Letters from an American - January 25, 2025
Episode Date: January 26, 2025Get full access to Letters from an American at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/subscribe...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
January 25th, 2025.
We have all earned a break for this week, but as some of you have heard me say, I write
these letters with an eye to what a graduate student will need to know in 150 years.
Two things from last night belong in the record of this time, not least because they illustrate
President Donald Trump's deliberate demonstration of dominance over Republican lawmakers.
Last night, the Senate confirmed former Fox News Channel Weekend host Pete Hegseth as
the Defense Secretary of the United States of America.
As Tom Bowman of NPR notes, since Congress
created the position in 1947 in the wake of World War II, every person who has
held it has come from a senior position in elected office, industry, or the
military. Hegseth has been accused of financial mismanagement at the small
nonprofits he directed, has demonstrated alcohol abuse abuse and paid $50,000 to a woman who accused him of
sexual assault as part of a nondisclosure agreement. He has
experienced primarily on the Fox News channel where his attacks on woke caught
Trump's eye. The Secretary of Defense oversees an organization of almost three
million people and a budget of more than eight hundred billion dollars as well as
advising the president and working with both allies and rivals around the globe
to prevent war. It should go without saying that a candidate like Hegseth
could never have been nominated, let alone confirmed, under any other
president. But Republicans caved, even on this most vital position for the
American people's safety. The chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger
Wicker, a Republican of Mississippi, tried to spin Hegseth's lack of relevant
experience as a plus. We must not underestimate the importance
of having a top-shelf communicator
as Secretary of Defense.
Other than the President,
no official plays a larger role
in telling the men and women in uniform,
the Congress, and the public about the threats we face
and the need for a peace-through-strength defense policy.
Vice President J.D. Vance had to break a 50-50 tie to confirm Hegseth as Republican Senators
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky
joined all the Democrats and independents in voting no. Hegseth was
sworn in early this morning.
That timing mattered. As MSNBC host Rachel Maddow noted,
as soon as Senator Joni Ernst, a Republican of Iowa,
whose yes was secured only
through an intense pressure campaign, had voted in favor,
President Trump informed at least 15
independent inspectors general of US
government departments that they were fired, including as David Nakamura, Lisa
Reign, and Matt Weiser of the Washington Post noted, those from the Departments of
Defense, State, Transportation, Labor, Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development, Interior,
Energy, Commerce, and Agriculture, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency, Small
Business Administration, and the Social Security Administration.
Most were Trump's own appointees from his first term, put in when he purged the
inspector's general more gradually after his first impeachment.
Project 2025 called for the removal of the inspector's general.
Just a week ago, Ernst and her fellow Iowa Republican Senator Chuck Grassley co-founded a bipartisan caucus, the Inspector General
caucus, to support those inspectors general. Grassley told Politico in
November that he intends to defend the inspectors general. Congress passed a law
in 1978 to create inspectors general in 12 government departments.
According to Jen Kirby, who explained inspectors general
for Vox in 2020, a movement to combat waste in government
had been building for a while, and the fraud and misuse
of offices in the administration of President Richard
M. Nixon made it clear that such protections were necessary.
Essentially, inspectors general
are watchdogs, keeping Congress informed of what's going on within departments.
Kirby notes that when he took office in 1981, President Ronald Reagan promptly
fired all the inspectors general, claiming he wanted to appoint his own
people. Congress members of both parties pushed back and Reagan
rehired at least five of those he had fired. George H.W. Bush also tried to fire
the Inspector General but backed down when Congress backed up their protests
that they must be independent. In 2008 Congress expanded the law by creating the
Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.
By 2010, that council covered 68 offices.
During his first term, in the wake of his first impeachment, Trump fired at least five
Inspectors General he considered disloyal to him.
And in 2022, Congress amended the law to require any president who sought to get rid of an inspector general to communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both houses of Congress, not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Congress called the law the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022.
The chair of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, Hannibal, or Mike,
Ware responded immediately to the information that Trump wanted to fire inspectors general.
to the information that Trump wanted to fire Inspectors General. Ware recommended that Director of Presidential Personnel Sergio Gore, who had sent the email
firing the Inspectors General, reach out to White House counsel to discuss your intended
course of action.
At this point, we do not believe the actions taken are legally sufficient to dismiss the inspectors general because of the requirements of the
twenty twenty two law. This evening, Nakamura, Rain and Weiser reported in the Washington Post
that Democrats are outraged at the illegal firings and even some Republicans are expressing
concern and have asked the White House for an explanation. For his part, Trump
said, incorrectly, that firing Inspector Generals is a very standard thing to do.
Several of the Inspector Generals Trump tried to fire are standing firm on the
illegality of the order and plan to show up to work on Monday. The framers of the
Constitution designed impeachment to
enable Congress to remove a chief executive who deliberately breaks the
law, believing that the determination of senators to hold on to their own power
would keep them from allowing a president to seize more than the
Constitution had assigned him. In Federalist number 69, Alexander Hamilton tried to reassure those
nervous about the centralization of
power in the new Constitution that no
man could ever become a dictator because
unlike a king, the President of the
United States would be liable to be
impeached, tried, and upon conviction of
treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed
from office, and would afterward be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary
course of the law.
But the framers did not anticipate the rise of political parties.
Partisanship would push politicians to put party over country
and eventually would induce even senators to bow to a rogue president.
MAGA Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming told the Fox News Channel today that he
is unconcerned about Trump's breaking the law written just two years ago. Well
sometimes inspector generals don't do the job that they're supposed to do.
Some of them deserve to be fired and the president is going to make wise decisions on those.
There's one more story you'll be hearing more about from me going forward,
but it's important enough to call out tonight because it indicates an important shift in American politics.
In an Associated Press-Nork poll released yesterday, only 12 percent of those polled thought the
president relying on billionaires for policy advice is a good thing. Even among Republicans, only 20% think it's a good thing.
Since the very earliest days of the United States,
class was a central lens through which Americans interpreted politics.
And yet, in the 1960s, politicians began to focus on race and gender,
and we talked very little about class.
Now, with Trump embracing the world's richest man, to focus on race and gender and we talked very little about class. Now with
Trump embracing the world's richest man who invested more than 250 million
dollars in his election and with Trump making it clear through the arrangement
of the seating at his inauguration that he is elevating the interests of
billionaires to the top of his agenda.
Class appears to be back on the table.
Letters from an American was produced at Soundscape Productions, Dedham, Massachusetts. It's recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.