Let's Find Out - (Pt. 3b) Philosophy of Bob Ross: Industrial to Digital Revolution (A Bob Ross Deep Dive) ASMR
Episode Date: July 15, 2022The final video of our 3-part Bob Ross deep dive! Let's find out how Bob fits into history, philosophy, spirituality, culture, art, technology, and the relation of them all to our evolving society, fr...om the Industrial to the Digital Revolution we're currently still trying to understand. The Bob Ross Deep Dive series: Part 1: His Legacy https://youtu.be/xrqTnUO5Mfc Part 2: His Biography https://youtu.be/q7pTA4CIoHQ Part 3A: The Philosophy of Bob Ross: Ancient History and Modern Leisure https://youtu.be/ve52XaufNoY Part 3B: The Philosophy of Bob Ross: Industrial to Digital Revolution (this video) Timestamps: 0:00 recap of Part 3a (summary of the evolution of social morality from prehistory and antiquity through Christian Medieval and renaissance Europe and our modern secular and spiritually disconnected society) 16:14 Bob's spirituality 40:44 Mr. Rogers and Bob Ross 53:27 history of landscape paintings and their symbolism 1:10:44 landscapes, Utopia and social reformation 1:30:50 America's work ethic differed from Europe's 1:38:53 "Consumer Society and American History" 1:47:21 this guy Baudrillard: technology and people, conspicuous consumption 1:54:50 an antidote to nihilism in modern society 2:06:50 importance of silence, an antidote to noise/over-stimulation 2:23:35 psychological significance of landscapes 2:31:21 reaction against the industrial revolution: dignity of craftsmanship, design, self-reliance 2:48:46 Bob was ahead of the curve: tech, leisure, and Education 2.0 2:57:55 the meaning of life (yes, i'm saying Bob knew the meaning of life) 3:15:40 Web 2.0 3:23:38 proto-social media: Bob anticipated live streams, parasocial relationships, audience engagement 3:33:33 8. hours. laytayer... (whew!) 3:34:35 Davy T. Painterman (a Bob Ross disciple, painter and teacher) 3:41:30 Bob the Boomer influencer 3:47:30 relational aesthetics: from consuming to participating in art 3:59:55 metamodernism and authenticity 4:16:27 Bob and ASMR 4:20:35 Bob and reactionary Millenial trends: farmhouse, DIY, environmentalism/conservation, traditionalism, frugality, ethical/fairtrade/sustainability, crunchy mom's, hand-crafted, locally-sourced, natural and quality products 4:42:23 Conclusion (excerpt from "Happy Clouds, Happy Trees: The Bob Ross Phenomenon" by **Congdon, Blandy, and Cooeyman** (https://www.amazon.com/Happy-Clouds-Trees-Ross-Phenomenon/dp/1617039950)) Thanks for watching guys. And thank you for the continued support and encouraging, thoughtful, and constructive feedback. -Rich Sources: ▸"Happy Clouds, Happy Trees: The Bob Ross Phenomenon" by **Congdon, Blandy, and Cooeyman** (https://www.amazon.com/Happy-Clouds-Trees-Ross-Phenomenon/dp/1617039950) ▸Sex, Deceit, and Scandal: The Ugly War Over Bob Ross' Ghost by **Alston Ramsay** https://www.thedailybeast.com/sex-deceit-and-scandal-the-ugly-war-over-bob-ross-ghost ▸"Bob Ross: Happy Accidents, Betrayal & Greed" by Director **Joshua Rofe** and producers **Melissa McCarthy and Ben Falcone **(https://www.netflix.com/title/81155081) ▸PBS doc "bob ross: the happy painter" ▸https://blog.rexhomes.com/how-did-farmhouse-style-become-a-trend/ ▸https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-shrink/201809/the-psychology-rustic-chic ▸https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Craftsman ▸https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_and_Crafts_movement ▸https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ruskin ▸https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Morris ▸https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape_painting ▸https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_River_School ▸Bill Alexander Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKEPISA0f4E ▸"**Consumer Society in American History: A Reader**" ▸**Chapter 3: "Recreation and Leisure in Modern Society"** ▸https://artsfuse.org/235381/film-review-bob-ross-happy-accidents-betrayal-greed-painting-by-plunders/ ▸https://thehustle.co/why-its-nearly-impossible-to-buy-an-original-bob-ross-painting/amp/ ▸https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-bob-ross-owes-happy-trees-forgotten-painter ▸https://biographics.org/bob-ross-biography-the-man-behind-the-canvas/ - ▸https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2021/10/bob-ross-inc-joan-kowalski #BobRoss #history #philosophy #asmr ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ► If you'd like to show support for the channel: ▸Patreon (monthly donations) ........ https://www.patreon.com/LetsFindOutASMR ▸PayPal (one-time donation)......... https://www.paypal.me/LetsFindOutASMR ......... letsfindoutASMR@gmail.com ▸Or if you shop on Amazon, using this link will support the channel at no extra cost to you: https://amzn.to/2LnNXd6 ▸Or see my Amazon Wishlist if you'd like to purchase a gift for the channel: http://a.co/9vUJ8eF ▸📪 If you'd like to mail me something: Let's Find Out ASMR (Rich) P.O. Box 1582 Palm City, FL 34991 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ► My Contact Information: ▸📧 Instagram............ https://www.instagram.com/lets_find_out_ig/ ▸📧 Discord.................https://discord.com/invite/PyUfaN7 (* I'm not very active here yet)
Transcript
Discussion (0)
In our world, in our world.
Ready for your bravery test?
Okay, here it comes.
There.
Okay, let's give him a friend.
Let's give him a friend.
There.
So up until now, we've seen that Bob has the quality,
a timeless quality of being an effective communicator,
effective teacher, an effective,
and an attractive personality that allows,
learning to happen more easily. He draws our attention. He knows how to talk to the whole person
and individuate the different learning styles, remain open, allow his message to be accessible
to everyone. We've talked about the trend, the idea of leisure and how that used to be
essentially non-existent in its modern form for the tribal and far ancient societies and how they used to be
integrally linked with work and their time used to be taken up by deeply meaningful activities
whether it was work hunting family life and building
community activities that were crucial to the survival of the group or he was even just
downtime where they were intimately communicating and grooming and even the more trivial socializing
that they would do was still very kept them very in tune and very attached and very apart their community
all their time was meaningful and as time progressed and wealth accumulated in the hands of fewer and fewer people
as technology and art and expression and spirituality was compartmentalized segregated into finer and finer practitioners
more increasingly expertise experts and you know the sense of a Rite in ancient
Greece where everybody of a certain status was expected at least the ideal was
that everybody was had a balanced self-development about them they were they paid
attention equally to all the important areas of being in the world. We saw the
disintegration of the Roman Empire and the emergence of Christian-centric Europe,
likely as a result of at least partially the collapse of values and integrity and
sense of duty to oneself and one's community of self-development on both the practical and spiritual,
more philosophical, more abstract, more spiritual levels.
The lack of attention to the deeper, more meaningful qualities of self-development by the Romans
led to a general degradation of the individual that made up society.
It swelled too large, took on too many conflicting religions, which made all of them,
which devalued all of them.
Christianity emerged out of that as a single unifying vision of what was good and what was the ideal.
It allowed the emergence, slow emergence.
Over thousands of 8,000.
years at least singular thousand of a of an ethic in a sense of morality a sense of
who the ideal person was which was Jesus Christ and those who generally in Europe
the ideal like Arete was in Greece was Jesus Christ and acting like him being a
Christian acting following in his footsteps and the way he acted
it was values like truth, like respect for tradition,
but also a respect for one's own intellect and one's logos
and one's ability to be conscious of when and when you can't break tradition
if it's a valuable thing to do if you've been paying attention
to an injustice, if you've detected a sense of imbalance and inequity in your own self-development,
being in tune with God and listening to your consciousness, your conscience, rather,
not letting yourself get too arrogant, breaking the Ten Commandments,
theft and murder and unfa.
in trades and in your time to hedonistic values like self-discipline were core to the Christian ethic
and we see that out of that a general at least if nothing else through the unification of morals
people were able to eventually little fiefdoms became counties became you know province
and states became countries that were unified together over centuries of
gradual elevation of the level of trust among communities through trades and
communications and allies allies ships during wars out of that simultaneous with
it possibly because of it science emerged the discipline
mind of the of the Christian specifically the Christian monks and the religious class in the
monasteries were very disciplined and they weren't reading and philosophizing over their
biblical scripts they were out they were encouraged to exercise physical labor
and keep their mind and body sharp we see a parallel with a Rite
paying attention both to all aspects of being but then as we got more and more technologically
powerful we've noticed that spirituality waned or at least explicit religiousness
the last 500 years until less and less people maybe revered or respected or the community
aspect of religion that keeps communities unified and together and perhaps even maybe makes the
individual not as not as morally having a little less moral integrity perhaps we at least risk
that happening if if not intellectual integrity but you know intellectual integrity of course
is at odds with um christianity if you're reading the bible
too literally. So the last 500 years has been a general secularization, a distancing of the average
individual from a communication with God, which in turn is a lack of a communication with a
communication with any sort of sense of divinity about them and their lives and the world.
and there's been movements to reconnect and to at least recognize the importance of being close
and in the proximity of nature in the therapeutic the essential closeness with nature
the essential value of not distancing yourself too much from both nature and
from a centrality of a sense of community and common values with your neighbor.
And through all that, that's the current tension that we're living through in the historical epic,
is the tension between a lack of belief in the literal,
a sense of, I would say a general sense of disillusionment,
with the Bible as a as a historical and scientific source of authority.
Because for so long, before we had refined and sophisticated our sense of what the Bible was really saying
from a historical and technical and scientific point of view about the way the world works,
the way matter operates on a scientific level.
Some people still try to interpret that
and that disillusioned many people over centuries
with the rise of science
and the incredible ability of science,
scientific methods and theories to, you know,
mathematically between Descartes and Galileo and Newton
and all these great early scientists like this
that were able to say,
well maybe god isn't the reason it rains and isn't the reason for earthquakes and
cycles celestial cycles of the planets and moons and sun um maybe biology chemistry are
more under our in our control than we used to think and this uh this gives us a general sense of
skepticism towards anyone claiming that the Bible has priority and precedence and authority
over our scientific understanding of the world and what our own agency and independence
and self-realization self-determination and being able to discover for ourselves how the
world works without having to refer to a religious text but there's always the impulse of the individual
that's existed for ever to there's always the impulse of religious experience within the individual
and it's deeply felt the closer generally the closer you are to nature it's felt in profound
interactions between humans but it's also felt in the irrefutably belittling effect of standing in front of a
vast landscape particularly large earthly structures like canyons mountains oceans but also beyond earthly
like the stars that you're observing your being something larger than yourself and through
through psychological experiences, whether they're drug-induced or not,
hallucinogenic rituals or undertaking, or just they're good or bad.
You can't often, it's harder to deny the existence of a sense of something beyond us and deeper than us,
or at least deeper within us that we're not aware of, and that,
territory that we could still further explore that science hasn't been able to penetrate yet even if you
think it ultimately will and this yields itself to the a sense of and the idea of spirituality
bob was known to have a deeply spiritual bent to him he didn't profess it very much um but he did
give us clues into what that how that manifested itself and that was
was often in his awe of nature and the creatures within nature, animals and his fondness for
rehabilitating and surrounding himself with not only nature, but a little forest critters,
as he would say. Points to a lot of spiritual aspects of Bob that we can't ignore.
Touch upon Bob's spiritual side. And we're going to see how that connects with predecessors in the
painting world and otherwise to him that also point out a deep connection between spirituality
and nature between societal progress between what we do as societies with our free time
self-development and all these again constellate around bob and what he chose
to do with his life. I said at the beginning there is a unity and a harmony about Bob and what he did when he talked about what he believed
What he felt about
Life and how it should be lived and what he wanted his legacy to be
what he wanted to mean to other people what other people meant to him
it's not exactly clear if Bob was a specifically a Christian
fairly clear that he at least was
raised in a Christian society of a background between his family
and definitely had a sense of a God in a relationship to him
in the article Alston Ramsey says
that Steve said that he had a spirituality, but it, and he was religious. It just wasn't the
religiousness that the priests were peddling, you know. There was a reverberation, a vibration
of divinity within existence, everything about it, himself included, and others. In the book they
talk about him being a sort of secular priest almost a shaman a healer a therapist these are all
aspects of his spirituality coming into play and I think it's a very important part of his popularity
his endurance and his how he's so endearing how so many people find him so endearing in
In chapter four, they say that the shaman upon this before is marked as an individual in among his, his peers.
Often by an early trauma, an early sense of trauma.
Bob's finger accident is at least to that.
I wrote here, ancient tribal societies.
Of course, everything was very mythically.
infused. All of existence was marinating in your tribe's mythology. Your life was dictated by the gods and the
ancestors that came before you. The fate of the entire society was
interly linked with yourself, your current individuals, the past, and future relatives of yours as
well it's no leap of imagination to see that any individual um any major experience or occurrence
or phenomenon experienced by an individual would be of course interpreted through this lens
and shamans were if you were attacked by an animal or you had something serious happened to you
you know having your finger cut off isn't exactly trivial it's not the same as
you know, a near-death experience, although in that time it certainly could have been,
but it's some sort of traumatic experience nonetheless.
And back then, there were experiences like that were considered a,
having been chosen by the ancestors, a vision quest of some sorts.
You were set aside as a person perhaps maybe more in touch with,
divinity some spirituality some essence of the spirits that inhabit the community and are
involved in the community than other people I think that still carries on into
modern society we we have a tendency to feel a sense of fate and destiny when
things out of our control happen to us or even things within our
control if they shift the direction of our life it's hard not to feel like your life is being
led in a certain direction by an external force it's interesting that bob chose to become this
healing figure you know this priest this therapist employing all these tens of thousands of
YouTube comments in and of themselves reveal that therapeutic the therapeutic aspect of his
shows and how how healing how comforting how encouraging how positive how impactful
how liberating they are you can do it there's no mistakes this is your world
it's hard to ignore even if it's not directly shot
communism, the spiritual aspect of Bob, they make an interesting point about his fusion of conservation
and attention to nature, attention to the world around us, specifically nature, the world untouched
by human technology, and returning to nature and being in nature. He often said he liked to walk
in the woods and near his home in Fairbanks there and talk to the trees and he's,
He said, and that's our secret.
Don't tell anybody.
But he communed with nature.
He communed with nature, undoubtedly.
And that's not exactly something normal that everybody does or will admit to doing
because it's not considered normal, even if they do.
Anything was a way of him sharing his spirituality.
Even if it wasn't a direct sermon of any explicit religious bent,
he was certainly trying to share his the depth of his experience with nature that he felt
and what Lao Tzu called harmony we find a similarity with Bob like I opened this video
with or the previous depending on but they say on top of and they make another connection
so Lao Tzu is Chinese philosophy, religion
They have a apparently from what I understand a much more complex and hard to
to parse fusion between their philosophy and their religion in the East versus in the
West where we have religion and you have philosophers but they stay very much
bounded within that religion if they're Christian thinkers Christians and then you
have secular philosophers that practice philosophy very distinct from religion.
St. Francis of Assisi in the Christian tradition and history of Christianity, he labeled this
what Bob called Joy, Brotherhood.
Boss has a Byzantine icon, Christian saint.
They say his afro is his halo.
Let's see right here.
Good more than that.
That's just a trivial observation.
The landscape painting itself was his spiritual activity.
Animal-loving St. Francis Assisi popularized.
He was animal.
It's mostly associated with caring for animals.
And snow.
you know again it's a nice connection with bob any pet squirrels bob at pepod ppod junior bob's paintings which
we can only assume he was the one who named had a spiritual bent to them like divine elegance divine beauty
bob often anthropomorphized nature setting saying it's uh he was fond of you know to
describing trees saying they need friends and clouds and all aspects of his paintings
saying they were old young whether they needed some help needed a friend and
another version of another member of their species next to them or
animals climbing them of course he would give them actual emotions lots of things were happy like
like he got from Bill Alexander.
Some were sad.
Some were tired.
Like him.
The landscape itself,
100 years before him,
there was a whole history, a tradition of,
there's a whole school,
the Hudson River School, based out of New York.
Painters painting the American landscape,
which itself was influenced by a whole European tradition,
much older, painting the European landscape,
often with ruins,
because America doesn't have many ruins, if at all.
So we didn't have that aspect in much of American painting,
but the famous Caspar David Friedrich's man with a cane standing over the misty mountains
from the top of a peak, it symbolizes the romantic visions of nature,
depicting the natural world with having a deep source of misty,
and beauty to it something that we haven't been pointing to a lack of science to have been able to explain and peel back yet we don't know anything about consciousness and science and there's a there's aspects of our experience that are obviously not yet able to be explained through just neurons firing
We can't define very easily at least.
