Lovett or Leave It - Nesting Doll of Idiots!
Episode Date: March 31, 2018Trump’s lawyer allegedly floated pardons. Trump’s lawyer’s lawyer is not doing much better. The census is under attack. And this White House can turn any adult into Benjamin Button. Comedians Em...ily Heller and Jaboukie Young-White and journalist Seema Mehta join Jon to break down the week’s news and celebrate Melania’s victory over cyber-bullying.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
It's not a holiday
Street shooter
Nothing for living, it's not a holiday
The snack we don't know sex
Nothing for living, it's not a holiday
Hey everybody!
Street shooter
Thanks for coming out to the improv.
How you doing?
I'm good, thank you for asking.
No one ever asks.
No one ever asks.
A month ago, we asked for submissions for Portrait Mode.
We received incredible, incredible submissions.
Do you know who submitted
a portrait?
Rosie O'Donnell.
And it was funny
because in the submission
it said, from Rosie.
And it described clearly.
It wasn't like,
you know, I work in entertainment
and I really have a problem
with Trump.
It was like,
Trump once called me out
several times by name
and we've been in a long-term feud
and I used to host The View.
And it's like,
this seems like it's probably Rosie O'Donnell I don't know what other
Rosie this one could be but it was very coy and then we confirmed Rosie O'Donnell submitted to
the portrait contest she did not make the finals but these are the three winners we have and obviously um uh podcasting is an ideal form for describing art but we're
these aren't the official names but i will simply describe this as uh trump on daddy's shoulders the
daddy is putin by jamie fontana we have trump basically puking tweets by Casey Promise. And then we have,
I think, a very accurate photo by Abigail Hammett, which is a donut with a slice of And a cigarette butt also on the pavement.
This one's more avant-garde.
Anyway, we are going to put this on some merch,
and all proceeds are going to go to PS Arts,
which goes to California Public Schools,
their art programs, which we're very excited about that.
You know, there's been some debate.
There's been some division at Crooked Media.
How many people in this room would wear Trump as a baby on Putin's shoulders as a T-shirt?
Okay, no one.
Very few of you.
All right, let's do this.
How many people, how do you feel about a mug?
Much better.
Much better. Much better.
You people still buying mouse pads? Guys, to the people of Miami, why don't you make
like Columbus, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Chicago, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, Nashville, Durham,
Minneapolis, Philadelphia Nashville, Durham
Boston and New York
and buy some fucking tickets
bunch of
pit bull worshipping
mojito
swilling
ignoramuses down there
get off your rollerblades
and take in some
political discourse Friday at 10
like these lovely people and take in some political discourse Friday at 10.
Like these lovely people who don't regret it yet.
All right, guys, we've got a great show.
Tonight's panel includes Roseanne Barr, my avatar from Oasis,
and Sanaa Lathan.
Got some questions for her.
All right, we have a great show for you tonight.
She's a political reporter for the Los Angeles Times. Please welcome Seema Mehta.
Hi, Seema. How are you?
I'm good. He is currently
a writer on Big Mouth. You've seen him on the
Tonight Show starring Jimmy Fallon. Please welcome
the very funny, back to the podcast,
Jaboukie Young-White.
She's a comedian, TV writer, and co-host
of the podcast Baby Geniuses.
Please welcome Emily Heller.
Hi, guys.
Hey, Emily.
How's it going?
It's so good.
It seems like it's going really good so far.
All right, guys.
Let's get into it.
What a week.
Donald Trump, our president, has been under special counsel investigation for the majority of his presidency.
This week we learned that the Trump camp is starting to panic a bit about how close that investigation is getting to the president himself. According to the New York Times, Trump's lawyer, John Dowd, who quit last week because he was tired of being ignored by
Donald Trump, may have dangled pardons to Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn to stop them from
flipping on Trump, which is like witness tampering, like obstruction of justice, which I think fits
with their brand in a lot of ways. That's very on trend for them.
This year for them is all about sort of dark blues and obstruction of justice.
I feel like tampering is such a light way of putting that.
That's the thing that people do to cereal boxes and stuff that you shouldn't buy.
It feels like a euphemism, i know it's not right tampering yeah yeah that's like you know what you do to like a
mattress you know you pull off the thing and you've tampered with it who tampered with this stereo
says a stereotypical father in an 80s thing where they remember when stereos could be tampered with
that's what john dow did uh we also learned from we also learned from court filings that
muller has established that during the election rick gates which means maybe also paul manafort
uh was in contact with a person who directly connected to the russian intelligence agency
responsible for uh the various hacks on Democrats, which happens.
You know, you're figuring out, you know, where to put resources in Iowa.
You're trying to decide where you're going to put together 270 electoral votes.
And you take a few meetings with Russian intelligence, which was a totally normal thing that used to happen all the time,
which everyone is blown out of charge because everybody, Trump made everybody go crazy.
