Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth - What it takes to become a top 1% PM | Ian McAllister (Uber, Amazon, Airbnb)
Episode Date: November 20, 2022Ian McAllister is the Senior Director of Product for Vehicles at Uber. Before moving to Uber, Ian spent over a decade directing teams at Amazon, where he created and led Amazon Smile. He was also Dire...ctor of Product Management at Airbnb, where I was lucky enough to have worked alongside him. In today’s episode, we discuss Ian’s famous document about the essential attributes of the top 1% of product managers. Ian outlines the most important skills to focus on for entry-level PMs and how to broaden your experience and diversify skills as you move up the ladder. He also shares what he learned working with Jeff Wilke, Jeff Bezos, and other leaders at Amazon, and goes in depth on Amazon’s working-backwards framework. —Where to find Ian McAllister:• Newsletter: https://ianmcallister.substack.com/• Twitter: https://twitter.com/ianmcall• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ianmcallister/—Where to find Lenny:• Newsletter: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com• Twitter: https://twitter.com/lennysan• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lennyrachitsky/—Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for making this episode possible:• Mixpanel: https://mixpanel.com/startups• Athletic Greens: https://athleticgreens.com/lenny• AssemblyAI: https://www.assemblyai.com/?utm_source=lennyspodcast&utm_medium=podcast&utm_campaign=nov20—Referenced:• What distinguishes the top 1% of product managers from the top 10%, on Substack: https://ianmcallister.substack.com/p/what-distinguishes-the-top-1-of-product• What distinguishes the top 1% of product managers from the top 10%, on Quora: https://www.quora.com/What-distinguishes-the-Top-1-of-product-managers-from-the-Top-10• Amazon’s working-backwards method: https://www.productplan.com/glossary/working-backward-amazon-method/• Jeff Wilke on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jeffawilke• Getting Real: The Smarter, Faster, Easier Way to Build a Successful Web Application: https://www.amazon.com/Getting-Real-Smarter-Successful-Application/dp/0578012812• Wool (Wool trilogy #1): https://www.amazon.com/Wool-Trilogy-Howey-25-Apr-2013-Paperback/dp/B011T7ACU0/• Energy and Civilization: A History: https://www.amazon.com/Energy-Civilization-History-MIT-Press/dp/0262035774• How I Built This podcast: https://www.npr.org/series/490248027/how-i-built-this• EV News Daily podcast: https://www.evnewsdaily.com/• Yellowstone on Peacock: https://www.peacocktv.com/stream-tv/yellowstone• Everything Everywhere All at Once on Showtime: https://www.sho.com/titles/3493875/everything-everywhere-all-at-once• Gibson Biddle’s website: https://www.gibsonbiddle.com/• Gibson Biddle on Lenny’s Podcast: https://www.lennyspodcast.com/gibson-biddle-on-his-dhm-product-strategy-framework-gem-roadmap-prioritization-framework-5-netflix-strategy-mini-case-studies-building-a-personal-board-of-directors-and-much-more/• Gibson Biddle’s Ask Gib newsletter: https://askgib.substack.com/—In this episode, we cover:(03:54) What Ian expected from his initial post on product management(05:30) How the post impacted Ian’s career(07:06) How writing can help you crystallize your thoughts(08:26) Ian’s background(10:57) Attributes of the top 1% of PMs(14:32) The top three skills for new PMs to perfect(20:32) Tips on strengthening communication and prioritization(23:06) How to level up as a PM(26:37) What kind of impact should new PMs expect to make?(29:36) How to broaden your view and think big(33:06) How to earn the trust of others(34:30) How Ian could have done more to earn trust at Airbnb(37:27) Why people tend to stick around Amazon for a while (39:53) What Ian learned from Bezos and Wilke(46:38) How teams get working backwards wrong(53:51) The two parts of working backwards and how Ian utilizes it at Uber(58:57) Lightning round—Production and marketing by https://penname.co/. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email podcast@lennyrachitsky.com. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lennysnewsletter.com/subscribe
Transcript
Discussion (0)
If you forget about everything else, forget about politics, forget about promotion or having more,
bigger org or whatever, if you simply wake up every day trying to have the biggest impact you can,
or if you're a leader, trying to use your team to have the biggest impact you can in the company,
how you do every part of your day, that's a really good guiding light.
Welcome to Lenny's podcast. I'm Lenny, and my goal here is to help you get better at the craft of building and growing products.
Today, my guest is Ian McAllister.
Ian is the author of one of the most classic post on product management,
what separates a top 1% PM from a top 10% PM,
amongst many other pieces of writing that he shared online.
Ian has managed over 100 product managers in his career.
He spent 12 years at Amazon, where he built Amazon Smile
and led the team responsible for growing Alexa internationally.
He also worked at Airbnb with me,
and now he's at Uber, leading global product for the vehicles platform,
which includes making Uber's fleet increasingly electric and autonomous.
In our conversation, we focus primarily on two topics.
What separates a top 1% PM from everyone else,
specifically for new PMs and also for senior PMs,
and we also dig deep into the working backwards process.
We get into how you can implement the process on your team
and how you might be doing it wrong.
There's also a bunch of links to templates and guides in the show notes,
so if you want to follow along, definitely check those out.
With that I bring you, Ian McAllister.
This episode is brought to you by Mix Panel, offering powerful self-serve product analytics.
If you listen to this podcast, you know that it's really hard to build great product without making compromises.
And when it comes to using data, a lot of teams think that they only have two choices.
Make quick decisions based on gut feelings or make data-driven decisions at a snail's pace.
But that's a false choice.
You shouldn't have to compromise on speed to get product answers that you can trust.
With MixPanel, there are no trade-ups.
Get deep insights at the speed of thought
at a fair price that scales as you grow.
MixPanel builds powerful and intuitive product analytics
that everyone can trust, use, and afford.
Explore plans for teams of every size
and see what MixPanel can do for you at MixPanel.com.
And while you're at it, they're hiring.
Check out Mixpanel.com to learn more.
This episode is brought to you by Athletic Greens.
I've been hearing about AG1
on basically every podcast
that I listened to, like Tim Ferriss and Lex Friedman, and so I finally gave it a shot earlier
this year, and it has quickly become a core part of my morning routine, especially on days that
I need to go deep on writing or record a podcast like this. Here's three things that I love about
AG1. One with a small scoop that dissolved in water, you're absorbing 75 vitamins, minerals,
probiotics, and adaptogens. I kind of like to think of it as a little safety net for my nutrition
in case I've missed something in my diet.
Two, they treat AG1 like a software product.
Apparently they're on their 52nd iteration
and they're constantly evolving it based on the latest science,
research studies, and internal testing that they do.
And three, it's just one easy thing that I can do every single day
to take care of myself.
Right now, it's time to reclaim your health
and arm your immune system with convenient daily nutrition.
It's just one scoop in a cup of water every day and that's it.
There's no need for a million different pills and supplements to look out for your health.
Make it easy, Athletic Greens is going to give you a free one-year supply of immune-supporting vitamin B
and five free travel packs with your first purchase.
All you have to do is visit athletic greens.com slash letting.
Again, that's athletic greens.com slash Lenny to take ownership over your health and pick up the ultimate daily nutritional insurance.
Ian, welcome to the podcast.
