Mayim Bialik's Breakdown - Re-Air: Bari Weiss: Age of Rising Conspiracy

Episode Date: October 9, 2025

In celebration of Bari Weiss' new position as Editor-in-Chief at CBS News, we are revisiting our conversation from 2 years ago! Bari Weiss (founder and editor of The Free Press, host of the Honestly podcast) opens up about her very public resignation from The New York Times, how the polarized mainstream media and negative news cycle can impact our wellness as a society, and the importance of being able to have conversations with people you may not always agree with. She explains how the digital revolution transformed the business model of news as an institution and considers the source of people’s paranoia with mainstream news, which has led to a rise in conspiracy theories. Bari reveals why her own grandma called her a right wing fascist, the values and historical perspective that guide her to stand up in the face of fear, and what the rise of gurus can tell us about our era. She discusses the importance of community and why sacrificing comfort is sometimes necessary to live a meaningful life. Check out our full episode with Bari Weiss: https://www.bialikbreakdown.com/watch-podcast/bari-weiss Follow us on Substack for Exclusive Bonus Content: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://bialikbreakdown.substack.com/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠BialikBreakdown.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube.com/mayimbialik⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hi, I'm Miami-Mialik. And I'm Jonathan Cohen. And welcome to our breakdown. Very exciting news. Barry Weiss, who runs the free press, has just been named the editor-in-chief of CBS News as Paramount acquires the free press. And you might know Barry because she's been on our podcast. She obviously has her own podcast, but she's a friend of the podcast, a former editor of mine, and we were so excited to hear this news for her. As we've talked about before, we don't all have to agree with all news that's published anywhere, but we really appreciate the voice that the free press has brought to our understanding of the lens of news. And we thought this was a great time to let you hear our conversation with Barry, where we talk about a lot of the things that led to the acquisition that's just in the news this week. One of the things that is unique about Barry is that she left the New York Times seeking a more transparent, honest, and balanced approach to news. and we respect everything that she's built, how she's been able to collect a unique variety of voices

and explore topics from both sides of the aisle. And she's going to continue that work now with CBS. Friendly reminder to check us out on Substack. We've got fun, exclusive content there. We actually have some other Barry Weiss content that will probably be posting there as well. So make sure to check that out. And we hope you enjoy taking a look back

at our episode and conversation with Barry Weiss. Break it down Hi guys, I'm so excited We're very excited Welcome Barry Weiss to our breakdown Jonathan we're talking to Barry Weiss It's like a really big deal It's huge

It's very big deal I'm big among the juice That's about it Well you're big among the humans What a tremendous honor it is To just to know you And get to watch the journey that you've been on I mean you've obviously created things

At the New York Times Which is one of the many things You did before what you do now But you have created something that is incredibly special and necessary, and I am a huge, huge fan of the free press. And I'm a huge fan of what you do when I agree with you, and I'm a huge fan of what you do when I don't agree with you.

And that is, I think, sort of one of the main things about what you have decided to do. So let's say someone... I'm so happy. Thank you. We're very happy to have you. If people don't know who you are, I know it's weird to do it like this. But can you explain to people, you know, in roughly 10 sentences?

Who are you? I am a girl from Pittsburgh. I'm the oldest of four daughters. I am a longtime journalist who spent her career at fancy prestige publications like the Wall Street Journal in the New York Times. And in the very hot, I would say hot politically, summer of 20, 2020, I left the New York Times in a very public way with a very public resignation letter, a little a la Jerry McGuire, and really sounded the alarm on things that were happening inside the most important journalistic institution in the country. I left without a plan. I've subsequently, which is

very foolish for anyone considering leaving their job, you should definitely have a plan. And after several months of drinking too much wine and taking way too many phone calls while pacing the sidewalk of Los Angeles, I decided to build the thing I felt was missing in the world. And I now run a company called The Free Press. We have an incredible team of more than a dozen people and growing. I should say I'm like the opposite of an entrepreneur. I am not someone that is in any way cut out. Like I don't know what ROI is. I don't know what EBITA is. I mean, I know, but like I don't. and I'm trying to pick up the flag that I feel other legacy publications have put down, which is really simple proposition.

It's to do honest, fearless, and dogged journalism that tells the truth, even when it's politically inconvenient and even when it's uncomfortable. And so a lot of times what that means is pursuing stories that other people are either papering over or averting their eyes from because of what the social or political ramifications of those stories would be. And so we're doing that on our podcast. Honestly, we're doing that every single day in the reporting we do on the free press. To be honest, like kind of astonished at everything that's happened over the past two years of my life. I should say I'm also a new mom. My wife gave birth to our daughter five months ago.

And I'm a relatively new resident of Los Angeles. What was going on or what is going on at these kinds of, you know, organizations that, again, are really the for many, I mean, I was raised reading the New York Times, you know, more than I was raised reading the Torah. Like it was, you know, every day my, my dad, like we had, I had the newspaper delivered all through college to my front door into grad school. I had the New York Times delivered. And I was taught to read the newspaper. That was an activity that my father would teach me to do. And he would teach me where's the topic sentence and how do you know and how do you do the section? Like it was an art, you know, that and that publication in particular, held a very specific place in many families' homes, especially if you were a New Yorker or an East Coaster. But if you had to say in the least paranoid, least, you know, fear mongering, least, you know, biased way, what is going on with the news?

And I'm just going to call it the news. Jonathan was using all these terms. What was he saying? Like the ideological structure. What were you calling it? Ideological capture? Yeah. He had all these things.