You know? Any thoughts,
Jaboukie? I just personally
cannot keep up with all these white dudes at this point.
It's so
difficult. It's like someone took a class list
from a boarding school and just put it in a blender
and just
dumped it out into every news headline,
and I cannot keep up anymore.
You know what I think happened?
I think that because the White House
personnel office was so screwed up, there was this
mistake that was made. There was a list
of super qualified Republicans
but instead, what
accidentally happened is somebody slipped in a list
of prep school graduates
who were investigated
by their honor code committee
during their time at prep school for various,
for cheating and other kinds of, you know, worse things.
And they said, oh, here's our list of super qualified people.
And then one by one, they're like, oh my God,
these people are terrible.
So it's sort of like a classic mix-up in a lot of ways.
Now, because of this news about pardons being offered, we know that the panic is extending to the things that Flynn, who has
flipped, and Manafort, who hasn't yet flipped, that what they might tell Mueller. While all this
news was breaking, a bunch of Democratic senators, this was really strange, they released a statement
urging the Justice Department to protect Mueller from being fired. These statements seemingly came out
of nowhere and made a lot of folks worry that there's something going on behind the scenes.
Seema, what did you make of that? These, you know, Blumenthal and others just coming out and saying
we must protect the special counsel, seemingly out of the blue. Well, I mean, it seems like the
White House is in an increasing state of panic, where you have the lawyers having to hire their
own lawyers, and yet at the same time, the president wants to hire more lawyers and they won't work for him which is unheard of because
you know normally it's very prestigious to be a white house lawyer yes right um but he's having
problems because people you know he hasn't necessarily listened to his lawyers which has
been a frustration um so it just seems like the white house a they're an increasing level of panic
and potentially moving towards doing something with muller which i think a lot of people on the Hill don't want.
And I think, you know, Dowd leaving the White House, leaving the president, that's a notable moment
because people thought that Dowd would be able to sort of, he would listen to him.
When he was brought in, people thought, like, this would be another one of the adults in the White House
who would sort of keep the president in check.
And then, you know, as we've seen, that has happened once again.
And then, you know, as we've seen, that has happened once again.
It's the adults in the White House. It's really it seems to be that if you're an adult who goes into the White House because you're an adult, one of two things happens.
You either quit because it's a madhouse or you kind of go through a kind of political Benjamin Button and become a child.
You regress.
Yes.
Benjamin Button and become a child.
You regress.
Yes.
Like, basically,
Donald Trump
is a political
Benjamin Button-er.
Yeah.
He found the perfect
kind of youth potion
that doesn't make you
look younger at all.
No, no.
No, it's like
Dorian Gray,
but your body gets worse
and your brain gets dumber.
I mean, all his wives
stay the same age.
He just keeps getting older.
Right, his wives, he does figure it out. He did figure. I mean, all his wives stay the same age. He just keeps getting older. Right. His wives, he does
figure it out. He did figure out how to Benjamin Button
his wives
through
this weapon. It's a kind of
futuristic ray called patriarchy.
Or something. Emily,
when John Dowd quit last week,
Trump was ecstatic to
finally start doing it his way.
What do you think is part of his way that we haven't yet seen?
Are you at all worried about what his way will be?
Like, wait, his way of doing the presidency?
Yeah, like he's going to finally, he is going to be himself.
He is done being a president for other people.
I feel like Donald Trump saying, I can finally do the presidency my way would be like me saying,
I can finally do this brain surgery my way.
It's like, there's not another way I've been doing brain surgery.
I don't know how to do brain surgery.
I mean, I'll give it a go.
Just want to pause to recognize that Dr. Ben Carson...
I mean...
...is a literal brain surgeon.
And his most recent scandal is blaming his wife for purchasing a thirty thousand dollar
dinette set okay in his defense women do be shopping
you're a brain surgeon you've accidentally purchased thirty thousand dollars worth of
shitty furniture on the government time.
The scandal has been going on for the better part of two weeks. You're asked a question about it,
and at the two-week mark, right when it's about to go away, like it's just the, it's on the ice flow. It's floating out to sea.
It's waving.
And he's like, my wife did it.
What if I say that now?
Oh, no.
That's worse because it's a government job
and she doesn't work for the government?
I like how he's like,
oh, you know what might make this horrible situation better?
Fighting with my wife.
I want him to put out a book
that's called Marriage.
It's not brain surgery.
But then the subtitle is
because I'm good at brain surgery
and I'm not good at this.
Looking around the room,
angry reporter, angry reporter,
angry reporter, smiling wife wife i got an idea
sema it also came out this week that uh as you said a bunch of different lawyers have turned
down the job of representing the president um what do you think like what do you think is preventing
blue chip firms like this is actually deeply strange, right? Representing the presidency used to be
an honor. Even when he was being
impeached for lying about
what in hindsight was a
deeply egregious abuse of office
with an intern. Yeah.