Thanks for having me, Lenny.
looking forward to this. Me too. I'm sure you hear this a lot, but when I was a new product manager,
a very new PM, the post that you wrote on what makes the top 1% product manager was really
influential and really helped me figure out what to focus on and what skills are really important.
And I find that it continues to Levant as this very legendary post for product managers who are
trying to figure out what to do. And I just reread it in prep for this post. And I was just like,
wow, this is like now that I'm on the other side, I'm like, this is so right. And so I'm really
excited to dig into a lot of these things in person, sort of virtually in person. And yeah,
with you. So thank you again for doing this. Yeah, man, it's awesome. I'm excited just to spend
some time talking with you about product and we'll see what happens. Did you expect the impact
that this had when you were writing it when you're just putting this together, the impact that
the post had in your career or just the PM industry? I definitely not. I used to lurk on
core at the time. And I was just kind of having fun reading things and answers some questions. And I used to
look for questions in the sort of Goldilocks zone. They weren't like too high level of distract,
like how do you be a good PM, but they weren't like too like super specific. And this one was kind
of right in the middle. And so I'd pluck off a couple of those. And I think more as a way to structure
my own thoughts, you know, that was kind of what was interesting and fun for me to do that,
not because I thought have any kind of real reach. But obviously it's been cool to see that
people reference it pretty often. And that's been, that's been pretty fun. We'll link to this in the show
notes. If folks that are listening don't know what we're talking about, we'll link to it.
and you could check it all out.
And we're going to be talking about a lot of this stuff in the actual chat.
But there's a couple of things there that are worth maybe drilling in on a little bit.
One is just the impact that writing on the internet can have on someone's career.
Like this one post, I imagine, had a lot of impact on the trajectory of your career.
Is there something you could share there?
Is that true?
Yeah, it did.
And there's another post.
I think it was before this one.
Someone just asked about Amazon's product development process.
And so I wrote about the working backwards process, which isn't my process.
I just used it.
and just described it and just kind of caught on a little bit there as well.
And I think those two, and then I started to kind of write more about people management
and product management.
And I think the value for me was so awesome just to like make connections with people in the
industry.
And it felt like this is, I guess, the 2010 or something like this, where a lot of Amazon
people, I sort of felt were just like so 100% heads down.
It was a little bit of a secretive culture, not maybe like Apple, but it was pretty private.
it. But I was kind of interested in the startup community and product in general. And so I think I
spent a little time trying to engage with folks. And I just made so many kind of great connections
and relationships from this. You know, I remember interacting with you and getting to know Joe Bot and
other folks at Airbnb early on, even before I joined. But obviously, I'd credit this work and those
relationships for me ultimately going there. And so many, so many great relationships and people I've met
because of it. And aside from just like the little positive feedback, I mean, people tweet at me
periodically be like, hey, by the way, just love this post and whatever. And so it's super gratifying.
You mentioned a little bit about your background. Then we're about to get into that. And I want you
to share all the things you've done. But the other piece there that I think is interesting that comes
up again and again in the power of writing is it often just starts with you trying to collect your
thoughts and putting it out there. And then, wow, so many people find that valuable and it spreads.
And so that's just like a really simple way of thinking about if you're starting to write online,
just summarize something that you've been thinking about that you want to just crystallize in your own head.
There's this quote that's probably falsely attributed to Mark Twain and Hemingway often of just like,
I don't know what I've thought until I've written it down.
And that's super true with these things.
And so that was a really good example of this.
Yeah.
And I think with any kind of writing, it was probably less structured initially, but I would
partially because I was trying to share something for an external audience, try to just organize
it and make it compact and not too wordy or rambling.
And I think business writing has spent a lot of the time doing that at Amazon is so valuable
because you've got to be a clear thinker to be a clear communicator.
And so it's kind of there's two tests in writing well or communicating well.
It's both those things.
So I found it's pretty valuable in kind of sharpening your acts.
So these are the two things we're going to focus our chat on is what makes the top
of 1% product manager and then the Amazon way of working and especially
working backwards. So these are all good cues for where we're going. But before we get there,
can you just spend just like a minute giving us a sense of some of the wonderful things you've done
in your career and what you're up to now? Well, I can tell you what I have done. I'll let others
decide what's wonderful or not. So after doing like finance and economics in school, I made
the logical choice and I got a job doing marketing in the beer industry. And then the next logical
choice, I moved to Tokyo and I sort of bootstrap my way into software development without
up knowing Japanese or software development.
Did that for a few years, came back to the States, working as a developer and a startup
and then kind of a mid-sized company, and then moved to Microsoft as a program manager,
pretty much a product manager, the same thing there in that role, learned some good stuff
and then made a connection with Amazon and moved there, 2006.
And that was really the start of when I think about building my product toolbox and kind of
leadership toolbox.
So a few different things I did over 20,
12 years, a few years in retail and conversion. I then moved to sort of traffic and direct traffic
loyalty when I created Amazon Smile. The role in Alexa, I led Alexa International, so sort of
scaling Alexa and Echo to six more countries. And the last role in delivery experience and
operations. So I led a number of different programs there. And then recently joined Uber, we're
a senior director of product and tech for vehicles. So that means everything, all the tools that help
fleets and rental companies make their vehicles accessible to Uber drivers so they can earn.
Sustainability tech and electrification, our vehicle platform, and then creating a path for
autonomous vehicles to come on to the platform. That's it. Amazing. I just realized this one thread
through your career is like autonomy and AI a little bit, right, with Alexa and then with
Uber with these autonomous car stuff you're working on now. Is that something realized or is that
accident. Well, I mean, I guess you could connect those things. Obviously, both are, you know,
machine learning, AI. I think the way I think about it is that I've done a whole bunch of
different lifet times, especially around e-commerce. And so it kind of allows me to cover the gamut.
Plus, I guess I forgot to mention the time at Airbnb, you know, working with Jobod and you and
Vlad and Dan and Shirley. And there was focused on kind of building out the customer support
technology platform. So that's another part of the sort of e-commerce platform covers the gamut.
Right. I forgot to bring that up too.
I'm glad to touch on that.
I guess I skip past that with the Amazon.
The most transformative time, getting to work together.
That was awesome.
That was awesome.
I learned a lot from you, too, during that time.
What a time.
This is a good time to chat about, speaking of Airbnb and all that, to chat about what makes
a top 1% product manager.
So I know your post was really titled, like, what separates a 1% PM from a 10%
PM, but it feels like it's even broader, just like, how do you become a top 1%
product manager?
And I thought maybe a good way to start here is just, maybe just like,
run through the attributes that you've kind of found over the years are like here's the things that
a top 1% PM needs to get great at maybe just run through them and then we'll talk through them in
a little more detail yeah i was going to pull up my post here so i can actually refer to it you want me to
go through all of them or just kind of pick out a couple to touch on let's maybe just go through them
quickly just to like put them out there and then i'll have some follow-up questions to dig into a few of
them all right sounds good well the way i listed at the time you know think big you know always
want to be hunting for bigger impact.
Communicate. I think we'll probably touch on that a little bit.
It's super important for PMs as a test of their thinking and their communication.
Simplify, you know, how you can do more with less and have more impact is simplifying is a great way to do that.
Prioritize, that's sort of, I think, the core skill after communication of a PM.
And there's so many different lenses to view that.
Let's see here.
Forecasting and measuring, I think that it's really important, you know, what separates product managers from
consultants sometimes as you forecast and then you execute and then you measure and validate
and that helps you build your instincts.
