Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime Podcast - Myron Gaines: The Lies Behind WW3 & Epstein
Episode Date: March 12, 2026Myron Gaines challenges mainstream narratives around Epstein, World War III, and global power struggles while arguing that understanding these hidden forces is key to waking up and taking control in a... rapidly changing world. Myron's links - Check out his books here - https://www.amazon.com/stores/Myron-Gaines/author/B0BVV871HF?ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1&qid=1773265923&sr=8-1&shoppingPortalEnabled=true https://www.instagram.com/fedreacts/?hl=en https://x.com/MyronGainesX?lang=en Do you want to be a guest? Fill out the form https://www.insidetruecrimepodcast.com/apply-to-be-a-guest Go to GoodRanchers.com and use code INSIDE to get a free meat for life plus $100 off your first three orders. F*%k your khakis and get The Perfect Jean 15% off with the code COX15 at theperfectjean.nyc/COX15 #theperfectjeanpod https://theperfectjean.nyc Get 10% sitewide for a limited time. Just visit https://GhostBed.com/cox and use code COX at checkout. Send me an email here: insidetruecrime@gmail.com Do you extra clips and behind the scenes content? Subscribe to my Patreon: https://patreon.com/InsideTrueCrime Check out my Dark Docs YouTube channel here - https://www.youtube.com/@DarkDocsMatthewCox Follow me on all socials! Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insidetruecrime/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@matthewcoxtruecrime Do you want a custom painting done by me? Check out my Etsy Store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/coxpopart Listen to my True Crime Podcasts anywhere: https://anchor.fm/mattcox Check out my true crime books! Shark in the Housing Pool: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0851KBYCF Bent: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BV4GC7TM It's Insanity: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08KFYXKK8 Devil Exposed: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08TH1WT5G Devil Exposed (The Abridgment): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1070682438 The Program: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0858W4G3K Bailout: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/bailout-matthew-cox/1142275402 Dude, Where's My Hand-Grenade?: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BXNFHBDF/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1678623676&sr=1-1 Checkout my disturbingly twisted satiric novel! Stranger Danger: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSWQP3WX If you would like to support me directly, I accept donations here: Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/MattCox69 Cashapp: $coxcon69 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
On June 18, 2023, Ocean Gate's Titan submersible imploded during an expedition dive to the Titanic,
killing all five on board, including Ocean Gate founder and CEO Stockton Rush.
Numerous industry experts and employees from within Ocean Gate itself had warned Rush of impending doom,
citing safety concerns and a lack of testing.
His hubris, ego, and reckless desire for innovation over all else cost him his life and that of four others.
The catastrophic destruction of the Titan submersible sent shockwaves through the ocean exploration industry that are still being felt today.
The Ocean Gate Titan Submersible, a preventable tragedy, a two-part series available now on shipwrecks and sea dogs.
Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
The thing with Edstein is that he's a criminal, but he was also an intelligence asset.
So Trump, there's a real chance of him being in Ph.D. He started an illegal war against Iran.
And the worst part is the real reason we're going is...
So I work with Uncensored America.
We called the Toxic Masculinity Tour.
So I just go to a bunch of different schools
and, you know, remind everyone why women suck at everything that men do.
Oh, my God.
I'm just kidding.
We debate a bunch of different things.
We debate feminism.
We debate geopolitics.
We debate cultural stuff.
I was debating a lot of the ICE stuff that was going on.
You know, I was like, you know, having provocative, you know,
signs that say, like, ice did nothing wrong.
stuff like that. And obviously the kids lose their minds. What do you mean? I did nothing wrong.
And, you know, we debate like the shootings were Renee Good and Alex, pretty, stuff like that.
How does that typically go? And how many of the end? Right. They get irate. They go nuts.
How many of these are you doing a month? So I'm doing, we do them probably one or two times a month because logistically,
getting on the campuses and making it happen is, I got a newfound respect for Charlie Kirk, by the way,
after doing this and going through this process. You have to make a chapter and go through all this,
you know, bureaucracy and then you have to, you know, set a, you know, get a table, set it up,
then, you know, have everything there, get arrange your security.
So it's not easy to do.
And Charlie had it like mastered where he had all of these different turning point, you know,
chapters made in all these different schools and he would go.
And the other big thing is like you can't really do it at private schools because private schools
refuse, you know, they reserve the right to just kick you off the campus because they don't
have to abide by the first amendment, but public schools do.
Okay.
So, and you just came, you just came from there.
So, what, I mean, how do these things go?
Do they, do they?
It's crazy.
So, like, what I'll do is, it depends on what it is, right?
So I have different lines, right?
Like, I, like, this time it was, why women deserve less.
I got a new book that came out, why women deserve even less.
The first book was why women deserve less.
The second book is why women deserve even less.
And then book three is coming in, why women deserve nothing.
So, that's like, let's go.
My God.
It's going out here.
This is, I got to go to hold.
home to my wife.
No, I'm just kidding.
But the book, you know, besides like the provocative talk,
what it really is is it kind of encapsulates dating in different, you know, times.
So why I'm Deserve Less, the first book was more about like guys focusing on themselves,
not being losers, understanding that the game has changed, feminism is here,
women have higher standards than ever before, you know, you can't be an average guy anymore.
It just doesn't work.
Yeah.
Even if they're an average woman.
Yes, average women do not want average men anymore.
Yeah.
And this is a very big red standard.
pill that guys are going to have to understand. You have to be exceptional to even get a chance.
And then why I don't deserve even less funny's title. But what that focuses more on is like,
how's dating landscape has changed in 2026 and beyond in my predictions with AI, with dating apps,
with sugar dating, with only fans with the rise of pornography. And we are moving, you know,
into a whole new era of relationships. And I think it's going to get worse before it gets better.
Why is it getting worse? Well, one, it,
This was something I've always just thought was fascinating.
And it wasn't really, and I've never really understood exactly why this happened.
But male testosterone is just dropping dramatically over the last like 50 or 100 years.
Is there like a study or something that why is that happening?
There's a bunch of different, you know, food.
You know, food is one of them.
Guys not doing laborious work.
Men in general not, you know, the need for masculinity is kind of dissipated a bit since we
in a, you know, modern world where everything is clean and safe and we don't have to worry
about anything.
Wars, you know, we don't have wars like that anymore, conflicts.
Well, we kind of have one now going on.
Right.
Which is crazy.
I mean, it's, but like not World War II type stuff.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Situation.
Exactly.
So it's not like there's boots on the ground.
Exactly.
Exactly.
Which I hope it doesn't get to that point.
But yeah, there's been a, there's a whole bunch of different reasons why the rise of
feminism.
All of these different things have, like, contributed to, you know, guys having lower testosterone
and in general, you know, degradation of relationships.
And then, obviously, the bottom line, which is the family in it.
Right. So it's funny because I went to prison, right, like 13 years. So I was literally like,
in 2006, I was, I was, all right, I was taken out of society and then came back 13 years later.
Never seen an iPhone. No, you know, I did have a phone. I had like the first razor.
It was really cool, right? You could chat texting had just come out. Facebook had just come out when I got
picked up and came back. This is like, what, 0809?
2006.
Okay, okay.
So in 2019, when I came back out, like everything had changed.
People were walking around with...
Smart phones and Bluetooth's and AirPods.
Right. There's six people sitting at a table that they obviously all went out together
and the whole family and I'm like, they're all on their phone or they're walking around talking.
You know how many times somebody would walk by me talking?
And I thought they're talking to me.
I'm like, I'm sorry, what?
I didn't...
And then it took me a couple of days to realize like, yeah.
Oh, they have something in there.
ear.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I'm thinking they're schizophrenic.
Yeah, yeah, they're nuts.
I'm used to the schizophrenic guys on, you know, in Coleman at the prison.
Yeah.
So, and then I just.
What was the biggest shock?
What was the biggest shock when you came out that you were like, what the hell is going on here?
I, I really, it took me about a year or two.
The whole cancel culture thing really shocked me because, look, when, and the news, and
maybe I, I, I think maybe I didn't notice it before.
But I don't think that's true because I was in my late 30s when I went to prison.
I remember growing up in the 80s and 90s, and I remember that the news seemed very, you know, they just reported the news.
Like the newscasters didn't give their opinion.
The actors didn't tell you what they thought of.
It was nobody's business.
Like, oh, no, well, that's pull.
I don't really talk about that.
Like, they stayed in the middle of the road.
They didn't have a cause.
And it suddenly became that all of these actors wanted you to, you know, wanted you to stop listening to so-and-so and cancel this.
And I didn't really know what canceled.
It was just coming out.
Cancel culture was just coming out.
And people started getting canceled left and right.
And I didn't really understand what that meant.
So I wasn't paying attention to it.
And I think I mentioned this to you.
I might have mentioned this to you before.
I actually, within a year or so of me getting out of prison, I actually had a podcast deal.
So I was just starting this with Colby, and I had a separate podcast deal based on some of the true crime books that I'd written.
And, I mean, contracts, everything, got a deal is probably worth a few hundred thousand.
Like, I was thrilled about this.
This is going to happen for me.
And while I'm doing the podcast, it was all through Riverside, right?
Through a company in L.A.
And during the course of this whole company.
I remember this story.
Yeah, had a conversation.
And I, one of the editors.
a mixed black girl made a comment about the, I forget, like, she made a comment about, I was talking
about just society in general. I was talking about like the economy and stuff. And she said something
about how, yeah, it was set up by old white people, old white men. And I went, I don't know that
they were all that old. I think most of these guys were in their 20s and 30s. I was like, okay.
And then it just morphed in this whole thing.
where she said something, I said something, and I said, well, I mean, that's just people's opinions.
Like, you're allowed to say what your opinion is. And we went back and forth and I ended up saying
something about, I didn't think that people should be canceled. I was like, like, like what they're
doing to Andrew Tate right now? I said, it just seems like this is just his opinion. And she went nuts.
It turned into, you're on hit. What do you mean by that? And I was like, well, I mean, I don't
agree with everything he said. I said, I agree with 90% of the stuff he says. Like, you should,
if you're having a hard time, then pull yourself up by your bootstraps.
Start working out.
Start working on yourself.
Become the person that you want to be.
If your girls aren't dating you, then become the guy that they want to date.
Exactly.
You know, like don't hate them.
And that's specifically what I talk about on the book.
Like, I have to do that nowadays.
So why I say all that.
And in the meantime, I end up saying that a lot of stuff.
I said, you know, he's also funny.
And she's like, what do you think is funny?
And I said, well, I said, you know, it's like, I said, I love the bit where he says
that a man, for a man to be on a yacht and own that.
yacht, he has to make all the right moves, work 80 hours a week, save money, make the right calls,
work his ass off, study, make the, you know, invest correctly. And ultimately, when he's in his
60s, he can, maybe he can get a, he can be on a yacht. He can own that yacht. And I said,
for a woman to be on that yacht, she's got to be 22 years old and have a makeup kit.
She can end up owning the yacht. I said, I go, and that's kind of true, right? So three days
later, I get the phone call that I'm a, Matt, we're not. Matt, we're not.
saying you're a misogynist. What? And suddenly, but, you know, we have to protect our,
our employees. Protect your, what did I say? Like what, and I was, and that was it. It was over.
And that's about $200,000 that I probably missed out on, which was a great opportunity.
And as a, and so we basically just continued on this. I just think that, so I said that,
and I was said that when I talked to you, I said, Andrew Tate got me, got, cost me $200,000.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I remember you telling that story.
It's a good story because it perfectly encapsulates where we are in society.
Because I, you know, as you're telling that story, I was thinking to myself, like, remember WWF Raw?
Like back in the day, Attitude Era?
Dude, they were pile driving chicks into tables and stuff.
Like, do you think that would fly now?
Like, I remember they were like, you know, Stone Cold Stuttering chicks.
Like, they were hitting her with chairs.
They're hitting with the bandmoorids.
They were smacking chicks on there.
I was like, wow, this is crazy stuff.
But, like, now it's like super woke and it's like, you know, you can't do any of that stuff.
Like, you look at like.
Well, look at the NFL.
Yeah.
As America turns 250 this year, it has me thinking about the people that really help build this country.
Not the ones in history books.
I'm talking about American ranchers.
The men and women who wake up before the sun work long days and keep food on our tables year after year.
That's exactly why I like good ranchers.
Good ranchers honors that legacy by only sourcing their meat from local American farmers and ranchers.
Everything from the pasture to the final seal on the box is done right here in America.
I'm actually a Good Ranchers subscriber myself.
In fact, my wife and I had the chicken nuggets last night, and they were amazing.
And that's not the only thing they have.
They have steak, chicken, seafood, and more.
And all of it is amazing quality.
If you want to support American ranchers and get great meat at the same time, now's the time to try it.
Subscribe today and get free meat plus $100 off your first three orders.
That's $40 off your first order and $30 off you are next two.
Just use my code inside.
That's good ranchers.com
American meat delivered.
You couldn't have gotten a more masculine
whatever sports
sport out there
and now it's just
they're taking a knee
and they hate America
and they're like come on man
Colin Kaepernick
like with all that bullshit
like dude Black Lives Matters a scam
Black Lives Matters a scam
Black Lives Matters a scam
you know I think I say all the time
they're a domestic terrorist organization
they literally white cities on fire
they burn things up
They ride in the streets and, you know, Antifa, same thing, domestic terrorist organization.
It took Charlie Kirk getting shot for them to finally take a stand and say, you know, we need to designate these guys are a terrorist organization.
But BLM is a terrorist organization too.
I mean, if you look at the definition of terrorism, it fits it 100 percent committing acts of violence for the purpose of, you know, some political ideology.
That's what it is.
And, you know, obviously they're scared to do that because they don't want to be called racist.
But it's a scam.
I call it buying lavish mansions, you know, but that's what they do.
They scam, they steal, they destroy cities all over the place.
They're rioting in L.A., Minneapolis, obviously after the George Floyd riots,
ridiculous, right?
We're talking about a guy that literally, you know, Floyd, he was overdosing on drugs.
You know, oh, the knee on the neck.
Is that really what killed him?
I don't think so.
I think it was the drug overdose and everything else, and that's like a hot take.
But I think Shalvin should get a pardon.
I don't think he should be in jail.
I think it's BS.
And I think that was a politicized arrest.
He didn't get a fair trial.
We all know that.
There was people in the jury.
There are BLM members.
So it's like, how are you going to give a guy like that a free trial with a politicized case like that?
There was no way.
They had to make an example of them.
And we're starting to get into a very dangerous era where I see police officers being crucified for the, you know, to kind of keep the peace.
And what's going to happen is you get like the Ferguson effect.
Law enforcement is not going to want to do their job.
They're not going to want to do active policing.
They're going to do the bare minimum.
They're going to respond.
And I won't one calls and that's it.
They're not going to actively go out and try to, you know, deter and or stop crime.
And you run into problems with this because they get scared.
They're like, I don't want to lose my job.
I don't want to get involved in anything.
And that, you know, they get that fear.
And who suffers?
The public suffers when that happens, right?
Because honest, let's be, and I know for you, you're like, you probably hate, you know,
you don't hate the cops.
You're actually very pro.
Are you kidding?
Yeah, you're actually very pro police.
Listen, the FBI didn't put me.
The FBI secret, the government didn't put me in prison.
I put me in prison.
I was breaking the law.
I should have gone to prison.
I don't doubt that for a second.
Yeah.
They did.
And,
and it was fair.
Everybody I dealt with was fair.
I had a couple of asshole FBI agents,
but they didn't get me more time as a result of it.
They just didn't like me.
And what are they supposed to like me?
Yeah.
You know,
I'm committing fraud on a regular basis.
And if I always had the,
you know,
when I was on a job,
I always try to be nice.
Because obviously you want to get them
to confess and stuff like that too,
but I always would say like,
look, man,
we're here to,
you know,
we're here to take your freedom,
not your dignity.
So, you know, like, I remember if I arrested somebody and he was like, he was with his kids or some shit like that, I'd be like, look, we'll handcuff you in the back.
We're not going to, you know, we're not going to handcuff you in front of your kids.
Because, like, stuff like that stick.
So, like, I remember that.
But, yeah, like, what we're approaching here is, like, we're approaching this era where, like, police are scared to do their jobs.
And the ones up happening is, like, they just don't want to do their jobs.
And then the crime ramps up because of that.
So another thing also that I want to mention, like district attorney's offices, they're under an enormous amount of pressure to indict these police officers, right?
So what's up happening is if there's ever, like, a.
a use of force and it's like questionable and it gets like a little bit of media.