Let's get some hindsight on that
whole thing. Seriously.
That would be really interesting to look back at that in the context
of the Me Too movement. But you're absolutely right.
I mean, that presidents have, you know, if you're a top chip lawyer, you want to work for the president no matter who it is.
So it's really interesting.
I think it feeds to two things.
One, you can't control him as a client.
And we've all seen that.
And we've seen this on the campaign trail.
We've seen this at the White House.
You have the president on a script.
And he can sort of stick by the script.
But then once he starts going off his own cuff, it's far more entertaining for reporters and more newsworthy for
reporters, but it's perhaps not the best thing when you're
dealing with an obstruction of justice
probe with the special prosecutor
and facing charges.
So I think some lawyers are wary in that
part. And then also, he also has a habit of not
paying people who he hires.
Right.
Sort of a one-two punch punch he's a terrible client who often in defending himself
cops to several crimes in the tweets and then he's also unbearable
and he won't pay you at the end of it at the end of it you'll be like i'm not paying you i'm in jail
why would i why would i pay scat and arps for this service everyone in my family is in jail now
that's not how it ends in our hearts we know that we get to the other side of this
and we're relieved and we're glad, but we're not satisfied.
Everybody's made their peace with that.
Everybody made their peace with the permanent injustice that will never be erased from the books.
You guys all good with that? Absolutely.
I've been black for like 23 years now.
Jaboukie's been black for 23 years.
That's just like a way to get in the fact that he's 23 years old.
It's like really a frustrating thing.
He also brought that up on the last time he was on love it or leave it.
It's my only credit.
When we come back.
Okay.
Stop.
Hey,
don't go anywhere.
There's more of love it or leave it coming up.
And we're back!
Now for a game we call OK Stop.
Here's how it works.
We're going to watch a clip wherever it stops.
We talk about it. That's it.
We say OK Stop, and then we can make a comment.
While Robert Mueller works slowly and methodically to unravel the various illegalities and malfeasance
that helped Trump and his second string
goon squad attain wealth and power,
Donald Trump is flailing a bit
through a scandal he refuses to comment on.
The Stormy Daniels saga.
L'affaire...
What's the French word for weather? Storm.
Tempest.
Can you do it? Because I'm going to fuck it up.
L'affaire tempeste.
Cool.
Mike, can you do it? Because I'm going to fuck it up.
L'affaire Trompeste.
Cool.
What he said.
Trump's lawyer recently claimed
he made a hush payment
to Stormy Daniels
with his own money
and that Trump wasn't involved.
That is so crazy.
What a crazy thing to say.
So Trump's lawyer's lawyer
went on Megyn Kelly
to defend him. Trump's lawyer's lawyer went on Megyn Kelly to defend him.
Trump's lawyer's lawyer.
This is just a Russian nesting doll of idiots.
It's like...
Guys, episode title, right?
I think it's...
It can be beaten, but maybe it won't be, you know? Probably not.
The bar is set.
Let's roll the clip.
Weird thing about this case is that Michael Cohen
signed the deal, Donald Trump didn't,
and you are claiming that Michael Cohen,
the president's lawyer and fixer, the Ray Donovan character,
never, ever told Donald Trump about it.
Never told him.
Okay, stop.
They've really put themselves in quite a bind here.
Because does that mean that Michael Cohen
is just not doing things,
just like going rogue on behalf of clients
and writing checks for people
and not asking, like it's a crazy claim.
I have really terrible friends apparently
because I couldn't get them to pay like five bucks
at that time.
I mean, seriously.
If somebody put out $130,000 for me and...
I'm ready for them to just like leak the Venmo receipts
of just like...
Cash app.
Thousands.
With just like...
Cash app.
Cash app, whatever.
And the memo is just like the dancing lady emoji.
That's what I think it would be.
Can I also point out, she started that sentence by saying,
the weird thing about this case is,
like, so confident she had narrowed it down.
I wish I had that much confidence about anything I said.
Dispensed $130,000 of his own money and never sought reimbursement from Donald Trump?
100%.
No one believes that, David.
Okay, stop.
You know lawyers.
As generous as they are stupid.
So, first of all, that's fair.
But I want you to know
that it's actually a nuanced thing I just said,
because if you really think about it,
what I was calling you was shark-like,
but ultimately very smart.
You know what I mean?
If you think about the math of the joke.
I don't want to break it down, but you know what I mean?
You see what I'm saying, right?
You get it. You get it.
But by the way, I didn't mean you.
I, of course, meant these
crazy, terrible,
stupid lawyers. Wait. Unless, do
you represent Donald Trump?
No. Okay. Do you represent
the lawyer representing Donald Trump?
One final question. One final question. Do you represent the lawyer representing Donald Trump? One final question.
One final question.
Do you represent the lawyer representing the lawyer representing Donald Trump?