Obviously, the core execution of just shipping and doing what you said you do, understanding
technical tradeoffs is that you don't have to be a software engineer to be a great PM,
but the more you learn about technical tradeoffs, not just product and customer tradeoffs,
that will help you, you know, simplify and get more yield out of your resources.
Understanding good design, if you're working on anything customer focused,
that's always going to help you kind of think in the mind of a customer or a user.
You don't need a design, but the more you understand helps.
Writing effective copy, this goes a long way, not to get close and not to like sub out the copy to somebody else,
but to get good at communicating with a couple words to your customers.
That's a great skill.
Those were the ones that I wrote at the time, you know, I guess 10 years ago.
And then I refreshed the posts recently in my newsletter.
and I added a couple new ones, honestly, because as I reflected back, there was a few that
I think a lot about these days that I miss the first time around earned trust with others.
That's so important as a PM, but especially if you're going to grow as a product leader,
it becomes even more important.
And I think trust is the currency of a product manager and a product leader, especially if you're
going to grow in your career.
Digging for data, it's out there, and you've got to develop the tools to go find it, not to
depend on your analyst or your or what's in the reports today.
So that's a really important skill for anyone in product.
Probably the more junior you are, the more important it is as you're really in the weeds there,
building product.
Pushing back effectively, this is an art and a skill, but I think your ability to do this
is pretty correlated with your ability to grow and succeed as a leader because if you say yes
to everything, you're going to go nowhere.
adapting to change, how you react to change will obviously impact one year mood and your morale,
as well as how effectively you can kind of rally yourself for your team. And then driven by
impact, not promotion. Ultimately, that's what you want to wake up every day thinking about
how to have an impact for your business. And that will be an indicator on your likelihood of
promotion. So do that instead of just focusing on how to get promoted and having that guide your day.
Awesome. So it's a long list. There's a lot that a PM needs to be good at, which I think
if you're a PM, you already know, it's like a wild, crazy, impossible job to have everything nailed down.
And at the end of this post, you even mentioned, like, you've never met at 1% PM that does all these things.
And I think that's important.
Like, no one's going to be the best at all these things.
And so just to drill down a little bit and get a little more focused, say you're a new product manager.
Of these, I forget how many of there, maybe 10, 12, what are like the top three that you think new PM should get most good at and focus on?
probably communicate, prioritize, and execute. I think those are just the core building blocks.
Other ones will be more important as you grow and become more senior, but those ones,
no matter where you are in your product career, I think, are super important.
Being a better communicator is something I've been working on my entire product career.
And I'll be working on until the day I stopped. I remember years ago I was at Microsoft.
I first kind of effectively product manager role.
And my product unit manager, Thomas, came by the office.
And I think he asked me, like, when is this going to ship?
And I was like, well, this thing is taking a little bit longer here and this other thing
and yada, yada.
And it sort of gave a bunch of background, but I didn't really answer the question.
And I got a little feedback from him, like, that's not really the, you know, ultimately he's like,
he's waiting for a date.
And so that, you know, I just sort of reflected on that.
And that was kind of, as I remember my journey to try to be a better communicator over time,
and I'm still on it.
When I went to Amazon, I worked for Kim Rackmeller, who was our, I think,
at the time SVP for Worldwide Discovery, and I think she was Amazon's first TPM. And she was tough,
but super smart. And so that was also kind of an early experience to kind of learn from her. And
sometimes you get some feedback when you didn't really answer the question. And my first boss,
Russell, I kind of organized and started to gather this thing called the Book of Kim. And so we would
gather these best practices that we learned from her or elsewhere, you know, avoid weasel words,
answer first and then explain, own your problems, and started building this.
And then I sort of extended that over time and added a bunch more and wrote a post called
the Operator's Manual.
I sort of tried to gather all these things together.
But it's such an important thing.
And the stakes get higher as you work with more and more senior people.
But if you can get in the habit early of answering it when question with a date, knowing how
to use numbers to answer questions.
And honestly, just learning from feedback and kind of.
grade yourself after you get feedback on a doc or after a meeting or after answering a question
in an elevator. And if you try to say, gosh, how could I have done that better? And then try to get
better, you can. And you can go far if you just focus on that and all the other 150 skills of a
product manager. But if you don't have that, it's unlikely that you're going to really go too far in
your product career. So that was communicate. I guess prioritizes the next one. And so I think this is like
the number one key tool of a product manager is prioritization because so many things come from
from being a good at prioritizing. And it's not just like what project do you do next or do you do
this project or that project. There's so many different dimensions to prioritization.
Which themes are you going to prioritize in a roadmap and which projects within a theme and
how are you going to sequence those projects, how much of a project you're going to build?
And also just time management is also a prioritization function.
like, what are you going to choose to spend your time on?
You know, which things are you going to really go all out to make great?
Which things are you going to kind of starve for attention or just not do?
Given the same amount of skill, intelligence, and resources,
a product manager with a great innate ability to prioritize
is going to generate 5x the impact of someone without that skill.
My early, if you could call it success at Amazon, I think was completely dependent.
It wasn't because I worked smarter or I was smarter,
I worked longer hours, or I was more technical.
than other people.
I think it was just because I was like one super hungry for impact.
And if there was a number or a metric that measured success at the business I was running,
I wanted that to go up into the right, not to hit a goal,
but just to go as far and as fast up to the right as possible.
And if then I think it was just like working with the team to hone in on the projects
that would do that with the greatest leverage and just marshalling all the team's resources.
So that was a good start.
That was a fit with Amazon in terms of,
of working backwards from a fitness function or a metric.
And so did that with the first team I was there.
And then again, later managed the gifting business.
And so it just was one skill that I think he helped me as well as make up for maybe some
deficiencies I had.
I don't have the biggest brain in the world.
And I don't have the biggest working memory.
And I wasn't the most technical.
But by trying to really get good at that prioritization, I think that I think that's helped
me and it still does.
I think execute is the third one, which is no surprise that like every PM has to execute.
And I think it's, you know, assuming you prioritize well, then execution means sort of molding what you want to build and do a simple compact package that has the highest impact possible.
And then you also, execution is a big function of the team you're working with.
So it's your designers and your data science folks and especially your engineers.
So anything to do with how well they're doing their jobs or how well they're resourced or whether they're getting better and better at every sprint.
like you have some amount of ownership in helping make that happen because that directly impacts your team's ability to execute and ultimately your reputation as well for being able to execute.
You know, sort of the drive that goes into execution, product managers are the motive power behind execution and impact.
And if you stall out or you don't do your job, the project's probably going to stall out as well.
And so you're the ones like with a, especially with a TPM, if you're lucky enough to have one in the back of the ship, kind of beating the drum and
driving everyone forward. But again, lots of people have written a lot of stuff about execution,
and there's a lot to it. But I think those are probably the three I'd focus on.
Awesome. And what's interesting about these three is if you look at the rest of the list,
like think big, understand technical tradeoffs, understand good design. I think what I would take
away from this is those are the things you don't need to focus on that much when you're in EPM.
Focus on, as you said, communication, prioritizing, executing. Focus less on these other things
because later they'll become more and more important
and obviously learn as much as you can.
But it's almost easier to think about the things
you don't need to stress about when you're starting out.
Yeah, I think that makes sense.
If there's a core, right?
Or like think about in year one as a PM,
focusing on those things.
And you can develop other skills over time.
