Lovett or Leave It - Ba Da Ba Ba Ba I'm Losin' It!
Episode Date: October 22, 202414 days! It’s like The Ring times two! This week on What A Weekday, Donald Trump does a dishonest days work at McDonald's. Elon Musk offers a million reasons to vote for the GOP. Liz Cheney reminds ...us: if you wouldn’t trust Trump to watch your kids, you shouldn’t trust him with the nuclear codes. Cynthia Erivo’s opinion of fan art has changed for good, and Dua Lipa walks so Cher can run.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I mean there needs to be you need to have like a warning system with friends to be like hey am I
being am I turning myself into a clown can someone tell me I think the guys are just having real
friends so yeah that's you yeah I just say that as someone who's like I'm not even I could absolutely
see myself going down that path like I could become one of those clown people yeah we know
yeah I know you want to do you want us to tell you if we start a slide? Yeah. I always want to be told.
Yeah, no, you're still good.
You need a stronger fear of needles.
I will do whatever works and even some things that don't work.
To flee from your own mortality?
To avoid aging?
Yeah.
She was saying, like, when you're dating someone, your check should be, is this a person who could help me through the death of my mother?
I think that's totally reasonable.
Well, you just don't think that way on a first date.
Yeah.
Or a third date.
But like, you should.
Yeah. Yeah. We're back with. But like you should. Yeah. Yeah.
We're back with Kendra, Halle and Sarah.
This week we also have an interview
with historian Eric Larson about his book,
The Demon of Unrest, about the lead up to the civil war.
For some reason I felt it was timely.
I love this book.
I found it to be a fascinating period of time
to think about, which is the time basically between Lincoln being elected and inaugurated and the march towards the Civil War
and what it is like to think about the perspective of the people that were making that Civil War a
reality, even though they did not believe and could not predict how bloody and terrible it would turn out to be.
And Kendra and I were here, we were into it.
I loved it.
I started reading the book this weekend.
And it's funny, because you say period of time.
What you did not explain is that it literally goes day
by day across multiple locations, which I'm fine with.
But you said during the interview that like,
you stopped reading Grant's memoirs because you hated the troop movements.
And he does, which again, I love this stuff, Eric Larson does describe full on troop movements
from Moultrie to Sumter, back to the mainland.
But it's really, it's much more like a narrative. The grant memoir, it is a mechanical description of various aspects
of the war planning. A topic for another day. We've got too much to talk about. Let's get
into it. What a weekday. On Monday, Vice President Kamala Harris campaigned with former Wyoming
Congresswoman Liz Cheney in the suburbs of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.
I certainly have many Republicans who will say to me,
I can't be public.
They do worry about a whole range of things,
including violence, but they'll do the right thing.
And I would just remind people, if you're at all concerned,
you can vote your conscience and not ever
have to say a word to anybody.
And there will be millions of Republicans
who do that on November 5th. Vote for Vice President Harris. and not ever have to say a word to anybody. And there will be millions of Republicans
who do that on November 5th, by President Harris.
Imagine doing something
and not telling everyone about it immediately.
Couldn't be me.
Republicans can be moral,
but only under the cover of night,
like waiting till the cashier turns their back
to put money in the tip jar.
Makes no sense.
The whole point is to do it when they can see it.
That's what it's about.
It's about the credit. You put the money, you put the, you put the money in and you make
a long sustained eye contact.
Big smile. That's for you. You must be a delight to deal with.
I am a delight to deal with. I am a, I'm a delight. Added Cheney.
Like if you wouldn't, if you wouldn't hire somebody to babysit your kids, like you shouldn't make that guy
the president of the United States.
Yeah that rules out most presidents we've had.
You think Rutherford B. Hayes knew how to change a diaper?
Going forward though, good rule.
And also by the way, even babysitting is an unnecessarily high bar for Donald Trump.
Would you trust Donald Trump not to give your child a peanut butter cookie when you went
to the bathroom even though he has a peanut allergy was the only piece of information
you conveyed to him?
Would you trust him not to think she's just being crazy and kids love peanut butter?
Now you're using the EpiPen.
You never use the EpiPen.
But Donald Trump gave your kid a peanut butter cookie.
I guess it's like there that he gave your kid a peanut butter cookie.
I guess it's like there that he would just eat the peanut butter cookie.
Right. But then he like wipes his hands on the kid. Like you use your kid's a napkin and then...
Yeah, now we got hives.
Now it's hives o'clock.
Also in Michigan, Maria Shriver had this question for Harris.
You know, everybody I talked to says, you know, I have to turn off the news. I can't read anything. I'm meditating.
I'm doing yoga.
I'm doing, I'm so anxious.
I just don't even know.
I'm eating gummies, all kinds of things, you know.
What are you doing?
What are you doing?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
How do you eat it?
Cop.
The, uh. I gotta say, that sounded like she's eating gummies. Yeah, I thought that's what she said and then Maria Shriver was arrested backstage the
Kind of is all fine. That was the most
I'm talking to rich friends in New York and LA question. I've ever heard. Oh, you're meditating and doing yoga
That's some that was that was rich person shit
Yeah, the rest of us are going to work. Yeah.
I mean, some people are doing yoga.
But like, are we in Michigan here?
We're in Royal Oak, Michigan?
Are we meditating and doing yoga?
Are they undecided?
Are they meditating and doing yoga?
Michigan, weigh in in the comments.
What are you doing in Michigan?
No, we're going to work.
We're coming home.
We're smoking a joint.
And then we're watching Real Housewives.
I think that is what people are doing.
That's what you're specifically doing.
But I do think like this straddles the line.
I think it's like how to be relatable and also like how to be aspirational to women.
Where I think like there is something where it's like, OK, well,
there Maria Shriver is also having to medicate herself through this.
I understand that part.
Yeah, I think there is that element to it.
Yeah. Wearing a sneaker, very relatable.
It's a cool outfit. I like it. Yeah, I think there is that element to it. Yeah. Wearing a sneaker, very relatable. It's a cool outfit.
I love it.
I like it.
I like it.
Like, it's a good—I like this look.
I like this group.
I like the exactly six people sitting in the back.
Meanwhile, in a low-energy interview with Dan Bongino on Friday, Trump offered this
fresh take on serial rapist Harvey Weinstein.
I was so amazed that Harvey Weinstein got schlonged.
He got hit as hard as you can get hit,
because he was sort of the king of the woke, right?
And yet he got hit.
Fuck, said Kamala Harris, lowering her head in her hands.
That was my closing message.
Interesting moment there of a man in decline. He didn't plan to say schlong.
No, you could see him hesitating.
He searches for the perfect word
and that perfect word is schlong.
But I think it's more that he couldn't,
I think that like we are watching Donald Trump decline.
He said schlonged.
I think he couldn't find a better word.
Yeah, no, his brain said, I got it.
Don't you worry, sir.
Schlonged.
We gotta beat this guy we're in for four schlong years.
Interestingly, the last time you heard the word schlonged
was in 2015 when Donald Trump
said Hillary Clinton got slunged by Obama in the 2008 primary.
He then posted this tweet for the ages.
When I said that Hillary Clinton got slunged by Obama, it meant got beaten badly.
The media knows this often used word in politics.