I'm like, are you talking about just like the paper? I mean, the pre-pod meeting for this interview is probably one of our best, where I say a sentence like, I got so mad. You should talk about ideological narratives in mainstream media. I was outraged, outraged. What's mainstream media? Right. I was like, okay, we're going to slow it down. Do you mean the paper?

Miami is stuck in another generation. She doesn't even know like the internet exists. I got you. Explain this like it's to your 70-year-old bubby. This is what I have to do because, frankly, the day that I joined the New York Times was probably the happiest day of my grandmother's life. She reads the paper religiously. She sobbed tears of joy.

And when I told her I was leaving, and I should add, like, her media diet is the New York Times. Everything sold at her super progressive bookstore in Pittsburgh. She loves supporting independent bookstores, which I do too. And Rachel Maddow. So like when I told her I was leaving, she was like, oh, I saw it on the news. Like you're a right-wing fascist. And I'm like, no, no, grandma. Like that's not what's going on.

Here's the long and short of it. Institutions are just people, right? And what happens when strong minority of people join an institution and don't have fealty to the stated mission of that institution? This is not a story that's unique to the New York Times. It's a story like you could easily look at the story of the Trump White House and conclude the same thing. Like institutions, the culture of institutions are only as good as the people that are working

for them. So let me kind of do it in two buckets. The first is like the pure financial model, which is my, I know you don't know this because you think that there's just like a physical newspaper that we get every day and you're probably like don't even know what like do you have spotted. It's like terrestrial like she's stuck in terrestrial radio. No, I got it. Exactly. You've never heard a podcast in your life. So it used to be back in the day that advertisers paid the bills of newspapers, right? And you had to worry about printing a swing. because it might piss off Procter and Gamble and they might pull their ads. To tell you the story of sort of the digital revolution and the way that the internet transformed that business model is now, it's not the advertisers that the New York Times or the Washington Post or the Wall Street Journal fears isolating because their business model has changed. Now the people that determine the news are the readers or the subscribers as it has shifted from a primarily ad-based business to a subscription-based business, you have to think about it just from a

purely financial incentive. Oh, well, who are our readers? What will satisfy them? And it turns out that something like 95% of paying New York Times readers are people like my grandmother. And people maybe mine like yours or Jonathan like yours. In other words, there are people who will never tired to use only like the crudest example of hearing about how Donald Trump is a moral monster. And so it takes a tremendous amount of sort of principle and discipline to resist that. What I know that you and the many writers, you know, who write for you, what I know is that places like the New York Times or even places like many colleges and universities have a demographic that often skews the kind of information that you're allowed to talk about and how you're allowed to talk about it. fair? Yeah, that's a great way of putting it. Very fair. And that's not saying like, I love Trump and I want you to talk about Trump. The notion is news places. What are the big words? Media

conglomerates, ideological blabby-blas. Those used to be places where there was a variety of information and you would sometimes read things you like or sometimes you read things you don't, but the idea was that you were hearing what was going on without the lens of, let's say, a political ideology. Right. And the thing is that was always sort of a myth, right? Like there was always sort of a bent. But the objective, the thing that everyone was striving for was to tell the public the world as it actually was and not as they wished it to be. It's all the news that's fit to print, right? And that has morphed into all the news that fits the, sorry, I'm going to use those words, ideological narrative. And that transformation, I think, is really shocking, especially to an older generation, that, you know, am I as you said in your family?

Like, you trusted it more than you trusted the Bible itself. And I think that that's one of the great untold stories of our time is the transformation of institutions, not just like the New York Times, but like college campuses across the country, like publishing houses, like production studios. what it's about is it really is not about partisan politics in the way we typically think about it. It is about actively trying to narrow the window of what is socially and politically acceptable to talk about to say in the viewpoints that you're allowed to hold on any given subject. I felt like I was more anxious, more sick, more confused, more fearful, and increasingly more paranoid during, especially the early years of COVID, because of what was happening in the press.

And Jonathan is Canadian. So I always tell him about when Canadians, you know, are on free press. Like Jonathan has a very different, you know, he has a very different lens with which to see how people take care of their people. But, you know, a lot of the things that were coming out of Canada, which also made their way to Tara Henley and to your world, you know, a lot of those things, I mean, people were violently, violently opposed to so much of the information, the way that they were violently opposed to talking about Trump or talking about Sanders, you know, it became like incredibly polarized.

So I see what you've done as such a parallel to sort of the mental health journey that our country has been on and that kind of the world has been on. So given what you're kind of telling us, how does that impact our wellness as a society when you have this kind of thing happening? Most people look at the options that they get in the news media and they just are either appalled or tune out entirely because they see that their options are like a total right wing caricature or a total left wing caricature and most people are somewhere in what I think of is the self-silencing majority. Like, they are judging things based on their merits, meaning they're taking things issue by

issue. They're increasingly disgusted by both parties and the grandstanding and the narcissism. And I could go on. Like, I really hate partisan. I increasingly just, like, despise partisan politics and don't understand why anyone would want to do that for their life. Although I know we need good people to do it. And I think people are just desperate for some sanity.