But yeah, I think you're spot on there.
If we were to go back through these three
just maybe as a last question,
and you may not have an answer to this.
But if you think about communicating,
prioritizing and executing, is there like one tactical thing you could suggest that a PM listening
to this can do to get better at one of these things? They're like a trick you've learned of like,
wow, this is one way you can level up communicating, executing, advertising, or not?
The closest thing to like a checklist, right? The post-dimensioned, the operator's manual, that was
that was the closest thing to like, if you do these things, these specific actions,
I think it'll go a long way because a lot of them are.
guided around not doing the easy pitfalls and communication mistakes, like rambling.
If you're asked a question and you explain and then maybe you get to the answer,
it's if you just think answer and then explain or sometimes answer and then shut up,
that actually is a tactical thing you can do to get better at communicating.
And there's some other tips in there as well.
So that's that was my attempt to try to encode to take some of the ones that we gathered
early at Amazon, add some more.
The others are, yeah, there's no just simple trick, unfortunately, to prioritize other than, I mean, I think working backwards is a good technique to have impact to guide your prioritization.
And that is something where it's not a simple tip, but there's a set of practices and behaviors that you can do that will ultimately lead you to prioritize better.
Awesome.
We'll talk about all that.
And then I think communication, the simple tip was just like grade yourself after you communicate and try to just take up.
moment, and after a while, you'll just do it naturally to think about, gosh, how would I have
answered that question better? And so the next time you can try to answer that question better,
and it's just a continuous improvement process. Or maybe even ask your manager, hey,
what could I have done better in terms of how I communicated in that last meeting or that last
email? Yeah, absolutely, absolutely. Okay, so then coming out it from the other direction,
say you're a senior PM, what are three of these attributes that you would suggest folks focus on
to get better and level up in their career? Gosh,
still communicate, to be honest. Like, I think that's the one at every level of product. It's just
the stakes are higher. I think Think Big is one for sure. There was a phrase, I think Warren Buffett and the
Berkshire Hathaway letter used at some point was like at our scale, we got to hunt for bigger elephants.
And so I think at any scale as a PM, whatever your idea is or whatever your solution or the
problem you're solving, take a minute at the beginning to say, could this be bigger? Could this be a bigger thing
and more impactful than the initial idea,
even if the initial idea sounds big.
So that's sort of a tool.
And that's often where I'd start when my PMs were sort of sharing an idea
is I'd try to expand it to the degree it might be expanded,
think about it from that perspective.
And then maybe you want to still start small,
but with a bigger vision in mind.
Earned trust is a huge one.
And that's kind of why I added it more recently.
And it becomes even more important as you get into senior roles
because that's, I think it's truly like the currency of,
of a product leader or probably any leader in any function.
Because if you want to ask for more resources to do something bigger,
if your leadership doesn't trust you to use those resources well or do what you said
you're going to do, you're probably not going to get them.
But if you've built trust that you're a good steward of resources and you make a lot of
impact with a given team, that's directly going to correlate with your ability to gain more
resources.
You know, trust is just built by repeatedly setting and meeting expectations.
And I think that's a good kind of mantra to think about as a PM.
like my meeting the expectations that I set and not just doing good things, but like calling your shots, forecasting, setting a goal, and then hitting it.
And if you do that repeatedly, you're going to be in pretty good shape.
And there's like so many practices as a product manager or product leader that build trust.
You know, you tell the truth without fail and you launch when you say you'd launch and you launch what you said, you launch, and you own your mistakes.
And then the other practices just lose trust.
You know, if you lie or if you're evasive, if you don't ship what you said you're going to do, if you ignore your mistakes or you repeat them.
And so I think, you know, just simply having high standards for yourself and think of trust is that like currency, that's going to correlate well as a PM, as a GPM or director of product in any level, you know, that's the thing that you want to build.
So thinking big, building trust, was there a third?
I think maybe the last one, which is certainly relevant for a PM, but is really true as well as like driven by impact.
And that if you forget about everything else, forget about politics, forget about promotion or having more bigger org or whatever, if you simply wake up every day trying to have the biggest impact you can, or if you're a leader, trying to use your team to have the biggest impact you can in the company, which will influence how you build your roadmap and how you,
How you do you do every part of your day?
That's a really good guiding light.
And I remember my first 10 years at Amazon, just naturally, not because I thought about it,
I was just hungry to have an impact, take my business, grow it as fast as possible.
I wasn't maybe loosely thinking about promotion, but I wasn't thinking about it.
I didn't never talk to my manager about it and I wasn't bringing it up.
I was just focus on taking my book of business and making it bigger.
And then the net result was I was promoted several times and I did grow in my role,
but that wasn't what drove me.
It was just the impact.
Would you say that driving impact is more important for new PM or senior PM?
Like, it feels like impact is like the soup within which all PMs swim and that's like constantly important.
But it's interesting that you mostly put that into the latter part of a career.
Do you feel like with new PMs in your team, you're less expecting them to like think about impact and focus on impact?
Well, I mean, I think for junior PMs, right?
If you're a brand new PM, then yeah, you want to have an impact, but you're really just like you have a project or a feature to ship or something like that.
And you're often kind of not necessarily told what, you know, given a lot of latitude, you build your own roadmap, but you're asked to sort of ship this.
So you want to spec it.
You want to execute and do it.
But increasingly as you grow, there are opportunities to sense out and try to have a bigger impact, maybe and then start to influence prioritization or roadmaps.
It's just that the expectations, it goes from being a nice to have as a junior or a very first time PM to as you get a little more senior.
Hopefully if things work the way they should work, that's really how you're evaluated.
Yes, you want to treat your team well and you want to do a whole bunch of other things, but take two people.
One has a massive impact on the business and one who doesn't.
Then the right way to work should be that first person should be the one that grows and develops and is tasked and with bigger challenges just because if you're in.
And a bigger challenge, that's even more important for the business.
So I think that's a good kind of way to think about the flywheel of product leadership.
Yeah, it feels like a lot of times you get lucky as an UPM.
You work on a project that ends up having a lot of impact that you didn't necessarily drive.
You just happen to work on something.
Wow, this was a huge deal.
And that feels like an important thing to optimize for a little in your early career,
is like work on something that's likely to have a lot of impact,
even if you're not responsible for setting the strategy and prioritizing.
Well, I think that's true if you have a choice in where you work in product.
If you have a choice to work on something that's part of like offense, you know, something that drives the business.
And like, you know, it's true that executives wake up if something drives dollars or customers or offense things.
And, you know, it just maybe shouldn't be this way, but a little less interested in things that maybe less than a risk that just the risk never happens.
It comes to pass or a cost center that operates a little more efficiently.
So it's one lens where that might relate to your success.
I think also who you work for, you know, and I think most of us don't get to choose that,
especially early in our career and either works out in your favor, which is great.
And that was the case for me, especially at Amazon, some of the leaders I work with,
but sometimes it doesn't.
But I think the more that you can suss out who you work for, because then the better they
are at these skills and prioritizing, one, they're just going to be a better teacher and a better
role model to learn from.
So I think that's an important thing to think about in any kind of job change.
To close the loop on this piece of four more senior PMs, the skills to focus on, you said,
Thinking Big, Building Trust, and Driving Impact.
I'll put you on the bottom, give you two options, two directions to go with this.
One is, if you want to get better at each of these three things, do you have any one thing someone could do?