The Diaz office is like, you know what?
We don't want to deal with the headache.
Just indict him.
Let him go to trial.
That way if he's found guilty.
It's not our fault.
It's not our fault.
And that's kind of where we're going.
It's like they're just indicting and they're just charging.
Like the cop out of Illinois.
That shot the woman.
I think her name was like Sonia master or something like that when she had the boiling hot water.
I was like, dude, she was literally about to throw the boiling hot water at him.
He got found guilty.
And I was like, wow.
Like that's crazy.
Yeah.
Listen, I, I, I, uh, I tell me,
heard me say this for.
Listen, I get no more enjoyment out of life than seeing these people that won't roll the window
down for the cops or giving their IDs.
And we're talking about as they're, look, please roll down your window.
I need your, I'm allowed to.
No, you're not allowed.
And they're arguing with them.
Listen, my wife would tell you, these guys have so much patience.
I mean, we're talking about 30 seconds into it.
I'm like, break the window, pull them out, drag them out of the car, break the window,
spray this guy with Mace.
I mean, I can't imagine the amount of patience you have to have with some of these.
people that are screaming and they're calling them names and they're, and I get it. Like, you know,
it's just calling names, but it's like the so overwhelmingly disrespectful. I'm sorry. I'm going to ask
once or twice for your ID and then I'm going to, I'm going to call the sergeant, which I'm sure
say, call the sergeant and I'm going to pop this window and I'm dragging this dude out of the car.
Like I need two other guys, but this guy can't, you can't just not give me your ID. I pulled you over.
It's a valid stop. You ran a red light. What are you doing? And they just, people have no respect for
police?
They don't.
I don't think that really,
I don't think any of those videos happen in Florida.
Because in Florida,
yeah, yeah, yeah.
I'm,
you better be fucking nice.
Yeah,
yeah, yeah,
I don't know what it's like in Miami.
Yeah,
you know,
you got Grady Judd here.
Yeah,
it's,
yeah, the thing is, like,
um,
it's crazy because, like,
these body cams,
I'm glad because,
you know, BLM actually
one of the big pushers of like,
we need more accountability
on the police and body cameras
and like good.
Great, you can see how they act.
Now you can see how stupid they act,
right?
And then you're like,
you know what, you deserve to get draft kicked.
Oh, wow, you got shot, yeah, because we're reaching.
Yeah, do you think it's got to play well in front of the judge when they show that camera
and you're calling the cop names?
Yeah.
Now we can watch you on YouTube and laugh.
Like literally like, you know, you look at like police activity or any of these other channels
like these body cam channels and you're like, wow, cops deal with some really crappy stuff.
And it backfired because like BLM thought like, yeah, these guys are corrupt, we're going to expose them.
Look, there's always going to be corrupt cops.
There's always going to be bad cops.
There's always going to be people that do dumb stuff.
But the reality is the majority of police officers are good people that, you know,
keep the community safe and you got to respect the law, man.
And I've always told people like, dude, if you're polite to the police when you get
pulled over, you're not going to get a ticket most of the time, man.
Roll the windows down, turn the light on if it's at night, show that, you know, let them
know if you have a firearm in the car.
You take like over steps to make them feel safe.
They're going to let you go nine out of ten times.
Even if you get a ticket, why are you going to make it worse?
Why are you going to drive off?
Now you're dragged out of the car.
It's resisting.
What are you doing?
You're going to end up with a felony.
You're going to end up with a $150 ticket.
Yep.
The politicization of law enforcement and, you know, enforcing.
on everything thanks to BLM, whatever.
But I'm glad because, like, these body cams is great entertainment.
These people are stupid.
You're seeing what actually leads up to it.
And a lot of times, the officers are on the right, a lot of the times.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, like you said, listen, anybody, when people are always asking me about the criminal
justice system, like, what do you think there is to fix it?
It's not perfect.
It's not perfect.
It's not a bad system.
It's not, but you have individuals.
The things that are, are, the laws that are applied, you know, that aren't equitable,
you know, the statutes are written wrong or, you know, whatever, but they, some, some U.S.
attorneys are applying it correctly. Some are, are extending. But for the most part,
anytime you have individuals involved in a system, there's, there's going to be flaws.
Like, it's not a perfect system, but it's a pretty good system. It's going to be prone to human error.
Yes. You know what I mean?
But it's not a bad system. You know, it's better than a lot of other places. Oh, hell yeah.
We, we, you know, we, you got a chance. Yeah, you got at least chance. And we, we, we, we, we, we definitely, look, it's not
perfect, but it's better than a lot of places. And, like, just, just, just, just, just,
don't be a criminal. Yeah. As America turns 250 this year, it has me thinking about the people that
really help build this country. Not the ones in history books. I'm talking about American ranchers.
The men and women who wake up before the sun work long days and keep food on our tables year after
year. That's exactly why I like good ranchers. Good ranchers honors that legacy by only sourcing
their meat from local American farmers and ranchers. Everything from the pasture to the final seal on the
box is done right here in America. I'm actually,
a Good Ranchers subscriber myself. In fact, my wife and I had the chicken nuggets last night,
and they were amazing. And that's not the only thing they have. They have steak, chicken,
seafood, and more. And all of it is amazing quality. If you want to support American ranchers
and get great meat at the same time, now's the time to try it. Subscribe today and get free meat,
plus $100 off your first three orders. That's $40 off your first order and $30 off your next two.
Just use my code inside. That's good ranchers.com.
American meat delivered.
Don't enter the machine, man.
Don't be in that, yeah, don't put yourself in that situation.
Yeah, just don't be a criminal.
Do you notice from the different regions of college campuses,
like maybe Florida is more, you know, right-meaning and more progressive than the other ones?
Do you get, like, more kickback from certain regions or schools?
That's a great question.
You know what I'll say, man?
Honestly, they all are fairly progressive.
And I think that's one of the big problems with the university atmosphere.
And I can say this as someone, you know, I went to Northeastern University, for those wondering
on my background, because some people might not be familiar.
I went to college of Northeastern University.
I graduated in 2013.
I then became a special age with Homeland Security Investigations.
I started my career in Laredo, Texas.
I was there for four years.
Then I went to the Miami Field Office and I worked there.
I did every type of crime under the sun federally, like you can from, literally from, you know,
kidnapping to extortion, murder for hire, drug trafficking, human smuggling, human trafficking,
literally everything.
money laundering, terrorism, counterproliferation, child exploitation crimes.
So, you know, and I've worked with almost every federal agency under the sun.
So I know how all of them work, you know, pretty intimately, been on task force, all that stuff.
But for the college campuses, and I say, the reason why I preface that is because Northeastern was a pretty fairly liberal school out of Boston.
And I would say it was really starting to get bad with the wokeness then.
it's like crazy now.
Like academia is completely controlled by the left,
is completely controlled by women.
They're like the majority of the faculty now
in a lot of these universities.
The left way of thinking is their correct way of thinking.
I got into a debate last yesterday,
matter of fact, with a girl,
where I was saying that, look, men typically look for what,
you know, look for sexual access to women.
That's what they're interested in.
Men are success objects and women are sex objects, right,
in crude terms.
And, you know, I was describing her like, look, men value women between 18 and 24 is the most attractive.
And men typically have like a physical interest in women versus women are interested in resources and status.
Men are interested in, you know, sexuality.
And she couldn't even concede to that.
Like, they're in looney tunes.
Like, what do you mean?
That's not true.
And I'm like, this is the biological imperative of the genders.
What are you talking about?
We're put on earth to have sex, right?
And what it takes for men to have sex versus what it takes for a woman to have sex are two different things because we're looking for different things.
Men are looking for replication value, right?
Is she hot?
Women are looking for survival value.
Can he protect me and provide for me?
And she can't even concede to that.
So this is what I mean when I say,
academia has morphed into a looney to a world than a lot of the ways.
Right.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, they can't, you know, you, when Charlie Kirk would always do the whole, you know,
what's a woman?
Yeah.
And then they just, next thing, you know, just completely, they're, it's like, come on.
And if you can't, if you can't define that, then, then the, the rest of your, your values are
Yeah, your worldview is cooked, like, because we don't even have a foundation to, like a stable
foundation to operate from, like, we can't even say the sky is blue. So how are we going to
have an actual real discussion? And I found myself, you know, literally having to deal with
that on a lot of these college campuses. So, but to answer the question, the wokeness is everywhere.
It's pretty bad. At this point where we've been everywhere. We went to Ohio State.
We just did the University of Florida yesterday. USC and South Carolina, University of
Carolina, Penn State, what was that the one?
Michigan State, University of Michigan,
sorry, University of Michigan, that one was crazy.
A lot of trainees were there.
Right.
Holy crap.
You might have to believe that, but yeah, a lot of T's.
I'll say that.
Alpha Beck community were there.
And they can't define what, you know, a woman is or how many genders were there.
So there were a couple there.
That was crazy.
They got mad.
How has the interviews on the college campuses changed since Charlie Kirk incident?
Like, has anything changed?
like for the setup side from your side,
or have you noticed a difference in the crowds and the people,
or has it been, you know, fairly the same?
Yeah, so when I was there at University of Florida,
they had snipers on roofs,
so that was a good shout to University of Florida.
Like, a lot of, I really, you know, appreciate that,
the sheriff's office and the police, like, you know, doing that.
But a lot of, I'll be honest,
a lot of conservative creators are scared to do these, you know,
debates and stuff like that
because you kind of do put yourself out there
it can be dangerous to some degree.
When I was at USC last couple weeks ago,
like Simedia put his backpack down on the floor
and was reaching in it trying to be funny.
Obviously, I was like, I knew he wasn't going to do anything,
but like a couple of the students in the back started running
and people got nervous.
And I got my comment section,
Myron, you need to take more care.
And, you know, like maybe my background,
I'm not scared from certain things when I should be.
But yeah, definitely there is an air of nervousness a little bit
with it compared to,
because, you know, it's interesting.
You know, rest of the piece of Charlie, we didn't agree on everything, but, you know, at the end of the day, the man was murdered in front of, you know, thousands of people and that was completely unacceptable. And I hope that people were responsible, face some form of justice. The interesting thing is Charlie was shot September 10th. I was supposed to go to University of North Carolina, Asheville, the next day, and I had to cancel it. And it really shook home because I was like the only person, me and Charlie were the only ones doing these college stores at the time. So, yeah, and I didn't want to cancel it. But like, you know, after enormous pressure, the school,
everybody, we had to cancel it that next day.
Because I literally was supposed to get on a plane that next morning to go to North Carolina.
So, you know, recipes to him.
But yeah, definitely, and I start every single one of my things, I give him a tribute.
Like I always say, you know, recipes to Charlie, they're not going to stop us.
We're going to be able to have these discussions.
I was just thinking of myself, the students that get up there, the woke students and that are kind
brainwashed that I feel like...
That's what college is now, man.
It used to be about, like, becoming smarter and higher IQ and being a critical thinker.
Now it's about, like, being brainwashed into, you know, liberal nonsense.
Well, what kills me is that, you know, you're getting your degree in, you know, women's
studies or...
And then you're going to get out of prison.
I mean, you're out of prison.
You're going to get out of college.
And then, you know, it's...
You're surrounded by this lunacy for four years.
You get out of college.
You try and get...
you try and get a job, and you end up working at Starbucks.
Yeah.
And you're videoing yourself and putting it on the internet crying because you can't pay your bills
or you have to live with your parents and you hate your parents because they're
conservatives or, you know, whatever, and they paid for your college, which was a mistake,
you know, and like you're, and then they switch to it's society's fault.
It's the conservative's fault. It's the government's fault.
The government, we should be socialist and we should, they should have to take care of me.
But you've been making nothing but bad decisions.
to the past four years.
Yeah.
Like,
well,
what I've seen,
you should,
you should have become a,
a plumber or an electrician.
Yeah.
You know?
Like,
those are the jobs
that are going to be around
for 10 or 15 years.
Yep.
Yep.
And,
and I kind of saw this.
So, like,
my generation,
right,
like,
we were taught,
you need to go to school.
If you don't have a degree,
you're not going to find a job,
blah, blah,
right?
My parents,
like,
would fear monger me this or whatever,
which I kind of understand,
like, okay.
At the time,
that was kind of true.
Right? Like 20 years ago, 10, 15, 20 years ago, but now. Now it's like it's in, it's in, it's
saturated, over saturated. Everyone's going to college now. And then also like,
college is like a business, right? It's turning into a business. Like, if you look at the price of like
tuition, you know, when I went to school at Northeastern, it was like 30 or 40K. Now it's like 70 to 80.
You know, in the span of like 10 years like college is like doubled in price. And it's like,
okay, is education like gotten that much better? No, but they're able to make money hand over fist because
they can and they can charge it.
And like, you have all these schools opening up
and everything else like that.
I think COVID kind of reeled it backed
because obviously kids couldn't go to school
and, you know, people ended up not going
and universities have to shut down.
But yeah, it's ridiculous, man.
And then now we kind of have this, you know,
rise of like, you can make money on the internet.
You don't need a college degree or whatever.
I still think one of the best gigs
is I agree with you being blue collar jobs.
Yeah.
Nowadays.
Like, because no one wants to do them.
And they still pay really high.
You can make six figures doing it.
You know, you get in and out of school.
You're out of there in like a couple years.
if that. Yeah, there's some kid who's 23 years old that I watch everyone. You know, you watch
one reel. They just start coming up. Yeah, they start coming up. I've probably watched six or
eight of this kid's reels. And he's making 200, that plus. He's like 22, 23, 24 years old. He's
making 200 plus thousand dollars as an electrician. Yeah. And it's like, this is, you know, he took
like a nine month course or something. And, and he'll probably have a job for 10 or 15 years before
some, you know, Elon Musk is going to make, eventually there's going to be a road.
robot that's going to walk in and just work 24 hours a day and take his job. But that's going to be
all of us. At least he'll have 10 or 15 more years of doing it. Like your degree in, you know,
women's studies is not going to, that wasn't even a degree worth anything when you signed up
five years ago or 12 years ago. Actually, funny story. This book is number one in feminist theory on
Amazon right now. Not. That's what makes it so funny, bro. Number one of feminist theory. So
I have two questions kind of on that. Can you define feminism and then what does the dating world look like in the next 10 years? Because I think you were kind of alluded to that. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So feminism used to be equality between the genders, but it's quickly morphed into female superiority. It went from equality to superiority. And that's kind of where we are now. I would argue that we live in a gynocentric social order enforced by a patriarchy kind of on paper. But the reality is that female decision making kind of prevails, right? Like, if
If I say something along the lines of, you know, men need to be leaders, women need to be followers,
or them should be in the kitchen, whatever.
That's going to meet quite a bit of pushback, right?
Like, oh, well, that's her massages, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But if I said this 56 years ago, no, one would care, you know, the famous saying, women
would be seen and not to be heard.
That would be incredibly inappropriate to say nowadays.
But if you said that 67 years ago, they're like, yeah, you're right.
Why are they even talking?
Be quiet, woman.
So that's what I mean when I say that.
Even though we live in, they say a patriarchy, it's somewhat of a patriarchy, but it's
reinforced by gynocentric social tendencies, right? So like the women way of, the woman way of thinking
is the way to think. The way that we say things and the way we tone police and the way that we speak
and convey information now needs to be put in a certain way where it's, you know, digestible for
women. Because, you know, one thing with women, it's like a fascinating thing that I've noticed.
I've interviewed almost like, what? Four thousand girls on my show now at this point. And it's
incredible, Matt, like from high education to different background, religion, whatever. It doesn't
matter what it is. One thing that I've noticed with females,
that is a huge difference between when I talk with men,
is women place an enormous amount of care
to how the information is conveyed
versus the content of the information.
This is something that it's literally, it's incredible.
Like, if I tell a guy, stop being a lazy piece of shit,
get in the gym, you're fucking slob, you're disgusting.
They'll internalize that.
They'll look at their reality around them,
be like, you know what?
What he's saying is being reinforced by reality,
even though he's saying in a way that I don't like,
I understand it.
I need to acclimate, right?
This is why, like in the military drill sergeants,
it works well.
get down to give me 50 piece of shit you know what I mean it works like oh god yeah because there's a defined
structure there's a defined hierarchy and like men understand this women don't understand this so for them
if I convey something to them that's true but it comes out rough or whatever like I don't like the way
you said that so then now now the information is like nolan void so you have to pay particular
attention to how you convey that message right versus the content of the message and for me just
you know studying women writing about them and everything else like this I think this comes to they have a
with understanding dominance hierarchies, right?
