do agree with him is as our company becomes a larger, more influential
and impactful company of society, it is my responsibility as a co-founder of the company and the
CEO of the company to at least propagate my ideas to our first AI founder community and then
larger the technology leadership and then the world writ large.
And so that's part of it.
I think in that way Mark is, Mark has really taken it.
You know, you think about VCs, not long ago, you would never even know who their names are.
Yeah.
I mean, they were like this, they were like, you know, they're like PE guys or, or, you know, hedge fund managers.
You can't even think of names.
They're like, they're just blobs of ominous sounding, you know, obsidian corporation or something like that.
And it's only A16Z and a couple of other folks, John Doar, who really kind of created the, hey, I'm going to be the indifference.
individual investor and I'm going to propagate a certain set of ideas and that's going to create
gravity within Silicon Valley's and influence founders to then make certain types of companies and
of course they invest in those. On this thread about reading to find almost areas you disagree and
don't, you know, haven't thought about. I know one of your approaches to management and one that may be
a value is to encourage your leaders to listen to naysayers to not create this positive reinforcement cycle.
talk about why that's important, how you operationalize that.
So imagine, you know, I'm not the founder of the company.
Peter's not the co-founder of the, it's just a generic company.
The ideal situation where the generic company is one that you can put in lots of different
competing ideas.
The culture is one where you will shake those ideas out.
There's not an emotion in it.
Whoever brings the idea, the best, best idea wins.
So why can't companies do that?
Frankly speaking, a lot of times it's the founders.
And the founders are told by popular media
and the way that human beings experience life
and our tribal kind of outlook
that you have to have this hard view.
And everyone has said, if they're not following you,
then maybe you're a weak leader or something like that.
And I think we just don't believe that.
We don't just believe in that philosophy.
And I think we believe maybe a more tactical
way of saying that is we take inputs of the environment, our customers, specifically, our employees,
our competitors, of our investors, and we, of what's happening in society at large, and that
impacts our strategy. And, and I think it's one of the reasons we've been very, very successful.
We're not, we're not so arrogant to think that we just have the answers because we had the
ambition to start a company. And I think that permeates into a very specific culture.
And I think the culture that we've built is one. It's also not being.
contrarian for contrarian's sake.
One view I do have is emotions are generally
not helpful in making rational decisions.
They're almost like the opposite of it.
And sometimes passion and, you know,
leadership are supposed to be about, you know,
they're supposed to be like, again, magnanimous or emotional.
And we just don't believe that.
And that's, I think, a bit more of our kind of Midwest,
you know, you know, roots showing for Peter and I,
And so I think it's not that we say, hey, disagree with everything in the room.
What we specifically say is speak up, speak up.
Everyone has to speak up because that one person with their one experience because they worked at, you know, Zooks or Waymo or wherever Tesla or they worked at a Chinese company, whatever it is, that one idea they have in their head when the debate is happening about what we should do in, you know, in space, like literally the space of space.
and and something maybe we don't know much about that one person's one idea they have to feel
comfortable sharing it even if they're the most junior person or they feel that they didn't get
their way in the last debate or they feel you know whatever whatever anxiety that they might have
they have to share that opinion that guys this is actually the right idea or this is the wrong
idea and if you can create that environment where the best idea wins you know Gandhi has this
line truth is what stands the test of time we're trying you know and I think there's become a little
bit of a meme in the Bay Area, like truth seeking, you know, as a culture. But it kind of is like
that. We're trying to find the best idea. Maybe truth is the wrong word. Maybe it's the best
idea. Find the best idea and then let's go full bore against the best idea. Let's maybe use a
counterfactual. Why do companies fail when they have great talent and they have, you know,
seemingly all the same components that an applied intuition have? It's because maybe the best ideas
they're not being surfaced and certainly maybe they're not actually being adopted. Or more often
than not, when I think about companies that have been very successful, is they have momentum going
in a specific direction. And that momentum over, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that, that's
emerging. Hey, the market's changing. The market's changing. You just can't even hear that,
because there's all this is a momentum going in a particular direction. A good example, I had front row seats for
this. When I worked at Google,
It was the era where Facebook was emerging.
And here was Google.
And people don't remember Google in the late double-Os and early teens.
Google wasn't just a company.
It was the apex predator of Silicon Valley.
Apple was just, you know, the MacBook Air had just come out.
Steve Jobs was getting in the right direction, but nothing like Apple is today.
Amazon, AWS was still a young thing.
InVideo was teetering off of bankruptcy.
I mean, all these.
giant companies that you think of Microsoft was run by Balmer, you know, Twitter was a small thing.
