Locked On Colts - Daily Podcast On The Indianapolis Colts - Indianapolis Colts' Jonathan Taylor Sounds Off On Heated Running Back Debate
Episode Date: July 19, 2023Indianapolis Colts running back Jonathan Taylor took a strong stance on the treatment of NFL running backs this week after Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs, and Tony Pollard failed to lock in new contracts.... What are both sides of the debate arguing, and why is Taylor a special case for the Colts?Find and follow Locked On Colts on your favorite podcast platforms:🎧 https://link.chtbl.com/LOColts?sid=YouTube📺YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLdpxJspi1hMh5HL7ExpWOQLocked On NFL League-Wide: Every Team, Fantasy, Draft & More🎧 https://linktr.ee/LockedOnNFLFollow Jake and Zach's written work on HorseshoeHuddle.com, and give them a follow on Twitter @JakeArthurNFL, @ZachHicks2, @LockedOnColts, and @ColtsOnFN!Support Us By Supporting Our Sponsors!eBay MotorsFor parts that fit, head to eBay Motors and look for the green check. Stay in the game with eBay Guaranteed Fit. eBay Motors dot com. Let’s ride. eBay Guaranteed Fit only available to US customers. Eligible items only. Exclusions apply.LinkedInLinkedIn Jobs helps you find the qualified candidates you want to talk to, faster. Post your job for free at LinkedIn.com/LOCKEDONNFL. Terms and conditions apply.FanDuelMake Every Moment More. Don’t miss the chance to get your No Sweat First Bet up to TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS in Bonus Bets when you go FanDuel.com/LOCKEDON.FANDUEL DISCLAIMER: 21+ in select states. First online real money wager only. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable free bets that expires in 14 days. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit FanDuel.com/RG (CO, IA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, IL, VA, WV), 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (WY, KS) or visit ksgamblinghelp.com (KS), 1-877-770-STOP (LA), 1-877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
We're a week out from training camp and one of the Colts biggest stars is a little disgruntled
with the treatment of his position around the league.
Let's get to it.
You are locked on Colts, your daily Indianapolis Colts podcast, part of the Locked On Podcast
Network, your team every day. All right, everybody.
Thanks for tuning in and making us your first listen of the day.
This is your daily podcast covering your Indianapolis Colts,
part of the Locked On Podcast Network, your team every day.
I'm Jake Arthur.
He is Zach Hicks.
And you know the two of us from HorseshoeHuddle.com.
I'm your regular credentialed media member from the site,
bringing you the inside scoopage from the facility,
from training camp coming up and all that.
And Zach is the meanest, greenest film guy in the business.
How was that one? That one wasn't bad. That wasn't too bad. I mean, I'll take mean over grimy.
Yeah. I'm telling you, search up grimy in any of the young folks, maybe Urban Dictionary,
but I don't, I'm going to preface that with, I don't know what that's going to bring.
I'm not going back to Urban Dictionary. I haven't been to Urban Dictionary since middle school when
I thought it was funny just to look up my name and see
some of the most grotesque things ever associated with my name. So I think we're good with Urban
Dictionary, Jake. Yeah. Yeah. Anyways, on today's show, we're going to kind of bring up something
that's going to be more of something all encompassing of something we've discussed in
certain segments recently, the last month or so.
Jonathan Taylor and the running back market across the league, his stance with the team,
his stance with his contract situation, everything. We're going to wrap that up into one episode. And we're a week away from training camp now. So there's probably not going to be any
development until then when he either shows up or he doesn't as far as i know
the expectation is that he'll be there uh but we'll see but basically today we're going to go
over you know the latest on the running back market across the league uh yesterday was the
deadline or monday was the deadline for uh franchise tag uh signings and you know you've
got jonathan taylor and every other big running back across the league, their reaction to all of it.
And then why exactly Jonathan Taylor's situation with the Colts isn't necessarily built like every other team's.
And the Colts really ought to pay attention to that.
So we'll go ahead and dive in.