Concepts like beauty, love and warmth and in the emotional sense.
Rapture, awe of nature, hate.
Can't experience negative emotions either objectively.
You can't read the definition of hate and just understand it.
You have to experience it.
And, you know, there's a lot of depth, there's a lot of symbolism, there's a lot expressed in landscape paintings.
Thomas Cole, a famous guy we're going to be talking about shortly.
His paintings are often known to have been pristine examples of divine perfection.
And we're going to talk also about how Bob deliberately made his nature other than, I think, episode 2 of season.
to he painted Mount McKinley. I don't think he ever painted a physical, a actual landscape that
exists in reality. Everything was a idealization from his own imagination, even if it was loosely
based off, you know, he was known to have gotten inspiration and used postcards and, you know,
just pictures of general locations to influence and get ideas from. But, um,
They were all at heart, the creation of his own imagination.
Henry David Thoreau's pragmatic and irreligious.
He was outwardly atheistic or at least non-Christian.
And even that depiction of his life of Walden Pond is contrasted with the, you know,
it contrasted the transcendent simplicity of existence out there in such a natural place
with the superfluous and trivial and shallowness
of his busy daily life in the city
before and after that transcending experience
that he had at Emerson's Walton Pond.
Francis of Assisi's one of his writings was canticle of the sun.
It calls out and praises the brother of the sun,
brother of the wind and the air,
sister of the moon and the water
phrases that are
overlapped with Eastern traditions
and mythologies and art
and writings
Bob tapped into all this
after promorcizing
his nature
and importantly he
in
espousing the divinity
the power the ability
the potential within all of us
what he was doing
was mirroring what St. Francis in particular was doing way before, you know, a thousand years
before Martin Luther told us all to read the Bible for ourselves instead of just listening
and taking good faith that the priests, the local priests' interpretation of it was the correct
one, St. Francis of Assisi was impelling people to recognize that they had direct contact with God
themselves, simply by the fact that they were divine individuals created in God's image, as the
Christian tradition implies in itself, that you didn't need to go to an institution to feel a connection
to revere and feel that divine communication.
Bob, well, St. Francis said anyone can have direct communion.
We line through intimate, direct contact with reality.
Specifically nature, though.
Specifically being out in nature.
In the book here, they say that against the hierarchical model of the Catholic Church and the art world,
St. Francis and Bob
because Bob supplanted the art world
he didn't he didn't
you know discourage people from going to art school
but he also wanted to encourage people
to follow their own visions
and their own agency
and sense of beauty
and not be
not be blindly led at least
be aware of where
your interest diverge from what any sort of art teacher is telling you your interest should be and uh both of
these figures st francis and bob were against in essence any hierarchical model of at least in terms
in the sense that as far as they were obstacles to connecting with your own abilities to create art or your own
ability to commune with God.
You didn't need a middleman.
Respectively, they preached a message that anyone could participate in a simple life of communion
with nature, with animals, with God's blessings.
I mean, Bob ended virtually, if not every episode, saying, God bless, my friend.
Unmistakably, there is a spirituality, a deep spiritual.
with Bob.
His fundamental belief,
his conviction, his dogma
was that something
he didn't question was that
anyone could paint.
And they didn't need to earn a master's degree
or fine arts or be touched
by Michelangelo, as he often
said, or go to a fancy
school or be of a certain
status or member of a
class of society.
To do it. There's an
idea about a happiness
gap in life. Bob was clear that there is a connection between painting, between expressing yourself
more generally maybe, and the happiness, the satisfaction, the contentment, not even if it's not
necessarily joy. The, again, the meaningfulness, I think at its root, that's what all the positive
experiences in life have in common is that they're meaningful they feel like they're not
worthless in the final analysis and bob wanted everyone he didn't want there to be any
institutional obstacles to accessing this experience and enriching people's lives i mean he went to
new york central park and apparently there was a quarter a quarter million people
showed up at that event.
Of course, you know, he didn't charge anybody for that.
He was out there.
I mean, maybe he sold whatever artwork he painted
or maybe he auctioned it off, most likely.
But anybody could stop by and see them,
take a picture with them, paint along.
Specifically, that's a very important part of that.
And Bob wanted to, again, just like St.
Francis emphasized the the power and the ability of the individual to access these deep, deep, deep
experiences for themselves without needing a metal man to tell them how to do it, when, and where.
Mr. Rogers, of course, he's equally in, if not more so, a well-known public TV personality,
He focused his efforts on children, but Bob also focused on children, you know, of all age groups.
But they have a lot in common.
And Mr. Rogers, interestingly, was explicitly.
He went to seminary and trained to become a pastor, our priest.
I guess a Protestant priest.
Or at least it says that he intended to go to seminary after college.
But instead he chose to go into the next.
nascent medium of TV after encountering a TV at his parents home in 1951.
Remember this is only about six years after the end of World War II and I'm sure to someone
who was so deeply religious as Mr. Rogers, Fred Rogers was, that was very impactful
event and it probably made him reanalyzed just reevaluate.
what it is that our society's doing to, at least ours in America,
to leading to such catastrophic devastation.
In a CNN interview, he said,
I went into TV because I hated it.
So, and I thought there's some way of using this fabulous instrument
to nurture those who would watch and listen.
So he worked for NBC in New York City for a while.
in his show Mr. Rogers' neighborhood
spent fewer
they were distinguished
from another public TV
famous TV children's show
Sesame Street
and that he spent fewer resources
on research
but he did use early childhood education concepts
taught by famous
intellectuals
and psychologists
in his lessons and he saw his responsibility as less academic intellectual rational you know reading
writing and arithmetic and more moral more ethical focusing on relationships that and emotions the
psychology things that children weren't going to explicitly be taught at that time in school
he was interestingly very
religious on a spiritual level
but also on a physical and daily level
he was very regimented
woke up 4.30 I said this in the last video
but it's cool to know that
he um he was physically fit
he's not very physically
in a muscular sense imposing
but he you look at him he was never overweight
and in fact
he swam
he was a devout swimmer
swam every morning
swam laps which is
a
deceptively
vigorous activity
to do if you guys
have ever swam much
you would know that and
he he swam
every single day
made a point to do that
kept his weight down
he played piano he was
artistic and in particular with his weight he kept it at 143 i don't know how many people know this but i
didn't because surely not only because but i'm sure it helped it added a nice layer of symbolism behind it
um the phrase i love you the each word in that phrase corresponds to the order of numbers in the number
143. The number of letters and I in love and you is one four and three respectively. Pretty cool.
Yeah, he knew, he recognized a need for attention to children's emotions and just deeper spiritual
concepts that we, that science does not tackle and is not in the position to
tackle yet has not reached a sophistication and a depth to to analyze with any with any effectiveness
really he noticed that society is too noisy we talk too much and don't listen enough
there's not enough pauses and there's too much noise and we'll be touching upon noise in a little bit
It's a very interesting concept and over-stimulation, over-saturation with noise, too much noise and not enough signal in the noise.
They even talk about Joseph Campbell, a famous student of Carl Jung's, or at least a famous follower of Carl Jung's, psychology and philosophy.
His Joseph Campbell's, one of his more famous lines was follow your bliss.
Campbell, they say in the book, speaks about the connection between art and mythology,
often saying that the work of the artist is to interpret the contemporary world as experienced in terms of relevance to our inner life.
Carl Young wrote in his book,
Aeon Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self.
In a chapter that is tellingly titled Christ in the symbol of the self,
the self being a psychological concept Carl Jung often used and very thoroughly elaborated on,
he wrote that no tree it is said that can grow.
He didn't attribute the saying, but he was pointing to the fact that it wasn't him that came up with it.
No tree can grow to heaven unless its roots reach down to hell.
There's a nature, a mix between nature and symbolism and religious ideas all throughout history and all religions.
There's the world tree of Norse mythology and a lot of native cultures.
They all base the concept of reality around a, of experience in the world.
itself around a tree or some sort of massive figure like the turtle with the ocean around it and
but was often known to as he was explaining and describing more literal concepts of you know needing
dark of needing a contrast between dark and light all the all the time he often used trees
as he was talking about the painting the technical artistic difference between light and dark
and how you need a contrast of both to be able to how each feed off each other but he would also
make the metaphorical connection as i've mentioned a couple times before it's just really important
to recognize though between happiness and sorrow you know saying the you're really
can't know happiness I believe unless you have a little sorrow in your life otherwise
you wouldn't know when the happy times come and Bob we've talked about he had
chronic health issues aside from reoccurring bouts of cancer he had headaches
he had a heart attack in his 40s he had cancer in his 30s and it came back
ultimately killed him in his 50s early 50s he died at 52 and despite
all that despite his parents' death his second wife's death um other less serious but still influential
sorrows and tragedies in his life he deliberately chose to remain optimistic to see the joy to have
gratitude in everything and of course he's only human i'm sure he had plenty of human emotions
that he showed outside and offset but on the show
show he deliberately
again sanitized his world he made it a
place of respite he made it a place of
of joy but a place
in which joy can thrive
of gratitude of constant
sayings of constant
you know encouragement
for us to see
nature and experience nature
and experience
and appreciate
that we can experience something as beautiful as nature when we have the chance and a relationship with other people.
The book constantly makes the connection that Bob recognizes not only the healing effects of creating art, but landscapes and the painting, uh, the proximity to nature that you feel when you're painting landscapes.
He knew there was a healing effect his words had on viewers and the comments.
combination of this, his style, his words, his landscapes, his philosophy of environmentalism and
spiritual, you know, finding a depth in experiencing nature, seeing the world through different
eyes when you pay attention. He, you know, he envisioned a future and he would sprinkle it
in every now and then, not a lot, but he would talk about his vision.
of his grandchildren being able to inhabit these landscapes you know like this was Bob's dream was to take care of the world so it was still beautiful still pristine for his grandchildren which unfortunately it doesn't appear that he ever his son Steve ever had kids so but that's okay because he touched enough people
where he has, you know, in essence,
a whole generation of children
that were influenced and appreciate him for who he was.
And the message he was embodying, really.
The concept of the symbolism
and the psychological impact that landscapes in general
have you know being in nature and what our valuation what we what our love of landscape paintings
if we're not directly in nature reveal about ourselves show us about ourselves
Bob's choice to paint landscapes points to his spirituality and we can see there was a
as I pointed to earlier there's a huge development that preceded bomb bomb wasn't the first landscape painter
there's a whole movement that you know relates to the in the 17th and 18th 18th um and even the
that was really I think culminating maybe in the 19th century the 1800s there's a landscape painting
movement that progressively got more and more popular because it you
used to be paintings of historical or mythological figures that were portraits and pictures of people,
less landscapes.
And there is a series of landscape painters that really wanted to elevate landscape painting to this status.
Or the human, the landscape rather than the human was the central figure of the painting.
and central subject matter and as these landscapes were elevated there's a philosophizing that the
this symbolized a interesting correlation it has no interesting correlation with the decline in
religiousness but the incline in spirituality more secular perhaps spirituality um so
psychologically it's very interesting
that as a society we were more increasingly drawn to nature
and to incorporate nature in our parks
and be surrounded by nature and react against over
over you know building into industrialization
and surrounding ourselves with too much man-made things
that at least the ones the man-made things that lacked beauty
and Sir Kenneth Clark, the famous historian,
he was often on BBC and serious civilizations.
He said that perhaps the chief artistic creation of the 19th century
was landscape paintings, the dominant art, he called it.
It said the painting landscape is a normal and enduring part
of our meaning the West's spiritual activity and there's a whole history that Bob was the
inheritor of between landscape painting like I alluded to earlier and social criticism
and movements for social progress and change and you know marrying the utopian visions of
society with the utopian ideal landscapes of the future.
One of the greatest landscape painters up there with Thomas Cole and a very large influence on
social reform in the 19th century in America in particular was John Ruskin.
John Ruskin
importantly linked the aesthetic and the divine
and he in that time and still is today
I guess the emergence of the criticism of
and reaction towards
the devaluation of human labor
that the industrial revolution really brought on
because it made the artisan
secondary to
cheap products
massively produced
in large quantities
it devalued the labor
of the individual
it generally
because you didn't have to be as skilled
you didn't have to be a specialist
anymore you were just
mostly on an assembly line
you were only having to be good at
one small particular
thing you didn't have to craft an entire
product from end to end like most artisans do you were just cap in the little string of a
shoelace rather than creating a whole shoe in and of itself and there's an interesting
correlation there between the arete and the balance of virtues that you cultivate under that
ideal and the you know degradation of society
when you start to forget about that and not pay attention to that and there's an imbalance or a
correlation at least between the self-development of the individual if it's imbalanced and the
fate of society that is made up of all these imbalanced individuals and John Ruskin famously
pointed out that and this is no access to
the artisan's joy in creating free uh and in freely creating and and you know
developing himself as a as a as a as a being intellectually spiritually and physically
and you know so much of factory work suppresses this you're not making money for
yourself you're not you're a master of your own destiny you're not creating your own
direction in your work you're you're a cog in a wheel he said that we want man to
always be thinking we we want one the problem with a society was that currently
in you know the 1800s the worker wasn't allowed to think and express his own
personality and ideas using his hands rather than machinery says it's an issue that we want one man to
always be thinking and another to be working and we call one a gentleman and another just a you know
simple operative whereas the workmen ought to be thinking and the thinker ought to be working
physically moving both should be gentlemen in the best sense the mass of society is made up of
morbid thinkers he says and miserable workers it's only by labor that thought can be made healthy
and only by thought that labor can be made happy and the two cannot be separated with impunity
without you know negative consequences this is both an aesthetic attack on and a social critique
of the division of labor from industrialization and this had a profound effect a profound effect on
William Morris a thinker that Congdon and company bring up later in the book and we will
too the 19th and into the 20th centuries there was a romantic movement that intensified and
And Bob was no, he didn't escape this.
He was a romantic.
He wasn't a hard secular rationalist.
The romantic movement intensified the existing interest in landscape art.
And remote and wild landscapes now became more prominent.
In the United States, the Hudson River School that we talked about, was prominent.
In the middle to late 19th century, so around 1900 is when it disbanded in its heyday,
is probably the best known native development in landscape art in America.
These painters, they created works of mammoth scales that attempted to capture the epic scope of the American landscapes that inspired them.
And Thomas Cole was arguably its leader,
acknowledged founder
a kind of
he embodied a kind of secular faith
in the spiritual benefits
to be gained from the contemplation
of natural beauty
there's a great little
self-made documentary
you know like YouTube
documentary but it's like
10 years old so it's cool to
see stuff that old
on YouTube
but called the course of empire
Thomas Cole's warning to America
and Thomas made criticisms of the American Empire Cole noticed the documentary says
Cole noticed the cruelty of man's imperial dominance he was awestruck by the
remains of Roman culture he had gone on a tour from America into Italy and
Europe greater Europe touring the cities but also the out of rural landscapes and the
the country scenes and saw a lot of the, you know, the ruins in both of those places.
And he said none but those who can see an experience in person, the remains of antiquity
can really understand what ancient Rome was.
They filled the mind with wonder.
And we can't but contrast the energy of the ancients with the effeminacy of the modern.
And what a difference between the builders of these great ruins
and those modern people just engaged in their excavation.
He's worried he reveres the greatness of Rome, for instance,
but he also is very aware of the collapse of it
and is trying to pay attention and learn lessons for America of what not to do.
He said, traveling through the ancient ruins and landscapes, the documentarists set heightened his awareness of the cyclical patterns of empires and the vulnerability of the budding American empire to these deep historical trends.
Some of the later Hudson River school artists
such as Albert Bierstadt
created less comforting works
that placed a greater emphasis
and a great deal of romantic exaggeration
on the raw, even terrifying power of nature.
And I think Bob's decision to use
more peaceful, tranquil environments
reveals something about his
temperament and personality
and his message.
And like I said,
a,
the link between, there was a link between these,
these popular landscapes,
the overwhelming
and increasing popularity
throughout the 1800s of these popular landscapes
and social movements.
And Congdon makes a connection there
with Bob and clearly
Bob as a landscape artist
was at least
partially if not
very significantly
influenced by
other American
landscape painters
and other cultures too
European I'm sure but
being an American
I'm sure he was influenced by the Hudson River School
and they
couldn't help make the connection
between the
there is a whole utopian education reform societal reform movement that was influenced by and led by in some cases painters of the hudson river school and other landscape painting schools
um they say significant to bob's success on the television series
series, the classes and the enterprise, is Bob's charisma. His charisma coupled with the philosophy
of education that he employed, that informed, that was informed by a utopian impulse to promote
the potential in all who participated. Daniel Trorticoff described the utopian impulse
as a response, quote, a response to existing social conditions and an
an attempt and an attempt to transcend and transform those conditions to achieve an ideal.