And that's like broadly, I think, what we're offering. Like it's not, I don't have like some silver bullet or some genius business based on gaming the Google algorithm. It's like, no, the business model is super simple. It's to treat readers like adults and to trust them with complicated information and to trust that a large number of Americans don't simply want political heroin that. feeds their fix, but they actually want real stories about the world and the world is a complicated place. When it comes to the mental health part of it, I feel you. Like I think that everyone, everyone I know was more anxious, more depressed, drinking too much, eating too much, like sent into spirals by what they were seeing on TV and in the paper over the past few years. Like,

I don't know anyone that was immune from that. And certainly not journalists. aren't immune from that. My Mianby Alex breakdown is supported by Superpower. We all know the feeling of leaving a doctor's office and kind of feeling like we didn't get anything out of the experience that was useful. Maybe they're like, you're fine, drink more water. There's no real data. There's no game plan.

This has happened to me many, many times, especially on the perimenopause journey. That's why we're fascinated by what Superpower is doing. They send a licensed professional to your home or you can visit a nearby lab, one simple blood draw with over 100 biomarkers. That's way more than you usually get. It unlocks a true understanding of your body. Their app has detailed information on heart, liver, thyroid

hormones, metabolism, vitamin and mineral levels, even environmental toxins. From disease prevention to treating that annoying brain fog or simply optimizing your gym game, Superpower is the most comprehensive and advanced system out there. I've been super tired of constantly guessing or just trying to read articles

online about what to do for health. Superpower gives you an actionable health plan based on personal results. It's a real game changer. Plus, they have an on-demand clinician team to answer questions. Supplement or prescription suggestions can be directly bought through superpower, so you don't have to go anywhere else. They also have nutritional guidance, tips for lifestyle and behavioral adjustments. You even get your true biological age that you can track over time. Superpower used to cost $499. Right now, it's $199 for the full experience, which is much more affordable than anything else out there. Make this the year you stop

guessing about your health with superpower. Superpower. Not only did Superpower reduce their price to just $199, but for a limited time, our listeners get an additional $20 off with the code break. Head to superpower.com. Use the code break at checkout for $20 off your membership. And after you sign up, they'll ask how you heard about them. Make sure to mention my ambiolics breakdown to help support the show. And I think that's kind of what my next question is. And I'm not trying to come down on the CDC. I'm not trying to come down on the government. I'm just saying like even those people who were gathering information for us. Like, of course there's ulterior motives. And I'm not trying to be this like crazy paranoid person,

but I think that's what a lot of people think when I tell them about the kind of work that you do. Like, there's a place where things are unearthed that we know have been tucked away. And studies are released in their entirety. You know, I'm reading Johann Hari's book, Lost Connections. Like the research about what actually goes on with SSRIs, like the actual research from the companies in their entirety reveals a completely different story than what I was told at 16. Here we found the pill. And I feel like this makes me very anxious and agitated. And I become that person who's like, I can't read anything. And until I started understanding what you were doing with free press.

It's like I had really, I had to turn off because it felt cuckoo. Can you speak to that a little bit? Yeah, I mean, I think everyone has their issue or their moment, right? So like I think for a lot of parents I knew, the idea that arguing against school lockdowns made you for a very long moment in mainstream American culture, let's call it mainstream, even though I think it does not actually represent the mainstream. but let's just call it those legacy institutions, those people who said, you know what, the unintended consequences of this policy are worse than the so-called cure. They were called grandma killers, right? They were accused of not wanting to protect their neighbors, not wanting to protect their fellow Americans. Well, it turns out, three years on, if you look at all of the reporting on this,

and I think the very best of it is being done by Alec McGillis at ProPublica, the effects of school lockdowns, especially on poor and minority children in this country, are devastating, does not begin to cover it. Right. And so if you're, if you were one of those moms and you were raising the alarm, sounding the alarm, and you were, smeared for it. Oh, people called for your head. They called for your head. And there was no, there was, there's like never a reckoning. It's like, well, the beat just kind of goes on. Right. And I think that that's what's alarming to people. I think if, let's say, you know, Fauci who admitted to telling a noble lie about masks because he's worried about a run on masks, if he had then subsequently said, you know what, we got it wrong or you know what, this is an evolving pandemic and the science change. I think people would have a really different reaction to the past few years.

But it's like that correction never came, that apology never came. It felt like a parent who lied to you and when you found out they were lying, they still lied. It was like, I know there's no Easter Bunny, but there is. No, but there's not, and we know it. And it's like, it's so Emperor's Clothes. The really alarming thing that happens to most people, not most people, let's say some people, when they feel like they've been lied to is all of a sudden they're looking over their shoulder and they have this deeply paranoid feeling about everything they're reading, everything they're watching, everything they're listening to. People make fun of the Americans who claim they're doing their own research. Well, why are they driven to do their own research? It's because the institutions that they were meant to trust, including our public health institutions, have revealed themselves to be, let's say, at the very least, politically motivated or ideologically motivated. That is really bad, right? It is really, really bad to live in a huge democracy like ours and not be able to trust institutions that need our trust, right? Not be able to trust one another. And so I think often what happens when you have that first moment, right, if it was over

masks or over school lockdowns or over, you know, the famous CNN, Kairon, right? The thing at the bottom of the screen, where flames were shooting out in the background, you know, at a violent riot. And the Kiron said, you know, fiery but mostly peaceful protests, right? It was unbelievable. It was like, you're literally telling me not to believe my own eyes with the words at the bottom of the screen. It's Orwellian. And so what a lot of people do then is they unplug or they say, you know what, I'm not trusting any of this. And all of a sudden, they're tumbling down the rabbit hole, right, into very, very dark fringe corners of the internet. It's not a coincidence that we're living in an age of rising conspiracy theorizing. You know, that has roots in lots of different

places. But I think one of the culprits is the fact that places that used to have are trust that we used to look to as authoritative no longer do. And so now you have all of these people spinning off into all these different corners. And that's where I think that if there's a silver lining to this moment, it's that there's a huge opening for people that actually are unafraid to look at where the facts lead. Right? We had a story today that I'm extremely proud that we ran. It is a story of a woman, queer woman, very politically on the left. She describes herself as to the left of Bernie Sanders. She was in an anarchist collective in college.