There were three franchise tag running backs this offseason, and none of them reached a long-term contract as of the deadline
this week. That's Josh Jacobs from the Raiders, who led the whole league in rushing. You've got
Tony Pollard, and then who is the third one? That escapes me. Saquon Barkley. Okay. So yeah,
Saquon plays out of his mind, has the best season of his career, at least since his rookie year.
He's dealt with some injuries. It was kind of a prove-it year for him, and he pretty much carried the Giants to the playoffs.
These guys are just really premier players at their position. They were
obviously franchise tagged for a reason, but no deal was done. And Jonathan Taylor came out after
the deadline and simply tweeted, wow. He's a guy who has always kind of kept to himself and kind of towed the company line when it comes to making statements about things.
But for the first time, we're really hearing him voice his opinion on what running backs feel is mistreatment of the position across the league.
And then, you know, there was,
there was a tweet that came out from Matt ESPN's Matt Miller as well later, basically saying, you know, draft a running back,
play them through their contract. If they're good,
franchise tag them once for a year and then draft their replacement,
which is basically use them, abuse them and lose them is in a nutshell.
And then of course that rubbed every running back the wrong way,
as it probably should have.
Jonathan Taylor among them.
And he basically said, you know, you pour your heart out for your team.
And then when it comes time to reward you, it doesn't matter
because you're a running back.
Paraphrasing right there.
So, Zach, what do you make of this whole thing?
Because, I mean, growing up, running back was pretty much
one of the premier positions everyone wanted to at least watch you know you think of all these major players
throughout the history of the game and and now they're they're really just being kind of cast
away well growing up for you jake i grew up in the peyton manning and tom brady eras man so like
daniel tomlinson i guess i guess okay i I guess. But no, to bring it back to this conversation, you know, like I'm going to, there's two ways
to approach this.
And then this first segment, I'm going to approach it from the team perspective.
So everything I'm going to say here is not exactly what I view it as, but this is kind
of how teams are viewing it is these are very, very depreciating assets.
You know, this is one of the few positions in the entire league where they're really
only prominent during their rookie contract and maybe like a year or two afterwards.
And then they start to hit that peak.
And once they hit that, it's just like free fall.
It's a free fall into injuries, a free fall into lack of production and lack of consistency.
And then you see a lot of running backs become reserve players or flat out out of the league by the time they hit 30 years old.
It's really the only position where we see something like this happen. You know, we talked
about Grover Stewart a couple of weeks ago that with nose tackles, they hit their peak around 30
years old. And that's where they start playing their best football. But with running backs,
you know, that's where they're out of the league. And I think when it comes to, you know, asset consolidation in the NFL, NFL teams have seen the contracts in the past pretty much all not work out.
You know, Zeke Elliott is obviously one of the biggest examples of that.
This recent contract with the Dallas Cowboys.
Todd Gurley was basically run out of the league by the time his big contract started,
you know, with all of his knee injuries. There was obviously a Le'Veon Bell holdout,
which led to nothing great for him. He bounced around the league after that.
And then there's a lot of other big contracts. And there's Dalvin Cook just didn't finish his,
and he's still a free agent right now. And this is a player as of, you know, two, three years ago, we're talking about one of the best overall playmakers in all of football. So, you know, the running back conversation really is around that position, what it adds to the
offense and when, what value it adds in a very passing heavy league. But also it's hard to extend
these players and give them that career security when it's almost always going to come back to
bite you. You know, as if you're looking at it purely from an asset management perspective,
and as a team that just doesn't want to have bad contracts on the books that limit them with their
spending power in the future, running backs are almost always going to be bad contracts on the
books because you can get pretty good production from someone on the rookie deal because that's
when running backs are in their peak. You're basically drafting this position at its peak. So when it comes to paying them, you're paying them after they're
on the decline or after they're going over the edge. And I'm not saying this is true for all
running backs. Christian McCaffrey is getting paid a ton of money and he was really, really
productive last year for the 49ers and the Panthers. Derrick Henry is obviously super human
in how he fights through injuries and
and is still one of the best running backs in football. So this isn't, you know, a thing that
applies to every single running back. Nick Chubb is another one getting paid $12 million a year
and easily the best running back in the league for my money. Like it doesn't apply to all running
backs. But at the end of the day, there's so many bad examples of contracts just not aging well and
teams having to sacrifice assets because of this
running back contract that teams are wary and teams are scared.
