Locked On Bengals - Daily Podcast On The Cincinnati Bengals - Looking For Bengals Cap Cut Candidates - Murky Options For 2026
Episode Date: February 10, 2026The Cincinnati Bengals have to add multiple key pieces to their roster this offseason, but should they cut some of their familiar faces to free up extra cap space? Jake Liscow and James Rapien break d...own the case to make cap-saving moves with Orlando Brown Jr, TJ Slaton and other veterans. Moving on from Brown would be wildly risky with minimal upside, there's and there's a good chance Slaton could return. Plus, we react to Willie Anderson and Ken Anderson not being voted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.Everydayer ClubIf you never miss an episode, it’s time to make it official. Join the Locked On Everydayer Club and get ad-free audio, access to our members-only Discord, and more — all built for our most loyal fans.Click here to learn more and join your team’s community: https://lockedonpodcasts.com/everydayerclubJoin the Locked On Bengals Insider Community! https://joinsubtext.com/lockedonbengalsFind and follow Locked On Bengals on your favorite podcast platforms:Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/locked-on-bengals-daily-podcast-on-the-cincinnati-bengals/id1159723162Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7AObc0lh0WmQl5fJVgtajsGoogle Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vbG9ja2Vkb25iZW5nYWxz?sa=X&ved=0CAYQrrcFahcKEwio_sXtj8nuAhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAgStitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/show/locked-on-bengalsSupport Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!TurboTaxFor a limited time, you can have your taxes done by a local TurboTax expert for just $150 — all in, if a TurboTax expert didn’t file for you last year. Just file by February 28. Visit http://TurboTax.com/local to book your appointment today.FanDuelThe Winter Games are on. And there’s no better way to follow them than with a bet on FanDuel. FanDuel - Play your game.IndeedListeners of this show get a $75 Sponsored Job Credit to help give your job the premium placement it deserves at http://Indeed.com/lockedonnfl. FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
If the Cincinnati Bengals need cap space in 2026, they have a number of ways to get that cap space.
And is one of them cutting Orlando Brown Jr? I don't think so, but let's talk about it.
You are locked on Bengals, your daily Cincinnati Bengals podcast, part of the Locked on Podcast Network, your team every day.
What up, Bengals fans. And welcome to another episode of the Lockdown Bengals podcast, part of the Lockdown Podcast Network, your team every day.
number one sports podcast network in the land.
He's James Rapine. I'm Jake Lisco and we've had you covered here on lockdown Bengals for
10 years.
10 years.
Your best one-stop shop for daily Cincinnati Bengals coverage anywhere on the internet.
And what we appreciate all the everydayers out there, all of you who make lockdown Bengals
your first listen.
Today we dive into looking for cap savings if the Bengals are interested in doing.
so in this offseason when yesterday we talked about Ian Rappaport's report that they're going to
really spend was the quote from Rappapur to build this team up around Joe Burrow and the
recent lessons of Super Bowl teams that tell us that well you actually do need a defense it turns
out even if you do score 35 points a game the Bengals have certainly shown us that to be the
case so if the Bengals need a little bit more cap space to make that happen well they can
consider certain cap cuts this year and the biggest cap savings they have for any remotely realistic
cut would be Orlando Brown Jr. And that's why we start the conversation there before discussing
other potential cap cut candidates and why cuts might not be the best way for the Bengals. In fact,
aren't the best way for the Bengals to make cap space this off season. But let's start the conversation
with Orlando Brown, who is set to have a $22 million cap hit this year, cutting him and
save just over $14 million in cap space. On the other hand, James, it would create a gaping
hole at starting left tackle for this team. Yeah. And that's, that's it right there.
That's it right there. You look at left tackle and how hard it's fine, how hard it is to find
a left tackle. And I think about Orlando Brown Jr. And the everydayers know, when Orlando
Brown Jr. agreed to a deal with the Bengals, well, Jake Liscoe was putting on his, what, Wednesday
day night best. I had just sat on the couch. We had finished recording. Orlando Brown Jr.
has agreed to a four-year deal with the Cincinnati Bengals. $64 million over four years.