And didn't know there was room to be to the left of him. Exactly. Like that kind of thing. And happens to be, by the way, married herself to a transgender man. They're raising five kids between the two of them. She worked for the past four years in Missouri at a pediatric gender clinic. And she went into that work because she believed that she would be. saving the lives of children with gender dysphoria.

And she came out today with this absolute bombshell personal essay, exposing what she saw there, just very, very plainly laying out the facts. In the hours subsequent to her publishing this story, and I'm really happy to get into what she published, the Attorney General of Missouri announced an investigation, one of the senators of Missouri announced an investigation, Washington University where the gender clinic is located, announced how alarmed they were at the story and they're looking into it. And yet no one in the legacy press yet has touched this story.

And it's a little bit like it's alarming really because by any normal measure, the fact that America has its sort of first whistleblower in this space. And if you look right at the UK, if you look at Sweden, if you look at Finland, whistleblowers have transformed. the way that they think about pediatric gender care. Wherever you fall on this issue, this is a new story. No, but this is the thing. And that's the point. Wherever you fall on the issue, I want to live in a world where we can talk about things

without it leading to the kind of, I don't even know what the word is, like polarization, hostility. I mean, in many cases, like litigation. Reality is highly nuanced, and people just gravitate towards these very clear, definitions of good and bad, it's like, it's beyond simplicity and it doesn't serve any of us. The world isn't two-dimensional. The world isn't black and white. The world is highly complicated. And yet why does it feel so much of the time when we're reading about the world that it becomes

on the page black and white or two-dimensional or just contrary to what it actually is in our lived experience to use that parlance? So the topics, and just for people who may not know, the kind of topics that that I'd say in the last couple years, you know, seem to seem to be featured, you know, prominently. Obviously, there are a lot of COVID stuff. Free Press also does delve very deep into some of the complexity of race relations, a lot about the gender space, and also a lot about what happens at academic institutions. But the question I had for you, like, those are all really, those are enormous topics. These are enormously complicated, nuanced, controversial topics.

Why are you not afraid? I wish I knew the answer to that. It's not that I'm not afraid. It's that I have a certain set of principles that I'm very clear about and that I've put myself on the hook for in many ways publicly. So when I meet the moment where I feel scared, I'm able to ask myself what really matters to me, if that makes sense. So like when I meet a moment where it's like, oh, I could lose maybe some friendly acquaintances, maybe even friends over this. Or I might be called really bad names for publishing this kind of piece.

Or I might suffer or people might lie about me on the internet if I do X or Y or Z thing. I can overcome that and make the what I think is the right choice and the choice that. that honors my conscience because I know that what's more important to me than popularity or prestige are values that I hold much more precious than those things. I think that if your life is about like fitting in or being cool or, and you might not even be aware of it, it's really, really hard to do the right thing in those moments. And also a lot of it is frankly like just building up the muscle. It always can be hard.

It always is painful when you see someone say something about you that has a prominent platform that, like, bears no resemblance to who you know yourself to be. But I will say looking back on my career, there were like probably six years ago I was probably trending on Twitter for the first time in a negative way. And I couldn't get out of bed. I mean, it would be a lie to say otherwise. Like I think that I'd have to be a sociopath not to have that reaction. So what happens on the internet is very much real life and it affects your actual real life.

And I've experienced that. But then you also realize a new cycle lasts like 48 hours and then everyone moves on to the next scapegoat or the next villain of the day or the next hero or whatever. And, you know, you go on with your life. To be honest with you also, like not to sound too Jewy here, but like Judaism is a big part of it for me. You know, a lot of people might say, like, how do you know what your values are? And I'm not saying that just because you're Jewish or anyone is a certain kind of Jew or an observant Jew, I'm not saying that that's a guarantee. But I do know, and your first book discusses specifically anti-Semitism, you know, from a very, very interesting lens. But what are some of those values that you hold? You know, like where do they come from, especially in light of sort of your upbringing? I believe in the dignity and equality of all human beings. And so that makes me allergic when I encounter any ideology or political movement that tries to suggest that some people have some kind of original sin and some people have

some kind of original salvation. Like I just don't believe that. I think that everyone is created in the image of God. Everyone is created equal. And we don't judge people based on the sins of their ancestors. I believe that, you know, the way to get to truth and the only way to avoid physical violence and conflict is conversation. And I come from a people and a culture with a cultural DNA that is built on that premise. And so any ideology that tells me that arguing with people that disagree with me

is somehow crossing a line or nefarious in some way, again, I'm running in the way. Again, I'm running in the other direction. I'm from a people like you, Maim, that's like, you know, we're the underdogs throughout history. And so that makes me allergic to bullies. And any group that needs to rely on, or political movement or ideology that relies on bullying and scapegoating as a primary tactic of persuasion, I am running in the opposite direction. Anytime I see a group of people running one way without questioning, I'm like, I have a deep, visceral spidey sense that, hold on, like, let's take a second look. I believe that people have personal choice and responsibility and freedom in the most foundational way. It doesn't mean that some people aren't born with a leg up. Of course,