And,
and you know,
it's not even a thing where you can call collusion on it because collusion
is like a widespread effort to drive prices down just because you don't want
to pay the premium prices.
But with running back,
it's more of a widespread effort and widespread awareness to be like, we don't want to pay that price. You know, like we don't want to pay that
price. And I think that plays into the whole thing where people are like, oh yeah, just trade Jonathan
Taylor. It's like, if nobody's going to pay these running backs, who's going to take them?
Like you can't, you can't just trade them to someone who, where everyone agrees with your
philosophy. You know, you have to find some sucker in your philosophy to take on that contract but right now with the with the NFL there's really
not many of them the biggest free agent signing was Miles Sanders and his contract if you take
out like if you know if you only look at the guaranteed money is like what five million a
year six million a year uh the franchise tags obviously are just the one year commitments only
around 10 million dollars a year uh those contracts are one of the few ones that hasn't risen since 2018
where almost every other contract's franchise tag has gone up.
So, you know, people around the NFL with the rise of analytics
and the rise of what's important and what's valuable,
along with seeing past contracts falling off,
teams are scared of that asset that is a running back.
And it's crazy.
Like you said, we grew up with LaDainian Tomlinson,
grew up with Adrian Peterson.
If you go back further than that, in the nineties,
Barry Sanders and Emmett Smith were the faces of the league.
Those are the faces of the league for an entire decade.
And obviously you can go before that. So it really is a,
I don't want to say it's a dying position,
but it's a position that's in peril right now.
And we don't really have a solution for it.
It's just all we can really do is look at it from NFL teams perspectives and say, look, they're scared of committing big money
to an asset that's probably not going to help them long term when they can draft someone who's
already in their peak out of college. So it's tough. I mean, from a business standpoint,
I get what NFL teams are doing, even though what we're going to get to here in the second segment, from the human perspective, it really sucks. It really sucks.
It's just the gross part of, and I don't even want to say gross part. It's the unfortunate part
of the NFL and unfortunate part of just business in general. Yeah, it really is. And again,
we'll get into it soon because I mean, these are people you're drafting and developing,
you know, at the end of the day. So we'll'll we'll touch on that here in a moment but first before we talk about the
human aspect let's talk about our friends over at FanDuel take your first swing at betting on
the MLB on FanDuel and get 10 times your first bet amount in bonus bets up to $200 that's right
just bet 20 bucks and you'll land $200 in bonus bets. Win or lose. That's 200 that you can spend betting everything from the money line to the over under who you think is going to get struck out.
Who you think is going to be out there hitting dingers, whatever.
It's all on an app that's safe, secure, and super easy to use.
Plus, when you win, you can get paid instantly.
There's no red tape.
You just get the money back that you actually earned and invested in.
It's really that simple.
So sign up today and visit FanDuel.com slash locked on to get up to $200 in bonus bets.
That's FanDuel.com slash locked on.
FanDuel, official partner of Major League Baseball.
And my beautiful everyday buddies, Jake Arthur is about to enter his prime part of the offseason.
We're about to enter the flu game Jake Arthur season
when it comes to his coverage
because he's going to be boots on the ground at Colts training camp.
And we're going to have all the inside information here on Locked on Colts.
So all you wonderful everydayers, set your alarms bright and early every day
going back to five episodes a week
because we're going to have to give Jake all the airtime that he needs.
It's hot outside, so I will look Jake all the airtime that he needs.
It's hot outside. So I will look like I have the flu at all times.
It gets hot out there at Grand Park, my man. Like it's, it's no joke.
All right, guys. So we're going to jump into the human side of this thing. Cause you know,
I basically at the very end of that first segment was like, yeah, these running backs are assets.