This impulse is evidenced broadly in culture and society, including the arts.
And Barbara Novak in 1974 argued that this impulse is coalesced in American landscape painting
around a belief in the redemptive qualities of unspoiled, pristine nature.
This impulse was shaped by the writings of famous philosophers
and writers as Rousseau, William Wordsworth, Emerson.
In the United States, it contributed to the formation of an artistic identity group
known as the Hudson River Schools that express their love of nature through their paintings.
Yeah, Thomas Cole, Frederick Edwin Church, John Friedrich Kensett.
Among these artists and their admirers, contemplating the landscape, including the painted
landscape, was equated with the contemplation of virtuous deeds.
In this regard in 1830, a contributor to the North American Review noted that the beauty in nature
and in the arts is nearly allied to the love.
of that which is good. So close is the association that it's often been doubted
whether beauty can be anything more than a visible manifestation of all those
amiable moral qualities of which the mere idea fills the heart with delightful
emotions and confers a charm on every person and thing with which they appear to be
associated. They say the landscapes produced by the Hudson River
school painters depicted nature as a paradise on earth undefiled with few human traces it's important to note
that the landscape painted landscapes painted by these artists despite the implied realism in their work
because it wasn't abstract or um it was just very literal and abstractly painted at least the shapes were
you know the subjects the objects and the like rocks trees all the components of the landscape
impressionist that's what i was going to say it wasn't impressionist it was very
sharply defined lines very real very photorealistic despite this though these were often
synthesized and idealized landscapes while sketches might have been done in the field the
actual paintings were accomplished in the studio.
So they were informed and they were elaborated upon and they were manipulated and transformed in order to gain a certain final image that more closely related to their vision, their utopian vision.
And then they go on to talk about more social reformers when in particular was Bronson Alcott.
and said
among the transcendentalists
influencing the Hudson River School
was some like Bronson Alcott
who promoted the link between
a transcendentalism which was a philosophy
education
utopian
education and utopian change
now
transcendentalism
I don't screw up if I tried to
So let's look it up.
It's a movement from the early 19th century, the 1820s and 30s,
in Upper East America, New England.
A core belief is in the inherent goodness of people and nature.
And while society and its institutions have corrupted the purity of the individual,
people are at their best when they're truly self-reliant and independent.
They often saw divine experience inherent in the everyday, rather than believing in a distant heaven.
In another world, they took the belief in heaven and kingdom of God on earth, serious.
The realization of heaven on earth.
They saw a physical and spiritual phenomenon as a part of dynamic processes rather than discrete entities.
So it was a holistic view of reality.
They felt that there could be divinity in any experience,
whether it's work or play or any explicitly spiritual activity like actually going to church.
Imagine that having an actual spiritual experience in church or at temple or at the mosque,
rather than it being more a social gathering.
Imagine that. What if that was the norm?
They emphasized subjective intuition over objective empiricism.
Adherents believe that individuals are capable of generating completely original insights
with little attention or deference to past masters.
It arose as a reaction to or protest against the general state of intellectualism and spirituality.
at the time.
I think, again, with the decline of prominence
as God in the church
as the central cohesive element in society
became a skepticism towards spirituality more generally.
And so, therefore, I think it wasn't taken as seriously.
It wasn't revered as much.
It wasn't respected.
Its status diminished, as well as its practice, probably,
and intellectualism
and intellectualism was
put on a pedestal
and this was an imbalance
because of course you know as I
was trying my best to
make a point about
intellectualism rational
scientific thought
is
very powerful very important
but isn't
in and of itself
a complete picture
and doesn't doesn't completely
characterized the human experience the human mental field of experience and capabilities the doctrine of
the Unitarian Church as taught by Harvard Divinity School was closely related to this transcendentalism
and emerged from English and German Romanticism of the late 1700s the biblical criticism of
John Gottfried Herder Friedrich
Leiermacher and the skepticism of the English philosopher David Hume as well as the
German philosophers Immanuel Kant in the school of German idealism.
Okay, so ONA may have also been strongly influenced by Hindu texts on philosophy of the
mind and spirituality, especially the Upanishads, which
especially in the 1700s and after were being widely previously they hadn't been widely translated in the west into english
so they were starting to have an effect as well in order to you know you have to practice anything
that you want to get good at and develop more finely and painting wasn't able to you can't paint
a complete picture without having the picture in mind first you can't just like you can't do anything
without having some general idea of how to go about doing it and what the end product is going to look like
you can adapt along the way but you have to have the vision in your mind to be most effective in
beginning and completing it and just like having a utopian ideal of society you have to know the steps to get there
you have to know what to change you have to know what you have to begin with and um there's a huge
metaphorical there's a huge analogy overlap between the two because you know anything you do
very often it overlaps and develops skills that translate over into other areas of experience in life
and behavior, action, being.
For Bob Ross, the, you know, the scenes obviously weren't real he was painting
because nature rarely grows as perfect as his, you know, perfectly landscaped his clearings here
with a perfect vista of a mountain there and the trees just perfectly dead here in the front
so that you can see the ones in the background and, you know, nice slope,
just gracefully going up to the water's edge.
with a perfect prominence out into the water like that.
It would be nice to be sitting under those trees
and make a nice little hammock there.
Have a nice picnic.
Nature would have eroded all this out, no way.
But it's still a beautiful scene
because you could imagine inhabiting it.
And just like that, you could, if you paint a beautiful enough,
I could imagine that would exist at some point.
maybe nature would eventually erode it so it has some sort of anchor to reality you have to paint
a picture of so in order to you know translate that to something like social reform you have to
imagine well you have to take into account the rules of society in history the what history
tells us human behavior psychology sociology um the patterns of history what works what clearly doesn't work
what mistakes we don't want to make but what might be open for re-evaluation and you have to have a vision
before you can complete it you have to have a vision of the possibilities of where the mistakes
could be made, where they could be rectified.
And with Bob, you know, he wasn't interested in social reform per se, but he was reforming
the individuals, giving them a view of his philosophy of his world that he wanted to exist.
You know, and that, for him, focused around environmentalism and conservation.
He even said multiple times that he used to hunt with a camera.
When he fished he always put him back you know give him a little pat pat on the two-two and let him go so we can catch him again tomorrow
So he wasn't a yeah, I'm sure he fished and ate fished but
He he enjoyed and appreciated and he wasn't frivolous with his
You know he wasn't extreme with his hunting and fishing if he did so this character Bronson Alcott here
the link between the transcendentalism education and utopian social change any good social reformist knows you got to get the children when they're young if you want to indoctrinate them with your philosophy
you know children are very they absorb information very readily they're very impressionable children
can pick up bad as well as good habits and they could be lifelong habits that they form if they're
taught consistently enough bronson alcott famously um worked with elizabeth peabody i believe of the peabody awards fame
and they
Peabody opened the first
U.S. kindergarten
a term from
from German
because it was invented first
over there thought to
put children in a social environment
and a school like environment
and specifically encouraged play
and the word means
kinder children
and garden
garden is garden
so a garden of children
and it means it was a place for really instilling the values of these utopian ideals that Bronson Alcott and Elizabeth Peabody and many others were promoting.
And some of these interesting and I think really positive, useful, practical, good concepts are a teaching style based on conversation against corporeal or physical
punishment. I think if you're going to do that, you do it at home on your own time with your own
children. And that's on you if you overdo it. I think the place, I think school is no place for
physical punishment and luckily it's not anymore. But it certainly was at a certain time. He
implemented things like he instead of hitting the child, he would offer his own hand to be hit.
offending student to hit, saying that any failing was the teacher's responsibility.
Instead of hitting the child, he would offer his own hand for that child who would normally be
hit to hit, and he felt the shame and guilt induced by this method, because he would
justify it by taking accountability for the child's actions on himself, or
or the teacher saying it was their fault.
If they hadn't taught the child to behave correctly,
he thought this was far superior to any method that, you know,
instilling fear by punishment in them.
When he used physical correction,
he required that the students be unanimous.
And on top of that, unanimously in support of doing it,
even including the student to be punished.
So he is making the student who would hit him on the hand
for acting poorly themselves or incorrectly,
take accountability for deciding to hit their teacher on the hand.
And in turn, also that would be an admission of guilt on their part,
that they did something wrong to merit that sort of merit punishment of either party.
Peabody, she opened the first kindergarten in the U.S., long before most educators.
She embraced the premise that children's play.
This is really important here, because Bob employs play in a sense of high-spiritedness
about him all the time.
this wit, playful creative exploration of, and course correction and, you know, doing things spontaneously.
Long before most educators, she thought children's play has intrinsic developmental and educational value.
Again, the connection with Buddhism, she was the first translator into English of the most famous Buddhist scripture, the Lotus Sutra.
very influenced in general is by Buddhism in Eastern philosophy promised joy he promised success
in the paintings even to the beginner because he knew the intrinsic value of trying
things out of being creative and he didn't want to you know he wanted to encourage his
business model was of course this would give him more money more customers but it would
also in doing that he knew that his business model like I touched upon in part one was a win-win
it was symbiotic they the more people he reached the more products he sold but the more people
he knew would challenge their own creativity would experience something similar to joy if not joy
itself in the act of creating and painting and they would they would learn something about themselves
they would develop new skills they would learn that they could learn they would learn to appreciate
nature to pay attention to nature based on how waterfalls or trees bend and lean and grow and
in what groups and what size and how mountains the contours of mountains yeah this is really really uh it just it's an onion
it just peels back layers and layers of it aspect of this it was the called the the temple school temple school
um in boston founded by ronson alcott and elizabeth pepottie and the core tenant was that under the right circumstances
Everyone could reach their potential.
They thought education is intrinsically connected with the utopian.
You know, because you can't have the end result you want
unless you plan it out and impact the people who become the end result at a young age.
And they say, I guess Michael Peters and John Moore in 2006 argued that,
indeed utopias can be thought of as fundamentally education in the sense that they are designs for living
designed explicitly for encouraging the development of certain kinds of habits dispositions and attitudes
you know towards each other in the world and this connects Kongden connects this with leisure time
it's telling like we touched upon before what people do it's telling of a society and the people
who make up and are made by it's a two-way exchange you know of influence their society
about what when we consider what they choose to do with their free time what what people
are inclined to do how magnanimous are they how you know
connected to their community are they how interested in self-development are they there was a stephen gelber in
1999 argued that in hobbies leisure in the culture of work in america that a basic distrust a basic distrust and
discomfort of leisure or free time encouraged americans to engage in hobbies in the 1800s when the
industrial revolution while it devalued individual creativity and labor it also you know and made them made work
simpler but less interesting less creative more monotonous you know the skill level reduced dramatically
to be able to make a product you just had to have a bunch of people know how to do one thing
very well but you know and together they made a complete product but
individually no one was that creative only the business owner structuring and
creating the business and the inventor of the product or crafter of the
initial design of the product I guess engineer was the one of being creative
there while that was a negative aspect the positive aspect was a general
and you can't deny this a very
rapid rise in wealth and therefore surplus goods a no longer a need to work yourself to the bone to be able to make ends meet so therefore there's more leisure time
and there is an emergence of a craft industry you know with the christian work ethic we touched upon Christians they
thought very poorly of they thought idleness was the devil's workshop they looked down upon laziness
you know gluttony these values that very prevalent in roman society right before its collapse dishonesty
corruption um they they put all those in the same basket and so especially in america there
although there was a decline in Christianity in Europe.
In America, there was a corresponding decline in some areas,
but in other areas,
and there was very influential religious movements, revivalists,
people trying to revive the religious fervor.
And you can imagine if you're on the west, on the frontier,
not in some civilized, mostly peaceful European village,
but you're on the American frontier.
You're, you know, you're, you have the genocide committed against the Indians and Native Americans,
and they want constant retaliation for that, of course.
You're constantly infringing on their lands.
So you're constantly at war with them, with other European settlers, colonizers.
You're constantly just at war with nature.
There's wild animals, bears, tigers,
you know snakes crocknows down here you're constantly fighting battling the elements battling
famine starvation if your crops you're settling new frontiers nothing is established nothing is
guaranteed you need a deep belief that you're doing that you have god at your back just you know to put it
simply and all that is a um informs the american spirit and the american perspective in the in the
dedication and discipline perseverance courage and you know um just hard work just just belief in
success and the you know future rewards that they'll be able to re reap if they
sacrifice metaphorically spiritually physically here and now with hard work and a disciplined mind and body
you know to achieve their goals so there was a deep spirituality about America that
Europe didn't quite have in on the whole and this has carried over until the present day
but definitely in even definitely World War II after
words you know there's a huge unity among nations in particular um there's a basic distrust and you know
people wanted to stay busy the whole craft industry emerged uh in the beginning of the 19th
through the 20th centuries painting was among these activities and um yeah bill alexander
in the 1960s he combined landscape painting
with an educational program for hobbyists.
And he opened the door for a bill in this way,
making it a business model.
And his purpose, Alexander's purpose, was, quote,
capturing dreams and putting them on canvas.
It wasn't long after Bob retired from the Navy,
like we found out last time,
that he started being a teacher,
being an instructor for Alexander
and his educational enterprise to all these new hobbyists.
especially after the war
you know think about the 60s were only 15 20 years after World War II
70s only 30 were in 2022
we're only 30 years removed from
you know I don't know
Bill Clinton's presidency
the Gulf War
the 90s general
Bob Ross's death I guess that's pretty relevant
all this
leads to there's a huge philosophical movement or movement um there's a lot of philosophers paid attention
and still do to consumerism and in leisure you know lack of leisure lack of proper use of
leisure time i guess and um you know the with the rise of the industrial revolution came
just a surplus of general goods and products and a
lack of appreciation for what the old artisans used to really offer the quality products
and until there was a reaction against it and in consumer society in American history a reader
in the introduction it's a series of essays about consumerism
you know the reduction of work of the work week from 1850 to the 1930s went from 64 hours to 40 hours
it's a massive reduction you have 15 extra hours a week and what do you do with it what is a as a society
what does that do when you have more money and less time and more time yourself this one result
that happened was more consumption
There is also a reaction to that and a reaction to the devaluation of labor with these DIY movements.
And, you know, there's a lot of people that recognize that it's a negative, it's a ailment of society.
To have too many people not, again, not acting for their own best interest, not developing themselves, not applying themselves, not applying them.
themselves learning new hobbies and trades and you know being extending out reaching more of
their potential when you have too many people passively consuming and material products and
entertainment you don't grow you wither Dallas Smith in 1972 says the basic myth of
modern American culture is that of consumption
And that consumption is the goal of life.
The Ford's Model T factory, 20-20 terms, paid about $160 a day.
Maybe that's more like $200 now with inflation.
But it reduced the typical work hour from workday, from 10 to 11, 10 or 11 hours to 8 hours.
So you earned about $20 an hour adjusted for inflation.
you know so there was a rise in pay in general and he he did set a massive trend in a standard
for factory work he was famously not overly exploiting his workers the way most factories were
and that with this rise of wealth this rise of consumerism um for instance that came with it
For instance, the number of malls, the proliferation of malls and shopping stores in general tells us something about this trend in 1945.
There was only eight malls in 1960, just 15 years later.
There's 3,840 malls in rapid expansion of our economy in America.
Anybody who
I don't even really remember this.
I mean, maybe I've seen a few in my life when I was younger.
I was born in 1989.
There used to be the store seers,
which is, you know, I think almost about defunct now.
It used to be essentially the Walmart of shopping malls.
And there was a catalog, a physical, thick catalog that they, you know, mailed out.
And Franklin D. Roosevelt in the 40s said that if you could give one book to the Soviets to teach them about the West, it would be this Sears catalog.
And so that said, yeah, we have plentitude. We have surplus. We have access to luxuries.
But the downside of industrialization overconsumption was that you lack individuation, you lack individuation, you lack.
meaning when you don't engage with yourself and others and develop and grow together and
God yeah just the price on advertising you know people were companies were rampant
with just trying to obviously consume with this growing economy came people
preying on people's psychology through marketing advertising until it became a real
big deal a real big problem
In the 1979 crisis of confidence speech,
President,
President Jimmy Carter famously warned Americans
that too many of us are now worshipping self-indulgence
and consumption.
Human identity is no longer defined by what one does,
but by what one owns.
We've discovered that owning things and consuming things,
though does not dissatisfy longing for meaning in the long run we've learned that piling up material goods
can't fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence and no purpose people were becoming
really gluttones of materialism not just fast food but fast products cheap merchandise and cheap
fashion sigman freud's nephew edward bernays famously a little
learned from his uncle and was a psychologist in and of himself really because he knew how to
tap into the desires to make people want to buy products and manipulate them.