So, like, with men, we play sports, right?
Guys compete, win, lose, who's the best, one, two, three.
We're cool with that.
We've been, you know, this is the way we've lived, right?
Like, when boys compete, we play sports,
there's a decisive winner and a loser.
Women aren't like that.
When little girls play, what do they do?
Hopscotch, patty cake, you know,
they play games where there's no actual real defined winner
versus when little boys play,
they typically play a sport or play a game.
So even when in our infancy,
in our young ages, like there's stark contrast.
And this builds in because with women, the concept of dominance hierarchies,
meritocracy, et cetera, they want more equality, right?
The egalitarianism is like their language.
With us, it's like meritocracy.
John, you did the best job.
You get $10.
Dave, you did the second best job.
You get $7 per hour.
And so on.
With that women, it's like, you get a dollar, you get a dollar, you get a dollar, you get a dollar,
you get a dollar.
You know, more communitarianism.
So with that said, that is like some of the main differences.
between the genders.
But now that I've defined where we are,
we can talk about the future.
So I was going to say,
and I absolutely agree with you
because it's like we were talking
before we got on here,
like being in prison in general.
But just prior to that,
being in business in general,
I don't have to like my clients
that walk in.
It's important that the women in my life
want to like the people
that they work with.
And when I grew up,
my father had always told me,
there will always be
someone at your job, you will despise. There will always be assholes. You will never have a perfect
environment. You have to work with them. You have to be professional. You have to be polite. And you have to do what
you're supposed to do and demand of them what they're supposed to be. And liking them is irrelevant.
Like, it's a job. You have to like this person. It's a job. But for women, I have definitely
noticed that it is super important for them to like everybody that they're around. Or they're more social
creatures. They're far more socially receptive and, you know, sensitive. And look, I'll give women their credit.
But like, you know, if someone comes in and they're a little off the deep end, they're a little weird or whatever, women are able to detect that right away.
Like, this guy sounds awful with this motherfucker.
Like, women are fantastic at that because since they're the more vulnerable sex, you know, if some guy tries to court them and they're a little bit off, right?
Or they're weird.
Like, women will feel that ick like, oh, something's off with this guy, right?
It's really the serial killers, like Ted Bunny and stuff that are able to conceal it.
Those are crazy ones.
But in general, women are, they are more socially receptive because for a safety perspective.
but yeah that's one thing like I've noticed is like with them it's like you know the way you convey
the information is super important and then like just a lack of understanding dominance hierarchies
and meritocracy it's not a thing for them like that it's like they want more egalitarianism and more
you know equality I guess now when it comes to mating in the future what I think is um so it's
interesting because when it comes to the way women view the world they want egalitarianism and
everything else like that. But when it comes to mating and finding a man, they want superiority.
And this is kind of what I call the female dilemma, because what will happen is they'll sit
there and they'll say, well, I want the equality with my partner. But the reality is what they're
looking for in their partner is superior to them in every single way, taller, stronger, more
competent, more intelligent. Yeah, they're picking someone who's their superior. Yeah. So, but then she wants
you to treat her like an equal. And I'm like, that's not how this works. Like you, you, when I say make a
sandwich, you make the sandwich, like, you know, you want me to be superior, cool. I'm going to act as if,
and I'm not going to pedestalize you.
And this is a fundamental problem
that a lot of guys have
where they don't understand
that there is supposed to be this dynamic
where you need to not just be the superior
but you need to act like it too
because when you pedicilize her
and make her like you're the priority
and everything is based on you,
she automatically is like,
okay, well I'm being pedicized,
what happens?
She looks down on you.
She looks down on you,
lose respect and all this other stuff.
But as far as the future of dating,
I think a lot of guys are going to be single.
I think a lot of guys are going to struggle.
And we're already starting to see
ramifications of this.
We've seen the, you know,
the ubiquity of increase.
We've seen AI, sex robots come out, right?
We've seen virtual reality, right?
So guys are already starting to figure out a way to deal with this reproductive problem
because women's standards have went up thanks to Instagram, social media, dating apps, etc.
Most guys are invisible to most women.
And they're giving up.
Like, I've seen all this thing where they just don't, like, they're not even, like, they're 35-year-olds.
Like, they're not even looking.
You're not even looking.
Like, you're, this is not a bad looking guy.
He needs to lose 20 pounds.
He's got a decent job.
he's spending all of his time playing video games.
Like, you're not even trying?
Yeah.
Because they just don't want the rejection.
They don't want the rejection.
And then also maybe 20, 30 years ago, he could have got a date.
Right.
But now he has to have abs.
He's got to be driving the right car.
He has to be in the right house.
Like, and maybe that's just.
And then some guys will have all that.
And they'll, because here's the other problem.
There's some guys that will have that.
And then you go out there and you date in the marketplace.
These girls are whores.
They're rude.
They're obunctious.
They act like men.
They talk like men.
They're not feminine.
They don't want to follow your lead.
So it takes quite a bit of, you know, not just having all this stuff together, like personally,
but then now you've got to go out into the dating marketplace and maneuver appropriately
and know how to deal with these women, right?
Because the dating marketplace that we have now is not the same as a dating marketplace we had
even five years ago, even 10 years ago, 20 years ago.
So, you know, if you take a guy that's like, you know, just getting out of a divorce now
and I told them, okay, go out and date in the marketplace, he'd be like, what's going on?
Like, this is madness because women have changed so much.
changed drastically.
So a guy that would have been able to clean up maybe 20, 30 years ago, is going to
struggle nowadays, big time, because women's standards have simply went up because since women
make their own money, they no longer have to tolerate a guy that might have been able to
get women before because that provider thing, they don't need that anymore.
They still want you to be able to do it, but they don't need it.
So I've always said that when you only want something versus when you need it, you're not going
to put up with certain things.
So for women, and to them, they look at it like, that's freedom for me, blah, blah, not
knowing that they're, you know, actually getting more depressed. But this is where we are. So I,
I think relationships are going to continue to falter. We're going to still, we're going to see more
and more women angry on TikTok crying in a car about why they can't find a day or why they can't find
a guy. Or divorcing their husbands. Or divorcing their husbands. 20 years. Yeah, you're 35 years old,
40 years old. My husband's a good guy. And I just, but he's just boring. Yeah. And I'm going to
divorce him. Yeah. Yeah. That's where we are. Because we prioritize, women nowadays are told to prioritize
their happiness over everything else. It's like, it's not about marriage and duty. It's about,
are you happy or you're not happy? No, divorce and leave them. Like, that's, that's the route.
And we have an entire infrastructure built around that with family courts, divorce courts,
lawyers, all that other stuff. So there's a need to keep that machine going, right? But we've
seen the marriage industry collapse, like David Bridal's, like closed all over the place. We see
divorce rates are sky high. Guys are waking up and realizing that marriage isn't, you know,
a good option for them a lot of the times. So I, this is what I think. We're going to see the explosion. And I
talk about this in my book, but to give one of the things that I think was going to happen,
and I make many predictions, I think sex robots are going to be a thing. I think they're going
to be a thing. You were to see Cherry 2000? I never saw that. Listen, it's probably put out probably
in the late 70s, early 80s, and it's about a sect that men have, they, first of all, it's actually
funny. It's a B movie. It's not great. But you, you, you, uh, these guys would go to a bar and they
would meet somebody and they they they the girl would you know hey what's going on they
they'd approach them they talked to the girl whatever they'd sit down they'd agree that they
liked each other they were interested and they pull out a contract and they'd go over a contract
before they went home and had sex oh and a lot of guys are just getting are getting um
uh you know sex robots right yeah and this one guy is falls in love with his sex robot which
is called i think it's cherry 2000 somebody in the and and it's a crazy name she uh
Who is it?
I forget what the chick that plays it.
And she's a complete kind of a dits robot.
But her chip goes bad, and when he goes to get a new chip, they don't make it anymore.
So he has to go out to the wasteland.
It's kind of like a badmacks.
And he hires a woman out in the wasteland.
Melanie Griffiths.
Yeah.
Hires up, right?
Hires up.
Is it Cherry 2000?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You're right.
I have a horrible memory, too.
Only for movies I'm good, right?
Like, I can't remember anybody's name.
So what ends up happening is he goes out there.
Melanie Griffith is like a, like the road warrior.
And she hunts down the chip for that can turn his robot back on.
But in the meantime, he falls in love with her.
And, you know, whatever's a happy ending.
That's probably not going to happen.
They actually get the chip.
He's better off the chip with the robot, really.
It will be.
But, yeah, great.
It's exactly.
And this is done in like the 70s.
This movie is in 70s.
What does it say it's, it might be 80s?
Well, it's like a futuristic movie.
No, but when was it made?
I'm saying.
Oh, it was made in 1987.
87.
And it takes place in the future in 2017.
Oh, wow.
Way ahead in 2017.
And there's that movie in 2012, her.
It was like,
a dude fell in with a load of the love with the robot.
And like it was an artificial intelligence.
And it was like an Oscar type of movie.
I never watched it.
But like in 2012, 13, it's like,
this is weird and far-fetched.
But now 10 years, 15 years later.
Oh, how many things are like, listen, you watch idiocracy and you're like, holy shit, we're like, we're living this right now.
Yeah.
This is a documentary.
This isn't, this isn't fiction.
This is real.
Yeah.
But, yeah, there's so many things.
There's so many things like that.
And, and, you know, like, and my evidence for this is like, if you look at humanity, right, mankind in general, men have always been able to solve certain problems, right?
Like, okay, we need to find warmth, fire.
Okay, we need to be able to drink clean water.
okay, we're going to come up with, you know, sewage and plumbing and all those other stuff, right?
Sanitation. So, um, now what men are realizing is like, okay, we have a reproductive problem, right?
Like, guys are struggling to get laid. So what are they going to do? They're going to find a way around it.
And I remember vividly when I was in college, because that's when Tinder and Bumble and all
these other like dating apps came out. It used to be weird to meet a girl on Tinder, right?
Like to say, oh, yeah, I'm going to meet a girl. Now, like, almost 50% if not more of new marriages
are from online. Yeah, I was I was going to say, I thought it was three-fifths. Yeah, three out of every five.
It's, it's completely the comment, but like 10, 15 years ago, it was weird to say you're a better girl.
So, you're a weirdo if you're meeting people online.
Exactly.
But now it's like the norm.
So like what I predict is like with these robots, we're laughing about it now.
But I would say in like 20, 30, 40 years, like, dude's going to be like, I don't doubt it at all.
I'm going to see my sex robot.
Like, because guys are going to deal with this reproductive problem because here's the, here's the thing that's the problem.
A majority of men are absolutely struggling with women.
But a majority of women are not struggling with men.
They're struggling with getting guys to like, you know, take.
to seriously and date and commit, but they have no problem with, like, you know, getting dates.
They have a problem with, like, getting guys to take them out and have sex.
Yeah, they can have some guy take them out and have sex with them, but they can't get this
guy to commit because he's able to bang 15 other women a week if he wants to.
Precisely.
So, like, with the men, since they're not getting late, what's going to, when I predict this is going to
happen is like, they're going to solve that reproductive problem first, and then they're
going to get their sex robots.
And then what's going to end up happening is, like, this is going to create an enormous
amount of instability in the dating marketplace because for women, here's the problem.
they're not just, they don't get the same satisfaction from physicality that men do.
Like men are easy to please.
Give them a sex robot that can make a sandwich and shut up and, you know, speak to someone
once spoken to, most guys will be happy with that.
With women, they need emotional bonding.
They need someone that they can vent to.
They need someone that's going to give them deep emotional connection.
So getting that robot's going to take significantly more time.
So the men, I would argue, are going to be satisfied with dealing with this reproductive problem
first.
Then that's going to lead to the need of potentially getting a robot for women.
But since our needs are significantly easier to deal with, that's going to come first.
And I think, dude, it's going to hurt the women.
It's already happening now.
Everybody needs a good pair of jeans.
What I like about the perfect gene is that the moment you put them on, they feel like sweatpants.
They don't ever pinch or bind up.
As a matter of fact, they're super stretchy.
There's never any point where you feel like they're binding up on you or they're tight or they pinch you or anything like that.
They're comfortable in pretty much any position.
that you sit in, they're really great, they're comfortable, and they look great.
And the best part is, our listeners get 15% off their first order plus free shipping at
the perfect jeans.
Or Google the perfect jeans and use promo code Cox15 for 15% off.
Normally, a good pair of jeans cost anywhere between $150 to $200, but the perfect jeans are
reasonably priced at $799.
For a limited time, our listeners get 15% off.
their first order plus free shipping at the perfect gene.
com.
And use promo code Cox15 for 15% off.
That's 15% off for new customers at the perfect gene.
comyc with promo code Cox15.
Please support our channel and tell them we sent you.
Fuck your khakis.
Get the perfect gene.
Did you see, I hate that I'm always going back to movies, bro.
This is my life.
You know, I thought about making a compilation of like all the movie references.
and all the explanations of like across all the process.
Listen, everything I know comes from movies.
Everything.
But this is perfect.
No, it's good to have this pop culture knowledge.
Yeah.
Well, I like the way you legitimize it.
Me being a retort.
No, I reference movies all the time too.
Did you see Blade Runner, the second one,
where he's got the actual,
the actual Blade Runner is a replicant.
I did see it.
Years ago, though.
I did see it.
Oh, my God, bro.
So he's got, he has a, he comes home, like he's a, like a, he's not a person, he's a
replicant, but, you know, he's a normal being.
And he when he comes, so he goes to work.
And when he comes home, he goes to his apartment and he's got a, it's a, it's a, what is it's
not real.
It's a hologram.
It's a hologram, AI hologram girlfriend.
Yeah.
And she comes and she turns on and she, listen, she says all the right things.
How was your day?
Oh my gosh, I did this today.
What happened with this?
And he's going through the motions, but you can see that there's genuine joy there.
And I'm listening to it thinking, wow, she's pretty, she's, I'm making this for you.
I got this.
He's like, don't fuss.
And she's like, it's not a big deal.
I mean, the whole banter is perfect.
He actually, she makes him dinner, which is, it's fake.
And he's actually eating a TV dinner.
But she puts down a plate of food where the TV dinner is and he starts eating.
Like, it's like they have this whole thing.
And it...
If that happens, women are cooked.
Listen, if you watch the whole thing...
That happens in real life.
Women are cooked.
Because the AI is so in sync with him.
He's got a real relationship with her.
And if you watch the whole movie
and you pay attention to the relationship with her,
you absolutely can see this woman
could take the place of a normal relationship with a woman.
Now, she doesn't have the physicality that a man needs,
which she comes up with a way around that.
But she's thinking...
thinking to do it. So I understand it's all AI and I get it. It's programming and it's
reprogramming of itself and it's learning by itself and I get all that. But it's totally in sync
with him and it's there's no downtime. There's no downside. There's no arguing. There's no bickering.
There's no, none of that. And I'm on my period or sorry. I'm not feeling it. Right. Or belittling him or
making fun of him or, you know, any, it's, you need to watch that movie because you'll be like,
holy shit. I'm telling you, this is where it's coming. You know, like,
Because, again, I talk on both sides.
I see the male gripes and I also see the female grapes.
And I just don't see like the guys are struggling to get the women.
The women have the men, but they're not getting the guys to commit.
And the guys that they actually, that they want are not going to commit because they know that they're able to have sex with a bunch of different girls.
So we're at a weird impasse here where I think that's going to be the solution.
And just like we made fun of people using dating apps, you know, 10, 20 years ago.
And now it's the norm.
we're making fun of guys
because of using sex robots
30, 40 years from now
it's going to be normal
for a guy to say,
yeah, I'm just spending
my Friday with my robot.
Oh, okay, cool, man.
You don't want to go to the club
with us to the bar?
Now I'd rather hang out my bot, man.
Okay, dude,
all right, later, see you.
And no one's going to flinch.
Like, me and you will be old men by then.
We'll be laughing like,
you fucking weird young guys.
The fuck's wrong with you guys.
But they're going to be like,
hey, this is what we do now.
We don't have,
you have a girlfriend?
You have like a human girlfriend?
Are you stupid?
That's what's going to happen?
you're going to get made fun of for having like a regular girlfriend.
No, I could.
I can see it.
You know what's funny?
This is funny.
I went with my wife to a doctor's appointment, right?
She's getting, she'd probably kill me for this.
She won't know, but she didn't watch these things.
