Love Life with Matthew Hussey - 24: Is It Risky to Flirt with Him? How to Read His Signs

Episode Date: May 18, 2020

“WTF? Do not use this.” This is a comment I received last week. It was in response to a flirty little text that I suggested you use with the guy who is on your mind right now. In fact, this text r...eally seemed to divide people. Someone even said it could result in “catastrophe.” And this comment had likes. A lot of them. W. T. F. So, despite the fact that I was going to move on to a different topic this week, my director Jameson Jordan politely (feistily) asked (demanded) that I respond to these comments. And I never say no to Jameson when he gets feisty. So, here is that response... You might be a little surprised by my response, because if you felt like the texts I suggested were a little dangerous, it might reveal a bigger, deeper, more important red flag at play. I hope you enjoy it. And if you don’t, please don’t leave any more comments that make Jameson make me do more work. I’m tired, and I’m in my pajamas. ►► FREE download: “9 Texts No Man Can Resist” → http://www.9texts.com ►► FREE download: “5 Compliments to Get Him Addicted to You” → http://www.SayThisToHim.com

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 So normally when I make a video we do that concept and then the next week we move on to the next thing. Jameson wouldn't let me do that this week because he said I had to comment on the comments from the last video. To recap the last video, I gave a bunch of text messages that you could send someone to flirt from a distance. But there was one text message I gave as an example that was particularly divisive, and dare I say, unexpectedly controversial.
Starting point is 00:00:50 Send the person that you're talking to a message that says, you're so annoying. Now that's gonna peak their interest. They're gonna ask why. When they say why, you say, because you're one of the main people who's making staying at home so difficult right now okay this might be the top comment him you're so annoying me what the actual fuck
Starting point is 00:01:16 do not use this so she's given that out as a kind of public service announcement. How on edge are you? If someone sends you a message saying you're so annoying, your first reaction is what the actual fuck? Well, I think it's time we took things a little less seriously. That's like the equivalent of a guy in a bar who you just brush past and he looks at you and says, "'You got a problem?'
Starting point is 00:01:51 That's, he's already on edge. Like there's something already going on there." If the dynamic that you're in with someone can't support that level of playfulness, then it says more about the dynamic than it does about the message. Don't do the first one. Catastrophe potential. Catastrophe potential. We're in a pandemic. You would think that we've softened our language on what we term a catastrophe. What's the potential for it to go wrong other than someone might go, what do you mean? It might be a
Starting point is 00:02:23 little, oh, what do you mean? Why am I so annoying? Because you're one of the main people making staying at home so difficult right now. Oh, that's nice. I thought you were being serious. No, I wasn't. It was just a joke because I like you.
Starting point is 00:02:39 Catastrophe. And if you're really worried that the person that you're texting is too sensitive or too literal to understand that this is being said in a playful context, obviously don't send this message on a day where you've just had a massive argument with someone, then you soften it. You say, you're so annoying, dot, dot, dot. You're so annoying with an eye rolling emoji. You're so annoying emoji with the steam coming out the little man's nostrils. You do that. How to potentially piss someone off with just a few sentences that set up a situation that may or may not go as you want. The setting up a situation that may or may not go as you want isn't that
Starting point is 00:03:19 flirting. That's the part that I'm concerned about. I'm concerned we're all a little serious. I'm concerned we're all a little literal. And I'm concerned that what's really happening here is fear of rejection masked as disapproval of the language of a message. This message isn't a perfect message. No message is. The whole point when I give you something to say
Starting point is 00:03:42 is for it to get you thinking, thinking about different ways of saying things, thinking about flirting in ways that you might not normally flirt, which could be a good thing. It can break someone's pattern. It can get you outside your comfort zone too. We are inherently taking a risk. Anytime we flirt with someone, we're pushing just a little bit. We're just pushing on that door. And we're seeing what happens when we do. Does someone decide to open the door a little wider for us because they're actually enjoying it? Or do we get silence? You know, my brother always talks about this invest, then test, right? Invest a little bit, show a little bit, be vulnerable a little bit, flirt a little bit,
Starting point is 00:04:21 express you like someone a little bit, and then see if you get a little bit back. If you don't, then don't keep pushing on that door. But the whole point of flirting is at some point, someone needs to take a little bit of a risk. Now, we should be qualified in that risk, right? We should calculate a little bit in the sense that have we had any signs that this person likes us at all? Do we know if this person is mutually attracted to us? We won't know that until we start talking to someone. And there are ways that we can know this just literally by measuring the amount of engagement they're giving us. Jameson and I did a video with Simi Singh about how you can tell that someone's not into you if you're in the blue.
Starting point is 00:05:08 We text all the time. Simi. What is it? Look at the colors. You're in the blue, mate. I coined the term being in the blue to describe the stream of messages on your screen that shows mostly those in blue that are from you. Sending these messages to someone who hasn't earned them
Starting point is 00:05:33 or to somebody who clearly isn't trying with you at all, that would be one step too far. And so what I want the takeaway from this to be is I need to start to calibrate where I actually am with someone. Something can easily feel cringy if it's not calibrated. If we send it at a time when the relationship hasn't earned that message, or if it seems completely off-key to the way we are the rest of the time. That's when things can seem weird, but that's not necessarily a reflection of how the message is bad, but more that I need to make sure the context is right to send that message. If you want to know whether the context of what you have is right for these kinds of messages, I have a way that you can do that. We have a free guide that literally
Starting point is 00:06:22 talks about the signs that someone might be interested in you. And if nothing else, then it will just raise your awareness a bit about the situation that you have with someone. So check that out. The link is here. It's at doeshelikeyou.com. It's about as on the nose as it can be. Read through the guide, super fast, super easy, but might help you feel either more cautious or more confident in sending some of the messages that I've been giving out. All I had to do was throw out one little text and then everybody looked at their minds. That was close. That's really scarily good. It's uncomfortable.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.