Because based on this guy's performance, he does need a lawyer.
I think that's the sequel to Human Centipede.
Lots of people believe it. it okay if you understand the dynamics
of the relationship it was not the dynamics of the relationship donald trump has billions of
dollars and michael cohen doesn't let me finish my let me michael cohen does have millions of
dollars okay billions so no billions and billions all right let me finish my answer okay okay stop Okay, stop. I just want, you guys can't see this at home,
but Megyn Kelly, who's not perfect,
is doing an admirable job in this interview,
but the poor production has taken over the situation
because the camera has zoomed in
on a large photo of Michael Cohen,
who is not present at this event,
looking like someone just whispered in his ear
that they found a head in his car.
Michael Cohen had great authority
within that organization to take care of things.
He chose not to go to the boss.
He chose to take care of this thing.
Why would he pay
$130,000 of his own money?
You know what?
It is the most
unanswerable question.
What is this story they're telling?
What lawyer
spends $130,000 of his own money for his client?
It's not a thing.
Unless it's like Susan Sarandon, you know, in one of those movies where she plays a lawyer.
And I don't think this is one of those.
I mean, I've gotten high and bought some shit on Amazon that I shouldn't have.
But it's like
max $80.
One other
reason that we know that this is
bullshit, by the way, is something that Michael
Cohn already told us, which is that
when he paid Stormy Daniels,
I believe it was Stormy Daniels,
it's one of the settlements, he used
the line of credit
he had taken out on his home. Yeah, yeah. Get yourself a friend who loves you the way Michael
Cohen loves Donald Trump. He borrowed against his home. As anyone who can spend, anyone who's
giving away $130,000 who doesn't care about it's not going to ask for it back does they borrow he borrowed it from business it's not a mortgage it's a line
of credit but it's still money he needs to pay back and if you have money to pay someone $130,000
you don't go to your home loan first right that what a, like, that's not what fancy,
I don't think,
that's like what fancy rich people do.
You know, when they're paying their hush money.
They write a check.
They do the thing where they have that,
that beautiful checkbook with multiple checks
and they write it out and they rip it out
and there's a little stub left behind.
A stub that someone later will find.
You know what I mean, Jaboukie?
No, I know exactly what you're talking about.
They begrudgingly take it out from underneath their desk,
slap it down.
Yeah, and it's a beautiful leather book.
Yeah, and they're looking up at the person
while they're writing it.
That's how you write a $130,000 check
with your own fucking money.
You don't borrow against your home.
Hey, honey, how was work today?
I don't want to talk about it. Why?
I don't want to talk about it. Did something happen?
I just had a...
You're going to be mad.
You know?
I mean, Ben Carson isn't looking so bad
now.
Husband of the year material.
You're not answering. You're dodging. You're getting out of balance.
I am answering you. What's the truth?
The truth is he loves
the boss.
He did it out of love.
He did it.
Okay, stop.
Shout out to the tourists who couldn't get
into the show they wanted and got
to be in the live audience for Megyn Kelly.
Because they're having a great time and they're laughing and funny stuff.
Just one other just small note.
When you're a lawyer for a high profile client who very clearly is lying, you don't have to go on news shows.
You don't have to.
You could actually just say,
no, thank you.
It doesn't matter what the public thinks,
and I can only make this worse
because your questions will be hard.
I should just fight this out in the legal system,
the only place where it really counts.
You go on Megyn Kelly when you're like,
we have a story to tell.
These people don't have a story to tell.
They're not waiting for the truth to come out.
Don't go on Megyn Kelly.
He does look like he's
having a good time, though. Don't discourage them.
He's smiling.
Don't discourage them.
Our ratings are up. Our viewership
is up. We need this.
Mainstream media, everybody.
Michael Cohen, this guy, Carter Page, what are they doing?
He did it out of love, and he did it out of loyalty.
I think when you're Donald Trump, and the best lawyer you can get is Michael Cohen,
that means that when you're Michael Cohen, the best lawyer you can get is this guy.
Are we sure he's a lawyer and not from improv everywhere?
Just like sneaking on?
Like sometimes you just send these shows a press release.
They have you on.
They don't check.
Yeah, I think I recognize that guy from my level two class.
Two seconds later he's just like,
and that's why he did it, out of love.
Did I hear Chinese restaurant?
When we come back, we're gonna play a game about the census.
So buckle up for that.
Don't go anywhere. This is Love It or Leave It, and there's more on the way.
And we're back! Now for a game we call Come to Our Census.
Can you hear that? In the distance. Excited drumming.
Children laughing.
It's finally here.
What we've all been waiting for.
It's time for the United States Census.
Once every ten years, Americans from sea to shining sea come together as one and fill out a Scantron.
The census is boring, but it is so important.
It's one of the most consequential civic responsibilities we have. Earlier this week, the Trump administration announced they would be adding a question about immigration status to the census.