So she's got some, I'll just say some blemishes, right, that she's having removed.
And I was like, okay, well, I'm going to go with you.
And she was like, well, she's like, no, I'll go.
You can sleep.
It's not a big deal.
I was like, no, no, no.
I said, I'm going with you.
And she's like, okay.
So I go with her, and she's like, why are you going?
I said, because this is what I signed up for.
Yeah, yeah.
That's why.
I said, I want to make sure that you make the right call and you don't do something crazy.
And I said, I don't know.
I don't know what's going on.
You want to go by yourself.
You usually want me to go, eh.
And we've had this discussion before we got married where I was like, listen, we've got to have the talk, not a big deal.
And we sat down, we talked.
And I was, listen, I respect you.
I respect your opinion.
But I said, you have to understand that in the balance of past.
power here. I'm not trying to be rude. I said, it's, it's 49. 51. I said, I'm going to listen to
it. I'm going to listen to it. I'm like, it's 991. You don't even have the one. I'm going to listen. I'm
going to everything you have to say, and you've got a good shot of convincing me. But in the end,
you have to understand that I'm making the decision. And there's no, no, I'm not going with
that. I'm like, that's a deal breaker. And you know, I'm not going to, you know, I'm, I'm,
and I remember you have to work really hard to get your girl. I remember you told, I remember you telling
the story. Oh, yeah. Yeah. She was a, yeah. She didn't, she's a. She didn't
date me.
You don't want to date me.
You know, that doesn't even make sense.
And it's funny because all the reasons that I could say, I'm like, tell me I'm too short.
That's the reason.
She's like, that's not it.
Tell me that, like, I'm giving her reasons.
These are acceptable reasons.
Not you're going to end up being famous and you're going to leave me.
Like, she was just insecure.
And I'm like, that's ridiculous.
Like, I don't care if a supermodel came and she was worth millions of dollars and I know she's
out of my league.
I'm going for it.
I'm like, and you're saying, no.
It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
It was just insecurity, right?
Yeah, women are not used to, yeah.
Right, but so we end up together, and I would just explain before we got married.
I was like, this is what it is.
And so, yeah, I went.
And so when I go to the appointment with her, every time the doctor's like, okay, and there's a female doctor, she's like, okay, well, what about this right here?
You know, we can do this, we can do this, this, we can do it today or it's, and she looks at me and she's like, what do you want to, do you want to take care of this first and do a test, like a test removal and then,
come back in two weeks after it's healed and you see how it looks. And she looks over at me and she's
like, what do you think? And the doctor looks at her and she says, this is your decision.
Of course. And I'm like, like, she's not a battered woman. And I'm like, why are you looking
at me? I want you to be, I see just, you make this, that's fine. She's like, are you okay with it?
And I'm like, and the doctor's looking at me. And I'm like, stop it. I'm going on 911.
She's like, I think there's some abuse going on here. That's not what's happening. She just wants
me to be happy.
So, but yeah, it was funny.
She looked at her.
She's like, this is your decision.
Yeah, of course.
I adore him.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Of course,
feminist doctor probably.
Yeah, I'm sure.
So, but it was so, it was so funny.
We walked out.
I was like, what was you looking at me like that?
I said, like, I'm beating you or something.
Like I, yeah.
And she's like, I know it's funny, right?
So it was a bell doctor.
He would have been like, what do you think, buddy?
Yeah.
Yeah.
We can make this happen in a day.
What should I do here?
Yeah, what's right?
You're the one pain, right?
Yeah, I'm going to talk to the guy that's pain.
So, yeah, it was funny.
Yeah, that's funny.
That's good.
So we did, okay, so we did that.
That's what I see.
Yeah, so with feminism, to bring that full circle,
college campuses aren't really changing too much.
It's all liberal morons.
Feminism is bad.
And then what I see in the future is sex robots for men and a bunch of other things, too.
I think fee is going to become even more immersive.
And, yeah, I just, I just see relationships getting worse and worse
and men finding other manners.
to deal with the reproductive problems.
So here's the problem.
If you're not, look, if you're not somebody who's like a long-term thinker
and if you just kick back and you go, okay, so what?
What I don't think of people realize is that, and it's funny too,
because when I was in my 20s or 30s, I never would have thought along these lines, right?
Yeah, yeah, that's crazy.
Okay, so what?
That's the way it happens, no big deal.
No, no, wait a minute.
Society, our population starts to dwindle.
It's already happening.
And then it drops.
Birth rates are already low.
Right.
Like if you think it's happening now, what's it going to be like when guys aren't even interested in women?
They're not even making an attempt.
Women aren't having children.
The birth rate drops down to nothing.
What happens to society?
There was a story that went viral.
I talked about this on Twitter.
The New York Times reported this.
There was like a – there's a lot of these like single meets, right?
Like speed dating and all those other stuff.
Or like it's an activity.
They can never get mental shopping.
show up. It's always like the guys like don't know about it or don't care to go. And there's
always like, you know, a bunch of women. And like at this event, it was like bowling and some
activities and shit like that. The women had to pay to go. The women had to pay to go and the guys
were for free. And I was like, oh, man, wow. Like the tables are turning. Yeah, the tables are
turning. And I think this is what's going to happen, man, because men are much easier to
satisfy than women. And women need that social cohesion. They need that, you know, bonding with people
and stuff like that.
They need that.
Men don't.
They can play video games all day,
whack off and have an AI robot and be fine.
So as this continues more and more,
you're seeing more of these singles events
that's like packed with single women,
but like no guys are showing up.
Right?
And this literally, it went viral a couple weeks ago,
like on the New York Times,
like that they had this event
and the women were paying to go, dude.
Women are going to have to accept
that you are never going to be the only girl.
That's what I tell girls on the show all the time.
Like if you want a guy that's attractive,
that's higher status that has this stuff together,
you're never going to be the only chick
and you need to accept that.
I'm not accepting that.
Okay, bro.
Then have a good one.
You'll have a couple of cats and some wine and you'll have your job as a work,
not even working customer service because that job will be to it with AI.
They don't understand the concept of like if you want a guy that's top tier and you're
as picky as you say that you are, that comes with consequences.
Like you're going to have to share the guy.
You're not going to have a higher status attractive man all to yourself that checks
all your boxes because every other girl wants that guy too.
Like women will sit there and try to say that they're like unique and different and I'm
special and I'm, they're actually far more pragmatic.
in their mate selection than we are actually.
Like, when they're looking at sizing up
and looking for a guy, like, they tend to
look at the same types of dudes, then they tend to admit.
They almost sit there like, I care about personality more.
I care about this.
It's all a bunch of bullshit, dude.
It's like they're all chasing the same small demographic
of guy.
And, you know, they'll make exceptions for the right guy.
Even if a dude doesn't, like, meet her normal barometer
of what he might look like, but he has other redeeming
factors, they'll make that change.
So what happens with society when,
when birth rates drop dramatically.
Mass immigration, and that's terrible.
Yeah.
And if you look at all the first world countries that, you know,
where feminism is prominent, they all have low birth rates.
And this is what?
Like England?
Like England, Canada, United States, etc.
And, you know, what you end up happening,
what ends up happening is when you have these little birth rates is you have to import more immigrants.
These immigrants come in, they don't want to assimilate.
They're bringing their backwards ideology, their backwards culture.
Well, and then they're not not having kids.
They're having tons of kids.
Yeah, they're having tons of kids.
So, you know, if you want to maintain the national identity,
the last thing you want to do is import, you know, a bunch of immigrants.
And I say that as a guy that, you know, I'm first generation.
My parents immigrated here from Sudan in 1980s.
But I have the wherewithal to understand that we probably shouldn't have a lot of
Sudanese people, or people from Africa or from, you know, the Middle East or whatever.
It's like we should, if you want to maintain America the way it was founded, right,
you have to maintain certain, you know, bromometers of statistics.
So, demographic, excuse me, yes, you want to maintain certain demographics.
And that's not racist. It's about promoting, you know, a certain image.
And how do I say this?
But you want to preserve a certain identity, a certain national identity.
And immigrants coming in will fundamentally change that identity to wherever they came from.
And they won't assimilate it a lot of the times they don't want to learn their language, whatever.
I'll give you a perfect example of this.
When I was in Laredo, Texas, right?
It's basically Mexico.
things are written in Spanish, people don't speak English, you know, something as simple as like going to the bathroom, you, uh, you look in the, in little trash can and it's like a bunch of toilet paper with like poo stains on it. And that's because in Mexico, they have working plumbing. You have, you can't flush your toilet paper down the toilet. So they, you know, just by habit of them being in Mexico all the time and then coming across the border, it's a habit that they throw it in the waste basket. That's disgusting. Yeah. But, um, this is what I mean. Like, and that's just on a, on a micro level, but imagine like if that happened with, you know, all. Um, you know, all.
across the United States or people from other countries.
You know, you lose your national identity.
And people might say, oh, that's racist, whatever.
But I think America has always been and thrives as a white majority country.
There's nothing wrong with saying that and admitting that.
You know, people say, oh, well, you're racist for saying that or whatever.
I mean, this is how the country was founded and how it, you know, has been a dominant force for so long.
And I have no problem with people that want to maintain that national identity.
I have respect.
Like, I don't go to the UAE, right?
And say, yeah, you know what, man?
Let's bring a bunch of white Christians over here.
Let's switch it up a little bit.
Let's start building some churches.
Let's make everybody speak English, blah, blah, blah.
Like, no, like, you don't do that.
Like, so I have no problem with people exercising a bit of nationalism.
I would argue nationalism is a good thing.
But, like, we demonize people for having you here in America,
and we wouldn't have a lot of issues we had if we had a little bit more nationalism.
Right, but if you tried the same shit in China or Japan or any of those areas,
they'd be like, that's your app.
China's fighting back.
Sorry, Japan's like fighting back against the immigration.
Like, they had low birth rates, so they started importing.
people and they start running problems.
Horrible birth rates.
Really bad.
Yeah.
Really bad.
And that, but then they got this new right wing prime minister who's a woman, surprisingly.
Yeah.
So, you know, they don't all suck it governing.
But she came in and she limited immigration right away.
She was like, no, we're banning this.
And I'm Muslim.
I think they're banning, they're not opening up any mosque or not allowing it or whatever.
Yeah.
You know, anyone that, you know, wonders about racism of a buddy, he spent a significant amount
of time in Japan.
He told me, dude, like, you guys complain about racism in America.
Like in Japan, it's way worse.
It was absolutely open.
Yeah.
It's open.
It's open in Japan, China.
Yeah.
They'll refuse your service.
They'll call you a, like they don't care.
Like, sorry, you can't come in, whatever.
Like if you're fat, they're like, oh, you're fat.
Like, they're just straight to your face.
Yeah, they don't care, dude.
So, and honestly, I don't have a problem with that.
Like, I don't have a problem with people preserving their culture, preserving their
national identity.
Mass immigration is a problem, right?
And then obviously we're running into these ice riots and everything else like that,
like in Minneapolis and people going nuts.
And it's funny, too, because like when these ice riots start,
first started kicking off like in LA. I remember like, you know, all these women walking around
like Mexican flags. I'm like, well, go back then. Like, what do you like, why are you running
around protesting eyes with Mexican flags? Like, if you love it so much, go back there. Like, what,
what the hell's going on here? And I think we've lost a lot of patriotism and like, you know,
these crazy lefties. They're not nationalist. They don't care about this country. They don't
love this country. Because if they did, they would understand that, you know, in order to have a
country, you need to have borders. You need to have laws. You have to have, you know, immigration
laws and you can't get mad at people for enforcing those immigration laws.
Well, if they got all, if they got their wish list, they wouldn't be able to survive
in the country that they would allow to be created. Does that make sense? Yeah. Like,
and I've always said this is that if, you know, if you allow all of these, all the immigrants
to come in here and swarm in and take over and change things, they will be far less kind to you
than you have been to them. Yes, yes. They will change everything about you, even though you
completely allowed them to do whatever they wanted to do and you didn't push back because you were
afraid to be called a racist. Yeah. Yeah. And it's bullshit. And, you know, I get a lot of pushback
because the way that I look, I come from Muslim background, whatever, so you shouldn't be
having these opinions. But I'm like, look, just because I'm saying something that I might not
necessarily benefit from doesn't mean that it's not true, right? So I'll give you a perfect example.
I got into a lot of heat with some Muslims because I said, I don't think it's appropriate to be praying
at the Times Square, you know, because they blocked off Times Square. They got a permit. They were praying there
or whatever for Ramadan.
And I was like, this is highly inappropriate.
What do you mean?
It's highly inappropriate.
Well, this isn't a Muslim country.
And, you know, I think it's disrespectful.
Well, what kind of country is?
This is a Christian country.
No, it's not.
Yes, it is.
It is.
This is a Christian country.
Like, if you want to sit here and be delusional and say that it's not, it is.
Like, you know, you can, there's many references to the Bible and the founding
documents.
The founding fathers, the majority of them were Christians.
If you look at like the, um, it was one of the amendments, it allowed the states to
have like an official religion.
all of them pretty much were Protestantism
and I think one of them was Catholic.
They were all Christian states, right?
So like we just have to be very honest here
that this is a Christian country
and like this is disrespectful and rude
because let's put the shoe on another foot.
If we took a bunch of Christians
and we put them, let's say in Dubai, right,
UAE, very westernized Muslim country
and had them pray in front of the Birch-Kleifa,
another place of great, you know,
cultural influence, tall's building in a world, right?
Like it's a marvel, just like Times Square, right?
It's a sign of U.S. strengthen, you know, economic power.
Let's go ahead and put a bunch of Christians praying in front of the British Cleveland.
What's going to happen?
They're going to get arrested.
They're going to get put in jail.
They're going to be admonished.
So, like, I have no issue with Christians kind of pushing back.
Like, well, we don't want you guys praying in our culturally relevant centers, especially
when you guys have mosques.
Right.
Like, go playing the mosques.
You have your home.
You have areas you can go to.
Like, you're doing it to throw it in your, in everybody's face and try and try
and acclimate them to the environment.
To assert dominance.
And they get mad at me when I say that.
And it's like, and my brother, he's a development.
And we had a very deep discussion on this.
Like, you don't really get, like, any, like, blessing or benefit for doing it.
It's considered, you're disrupting others.
It's loud.
You're showing off.
And it's just rude.
And it's not nice to the host nation.
So when I said that, obviously, they got pissed off of me for saying that.
Like, look, if you're going to pray in a park or something, that's different, but, like,
praying at a culturally irrelevant area in the United States, you know, in times,
is that really necessary? Is it? It's not. It's just showboating and it's annoying and it's rude and
disruptive and it's not necessary. And it doesn't give you any blessings, especially when New York
City has, you know, some of the highest concentrations of mosque all across the country. And to be
clear, this is for any religion. I think America is a Christian country and people say, well,
you can have your church bells. Well, this was founded as a Christian country, buddy, right? I'm not
going to go to, you know, Oman or Bahrain or these other countries that are like, you know,
westernized, you know, rich, affluent Muslim countries and be like, oh, yeah, I want to be able to,
you know, play church bells or whatever.
They're going to be like, no, you're not.
We're going to hear that then five times a day
and you're going to like it.
Okay, cool.
Like, we act, we ask to them.
So I think there's nothing wrong
with having that same framework here in the United States
and people try to sit here and say it's not a Christian country.
The United States is a Christian country.
If you're not going to say that, you're delusional.
Even like, you know, Muslim scholars admit
that this is a Christian country, right?
Because one of the, my brother, me and my brother had discussion on this.
Because they say all the time, can Muslims eat meat in America?
if it's, you know, because we're supposed to eat halal, right?
Halal or kosher, kosher.
Right.
And they said yes, and the reason why is because Christians are considered people of the book
and you can eat the meat that they make because, you know, they're people of the book.
So, and what does that mean?
That means that this is a Christian country.
Right.
So, you know, anyone that denies that is just, you know, fundamentally disingenuous.
You think that someone who comes here who immigrates, you know, legally emigrates, they get here.
they become a citizen, should they be able to run for office?
No.
See, I agree.
I don't think so either because I see that as being a way to foreign influence in the government.
I see it being a way to manipulate.
Because if you were...
Well, there's a problem we have with Israel.
Okay.
This is one of the problems.
People are able to, you know, have dual allegiance.
They have another passport in there.
You know, they have positions of power or clearance in America.
It's absolutely nuts that we, you know, people can have dual citizenship and have some type...
I don't even think you should be able to serve in a government.
at all if you have another citizenship at all.