I wanted to talk about this because this is a reminder that when Trump first ran in 2015,
he felt like he had to explain himself a tiny bit.
Like he felt like when he said this,
he needed to say, no, no, no, I just met Beaton badly.
Don't worry, I wasn't saying something more vulgar than that.
No longer is he bound by whatever sense of restriction
he felt in this moment. That's gone. Is he bound by whatever sense of restriction
he felt in this moment? That's gone.
We're thinking about.
This and the 14 other tweets from this specific day
are captured at UC Santa Barbara's
American Presidency Project.
Cause it's like, oh right,
they just are capturing documentation from every,
like a presidential election.
And that's it.
That's what we got.
It's funny, we're talking about Ulysses S.
Grant's memoirs in which he writes movingly
about standing up to a Confederate
and saying the importance of standing up
for the American flag.
And that will sit side by side with, by schlonged,
I of course meant.
On Saturday, Trump was speaking at a rally in Pennsylvania
when he rambled for 12 minutes, 12 minutes,
about the late Arnold Palmer,
eventually getting lost in a reverie
about Palmer's genitalia.
But Arnold Palmer was all man.
And I say that in all due respect to women,
and I love women, but this guy,
this guy, this is a guy that was all man.
This man was strong and tough, and I refuse to say it,
but when he took showers with the other pros,
they came out of there and they said,
oh my God.
That's unbelievable.
I had to say it.
Thank you, Mr. Trump. The question was about abortion.
What's annoying about all of this
is now when I asked for an Alma Palmer,
some jokester is gonna bring me iced tea and lemonade.
One of my qualifications for dating
is not someone who would help me through
a passing of a relative.
Uh-huh. Uh-huh.
But was specifically, I wanted to be with a man
who would never bring up golf
or anything related to golf in a conversation.
And I really think this this this is why Yeah
Golf is bad. Well, I mean the problem is golf, you know a case of golf
You can come down with it later in life
You know, it's something that you can you can you can become golf with age
Well, you may not be golf in your 20s, but you can become golf golf in your 30s or 40s
I think it's actually hard to come down with golf with age because
golf in your 30s or 40s. I think it's actually hard to come down with golf with age
because, no, it hurts the back.
When you get back into it, it hurts.
Have you taken a golf swing lately?
Let me guess, no.
I was polite if you didn't even ask that question.
No, I haven't.
No.
You haven't been to a top golf?
I haven't been to a top golf.
I don't hate golf. I used to go, you know, Travis and I would golf. uh, no. You haven't been to a top golf? I haven't been to a top golf. I don't, I don't hate golf.
I used to, you know, Travis and I would golf.
That's right.
During the pandemic too, we would go golf.
How about that?
I mean, like three times.
I just lost like three points of three hits for you.
Oh really?
Are there hits left?
How many?
Yeah, negative hits.
Are we, are we, are we at the bottom of the, uh, Arnold Palmer had a huge hog, huh?
Well, that's all I needed to hear, said an undecided voter in Pennsylvania.
And the hits from Trump kept coming.
On Sunday, Trump visited a McDonald's in Feasterville, Pennsylvania, which had been closed for the
photo op as he pretended to work at the fry station and pushed his base's claim that
Kamala Harris didn't actually work at McDonald's in college.
The best part is when Trump took a good long stare at the fry oil and said, this is what will inevitably kill me. Trump spent about five minutes making fries, sans
hairnet, and then he said this. Never touches the human hand nice and full. Said. Good. Never touches the human hand.
Nice and full.
Said a McDonald's employee.
I've never heard it described that way, but sure.
Did Trump think they just plunge their hands into the scalding fry pan and scoop them out
with burning fingers?
Is this guy a fucking gorilla?
He's a mansuit.
I hate how much this made me want McDonald's, by the way.
That's the ultimate testament to McDonald's fries.
They can be subjected to this and come out unscathed.
I went to McDonald's because of this story yesterday.
And even though I am currently on a miracle weight loss drug,
I still managed to get down a McDouble, a hot and spicy
McChicken, and a 10-piece nugget meal.
I had my normal order on Sunday when
I was coming back from Target because this was all
what you guys. Looking at this right now, it's 10 a.m. I want fry so bad
It's gonna be something crazy no, it's not
No, I got I got a large fry. Okay, right?
That's great you just don't get it you don't get a sandwich McDonald's meat
I'm fish fillet all the way.
I know you're fish fillet.
I know you're fish fillet.
I remember when I was because there was a time when I would when I would go to McDonald's
more frequently and I just I knew that if I got you a fish fillet, you'd be pleased.
You think of me next time we go.
Anyway, no prison can hold my appetite once the idea of McDonald's is introduced.
Trump spent 15 minutes at the drive-through window handing pre-screened drivers bags of
food that they hadn't ordered and dodging reporters' questions.
Obviously, the drivers had to be pre-screened.
Anyone who has worked at the drive-through can tell you about the full spectrum of humanity's
flaws and mental illnesses that come before you at that window.
A person's car is a portal into their secret lives, and your job is to reach out toward that portal time and time again. And then from the other side, imagine
you're on your way to work. You pull into a drive-through for a shame egg McMuffin that
you plan to keep between you and God. You come around the corner to pick it up, and
fucking Donald Trump pops out of the window. It's a waking nightmare. You might disassociate.
You might not trust that you aren't dreaming until you fully alienated yourself from every
person who loves you.
Seeing Donald Trump in a McDonald's drive-through window could ruin your fucking life.
Could you imagine?
Could you imagine?
Like I was thinking about what it would be like to have that, that, that physical form,
that shape pop out of the drive-through window to hand you a bag
of food.
I think I would scream at the top of my lungs.
Not even in a self-aware way.
I think I would just, like when that studio head finds the horse in his bed, like that
kind of, ah!
Like that would kind of scream.
Now you crash your car into a tree just to see if you were real.
What'd you do? You crash your car into a tree just to see if you were real what you do you crash your car into a tree just to see yeah
Yeah, right exactly like this can't be happening. You can't eat that food like that's the other day
I don't know you have to go to the next McDonald's cuz you know he wants to touch it with his human hand
Yeah, also he's bringing it up. I'm like I don't I I don't know what they do at McDonald's normally, but he's not wearing gloves
Well, he's in a hairnet. Yes. See all that shit just falling in there.
Yeah, he doesn't have a hat on.
I'm not eating it.
I'd probably eat it, but I feel bad.
I'd eat it.
We know.
I'd 100% eat it.
We know.
I can't get McDonald's again, right?
No, I can't do it.
No, there's definitely another McDonald's around the corner
that you can go to.
If you do, that would take some fries.
Oh, wow.
No, we're not doing it.
I don't want it.
We don't have a close one here. I had it yesterday. Yeah. That's like a little bit of a hic. No, we're not doing it. I don't want it. I had it yesterday.
We don't have a close one here.
That's like a little bit of a hook.
I know where you have to go.
You have to drive to it.
It's at La Brea in Santa Monica.
It's best to come in.
You said that like it's through a Narnia wardrobe.
You don't want to go through the,
you have to make the, it's a tough left from La Brea,
so it's best to either come around
or to take Lexington to make the left
to get into the McDonald's or go down to Santa Monica
and make the right and then the right.