And then you, so it wasn't, it was in it, but Google was this already larger than life,
number one company. Everybody wanted to work at Google. And there was, there were not many
companies with that stature. And then in the periphery, this little company, Facebook starts
emerging. And Google, who has the best engineers on the planet, is making a billion in cash flow
a month, tries to fight this little company that, and I remember Facebook at that time,
maybe had a thousand people and Google was like you know 15x 20x to size with a lot of cash flow
and why couldn't Google fight Facebook it's because Google is not Facebook it's like the
confucian saying like how does a gorilla learn how to fly by not being a gorilla the way that
Google would have won the social media wars by being a social media company it's just fundamentally
not and so the large this happens in companies all the time which is you're just going in
one direction with momentum consciously or unconscious because that's where all the employees are.
That's what the culture is. That's what they work on. And then something changes in the market.
And you just can't even even move there. And I think that also can happen on character or surprisingly
at really small companies. So where founders have a view and it's like that view is the view it's
going to be. And actually that can be just 10 degrees off from what is the was the correct path.
And the whole company is kind of led us straight. So they were in the right market.
They might even have been solving the right problem, but they were just a little off.
And so we're so scared of failing and so scared of losing that I will humble myself and listen to other people.
And they say, hey, we're five degrees off course here.
And it's like, okay, let's maybe fix the course.
And then once that becomes your culture, then it's really hard to lose.
Because everybody's not about fulfilling a preset path.
They're just about finding the, you know, how to win.
this is exactly what I wanted to ask about. Everyone listening to this either is like, oh yeah, we're very open-minded. We're absolutely going to listen to everyone's opinions and decide rationally the right path in practice. Almost never happens. Right. Or they're just like, we're just, we know we're not good at this. We're just like too nice to each other. How do you do this at a company that isn't good at this? Is it like, does it have to be the CEO top down in your experiences that have to be part of the culture? How do you operationalize at a company that's not like you?
you know the the middle way is
typically the right way and it's it's hard
to find the middle way because these are
conflicting ideas. The
the guardrails or the flag the post you just
set. One side is like we're just going to go
on the other side is we're too you know maybe like almost like
unsure and you have to somehow
once you do make that have that debate you have to
then confidently walk down that path and again this is
conflicting. I just said be humble
enough to listen to what's going on, but then once that decision is made, the decisive,
in our values, that first value, the speed value, which is specifically the wording is
move fast, move safe, that's specifically the wording. We assess our managers on adherence
of those values. Literally, we compensate and promote against those values. They're not just like
abstract values. So the behavior we're actually looking at under speed is decisiveness. So we're
setting up a system that is looking at, you know,
you know, these conflicting kind of things.
One is like be open and the other ones make decisions quickly.
And you have to hold those intention.
This is why you as the co-founder or founder of the company get paid the big bucks.
You got to do that.
You have to know when to bluff and when to hold them and, you know, when to fold them.
So at some point, and that point comes sometimes faster than you think, you will not get any more information.
You have to make a decision.
So you're walking this very, very thin line.
Your point about emotions was extremely interesting.
And I want to make sure people don't take away the wrong takeaway here.
So what I actually found really helpful, which I think is aligned with what you were suggesting, is taking emotions out of it.
The way I've used this in my work is when you have to make a hard decision, pretend nobody's feelings would be hurt and emotions are not involved.
What would you do if nobody cared if they're like totally great?
So what would you do in that world?
And then that tells you, okay, that's actually the right thing to do.
And then it's, okay, how do I help people feel okay about this?
How do I deal with the downsides of this path?
Yeah, I think that's the obvious version of it.
I think maybe another version of thinking is it's an emotion is, let's take another.
You as the leader or as the engineer who is getting direction, you already have some preset view that this is my idea.
that's an emotional, you know, that's an emotional construct.
And it's, it's around ownership and feeling of ownership.
So, yeah, I'm, I really fall into that category of like the more.
So like, even maybe most fundamentally, like, what is an emotion?
An emotion is like these set of reactions that have been, that a framework that's been
imparted in your brain through life experiences.
And those life experiences might not actually make you optimize, they've not been optimized for
you to make a decision in a product review.
And so the more you can pull that away, a good heuristic would be the same decision being
made by multiple people in the company gets the same result.
So you're removing a little bit of that almost like filter.
You can almost think of that emotion as like a filter.
So I like to have the raw image come through, the raw decision come through, so we can
consistently classify it again and again, not to get too abstract, but on a,
that makes sense. Yeah, it makes sense. And I have one last question, but there's an interesting
trend I've noticed with people talking about AGI. The missing piece I've been hearing more and more
is just emotions are what creates consciousness potentially. Michael Paulin has a new book out
about consciousness and his take is it's not just more intelligence. It's actually emotions
that led to the consciousness. I think it's it's under, let's say undermining
how complex human thought is to think that it's just the, let's say, the inputs and outputs of,
or let's say, association for the lack of better word, of ideas, facts, words, letters.
It's not just as associations.
And creativity is kind of a little bit of that as well.
Like the old saying of like technical mastery is mastering the complex.
And I think computers do that really well.
and creativity is mastering the simple.
I'm sure I'm going to eat my words on this
as like the best artist in like three years.
That will be.
It will be.
Yeah, yeah.
