Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth - Unconventional product lessons from Binance, N26, Google, more | Mayur Kamat (CPO at N26, ex-Binance Head of Product)

Episode Date: May 22, 2025

Mayur Kamat is the chief product officer at N26—a $9 billion neobank serving over 7 million customers in 25 countries—where he leads product, design, data, and research. Prior to N26, Mayur was Head of Product at Binance, growing the crypto exchange to a peak $400 billion valuation. Earlier in his career, he built and scaled products at Google (Gmail Mobile, Hangouts), Microsoft, and travel unicorn Agoda.Learn:1. How to find and focus on the highest-leverage problems2. Why you shouldn’t optimize for compensation early in your career3. Why you should optimize for strengths, not weaknesses4. Why you need to decide if you truly want the C-suite path5. Why working at a fintech company creates exceptional PMs6. Strategy = hypothesis × experimentation velocity7. Small, fast wins compound faster than big, slow bets—Brought to you by:• WorkOS—Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs• Paragon—Ship every SaaS integration your customers want• Vanta—Automate compliance. Simplify security.—Where to find Mayur Kamat:• X: https://x.com/5degreez• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mayur/—Where to find Lenny:• Newsletter: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com• X: https://twitter.com/lennysan• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lennyrachitsky/—In this episode, we cover:(00:00) Introduction and Mayur’s background(04:49) Working at Binance: An inside look(18:18) Career advice for product managers(27:00) PM career paths(33:58) Understanding fintech customers(36:00) Understanding your strengths(44:46) Creating a culture of experimentation(51:14) Hiring and developing top talent(54:50) Building a diverse product portfolio(57:08) Working in high talent density areas(59:43) Personal and professional balance(01:06:32) High-leverage opportunities and decision making(01:14:28) AI tools in the workplace(01:19:14) Failure corner(01:25:11) Lightning round and final thoughts—Referenced:• Binance: https://www.binance.us/• Google: https://about.google/• Microsoft: https://www.microsoft.com/• Agoda: https://www.agoda.com• N26: https://n26.com/• Which companies accelerate PM careers most: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/which-companies-accelerate-your-pm• Which companies produce the best product managers: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/which-companies-produce-the-best• Bezos Says Work-Life Balance is a “Debilitating” Phrase: https://www.investopedia.com/news/bezos-says-worklife-balance-debilitating-phrase/• Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html• PayPal Mafia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PayPal_Mafia• Changpeng Zhao on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cpzhao/• Ray Dalio on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/raydalio/• Porter’s five forces: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter%27s_five_forces_analysis• Jonathan Rosenberg on X: https://x.com/jjrosenberg• Aura: https://buy.aura.com/• Intercom: https://www.intercom.com/• Palantir: https://www.palantir.com/• Revolut: https://www.revolut.com/• Chime: https://www.chime.com/• Stripe: https://stripe.com/• Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/• Alex Algard on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexalgard• Hiya: https://www.hiya.com/• Brian Chesky’s new playbook: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/brian-cheskys-contrarian-approach• Gemini: https://gemini.google.com/app• Writer: https://writer.com/• Google Hangouts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Hangouts• Sundar Pichai on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sundarpichai/• Google Meet: https://meet.google.com/landing• House on Hulu: https://www.hulu.com/series/ef39603f-eb90-4248-8237-f6168d7c1be1• Big Bang Theory on Hulu: https://www.hulu.com/series/9bde5aeb-5297-4290-b173-19a4d59cc11d• Adolescence on Netflix: https://www.netflix.com/title/81756069• The White Lotus on HBO: https://www.hbo.com/the-white-lotus• Robinhood: https://robinhood.com/us/en/• Nikita Bier’s post on X about Bible Chat: https://x.com/nikitabier/status/1915252215507210349• Bible Chat: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/bible-chat-daily-devotional/id6448849666?mt=8• Suno: https://suno.com/home• Disfrutar: https://www.disfrutarbarcelona.com/—Recommended books:• StrengthsFinder 2.0: https://www.amazon.com/StrengthsFinder-2-0-Tom-Rath/dp/159562015X• The 5 Types of Wealth: A Transformative Guide to Design Your Dream Life: https://www.amazon.com/Types-Wealth-Transformative-Guide-Design/dp/059372318X—Production and marketing by https://penname.co/. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email [e-mail].—Lenny may be an investor in the companies discussed. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lennysnewsletter.com/subscribe

My probably most spectacular failure was I was the first PM on Hangouts. We had thousands of people working for me. We had entire power of Google. We had Larry literally sitting with us saying we can do anything. We want Chrome to do. And we still didn't manage to build a great messaging product. The main kind of learnings from that is don't take on projects that are going to be six months a year. Because you just generally don't have control over the macro.

The challenge with being a product manager is everybody thinks they can do. their job. Anybody who uses the product thinks they have ideas. So at some point in time, you're like, what is my discipline? Like, what is my science? The moment you build experimentation, you're now made it scientific. A lot of new people in their career like, oh, I just want to think about strategy. I'm going to think about the big picture. Strategy is a little bit overrated for product. For most product managers, your strategy should be how fast can I go from hypothesis to data. Today, my guest is Mayor Comet. Mayor is chief product officer at N26, one of the most successful fintech startups in the world, and which in my research came in amongst the top five companies in

in the world who are hiring and producing the best product managers. Prior to N26, Mayur was global head of product at Binance, VP of product at Agoda, which is over a hundred billion dollar company based in Thailand, and a PM at Google and Microsoft. In our wide-ranging conversation, Mayur shares what he's learned about hiring and developing great product managers, what he learned from his time working at finance, which, as you'll soon hear, was one of the wildest and most unique ways of working. What he learned from the failure of Google's early attempts at hangouts, where he was the first PM? Also, the pros and cons of working in Asia versus Europe versus the U.S. and why you should be starting your career on the west coast of the U.S. Also why

comp early in your career does not matter. And so much more. This episode is so full of golden nuggets and advice for product people throughout every stage of their career. If you enjoy this podcast, don't forget to subscribe and follow it in your favorite podcasting app or YouTube. Also, if you become an annual subscriber of my newsletter. You get a year free of a bunch of amazing products including superhuman, Notion, linear perplexity, granola, and more. Check it out at lenny's newsletter.com and click bundle. With that, I bring you Mayur comment. This episode is brought to you by WorkOS. If you're building a SaaS app, at some point, your customers will start asking for enterprise features like Samo authentication and skim provisioning. That's where WorkOS comes in, making it

fast and painless to add enterprise features to your app. Their APIs are easy to understand so that you can ship quickly and get back to building other features. Today, hundreds of companies are already powered by WorkOS, including ones you probably know, like Vercell, Webflow, and Loom. WorkOS also recently acquired Warrant, the Fine Grain Authorization Service. Warrant's product is based on a groundbreaking authorization system called Zanzibar, which was originally designed for Google

to power Google Docs and YouTube. This enables fast authorization checks at enormous scale while maintaining a flexible model that can be adapted to even the most complex use cases. If you're currently looking to build role-based access control or other enterprise features like single sign-on, skim, or user management,

you should consider WorkOS. It's a drop-in replacement for AuthZero and supports up to 1 million monthly active users for free. Check it out. at Workos.com to learn more. That's WorkOS.com. Many of you are building AI products,

which is why I'm very excited to chat with Brandon Fu, founder and CEO of Paragon. Hey Brandon. Hey, Lenny. Thanks for having me. So integrations have become a big deal for AI products. Why is that? Integrations are mission critical for AI for two reasons.

First, AI products need contacts from their customers' business data, such as Google Drive files, Slack messages, or CRM records. Second, for AI products to automate work on behalf of users, AI agents need to be able to take action across these different third-party tools. So where does Paragon fit into all this? Well, these integrations are a pain to build, and that's why Paragon provides an embedded platform that enables engineers to ship these product integrations in just days instead of months, across every use case, from rag data ingestion to agentic actions. And I know from first-hand experience that maintenance is even harder than just building it for the first time. Exactly. We believe product teams should focus engineering efforts and competitive advantages, not integrations.

That's why companies like U.com, AI21, and hundreds of others use Paragon to accelerate their integration strategy. If you want to avoid wasting months of engineering on integrations that your customers need, check out Paragon at useparagon.com slash Lenny. Mayor, thank you so much for being here and welcome to the podcast. Thank you. This is super exciting. Thank you for having me. I want to start with your time at Binance. So you've worked at Google, you worked at Microsoft, you worked at a company called Goda, now you're at N26.

I imagine Binance was the most unique place that you've worked at. And I've also never heard much about what it's like to work at a company like Binance. I was just looking them up on Wikipedia. I saw they started in China, they moved to Japan, they moved to Malta, and now they have no official headquarters. What was it just like working at Binance? How was it most unique from other places you've worked?

Yeah, so really just a background for Binance, because I think a lot of people have heard it, some in positive connotations, some not so much. The scale of Binance is pretty mind-boggling. So just to give the history, they started in 2017 as a crypto exchange, when there were other crypto exchange on the market for years, and within six months, they became number one.

So that's unprecedented. That's like launching a search engine today, and then six months later beating Google. And then they went within five years to at a peak valuation of somewhere like 400 billion or so with 2,000 employees. Right. So that's zero to 400 billion in five years.

