Lex Fridman Podcast - #396 – James Sexton: Divorce Lawyer on Marriage, Relationships, Sex, Lies & Love

Episode Date: September 18, 2023

James Sexton is a divorce attorney and author. Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors: - Eight Sleep: https://www.eightsleep.com/lex to get special savings - InsideTracker: https://insidetracker.com/lex to get 20% off - House of Macadamias: https://houseofmacadamias.com/lex and use code LEX to get 20% off first order - MasterClass: https://masterclass.com/lexpod to get 15% off - AG1: https://drinkag1.com/lex to get 1 month supply of fish oil Transcript: https://lexfridman.com/james-sexton-transcript EPISODE LINKS: James's Twitter: https://twitter.com/nycdivorcelaw James's Instagram: https://instagram.com/nycdivorcelawyer James's Website: https://nycdivorces.com/our-attorneys How to Stay in Love (book): https://amzn.to/3t61uji If You're in My Office, It's Already Too Late (audiobook): https://amzn.to/3PkVECg PODCAST INFO: Podcast website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ YouTube Full Episodes: https://youtube.com/lexfridman YouTube Clips: https://youtube.com/lexclips SUPPORT & CONNECT: - Check out the sponsors above, it's the best way to support this podcast - Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lexfridman - Twitter: https://twitter.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lexfridman - Medium: https://medium.com/@lexfridman OUTLINE: Here's the timestamps for the episode. On some podcast players you should be able to click the timestamp to jump to that time. (00:00) - Introduction (09:01) - Why marriages fail (30:32) - Sex and fetishes (39:49) - Breakups (1:05:35) - Johnny Depp and Amber Heard (1:25:36) - Complicated divorce cases (1:32:22) - Cheating with the nanny (1:34:39) - Relationship advice (1:43:20) - Cost of divorce (2:05:11) - Prenups (2:19:33) - Cheating (2:27:17) - Open marriages and threesomes (2:40:05) - Sex and fighting (3:05:00) - Kevin Costner's divorce (3:14:44) - Lying (3:22:12) - Productivity (3:30:06) - Jiu Jitsu (3:38:38) - Sex, love, and marriage

The following is a conversation with James Sexton, divorce attorney and author of How to Stay in Love, a divorce lawyer's guide to staying together. As a trial lawyer, James, for over two decades, has negotiated and litigated a huge number of high-conflict divorces. This has given him a deep understanding of how relationships fail and how they can succeed. And bigger than that, the role of love and pain in this whole messy rollercoaster ride we call life. I know a quick few seconds mention of each sponsor. Check them out in the description. It's the best way to support this podcast. We got 8 Sleep Naps, Inside Tracker for Biological caps, inside tracker for biological data, house of mecha-day-me-s for delicious, and healthy

snacks. Masterclass for learning and AG1 that I'm drinking right now for gut health. Jesus wise, my friends, also, if you want to work with our amazing team where I was hiring go to lexfrened.com slash hiring and now onto the full ad reads, as always no ads in the middle, I try to make these interesting. I really do try, but if you must skip them, I will forgive you. But please still check out the sponsors. I enjoy their stuff.

Maybe you will too. This episode is brought to you by A sleep and their pod 3 mattress. I cool my body under a warm blanket with a sleep pod 3 and my smartphone. You can control each side of the bed separately to I think down to 55 degrees and as hot as one time. I've never done that. I think you'll be insane to do that. But some of the greatest experiences in my life include some insanity. So maybe you should try try and report back to me how that goes for you. I like the bed cold when I sleep. And a warm blanket just creates a whole beautiful feeling of comfort. I think James in this conversation calls it a cocoon like a relationship is when you're just in this conversation calls it a cocoon, like a relationship is when you're just in this private place together and you share this wonderful intimacy. So that's how I feel about this A-Sleep cover.

And there's a lot of other nice things I could say, but it's just a happy place. A good nap can solve so many things in life. So if you believe in a good nap, in the best nap, check it out and get special savings when you go to a sleep.com slash lux. This shows also brought to you by Inside Tracker, a service I use to track biological data, data that comes from my body, my body, as John Merr says, is a wonderland. And it sends a bunch of signals, a rich, complex set of signals, and it's nice to be able to track them, to collect them through whatever ways we currently have and to make lifestyle and diet decisions based on that. That's the future. It's obvious. I can't

wait till the day when we can get the full richness of signals that the human body provides. I mean, just the incredible variety of organisms, the multi hierarchical system that is the biological organism that each human, each of us are, to get the signal, to get like the detailed chemical, mechanical, electrical signals from this multi-harchal organism and use those signals to get and understand what's going on inside. The full temporal picture, just from second to second, how all of that changes. I think, I mean, that's so, so exciting to me. And so obviously first steps towards that

is the collect blood test that give you all kinds of information. But if there's a way to get like, richer and richer signal, both in terms of the set of signals and the temporal resolution of those signals. Anyway, get special savings for a limited time when you go to insidetracker.com slash Lex. This show is also brought to you by the delicious,

the amazing, the high quality, the healthy, what else can I say? How some academia's? I have all of their snacks. Two things I wanna tell you. One, I know I'm an adult because I now have purchased and owned a couch. This is a big accomplishment for me. Number two is I know I have made it in life.

As far as material possessions go, is I have a small closet in my kitchen. I don't know why I said small, but I'm trying to be humble. It doesn't matter the size. I don't know why I said small, but I'm trying to be humble. It doesn't matter the size. It's a damn closet in my kitchen. I guess you can call it a food pantry. And I know what you're saying. I have a food pantry too. This is not a thing I thought you could possibly have.

And I have it. I have made it. So anyway, my food pantry is mostly filled with nuts. Macadamia nuts and macadamia nut based snacks because I love it so much and I love sharing that joy with others when they come over in their perfectly portions. You too can take part in the joy when you go to house of macadamias.com slash likes to get a free box of their best seller,

and maybe in sea salted macadamia nuts plus 20% off your entire order. That's house of maccha Damias calm slash Lex This shows also brought to you by master class $10 a month gets you an all-access pass to watch courses from the best people in the world at a particular thing Whatever that thing is whatever a cool thing you can imagine master class probably has a course From a person that does that thing, but then anyone else in the world, we're talking Gareth as part of, we're talking Daniel Nagrano, Neil Gaiman, Martin Scorsese, Tony, it just goes on and on. Will Wright, I should

talk to Will Wright at some point. Video games bring so much happiness to me. And to understand the creative art that is the design, the implementation, the deployment, the whole shabang of it of creating great video again, I can't wait. I can't wait to talk to Todd Howard again many, many more times. My dream is to somehow be part of the next Elder Scrolls in some way. I hope one day you shall find me in a cave somewhere in an Elder Scrolls game. If you want to learn about the process of creating such a game, you should listen to a game designer. One of the greatest ever will write. If you want to learn about

directing, Martin Scorsese, there's a masterclass for that. One of my favorite. Daniel Nagarana, poker by the way, is one of the greatest masterclasses you'll ever see. There's a whole lot of them and you can get unlimited access to every masterclass and get 50% off an annual membership at masterclass.com slash Lex pod. That's masterclass.com slash Lex pod. This show is also brought to you by A.G.1. This delicious drink that I drink twice a day. Some people drink once a day. It's an all in one daily drink to support better health

and peak performance. It's green. It's delicious. It has 75 vitamins and minerals. You know, a long time ago when I was growing up I would watch Popeye, a cartoon, drink spinach or eat spinach, whatever it was. And you get really strong beat everybody up. That's what age you want is. It kind of looks like whatever the substance that Popeye was consuming. I kind of like to think he was drinking AG1 and I kind of like to think of myself as a Popeye. Anyway it gives me a nutritional foundation to whatever crazy thing I

do in terms of eating in terms of exercise in terms of physical and mental stress and all the things I do in life. AG one is just the place where I go to to be grounded. Reminds me of home. Reminds me of ritual. It centers me. And I just sit there drinking a cold age of one, meditating, relaxing, just having no thoughts in my mind, just watching my breath. Anyway, they'll give you a one month supply of fish oil when you sign up at drinkag1.com-lash-lex. This is Alex Friedman podcast to support it, please check out our sponsors in the description.

And now, dear friends, here's James Suston. What is the most common reason that marriages fail? That's a great question, but it's a question that everybody wants there to be a simple What is the most common reason that marriages fail? That's a great question, but it's a question that everybody wants there to be a simple answer. Like they want me to say cheating or money or the internet. But the reality is, I think it's a lot of little things. It's disconnection. That would be my answer.

The reason marriages fail is disconnection. What causes disconnection. That would be my answer. The reason marriage is fail is disconnection. What causes disconnection? That's the bigger and I think more important question, because like Tom Wolf said about bankruptcy, it happens very slowly and then all at once. Disconnection happens very slowly and then all at once. So most of the time what I think people want is an answer like cheating, but cheating is the big all at once thing. How did we get to the place where cheating was even something you were thinking about doing, or that you would think about it and then cross the line from thought into action? And that's I think the big question. So disconnection. What do you do? My answer. Do you think it's possible to introspect

like looking backwards for every individual case where the disconnection. What do you think is possible to introspect, like looking backwards for every individual case where the disconnection began and how it evolved? Sure. Yeah. This is such a multivariate equation. It's a dance. It's a chemistry. It's what did you do and what did the other person do and see that the interesting thing about being a divorce lawyer is I'm weaponizing intimacy in a courtroom. So I'm telling it's full-contact story telling what I do for a living. So what I do is I take my client's story and I have to present it to a judge and make my client the hero in every way and the other side, the villain in every way. Now I have to be careful not to do that in a manner that loses credibility because even a judge would know, even a judge is

smart enough to know that no one's all good or all bad. But only if you were reverse engineering a relationship and saying, how did this break? You really have to look at both people, the good and the bad, you know, what each of them did that moved the dial in these different directions. And I think that that's very hard for anyone going through a divorce to do about their own relationship. You know, we don't know who discovered water, but it wasn't a fish. Like if you're in it, I don't think you see it clearly. I think as a divorce lawyer whose job is to really

drill down on the facts and figure out what's going on in this story, I have to look at both sides. So I have to think a lot about my own arguments, but I also have to think about what's the other lawyers argument going to be, especially in custody cases. So I really have been forced to look at both sides for so many years, so deeply in relationships that once you do that, it's very, you realize that the good guy bad guy thing just doesn't apply. I wonder if it's the little things or a few big things that cause this connection. Whether it's, I mean, you've talked about granola and blow jobs, but those seem to be stories that you can tell to yourself.

Like, maybe that story should be explained. Or maybe not. You don't think granola and blow jobs is self-explanatory? Almost. I think people can construct a good, like if you asked GPD, what do they mean? I think the story that would come up is a pretty good one.

But, you know, that's a story you tell about when you first knew the disconnection has begun, is when you stop putting my, by my favorite granola or when she stopped giving glow jobs. I would say when it's reached like a critical mass. Yeah, face shift. Because I think it started before that. When she said, yeah, I used to give them blow jobs and when we were in our early relationship and then one day, I just was like, oh, well, we don't have much time. I'll wait until later and we'll have sex

and then we both enjoy it. Low jobs are inefficient. Yeah, exactly, right. So you batch it all together. Yeah, so she said, well, you're exact and they had kids at that point. So I think she really was. Like, hey, we've gotten a certain window.

So let's have something we both enjoy. So I don't think she had any negative intentions there. I think that she was working in good faith towards the betterment of the relationship. But it was having this second order effect. And so I really do think that, yeah, the blow jobs, granola. I mean, there are anyone who's been in a long-term relationship. I guess it's just worth asking the question, what does this person do that makes me feel loved?

Because I think it's very interesting in my own experience in life. I remember I had a difficult chapter with one of my sons, my younger son, when he was in his early 20s. And we were having a heartfelt conversation. And I said to him, do you know I love you? And he said, well, yeah, of course I do. I said, but do you feel my love?

Like do you feel it? Not just do you know it intellectually, do you feel it? And I remember thinking to myself, when do we feel someone's love, right? Like, what, what is it that they do? And sometimes it's the weirdest, silliest things that they would never know. They are the person who's showing us that they love us and that we're feeling their love. They would never show us. Like, if you said, why does this person love you? They wouldn't say, oh, because I always make sure that when the paper comes, I bring it from the bottom of the driveway to the door, so they don't have to go out and get it.

Where I always hold the door for them. Or I, you know, oh, I always, like, again, I buy the granola that I know this person likes, you know? Or I, I remembered that they don't like it when I put on this particular record so I don't put it on. And those are these, yes, they're small things, but they're not small, they're kind of everything. Do you think it's good to communicate that stuff? What, 100%. It takes away some of the power of it, right?

When you point it out, then the person realizes, okay, he likes this or dislikes it. So yes, that becomes a deliberateness to it You know a conscious So I understand not pointing that out When it's a good thing I think when it's a negative thing like I think in in the granola situation If she had said to him, hey, you used to do this and you've stopped. That feels like something to me. Like she said, she didn't say anything about that. Just like he probably didn't say anything about the blow jobs.

Like I think if there had been a moment of this is starting. Let's talk about it while it's starting, but people wait from what I can see, people wait until the big thing happens, the financial and propriety, the substance use disorder, the cheating, they wait for that to happen, and then they go, where did we go wrong? And the answer is quite a while ago, with the granola.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, so when you notice something, like, you notice that little something, talk about it, because that little something is probably a kernel of a deeper truth. Of course, there's also moods. We're all like a roller coaster for motion, so you can not bring a granola one day just a just because you're in this place where just not nothing is just cynicism everywhere just anger and so on. But it's a temporary feeling, but maybe that temporary feeling is grounded in some other deeper current that's actually building up. Yeah, and I think a good partner wants to understand the currents

yeah, they're of their part. Yeah, they want to understand like, wants to understand the currents of their part. If they want to understand, like, hey, are you going through something? Like, and look, if I'm the one you need to take it out on, that's okay. Like, we're, I'm a big boy. I can take it, you know, like if you're hormonal, if you're, you know, frustrated at work, if you're whatever, like we should be able to, you know, to have a little bit of that interaction and a relationship. But I do think it's so easy to just say to people, oh, communication is the key.

But it really is about fearless kinds of communication. It's about really honestly saying to somebody, you know, this is feels like something to me. Am I wrong? Like this just feels like something to me. Am I wrong? This just feels like something to me. And also how that's presented. I mean, one of the things I'm very caught up on or feel very strongly about is that we have been encouraged culturally to criticize people

we're in long-term relationships with. Not new relationships. New relationships put the person on a pedestal. You're allowed to just, oh, they're wonderful. is people were in long-term relationships with. Not new relationships, new relationships, put the person on a pedestal, you're allowed to just, oh, they're wonderful. But every trope out there in every form of popular media is like the wife rolling her eyes at the husband and the husband being like,

oh, there's loads of some harpy that castrated me. As if like people are just passive players in their lives. And I think that is an incredibly toxic message to send to people. This is how we should be relating to our partner. Like we should not, you don't take the piss out of your partner in front of people. Like the successful relationships I've seen

are where people are just cheering for their partner, where they are thickest thieves, where there is just this feeling of like, man, they like each other. Like they are. They got each other's back like you wouldn't believe. Like man, you could take sides against anybody, but take sides against their partner, you're going down.

Like, and that, when you see a couple that has that, you just, you know, that's so hard to break, but I think that comes from having like a steadfast, yeah, no, I don't do that. Like I don't shit talk my partner. And you don't shit talk my partner to me. You know, like and that to me is, because I think we're just so criticized

by the world, the world is so full of criticism. We criticize ourselves so harshly that having a partner who no matter what is like you've got this, I'm with you, like you fuck, okay, yeah, you screwed up. I see it, look, I'm not gonna lie to you about your blind spots, you screwed up, but you know what, people screw up sometimes. You gotta write to screw up, a lot of people screw up.

Come on, get up, let's go. I know you have it in you. If you have that person, I feel like that's a super power to have that effect on another person. Yeah, one of the things I love seeing, you look at a couple and one is talking, like in an interview, answering a question, especially like intellectual questions. What do you think about the war in Ukraine or something? And then the partner is talking, and then the other person is looking at them as if they're hearing the wisest thing

ever. Like, they're still looking at them, not waiting for their turn to speak, not thinking about how's the audience going to take that, but they're looking at them like, God damn, I'm so lucky to be with this smart motherfucker. Isn't that, but there's a scene. And they can be saying the dumbest shit. There's a scene in the movie, True Romance. Yeah, that's a lot of fun.

I love a great movie. I mean, that Gary Oldman scenes, like the greatest scene ever done in film, you know, with Christian Slater and he, but there's a scene in it where she holds up a sign to Christian Slater and it says, you're so cool. That's so cool.

And I, like, man, like that's it. Yeah. That's it. I've always, I think I said somewhere in the book that, you know, you go to weddings and like when the bride walks in, you know, everybody's looking at the bride. It's her show, you know, everybody turns around

as the first glimpse everybody gets to the bride. And I never look at the bride. It's her show. Everybody turns around as the first glimpse everybody gets to the bride. And I never look at the bride. I always look at the groom looking at the bride. Because there's this like, to me, that's every, like he has this look, like this, because this is the first time he's seeing her in the dress most of the time. And also, he's seeing her like, holy shit,

she's coming down the aisle, we're getting married. Like, but this is it, and everyone's looking at her. And I always look at him, because I always think to myself, like the look on his face is like, that's like this feeling of like holy, yeah, wow, okay. Like that's, everyone's looking at her and she's mine, and she's coming up here and we're getting married.

And I feel like, yeah, like that, that kind of adoration. Like I think that's the look we're describing, is like adoration, like that, that kind of adoration. Like I think that's the look we're describing is like adoration, like that the words coming out of their mouth, that they're like, yeah, that's mine, that one's mine, you know? That's such a great thing. Like it's such a great feeling.

Seeing the good stuff, like with what you're romance, I mean, you could make fun of the guys, totally cringe, wearing Elvis, like essentially being a fake Elvis with shades and like what is he doing? Like watching these Kung Fu movies but from her perspective and from any perspective you could take on him is this is the the baddest motherfucker who's ever lived like he's willing to do those things for me, but not like, it's almost like an epic heroic figure.

And we're living in this epic hero story. And what does that do to him, though? Yeah. That's what, see that, that's the point. Like if there's a point to this, to this whole thing, this whole couple thing, isn't that it? Yeah. Like, I don't, I don't understand this idea of, you know, we had a successful marriage.

We were married for 50-something years. We were miserable for 47 of them, but we hung in there. Like, this is an endurance event. Like, the primary relationship of your life, you've decided you're going to turn into the, like, a 50- mile trail race. Like why? Why would you do that? Like congratulations, you took the concept of monogamy and made it something that two people are absolutely not gonna enjoy but you hung in there. Congratulations, I don't understand.

There's religious perspectives that say, well, it's a sacred covenant, but I have a real chicken or the egg problem with that. Because I think it was like, well, how do we sell this incredibly stupid concept that isn't working to people? I know we'll tell them God says you have to. And we'll sign on for that.

I don't buy it. I don't buy it anymore. I really, because when you see a successful marriage, or you see to be even without a marriage, you see a pair bond, you see a couple that really love each other and cheer for each other in that way and like hang on each other's words that way and like are just in each other's corner that way.

You see the fake shit instantly. Like you see the difference right away. It's like if you, you know, the first time, this is the first time I've come to Austin, I've thought I'd eaten a lot of barbecue in my life. I've never had Texas barbecue. I landed, I went and had barbecue. I was like, okay, I've never had barbecue before, apparently.

This is a whole different thing. I think it's the same thing. I think it's like, once you see real love, like real love, and I mean romantic love, like real love, like that, real bond, real, you go, oh yeah, this other thing's not going to do it. Do you think that's a daily deliberate choice that a couple like that makes? Because it feels like a very easy to do deliberate step, like choose to see the brilliant in it,

the beautiful in it, and almost immediately everything shifts and it becomes a momentum, or all you see is the beautiful, and all you see is the brilliant. That is a conscious choice. I think approaching life that way is a conscious choice, approaching any relationship that way is a conscious choice. Looking at someone who hurts you or does something hurtful to you and thinking about what's going on in their life that they're doing that, or what's happening with them.

Yeah, that's a very conscious choice. And I think a better one. A better one than seething and animosity and letting that eat you alive. But I don't know that it's, I don't think it should be so difficult. Like with our children, with our pets, we don't have this problem.

Like, you never have someone look at their dog who they've had for eight years and go, I gotta get any dog. Like, I've had this one for eight years. Like, I gotta get, like puppies are so cute. Why am I doing this old dog? Like, the total opposite. They're like, oh my god, this is like my dog.

This is my dog, like the smell like my dog. This is my dog. The smell of the dog is like, this is my dog smell. The bad habits of the dog, you're like, oh, it's my stupid dog, they're stupid things. And it's not like that has to be a conscious like they wake up every day and go, I should be grateful for the dog. Like, it's just this or all, it's in them.

And so, and your children, people's children, you know, it's why people are like not aware of how annoying their children are. Because they're not annoying to them. Like I get it. Like to you, the sound of your kid's shrieking is like, oh, my kid's having a good time. And you don't get that NC, when I try to, when I hear that, I try to hear it with those ears. Like, oh, that, like I'm a parent. I get it. My kids are adults now, but like, I get it. Like, so when I hear a kid shrieking, I just am like, oh, like, to that parent, that's the sound of that kid having a great time and good. Like, it's so nice that's in the world.

But it, so for me, it has to be conscious. For that parent, I don't think it has to be conscious. So I think it would be great if it didn't have to be a conscious practice, but I wonder if like anything in meditation or mindfulness, it's a matter of exercising that way of seeing. And then once you've come to that, it does itself, right? It really does. I think it initially has to be a conscious practice. And, and by the way, it's easier to make it a conscious practice before it started to fade, right? Like the, I mean, that's what's so amazing about marriage is there's like almost eight billion people in the world.