Yeah. Yada, yada. From a business perspective, you can't pay them. But at the end of that first segment was like, yeah, these running backs are assets. Yeah. Yada, yada.
From a business perspective, you can't pay them. But at the end of the day, we're not talking about numbers on the spreadsheet. We're not talking about just data points in a computer or anything
like that. We're talking about human beings. And I think the toughest aspect of this entire
conversation, which kind of leans into what Derrick Henry and what Christian McCaffrey and Austin Eckler and Jonathan Taylor
and all those running backs were talking about on social media the other day, especially with Jonathan Taylor's tweet.
His was kind of exactly what I'm about to go into here is, you know, when you are running an organization or running a business
and you're standing in front of all your employees or all your 53 players that are on the roster,
you know, you want each of them to believe you go out there, you perform your best, you help us win, you do some great things on the football field, and you will be rewarded with pay.
You will be rewarded either from us or from someone else.
You will get rewarded for what you're doing.
If you are an extremely valuable, extremely qualified player who is going out there and
performing at a high level, you will be getting paid. And with these running backs, what they're
kind of seeing is it doesn't matter if you're a multiple time first team all pro. It doesn't
matter if you're leading the NFL in rushing yards. It doesn't matter if you are doing whatever.
Whatever you are, if you're a running back, you're not really getting that
second contract anymore, or you're getting driven down, or you're just getting stuck on that
franchise tag without the long-term security. So it's basically like you're kind of telling
all these people like, hey, you go out there, work hard, you're going to earn your money,
except these couple positions that we don't value for our business, you know? And again, it kind of is where you have to lump in the business and the human aspect,
but that's a kind of demoralizing thing to tell people at these certain
non-premium positions,
you know?
Yeah,
it absolutely is.
Cause I mean,
it,
it seems like it almost makes it seem like running backs don't matter,
which of course is like the moniker of the whole argument that has been going on for years right but like you you look at it and some of these guys are
like the straw that stirs the whole drink you know and so you're just saying we're going to
use you for four years we'll franchise tag you for one which really the franchise tag is to buy time
for a long-term deal like that's's misuse of it, just buying one more year necessarily.
But yeah, like you said,
I think it sends the wrong message to the locker room,
especially, you know, the Colts aren't alone.
There are other teams
that kind of throw positional value out the window
and they reward, you know,
non-pillar positions with big contracts.
And so my thought on it, and I'm curious what you think,
do you think there is some middle ground where maybe you get like an incentive
laden contract essentially, or, you know,
maybe it's front loaded where you're more comfortable getting these guys their
money within the first year or two of the deal,
if you're signing them to three, four years, whatever you know incentives for playing time for productivity like things to for teams to
save themselves from getting tied into these these big messy contracts because the zeke one is
probably the most recent the zeke and todd early are the two ugliest ones in recent memory um a way that
teams can get out of that but also this player who has you know touched the ball three four hundred
times for you for four years they get rewarded as well because it's really not right to just
use them and lose them basically like there's got to be some mutual ground well I mean now we're
getting into business business ethics on the podcast jake
because again my specialty at the end of the day morality is great and it's great to to lean into
the morale of your team but at the end of the day if you're looking at this from the business
perspective again me reverting back to my first segment version of myself here you know you're
getting say again say say with jonathan tay you know, you're getting multiple Pro Bowl caliber seasons or all pro seasons.
And from years one through five, you're paying him, if you franchise tag him the fifth year, what, $12 million, $13, $14 million total, right?
From a business perspective, total is all you're paying him for those years, you know, less than less than what, $3 million a year
for that type of production. And then theoretically, you just draft a replacement that can
do a similar type thing. Now, again, you want to reward that, but like, what's my incentive to
really renegotiate that from a business perspective, or from a team perspective, you know,
I want to have as much cap space as possible. I want to have the most flexibility to run my business the way that I want or run my team the way I want.
So like with the CBA not expiring until I think 2030, with really no reason for these owners
and teams to really renegotiate that, like, I don't see a change coming to that anytime soon,
which again, it's, it's, it's a tough conversation because you want to have that human aspect.