In 1877 was the first year an advertising agency came onto the scene and less than 30 years later
corporations were spending 95 million dollars in those dollars a year
This was a linchpin of the new corporate economy and a crucial purveyor of the American dream.
By 1919, you know, about 50 years later, World War I, advertising in America was $500 million a year a year.
Okay, this guy, so there's a guy who famously inspired the Wukowski and Wachowski's to the Matrix series.
and they put his book
he's it's
Jean-Baudreard
they put his book in the
one of the early scenes
in the first movie of the Matrix
it's where Neo stores
his illegal
disc drives and thumb drives and
what not
it's called
a simulacra on simulation
I haven't read it
I've heard about the guy for years
um I don't
want to pretend that I'm able to interpret what it was, but he famously wrote about consumerism
and it in society more generally in the, you know, he was a philosopher. He tried to understand
what, how we're being changed as individuals, as a society, through overconsumption, through
digital media, which is really insightful into social and society and, society and
culture in general. And according to the Stanford and Cycliaclopedia of philosophy, he continues to be
of use and interpreting present social trends too. There is a concept. Him and Vablin came up with
it called conspicuous, or at least used, Vablin came up with it and he used it conspicuous
consumption and a display of commodities. He analyzed in his book theory of the leisure class.
Bodriard argued that it's become extended to everyone in the consumer society.
What used to be the aristocracy, the royalty, you know, pissing contest for how much wealth you have now that everybody had access to at least some level of wealth and products that were cheap but could symbolize wealth by looking more expensive than that.
really were. Think about like all the fake wood shells, UCM Publix or Publix Home Depot.
Bodriard sees violent eruptions and sudden disintegration of society on the horizon for this
vacuous stand-in for actual social status. He posits that the exploitation of workers' time and labor
and their subsequent alienation from communities, because,
this wouldn't result in their work is rarely a source of pride but only as you know monetary
compensation is going to lead to the end of transcendence where the individuals can neither perceive
their own true needs or another way of life they're they're becoming removed from our own
biological instincts and our needs our desires we're being manipulated we're being over saturated
with cheap pleasures.
We're not cultivating deep sense personhoods and senses of identity.
And we're not in tune with mythology and spiritual narratives,
overarching narratives of society that we used to be in so in tune with.
And that used to inform the motivation for our every action used to help us get out of bed.
we didn't even think it was so ingrained in the world uh we lived in everything was alive everything
was had a purpose everything was towards a an end a heaven a paradise everything was progress
but now we get so confused over stimulated we don't know we're disoriented we have no
orientation we have no direction we have no purpose no meaning and it's a huge
problem if we if if we choose to partake in this over overly vacuous consumer society and he thinks at its core
bodriard thinks that it's human creativity and potentiality that's at risk here in a media consumer
society culture and consumption also become homogenized depriving individuals of the possibility of
cultivating individuality and self-determination.
For Bataya, another famous late 20th century philosopher,
human beings were beings of excess with exorbitant energy,
fantasies, drives, needs, desires, like unique desires,
not all the same.
And this is, he's one of a key figure in post-modernism,
which is another thing.
don't understand, but I love exploring and just trying to see the overlaps and correlations with
these ideas and ideas in history and how we interpret history and trends and historical,
cultural movements. And Boudriard's postmodern universe is one that he calls hyper-reality.
if anyone's ever watched
Rick Roderick, the philosopher
long since dead, but
he actually died in the late
90s, I think, but his
videos
he has videos on
postmodernism, Nietzsche
and philosophy in general.
Really interesting if you guys
want a
you know
just a really
entertaining but
very deep
thinker and communicator of deep ideas
I highly recommend watching Rick Roderick
but that's where I learned about all these guys
initially
so this idea in this postmodern universe of Bodriards
this idea of hyper-reality is one that
entertainment information communication technologies
they provide experiences that
more and more intense and evolve and involving than the actual experience of life to the point where
we get detached i guess we get snipped off from all we get untethered from reality we get ungrounded
and all work and no play it doesn't pay juliet shore um i said that the in the last 40 years
or so years. The work week
instead of decreasing has actually
started to increase now
and we're not really sure why
but it's
undoubtedly and
Bob Ross this is from
1969 to 1989
a study was
looking at this and over that
period
I'm pretty sure it has continued a little
bit but I don't think it's gone down
from 19 roughly
70 to 1990, American work hours has increased, and they're only topped by Japanese work hours,
from about 1800 to almost 1950, adding almost a 13th work month to the workforce.
And Bob, I think, represented an antidote to all this.
He wanted us to get grounded, get back in touch with nature, get our feet on the ground,
out in the wild into reality.
Because if nothing else, nature represents reality.
It's not fake.
It's not man-made.
It's not a facade.
It's not a simulation.
It's not anything we can deceive ourselves about navigating.
You have to be wary of animals.
about, you know, be wary of physics
and the laws of nature and biology
and, you know, toxic plants and poisonous insects
and animals that might eat you.
You have to be able to navigate the real world.
You have to be exposed to the elements.
But then you can also feel the vibrancy,
the vibration that we talked about Bob feelings
of God, the vibration of God and spirituality and the spirit that's alive out there.
You just let it in.
And I'm not advocating New Ageism and, you know, telling you have to force this view on yourself.
You just have to go out there and experience, experience that you, unlike being in the supermarket
and you have the, what is it, supermarket, Dr. Darren Stalehoff said there's a sense of supermarkets.
he had a cool phrase but basically it's the delusion we get of being removed from the actual
process of procuring meat raising animals on a farm slaughtering them putting them processing them
putting them in packages shipping them to stores where we just you know drive our car getting a nice
shot um go in some air-conditioned store and pick them out of a nice
display of frozen meat and in our minds were so removed from the actual reality of what it takes
to get that meat there how many you know it's so far away it's shipped from maybe up to hundreds
of miles away in some cases it's um makes us out of touch with reality and you know all this
are things that are hurting our psyche, our sense of, again, unification with the world.
And this increase in the work week that Shore is talking about in a 1991 Gallup poll,
there's an indication that 43% of working parents experience a great deal of stress
and conflict between work and family in personal life or happiness,
you know, the satisfaction of your personal life,
there's the burden of this.
The work ethic and leisure activity,
written by Morehouse,
the work ethic and leisure activity said that
there's a huge correlation
and we need to pay attention to the purpose
given by one's job.
And just how core and how integral to social stability
it really is for people to have purpose.
in what they do. They say clear he says clearly work not only serves to produce goods and services,
but it also performs an essential psychic logistical function. Psychologistical. It operates as a great
stabilizing integration, ego satisfying, central influence in the pattern of each person's life.
If the job fails to fulfill the needs of the personality, it's problem.
whether man can find adequate substitutes provide a sense of achievement purpose justification for their lives
and as a suggestion an ideal job would give you a sense of pride a sense of real
contribution to you your family your community you're just like in the tribal setting we talked about
leisure wasn't wasn't frivolous leisure was still purposes
all activity all time spent doing something whether it was just you know horsing around with your friends and cousins and whatnot neighbors you are still engaging in your community you're reinforcing bonds and social ties everything had a purpose and we're realizing that the importance of that and the ramifications of ignoring that you know this wasn't just
a single slice in time that
that our time was
purposive all the time
it was essentially
the entire evolutionary history
of humanity
and if not
the billion the three and a half billion years
before we became
you know before seven million years ago
when we diverged from
jampanzees and
it became our own homo
genus it was at least in the last you know 500,000 years or 300,000 years whatever the current
estimate is that we became homo sapiens that we were acting as a unified tribe community very
much integrated into whatever group we belonged to another couple aspects of an ideal job or
are a sense of affirmation of identity that you get with a belonging through, you know,
connection with the end product.
You're not just another level in a pyramid.
You can see the whole pyramid.
You can see the whole building, the whole product, the planting and harvesting of the food.
And that it's another aspect is that it's a.
source of meaning and purpose because it contributes again to the overarching goal of society.
I alluded to this in my intro that there was with this sprawl like we said it went you know we
built thousands of shopping malls in just the first 15 years after World War II well that also
the housing market also correlates into that we had to have we had you know baby boom we have we have an
entire generation we call we label baby boomers based on the booming increase in the number of
births after World War II the economy was great there was surplus of everything there's no
reason not to have children and there was a ton of children and there still is for you know a short while
more at least but um there was new suburban sprawl new development happening left and right but with this
suburban sprawl there was also more social ramifications people weren't in in dense cities or they
had to interact with multiple people all the time just on your way out of your apartment building
or down to the corner store you
could live in a house in a, in a neighborhood,
without seeing anybody all day if, you know, you so choose.
Or you just get in your car and you only have to interact with the cashier at the grocery store,
the gas station.
Go back home and you're back in isolation.
And I think Bob, it really reached its peak in the late 80s, I think, right around there.
And that's, interestingly, when Bob was on TV.
and interestingly he was very popular very popular what correlated with all this is the tv you know consumption went from
material to digital material didn't go away but we added a whole other complex layer of digital to it
but just as um as fred rogers recognized that the medium wasn't necessarily bad it was how you
use it. So did Bob. I think he used TV the early symbol of American affluence and leisure.
The symbolic and literal replacement of the family hearth as a place to gather around,
to befriend and suggest to others a means by which they could achieve true individualism.
And this was by a creative challenge as opposed to a super official,
superficial appearance of you know individualism through consumption bob wanted to not only you know be keep
uh give you a companionship in his personality and maybe some entertainment because of the gimmicky
nature of just doing something cool fast but um he wanted to of course encourage us to be individuals and not
be victim to the fast pleasure, instant gratification,
which is more and more rampant with the internet, TV 2.0.
That was so tempting.
Fred Rogers recognized the problem of modern over-stimulation,
and I thought it was interesting between TV and cinema and action,
and then music.
I heard an interesting example recently.
about pointing to this the negative effects of popularity um in action cinema from
erin bergstrom writes from three brothers film dot com jump cuts shaky cam instead of tracking you know
uh the long like in good fellows yeah good fellows the the famous long scene tracking tracking
camera they go all the way through the back of out of the car across the street into the bottom of the
clubs you know back door of the kitchen all the way through the kitchen out of the kitchen through the
um a lot the dining hall towards the stage weaving through the tables and finally landing at the table
it was like a impressive shot all one take all one one one shot
no cuts but nowadays you know transformer movies the most emblematic I guess of
this shaky cam jump cuts Jason Bourne the Bourne series did this they did it well but
they still did a lot of shaky cam lots of very short jump cuts to simulate an actual
the intensity of an actual fight Hong Kong
filmmakers going back to the matrix they the wakowski's famously used uh long takes as well they
had keanu reeves and laurence fishburn and kerryan moss and all the actors there use um trained for
months to actually become proficient in martial arts enough to the point where they could use stunt doubles
for you know to take a couple grabs of the stunt doubles back of the head and um
make it more convincing but for the most part when you see their face it's them fighting uh you know
choreographed fight scenes and it's very um it holds up to time too you don't just have this
whizbang cutting um he's like that's why 15 years out we remember the matrix action scenes
but not Iron Man 3 is barely a year afterwards.
He says,
Bergstrom says Hollywood may be where the big money is,
but big money doesn't buy imagination.
The Wakowski's knew that an action scene was just,
was more than noise and velocity,
that the camera couldn't,
or maybe they're talking about Hong Kong filmmakers here.
There's a revival, I think, of these long,
steady tracking shots
East Asian cinema
He said they knew
It's just more than noise
And high velocity
The camera couldn't be just doing something
Couldn't just be the camera
Doing some superficial
effect but they had to be capturing
Something actually happening on screen too
And maybe one day soon
We'll you know we'll get the idea again
And um
In America here
He says
At the moment though American action
seems dead. It blew everything up too big and killed itself in the process. And I listened to
the founder of Wisecrack, you guys probably know him if you if you don't. His name's Jared
Bauer. He founded Wisecrack a philosophy YouTube channel essentially very very well done.
And he makes compared to my content short.
YouTube videos but they're about 20 you know 10 to 20 minutes long tackling in very
efficient very entertaining very interesting order the deep philosophical concepts
often tying it into entertainment somehow TV movies and he is a a huge fan of
the matrix but he also I was watching one of his videos recently where he was
talking about John Wick and of course that's Keanu Reeves too and um it's very cool that
Keanu is able to because like I said he trained in martial arts uh to do a lot of the action scenes
in the matrix and and he does a lot of his own stunts in John Wick if not all of them but I'm
sure you know there's a couple scenes where he doesn't want to be jumping off a building or something
But it just goes to show you the success of John Wick proves that there's still a hunger for art quality,
not just the cheap knockoff, you know, the imitation of quality.
The actual quality still holds up, holds its value, and hopefully there's a revival of demand for it in production of it.
And another YouTuber I follow is meme analysis is the creator.
His name is Chris Gabriel.
And he was on a panel with the lead singer of Edward Sharp and the Magnetic Zeros.
His name is Alex Ebert, who I guess his parents were actually a psychologist.
And he's a really, he's an interesting character in and of all.
They both are.
very interesting
just fascinating they have
they're fascinating people but also
have very
fascinating and
I think insightful
things to say
about society and culture
and psychology
and history
and along these same lines in one of their
talks he he brought up
he was in a band
before Edward
sharp in the magnetic zeros called I'm a robot but it was in the early 2000s and there was this thing
and it's actually on Wikipedia you can look it up called the loudness war and it was where
I mean there's a whole he has a really cool interpretation of it now it connects with his view of
history and the evolution of culture and all that but essentially even since the 1940s we've been
compressing music and I think the simplest explanation is that where there's peaks and valleys
compressing is essentially closing the distance between those and so you're taking all
silence moving it up you're taking the loudest peaks kind of tapering them off until they're
all a consistent stream of stimulation
He said that we need more negation, less of everything all at once,
so that we can actually experience one another more deeply.
There's an oversaturation of information
and we're not able to distinguish between peaks and valleys anymore.
In music, this trend since the 1940s is,
I think it might be starting to come out
and not be as aggressive as it was in the 2000s,
But he says if you took a record from the 60s, even a Led Zeppelin record,
and compared it to a record from the 2000s, Lincoln Park or whatever,
he said that you would be shocked at the difference in the waveforms.
So if you took the whole album, you would notice a ton of individual variations on each song
and the album itself, you know, the image of waveforms,
would look like it has a unique, you know, it would be a unique image of, of wave forms.
Very distinct.
The 2000s record, the Lincoln Park record, almost all of it would just be a single line.
Not across the whole song, not only across the whole song, but across the entire album.
It would just be, you know, from a certain distance, you would still be able to make out the
uniqueness of the
Led Zeppelin album?
Maybe that's a bad example because they are rock
and a lot of others. No, but that's...
They do have tons of quiet parts.
But yeah, the rock.
The Lincoln Park is
just this
uniformity
to it that doesn't have
leave any room for the
crescendos and the
drops, the
the slowing of
and speeding up of the tempos and you know the character the thing that really gives
depth to music so yeah it just looks like a flat line and then Alex Ebert of course I say
of course because I've watched a couple of his videos now and he's very articulate and he
says all you do is see you look talking about the difference there and they can park and all
you see is a flat line and what's a flat line death there's no more
dynamism.
And he elaborates that, speculates, extrapolates that to the wider society, saying,
if all we are is just a bunch of noise on Twitter shouting at each other, that's death.
There's no dynamism.
There's no listening, being quiet so you can hear and interpret.
It's just loud, flashy, impulsive, instant.
ratification, all reactionary action.
There's no thought, there's no meditation, marination, there's no, yeah, there's no thought put into anything.
There's no time for depth.
And as I'm sure we could see, I'm not going to do it, but I'm sure if we took a waveform of Bob Ross's video,
I may be well, but we would see tons of,
of dynamism. Tons of it.
The over-compressed music doesn't allow it to breathe.
Even Bob Dylan apparently condemned the practice as just atrocious.
He's like these modern records, they have no, he says there's no definition, they just
have sounds all over them.
There's no vocal, no nothing, just static.
Static.
In the book they point to this, this, the caller, she's an artist, but she, she, she, she's an artist,
she well she she's a performer let's say and uh there was one thing in new york where she sat in a chair
and a line a very long line formed to have i mean guess technically you could sit there as long as you
wanted but as social pressures work um you know you just sit there for a few minutes and you sit
in front of her and she just had a she just her the whole
point of the performance was to feel the depth in nothingness. It was to sit there and she would
deliberately not respond, not react, no minimal body language, no words. Apparently some people,
I think, speculate she was wearing diapers so she didn't have to pee. And she would sit in a chair
in the same posture and just look at you in the eye. That's the important part. I think it would
have been drastically drastically different if she was just staring off you know up at the ceiling or
even over your shoulder she was staring dead in the eyes of someone whoever was sitting in front of
her really bork james franko marissa tomey lou reed um so there was a you know celebrities that came by
and uh this points to the infinite complexity that you can feel in the present
presence of another, even in silence.
