Letters from an American - March 17, 2024
Episode Date: March 18, 2024Get full access to Letters from an American at heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/subscribe...
Transcript
Discussion (0)
March 17th, 2024.
On Friday, journalist Casey Mischel, who specializes in the study of kleptocracy, pointed out that
reporters had missed an important meeting last week.
Mischel noted that while reporters covered Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's visit to
former President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago, they paid far less attention to the visit Orban paid
to the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Heritage Foundation on Friday, March 8. There,
Orban spoke privately to an audience that included the president of the organization, Kevin Roberts, and, according to a state media printout, renowned U.S. right-wing politicians, analysts, and public personalities.
short of shocking that Orban declined to meet with administration officials and instead went to Washington, D.C. to meet with a right-wing think tank. With Roberts' appointment as head
of Heritage in 2021, the conservative organization swung to the position that its role is
institutionalizing Trumpism. Roberts has been vocal about his admiration for Orban,
tweeting in 2022 that it was an honor to meet him. At last year's Conservative Political Action
Conference, or CPAC, Orban boasted that Hungary is the place where we didn't just talk about
defeating the progressives and liberals and causing a
conservative Christian political turn, but we actually did it. In January, Roberts told Lulu
Garcia Navarro of the New York Times that Orban's statement was all true and should be celebrated.
In a different interview, Garcia Navarro noted, Roberts had called modern Hungary
not just a model for conservative statecraft, but the model. Last year, Michelle notes,
Heritage joined the Hungarian Danube Institute in a formal partnership. The Hungarian think tank
is overseen by a foundation that is directly funded by the Hungarian government.
As Michelle says, it is, for all intents and purposes, a state-funded front for pushing pro-Orban rhetoric.
The Danube Institute has given grants to far-right figures in the U.S. and, Michelle notes, we have no idea how much funding may be flowing
directly from Orban's regime to the Heritage Foundation. The tight cooperation between
Heritage and Orban illuminates Project 2025, the plan Heritage has led, along with dozens of other
right-wing organizations, to map out a future right-wing presidency.
In Hungary, Orbán has undermined democracy, gutting the civil service and filling it with
loyalists, attacking immigrants, women, and the rights of LGBTQ plus individuals,
taking over businesses for friends and family, and moving the country away from the rules-based
international order
supported by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO. In the January interview,
Roberts told Garcia Navarro that Project 2025 was designed to jumpstart a right-wing takeover of the
government. The Trump administration, with the best of intentions, simply got a slow start, Roberts
said, and Heritage and our allies in Project 2025 believe that must never be repeated.
Project 2025 stands on four principles that it says the country must embrace.
In their vision, the U.S. must restore the family as the centerpiece of American
life and protect our children, dismantle the administrative state and return self-governance
to the American people, defend our nation's sovereignty, borders, and bounty against global
threats, and secure our God-given individual rights to live freely,
what our Constitution calls the blessings of liberty. In almost a thousand pages,
the document explains what these policies mean for ordinary Americans.
Restoring the family and protecting children means making family authority, formation, and cohesion a top priority and using government power to restore the American family.
associated with sexual orientation or gender identity, gender, abortion, reproductive health, or reproductive rights from any government rule, regulation, or law. Any reference to transgenderism
is pornography and must be banned. The overturning of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision recognizing the right to abortion must be gratefully celebrated, the document says, but the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision accomplishing that end is just the beginning.
administrative state in this document starts from the premise that people are policy. Frustrated because nonpartisan civil employees thwarted much of Trump's agenda in his first term,
the authors of Project 2025 call for firing much of the current government workforce,
about two million people work for the U.S. government, and replacing it with loyalists who will carry out a right-wing
president's demands. On Friday, journalist Daniel Miller noted that purging the civil service is a
hallmark of dictators, whose loyalists then take over media, education, courts, and the military.
In a powerful essay today, scholar of authoritarianism Timothy Snyder explained that
with the government firmly in the hands of a dictator's loyalists, things like water or schools
or social security checks depend on your declaration of loyalty and there is no recourse.
You cannot escape to the bar or the bowling alley since everything you say is monitored and even courageous people restrain themselves to protect their children.
Defending our nation's sovereignty means ending the rules-based international order hammered out in the years after World War II.
War II. This includes organizations like the United Nations and NATO and agreements like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provide an international set of rules and forums
for countries to work out their differences without going to war, and which offer a system
of principles for those abused within countries to assert their rights. Heritage and Orban have stood firmly against aid to Ukraine
in its struggle to fight off Russian aggression. Securing our God-given individual rights to live
freely hints at religious rule, but ultimately focuses on standing against government control of the economy. The idea that regulation of business
and taxes hampered economic liberty was actually one of the founding ideas of heritage in the 1980s.
In the U.S., that ideology has, since 1981, moved as much as 50 trillion trillion from the bottom 90% to the top 1%.
And as that concentration of wealth and power
among a small group of people reveals,
the real plan behind Project 2025
is the rule of a small minority of extremists
over the vast majority of Americans.
The plan asserts the existential need for aggressive use
of the vast powers of the executive branch. That is, it calls for a very powerful leader
to dismantle the current government that regulates business, provides a social safety net,
and protects civil rights. Instead of the government Americans have built since 1933,
the plan says the national government must decentralize
and privatize as much as possible
and leave the great majority of domestic activities
to state, local, and private governance.
We have in front of us examples of what such governance means. Because state legislatures control who can vote and how the state's districts are carved up,
Republican-dominated state legislatures have taken absolute control of a number of states.
There, they have banned abortion without exceptions and defined a fertilized human egg as a person,
discriminated against LGBTQ plus people and immigrants,
banned books, attacked public education,
and gutted business regulation, including child labor laws.
They have also attacked voting rights.
Project 2025 presents an apocalyptic vision of a United States whose dark problems can
be fixed only by a minority assuming power under a strong man and imposing their values
on the rest of the country.
And yet the authors of the document assert that it is not them, but their opponents who
do not believe that all men are
created equal. They think they are special. They certainly don't think all people have an unalienable
right to pursue the good life. They think only themselves have such a right along with a moral
responsibility to make decisions for everyone else. In 1776, the founders were quite clear
about the relationship between rights and government,
and their vision was quite different
than that of the authors of Project 2025.
We hold these truths to be self-evident,
that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their creator
with certain unalienable rights,
and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," they wrote.
They continued that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,
and that those governments were not legitimate unless they derived power from
the consent of the governed. Recorded with music composed by Michael Moss.