And you're picking this one. So when you marry in theory, like the stock said it's highest, like you're as crazy about each other as you could possibly be. So that's the time to get into this mindfulness to get into this practice. Not once it's like the wheels are starting to come off, it's much harder. It's like gaining a bunch of weight and saying,

okay, how am I gonna lose the weight now? Well, I think that even before marriage, like right away, just see everything is beautiful. Let me quote Bojack Horseman on this, when you look at someone through Rose Call of Glasses, all the red flags just look like flags. That's great. There's a certain sense where, if you from the very beginning, of course, you could end up in toxic relationships that way. But, you know, life is short. You're going to die eventually. Might as well really go all in on relationships. There's a line in drugstore cowboy, which is a great film, where he says, we played a game you couldn't win to the utmost. And I think everything, I think life is a game you can't win.

And so you play it to the utmost. Like to love anything is insane because you are accepting that you're going to lose it. Like I'm a dog person. And you get a dog and you've just resigned yourself to unbelievable pain because this thing's gonna die in like 10 years, maybe 15 if you're lucky. And why would you open your heart to that?

Why would you let, because the joy is just so wonderful of it, of the ride up until it. Same thing with us. I mean, every marriage, every relationship, every love is gonna end. It's gonna end in death or divorce. So why not, like just go in, like go in, like go in and just get weird, you know,

like don't define it the way that's, I mean, look at, you know, again, we keep going back to true romance, but just get weird. Like yeah, I love this Elvis pretending to be weirdo. I love this, like, you know, like former sex worker who's like, you know, like whatever, like just go in. Like, love this person, have them love you.

Don't worry about what everybody else is doing in their relationship. Like we're in such, I mean, it's not to me surprising that, that as the performative aspects of life on social media increases, people satisfaction with their relationships and the divorce rate, you know, is following the same trend. Because I think everyone's going, well, what's everybody else doing? You know, well, how much sex is everyone else having? Are you? The only two people that should worry about how much sex you're having to the two people.

If the two people are happy in the relationship, great. Then what does it matter? What does matter what everybody else is doing? Yeah, there should be an element to great relationships and great friendships of like, fuck the world. It's us versus the world. It's us, it's us. And that's why me when I say that, that thickest thieves, like when they're like a unit like that,

because it's just look, it's just us. It's just what we want, it's what we like. And that's why I said like, you know, even when it comes to sex or things like that, like if you can't be candid with your partner about whatever weird shit you're into or what fantasy you had in any particular, well, then who the hell can you be candid with?

I mean, because you're gonna either go without or go elsewhere, and neither of those is a particularly healthy option or helpful option. It's the start of that decline. So why open yourself to that decline, which invariably is just the path to the chair in front of me in my office? Yeah, you have a full section in your book on foot fetishes. I do.

I do. Yeah. Which is funny because I don't know anything about foot fetishes. Me neither. Yeah. I can't. I'm not kinshaming anybody, but like there's nothing sexual about feet to me at all. Like I just don't get it. I don't, but I mean listen, the people like things, it's good, you know. But yeah, I have had clients that have odd fetishes or sexual proclivities or things they want to do and they don't share it with their partner at all. And then they find an outlet for it because

they try to go without it and that doesn't work. So they try to find some other outlet for it and then that's interpreted as a betrayal and it creates distance and people split up. And of course, everybody likes to have like a bad guy to blame it on. So when you say, well, why'd you guys get divorced? Oh, because he secretly had a foot fetish

and he was on these message boards like me and people. Well, it gives you an easy answer as to why the two of you split up But I don't think you know most divorces have such simple answers is it was a foot thing But I also think too like listen if you got a partner I mean we all do stuff that we're not super into because we're in a relationship and that's what part of it is like Do you really want to go see that chick flick? Do you really want to eat at this restaurant? You really want to go to her cousin's wedding?

No, but part of being a relationship is, okay, if you're into this, I'm gonna pretend this song's a good song, even though it's not my favorite song. And I think, I just don't know, we've turned sex. I mean, sex has been so politicized in recent years, maybe it always was, but I think we've made it into something where we can't just, I don't know,

I'm not into feet, but if the woman I love was like, you know, I'm really into feet. Like I really want to do stuff with your feet. I'd be like, alright, I'm going to pretend I'm into that. Like for, it's not going to kill me. Yeah. I'm not going to be able to make it a centerpiece of our coupling, but, you know, like, yeah, I'm going to pretend I'm into feet if you want. I don't personally have any fetishes that are outside of the normal discourse. As a divorce lawyer, I get to experience the whole spectrum. But if I, like if I was into like furries, for example,

you know, I don't know how I would initiate the conversation with my partner or about that. But frame the question the other direction. If you were into furries, how do you prevent your partner from knowing anything about that? That feels like a real, you'd have to make a conscious choice to not let your partner know. Sure. So I don't think either of those is a particularly palatable or easy proposition. But a lot of people live life hiding some part of themselves.

Yeah, quite unsuccessfully. Like the second order effects of that are very rarely positive. Sure. I don't think I've ever met someone and went, yeah, I really hid this huge part of myself for an extended period of time. And that's the best thing that happened.

It's really glad. I'm really glad I stayed in the closet as long as I did. It really worked out. Like it rarely does. It's a question of how long can you hold it off? Yeah. Like I know gay men who stayed in the closet for 40 years, 50 years of their lives.

And then they had a successful second chapter as a gay man. I've had clients like that. Do they regret that they were in the closet? No, because they were married, they had kids, like they had experiences, they're glad they had. But would their advice to a young person in their 20s and 30s whose gay be, stay in the closet,

because then you can have a wife and some kids, and then you can come out when you're 50 or 60 and have a second chapter. No. They would say, be who you are. Don't be afraid. As you were talking, I'm trying to think of, because I'm publicly and privately, I'm the exact same person, or try to be the exact same person.

So usually you try to make sure there's nothing to hide, but I was trying to come up with a counter-example for it, if there's good things to hide. Well, there could be past relationships. If I slept with thousands of women or something like this, maybe you want to put that to the side. Well, you don't want to be in, there's a difference between being honest about something and being inicate about it. Right. You know, like I, I, I, I think we all do this with lovers, like any of us who've been in more than one relationship.

You would not, you know, at the end of sex be like, that was the third best sex I've ever had. You know, like you, that's, it's just indelicate, it's rude, you know. So, so I don't think it's a matter of total candor at all times. But I think if you were, we're using the furry example. I'm not picking on furries. I just think if that is a proclivity that is anything other than a passing thought, like it's something that you just keep coming back to,

then you're making a conscious decision to withhold it from your partner. And what is that out of? I mean, I would say it's probably out of fear. I'm not a psychologist, but probably out of fear. Fear that they would reject you. That they, okay, well, now, see, I genuinely believe that this, you know, I'm very conflicted in my religious faith, but I don't know that I believe in the devil. But if there was a devil, I think his principle function would be to convince us that we are so beech-jill that God couldn't love us. It would be to convince us that we are so beast-jill that God couldn't love us. It would be to convince us that we're awful

and that we should just lean into the awfulness. And I know the greatest low points of my life came, whenever I just went, you know what, I'm just awful, I might as well just behave awfully. And I really believe that when you push down parts of yourself, like your sexuality, like your insecurities, your true feelings from your romantic partner, the person who's supposed

to be your number one. You are making sure you will never feel their love because they don't love you. They love the you you've presented to them, which you know in your heart is not the authentic honest real you. And so if you know you're super into furries and you don't tell your partner about that and your partner says, I love you so much and you know what I love one of the things I love about us is we have such great sexual chemistry, you'll never feel that love because you know, yeah that's not true though, she doesn't know, she doesn't know that actually I'm not really

satisfied and there is this thing that I want that I know I can't even tell her because I'm so ashamed. Like that doesn't feel like a good option to me. Yeah, yeah. So that kind of vulnerability is essential to intimacy. You know, I'm prone to jujitsu metaphors. And this is one of the first conversations where I can actually use them

because the person I'm talking to is a jujitsu person. But, and people should know that you are a Quarantko jiu jitsu person. You have been Afflicted with the I am a brown belt on their moreseller Garcia, and I am like a seven-year brown belt now So which is the right way to be a brown belt. Well, and also I am, you know, late middle aged Middle weight and moderately talented. So I'm, and training at that academy with so many incredibly talented people and training in New York City

where there's so many unbelievably talented people, you're constantly humble and feeling like you should just be wearing a blue belt all the time. But, but a lot of, I think as you know, and as most, most people who practice Jiu-Jitsu know, you start to sort of see Jiu-Jitsu in everything. I genuinely believe that in love, you have to give something to get something,

you have to create everything you do creates a vulnerability. Every move you make in Jiu-Jitsu creates opportunity and creates vulnerability. And so you have to be willing to create vulnerabilities in order to get any leverage in order to get any progress in any way to move the position. You don't want a marriage that's just two people

both in 50-50. You know, like you're just sitting in that car doing nothing. You know, you want to actually move along. Yeah, I mean, that's the way I see love in relationships. This should take that leap of vulnerability, give the other person the option to destroy you. Well, you have to expose. And that's the part that I think is hard for everyone, is to expose yourself in that way.

But that's what I mean, even when I said about getting a dog or having a child, like loving anything is tremendously courageous because it's terrifying. And it's only brave if you're scared. If you're not scared, you know, it's not brave, it's just stupidity. It's just, you know, it's bravery when you're afraid and you do the thing anyway. And so love is like, yeah, it's scary. Like, I don't care who you are.

Like, you know, being, you know, in the Jiu-Jitsu community, like, I'm around, you know, as you are like, incredibly tough people, like physically tough people, mentally tough people. But, you know, I've seen some of those people taken down by a 120 pound woman, you know, not from a grappling perspective, but they are taken apart by a woman in their life. And vice versa, I've seen men, you know, who like it really is shocking how much leverage we give to our romantic partners.

And how little discussion we really, genuine discussion we really have about it, how much we really are ever trained to think about it. You know, there's nothing in school that teaches us about it. So much of literature and art is an idealized version of it. So little of it is real. And no matter how how it evolves when it ends in tragedy or drama I Feel like what people don't do enough is appreciate the good times like appreciate How beautiful it is to having taken the risk and to having experience that kind of love I mean when when you look at people that are divorcing each other, there's a girl in Polk who the years of love have been forgot in the hatred of a minute. I always

kind of am saddened, like deeply saddened, people who seem to forget how many beautiful moments have been shared when some reason, some drama, some break up leads them to part ways. Yeah. Yeah. It's interesting that you came to that not being a divorce lawyer because I felt that way for a long time. And I really try to say to my clients,

like in the courtroom at the negotiating table, I have a role to play where I have to be sort of like a pit bowl or you know, some kind of a like a courtroom sociopath. But behind closed doors, like I'm very candid with people, I'm trying to be much more emotionally attuned with them. So you're an empath in the sheets and sociopath in the streets? Exactly correct. That's well said.

I even hate, boy, I get a new tattoo idea, that's good, I like that. But I do believe when I'm behind closed doors with people, I say to them how you end things is gonna be how you can remember the whole thing. And that's unfortunate because you know, you watch like a two hour movie. And if the last 15 minutes of it sucked, you go, well, that movie sucked. Like well, the first hour in 45 was great, you know, but you walk out with this bad taste in your mouth. I'm genuinely in awe of how easily people forget that they love each other. And I'm amazed because by the time I meet them and by the time they hire me to be a weapon against the person they were in love with,

there's nothing but animosity there. And so I have to try to imagine what these two people looked like when they were in love with each other and how that even existed. But I have to tell you, I don't function that way. Every woman I ever had a relationship with, when I think of them, I don't think of the ending necessarily. I try to think about the greatest hits. I try to think about the moments that were wonderful, where I loved them and they loved me, and there was joy and there was connection. I don't know why you choose not to.

It's this that old axiom, I don't know who you choose not to. You know, it's those that old axiom, I don't know who said it, that if you don't learn to find joy in the snow, you'll have less joy in your life and precisely the same amount of snow. And I genuinely believe like, okay, the relationship ends. This is where it ends.

We're done now. I am making a choice as to how I will remember you. And we do it in relationships. Like, I always tell people, you know, if you ever want to see a couple light up, if they're ever like the couple at the table, it's, you know, it seems like they got in a fight or something. Ask them how they met. And most people, when they talk about how they met, like the face softens, they both, and the other softens, they both, and the other person looking at them telling the story, gets that look you were talking about before.

And because they remember that thing, and how they felt at that moment. And when this person was a choice, not a default, not their automatic plus one, but the person they asked to the wedding, not that, of course, you're bringing her, it's your wife, you're bringing a fucking wife places. Like it was still, hey, there's like, you know, three and a half billion

women, and I'm picking you, you know? Like that feeling, and I don't know why I want a relationship ends, you can't do that. A lesson I learned when my mother passed away of a very, she had a two-year terrible battle with cancer and was on hospice and was very, very sick and was a very slow and awful end. And I remember one of my worst fears was that this is how I would remember my mother for the rest of my life, that I would never be able to think of her, that I didn't think of what she had become in the last months, where she was withered away to nothing in this bed, you know?

And I learned over time that memory is very kind, that like that faded somehow, and that now like when I remember her, I remember her healthy and vibrant, I remember her laughter, I remember positive things. Some of that is I like to look at photos of that. But some of it is just how, I think, memory works. And I don't know why we don't apply that to relationships.

And I think part of it is because we have this binary view of relationships. That it's either success, which means you live happily ever after for the rest of your lives and die together or like in short succession. Or it was wrong, it was awful. And I don't understand why that would have to be how we do it. I think we could look at relationships like what they are, which is chapters in a book. And that book is our life.

And those chapters all have significance and none of them would have the later chapters none of them would happen without the prior ones. So there's this beauty of me of that and it's I don't know if that it's a choice or if that is how it is and the rest is just narrative that we've put on top of it culturally for some reason. Well, I think to push back a little bit, I think memory can also, I think it is a deliberate choice because I think memory can basically, that's how trauma works. It can surface the negative stuff and the negative stuff completely drowns out all the positive.

So I think it's a deliberate choice to make your memory probably work that way. You know, in relationships, betrayal can do that, right? Sort of cheating and fidelity, like one event can almost erase the entirety of your understanding of the past and all the memories are sort of shrouded in this darkness of, okay, what I believed was true is totally untrue, and sort of to overcome that and still appreciate the beautiful moments. I'm continually astounded by how long the hurt and anger of betrayal can reverberate. I have clients who were four years, five years past when the divorce ended, the cheating was discovered,

and there is angry as they were the day they found out. And I don't know what that's about. Yeah, because I also have clients that they like look back on it and they go, you know, we screwed up. Like we were, you know, we didn't do the best, but we did the best we could do at the time. And, you know, we, like, there should be stars for wars like ours, you know, like we should be champagne for the survivors. Yeah, that's beautiful. Like we made it through, you know, like we survived it and we were fools. And we were fools for love.

And there are worse things than the world to be fools for it. But I also do think that most relationships where there was infidelity. And it's not a, it's not a popular thing to say. And I'll get, I'll get pilloried for it, but great. You know, I just don't know, and I don't want to blame the victim of infidelity. But was the relationship really where it needed to be? Like, had, were you truly the most just

dutiful spouse who was seeing this person's needs be met? Again, we've established in the granola story that people can sometimes with good intentions not be meeting their partner's needs or perceiving their partner's needs, where their partner isn't communicating them the right way or all of the above. But I've rarely seen very happy content couples

that cheat on each other. And so I understand there's a shame in saying this person cheated on me, or I cheated on this person. Because I represent the cheater and I represent the cheated. I represent the victim of domestic violence, I represent perpetrator of domestic violence. I represent the person with the substance use disorder the person married to the person.

So I don't get to choose the white or the black hat. Like I have my client and that's my client. And it forces me to put myself into their story from their point of view. And I think that kind of radical empathy that you need to engage in on a daily basis to represent people in those kinds of proceedings. It just doesn't seem like there's good guys and bad guys. It just seems like

it's complicated and people's intentions and where they actually end up are different. Yeah, I think there's some sense in still remembering the betrayal as it being symptom of taking life a little too seriously. Too seriously where you don't... life shouldn't be taking that seriously. You should be able to laugh at it all. I like the story you say, you know, be able to appreciate the battle that should give stars for those kind of wars that we fought and just kind of be able to laugh at it all. give stars for those kind of wars that we fought and just kind of be able to laugh at it all. Especially with love. Like, let's just so absurd. Yeah. Like, it's so crazy. It's just crazy. It's so crazy. I mean, like, I don't, you know, I, I think it's

funny. I think this is real candor, but, you know, as a man, like, there's nothing funnier than when you finish masturbating, you know? There's no more humbling moment. And I like to think about the fact that like the richest, famous, most powerful person in the world, they jerk off. You know, the most powerful man in the world jerks off, I'm sure, you know, all of them do.

I mean, you probably know them, so you could ask. But in that moment where you just, you come and you go, what am I doing? Look what the, now I got a wipe that like, oh, good Lord. And there's this feeling of, what a second ago this seemed like a great idea. And it was, by the way, it was a great idea.

But, but there's this moment, this satori, you know, where you just go, oh, like what, this is so silly. Well, like that's love, that's sex. Like it's great. Like when you read other people's infidelity, the text messages, the emails, because I have to do that all the time.

And I'll tell you how we make the sausage in a divorce lawyer's office. The sum of the most entertaining moments is dramatic readings allowed of people's infidelity exchanges, but they're lovers. The sex. Yeah, the sex and the like, you know,

like it's just so ridiculous. Because people have to go through like all kinds of gymnastics to be able to meet and have sex in weird places. And, you know, and you're reading this and you're reading these texts and you kinda go like, oh my God, these people. And by the way, like I represented some very powerful people.

And you read their texts with their lover or even their spouse, like even their spouse, you know, and they're just pathetic. I mean, they're just like so not powerful. They're so like, hey babe, you know, I have a, I have a totally nameless, I have a very powerful, wealthy, famous former client.

There's a whole series of texts about, is my dick weird. Which by the way, I think the answer is, if you have to ask, if you have a weird dick, the answer is probably yes. Cause I own one and I've never thought, is this weird? But I, the fact that you're having this discussion, like it's absurd, it's hilarious, love is hilarious, it's bizarre, it's such a weird vulnerability, it's such a basic visceral human need.

It really is something that we just, it's mysterious, but it doesn't have to be that complicated. I don't think that even betrayal, like I said, it doesn't have to be that complicated. I don't think that even betrayal, like I said, it doesn't have to be that complicated. I think we can frame it differently. Yeah, you can laugh at the whole thing. I mean, I think what we don't often do with ourselves

is look back at texts or look back at emails or look back at Google search. I did that recently. Just looking at what I searched for, like 10 years ago, 15 years ago, and it's like, forget, last week, just look at your Google searches last week, and you're like, wait a minute. Why did you just search for this?

50 times. Like, why did the karate kid three pop in? Yeah, exactly. And like, where is Ralph Macho now? Where is he dating? Yeah, head? What why in like you're like where's Ralph Macho now? Where is he dating? Yeah, why is it another and then you're like a restaurant nearby. Like how did I go from this to that?

But it made sense at the time. So when you ask someone, how did our relationship fall apart? It's like looking at the Google search history of yourself from 10 year, relationship fall apart. It's like looking at the Google search history of yourself from tenure. You don't even know why you were thinking about those things. And now you wanna understand why you did what you did,

felt what you felt, she felt what she felt, she did what she did, and why the two of you, how you impacted each other and interacted with each other, really? You think that's doable? But you've, so you've in the courtroom. Does that come up like text messages that resulted in whoever you're cheating with? Yeah, I mean, you know, cheating doesn't come up as much because most states are no fault

states now. So why someone's getting divorced, whether it's infidelity or, you know, it doesn't matter. There's no good spouse bonus or bad spouse penalty. Oh, there isn't. I mean, you know, like, that's, well, you can have, we've had times where we have to prove infidelity because we want to prove what's called wasteful dissipation of marital assets, which means that you were spending money that was marital money on a paramour. That's what the legal name for a boyfriend or girlfriend in the marriage. And usually the person calls it that whore,

or that piece of shit, but we call it paramor. That's paramor. And sometimes we have to prove inclination and opportunity. We have to prove that this person had the inclination to cheat and that they had the opportunity to cheat. And then we want to show that, okay, so when they went away, that should be considered dissipation of marital assets. So if you go out to dinner with your brother,

you didn't dissipate the marital estate. But if you bought your paramour, a Tiffany bracelet, that would be a dissipation of marital assets, and the person's entitled to a credit back for that, from what was taken out of the marital estate. So we do sometimes have to authenticate text messages on the witness stand, or in in depositions, you know. And what's interesting about that

is the way people approach it. Like people sometimes try to pretend, oh no, this is just my good friend, you know, and which is just like you kill your credibility, you know, if you, oh no, she's just my very good friend. She's not, she's not, that makes no sense whatsoever. For no, we were just my very good friend. She's not. She's not. That makes no sense whatsoever. For no, we were just friends at that point. And then several months later,

is when we once this marriage was over, that's when we got together as part, that's ridiculous. But sometimes people just don't want it. Just own it. Like I did a deposition of an executive once. And you know, posing council like thought they were going to really hit them. They were like, and looking at this credit card receipt,

what was this charge for for this hotel? He was like, oh, that was for a hotel room that I got with my girlfriend. And you were married, yes, yes. What did you, where did you stay at the hotel? It was, we didn't even stay. We actually just did like an afternoon delight rolled around in bed for the day.