Oh my goodness. I am looking here and there are so many contracts for left tackles that are
$60 plus million that are a lot without looking at even the per year or anything like that.
My point is that left tackles cost a lot of money and it's not like he's the top three or top four
paid left tackle.
And so when you look at that and you look at where he's at and the money that they would
spend on him this year, I don't really see a scenario where you can convince me they're
better by cutting Orlando Brown Jr.
In fact, and people are going to love this, Jake, so buckle up.
Keep on that Wednesday best, even though it's Tuesday as we record this.
It's a date reference every day.
I would be far more in favor if it's cut or extend to extend him.
If you want to lower that cap hit some and you wanted to extend him and you wanted to kind of cancel that out, then do that.
And I'm not saying do that because I get it.
There are some questions about his effectiveness, how he's going to age all of those things.
Fine.
Then don't.
But I don't really think there's a realistic scenario where you improve your roster, given all the holes.
and there are things on offense that I want to do that doesn't involve left tackle given all the holes where you cut Orlando Brown Jr.
And get significantly better on offense.
And so, yeah, I would keep them.
And it's pretty cut and dry for me.
I hope it's pretty cut and dry for the Bengals.
You're not paying Amarius yet.
So it works there.
It makes sense there.
It lines up well there.
I think Orlando Brown Jr. should be here to stay.
Yeah.
Shout out to Tom Cole, by the way.
And I presume every day.
No, he says an everydayer when he sent the question in.
He actually asked this question last week.
So as we talk about this today, just wanted to quickly shout out
every day or Tom Cole.
Orlando Brad Jr. is the 18th highest paid tackle on an average per year basis in the NFL.
That's behind guys like Cole Van Lannett,
Alarick Jackson, who's really taken a step for the Rams, by the way.
so fair enough.
Dan Moore, who you might remember from us talking about
how Trey Hendrickson should beat him into the turf
when he played for the Pittsburgh Steelers.
A number of tackles that are clearly better
than Orlando Brown above him on this list as well.
Charles Cross just got an extension, for example,
Rashon Slater at the top of this list,
Christian Darrasop there too.
But if they were to cut Orlando Brown,
all right, we got 14.2 million more dollars in cap space.
Now we're going to go spend $14.2 million on a left tackle, and there is not, as far as I know, a left tackle that is better than Orlando Brown available in free agency.
Top of the list for guys who have played left tackle in their career, both Packers, they weren't both playing left tackle this year.
Rashid Walker and Sean Ryan played the most snaps of any free agent to be left tackle in 2025.
Charles Cross was another one that would have been on this list,
but of course he got extended.
Cole Van Lannin also got extended
and is now making more than Orlando Brown, as I mentioned.
So the answer are not there in free agency.
And then what?
You cut Orlando Brown and now you're suddenly drafting a tackle at 10
or you're starting a second round left tackle
and you're doing this thing again where it's like,
all right, we need a left tackle.
better in the second round
better start them right away
and who cares if it's good or not
we need somebody what do you mean
of course we have to drop you know
you put yourself in that position
it's really hard to paint a picture
where cutting Orlando Brown makes sense
it's like there's an air apparent team
either sure no doubt
Alyn Rivers is that your best
like no disrespect to Jalen Rivers
I don't think he's ready for that I don't think he'll ever
necessarily be ready for that
but I just don't see
where you're going if you're like oh yeah we can get money here let's cut Orlando
brown i think you got to think pass some money on this one yeah i i asked about amarius and like
would there be any desire to move him this is a few months ago and they're like right tackle's
just as important like well why you feel good about amarius now and in in him holding up and not
having to give him help and all of those things why why move him and mess with a good thing so i don't
think there's any desire there. And the only reason I mentioned that is because you mentioned the error
apparent. And I think some would be like, oh, well, you could move a Marius and find a right tackle.
I don't think the Bengals view it that way. I also look at it. And you look at his cap hit. And I think
that's what people will say. To see the 21 million. That ain't the most important number.