So it's at the scale that's never been done before. Like Google couldn't do it, Facebook, none of the names that you hear it. And so it's remarkable. When I was there as the head of product, my KPI, my top line KPI was the trading, volume and my monthly KPI was in trillions of dollars. So that's just the scale was mind boggling.

We had teams of 10, 20 people running multi-billion dollar profit businesses. And that brings it with it like a first like, how did they do that to that scale and to what kind of culture requires to keep that running. Both are very fascinating. I think we could we could spend a lot of time talking about it. But the truly interesting thing, the first one is you can't do this by having a traditional log structure. So CZ, the founder and CEO, at one point had like 55 direct reports, and his direct reports

had about the similar ones. So for a large portion of the history of the company, there was just one level between the individual employees and the CEO. And that leads to like an extreme level of decision making and execution. You cannot have one-on-ones when you have 55 direct reports. So there's a culture of one to many and doing that as often as possible. So the leadership team, for example, met every day. And because the leadership team was spread across the world,

we met at like 11 p.m. when I was in Singapore every day. That includes the weekends, holidays. Like the leadership team was there 11 p.m. every single day, which meant that none of the decisions were blocked for more than 24 hours. And most of them we made it on chat even within those 24 hours. But if there was something big, it was escalated, decided. We executed largely based on this concept that I now take with me. I call it the running products via a daily meeting.

So we would pick an owner for something really urgent at the nightly leadership call. And then that owner would be expected to have like all hands on deck for however long that problem is. every single day and then report the updates on the daily call. And some of these were like really massive topics. Like how do we get 15 financial licenses in 15 countries in the next three months? So it wouldn't be at a scale that was like over. 24 hours. Yes.

And people did it. Like it's extremely interesting to see that when you have really smart people, you give them really hard problems. you have no constraints on what can you need to solve them, whether it's money, people, except time. Time is always at a premium. People can move mountains in small amount of time. And that extreme ownership, culture, I think probably was the most fascinating part of working at Vynans that I've now tried to take some good parts of it in terms of attention to detail, being able to pick. certain areas that own it

irrespective of what your title is and how many people report to you. There are certain downsides in terms of the amount of randomization that it can cause teams, especially if it's not super well thought through. So I'm trying to see what are the great parts of that

that I can bring to different roles. But that concept of daily meeting, if there's something super urgent, how can you own it directly and run it yourself where you are in the details? So your team knows that you, need to be in the details and then then be able to execute that. So that's probably the most

fascinating. There's several war stories. I was there for two years and the the amount of interesting stories that happened during that time is a lot. But then maybe we can, I can follow up later for your specific questions. I would love to hear a war story. This is definitely as interesting as I was expecting it to be. So just what I'm hearing so far is just things that worked well for them to operate at this insane pace and scale. is the entire leadership team meeting every single day, 11 p.m. your time, hopefully better times for other folks around the world. Well, there's some people in Sydney, Australia, so it was 1 a.m. for them.

This idea of a flat structure, yeah, it's interesting because I imagine that's not necessarily great for other reasons. And then this idea of being in the details. Let me ask about that, actually. What does that actually look like? Because I think a lot of people, a lot of leaders are like, oh, yeah, I'm in the details. We should be in the details. What does it actually look like in real life at finance?

So let me get an example. So one of the areas, when I joined, one of the biggest kind of product problem we had was like crypto before was fairly unregulated. So you could just sign up with an email address or even just a wallet and start trading. Like there was almost zero friction. And then it suddenly became regulated where you had to almost have a full KYC flow like a bank. And that just meant that the conversion rate dropped from, let's say, 100% to like 2%.

And now we had to solve this problem. This was the daily meeting level problem. And it's okay if you're operating in one country. You can do it easily. If you're operating in 200 countries where there's not even a standard for what a document acceptance criteria might look like, now you have a significantly larger problem. You cannot say let's work with the K-YC vendor and do the onboarding.

So we would need to, we had to literally have, have the top 50 countries, the top 10 document types. So there's this spreadsheet of basically 500 cells, the conversion rate at each level. And then we are looking at, okay, a passport in Kazakhstan has very low level of conversion. What can we do about that? Do we need a new vendor?

Do we need better imaging technology? Do we need a new SDK from a vendor? And then we go sell by cell based on So let's say, if I was running a typical product team, I would say, okay, let's just look at maybe the top 90 percentile of our users. But this was Binance, and then CZ's like, no user left behind. Even that one user in Congo is important because this is financial inclusion for them. So then all of those 500 sales matter, no matter how low their impact to the conversion rate. So that's a little bit of balance flavor there.

It's extreme customer focus, and it doesn't really matter. It's not that customers are not a number. It's a person at the end of the screen, and we care about them. So you would need to know, like, hey, well, you would get question that, like, why is the driver's license acceptance rate in Kenya falling suddenly? Right. So when you have, and that's just one piece of the problem in a large product with like 80 different products. Right. So you would, of course, cannot do it for every single product.

But the concept of like, what is the most leveraged decision? you could be working on right now. And if it is for your growth, it's the onboarding, then you better know exact every single screen of the flow. Why is there a drop-off and what are your teams doing for it? So that level of detail. And you just do it on different products at different parts of your journey.

I imagine there's people listening where there, there's the team responsible for the onboarding flow and the KYC flow of their product. And it's like so hard. They're like, oh, there's all these problems with our flow. Imagine that for like 100 different versions of the flow across 100 different countries and good God. And documents.

So it gets very tricky. It gets very tricky. But we also had resources. At one point in time, we said, we had like a team of 20 people working on KYC. And we said for the next three months, we won 500. Which has its own downsides too. Has its downside.

But if you're running in this kind of, of extreme mode and you're less not as worried about just the team stress and personal development aspects of it. We're just purely looking at the execution of the product. This is a surprising amount of power that comes with it. This was probably a second time in my career where I had that, wow, you can do this. Because in other companies, it would take years to do it. The first one was just going back at Google.

I remember I joined Google. It was my first day at onboarding, and I was the product manager for Gmail, for mobile, for sync. And I was in my onboarding meeting when they pulled me out and said, hey, we have an issue. The service is down, and Wall Street Journal is writing an article that Google, Microsoft, Apple not working together, causing the service to go down.

So we need you in this war room right now. And it was a bug in iOS 4, this is a long time ago, which caused every single user to pull the entire Gmail inbox, re-sync the whole inbox. So the bug on the Apple side is going to take two, three weeks to fix. And it was causing like a thousand X load to our servers. And I remember calling Ouse, who was the head of infrastructure at Google, and he's like, sure, he slipped a button, and there were 1,000x servers

that showed up for the next two weeks. and I was like, wow, that is scale. This was my second time kind of feeling that wow moment. Like, oh, we just put 500 people and solve the problem. It's less about having the 500 people and being able to maneuver them that quickly. I don't think I've been able to do that at any other company. To close kind of the loop on some of these sort of radical ways of working, this idea of 50 reports per person and this idea of caring about a person in Congo not being able to sign up,

Do you think that's a good idea? Do you take those in the way you work now, or is it just in this particular situation? It's important. Other places, maybe not. There are several preconditions. One is you're growing really fast. So the growth for the employees comes just from seeing problems at scale

that are growing every day, that it needs less of a manager's attention to figure out what you need to grow. And the best way to grow in general is that you work at a really fast-growing company. Right. So if that's true, two, people are extremely well compensated. So they care about the KPI's more than they care about what's the next stage in my career and how do I get promoted. Because, I mean, our bonus structure went from like 0% to like 500%.

Right. So a lot of people didn't really care getting a 10% 20% period. They should want to do incredible work because they know they would be taken care of. And three, there's like some, it's a mission-driven company. You still believe at the end of the day that you're doing this just beyond the KPI. So at Bina, there was a very strong belief that, hey, 80% of the world doesn't have access to financial tools. They don't even have an access to currency that they can trust. And when we see, look at like live in Europe or in U.S. and we think about crypto, it's largely about speculation or Bitcoin. For most of the world, they just need access to a U.S. dollars.

stable coin, right? And just knowing that my currency is not getting kind of de-inflated because of things beyond my control. So everyone having come from these kind of, a lot of our employees across all these countries, they had a very strong mission, believe that what we are doing will truly empower billions of people. And there's, there's a power in that. Like, a lot of people, like, go through, like, hey, I'm going to move mountains because it's not just about the money, it's just not about my career. It's about doing something that will change the world. Let's follow this thread on accelerating your career and talk about where you're at today in 26. So as you know, I've been doing a bunch of research on which companies hire and produce the best product managers.