Yeah. And it was like, well, now, you know, to call the thunder out of that. What's the downside of doing that? It seems like it wasn't. It actually, I think, helped his credibility. It was my client, so I thought it was the right move. We hadn't really discussed it in advance,

but he was naturally intelligent enough to go, yeah, my credibility, like, I'm not gonna lie under oath. I'll admit what it was, but I'll do it in such an, you know, we did it like at the end, like, M&M at the end of eight mile. Like it was very like, yeah, cheated on her with this person. Now tell these people something they don't know about me, you know? And that's kind of how I try to, as a trial lawyer,

we actually, in my firm refer to it as the eight mile strategy, which is like, we will, if I know there was a text message sent, you know, you piece of shit, I hope you die. My client sent that text message to his co-parent. I, on my examination of my client, I will say I'd like to have this mark for identification, shown to the witness. What is that? It's a text message.

Who's it to? Plain of. You sent it? Yeah. Read it out loud for the court. Do I have to? I think you should. You're a piece of s.

Does it say s? What does it say? It's a profanity. Say it. You piece of shit, I hope that she'd die. You sent that to her. Yes. Why? I was really mad.

Do you think that was good? No. Do you think it was helpful for your co-parenting relationship with her? No. Why did you send it then? You know, she sent me like 50 texts exactly like that. And I never responded and I pushed it down every time.

And then finally, I just blew up at her. If you had it to do over again, would you do it differently? You know, I wish I could say I would, but the truth is, I'm human and I was at my limits. And I'm watching opposing counsel cross out entire sheets of their cross examination, because it's gone now. They thought that they had their like, Perry Mason moment, they had their like,

did you order the code red moment? And it's gone now. Because if you just own and accept your fault or your issues in the relationship, you can take a lot of the power out of that. And I wish we wouldn't take texts seriously. I don't think we should have substantive discussions via text. I think text was designed for, are you here?

Yes. 15 minutes away. Or I got here safely, love you. Like that substantive discussions, are people love having arguments via text? And I have to say, when you read other people's text messages, as I am often forced to do, it is amazing because just like that Google history

you were talking about, I don't know how you got from one thing to another. Like I was just reading on actually on the way here, in the car, I was reading through a text exchange between two co-parents in the middle of a custody thing that I'm involved in. And it's like you piece of shit, you never cared about anything and I'm going to say, you have no right to take the kids from me. Get it, and then the next day, nothing in between,

the next day, Maddie got a good grade on her science thing. Oh, that's great. She's doing so well. It makes me so happy. Yeah, her teacher said she's doing really thing. Oh, that's great. She's doing so well. It makes me so happy. Yeah, her teacher said she's doing really well. Yeah, that's really great to see. I'll be there about 15 minutes late. No problem. See you then. Wait, like it was a day ago.

Was there some, I want to know, was there a phone conversation in between where one of you went, hey, man, listen, I'm really sorry about that. Ah, now look, we were both pissed, whatever. Or is it just like you did that and then we're supposed to pretend that didn't happen and now we're just going to talk about what Maddie got under a test? Yeah, well, sometimes a good nap or a good night's sleep can solve a lot of emotional issues.

I totally get it. But is there some, if you're looking just at the texts, like it begs the question, wouldn't she take the nap and then go, hey, hey listen I just woke up from the nap it turns that I was really tired. Like is that not happened by text? I know that's important because sometimes it's hard to probably apologize for being an asshole right. So I think we use just text, we humans use all kinds of forms of communication to kind of vent. I think it's the wrong thing to do but people do do that. Text has a permanence though it's writing. I mean it's writing wrong thing to do, but people do do that. Text has a permanent, though, it's writing.

I mean, it's writing. You think like a lawyer. I like to do. You think like a lawyer, but lawyers think, lawyers think like detail, you know? And why would you write that down? Like, you know, writing it down? Like, would you write it down

and would you put it on a billboard and Times Square? Cause like that's, everything you say on Facebook or Instagram can and will be used against you in a court of law. Like every photo you post. I mean, that's going on with what's his name, Jake Paul or whatever Paul and Dylan Dannis right now. That guy's girlfriend, every picture has ever been put on the internet of her by her, is being weaponized right now. To reference an earlier part of our discussion that's love, you take a big risk, big risk putting it out there. Putting out there on text, putting out there on social media.

But is the reward of doing it via text worthwhile? Listen, the reward of love, I think, is worth the risks of love. But the benefit of communicating by text, does it merit that risk of that being in writing that the person can reflect on and review and scroll back and get heated up again about? I don't know, we just take risks and we're vulnerable with each other. There may be something about text that for whatever reasons, inspires a kind of candor

because I think it is a new way to communicate, right? In the scheme of things. And so sometimes, we don't know the thing until it's really come into existence. So I don't know. I think it started as something that we just communicated in a very extemporaneous unplanned way. Like texts were meant to be. I'm here. I'm outside, whatever it might be. And so what happens when you start to talk about more emotional, deeper, bigger things, or visceral things, or more emphatic, passionate things, using a technology that was originally

just being used for the other purpose? I don't know the answer to that. What I do know is, yeah, as a lawyer, A, from an evidentiary perspective, and B, I just know what it looks like on the outside. Like I know when I read it, what it looks like. And that's not always accurate. Like to just see the, it's like when you watch, you know, a video of someone at just their worst moment,

you know, and the person tries to say, but wait, that's not me. Like that was just me in that moment. That was me at this incredible low point. And I, I think as a lawyer, my job is to weaponize that and to try to say, okay, this, this low point is indicative of who they actually are. Yeah. And when I'm defending someone, I'm not supposed to say, you know, well, this is their low point. And we've all been to a low point. And this is just a moment in this person and to judge them by that moment, would you want to be judged by your worst moment?

So I have to be able to look at that both directions. Yeah, I mean, I don't think anyone looks great on text. I mean, there's so much of our communication that is missing, you know, your expression. Like my sense of humor does not do well via text. Like I, because I have like sometimes the sarcastic sense of humor or I have a dry sense of humor and it does not always translate well to text. The nuance of things is lost sometimes,

yeah, but that's what makes the risk of it hilarious. I mean, the emojis, the memes, all that, memes, all that, taking a risk, there's a risk with a text. If you do some dark, dry statement, that's a joke, and then the pause, and then there's no response for a couple of, I mean, that's beautiful. I don't know. That's the gap between the two trapezes, you know, like once you've hit send, and you're like, well, as you wear this ghost, like, this is coming back now, you know, like once you've hit send and you're like, well, see where this goes. Like, just coming back now, you know, and you're waiting and waiting. It's like that moment of just hang is, yeah, that's a rush. I mean, that's a rush. That's a beautiful

thing. Well, I have my friend Michael Malice living close by and if the courtroom were ever to see the text between us, I would be both in jail for many years. Yeah, this finally comes out when I have my Johnny Depp Amber herd moment. This is being as ready. We'll get my comments. Well, but that was one of, you know, the Johnny Depp Amber herd thing was a great example

of in a gun fight between those two, everyone was cheering for the bullets. I mean, no one was, I don't think anybody looked like a hero. They both looked like what they are, which is humans. Really flawed humans who had, you know, it really is like that, that people magazine thing stars, they're just like us, you know? Like, we watched that and went like,

oh yeah, they're just like us, like they cannot keep it together. They cannot have, like they just have these ridiculous toxic moments where both of them look awful in that trial. Well, what do you take away from that trial? Just given all the work you've done. I mean, for me, I don't know if you can speak to that. It's probably the first time I've seen that kind of a complicated relationship, even just to say a relationship laid out in this raw form, like the fights of a relationship. My feeling about that trial is there is no amount of money that would be worth laying that

kind of stuff bare publicly for you if you were giant dev. For me, yeah. There's no amount of money. I don't know. Because they both look awful. They both look awful. And I don't think I'm qualified to say if one of, or both of them are awful. But they both had moments in that courtroom

where their behavior and words looked awful. And I just don't know that exposing that to the world, like I just don't know. I that to the world, like the, I just don't know. I mean, I understand the point of view that by bringing that suit, Johnny Depp was saying, look, I, yeah, I have to show these awful things to the world about myself, but it's, it's not as bad as what she's claimed I've done. So I get it. I'm not saying that's incorrect. And for Amber Hurt, I think her responses, well, for him to say I'm lying, you know, I have to prove my, but my God, like, what an awful thing to watch.

I, it was all it really is. It's just another, it's just another couple. Like, there's, you know how banal that is. You know, many of those. You know, stuff happens a lot. A lot. It's, it's the norm. It's not, it's not the exception.

They just happen to have like a grand scale because they have lots of people around them and lots of money. But yeah, that kind of dysfunction, that kind of chaos, that kind of, he said, she said, two people with completely differing histories of what happened in the marriage, false allegations of domestic violence or true allegations of domestic violence that are completely denied by the person, and you have witnesses that'll say, oh my god, they never engaged in any kind of. Because again, no one engages in domestic violence

with company over. You know, you don't like invite friends, like people always say, oh, no, I saw them, they seem so happy. Like, people always do this to me as a divorce lawyer, they come in and they go, well, here's photos of the kids, you know, smiling with me.

So that's proof that, like, I'm a good dad. go, well, here's photos of the kids smiling with me. So that's proof that I'm a good dad. I'm like, there's photos of Jeffrey Dahmer smiling with people he ate later. And you think these photos prove something? Like, I don't, the lack of, I'm in the middle of a very complex domestic violence trial. And the entire defense on the other side is,

well, we have photos of the monvocation where they look very happy, and she never called the cops. That's no defense at all. Like most victims of intimate partner abuse don't call the cops. They don't identify, self-identify as victims of domestic violence. And they probably have many stretches of time of intense happiness or happiness of course and by the way perpetrators of domestic violence are charismatic How was what they get victims? You know, it's not like if they were ogresh They no one would sign on for that relationship. It's that when they're good They're so good that when they're bad you go, but wait. No, that's not him the really good person's him or her You know, we saw that in in in the public testimony of that, you know, deaf, hurt thing is there were moments

where you look at her and go, oh my God, like, I want one just like that. And there were moments where you listen to the testimony and go, oh my God, she's awful. Like what, that's just evil. And the same for him. So I really, this should teach us something about how not only are there two sides to every story, like that there's just so much complexity and nuance to these reasons,

but I think everyone was asking the question whether you were team-depth, team-heard, or team I could care less about either of these people. Everybody's looking at it going, why, like, what 8 billion people in the world? Why did you stay together? Just break up, you're miserable, it's obvious. It's obvious, you're not, this can't be worth it. I've actually become friendly with Camille Vasquez, who's the lawyer on the website. She's an incredible woman. Great lawyer. And

just great human being, just how passionate she's about to work. I mean, you radiate this kind of same passion, like she's just truly happy to do what she does. And but also where the stress of a case, it is like takes all, like it is, becomes her. She's, you can't sleep, all this kind of stuff, which is fascinating. That's, I think that's a function of our professions. We, we, even after 20 plus years of doing this, like the night before a trial, I can hardly sleep. And I, Sightman fear.

Yes, yes. Okay. All of that, all of that. And, and I even have moments as I, I pull up to the courthouse and I listen, I wear certain cuff links that are like my lucky cuff links or something and, and I pull up to the courthouse, I walk into the courthouse and I listen, I wear certain cuff links that are like my lucky cuff links or something. And I pull up to the courthouse, I walk into the courtroom and I have this feeling in the pit of my stomach. And then it starts. And the moment it starts, something

in me goes, oh yeah, I know how to do this. And it's instantly, like I just, I own it, I love it. And it's, yeah, the people that love this job, you know, being a trial lawyer, being particularly a divorce trial lawyer, family law trial lawyer, I love it. I love it. I love it more than I loved it when I started doing it. I can't imagine spending five days a week

looking forward to two. You know, I love what I do. I don't know that I'll ever love anyone or anything more than I love the work. So I saw you on Talk with Steve Harvey a bunch of times and I always loved it. One thing just sticks in my head from something he said as a device that if you and your partner, your spouse, are, you know, if there's a fight, there's a difficult thing you have to deal with, keep that to yourself. Don't talk to anyone else.

That's a little, like, what does he say? Like a two arm circle or something, whatever the expression is, but basically resolve it all internally. Don't, like, when you face face the world You have a front of like Don't take sides against the family. Yeah Yes, they get all boils down to go It all everything goes down to go by the references really that true romance You don't take sides against the family. You don't you don't you don't

Show that weakness to the world. I mean again. I don't know that show that weakness to the world. I mean, again, I don't know that, I don't know that Steve in candor would say you shouldn't discuss it with your own therapist, you know? But I think what he's saying is don't project it out to the world, don't share that because I think, you know, it can change the way people view your relationship, which then will change the way you view your relationship,

you know, and so I think don't run reckless when it comes to your that primary relationship. Don't run your mouth recklessly. Yeah, it's one of the things I mentioned to you offline. My now close friend, Joe Rogan, I've never heard him ever speak negatively of his wife. It's always like super positive how awesome a person she is. That's me has always been an inspiration to do the same for everybody in my life to always speak positively about them. So that has probably a virtuous spiral effect.

I'm sure. That's probably because he has a great wife and he has a great wife in part because of that. Like I think it's clear that he's in her corner and shearing for her, it's clear she's shearing for him. Like they have, it's not like Joe Rogan's not a man who has opportunity. I mean, he's surrounded by UFC ring girls for God's sakes. Like this is a guy who has all the opportunity in the world.

He seems to be quite a fan of his wife. And that is, you know, that's surrounded by UFC ring girls for God's sakes. Like, this is a guy who has all the opportunity in the world. He seems to be quite a fan of his wife. And that is, you know, that's a superpower. Like, that's a real thing. Now, the question is, is, you know, he doesn't seem to talk about it. Like, oh, I've got to really work at that. You know, and that's not a man who's afraid to talk about what he works at.

You know, he's pretty honest about man. Yeah, I gotta work really hard to stay and show I gotta work really hard to be able to do this. Like, yeah, I'm not good at memorizing that. It takes time. Yeah. But I've never heard him say like, oh, marriage is a lot of work. Like, and I think that's his credit because it seems like they're enjoying that. Yeah. It's also not incredibly public. Like, it's not something most people couldn't pick her out of a lineup. He kept the private for many years, and just because it's a private joy,

it's a private, like, deep, meaningful intimate partnership, that's interesting. That's also an inspiration. It doesn't, not everything about your life has to be this, like, like, look at me, I'm happy. Like, I'm in a happy relationship. Everything is wonderful, especially that. I think there is something about the womb like,

cocoon like joy of love. You know, when you just talked in, snuggled in, like just pressed against each other with that. Like that's such a, you know, like a, it's just the two of you. Yeah. And that's lovely, you know? And that's such a, you know, like a, it's just the two of you. Yeah. And that's lovely, you know, and that's such a good thing. And I, like, we were just dying for connection, you know,

and that connection is so big, it's so everything, you know, one of my earliest psychedelic experiences, probably when I was a teenager, but a theme that's been persistent in every psychedelic experience I've ever had is this idea of like everything is connection. Everything is being pressed to someone and with them, you know, like the warmth of human connection. Like one of the reasons I enjoy listening to your work and your perspective has always been that I think at the core, you see connection and love. And I think for me, from my earliest experiences with psychedelics at, you know,

16, 17, I was very attuned to that. I was very much, that was put on my radar by psychedelics and just stayed part of my consciousness forever. I think I had a 30-something year break from psychedelics, but it was like when I came back to it, I went, oh yeah, it's still there. That's still the core of everything, is connection. I mean, it's fascinating how deeply you value connection, how impatric you are, that you would be doing what you're doing,

which is, or is it not... I think it's the opposite. No, I think it's actually why I'm well suited for what I do. I think what I do is I have to learn the story of my client and know it and feel it very deeply. And I have to feel it in a very human way that's very compassionate to this person. And then I have to feel it and understand it in a way

that's incredibly antagonistic to it, so I can show up defenses. So I have to feel this person's story and feelings from every possible angle, because every one of them is of own ribility, and every one of them is a potential strength and a potential defense. And so, I actually think it's my number one other than extemporaneous speaking ability. It is my number one job tool.

It's the ability to radically empathize and to put myself in the emotional state of someone in its best possible light and its worst possible light so that I can see again the defense and I can see the vulnerability. But I mean so that's beautifully put but also just to bear witness to this connection broken in the, in those dramatic way, over and over and over and over. That part is hard, but I was a hospice volunteer for many, many years when I first got out of college. And it really showed me a lot about,

what is sadness, what is tragic, and what is just inevitable decay, what is pain and decay? Like we all die. Like we play a game you can't win to the utmost. And so if we know the answer to all of this is you're going to die, then what do we do with the rest of that time? If all your stuff is just stuff, it's just going to go to the money's going to go. Everything's your looks is going to go.

Your everything's going to go. Love's going to end one way. Then what are we doing? And again, I think it's love and connection, but what I'm doing for a living is helping, and I don't look at it as what I'm doing is helping people beat the crap out of each other. I look at it as I'm trying to help a client build their post-divorce life, to sort of rise from the ashes of that,

which has fallen apart and move on to the next chapter, and refocus and have the things they need, financially, emotionally, whatever it might be, and transpersonally, in terms of with their kids. And so for me, it's actually a job that is very consistent with my desire to build connection and to be empathetic. And witnessing the ashes doesn't make you cynical about the whole thing of love. No, because again, you know, 56% of marriage is end-in-divorce, but 84% are remarried

within five years. Like we keep doing it over and over again. That's a good thing. I think it is a good thing. The mess of it, the absurdity of it, the hypocrisy of it, that's something beautiful about that. Well, it's just the return is so great on the investment. Listen man, I've had more than one dog.

Yeah. Like when my dog died, the first dog I had died, I remember when I'm never gonna love again. I'm done. I'm done with this. I will never expose myself to this kind of pain again. I'll never have to take the dog bed and put it in the closet and it like, ugh. And then some friend called me and said, we have an adoption event. Can you just watch this dog for 24 hours and then we'll take him.

You know, we just need to know. And I went, yeah, all right, I'll watch a dog for the night. You know, and this dog coming, they say, oh, he has maine. She's not going, fuck, I got another dog. He walked in, my heart went, yeah, I got a dog. And now that dog is 13 years old and his eyes are cloudy and he doesn't go up the stairs real well and he's going to break my heart. And I wouldn't change that for the world.

I'm still there. I'm still struggling for the second one. I've lost a dog and broke my heart. I'm still struggling for the second one. I've lost a dog and broke my heart. And yeah, and you'll never lose that pain. But I promise you, your heart has an infinite capacity for the kind of love you felt with that dog. And you'll never feel a love that replaces the whole. Like there will never be another buster for me. But there was Kaba.

And like, you know what? Like, and when he's gone, there will never be another one of him. But you know what? Like, when that stupid puppy that was five months old stumbled in, I went, I guess I'm gonna do this again. And you know what, I'm so glad. I'm so glad. And I know, by the way, I know now, because in that's where I've said,

like, you know, it's that Joseph Brodsky poem, you know, a song, like I wish I knew no astronomy when stars appear. Like I wish I didn't know the pain. But you know what, like, I don't care. I don't care. And I believe we don't care. I think there's something to that.

If something hurts so badly, and you go, I'm going to do it again. I'm going to do it. But it must be a value. It must be a real value. There's also a different perspective on it, that pain. So there's that from Louis the show of this interaction with an old man with Lucy Kay and he says that because Louis mourning the loss of God split up, he got dumped to whatever and his mourning the loss of that partner of love. And the old man says that

that is the best part. Like missing the love is still love. The real bad part is when you forget it, when the pain fades. It's all gone. But the pain is actually a kind of celebration of the love you have. Of course. Well, the opposite of love is in hate. The opposite of love is in difference. There's no question about that.

I mean, hate is a passion, an emotion, love is a passion, an emotion. And there is a school of thought that says that only unfulfilled love can be truly romantic. But I believe that it's what I think I learned from hospice, is that I think for me knowing the impermanence is the thing. It's the key. Yeah, it's finite. As when she's gonna be over. And so that intensifies the feeling.

That's when you can have pure love without the drama. Dogs are for me a great example. And again, I don't know what it all means, right? Existentially. But I just feel like that kind of love has to be here to teach us something. And I feel like the fact that they're so amazing and just so loving and so wonderful and the bond we feel is so amazing and deep and doesn't require a lot of maintenance. And yet it's so finite.

Like, it's just this short little lifespan. And I feel like there's just such a lesson there. There's so much there to unpack about the nature of connection and loss. And that your heart has this infinite capacity. Like, when you're, I'm telling you, when my dog died, when Buster died, I remember I thinking with certainty,

I will never do this again, because I'll never love that way again. I'll never love a dog the way I love this dog. And it's just not true. That's just not true. Like you have this infinite capacity. And that makes it scary, actually, because right now, there's so many people you could love.

There's so many dogs you could love. Like, there's so much out there. And it requires a certain bravery and tremendous amount of risk to do it, you know. And a commitment. Because I think to really experience love, you just dive in, because there is a huge number of people, but to really like, I mean, you have to like really dive into the full complexity, the full range of another human being. Yeah, which is hard because we don't even, I don't know that we even feel comfortable diving into the full range of ourselves.

You know, there's pieces of ourselves we try to push away or not think about. Okay, so speaking of the whole social path slash empath that is all embodied in one human being that is you. Let's go back to some cases perhaps that you've worked on. Just something that stands out to you. What's maybe the craziest, most complicated thing you've worked on, is there something to post in mind? Craziest would be different than most complicated.

Let's go craziest. Yeah, so craziest. Ah, gosh, that's a great question. So from a chaos standpoint, I mean, I see so many bizarre fact patterns and so many variations of people cheating with people, people sleeping with the nanny, people sleeping with someone's a relative of their spouse, people having same sex or polyamorous relationships

and the other person doesn't even know they're not monogamous. So much craziness that you could fill 15 books. In terms of complexity, I mean emotionally complex is any custody case is emotionally complex because you're dealing with parenting issues. And what makes a good parent, I think, is a very tricky question because I'm trying to convince a judge who's a better parent. And that is so loaded with subjective value judgments.