I would say, hypothetically, if I've got-
This is your grant's diary of your-
No.
Yes.
Anyway, even though the drivers were pre-screened,
things got dicey when one asked for an extra barbecue sauce
and an abortion.
Because you only get one sauce with the four piece.
People don't know that.
Of course, the fun of the event couldn't help but make way for the snarling chaos and evil
just beneath the apron as Trump once again refused to say he'd accept the election results.
Either way, will you accept the results of the election?
Yeah, sure.
It's a fair election.
Somehow, as usual, awfulness is even more offensive when spoken through a drive-through
window.
The drive-through window is a place of receiving what you ask for, of what you see is what
you get, of the best America has to offer, a place of fairness, a place of truth.
The reporter then took the opportunity to ask the Hamburgler if we could trust him around
all these juicy piping hot Big Macs.
Another question Trump refused to answer, a question about raising the minimum wage.
Well, I think this, I think these people work hard.
They're great. And I just saw something, a process.
It's beautiful. It's a beautiful thing to see.
These are great franchises and produce a lot of jobs,
and it's great. And great people work in here, too.
Ba-da-ba-ba-ba. I'm dodging it.
These are great franchises.
He's there at the behest of the owner.
Trump as president will break unions, oppose the minimum wage, eliminate the protections
against out-of-pocket costs or Obamacare, and pass a national sales tax to pay for tax
cuts for billionaires while exploiting working people in every way possible and turning the
federal government into a favor factory for his rich friends.
But he did put on an apron.
And he's wearing it.
Will it work?
It's a good picture for him.
That's true.
It's the one time the tie works and matches,
and it's because you can't see how low it's been hanging.
Damn it.
It just works.
It's a great picture for him.
And the Trump people, their bet is
that the picture will work because they
think everyone's stupid.
That's what they're counting on.
This is like a sick and twisted joke.
And you guys all ran out and went to McDonald's
after you saw this?
No, but I would like to.
The pictures were everywhere, and I was sitting at home,
and I knew I had to go to Target,
and I knew that there was a McDonald's.
It's the Valley, I don't have to go too far.
There was just one everywhere.
Yeah, I mean, I didn't want to go to McDonald's
because I saw Trump and a McDonald's apron. I wanted to go to McDonald's because I heard the word McDonald's, one everywhere. Yeah, I mean, I didn't want to go to McDonald's because I saw Trump at a McDonald's apron.
I wanted to go to McDonald's because I heard the word
McDonald's, McDonald's, McDonald's, McDonald's.
And fries specifically.
We've got to get Tim Walz in there.
There's something about seeing him scoop the fries,
just seeing that many fries.
Yeah, it's a lot of fries. You see all the fries,
you think, my God, you think Abundanza.
Just the abundance.
If Tim Walz wants to go to a Five Guys,
I will go to Five Guys.
I'll add Guys.
Five Guys.
I love Five Guys.
It's the better burger.
It's the better Five Guys.
Even a grilled cheese.
Oh.
Yeah, well, just on the bun.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They do have a good grilled cheese.
I don't like the fries that much there.
I'm sorry.
Oh, I like how much they give you,
because you don't have to get a large. You can get a small. Yeah, they throw fries that much there. I'm sorry. Oh, I like how much they give you because you don't have to get a large
You can get a small. Yeah, they throw fries in the bag
That's the that's the bargain you make when you go to the five guys, but I you know, I'd rather have less
I'd rather have fewer fries of a fry. I prefer
McDonald's
That's just un-American. I'm sorry Shake Shack. Well. I know what I'm saying is blasphemous.
You don't like Shake Shack?
Well, I've moved. So I was eating a lot of Shake Shack and
then I rediscovered Five Guys and I genuinely think Five Guys
makes a better product all around.
Really? Yeah. Not my position.
I respect Five Guys.
I don't. It's just not my preference.
If I.
You know why I think I think the problem is and I think it's
important that we really get into this
14 days before the election is that I for me five guys sits in
between McDonald's and Shake Shack really yes, and that in that I think of five guys as a little bit more of
It's more effort and if I'm gonna do the more effort version
I'd rather go up to Shake Shack and if I want to more effort version, I'd rather go up to Shake Shack.
And if I wanna do less effort,
I'd rather go down to McDonald's.
See, I would put Shake Shack in the middle of McDonald's
and Five Guys, because I feel like Five Guys
is the more effort food.
No, but Five Guys is, Shake Shack is,
Shake Shack's problem is the price.
Shake Shack is a fast food bridge.
It's a price.
The Shake Shack is priced up.
And so you end up, like Shake Shack is just,
it's a little bit more premium.
And I just, if I'm not going premium,
I'm going to McDonald's or Taco Bell, to be honest.
Or being honest, Taco Bell's getting in there.
You know how I feel about Taco Bell.
I looked up and all five guys are voting for Jill Stein.
So, so I'm gonna keep mine.
Four out of five, five guys.
Trump reflects it on his McDonald's stop on Monday.
You know, you never know about life
and you never know what's good, what's bad.
You do something that's gonna be great, it's okay.
And you do something that's supposed to be okay.
This was supposed to be a routine stop
and it turned into a monster,
but it was a beautiful monster.
There was a lot of love.
Hey, do you ever wonder what it sounds like
when a declining maniac tries to wax poetic
but his vocabulary has dropped to about 300 words? That's what it sounds like when a declining maniac tries to wax poetic but his vocabulary has dropped to about 300 words?
That's what it sounds like.
Fourteen days.
Fourteen days, baby.
I'm losing it.
Ba-da-ba-ba-ba.
I'm losing it.
Yeah, we can tell.
I am losing it.
McDonald said the company does not endorse candidates for elected office, and that remains
true in this race for the next president.
We are not red or blue.
We are golden.
Really?
Then explain to us how Mayor McChese has run unopposed 12 times in a row on a platform
of sending Grimace back to where he came from.
Which is hell.
Where was Grimace on January 6th?
Yeah.
Where was Mayor McChese on January 6th?
He was there.
Mayor McChese was at the Capitol.
Is that a real character? Mayor McChese? Yeah. cheese on January 6th he was there Mary me cheese was at the Capitol character
Mary yeah yeah I genuinely didn't I'm what's the sheriff called sheriff
burger no the cop called constable chicken bird right there's a bird that's
like a pilot or something really sheriff? Sheriff. Yeah, or like some female bird character.
Huh.
I've only heard of- Is it Officer Big Mac?
Okay.
And is there a girl bird?
Did I make that up?
I think it's Birdie.
I can only think of Grimace and the burglar.
There is a pantheon that they kind of got rid of.
He's not the burglar.
He's the hamburglar.
Okay, I'm so sorry.
He's never shorter to the burglar.
Birdie the early bird.
Oh, okay, for breakfast probably.
Anyway, is Donald Trump a ridiculous clown?
Is he a terrifying threat?
He is of course both at once a balance that Barack Obama attempted to strike during a
rally in Nevada over the weekend.
Obama highlighted the mistake of dismissing Trump as unserious.
When Donald Trump repeatedly lies or cheats or shows utter disregard for our Constitution or just insults people.
People make excuses for it.
They say, well, he's not serious.
He's not—everything a president says is serious.