You want to be like what the Colts always say they are, which is rewarding high level
play.
You know, regardless of what position you are, we're going to pay our stars that we
are, you know, growing up in our organization.
But that's just not always the case when it comes to a business.
So, yeah, I mean mean I just don't see the
incentive from teams to try to renegotiate that when it's already working out really well for
them right now you know they kind of are in a good place that benefits themselves even if it's
shafting all these running backs around the league and and really lowering their value I think you
know the way the market will kind of adjust itself is all these running backs will become
pseudo wide receivers you know in a way you know the Austin of adjust itself is all these running backs will become pseudo wide receivers, you know, in a way, you know, the Austin Ecklers and the Christian
McCaffrey's are the ones that survive. Whereas, you know, the throwback Derek Henry's and Nick
Chubbs and even Jonathan Taylor's are the ones that despite being immensely talented and would
have been the best players in all of football back in the eighties and nineties, that brand
of running back might die off as a result of this. But to kind of, again, just kind of football back in the 80s and 90s that brand of running back might die off as
a result of this but um to kind of again just kind of circle back on this human perspective again
it's it's a tough message in the locker room it really is but at the end of the day guys are going
to try to get theirs and you can be upset for your teammate but if it means more money in your own
pocket like it's it's a weird conversation
to have it's it's it's the problem with lumping wanting to make money with like the family culture
that is a locker room and stuff like that you know you want to see your buddy get paid but you also
want to get paid so it's it's a it's a tough conversation to have and stuff like that. But personally, I want all these guys to get paid. I do not care about ownership, saving money and
cap space and all that. Like on a personal level, I think if someone earns it and they're worth that
kind of money, then, you know, go, go make your money, you know? Yeah. I am a little curious
because it seems like these running backs are getting to kind of
a boiling point where if they come together and decide some you know something that they would
like to do moving forward like it just seems like this is not the end of it like i know the cba isn't
coming up for a while like you mentioned but like this doesn't seem like the argument is over by any
means like it feels like we're hitting kind
of the fever pitch of something that's kind of been coming up for almost a decade now
so I'm really curious to see what's coming next or whether it's more holdouts or refusal to play
into the season things like that I don't know but yeah it'd be interesting to see what Jacobs and
Barkley do like if they decide to hold out and that holdout goes into the season
but then both those teams don't really have a negative ramification for it like they still
have decent running games and stuff like what does that do to those two players you know like
it kills the argument right but not even that kills like say all the top running backs in
league come together and say we're holding out until this is addressed but then the replacement
backs are all
fine then what happened like what happens like you just have a bunch of star players sitting out
it's a levy on bell thing really yeah and but you it's an entertainment league at the end of the day
it's like don't get me wrong it's a sporting event but it's entertainment league at the end of the
day where you know you want these these big name players even if there are running backs big name
players out there for draw so yeah i think i'm I'm with you. It's near a tipping point. It could go either way, but
at the end of the day, all the power right now is with the organizations and it comes down to what
they're willing to give back to these running backs to change any of this if they want to
change any of it. Yeah. So here coming up next, we're going to talk specifically about Jonathan
Taylor and Indy, his future and why not all situations are built the same, because the Colts would probably be pretty wise to invest in a player like him.
All right, Zach. So.
We've spent all offseason talking about, you know, bringing Shane Steichen as the head coach.
OK, he's in Anthonyichen as the head coach. Okay, he's in. Anthony Richardson as the quarterback now.
What does this offense look like?
And when you think of what it could be at its peak,
it almost always involves Jonathan Taylor and him, you know,
him, I guess, being the engine,
but also getting back to how good he looked in the second half of his rookie
year, 2021, like the offense, really what you envision it becoming, Jonathan Taylor plays a huge part of it.
So, you know, again, not all situations are created equal.
So what are what's your temperature again on how much of an urgency the Colts should have in re-signing him. Yeah. You know,
I wouldn't say there should be much urgency on resigning him this off season
because like we've kind of said, when running backs get injuries,
you just never know how they're really going to react or how they're going to
ever bounce back or if they're ever going to bounce back.