A lot of people are very understandably worried about it.
So we wanted to talk about it in a game we call Come to Our Census.
Would anybody out there like to play?
It's her birthday.
Let's come forward.
It's her birthday.
That works.
That was very effective.
Alisa's going to come and give you a microphone.
Hi, what's your name?
Hi, Susie.
Susie.
Yes.
Let's play the game.
Okay.
What is a major consequence of adding a question about citizenship to the United States Census?
Is it A?
The Census will spill onto a fourth page, thereby depleting an additional square mile of
rainforest, which is only happening because Trump
repealed the no-census paper from
Fern Gully regulation that Obama
signed because of logging
oligarch S. Trump nicely during
a fake charity event at Mar-a-Lago.
No-census paper
from Fern Gully.
I'm sorry.
Realizing now I took you all on a journey
and it went a little bit further
than you were prepared to go.
Is it B?
Undocumented immigrants afraid of being caught
will avoid filling out their census forms,
warping the data,
and lowering the official population
in certain neighborhoods.
Or was it C?
American citizens will feel a raw and intense patriotism
the moment they check that box,
leading to a surge in voting, flag-waving,
apple pie baking, Uncle Sam hat-buying,
and preemptive war.
I'm gonna go for B.
B is correct, Susie.
Oh, no.
Don't worry.
We're only going to hear that six more times.
Question two for Susie.
Why is an accurate census count important?
Is it A?
Because if we don't get an accurate head count,
then we won't know how much pizza to order.
Is it B?
Because we as a nation are like Tony Shalhoub's character on Monk,
and we must know the perfect, precise, exact number of citizens in each district
because it just makes us feel slightly more comfortable
when we pay attention to detail,
which, again, is similar to Tony Shalhoub's character,
Adrian Monk on the show Monk,
which ran for eight seasons on the USA Network.
Or was it C?
Because the census count in a neighborhood
determines an insane amount about a neighborhood,
including which member of Congress represents them,
how many members of the state house they have, how districts are drawn, and how 132 government
agencies allocate $675 billion in resources, including funding for Medicare, Head Start,
lunch programs, and even money for highway repairs, which means that if immigrants are
too scared to fill out the census, certain neighborhoods that just happen to be more
black and brown and liberal, of course, will be punished for a decade.
C. I think that's right punished for a decade. C.
I think that's right. I think it's C.
Final question,
Susie.
In 2010,
1.5 million people of color
were not counted in the census.
Why are activists and experts already worried that the census will be even less accurate in 2020?
Is it A?
The director of the Census Bureau resigned on the same day James Comey was fired,
and almost a year later, he has still not been replaced because, you know,
Trump has a lot of fox and friends to catch up on.
Was it B?
The Republican budget slashed funding to the Census Bureau,
which means fewer people
will go door-to-door
this year,
and important field tests
were canceled.
Or was it C?
Lots of people
will be filling out
the census online
for the first time ever,
and despite America's
impeccable record
on cybersecurity,
many people are worried
census data
could be hacked
or manipulated.
B.
All of the above.
Incorrect,
Susie.
Happy birthday, Susie.
Happy birthday, Susie.
Susie, you've won.
Come
to our census.
Parachute gift card. You can buy some
sheets and stuff. You know, pillows.
Or really whatever.
You know, so thank you for playing, Susie.
Or a bathroom, Susie.
That's great.
That's exactly right.
Happy birthday.
Thank you.
Get yourself a robe.
Give it up for Susie.
We'll be right back.
Hey, don't go anywhere.
There's more of Love It or Leave It coming up.
And we're back!
Look, I don't want to make a big deal out of it,
but this is actually the one-year anniversary
of a show called Love It or Leave It.
Which is cool stop it
it was nothing
it's a labor of love
you know
but
it's been a pretty intense
year
I don't know if you guys
have been paying attention
to the news at all
but a lot of shit
has gone down
it is often pretty difficult to keep up with the pace of news and so this is going to be year. I don't know if you guys have been paying attention to the news at all, but a lot of shit has gone down.
It is often pretty difficult to keep up with the pace of news
and so this is going to be a game
we play with our panel.
Okay? And I am going
to give them several
events or tweets
or other things that took place during
the year and together as a team
they are going to put those events
in the right order,
hopefully, right in front of you.
All right?
So give it up for our panel.
They're going to play today.
You guys ready?
Question number one.
Hope Hicks, Sean Spicer, Mike Dubke, Sean Spicer,
Anthony Scaramucci.
These were the communications directors over the past year at the White House.
Their names are behind you.
In what order were they communications director?
Oh, my God.
Hope is last.
All of those are real names?
All of them are real names.
Okay. You have to put them in order. I totally miss Dubke. All of those are real names? All of them are real names.
Okay.
You have to put them in order.
I totally missed Dubkey.