But, you know, certain countries get the past, like Israel's one of them.
But, but yeah, I agree with you.
Like, if you were born in another country and you come here and you immigrate and, you know,
you try to run for office, I don't think it's appropriate now.
Got to be born here.
What about term limits just in general for regular?
I understand a need for terminalists to avoid, obviously, you know,
tyrants and dictators coming in.
I don't know.
That's a good question.
So I think part of the problem is I think these people,
that have been in Congress for fucking 30 years.
Oh, oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I thought you're talking about strictly presidency.
No, no, no, no.
Presidency, I see.
I don't know that eight years, I think it should probably be 12.
It has nothing to with Trump in general, I think 12 years.
And in Congress.
Yeah, and Congress is a problem.
I think Congress should be limited also to probably, let's say, 12 or 16 years, maybe 20.
Because here's the problem is that it takes some time to understand the system and to have the
experience to understand that when you make this decision.
the ramifications don't happen right away.
So you think initially, oh, we made the right decision
because two years later everything's great.
Wait a minute.
12 years later, it comes back to haunt you.
And so I think that you need a certain amount of experience.
But I also see these people that have been there for 20, 30 years.
Which these conflicts are going to come back.
Like, for example, these conflicts that we have,
they're going to come back to haunt us later.
Right.
You know what I mean?
But no, I agree with you that.
Like, you won't see the cascade sometimes until many years later.
So, but no, when it comes to, yes, Congress.
I was thinking,
strictly, like, as a president, is what, when you ask me that question.
Another question is, back to that video we did with, uh, with Rudger, which, listen, you
should watch this guy's channel, bro.
I mean, not all of his videos, but the ones where, I'll check it out.
He talks about the civil war.
Yeah.
It's funny, too, because like, I loved his civil, like, I was born in the South, right?
So I've raised in the South.
I've, uh, and, you know, it's funny because Cracker's like a bad word, right?
Yeah.
But when I grew up, my mom used to call me, I was a little Florida Cracker.
But isn't it interesting how that is not demonized whatsoever?
Someone can openly call you that.
And like, it won't matter.
But if you went ahead and you responded, you know, called them the N-word or something like that, you'd be crucified.
Of course.
Like, it's totally okay to be racist towards white people.
But when I grew up, but when I grew up, yeah, I mean, obviously that's a whole thing.
That's a whole conversation, yeah.
But being called a Cracker when I grew up, we were all Florida Crackers.
Like that wasn't a big deal.
It wasn't until blacks took it and turned it in to.
Yeah, yeah.
To me, when you looked it up, it was that it was the, it was the farmers bringing in the crops or to the market and you could hear them cracking the whips.
And they were called, they would say in the markets, they'd say, here come the Florida crackers.
That's where Cracker came.
Oh.
Then it was it like whipping their, the animals?
Here was just the animals.
Oh, so bring the horses.
Right.
Okay.
Then it turned into, no, it's them whipping the whip on the black man's back.
It's like, come on, let's stop it.
Like, that's not what I never.
Okay, that's interesting.
I didn't know that.
So that's where it came from.
I think it still says that if you look it up,
that that's where the word came from.
So, but I was always a Florida,
I was just a Florida cracker.
It wasn't until,
it really was until I got to prison
that I started realizing that these guys
are using this as, oh, it's a derogatory term to them.
So, but.
Was zero consequence, too.
Right.
Oh, yeah.
But if you watch Rudger's stuff
on the Civil War,
like he explained he first he talks about what if there was a civil war and he breaks apart the whole
the states and who would win the civil war and why and let me guess Texas well I mean he breaks
it apart into multiple states and talks about how but yeah ultimately it's like the conservative states
he believes would win oh yeah and really destroy everybody really we have guns right well really what
he also says is he talks about is you know the real deciding factor is is who does the military
side with right like like like but
When we were talking, I was like, well, wait a minute, what if you broke it up into the states, each state having their own, their own, come on, what, we have the National Guard?
The National Guard, okay, I was going to say.
South Carolina National Guard, or Ford National Guard.
What if each National Guard win, he was like, wow, that's a, you know, I hadn't thought about like that.
But when you break it all apart, too, it still ends up being the conservative states end up winning.
And he talks about the, he has another video where he talks about the, what if the Confederacy had won, the Civil War.
Okay.
And he does a whole thing.
And it's really interesting because there was such a boom during the Civil War and after the Civil War of industrialization.
Yeah.
And what he explains is had there been a tie, which was the best case.
for the Confederacy. Had there been a tie, the Confederacy, the Southern states would have
continued with slavery and they would have never developed. And he explains that within, I think he
even has a breakdown of what the time period would be to where the North would continue to advance
and eventually they would have so much overwhelming money that they would eventually be able to invade
and take over the... I'm watching that video. It's a great video. And listen, the guy's mind,
you know, some of these guys that their minds are just, they're so analytical.
is just amazing. But what I'm wondering is, because we basically were saying, look, based on the
current events, what do you think there could be a civil war? He was saying within a year to five
years, yes. And he talked about Trump possibly winning, and he hadn't won at this point. He was
just going to run. We were six months away from him running probably, right? Trump at that time,
because this was way before the election. Oh, no, 23. Yeah, this was before the election. Probably
six months beforehand. But do you see anything along those lines based on the current? Because,
listen, every time I turn around, it seems like they're taking a vote or there's some amendment
put in to try and impeach him. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So what do you? There's a very real,
there's a very real chance of him being impeached for sure, especially with the midterms coming
around. So I would say we've already kind of seen remnants of it. Look at what happened in Minneapolis,
right? We, and LA and a lot of these other blue cities just with the ice raids, right? They were,
you know, obviously the shooting of Renee Good and Alex Prady divided the nation, right? This is a topic
that I debated ad nauseum at the schools. For those that are wondering, you know, I'm not here to
make a moral judgment of whether it was good or bad, but what I will say is that the, you know,
the ICE agents or ICE officers in this case acted legally because people need to understand that when
it comes to use of force situations and shootings, it's always based on what were the
rule, the facts of circumstances at the point the use of force was triggered, not necessarily
20-20 hindsight and all the facts after the matter, right? And the example I always give to
explain this to people, because like, people have a very difficult time digesting this. Because
like they're looking at it from like a Monday morning quarterback perspective, like, she, she was just
driving away. What do you mean? Or he didn't even have his gun on him. It was whatever. Like,
that doesn't matter. None of that matters. What matters?
is what did the officers know at the time that they pulled the trigger?
That's the only thing that matters and that's what they're going to be judged on,
especially a rapidly evolving, evolving facts.
So, like, what I'll tell someone is like, okay, let's someone say someone breaks into your house, right?
And you go downstairs with your handgun, and you see the individual, you confront an individual,
and then they raise up something black towards you.
You don't know what it is, but you fucking shoot and you light them up and you kill them, right?
You think it's a gun.
You think it's a gun.
And you find out it was a cap gun.
It was plastic.
It wasn't real, right?
And now, right?
Precisely.
But, like, this is what I have to explain.
liberals when I do this debate with them because they look at it like 2020 odds.
I'm like, so should you go to jail because you didn't know that it was a plastic gun?
Well, I don't know.
Well, yeah, exactly.
You don't because it was reasonable at the time that you would think that they would have a fart
arm and they raised something up at you and you shot them and you didn't want to take a chance.
That's why you're justified it.
You know, and we have, you know, use of force cases that, you know, Grand v. Connor,
Tennessee versus Garner.
Like these cases establish that when it comes to use of force, it's based on the reasonable
of the officer at the time, right?
Was it reasonable to use of force?
And me and you would conclude, yeah, like,
they broke in your house,
you saw something in a darkness raise up.
You're not going to be able to know
it's a plastic gun at that point.
You shot and you kill them.
And that's what covers you with the law.
So if anything, they should thank God
that we don't have this 20-20 hindsight
written into our laws because everybody
will go to Jeff for defending themselves.
Right.
Or a lot of them would.
So, but I would say that's like the closest we've been
like with these ice raids and stuff.
It's absolutely nuts.
You look at like Portland, Minneapolis, L.A., Seattle,
the George Floyd BLM riots.
So it's crazy.
And I've gotten into like really heated discussions about this.
Because one thing I will say about progressives is like,
progressives are willing to fight.
And not only are they willing to fight,
they're willing to like.
They're extremely violent.
It seems like all the violence as a result.
And when Biden was in office,
they're not,
they're not constantly having a possible assassinations.
There's not all these killings.
Yeah.
Like I'm smart enough to know.
that I'm, if there's six ice agents and I'm unhappy with something that they're doing,
like, I'm not winning this argument.
Like, I'm not winning this confrontation.
There's no way for me to win this.
Even if it's two guys or one, even if it's one guy, the other guys are going to come.
Exactly.
Like, I'm not winning this.
So we can complain and I can pick it and I can hold my signs and I can do all of that.
That's perfectly legal.
There's nothing wrong with that.
But I can't interfere.
I'm putting myself in jeopardy and putting other people in jeopardy.
And that's a crime and they don't know that.
Like I have to tell them, like with Alex,
Pretty's situation and with Renee Good, like both of them were impeding officers from doing their jobs.
That's a felony. You can't do that. And I know that because I've arrested people for that crime.
You can't you can't impede federal agents from doing their job. You want to protest? That's cool.
But like once you get in the way or you put a hand on him like Alex Petty did, he put his hand on the guy first or Renee Good where you strike them with a vehicle.
Like, it doesn't matter. It's game on. So it's like, you know, they put themselves in very bad positions where they were interrupting and stopping lawful immigration enforcement.
and they put themselves in a precarious situation.
And when it comes to left before, you know, because I've gotten in discussions,
you know, people say, oh, well, the conservatives are violent.
Not really.
Like, if you look at progressives, right, they're far more willing to demonstrate.
They're far more willing to protest.
They're far more willing to get out there and hit the pick of signs and, you know,
go crazy and everything, which I'll give them credit for.
Like, they are far more active and vocal in their political ideologies.
They tend to be younger, maybe not have as much, you know, to lose with families and everything
else like that.
Conservatives, we got to work, bro.
Like we got families.
Like we can't be out here saying there's two genders and Luke getting canceled.
So conservatives aren't as vocal with that stuff.
And here's the other thing too.
And I'm sure you could actually add to this.
With Progressives, right?
Antifa, for many years, we're able to openly demonstrate, protest, whatever.
They weren't on a terrorist watch list or anything like that.
Or they weren't considered terrorists or domestic terrorists.
They could do whatever they want.
BLM, same thing.
Like they're able to openly assemble.
But if you take like far right groups, what's happening with them?
They're getting infiltrated by the FBI.
They're getting stopped all the time.
They can't openly even do anything, right?
Like with political movement.
So in the right wing, even the ones that want to get out there and be active in protests and stuff like that,
they're constantly being infiltrated by law enforcement and targeted heavily versus the left
doesn't have that same hindrance.
So they're able to go out there and demonstrate and do what they do.
So another reason, too, why liberals are more violence because they can be.
Like, look at January 6.
A perfect example.
Look at January 6.
All those people that went into the Capitol building, all the people that went into the Capitol building,
all the people that were involved, all of them got arrested.
The FBI did one of the biggest cases, identified everybody, showed up, arrested every single one of them.
You look at the BLM riots, George Floyd, burn the city down.
Did all those guys get arrested?
No.
You look at the ICE riots.
Did all them get arrested?
No.
Right?
So it just goes to show the difference.
If conservatives come out and act crazy, you're all going to jail.
If liberals do, nothing happens.
Or you have a good chance of not being arrested.
But you see the pendulum swinging since Trump's been in office, right?
Sure.
So let's assume that the pendulum is shifting, right?
And they are able to impeach Trump.
What do you think happens?
Like, what do you think happens?
They're going to try to put him in jail.
Okay.
That's why I think.
They're going to say everything.
They're going to say, illegally invader of Venezuela, sovereign stay.
He cannot a sitting world leader.
He started an illegal war against Iran.
They're going to say.
Same thing Obama did.
Like what about grabbing Osama bin Laden taking him, shooting him, taking him, dumping his body.
Yeah, they're going to say all that.
Yeah, they're going to, yeah.
But that's what I predict.
They're going to try to impeach the tariffs.
They're going to go after him for everything because they couldn't get him the first time, right?
He was indicted.
I mean, he was facing so many different cases.
He was facing two federal cases.
I remember he had one out of some district of Florida for the documents case, espionage,
793.
Then they had him in D.C. for insurrection.
New York.
That was, and then they had them out in New York for the state case for the document,
the document fraud case, which he actually got convicted of that one.
Yeah.
And then they had them for RICO out of Georgia with Fannie Willis for the, also for the trying
to steal the election or something like that or overturned the election.
So, but all those cases got dismissed.
But I think, you know, we have a very real chance of.
losing the midterms for sure.
And I think this war set it over the edge
because a big part of his base
is not happy with this war.
I mean, this is, you know, I mean war.
We're dropping some bombs.
There's no boots on the ground.
I think we're getting to that closely,
you know, slowly, but I hope not,
but we are definitely going in that direction.
Like no conflict has ever been won
by just air power alone.
Right.
I don't know some smart ass in the comments
going to say World War II.
Yeah, buddy, but that's because,
because Stalin, right, and the Soviets
were literally progressing towards Japan
and they knew that if Stalin got to them first,
they weren't going to be able to surrender and live.
They were going to just take over and kill them all.
So that's why they surrendered.
So that was a land invasion coupled with, obviously,
the nuclear bombs.
But air power alone.
Japan was defeated by that point.
They were, but they didn't want to surrender.
People don't know this.
Like, they were not, they didn't want to surrender.
The only reason they surrendered,
not even because of nuclear bombs and us,
they only surrendered because the Soviets were closing them on the,
on the west.
Right.
Oh, it's funny too, because the military didn't want to either, right?
Like the emperor went on the radio for the first time.
They heard his voice where he actually surrendered,
and they actually tried to take, they actually tried to stop him, right?
They tried to stop the tape from getting out or something along those lines.
Yeah, actually the whole thing.
But it was an air power that made them surrender.
It was actually the land, the ground invasion that the Soviets were pushing
because they were pushing back to Japanese forces
and they were killing them all and not taking any prisoners.
Yeah, yeah.
The Soviets would have, it would have been.
It would have been bad under Stalin.
So that's, yeah, that's kind of what it is.
So, like, yeah, air power alone will never get you a victory.
And, you know, I don't know if you want to go into the war now, but, you know, it's not good, man.
We've got a lot of problems with this conflict in Iran.
A lot of problems.
You don't think that the, you don't think that there could be the civil unrest that they could take over?
Or you think that the, you think there's too much of a stranglehold on the government?
Sure. So I can, I can go into detail on all of this.
Yeah, yeah, sure.
So, um, okay.
Okay, so for me to kind of address that, because you're asking about, like, the uprising, like, is that possible?
No, and I'll explain why.
Okay.
So the reason why it's not is because in America and in the West in general, we have a very skewed perception of what Iranians are like.
You know, you look at someone like maybe like a Patrick Bed David or these, you know, the Shah or these other like really influential Iranians that are very westernized that live in America.
You know, I need people to understand that like these Iranians are like not a good sample size of like the, the, you know, the.
Iranians that actually live in Iran. Like these guys a lot of the times come from the pre-Islamic
revolution era, right, when it was more westernized, the Shah was in power, they were under the
monarchy, they were pro-West, you know, the oil wasn't nationalized, it was, you know, being
privatized by U.S. companies, et cetera, working with Israel. And these Iranians typically were
exiled or fled or whatever after the Islamic Republic came into power in 1979. And
The Iranians that are there now, right, have a deep dislike of not just the United States, but also of Israel, right?
They're not Zionists at all, and they definitely don't like the United States either.
And they really don't like Israel because Israel has been their main enemy that has been trying to destroy them ever since 1979.
So these Western Iranians don't have a proper pulse on the current political climate in Iran.
Now, with that said, let me be clear about this.
There's a lot of Iranians that don't like the Ayatollah.
There's a lot of Iranians that hate the government structure that don't like the IRGC, don't like Qasem Soleimani or any of these guys.
You see them in the streets.
You see the videos.
Even in Iran.
Like some of them were even celebrating when he was killed.
Right.
But who do they like less than Ayatollah, Israel and the United States?
Because they look at it like, okay, we don't like this guy, but we'll be damned if you guys are going to bomb us and have us do your dirty work for you and fall to, you know, Western imperialism.
That's how they look at it.