Is there, I just, to link on the maternal presumption, is that a thing you come face to face with often? Well, there was. I mean, it was real. It was the law. There was something in the law called the maternal presumption. It was also known as the tender years doctrine,

which meant that a child under the age of seven was presumed to be in the custody of the mother unless you could show she was an unfit mother. So that's where the idea of like someone has to be proven and unfit mother came from. Now in the 80s, 1980s, that was changed. But, you know, under my skin is under my sovereignty. I mean, you can't suggest that there isn't in the world, a suggestion that a mother who births a child and feeds a child with her body doesn't have a particular bond with a child that's different than a father's bond

with a child. So where do we put that? How much importance do we put on it? Now that there's better and more research in the mental health field about attachment theory and infants, there's also a lot of, you know, a lot of research on how is attachment formed, how should parenting schedules be put together based on attachment theory? But, you know, there's conflicting perspectives on that. So as judge to judge, you see, like, is there a lot of variation?

Yeah, there is because there's lots of kinds of judges. Like, there's judges that are thoughtful, enlightened, interested in mental health research. And there's judges that just want, we're unsuccessful lawyers that were good politically and got elected and they just want to, you know, they just want a job where like they show up at nine o'clock, they have a lunch break from 12th until two o'clock and that they leave at 4.30 and they get a certain number of weeks vacation and a pension after 20 years. So what is in general the process of these custody battles,

like what's the landscape? Well, most, the overwhelming majority of custody cases don't end up in my office. They are a negotiation between two people that love their children more than they dislike their soon-to-be-X. So the overwhelming majority of cases are just two people going, okay, how are we going to make decisions together? Because there are decisions that have to be made about kids. Will it go to public or private school? Can they go on medication if they need it or not?

Should we change pediatricians, you know, all those kinds of things? How do we make decisions and when will we each spend time with the kids? And so most custody cases are just that. Most custody cases are just a discussion, a negotiation between counsel about those issues. And they're not ugly and they're not anything. They're just people. Again, sometimes people have differing perspectives,

you know, but sometimes people haven't thought through their perspective. So as a divorce lawyer, a lot of what I'm doing is counseling a person. Because they come in and say, well, I've been the person who handles, you know, all of the homework I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful.

I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. I'm going to be a little bit more careful. done that before. But there's also a logic that you can then say, right, but then you're doing all the heavy lifting of parenting and he's doing none of that. And

you were a married couple and living together. So he was trusting you to do that because you're good at it and you you seem to like it. So maybe now we want him to have to do some of the heavy lifting of parenting because we don't want the child when they're 13 to say, I love dad, we have nothing but a good time together, whereas you make me do my homework and eat my broccoli. Dad's the grass on the other side of the fence that's greener. So sometimes it's about educating a client to like change their frame, you know,

to look at this differently. Yeah, okay, we always go to my mother's for Thanksgiving, so I need everything's giving. Okay, well, you were married. So you went to, now you're gonna have new traditions. Things are changing for your children. Things are changing for your family. You're both going to have new traditions. So a lot of times it's just educating people on looking at things in a different way, looking at their parenting in a different way. We're not going to live

in the same house anymore, but we're still going to parent these child, you know, this child or these children together. What's much more interesting, because like, you know, I don't get invited to a lot of parties, but when I get invited to parties, if somebody says, what do you do for a living, and I say I'm a divorce lawyer, and they go, oh my God, you must have stories.

That's so everybody's, oh my God, you must have so many stories. And if I said, yeah, there was this couple, and they slowly grew apart, and then they decided that it would be good for them to end their relationship as a married couple, but they wanted to continue to have an amicable co-parenting relationship. So they divided their assets and they figured out a good parenting access schedule that made

sure that they both had both leisure time and responsibilities with the children. People would be like, that's the worst fucking story. That's so boring. Yeah. So what they really want is the like, and then he was sleeping with the nanny, and then she caught it. So, you know, the truth is, like, people want to hear about those flamounts. And by the way, those are super interesting as a lawyer. Like, it's super interesting. It's usually going to be what? Infidelity. You do have a chapter called, everybody fucks the nanny. Everybody's usually going to be what infidelity. You do have a chapter called Everybody Fucks the Nanny. Everybody's fucking the Nanny. Yeah, there's a nanny fascination out there.

I try to explain it in the book, but yeah, I mean, I've had some great nanny stories. I mean, people run off with the nanny, people end up getting married to the nanny. I had one where the, he convinced her that they should have a threesome with the nanny. They got the nanny drunk. They had a bunch of threesome with the nanny and then the nanny and the wife paired up and left him. Oh, nice. And they're still quite happy. It seems like a happy ending to the whole forever.

For everyone but him, but it was his idea. Well, he's really going to have a nanny fascination now. Now he's, yeah, well, now he's got to see the nanny who's now the like step parents to the kids. And it was his bright idea of let's have a person with the nanny. You know, I mean the nanny thing I think is a function of in many circumstances is the characteristics of the wife that he remembers fondly and that have been extinguished by the presence of children. So my words of wisdom is not don't get a nanny or make sure you get an ugly nanny. My thought on it is that a woman should remember even when she's a mother, that she's also

a woman who a man, you know, they fell in love with each other. And she should take time to be in touch with the part of herself that is an independent woman that's interesting and interested. And, you know, like, there's a lot to be learned from divorce couples because like divorce couples, if you do it right, it's awesome. Like, I had a wonderful experience parenting

and being divorced, because I divorced when my kids were quite young. My co-parent, you know, my ex-wife is awesome. She's a great mom. Nice person. We're good friends. And it was great. I had half the time. I had my kids, and I could focus on them.

And the other half of the time, they were with the other person who loves them as much as I do, and I didn't have any of the responsibilities of kids. And I could just have all of the wonderful fun that you can have when you don't have the responsibilities that come with full time caring for children. So.

What would you say now on the flip positive side when talking about the collapse of things? What about success? What's the secret to a successful romantic relationship? My mom used to say that it's hard to define intelligence, but you could spot stupid a mile away. Yeah. So I'm much better at pointing out where people fall apart

because I spend a lot of time with people who have fallen apart in their relationship. So it's easy to then say, well, just don't do what they do, but I don't know that that's not an oversimplification. So again, I think the answer is connection. I think the answer is affection, presence, you know, mindfulness and presence. I do think in my personal and professional experience, that most people want you fully, more than they just want you in a disconnected way.

So, if you were to say to your romantic partner, you can have me for two hours, where I'm giving you my undivided attention. And I'm really joyful to be with you. Or you can have me for eight hours where I'm sort of half paying attention and I kind of want to be someplace else for part of the time. There's just no choice there. It's so obvious. So I think presence is a big piece. And I think that I think presence is a big piece, and I think that the you, the me, and the we, I think is important. Because I think in relationships, there's you and there's me, and we meet, and something

magical happens, you know. And we become we. And now there's you and there's me, there's we. And then the we gets bigger, bigger, and bigger. And isn't it great? Because it's such a nice warm place. It gets so big. But it gets so big that you get small and me get small because we. And if any vass deris to ask, well, what about you? What about me? No, no, the we what you don't like the we you don't want to be with the way like well, no, it's not that. But the we only exist because there was you and there was me. And I really like you and you really liked me. And so we picked each other out of

lots of choices. And now this we is so fucking big, like it threatens to just consume all of it, you know? And I really think that there's something there we have to look at more honestly. So we should not consume everything, but at the same time, not be small. Well, the we is the you and the me. And if you mix it so much that you and me lose

as it's components that all that's left is we. Like, I don't think that that's the way to do it. I just think there's a, the world pulls us in that direction. Like, we get told culturally that, well, why aren't you going with this person to that? I just think there's a, the world pulls us in that direction. Like we get told culturally that, well, why aren't you going with this person to that? Why would you do that by yourself? And why? Why?

Like anyone knows that there's joy in being away from each other and there's joy being reunited together. So why don't we speak very honestly about that? You know, it's very, and I think some of that's our own insecurity. You know, well, why don't you wanna be with me 24 hours a day? Or are you not wonderful? Or are you not delightful?

It's like, well, wait, what? You know? Well, but also probably people are either afraid or lazy in developing their individual selves. I mean, still, it's slowly going out there in the world by yourself. And it's comforting in that little cocoon of we. I mean, it can also be incredibly adventurous

going out into the world by yourself and then coming back to the we with a full report. Yeah, you know, coming back and saying like, Oh my God, guess what I saw? I guess what I did. I'm like, we have to go there together now. Because all I could think about was you. Yeah, you know, while I was there,

I was like, Oh my God, she would love this. That's magical. That's amazing. Look what I brought you back. I went into this and then I got you this present from there. There's something, and we know this. I always thought it was, when you watch the old Westerns, the heroes leaving, and he's walking away from the cabin, because he's going to go to the gunfight and, you know, or like the, you know, the heroes leaving, you know,

and he's walking away from the cabin because he's gonna go fight the gunfight and she runs up and she goes, please don't go, don't go, stay here with me. And he like kisses there and then he goes. Yeah. You know, if he goes like, yeah, you're right, I'll just stay here, it's cool, you know,

like this is, I didn't want to deal with that anyway. Like he's not the hero anymore of that. Yeah. Yeah, as deep truedrew to that. And probably, like you mentioned, sex. Sexes? Probably a big part of it, friendship. That seems to me like a really important one.

Depends on how you define friend. Like, I, you know, if being a friend means we have some connection to each other and we have each other's cell phone numbers, okay, then we're friends. But if it's a bigger definition than that, if it's like you've picked me up at the airport, you know, you're someone I could call.

That it's like, dude, I gotta hide a body. Like you get shovel and line. I like how you escalated from airport pick up. Yeah, well, it was, I, I, I, I, I, I try to go through the direction. What, I, I, I define, you know, the Ben Affleck movie, The Town, you know, that scene, that's friendship to me.

I mean, to me, the ideal male friendship is the scene where he says, I need you to come with me, we're going to hurt some people and you never have to ask me about it again. Oh, yeah. And he says, who's car are we taking? Yeah. And that's sort of like, to me, that's friendship. So it's a high bar, you know, to be like a friend. So when you say like, friendship,

I think that's the kind of friendship you should ideally have with your romantic partner. If you're getting married, it should be the like, who's car we taking? Like it should be that it's you and me. To be fair, that bars reached with me with a a lot of people like if you called me tomorrow There's a body, but you're a big open big open heart, but it's true like I Wonder how many people out there are like that in terms of hiding the body. I mean my theory on this

Because I think I'm like you in that way. I think I I'm like you in that way. I think I'm very sensitive. I feel things really deeply, you know? And I think it's, that's a tariff. The world is terrifying when you feel things very deeply, because there's so much pain, there's so much betrayal, there's so many opportunities to be hurt, you know? And I think when you are that kind of person,

you go through like stages, and one of them is that I don't care, I don't feel anything, it doesn't matter, I don't feel anything, I don't feel anything, I don't feel anything, well you try to convince yourself, I don't feel anything, it's fine, I don't feel anything. And then at some point, like, you do feel all of it, and then it's like, oh my God, the weight of this is cry. I mean, I think it's the whole arc of Pink Floyd the wall.

It's literally the entire arc of Pink Floyd the wall, you know, and the song Stop. You know, I want to go home, take office, uniformly, and leave the show. Like you just, when you feel all of it, the army of hammers coming at you. The slings and arrows about rage is fortune. The thousand natural shocks the flesh is heir to. When you feel all of that, deeply, it's very hard, but it can also be a superpower. Because I think when you can bring that to a relationship, when you can bring that to a profession,

like you've done and I've done, then there's something very magical about that. The ability to bring it out in someone to feel it in yourself, to understand it, you know, is a gift, it's a wonderful, wonderful, I'm humbled by what it brought me professionally. And I'd like to think that you and I have both found professions that enable us to use that sensitivity, that empathy in a productive and good way, in a fulfilling, a personally fulfilling way,

and ideally in a way that does good for other people. You yourself are incredibly successful in high-performer. You've dealt with a lot of CEOs and just high-performers in all walks of life. What can you say about successful relationships with those kinds of folks? That's a good question. I think is it all the same stuff, or there's something special when they're busier? Well, you know, I, I think when you represent high net worth individuals, but also high performing, I would make a distinction between high

net worth and high performing. So I, I've done high net worth divorces where the person's like a trust fun kid, even though they're an adult, you know, but they're like, they're, what they did to achieve their high-net worth status is their great-grandfather died. So that is different than someone who is self-made, who through discipline, focus, entrepreneurship, whatever it might be, that they have found success. And there's also a difference between financial success

and fame, because I've represented famous people that actually did not have that much money in the scheme of things, or much liquidity. And I've represented people that were not in any way famous, and were very high performing in their field. Like in New York, we have a lot of finance people. And what I find is their divorces are challenging one on a technical level because figuring out

what they have and how to divide it is tricky. Because when something is moving that quickly, like when your portfolio's movement affects a market, that's challenging. Jeff Bezos divorce for a time when it was in its early stages, could affect Amazon stock. It did, so that's a real thing. There are businesses that are affected by a divorce. But in terms of being in a relationship with someone

who is a high performing person, most of the high performing people I know are creatures of discipline and routine. From Joe Rogan, we've talked about, you know, any of these people, like they have a routine, they have a discipline, they have a focus, they have a way they like to do things, they have a type of coffee, they like to drink, they have a way that they like to do. And divorce is a tremendous disruption.

I mean, divorce is fundamental things in your life are shifted out of your control. Like your spouse may be the one who has decided you are no longer going to live in that house. You will no longer see your children on these days. So to take that control away from someone is very, very hard. I mean, when someone is a high performing high net worth person, they are used to being told, yes. They are used to be able to buy their way out of a problem. But just like illness, you know, you can hire the best doctor, but you can't cure cancer because you have a lot of money.

Like you can hire the best lawyer, but you can't cure a custody case, you know. And that's, I mean, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's seemingly endless custody disputes that have been going on for years now with the best lawyers in California working on them, is proof of the fact that you can't just buy a resolution to those things,

that you have to go through it just like everyone else. So that, let's me ask the question of how much does a divorce usually cost? It's a great question. Average divorce? I mean, it's sort of like a, what I always tell clients in the first consultation is I tell them that the most reasonable question a person could ask me sitting in that chair across from me is, too. How long is this going to take and how much is it gonna cost?

And those are the two questions I can't answer. Yeah. And then the next thing they say is, give me a range. Which is a bit like calling your doctor and saying, I have a headache. What is it? Well, I can't tell you, I'd have to do tests.

Give me a range. Okay. It's a reaction to the barometric pressure, and it'll be gone in 15 minutes. Or it's a brain aneurysm, and you'll be dead in five minutes. There's your range. And so it didn't really help, right? So I have the least expensive divorce I've ever seen is two people who, who, one of whom, comes into my office and says, we've written down on a yellow pad, what we figured out at the

kitchen table. She's going to keep the house. I'm going to keep the 401k. We have a bank account at this bank. We're going to split that 50-50. I'm going to pay her this much in child support each month. And we're going to agree from time to time on what we're going to do in terms of the schedule with the kids, but they're primarily going to live with her. Can you write this up and make it legally binding? Yes, $3,500.

Just as a side note, I have a friend who went to a divorce and handled it just masterfully by giving more than he's supposed to and having nothing but love in his heart and happiness with the kids and just like, I don't know, that to me is just an inspiration. Like, no, like, his whole view view was like who cares about money like well yeah and also like he refused like with every ounce of his being to have anything but complete love for the other person yeah I've had clients who with a straight face will say to me like well I'm not going to quibble over a few million dollars and they mean because to them, it's numbers on a page.

So I'll personalize this a bit. So I have a friendly relationship with my ex-wife, who's the mother of my sons, who are adults. And we have maintained a very good relationship. And so now it's many years divorced later, 17, 18 years later. And we were able to sort of post game that relationship, even our co-parenting relationship. We kind of post game it when we chat with each other.

And I remember once saying to her, you know, yeah, you never, you never like screwed around with me when it came to the kids. Like you were always so like cool, you know? Like if I called you, like if I was having a really bad day at work, and I was like seeing like if I called you, like if I was having a really bad day at work, and I was like seeing just an ugly custody case, and like I just felt like I would call her and say, like, hey, can I just pick the boys up and like take them out for ice cream or something tonight?

I know it's not my night, but would you mind if I just like took them out for a couple of hours? She'd be like, yeah, sure, come on by, you know, she was always flexible like that. And I said to her, like, was that just goodwill? Like you're just a good person? Or like, what was that about? And she was like, yeah, it was partly that, but she, like, was that just goodwill? Like you're just a good person? Or like, what was that about? And she was like, yeah, it was partly that, but she was like, it was partly that, like, you never screwed around with me when he came to money.

Like, if the kids needed something or if I needed something as the mother of the kids, like, you were always like, yeah, sure, of course. Like, I heard her conditioning kicked out and she needed it to replace it. And she didn't have like liquidity at the time. I mean, I didn't have a lot of money at the time because it was a long time ago.

And I was like, all right, no, because I don't want you hot and upset and I don't want the boys to be in, like of course. And so I think, yeah, when you approach a conflict with, like, it's very hard to argue with someone who won't argue with you. If the person approaches the argument from the point of view of like, I'm not gonna argue with you.

Like, I'm gonna absorb your aggression. I. Like, I'm going to absorb your aggression. I'm going to, I'm going to just not meet it with that. I'm going to meet it with love. I'm going to meet it with positive. It doesn't always work because I'm just people are so angry that they just are, they're relentless. But I have to tell you, like, the louder you get, the quieter I get, the more you see me rational. And that's what I always try to bring that to court

proceedings, like I always try to bring to court. Like if I know my adversaries coming in hard, I'll come in quiet and slow and deliberate because I want the volume to be turned up way too high over there. And then it looks like what it was, you're on it, what up way too high over there. And then it looks like what it was, you're on it, what's their problem over there, you know?

And I think that, I say this to clients. They got a four year old, they're getting divorced, let's say. There's gonna be a wedding in like 20 something years. There's gonna be a wedding. And it's either gonna be the wedding where they got to put these people on opposite sides of the room because if they pass each other by the shrimp boat, they're going to kill each other. Or it's the wedding where like you stand there, you take

some pictures, you kind of go like, yeah, we fucked up this whole marriage thing, but maybe we did a good job with this kid, didn't we? You know, and the decisions you make right now, there's a straight line to that wedding. And so even if you don't like this person, even if you're mad at them, even if you're mad at yourself for the choices you made in choosing them as a co-parent. Like every single mother's day for 27 years,

I have told my now long time ex-wife, happy mother's day. I'm so glad that we had kids together. I'm so glad you're the mother of my kids. Because they wouldn't be who they are if it wasn't that they were part me and part you. And I'm so grateful for you. And, you know, I'm always cheering for you. Like, how hard is that? How hard is that?

Oh, it's really hard for some people. But it's... I understand why. It's so hard for some people. I'll tell you, I do find that hard. There's not a lot of things that I kind of don't understand, but that's one that I kind of don't understand. Like I put in one of the weird things I did

as a divorce lawyer that caused like a little stir among my colleagues for a few years. With some years ago, like we all steal from each other's work divorce lawyers like we're like the matrimonial mafia like we all know each other. We all deal with each other over and over again But we all have the same job and so we we're the only people that really know the unique stresses of that job So even though we try to kill each other all day It's like box or like professional fighters like yeah your jobs to take each other's head off but like nobody knows what the two of you went through like the two of you You know, that's why like I always get like I go like all kinds of rubbery when I see after the fight like the two people hug each other

Yeah, cuz I'm always like like yeah, cuz you know what they they relate to each other better than anybody They suffered they bled you know the competitors. They bled they bled. So I really think divorce lawyers, we have that same kind of relationship. We went through this stress on opposite sides trying to take each other apart. And I find that we all steal from each other's material when it comes to separation agreements, provisions that we use for agreements. All the agreements are like these Frankenstein monsters of, oh, I like his estate planning provisions. I like her provisions related to maintaining a life insurance policy to secure the

Alimony Award. I wrote this paragraph for this selection. What occurred to me is that when you have a child with someone, and let's say they're three or four or five, they're old enough to know what Christmas is, but they're not old enough to go buy a Christmas present. But they're old enough to know that you get presents on Christmas

and you give presents on Christmas, but they're not old enough to buy one for the parent. So someone has to do that for them. So I thought, I'm gonna put in a provision that says that as long as the children are so young that they can't independently purchase a mother's day or a birthday present for the co-parent, that you'll take the children either to buy

a small gift or to make a card, something like that. This struck me as a no-brainer. Who could disagree with this? Like it's not for the person, it's for the kid. It's so the kid, happy birthday, mom. I don't have a present for you. I don't know a card for you because I'm fucking five. Like I'm five.

Like you can't go do that. So wouldn't you want your child? Not your co-parent. Who cares? Maybe you want them to have the worst birthday ever. Fine, but you don't want your child to be embarrassed. And I even put in the provision. The party's acknowledged that it is the intention

of this provision to ensure that the child is not embarrassed and feels that they were able to say, I cannot tell you how many people refuse to sign that. How many lawyers said to me, we're taking that out. And I went, wait, why? Well, why does my client have to buy a present for your client? I said, they're not buying a present for my client. They're buying a present for the child

to give to my client. It can be one of those little $3 boxes of chocolates. They sell it the drug store. Like it's a kid, they don't know. They don't know what anything is. And people, nope. And I have to tell you, of the conundrums, of the puzzles that I can't figure out in existence.