It's that cash number, that 14 million? Yeah. Yes. If you want some cap space, this is why I
mentioned it. And maybe Orlando wants a little more cash. Maybe you could add a year and go the
Ted Carus route if you wanted to give him a little more cash now and lower that to from 21 to 15 million
or whatever, whatever cap wise if you wanted to because you have unlimited cap space in 27, it feels like.
So if anything, that's what I mean by an extension. I don't mean a three year deal. But if you added one,
could it make sense for Orlando?
It might.
And I think he's happy here.
And I don't think he's in a rush to get to free agency.
And so there is a scenario where I think that that could make some sense.
Ultimately, though, like you said, like finding a replacement, it's so hard, so hard to do.
And there's so many other things they have to do.
And he's competent.
Like he's a great leader.
He played, he was really durable this year.
After getting nicked up the past couple of years, really durable.
this year, I don't really see how cutting Orlando makes any sense.
Yeah, I'm with you.
The extension-
Did you give them a year?
Would you give them a year?
Yeah, that's honest.
I would wait until the summer to think about that.
I'm not doing that proactively to create cap space.
I would wait and see, like, how does free agency go?
How does a draft go?
What's our cap situation look like going forward?
What's our cap situation looking like this year?
Did we draft a left tackle in the second round?
who we want to develop and slide in here next year.
I would wait.
And they've waited with Ted.
They've done those in the summer.
Because I just kind of think that's the blueprint almost if you're going to.
And it's not just cap space either.
It is also cash.
Like the Bengals are going to have a cash budget this year.
Orlando is making more in cash than he made since he signed that deal.
So his deal very, very front-loaded for cash.
It was $33,000, $34 million nearly in 2023 when the Bengals signed him.
in the last couple of years combined, he's made about $16 million.
So very front-loaded for cash.
This is his biggest cash year since 2023.
If they were going to do an extension, that would lead to an increase in cash spend on
Orlando.
That's one of the reasons I would wait.
I want to make sure that they've done everything they need to do and spent as much money
as they need to spend elsewhere before they talk about giving additional money to a player
who's on the team this year anyway.
And unless it gets really ugly and Orlando Brown starts a holdout that we don't
expect them to do.
Yeah, I would certainly wait on that one.
But if you're looking for other bits of additional money for the Bengals,
you can look down the roster, try to find cut candidates.
And by the way, you mentioned moving Amarius Mims and right tackle being important.
Somebody needs to let the Pro Football Hall of Fame know as well.
We'll get to that in segment three as we look for some other ways for the Bengals
great cap space coming up next.
Jake Liscoe laying the hammer down.
Look, you know what you need to do?
You need to find an employee like Jake, right?
You're looking for the right employee, the right fit.
If you've ever hired someone who looked good on paper but wasn't the right fit, well, you know how important fit is.
And that's why with Indeed sponsor jobs, you're going to find the right fit, the right person that's going to come in and do what you're looking for.
And look, if you have struggled in the past or maybe you think you may struggle to get your job post seen indeed.
Sponsored Jobs helps your listing stand out and reach quality candidates faster.
According to Indeed data, sponsored directly on Indeed are 90% more likely to hire
than non-sponsored jobs.
And they boost your post so the people who are the best match for your role can see it
and make a real difference.
Spend more time interviewing candidates that check all the boxes with less stress, less time,
more results using Indeed sponsored jobs.
Listeners of Lockdown Bengals get $75 in sponsored job credit to help give
you at your premium placement that you need for your job at Indeed.com slash
locked on NFL.
That's Indeed.com slash locked on NFL.
Let them know that Lockdown Bengals sent you get your $75 sponsored job credit today.
Again, Indeed.com slash locked on NFL terms and conditions apply.
James, if you're looking for some other cap cut candidates this year, last year it was
cut and dried for a lot of these guys.
Sam Hubbard wasn't going to be on the team this year in 2025.
Alex Caput wasn't going to return.
Jermaine Pratt wasn't going to return,
although that cut took forever to come to fruition.
Zach Moss looked unlikely to return,
although that one also took a while and got weird
and left Zach Moss apparently feeling spurned.