I've done a couple passes at this. And N26 has come up in the top five of both ways of approaching this. So essentially which companies alumni go on to do the best in their career. N26 as way up there. I want to come at this from a couple directions. One is what N26 as a company does to hire and incubate the best people, but also just you personally, what your advice is to people and how you help them become great PMs. So let's actually start in that second bucket. What is the most kind of common and most impactful career advice that you share with product managers that you manage that you find most helps them move ahead in their career and get unstuck in their career? I think the number one thing I shared before the,

The best thing you can do is find companies that are growing fast. Because it kind of compounds your learning at a much faster interval. Just the basic compound interest formula, right? Even if your interest rate is low, if you're compounding daily versus compounding yearly, after two years you would be at a whole different stage at the end point. Companies that are growing fast just lets you get that learning much, much quicker. I remember joining Microsoft first in my career. Some of the products I worked on during my internship had not shipped till I left Microsoft

three, four years later. That's a very low rate of compounding. And Microsoft's a whole different company now, 20 years later, thankfully. Then you contrast that something like Binance where every day or every hour, every minute you're shipping something and learning from it. So the faster you can compound your learning, the faster you will grow. The second piece generally is like if you need to be. to optimize for what you're great at. And now after having two kids, I'm like fairly in the fact

that your strengths kind of get defined very, very early. I'm looking at my nine-year-old and 12-year-old, and they have a whole different set of strengths. So if you're like 25 years old early in your career, it's very hard at that point to say, oh, here are all my weaknesses, and I need to improve on those. A lot of the career feedback typically tends to be around. Like, hey, here are the things you need to be better at. Why don't you do more of that stuff? Formally in the camp that you need to know what you're great at, what are your superpowers,

and you need to find jobs where success is determined by how much of that superpowers you get to use. And early in your career, you can't get away with the fact that there's some stuff you're not going to be great at and you just have to manage around it. If you get higher up in your career, then it gets easier because you can, to build a team that complements your strengths.

But again, if you're early in the career, find places that if you're a great kind of creative person, if you can look at a product and think of 100 things, you can do better. You're always about what's the next best thing and how quickly can I implement it. You need to be working in teams that have a high experimentation culture. You need to be working in growth teams in large companies. if you work at in a fintech company on a compliance side project or launching like a new business vertical, you're going to struggle. Right. On the same time, if you have like extreme management, like structured thinking, you have great stakeholder management, you have high EQ.

You should work in teams where there is a large amount of complex people management and process management. You would struggle in a kind of a growth team where the expectation is you're doing things really quickly. So I would look at, like, first, like, very introspectively, what are my true strengths? What do I? And then look at jobs where that has a much higher profile of winning. And thirdly, like, largely, I would say, do not optimize for compensation, especially early in your career. If you're truly on a track to become, like, an executive someday or found your own company

and make it successful, you will find the. the compensation is so much backloaded that you would make 90% of your compensation in the last five years of your career. So optimizing for 10%, 20% early in your career. So if you have two jobs and I would like rank in your first 15 years of your career, I would say do not look at the compensation. And then the last one, this was kind of strange. Like I never thought about this longer. But now I think it's probably the most interesting advice. I can give people is determine very early in your career if you truly want to be a C-level someday. You want to be an executive someday.

Because it's almost like if you're ambitious and successful, you enter product management, you're in like top of your, it's almost like an expectation of you that you would become that. And you'd never really challenge or question yourself. Like, is this the thing that needs me that I need to do to get there? Is there something I'm going to truly enjoy? are not just the destination, but the process to get there. And a lot of people think that, and they make suboptimal decisions based on that. There's like incredible careers you can build and incredible lives that you can live

by just being great at what you do, doing more of that stuff, and you end your career, maybe as a director, maybe as a group product manager. But throughout the stuff, you have like built a holistic life that's, doesn't revolve around your work and gives incredible meaning to you. Or you can be saying, you know what? Work is a huge part of my identity. Somebody asks me what wakes me up in the morning and what gives me that energy. It's my work.

I can't separate my identity from your work. Then maybe you should pursue that C-level path because it will truly be fulfilling and you would be able to make those challenges and sacrifices that are going to be asked for you to make that. So if you can calibrate that early and have that true conversation, with yourself, like, yes, I want to go down that path and I want to do, you would make different career choices. And in that path, I would definitely say, don't look at compensation. There are two jobs, look at the three things. Is it going to give me high compounding of learning? Is it high overlap with my strengths? And is it, I'm going to have a lot of fun doing it? Because if you have fun doing

it, then it becomes a virtuous cycle and you do more of it and you're great at it. On the question of, do you want, decide if you want to be a CPO, essentially, is The implication there is, if you do, that's like a big sacrifice, you're going to be stressed, work-life balance is worse? Is that the kind of the core question? No, no, no, no, absolutely not. Absolutely. It's like, if you truly enjoy your work and what you're doing, it won't feel like a sacrifice. When you're constantly, when you look at a new product, you're walking down the street, you see a new product, you're on the app store, you see a new product, and you're like, oh, this is cool, oh, look how they're doing the onboarding, oh, look how the app store

entry looks back. If that truly fills you up, it fills your cup, right? Like every moment you're looking at why things can be better, how you can be better, how a certain thing, you would be, the sacrifice will not feel like sacrifices. It would not feel like you're working long hours. You'd not feel like, hey, when you're talking to PMs and giving them some guidances, when you're building things, when you're recruiting new people, all that stuff feels, it like feels your cup, right? It doesn't drain it. And then you would have incredible fun on the journey. So it's less about that your sacrifices or work-life balance. The moment you start having those conversations, you are probably not on that track.

Like you should not be on that track. Because the moment the word work-life balance comes, I think Jeff Bezos has this thing that he hits the word because it means like they're opposing things that need to be balanced. It needs to be work-life awesomeness or something like that. Every moment is awesome whether you're working or we're living. But for some people, that comes naturally because that's how they're wired. And those people should absolutely pursue it because it would be incredibly fulfilling. And the things that are challenging would also feel not as onerous.

Whereas for everything else, it would feel like a sacrifice. It would feel like something you need to balance. And then you would, again, even if you're great at it, you're not going to have fun doing it. And at some point, you would not be great at it. for folks that are PMs today, like there's almost an implication their career is heading towards CPO eventually. That's kind of like the ladder they're on. What are the, say, top three most common other options you've seen, other paths, you've seen folks that you manage so that people can think about, okay, I don't need to maybe just keep climbing this ladder. There's these other directions that can go.

I mean, the number one, and that's, I think back to your original question on N26, like, If you work in an incredibly high growth companies, especially fintech where there's a higher people end up being founders because it's probably a whole different kind of track we can go down on. The founding your own company is probably the most kind of obvious slash exciting alternate path. The only thing I asked there is like, again, the same question, like what you are good at, and what you love doing. The challenges with founding a company is like a large portion of running a company has nothing to do with building a great product,

especially as the company gets bigger. I've worked for founders now for 17 of my 20-year career. So even at Google and stuff, like Mikhail was my boss at Google, used to be a founder. And the CEOs now, the thing they tell me when they hire me is like, I wish I had your job. right that's because that's what I used to do that's what I have loved doing and now I spent 90% of my time doing stuff that is not the stuff that I truly enjoy but folks enjoy like building

stuff there's as a PM there's a lot of things you don't have control over and you feel like hey that's what's stopping me from growing that's what's stopping me from truly enjoying founding is a great path right you have that control now you own the decision making there's a rarely times you can say, hey, this did not work because of that person. If you're constantly hitting that, then founding is a great path for you because then you have the ball control for better or worse. The other is just like, I mean, it's less about being a CPU and just like growing your breadth and your depth in sort of just the ladder. So you are incredibly either getting specialized in a specific domain where there's a...

is now enough value for you to separate yourself from the back. Whether it's like in fintech now, we have folks who are onboarding experts with KYC. We have people who are fraud experts. They're people who have really great understanding of how card schemes work and how master cards work and where can we get the right incentives for the user. The folks who are experts on customer loyalty and retention. You build that domain expertise and then you realize that everyone needs that. and that could be like an incredible way to specialize.

So you may not be, you may lead growth at certain team even though you're not a CPU. So that's kind of the second way of doing it. And the third one, again, just not to knock it out is you realize that work is not going to be my big part of my identity. My identity is who am I as a parent, who am I as a community member, who am I as a son to my parents, who am I as an artist or a contributor and that's what my death is going to be a well-rounded person and a job is it's great I'm great-ended but I'm going to do it as much as it's needed and the value and meaning that the top part of the Maslow's pyramid comes from everything but work and then you just lead a kind of a balanced life because then work is a certain portion of it and the rest rest kind of fills the picture. So just to

summarize these four really good pieces of advice for how to essentially keep your career going and get unstuck and accelerate it is work at companies that are really high growth because your learnings will compound. And also the network you build, you don't even mention that, that becomes really valuable because especially if the company does well, sometimes companies grow really well and there's extra benefits there. But even if they aren't, you still earn a lot. Absolutely. Well, let's say N26. One of the reasons why they have so many founders is the fact that that it was a category defining, like we were the first kind of mobile bank. So a lot of the problems we saw in early days, nobody else saw them.

Right. So every product manager had to solve it for the very first time in history. And that kind of is a whole different level of kind of trial by fire. Same thing with the revolution. They about started about the same time. Those are the companies that show up in like the top rankings because you did this before anybody could do it. and you learn by literally mowing mountains. I think two is also the fact that you see we have this whole PayPal Mafia. When you see this early success,

everyone sees it together. So when they go, they have that network, as you said, built in. These are, like maybe it's a product manager who starts a company, but maybe there is a business development manager who has also started this company, and now you can collaborate and have partnerships. So that success, the mutual success, which a lot of early startups see,

that creates a kind of a more denser network than you working at a large company where not all of you see the success at the same time. And three else comes down to the founders as well. Like they're incredibly mission-driven founders. I always find it super admiring now when I look back at Valentin and Max year at N26 or I look at CZ. they have reached from a whatever metric you can define of success, whether it's the size of the company, whether it's the personal network, beyond like whatever anybody would think success means.