That's when I can't figure out. I do not understand why that's so hard. That's basically just an illustration of their complete inability to do anything nice for the other person. The level of hatred, the level of vitriol that they, like maybe this is me, I'm, if you apologize, there's not a lot I won't forgive. Like I'm not saying I'll forget it,

I'm not saying, oh we're totally good like it never happened, I understand that. But if someone says, what I call a non bullshit apology, right, like a bullshit apology is, oh I'm sorry you got so upset when I did that. Like that's a bullshit apology. You know, I'm sorry that you were offended. That's an bullshit apology. Or I'm sorry for what I did. Because what are we talking about? We might have been talking about the same thing.

Or you might be saying I'm sorry that you found out about that, not that you did it. So a real apology is I lied to you and I realized that that hurt you. And I'm really sorry. I shouldn't have done that. I regret that I did that. And I know that it hurt you and I'm really sorry. That's a real apology, okay?

So someone's willing to give you that, and you still wanna walk around with like the level of vitriol that you will harm your child rather than do something nice for them. I don't have a solution. And I say I see that all the time like parental alienation is a thing. It is a thing like children can be weaponized like I always always tell people, you want to get married, get married. Get a prenup ideally, but if you don't have a prenup, okay, you're just risking money.

Don't worry, you're just risking money. Money and hassle, you know, of paperwork and of time and of going through an ugly financial divorce. But you have a kid with somebody? You have, that is a missile. Like that person has a power over you for a long time, if not forever.

So the child could be used as part of a manipulation. Oh, routinely. The smart break. People weaponize children all the time. And they do it, they do it with the permission of their own conscience, because they genuinely believe, I'm gonna protect this person, this child, from this person who, by the way, is a bad spouse.

But that doesn't mean they were a bad father or a bad mother. You can be bad at being a spouse, but the skill set of a spouse and of a parent, it's not necessarily the same. And I've seen people alienate children from a parent in such subtle ways, but they're so powerful. And as a lawyer, it doesn't matter what I know, it matters what I can prove. And it's very hard to prove alienation because it's usually a very subtle process. And the example I always give to people is,

it's a rare kind of crazy person that will say to a seven-year-old, your dad is a bad person. But this, hello, here's your dad. You just said your dad's a bad person. You just did it with your eyes You did it with your the expression on your face when you handed the phone to the kid You told that kid your dad's a bad person. You didn't have to say it out loud and that

That is something people are guilty of all the time You know when when the kid comes home and says You know there's a divorced couple kid comes home and says oh, I met there's a divorced couple. Kid comes home and says, oh, I met mom's new boyfriend. And you go, oh yeah, that's nice. Remember he's not your dad. You know, like, well, whoa, like you just told that kid a whole bunch of information

about how he's supposed to feel about this person. Whereas if you go, that's nice. It's nice, oh, that's great. I heard nice things. Yeah, I heard he's really, he likes bicycles. That's cool. That's really neat. You just told this kid, okay, it's okay. You can like this person. It's okay

to like this person. It's okay that your mom is with this person. Like and again, whatever you feel about your ex, your co-parent, usually you love your kid more than you hate your ex, ideally. Also, I wish people would even without an apology forgive each other. Because it goes back to the earlier discussion we had. I usually forgive people if there's something in them, especially if we shared something, but even just if there's something about them that's beautiful. It's great that they exist in the world. So I'm just grateful for that,

and I use that as the fuel of forgiveness. I don't know, to me, like forgiveness is very often, it's for me, you know, like when I let go of anger, I feel lighter, you know, I think my heart enjoys peace. I mean, partly it's because I fight for a living, you know, I work in the world of conflict. Like I jokingly used to say to my sons when they were teenagers, you know, like I can only argue if you've paid.

Like it's not fair to the paying customers. If I argue with you for free, that's not fair. You know. But I think we're talking about the incredibly wide range that a divorced can cost. Yeah. So, and you were saying the cheapest one was the yellow pad two people, came to an agreement, write it up, make it legally binding five grand, maybe, you know, tops, but usually 3,500, five grand, that kind of vibe.

Most expensive millions, millions of in council fees fees and that's because of the duration the Conplexity of issues like I have clients who've paid 2 3 million in council fees to me. So it's like acid custody or like what? It can be complex custody that requires a hearing that requires expert testimony, dueling mental health professionals, opining on the parenting. It can be a situation where emergency circumstances occur, like we're an individual tries to abscond to another country with the children

and you have to bring them back under the head convention. Oh wow. On international child abduction. Oh wow. Yeah, we've done some hate cases. You know, there are cases where people have very different facts. Like before I came here today,

a client of mine's soon to be ex-husband who she's in the middle of it, where he tested positive for cocaine, on a hair follicle test, where it was said he was definitely not going to test positive and he tested positive. So it was like we were scurrying now with, okay, we gotta get a motion filed, we gotta suspend access, we gotta protect the kids, we gotta get in front

of a judge, we gotta think about what are the implications of this, because he was about to transition to an unsupervised parenting. Like this is the kind of stuff that can amp up the amount of work the lawyer has to do, which then translates to money. I get paid for my time. And the time of my team, I have attorneys and paralegals who work for me. When you have a team of lawyers working on a case, you can burn tens of thousands of

dollars a day if it's a big enough case. There are also very complex financial cases. People move and hide money. The high net worth space is a different world. Like if an average person owns a home, they own a home in their name or their name with their spouse. A high net worth person owns an LLC that owns that home.

That LLC is owned by a trust. They are a beneficial interested party in that trust. Like this is how some of my clients who make tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars a year, pay less in taxes than a copper or a firefighter. Because they have structures. And the structures that were designed for tax planning purposes, then in a divorce become very tricky to unwind. And to figure out, wait, no, what is mine? then in a divorce become very tricky to unwind

and to figure out, wait, no, what is mine and what is not, you know. Well, then that takes us to the question of prenups. What's your view on prenups? Pre-Nupial agreements. It's not popular at a quote Kanye West, but if you ain't no champ, Paula, we want prenup, we want prenup.

I mean, that's what he had to say. Meaning, so that's a, prenup is a good idea. Prinup is an excellent idea. Prinup is a prenup is a contract between two people that binds their respective rights and obligations in the event of a divorce when it comes to financial issues. That's all it is. And it's a, there's a lot of reasons to have them.

And there really aren't any reasons not to have them other than the fact it requires an uncomfortable conversation. So I mean, there's a few questions here. First, do they work legally in general? Yes. If they are crafted correctly, which is not that hard to do for a lawyer to do. I'm saying for a lawyer to do because with the internet, everybody thinks, why would I spend a thousand dollars? I can just Google prenuptial agreement.

I can get one and then it'll be, that is a bad idea. Like it is, it is like a will. Like if you're going to have a document that binds your rights at that level, it's worth, the most expensive prenup I've ever done was like three grand. That's ridiculous. That's not a lot of money. So there's no reason you wouldn't do it, but people will still, I've had clients

that have hundreds of thousands of dollars and they did their prenup downloading something from the internet and because of some imperfection, you know, it doesn't have the right what's called acknowledgment which is the section where the node resigns and it has to say that it was duly sworn before this person on this state and if it doesn't have that it's invalid, it's not binding. So there are weird technicalities but yeah, prenups are binding. As long as there's been some minimal asset disclosure, which is easily done in a prenup, and as long as there's not a language deficiency meaning that the person

who is reading it understands English to the level that they understand what they're signing, and if they don't, that at least they've acknowledged in their native language, that there is some opportunity for this to be translated for them. Yeah, they're binding. They're presumptively binding. We live thankfully in a culture where people are allowed to enter into contracts about money. What are some pre-nubs that you've seen that can be effective or that people converge towards in terms of what does that agreement look like? Because the popular conception is when there's no prenup, both sides get half.

And that's generally true that both sides get half. Equitable distribution, which is what the law is called. It's the law of equitable distribution. It's not called the law of equal distribution for a reason, because it's equitable, not equal. Now, equal, like, equitable is presumed to be equal, but there are exceptions to that presumption, and that's where lawyers can get into fun and or trouble,

depending on how you view it. It's where we make our money. We make our money arguing that the fair result will not be just a 50-50 split. And so there's the very generic standard prenup, which is easy. And I call that yours mine and ours. Like if it's in your name, it's yours,

whether it's an asset or a liability. My name is mine, joint names we split at 50.50, simple, clean. And you go in to the marriage now knowing what the rules are. So if you get a bonus at work and you put it in your sole name, then it's your separate property in the event you divorce. You go out and buy a boat and she doesn't support you buying the boat, but you got a big loan on this boat. You're responsible for that loan.

So, I like that because I like people having some control. And I also like people having to have discussions. Well, why are we putting that bonus just in your bank account? Why wouldn't we put it in the joint bank account? We should have that discussion while we're married, not when we're in a divorce lawyer's office 10 years later, because we should be able to talk about those kinds of things. So you know, what's interesting about pre-nubs is that somehow people think there's something, like it takes away from the romance of a marriage.

But I've said it before, and I'll say it again, all marriage is end. They end in death or divorce. So having life insurance or having a will, it doesn't mean you can't wait to die, it doesn't mean you're looking forward to death, it doesn't mean that you're predicting, you're demise sometime and imminently. It just means that you're being realistic and honest.

So when you marry, and I don't mean spiritually marrying, having a marriage ceremony, I mean legally marrying, you're making changes to your rights and obligations under law. That's what you're doing. Like marriage from a legal standpoint, what we mean when we say I got married, is a state agency. It's been created by the state. Like this is a state agency. It's been created by the state, like this is a legal status

that most people who are in it know nothing about. They just did the most legally significant thing they're ever going to do other than dying and they have no idea what rights and obligations that created in them. And the first time they're going to get an education about it is in my office, that's crazy. When they get divorced.

That's crazy. And so pre-nup is an opportunity to learn something about it at the start. So first of all, whenever someone approaches me about pre-nups, and that's like four or five times a week, probably, depending on the season, right before wedding season, we get a lot. When's wedding season?

Well, it used to just be the summer, they say when you marry in June, you're a bride all your life. That's from some Rodgers and Hammerstein musical. Now the fall is very big too. People love fall content, fall weddings, pretty pictures and things. Content.

Yeah, fall content. That's a full content. Yeah, fall content for the grand. That's a hashtag. Weddings is for the grand. That's a full content. Yeah, that's a hashtag. The weddings is for the gram. I have to tell you, weddings is performative, man. It's a problem is though, it's curated. So here's us picking the cake.

It's not here's us doing the prenup. You know how many people I've done prenups for that I've watched on their social media or them being interviewed by Andy Cohen on Bravo and saying, well, no, we don't have a prenup. Yeah, you do. Yeah, you do. You do.

It's in my office. It's in a folder. Yeah. That's a prenup. I know. That's beautiful. But prenups are not published any place. They're not filed with a court.

They're maintained by the two people that signed it and their lawyers. That's it. So nobody has to admit that they have a prenup. Beautiful. But there's, yes, but there's a certain problem with that in so far as a lot of people have prenups and we need to normalize prenups.

There's no reason not to normalize prenups. There's no reason not for until some famous people say, yeah, we have a prenup. We're crazy about each other. That's why we're getting married. But yeah, look, we're getting, you know, I don't want to get car accident, but I've got a seat belt, you know, like you have it, just in case. And, I mean, what do you do if you're running a company, like what does that have to do with the prenup?

You know, you're running a $100 billion or a trillion dollar company, Jeff Bezos. I suppose his marriage was before Amazon. Yeah, as was before it was anything. But how does that work in a prenup? Well, no, actually, it's the same. What you're doing with a prenup is you're identifying how things will be classified in advance.

So you're creating a set of rules, and then you both can function under those rules during the marriage. So for a brief time, I taught a family law drafting class at a law school, and when we would do separation agreements and we would do pleadings, it was lots of fun. When we would do prenups, I would say to the students, what's the main thing you need

when you're doing a prenup? And they would say, well, you need assets disclosure and say, well, that's not the main thing. And they'd say, well, you need, you know, technical language. They'd say, nope, main thing you need is a crystal ball. The main thing you need is the ability to see what's gonna happen in the future.

Who's gonna have money, who's not? Who's gonna be successful, who isn't? What people will inherit? Problem is, we don't have that. We don't have that. So what can we do? We can create tranches. We can create structures. We can create systems. And then people can live with those in mind. You enter the game knowing the rules, right? So you know if this is going to be a submission-only event. You know if this is going to be submission only event, you know if this is gonna be no time limit, you know if we're after certain number of minutes, we're going into points now, okay?

So I can work with that rule set and I'm gonna amend my game based on that rule set. Same thing, same thing. You're just gonna say, look, what's the rule set? Let's agree on the rule set, and then let's conduct ourselves with the rule set in mind. Let's plan the rule set in mind. And I think that, you know, by the way, and if you're going to cheat, you cheat with

the rule set in mind. You know you're cheating, right? You know you're trying to get around the rule set. So prenups are, when I do a consult for a prenup, the first thing I do is here's what's going to happen legally if you marry without a prenup. The first thing I do is here's what's gonna happen legally if you marry without a prenup. Here's what happens to your rights and obligations. Then what we can change with that, there's almost no limit. You can amend anything you want to.

The example I always give is there was a case that went up to the appellate court where high net worth guy married a very beautiful woman and there was a provision in the prenuptial agreement that said for every 10 pounds she gained during the marriage, she would lose $10,000 a month in alimony if they divorced. And there was a, here's her baseline weight as of the time of execution of this agreement. And I wondered if she was like, like, did like, what a wrestler does. Like, did she like, you know, did was like, like did like what a wrestler does.

Like did she like, you know, did she like, call God right before and then cut when she eventually got divorced. Like is she in there with Sonna, you know, with the suit on. But the, and the appellate court essentially said, I don't know why you married this person,

having had them make you sign this, but it's binding. Yeah, but it's binding. Yeah. But it's binding. I wish somebody would do a contract like that, like the rent for this place would be more expensive if I was fatter and cheaper if I was skinnier. And that way I would have to weigh in and be at the motivation. Like some motivation on you. Yeah, exactly.

That's that kind of pre-enough is motivating. Well, what's his name? I think Tim Ferris says that about how he does like, he says you should make bets with people. Yeah. Like, it's like if you gain this much, I got to give you this amount of money, you know. And he says that in one of his early books. And try to make it binding somehow, which is tough.

Yeah, I think when we create incentives of that kind, you know, that's why like there was like the, no, not November, no, shave, November, you know, sober, like all this. Yeah. It was a competition. When people make a competition of something, they gamify something. It, you know, makes it something that people are more likely to stick with. So, I mean, I guess a prenup, be interesting. The, you know, the problem is there, there's also people put in prenups, what's called

fidelity clauses. Uh-oh. Yeah. Yeah. Fidelity clauses, people still do these. Iubs what's called fidelity clauses. Uh-oh. Yeah. Yeah. Fidelity clauses, people still do these. I discourage people from doing them. The two things that people put in pre-nubs that I discourage people from putting in pre-nubs, but very often people still put in pre-nubs even with my caveat, is fidelity clauses and sunset

clauses. So fidelity clauses is, I'm waving alimony, I'm waving this, I'm waving that. But if you cheat, I get a million bucks or I get this much alimony or I get this amount. And I know the intention is to disincentivize the person from cheating. It's a deterrent to have them cheat. But all it really does is just creates like an interesting legal battle for lawyers. Like how did you prove that they cheated or not? All right, because what, yeah, well, constitutes cheating also.

Right, right. Is an emotional affair and affair, is oral sex cheating, is, you know, like what, what is, and by the way, how do you prove it? Like, well, I was in a hotel with her, but how do you prove that I had sex with her, you know? Yeah. Well, I was in a hotel with her, but how do you prove that I had sex with her? And it's very, very, you're opening a can of worms with that kind of a thing, but people sometimes still put them in. And sunset clauses.

Sunset clauses is if we're married X period of time, this goes away, as if it never existed. And why is that a bad idea? The same reason the community property law in California is a bad idea. So the community property law is after a certain number of years, I think it's seven, everything,

including your premarital property, all becomes marital property. And the idea of that was supposed to be that if you've been married that number of years, like you're in enough of a serious relationship now that everything is one unit, you're in enough of a serious relationship now that everything is one unit, you're one person. What it actually does is creates a very uncomfortable thought experiment that people have to have at the six-year mark. Because you have to, now the honeymoon's kind of over, you might have a kid or two, and you go, okay,

wait a minute, am I so happy in this relationship that I'm willing to take all of my premarital assets and throw them in the pot right now? Because if not, I got six months to get divorced. Yeah. Like, and that's not, so like if you say to someone, like if you got married tomorrow and then you found a company that's worth $100 million.

And under your prenup, that's your separate property. But there's a sunset clause that says that your prenup goes out the window in 15 years. Man, at year 14 and six months, you got to ask yourself some serious questions about where's this relationship going to be in five, ten years. That's brilliant. And that's why kids, you pay for a lawyer. We get paid to see around coroners, you know.

I get paid to be paranoid. I tell people that all the time. Okay. So you mentioned in fidelity, you write in the book, which everybody should get. It's a great book. It's a great read. It's a window into your soul. You are in this book, right, that there's five kinds of infidelity.

Do you remember, can you explain? Yeah, I mean, what I wanted to say is that all infidelity is not the same, that there's different kinds. And some of them are more obvious than others. Like, there's the soulmate, you know, that's the one I think I see most often, which is a person meets another person or rekindles on social media or elsewhere a reconnection with another person in their life and they go, oh my god, this is the person I'm supposed to be with. I'm in love. The heart wants what the heart wants. Like I'm leaving you for this person

because I have found my true love. That's one type and it's an incredibly common type. And there are plenty of cautionary tales associated with that where people thought that they found there's someone and then it turns out it was, you know, no, it was just unfair, you know. And a man who leaves his wife for his mistress just leaves a new job opportunity open. And we should also mention that you talk about Facebook

and Instagram. Oh yes, if we were going to invent an infidelity generating machine, it would be called Facebook, which by the way, is a function of the fact that book was written in 2019. I would now change it to Instagram. Oh, because you said just Facebook. Yes, but now if I had to rewrite it,

it would be if we were going to invent an infidelity generating machine, it would be called meta. That would be what it to Instagram. Oh, because you said just Facebook. Yes. But now if I had to rewrite it, it would be if we were going to invent an infidelity generating machine, it would be called meta. That would be what happens. There you go. Yeah. Yeah. Very tech forward. It's a was a function of what Facebook and I think Instagram also are, which is it is a communication tool that has people looking into windows that I think are antagonistic to marriage. You're looking into the lives of other people, you're looking into the social lives of people that you meet casually. So there was a time where you would be at your son's soccer practice and see the attractive mom across the way. And you wouldn't really talk to her, interact with her.

If you did, it would just be at practice. But now we add on social media, those people, because for legitimate reasons, we need to maybe communicate about one practice is or we want to message the person. But now it's sort of an invitation to a connection. And then it's, you know, there's a picture of her on vacation in a bikini. That's very intriguing. And then you have a benign, oh, I saw you guys on a vacation, where did you stay? Oh, it was that good, did you like that? That's tonight and now we're talking. And now we're having an interaction.

And now this is how the spark of affairs begins. It's usually, people don't usually meet and go, would you like to potentially wreck your marriage? Yes, would you? Oh my god, let's do this. Like it's much more, you know, it's slowly happened. So when I talk about types of infidelity, the soulmate, the unexpected soulmate, you know,

this connection that you didn't expect, I didn't expect to fall in love with this person, but I did and the heart wants with the heart wants and I'm sorry. That one's tough, that one's tough, because, you know, it's an interesting distinction between men and women to some degree that when a man finds out his wife was cheating, the question is, did you fuck him? And when a woman finds out that a man cheated, the question is,

do you love her? You know? And those are, those are different things, you know? I feel like there could be many and have been many books written on that very distinction. Yeah, they're have to be. By much smarter people than me. Yeah. But, but, um, I, I think that the soulmate thing is very, very painful for a lot of my female clients. very, very painful for a lot of my female clients. When a man says, listen, I found the one. I found the one and it's not you. That is really, really hard to get past. Even when it turned out to be true.

I mean, I've seen some people that, you know, it was an affair that turned into 20 plus your marriages, you know. So I, I, an unhappy marriage and then a happy affair that turned into a very happy marriage. Like, I've not seen, there's not a formula, you know, like I've, I've been doing it long enough now that I've seen permutations I never would have expected. So that's one, one type of infidelity. The other is what I call the push out of the closet, which is, and that I think happened more often earlier in my career. There have been tremendous strides, I think, in the lesbian and gay community, where, including

marriage equality, obviously, where there's a lot of change as to people accepting people as being gay or lesbian. And I think that there was a time where people were having, being in the closet was much more important. You were subject to professional scorn and all kinds of things if you were gay or lesbian. So people were sneaking around and having affairs with their same sex partners and then they get caught

and then, you know, it really was a function of the of the of the the fact that they were closeted. And again, that's another kind of complicated dynamic because you know, I haven't had that happen to me where a woman left me for a woman, but I'd like to think it would be easier for a woman, but I'd like to think it would be easier for me. Because if you left me for a man, you're saying I want one like you, but better than you. Whereas if you leave me for a woman, well, that's a whole different set of equipment. I don't have that. So like, I can't, like, okay, like, it's not me. It's you. It's something you want that I can't offer. I don't't we don't serve that at this restaurant so you know it's okay like I get it I mean there's a betrayal there's a sadness whatever but you know this is a different thing.