Yeah, who was that?
He was there for two seconds.
And then Scaramucci was for three seconds.
Sean, Scaramucci, Mike, Sean Hope.
Close.
However, it was Spicer, then Dubkey,
then Spicer again, then the 10 glorious days of Scaramucci, then Hope Hicks.
So that was five communications directors in a year, a year and change, which is more than Obama had in eight years.
So he's winning. Trump is winning.
Trump is... Most communications directors.
Trump is winning yet again. Question number two for our panel.
Trump tweets are notoriously
unique and not redundant.
In what order
did he send
the following tweets? One,
everybody is asking
why the Justice Department and FBI
isn't looking into all of the dishonesty
going on with Crooked Hillary and the Dems.
Two, many people in our country
are asking what the Justice Department,
quotes around justice, tough hit,
tough hit, is going to do
after the fact that totally Crooked Hillary,
after receiving a subpoena
from the United States Congress,
deleted and, quote, acid washed,
end quote,
30,000 emails.
No justice.
Three, so why aren't the committees and investigators,
and of course our beleaguered AG,
remember that was a period of time
where he was hassling Sessions,
why aren't they looking into Cricket Hillary's
crimes and Russia relations?
These are all from today.
Two, I remember two from the campaign.
I think two is from the campaign.
Because the acid washing was a big thing that he was focused on for a bit.
Okay.
So do you think that's number one then?
I don't know.
We can't tell the rest because the rest are all similar.
Yeah.
I feel like three is last.
Believer Day juice.
That's Sessions.
Two and three.
Two, one, three.
Two, one, three. You and 3. 2 and 3. 2, 1, 3.
You're so,
so not right.
We were misled.
Beligard AG
was first
because he was
trying to fire Sessions.
After Donald Brazil's
book in November
he went after Hillary
and finally
December of 2017
that was when
he went after
Michael Flynn
when he,
when Michael Flynn
pled guilty to Mueller.
Oh my gosh.
I am a failure.
Final.
So the acid-washed one is the most recent.
That's wild.
I mean, acid-washed jeans didn't last that long.
Yeah, it was a throwback.
You guys are all correct in that it was a throwback.
He was digging into his...
It was in his drafts for a while. Yeah, it was a throwback. It was a cheat his it was he pulled out you know it was like a throwback. Yeah it was his
it was a cheat.
That's his thunder road you know
like he brings he doesn't do it
at every show but when he does people
fucking love it.
Final question.
Put the following scandals in
chronological order.
Trump calling Haiti and Africa shithole
countries. Trump saying
that there were bad people
on both sides
of the Nazi
anti-Nazi clashes
in Charlottesville.
Trump tweets
that his nuclear button
is much bigger
and more powerful
than Kim Jong-un's
and Trump gives
a rambling speech
in front of Boy Scouts
where he brags
about his victory.
I think it's
Charlottesville nuclear
Boy Scout shithole.
Boy Scout was first?
Boy Scout Charlottesville nuclear shithole. Boy Scout was first? Boy Scout Charlottesville
nuclear shithole.
You got it.
Boy Scout Charlottesville
nuclear shithole.
I have to say.
Well done.
Thank you.
Boy Scout Charlottesville
nuclear shithole
is a fucking cool name
for a bar
in Charlottesville. Yeah. Nuclear shithole is a fucking cool name for a bar in Charlottesville.
Nuclear shithole.
That's cool. That sounds like
a place where you get caps
in Fallout. Sounds like a
symptom I described to my doctor.
They do that thing where they show you the different faces
and I have to show how you feel
And the last one is the nuclear face
Oh we got a nuclear shithole on our hands
What a year
When we come back
The rant wheel
You stop it now.
Oh my, how much more of that can we take?
Don't go anywhere.
This is love it or leave it.
There's more on the way.
And we're back.
Now for a segment we call the rant wheel.
Here's how it works.
We spin a wheel and wherever it lands,
we rant about the topic.
This week on the wheel,
we have repealing the Second Amendment.
We have the Atlanta computer hacks.
We have the NCAA.
We have Texas felon disenfranchisement.
We have Stephon Clark.
We have Scott Pruitt's $50 apartment.
We have race science, which has been in the news inexplicably this week.
And we have personal attacks against the Parkland kids.
Let's spin the wheel.
It has landed on this Texas disenfranchisement.
How many of you saw this story about this woman? She was on probation.
She didn't realize it was against the rules, against the law.
She voted while she was on probation, even though she's a felon, even though she was technically barred from voting in Texas, she was sentenced to five years in jail. Five years in jail for a mistake.
No one in their right mind can believe that this woman was willing to jeopardize her future to cast
a vote. She clearly just made a mistake, and this judge just threw the book at her.
The most insane part is that I saw a similar article
of a white woman who tried to vote for Trump twice.
And they gave her $50.
Yeah.