Mass deportations of immigrants, punishing his enemies, Arnold Palmer's big hog, being
shocked you don't touch scalding hot french fries with your bare hands because he never
thought about, let alone saw, how his favorite food was delivered to him on a silver tray.
He means every word.
Obama also called out the inherent danger in Trump's recent looniness, describing his
long word-soud speeches in the town hall where he swayed to music for 39 minutes. You would be worried if your grandpa started acting like this.
You would.
I mean, right?
You'd like call up your brother, your cousin or something,
and be like, have you seen grandpa lately?
What are we going to do?
But this is coming from somebody who wants unchecked power, wants the most
powerful office on earth with the nuclear codes and all that. Now, the point is we do
not need to see what an older, loonier Donald Trump looks like with no guardrails.
Especially around the bathtub.
As voting began across the country, pundits and podcasters alike rushed to predict the
significance of the early vote. Spoiler, we don't know. Nobody knows. There will be no clear answer
on who's winning this election until the election is over, and even then, probably not for a few
days, every moment spent trying to
decipher ambiguous scraps of data is a moment you could be spending pestering an exhausted mother
of three in Lansing, Michigan, via phone. In a bit of good news, Elon Musk's attempt to bump
Trump's ground game in Arizona and Nevada might turn out to be a bust. Why? Because his canvassers
were faking it, or as Musk calls it, coming every time. I like that one.
Yeah.
According to leaked data obtained by The Guardian, up to a quarter of door knocks registered
by Musk's America pack in both states were reportedly fake, with canvassers allegedly
lying about the number of houses they visited.
Also, many of the canvassers appear to have been porn bots.
Troubling.
The pack's internal system flagged 24% of Arizona door knocks and 25% of Nevada door knocks as
unusual survey logs.
In one example, a canvasser logged home visits while sitting at Guayos on the Trail restaurant
in Globe, Arizona, a half a mile away from the doors he was allegedly knocking.
Bad look for democracy, but excellent look for Guayos' incredible happy hour deals.
Bottomless chips and salsa for $5.99.
I lie about canvassing voters in Arizona, too.
Of course, canvassing for Trump is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Elon Musk's
attempt to influence the 2024 presidential election.
Last week, Musk announced that he would give away $1 million each day to registered voters
in swing states from now until the election.
He's like a more sinister Willy Wonka, which is saying something because most of the kids
who visited Willy Wonka's factory died horribly.
To enter, voters have to sign Elon's petition pledging to support the First and Second Amendments.
Some experts say Musk's offer may be illegal and constitutes election interference.
Yeah, we can't have one billionaire illegally buying elections.
It's not fair to the other billionaires and corporations trying to buy it legally.
If I were in one of these swing states, I'd sure as shit sign that pledge.
Many of you listening are perhaps eligible.
Consider taking that pledge might put you in a position to take a million dollars from
the world's richest loser and get the funniest fucking story of your life.
That'd be awesome.
When you sign it if you lived in Pennsylvania, I would.
That's a good question. I don't know.
I don't think I wouldn't want my name on that for posterity
sake.
I would immediately donate it to like plant pyramid. I feel
like you have to immediately
donate it. And by the way, if you win a million dollars meal
mucks, you could donate some of it. I still feel pretty good
about it. How about this? Buy yourself a car as a down payment
for a house and hundreds of thousands of dollars for good cause.
That's a great fucking day.
It's easier than going on Survivor and losing immediately.
Oh.
Wow.
Just didn't expect to.
Wow.
Didn't expect to just a.
Just as far as we're seeking a million dollars.
A samurai sword to the face.
Yeah, race share ours indeed.
Just sitting here having a nice time, next thing I know.
Ow. It's my job. Lest nice time. Next thing I know. Ow.
It's my job.
Lest you forget.
Yeah, lest you forget.
Got him.
While Elon Musk might not like being in politics,
he sure likes spending his money on it.
According to The Guardian,
Musk donated $75 million to his America PAC
to support Trump in the last three months.
He remains the PAC's only donor.
Fortunately for our side, Kamala Harris has set a record for fundraising this fall, raising
over $1 billion in the three months leading up to September 30th, while Trump has raised
less than he did in 2020.
Between targeting battleground states and focusing on canvassers, Elon Musk and Donald
Trump are essentially running the evil version of the Democratic campaign.
If Kamala is Spider-Man, Elon and Donald are like Green Goblin.
Crazy rich villains while we're all out here
just missing our uncle, you know?
I think one of the other things that I took
from Demon of Unrest that I didn't know anything about.
By the way, look, it's happening.
Now Kendra's talking about it.
I like it.
I know.
Eric, I know.
I wanna hear what you have to say.
Eric Larson is a, he's a good writer.
He makes history really accessible to the masses.
It's very important.
But there was one of the main protagonists in the story.
It's either Ruffin or Hammond, I think it's Ruffin.
He was also a scientist who, because he was a,
remember he studied soil.
That was his big thing.
He studied soil in order to like make crop yields larger.
But then, and he was also a very rich plantation owner,
and then his side gig was being a rabid secessionist
who went from state to state agitating.
But that's Ruffin, that's Ruffin.
Yeah, and I'm just like, oh, this is the same thing.
A person who could just be doing science.
Yeah, that's a good point.
Yes, there's a moment.
In the book, there's this guy, Ruffin, Edmund Ruffin?
Edmund Ruffin.
Edmund Ruffin.
He's just a vile, egotistical narcissist who craves attention and praise for pushing, craves
attention and praise for pushing the Civil War to the point where he
goes to the battlefield and rides on a cannon and there's just clearly soldiers who have to
manage this old man who's famous, who's come to be part of the battle.
S1 06 And he's 67, so he's very old by 1861 standards. But at one point he is sleeping nearby a cannon and a bunch of soldiers set the cannon off,
basically deafening him.
And it's very clear like they fucking hated this guy.
And it's just funny.
Like it's like, yeah, it's, there's a reason I thought it would be worth talking to Eric
Larson because
I get it now.
Oof.
So, and again, we're not, we're not saying these things are the same.
We're not saying these things are exactly the same or equivalent, but history, history,
as Joe Biden would say, quoting Seamus Haney, it does rhyme.
Right.
I was saying, if it's almost like if we didn't learn from it, it will repeat itself.
Yeah.
We're really dedicated to not learning from it.
And even sometimes we learn from it and it repeats itself.
You know? It's sort of like, if you don't learn from history, you're doomed learning from it. And even sometimes we learn from it and it repeats itself.
It's sort of like if you don't learn from history,
you're doomed to repeat it.
But you're also doomed to repeat it if you learn about it.
There's only so much stuff that can happen.
Eventually it's got to start repeating.
Yeah, like when we're trying to decide on what color should
be the crooked color.
And we were talking about what brands use which colors.
And the person that was designing it
got pretty annoyed with how circuitous the conversation had become and said well yeah it's tough to choose
but there are only six colors. So instead of spending the next two weeks
refreshing Twitter and panicking yourself and your group text how about
you volunteer knock on doors make calls get together with your fellow anxious
Americans to make an actual difference do not sit home and just freak out.
Save that for election night.
That's why Senator Brian Schott said during our Pod Save America interview,
if we do everything we're supposed to do, we will win.
And if we do anything we're not supposed to do, we will not.
Are we going to win?