The saddest type of infidelity in my opinion the mistake, which is someone just makes a mistake. They just, people do dumb shit when it comes to sex. Like people just, in a moment, they follow temptation, their impulse control is poor, and they do something that they, that doesn't reflect their morality or doesn't reflect the depth of their feelings. Like, would you spend enough time in a room

with people who've cheated in a relationship and are speaking candidly to you about it because you're their lawyer? They'll say to you very openly, like, no, I really love my wife. I really love my wife. Like, I just, I don't know, I was just an idiot. Like, I just, you know, I saw this bright shiny object and I went for it. I don't know, I was just an idiot. I just saw this bright shiny

object and I went for it. I really wanted to sleep with that woman. I wanted to fuck her. I love my wife. I make love to my wife. I love my wife, but I just wanted to sleep with this one. And we created a culture where one of those eradicates the other. Culture where one of those eradicates the other. I don't, that's a whole nother discussion, is there ethical non-monogamy? Like, should we, is marriage about who I have sex with or is marriage a different kind of a partnership? Is it a, is it a pair bond that's about building a life

together? You know, and where does monogamy fit into that? And people like Esther Perrell, and those are people who are making very intelligent discussions about that. Yeah, that's a complicated one. Just to actually just linger on that, I view how often have people with open marriages have been in your office. Well, let's see, and this is one of those,

like, from a research perspective, this would be flawed because I see the, they're in my office because their marriage is falling apart. So there may be lots of people having open relationships that don't end up in a divorce lawyer's office, so I'd never meet them. But I meet a lot of people that that was the Hail Mary Pass. It's true.

I meet a lot of people that they tried that, but in retrospect, it was the Hail Mary Pass. It was like, look, we've just figured, let's try this. Maybe this will keep the glue together on this thing. And I've also seen open, open relationships go wrong, you know, where we agree we're just going to have sexual connections with other people, or we're going to bring other people into the bedroom, but together, like we're going to be together with other people or with another person, and then that connection of those two people, like, do you think it's a soulmate

all of a sudden now? And it goes in this other, because again, is that novelty, is that, like, it's the reason why I don't understand why people have three sins. It's kind of like, you know, when someone sings to you, I don't know where to look. I don't know where to look. Like if someone's singing to me, I don't know where to look. Like it feels weird, right? Like this is a conundrum, I have to,

no this, I'll say this to you, this will never, but it's the reason I can't go to strip clubs. Yeah, I don't know where to look. Like if I go to strip club, you know, like you go to strip club and there's, you know, the part where the woman's on the stage and she walks past each person, she does a little thing and then next person and then next little thing. So when she's right in front of you,

I like a woman's face and I like a woman's body. I like both of them. So I'm looking at the woman's face and she's very beautiful. But she's naked. And I think, oh, she's naked. I should be looking at her naked body because obviously that's like, it's almost rude not to because she's naked in front of me. Of course, sedan, I'm looking at her naked body, which is's like, it's almost rude not to because she's naked in front of me. Well, of course, so then I'm looking at her naked body, which is lovely to look at. But then I find myself going, oh my God, you're just stintly, you should look at her face for God's sake.

And then I look at her face and find myself having this whole thing in my head where I'm going like, oh my God, where am I supposed to look? So I think a threesome with two women you don't hardly know or you're not, that's different. But a threesome with a long-term partner who you're in a relationship with and a new person seems to me a very dangerous ground.

Because you're gonna wanna enjoy the novelty of this new person, but you're going to have to spend time with this person after. So how much attention do you spend to the new novel exciting thing without creating the impression that you don't, you're not interested in this because you want, you're my favorite person, but this is fun. So I want to just try this for a few, but then also, I don't want to forget about that. Like, it just seems tricky. That analogy, by the way, is brilliant. And also, I guess, is tricky

because the consequences of mistakes are quite high because you're going to have to talk about it. Right, and there's an easy way to misinterpret the data, right? Like, so if I'm, if I really like sleeping with my partner, but I get one chance to sleep with this other person, like, well, of course I should indulge in that because I can do this anytime. Like what did, but this person, my partner might interpret that

as, oh, so you're more interested in her than me because that voice in my partner that would be, you know, insecure might hear that. You know, so I just, why would you even, why would you open yourself up to that level of chaos? You seem to love chess in the courtroom. Is it kind of intimate human chess of sorts? Yeah, no, that's too high risk.

How do we get on three things? I'll open marriages. Well, we got, have we got on three things? I don't know, I was wondering how people get on three things. I think if one is fun, two must be better, if two is better, three must be better. Yeah, I think the way that this becomes an issue is, why would you have a non-monogamous relationship? What is it about your sex life with this person that's not satisfying?

And I think that that is the question that's harder to ask yourself and to try to answer with your partner. I mean, you've said that this idea of soulmates is great for your business, but it's like a human being in a partnership can't be everything. Is that true? I think it's unrealistic. It's true romance, right?

The document of that we keep referencing here. I think it's wonderful if you do, because sometimes now people don't get that reference anymore. Like I talk to people in, when I try to teach negotiation to young lawyers who come work for me, I tell them to watch the Gary Oldman scene where he offers him the Chinese food.

Yeah, why has that seen the one that really? Because it's the best negotiating lesson I've ever heard in my life. Where he comes and he's... I should just call it the record. Yeah, Gary Oldman plays a pimp. And he owns, his girl is Patricia Arquette, right? And Christian Slater's character, the protagonist,

is coming in to tell Gary Oldman that he no longer owns this girl, Alabama. Is it? Alabama is gonna be with him now. And Gary Oldman is a amazing performance. And he's sitting in a living room with a shotgun next to him with armed guys around him watching television and eating Chinese food.

And he's got Chinese food laid out in front of him. And Christian Slater comes in and he says, I need to talk to you about Alabama. And Gary Oldman says, do you want some Chinese food? And Christian Slater sort of taken back by the question, he says, no, I came to talk about Alabama. She's with me now. She's there and he proceeds to tell him what his offer essentially is. And Gary Olman says, you know, you fucked up, right? In some of the substance, he says, you know, if you'd sat down and started eating my Chinese food,

I would have thought, who's this guy? He didn't have a care in the world, just sitting down, eat my eggful young. But instead, you tried to be hard, and now I know you're full of shit. And so I think that scene summarizes how in negotiation, the more you enter into it with that, like anytime I deal with another lawyer and they're like, well, we'll see you in court. Okay. I'm seeing court. Like empty barrels make the most noise. Like, you and I as people have been in the Jiu-Jitsu community, but I know some dangerous

people. I know FBI SWAT people. I know, you know, I know people that are they know how to do things to people and They're the calmest guys you ever meet in your life. You you scuff their sneaker. They're like, oh yeah, wait That's okay. Like they're quick to apology. Like they're just chill. What what were we talking about? We were talking about oh Wait true romance., the soulmate. Yeah, soulmate. Yeah, you're saying that this idea,

like that film underlying there's this current of like they were made for each other. Yeah. I think there's a distinction between the feeling that someone is your missing puzzle piece that you're made for this person. I think what that just means is there's a lot of overlapping beautiful connections. I love them intellectually. I think what that just means is there's a lot of overlapping beautiful connections.

I love them intellectually. I love them sexually. I love them interpersonally. We have some shared history. We have some shared commonalities. We were raised in the same culture, raised in the same religion. Like we view, we have politically similar ideas. Like these are all, or we have totally opposite ones, but they're complementary. Like I are all, or we have totally opposite ones with their complimentary. Like I've always joke that like finding someone with complimentary pathologies. You know, like I'm obsessively disciplined.

So having a partner who's like flexible and like spontaneous is really good for me. And also me being like, no, no, no, come on, come back, we're gonna do this now. No, no, it's time to actually do this now. Like we're good for each other. It's barefoot in the park. It's this idea of like, you know, the in and the in.

So what I have an issue with is that the definition of soulmate that I think is sold to so many people now is this idea that if your partner is disappointing to you in any way, meaning they're not the perfect travel companion, they're not the perfect vocabulary companion, they're not the perfect roommate, they're not the perfect lover, they're not the, like the odds of someone being all of those seems crazy to me, like it's infinitesimally small and they don't have to be everything. Like, if I go to a restaurant and eat 10 courses and one of them is kind of subpar

and the other nine are the most amazing culinary experience I've ever had, how dare I say, well, that wasn't the right restaurant. Like, what do you mean? Like, that's a great restaurant. What are you talking about? Like, of course, there was one little thing. So I think it's impossible to have someone

never disappoint you. It's impossible to have someone who never lets you down or doesn't say and do the exact right thing at the exact right time. And to create the idea or expectation in anyone that your partner should never let you down, never disappoint you, never not know what to say.

Is I think crazy? I mean, I find for myself, when someone, for example, loses someone, when someone loses a family member or a pet, I often say the same thing to the person. I'll either talk to them or send them a text or call them and I'll say, if I wish I knew the perfect thing to say, because I would say it right now. But I know there isn't. I know that I don't say that part, but I know there isn't. There isn't a perfect thing to say. But if there was a perfect thing to say, I would say it right now.

Love to me is not that you never let this person down. It's that you never want to let this person down. You know, it's love is a verb, you know, like it's this feeling of, I never want to disappoint you. I will disappoint you, but I never want to disappoint you. I will hurt you, but I never want to hurt you. When I hurt you, it will be my insecurity, my stupidity,

my humanity that causes me to hurt you, but I will never intentionally hurt you, it will be my insecurity, my stupidity, my humanity that causes me to hurt you, but I will never intentionally hurt you. You know, I will betray your trust. I'll never intentionally betray your trust. Like, I will, by my stupidity, say the wrong thing or lose, say something to someone that you didn't want me to, but it won't be intentional. I will always try to be on your team. That feels to me like a realistic thing. Yeah, the intention is the way, but there's some aspect of, you know, just like the ten-course meal that over time, there's a kind of convergence towards perfection. And along

the way, there's the rose-collar glasses where you see the beauty and everything. So it just, it feels, it's probably destructive to really internalize the idea of soulmate because then any imperfections can make you doubt, can make you step away, can make you lose the connection. But it just feels like, I don't know. It's too heavy. It just feels, I feel like when you see a couple that's 90 years old, and they've been together for 60 years, 70 years.

There is of course a temptation to think about all the beauty that they've seen on that journey together, the children, the grandchildren, maybe the great grandchildren, all the joy that they've seen on that journey together, the children, the grandchildren, maybe the great grandchildren, all the joy that they've seen, all the pain they've endured and struggled together, you know. But they've also disappointed each other a whole bunch of times, probably let each other down, they probably lied to each other a bunch. And yet, and to me, that is a beautiful thing.

Like that's what, that is not beautiful thing. Like, that's what that is not. It's great in spite of that. It's great because of that. They still love each other, even though they've been so flawed and imperfect and and they're human. And they still love each other. They still rode that thing together because the reasons to do so were greater than the reasons to not. We've mentioned some of this, but I'd love to get your opinion on having seen things gone wrong. How much, and having mentioned, and we're heard in Johnny Depp, how much fighting do you think is okay in a relationship?

And how to resolve the fights such that they don't escalate to that disconnection. Is there some wisdom you have for that? Imagine you've seen some epic fights. Yeah, you know, it's very, I've seen some crazy fights. I have, even on my phone, I have some recordings. Because now there's, you know, cameras everywhere. It's like Nest Cams and nest cams and ring cams.

So a lot of this gets recorded. And people have phones so readily available that they can record the other person and know it. And I listen to the way people speak to, first of all, I listen to the way people speak to each other and I'm shocked. I listen to the way people speak to their romantic partner, to their spouse, and I'm blown away. I can blown away. I'm blown away.

Disrespect, or what? Just disrespect, insults, profanity, just degradation, just brutality, just... And then, like, to then kind of go on, like the next day, you kind of go on, like, nothing happened. I don't... I'm shocked by it. I mean, I listen to it, and I think, think like I have someone ever spoke to me that way. I don't know that I could ever really feel deep connection to them, like freely. I would feel so betrayed, like that they just so brutal. Like I can't

imagine speaking to someone that way, like it's saying you just, such vicious insults to someone, you know, like I, but I understand that's how some people communicate perhaps. I guess the question of how much fighting is too much fighting in the relationship is for me a bit like the question, how much sex is enough sex in the relationship. It depends on the two people and their individual tastes. But what's problematic is when there is a disconnect between the two people. So if, you know, there's a, I think it's Annie Hall. It's one of the Woody Allen films, where Diane Keaton and Woody Allen are both talking to their respective therapists

about the relationship, you know, but it's like a split screen. Yeah. And she says, I mean, we have sex all the time. We have sex like once a week. And he goes, we never have sex. We have sex like once a week. And, you know, it's funny because it's true. It really is this, you know, they both know the same data, but they're

interpreting that data set completely differently. And I think it, you know, the question you have to start asking is like, what is, you know, Steve Harvey actually once said something funny to me, he said that success is not where you are. Success is where you are in relation to where you started. He says, because if success is where you are, Oprah's got a salt beat. Yeah. Or maybe Elon's got a salt beat. I don't know.

But if it's where you are versus where you started, because there's a lot of people that started on second and, you know, start on third act like they hit a double. You know, like, well, I was given 10 million, but then I turned it into 100 million. Well, the first million's the hardest. So, you know, come on. But I think the question of like how much sex were we having at the beginning of the relationship?

That might be the wrong gauge, because that's like we couldn't keep our hands off each other and we just, it's novelty. But, you know, like how far, well, how much sex we're having post children versus before the children, that might be worth looking at. Like how do we compare it? Am I overweight compared to what?

When I was 20 and running marathons or most 50 year old men, I don't know. I gotta, what do you compare it to? So I think fighting, there are some people that I think they enjoy fighting. Like they enjoy argument. You know, I know people that enjoy political debate. I don't particularly enjoy political debate. Not that I'm not very interested in political concepts,

economic concepts, I just argue for a living. So in my free time, I don't find argument that enjoyable. When it's intense, I find discussion more interesting. That's so interesting. You just keep the battle to that particular, to your main profession. And I'm sure I'll see what it is. Well, did you ever, Bob Goldfway,

Bobcat Goldfway, the comedian, very, very funny. And he had all second chapters, like a director and a writer. But he has this, you know, I saw an interview with him once where he said, you know, yeah, he says, like, I'm a comedian. I've been a comedian a long time. People always come up to me and they're like, oh, you're a comedian, do you want to hear a joke? He's like, and all I can think is, oh, yeah,

that'd be a real fucking treat. Yeah. Like, I haven't heard jokes all day, all night, for years. That would be a real special occasion. Yes. Like, I get it, you know. Yeah, and I mean, a sadder story. I've been reading quite a bit about Robin Williams and his wife would talk about how quiet and introspective and thoughtful and intellectual he was and

not really that humorous and his private life. But that may be a function of, you know, that it is enjoyable to be the other thing. Yeah. You know, one of the things I've always thought was very funny and relationships, my own relationships is most women I know who have a husband who doesn't wear a suit every day for a living. When their husband gets dressed up, like they're going to a wedding or something, they get like, oh my god, look, look at them, you know. And I wear a suit every day, you know, on the weekends I don't. I wear like jeans and a black t-shirt, but the rest of the time I wear a suit. And I remember, I think

there's been true in every relationship I've been in since I was a lawyer, including my ex-wife. It was always like, if I had on jeans and I wasn't shaving, it was like, look at you. You're like, you're like, you're kidding me? Like, I'm like, really? Like, where is the suit? They wouldn't even notice. What do you notice the suit? Sometimes the other thing. Well, that's what it is. It's the novelty of the other thing. So I think that if you're Robin Williams and you're like being shot out of a cannon in terms of your performative style

and your energy and explosive, yeah, being quiet must be very refreshing. Like, I imagine, you know, incredibly intelligent people must love just watching stupid humor or having a dumb, say, it's why some of the smartest people I know, like really dumb shit, you know? It's why like Rick and Morty, I think, is brilliant because it's both smart and dumb. Yeah, it's the perfect combination. It really is. Yeah, I think it's possible the

perfect show. Is there advice you can give to somebody like me and how to interview well, how to do conversations well. Do you think there's something transferable from the courtroom to this setting with complicated people? Yeah, I think so. I think what can be learned about interviewing is the distillation, like what is most important. When I hear a story that I have to present to a judge, the totality of someone's parenting, the good of their parenting, the bad of their parenting, the good of the other parent, the bad of the other parent. I have to sort of boil down what are the best examples, because I can't lay it all out. And then what greater principles do they speak to?

You know, the best Jiu-Jitsu teacher that I think I've had is Paul Schreiner. And Paul doesn't teach, just teach you techniques. He's teaching you ways of thinking about concepts in Jiu-Jitsu, and then here are some techniques that illustrate that. John Donner, from what I can see, does a lot of that as well. I think they're like soulmates in the Jiu Jitsu world. And then there's that element that you spoke to, which is maybe considering the other

side. Well, always. Always. Kind of thing. Yeah, I mean, straw man, steel man stuff. You do a lot of that, and I think all the best side. Always. Always. Kind of thing. Yeah, I mean, straw man, steel man stuff. You do a lot of that, and I think all the best interviewers do. But yeah, I think it's really, really important to think about. I have to know the other side's case much better than my own.

I have to know what are their defenses, what are their strengths. I have to map out a strategy that keeps those in mind. And that's hard because early in my career, I would attribute to the other side an intelligence and strategy that sometimes wasn't applicable. Like I've learned like, there's like the simplest explanation is the accurate one, the Occam's razor.

I think sextons would never attribute to strategy that which could be attributed to stupidity for laziness. Because I have lots of adversaries that they'll not file a motion. I thought they were going to file, and I'll go, wait, why didn't they file that? Like, tactically, what are they thinking I'm going to do? And what is that about?

And I would go, well, I didn't file it. Why wouldn't I? And the answer is they just didn't think to file it. Or they were too lazy to draft it. Or they went on vacation last week. So that's why they didn't. And I'm driving myself crazy going, there's some tactical read, there must be.

So I think you have to Look honestly and don't attribute to the other side your Constitution You know if I said that I'd be saying it sarcastically if you said it Maybe you weren't saying it sarcastically like you have to think about the fact that we're unique human beings who express Themselves differently and for you the audience is usually the judge. Do you do that? the fact that we're unique human beings who express themselves differently. And for you, the audience is usually the judge. Yeah, it's the judge. No, we don't do jury trials.

That's the interesting thing about family law attorneys. Family law attorneys don't do jury trials. We do bench trials. We just persuade there's a person in a black robe. That's the only person I have to convince. Does the person in the black robe, do they have emotions? Are they human? Are they very...

They are human. They are all too human. Do they impose that humanity on you? Like do you steal it? Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Oh, no, they do you feel it like they're human? They're working their shit out. Okay. They're parents. Yeah, they're husbands and wives Yeah, you're and you're talking about stuff they deal with yeah, I had I had a woman on the stand an expert witness on the stand Who was talking about the emotional and physical abuse that was perpetrated on a seven-year-old

and I this person had written a Bunch of reports that were in evidence in this trial, where I'm like day six or seven in the trial. And there's all of this information in the record about this verbal abuse and mental abuse and gas lighting and really intense stuff that this woman was doing in this seven year old. And the judge was vaguely paying attention for most of the time.

And at some point, the person says, well, when a parent is abusing a child and the judge just interrupts, she goes, well, look, you know, do you think like if a person spanks a child, that's abuse? She's like, well, like a person in general, like, and by the way, if my adversary asked that question, I could object, but I can't object when the judge asks the question. They get the rule on that objection. So I'm object, but I can't object when the judge asks the question. They get to rule on that objection. So I'm like, where's this going?

She's like, well, no, I mean, spanking can be a form of abuse. She's like, right, but like, you know, are you saying like everybody who spanks, and I'm saying you're going, what is going on in your house? Yeah. But what went on with your parents?

Like, cause you're bringing some stuff here that's not, this is not what you're supposed to be. This is not your role, you know? But there are good judges and bad judges. And that's a big, big deal. Well, I've noticed that, now I don't have kids, so I have a certain perspective on the world.

I really wanna have a family and have kids, but I've noticed when I talk to people that have kids and gender matters also, like fathers or like with daughters and so on, like it changes the landscape of the conversation. Sure does. It's like, you're no longer this intellectual that's like, while there's this and there's this,

it's more like, like go fuck yourself, anything that fucks with kids can burn it to the ground. I don't care. I don't care what the nuance is of the little intellectual thing. Oh, you want to learn about this. Represent someone is accused of child sexual abuse. I've had about a dozen of those cases where I represented someone who is alleged to have perpetrated sexual abuse of a child. You are guilty until proven innocent. And let me tell you as a lawyer,

that is the toughest cases because you put sex and kids together and everyone loses their god-damn mind immediately. There's a rush to judgment, there's a disregard for procedure, there's a confirmation bias, there's a desire to be a protector, and again, all motivated and informed by really good things that desire to protect the innocent, the desire to protect the vulnerable, but gang. No, like we have these, I like living in a world that has due process. I like these rules. I like the rules of evidence.

I like innocent until proven guilty. I like that. I'm not saying it's perfect. It's such a, I'm so torn on it because I also like living in a world where people are so emotionally invested in connection to other like, those two things are mutually exclusive. It shouldn't be. I know, but if you dedicate yourself fully to the law, you might lose some of the humanity. I don't think you have to.

I have to tell you, I once actually went off on a DA, on a district attorney, who was very vehemently prosecuting a child sex abuse case that I was involved in. I remember, I came in thankfully, I came in very early in the case. So the accusation was made and I came in right away. Because very often you get this case, there've been 15 interviews, this person's been interviewed by police,

by child protective services, and it's like they've already, they're already so far down a hole that didn't even know they dug themselves into, you know? So I got in very early on and I just kept saying, she's like, well, we're going to do this. We're going to do this. I was like, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. We should both want this to be fair, done properly.