And so I think, and this again goes back to my philosophy
of like consume broad, you know, broad inputs,
but then try to remove that filter,
see things as honestly as they possibly can,
create a culture in the company that is also similar
and doesn't put any weight on who the idea came from
or where it came from, but then ultimately as a leader, you decide.
And by the way, you got to be right.
Like, that's the other thing.
I think a lot of founders just were not, we don't emphasize enough.
Founders love to take credit for things.
It's just human nature.
Everybody does.
But the reality is you have to be right.
It's not enough to just start a company.
It's not enough to, you know, have this vision of the world.
You have to be right.
And the evidence is, is the company a sustainable,
standalone business because we're talking specifically about, you know, venture-backed AI companies in Silicon
Valley. All of my, but I should have said this at the beginning, all of my, you know, all my
advice is specifically for that narrow group, which is founders of AI venture-backed companies in the Bay Area.
Speaking of that, last question, I've been wanting to get to this because it's an interesting,
spicy take that you have as the last question. I know you have to run after this. You have this view
that a lot of CEOs in Silicon Valley don't actually have great taste. I'm excited to hear your experience
there and just what you're saying. Yeah, I also want to be careful to imply that I do. I follow into that
group. I think, you know, the, it is true because a lot of times, a couple of reasons. Both, both taste
in the most, let's say, you know, artistic sense and in the most specific, like running a company and like what should be the policy, like HR policy for being a point X.
a lot of that is I think they're just not exposed to a lot of interesting good things.
And that's been a theme in this whole conversation is like just get more and more exposure.
It's very unfortunate when I meet somebody who, and I'm not thinking of anyone in particular.
So if this is you and you're one of my friends, I apologize.
I'm not talking about you.
But it's like, you know, you grow up in Cupertino, you go to Berkeley and you start.
And the first thing you do when you come out of school is you start a company and then that's all you do, you know, for 20.
Like, you've never even been an employee.
And why I think that's so important.
Like, I spent over a decade working in large organizations and, like, truly large,
like more than 100,000 employees, like a General Motors or like a Bosch.
And when you're in the, you know, the back alley of that organization, the bowels of those organizations,
you learn how bad it is to be an employee.
Like the bureaucracy above you, leadership doesn't know what's going on, the industry, you know,
your antiquated tools, all this stuff.
Why that's so important to experience as an individual is then when you become a leader,
you're making policies and you're creating culture and you have to keep that in mind.
And a bunch of founders, we just never had the, frankly, the fortune of being at the bottom of the totem pole.
And that's just one version of how to, you know, that doesn't obviously seem like, you know,
read, you know, consume the photos of Bresson or, you know, Picasso or whoever it might be.
But it's something similar.
There's something similar about, you can sometimes meet founders and maybe a good heuristic here is like,
there's some founders that would be good at lots and lots of things, actually not just being
a founder of an AI company in the Bay Area.
And there's something about taste there.
Because you're really what you're talking about is like understanding humans and
understanding life and then being able to discern with some judgment what is good and what's not good
because that's really what we're talking about. And so if your life experience is very narrow,
you could still be good and you might have the ability to discern what's good and what's,
what's not good. But I think like there's something about like, if you've backpacked for a few years
around the world, I somehow believe that's going to be a better founder. It's like, you know,
I don't know how I can, there's no peer reviewed research that can, that I can point to that
says that.
So I think that's what I'm getting at.
There is some developing of taste.
Yeah.
Well, I feel like we have helped people build their taste, build, feed their model with more
insights and different perspectives in this conversation.
I feel like we could chat for hours, but I know get a run.
Yeah, I'm not sure if there were any real takeaways other than that.
Okay.
We really, we really went everywhere.
I'm sorry if you had a particular line of questions you want.
wanted to go down. We went in all the perfect directions. Okay, good, good. Kassar, thank you so much
for doing this. Thank you so much for being here. Final question, just where can folks finding
online? How can listeners be useful to you? That's a great question. I mean, I love to hear what are books
that I don't know. So that's always good. Some of my favorite books have been just randomly
kind of recommended to me. So I'll take that. Of course, I consume, you know, research as well. And
So if there's something particularly novel that's going on, obviously all the mainstream stuff we as a company and me as an individual are going to consume, but things that are a bit off the beaten path, we're always looking for that.
But yeah.
And then if you if you have a particular opinion about specifically our domain, physical AI and how AI is going to impact minds, farms, you know, construction sites, robotax, all of that stuff.
I'm always interested in here, new opinions on that, or even old opinions maybe with a different viewpoint.
So, yeah, if you see me, you can see me online.
Of course, I'm always around as well.
I'm always open to that feedback.
And you're on Twitter now.
There you go.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, follow me there.
Yeah, exactly.
That's the answer.
That's the call to action.
channeling my inner mark.
There you go.
Kasser, thank you so much for doing this for being here.
Yeah, thanks for having me.
It was a lot of fun.
everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating
or leaving a review, as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past
episodes or learn more about the show at Lenny's Podcast.com. See you in the next episode.