And then to wake up every day and to do this hours and hours single day, every single day, you're driven by a whole. These are the voyagers of the people who would go explore new planets and the future are the folks who sailed out on the seas in 1600s to discover new land. That being access to these people directly is extremely, extremely empowering. You not just learn from it, but you get inspired by it. If you have an X definition of success, now your definition of success is 10x. You automatically push the boundaries more.

So I think those two things, those three things. early start category defining companies, mutual success and creation of dense networks, and just being inspired by incredibly, incredibly successful and talented people. You pointed out this really interesting insight that I forgot to mention with the list of companies that seem to hire and create the most, the strongest PMs. There's a lot of fintech representation there. And I think you touched on why that might be the case because all these problems are extremely complicated and never been solved and they're solving at scale.

Here's the thing about fintech, which is probably the most interesting, is fintech, you have two customers. You have your usual customers and you have your regulated. And you need to keep both of them happy. And usually what makes one happy, it makes the other one less happy. So you are constantly dealing with tradeoffs. Like in most PMS and most companies, you have some tradeoffs, but they're not existential. Whereas in fintech, like, every tradeoff is existential. Like when you found a company, every tradeoff is existential.

You may not exist as a business. make a wrong decision. In fintech, a lot of the PNs see that day in, day out. And that probably kind of conditions them to a whole different level of like juggling balls than you would be a P.m. at other company. Yeah, that's such a good point. Just like really good stakeholder management, influence dealing with all these tradeoffs. I think that's a really good point. I'm going to come back to the strength stuff, because that's really important. And I've been meaning to come back to So just to reflect back the four things you pointed out are really what you want to look for to accelerate your career. Companies that are going really fast, working on things that you're good at and finding a role that leverages your strengths versus things you're not good at.

Not optimizing for comp early. Such a good point there. Your point essentially is you'll make most of your comp later, like probably the 50% the second half of your career, you probably make, I don't know, 10 times more than you make the first part of your career. And so optimize for the future comp, not today's comp. And then this idea of making sure, ask yourself, do you want to be CBOs? Do you want to go down the C-suite route? Or do you want to maybe probably plan to start a company, something else? And that informs the role you're in.

Coming back to the strength stuff, how do people figure out their strengths? Do you have any advice for someone sitting around? They're like, what am I actually good at? I don't know. So there's several ways to do it. I remember I read this book. This was, I don't think it shaped my understanding of it because I was already operating in that mode. but it used to be called like,

now discover your strengths. I think now it's called like strength find 2.0. It's still like 20 years old now, but there's a lot more newer ways to do it. There are two things I have done, and they're both kind of, I'm not sure how accessible they are, but I'll give you the examples.

So at Agoda, we used to pay a psychologist $5,000 for every single PM we interview. Right? So after you finish your PM rounds, we would send you to this, psych assessment. It would be a six-hour psych assessment. And they would tell me what your strengths are.

Not just that, it would be an IQ component. So we would know what percentile you are. And not just like an IQ score, like Einstein or not. But IQ score across different, across pattern recognition or structured thinking, across numerical ability, verbal ability. So a lot of people say they hire the smartest people. And Agoda, we literally hired the smartest people. because we paid a psychologist a lot of money to tell whether they're smart or not.

But other than that, they also gave you your strengths and weaknesses. It used to be called, I know it's the company still around. It's just called Q4. And it's called Q4 because they had this four quadrants on two axes. One is on dominance and one is on warmth. So you want people who are high dominance, high warmth, so the Q4 quadrant. And that, as you can realize, if you also want smart people to find those who will land, in that quadrant is literally looking through a needle through a haystack.

But when I, I almost didn't do it. Like, I was like, this is like, I've been doing product for 15 years. This is insulting that I need to go do a six hour. The only reason I did it at that time was my son was like four and a half years old. And I was teaching him like, because he was going to go to kindergarten. I was starting like do some math with him. And then in like six months, he knew all the math that I knew. like he was solving quadratic equations and stuff

and we thought oh we have a genius in the house we got to get him tested so we were testing him and that's the only reason I took this test because I thought hey it would be interesting to understand what this process looks like but then when I got the results I was like it was so spot on it was incredibly spot on

and areas where I would do well areas where I would struggle and need help so that's one way to do it it's super extreme a little bit A year, two years ago, we had the opportunity is Cisi as good friends with Ray Dalio. So we had Ray Dalio come to our executive website. And he walked us through how he and his company does Strengths assessment.

So he has a, that one is a lot more accessible. I think it costs like $50. You can go to, I think we search for Ray Dalio Strengths. There's a website that you can go in. The way it works slightly differently for executives because you do it. So there's a your component. tells you how good you think you are. And then it has your leadership team vote to you on certain different aspects.

So there's a two-layer assessment, how good you think you are, and how good everybody else think you are. And then the overlap is where your two strengths are. And as a CEO, I can say, oh, Meyer's great at design. Everybody else knows that Mayer's great at design. We should give design problems to me. So that's another way of kind of – so there's a scientific way of doing this. and it's gotten a lot better since I read that book a long time ago. Again, if you're truly, truly curious, it doesn't take that long and now it's not more accessible.

That's one way to do it. And it kind of separates in terms of execution and some sort of structured thinking, innovation and design, creativity, stakeholder management, EQ. Like, you get a little bit of a more scientific picture on what your strengths are. But there's also a simpler way, right? Like, you know there's, as a PM, you do pretty much a large portion. Everybody does the same few things. You think you're designing the roadmap. You're coming up with what you think is the product strategy.

There's a lot of time around just managing engineers, making sure they do stuff. There's stakeholder management, marketing, compliance, whatever. There's launch and just tracking data analytics. So this part is true for most PM. some jobs require more of one versus the other. And you just know when you do these things, which one you're truly great at and you have a lot of fun doing. Maybe you just don't like Jira and the ticket tracking

and just following people on that. And that's the worst part of your job. Like stay away from more structured, complex stakeholder management jobs. Or you find that, hey, you do really well at that and somebody asks you like, hey, what are the 15 things we're going to do next week? to improve a conversion, that's where you kind of have a hard time to sit down,

spend hours thinking about it. Then maybe that's not your strength. So what time you kind of build this self-calibration on areas that you have fun doing and areas where you don't have? And then when you look at the next job, just try and engage. Like, are they hiring me because I did really well at some of the stuff that I didn't love doing? and if that's one day hiring you for probably

you're not going to have a lot of fun or high acceleration if you go there. There's so much there. There's a, I think an important point that I'll add and I'm curious if you agree, a lot of new people or like new people in their career like, oh, I just want to think about strategy. I'm going to think about the big picture.

I don't want to just sit there and optimize the roadmap and like, you know, be in GERA. But it's actually, that's your job when you're just starting out. Like, you need to earn the right to, contribute to the vision to the strategy. There's one of the, and there's a pre-conversation you talk about

contrary and view, like, I'm, like, product strategy by definition seems like a, yeah, this is going to be a controversial. Great. Like, not really, those, those two words feel very at odds with each other for me.

Like a product, you have, you have hypotheses, you know, and if you can test it, you don't need a strategy. If I say, hey, if I build this and I know this will add this much users and this time with this conversion late, this customer acquisition cost and this LTV, that's your hypothesis.

And you could test it in the market very quickly. And if it works, you have your strategy. Keep doing more of it. Strategy is always like keep doing more of it or don't do it. That's all that is to strategy. The key part is just figuring out which one goes in which bucket. And if you're really executing fast enough in a kind of a structured experimentation-driven manner, the strategy becomes a largely solved problem.

And that's a challenge. A lot of people think strategies about looking at portals, port-forces, a lot of slides, looking at some data and slicing it and saying we need to go here or there. all of it is largely some sort of package intuition and the challenge with that is usually go with the loudest voice in the room and if you're a junior in your career it's a very frustrating exercise because you think you know the strategy better

but it's all it is it's a sense of package intuition and then the guy with the loudest biggest title or the loudest voice is going to go do it It was very early in my career, Jonathan Rosenberg, he was the head of the CPU at Google. All the PMs reported to him. He was not called the CPO back then. And he had this one thing he would say all the time that come to me with data. If you come to me with ideas, we'll go with mine.

That was the same. You can come with any ideas. You're just going to do what I think. But unless you come with strong sensors proof to override me. So again, strategy is a little bit overrated for product. for market expansions, for investments, for licenses, compliance, there's several areas where it makes sense, and it's kind of useful.

But for most product managers, your strategy should be how fast can I go from hypothesis to data? The faster you can go there, the easier your strategy gets. That is certainly a hot take. So the idea here, I'm curious how you operationalize this with folks at N26, is it just like, I don't need to see like a whole strategy for the year. Just give me, here's the plan, here's what we're going to test, here's a hair hypothesis. What do you tell your PM team? We use this tool.

I'm going to give a shout out to Statsing because they're awesome. Vijay, who's used to run the experimentation at Facebook. He's Parnas and now has this tool. There's several of those. But if you're running proper experiments, I just look at the statutes. I just look at the static dashboards, right? And I'm looking at experiments. I'm looking at what my tricks they're moving.