Or what does Great look like for Thinking Big or Building Trust or Driving Impact?
Those are two options.
That was like six questions there, Lenny.
Let me see here what I'm answering.
Well, I think the think big one is interesting.
And one way to think about thinking big, especially as you grow in your career, is most people are like, operate within a box.
You know, there's a box of there's product management.
And there's these are the things that product managers do.
And you basically have build a roadmap and you prioritize features and you work with Eng.
And so that might be the typical kind of product scope and tech.
Most of my roles were ones where I was kind of a GM, but a really product-focused GM.
And so I naturally found myself taking a much wider view of what product is across disciplines.
And I was lucky enough that I had engineering teams and marketers and, you know, analysts and other folks.
And so that helped me.
But I think as a PM, you can still do that, even if those functions don't report to you,
is take that really wide view of what success for your product is and not have the blinders on its product or
tech, it's anything. It's anything that influences the success and your your, your customer's
success or anything else. And it just means, you know, you don't own marketing or you don't own
this other function, but you own it until you find somebody else to own it. And so that's not
necessarily thinking big in terms of scale or whatever, but in terms of how you think about your role
as a PM and what your ownership responsibility is. And so I think just the more that you, you know,
you don't want to get over your skis as a PM and then you're trying to like change your
CFO's mind about something necessarily. But the more you grow that you have to increasingly
do that and find the constraints or barriers to your success or your product success and knock
them down no matter what they are. So yeah, it makes me think about just the advice of like think
like an owner. Think beyond just like your one little bubble. Think about the broader business
outside of the one little product you might be working on. So that's great advice.
This episode is brought to you by Assembly AI.
If you're looking to build powerful AI-powered features in your audio or video products,
then you need to know about Assembly AI.
Assembly AI is the API platform for state-of-the-art AI models.
The thousands of product-led growth companies like Spotify, Lume, and CallRail are using to infuse AI into their products.
With simple APIs, developers and PMs can get access to powerful AI models for transcription, summarization,
and dozens of other tasks that are fast, secure, and production-ready.
All of their models are researched and trained in-house
and continuously updated by their team of AI experts,
which, for a PM, makes it easy to build and ship new AI-powered features.
Product teams at startups and enterprises are using Assembly AI
to automatically transcribe and summarize phone calls and virtual meetings,
detect topics and podcasts, pinpoint when sensitive content is spoken,
redact PII from audio videos,
and way more. Visit assemblyaI.com to try assemblyaI's API for free and start testing their models
in their no-code playground. That's assemblyaI.com. Before we move on to the working backwards piece,
which I'm excited to get into, is there anything else you want to share on this thread?
I might just talk about earned trust because this is one that I don't think I really, I didn't put in there
initially, and I honestly don't think that I recognize the importance of it early on in my career or even
in the middle of my career. And it's been in the last couple years that I really understood the
importance of it. You know, my wife, my wife, Sarah is a product manager in AWS. And so I've kind of,
as I've mentored her a little bit in her career, and I've seen how this is really a superpower for her,
it really made me reflect. I'm like, one of the things I could have done better in different roles
to earn trust more. And it's, you know, it's not just the basic things, like to be honest and tell two
different people the same thing versus different things. I think it's, you know, trying to really
understand work backwards from that person and what are their goals and what are their organization's
goals and honestly spend the time and the energy to try to get to alignment in the same place
and be willing, not just bullheaded, which I might have been earlier in my career, maybe still to many
people, but charging forth what I think is right, but taking some more time to try to forge an
alliance with someone because if you do that, you're ultimately going to be more successful.
So that was just one that I was probably slow to recognize the importance of, and I'm trying to catch up now.
Is there a story that comes to mind where you look back and I should have earned trust there or I broke some trust here that you'd be willing to share?
You know, when I was working with you and the team at Airbnb, I think this is one where Joe Bot brought me on to help sort of build out the customer support technology platform, maybe more how Amazon would do it, like to maintain a high level of quality, but to become like more efficient.
as well and to reduce the cost so that Airbnb wouldn't have to scale customer support to the same
degree the business was scaling. And so, you know, coming, kind of trying to build a new team and
develop. And I was pretty heads down doing it the way I thought it should be done and
then working with the team there in terms of like, let's get a strong analytics framework.
Anyway, let's measure all these things and really understand what's going on at the data level.
And then let's use the same prioritization muscles that had kind of made me successful at Amazon.
to prioritize things that were best,
work backwards.
And I think that what I didn't do as much as I should have
is obviously really partnering with the customer support leadership team as well.
That was something where I think in some ways it felt like we were in alignment
and getting on stage together and stuff.
But it turned out I maybe hadn't spent as much time and effort on that
as I thought to build that true support there
such that that leader would rally the organization around it
as well, and we'd be marching in the same beat. And so that was something that I would reflect.
Now, I think the team did amazing things and, you know, Shirley really carrying the torch there
and the entire team. And so accomplished a lot. But that was a learning about like going back,
I probably would have spent more time and really tried to do even more on that.
Thanks for sharing that. I never knew that story. And it sounds like the takeaway there is maybe
don't take for granted the leadership team, the team that will actually be using the product.
Is that kind of roughly way to think about it?
Well, I would say that if you have a certain approach, now you may be, I believe it's the right one.
It may be the right one.
But if you don't build the support and the relationships, you know, that they're going to help carry that out and execute on that strategy, it may not, it may not get executed as well as you think it should be.
And so that's an important part of success.
It's a risk that you have to kind of mitigate and trying to earn trust and to do it that way as a way to mitigate that risk that the right product and the right direction and the right.
strategy, it may not land if you don't have that support that you need. And so that,
that I think was by learning. What better way to learn a lesson than get some wrong and then you
never forget it again. You could call it getting wrong. I just think of like something I could
have done better, you know, and just that same continuous improvement mindset. You know, it's,
it's to everything, every role, every experience, every project, every communication. And if you build
that muscle to try to like do it better the next time and also just the try to be a little self-aware
about what could have gone better, then I think it's a really good muscle to build.
So it's a good segue to the second area of where our chat is going to go, which is Amazon
and things you've learned about just the working backwards process.
How many years did you say you worked at Amazon total?
12 years.
12 years.
It feels like everyone that worked at Amazon is like 10 years or more.
These like large numbers.
So they must be doing something right.
And I don't know.
What do you think that is actually?
Why do people stay there so long?
It's amazing.
What's interesting about Amazon and it's changed over time is that I think you know pretty quickly
whether you're a fit for it or not.
You know, and it can be kind of a crucible and, you know, a little Spartan.
And it just clicked with me though, because I'm kind of a structured thinker and right brain.
And so this idea that like, hey, I could have this business and then figure out one metric
or fitness function that determines success.
And then my job is to make that number go up and to the right.
That kind of fit with me.
Then, you know, I rewired my brain probably over the first 10 years around this concept.
And I just, I just felt like I was learning.
I was not only working with smart people that were driven, which was true at Microsoft as well,
but there was kind of this DNA in the organization and this wiring that I thought was really effective.
And it just kind of clicked with me.
And so I kind of molded myself to the environment.
And, you know, at every step of the way, I felt like I was learning and growing.
and I was, you know, one of the benefits for me is you get a chance to learn from so many other people in these different settings.
You get a chance to read documents that make you, you know, learn more so than probably a slide deck.