They look at it like they're the only country fighting against Western American slash Israeli imperialism in the Middle East.
Because to understand, and also they're Shi'i Muslims, right?
So they, to them, dying for their country is a big deal.
Like it's an honor, right?
Like they don't, like, this is what we, this is what we want to do.
And it's like the holy month of Ramadan.
So like dying is our martyr while defending your country in their eyes is like an honor.
It's huge because they have a completely different worldview than we have here.
Right.
Like we live in a very secularized, you know, free nation where, you know, everyone's able to do whatever they want, whatever.
Iran's not like that.
They're looking at it like we are fighting, you know, they call America the big Satan and Israel the little Satan.
They're looking at it like we are the ones standing up for Islam against the West and their imperial expansion.
And they look at Israel as like the satellite of that expansion in the Middle East because Israel wants to be the hegemon in the region.
And Iran is the last country standing in their way.
And this has been going on for many years.
this all started with October 7th.
As you know, Hamas invaded and attacked Israel,
and Hamas is a proxy for the Iranians.
The Iranians have been backing them.
The Houthis in Yemen has bullets of the northern Lebanon,
as well as the Bashal Assad regime.
Now, the Israelis, especially Benjamin and Yahoo,
have wanted to go to war the Iranians for a very long time
and get them out of there and have a regime change
because that is the last part,
it is the last country that's still standing against them.
And ever since October 7th, the Israelis have been able to systematically disrupt, dismantle,
and or destroy all of their enemies.
They went into Gaza, bombed it into oblivion, Hamas is pretty much weakened.
They went into Lebanon, started a foot for, they invaded, you know, on foot, ground troops,
as well as they bombed, ended in the pejor event.
Then they hurt Hezbollah by, you know, killing Hassan Nasrallah,
taking out the leadership, doing the pager attacks so they couldn't even communicate with each other
while also simultaneously running a ground assault.
That led to a ceasefire at the war.
that ceasefire happened, they dominated that into the disruption and destruction of the Bashal Assad regime.
And Bashar al-Assad ended up, who was the former president, he ended up fleeing to Russia.
And then a guy named Ahmed al-Shara came into power.
Ahmed al-Shara was backed by the United States and Israel.
Syria now is, you know, getting their sanctions lifted, right?
That was a guy that used to be a part of al-Qaeda, Ahmad al-Shara, aka Al-Jalani.
So when Syria was destabilized, that opened the door for Iran.
So why am I mentioning all these countries?
All these countries were backed by the Iranians.
called the axis of resistance. And the Houthis were getting bombed by us as well, right?
They're still somewhat intact, aka. Ansarallah. So the Israelis, since they've been able to disrupt
and hurt all these different proxies and stop them, the only country left is Iran, and Iran has
been at the weakest it's ever been for the past year or so. So they tried to do decapitation back
during the 12th day, were in June last year. They did a sneak attack as the United States was doing
negotiations with Iran. They failed to do the decapitation. They bombed them. They bombed them.
they attacked them, they destroyed all their infrastructure,
they destroyed a lot of their military infrastructure,
they bombed their nuclear facilities.
And then the United States came in
and then did drop the really big bunker buster bombs
from the B2 bombers, et cetera,
and Trump comes in, does the victory thing.
We destroyed their nuclear capabilities,
they're pushed back several months, if not years.
And, you know, a mission accomplished, midnight hammer was great,
boom, and then ceasefire done.
And then obviously now we're restarting the war
as of a couple of weeks ago.
But so that was always the plan.
and they're using the nuclear angle as to why they're bombing, which is BS.
But they needed some type of something to sell to the American public to justify the invasion.
But I threw a lot out there, so I don't know if you had to.
Yeah, I mean, what I'm saying, what I'm wondering is that based on the video.
Oh, the ground groups.
You asked me about the uprising, right?
Yeah, yeah.
That's what I'm saying is like it doesn't seem like the, it seems like I understand the government
who's in power what they're there, but are you saying that the civilians,
feel the same way that they're mostly Muslim
and that they also believe the Great Satan.
So let me, okay, so we established kind of the atmosphere, right,
of what led to that.
So the people, right, and keep in mind, Iran's been heavily sanctioned
for several decades now at this point by the United States
because of, you know, standing up for Palestine
and, you know, resisting and all those other stuff.
So the people look at it like, yes, our government,
us off, we might have issues, but we're not going to rise up and fight against our government
as invaders are coming in and bombing us and attacking us. So it actually had the reverse effect,
and that's the 12 they were going back to, that's why I brought the 12 they were. So they already
tried this in June, right? So the Israeli bombed them, you know, they took out several nuclear
scientists killed a bunch of generals. They did a sneak attack inside. It was very well done.
The Mossad is fantastic. Yeah, they're very, yeah, with that. Like they're, I can't even, you know,
as much as I'm critical of Israel, one thing I always give them credit for is they have one of the
best intelligence services in the world between unit 80, 200, Mossad, Shinnbet, their FBI equivalent.
And they're able to take that intelligence and actually turn it into, like the pager thing, right?
Yeah, incredible.
Right.
They're able to.
Ten-year operation, dude.
Like, 10 years they had bombs and walkie-talkies and pagers.
Even with the, what, where they took out 80 of their, was it their clerics or whoever, it was basically like their Congress recently, where they had all, they were all getting together to, they were all in the same place.
Oh, you're talking about this last conflict?
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
They killed Iatoll in 50 of his top 50.
They killed Aitone in top his top 50 guys, essentially.
Yeah.
Like that was all done through by hacking into the cameras
and realizing they're all going to be at this one location.
This is what's happening.
Bomb it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They're, like they.
And that's years, years of them hacking and watching.
And the Mossad is cutthroat like that because they have to be.
They're in a very hostile region.
Nobody wants them there.
Everyone feels like they stole the land from the Palestinians.
The Muslim world doesn't want them there.
So they've always been on attack.
And their quote literally is by deception we create war.
That's one of their old quotes.
and now it's like, you know, rise up and kill them first.
So that's always been, you know, the way they go.
They have the most confirmed assassinations.
They've killed nuclear scientists in Iran many times.
So this is what they do.
But going back to what I was saying, so they tried this already.
So the reason why the people aren't going to rise to answer that,
because there's a two part to this question.
So the reason why the people aren't going to rise
is because they already tried this back in Juneer in the 12-day war.
So as they did this attack and they, you know,
completely disoriented Iran, they destroyed their radars,
they destroyed their air defense, et cetera.
They did the strikes.
They killed all the generals, the nuclear science, et cetera.
The Shah gets on the internet and says,
okay, guys, rise up and take over, right?
Benjamin Nanyahu, rise up and take over, blah, blah, blah.
Did it work.
It actually, the opposite happened.
The people took to the streets and they said,
hit Israel back, hit Israel back.
They protested telling the government to hit them back.
Because for a very long time,
the Iranians have always been very restrained in their retaliations to Israel.
They blew up an embassy in Damascus.
They've been attacking them, killing scientists, whatever.
And Iran's always been extremely reserved in the retaliation
because they don't want to draw the United States in
because they know if they hit them too hard, the U.S. can hit them, and they don't want a war with the U.S.
So after Operation, it was called Operation Rising Line, was with a sneak attack.
That's what led to the 12-day war.
And when Iran retaliated, they retaliated very badly.
And they absolutely, you know, destroyed many strategic locations all across Israel.
And the reason why you might not know about is because Israel had a very strict censorship policy at the time for now security purposes.
Because if the Iranians were able to see on the news, the place that were destroyed, they'd be able to fine-tune their,
their missiles to hit it again or they would know where the interceptors are.
So obviously that's a huge national security risk for them.
But they hit them very hard.
It was actually the Israelis that went to the United States begging for the ceasefire of the 12-day war
because they're running out of interceptor missiles.
Interceptor missiles are significantly more expensive than the missiles that the Iranians were using
in the drones.
So, you know, they were saturated in the air and then as a day's passed by, more and more
missiles started getting in.
Even though the Iranians were shooting less, more were starting to strike.
And obviously the Israelis can't tolerate that forever.
So they ended up ending the war.
And this actually is what led to this next conflict
because they shifted from the nuclear problem, right,
to, oh, these guys actually have really dangerous ballistic missiles
because this is the first time that they saw all those capabilities.
They saw hypersonic missiles hitting them.
Israel's never been hit like that.
So ever since the 12th day war,
I knew that they were going to fight again
because those ballistic missiles caused a lot of damage to the Israelis.
So they tried to decapitation strikes the first time.
They told the people, rise up,
your government's disoriented.
The opposite happened.
They took to the streets
and they rallied around the flag
and Iran hit them back very hard.
So this time, they tried it twice.
They tried it in January.
They had the protests
and everything else like that,
which were Mossad operations.
I think at this point now,
it's pretty much widely known
unless I feel I'm going to go in more detail.
But a lot of the protesters,
so, okay,
the secretary of the treasury,
percent.
He goes ahead,
I might have pronounced the name wrong,
But he goes ahead and he messes with their currency.
They crashed the currency.
This makes shopkeepers say, what the hell?
Inflation going nuts.
They protest.
As these legitimate protests were going on, agitators,
Mossad agitators or CIA or some other foreign intelligence service agitators got involved
in these protests and started like shooting and killing police officers, right,
and military officials.
And this led to, you know, widespread pandemonium.
They were lighting masks on fire, et cetera.
And if you look at Israeli media, they admitted that there were intelligence.
assets on the ground agitating these protests. Mike Pompeo, the former Secretary of State,
was on Twitter, said Mossad walks amongst you. So like they put it out there in the public, right?
That's what was going on with these protests. And then they said, oh, yeah, they killed 30,000
people. There's no way. It's not 30,000, right? The Iranian government said 3,176, if I'm
not mistaken. The U.S. government said it around 30,000 or whatever. It's probably somewhere in the
middle. Obviously, a lot of people did die, but a lot of those people were like, you know,
operatives that were getting paid. I don't believe.
any government, they're always going to lie, right? Either overestimate or underestimate or underestimate.
And after that happened, the Iranians were able to stop those protests. And they stopped it twice
because what happened was when the protesters got arrested the first time, some didn't get arrested,
and they ended up trying to smuggle a bunch of Starlink satellites in, right, so they can get
on the Internet because the Iranians shut the Internet off because they knew, they're like,
okay, this is a coordinated attack. Let's shut the Internet off. They shut the Internet off,
and the protests dissipated, you know, significantly reduced.
So they smuggled in a bunch of Starlink.
And this came from the White House.
Like the government admitted already that they were involved in trying to smuggle these Starlink
into the U.S.
Sorry, into Iran.
So they got the Starlink sent.
A couple of the operators got the things to try to communicate.
And then that's when a Chinese came in and they shut down the Starlink.
And the Chinese intelligence services had to help them with jamming the Starlink.
And then they shut it down.
And then that's when the protests pretty much died off.
They captured a bunch of them.
100 of them got arrested.
And I think they got like a date.
to be hanged or whatever,
and then that's when Trump said,
oh, if you hang any of them,
we're going to start a war or whatever.
And that's what I knew, okay,
the U.S. is looking for an angle to come in
and invade and start a war.
That's why I was saying, like,
oh, yeah, if you do any of these protesters,
we're going to come in.
Trump doesn't care about that.
I mean, it's like, dude,
you've had crippling sanctions on them forever.
They were part of the JCPOA.
You could have had an eye on their nuclear program.
You pulled out of that because of Zionist lobby.
So that's when I knew, like,
they're not going to rise up.
They tried with the protests, it failed.
they tried with the 12-day war, it failed.
And then now they tried it again.
They thought, you know, okay, let's bomb this base,
kill the Ayatollah on the top 50 guys.
Then let's go ahead and say, okay, guys, rise up.
They thought the war was going to last four days.
By Monday, they're striking a deal.
It's going to be good.
Didn't work.
People didn't rise up, if anything, they said,
now we're going to fight back.
We're going to go hard, we're in war.
So it made the people once again rally around the flag.
They don't have to like the regime,
but they look at it like, well, we're not going to, you know,
be attacked by the United States and Israel.
and turn on our government, we're still Iranian, right?
That's how they looked at it.
And like, if you look at like, because I watch all media,
I watch Israeli media, I watch Israeli media, Iranian media,
and I watch Iranian media in Middle Eastern media.
A majority of the people are pro-government right now
when it comes to this war.
Of course, you got people that are like, fuck how many, whatever.
But even those people, like, say, fuck Israel more.
So in the United States.
So they're not going to do an uprising.
So since that didn't work, now the war's going longer.
So Trump said, okay, it's going to be four weeks.
Now, then it went to eight weeks.
Then it went to 100 days.
we're looking at September. So now we're looking at seven months. So what was supposed to be a four-day
operation is going to probably run into September. Does Israel have the manpower to go into Iran?
No. Neither do we. Neither do we. To put things in perspective, Operation Iraqi Freedom, we had roughly
300,000. We went in there and we bombed the hell out of them before. Number one, Iran's a way
bigger country. Military is way more competent. They have, you know, hundreds of thousands of guys
in their military.
And then the worst part, the nightmarish part,
is invading Iran is not going to work.
Saddam Hussein tried in the 80s
with U.S. backing and help, and he failed.
And the reason why is because the terrain is unforgiving.
We're talking about mountains, right?
And mountains that are worse than Afghanistan.
So when we have some case studies on this,
when U.S. special forces were fighting in the mountains
of Afghanistan against the Taliban or whatever,
we suffered quite a bit of casualties.
It was very difficult because they're hiding in the mountains.
We got some farmers that don't know anything.
fighting against, you know, elite military, and they're, like, killing them and, like, you know,
being able to actually resist.
Osama Belodin was able to spend off the Soviets, right, even though we're backing him and stuff,
but he was because of the mountainous environment.
Iran's that even worse, like same exact terrain, but even worse.
So imagine the difficulties of Afghanistan with the mountainous terrain, and then you're
actually fighting a real military that actually has real capabilities, right?
It's a nightmare.
We would suffer an enormous amount of casualties.
Israel can barely get into Lebanon against Hezbollah.
Like, they can barely fight them.
Like, the only reason they even won on the last conflict is because the Pager attack alongside
the bombings.
Like, the Israelis rely heavily upon their intelligence and their airpower.
But if we're talking about boots on the ground between the IDF and the United States going
into Iran, it's going to be a bloodbath.
They're going to get cooked because it's extremely difficult to run supply lines into a
region like that that's so mountainous and so hard.
You get tanks in, supplies, it's not going to work.
So what's the, I mean, what is the, what's the answer?
That's a good question.
And I don't think the Trump administration planned that out, right?
It's, it, because what I'm thinking is this, Trump wanted, Trump understands that this
conflict is extremely unpopular for his base, right?
Like a lot of us voted, like I voted for Trump and I said, okay, he said no new wars.
I was like, let's go, because wars create a lot of issues.
You know, and a lot of issues that, like you said, you might feel down the line.
I'll give an example of why you're right.
Like a lot of Americans, in 2024,
what was the big things that they were campaigning on?
Inflation is high.
Groceries are too expensive, right?
Bread, milk, eggs.
A lot of Americans weren't able to kind of pinpoint it back.
The reason why bread and food was expensive
is because the Russia-Ukraine war.
What the hell are you talking about?
Well, Ukraine's the bread basket of Europe.
If you hurt the supply chain there for food like bread, for example, grain,
well, that's going to put stress on another part of the
supply chain, which winds up happening. Capitalism, people want to make money. They're going to
increase the prices, right? It goes up. Supply and demand. So, though it took years for Americans
to feel it, we eventually started feeling that in our pockets when it came to the cost of food. And
the rest of Ukraine war was a part of that. No one wants to, you know, work it back that way.
But conflicts inherently create instability. Instability inherently creates increases in the
price of food and energy and everything else like that. So Trump, right, campaign on no new war.
So in his head, he's like, okay, I'm on my high with Venezuela.
We went in there.
We got Maduro.
It was a badass operation with no casualties, nothing.
We can do this in Iran.
He became emboldened.
He came emboldened.
And Iran is not Venezuela, my friend.
It's a way bigger country, way more competent military.
They have Russian and Chinese assistance, like for real.
They have hypersonic missiles.
They have real military capabilities.
And then they have underground cities that we can't even get into a lot of the times with their missile
system with their missile cities. So he thought, okay, if we killed Ayatollah and his top 50 guys,
they're going to rise up, they're going to be like, yes, there's an opening, we can do it,
we're going to hit them even harder than when the Israelis did it with the 12-day war. And they're
going to surrender and everything. Didn't work? So he's like, okay, well, this sucks. And then
he didn't anticipate, and he admitted this when he spoke to, I think, the New York Post,
trying to admit to this, he didn't think they were going to attack the Gulf country so hard.