This year, not as many very clear options,
which is why I think people are asking about Orlando Brown.
I don't think Tom, when he asked this question,
thought they should cut Orlando Brown,
and here's the plan to replace him.
And I'm sure people out there have plans to replace.
And maybe they have a favorite free agent left tackle.
And they think strongly that's what the Bengals should do.
And if that's your opinion, we're all entitled to those.
But if you look down the roster, the other one I think that people are probably thinking most about is T.J. Slayton.
And then you can get down to some smaller money ones like the Cody Ford's and Orrin Burks.
And we might see those in the summer.
but when you're only talking about $2.3, $2.9 million,
it's not giving you a ton of wiggle room to make those moves
super proactively.
Like maybe they sign a linebacker and then they make the move on
Orrin Berks and Free Agency.
Maybe they sign a swing tackle.
Then they make the move on Cody Ford and Free Agency.
But there aren't a ton of big cap saving measures here.
What about the TJ Slayton line item, James?
I think that's the real dilemma.
And it's twofold.
to create a hole and you're going to save significant cap he's on on the last year of his deal he's
not as hard to find as orlando and left tackle and he's well paid for what he gives you and you'd
save six million bucks in cap space you'd open that up boom right now and is that worth the two and a
half million cap hit that you would have uh basically instead of paying him nine million you pay him
two and a half. You have that two and a half million dollar cap hit. And is that worth it?
Can you find an upgrade for $6 million? And is, is it worth the tradeoff? Given his familiarity,
given all of those things. You could make the argument, yeah, right? I think a lot of people would say,
yeah, take that money, put it towards DJ Reader. I'm nervous about doing this. And I would be more
comfortable going with the Cody Ford and
Orenberg's combo, which saves
five instead of six million.
But T.J. Slayton, at least you have a proven
nose. And we know what
it was like, the 2024 Bengals without that
proven nose tackle. It's tough. It's tough sledding.
And maybe you do end up getting one of these guys.
And fine. But
is Slaten someone you proactively cut
like Alex Kappa? Like, do you know you're replacing him?
Like, I don't know that.
So I'd be fine waiting it out, seeing what you get.
If you can get an upgrade in your eyes, great.
If not, then at least you have that spot in there.
Last year at this time, I knew Sam Hubbard's replacement was on the roster.
I knew Alex Kappa needed to be cut because they needed to upgrade there.
We knew those things.
This one is a bit different.
By the way, last year, I knew Gino Stone needed to be cut and needed to be replaced.
They clearly didn't.
sorry gino but like that's that's it and maybe they view slayton differently but i think at worst
case they view him like a gino stone where maybe you can upgrade but you don't necessarily need to
proactively get rid of him because you you might not be able to find a replacement that's better
i don't know that there's like a pay cut coming for j slaten either just to continue to try that
comparison like he wasn't the i know what the pff grades say pfs struggles with no sackles in my opinion i
I don't think that he was as good as DJ Reader.
Don't get me wrong, but it's a nose tackle.
A lot of that job is going to be ugly.
Could they get better there?
Yeah, absolutely.
Could they get better at all of their interior spots?
Yeah, absolutely.
But like you said, this is one where the Bengals approached to these things.
And honestly, we were surprised at how early Kappa got cut last year,
I recall correctly, because their typical way of doing business is,
let's make sure we have the replacement.
And that's why, you know, Sam Hubbard ends up retiring.
If they were to cut him early, that would have made sense.
To cut Kappa early seemingly as a courtesy to Kappa more than anything, maybe to let him go catch on with another team.
Because of the way the Jermaine Pratt thing went and the Zach Moss thing went, I assume that's what it was.
I think you would take that delayed approach if you were to make a move with Slayton.