You get a chance to be in weekly business reviews with really smart people and learn from that, not just learn from your own experience, but from everyone else in that room.
So I was just a sponge and so much learning happening that I think propelled my career.
And so that's, that was why, especially the first 10 years that it was so fantastic,
just like growing and, you know, feeling yourself kind of build these new muscles and develop
these new tools. And I loved it. So that was why I stayed so long. And obviously, Airbnb then,
it was a time to try something new, which was a great experience. You know, kind of a test.
You know, I was in Seattle and the company was in San Francisco and spending three days on a road
each week was a good learning and ultimately, you know, a reason to come back and be Seattle-based.
But then I chose Amazon again because it was still a great place. And I thought that I could continue.
to learn. Awesome. I was going to mention they drew you back in. So yeah, that's pretty rare.
What did you learn from folks like Jeff Bezos and Jeff Wilkie about building product,
leadership, company building? What's kind of stuck with you working with folks like that?
I was two very different people, but like complimented themselves so well. You know, I didn't have,
you know, hundreds of meetings with Jeff Bezos while I was there, but I did have a chance,
especially in kind of the development of Amazon Smile. And then early when I started the social team to have some
some of those meetings where I wrote the doc and it was Jeff and, you know, 10 other people reviewing.
The process of kind of doing, even before hitting on Amazon Smile, it was really kind of a
innovation process, I guess you could call it, where we had a goal in mind to increase customers,
kind of loyalty to Amazon, their direct traffic loyalty, not in the way Prime did, which is a paid
program, but to try to come up with another program or way in which customers might start
they're shopping on Amazon instead of elsewhere. And so I kind of, I was running the gifting business.
I just moved over to the traffic org to try to come up with a new program with no team or anything.
And then I would meet with Jeff and, you know, Bezos and Wilkie and others every couple
months and just kind of I would profile a couple different options and use the working backwards
process and we'd review some facts. And so there was a bunch of kind of learnings throughout that
process. One, I found Jeff to be super encouraging. And, you know, each time we'd leave one of those
meetings, we maybe didn't find the thing in that meeting. We talk about it and brainstorm a little
bit, but he would always leave and be encouraging and, you know, with a quote, you know, one time he was
like, you know, remember, this process doesn't have to be efficient because the prerequisite for efficiency
is knowing where you're going. And then he'd leave the room and whatever. So I just, I found like the
the rhetoric around Jeff or blowing up or whatever, I didn't find any of that. And I found him to be
super encouraging. And he found all these times to sort of help train me in the working backwards
process. Like there was a time when I came with a press release for a concept. And it didn't have
a problem paragraph. I'd skip that. And, you know, we reviewed it and so forth. And he was like,
you know what? Maybe if you don't have a problem paragraph, there's not really a problem. And so it was
kind of a little lesson to me like, yeah, maybe that is why I did it. I wasn't really working backwards.
I kind of had the solution in mind.
And so I'd skipped over that part.
So that was one just very specific learning about the process from Jeff.
So Jeff Wilkie, I probably learned more from Wilkie just because I had more exposure over my time there.
You know, at one point he was my skip level.
And I have such tremendous respect for Wilkie or jaw, as he was called internally, because
he was sort of the constant like operator.
This muscle that I think you learn working at Amazon about being an operator, whether you're
you're not in operations, but any part of the business that I think came from him. And I think it was due to him that Amazon developed that muscle. And I think it's one way that separates some Amazon PMs for people who haven't worked there in that environment. And that continuous improvement mindset. That's like so important. And, you know, one of the forums that was a great learning was sort of the WBR, weekly business review or later called Consumer Business Review. So this was a forum where Jeff would lead the meeting. It would be a series of metrics for different parts.
of the business, everywhere from fulfillment to customer support, to traffic, to category teams,
to programs, and I would present on Amazon Smile there.
And the way he would run that meeting and kind of enable you to get through a metrics
meeting for the entire North American retail business in one hour.
And the way he ran that meeting would lead all those leaders to build these muscles,
because you wanted to be prepared to speak to the variances or trends in your business
and a key metric and know your business and know what you are doing,
on that thing. And so just this hour a week of probing and asking questions and everyone,
there might be 100 people in that room prepared to answer questions about your business. And it had
this cascading effect that not only was I or other leaders there, you know, on the spot,
having to answer a question and being prepared, but that I would do the same thing with my team,
et cetera. So I was trying to build those muscles in my team such that they could
bring their insights and understanding and actions on things in this casket.
skating effect. So that was a mechanism, which is another really big thing at Amazon, that led to all
these, like, amazing behaviors. And I think a lot of those mechanisms, you know, came from Jeff Wilkie,
or he created an environment where they would be developed throughout the organization and then
propagated. And so that was one thing, just that operational mindset and rigor that is, you know,
being a product leader is not just about building new things. It's about, you know, how well you run,
which you've already built. And if you're really paying attention to the product that you operate,
it will give you ideas for things you could do to double down on something that's happening well
or to prevent something bad happening. And I think that's been a very key reason for Amazon scale.
Another thing I really respect about Jeff Wilkie, and I think Doug Harrington has some of this as well,
is that the notion of kind of a little bit of tough love, you know, and like, I think that's important.
And that neither were, you know, assholes, but sometimes, and especially, you know, Wilkie,
like you need to get that look kind of like your dad might you know look over his glasses at you and be like
hey um and so i think that was kind of the vibe that you would get it was professional it was respectful
but sometimes everyone needs a little kick in the ass and i think that was something but it was
you know it almost builds more respect from him and just incredible leaderly behavior which i really
respect and i try to model and i try to try to do the same because i respected it so much and then the
I guess the last attribute of Wilkie, which I really saw was like teaching. And it wasn't just saying
this is the right thing or this is the, this is the what my decision is in a meeting, but teaching the
why and why the pattern, the mental model that informs him to think this is the right thing.
And so I think he was just great at kind of teaching. Taking a moment, it might just take 10 seconds
in a meeting to teach. And that's something that I've forgotten in different parts of my career,
especially as you get more experienced. And you know the right thing.
decision to do and you know what you want, whatever, that may be the right thing, but I think
you'll have a lot more lasting effect if you could kind of abstract it to a degree and teach the lesson
because then that person will hopefully learn the lesson and can apply it to a bunch of future
situations. And it'll also understand the why more and it helps them kind of sometimes disagree
and commit more so than just being kind of given prescriptive advice.
Sounds like it must have been an incredible experience learning from these two.
Thanks for sharing all that.
I want to get to the working backwards stuff.
I feel like we've talked about this a lot.
We've talked about this in other podcasts with other guests.
I feel like people understand the general idea.
Yeah, Amazon works backwards.
They write a PR.
Maybe there's a six-pageer thing they do.
But I feel like there's not a lot of here's how you actually do this thing.
And so just to spend a little time on this, when you see teams trying to work backwards
and be like, let's work backwards.
We're going to be like Amazon.
What do you find they do wrong when they're actually?
actually trying to implement this idea of working backwards.
What's the most common mistake do you find?
Yeah, well, working backwards is all about the problem and kind of starting there and
obsessing about the problem and being guided by it to then go into the solution.
So when teams that do it wrong is they don't do that, they don't work backwards, they start,
they have something they want to build.
We've got these things look similar, these two technologies or whatever.
We could combine them and then do this.