So what Iran did, their strategy is this. It was very important to, like, understand
because I know I'm going to have some idiots comment.
Like, we're destroying them.
We're bombing them into an oblivion.
That is true.
Let me be very clear about this.
American firepower is unstoppable.
We are the best military in the world.
No one can touch us in many different ways.
They're basically their Navy's gone.
Yeah.
Yeah, but here's the thing.
It was never their Navy that was the threat.
It was their ballistic missile program.
Right.
Right.
Now the Trump industry, notice out there moving the goal pole.
Like, we destroyed their Navy.
Their Navy was never the issue, right?
It was the ballistic missile program, which is precisely why you went in.
And the reason why their ballistic missile program was an issue
is because the Israelis found out from the 12-day war
that Israel can't touch them and they can really hurt them.
So the Israelis said, holy crap, we need to stop these guys.
And the Israelis told the United States,
and Marco Rubio slipped the other day admitting this.
The Israelis were going to attack the Iranians no matter what.
They were going to attack them no matter what,
with or without U.S. assistance.
So Marco Rubio said, well, if they're going to attack anyway,
we need to be involved because the Iranians said,
if the Israelis attack us or if the U.S. attacks us,
we're going to attack both of you
and we're going to attack the Gulf states.
because the Gulf states house a lot of the military bases
that are used to attack us.
So anyone that was involved in this chain of attacking us
is up for it.
We're going to create a regional war.
So that is why the United States said,
okay, if the Israel are going to attack anyway,
we might as well be involved
and have some type of control in this situation.
I want to concede this,
that the U.S. is absolutely decimating Iran
from like a bombing slash casualty level,
air power superiority, fine.
But that's not what the Iranians are going to do.
We bombed in an absolutely.
devastated in Vietnam also.
Yep, and Afghanistan.
Yeah.
And who's in power now?
The Taliban.
And we had boots on the round.
And we, like, you win every single battle and you still lost the war.
So it doesn't always work.
And with the Iranians, they've been planning this.
They've watched the United States and Israel destroy all of their neighbors.
They've seen, you know, they saw Saddam Hussein lose.
They saw Gaddafi, whatever.
And they saw that the U.S. relies heavily upon air power.
So what did they do?
Move all their military infrastructure underground.
where even bunker busters a lot of the times
have a difficult time destroying them.
So they've been preparing for this,
and they're going to have a war of attrition.
They've mastered something called asymmetric warfare.
And this is something actually that Qasam Soleimani, like, mastered.
This is why Trump killed him in 2020
because he was so dangerous to, not just Israel,
but to the United States and manufacturing asymmetric warfare.
And asymmetric warfare is basically,
the Iranians understand that we're superior to them militarily,
and they can't stop us.
So what they're doing is, okay, we're going to hurt them in pressure points.
We're going to hurt them economically, politically, and make it where, and financially,
where they can no longer continue the war in this manner.
And they're doing this already.
What have they done?
They've shut down the straight of Hamos.
20 to 30 percent of the world's oil goes through that little straight.
Qatar shut down their natural gas production.
That's 20 percent of the world's gas, right?
That's created an enormous strain on Europe now, right?
Now they have to rely on the Russia to get the gas.
Well, they have a problem with Russia because Russia, Ukraine, they had them sanctioned.
And Europe, Western Europe, especially, their entire model of sanctioning Russia for their gas
was based upon Qatari gas replacing it.
Now they don't have that.
The oil coming through.
We're talking about $90 a barrel.
As the time we're recording this, it's about $90 to $95 for a barrel of oil.
It was like 50 to 60 like last week.
So it's up significantly.
So people are feeling that at the gas station.
I've seen in multiple places now, like California, gas shop.
up a dollar plus over overnight.
If you sleep hot at night, you know how disruptive that can be.
When you're not resting well, everything else feels harder.
Your focus, your mood, even your recovery.
Ghostbed is here to help you fix that.
They've spent decades perfecting how to build a bed that's comfortable,
durable, and designed to actually help you rest.
Every ghost bed mattress features premier materials,
proven cooling technology, and their exclusive pro-core layer,
a targeted support system that reinforces the center of the mattress where the body is heaviest.
It helps keep your spine aligned and your back supported.
So you can wake up ready for anything 2026 throws at you.
Each mattress comes with a 101 night sleep trial and a 20 to 25 year warranty.
So you can try it risk-free, knowing it's built to last.
Shipping is fast and free.
Most orders arrive in two to five days.
Ghostbed has great prices to begin with up to 50% off comparable brands.
And inside true crime listeners can get an extra 10% off sitewide for a limited time.
Just go to ghostbed.com slash Cox and use promo code Cox at checkout.
That's ghostbed.com slash Cox, promo code Cox.
Upgrade your sleep with Ghostbed, the makers of the coolest bed in the world.
Some exclusions apply.
See site for details.
Yeah, they're showing like six, seven bucks.
Yeah, it's shot up.
It's not like that in Florida.
Yeah, not Florida, but it's going to catch up to us.
And then also, so they shut down straight to Hermos, gas and natural energy is taking a hit there, right?
Also.
But isn't the United States, aren't we now escorting boats through Hermose?
So Trump said that, but they, no ship is going to take that up because they've already
bomb the few of them and set them on fire, the Iranians,
and no captain is going to sail through that, through that,
because these aren't worship.
These are like old freighters, right?
That are very sensitive.
So, like, number one, no one's going to want to insure it.
And then number two, no one's going to want to take that risk and lose the cargo
because then the captain's on the hook for that, right?
And then as far as, like, the naval escort, like,
they don't want to be within range of these ballistic missiles from the Iranians.
Because you literally have to, because the Strait of Ramos, like, at the narrowest point,
it's about 20 miles.
That's well within a ballistic missile.
Right.
So, like, that's an enormous risk.
That's why they had to move the armadas back.
The destroy armadas, they had to move them back to not be within a striking distance of the ballistic missile.
So I don't even know how he would be able to guarantee them, you know, safe passage across the strait.
And then on top of that, they got mines on the seafloor.
And the Strait of Hermuz is very shallow.
So no ship is going to take that risk, you know, freighter ship.
And right now there's about 200 of them just lined up, anchored down.
And there has been, none of the ships have been passing by.
So energy stagnated.
Then, you know, we have the war of attrition.
with interceptors.
The interceptor missiles that we use
to shoot down their drones
and their ballistic missiles
are significantly more expensive
than their drones.
The other crazy part
people need to understand
is that Iranians manufacture everything in-house.
They make all their own drones,
all their own weapons,
and they have many of these factories
all across Iran, so they can keep doing it.
And these interceptor missiles that we have,
we already wasted 25% of them
during the 12-day war.
This is why Israel needed a ceasefire immediately
to try to replenish.
And I know Trump made a tweet or a truth social post saying that like we met with the, you know, defense contractors, we're going to quadruple.
Even if they quadrupled it, it wouldn't matter.
They would never have the amount of interceptors necessary to be able to stop the amount of missiles that these guys have, especially when they make them domestically.
And then the third part, over a week, the Iranians have destroyed our capacity to project influence and power in the Gulf in the Middle East.
They destroyed all the bases, pretty much.
and Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, they've pretty much bombed the hell out of the bases.
People had to evacuate.
They bombed the embassies.
And the worst part, they bombed the radars.
We have some very sophisticated radars that are our first lines, yeah, of defense.
So billion-dollar radars, right?
That systems, 30% of them been destroyed.
So, you know, can we maintain spending a billion dollars a day and losing our equipment
on our foothold in the golf?
Now, here's other problem.
We're paying for this diplomatically.
The Gulf states are like, hold on one second.
We had these military bases here.
You guys are supposed to protect us, guaranteed protection.
We're getting attacked for having these bases here,
and you guys aren't even doing what you're supposed to do.
What the hell?
And they had just invested a bunch of money into the United States.
Trump was there in spring negotiating deals.
So this is hurting us diplomatically as well.
We've already seen like Qatarie billionaires,
sorry, a big UAE billionaire who's like,
you know, responsible for a lot of the infrastructure and the construction.
He's like, who are you to get us involved in this war?
And the crazy part is like, the Iranians warn the Gulf, they warned the Gulf, they warned
the United States.
If you attack us, we're going to shut down the Strait of Hamoos, and we are going to make
this a regional war.
And they're doing everything that they said they would.
And the interceptors are slowing down.
Gulf states are panicking.
They're pissed off.
They've destroyed our bases all across the region.
And the worst part is, here's the reality.
We need to do the regime change, the way that we're going to do the regime change, the way that
want. We're going to need to get boots underground. To get boots on the ground, we're going to have
to traverse the mountains. Those mountains are going to be fortified by their military. They're going to be
able to, it's going to be a bloodbath. Very difficult to do that. We're going to have to get all the way
to Tehran, right? Very difficult to do. So I don't think a regime change is going to be done because
boots on the ground is just not going to work. So if we don't do a regime change, well, the regime is
still in place that bomb the hell out of the Gulf. So the Gulf is going to be in a weird spot.
Do we allow the United States to stay in this area and risk getting bombed to
and losing all of our infrastructure and our tourism and our safety again after building up
because the golf right now they're trying to acquiesce to the west they're trying to bring tourism
they're trying to bring people there they want to bring investors they want to bring expatriates
so are we going to allow the united states to stay here and you know lose a lot of the economic
benefit that we've had or are we going to say you know what look we had great business with you
guys before, but we're going to limit your influence in the region with your military bases.
You guys, we still work with you diplomatically, but we're not going to let you guys
have military bases because it makes us a target.
And then they'll go to the Chinese or the Russians.
The Chinese don't get into wars.
And the Chinese have sophisticated military.
And the Chinese get along with the Iranians.
So would they just say, you know, sorry guys, we'll work with you diplomatically,
but you can't have military basis anymore?
So, like, one of the biggest things that the United States has with the military is, like,
our ability to project power all across the world.
the Iranians have effectively hurt our presence in the Middle East.
They bombed their bases, billions of dollars gone,
and they've made us look really bad diplomatically to the Gulf states
that hosted them there in the first place
because we're not doing our job.
We can't even protect them.
A big Saudi Arabian analyst was complaining that we were putting more effort
to protect the Israel than the Gulf states.
And that's a big problem because this is unspoken,
but in the Middle Eastern world, no one likes Israel,
even the countries that are in the Abraham Accords.
So they're doing all this business with the West.
and they're seeing, you know, we're the ones that they're, you know, they're investing in us
and everything else like that, letting us have bases.
Meanwhile, we're putting all our resources into protecting Israel.
That doesn't rub them the right way.
So, like, why the fuck are we even taking all these risks, all these bombs, losing all this
infrastructure?
We don't need these guys.
Like, we'll go to the Chinese or the Russians for protection now.
So there's many different issues here.
I'm sure the Russians can do much at this point.
True, true.
But the Ukraine war is winding down.
But I would say the Chinese.
But, you know, but they did.
didn't make calls some Moscow with the energy, right?
Right, right. And they didn't make, so, so we're just in a very bad place, politically,
economically, militarily, to effectuate the regime change. I don't want more soldiers
dying. We've already lost six. And was this war necessary? I don't think so. This war serves
zero strategic benefit for the United States. I've debated many Zionists on this. I ask them
all the time. Give me one benefit the United States gets from this. They can't name anything.
It's all strategic benefit for Israel. It's really not for us. So, you know,
I just see so many different issues between the straight-in-home was being closed down and energy prices shooting up.
The loss of diplomacy with the Gulf states, us probably not being able to return to the region, losing billions upon billions of dollars of military infrastructure.
For what, dude?
Like, it's completely unnecessary.
So what's the end gate?
Where does it end up, depending on what Trump does?
Because if you're saying, you know, that, like, if they don't put boots on the ground, then it becomes some kind of a stalemate.
and they signed some kind of a peace agreement,
which Iran won't live up to.
You know, oh, they already so,
I think on like day three of the war, whatever,
Trump had tried to get Italians.
He had to try to,
he had tried to kind of go through back channels
to speak, have the Italians, like, kind of try to mediate something.
And Iranians said, no, we're not negotiating at all.
We don't want to talk to the United States,
no negotiation, no nothing.
Because in their eyes, they're looking at this.
And this is another important thing, too,
that the American Republic needs to understand.
For us, this was an optional war.
For them, this is an existential war.
Right.
This is do or die for them.
For us, it's like, ah, like, let's, you know, beat them up a little bit, short, air power or whatever.
For them, it's like, no, this is, this is it, right?
So the stakes are way higher for them.
This comes back literally to like the Russia-Ukraine conflict, right?
The Russians want Ukraine way more than we want to be involved, right?
The Iranians want to exist way more than we want to bomb them.
So they're not going to give up.
And, you know, Trump put out this stupid thing of, like, you know, unconditional surrender.
blah, blah, blah. These guys have survived decades of sanctions, all being bombed already. They're hardened.
They're not going to surrender. They got underground cities. This is what they've been preparing for for decades.
Ever since Saddam Hussein got put out of power, they learned we need to have underground cities and we need to be able to maintain a long-term war and just bleed out the United States financially and politically.
And then they know that Trump has a midterm this year. They know that this war is very unpopular.
I'm sure they're very in too. Yeah. So they know the longer that they can make it happen and the more that they can like, he destroyed her and was closed.
and then Qatar's LNG shut down,
the better it is for them.
So it's just, I don't see a political off.
To answer your question,
do I see a political off ramp here?
Yeah, but Trump would have to,
he has too much of an ego.
He would have to like pull out and be like,
all right, mission complete.
We killed Ayatollah, blah, blah, blah.
But dude, we all know that it was about a regime change.
So I just don't see any political off ramp here
where Trump would be able to save face
for his ego.
So like he's going to have to, you know,
and this is why,
They ask him at the White House, him and Hexeth,
are boots on the ground still in the question?
It's not off the table.
That's scary.
For anyone that's in the service, that's scary.
They're basically telling you that you're going to have to go.
Even if it is off the table, they have to say that as a part,
just a part of negotiations.
They have to say, they have to make it seem like it's possible.
Yeah, yeah, it's possible.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But like that's, but like the fact that they would even entertain that after Iraq,
like seriously, like, you know what I mean?
Like, this is a way more competent military with worse terrain.
It's not flat like Iraq was in many places.
No, I think that they would,
it may be better off putting more emphasis into Venezuela than doing what they're doing now.
Like, why not, why not just go, if you're going to go in anywhere, going to Venezuela,
it's a much more controllable environment, it's much closer, costs almost nothing.
But it's not about the oil.
It's it's about making Israel the hegemony.
And that's the problem.
Like, and this is what I, when I say like our, like, because I've been like very,
I'm very critical of Israel.
And this is a perfect example of what I mean when I say that Israel drags us into wars
because Israel is going to attack them no matter what.
Because Israel's chief problem is a ballistic.
missiles. Now, those ballistic missiles can't touch us. So Trump and his administration had to come up
with some type of excuse that they can use to justify an invasion and they use the nuclear weapons.
Yeah, I was just say, it's the weapons of mass destruction and going into Iraq. And this is the
crazy part about that. Like anyone that pays attention is like, okay, Trump said back in June,
Operation Binai Hemmer was a success and we, you know, we pushed them back years. So which one is it?
I thought you'd destroy their nuclear program. Now we're going back in for their nuclear program.
what's going on here. So did you lie then or are you lying now? Right. Right. But they needed to
manufacture some type of story to justify this invasion and they're using a nuclear weapon angle,
but the real reason we're going in? Without not really an evasion yet, but yeah, you can say invasion.
Well, yeah, sorry, yeah, this attack. But the real reason we're going is because of ballistic missiles.
That's the real reason. And the Israelis definitely, that's the number one reason the Israelis are going on.
We can't find them and we can't, we can't pinpoint them because you're saying they're hidden all over the place.
The country's literally that like, I think four times a size of
Iraq. It's like three Californias, all of Western Europe. It's huge. And there's hundreds of
these missile cities. There's hundreds of these launchers all over the place. Like the country's
massive. So and it's all over the place. So it's like it's going to be extremely difficult. And
then people are saying now, well, we've lowered their ability down to 90, 90% of the missiles are
done. Yeah, they're obviously saving. I really know that though. And yeah. How do you really know that?
Like you don't really know where they all are. How are you really sure that? That's what they're
telling the American public to make them feel better.