I believe that. That's just true. But that we have the ability to shape our own lives. that is a core foundational belief that I have. You know, the belief that your character and your actions and your deeds matter more than any immutable characteristic. And anyone that tells me otherwise, I'm going to be skeptical of the next thing that comes out of their mouth. So those are some of the core things I believe. The other thing that I believe, you know, that I almost don't even know how to articulate it is just a like profound sense of gratitude that colors everything about the way I see my life and see my position. So like, I live in a world where I'm married to a woman. We have a child. I am able to walk down the street with them

without being physically assaulted or even heckled, at least most of the time. And when someone says something, it's usually nice. I'm sorry, like in no other context in human history, was that possible. And so like there's a lot that's really broken about this world. And a lot of what my work is about as an editor and a publisher and writer is exposing that. I hold that in one hand. And in the other hand, I hold like, I am the luckiest person that was ever born. And like, I really feel that. And so part of that like historical perspective, I guess, would be a way to put it also allows me to do the right thing. Because when you think about just, like what two generations ago are great-grandparents endured.

I'm sorry, like the idea of sacrificing being able to tell people I work at the New York Times, it's like, okay. Like it's just so not a big deal in comparison. Those are some of the values I hold dear. And those are like my North Stars. And I don't know if Miami you've experienced this in your life. But sometimes in periods of a lot of noise and a lot of negative noise, there's like this one voice that emerges that feels like,

that still small voice that is true. And that has also really happened for me in critical moments of my life. I don't know what to call that other than luck or blessing, but that's also been really important to me is to know that I'm very lucky to have a handful of people in my life that I just deeply, deeply admire and turn to for wisdom and guidance and to know if I'm doing the right thing and to check myself and to make sure that my motivations are right. And that's also been really important to me.

and people that are real friends and will tell me the truth, even if I don't want to hear it. I listen to a lot of honestly. I hear you interview a wide variety of people. And just listening to you for this last little stretch, have you always been so organized in your thinking? You guys are crazy. I'm off right. I mean, it slipped like three hours last night. That's so nice of you.

No. I do think that, you know, I come from a, like, my parents are politically mixed. my dad is a conservative. My mom is a liberal. I'm the oldest of four daughters. My divorced grandparents lived with us. That's like a script for another time and a possible sitcom. Like I grew up in a house where we argued and talked a lot and that was a part of our family culture. And, you know, I'm really comfortable in that environment. But I also think that, you know, whatever it is, like that 10,000 hour rule of writing a lot. Like what is good writing? Good writing is good thinking. is clear thinking.

And those two things are just inextricable. And the more I've strengthened my muscle to be able to write clearly, I think the more I'm able to think clearly. I also think a really big part of it is just not being scared anymore. I mean, not being scared anymore is a huge part of it. And I don't think I was ever scared, scared, but I definitely, when I was at the times thought a little bit more about, like, wait, how is this going to be heard by my colleagues? is this going to get me in hot water?

Is this something where I could lose, bu, blah, blah, blah, blah, which are all normal things. You did an unbelievable thing, which is that you created a place where you didn't have to be afraid. Someone who I worked with said something just really nice to you. He's just like, in my old place of work, like I worried every day about saying the wrong thing.

And now I never worry. And I know that if I put my foot in my mouth, like it won't be heard, like it will be heard in the most generous. way and the most good faith way. And I'm really proud of that. In the outro, I'm going to ask you what you stand for, and I'd like to measure the clarity. I stand for what Barry Weiss stands for. I mean, I'll take it. I'm going to put that blurb on a t-shirt. It's a very long t-shirt, but it's very accurate. It's very, very long. The other part that I was going to ask is about sort of the ideological

narratives that are circulating. It used to be, as a Canadian, you saw America and it was the land of opportunity and it had a narrative to it. It was, you're going to own a home, you're going to get a gun, you're going to make $10 million, and it's all going to be easier. I like the get a gun is the second step there, yes. Can you speak to how mainstream media particularly has been perpetuating or circulating, or circulating different types of ideological narratives. Like, what is there to believe in these days?

And, you know, if you were to propagate a new set of things for young people to believe in, do you have that manifesto also? Look, I'm not saying anything new or anything that it doesn't sound like you cover regularly on this show that, like, we're living through a crisis of meaning. And of course we are, because we're living through, my might not know it, but like a major technological revolution that is like maybe the big, one that's ever happened. I still don't know how to work the microwave and I don't know how it works. And that's great and good for you. But like most kids in school right now, like don't even have to

write a paper because they can ask chat GPT to do it for them. I just learned about this this week and I'm astounded and I'm shocked and I'm outraged. This is definitely going to come up on Jeopardy and you need to know this. So yeah, like we're living through a crisis of meaning. People, you know, on the one hand, we're living objectively in like the most comfortable privileged, wealthy time ever. I could go on my phone right now and order Ben and Jerry's and it can be at my door in 30 minutes. Everything is available to us. And yet it feels like we're missing some core aspects of what it is to be human being and live a life of meaning. Like I will not be surprised if we live through right now politics is religion.

but if we live through a kind of religious revival in the next few decades, because I think people are thirsty for the things that human beings always need, like a higher purpose, like community, like sacrifice, like duty, like honor. Like I know those things aren't cool to talk about anymore, but those are really important to living a life of meaning. We ran this incredible piece earlier this week by this young social scientists who I so admire named Rob Henderson about why people are jealous when they watch the last of us. It's like this post-apocalyptic dystopia. And yet they have things like connection and looking out for one another. And when you're living in the world that we're living in, like you could go days, many, many days, weeks, playing your video game, getting your DoorDash, watching your Netflix and never interacting with another human being. Like that is just not a good recipe for a good, meaningful life. and I think that for all of our comforts and they're amazing, like what do we lose in the balance?