There's an expert, a well-respected expert who is a clinical psychologist to their job as their evaluation expert. So their job is to interview a child. They record the interviews with a hidden camera so that everyone can see that it isn't a suggestive questioning. They're very stringent standards that they follow to prevent like suggestive questioning or any of those kinds of things. And I was saying, listen, no, no one should be interviewing this child other than this person who's a neutral, qualified person.

And I kept saying to the other side, like, wait, you know, you're, see, this is the problem. Like you want to win. You're a lawyer. You want to win. I want to win too, right? But, but we want to win fair. Like that's like saying, you know, I'm going to know boxing match. I want to win.

So if the referee's looking to the side, I'm going to kick the guy in the nuts. Like, okay, then you might have won, but you didn't win boxing. You won some other thing, you know, like I want to win a fair fight. Like I want to go in with the rules set, the law, the rules of evidence. I don't want a judge who doesn't understand evidence.

I don't want an adversary who plays it fast and loose with the rules. I want to go in and win a fair fight. And that's where when it comes, our passion to protect the innocent, to emotionally connect, to feel deeply about children and protecting them. I don't think that that's antagonistic to, like, we always treat danger with decapitation in this culture. And I don't understand it and That's what I like about the law the law. There's rules. There's and there's rules about procedure

And so that's that's our job is to bring out the truth using the rules and the procedure and I love that job But still there's a human being in the judge, right? That's the problem It seems like a really hard job. It's a real thing. Because you have to be pay attention to the whole thing. You have to pay attention to the whole thing, and everyone is trying to persuade you and lie to you. Yeah.

And everyone can keep their shit together in a quarter parent's most of the time. Yeah. Like it takes a rare kind of crazy to blow up in a courtroom. So most of the time everybody looks really put together and like, yeah, you got to have an amazing bullshit detector. I'm not saying they don't have a really hard job. They have a really hard job.

They have way harder job than I have. What's their source of ground truth? How do they sharpen the radar for bullshit? I think that their assessing credibility, which is what you call it in the law, is something that, you know, I think you're supposed to call it in the law, is something that, you know, I think you're supposed to develop it on the job, you know. Do you have the data of who was lying in the end or not? No, not really.

Not really. I mean, you can try to demonstrate a lot. What I always tell clients, and this is the art of advocacy, right, is I want to use examples of misrepresentations to show that this person's a liar. Like I'm trying to extrapolate from the small, the large. Like I'm trying to say, here's three times he lied, therefore he's a liar. When in fact, you know, we know human beings

don't really work that way. But I've seen people submarine their, just torpedo their entire case because they lied about some dumb shit, some dumb little thing. And I said, and why would you lie? Why did you lie about that? Like, I had a case where a person was accused of child sexual abuse. And on cross examination, they were asked, did you have an affair with this babysitter? And they're like no no no no no and then it was shown through text messages and things

They clearly had an affair with the babysitter and I said why did you lie? And they said well, I didn't want that to come out. I said right, but now you're a liar Like did you molest your child? right but now you're a liar. Like, did you molest your child? Because if the answer to that is no. And now you destroyed your credibility because you didn't want to admit that you slept within adult woman.

By the way, it would have been good for your case. It would have been good for your case for you to say, yeah, I slept with her because I like sleeping with adult women. That's how I am. I don't sleep with children, much less my own. So why would you lie? And so that concept is incredibly important.

And judges theoretically, they have to make very tough calls. I feel like it's the most impotent place to just sit there and dispassionately sort of listen and rule on objections. Like I just would be so frustrated because I'd want to get there and dispassionately sort of listen and rule on objections. Like I just would be so frustrated because I'd wanna get up and, you know, I did do jury duty once and it was like a horrific experience for me

because I'm sitting there and I'm- In the power, you're taking it. Yeah, I'm just watching these two letters and I'm like, why did you ask that question that way? I would never have asked it that way. Why would you object like that? When you object, you bring more attention to what are you doing? Like I'm watching both of them.

It's like watching like a jujitsu. Maybe probably what it feel like for like John Donner heard a watch to White Belt spar. Like why are you doing it? Wow, my God, what are you doing? Why would you grab that? What are you thinking? Like, and you know, it's frustrating.

It's frustrating to watch. And as a judge, it must just be unbelievable. So divorce lawyers sometimes get a bad rap. Is there a reason for this? I mean, no one's ever happy to be spending time with a divorce lawyer. Like if you have a criminal lawyer, they're defending you against the malstrom of injustice and false allegations. They're protecting your freedom.

And maybe you're acquitted and then you're like, oh, I personally saved me, you know, you buy a house You know that lawyer helps you get the house, you know, you're happy about that son paperwork You do a will like you help they make you feel secure like at best I'm a representative of a chapter in someone's life that was very unpleasant I have a friend who's a julie art trained classical pianist and He was having a humidification system installed in his home, because his piano required a certain level of humidity. And it was very expensive to install this humidification system. And we went out to dinner and then we came back to his place and he said, man, this is the

most depressing $15,000 I've ever spent. And I said, why? And he said, because there's nothing different. Like, I spent $15,000 and I feel absolutely nothing different. My piano does, but I don't. Like, I don't have anything to show for it. Like, you finish getting divorced. You don't really have anything to show for it.

You know, like, best. Yeah. It's the best that's the same. It's one of the things I think that's interesting about divorce is that our increasingly performative society, you can't pretend you meant to get divorced. You can't.

Like, everything everybody does. Like, well, I wrote that album for me. I didn't matter that it was not gonna be popular. No, you wanted that album to be popular. Like, come on, like you're lying. And that's fine, but you're lying. Oh, I think my haircut can't not great. I wanted it to look this fucked up. No, you didn't. You didn't like you're lying. And that's fine, but you're lying. Oh, I think my haircut cannot grade. I wanted it to look this fucked up.

No, you didn't. You didn't, you're lying. And that's fine because we live in a society now where everybody's just, oh yes, I meant to do that. Okay, divorce? Nope, you got married. You wouldn't, you would not, you break up in a relationship, not a marriage, okay?

Well, we were only gonna be together for a little while. It was never serious. We were just like, you know, we're having fun. That's all it wasn't. We were never gonna be a happily a little while. It was never serious. We were just like, you know, we're having fun. That's all it was. It wasn't, we were never gonna be a happily ever after. Now, you got married. You got married, guys. You got up there and you said forever.

And it didn't go forever. So you can't bullshit anybody anymore. Like, you, no, it didn't go the way you thought it was gonna go. It didn't go the way you signed on for it. So now that that's undeniable, what can we make it? What can we make it into? It can be burned down.

Now I can see the moon. You know, like let's make it something. And so for me, I think people look at a divorce lawyer and they just go, yeah, like this is this horrible chapter and I associate you with it. Also too, listen, some of the things we do, it's difficult to simultaneously prevent and prepare for war. The things you do to protect your clients sometimes look like acts of aggression, but really they're just trying to shore up a defense.

And so I get paid to be paranoid and I have to say to clients sometimes, like, well, are you sure that they're not doing this? And then they go, well, I don't know. And I go, well, let me inquire. Did she accuse me of that? No, no, I'm not accusing you. I'm just trying, like we get a reputation to worse lawyers

as amping up a conflict because we get paid for the conflict, right? So like if you get paid by the bullet, you're gonna start a lot for the conflict, right? So like, if you get paid by the bullet, you're going to start a lot of gun fights, right? It doesn't really work that way with most good divorce lawyers. Like, there are plenty of people that are bad lawyers, and they stoke up conflict because it jacks up fees.

They usually don't do well. They don't build a successful career, because you live and die by your reputation. Yes, reputation, everything. But good lawyers, like good experienced divorce lawyers, we do the whole, you know, hey, listen, you're gonna say this,

I'm gonna say this, you're gonna do this, I'm gonna do this, this is what, let's skip it. We're gonna end up here. You know, we got Judge Blubb of Law and you know what he's gonna do, he's gonna go right here. So why don't we just agree right now to X, Y, Z?

Sounds good. We're done. We're good. So you wanna minimize the number of bullets? It's like the two. It's like a more you might have Mishashi. It's like the two swordsmen who see each other and they just stand there at the edge and they see the whole fight in their minds and they know who won and who lost and they walk away. Like, it's, we do a lot of that.

We do a lot of, okay. You know, it's like we do a lot of that. We do a lot of, okay, you know, it's, it's like when you watch high level chess and someone resigns and you go, wait, what happened? He didn't, he's going, no, no, he, the other guy won. Yeah. It's 15 moves from now. But he won and the other guy sees it. So now we're done. Can you speak to some recent high profile Can you speak to some recent high profile divorces? Like the most recent I saw is Kevin Costner. Yeah, Kevin Costner is a great, I mean, I don't know him, I'm not involved in the case.

By the way, Yellowstone, just so great. Oh, it's so good, right? And I hope Matthew McConaughey, who I've gotten to know, I hope he does one of the, one of these shows. Is Yellowstone or anything else? He's just born for the role, frankly. But anyway. He'd be amazing in that.

Your conversation with him was great. The Kevin Cosner divorce is interesting because Kevin Cosner had one of the most expensive from a district of award perspective. Like he gave a huge payout to his first wife. And then this time he had a prenup. So it's actually, it's a very public showing of the fact that once bit in twice shy,

like he had a very public divorce that cost him a lot of assets in terms of the division of assets. And now it appears by all acknowledged reports that he had a prenuptial agreement that was well crafted and enforceable. And, you know, he's, he's, the argument now is over what is child's port, what is spousal's port, what's covered in the pre-nup and what isn't.

So it seems like the pre-nup work, actually. The pre-nup work, you know, and Kevin Cosner's career, which has always been a steady career, I don't know that in the Hollywood stock market that people would have bet on Yellowstone. I think you would have said, hey, the best years of that guy's career are behind him. How do you get better than dances with wolves and Robin Hood and all these big, big, big,

the bodyguard and then Yellowstone? And it's like, holy cow, did he knock that out of the park? And he's central to it. I mean, he knocked that out of the park, and he's central to it. I mean, he knocked the skin off the ball. So I think that's why pre-nups are important. You don't know what your career is gonna do. You don't know where it's gonna go. And so he saved himself a lot of money.

He also has a great lawyer. He has Laura Wasser. Laura Wasser is LA, just a top professional, brilliant lawyer, even tempered, but intense in the courtroom and just a smart, smart human being. The thing I like just, you know, I haven't been following it, but I saw a few comments he's made and he like refused to comment negatively about his spouse and just smart. But like the way he said it, it wasn't lawyer advice. It's good lawyer advice probably.

But he said it from the heart, which I always like, I like seeing that. Yeah. Where he refuses even the drama, even the public nature of it to throwing jabs or. Well, Laura, his lawyer is actually notorious for like not Speaking to the press about cases in an extended way and that's smart move like I don't speak about pending cases

I'm involved in publicly and I discourage my clients from doing so I can't always stop them But but I discourage them from doing so I don't think there's any good to come of it There are lawyers who try to try things in the court of public opinion. I think there is a, to take it to the broader principle, you just brought up. I think there is a lot of value in talking about your ex in a favorable way. I have to say, when I first got divorced many years ago, I went on a date with a young woman.

One of my first dates as a divorced man. And she was a divorced woman. And she was a beautiful woman. And we were having dinner and it was going quite well. And it was one of those things where I was like, I definitely want to see this girl again. And I said something about, oh, you know, there's going to be this thing at this museum. We should go. And she's like, oh yeah, that'd be a lot of fun. And I'm like, yeah, we should definitely, yeah, maybe the next thing we do together.

And she's like, yeah, we should go next weekend. Like the kids are with the asshole. So we can go and I just, it was like, you could hear that record scratch. Like, yeah, I just went, oh, yeah, no, this isn't good. Like, I'm not, you're referring to the father of your kids is the asshole. Like, we're, like, we're already, I'm walking into something here that I don't know that I want to be involved in. Matthew McConaughey, before he was married,

you know, if you look at his history, he dated some of the most beautiful women in Hollywood in their prime. And none of them ever talked bad about him in the press. They all were like, oh my god, he's such a great guy. None of them ever talked bad about him in the press. They all were like, oh my God, he's such a great guy, he's such great guy, and I always wondered like, how do you, he got out of all of those relationships

without a scratch on him, and when you'd watch an interview with him, they would say like, so you dated Penelope Cruz, and he'd go, Penelope, that's just a special lady. That's just a special lady. She's just a wonderful woman. I'll just so blessed to have the time with her, what a beautiful woman.

And I would think to myself, I'm like, you're a genius. He's a genius. Because like, he'd never came off as petty, as spiteful, bitter, any of that. He just came off as like just dignified, strong, smart, self assured. And like it left, you know, it left like, it left the viewer with the impression

that like when he was looking off and spills like, like he's probably like just thinking about some wonderful time he had with her. And you think to yourself like, God, that guy, like he just became cooler and cooler. Whereas if he got into like the hole, you know, Oh yeah, that was ugly. And then you know this happened.

And like nobody wants to hear it. It's awful. The funny thing about him, just having to interact with him a bunch. I don't think he's in the, he's in the Rogan school of thought, I think, that I don't see him ever having a bunch. I don't think he's in the he's in the Rogan school of thought I think that I don't seem ever having a fight. Now his parents were as he's spoken about a bunch nonstop fighting. They got divorced and remarried and just insane.

And they were volatile. Yeah, very. He seems maybe you kind of depend on on swimming the other way. He just seems cool as a cucumber, like always. Just lets it roll off. Yeah. But even if it's internally, not rolling off, there is value in just rising above it in your discourse. That's true. Yes, that's true.

Like, you lie to your children. Like people say this to me all the time, clients. They're like, you know, why did you tell your child that dad had an affair? Well, I'm not going to lie to my kids. Fuck you. Yes, you are. You lie to your kids all the time. Yeah.

Mommy, are you going to die someday? Yes, baby. I'm going to die and daddy's going to die. And then someday, the earth's going to hurl into the sun and we're all going to die. Sweet dreams. Like, that's not you lie to your're all gonna die. Sweet dreams, like that's not, you lie to your kids all the time. You know, what's wrong with me? We don't know what's wrong with you.

We're gonna take you to the doctor and hopefully it's nothing serious and you won't die. Like, you lie to your kids all the time. You tell them that Santa Claus exists when he does whatever. So to say, I'm not gonna lie to my kids. You lie to your kids all the time. You don't like your husband, that's okay.

You don't like your ex-husband, but it's their father. So just grin, you know? Oh, daddy took me to meet his new girlfriend, Kiki. Oh, that's nice. You guys have a good time. Good, oh, that's, yeah. And she helped me do my hair and she did my makeup. Listen, I'm sure that's burning you inside.

Yeah. But you go, oh, that's great. Because why, you love your kids. Well, that's what I mean, again, Makana has a way bottom with that. He's like, he basically says never lie, but a little bullshit is okay. Sure.

Sure. Yeah. I mean, I'm very, Tom Ways has that song lie to me. You got to lie to me, baby. I honestly is a funny thing. But Tom Ways also believes that God's a way on business. I think his words, man. And who are the ones that we left in charge?

Killers, thieves and lawyers. That's a Tom Waits quote. Well, it must be true then. Yeah. I don't know how many, I don't know how many limbs I have, but I will give all of them to talk to Tom. And he's a very private person. I feel like he's the musical equivalent of Kormak McCarthy.

Yeah. Even if you get the interview, you're not, I don't think I'm going to get in there. No, I don't think you want, like, uh, honestly, I don't think you want to. I think I've seen his public interviews over the years with the wood letterman and I think he just, he is the poetry. I would put Tom Wates, Cormac McCarthy, Maynard James Keenan. Like these are artists that like,

I think they want the art to speak for itself. They would like to be lessened, they don't want you to. And I remember early, early days of tool that he, like this, he could not have been less interested in the spotlight hit. To the point where I think it was almost to the detriment of the band early on.

You know, and that's, there's no surprise that those are three artists that I think are unbelievable and in a category of their own and that you hear their performance. You can give me a page of a Cormac McCarthy novel and I'll know it's a Cormac McCarthy novel. You can, a few notes of Manor James Keenan or Tom Wade's voice, you know that that's them.

Yeah, as genius, genius highs from the spotlight,, but you know, doesn't stop me from feeling sad about it, but anyway. Yeah, that does. I would like to hear that in her. She's the girl that got away. Yeah. Yeah, I'm just standing outside of that girl's house with the book. You just put the stuff in, yeah, just playing in your eyes with Peter Gabriel, yeah.

Yeah. Anyway, what does it lie to me? This whole idea of honesty in relationships is interesting. I mean, clerks with the blow jobs. Yeah. I don't know how to phrase it eloquently, but like, there's stuff you should be honest about.

And there's stuff, maybe you don't need to be honest about. So in the law, it is illegal to commit fraud. Fraud is a material misrepresentation of fact. But the law specifically says you're permitted to engage in quote, mere puffery. Nice. Puffery.

So that's the term that was used for it. Puffery, and puffery is when you are inflating something, you're being hyperbolic, but people wouldn't necessarily think you're telling the truth. It's not, if I say to you, this bottle of water was held by Elvis, and that's why you should pay me $50 worth, that's fraud. But if I say this is the water that is, this water is drank by the finest people. Presidents drink this water. Now this is

puffery. And so I advertising marketing is based on puffery. It's not fraud, but it's fraud across the line. So I think there's a difference between honesty and candor, right? So in relationships, being honest is good. Being totally candid is probably not a great idea. Like it's indelicate to be totally candid about some things. For a woman you're're an romantic relationship with says to you, do I look good in this dress? And they don't. Or do I look fat in this? That's a better one. Any heterosexual man who's ever been in a relationship

has had that question asked of him. Do I look fat in this? Does this make my butt look big? Or does it, whatever, does this? Do I look fat in this? If you go, yes, that's in delicate. It's honest, but it's in delicate and it's almost mean, right? But there is, and if you say no, but it's true, she doesn't look good in that.

Like the concern she sees is a legitimate concern. Do you lie and go, no, no, you look great in that. That's great. That's not a good thing either. So what do you say? You know That blue dress you have really Compliments your body like in a way that one doesn't you know that the cut of that dress is such that it doesn't flatter you I see what you're saying now now it's the dress. It's not you babe

You know, but I'm telling you the truth, like I'm addressing your concern. Like this is what, this is the distinction. Like don't material misrepresent the facts. Like don't steer people down roads that, you know that that's not how it's gonna go, right? But, you know, so it's like if the woman says, I love you, and you don't love her,

don't say I love you back. You know, you do the like like oh, you know, I have very strong feelings for you as well Or you know like there has to be some middle ground. You don't just tend to even hear them Yeah, I mean the I guess all of it requires skill just like you described I think just being honest in quotes is not enough Well, it's not a specific enough instruction. I mean, that's the problem. Is you, when you write a relationship book, which I never intended to do, people come to you and say, you know, what are the things I should do to help my relationship or what

is the cause of divorce? And you go, well, disconnection. But like, what do you mean by that? Or like, how do I improve my relationship? Pay more attention. Make small gestures. Okay, what does that even mean? Like, what do you mean?

Like, acts of love. You should show your partner that you love them more often. What do you mean? Like, what do I say? What I do? We should have more sex. Like, what do you add? What are you saying?

Like, people want measurable specific things. So that's why I tried in my book to be like, very specific about like things you can do, things you shouldn't do. And their practical suggestions, like leaving a note. I talk a lot about leaving a note. Like if you're dating someone or you're living with them or you're in a serious relationship, send a text, leave a note, just every day, just some little thing that just tells

them how much you like them. Like this is a low cost, high value move, doesn't take much, and it's a practical thing. But when we speak in these sort of like broader axioms, these broader concepts, that people just don't have any idea how to practically apply. I can't wait to listen to the audiobook where you talk about managing marital finances is like anal sex, which your mastery of the metaphor touches one's heart and soul. Your Shakespeare of the 21st century, really? I don't know that Shakespeare would have brought anal up in that context, but I appreciate

it. Yeah. My thesis there or my point there was, you know, proceed carefully and have discussion in advance. Yes. And don't just spring it on someone. Sure. And realize that this, if this goes wrong, it will go catastrophically wrong.

So good communication is important. And you know, yeah, I don't think it's something you should just dive into unless you're prepared for that to have potentially a very negative impact. And, you know, finances is one of the sources of a huge amount of stress and relationships, which is... tremendous. Because it's about value, I think. I mean, it's aside from having painful conversations about what you tried to do and were able to

do or what your impulse control was in terms of what you spent money on. Like, there's the conversation and then there's what's underneath the conversation. There's gender stuff about men feeling they need to be a provider. There's gender stuff of men or women thinking to be a provider, there's gender stuff of men or women thinking material goods will fill the void and buying things and then creating stress on their partner. There's the very human desire to make things seem effortless so your spouse doesn't feel any stress.

When in fact it's causing tremendous financial stress and then when the damn breaks it breaks hard. So yeah, there's a lot. Finance is tricky stuff, and you could probably be wonderful, romantic, and sexual partners, and have very different styles of how you handle your finances. And how you handle your finances is informed by,

not only your individual psychology, but also how you were raised and, you know, how your family taught you about finance and how you should conduct your finances. And there's interesting power dynamics and play tremendously. Yeah. And those are, those are very tricky because the standard of living of a couple becomes important in a divorce, but sometimes the toxic standard of living that created toxic levels of stress is one of the causes of the divorce. And so, you're asking the court to maintain a financial obligation on you that is the reason why the marriage fell apart and that feels like a particularly insulting form of Indigity Well, you're fascinating human being on many levels, but you're also exceptionally productive and you've talked to me about waking up early for you

We've met today at 11 a.m. and for you that's what lead afternoon I suppose. Yeah, we had to negotiate. It comes to an agreement because I went to bed at 4 a.m. And I was up it. I get up at 4 every day. You will come for it here. Well, I woke it's 3 o'clock local time. So I woke up at 3 local time. Nice. Yeah, I wake up at 4 naturally. Then my body just wakes up. Oh, I wake up. And wakes up full on this speed. Like my most productive writing and speaking is from 4 a.m. until noon or one. So can you take me through a productive,

like a perfectly productive day? I wake up at 4 a.m. very naturally. I wish I didn't, but I do check my phone first thing because I wanna see if any emergencies came in from a client overnight. So work emergencies? Yeah, work related emergencies. And it is a divorce lawyer.