No one knows.
I feel terrified.
Correct feeling.
You don't get to feel okay these next two weeks.
And if you do, you're just lying to yourself.
Because if Donald Trump wins, none of us are anxious enough.
And if he loses, it will be because we were awake to the danger.
There are two weeks left.
If you are listening to this, you can get to a swing state to knock on doors.
You can make calls. You can donate.
And at Vote Save America, we are launching a new program.
It is called Last Call.
Because the messengers that will make the biggest difference are the ones people know and trust.
So we need everyone listening. We need you to think of three people you know who live in a battleground state like Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, or Georgia, and make sure they vote.
Scroll through your contacts, find those names, text or call them. Then do that a few more times before election day. We are not kidding. The reminders work.
And if you don't know anyone in those three states,
you definitely know three people
who could use a nudge to vote no matter where they live.
If you don't know what to say in those texts,
DMs and calls, go to votesaveamerica.com slash vote
to see your voting checklist and click last call
to get to a script to convince three people you know to vote.
That's votesaveamerica.com slash vote.
And if you do it, email us to tell us how it went
with a voice memo and Cricket might play it
on an upcoming pod.
Everybody knows three people in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,
Michigan, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, North Carolina.
Text them.
They could be an old friend.
They could be a college friend.
They could be someone you slept with. They could be an old friend. They could be a college friend. They could be someone you slept with.
They could be someone you didn't sleep with.
They could be the love of your life.
And the time you didn't work. But you think about them every day. You think about them every single day.
This is your in.
This is it.
Two birds, one stone.
Speaking of having to do a whole song and dance,
Cynthia Erivo took the Internet to task for a fan-made Wicked poster in which
And then, in the song and dance, Cynthia Erivo took the internet to task for a fan-made Wicked poster, which obscured her character's eyes.
A reference to the musical's original poster, as well as an infamous Wicked meme that asked,
is your pussy green?
So here we have the movie poster as it was released.
It's inspired by the original cartoon version for the Broadway show, but they have Ariana
a little more visible and they have Cynthia they have Ariana a little more visible and
they have Cynthia Erivo a little more visible.
You can see her eyes.
So then some fan made this alternate poster that obscures the eyes, makes the lips red
like in the original poster, covers up a bit more of Ariana's face like the whisper and
also gives Cynthia Erivo more of a smirk.
Someone also made reference to the fact that on the original Broadway poster,
somebody had scrawled graffiti that said,
"'Is your pussy green?'
Which made the rounds many times over the years.
Cynthia Erivo saw all this and said,
"'This is the wildest, most offensive thing I have seen.
"'Equal to that awful AI of us fighting,
"'equal to people posing the question,
"'Is your pussy green?
"'None of this is funny.
"'None of it is cute.
"'It degrades me.
It degrades us.
Wrote a revote, the original poster is an illustration.
I am a real life human being who chose to look
right down the barrel of the camera to you, the viewer,
because without words, we communicate with our eyes.
Look, she's a theater kid.
She's earnest.
You don't get vocals like that being ironic or detached. That's for incels and podcast hosts who are incels. It sucks
that you have to take yourself this seriously and be a little bit insufferable to be
that good at musical theater, but that's the bargain every Broadway star makes
with the ghost of Uta Hagen. It's just sort of like, ugh, it's just a fan art.
It's not a big deal. It's the original poster.
That's, I didn't, it's just the original poster.
You should be excited.
Ha, ha, that's cool.
That's the, ha.
It is sort of, it is interesting.
I feel like musical theater people in,
I think there is an earnestness that does speak to,
that comes out in their talent,
but then it does require them to be so humorless
about their craft.
I think, I allow it. I think they're allowed to be just mad about everything.
I like it.
If it helps their talent.
Oh, I just, I am glad, I am glad like,
I am glad Zendaya Arevo is just telling us how she feels.
And she's not doing anything polished.
She's out there.
She's out there being herself.
Great.
It's nice.
I feel like everything is so ironic and detached.
And like, if you're younger, it's like, oh, everything's cringe. I like someone being like, ironic and detached and like if you're younger, it's
like, oh, everything's cringe. I like someone being like, I'm just going to tell them how
this you know, how upset I am about this thing that doesn't really matter. I mean, until
they're endorsing or not quite endorsing Kamala, then we have to have a whole 15 minute conversation
about it.
That's well, that's because the stakes. There's no stakes here. That's why this is fun. There's
the stakes here are zero.
I think it's right that she's outspoken about being upset. I do think it's a very funny thing to be upset about that your fans are engaging with the
thing you made and that's somehow a hit on you.
I love it.
I love it.
I'm excited for the Wicked musical.
I couldn't believe you said that.
Yeah, I was really shocked.
This PR campaign has been rough.
It's too much.
So I only found out yesterday that it's a two-part movie that they
divided in half but actually to me that's not a bug that's a feature because
the first movie must go till Defying Gravity and that second act is
not as good as the first so who's gonna see it yeah I don't know but that's not
my problem I get to read on Defying Gravity. You're right. And when I saw it the first time, I didn't, when I saw Wicked, I saw it when it came to DC.
Actually, I saw it, I mentioned this to Senator Jackie Rosen, in fact, because I was interviewing her.
And when I saw it with my mother at the Kennedy Center, Harry Reid was in the box next to us.
And after Defying Gravity and the current comes down, I was crying and applauding and on my feet.
And then I looked to my right and Harry Reid fully asleep,
which was awesome.
But I didn't know really anything about Wicked
when I saw it.
And I don't really remember anything
after that Defying Gravity.
I don't think anyone does, really.
Yeah.
It's no Into the Woods second act.
Well, that's true.
And finally, during Dua Lipa's rendition of Do You Believe in Life After Love
during the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction ceremony,
Cher joined her on stage and said, I'm Cher, bitch.
I can feel the sin of my missing.
I really don't think I'm talking enough, no. I'm over, I'm counting. Unbelievable. I thought Dua Lipa was doing fine.
It was a great live performance.
Not just Dua Lipa was doing fine. It was like a great live performance. Just like not, you know, just Dua Lipa doing a live show.
And you don't realize until you hear Cher singing
what Cher singing is like.
And you hear that booming tone, that rich voice.
And you're like, and that is a, that woman,
how old is she in her seventies?
Yeah.
Incredible.
A very...
Oh no, I was just going to Italy and be like,
oh, I've had Olive Garden. I guess I kind of know what this is than having actual pasta. A very, oh. Oh, no, she's going to Italy and be like,
oh, I've had Olive Garden.
I guess I kind of know what this is
than having actual pasta.
Like, oh, no.
Dua Lima is Olive Garden Cher.
This is like if you were recording
a weekly political podcast, and then bam,
Cher walks in and starts podcasting.
I bet she's great at it.
Yeah.
Oh, god, if she had a podcast.
How much better would this episode be
if Cher walked in right now?
So much better.
OK, before we go, I have not been able to stop talking about this book.
And now Kendra's reading it, and she understands why.
So I sat down with Eric Larson to talk about Fort Sumter, January 6th,
and what we can all learn from a time in which a group of Americans
turned against the country as a result of right-wing and racist propaganda,
and also the Civil War.
You know?
So when we come back, my conversation with Eric Larson.