And, God, apparently in just, you know, one event,
over a week or so, she logged 700 hours sitting in that chair.
I think Bob Ross is the antidote to overstimulation with noise,
to fast-paced entertainment, negative views.
We need silence.
I think we need silence.
So I love these, you know, book sounds.
I love these peripheral noises that ASMR mostly creates.
Page 82, he says,
We're drawn into his meditative presence.
Watching Bob is like a lava lamp or a Christmas tree, slowly twinkling.
It's patterned, but not quite predictable.
So we watch.
Think silence.
I think to,
digest information is important and it's especially important to as a prerequisite
to being inspired creatively exploring your dreams your values reflecting on them and
ultimately finding purpose on page let's see 76 they touch upon the importance of
landscapes to elaborate further on the psychological significance of landscapes.
When writer Sarah Maitland wanted to develop her creative potential, she went to
nature to seek silence. She equated landscapes that she relished with landscapes of her
mind. I think it's very human to make analogies and metaphors and it's not, I don't
think it's very abstract to take something that happens in the real world in nature and transpose
it onto meaning in our lives and maybe smaller different things and experiences that we have.
Bob understood this and repeatedly pointed his viewers to the landscape's ability to
open oneself up.
I listened to Lex Friedman's podcast and sometimes
neuropsychologist Andrew Huberman's podcast.
Andrew, was it called Huberman?
Huberman Labs?
And the other day it was interesting right as I was writing this.
He said that he discovered in his lab,
or at least he knew a study that did,
discovered that tall ceilings make people work more creatively.
and think more expansively.
So simply being in an outdoor,
so what that means is that you extrapolate that
to nature in the open sky
and then extrapolate that to nature and the open sky at night
where you don't have the atmospheric blue dome above you.
You have the infinite, infinitely far away celestial plane.
that you're exposed to and it's no you know it's no wonder that people get inspired when they
have these expansive environments that they're in and landscapes are an analogy when you're
painting them to encourage that 98 interesting like how many times have I said that it is
interesting though a scientific study by
Melamid and Comar apparently confirmed the popularity of the landscape, or at least they wrote about the study, that people like tranquil blue landscapes that are realistically depicted.
They don't have to be real environments, but realistically depicted.
They're biologically appealing.
They transcend.
That means they transcend social, not only social class within a culture, but they transcend.
cultures, their species, they're universal across, human, humans. You know, going back to
industrialization and, you know, what creating the Central Park, the movement, the impetus to do
that, signaled, our connection to nature is changing over time. The suburban sprawl, we're
being more isolated from it, isolated. And it's accelerating, too. You got to be careful.
about these changes because they're happening more and more fast.
Landscapes in the pristine nature they represent are an antidote
and a reaction to the increasingly digital leisure activities,
whether it's TV or internet of the sprawling suburbs and concrete jungles of the urban sprawls.
These landscapes remind us of what it's like to be more fully alive in the wilderness.
as I was pointing to earlier.
Your mind can exist in and in these you again they're curated,
sanitized because in these landscapes there aren't snakes, poison, avalanches, storms.
There is a place where the mind can rest,
where the mind can experience freedom in a space of open possibility.
I thought Bill Alexander's view, and again, I want to emphasize how much of an influence on Bob Bill Alexander really was.
He's quoted as saying maybe one of the reasons that landscapes are so popular is because living in the country is the most natural thing.
Even city people like to go back to the country.
It's a kind of instinct.
The country is still the beginning of people on earth.
The earth smells fresh after a rain,
and has a sweetness on its breath.
Every day is a joy with a special kind of color,
bursting oranges of autumn or green,
laughing with you in the spring.
You can put your seed in the garden,
and you can harvest what you plant
and make the tools you live by,
and you repair the things you create.
this is an instinct of being human
I thought that was a beautiful quote
and that was by Bill Alexander
Bob's mentor
The magic of oil paint
He wrote the Bob was simultaneously constructing
the landscape of the mind
where life slows down
and becomes peaceful
and dreams have an opportunity to take shape
and he said
Bob often said you know that's how I made it through the military
I'd come home.
He said, I don't have any power over anything.
You know, all I have is the power to take out the trash.
I have power over the trash.
I can take it out.
It lets me take it to the curb.
But Bob knew how much power creating painting you had on canvas.
You can move mountains.
You can move trees.
Create trees.
He's professing his belief in the psychological need
of this freedom to explore with total creative control.
At the end of the book,
they talk about the importance of envisioning something better
for whatever reason.
Painting acted like, you know, Bob's instruction
acted like a literal and metaphorical lesson
in the practice of envisioning our future.
The painting, the instructions during the process of painting
and the TV show as art in itself.
Being a painter, you know, him on the show, his persona being a painter, an instructor, a friend, a mentor, a healer, a guide, another human being, really.
Going back to that American distrust of leisure and its connection to the development of DIY movements,
A link it and I think there is an important link you know I know this is just me on a YouTube channel
I'm not an academic
I'm very interested in these things though and from what I can tell
It seems like there is a link between our
Progressive isolation
Our absorption in the internet and TV and
Suburban sprawl and cheap products and
Overabsorption of over-stimulation and gluttony
You know cheap food terrible food
for us fast food sugar and all this processed preservatives in our food fast fashion quick you know our
short attention span this all link is linked to together and I think it's linked to movements
that are happening right now and we'll talk about those between farmhouse or live streaming
relationships, parasocial relationships
we have. It's very
I think prussian. And
at the root of this
change in these reactive social
movements is the Industrial Revolution
on the Wikipedia
page itself
well the Wikipedia page
of leisure it says more than any
other factor
the Industrial Revolution changed the way
people live.
It also had a major
effect on popular patterns of
recreation and leisure by the early decades of the 20th century leisure was more freely
available like we talked about so there's more leisure brought about because we have more
technological progress the beginning of the industrial revolution was let's see the
late 1700s science and capital combined increased production
as businessmen invested in the industrial expansion made possible by the new machines newly invented machines into industry moved from rural areas to metropolitan or not metropolitan necessarily but urban city cores big factories from homes and small workshops to mills and factories with mechanical instead of wind or water,
power, invention of spinning jenny, the water frame, the weaving machinery, the
the Jakard machines, loom, the steam engine, all during the 1760s, by the way.
Some rapid, expanded explosion of inventions happened during the 1760s.
They drastically altered the production methods and, of course, increased the output.
I'm not sure why, but it also mentions that economists aren't sure either,
but Americans for some reason work longer hours, like we mentioned earlier.
But even back then, 1800s immigration was really happening in the U.S., especially from Europe.
The U.S. had a reputation in Europe for providing much less leisure despite our wealth.
immigrants to the U.S. discovered they had to work harder than they did in Europe.
And I think it has something to do with the sense of
the religious individuality in America
and making it self-determined destiny.
You know, the American dream.
So the point is that leisure gave freedom,
but with it
to those pursuing
positive progressive
and not
you know
to those pursuing individual
individualism
and healthy
individuals in accordance with the
principle you know the ancient Greek
principle of orita
not
dependent
I don't know
infantilized
coddled
individuals that would
you know just suck off a
large welfare state
they're talking about
a
the danger of not recognizing when you have
increased leisure if you are
lucky enough to have leisure
they think the
wise thing to do
these utopian idealists
these transcendentalists these landscape painters
these
philosophers trying to understand what we should do, how we should change society,
they wanted to change it by making better individuals, better components of the society
itself. They said we need to recognize with greater freedom comes greater responsibility.
sort of a tweak on Peter Parker's Peter Parker's advice from uncle uncle what's
his name well the latest one at San May so I'll just stick with that I wasn't gonna let
that go don't worry guys what else where are we so that leads us to a pre a
predecessor of the farmhouse movement that we see today
I'm slowly trying to make a case as we move up chronologically through history from, you know, tribal to modern.
The values that we see occur over and over again.
The pursuit of certain values and interests, you know, of humans and activities and endeavors.
There's a style called American craftsman that developed in the...
the early 1900s that it developed in the early 1900s and I guess I won't go into it but it was
essentially a reaction against the overly ornamented ornate architecture of the Victorian era in
England and America both or just fancy elaborate columns and you know swirly designs everywhere
which could be definitely an act of artist, artistanship, artisanry, artist, craftsmanship.
But there was also an American offshoot of, well, let's see, there was, especially around 1876, around the centennial of America's founding 1776, there was a celebration.
of colonial American architecture, which was very plain because we didn't have the leisure back then.
Most people were, you know, if not frontiersmen, we were in small towns, you know, poor, just hardworking people, farms, lots of farms.
There was a streamlined plainness to the architecture.
The Gothic Revival, the Victorian,
architecture was could be a mark of craftsmanship in and of itself but it had a tendency to be overly
embellished overly well overly copied to it was to um there was a whole kind of a smeared
view about it for the people who were proponents of this american craftsmanship because it had um
you know it had the tinge of the devaluation of human labor over dependent
on machines and disbanding of the guilt systems that through its it's it's its closeness I guess to the overall Victorian aesthetic which was cluttered rooms with mismatched faux historic goods and an attempt to convey a sense of worldliness just a sense of falseness a sense of excessiveness really that didn't
play well in the American people, in the American mind.
So this American craftsman movement I'm talking about
emphasized handwork over mass production,
a return to traditional simplicity over gaudy historical styles,
use of local natural materials,
the elevation of handicraft,
and the people teaching and learning the handicraft,
equating moral integrity with the ability to create something beautiful.
beautiful out of simple things.
This naturally had social reforming underpinnings
in that it recognized the plight of the industrial worker
who, again, like Arita, it wasn't,
it was an imbalance of skills, you know?
You didn't want to be just a politician
who couldn't tell a wrench from a pair of pliers.
You know, you wanted to be a worldly man,
a worldly individual, a cultivated,
a renaissance individual, you know, a physically and intellectually and maybe even spiritually
imposing figure, or at least going back to John Ruskin and William Morris, who I briefly
mentioned earlier, we can see in their writings, they were both, again, highly influential thinkers
to both the Hudson River School landscape painters, the utopian thinkers, like, uh,
Bronson Alcott and Elizabeth Peabody, but they were also influenced this architectural movement too,
the American craftsman in the more general DIY movement of the early 1900s.
Ruskin and Morris sought to elevate their ideas,
sought to encourage the elevation of the status of art forms that adhered for being seen as mere trade
and not fine art.
And this found
likely
came out of
British reaction
to Victorian's ideals
and all that.
He's overly ornate,
overly showy,
ostentatious
ways of
and then style
in art and architecture
of the early 1800s.
The American Arts and Crafts
movement got its blueprint
from this British reaction
to this over-consumption and cheapening of human labor,
and cheapening cheap products and, you know, quick, fast machine-produced products.
They were more adept at the business side the Americans were of design and architecture.
There was a guy that the Congdon mentions in the book here.
Gustav Stickley, in particular he hit accord with American to the populace of America
with his goal of ennobling modest homes
for rapidly expanding American middle class
from the early 1900s
after the first World War around then.
A kind of precursor
to the post-World War II boom
and this was embodied in the craftsman bungalow style.
This was reacting to the Victorian architectural opulence
and increasingly common mass-produced housing
the box homes.
This incorporated visibly sturdy
structures of clean lines
and natural materials
influenced and inspired
by specifically American antecedents
around the colonial times,
Shaker furniture, the Mission Revival style,
and even Anglo-Japanese style.
The arts and crafts movement more
broadly first emerged
in the United States in Boston,
in the 1890s.
Remember, this is where we were talking about earlier,
influenced by Emerson, Thoreau.
This was where Alcott and Peabody started their school,
Kindred, first kindergarten, the temple school as well.
The area in general was very receptive
to the ideas of the arts and crafts movement,
to one of its two most famous
thinkers, philosophers, activists,
Ralph Waldo Emerson
and his student successor, almost,
friend Henry David Thoreau.
Emerson famously wrote the title,
the essay titled On Self-Reliance,
self-explanatory in terms of what it was promoting.
And one of the recurrent themes was the need for the individual
in that essay to avoid conformity
and false consistency and follow their own instincts and ideas.
Self-reliance emphasizes the importance of individualism
and its effect on individuals' satisfaction in life.
And lastly, the Boston Society of Arts had a credo
to just really drive this point home that read,
This Society hopes to bring designers and workmen
into mutually helpful relations
and to encourage workmen to execute designs of their own.
It endeavors to stimulate in workmen
and appreciation of the dignity and value of good design.
To counteract the popular impatience of law
and form in the desire for over-ornamentation
and specious originality, copying,
clunky, useless designs.
It will insist upon the necessity of sobriety,
and restraint
of ordered arrangement
of due regard
for the relation between the form
of an object and its use
and of harmony
and fitness in the decoration
put upon it
aka its beauty
is due more to its harmony
with natural durable practical aspects
than useless
ostentatious complexity
leisure
now we
go into
how Bob predated the internet more and more modern trends.
That was a little primer.
Those past seven hours were just a little primer.
We're talking about now.
I think Bob was ahead of the curve on a lot of trends,
and I'm going to elaborate on these now.
I think what he said, let's see.
I don't think this is what I wrote.
what I this is of species originality let's see page 157 because a lot of this I did you know
copy sections from the book and then found elaborate it upon it so some of the things I'm
not able to attribute directly to Congdon and for that I apologize but they wrote a
really good book so I just I found so much of it useful and sometimes I forgot what I
didn't didn't take from it Kongden and company says that what he said when he said
it and how he said it is of great historic value and I'm trying to really emphasize that
a great way to emphasize it is in how he predates technology
the the the what I am a small part of education online education 2.0 as we talked about briefly earlier
education 2.0 is not only the use I mean it's far more than the use of technology it's knowing
how to educate how to do it more effectively as we talked about with effective teaching
it's how to
it's how to
create
take into the
into account the whole individual
you know
create a sense of
camaraderie
teacher and student
and a take into account
their learning
the different learning styles
a lot of students have
what
you know what methods
students are most receptive to
you have to cater to interests
you have to take into account
how student self-development leads to personal meaning
you have to give
really give students more access
to more subjects understand
to understand what their affinities are
we all have to learn things we don't want to
but we don't have to pursue careers
in things we don't want to
and it's futile to try to do that
I mean, you're spinning your gears doing that.
You need to...
I mean, the ideal education is one that taps into a student's proclivities
at an early age and cultivates that and fosters that.
You have to target individual strengths and weaknesses,
recognize the importance of different teaching styles.
So a reimagined education is what,
Bob
he's not doing it
he's not uh you know
he's a significant contributor
and he's a
good gauge
of the importance
different methods of teaching
different styles of teaching different
different subjects of teaching
different
depths different layers
different aspects of the human
experience just like Fred Rogers
he added breadth to the academic more reading, writing, arithmetic, more rational education of children
by paying attention, targeting their emotional growth development.
We have to take into account all aspects of existence and being in what it means to be a balanced
well-developed individual in multiple areas of one's life.
What do we do when AI replaces most jobs?
We have to find purpose with our leisure.
I mean, that's the least, that's most benevolent, you know,
the least, what's the word, malignant least,
that's the most benignine instance of a possible future,
where we would have to, we would have just too much leisure time
and not have to work if we had guaranteed income.
On page 62, they suggest that work may become obsolete,
so we have to discover some non-financial incentives to pursue.
Apparently, John Maynard Keene, a famous economist,
said in 1930 that he thought by 2030,
30 hundred years from then, eight years from now.
We might live in a world where labor is distributed more equally,
equally, and people work only 15 hours a week.
That's for that theory.
But condens thesis is that leisure time,
regardless of how we get there, if we do and how much we have,
leisure time spent painting can lead to a good life.
so she begs the question what would we do if we you know what would make a good life what would be a good use of leisure time
obviously painting is what she's suggesting but what does that mean what activities would fall would also fall under that category
we have health care you know food and water dwelling uh basically
tools and appliances basic access to technologies that make our life easier transportation
lodging entertainment if all those were satisfied taken care of freely
available if we had plenty of them you know if we all want to drill to you know
build something we'd have to have plenty of them for it not to be or at least
mostly plenty of them
you know for that not to constitute for that to constitute free access and availability
well this guy Skidelsky writing about leisure says that it's our culture's poverty of imagination
that leads it to believe that all creativity and innovation needs to be stimulated by money
and have a direct you know profitability but you know hobbies don't often yield income
and if they do it's not until years of practice
because you have to develop and refine the skill
subtle effects of developing skills
carry over into other areas of life too
like we've talked about learning begets learning
we get better at learning the more we learn a skill
we get better at learning other skills
and bob said
very importantly
I can't think, he said, I can't think of anything more rewarding than being able to express yourself
to others through painting. Exercising the imagination, experimenting with talents, being creative.