What do we lose when the whole purpose of life becomes about achieving luxury and achieving comfort? Like there's a lot of things that are missing in that actually. And that's one of the, that's like one of many subjects that I'm deeply interested in writing about and that we publish lots of people on. And I did give a talk. I'm on the board of this new university that's starting in Austin. And I gave a talk to them last summer. It was the most intimidating group of students I've ever spoken to. It was like the brightest group ever and like very skeptical politically all over the map.

And it was called the new founders America needs. And it was really it was really the answer to this question. Like what are the kind of values and principles and virtues that we need to stand for to live a meaningful good life that has. Those are questions that are so far above politics that I think are so much more pressing in a way than whatever goes on in Washington. Well, do you think media outlets are perpetuating that? Do you think they're feeding this notion of we're all isolated? And so in our isolated bubbles, we're also going to tell stories about how all the things that you once aspired towards are no longer attainable. You're never going to have a job that's going to give you any sort of security. you're going to potentially, you know, live in an environment where it may not be inhabitable for your kids.

So like this level of propagation of dystopian futures sort of feeding this cycle, which then only makes us hunker down and isolate more and ultimately consume more. Well, you guys know, like bad news cells. And the thing that makes you want to keep scrolling, keep clicking as every single documentary investigation, et cetera, et cetera, has shown is anxiety and outrage. It's not like love and kindness and fellow feeling. And so it's a good business model to make people really outrage. There is also a lot to genuinely be outraged about. Like there is. The world is very broken in some fundamental ways.

I just think that one of the ways that it is that desperately needs to be repaired and remedied that is not really talked about because it's kind of ineffable and there's not like an easy solution is loneliness. and the crisis of meaning and the loss of trust in the things we used to trust. Like, those are really big ones. And it's way easier to be like, go support the Green New Deal or whatever the policy is than to talk about, like, what do we do about the fact that a lot of young people are deeply lonely, deeply depressed, deeply anxious, aren't even interested in sex, aren't even interested

in like drugs, like all the normal things. Those are two really good things. So like, I don't know what's happening, people. Yeah. I just think those are enormous stories. And there's something deep about like the human animal that makes those things that maybe we thought we could live without. Like we can't live without those things.

We just can't. We can't live without community. You can't live without a bigger purpose. You can't just like be a slave to your phone and be content or happy or joyful. It just it won't work. I'm fascinated by the fascination of QAnon people with the things that they're fascinated with. you know, like if there's a documentary, like I want to learn. That's just fascinating to me that there's this entire, you know,

universe of, let's say, that kind of set of thinking. But the other thing that is happening is much more fun. It's much less scary, I think, you know, when you think about it sort of colloquially, but I find it very disturbing. And it's something that Jonathan and I kind of, I don't want to say that we disagree on, but I have a feeling you're going to be able to our team. why I have a problem with it. So I've brought you here today.

I hope so. What is it? It's gurus. And the... Oh, there's a really great new podcast about this. I know. Jonathan, my personal guru, Jonathan is one of those people who spends a lot more time,

sorry, spends time because I really don't. Like, he spends time on social media, not a ton. Like, he's a working person, very productive, wonderful, creative, who does many wonderful things. But he often sends me like the dude, the lady, the, not the diet, but like the protocol, the piece of equipment. You know, like, he wants me to get a fucking sled. You push it. What?

That's all that you just push it in your yard. And he's like, a sled? You pull it too. It's like the sled. It's the thing. It's the cold plunge. It's the this. It's the NMA.

It's like a. And in many cases, God bless this Canadian. he's right and those things like i i totally get it but there's something that i and i do think it is part of my i mean i don't think it's just my you know my the itchiness in me when people try and impose something on me from a large leader but i feel that kind of allergy to a lot of this stuff because it's often packaged really sleek you know like most of the things he sends me it's like everybody's half naked and they have these amazing and it's like you too will be this person. What is it? Because I feel like it's it's kind of a satellite

thing to what you're talking about with kind of what we're craving. Well, it's adjacent to it, right? If you're untethered from the institutions and like we don't live in a world without the internet where we all watch Walter Cronkite, we all had a shared, I'm going to use a fancy word, epistemological reality. Like that world is over. You don't trust the institutions anymore. So now you're in this wild west, right? But people need leadership. People need to know, people need something to trust. And so it's like we're now living in a world in which we have like, we're all these little tribes following around these little leaders like waving their particular hyper specific

flag, whether it's like the drinking your own urine flag or the pulling the sled flag or the goji berries make you skinny flag. Like there's there's untold numbers of these people. And so I, A, I think it probably makes you nervous because when the thing that you are venerated, venerating or looking up to is a human being. And you start to look to that human being as a kind of like almost demi-god. That is just a scary reality. It's set up to fail because human beings are fallible. And so I think that like maybe part of your spidey sense is turning you off to that. I also think that a huge part of like the model for a lot of these people is built on selling you on

something that's not just selling you on an idea. It might be selling you on a sled. And maybe the sled is great. I don't know. The rise of the gurus speaks to the deeper phenomena. It's like, why are we living in an age of conspiracy theories? Why are we living in an age where everyone needs a guru? Well, sure. Part of it is that like we're deeply religious people. Traditional religion is dead and people need to like fill the God-shaped hole in their heart. And they're going to look to goji berries, God damn it if they have to or they're going to look to Trump or they're going to look to, you know, like woke politics. Like you need to fill that hole. Everyone does. And so I think to me it's less about the rise of the guru. It's more about what does the rise of the guru tell me