You would probably wait until you see how things shake.
out in free agency because they're putting their plan together right they got plan a plan
b they have some plans charted out and they'll start adjusting the plans as players start
resigning with teams later this month in early march before right before free agency opens we'll
have a flurry of activity a flurry of players resigning all over the nflare and maybe we'll see
somebody resign with the bengals dalton riser i know bengal's fans were waiting but i i don't know
that the t j slayton move needs to happen before
free agency, especially because the Bengals, if they need cap space this year, and we're going
to do an episode on this. We're going to talk about this. They have 50 plus million in cap space
already, by the way, top seven in the, like they, it's not like they don't. And I know you're
not saying that. I'm just reminding everyone. Like, they have a lot of Roop. They have a good about.
And the corollary to that, unfortunately, is that for the Bengals, that number is much more real
than those numbers you see for other teams in their vicinity. They will behave.
as if that is their true amount of cap space and other teams will be like oh well we can change
this around change that around well the bengals maybe can change something around this year is where i was
going which is joe burrow's contract restructure saves them a ton of cap space if they if they need that
option and this is something like i said that we're going to we're going to dig into in more detail it
could save them up to nearly 20 million dollars in cap space if they need that cap space
it doesn't change anything in terms of when joe burrow gets paid there's next to zero risk
because Joe Burrow is a guy that you plan on being around for the entire length of the contract.
That's when you restructure contracts is when that guy's going to be around for the entire length of the contract.
And so it pushes some cap expenses into the future.
Doesn't change Joe's cash cap.
Sorry, doesn't change Joe's cash flow.
Does change his cap hit.
Again, we'll dive into that in greater detail in the future because they could also do this with T.
Higgins.
They could also do this with Jammar Chase if they need caps.
this year. And they've taken steps to put themselves in a position to do so if they need to.
I'm sure they don't want to do this on the bottom line. And again, we're going to do this
in more depth in a future episode because it's a bigger conversation. But if they need cap space
this off season, I think it probably makes more sense to look at these restructure options,
especially with Joe Burrow, than cap cuts because it can make more cap space and then you're
not losing the players while in the process. Yeah. Joe,
would love to do this he would love for them to be like hey we're going to add all these pieces
and we need to have an extra little bit of cap room here joe he would be like yep where do i sign he
doesn't even need to agree the bengals have unilateral right there you go so in the contract well there
you go and he knew that given he and he gave them that because it changed nothing for the player
he still gets paid the same amount exactly well we get these comments this is what annoys me and
Oh, it's Joe willing to take a pay cut?
He doesn't need to.
One, two, he would love to restructure.
He would love for that to happen.
And I didn't know about the unilateral part of it.
He agreed to that.
Why did he agree to that?
Because then the Bengals can do it.
Yeah, correct.
And then they did it for T and Jemar.
I need to double check that it's in Joe's contract.
It's definitely in T and Jemars.
I think it's in Joe's as well, but I can't remember.
He would sign up today.
I speak for Joe.
All right.
I represent him in this thing.
He would love to research.
structure his deal to give the Bengals more cap space to add more talent. I promise you.
And so, yeah, we will dive into that more in a future episode, all the details of it, why they
would do it, how it would work, why they may not do it, why they haven't done it in the past,
all of those things, because there's certainly a lot there. But you mentioned it. You mentioned it.
The snubbing, the ridiculousness that is the Pro Football Hall of Fame, that and a few other
NFL honors takeaways coming up next. Today's show is brought to you by.
Fandle. America's number one sports book is perfect for the winter games. The winter games are
officially here. And if you're anything like us, you're locking in for all of the events. It's been on
my TV nonstop outside of, you know, Super Bowl 60, which obviously you used Fandall to bet on
Super Bowl 60. Well, Vandall is also perfect for the winter games from metal counts to individual
events. Every angle you can think of about the sports you care about the most. Fandle makes
the winter games that much more fun. The drama of curling matches
the speed skating, hockey, everything that you're watching
and all these different events that you're not used to.
Why did you watch them every four years?
Well, guess what?
They're even more fun with Fandall.
Fando keeps the entire Olympic experience,
engaging from start to finish.
The winter games are on,
and there's no better way to follow them than with Fandall.
Again, you've got to get to Fandall today.
Fandle, play your game.
I was just checking there to confirm the Joe Burrow restructure clause.
I'm pretty sure it's there.