These things to me, they're truly the windows to your soul. He said, go, make mistakes, learn from them.
If you're not making mistakes, you're not learning. You're not challenging yourself.
He pursued, he encouraged people to pursue their passion.
to answer callings they might not never known they have.
He himself wasn't a hypocrite because he was a demonstration of this.
He was a successful hobbyist turned painter, a professional painter.
His example, his example taught us all not to undermine the value of a sincere and steady application of effort towards our inclinations.
He showed us how a passion can tangibly become a source of both satisfaction through creativity and a source of income.
You know, there's an article I read and said,
I wondered if it was an actual trend.
Maybe it's a fad, but I said Gen Z and millennials would rather be unemployed than be unhappy at their job at work.
2011, Etsy is still very much a thing.
We trace this example in Etsy, they said.
Etsy vendors who sell their crafts online and boast about it under a blog called quit your day job.
And I think creativity, you know, developing a skill takes creativity and especially painting, especially an artistic skill.
Even a craftsman skill, a trades skill takes creativity.
It takes, you know, creative thinking, thinking outside the box, finding new ways.
is innovativeness and innovation.
Envisioning a new reality, like we said before,
is the first step to make that possible,
and you get better at something you do,
the more you do it.
I know I've already said that,
but it's such an important point.
We often don't realize, like,
these incremental, minute gains that we're getting in return,
for doing something and practicing things.
If you think about the 10,000 hour rule,
think about how many tens of hours
before you even see, you know,
a fraction of that final development of your skill
over the 10,000 hour period.
It's very subtle,
and oftentimes it's actually far from linear, too.
It's very exponential.
It's a very rapidly accelerating,
gain the more you work at it the more gain you'll see so I was thinking about how
creativity relates to meaning and what I could come up with was that most of our
daily lives you know if we have a a smooth flow a consistent day-to-day type of
routine we don't get a chance to exercise much creativity you know you got small little pockets
of creative things you can do but um you know between your career your housework chores
child care other social obligations can't be very creative in what you do lends itself to bob's
painting giving us a sense of control of our lives
I think that when we learn the value of learning and we start applying learning to learning more and more and more things,
so not only do we get better at learning one skill, but as we learn other skills, we get better at learning a range of skills.
We become more adaptable.
Creativity in one area then bleeds over into other areas of life.
so this it allows for expression of abstract psychological feelings when we paint when we express ourselves
and we create we impose a vision onto the world onto a definite physical concrete medium because
reality always gets the last word doesn't it like that sublime song this reveals our values
in the measure of our ability to adapt because when we try things in the
real world. We get slapped down if we aren't in alignment with reality. So new skills, for instance,
if we take Bob's example in painting, correlates to our wider abilities and to their limits.
Because as we test ourselves, we test what we can do in the real world, and we test what our innate
biology allows us to do, whether it's our mind or our physical limitations. I wondered if
values were indirectly discovered this isn't original to me but it is interesting
to think about it's like there's clearly limits to what we can do and we can't do
what works as a mode of being in society what what morals we can exercise for
how long how long can we avoid self-development before we either individually
deteriorate and
integrate or we deteriorate as a society so anyways I really think that just the more we try the more we do
the more we reach out extend our abilities the more we learn the more we learn our limitations
we learn what we can and can't do we're able to refine our skill sets within those limits that we
discover because before you see the limits
You don't have a real grasp on where they really are.
I think with all this, you get a sense of general competence within your own body
and how you can carry out your visions in the world.
Increased action leads to increased exposure to the reality of matter,
the reality of other minds, other people, and their goals.
they in turn become, they can become obstacles if your goals conflict with theirs.
So this leads to a more definite series of decisions, commitments to future actions.
This commitment then to future actions becomes a growing direction.
We let the walls of reality that we bounce off of continually orient us through a
series of successive approximations about what we're able to do what we can do with our not only our finite existence or our finite
physical existence but our temporal existence how long we actually have to live that we can have children allows us to think even longer how long can our society our species
you know our civilization live um this gives us
The direction that we get from this gives us purpose.
It's not just us.
It's not just our children.
It's our friends in the future.
Our families weigh in the future.
The wider society, ever and ever expanding concentric circles,
it seems hard to avoid the really penetrating concept of harmony,
whether it's in your own life and your own skills,
having an imbalance of development or an imbalance of societal development.
Is a society too greedy?
Is it way too conservative?
Is it changing way too quickly without being properly cautious
about what their negative repercussions,
unforeseen negative consequences might be?
Is it moving too slow?
Is it way too slow to not adapting to change quickly enough?
We don't know.
But we find out more and more about these limits.
The more we act, the more we do, the more we create,
the more we creatively explore ourselves, our environment, our world.
I think this directly ties in to essentially a summation
of competence created through action and purpose created through competence and way we develop
a deeper sense of our place in the universe through successive attempts to carry out our vision
from within and you know the two-way road I was talking about earlier how we develop we
influence society and society in turn of course
influences us the constant two-way communication between all of us and between us and nature
This ultimately ideally is towards the goal of creating a better existence otherwise. Why are we doing it? It's pretty easy to just create hell and you just
Stop doing anything ever and just do what you think will cause people most suffering pretty simple
the hard uphill battle
but one that I think
we're having a grasp on
we're tackling
even if we're slipping
a lot is
towards the good
and I think that's what Bob was aiming at
I mean it's clear he was aiming at that
but I think it was
effective
the way he was doing it
I think he was
pointing to something that was
effective when something that worked
and you know I think
maybe perhaps the most ideal utopia maybe could be one that allows for the the harmony of
everybody's experiences of experiences that would allow for the most profound joy in almost every
moment of everyone's life so these can't conflict you can't be greedy in a society like
this because that would conflict with someone else's joy it's it's
And that's all well and, you know, good and well to think about on that abstract level.
It's how you, rubber meets the road, how you actually do that.
What's the details to that?
It's just a platitude right now.
But, you know, is perhaps, if we really want to get to the ground of it,
the meaning of life is perhaps the maximizing our ability to creatively explore.
but as a necessary caveat also simultaneously maximizing the ability of others to be able to also creatively explore
and creativity necessarily implies a a lack of confinement a lack of arbitrary bounds the bounds are created again by reality by
by what works over individual lifespans and societal civilization time periods
time scales so if we could somehow be maximally open we could be maximally
creative I really wonder what world that would be what that would look like
Herbert Spencer a famous philosopher of the 1900s or 1800s or 18
1900s said that the ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of their folly is to fill the world with fools
Bob was he was using just as Congdon said earlier
well maybe in part one he was using painting as a as a an excuse to practice joy
well he was also using painting as an excuse to to encourage us to be
better people to encourage us to challenge ourselves to be larger expansive in our goals and desires
and the things we take into account inside those goals and desires he wanted us to look at
nature to see it really see it he always said that and when you do that you can't help but
again applies to it applies to it applies to
across multiple areas you can't help but really pay attention to other people see the good
in them see the bad just be more aware and then hey maybe you might start seeing being more
aware of yourself see the good see the bad you might not be able to force other people to be better
fix them but you can fix yourself you can focus on what you know as bad about your
yourself Bob said you can have anything you want in the world once you help people
around you get what they want this is his domain of competence he was an
expert painter he was an expert teacher he was a empathetic
human being he was perceptive very I think pretty self-aware and he was aware of
the tragedies of life yet still had the courage and the discipline the dedication the all these very
virtuous characteristics i think he practiced arite mostly you know i think he was he was able to see
despite all his proximity to tragedy the good in people and have gratitude for life
really beautiful was teaching people he was reaching people he wasn't teaching students he wasn't
teaching young people wasn't teaching old people he was teaching as many people talking to
the whole person and many people as he as he could and trying to teach on a as deep of a level
as uh i think he could you know along with education 2.0.
or education 2.0 there's also web 2.0 which is a much more technological aspect in the book
David David Gauntlet talks about the new creator economy and again I don't want to sound like a broken record but this is 2011 so this is ten years ago and they were talking about they were talking about social media
influencers education DIY online and I think Bob for shadowed what we call web 2.0
this guy Gontlet wrote a book called Making is Connecting the social meaning of creativity
from DIY to knitting to YouTube to web 2.0 during the previous century the production
of culture he argues is predominated by consumption like we talked about
you had this titanet elite community in Hollywood or YouTube or TV cable TV only a few people got on relative to you know the hundreds of millions of Americans and billions of global citizens versus YouTube and I essentially just use that as a stand-in for the internet everybody has a voice now
Sure, not everybody is heard, but the platform is open for everybody to speak on now.
Gaunt argues that today a vast array of people are making and sharing their own ideas and videos and other creativity, creative activities.
And they're not only talking like me, but they're also creating.
They're also in communities where they develop arts and crafts, trades, other skills.
He finds that there's a shift in culture.
This is to me the interesting part here is a shift from culture of a culture of sit back and relax and be told what to do to making and doing.
You know, you're consuming but you're also participating.
you're also interacting your voice your comments are heard your criticism your feedback is taken into account
and he thinks people are rejecting this towards their own learning and entertainment instead and
this is just confirmed you know it's like it's like being able to read the book in 2011 and hop into
10 years into the future now that we're in it he drew upon psychology politics
philosophy, economics, and he saw that this shift is necessary for the essential happiness
and even survival of modern societies. And what evolution tracks with general culture,
the cultural evolution of the overall trend toward a desire for active creation
over passive consumption. That's my comment thread. I'm trying to weave.
through this narrative web 1.0 web 2.0 they're referring to areas in the history of the
internet web 1.0 refers roughly to the period between 91 and 2004 when you had all
these static non-interactive web pages most users were consumers of content but now
after 2004 YouTube Facebook my space Twitter social media in general smartphones
with cameras and increasingly more and more storage and data in receiving and
transmitting capabilities increased bandwidth web 2.0 is from 9 2004 until the
current day web 3.0 there's
It's not exactly a thing yet, but it's predicted to be maybe perhaps centralized, centered around a decentralization,
either directly on a blockchain or having to do with some sort of distributed network that isn't controlled through a central corporation,
you know like Google Amazon etc so this web 2.0 that we're a part of is it centers on user created content
to form social media and it's it's very very significant for the development of really of human history
it has its fingers in all aspects um yeah think about like
Amazon owns Twitch
Microsoft
They own all corporations
And they have the Xbox
Facebook
Owns Instagram
And WeChat
Google owns YouTube
Twitter
You have TikTok
You have sort of relevant
Sony owning
PlayStation and being a major
movie producer
company production company you have a you know only a few dozen other major players but those are
the core four and five and then when the first time in history technology's liberated access to
information knowledge even wisdom which is much deeper and broader than and complex than just knowledge and
facts. Wisdom is integrated into personalities and you know philosophies of show not through words
only but through actions now people carry themselves and how their lives evolve now online so it's
so interesting what this is doing this two-way interaction to us yeah i think bob predated all of this
He broke the boundary of the cost of tuition, the proximity, because he was on TV now.
He was able to reach people.
Like we mentioned before, the art director of National Geographic, he didn't have access to any art culture.
He initially got his feet wet through Bob.
Most articles, even if they kind of denigrate his actual art, they always talk about how many people he reached.
and there's one quote I think I used before
but basically Bob got letters
and he got one in particular saying that
and of course he was proud about this
so he remembered it for the article quote
art professors were
writing him telling them that
hey even if they're not creating fine art
you're encouraging thousands
of students that otherwise wouldn't have ever
even thought about joining
the art world and entering into art schools
and they were thankful.
We're really grateful for that.
Even further,
well, in addition to
elaborate upon the Web 2.0
aspect that Bob is ahead of
was the audience engagement
and participation.
He not only
spoke to them
and it was novel to speak
intimately. Really, like the way I'm
doing now, I really wonder if
I would have thought to do it.
I mean, I don't even know if it's still
it's just what I like
so I don't even know if it's ever going to be really popular
or whatever
ASMR in general
but it's what I enjoy
I consume a lot of stuff
at night when I just need lower
stimulation
and
you know I know I get
jazzed up sometimes
when I'm talking I'm sure it doesn't
come across as relaxing
as much as I intended to
at times but
I really
personally just like it
that that aside
Bob was
talking to one single
person and that's kind of what I try to do here
because I used to be a tutor
for you know as a part-time job
and I tutored kids
from elementary to high school
occasional college student but
I had
I found you know I just liked
again I kind of have an affinity
I have a
yeah with with Bob
because I
I love his
I appreciate his speaking style
and his teaching style
how he talks to
the person he doesn't just
you know he almost
puts his whole being into how he
talks and teaches
you don't feel like he when the camera shut off
he's just you know starts talking about the things
he really wants to talk about
I'm sure there's plenty he didn't talk
about on the show but the core things that he really cared about he he chose to share with us and
Bob was you know he again he was a cog he not cog he was a link in a chain as we all are
we all have predecessors and hopefully if if we maybe if we do enough with our life we'll
have many but at least we have some um people that we influence too
you know, antecedents, I guess.
So Bob, I think his engagement with the audience was very,
it was ahead of its time at the very least.
You know, there's a lady called Grandma Moses.
She was born at a time when self-broadcasting wasn't quite possible,
as Congdon and the gang say.
But they say she set the stage for the everyday painter.
and television made it possible for us to learn from a talking screen.
They think Bob really had an audience.
And Bill and Bob both, you know, they had many predecessors,
but Grandma Moses, who didn't start painting until 78,
creates an interesting connection between all three of them.
Grandma Moses, she was born in 1860.
Bill he was born in 19 was it 17 something around there
Bob was born in 1942 so they're all generations apart
Grandma Moses predated Bill Bill predated Bob
they all were you know influenced each other respectively
and Grandma Moses interestingly didn't start painting until 78 years old
in the way she did
Bill didn't
start becoming famous
to the extent that he did
until
in his 60s
Bob not until his 40s
so
it's cool that they
you know they further back in time
the older they were
just a little bit of trivia
but yeah grandma Moses
she had
you know not fine art by
any means but it was sold in 2006 one of her famous paintings sugaring off sold for
1.2 million dollars so it goes to show you anyone can paint if they want to she said all
they have to do is get a brush and start right in same as I did and that's all she said
Bob did the same thing he challenged the artist as genius she's interesting in her
own right want to talk about the parisocial aspect of
modern media and Bob kind of really predated that.
He wasn't the only one, but he talked and he listened to some of his viewers.
They called in, they sent in a lot of pictures.
A lot of people painted pictures and sent them in and Bob displayed them.
He, again, he talked to us as though he was on a live chat and he recorded as though he was on a live chat.
um he responded to previous feedback he had gotten from earlier you know when he had recorded
he talked as though he was talking to a single person he also was very like we mentioned
earlier he was proud of the fact that he recorded it all live very little editing was going on
if it was it wasn't generally to cut out any mistakes it was because
of some technical issue and so in those in that respect Bob was really a live
streamer he set up a camera you know he was recording himself doing something
artistic in real time it wasn't playing a video game but there are so many
people that Bob was way ahead of there in that respect and it's no doubt that
Bob has cultivated a parisocial relationship
with his audience meaning a relationship that
yeah cultivated a sense of
really knowing the presenter a closeness and intimacy
that you only get through the you know live streams nowadays
Bob encouraged participation submission of work
yeah he encouraged us to paint along didn't even mention that
like in real time.
They mentioned
that Bob
had a time before the internet
the deliberate push towards
interactivity was like a form of
proto-social media.
I think it's really interesting that Tim Berners-Lee
invented the first web browser
in Bob's joy of painting had already
been seven years into
its run.
It's 11 year.
And even that,
It wasn't until 2000, 10 years later, before even 30% of the US had computers in their house.
And Bob, this is where we're fleshing out Bob's, really the complexity of his performance.
He demonstrated that an artist could be way more than just a lecturer or genius demonstrating their talent passively to audiences, or to passive audiences in a very,
just a very simple, you know, non-personable way.
They think Bob's real art to really,
Bob's real artwork was the dialogue between his paintings and his performance.
It was the experience, you know.