I'm looking at the P-value. I'm looking at how quickly can they get to statistical significance. And I'm like, oh, this is working. Let's do more of these. Right. So now there's some areas where you can't do it, like in compliance, in legal aspects, in Europe, especially pricing.

In the U.S., you can run pricing tests in Europe. It's a little bit different. So those areas you would need to have a lot more kind of deeper thinking, understanding of your cohorts, you're coming up with more structured reason for why you should do it. But you can't really test and know within a couple of days or a couple of weeks at max, whether this was a good idea or not. Those, if there are either irreversible decisions

or they're just extremely time-consuming to find out, then do some pre-work. We look at largely finding a lot of companies that really look at data without looking at cohorts. You make completely bad decisions, right? Because if you look at your dashboard as a mixture of users over 10 years, 20 years, even six months, and they all behave differently. If you look at a cohort level, development, or certain users, you generally end up making better decisions. But even over there, it's still a lot more, there's a lot of noise between the moment you start tracking. it, then the moment you start making decisions based on it, the world has changed in that

meantime. At Binance, this was kind of a very foreign concept when I brought this in. I'm like, oh, the conversions down now, even though the product's done really well, because Bitcoin has crashed, right? Nobody wants to go sign up for an exchange account. So if you just measure pre-enpost, you would think that you have done something wrong in the product. If you measure it as an experiment, you would know that, yeah, between that variant and control,

it's still doing great, even the overall conversion is down. So largely the more you kind of, one of the first thing kind of do when I take on a role, the company already doesn't have an experimentation culture. And that's largely why they hire me in the first place. So one of the first thing is to say, how can we bring it in? First, the kind of right culture, the right incentives and the right tools. And then once it's set up, it gets a lot of fun. get a lot of fun for the PMs

because you have kind of democratized performance for the product manager. And the second thing, which I tell my PMs now, which is truly kind of empowering if you think about it, the challenge with being a product manager is everybody thinks they can do their job. You go to the CFO might have an idea. The head of accounting has an idea.

Anybody who uses the product thinks they have ideas, So at some point in time, you're like, what is my discipline? Like, what is my science? Nobody goes to the accounting guy and says, hey, this is, I have a great idea for how to cook our books. Nobody does that because there's a science behind it. There's a science for financial forecasting. Even in technology, like a lot of the times people just don't go and say, hey, just jump this thing and let's use this code that the AI code generator has used.

There's a little bit of science there. But in product, like, you largely find that it's a combination. of data and ideas and stuff, and anybody thinks they can. The moment you build experimentation, you will now make it scientific. Now somebody comes up with an idea, say, it was a bad idea. Here, this is why it's a bad idea. Because we have done this experiment six times, and it has failed across this user groups at this exact level of impact created.

So it kind of gives the PMs the kind of, hey, I'm not just a general purpose technician. I'm a specialist now. So, and it's extremely empowering once we can, it takes a long time to move the team in that direction. But once you get it there, the PMs just, it's a natural kind of dopamine hit every time you're on an experiment and see it more metrics. I'm a huge fan of experimentation.

I think most guests on this podcast are on your side of the debate. I feel like we could do a whole podcast episode on just how to create a culture of experimentation, how to change culture. This episode is brought to you by Vanta, and I am very excited to have Christina Cassiopo, CEO and co-founder Vanta, joining me for this very short conversation.

Great to be here, big fan of the podcast and the newsletter. Vanta is a longtime sponsor of the show, but for some of our newer listeners, what does Vanta do and who is it for? Sure. So we started Vanta in 2018, focused on founders,

helping them start to build out their security programs and get credit for all of that hard security work with compliance certifications like SOC2 or ISO-2701. Today, we currently help over 9,000 companies, including some startup household names like Atlassian, Ramp, and Lange chain, start and scale their security programs and ultimately build trust by automating compliance, centralizing GRC, and accelerating security reviews. That is awesome. I know from experience that these things take a lot of time and a lot of resources, and nobody

wants to spend time doing this. That is very much our experience, but before the company, in some extent, during it. But the idea is with automation, with AI, with software, we are helping customers build trust with prospects and customers in an efficient way. And, you know, our joke, we started this compliance company, so you don't have to. We appreciate you for doing that. And you have a special discount for listeners.

They can get $1,000 off Vanta at vanta.com slash lenny. That's V-A-N-T-A-com slash Lenny for $1,000. off ANTA. Thanks for that, Christina. Thank you. I want to come back to the question of what N26 has done well to create and hire grade pms. So we've spent a bunch of time on here's career advice that I often give and what helps people most in their career. Is there anything, just to kind of close this thread, is there anything N26 did or is doing that either from the hiring perspective or from

training? I know you haven't been there from the beginning, just like as a business, as a company that they've done really well that other companies may want to copy. Some of it is just the hiring philosophy, right? Like, we tend, like, one of the advantages you get for being like a big fish in a small pond is you get to have your pick of the cream of the crop. So in Europe here, where we don't have like the same level of unicorn or deconcon density you have in the Bay Area, being one of the first ones or the few ones, you do get a little bit of that branding working in your favor.

So some portion of that is just the input. If you're taking really smart people, very tense at N26, they will stay smart. Two is, again, the level of problems that they work on are harder. Just the Pentech angle we mentioned. And now with this whole experimentation-driven kind of change that we made in the last year or so, there's also a new kind of toolkit that they get,

especially if they're going for like larger big growth company that's the next step of the career. Once you kind of, this is still so, like all the people, companies I talk to, the amount of companies that are truly world class at experimentation is so low that if you work in one of these companies and you build this tool set,

you can build a whole career on this. You can go to any other company and say, this is what I'm going to bring to the table because there's no growth without, as I said, without compounding. wins faster and nothing compounds wins faster than experiments. And there's no company out in the world that says we don't want to grow. So that is an incredible kind of brand that you can build alongside with it.

And then the third piece is just the scale. One of the other interesting aspects of banking is what I call a 100% product. It's actually more than 100%. There are more bank accounts than human beings, right? Because a lot of people are more than one bank account. So you never run out of target addressable market. It's as big as it can get, which means that there's no upper round on how much. Because at some point, like if you're, I don't know, building kind of an AI code generator,

like your market is the capped. And maybe developers or people want to be developers. Or you're building, I don't know, AWS. It's a massive market, but it's still like all the company that need online hosting. They look at banking, everybody needs. And the fact that it's oldest of the second old list, depending on how risky you are or not profession known to man. It is a self-hedged product.

Like when things get tough on one side of our business, the interest rates, let's say, go high. Spending goes down, but we make money on deposits. When interest rates go down, spending increases, so we make more your money on interchange, right, at an investment. So it's a very self-haged business that lets you kind of go through the troughs and the peaks kind of better than most companies. And that understanding that how do you build naturally hedged products is probably another kind of reason

where it just influences how you make decisions and how do you kind of scale your core product portfolio. There's one example. For longest, like about a year and a half ago, we were largely a bank with a card. right and that was we were the first mobile bank and that was a big enough market but in the last year or so we have just fleshed out that product portfolio we have a big lending portfolio now we launched savings last year we invested heavily in savings because the interest rates were high was a super amazing tool to attract new users by offering high interest rates but as the interest rates

are going down now we're just investing heavily in lending because now you can get loans for lower prices, which was super hard to get last year. So being able to kind of build products that complement the macro also gives you that additional kind of balancing act that you don't get in typical single focus companies. So I think it's a combination of few of those things, being able to get great talent, being able to kind of train them now more so, especially around experimentation, and just see how you can build a product portfolio. that complements each other, but also naturally hedges against each other,

just gives you a better kind of well-balanced way to operate. I think this explains something really interesting. As you were talking, I realized that a lot of these companies that produce the best PMs are, to your point, non-US-based, but incredibly successful in their location. And so it draws in the most talented people in that region. So, like, I know Intercom, I think technically, so Intercom was number one on this list of companies that produced the best PMs. Intercom Palantier Revolut and then N26

Chim Striped Dropbox were kind of at the top and four of those essentially are three of those are non like Intercom I think was Ireland for a lot of their team is based in Ireland then Revolut is the UK and then you guys so it's interesting that that explains some really

interesting insights of just be the best be the big fish in a small pond draw in the best talent and then work on really hard problems and be really successful there you go there's a formula Yes, yes. It's very simple when you put it that way. Oh, man. Okay. You interestingly have worked in a lot of different places. I want to spend a little time here. So you've worked in Europe, you've worked in Asia, you worked in the U.S., obviously. For someone that is maybe thinking about moving out of the U.S. or maybe moving to the U.S., what have you found are kind of the big tradeoffs? Yeah, so I would say like early career you want to be in like intensely talents, dense areas for all.

all the reasons that we mentioned before, finding the high growth companies, finding the networks that will make you successful. There's no, for general tech, there's no better place than West Coast of the U.S. Now, everybody doesn't have the option, especially now with the immigration policies and so forth. I mean, things were always hard. They seem extremely harder now. So you may not have that option. But if you do have that option, I would encourage everyone.