Hey, don't go anywhere.
There's more of Love It or Leave It coming up.
Earlier this year, I read a book I haven't stopped thinking about
and to my producer's exhaustion, talking about.
Joining me now is the author of the book
The Demon of Unrest. It's it's eric larson eric. Welcome to the show. Thanks for being here
Thank you
Let's start with this
What is the demon of unrest?
well, so the reason the reason I call it the demon of unrest i'm taking that actually from a
A letter written by one of the minor
protagonists in the book. And he's commenting on the Demon of Unrest being unleashed in
America in this antebellum period leading up to the Civil War. So political discontent
and discord. And I found that particularly striking because it really is sort of an interesting
resonance when you think of a demon
You know running a running a mock in the landscape stirring up trouble. And so so that's why that's why I borrowed that for the title
so when I when I picked up the book, I just assumed that
you had seen the events of January 6 unfold and all the the tension and
January 6 unfold and all the tension and plotting that went into it and then started looking into Fort Sumter as a parallel. But actually, you had begun working on that book during
the pandemic long before January 6. Is that right?
Right. Well, essentially a year before January 6. just sort of exploring the nature of, well, trying to answer for
myself. I mean, how did the American Civil War start? It's a question that occurred
to me back when my book tour for a previous book, The Splendid and the Vile, about Churchill,
got cut in half by the pandemic, and I found myself with a lot of extra time on my hands.
And back in that period, as now, unfortunately, there was a
lot of political discord. Fringe people were muttering about a contemporary civil war,
contemporary secession. I just found myself thinking, well, how did the civil war start?
So I started looking into it. What happened with January 6, as I watched that unfold,
was that it persuaded me in a very visceral way
that this story that I've been working on for a year
was not just a story from the distant past.
It had a real contemporary resonance.
Now, unfortunately, mentioning January 6th, who knew?
Who knew that this would be a real flashpoint
in America today, but apparently it is.
I got a lovely note from a cordial reader
who tore out my author's note and said,
January 6th, horse shit.
Yeah, well, in reading the book,
you write about someone named Edmund Ruffin
who was a fire reader, a very pro-slavery,
very anti-union confederate.
And can you talk about the role, maybe this isn't the right term, I'm not drawing an exact
parallel, but between the role of a form of right-wing propaganda about the North and
about Lincoln and the role that kind of writing played in exacerbating tensions and leading
to the events of the book.
Well, here's the thing, back in the antebellum period,
much as there is today, you know,
we talk about echo chambers and people talking
to themselves and ramping themselves up
into believing things that aren't true.
This was the case back in 1860, 61, in particular with regard
to how the South viewed the advent of Abraham Lincoln, but of course was elected November
6, 1860, was not inaugurated until March of 1861. When he was elected, he made it very
clear, prior to his election, he made it very
clear that he had no intention of abolishing slavery in states where it already existed,
nor was he going to oppose the Fugitive Slave Act, which of abolitionists in the North found
really atrocious. So basically, his stance was very moderate in terms of slavery. The
South would not believe it. They saw him as the antichrist. They came to believe that his one goal was
to abolish slavery, which of course to Southerners, Southern planters in particular, wasn't existentialist
threat. So when you talk about propaganda, the South was convincing itself. The South
was convincing itself that Abraham Lincoln had one goal in mind, and that is
to abolish slavery.
In the North, where abolitionism was on the rise, they saw the South and its protection
of the institution of slavery as equally atrocious on errands.
So you had this rift that grew ever wider in the course of those those months between November 6, excuse
me, and March 4 of 1861 inauguration day.
There was a I was reading Grant's memoirs.
Actually, I was reading them before I read your book.
And I got to the part where he was describing in exquisite detail various troop movements
and I got bored. Okay, well, now, I love it that you said that exquisite detail various troop movements and I got bored.
Okay, well now, I love that you said that you were reading about troop movements and
you got bored.
I've actually had a lot of people come to me and say, you know, I really didn't really
want to read your book because I thought it would be boring.
I wanted to wait for the good stuff, which of course is the troop movements and the battles.
So thank you.
Yes, look, it's very interesting, but it's a lot of logistics.
Grant goes into a lot of logistics
in that book. But there's one part where he's talking about being in Missouri, and the Union
forces have just taken Camp Jackson, which was a rebel military installation. And he's
on the train, and there's a pro-Confederate guy guy on the train and he's ranting and raving
about the North and he says, things have come to a pretty pass when a free people can't
choose their own flag.
Where I come from, a man dares to say a word in favor of the Union.
We hang him from the limb of the first tree we come to.
He thinks he's in safe space.
Grant goes up to him and basically says, I had not seen a single rebel hung yet, nor heard of one.
There were plenty of them who ought to be, however.
And what Grant says is, that man was so crest-falling
that I believe if I had ordered him to leave the car,
he would have gone quietly out saying to himself,
more Yankee oppression.
And I do not believe, I cannot believe believe how modern that felt how contemporary that felt
And I'm wondering if in your research for this book we you're doing all that you're in all this
This do these documents these diaries this source material and then January 6 happens
And was there some part of you that said you know what what, maybe this isn't as shocking as I felt.
Maybe this is exactly what flows
from what I've been looking into.
Well, when January 6th unfolded,
I mean, I was watching it right here in my office on CNN.
And I watched for hours as this thing happened.
And with just a growing sense of fury, anxiety, shock, and what was
going on, but also with a sense that, you know, I'd just been through all this reading
these historical documents. You know, some of these things that I had been reading could
have been written today. You know, for example, case in point is that in 1861, the two moments of gravest national concern
before the actual start of the Civil War were would the electoral count be certified?
Doesn't that sound familiar?
And would the inauguration come off with Lincoln surviving?
Now, the electoral count back in 1860, they took it a lot more seriously, the potential for disruption of this. There
was a gentleman named Winfield Scott, General Winfield Scott, commanding general of the
US Army, who was a lot of things. I mean, he was ill, he was six foot four, 350 pounds,
ailing in every conceivable way. But one thing he was, was utterly loyal to the Union.
And he vowed that nobody was gonna interfere
with this electoral count.
And if they did, he was gonna, if anybody did,
he was gonna strap them to the muzzle of a cannon
and fire that cannon and as he put it,
maneuver the hills of Arlington, Virginia with his body.
And he flooded Washington with cavalry,
with cannon, with cannon,
with soldiers, and indeed the electoral count came off fine, although there was an attempt
to disrupt it with people trying to get into the Capitol. But with that kind of force,
it was obviously that there was not going to be any disruption of the count.
So you rely on a lot of original documents, diaries, source material.
But of course, some of the best stories people don't write down.
You can't know what they are.
You can't always report them because they weren't recorded.
But how do you think about that, right?
Because if you're trying to base as much as you can on what people were willing to put to paper,
those are accounts that are inherently going to be
in some way sanitized.
Well, I don't know.
I mean, look, you used the phrase based on,
which suggests that there's partly based on these things,
partly not, the scrupulous with this book
to adhere entirely to the documents
that existed at the time. The documents, both government, private, and the diaries and so forth,
pretty comprehensive and give a really, really very rich view of how people were thinking and
what was happening. Is anything being sanitized? I don't know.
If Edmund Ruffin in his 4,000 page diary,
he's one of the villains in the book.