about what is so screwed up about our era. Look, and I also think there's like, there's better gurus and worse gurus also. Like I think that there's a huge spectrum. And some gurus are, you know, the Dalai Lama is a guru. Like his wisdom's kind of work. following on a lot of scores. If you take away guru from this conversation and you just say there are people who are actually have really valuable information and there are people who have some potential information that may offer some value but it's couched in their own incentives to try to sell you shit, that's a big divide and there are people out there right now who like the

popularization for example that Andrew Huberman has given morning light. He taught me about that. Yeah. Right. So like he's a guru. He's a science guru, but he's actually popularizing and democratizing information about how our bodies were that we've never had. And now all of a sudden, because of the rise of the quote unquote guru that has all the snake oil while you have someone else who's taking really valuable information about how the human body works and saying, look, everyone, you're kind of sick and feeling horrible because you're not doing the basic things that are needed to survive as a human animal. Like we have this incredibly exciting Wild West space of independent creators,

independent experts, independent journalism, podcasts. Like it's an explosion and it's amazing. And there's people that I follow that are like have 50 Twitter fault. Like you would never even know who they are. And I think they're absolutely brilliant. And that's phenomenal and amazing. I think one of the things though that will ultimately probably change, but is very emblematic of the current moment is like it's hard sometimes to suss out who is worthy

of paying attention to who actually has good information and who doesn't and we used to have like a really simple way of doing that it was like oh that institution has that logo or that fawn or that name i trust them it's Harvard right and now like we don't have that luxury as much anymore and so now every person is going out there with a flashlight trying to be like oh is there something good there maybe Oh, no, wait. I only saw like half of it. The other half is horrifying, like running in the opposite direction. And so I think that like the great news about our moment is the democratization of the

internet has allowed us to find unbelievable people, voices, experts, creators all over the world. Like I couldn't do my job without the internet and social media. The people it has connected me to, the people who are able to get in touch with me, including the woman today whose story we ran, like underground patterns. pastors in China, survivors, like, you name it. It would not be possible without the Internet. So that's the great part.

The bad part is, like, there's not a lot of gatekeeping or fact-checking in the new space. And the question is, and not to, like, take it back to the free press, but I do think that the thing we do that is unique is we're trying to marry the standards of the old world with, like, fact-checking and reading everything. having a great clear, honest headline that doesn't spin you, like all of those old school values that you expect from premium news without the bullshit politics that are currently overlaid on that, right? So it's like marrying the standards or they used to be standards of the old world with the freedom of the new world of the independent. And I think like bridging the like bringing the best values of each world into one new place is really important. Like to me, the key because freedom is good, but you also need responsibility. And you need both of those things

to have an institution that is worthy of trust. And that's really what I'm trying to do. You know, I remember when I found out that Nellie was your wife and you lost my mind because one of my favorite things is what happens on Fridays in my inbox. My, you were like thinking me so happy. I'm like your biggest fan. I'm obsessed because what's so important is that, even with the seriousness that you have to bring to what you do, there's no way to be light about what you're doing because by definition, what you're doing is stepping outside of a realm

that does not want you to step outside of it. It's a serious matter. But there is so much that is ridiculous and hilarious about the way that we as Homo sapiens are functioning right now. And so the breakdown of the news is like it is the most helpful for me. And I started sending it to myself. 17-year-old because he's a really bright kid, but he is flooded with an internet of information that is not helpful to him. It's mostly depressing or it's confusing or he has me in his ear

being like, but is that really true? Look at that story. He's like, I don't have the energy to do it. So I started sharing that with him. But I think, and then when I realized that you're married, I was like, that's an amazing couple. And I just think that's incredible. Can you just talk a little bit about sort of how you've built, you know, a relationship, meaning a structure of personal trust and are able to sort of work together to build a larger trust. We met at the New York Times. We met in the fifth floor. It's not even a cafeteria, like the little coffee alcove.

And as she would say, if she were here, she said to her editor at the time, I'm going to go meet Barry Weiss and I'm going to set her politics straight. Because I had already like put my neck out there on, you know, things that. that now are common sensical wisdom, but at the time we're heresy, like, you know, my Aziz Ansari Peace and other things like that. And we met and, you know, she wasn't sure if I just like needed a friend or if we actually, because I did. Or if we had chemistry and anyway, we met a few weeks later and kind of the rest is history. And I will just be forever grateful to the New York Times for introducing me to Nellie. I could never, in my wildest dreams,

when we met that day at the times have imagined what we would be doing together now. Like we moved across the country together. She's a sixth generation Californian. She's like diehard California. I know it's crazy. Like we moved across the country. We had a baby. We bought a house.

Like I never bought a house. Like I got my first credit card. I became an adult. And like now the person that is my wife and the mother of our daughter is. is also building a company with me along with our other, I should also say, you know, with our other close friends and also my sister works with us too, one of my sisters. So like, it, you got the whole mishbacha here.