99% sure.
Even if it's not, I, Bengals, he'll agree.
He would agree to it.
Yeah.
Yes.
I promise.
Agreed.
A non-material distinction.
A distinction without a difference.
The pro football Hall of Fame has gotten to the point, James, where I'm almost reaching apathy with this.
Like, it's not there because I know how much it means to the guys that are affected by it, Ken Anderson, Willie Anderson.
But the process, I mean, the.
drama this year around the Patriots owner and former head coach, Bill Belichick obviously should be in the Hall of Fame.
It's like a microcosm of what you've been experiencing where like this process is just what, why are you stepping on your own toes so often to make the right decisions here?
And we've had two kickers go into the Hall of Fame since the last time a right tackle went into the Hall of Fame.
Was it 40 years ago?
Did I see that right?
30, 40 years?
It's been so long since a right tackle has gone into the Hall of Fame.
It's just crazy to me that people discount right tackle the way they do in this day and age,
knowing what we know now.
And that we continue to go through this song and dance with Ken Anderson and the process that he's now dealing with that the NFL is looking at fixing.
And that's why it's kind of reaching that point of apathy to me.
It's just like, man, you guys are.
such a joke.
It's hard to care, but honestly, because of what it means of the players, you have to continue
to care.
Yeah, you have to care.
And I think Ken Anderson has gotten to the point where he's like, well, if I get in
great, if not had a great career, have a great fan, like, he's gotten to that stage of
his life.
Obviously, he would love to be in.
I think Willie is still like, I'm in it.
I'm in the mix.
I'm right there.
I'm right and he was in the top seven and was just short of that 80% and you just have to wonder when and you hope it's next year.
I hope both of them get in next year.
You think it's when not if though?
It feels like it's getting really close to that now.
Like the fact that we know that he was in the top seven, obviously five got in.
So he was at least seventh.
What did he get?
76% of the vote.
You know, like it's, you're probably talking about one.
or two voters flipping or voting for him. And in the longer you're on there, the better, like,
he's going to be a finalist next year. I think so. I think he gets in next year. I don't want to
jinx it, but I just think it's getting so close now that he will. But if he doesn't, then it's a
travesty. And it's a travesty because Willie Anderson was an awesome player when the Bengals were
so irrelevant. And he was awesome as in league-wide. Awesome.
Every player knew about him.
Writers were very aware.
And because the Bengals weren't as good, I think that's part of it.
The right tackle spot of that era, that's part of it.
And then the other element here is it's not like Willie is on a national stage everywhere.
Like he's in the trenches.
My man's coaching linemen.
And he'll do radio stuff and talk on pot.
Like he'll do that.
But he's been on with us, right?
Or with you and Joe?
Willie, yeah, we have Billy on.
Yeah, yeah, he's been on this spot.
Yeah, yeah, it's been forever.
But, like, I've talked to the-
He started doing his own thing, yeah.
But the point is, is like,
you don't see him like Witt, like, now he's got to go against
Witt next year.
Willie should go in before Witt.
The list is tough next year.
That's the problem is you keep getting all these guys
who probably should be first ballot hall of famers,
like Kronkowski, Richard Sherman, Adrian Peterson next year.
and I mean,
Ben Rotheltsberger probably will go into the Hall of Fame
very early in his candidacy as well.
There's just new guys every year to get added
and then you get the recency bias stuff
that goes on with them too.
That's what makes it tough every year,
I think, because you keep getting these guys
that rightly go in
and it's easy to make the case that they should when they do,
but so should Willie.
And the consideration
just is,
what was too late to arrive for him in the first place,
which is why we're still dealing with this years later.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's bad when there's this kind of backlog.
I wonder how much that Ring of Honor stuff
had Willie been in the Bengals Ring of Honor in 2012 or 13, right?
If that had mattered at all.
Also, oddly enough, and I forgot this,
probably since I wrote my book, Enter the Jungle,
but they cut Willie on August 30th.
Like Willie was cut right before camp end,
like as one of the final cut.
That's great,
like to think about that.
And then he played for the Ravens in 2008,
which lucky him.