Our definition of emergency can be very serious. It's people absconding with a child. It's a police being involved in a domestic violence. And so they can be like time sensitive things. And when someone is hiring a divorce lawyer, I think they're hiring, they want someone responsive. My clients have my cell phone number. And I go to bed early because I get up early and so I go to sleep by 8 p.m. latest.

I don't think I've seen 9 p.m. even on New Year's Eve. So I wake up at 4. I check my phone, check my email usually even if there's something that's you know time sensitive, it's usually not so time sensitive that it needs to be responded to it for you because most other normal people are asleep. I have espresso, black espresso which I enjoy very much and then I work out and that's some days going to be weights, a lot of days it's just going to be cardio.

I've changed my habits now that I'm in my early 50s. It used to be much more intensive weight training and dead lifts and stuff like that. And then I herniated my L5S1. So 485 was my max deadlift. And now I don't hardly do dead lifts. Well, you can still live the past glory. I do.

I've some pictures of videos. I have videos. I have videos. I have videos of me putting it in 3D, 5 for 3, which is... But you can, in stories when you talk about it, you can exaggerate how much you've actually lifted. That's true, but then you can't pack it up. See, I'm very evidence-based. So if I don't have a photo or video of it,

I mean, it's just puffing. Me or puffery at that point. But I work out, and then I try to work out for like a good hour. And I do that partly because of stress. I think when I don't work out, it's difficult. I had a group of guys that I would do Jiu-Jitsu with at 5am. They were mostly law enforcement.

They were cops who would either be starting a shift or coming off of a night shift. And we would train together just do like an open mat. It was at 5am till 6am and that was heaven. I love love training jiu jitsu first thing in the morning if I can. And then I always do either a sauna or a steam for 20 minutes, half an hour. And then I do a cold plunge or if I don't have access to a cold plunge, a cold shower. And then I have breakfast. And it's usually a very uncontroversial simple breakfast. I like to eat, you know, like slow carb, Tim Ferris-type style. And then I get right to work. I try to do my drafting early in the day, pre-nupp's motions, things like that, from, you know,

let's say six or seven until nine, nine, thirty, which is when court begins. So drafting is like writing up different documents. Writing pre-naps, writing separation agreements, writing settlement proposals, writing motions for the court pre-trial memos, which is like research that I want to present to a judge that supports my arguments. I do drafting. I review documents that the attorneys who work for me have drafted and refine them. And then court is usually from 9 o'clock until noon. And if we're on trial, then it's a whole different pace because trials, the lunch break isn't really a lunch break.

You're preparing the afternoon's witnesses and you're trying to do damage control on what happened in the morning. But if it's just court conferences, like most cases, there's conferences. Conferences, as you go in, you make or a argument but you don't have witnesses on the stand You're not taking testimony. It's like everybody's just shouting allegations back and forth and making temporary arguments pre trial It's kind of the for play of the trial, right? That exhausting by the way It's exhausting when you're done with it like while you're doing it. It's exhilarating

I always say that I never sleep as poorly as the night before a trial and I never sleep as well as the night I've finished a trial because when I am on trial, I am speaking, listening, watching the judge closely to see what they're reacting to and when they're paying attention or not paying attention. Watching opposing counsel and the opposing party, like when is the opposing party writing a little note to their lawyer to show it to them? What is the opposing counsel objecting to? My client is trying to pass me notes half the time while I'm speaking and making my arguments. I'm trying to like adjust what I'm doing strategically based on the objections that the judge is ruling on. what I'm doing strategically based on the objections that the judge is ruling on.

So I'm so hyper-stimulated on trial that when you finish, you can't even talk. You've gone. Your brain is jello. The conference is as hard because at least with a trial, there's a singularity of focus. Like with a trial, it's just one case and they have all my attention. The problem is, is then on the lunch break, all the other cases that I've been ignoring for the last several hours while I was on trial, they all have stuff going on. So it's like, where's that settlement proposal on this? Hey, she just did this, we need to file a motion. So now it's like, okay, I have an hour to eat

and to answer all of this in some preliminary way to delegate some responsibilities. And then I gotta go back in and put 100% on my focus on this other case again. So you find yourself in a place, why I'm very disciplined, as you find yourself in a place where I live my whole life in six minute increments, tense of an hour, because we bill in tense of an hour. So everything I do, it's like 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and I'm logging time throughout the day. And you find yourself at the end of the day, my son is a lawyer, my older son.

He's a district attorney. And I'm very proud of him. He gets to put bad guys in jail, and he's very smart. He's doing a great job. He just bit about a year ago. And when he graduated from law school, we were very close and we were talking and he said, we were just talking about like with the career and the law

that he was about to embark on. And I said to him, you know the feeling at the end of the day, when like all your homework or all your work is done, and you just go, okay, it's all done now and I'm gonna go home. You'll never have that feeling ever again. Ever. You're just gonna every day go, all right, it's enough. It's enough. I gotta, I gotta, I gotta get out of here. Like because you could with every one of these cases, you could stay up 24 hours focusing just on it. So you have to have the discipline to go, yeah, no, that's it.

Like I'm done for now, I've done what I could do today, and now I'm going to sit and read for a half an hour. I'm gonna watch this show for a half an hour. I'm gonna have this meal because it's never done, you know. So that's challenging. That's a hard, that's a hard part of this job, but I think my discipline helps with that. And then I, like I said, I finish my day around 5'36 o'clock, and I have something to eat, and I try to wind down a little, and I'm usually in bed by 730 and sleep by 8. Yeah, you mentioned Jiu Jitsu.

What, your brawm belt, what role has Jiu Jitsu played in your life? I, I loved Jiu Jitsu. I train martial arts from the time I was a little kid, I think I was 7 or 8. I took a poke now and go to karate and I did judo. And it was always part of my life. And then I got to college and grad school and I didn't have time for it and I didn'to and it was always part of my life and then I got to college in grad school and I didn't have time for it and I didn't do it so much and then I got divorced. That was quite young still when I got divorced and I had two young kids and I thought well I can

like grow a goatee and buy a convertible and do like the thing you're supposed to do and you're dude with kids in middle close to middle age or I can I can try to do when you're dude with kids in middle, close to middle age. Or I can, I can try to do something more productive. And so I said, well, maybe I'll go back to martial arts. So I took up Moitai kickboxing. And they had a Jujitsu class, that at the same school after the Moitai class. And I had been around the orbit of Jujitsu, having been my kids took took karate and there was Jiu-Jitsu there, it was a Gracie Academy. And I stayed for a Jiu-Jitsu class and I had a 120-pound girl rag doll me, like, because I just knew nothing about grappling.

And I remember just going, well, I got to learn what this is. And that was it. I just dove into it. My first professor was Lou Vintelaro in New Jersey's, a hoiler grassy black belt. Great teacher. Taught me amazing fundamentals. Took me all the way up to Purple Belt. And then right after I got my Purple Belt, I moved to the city.

I moved to Manhattan. I actually chose my apartment based on proximity to Marcella Garcia. And I moved to West Chelsea because it was a short walk to Marcello Garcia. And I moved to West Chelsea because it was a short walk to Marcello's Academy. My core Jiu-Jitsu was up to Purple Belt. It was Lou Vintelaro and then it's been Marcello. And Marcello, Paul Schreiner, who's really phenomenal at his Academy,

and all of the people at his Academy, I mean, are all phenomenal. I mean, Bernardo Faheo was there for a period of time that I was there and before he went to Boston. Marcos Tenoco was like his last-so guard stuff. He was at Marsello's for a long time and what a teacher. I mean, my lack of skill at Jiu-Jitsu is not based on a lack of quality instruction.

It's based on an inability to retain the information, you know, for very long. Like, for me, that's one of the most reliable places I can go to humble myself. I love Chew Jitsu. I love the progressive humility that it drives home constantly. I love the impossibility of perfecting it,

although Gordon Ryan's probably come close and Marcelo's probably come close to perfecting it Let me ask you since you mentioned Gordon Ryan So apparently some Close with Gordon and there's I'm sure you know in Austin just this Did you just seen this like to mecca? Yeah, it's the max lead seeing John's honor her this evening. So he's I mean, yeah, this is like, yeah, this is amazing, truly special place. Anyway, apparently long ago, mentioned Jersey, there's, there's a bit of a conflict between you and Gordon. And you mentioned to me offline that you love them and Like just how much respect you have for him as an athlete and so on but can you explain what way that way? There's be yeah, I'm actually glad I have that it's funny that you bring it up and of all the you know

We're talking about all these heavy topics and this is probably the one that I find most the most actually emotional but You know Gordon's a very I think a very young man still. He's like probably in his 20s or early 30s And it's hard to imagine that because he's accomplished so much as an athlete and as a business person But there was a time, you know, not that long ago. I think it was eight or nine years ago where he was just a young guy on his way up He's only I think a couple years older than my oldest son and I

Through a series of circumstances, Jiu Jitsu wasn't you know, it's really exploded in the last 10 years But there were not as many people sponsoring Quote and quotes super fights. They really weren't like Jiu Jitsu super fights being sponsored even Jersey in New York particular and I got involved in sponsoring some Chujitsu Superfights. And I also got involved in sponsoring some Chujitsu athletes. And Gordon was a young part of the Donner, her death squad. I was friends with Eddie Cummings. I'm still friends with Eddie.

I was friends with John. Still friends with John. But I didn't really know Gordon. I actually don't know that I've still ever met, I don't think I've ever met Gordon. I've been in the same room as him. But there was a fight that I had sponsored some other fights with this particular promoter,

and they asked me to sponsor one, and it didn't involve anyone from Marcelos. But it involved Gordon. He was one of the people. And I liked John very much, and I liked everybody in the Donner-Herr Death Squad. I was watching them compete. And I thought, you know, I think John's just brilliant.

I mean, everyone at Marcello's has such respect for John and for everyone. And the stuff they were doing, like when they were the early days of that Donner-Herr Death Squad, like the Eddie Cummings, like his leg locks, like it just blew the whole game up. Like it just was this whole other thing.

It's insane what they did, such innovation. And Gordon at the time was, he was online, and I'm much older than that. I'm in my early 50s, and that's not, I guess, chronologically that much older, but generationally, I think it's quite a bit different. And Gordon was smack talking with a guy who I, about a guy who I was sponsor of, who I knew, and who I knew was a very good athlete, and had been through difficult things in his life. And Gordon just, you know, said some like nasty things about him, you know, some,

this, very, it falls into the category of totally appropriate smack talking looking at it now and looking at what Gordon became, which is he's someone who talks trash. It's part of his brand is to talk trash. And I see now that that's like a Muhammad Ali thing. But the time I just didn't see it as what it was. And although it doesn't excuse it, my mother was dying. I was not at my best. I was having a hard time. And Gordon had spoken ill of this person. And I got upset and I reached out to John and to Tom DeBlas. And I said to them, hey, like, can you tell this guy to knock it off? Like, don't talk

about this person who I sponsor. If I'm sponsoring his fight, I don't even know this Gordon Ryan kid. And I'm sponsoring his fight. And like, he should say thank you. Don't talk bad about a person who I financially sponsor. Like, that's not cool. And I think on Facebook, he like wrote some comments and then I wrote some comments back.

And I was incredibly obnoxious. And very soon after, I felt really gross because I was an adult and I was talking to a young person this way who's on their way up, who's like a little older than one of my kids. And I just said these obnoxious things to him. And I felt really like that's gross, you know? And I never really thought much about it again.

You know, I watched a star rise and I was very, I mean, who could not impress by Gordon Ryan? Like, and everyone at our academy was always very, you know, like thrilled to see him rise. And, you know, I've stayed friends with John and every time Gordon would have a big victory, I would always text John and be like, because, you know, Gordon's victories are John's victories,

too. You know, they have such a great bond. All the people in his orbit, like are all people that I respect and like. And I just would say, hey, listen, congratulations, and please pass on my congratulations to Gordon. And, but I, we don't know each other. I don't have his number. I have no way to contact him, to apologize to him But you know of gourd if Gordon hears this

I am profoundly sorry I And not I don't say that because I'm trying to get in your good graces. I don't know that we'll ever meet each other But but that was an unbelievably wrong Stupid thing to say to a young person Well, thank you for saying that This war was my heart in general. See you to talk to a divorce lawyer. Well, thank you for saying that. This warms my heart in general. See, to talk to a divorce lawyer and it warms your heart. Look at that.

Well, speaking of which, so what, you're romantic actually. What role you've seen love, you've seen love break down completely. What role does love play in the human condition? I mean, I think it's kind of everything, right? Like, it's love is romantic love. Wars are fought for romantic love. Empires fall because of romantic love. Like, it takes down kings. It takes down, you know, like, it's, it's, we're all just struggling for it. We're all just chasing it. Like we're all chasing the dragon, you know, it's like the rush we all are.

So it's huge, you know, it's huge. I mean, sex and love, which I like to believe are some way connected. And love and romance, which again, I like to believe are in some way connected. I think it's huge. I think it's a, look, I've always thought most of what men do, including me, we do to get laid, like on some level. Like you, you wanna be successful.

Why? So you can have money. Why? So you can have nice things so that you can attract attractive members of the opposite sex, you know? Like a lot of things come down to that. And even for like men, you know, like Red Pill, you know, men who are like, yeah, I don't care about women. Well, you talk about them off a lot. Like for someone that's not interested in women, you sure, or like in the orbit of women who you're telling how much you don't care about women, which kind of feels like you're doing that to attract a certain kind of woman, which I get, you know, like more power to you.

But like a person who worships an idol and a person who destroys an idol are both idolaters. You know? So, you're, you're, if all you're talking about is how you don't need women, you're talking about women and all of a lot. So it's just such a splinter in people's mind, you know, relationships, breakups. And like it's such a great equalizer. I mean, you're spending some time in the rarefied air now

of like big celebrity people. And I remember when I started out as a lawyer just doing like the regular like the cop and the teacher with a 401k and they didn't have any assets. I remember thinking like well someday if I represent celebrities or wealthy CEOs, like they'll be different. They'll be like smarter. They'll be like different. It's the same weird petty shit, the same infidelity, the same. The same kind of insecurities, the same kind of jealousy, the same infidelity, the same, the same kind of insecurities,

the same kind of jealousy, the same kind of fights. It all, it's all the same. But it is, it's like, and it's all the same, insecurity, sadness, it's the same like, desire to be validated, like mommy issues, daddy issues, like intimacy issues, you know, and it's all the same stuff. And just because you're really good at other things, like I've represented professional

athletes who are phenomenal world class, you know, doctors, business people, and they suck at relationships no better than like anybody else. Like there's no, you know, there's no connection between the skills that made you a good entrepreneur and the skills that made you a good, you know, spouse or partner. I'm sure there's some overlap, like patience is good and thinking strategically is probably good.

But I'm just humbled by how we're called to it still. So, and even when we lose, and even when our greatest pains were caused by our desire to love and be loved in a romantic sense, we just keep putting the money on the table and playing. Like we won't just quit, we just keep going, you know? And the whole mess of it is worth it. I mean, I guess so. Like, it's calling us. I don whole mess of it is worth it. I mean, I guess, I guess so.

Like, it's calling us. I don't know if it's worth it or not. That's a value judgment, right? But I, we don't stop. I don't know a lot of people that, they played the hand, they lost, and they went, well, no more of that game for me. Like, I'm not a good poker player.

I'm not playing poker anymore. Like, I know people who've done that. I know people that are like, listen, I don't drink. Like, you know, I'm not a good poker player. I'm not playing poker anymore. Like, I know people who've done that. I know people that are like, listen, I don't drink. Like, you know, I'm allergic. I break out and handcuffs in hospital bills. Like, I'm not drinking anymore. But I don't know people that are like, man, that relationship, I screwed that up

or I got screwed on that one. I'm not doing that anymore. You can say that. Everybody says that. I'm through with love, you know, I'm done. They're not, they keep going. They'll, not, they keep going, they'll go up again. Never gonna fall in love again and then a few weeks later, there you go.

I got job security, man. I got job security. People are not gonna stop walking down that aisle. They are not gonna stop having kids with people that they probably should have thought through whether they would have kids with that person or probably should have thought through whether they would have kids with that person or not. But I'm glad they are.

I'm glad they're taking that leap on. Glad they're taking that risk. It's this whole beautiful mess that we're all a part of. It's like taking that risk, taking that leap of all their abilities of what this whole thing is about. And what a danger if we didn't, you know? Like every, you know, you hear about people like Alexander Hamilton, or you hear about, you know, people who like, they were born of circumstances that like, these two people

should never have had a kid. And then they did, and that kid changes the world, you know, and like moves the dial forward. What a like, what a great mistake. Like what a great, it's, you know, and like moves the dial forward. What a great mistake. Like, what a great, you can't ever say it's a mistake. Like, what an amazing thing that happened. And I think that that's one of the things I like about divorce as a practice and as almost looking at it like a spiritual practice. I think you just don't know what is a blessing, right, in the world. Like you just don't know. Like I, my father, I've spoken about this before publicly and he does frequently. My father is an alcoholic. My father's been in recovery now for seven

years, I think. Yeah. But he was bad alcoholic, Vietnam veteran, my whole life. And only got sober when I was in my 40s. And a lot of the personality characteristics I have are consistent with those of adult children in alcoholics. Desire for control and control issues. A lot of those things. And I love my life. Like, I'm having a great time. If I died tomorrow, man, I did more, learned more, earned more, loved more than I ever dreamed. And so I'm so glad my dad was an alcoholic. And if you said to me, how do you raise kids? Like, I wouldn't say like, well, you definitely want to be an alcoholic,

because like your kids getting a lot of really good discipline lessons from that experience. Like, no, like I wouldn't, you know, I wouldn't want that for, but it's born, like all these wonderful things were born of this awful situation. So I think divorce is the same thing. Like I, we make these mistakes, right?

But they're not really, you know, I often have to say to my clients, when they're like, oh, I wish I'd never married this person. I'm like, you love your kids, right? Like your kids are half that person. They would not be the organism they are without that person's DNA. So you can't regret being with that person

if you love your kids. Like if you love your kids, those kids don't exist without that person. And I don't know how we refocus on that. You know, I don't know. Maybe we give anyone going through it to, I've actually had a theory, which I've not set out loud,

but I'll say it to you, because it's just us talking. I think if we could figure out a way to take a divorcing couple that is interested in potentially mediating, and put them in a setting where we could give them both psilocybin, like a good dose, like two and a half, three grams, and have them do individual sessions with controlled setting with a guide, right? And have them do that in their work, and then have them do some kind of a session together

after they've had that experience, that's like psychedelic experience. I actually think you could do transformative divorce work because I have found myself, and certainly the many people that I've talked to who've had psilocybin experiences, and in particular, but any psychedelic experience, many of the empathogens, right?

Or even like MDMA, you know, like MDMA, which is, you know, is an empathogenic. If we brought that space and the divorce and conflict resolution space together, that sort of psychopharmacological intervention on empathy, one's empathy receptors or one's connectivity, I think that could be radically transforming. It would be logistically, an absolute nightmare, it would never get done from a legal standpoint. But man, I think sometimes,

like that, because I think the more that you can bring people to the awareness of connection that comes from many people's psychedelic experiences. I think they could then extrapolate that into their understanding of the conflict and disconnect they're having with their partner. So really lean into the, like use this brink of divorce

as a kind of catalyst for doing a lot of soul searching, a lot of growth together. That was what appealed to me about it. I mean, before I started doing it, is it was this idea that this is a opportunity to, for radical reinvention. Yeah. Like, it was an opportunity for people to say,

okay, now what? Like, I to say, okay, now what? Like I didn't expect that now what? And it was to be part of the architecture of that. Like I didn't look at it like I'm helping demolish the building. It was like I'm tearing down the building so we can build the new one, which I hope is filled with joy and abundance and peace and love and real love, real satisfaction. Like my ex-wife is married for over a decade now to a phenomenal guy who is perfect for her and he's nothing like me, by the way.

Like if you met him and you met both of us, you'd go, well, no one could love both of these guys. Because if you like this flavor, you wouldn't like this flavor. Like I am impatient, fast-talking, like skip to the end, we've got to land this plane, come on. And he's like, he's therapist, he's chill, he's sort of like, patient, and they're perfect together. And I can say that as someone who loves her and loved her,

you know, and knows her or knew her. Like, and I think if we can, you know, if we can radically view honestly, like without jealousy, without, you know, without the sense of like, look at it and just go, yeah, yeah, okay, like this, like this is the love this person needed. Like that doesn't mean my love sucks. Just means it wasn't the right one for this person, you know? Like, there's someone, there's a lid for every pot, you know? Like, she found her lid.

I wanted to find her lid. That's good, you know? And there's billions of pots out there, and we just need to match it with the proper lid. Yeah, not hit each other over the head with them all day long. Yeah, man. This is such a romantic few hours we've got to spend together. And there's you in a candle burning all day. Like, there, oh, this is such a romantic few hours we've got to spend together. And there's even a candle burning.

Oh, it's there. All this lovely. I brother, thanks so much, James. Thank you. Thanks for having me. Thanks for listening to this conversation with James Sexton to support this podcast. Please check out our sponsors in the description. And now let me leave you with some words from Rumi. Your task is not to seek for love, but merely to seek and find all the barriers

within yourself that you have built against it. Thank you for listening, and hope to see you next time. you