Media Storm - Is the media responsible for the rise of Reform?

Episode Date: May 29, 2025

Let’s talk about how the media is fuelling the rise of Reform. This is not a new topic. The News Agents called it a "lefty cop-out" to blame the media for the rise of Reform. But what about the media cop-outs? What about the media's refusal to change, even as the Far-Right returns to the mainstream? The truth, Media Storm argues, is this: our media did not just fuel the rise of Reform, they cashed in on it. So on this week's episode, while Mathilda struggles with corrupted live show audio (sorry), we bring you a special audio article on the topic instead, and introduce you to the Media Storm column in Byline Times - out every Friday. This episode is produced and presented by Mathilda Mallinson (@mathildamall). The music is by Samfire (@soundofsamfire). Support Media Storm on Patreon, and follow the column on Byline Times. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This episode is brought to you by Square. You're not just running a restaurant, you're building something big. And Square's there for all of it. Giving your customers more ways to order, whether that's in-person with Square kiosk or online. Instant access to your sales, plus the funding you need to go even bigger. And real-time insights so you know what's working, what's not, and what's next. Because when you're doing big things, your tools should to.

Visit square.ca to get started. Paramount Woose. Check out the big stars, big series, and blockbuster movies. Streaming on Paramount Plus. Cue the music. Like NCIS, Tony and Ziva. We'd like to make up for own rules. Tulsa King.

We want to take out the competition. The substance. This balance is not working. And the naked gun. That was awesome. Now that's a mountain of entertainment. Paramount Wolfe. Hello Media Stormers, it is Matilda.

Helena is away, so you have me this week, and things may go a little bit rogue compared to usual. It's not entirely my fault. This week we were hoping to bring you the live show audio from our discussion last week with Milo Edwards comedian and Natasha Devon, LBC broadcaster. We debated the most unhinged headlines of 2025. Sadly, I logged on this morning to edit that audio and discovered that it sounded like a robot had shattered out and I didn't want you guys to have to sit through that. So, I started writing our weekly column.

For those of you who don't know, Media Storm has a weekly column in Byline Times. And this week I wrote about the third of the headline topics that Helena and I discussed. whether the media is responsible for the rise of reform. So while we work out how to bring you the other topics we discussed on the panel, this week I'm bringing you an audio article to introduce you to our column at Byline Times. And if you don't already read Byline, you definitely should.

They're very good at spotting things that the mainstream media you otherwise rely on might have missed. Our column comes out every Friday. If you like this audio article and you want us to record more like it, Do let us know, it won't replace Media Storm's regular content, but it might be a way that we can bring you more bonus content without too much difficulty. If you don't like it, just tune out, but make sure you tune back in next week where we'll be bringing you more of our Media Storm usuals. And also, make sure you come to our live show next time,

because you never know what's going to happen to that audio, especially when you have hosts who repeatedly forget to record backups. Anyway, here we go. Let's talk about how the media is fueling the rise of reform. This is not a new topic. We have seen and heard mainstream journalists, editors and broadcasters, asking each other, are we responsible for the rise of reform? But after a cursory moment of introspection, they generally reaffirm their own journalistic decision-making

and deflect culpability onto other. pied pipers. When the newsagents were asked this question by a listener, they decided it was a lefty cop-out to blame the media for the rise of reform. Yet I have seen nothing but media cop-outs, and most offensively, a media continuing unchanged. The truth is, our media did not just fuel the rise of reform. They cashed in on it. Of course, there is not a straightforward channel of blame, and I say blame to condemn not the rise of a party, but the fact the party rising was one founded on hatred. On the one hand, yes, UK outlets are guilty of giving reform disproportionate coverage with disproportionately singular focus on frontman Farage.