So after he's coming off a big injury season that he just had,
there's no rush to extend them right now. And this is me again,
purely talking from an asset management perspective.
But going forward, say he comes back this year and he has a really strong season,
you know, the Colts are in a really unique situation compared to most of these teams
that we talk about with running back contracts.
You know, if you look at the Vikings with Dalvin Cook, they ended up kind of releasing
him because they're paying Kirk Cousins a jillion dollars, like literally a jillion
dollars that you can look it up.
It's exactly what it is on the books.
They have Justin Jefferson's contract that's going to be hitting the books.
You know, they have other big contracts.
Daniel Hunter is still on the books there.
Then you look over at the Cowboys.
You know, they had to choose between Zeke Elliott and Amari Cooper
because of all their other big contracts they were throwing out there.
And they end up losing Amari Cooper, who is an infinitely more valuable player.
Now, when you look at the Indianapolis Colts,
they do have a couple of big contracts on the books
in Braden Smith, in Quentin Nelson, in Shaquille Leonard.
But outside of that, they're not really paying anybody.
They're just really not,
especially at the quarterback position.
Going into next season,
the Colts are gonna have $65 million in cap space.
And again, this rookie quarterback contract is going to be a huge thing for them because
it's really never going to hit that big for them until that year five option.
And then obviously if they franchise tag or long-term extend Anthony Rich
and after that,
so they have a pretty decent window here where they're going to have a little
bit extra cap space to play around with.
And again,
the big thing with this running back conversation is that I like to look at is look at the cost benefit analysis of it. You know, if you again, look at
it from the Cowboys perspective, your cost benefit analysis of keeping Zeke Elliott was losing Amari
Cooper. That's a net negative for your team and for your offense right there. But with the
Indianapolis Colts, you know, the Colts are not a team that spends in free agency. They are a team that saves
their money, hoards their money even to extend their in-house guys. So when you're looking at
$64 million next year, and even if you put aside 20 million for Pittman Jr. and put aside 13 or
14 million for Grover Stewart, you're still looking at a good 30 something million dollars
that the Colts really aren't going to do much with. Like they're not, they're not going out there and signing another $20 million wide
receiver on the market. They're not trading for an AJ Brown caliber player. Most likely not going
to trade for that. You know, Chris Ballard does trade every now and then, but they're not going
to make big moves like that. So when it comes to the Colts, it's really not like, it's not
pay Jonathan Taylor versus pay Michael Pittman Jr.
It's not anything like that with the Colts.
It's really pay Jonathan Taylor or not pay him.
Like that's the whole conversation with the Colts.
So I think the Colts conversation is a bit different than it is with other teams because they're going to have that cap space and they're not really a team that is going to make a
million moves in free agency where they need that flexibility. They're going to make their couple little moves that they always do maybe
making a book on level uh mid-level signing but they're not really like if they have cap space
they're typically just going to hoard it so why not just have that star running back for your
young athletic quarterback and benefit him the best you can so it really I really don't even think
the Anthony Richardson thing comes in too big with this where it's like you need to give
Richardson a star running back to make him better I think it's just like there is no way the Colts
are going to add the value that Jonathan Taylor does like add to this team with how they approach
free agency just because they have that extra cap space you know like having an additional 15 million dollars a year whatever it's going to be doesn't really do anything for the
colts so you can love it or hate it you can love or hate chris ballard's approach to free agency
and approach to trading and and all that stuff but knowing what we know with him the options are not
jonathan taylor or top wide receiver on the market. The options are Jonathan Taylor or no
Jonathan Taylor. That's all it is. So when it comes down to that, for me personally, I'd prefer
the Jonathan Taylor option. Like, I think that's a pretty easy choice. What do you think, Jake?
Yeah. And I wouldn't be surprised if they're convincing themselves they have to choose,
because you mentioned Grover Stewart, Michael Pittman Jr. Like those are deals coming up, but there is enough money to go around.