The Bengals sucked in 2008.
So he played one last season,
went to the playoffs,
all those things.
But like,
just wild to think of like a legend like that,
making it to final cuts and then getting cut,
not trade it,
not anything,
just cuts.
Like,
that's just insane to me, insane in my head to think of what that. How many times does that happen?
Like it's not many. No. There's also, of course, a very easy argument to make that the NFL just
doesn't respect the organization in Cincinnati, doesn't respect the players that have played in
Cincinnati as much as they should. There are all sorts of examples where it's easy to make this
argument. Of course, you don't know what exactly the arguments are in their head when they're voting.
and how they're thinking about things,
if it's a subconscious bias,
if it's a conscious bias.
But, I mean,
it extends to Jackson Smith and Jigma winning
offensive player of the year
after a year that was probably a little bit worse
than Jamar's 20, 24.
And I know that there's different candidates year to year.
There's different competition year to year,
all these things.
But Jamar can get a single first place vote last year.
I mean, it was a bit jarring to me at the time,
a triple crown winner, a rare accomplishment in the NFL,
putting up the season he did,
which was what, plus seven touchdowns compared to JSN this year
and like minus a little bit in receptions and yards,
like a little bit less than a percent probably
or a couple percent maybe.
Yeah.
Couldn't get a single vote.
Man, I know Seekwon exists a bunch.
I know all that, but man.
Yeah, I, he should have gotten votes for,
sure. I mean, he's, he was dominant. He had 17 touchdowns as a receiver. Like that, that's really
hard to do now and to score that many touchdowns with the attention that he commands. And that's
part of it for sure. It's, uh, it's tough. And look, Sequin, I'm not saying he didn't deserve it.
There should, it should have been much closer. Like all the outrage about MVP,
Jamar and Sequin for OPO. Y should have been much closer than Drake, maybe.
And Matt Stafford.
Anyways.
Not enough MVP voters watched him throw that same interception.
He threw in the Super Bowl to do.
Drake may be.
Like, come on.
Anyways, all right.
My only exposures of Drake May this year, to be fair, are the Bengals and the playoffs.
And I wasn't, he obviously made some plays against the Bengals.
But, like, the way he started that game was like, this, this is your MVP candidate?
Really?
He was really good this year and, like, really good.
but it's like he got an a in algebra in Matthew Stafford's acing AP Calc or something you know
like it's just on a whole other like everything they asked Stafford to do in Los Angeles it's just
different that's all it's just like how Joe's asked to do much differently than what would Drake Mays
asked that like it's very similar in that way I would say and one of the Stafford does a ton for
that one of the most infuriating arguments I see about evaluating quarterbacks is people just talk
about the receivers.
Like, yeah, but look at who they're throwing to.
Like, come on, man.
More matters to your quarterback success than only the receivers he's throwing to.
People have been using it to discount Joe Burrow for years.
And it just drives me crazy.
That kind of thinking drives me crazy.
Also, Joe couldn't get a single MVP vote last year.
That's the other thing.
Like, the way MVP voting went this year,
you're throwing out votes for Allen, you're throwing out a vote for Herbert.
Couldn't get a single vote for Joe last year.
I just, yeah, I get it.
Yeah, the Herbert ones.
Joe, and that's our guy who did it, but Joe,
2004 Joe Burrow is better and more valuable than
2025 Justin Herbert. I don't think that's a take. Maybe it is, I guess.
It's not a take. It shouldn't be a thing. It should just be kind of bad. These voters just care
so much about team records. That's probably why Jamar didn't get the vote. You know,
if Bengals were 14 and 3 last year, Jamar's probably the offensive player of the year.
Joe's probably the MVP, right? Bengals probably get those two categories. But because,
the defense is so bad.
Well, offense, you don't get those honors anymore.
That's why you got to fix the defense, James.
Fix the defense.
All right.
That's going to do it for this episode of the Lockdown Bengals podcast.
Hopefully these NFL honors get sorted out in the near future.
Until next time, thanks for listening.
Ho-day and have a good one.