If Edmund Ruffin in his 4,000 page diary
is not telling us the truth about some aspect
of what he's writing about, well, maybe that's true.
But boy, he sure gives you a lot to go with.
You don't have to worry about the rest.
It's funny that you call him a villain
because you're very,
you really try to let their words,
let people hang themselves with their own words.
But as I'm reading the book, I thought,
Eric Larson fucking hates this guy.
Is that right?
Well, well phrased, first of all.
No, you know, I'm a journalist. I'm a trained journalist.
There are two of me, you know.
There's one that sits up here.
This is the good guy who says, wow, this is really sad.
This is hard.
This is awful and so forth.
This one sits up here and sees this stuff, sees Edmund Ruffin, reads his diary and is like, wow, this is really good stuff.
This is great.
You know, do I hate Ruffin?
No, not really. I mean, as you say,
I just let him hang himself. I mean, he was a hateful, hateful man. And so I just play
out what was in his diary and let him tell us exactly how he was feeling. His hatred,
his absolute hatred for Yankees, anything northern. And just his, even his initial hatred of being a Virginian, that's where he hailed from,
because Virginia was not avidly seeking secession in the way that South Carolina was.
Even there, he was like continually complaining about Virginia, Virginia, Virginia.
His diary, if you can stand it, is really
well worth reading. It's an amazing, amazing document. Like I said, 4,000 pages, very candid
pages. When you read that diary, you come away thinking, yeah, Ruffin has bared his
soul to me and he's not dissembling about anything.
So, let me say to another villain in the book.
Which one?
James Henry Hammond from South Carolina,
planter and senator who also left a very detailed diary,
sufficiently detailed that he reveals
that he had a sexual dalliance
with four of his nieces at one time.
Yeah.
Pretty candid.
That's what I actually, that was gonna be
literally my next question because
that that's another villain in this book.
And you know, this is somebody abusing several children.
And you know, you, you tell the story from multiple perspectives.
You get Edwin Ruffin's perspective, you get James Hammond's perspective, you get Robert
Anderson's perspective, you get Robert Anderson's perspective. He's the Kentucky-born commander at Fort Sumter.
And what I thought as I was reading the book is you're telling the stories through these
various perspectives and every person in their own mind is a hero of their journey.
And yet there is evil here. These are people participating in contributing to being genuinely evil.
And I wonder how you grapple with that in trying to tell this story because the documents
you have about James Hammond are by James Hammond.
But he's committing atrocities inside of
his house and telling himself a story about what that looks like. And so how
do you strike the line between letting, as you say, that you know being
meticulous and inscrupulous and using the words that these people put to paper
while also recognizing that you know in history's lens, like these were monsters.
Right, right. Well, you know, in the case of Hammond, it's pretty clear that dalliance
with four knees is inexcusable by any standard in any time. If we take that off the plate
and we talk about other things that he did and other things that he felt. You really have to view them through the lens of the times. Something that I always
have to remind myself is that it is a mistake of the first order to bring modern judgments
into play when reading, you know, past documents, past diaries and so on. Again, I make the exception of the sexual allowance
with four nieces, that's, I don't care what area you're in,
that's pretty vile.
But, you know, screenwriters always refer point of view,
and this is something I really try to adhere to this.
I'm trying to look at this period,
I was trying to look at this period
through the eyes of people who existed in that time,
what their goals were, what their standards were.
I mean, for example, another thing that today we would classify as evil, but back in that
era was fairly, pretty much the norm among Southern Platters.
Senator Hammond has a manual for his overseers to help manage his population of enslaved blacks.
And the last portion of that manual is a very detailed essentially how to guide for how to
whip his enslaved laborers. Now today, we are outraged by this. It's absolutely incredible
that this happened. Back in the day, this was the norm.
Such, so much a norm that he felt
he could actually codify it in his manual.
A norm in one part of the country,
and yet, obviously you have abolitionists,
white and black fighting against the practice.
Exactly, a norm in the South.
But at the same time, and I struggle with this a little
because it's funny, it's a fun talk. I'm supposed to be this the same time, and you know, I struggle with this a little because it's funny,
it's like if I'm talking, I'm supposed to be this sort of,
I don't know, lefty progressive,
but I find myself less a moral relativist.
Like you see in this work,
the way in which their participation in slavery
destroyed their souls, made them, made them coarse,
their souls, made them, made them coarse, egotistical, narcissistic, mean-spirited, closed off and ultimately unhappy.
I don't want to, Edmund Ruffin's story does not end happily, right?
These are people that were corrupted by something, even though they tried to convince themselves.
Spoiler alert. Yes. themselves. Spoiler alert.
Yeah.
Spoiler alert.
Edmund Ruffin.
And honestly, I'm sorry.
I was like a little bit like, good.
I was satisfied.
I was like, you may not want to say that you hated that guy.
I fucking hated that guy.
It was sort of a perverse slow clap moment.
Yeah.
The zealotry of someone like Edmund Ruffin, the convincing
themselves of the righteousness of their cause, the almost the
the kind of projection, the way in which they defended their kind of way of life.
On some level in reading it, you couldn't help but think, I don't know that these
people really believe this.
I think on some level there is a way in which they are trying to convince themselves while aware
of these horrors. Is there any truth to that?
You know, one of the things that I found particularly fascinating is, is the advent of the so-called
pro-slavery movement, which is a big part, I feel,
of what provided fuel for the start of the Civil War.
Going back to as early as 1800,
even Southern planters felt that slavery was,
they would refer to it as a necessary evil.
But over time, as slavery began to be perceived
as an active evil by the North,
by the international community, in the South, there grew this pro-slavery movement because
they couldn't abide this perception of themselves as evil because they kept slaves. So they
came up with this rationale, this idea that,
and came to really believe it.
This is the pro-slavery movement was very, very effective
in having the South.
It was not meant to persuade the North.
It was meant to persuade Southerners
that really what they were doing was
what they were maintaining in terms
of the institutional slavery was the best of all worlds
for everybody concerned, including the enslaved
blacks. That's the really interesting element of their argument. They felt that they were
doing these people essentially a favor by giving them basically three squares a day,
insulating them from the labor market, the institutes up in the north, protecting them
through economic ups and downs.
They really came to believe that. And they weren't kidding around. It was not like
they were looking in the mirror in the morning saying, okay, I think this is horrible, but
I'm going to propound this view of this is the pro-slavery ethos. Now, there were people who were very clear-eyed about slavery.
One of them is somebody I love in the book, a diarist named Mary Boykin Chestnut, the
premier female diarist of the Civil War era. And she was very conflicted about slavery
and she was not shy about stating that conflict. And so that, and I found that very compelling.
She's sort of the person who stood there in the, in the murk between North and South.
So one point you make throughout the book is this is a group of people motivated by
their ideological sentiments, by their belief in this evil institution, by their loyalty
to the union, but few could have comprehended
that what they were marching towards was the most deadly war in American history. And yet
that is what they were marching towards.