And the Russians sent her a cake.
But no, she only got $750 fine
and just some probation.
That was it.
It is truly despicable.
It's obviously a reminder of just sort of, you know, the racial inequity and how we sentence people.
But also just a reminder that this woman was mistaken in exercising her vote.
But she's correct in thinking it's completely crazy that after she gets out of jail and she's paid her debts to society,
where supposedly she's now supposed to go get a job and start a life and do what people do,
that she's permanently barred from voting. It's actually counterintuitive. So of course she made
the mistake. Why on earth would we bar felons from voting? We don't bar them from getting all
kinds of jobs. We tell them that they've paid their debts, that justice has been served,
and then they're never allowed to vote again because it's a wholly racist policy
designed to disenfranchise minorities in the South
and elsewhere.
And, you know, on Ponce,
the people they've talked a lot about this
is a great project in Florida that is on the ballot.
They're trying to restore felon voting rights.
It's something that Democrats need to get behind in a big way.
I personally believe in a constitutional
amendment guaranteeing citizens the right to vote in the United States. There is no positive right
in the Constitution that guarantees the right to vote, and we should have one. And I believe long
term that Democrats should rally behind that in the same way that Republicans have been beating
their heads against the wall for this balanced budget amendment or the flag amendment or the gay marriage amendment for so long. I think Democrats should
get behind a voting rights amendment. I think it's important. Let's spin the wheel.
It has landed on Stephon Clark.
Seema, I know this was something that you had suggested
because you wanted to talk about it, so take it away.
It seems weird to talk about it in this kind of setting,
but we had more news today.
The autopsy that the family commissioned came out
that he was shot eight times, six of which were in the back,
one of which was in the side,
and that his body was left on the ground for three to seven minutes or sorry, three to 10 minutes before they tried to attempt to give him help.
So, I mean, there's a lot of we still need to find out more about the investigation.
But I mean, this keeps happening, you know, and I just think it's something we all need to talk about.
Yeah, I think there have been a lot of protests in Sacramento, which I think is good. Yeah, it's a heartbreaking case. He had a cell phone. Yeah,
he had a cell phone, and he was in his own backyard. It makes me crazy when people criticize
the protests. The protesters surrounded the Sacramento Kings Stadium, which I thought was
really smart and cool. Some of the athletes might join them tomorrow. I'm sorry to interrupt,
but there's a big basketball game tomorrow, and some of the athletes might join them tomorrow. I'm sorry to interrupt. There's a big basketball game tomorrow and some of the athletes might join them.
Yeah, which would be amazing.
And I feel like I keep hearing people criticizing it being like,
why are these protests disrupting things?
And it's like, you don't know what a protest is.
Because now you're talking about it.
Yeah, I mean, it seems to happen over and over.
We've talked about this before, that whenever somebody sees a protest they disagree with,
they're like, what happened to the protests that are apolitical and don't bother anybody?
Yeah, that no one knows about or hears about.
They really just want a Black Eyed Peas song.
That is the only acceptable form of protest to them.
Yeah, I think that's right.
And that would be terrible.
Let's spin the wheel again.
It has landed on Scott Pruitt's $50 apartment.
So this, I think this first broke yesterday,
that Scott Pruitt had been renting a room from a lobbyist,
that that's where he was staying when he was in D.C.
And I remember seeing that, and people were saying,
well, this could be untoward, especially if he's not paying fair market rent.
And I thought to myself, I actually thought,
I wonder what number they landed on, right?
Because they would land on a number low enough
so that Scott Pruitt's getting a deal,
but high enough so that they could defend it, right?
Like, you know, like a too good of a deal.
Like, that's what I thought we were going to end up with.
We were going to be arguing over a too good
of an apartment situation for Scott Pruitt.
No, they're such bad criminals.
Scott Pruitt was spending $50 a night, but he only paid them on the nights he was there,
as all rental apartments work. So he's paying nothing, like a couple hundred bucks for an
apartment in DC.C.
Or whatever it was.
A basement or some kind of cave or cavern.
I'm not sure where they keep some sort of abandoned coal mine.
What did you shout?
A shithole apartment.
Her daughter lived there for free the rest of the time?
I got to tell you, this is not well sourced from my point of view
because you're just a woman in a repeal
and go fuck yourself shirt, but I trust you implicitly.
Can I get
a second source from the crowd?
Second source from Susie,
we're calling it a fact.
I feel like
two sources from the same table is like
a Wikipedia page that references another Wikipedia page.
Let's spin it again.
It landed on repealing the Second Amendment.
But first, I just want...
Wrong.
So Justice John Paul Stevens wrote an op-ed in the New York Times about repealing the Second Amendment.
Brett Stevens, conservative writer in the New York Times, also wrote about repealing the Second Amendment.