And listen, it's not for everybody. Like, there are people who really believe in things that are foreign to me, like work-life balance. I don't know what that means. I come from a family that was a family business that is still a family business in Pittsburgh. It's kind of like a furniture store and flooring store. There was a time in my life where I would go into the store and it was like my grandpa, my dad,

and whose two sisters, and then my mom, all in one place. So it's very normal to me. For other people, and I totally get this, this would seem like absolutely insane. But I think it's the most rewarding, exciting thing ever. Like, yeah, we have to put moratorium sometimes on like I actually cannot discuss XYZ tonight. like it's done we're going to watch the last of us or the sex lies of college girls which was the other show we were watching recently but like in general I love it I you know I'm going to edit TGIF every week I'm going to edit TGIF tonight I'm so jealous I'm so jealous I can't wait to see what

happens in my inbox tomorrow don't don't you guys love like I I don't know like for me like the core of a relationship is is like the ongoing conversation that never ends and and like that's what we get to do for our work it's it's like a fantasy to me did you always always want to be a parent? Yes. I always wanted a family. I did not necessarily know if I would be the one to give birth. But I will say, having seen it, I really want to do it now. I really want to do it. It's a real hoot. It was the most mad. I mean, it's magic. It was, it was, it just like still, like I still think about it every day, which is maybe a little weird five months on. I just thought it was, I just thought it was amazing. And I'll say it was really incredible because the doctor who was there was herself 37 weeks pregnant that delivered the baby. Oh, stop it. That's the best story ever. It was the best story. She was pregnant with her fifth child. I mean, the only better thing is if she would have gotten into labor because the hormones were just like flowing and everybody gives birth at the same time. Exactly. It has been really such a pleasure to talk to you. I respect you so much. Like I said, even when I don't agree with you, I respect you. And that.

that is what you have taught me is possible. And really it's, um, I had really given up. I had really given up and I was feeling a tremendous amount of despair. And in particular, as a Jewish person and a Zionist and a liberal Zionist and a progressive Zionist, you've really helped clarify a lot of the, the core values that drive the labels that we have. Um, and it's really, it's tremendously helpful. And I really just think that if you are a person who is feeling stuck, lost, disillusioned and confused by what is going on in the news, as we simpletons call it. There are people who are trying to do it differently, right?

There are people who are trying to do it differently. And it's okay to listen to people and to read things that you don't agree with. It doesn't change you. It doesn't change the core of your heart or your brain. It is such a pleasure to speak to you. We're so glad. we got to talk to you, Barry. Oh, it was so much fun. Thank you guys so much. I am very grateful that she spoke to us because she's a very busy person. And she's pulled in many, many different

directions. And she has a very specific category of expertise that I feel like so suits the work that we do, you know, meaning talking about things that you and I are interested in on much more of kind of like the micro level. She works on this like huge level of like, how do we trust? how do we get information? She really articulates things a way that makes sense to me. Like when she says you cannot be truly joyful with your life, you know, planted in a phone. You can't.

We are made to interact with people. Well, she can't have meaning. Right. And that that's a crisis. Like that's a, that is a, it's a mental health crisis. And when you think of teenagers, I can't tell you how much time I spend debating with them, how much time they should be devoting to look at it. at that screen.

And like, I just want to be like, I'm, it's so, she makes it sound super clear. It is. Really? Anyway, I'll take their phones away. She mentioned sacrifice and that we don't have sacrifice anymore. So the notion of it's not just hard work, but what are you giving up in order to work hard and pursue the things that you want? And that being a necessary part of not just the creation of dopamine,

and pleasure and reward, but to feel meaningful and to feel like you're having a purpose in the world, sacrifice has to be a part of that. But don't you think a lot of people, I mean, I don't want to say young people, but when I even think about the conversations, like, I get eyes rolled at me a lot, just by the humans that I literally gave birth to, you know, when I try and talk about this. What's their job? But I'm saying, yeah, but people who are not my children also roll their eyes at me. She started by saying at the beginning of the podcast about how, you know, there are some core things missing in the world.

And she set out to try and address those. But she didn't say specifically what the core things that were missing were. I mean, she circled back to them talking about meaning, talking about purpose, talking about connection, the epidemic of loneliness, which is, you know, we talked about at the beginning of this podcast. We said there was an epidemic of loneliness. and we had looked at all that research together, and we said part of the reason that we needed to have conversations about mental health is that loneliness may not be considered mental health, but it's the fact that the need for human connection

and normalizing every type of experience from being sad and what does that look like to be okay with an emotion to being lonely was essential. Yeah, I think when I think about documentaries and books, and things that I've read about sort of what makes people happy, meaning by objective measures of happiness, you know? Yeah, it's a sense of purpose, which often comes from interacting with people of a variety of different ages and, you know, knowing old people, seeing babies and also knowing old people.

Socialization, meaning not living a life of loneliness or isolation. That's, you know, hugely important. and, you know, a community and by extension a government that seeks to facilitate those things. And I think it's really hard because from a very privileged Western, you know, perspective, I want people to live only under governments where they have freedom no matter what. Like I really want that. I don't like that there are places where women are not allowed to drive cars or go outside. like that just feels so hard

meaning it feels so hard that that exists like I can't even wrap my head around that so when I think about like what's missing in the world I want people to be compassionate in a way that allows for more freedom and more dignity and more life choices even if you don't agree with them you know well said and what about your personal values

that you live by great like a sense of grace like being gracious, compassion, patience, kindness, faithfulness, loving, forgiving, forgiving, gold star for anyone who knows where those come from. But we'll just leave that as a mystery for now. All right. Check us out on Appialic Breakdown to try and sleuth to see where Mime's purpose and meaning in her life is being delivered from. From our breakdown, the one we hope you never have. We'll see you next time.

It's YM. Beallix Breakdown. She's going to break it down for you. She's got a neuroscience Ph.D. or two. One fiction. And now she's going to break down. It's a breakdown.