Right, right. Let's stop there for a second, because that to me is one of the also very,
very fascinating elements of the saga and something that actually,
I think, has a lot of relevance today. You know, what amazes me is that with this tension,
there was the prevailing belief, certainly in the South was that there would be no civil
war. And if there was, there would be so, there would be so little bloodshed. One
guy vowed that he would drink, first of all, there would be so little bloodshed that it
would only fill as quote unquote a lady's thimble. And another guy vowed that he would
eat all the corpses of this civil war because he believed that there would be none.
So here is this very interesting situation
where people have persuaded themselves that this conflict is not going to lead to a civil
war. The civil war that ultimately killed the current count, it believed to be 750,000
people. What underscored for me vis-a-vis today. First of all, my takeaway was that, A, when people say crazy
things, take them seriously. When people today start talking about civil war, talking about
violence and so forth, take them seriously because they probably mean it. The other thing that my takeaway from my research was that, you know, the inconceivable
is always conceivable to someone. Case in point is Edmund Ruffin. He was one of the
few in his diary – well, actually – sorry, in his really, really bad novel called Anticipations
of the Future. He was one of the few who actually saw forward far enough
and darkly enough to recognize what a conflict like this would actually do. He envisioned
the complete incineration of New York City by southern forces as part of this conflict.
And that came, not New York was never destroyed in the civil war, but
that volume that that degree of violence comes a lot closer to what ultimately happened than this
this this self-delusion that any civil war would only provide enough blood to fill a lady's symbol.
As you look at this election, there's a lot of people listening to this that feel like they're seeing the kinds of...
There are Edmund Ruffin's versions of Edmund Ruffin.
I'm not making a direct comparison, but there are versions of Edmund Ruffin all around us.
People who are saying the most extreme things, thirsty for blood, wanting the fight, vilifying
their enemies.
What lessons did you take from that, of looking at how we kind of went into the Civil War,
that we could apply now and how we fight back against that kind of tension?
How we, I don't know, how you deal with a demon of unrest?
My answer is, I mean, what you do is you try to have a safe and, you know, unthreadened
election. And that's the best you can do. I mean, we're living in troubled times. And you know,
that's no secret to anybody. How this gets resolved. I am not the person to ask. I wrote a book about
the start of the American Civil War in 1861, you know, with certainly
no anticipation that the events of January 6th would occur.
So it's anybody's guess what's going to happen and how to deal with it.
Well, you know, well, what help is that?
We need you to write something about the future.
Well, I wish I wish I could I wish I could could for it. You know, one of the things that is always tempting when you look at history and historical
patterns is that you maybe delude yourself into thinking that you can see, oh, this is
not going to have a good end because we're moving in a direction that historically
has not resulted in a very positive outcome. I think, you know, my speculation is that,
I think there's tremendous potential for violence in America. I know that the national
intelligence, domestic intelligence entities, you know, Homeland Security and the FBI know that they are deeply concerned about this happening.
And I come back to what I said before is that, you know, when people start talking crazy,
when people start talking crazy, take them seriously.
And I, you know, maybe I'm alluding here to certain things that a certain individual has said about,
you know, locking up Democrats and so forth.
But, you know, take seriously.
Thank you so much for your time.
Last question before we let you go,
what's the silliest or most surprising
or funniest thing you've ever seen
in a piece of primary documentation
that you've been looking into?
Oh, I mean, in any book.
Yeah, any book.
Well, I'd have to say, so often I come across things
that actually just make me laugh.
And if I can, if they work in the actual primary narrative,
they go in the primary narrative. If they don they work in the actual primary narrative, they go in the primary narrative.
If they don't work in the primary narrative, readers of my books I think now know enough
to know that they should go to the footnotes because that's where I stick the stories that
are particularly funny or particularly offbeat.
I mean, one case in the case of Demon of Unrest was this guy, this guy's walking, a congressman,
I believe, was walking in the vicinity of the Capitol in Washington on a dark night
as before the Civil War.
He's molested by two guys, one who tries to stab him, stabs him through a folded edition
of the Congressional Globe, which is the past version
of what we call the Congressional Quarterly.
So he isn't hurt by this display.
He survives that.
He pulls out a gun, shoots one of his attackers, punches another one and knocks him out, and
he fights off this group of assailants in a very,
very dramatic and very funny way, as if you expect him next to have a cannon come out of his coat
and blow these guys away. The New York Times wrote a piece about that back in the day.
That was actually very funny. Now, we're not talking knee slapper here. I'm sure I could come up with something
if I had more time, but that'll do it for now.
That's enough with that.
I love that story, because these guys think
they're gonna get away with screwing
with this pro-Lincoln guy, and he just fucks him up.
He just, that's a good way to put it.
That's a good way to put it.
Totally, totally surprises me.
Eric Larson, thank you so much for your time.
I really appreciated Demon of Unrest.
I really felt like it was a helpful bit of history
that resonates with what we're going through right now.
And as you said, to take these kinds of people seriously,
even if they are not serious people.
So Eric, thank you for your time.
Sure, sure.
Thank you.
All right, thank you so much to Eric Larson.
That's our show.
Thank you to Sarah.
Thank you to Halle.
Thank you to Kendra.
We got 14 days.
If you haven't signed up yet,
go to vote save America.com, sign up right now.
Shots told me this on Pod Save America.
They need bodies in Pennsylvania. They need bodies Save America. They need bodies in Pennsylvania.
They need bodies in Wisconsin.
They need money in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Texas,
a bunch of other places.
You can donate to our Senate fund.
You can donate to our House fund at Vote Save America.
You can sign up for shifts to make calls and knock on doors.
Now is the time.
Early vote tells you nothing.
Polls tell you nothing.
Everybody's gotta do everything.
See you sluts on Saturday. Respect the opposite
Love it or leave it, yes love it or leave it
Straight, shoot, tie
Love it or leave it, yes love it or leave it
Respect the opposite Love it or Leave it is a Crooked Media Production.
It is written and produced by me, John Lovett and Lee Eisenberg.
Kendra James is our Executive Producer, Chris Lord is our Producer, and Kennedy Hill is
our Associate Producer.
Hallie Kiefer is our Head Writer, Sarah Lazarus and Jocelyn Kaufman, Peter Lord is our producer, and Kennedy Hill is our associate producer.
Hallie Kiefer is our head writer, Sarah Lazarus and Jocelyn Kaufman, Peter Miller, Alan Pierre,
Will Miles and Mahana Del Shiki are our writers.
Evan Sutton is our editor, Kyle Seglen and Charlotte Landis provide audio support, Steven
Colon is our audio engineer, and Milo Kim is our videographer.
Our theme song is written and performed by Shure Shure.
Thanks to our designer, Bernardo Serna, for creating and running all of our visuals, which
you can't see because this is a podcast,
and to our digital producers David Tolles, Claudia Shang, Mia Kelman, and Matt DeGroote
for filming and editing video each week so you can.
[♪ Music playing. And the song is playing. Let's love it or leave it.
Perfect. And I didn't order lunch.
Ah, we're going to McDonald's. Yay!
No, no, no, no McDonald's. Come on, people people in a statement released after Trump's visit
I'm gonna order a salad and take fucking forever
How you can eat the McDonald's like you have to go with him to get the McDonald's you can't eat McDonald's after it's been
Transformed that I'll go I'll go but also yes you can
For four and a half minutes from the McDonald's that's too long
You got us you got to eat it as soon as it comes out.
As soon as Trump hands it to you.