There's no better place than West Coast to start your career. There's some exceptions. For crypto, I would say Dubai is very strong, very great. Has a really high density there. But again, it's a very industry-specific. Bangalore, if you're Indian, has managed to recreate some of the magic of Silicon Valley, not at the same scale, but getting better. if you're in finance, maybe there is London, Singapore and Asia has now at least not as much

new innovation, but each of the big companies has a presence there. So at least secondary talent densities there, those would be your options if you're, if U.S. is not available early in your career. And in some ways, it helps define you, right? If you work at Microsoft or Google or Open AI or some of these companies that become brands later, it's something you can take with you when going part. The second part of your question is when you, if you decide to move, having that experience and that brand and that kind of achievements there can help you kind of make the find great opportunities elsewhere.

I mean, I've been a little bit privileged that some of these opportunities I found me, like end 26 year in Europe or Binance before in Asia where it was I wasn't really in that super talent dense area in the first place but like luck's not a great strategy right so if you're planning for it I would say build it build your early career in the US and then honestly when we moved to Thailand 2018 it wasn't a at that point I didn't think I was making a great professional decision. We were just struggling in the U.S. with both me and my wife working. Both are kids in Seattle, were timely. My daughter had asked them at that time. It was like, and she was just constantly sick. And it was a struggle for us to kind of manage both work and life.

When I talked to Agua, I had never heard of the company. And the only reason I ended up taking the job was like, hey, Bangkok's a hot mess. My daughter might not have asthma there, and we might have some help in the house, so we could probably balance some of the things that are really not adding value to our life right now. And that was the hypothesis there that we would be, I can do a lot more on work because I was literally not able to focus as much on it, with everything else that was happening. And as I said, everything got an experimentation that we just hit a home run on all the hypotheses. right? My daughter, like the heat cure asthma,

my just having a support structure allowed us just as a family to spend a lot more time with each other and allowed me a lot more time to work and be on my career when I'm not doing dishes and not doing laundry and not throwing out the trash and not mowing the lawn. There's just so much hours that show up in the day that you could be doing things that you're great at and kind of add to your career.

career. And then I just turned out to be just a, like a, almost like a boot camp for understanding how an experimentation-based product culture might work. Because before that, I worked at Google, I worked at startups. My whole frame-to-frame was, like, building big stuff. And I got to just taught me that a lot of the growth comes with, like, incredibly small things done faster. So it's part of booking holdings. So if you heard of booking.com, it's a $170 billion company. And what's interesting is that 10 years ago, it was a $10 billion company, which sold flights, hotels, and cars. Like, 10 years later, it still sells flights, hotels, and cars.

It's a $170 billion company. Oh, wow. It's an incredible growth story. And that tells you, like, you really don't need, from a strategy perspective, to do something completely different if you can truly compound your growth by optimizing every single thing really, really well. So there are the pros that come with, as I said, when you move, most of the time you're building products that are global, especially if you're based in the US. Very few times you're building product that just work in the US.

Now that's not true for a lot of the countries, like in India, a lot of products are only designed for Indian market, a lot of products in China, only designed for Chinese market. But in the US, you're designing product for the world. and a lot of the times you don't experience the same constraints or you don't empathize with the user at the same level because you just haven't lived that user's life. So in terms of just being able to calibrate yourself on what a global product might look like, being able to live in different places

and understanding some of these constraints first time, definitely a pro. You get to, as said, especially if you have built that early reputation, you get to work at some of the best companies when you go abroad. So there's a hit to compensation, at least initially, for sure. Nobody pays anywhere close, especially here in Europe. But as I said before, don't optimize for compensation early in your career

or even middle part of your career. So if you follow that advice, it will not matter because you will have kind of a something unique to offer even if you come back to the US later having kind of worked in different having understanding, especially if you're in fintech where the actual laws are different

in different countries and that one you truly do not appreciate working in the US. Even at Google and stuff when we would launch products like, I would be like, oh, the lawyers, they're just making life difficult. But the many of now have a true appreciation of how different

the world truly is. It just makes you a better stakeholder when you talk to the legal team, when you talk to compliance team, when you talk to marketing. So I think those are all the pros. The compensation could be the con. The other big con is that

like today if you're in Silicon Valley, like I spent 15 years in Seattle, I worked at four companies. I could change jobs and stay in Seattle. Because there's enough companies there. It's not going to run a CLEC. At some point, Bay Area there's no ceiling. You can keep growing.

The challenge now is that if I'm in Bangkok and working at Agura, at some point I'm to find a new job or because if I let's say I'm at the CPO level, I want to be CEO now. Aga already has a CEO. So I need to find DSEO somewhere else. Guess what? That's company is not going to be in Bangkok. Now I have to move and move my whole family, right, to Singapore, which I did. Then you hit somewhere over there or then you hit another. the ceiling. Now you need to move back or go somewhere else to Thailand, which I did.

And then you're like, oh, maybe there's a great opportunity in Europe which will give you like a whole different scale. Then you need to move to Spain, which I did. So this at some point, your family is like, what's happening? It turned out to be, it was what turned out to be one step to go from A to B is now just a every year journey. And so that's something to calibrate, especially later in your career, that it's extremely hard if you like the job and don't like the location or vice versa, because they usually come as a package deal now. You see this in Bangkok now where there's not that many great tech companies. And if you're at a Gorda and you're doing really well, but it's just one company.

You just don't have options. And especially if you love Bangkok, which is a great city, probably my word for the best place to live in the world. That's a struggle. You love the city, but if you need to move your career ahead, you need to go somewhere else. So interesting. I feel like Thailand is very popular right now with White Lotus. I think White Lotus had like the most views of any show or some crazy.

That was very popular. I feel like there's a lot of tourism coming to Thailand more than they've had. Yes. Yeah. I want to come back to one piece of advice that, that we were chatting about before we started recording that I think might be helpful to people, which is, and this is kind of in a different direction,

but I want to make sure we touch on it, is Shreos Doshi's point about leverage. I know this is something that you think a lot about. He has this really good advice, and we'll point to the episode if people want to dig deeper around finding the highest leverage opportunities for you to work on as a PM.

Can you just share that advice for folks that haven't heard this before? This is true for no matter what level of career you are in, But you have a finite amount of time and largely you have more problems than you have time to solve them. The question is which ones you work on, right? And this becomes even harder, like let's say you're a CPO now because all of them are important. Otherwise, they would not come to you in the first place. The question is, is which one do you work on?

And the principle is simple. Like you work on problems that have a 10x positive or a negative impact. I mean, the number can be 10, 5, 300, depending on finance, it would be 100. Some companies might be 3. And in most, in 10 companies, one of two problems. It's a growth problem or a compliance problem?

Because both of them can have a negative or positive 10x impact. And that's what you focus on, right? That's what you spend bulk of your time. What was interesting for me, my first executive role, so I was Google, I was a product manager. I joined what was white pages back, then as a VP of product.

It was my first kind of. And I invite pages Alex Algardens, Seattle founding legend, three companies, all your icons now. Incredible, very good personal friend and mentor. What was truly interesting when I joined it, they're like, okay, this is your desk, this is the product area. So we had two offices. This is when everybody worked in office five days a week, right?

And I'm like, okay, where does Alex sit? And he's like, oh, he's sitting with accounting rate. And I'm like, I didn't think about it because I thought his office is near accounting. Then I find out he doesn't have an office. He has like a floating desk. So it's all the other desks were like fixed, but he had a movable desk. And he would move his desk to one of the departments which you think had the highest leverage opportunity. And he would sit there at that desk in that department till that either problem was solved or the opportunity was realized.

and then he would literally move his desk and then go to product or tag or finance. And that was his way of, like you could literally visualize him working on the highest leverage problem by his desk moving. And then that combines that with what we talked before about details. And a little bit, I think it didn't mention it, about the humility that you need to have to be work in the detail. Not other times, especially later in your career, you're like, hey, this is about, this is beyond. I mean, this is Delomi, right? Why do I need to do that? Like I have so many PMs or data analyst

or somebody should do it, like why is it, why would I do it? And that was kind of, again, just a quick story there. I remember we were trying to figure out our growth channels and we found out that, hey, we are kind of really tapping out on paid, on social, on referrals. But SEO was something we just hadn't worked on for a while. building a caller ID app.

And what we wanted to do was when somebody types a phone number in Google, we want to be the first thing to say, hey, is this a spam call or not, or is this whose number it is. And if we could, then we could get them to download our app. That was the hypothesis. So I present at the executive team meeting to Alex, like, hey, I want to have the pool.

I want to hire a product manager, focus purely on SEO. And because I think that's one of our highest leverage areas right now. And Alice is like, hey, the whole white page is I built based on SEO, but people who type people's name, and the first thing used to be a white pages link. I'm like one of the best people in the world to work on SEO. I'm like, yeah, so?

He's like, let me run this product. And I'm like, okay, what do you mean? It's like, no, no, I will be the product manager for this, for however long you need it. And I'm like, okay, how's it? They don't worry about it. Just tell me over the engineers. So again, he moved his desk to where that product team's had.

and for the next three months he was the product manager on that scrum. So he would come to my product team meetings, give his update on what's happening with the SEO scrum, and then an hour later I would be in the leadership meeting giving my update to him. And truly he was operating at saying this is high leverage area for the company. High leverage for my urge. It should be high leverage for me. I'm the best person to do it. I'm going to be in the details and do it.