But also they're lowering it down
because they know that this is going to be a long-term war.
And even if you did destroy the launchers,
they have missiles that can come out the sand.
They don't even need launchers for them.
So it's like, and these are all over the country.
So, yeah, I don't know.
This is a very bad war.
I don't like it.
You know, I don't want more American bloodshed.
We all saw Iraq.
I thought we'd learned from that.
But we clearly didn't.
We clearly didn't because Iraq was the same exact thing.
The number one guy that was, you know, in Washington, D.C. was Benjamin Netanyahu.
I'll never forget, famously 2002, if we take Osudam, it will have positive reversions all across the region.
What is it done?
It's created more instability.
You know, Iraq is still, you know, a shithole, still unstable, the Middle East.
Like, regime change wars just don't work.
Like, it just doesn't work.
And Iran is, like, one of the worst countries to try to try it with.
We're talking about people that are, you know, super religious.
they're Shiites, they love martyrdom.
It's a huge country.
They have a capable military, capable of blissism as a program.
Fundamentalists.
Fundamentalists.
Like, you know, this isn't a, these aren't secular people you're dealing with.
You're dealing with people here that will, that will die for their religion.
And they look at it as like a blessing.
Like, I'll never forget when they, during a six-day war, there was this woman.
She was on the news broadcasting, right?
And they bombed the location while she was broadcasting.
She gets up and she walks away.
Then she comes back.
And she's like, the Zionist regime will never stop us.
We will continue to go.
And then she goes on another news station and does another broadcast after getting bombed.
People are crazy, right?
Do we really want to send our sons and daughters over to deal with these people?
The thing that kills me is like, there's no strategic benefit to this.
Why are we doing this?
It doesn't benefit us.
It's a fight these crazy people.
It's not our business.
Why does, dumb it down to me for me or for anyone listening?
Why does America care so much?
Because the whole...
He's saying to protect Israel.
And why?
That sort of boils down to...
What's the big deal about Israel?
I don't pay it into any.
No, no, you're cool.
I'll give you the politically correct version.
The Zionist lobby has a lot of control in America,
a lot of power and a lot of influence,
especially within our political structure.
If you look at some of the big donors
to Donald Trump on his last campaign,
one of them was a woman named Mirro Madelson,
wife of Sheldon Nativesson, who passed away,
you know, gambling tycoon, right?
Casino Tycoon.
Billions upon billions of dollars.
owners in the Republican Party. She gave them like $100 million. And, you know, look, when people,
you know, give you that kind of money, they typically that money comes with, you know, with strings
attached. And for her, she's very pro-Israel. She obviously, every pro-Israel Zionists, a lot of
times understand that Iran is like the big enemy for them. It's the country that's the biggest national
security threat for them. So she's going to go ahead and donate money for her political interests and
as many others. And they have an enormous.
amount of influence and power in DC.
And that is a big reason why we're seeing, you know,
the conflict going on in the Middle East,
because if you were to try to figure out what strategic benefit
does it have for the United States, there's virtually none.
But there's a lot of strategic benefits for Israel.
Lots.
You wanted to do Epstein?
Colby does.
Yeah, what do you want to talk about, Matt?
Colby, Epstein's fine.
What is it?
What is it?
What is the, what Epstein part?
It comes back.
Who would think this fucking guy was plugged in
to all of this.
this insanity in all these people
and when it first happened it was like
man they're blowing this this is some fucking
he's just some rich weirdo
what's the big I was locked up with a bunch of fucking rich weirdos
what's the big deal yeah and then when it starts getting released
and you see all this shit coming up you're like
he's texting fucking senators
to the hearings he's this he's plugged him with this person
this person it's like this is more than I was friends with
Bill Clinton they pulled
they pulled Bill Clinton and Hillary in to answer questions
about it, dude, which is nuts.
She handled it really well.
Yeah, I got to watch.
I didn't get to watch.
I know that her, I think her and Mace went out of each other, right?
Constantly.
She's an extremely unpleasant, bitter woman.
And Bill Clinton, although there were a couple times when he's, he's a weird guy,
I mean, he's an old man.
Yeah.
You know, but he's answered the question.
He's lost a lot of his cognitive function.
Holy crap, dude.
But he's answering the question.
He used to be a sharp guy, but like, now it's like.
Well, he answers the questions really well.
The problem is, did you see the part where they were showing the photos?
No, I didn't see that.
It's like he's looking through his old high school rea.
He's like flipping the pages and he's like, he's smiling like, oh, there's, oh, look, it's Jennifer.
And there's flipping paper.
And then his lawyer realizes what's happening.
Yeah, because he had his lawyer with him.
She grabs it and slides it.
And he goes, like an old man too.
He's like, whoa, wait a minute.
He tries it grabs it back and starts flipping the pages again.
He's looking, he's like, looking down.
It's like, what are you doing, bro?
This is you with young girls sitting on your lap.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Like, like, stop.
Like, you don't realize how inappropriate this is.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Yeah, especially without context, you know what I mean?
Yeah, so it's like, um, I feel for old.
You know, I feel for like, you're right.
He's like, see now probably by now and stuff, you know, because, you know, it's crazy
because like me growing up, man, I was born in 90.
So like, I remember vividly like Bill Clinton in my childhood, like, he addressed
a nation and he was like always well spoken and how we navigated the whole.
Monica Lewinsky thing.
And, you know, to kind of see him, like, how we, you know, they're degraded.
I'm just like, oh, my God.
Like, because, like, he's, like, completely oblivious.
Like, I've seen videos of him, like, where he's just, like, walking, like, around
like this, like, doesn't know what's going on in Secret Service.
You can still tell, like, they're, like, they're like, they're like, what's going on
and shit like that.
And he has no, he has no idea what's going on.
He's just kind of, you know, Biden walking, you know, walking the wrong way.
And they're, they're corraling him while trying to be dignified.
And it's like, listen, my favorite, one of my favorite videos, though.
And listen, I love Trump.
I like Trump.
I like Trump, too.
I wish he was more presidential.
That's my only problem is I just wish he wasn't such a blue collar guy, you know.
But that's his base and people love that.
But my favorite is when they have like a TikTok and they show Obama talking about killing some.
A terrorist.
And I mean, he's.
Very punctual, very well.
Obama is one of the best orators we've had in a very important.
And then they compare it to Trump.
Yeah.
He died like a dog.
Like a dog.
They went in the windows.
You think they'd go in the door.
But they went.
It's like,
oh my God, please stop.
Dude.
Uzbabu,
Pudakat.
I'm like,
oh, God.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's like he's so politically incorrect.
And it's hilarious.
Like,
because like you look at,
because,
and I was literally talking about this on my show.
Like,
if you look at like the Mitt Romney
and Barack Obama debate.
Right.
Super professional.
Super posh.
Super nice.
You know,
like,
just like,
you know,
just articulate.
Like two gentlemen having a discussion in the debate.
Then you look at Trump versus like Hillary or Trump versus Biden.
Yeah.
They're eating the cats and dogs, right?
Like or you know, it's just like what the hell is going on?
What thing I got to give Trump credit for is like he made politics interesting for like the average person.
Because politics used to be an extremely dry thing that no one ever cared about.
No one you know.
But like now you have like all these young guys interested in it and like Trump like made it cool and interesting.
So, you know, look, I've been very critical of Trump.
Right.
When he does things that I like, I praise him, but when he does dumb shit, like, for example, I think him enforcing immigration, good, right?
You got to get agents into the interior to actually enforce immigration.
You just got to do it.
Shut down the border.
The war, not a fan of because I understand the long-term ramifications of it, and we all remember Iraq.
But going back to the Epstein thing, like with Clinton, yeah, it's just nuts to see how, you know, he's like cooked, man.
Like, Hillary's still there.
But he's like, yeah, he's like, see now now at this point.
But I also thought it was hilarious that they were, every.
it seemed, and this could be just bias on my part, you know, it seemed like the Democrats were
pushing hard to get the paperwork released and, which is funny because like you didn't
give a shit when, like, Biden could have released it.
Like, everybody could have released it.
And then, oh, he's hiding it.
Well, why didn't Biden?
You didn't care?
Because they felt like it was going to be damning towards Trump.
And then it's not damning towards Trump.
You know what I'm saying?
It looks bad optically.
Like, there's some good things in there like, oh, yeah, he called the police on, on, on him
and everything else like this.
because I didn't get a chance to see these hearings
because I was actually, I was very,
I was not happy because I was like,
because Hillary, and I will give Hillary and Bill Clinton credit on this,
they told them, do it live.
Do it live, make it public for the American public.
Oh, no, we're not going to do that.
I was like, come on, dude.
And they had to go ahead and release it after the fact,
but it would have been awesome if they did it live.
They should have.
I mean, dude, you brought in a, you know,
the former secretary of state and, like,
former president is unprecedented, like,
have them do it live.
Like, you know what I mean?
and they're like, well, we don't normally do that.
Well, you also normally don't bring in Secretary of States of Presidents either.
So it's a, you know, to answer questions under oath.
So you should televise this live and let the American public see.
Because the American public were the ones that even got them there.
We created the, you know, the public pressure for them to even be able to do it.
But, you know, this whole Epstein thing.
So here's the thing.
Trump, Cash Patel, Pam Bondi, even Boni.
Even Bongino's dealing with it now.
He came back to podcasting, but he's still getting hate on that shit.
He's got to block everybody.
this Epstein file thing is
going to be a huge black mark
on his presidency. It's going to be a huge
asterisk. And, you know, it sucks
because it's kind of overriding, you know,
it's overshadowing like all the good that's been done, right?
Like, let me be clear, right? Someone who came
from law enforcement, I remember the Biden
FBI. I was there, right? You know,
it was terrible. Like, they don't share
information. They weren't doing shit. They weren't doing anything.
Violent crime was still going nuts.
You know, Katzberthelz did a pretty good job of going in there
and having the FBI actually do their fucking job.
right um you know they released a lot of files they they released i think um they released
the whole Biden administration they released like 13000 but like by the time cash patel
they already been there for a few months they'll lose 33 000 but like you know they've
they just had huge media blunders to charlie kirk assassination right like we're all see you in valhalla
that was retarded right the guy was an avid christian what are you talking about with this paganism
stuff right um you know that was a blunder the the fstein file debacle that that was a huge l right um you know
They have been a former transparent administration in others, but, you know,
you know, Trump's saying one day, oh, it's a, it's a Democrat hoax.
Then now we got like three million pages.
Like, which one is it?
They don't exist.
They're not real.
Then we see them that they are real, right?
We're seeing all these people showing up in it, right?
And then obviously with Epstein, with his background, right?
And I call this from the beginning.
The Epstein stuff, there's so many people that are to blame for this.
It's not just Pampani and Cash Patel.
You got to also bring Tulsi Gabbard in.
She is the, you know, D&I, Director of National Intelligence,
like she oversees all the intelligence community, right?
F.C., what was he?
We know he was not just, you know, a pervert and a child,
but he also was an intelligence asset.
And as an intelligence asset, I know off of rip,
there's probably going to be a CIA or NSA file on him,
automatically, just by nature of him being a foreign spy.
But they're not going to give that up.
Like, I mean, do they even do, or do they have to under national security?
They probably, you know, they probably won't.
We probably don't have everything.
Because that could be saying specifically, like, no, we knew he was, or we didn't care that, but we knew he was obtaining information for us or working, you know, to our benefit, creating these kind of these honeypots, you know, like, how's he going about it?
Maybe we don't want to know.
Yeah.
Well, and it even came out on the files.
Like, you know, they mentioned his lawyer, Alan Dershowitz how, like, he had been, like, he would talk with, with EFSI and after, and he'd, like, debrief the Mossad after or whatever.
So it's like, what's, you know, what's exactly going on here?
I think we can all confidently say now at this point that he was an intelligence asset,
probably for Israeli intelligence,
and Tulsi Gabbard had a lot of that intelligence.
And, you know, because the thing what Epstein is that that makes it so complex is he's a criminal,
but he was also an intelligence asset.
Like, and the problem when it comes to, you know, criminal cases versus intelligence is like
they're two different worlds.
Intelligence is like, okay, let's gather information.
We're doing a lot of shit off the record.
It's a lot of this stuff is illegal.
It's classified.
Not supposed to see the lie today.
criminal, it's supposed to see the line of day because it's going to go in front of a jury,
and you need to present evidence in front of an open court to convict somebody.
So since SD was dabbling in both, we have like a murkied, you know, representation of what this guy was.
Like on one end, we got the criminal side, which is like the human trafficking or whatever,
but why was he doing it?
That's what's blurred, because we, because that's where you start getting into the intel side.
So I think the industry needs to release everything, but are they going to?
Probably not.
And I think, you know, if we're going to blame Cash Patel and Pam Bondi, who, or they are responsible
by the way, because the FBI obviously did have a criminal investigation on this guy open,
and Pam Bondi is the head of the Department of Justice who oversees the FBI, definitely culpable.
But we also need to put a little bit of pressure on Tulsi Gabbard as well because she runs the intelligence community.
The CIA, NSA, all these different intel agencies have a file in Epstein.
We need everything. We need the DIA files. We need everything.
So that's, I still think that there's more out there more than likely.
What do you think, here's what kills me is when people are like, you know, why aren't these people, you know, people that are in the files, why aren't they being arrested?
Well, first of all, there's nothing really overwhelmingly damning that is in the files.
And there's really, even if you said, hey, no, we have a specific, this specifically proves this one case.
Okay, well, unless it's murder or it's some kind of, uh, crime that doesn't have a statute of limitations.
Which is what? Like murder and like espionage? Like, like, there's like two, there's only like two.
Like everything else, even if it's CP.
Yeah, CP. Even if it's like, there's still tacit of limitations. And this is decades ago, you know?
So I don't see what it's, you know, because I see that all the time.
Why aren't these people arrested?
They're not going to arrest anybody.
Nobody's getting arrested.
Yeah, some of these people are dead or they're old or they're not even in the country anymore.
Or the statute of limitations is up.
Or they might have tried to open an investigation and didn't have enough evidence because, you know, it's one thing to, another thing I'll say as well.
And you know this from coming from the federal world.
AUSAs are picky.
AUSAs are not going to take every single case.
They want to win.
Yeah, they want to win.
And most United States Attorney's offices have like a 90% plus.
you know, success rate with, with prosecution.
Like they get people to plead guilty.
Like 97 point whatever.
Yeah.
So they don't want to lose that and take a case that's like kind of iffy and lose a
trial or not get a guilty plea.
So, you know, what you know and what you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, especially
in a federal court are two different things.
Well, especially pulling up something from 20 years ago that, you know, in most of these cases
are built on, they have wires, they have informants, they have like, you don't have any of this.
We've got some paperwork from a bunch of people that are either.
deceased or the statute of limitations is up where we have no way to get them to cooperate.
And even if we could, we can't get an indictment because there's the statute of limitations.
Like, look, it's like either what they should either do is say, look, we're releasing nothing else.
It's done.
And that's it, which of course would be, you know, create a huge, a huge issue.
Or just like you said, just release everything.
Get it over as quick as possible, which is something he probably should have done the first month.
That's what messed them up.
He should have done that the first month and just dealt with it.
Right.
Because the fact that he slow rolled it, made the promise he was going to do it, it's a Democrat hoax, whatever.
That made it worse, man.
It made it worse.
And there's just been so many blunders with this administration.
And the Epstein one is going to be one of the biggest ones because they would not let it go.
The base would not let it go.
They kept complaining about it.
They kept complaining about it.
And they released it.
And then the Democrats are having a field day.
Because I remember CNN was talking about the Epstein.
They would not let it go, dude.
CNN especially.
Like all the Democrat media, like the left-leaning media, they were not going to let it go.
And this war, along with the EFSIN files, everything else, dude, like,
Hey, you guys, I appreciate you watching.
Do you be a favorite hit the subscribe button.
Hit the bell so get notified of videos just like this.
Also, we are going to leave all of Myron's links in the description box.
You can go there, click on there, go and follow.
We'll also leave the links for his books, which are, what was it?
It's the best seller.
Yeah, it's Amazon bestseller.
in feminist theory
category which is later.
So it was number one
in dating, feminist theory, and also
psychology.
Number one bestseller, Amazon.
And
if you want to be a guest,
we're going to leave the link to the
website. You can go there, go to
be a guest page, fill out a quick form,
real quick, leave a short video.
And we'll get back with you as soon as possible.
Thank you very much. See ya.