And it just I would be surprised if they if they bungle this whole thing, because you mentioned it.
It's their philosophy. They've said it from day one of the Chris Ballard regime draft, develop and extend your own guys.
Like you said, they're not they're not a spending happy team out on the open market.
So your pool of free agents is essentially your own free agents in which he
will become one.
So I would be pretty surprised if,
if they don't do it,
I think he is worth it.
And I know I've probably come off like very,
very pro player pro running back in this argument
in general uh I don't think just everybody needs to have you know these these demands met for them
uh I I don't want to say they're a dime a dozen but like there are some some select special players
that I think you should make sure that you keep in househouse. And I think he's one of them. Like, I don't think every running back should be re-signed and everything necessarily.
But for him, we've seen what the offense can look like with him.
And if you pair him with a competent passing game, then, you know, the sky's the limit.
And people kind of tried to use my own argument against me recently because I've said, you know,
Jonathan Taylor had
arguably the best season of running back has had in franchise history in 2021. And they still didn't
make the playoffs. But you look at it further, like they wouldn't have even been in position
to compete because they had to hide their passing game for a huge chunk of the year.
So Jonathan Taylor was the offense for a good chunk of 2021. And I mean, he's still under 25.
You know, he's not really pushing it too much. I mean, he's coming off his first injury, like
the guy had never even missed practices. I do understand that you have to monitor that and
see what he's going to look like, because that's how his season ended. He didn't come back from
that yet. So the last we saw was him
with the ankle injury not playing so I get that I don't think there's immediate urgency
which is something you and I have talked about recently because it probably benefits him to come
out and have another awesome season and then you know get that that bigger payday because right now
his arrow is a little more medium yeah because again we didn't see prime jonathan
taylor last time we saw him but in general i think it would be very wise to bet on him and
and make sure that he stays in house maybe that's just a two or three year deal it doesn't have to
be four or five because that's a little long for running backs i would encourage a two or three
year deal um but still for him and indy, I think that'd be a good choice.
Yeah, my closing remarks on this whole topic are this when it comes to the Colts, the Chris
Ballard era Colts, again, love it or hate it, love his philosophy.
I don't care what you really think about his philosophy because it's going to be here.
You know, like we can say we hate it and we disagree completely, but it's going to be
here.
So we kind of have to talk about what it means for
the Colts going forward. And with the Colts, when it comes to skill position players, they draft,
they don't sign, you know, they draft players. Jonathan Taylor drafted player. Zach Moss was a
rare trade, but Dion Jackson, uh, undrafted free agent signing Jelani Woods drafted Kylan
Granson drafted Mo Alleycock signed after the draft. Michael Pittman Jr. drafted.
Alec Pierce drafted. Josh Downs drafted. They just draft skill position players. So really,
when it comes down to paying versus not paying Jonathan Taylor, you're not going to find a skill position player in the draft that adds the value that Jonathan Taylor has. I mean, again, unless
you're adding a wide receiver, which you could do with Jonathan Taylor still. So really your argument is if we let Jonathan Taylor leave, like the way that we
have to replace his value on offense is by drafting someone equivalent to or better than him in the
draft, which is not going to happen. So you're just making your offense worse by default because
of some, you know, want to have the greatest process ever it's at the end of the
day results matter too you know process is great and i understand the process of not paying running
backs but results matter too and you don't want to take away explosiveness and take away playmaking
from your offense because you just want to have this great process for the heck of having a great
process but every day is this this concludes our conversation on Jonathan Taylor for the time being obviously we will rehash a lot of this if he does get that extension this offseason but
I think for the most part we are we've kind of said everything we need to say on it let us know
in the comment section for like the 10th time this offseason what you think on this should the Colts
resign Jonathan Taylor and if they do resign him what kind of contract are you looking at for him
so let us know in the comments there every day or if you don't already follow at locked on colts at jake arthur nfl at zach
hicks to all on twitter also subscribe to the locked on quotes podcast on youtube or relist
your podcast we love your guys ratings and reviews and we'll see you guys bright and early tomorrow
morning