It's easy. Same at Binance. There are a lot of products that he would just sit on himself. work. There were very few people at finance who would say no to CZ. But one of my lead PMs who worked on the products that CZ worked on, he would tell them no all the time. They would just baffle all the other executives. Like, how is he saying no to CZ? And none of us are doing it because, hey, that was his product area that CZ was working on. And there was that mutual respect there, that, hey, we know this thing and he's going to say no

to me because probably not a good idea. So that humility and attention to detail is required to work on the high leverage problems. A lot of the high leverage problems are not, as I said, not strategy decisions. They are not lay which markets to go after and stuff. A lot of them are like, why is this thing not working as well as it needs to be? A lot of time the devil is in the details. And you need to be over there. So I think combining that knowing what is high leverage or not,

and two, both having the humility and the patients to be able to be able to, to go or dig deeper and solve that. And some of them are like quick ones. Like if I'm looking today at, let's say, how many of our signed-up users convert into a long-term, long-term monthly, daily active user, right? That could be like something I focus on for a month

because we're running a lot of experiments on like early onboarding screens, early rewards, early incentives, early loyalty program. And at some point, it might be like, oh, the team's got it. Like I've given all my what I could do there. It's functioning. We have great clients.

I trust their execution on this. Then we just go focus on some of the compliance challenges that we have and fraud issues that we have in France. Those kind of being able to kind of, the only way that works for me is I keep a very free calendar because you cannot do this without that. If you have hundreds of meetings, hundreds of one-on-ones, daily standard, a lot of recurring meetings, you just can't find time to go work on high leverage problems.

So that would be my kind of other stuff is like, keep your, you should have plenty of open spaces on your calendar. A full calendar is a badge of shame, not a badge of honor. These are awesome stories. Just the metaphor of the moving desk is so good. Like that's the epitome of a, like what you're describing is what people now call founder mode where the founder just goes in in the details,

working on the problem. Brian Chesky actually did this at Airbnb. While I was there, he took on a new product and was the, like, mini CEO essentially. I don't know if he called himself the product manager because I don't think he loved product managers. He kind of famously got rid of product managers, which he didn't actually. But, yeah, he did that very much. And he sat with the team, kind of created a whole space for the team that he was in. These are awesome stories and a really good example of just a founder using their power to unblock

and finding the highest leverage opportunities. To kind of start to close off our conversation, I'm going to take you to a couple recurring themes on this podcast, recurring segments on this podcast. First, we're going to visit AI Corner. And in AI Corner, I ask, what's a way that you have found to use AI in AI tool, a bunch of AI tools in your work to work more efficiently,

to work, to create better quality work. I still haven't found a game changer for me personally. Something that I use right now, and I'm a little bit not sure that am I not doing something right, what the other people are, or I'm a little bit too jaded for it. But the, so we have a lot of, we have Gemini across the work. So for meeting nodes and stuff, works great,

especially for folks who don't meet it. There's a tool called writer for our copywriting and U.S. teams, for especially because we are operating in Europe across, several languages, so being able to generate that very quickly, especially for illustrations and in-app messages and stuff that's been a, there's several tools now, but writer just has kind of, like the copywriting market is really well done over there. If you ask me across N26, but even when we did this at Binance or at Agoda, there are three areas where AI is complete game chain. One is on coding.

Again, you can use whatever latest tool for prototyping or not. Most value, especially for the companies I have worked at, which are fairly large companies, very large code bases, having some sort of co-pilot that's integrated with your repositories. Rough data may be somewhere between 18 to 25% productivity boost for a developer, which is fairly massive. So that's one category, game changer. Customer support game changer.

Whether we should do it at scale or not, that's a different kind of more ethical slash human question to ask there. But for solving the bottom 70 percentile problems, why is my card decline, why is there a hold on mechon, what happened to the replacement card I shipped, why is it not arrived? Basic questions, AI automating now almost 60, 70 percent, of that, customers getting that real feedback game changer. And the last one is on just on fraud and being able to just understand patterns better on

real customers versus not. And Binance, we had this product where users could exchange crypto with each other. Like I could pay you Bitcoin and get like Thai Bath in return. Huge amount of fraud. And they're like using AI just to understand language patterns of fraudsters versus not fraudster massive. So again, as a company level, there is an incredible set of advancements across these three areas, developer productivity, customer support, and fraud. But for me personally, I'm like, what would I use that suddenly makes me a better CPU? I'm still struggling a little

bit over there. But it's not really, I don't think we need something at that level. Because largely, what still remains the domain of humans is decision-making and taking the impact of what decisions you make because I would love to blame AI for some of my bad decisions. That's not why they can still do that you can still do that even if it's not yes yes so but again hopeful to it's generally not a big fan of like the thing I why I call it a little bit jaded. You have tools now that you write a few things and they make a long essay for it.

And then you have tools that compress long essays into a few words. You could have just said few words in the first place, right, and save the whole round trip. It's like a reverse zip. I remember when we had zip and it was a game changer. But there was a big file. You need to send over slow networks. So you compressed it and sent it and then expanded it.

We're doing the reverse now. We have a small thing. We make it big and then send it over and somebody's making it small. So that's, but on these three areas, if you're at all-scale companies, like if you don't have a great tool for development productivity, you're not looking at like essential basic LLM bots toward deflecting customer service and they're not looking at patterns on user transactions or user communications to detect fraud, like that's the first area I would focus on. Okay, I'm going to take us to another recurring segment on the podcast. It's called Fail Corner. And the idea here is folks like you come on this podcast, there's all these wins killing it, CPO this and that, and just move into Thailand.

It worked out incredibly. What a win all the time. In reality, that's not how things go. So the question to you here is just what's the story of a failure in your career when things didn't go well and it was a big deal for you and then what you learned from that experience, how that actually impacted you. Yeah. So one of the products side, like my probably most spectacular failure was,

I was the first PM on Hangouts. And if you asked Nick Hilley, we'll probably say he was my boss then. It was an effort, the size I've never seen before or after in my career, we had thousands of people working for me. We had entire power of Google. We had Larry literally sitting with us saying we can do anything. We want Chrome to do those. And we still didn't manage to build a great messaging product.

So when I look at pure product sense, product decision making was, there's several reasons now I'd had luxury of 15 years to analyze that on solving for the wrong audience, solving for the wrong DNA of the company. I have this premise that certain companies

can never succeed at certain type of products, like Microsoft with mobile or Google with social or Facebook with Enterprise, right? It's just the DNA of the founder actively acts against you succeeding there. I would have said Google with Enterprise as well, but then Sundar came and Larry was no longer the CEO, and that's when the Enterprise took off.

They literally had to change the CEO to kind of win in certain segments. But more, and then again, I worked in Nagoda during COVID. So travel company during COVID, Binance during its probably most tumulted, area of compliance and government scrutiny. So a lot of missteps there around externalities. I think one of the main kind of learnings from that is just don't take on projects that are

going to be six months a year because you just generally don't have control over the macro. Things just move way more faster and that's probably cemented my kind of now product philosophy of just doing small things very quickly. Finding most of the times doing that, you still launch big products, but even over there, we try and kind of get early signals as soon as possible. But because Rigoda, like one of the big projects we launched was we wanted to control the payments infrastructure for all the hotels. And we thought if we had that device in the hotel's desk, so not only for booking,

made online, but for everything that happens at the hotel, if we control that that infrastructure, not only would we make money, but we had a touch point with the users that were beyond booking the travel. Travel, as you know, is not a high frequency activity. You book once, then you book six months later. Most of the time, people would not come to a Goda. They would just go to Google and go to some other website. So we wanted that touchpoint that stayed with them and without payments would be a great, great avenue to do that because that's something you do every day. And again, we did it in the Goda style. So we did it experiment.

We started very small. I literally went to the mall and bought these $50 Android devices where we ran our software that people could just scan the credit card by a camera and charge it. It was incredible. We have thousands of hotels use it. And then COVID hits and then there's literally nobody going to hotels anymore. But it took us like six, nine months because of the licenses and so to launch it. And in hindsight, probably, I mean, you couldn't have thought about COVID with that sense,

but still the amount of time it took to launch the product was something we could, we could have done better. So learnings for most of it is don't take too long to launch. Don't take too long to validate your hypothesis. The hangout story is amazing. It's like a classic product people now make fun of just Google. Why can't you get this right? And it's been changed.

Names have changed 100 times. Interestingly, meat ended up being really good. Like Google meat. That's the last thing I did when I left Google. Oh, okay. I was like after we build the hangouts, they're like, okay, this is not going anywhere. We're going to start this new product called Allo, right, which also didn't work. One of the many names.

Yeah, but then I said, you know what? like we should still, because I used to work for Android Enterprise team before. I'm like, what if we just made it an enterprise product? Let me at least write the spec for it on, hey, what would we do differently for, I still called it Hangouts by Enterprise, they rebranded it later. But that was my salvaging moment for, but from the sense, I mean, we, the Hangouts team invented WebRTC. Now every single communication, the world happens on Wrenc.