It was the joy of painting, the experience of learning about him,
learning more about painting, watching him paints.
painting yourself communicating with him sending your painting in feeling like he's talking to you
responding to you um letting letting the aura he was crafting just wash over you it was cool it was really
something the way he developed that i didn't want to not mention davy turner this guy who's really
nice and answered a couple questions through email he was featured in this book here
they may have a whole chapter on Bob's network and that's pretty important about the
communities Bob encouraged to create you didn't have to again you didn't have to be
work for his company you had to um you just had to pay a few hundred dollars take the class
and become a certified instructor and you could go out on your own and teach and you know that was up to you
how big you wanted to create your community and uh davy turner was a guy who's he entered um he responded
to me i was just curious about his life story had a tragedy of his own and um he found solace
in Bob. Let's see, 96. Here he is right here. Davy T. He said basically, he said he was 100%
influenced by Bob. He thinks, uh, I thought this was very clever. Painting has the largest
creative freedom to startup cost ratio. Meaning you could try to build, uh, you know, build a barn
or I don't know, weld something, but relative to
painting the actual startup cost and especially Bob specifically designed his products to be
few in number and good enough quality but low enough cost to be able to not be intimidating
for the beginner you know who just wanted to dabble get their toes wet and um i was such a cool
way of phrasing it the largest creative freedom to start up cost ratio so
Davey said that he was he said quote basically I was home sick in 1997 came across Bob on an obscure
cable channel at the time and was wowed wowed it he's producing a fantastic landscape
painting in just you know half an hour I loved his style loved his presentation his
anecdotes about his critters I just wanted to learn more about him and so we did he became a
he actually sent me a picture of a pan
maybe I'll hopefully I'll remember to put it in here
but it was cool like he painted his own pan
in a nice cool Aurora landscape
and
Bob
on the Netflix documentary
I hadn't heard about it before this
he said that there was a 93 old woman who came
took a class with him and next year
at 94 she called him back
and reached out and said she had started
selling her paintings at 94 years old and Davy similarly taught an older gentleman to paint and the guy said
and Davy said to Gondon in the book the man painted every day until just before he died four years later
the older man had tinkered with many things in his life but really importantly here he confessed
that of all the many things he had done the wet-on-wit technique the painting technique
brought him and I think Davy sums up Bob's approach to how he wanted people to
interpret his at least the way he was teaching painting Davy says that's that's
what Bob wanted not for everyone to copy is but to learn the skill of the brush and
the pallet knife and then go out and create your own composition and Davey again
he's super nice he said he holds paint alongs
rather than teach. So I love the status he gives himself. He puts himself on par with the students,
the people he's teaching, and doesn't hold any sort of authority, doesn't put any prestige
on his position. He, you know, he's, yeah, he just makes it a level playing field. And he's there as a friend,
not a
lecturer
unfortunately
he had a bad experience
I mean he was
he loved it so much
that he decided to start his own
I think in the early 2000
something along there
late 90s
his own Bob Ross fan letter
and old
Walt from
Bob Ross Inc
sent him a legally threatening
letter to stop
it's just
very
very uncalled for
Book page 102, they say that Bob, Bob left the Air Force with its focus on hierarchy
to pursue the development of an egalitarian community of painters.
I think this is a great example of the, like I said here, of opposites.
From leader by compulsion to leader by inspiration.
As far as online influencers or live streamers, even the article on Daily Beast say he's a smash hit on social media.
he feels more like a Gen C influencer.
The director of the Netflix documentary,
Happy Accidents, Portrayal and Greed.
He says he was the right size for the era.
There was no Twitter, you know, back in the 90s,
there was no Twitter.
There was no Instagram, no Netflix.
So to see Bob, yeah, think about what that meant.
That meant you had to tune into a show when it was programmed.
and he had a huge following, a huge following.
If you fast forward to around 2015, you know, with the streaming platforms,
he's reached the whole new generation.
Ben Davis ofartnet.com says, you know,
as much as he is loved for his paintings,
his true resonance is with the screen.
And Karen Patel talks about pressure to presence,
saying that now artists feel that they have to engage, you know, with their audience more.
People don't necessarily, you know, they want to see things being created.
They want to see behind the scenes.
And Bob did that.
Definitely did that.
I think the Internet is evolving us.
It's exposing us to our human nature, our interests more clearly than ever before.
We have data, we have views, we have people who are personalities that are being,
followed. There's a growing demand for information delivered by authentic people with creative
personalities for every type of community to even the most niche community. In the book,
the 153, they point to Susan Boyle. I don't know if you remember her, but she was the lady on
the British
American
British Idol or whatever it's called the singing contest show
and she
she was this
very plain looking older woman
but when she opened her mouth she had a beautiful
singing voice just beautiful
and it dropped the jaws of everyone in there
everyone was astonished
and it was cool the way the Congdon
and company wrote
about
what that
that and the fact that it went viral
on YouTube meant
so she had an amazing voice
from an unassuming appearance
but our reaction
also surprises us and causes us
to question ourselves
the judges
and audiences reaction are
unusually odd
they reinforced
the emergence potential
from anywhere
even the most
unassuming people.
They say it was our recognition
of her as a star
in spite of her dowdy looks and unpolished
presentation that made her
that helped us make
us love her.
They say Bob's joy
calls us to question our values of art
because
and people are paying attention
to him in the fine art community
because of who he was
and what he did beyond the art
and what he did
with his instruction they have a huge section or I made it into a huge section called um
about relational aesthetics and about the about the engagement of people I think maybe
probably predating live streaming and so there's some overlap here that uh you know
the more we communicate the more
That two-way avenue I've talked about opens up.
The more we can communicate back and therefore have a two-way influence on each other.
And apparently there's art, and there's a whole movement called relational aesthetics in the proper art community
where it encourages action and interaction, interactivity with museum displays and things like that.
They say in 156, that as a cultural phenomenon, let alone a teacher and artist, Bob, is clearly
more than his paintings.
Emerging terms like relational aesthetics are now legitimating diverse practices such as cooking,
talking, teaching, in specifically artistic contexts.
His work and his example of a highly considered relationship between artist and audience.
not just a one way I'm gonna do this film it and whatever it's a I'm really gonna pay attention to what I think my audience wants what I think would be most accessible what would help them absorb it best most effective in communicating
they say to that end bomb was ultimately a mediator a lens that offered his viewers a unique vision of the world they say that
You know, they think it's really, they think it points to important aspects of both cultural transformations and just human behavior.
Sky Boryard, who wrote about relational aesthetics, says art doesn't transcend everyday preoccupation.
It confronts us with reality by way of the remarkable nature of any, you know, any of relationship to the world.
it comes as no surprise that Bob's work
is popular at a time when meaningful relationships
in community are in short supply
and people crave something
that will help them connect
both to nature and to others
things where you like in Tampa
meditation sessions at the Tampa Museum
led by a Buddhist monk
visitors could play basketball
on a court that was also an arborate
abstract sculpture.
You could canoe,
row a boat across a lake to a visit art students who were living on a floating sculpture
at a $25 million dollar 100-acre Virginia Fairbanks Art and Nature Park.
Virginia Beach, I guess.
No, no, sorry.
I guess that's the name Virginia B. Fairbanks in Indianapolis Museum of Art.
143.
They have a section called
the decentralization of art.
And again, this book was written
the year or two after Bitcoin was even invented,
let alone any sort of widespread thing.
The decentralization of art.
Bob's philosophy was fundamentally democratic,
not a centralized one.
Page 142,
Bob understood that his work
and teaching flew in the face of the establishment.
Jackson Pollard, as I mentioned earlier.
When you make a decision about what goes on your canvas, he said, you gain control of life.
You recognize that you are powerful.
And this can manifest itself in other parts of your life too.
Again, it's like a seed that he hopes will grow and flourish in a balanced way within us all.
created a community as we talked about with Davy and all that he you know this relational
aesthetics is more about the emergent social experience often of interacting with people who
are interacting with the art and it's adding that other layer to it it's pointing again a lens at
what we what we are how we behave as humans the art is whatever invites the action action
in response from participants.
They touch upon Bodriard a little bit of postmodernist again,
and they said works, said everything is necessarily a reproduction.
What we choose to reproduce, though, indicates what we value.
So when you think about really the wider context of, you know,
art isn't just something that comes about in nature.
It's something we create because we feel, if not nothing else, that we feel that someone will value it.
And when people do value it, there's a whole slew of ways to learn and interpret that
and how that influences other future art, how it's been influenced by the existing culture.
You know, I was thinking about how previously obscure social psychological concepts are increasingly just,
like a part of everyday speech we say I often say I'll be like hey maybe maybe I'm projecting
too much you know sorry maybe I got it wrong because I'm just projecting or you know
people matter of factly label things as virtue signaling or gaslighting like it's just
understood nowadays whereas I feel like 10 years ago that wouldn't have been as prevalent
so these are evolving this is an example my
example of how people in societies evolve how we communicate you know Bodriard is you
know pointing to context the primacy of context creating and creatively copying to him
becomes as important as the finished product so we see the art as the image but
we also simultaneously see what it means for it to be you know for for people
to appreciate it and value it or devalue it but it generally gets spread more if it's valued and
you know what does that tell us about its status its value um what does it tell us about the medium
it's created on was it film or canvas or whatever the artist the art world friends uh in wider cultural's
response to it how it was disseminated how we
it reached us to begin with
how we engage with
it and all those other
aspects so
this is all to say that
this is stuff we need to take into
context when we're again
maybe I'm just using Bob Ross
as a excuse
to
look deeper into one
particular phenomenon that hopefully
ideally will
relate and
translate to other aspects
that I learn about in life.
I think that might be what I'm doing here.
Bodriard says power is not in the real,
but in the reproduction,
which is manipulated and readjusted to new contexts.
I think about,
I was literally listening to this artist,
Com Trues.
It's a, you know,
best play on Tom Cruise.
And I was listening to his album.
He's recreating,
not reusing 80s synthesizer sounds so i mean he is i guess he is using old analog synths but the sounds he's
creating it's interesting in that we have this 80s revival aesthetic you know it's kind of dying now
but it was you think about thor ragner rock and all these um you know uh what's that band's name
Paramore, their latest album or one of their latest albums is very 80s sounding.
Lots of cultural, artistic things of the last, up the 2010s were at least.
And when you think about it, they, they aren't, they're recreating.
They're, they're like an image of an image.
They're not the exact same thing, even fashion.
If you really wore something from the 80s or 90s, you would look
stupid but because it has a the vibe of the 80s and 90s married with the actual you know more
modern um cuts of fashion whether it's a shirt or shorts it's uh cool you know it's funny how that
trends are cycle they're cyclical but they're not repeated exactly
So, nowadays, I think we're the artist and consumer is being blurred.
And Bob was clearly the artist, but he encouraged you to also be the artist.
There's a little section about how, you know, sexual and even food, sensualism was kind of infused there.
Bob's ability to watch teeters towards the erotic.
I used that in my opening a little monologue of part one, joking around.
But they literally do say that.
They say, they quote them as saying,
make love to the canvas or big old brush,
or it makes me feel good.
Caress her.
Yeah, there's just so many obvious examples of him encouraging others to
Democratic participation.
He didn't want to be the monopolies.
on wet-on-wet techniques which is why I don't think you can really blame him and think
poorly of him for using Bill Alexander's entire you know entire business model and method
of painting because he like Bill freely shared it with the world and not just
freely shared it he encouraged people it's cool that Bob all
you know I love that he stuck with a small PBS studio too so that it just reinforces the DIY
self-published kind of ethos that you know YouTubers have and again he was way ahead of his time
he stuck with a really tiny studio probably because he liked the people but also because it gave
him creative freedom that he most likely wouldn't have had at a larger studio as well
there is a trend more people are beginning to create for an audience a few of you know a niche audience
there's um he had an intuition about his style that greatly resonated with his own niche audience
this was remember they were comparing it to youtube movements and um general DIY they called it
proto social media they didn't this was 2011 so the whole YouTube persona you know
Twitch and TikTok didn't even exist then but they were the riders congden and
Blandy and them cooemen were smart in predicting that you know Bob emulates or
they emulate Bob these new age these contemporary
personalities, influencers, streamers.
Towards the end, they say Bob found a way to navigate the dehumanizing tensions of TV.
They found he made an image of his personality, but he made one that almost in a reverse of what most people do,
creating an image that's different.
He created one that's exactly almost the same as who he really was.
instead of applying the usual show host persona and bob phil donnie who a famous tv uh daytime tv host said that he spoke
so lightly and so gently that people noticed him i think all this it made him more relatable
made him connect with audiences he had a hyper sincerity about him and this is the whole thing i was
touching upon postmodernism there was a whole new thing that actually jared bowlerd
the guy I mentioned earlier, the creator of Wisecrack.
He was the first person I heard this philosophical and cultural system of ideas, I guess,
about this called meta-modernism.
So it's kind of a play on words in that meta-means it means it's beyond post-modernism,
the next phase of cultural evolution.
but it's also meta
in the sense of
the Greek, I guess Plato's
word metaxi, which
meant between
so it's like a bounce
it's going beyond
modernism
postmodernism but it's also a bounce
between both of those
areas
and I thought it's pretty cool
I guess I'll have time to mention it here
they
in the book
they equate him with David Foster Wallace,
the guy who wrote Infinite Jast,
who famously put like
hundreds of pages of footnotes
in his book, they think,
argue,
they make a claim that it was
an attempt for him to be
genuine. It was his need to be
genuine, making an essential
aspect of his work.
In Dolly Parton, she spoke
candidly about her artificial appearance.
I'm sure a lot of you have seen it, but it's cool.
She's so,
she's so, you know, flamboyant in her looks, but she's so humble as an actual person.
And those distinctions right there tell you, it's like everybody has that persona,
but dollies is just so exaggerated that we're able to easily identify it.
Most people you can't.
I mean, I'm kind of putting on a persona now.
I mean, I'm not always talking this softly.
but I'm trying my best to I'm doing it because I personally would watch it
and it's it's how I personally engage most I guess intimately with content
it's most true to who I am so there is an authenticity to it but of course you know
I'm not giving out my zip code and address and you know details about my private life
too many I guess at least
other than the occasional sound my baby girl makes out there when she's hungry but um right on cue
i uh it's just so interesting to learn about you know just peek behind the scenes of things we engage with
every day whether it's tv or more younger generations like us or i say us like me even though i'm not so young
anymore.
Watching, you know, just other less traditional media figures on, you know, as we're watching
people on YouTube and like myself and making videos ourselves.
It's so interesting to see how Bob, he navigated that just so effectively.
They say he's self-stereotyped.
He never gave any winks, though, of irony or being above the audience.
he kind of leaned into how corny he and wholesome he came across he often giggled at himself when he said happy little bush or you know whatever but someone calls him a ben davis and artnet dot com calls him the avatar of edgeless culture meaning the opposite of edgy
interestingly he probably didn't read this book but they made a comparison to andy in this book like we did last time and he says that he thinks spot
is probably more well known at least than Andy nowadays and to cap our historical journey that we're
making our trajectory into the contemporary sphere of culture and history Molly Fisher describes
the millennial aesthetic in art and design as a return to sincerity after
the, you know, in 80s, 90s, early 2000s, hipster irony that was so pervasive.
In the millennial aesthetic of hyper sincerity or just, you know, return to sincerity
is an invocation of a lot of self-help, self-care, slogans of affirmation,
the domination of soothing colors, soft lines, unthreatening subject matter.
This tendency towards traditional sincerity in a way,
from sarcasm in the irony of the 90s is increasingly becoming a thing metamonorism
so this is a reaction like I said to postmodern skepticism about all grand narratives
including religious and political ones too won't get into the whole history I
wrote a little I wrote I copied and pasted a little I wanted to you know just say a
little more about it because it's an interesting concept that I feel is very well it's it's very
apt in describing what it is that is going on in culture vermilion and acker say
metamodern sensibility can be conceived of as a kind of informed naivety a pragmatic idealism
characteristic characteristic of cultural responses to recent global events such as climate change
financial crisis, political instability, and even the digital revolution that we've been referencing.
They see, you know, the postmodern culture since the 70s of relativism, irony, pastiche, obvious imitation, is over.
It's been replaced by a movement that stresses engagement, emotion, storytelling.
if through even if through an ironic sincerity metamonarism is both above and beyond modernism
above and beyond and between like we said modernism and postmodernism so we need to know what
modernism and postmodernism are to understand what created metamodernism and how it's reacting
to those two this also
between these two movements modernism and postmodernism must embrace doubt as well as hope and melancholy
sincerity and irony affect and apathy so it we feel feelings and a indifference the personal and the political
the technology in the technique modernism generation grand narratives are as necessary as they
problematic hope is not simply something to distrust and love not necessarily
something to be ridiculed and David Foster Wallace I thought and I and I think
metamodernism was in the metamodernist manifesto from 2011 Luke Turner talked
about the metamodernist spirit describing it as a romantic in reaction to our
crisis-ridden moment and that was after the you know
2008 financial collapse.
But again,
this book was written in 2011.
And so
maybe they had heard the term, but it didn't
have as much cultural weight,
so they didn't use it. But
they say
a 2013
issue of American Book Review
dedicated
its issue to metamodernist
authors, David Foster Wallace,
being one of them. They just
compared David to Bob.