And yes, politics pages have long been locked in a two-party matrix that fails to cater to those pouring out of its rusty crevices. On the other hand, And no, this is no longer the newspaper era when Murdoch made the man in charge. There's a myriad of social and alternative media, some fronted by Farage, with whom the mainstream must compete. And no, the mainstreaming of far-right ideas is not an exclusively British phenomenon. Also, no, there are not many inspiring alternative parties willing to break from the broken status quo. But to set the parameters of this debate around reform itself is to entirely miss the point. The key way in which our media has failed us is by making the most clickable politics the most successful.

With one hand, our media has shunned reform as unsurious, thereby playing into their anti-establishment narrative, while fanning with the other hand the flames of culture warfare and us versus them identity making on the right and the left alike, that give reform such an easy route forwards without requiring them to offer root cause solutions. Quote, in many ways our media repeatedly falls into the trap that extremists lay out for us, end quote.

Radicalisation researcher Dr Rajan Basra told media storm. This was back in 2022 when we were investigating a far right attack on an asylum centre in Dover, which occurred amid headlines of an invasion on our border. Headlines that quoted then-home secretary Suella Braverman in her carefully clickable wording. This trap, Basracles, destroying the grey zone. Quote, whether it's ISIS or someone from the far right, extremists want to destroy the nuance, the moderate view, the understanding that could bridge divides. They want us to think in us versus them, in black and white.

I don't know if it's just how the media's structured, he lamented. The sad truth is, it largely is. Ad-funded media quite literally live off-clicks, and even editors at other outlets pour over most red leaderboards and pressure reporters to compete accordingly. It's therefore easy for politicians, especially former media personalities like Nigel Farage and Donald Trump, to write headlines they know the media will repeat,

even if they're inaccurate or immaterial or, in no way, immeliorate people's day-to-day issues because they're clickable. In this way, our media prostitutes its services out to politicians in exchange for clicks. The cost is moderate politics. Clickbait naturally favors extremist messaging. In the clickbait cooker, certain ingredients, take heat and rise, while others flatten and get discarded. Seeds of division offer more bite than universal values. Fear is far more flavourful than facts. Ridicule makes a better roast than reason.

These ingredients may make juicier headlines, but they are also the ingredients of nascent fascism. We have seen them poison democracies before, and we have said, never again. I'm not telling our media to boycott legitimate parties or bury their heads in the sand. Just stop doing all the other shite we call out in this column every week. Stop publishing data that falls far below the threshold of academic publication. Stop letting charismatic politicians write their own headlines. Stop butchering, nuanced reporting with exaggerated headlines that blatantly misrepresent the articles themselves, and stop dehumanising minorities by denying them voice in coverage that is

directly and primarily about them. Of course, it is complicated calling something extremist once it has officially entered the mainstream. Britain's are now slightly more likely to consider Reform UK as the main opposition party ahead of the Conservatives. That's 37 to 33%, according to Ipsis. But there is a set definition of far-right. ideology and it does not change or become less alarming the more people that vote for it. That said, people voting for reform are not the problem. They are us. We all have to take a bit of responsibility. That's a quote from LBC broadcaster Natasha Devon when she joined Media Storm's live debate on this topic. By not bothering to engage as much with nuanced, thoughtful, long-form

journalism, we fuel the clickbait market. End quote. We are all responsible for the ways in which our society allocates political currency, for the ways we condemn each other before seeking to understand, for the ways we emote when we should rationalise, or rationalise when we should emote. But unlike the clickbait media, we do not all cash in on it. The ability of the far right to thrive again in a post-Nazi world is a damning indictment of a media so commercialized

it is willing to reward whichever would-be leader incites the public to click on it. Thank you for listening. That was Media Storm's column which will be out in byline times this Friday, as it appears every Friday. See you next week.

Calling all Book Lovers, The Toronto International Festival of Authors, brings you a world of stories all in one place. Discover five days of readings, talks, workshops and more with over 100 authors from around the world, including Rachel Maddow, Ketouru Isaku and Kieran Desai. The Toronto International Festival of Authors, October 29th to November 2nd. Details and tickets at festivalofauthors.ca.