And if you say we could, and it's not grounded.
in a customer or a customer's problem, you're not working backwards. And then you may use
sort of quote unquote the working backwards process, but you already have the solution. And so
you're adding the problem after the solution. You're kind of retrofitting the problem,
retrofitting the customer. And so that I think is the number one thing is that it's,
they don't get the importance of truly starting with the problem that you're trying to solve
and being faithful to that working backwards from the problem. When I first started at Amazon
on community, we had sort of this business of automated merchandising using community content.
And that was kind of the core thing we were doing is to grow that.
But there was this Jeff idea that the team was super excited about because I think in some
meeting he'd kind of sketched it out or whatever.
And so there was already all this momentum to like build this thing that was actually a Jeff,
a Jeff project.
But I should have known at the time, in hindsight, I do because the name they had for this project
was Aeson to Aeson linking.
And, you know, Aeson was kind of the identifier for a project.
product on Amazon. And so it was kind of this not working backwards idea, ultimately, of like,
if you could link to products by a subjective attributes, and then you could build a feature around
it that allowed customers to vote on these things. And then it would be kind of a merge. So it was
not in spirit. It really wasn't working backwards. But the team was all excited. And so we kind of
eventually wrote the press release and we kind of did it. And you know what? It turned out it wasn't
successful. I ended up shutting it down later. And so I learned a lot. This was like the first year
or two at Amazon about using the working backwards process, but not really working backwards.
And so that's literally if I'm reviewing a working backwards press release or FAC or even talking
with someone about a new initiative. My brain is kind of wired down to not be able to process any
information until I focus on the problem and the customer. And then once we start talking about
that, then I can engage and kind of literally work backwards to say,
okay, how do we solve that problem?
And what's the most elegant way to solve it?
Or if there's three problems, what's number one or two or three?
So it's probably a gap in me that I can't like process information without working backwards
from the problem.
But I find it to be helpful when people do that.
So when people talk about working backwards, the way you're describing it is,
is interesting where it's focused on start with the problem, which I think generally product
teams try to do.
Like they're one pagers, their PRDs often have like, here's the problem we're solving.
here's why it's a problem.
Here's how we think about.
Is that the core of working backwards?
I always imagine it was like the launch release and the PR thing and maybe the FAQ.
Do you actually do working backwards at like Uber and Airbnb?
Like do you actually do that for every project yourself at this point?
There's two parts of it.
One, there's the concept of working backwards from what you're trying to accomplish.
And I still absolutely do that with my teams as well.
Like what are we trying to accomplish for the business or accomplish for a customer?
And let's start there.
And if they have a problem that is interfering with.
with their ability to be profitable for their ability,
you know, if it's a business customer or it's a customer trying to accomplish a goal,
starting with that problem.
That's different from the working backwards mechanism,
which is the press release and the fact,
which was the mechanism that Amazon used to enforce working backwards,
which I think is effective, you know,
and I've tried to sort of teach that and write some posts about with templates and things like that
because it's a great way to start of like the press release has a paragraph about the problem.
That's what you write.
And then you write the solution paragraph and then the customer quote.
And then the fact, which is like, is there a legitimate plan to succeed?
So if you don't have that muscle to work backwards already and your team, it's a great thing to try.
But that's not the only mechanism that can do it.
And eventually, if you do it enough and you build that muscle to work backwards, you can do it in any number of formats, whether it's something in a PRD or some other way.
But the key is that you don't just, you don't think what we could build.
you think about the problem and then the solution that solves that problem.
Got it. Okay. So the press release is not core to it. It's like a trick to get you to think about the problem you're solving. It's not like how you plan to now.
Interesting. And never thought about it that way. So when you're doing this process at other places outside Amazon, say you're a product leader that's trying to like, I want to do this. I want to improve the way we think about product. What is it that you suggest they do specifically? Is it right out? Here's the problem we're solving. Is there.
more to it. What would you suggest there? If it's a blank slate, truly, you could certainly use the
working backwards process like Amazon does with the internal press release and then the fact and so
forth. So that's fine. But a lot of companies have a different way they go about it. Some companies
are very much, it's slide culture and presentations and so forth. And so as a product leader,
you can think about what you do with your team and what you do upwards or across. And so
you may have the latitude to use any process with your team.
And I've done that at some companies where using documents and if they're supportive,
the team and they recognize the value of that, like, actually, this is a good and this is a great
way to write things down on paper and to have better information, content, and richer
discussion that oftentimes I think people will find that versus a slide with a couple
bullets is not great. Then you can kind of build that muscle. And I found it's a great way to
kind of teach and use those to dive deeper into the product. But depending on the organization
you're at, that may not wash to sort of train your senior leadership to use the process you want
to use. And so then it might be a matter of finding the opportunities to try something and saying,
you know, are you open to doing something this way, a review of a doc instead of a review of a whatever.
So it's a little separate than just working backwards,
but I think you just have to acknowledge the environment you're in.
And also, like, unless the organization has a specific format to do this,
if it does, you probably just need to use it.
Different leaders process information different ways.
You may find one format's effective with your leader,
but another one to sort of educate a broader organization.
But it's very kind of company specific.
So despite what I might want to do,
I just got to recognize that I have more leverage down.
with my team versus up or across.
Right.
Is there a template that you use consistently?
Is that something that you've published of just like how to frame the problem,
how to frame all these other elements?
I have shared posts on, I know for sure LinkedIn,
and I probably should put it on the newsletter on my newsletter that sort of a
working backwards template and some posts about how to do the process or, you know,
tips on how the Amazon does the process.
And so I'll make sure to put those up on my newsletter as well.
And the template's free.
obviously anyone can just copy it and grab it.
Awesome.
We'll link to that in the show notes.
Definitely send that to me after we wrap this thing.
And I was going to ask, does Amazon work backwards on every product they work on?
Do you suggest working backwards in every feature and product?
I think there's some scale below which it doesn't probably make sense to do this process
because there's a little bit of overhead to it.
But I think if it's a significant, if it's a new product, absolutely.
And I think there, I'm sure there's some at Amazon that don't use the process.
But in general, that was the way.
and often enforce that you need to, you need a working backwards review.
Ideally, that would happen kind of at the outset, but sometimes it would be added later.
And yeah, I think it's a great thing.
Whether you use the mechanism, again, it's a great template to start with and use if you have the flexibility to.
But I think it's also possible just to have the spirit and to try to be true to the spirit of working backwards from what you're trying to do for customers and what problem.
That's the most important thing.
The template is just a mechanism to help ensure that happen.
Got it. You mentioned this a review. What is that? Working backwards review? Well, that would just be a meeting with
leadership or other folks to kind of review the concept, review the press release, review the fact,
and ask questions. And in some cases, that would be the gate to like approving it. That was the case
with me and Bezos before we went off and built the team and launched Amazon Smile, as I would do
these reviews about different concepts. And that was the one that we greenlit. I mean,
that's often the case. It's also just a great way to educate other people about what you're trying
to accomplish, ground them and the customer problem and solution. And the fact is a whole other concept.
It's about the legitimate plan to succeed.
One other thing that I use, I got a chance to have lunch with Jeff Bezos,
who's probably back in 2008 or something like this.
And I sort of asked him, like, what's your criteria for sort of investing in something new?
And he said, well, it's like three things.
One, is it a big idea?
And then second, is it something we should be doing?
So if maybe you have an idea, if you have this new way to extract oil from shale,
is it a big idea?
Yeah, it probably could be a big idea.