WebRDC. So if you think from the cultural and technological impact that the Hangouts team had, is insane. This tool we are using, every single meeting product, every single WhatsApp, voice calling, video calling, every Zoom, everything runs on WebRDC. So from a technology side, I think that was a pretty massive win that the team came up with that. That's the power of having Chrome, having a browser also, just introducing. Yeah, yeah. I mean, yes, absolutely. Final question before we get to a very exciting lightning round. Is there anything else that you want to leave listeners with, or maybe a point you want to

double down on just to kind of leave a little less little nugget before we get to the lightning round? I mean, just summarized, it depends on the audience. A lot of the folks who probably listen to it are coming from a perspective of, like, hey, how does this help me be better at my job tomorrow than I was today? And for them, I would say, again, like, if you're, if you're truly working in areas where you think you're you're optimizing your strengths and having fun just keep doing it and just keep that as your kind of north star as you look at new pieces when you talk to new companies try and evaluate the overlap of superpowers like what is your superpower

what is the company superpower will they feed each other if you get a very strong resonance there I think that would be a great career step irrespective of whether it's in Bangkok or Spain or however the compensation is going to be because truly you will find that you grow much faster because it's a kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy at that point but just keep looking for overlapping superpowers all the time and not just in professional life

like in even the transcends beyond maybe even for relationships and stuff. Like folks who are extremely complementing strengths and whose superpowers feed each other, make for great life partners. So there's maybe that analogy can be extended beyond your career. Wow, that's a powerful point right there. What a cool way to end that. Well, with that, Mayor, we've reached our very exciting lightning round. I've got five questions for you.

Are you ready? Yeah, let's do it. What are two or three books that you find yourself recommending most other people? The one that I read most recently, so I'm generally don't read a lot of books because I read a lot of content, like small content. Tweets. And tweets and subscriets and discords and WhatsApp messages. And so book takes like a mind share shift for me to go read a book. the one I read most recently, which I thought was pretty amazing and a lot of overlap with

what I said today, the five kinds of wealth. That one was very well articulated, especially the last point I meant very early. One of the potential paths is you just do well on your job and then you find meaning elsewhere. This book is probably an incredible structured way of thinking around it. What is your wealth in terms of your health, your physical health, your mental health, your relationship health, your community, right, and your wealth that you're generating financial wealth. How do you think holistically? Because at the end of the day, you are what you optimize for. If you optimize for financial wealth, you will become wealthy, right? But you might not be wealthy in a full spectrum manner. The Strengths finder 2.0, I said very early on. It's still

an interesting book to just think about how you would think about your strengths. But again, if you don't want to read the book, I would just do one of these kind of online, online quizzes for it. But the five kinds of wealth and Strength Finder 2.0, maybe what I would suggest. The first book's by Sahil Bloom, friend of the podcast, we'll link to all this stuff. I forgot to mention the story briefly about the Strength Finder stuff. So actually, when I was leaving Airbnb and looking for my next thing and even thinking about leaving, I took a strengths test. And I was working with executive coach.

And I saw the results. And she's like, what do you see in these results? What are these results telling you? I'm like, I don't know. She's like, this tells me you should start your own company and work on your own. All the strengths that are popping up here are things that you as a founder need. And that really helped me. What's your one person data point on that?

Was it a good one? What is a good decision you mean? Yes. Oh, relying on that strength test to make a career. I am such a huge fan of strengths finder. And any kind of strengths test. And interestingly, people may be afraid of taking them because that'd be like, here's what I suck at. It always makes you feel good.

It's like, here's the stuff you're good at. And it's not like, here's what you're bad at. It's just here's the stuff you're best at. And it's always positive. It's never like you suck at this stuff. It's just not your strength. So it was a huge win for me. I highly recommended.

Especially if you're trying to make a career move. So yeah, fully aligned. Okay. Next question. Do you have a favorite recent movie or TV show? You really enjoyed? The one I saw that kind of TV shows, usually I watch to kind of give a downtime.

So usually I watch this period. The periodic shows, the house or Big Bantiria and stuff. The one that saw recently that kind of shook me a little bit was adolescents. Again, it's a tough topic around teenage mental health and violence and schools. And just the way it was shot. Like I would see the first episode, even if it's not your genre. Because it's shot in a single camera motion. And the whole episode for an hour, there's no cut.

camera just keeps moving and it just makes like a desire. You feel we feel a little different than watching it. In respect to this topic, which is also pretty intense, just visually you feel different. And if you're motion sick like me, like you really feel different. That's wonderful.

Sounds like what a joy. I would watch that. I need to watch the White Lotus because everybody keeps bringing it. Every time I tell them I'm from Thailand and I haven't seen it yet. So I'm behind on my mean culture a little bit. Yeah, you are. It's like you and no one else has not seen it. I think you're the only person left.

Yes, I'm the only one. Okay. Do you have a favorite product you've usually discovered that you really love? So products, so I spend most of my time using banking and trading products. And I would give a plug here. If you're in Europe, try N26 or even revolution. You're an incredible product. If you're in the U.S., Robin Hood, just their motion design they have done and the onboarding is just an joy to use, whether you use it for banking or trading or just for their card.

I just find the product design and motion, especially as you touch and swipe. I'm incredibly done. Anything that Nikita Beard launches, so I just downloaded Bible study or Bible chat yesterday. I started a tweet about that. It's like in the top 10 of all social apps. It's like a Bible study. And I can tell why. Like, I have got three messages right now to take my anxiety by reading Bible today.

And one of the time I was feeling slightly anxious. So maybe there's some magic there. But the one happened that I would just, like, for personal. So I used to write, like in Hindi, I used to write poems growing up as a kid. And that was just now this app suno.com. I can like make songs from them. And they're incredible songs. At least I think so.

Nobody else thinks it so far. But just the fact that you can write something and now you have a song is just magical. The first time that AI I saw a use case, again, I said, it's nothing so far that makes me a better CPU right now. But as an artist or at least the bathroom artist, it's just incredible that you can think of something, put it down there. and you can actually see what would a professional singer and a band and the musician, if they were to compose it, what it would look like. So that's probably like the most wild I have been by technology in the recent times. So suno.com.

Their onboarding flow socks and their growth product is, if I were the PM on Suno, I would do things a lot differently, but their core tech is magical. I'm a huge fan. One of my favorite things to do with Suno, I think it's Zuno-Datai also, is just ask it to make a song in the style of a sea shanty. It's so fun. And they give you like a few options, so you could be like, here's this version, that version. Yes, yes.

Okay, two more questions. Do you have a favorite life motto that you often come back to find useful in work or in life? One I kind of relates to the themes we talked about is there's no right or wrong decision. There's just slow and fast decisions. Now, there's some extreme caveats to that around if you're doing something that might kill user like healthcare or military or even compliance, which can kill your company. Don't use it. But everywhere else, in generally, goes back to the strategy thing we talked about as well.

A lot of the times, like if you make a wrong decision, if you make it fast enough, you would know it was wrong and you would correct it. And you would still do it faster than thinking months for the right decision. So for anything that's reversible, anything that's not going to get you in jail or kill your company, no right or wrong decisions. slower fast decisions. Final question. You've lived in a bunch of places. You've lived in Spain, Thailand, Mumbai, Seattle, I think Texas even for some period for school.

Yeah, college. Okay. There's probably other places. Which has the best food? Bangkok. No, no question. Barcelona comes closer for some. But Bangkok, you can have a three Michelin Star, like one of the top five restaurants in the world, spend like $500 a meal, or you can have a $1 street food, stirred fried pork and rice with basil. Incredible. Just the spectrum of entire, from the cheapest food you can think about, the most expensive food you can think of in that same like one kilometer walkable area, having like thousands of these, literally, It's the density of food. Like, no one comes closer.

Barcelona has an incredible restaurant, like the best restaurant in the world, is like a block away from here. It's called the Ruther. It takes like two years to get on the wait list there. But it's on one end of the spectrum. Barcelona probably comes close second. But that cheap, get down 2 a.m., walk down,

and have an incredible meal for a dollar. Like, nothing comes closer to Bangkok. This episode is a great ad for Thailand. Let's go. And you definitely got to watch White Lotus. Mayur, this was awesome. We covered so much ground. I feel like I got to know you so well.

We covered so many perspectives of all this. Yeah, we're not done yet. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out, maybe check out if there's roles at N26? And then how can listeners be useful to you? Finally, this is one of the thing being old is I was one of the first users of LinkedIn. So LinkedIn.com slash Mayur.

early basis of Facebook, so Facebook.com slash Kamath, or N26.com, mk at n26.com. Like, if you're especially curious about how we do stuff here, we are hiring, we're growing really fast. And it's like, banking is a great business to be in. We're not going to go out of flavor for the next few thousand years. So if you're thinking of a career, you're thinking about Spain or thinking about Berlin, it's just a whole different, interesting lifestyle, and different. kind of product thinking. Please reach out on any of those channels.

If you're in Europe, download our try in 26, like we go by the motto, love your bank. Our founders say that people would rather go to a dentist than to a bank branch, and that's why we build this. We truly feel like for an everyday banking, like it's just use the app

and you feel like, I want to use my banking app every day. There's some bit of magic, which I didn't have that much contribution yet. I made it a little bit simple and seamless, but magic was there before. And so if you're in Europe, you are looking for a new bank account, N26.com.

There we go. Mayura, thank you so much for being here. Thank you. Thank you, Lenny, and thank you, everyone. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcast, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating

or leaving a review, as that really helps other listeners find the podcast. You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lenniespodcast.com. See you in the next episode.