I have to say, you know, it's this thing where it's cast as the kind of why won't it's almost always said,
like, if you really believed in gun control, you'd believe in repealing the Second Amendment.
And it's often cast as the kind of extreme position in gun control, which in some sense it
is. But it's also the the dumbest position in that it's not going to happen. And if you say that we
need to repeal the Second Amendment to have gun
control, you are conceding an incredibly important argument, which says that you can't have common
sense gun control under the Second Amendment, which is totally not true. We don't need to
repeal the Second Amendment to pass the gun control we need to protect ourselves.
Just refer to the well-regulated militia line.
Yes. And we are not going to repeal
the Second Amendment. We are not going to be able to get that through Congress. We sure as hell
shouldn't do a ratifying convention in all the states, which we've never done, which would be
crazy. And we're never going to repeal the Second Amendment, and it's a sucker's game. So we should
just talk about common sense gun control that we can pass without ever very legally, very constitutionally
under the Second Amendment. And that's all I wanted to say about that. Should we do one more?
All right, let's do one more.
It has landed on personal attacks against the Parkland kids.
So there's been this deeply strange and vicious campaign against the Parkland kids as individuals.
You know, you've seen Laura Ingraham obviously has gotten into some trouble over it. A bunch of conservatives have made a point of targeting these kids, insulting these kids, making fun of these kids, calling them brown shirts, all kinds of insults.
And I think it's, look, I think we're all in agreement that that's crazy and despicable.
I don't think we need to make that case.
There are kids who are through a gruesome shooting who became activists because of what they went through.
And you can attack them on the merits of their arguments, but you don't need to attack them personally.
That's, I think, pretty obvious.
But I think it says something about conservative incentives.
That so many people think that there is value in doing this, that doing this somehow proves something about them.
Like there's almost like this, it's almost as if when someone says something insulting about david hogg or or emma gonzalez or any of these kids that they're proving that they're not afraid of liberals or they're proving they're not politically correct or they're proving
that they'll speak their mind and it really is a part of that poisonous culture which is
this idea that you demonstrate just how much you aren't beholden to liberals by proving you don't care when you've hurt their feelings or said something bad about them or sort of demonstrated your kind of bona fides to your little club of conservatives.
It's what Tommy Lahren does.
It's what all these people do.
And both sides have their version of it.
But there just is no equivalent of this. There is no equivalent of this on the left. And you know that because
one point conservatives have made over the course of these marches is, I don't see these liberals
applauding the March for Life. Why don't they think, praise those kids for standing up for
what they believe in? Well, we don't go around and puning their motives and
attacking children for protesting because they believe in being pro-life. We disagree with them
on policy, but there isn't a large campaign to insult children every time they march on Washington.
And we know that because if it happened, we would never hear the end of it from these very same
people. Listen, I get it. These kids make me feel really bad about myself.
I've really not done very much with my life compared to them,
and that makes me feel bad about myself.
Yeah, I feel incredibly insecure about how much more articulate they are than I am,
but I'm not going to deal with that by insulting them
because then it would be so obvious how insecure I was.
You know what I mean?
Like, have a little shame.
For the black students at Parkland, there was a call for more police presence in the school.
And the black kids were like, hold up, what?
And I do think that that is an interesting intersection of the guns discussion that we're having right now.
Like, I don't think that more police is
good for everyone and it's kind of it's kind of just been tossed out in a way that's like
disregarding the identities of the people who were leading the guns like anti-gun movement before
the parkland situation happened and i do think it's true i think the parkland kids have tried
to say like look we've gotten this platform because mass shootings are something that affects white
communities and wealthier communities as well as basically every community. And so that's gotten
us more attention. I think they've done a good job of trying to bring in other voices and elevate
other voices to say that this is more than just about mass shootings, especially because in the
grand scheme of gun deaths in the United States, mass shootings are actually a very small part of it.
They are dwarfed by murders that happen every day in our cities,
and even more so, they're dwarfed by suicides.
And I think they've done a good job of saying this is a larger issue,
which I think is really important.
But it was interesting to see that one of the responses was a greater police presence
that just is a reminder that there are many different forms of violence
that people are dealing with on a daily basis. What do you got, Emily? I just think it's interesting that like a lot of the conservative
responses to try and avoid gun control is they're like, well, how about more police? And that's like,
that's a terrible idea. And then also like, well, how about we work on bullying? And then they're
the ones bullying the survivors of the shooting. It's just like, I don't think that they're
thinking before they talk about most of these
things.
And I think that's a good place to close.
Just a reminder that we are a company that cares about activism and doing
your part.
And I'd remind you that Melania Trump is leading a cyber bullying effort.
And you can sign up and be a part of it by going to whitehouse.gov
slash fake thing
and you can sign up.
That is our show.
I want to thank our panel,
Seema Mehta,
Jaboukie Young-White,
Emily Heller.
Thank you guys for coming out.
Have a great night.
Thank you.