Is this something Amazon should be doing?
Probably not.
And the third test is there a legitimate plan to succeed.
And you got to have all three of those things.
And I think the fact part of the working backwards process is that early stage legitimate test of whether this thing has a plan.
Because you could have this internal press release or big idea or big idea for solution.
But the fact basically says, okay, I've thought through the internal components or the finances or the key technical hurdles or whatever.
And so that's one that's not written about as much, how to do the fact.
But I think it's another way to kind of build trust that you've been thoughtful enough,
given the stage of the product, to deserve the resources or deserve to kind of move forward with it.
That's awesome.
I feel like most PMs listening to this are going to be like, I always start with the problem.
I'm always problem focused.
So I'm working backwards.
So I'm good.
Are there signs of just like, no, you're not?
You think you are, but you're probably not doing this well.
They're like a symptom of like, hmm, you don't actually know.
you're not actually doing this correctly.
The most common thing that I see that kind of tips me off is that when they talk about
something, there's different pieces in the pantry, right?
And they're like, we have these ingredients.
We could put them together.
We could add these two things together and make a meal out of it, right?
And so it might be a technology.
It might be a service.
It might be two different things.
Or the building blocks are there.
And what's enabled if you add these two.
building blocks together is something. But that's not really working backwards. It may be true
that there's some leverage or some benefit from the company having these technologies or assets.
But that to me is often the first step that these two things look similar. We combine them and
it's all goodness and this new thing. So if you start talking about those things or the technology,
I think that's a likely case that you're not really working backwards as opposed to
the opposite is that there's a customer problem that feels compelling.
Even before you know the solution, like, yeah, that does feel compelling.
And just like with every startup out there, probably a lot of the pitches are like,
there's a big audience and a painful problem.
And it's kind of the painkiller versus the vitamin thing.
And then we have a novel way to solve that.
That's kind of working backwards.
But the more often, especially in a big company, you'll have all these ideas because you have more
ingredients in the pantry of ways you could combine them and try to feed it to someone, but may not
be working backwards. Awesome. We're reaching about an hour chatting, and so I want to let you go.
Before we get our very exciting lightning round, is there anything else you want to share on
anything we've chatted about? See, no, I mean, I think we covered a bunch of good grounds. It's been
fun, but nothing, nothing particular. Okay, great. Well, then we've reached our very exciting
lightning round. We've got six questions here. They'll be pretty quick and easy. Whatever comes to
mind, share, and we'll go through them relatively quickly. Sound good. All right, let's do it. Let's do
what are two or three books that you've most recommended to other people? I said Getting Real by 37
signals, and it's specifically the chapter on epicenter design. I've shared that many, many times.
You can link to it. That's definitely the most thing I've shared. For fun, the wool trilogy by Hugh Howie,
he's probably my favorite author in a great series. And then for learning, just a recent one that I thought
be super fascinating was energy and civilization by Vaklav Smil. So it might not be on the best
seller list, but I thought it was interesting. What's another favorite podcast of yours other than
this one possibly? I think how I built this is really interesting just to kind of decompose
how interesting businesses and products came about. And then just because of my work,
EV News Daily is kind of a daily digest of what's going on in the electric vehicle space.
So that's a very good use of my time, five minutes a day, to get up to speed.
niche. I love it. What's a favorite movie or TV show you've recently seen? Yellowstone. That's
definitely my favorite. Can't wait for the next season. Montana is my happy place, although I'm probably
the kind of person that they rail about in the show, so it's kind of ironic. I think the movie,
the was everything everywhere all at once. I love movies that are not predictable, and I thought that
was just very creative. I'm shocked by how many people on Yellowstone die. That show is just
murder left and right. It was not expecting that on a ranch.
oriented show. It's a harsh environment. Quite harsh turns out, especially if you mess with the Dutton's.
Next question, favorite interview question that you like to ask. When I'm coming out of left field,
I ask people like, at this stage in your career, what have you learned about yourself? How are you
different from other people? No one's prepared for that. What do you look for in and their answers?
I don't know. I mean, there's not one specific thing and there's no right answer which maybe makes it
unfair, but just maybe a little self-reflection and maybe they will have understanding their
strength and that might be a good bit of self-awareness about what makes them
different where they can harness that and that makes them a better PM or engineer or
something. And so that's kind of what I'm looking for, but there's no set answer. It's more
just to throw them off balance. Interesting. Favorite app right now? It's probably not too
interesting, but to be honest, YouTube, it's like the, you know, eighth wonder of the world.
I just every day I'm amazed if I want to learn about something new like a couple summers ago.
I had some time off.
And so I basically taught myself how to do woodworking and built a kitchen and other stuff.
And so it's just like it continues to be this resource and this jewel that helps me kind of grow and learn about anything.
I imagine some people are watching this on YouTube right now.
All right.
I just wrote a story about a javelin, Olympic javelin thrower who learned how to do this watching YouTube.
He was somewhere in, I think, maybe Africa.
He had no coaches around and he just watched this one other javelin guy that just shared lessons on how to do this.
and became incredibly good.
It's insane.
And I didn't, I mean, I'm old, so I didn't have this when I was growing up.
Like, I remember going to the library and, like, sending away for a brochure in the back of a magazine and things like.
Learning was not so easy back then.
The Internet obviously was a huge resource and is, but then YouTube as well to see somebody do it.
It's also interesting to see somebody live.
So anyway, I'm a fan.
Final question.
Who else in the industry do you most respect as a thought leader, someone you look up.
to you. I say Gibson Biddle. I think that he is one, just tremendous amount of product experience that I think is
valuable. He, I respect the fact that he takes the time to share it. He doesn't have to, but he does. And he's also a great
communicator. And he invests in being, you can tell, like, you know, he measures seaside of his talks and things
like this. Like, he's invested over his career to be a great communicator. So I think he's a good, a good kind of
role model for me and I think for others out there. That guy is a force. I'm happy that we've had him on this
podcast. I'm hoping that everyone eventually that people mention this question we end up having on this
podcast. So that's great to check. I also love Gibson. He's got a great newsletter. Askgibs.com, I think.
Ian, thank you so much for being here. This was amazing. I really appreciate you sharing all this
wisdom with us. Two final questions. Where can folks find you online if they want to reach out,
learn more? And how can listeners be useful to you? Yeah, I guess Twitter is a great place. So Ian McAll,
I-A-N-M-C-A-L as my handle.
And then, you know, I've started a newsletter.
I'm not that frequent, to be honest.
I have a lot of good intentions and a bunch of ideas,
Ian McAllister.substack.com.
And so that's something to kind of connect and feel free to subscribe.
And hit me up on Twitter if you have ideas for posts or questions.
And if I can answer in a tweet, I will.
If not, I might put it on the queue of things to write about.
And, yeah, thanks for having me on, Lenny.
It's like we were talking earlier about like writing or doing other things.
And like the value of that is just like making connections with people.
And so that was what I was, one, just to reconnect with you is awesome.
And to whatever extent, I get a chance to make new connections in the world.
That's a good thing.
Amazing.
Yeah.
And we originally connected over that piece that you wrote.
So it all circles back 10 years later maybe.
Thanks, Ian.
All right.
Thanks, Laine.
Thank you so much for listening.
If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show,
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app.
Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review,
as that really helps other listeners find the podcast.
You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at lenniespodcast.com.
See you in the next episode.