I think Bob fits right in this category.
Yeah, that's the gist of it.
I have quite a bit more, but I really think it ties into what I was saying earlier
about meaning through creativity and action and success of approximation.
That was a concept I remember a lot from engineering school
in differential equations.
You and engineers do this a lot.
they just find two bounds in which they know the answer lies
and they just keep bouncing between them until getting successively closer
and approximating the answer more and more finely and that almost you know i i know it's not
that simple and it's probably maybe it's maybe it's wrong ultimately but it's how my brain
based on my experience interprets it saying hey maybe the bounce
the oscillation between straightforward progressive positive ideas about the progress in ultimate
you know word utopia of history versus of modernism um basically modernism is saying hey look at all this
that science and technology this technology that science has given us seems like we're really marching
towards a better future.
Postmodernism says,
hold on, let's analyze all this.
There's a lot of corruption,
there's a lot of deception,
a lot of, a lot more layers of complexity
to human interaction,
humans in general,
the works of humans,
and the narratives of history,
than we realized.
And maybe we're not in,
going in the right direction.
But metamonarism is saying,
we need to take all of these into account.
We need to approach it from as many angles as possible
and not to loot ourselves
and be a ship of fools like Herbert Spencer says.
But walk forth with courage and faith
that we can do better.
Like I said, the,
You know, the spiritual characterization of tribal cultures,
how they were uplifted by a closeness to their ancestors
and the spirits and the gods around them into nature.
And the laser-sharp, incisive rationality
of post-enlightenment science and academia.
and if we have these two together feeling and intellect and rationality you know we we have at least
two things that if they're in harmony maybe we're closer to reality than either one of those
in and of themselves by themselves more encouraging friend than an authoritative father you know he was
again like davy turner modeled himself on bob bob was a peer node rather than an impenetrable
authority. He managed to promote a truly generous message in the midst of public popularity and
economic gain too. He wanted people to paint it, of course, buy his products and become
painters themselves, but only 4% of his viewership ever actually painted. That's okay. He knew
it. He was a friend. He was authentic. That's how he came across as a friend. That's a huge
part of um you know the gen z is apparently a huge characteristic of you know on average of gen z people
a sense of self-deprecation or at least publicized sense where they um self-deprecating humor on
social media is becoming more popular and it's like a metamodernist reaction to you know distant
being ironic it's like being overly
authentic saying oh my god I'm too depressed to get out of bed today and that's something you choose
to share if you would have said that 20 years ago it would have had a much different effect
a much different reception let's say but um yeah I think authenticity is a balance between being
truthful about our flaws and our virtues because you don't want to be too ironic too detached
You can be untethered and ungrounded, like we said.
You know, Bob, from an ASMR standpoint,
he didn't distance himself from his art
or his TV persona.
He leaned into it as an identity.
He gave us a sense of certainty, of predictability,
and that allows us to drop our guard.
And Beyond the Pale, he made numerous this guy, Jones, in 2015.
so ASMR wasn't really as nearly as big as it was.
It was around though, of course.
But he says he didn't say anything about ASMR.
He was talking about Bob saying,
you know, whether he was much good or not at art,
it was hardly, at that hardly mattered.
He promoted relaxation and sleep.
And he still does, you know, on TV back then,
and he still does on YouTube 20 years later.
he says I often watch Bob when I can't sleep
and if you look closely at some of Bob's paintings
and you know
some are pretty poor stuff
but he says it's only
if you resist being seduced
by that voice and smile
he did a lot of the like I said
ritualistic repetitive repetition
beat the devil out of it
you know I talked about his two inch brush and his
easel every time give the same chuckle with his
little jokes he always repeated it always ended it with the same just wholesome encouraging phrase
warm goodbye it was relatable he was humble restrained honest authentic straightforward direct
predictable practical hands-on industrious he was god-fearing that lets us know that he didn't
assert himself as the highest authority
he always subordinated himself to a higher ideal and that to me if it's genuine says something
about a man's character friendly peaceful vulnerable till next time happy painting and god bless my
friend that was his phrase yeah everything we see reinforces our sense of knowing him
deeply as a human being they say I think it was real way ahead of his time lastly I just want to talk about
the millennial aesthetic those that Davis talks about nostalgia cycles you know every 20 or 30 years like we
mentioned has about the time it takes for new generation to see cultural landscapes of their youth through
rose colored glasses in 1995 so that fits
right on time but this isn't why he's popular right I think it's only helping with his already
solid rapport with millennials on page 150 they say that Bob's ethos they say Bob's ethos
especially with its emphasis on participation it mirrors other movements both past and
present and that got me thinking well you know what else how true is that and what are these
movements. And his re-emergence as a cultural figure actually says something deeper about cultural
trends in our culture. His affinity to the DIY arts and crafts and American craftsmen movements
mirrors our turn away from overconsumption of cheap goods, the de-valuation of our labor,
the Industrial Revolution brought on, and maybe our attraction to his integrity and the wholesome
character even says something about us and are growing unease with impulsive pleasures and lack
of purpose at least in the west maybe you know we've become a culture of impulsive pleasures
cheap fast food same-day shipping we scroll thoughtlessly through reddit facebook instagram for hours
and wonder why we're unsatisfied with ourselves bob hasn't lost popularity i think
because his message hasn't lost popularity.
It wasn't just Bob's subdued fashion and landscapes that were timeless,
but his character and his sincere spirituality.
He urged us to work hard towards something worth pursuing.
He told us to clear our minds and begin painting from a vision in our hearts.
He had an appreciation for nature, conservation, a real belief,
in making the world a better place.
Not just for us now, but for future generations.
Even the simplicity of his painting style and the paintings themselves
call back to a more traditional, less abstract,
less almost arrogant style, self-important, maybe,
or less ironic.
He's not hiding behind his irony.
They make a point.
Pretty good point.
He's leaning into who he was and how he comes across.
you know he always smiles I was on Kathy Lee and Regis and they said oh you know
Regis says oh Bob you're a happy guy aren't you as he said now we're just gonna paint
happy little sky and he says yeah yeah I think I am this current so we talked about
the DIY trends of the 1800s early 1900s well I think it is not only re
having a resurgence a revival but there's a whole other constellation of other you know
many other things coming along with it as well and I think they're all tied at least in
part I'm not claiming to you know be able to I don't know reveal the underlying
mechanics of real human history here but I think these trends have an important
connection at least to what Bob was doing and who uh and to how Bob influenced them so we talked
about Ruskin and Morris and they had the American values of industriousness entrepreneurship self-reliance
individualism community romantic connections with nature it rejected um they rejected
the dehumanization of the industrial revolution the mass produced items
without individual expression in them.
There were a reaction against deteriorating quality,
devaluation of human labor.
And now we have outsourcing in the 21st century in America.
That's the new invention, innovation.
So Gustav Stickley in the book, they say,
he helped the movement progress when he published the craftsman.
He published that in 1901,
to 1916.
And they revived the concept of open source.
And that others should be free to use and improve upon ideas.
And I thought this decentralization really tied in with Bitcoin and the whole internet
DIY trend, just a blockchain, new education 2.0, web 2.0,
um, on just DIY YouTube channels and, and how to videos.
Gregory Cholette even calls on 151 here.
He says he calls the DIY category of creative work, dark matter,
because it functions in relation to the institutional art world
in a way similar to the mass of individual substance
that a Korean cosmologist makes up over 90% of the universe.
However you think about it, Bob and his teachings,
say they clearly filled a relevant space for millions and the momentum doesn't seem to be dying down think
about this was written 10 years ago Bob's still just as relevant if not more so has the u.s and
huge portions of the rest of the world become more economically unequal and politically estranged
questions questions about who we are what we value
are bubbling to the surface.
And I love that.
The response to that is
these kinds of discussions
should give us hope.
We're talking.
Talking is better than fighting.
Internet DIY trends
such as, well first of all,
we got blockchain, Bitcoin,
NFT, well, fundamentally it's Bitcoin
that introduced
the blockchain technology,
which all other cryptocurrencies
are mostly
based upon,
mostly based
and then open source coding
has been around for a long time
we have on 2009 I think
and on social media
mostly YouTube though you have
you have traditional arts and crafts
quilting knitting sewing but you also have
home life you have family vlogs
you have news
by independent sources
you have booktube
film analysis
which I personally love
You have, you know, video game.
I love that.
I've been watching this guy, cartoon buffoon.
This guy, Cruton, he calls himself.
Speed Run, a very obscure video game,
which is a ROM hack of a ROM hack of Mario 64.
It's called Super Mario 74 Extreme Edition.
Anyways, it's fascinating.
But he's extremely skilled at writing
at playing this game.
And it's just fun to watch someone
at the edge of their creativity,
literally playing.
You know, science, technology, math, education,
you have philosophy, literature.
You have podcasts like the Huberman Lab podcast.
I mean, that's not to mention art.
Man, you have home improvement,
auto mechanics,
teaching you basic,
how to work on stuff.
you know how to construction how to fix your house electronics cooking gaming we said style design
interest on Pinterest we have farmers markets local markets are becoming a thing we have farmers
markets which are a trend the number of total markets from 94 until today has grown
by about 400% over 400%.
Then we have modern farmhouse.
Which I was surprised to learn.
I mean, farmhouse is one thing.
Then we have modern farmhouse.
This phrase actually wasn't invented until 2016.
New York Times article used it to, I guess, describe the work and aesthetic of a Jersey
of a company called Jersey Ice Cream Co.
According to forms, that's the exact year
that millennials became the largest living generation.
I don't think that's a coincidence.
Gene Kim writes in the psychology of Rostic Sheik
that shows like Fixer Upper in hometown,
Chippy and Joey, if you're an insider,
have encapsulated the modern farmhouse look
the defining fashion and design trend of the 2010s.
In the food and wine scene has also embraced the Rootsie Farm to Table cuisine
and earthy American beverages like craft beer and bourbon.
She says recently America has turned inward.
The aftermath of the 2008 financial collapse.
Increased flexibility of online work.
This is written before COVID, so it's just a.
accelerated and the better cost of living in inner more traditional cities like
Nashville Denver Austin all these factor in to shift in value to a shift in
values in accompanying appearance so this trend is this return to less you know
future less you know even retro this is like very retro this is very salt of
the earth craftsman style this is
a turn away from industrialization, cheap plastics,
the artifice of quality and style and class and, you know,
Tate, high society.
This is, hey, we want to be back to the basics.
We want to use raw materials like wood and raw metal,
not plastics and synthetic materials.
and we want to be obvious about it we don't want to paint it in white necessarily you know some do but
you know because you can paint plastic to look like painted wood but when you have raw wood
it's very hard to you know have a print of wood grain that looks convincing this is saying hey
we're proud to have built this or have someone local build this or you know this trend of course
can be manipulated.
As I posted
on my Instagram, that picture of
the huge, like
absurdly large
farmhouse sign,
which is, you know,
that whole store,
home goods is meant to
give the illusion,
which is, it's like
old industry trying to keep up with these
trends, the illusion of
handcrafted, locally
sourced, raw materials,
but it's all manufactured and overseas let's say
This trend is so I'm so interested in what it says about
Culture or modern history in America some of the farmhouse's most character you know modern farmhouse's most characteristic traits is simple decor sturdy furniture quality
Traditionally made from readily available
wood around an actual farm you know these things were actually used and they're just being kind
of replicated nowadays but back then when you lived on a farm and maybe you didn't have that many
trees around you literally would have to reclaim the wood from an old barn door make a bench
make something make a window sill um you got butcher block countertops we have some of this in our
house you have porcelain apron sinks farmhouse sinks they have a clean look and a
practicality you have vintage furniture bonus points if they have weathered look in
perfect looks traditional fabric prints you know floral and paisley secondhand furniture
this trend seems to imply our cultural desire to look back toward a more traditional
a simpler time and extract the best, not all of them, but the best American values.
And then we have the ethical, sustainable conservation, local, handcrafted, unprocessed.
I think Bob's values resonate with our growing awareness of like toxicity in our foods.
And really in all our products.
His message always stressed that healthy, physically,
spiritual individuals have healthy relationships to their environment.
As a millennial, I can personally attest to this.
We're a generation whose education spoon fed us, compassion for the environment.
Even if it was with a side helping of processed food at lunch, you know, we care more about where our products came from,
who produced them under what conditions, was it sustainable, was it ethical, was an ethical,
We anthropomorphize, you know, him anthropomorphizing trees and clouds and mountains.
It encouraged a stewardship of nature, a connection, a relation to nature.
He helps better recognize the importance of the environment as living systems of individual living organisms.
He emphasized our dependence on protecting finite natural resources.
In the 2020s, I go around.
It's impossible to walk into a store without running into a wall of organically green marketing slogans,
responsibly produced, consciously crafted.
We want pillows sewn by women's collectives in an impoverished community.
We want furnishings constructed with ethically sourced wood,
whose proceeds benefit farmers, go towards replacing.
the trees it destroyed, we like our barista to point us toward the handmade, the handmade
artisanal accents with the local focus while we wait for our single origin, you know, frape
latte. I had some fun. According to architectural digest, the fair trade and sustainable movements
have redefined the retail landscape in years, and the millennials again are
the driving force behind it we have been since 2016 we've been the largest living generation
and since recently we've been the largest um generation influencing the american economy and
therefore at least as of now the global economy the largest and we're the largest segment
of the labor force so of course the modern marketplace is listening to our aesthetic choices
and the values that create them.
You know, Amazon, yes, in 2020 it received,
it got a 38% growth.
But the booming handcraft good sector, too,
is jumping from, in 2017, it was $160 billion.
In 27, sorry, it jumped $160 billion in the last four years.
In the next six years, it will jump probably,
Another 800 million?
No, more than that.
He'll jump over $900 billion in the next six years,
topping $1 trillion.
The handcraft goods sector.
And especially now that's Etsy and similarly artisanal,
locally produced, single handcraft.
especially now that we've been at home since COVID.
This video again is in 2022.
In COVID in inflation, we're recognizing that the marriage of aesthetics and function are more crucial than ever.
Casamorosa put it on their website.
Many have come to a realization that our homes need to be a place where we feel safe, cozy, relaxed.
Nobody wants to live in and off the shelf.
shelf environment anymore this is so interesting this is so it's just so it makes
modern trends make so much sense and we see how Bob effortlessly fits right
into this he had a timeless sense sensibility and aesthetic and perspective and
way of being and I don't think he's gonna get old
I think with each new generation
he's going to be appreciated
and with the
reaction of the previous generations
and the endearing
endearment that we give him
that will be of course
taken into the context
of how he's viewed
by future generations
Casamorosa says we want real wood shelving
holding real glass mason jars
with unprocessed natural food in them
were more inclined towards more simple, more local, and more practical.
Not only is sustainability and ethical consumption on our minds,
but a taste is a reactionary craving, I think, against fast fashion
and cheap plastics that were produced with planned obsolescence in mind.
So, BR's value was the
experience he gave
not just the art
obviously at this point
the art was the instruction
the message found in the painting
and the delivery
of the message
so from here's paintings
again like they say
they become props
whose formal qualities are really
besides the point
his paintings are really an excuse
to practice joy
Bob
to Congdon and crew can't be evaluated without considering this experience as a whole.
Good art can raise more questions than it answers, and Bob's work does just that.
We have our psychological reliance on experiencing nature, our need for companionship
with people on digital formats, mediums. Our connection with his profound
message of love and painting with our hearts or caring for others nature.
And the book, the book ends.
I'm going to end with how in this video with how the book ends.
They sum up Bob in their view of him and his art, his paintings, in his show.
They may be excused as kitsch, but Bob's paintings aren't paintings.
They're an excuse to practice joy.
And that's where future generations are going to detect the art in Bob's life, the art.
He created meaningful, complicated art practice, a meaningful, complicated art practice that supported a simple, accessible vision of happiness.
It's an Emersonian, back to nature, rigorous notion of simplicity as goodness.
Bob could have been a despot.
it could have exploited those who bought into his comforting vision
but from all we learned in this book here
he used that power to heal and inspire
rather than repress and deny
he could have hold himself up in a happy little place of self-delusion
much like Thomas Kincaid did
but we feel he felt compelled to engage the real world
complexities of life with incredible intelligence
It was all done to share one possible way, just one, but that was his way, of being joyful,
and connecting with others and caring for them, leaves behind hundreds, now thousands,
of artists who will navigate other worlds crafted by their own sensibilities and their own desires.
Whether they treat self-expression as ironic or incomplete or invaluable,
Bob taught them that painting is an occasion for joy that's Bob's legacy joy it's sublime
seductive inspiring cannot be owned cannot be ironic it's healing it's connecting it's beautiful
and most of all when it's sincere joy is always radical thanks for watching guys
