Megalithic Marvels - Nevada’s 10k yr old Mummy, 1953 UFO Crash, Shocking Mound Artifacts (full episode)

Episode Date: December 8, 2025

One of the sites that shook me most on my recent Cambodia tour was a site that I had never even heard of before - the Baphuon: Cambodia's Mysterious Golden Mountain Temple! Was this temple actually constructed on top of a much older precision megalithic base? Did you know that a 10,000+ year old mummy was discovered in Nevada's Spirit Cave in 1940? The original tests done on it by Smithsonian scientists found that it was of European origins. Why was this ancient specimen taken and buried, never to be seen or studied again? Most people have heard about the Roswell incident, but very few people seem to have ever heard about the 1953 Kingman UFO crash retrieval... Pulling from leaked emails, eye-witness accounts and the sworn testimony of mechanical engineer Arthur G. Stancil who worked at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, I piece together the details of this incredible event. Why are our history books mostly silent when it comes to the ancient mounds of America and the anomalous artifacts and enigmatic entities that were unearthed inside them? Why has this fascinating history been suppressed? JOIN ME ON A 2026 TOUR TO EGYPT OR PERU

Hey everyone, thanks for tuning in. So in this episode, we are going to cover some incredible topics. I'm going to take you to an incredible site that I was just at in Cambodia, known as Bapuan. And this is a mysterious site. It's very little known, but I believe it may have been built on a much older megalithic foundation. I'm going to show you a 4K virtual tour of this site and point out to you what I saw in my theories. Then we are going to go down a rabbit trail that I am very excited about, and that is the Spirit Cave mummy that was discovered in Nevada in 1940. And this mummy is estimated by someone to be 10,000 plus years old. In many ways, it has been rewriting history, yet it appears to me that there may have been and still is a cover-up concerning this mysterious mummy. After this, we will go to Arizona, where I'm going to break down for you, the 1953,

what's known as the Kingman, Arizona UFO crash retrieval. This, I know it sounds crazy, UFO crash retrieval. This is something I've been more into of late. This is a crazy story. There's some pretty credible witnesses, and the details of this event are mind-blowing. You do not want to miss this. And lastly, we're going to talk about the ancient mounds of the events. of America and the crazy artifacts that have been discovered inside of them.

I'm going to show you on screen these top artifacts. I'm going to talk to you about the mysterious skeletons often discovered in these mounds, some of which measures seven to eight feet plus tall and several anomalous, what seems to be hybrid chimeric type creatures that were found inside these mounds. I know it sounds crazy, but I didn't say this. The Smithsonian said it. And I'm going to show you their own writings, articles, articles from the New York Times. You are not going to want to miss this episode.

But before we dive into these topics, just a quick reminder, please subscribe to this podcast from wherever you are watching, whether that's YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, wherever. And while you're at it, like this video or episode, leave me a comment. I'm going to ask you several questions during this episode, and I'd love to get your feedback on what you think about each topic we're going to be discussing. And again, so make sure to subscribe and on Spotify, please give me a five-star rating or review that really helps me break through the algorithms and climb the charts. And don't forget to check out megalithic marvels.com slash tours, where you can see our lineup of 2006 tours on tap.

In May and June, we've got our tours to Peru and Easter Island. And then coming December, 2006, we have our Egypt tour, which is going to be off the chain. And we're likely going to be adding one more tour to the lineup for 2006. So check megalithic marvels.com slash tours or go to the link in the show notes below to be directed there. So we just enjoyed the most epic trip to Cambodia where I was just. joined by almost 50 other friends. It was one of my largest tours ever, and we explored Anchor Wat in Bayon Temple and all of the most incredible temples and ancient sites in this CM-Reap Cambodia area. And it was really incredible because I counted about half the group had

been on previous tours with me before. There was literally 20-plus people who had been on not just two, but some of them three tours with me on other tours I've led to Egypt and Peru and Easter Island and even England. So it was a very special tour because to have a group of almost 50 and then have almost half of them be who I consider to be friends that have joined me on other trips. It was just a special time. And it was cool to meet all the new friends as well. But I just wanted to give a shout out to everybody who came on a previous tour with me before that was on this tour and that was David Jeff, Hank, John, Christy Michael, Mary Stephen, Tom Alana, Carly Jason, Kim Larry, Lisa Robin, Michelle, Risha Scott, Willie James, and Stephen. You guys are

incredible. Thank you for trusting me and our team with your lives on all these tours. It was so incredible to hang out with you. And it's just really exciting to have have this many people come on tours and repeat tours who are from all over the world. We had people from Australia and New Zealand, actually quite a big group. We had people from Switzerland on this tour. We had people from all over the U.S. and different states and Canada. So it was just an incredible time getting to experience Cambodia for the first time myself. It's always special when everything is new.

It was so amazing to experience the culture and the people of Kamborea. Cambodia. It's some of the most amazing people I've ever met. They're so hospitable. They're so kind. It's really incredible, whether it's the hotel staff, the bus drivers, just the merchants on the street. Everybody wants to help you, it seems like, and is very helpful, hospitable. The food is great in Cambodia and the coffee is amazing. I'm a coffee snob from the Seattle area. So I drink three, four cups a day. I have my own espresso machine. I am custom making iced lattes all day. And so one fear or hesitation I can have when traveling sometimes is, will there be enough good coffee? I hate to say it, but in Egypt, the copy is not that great. In Peru and England, the coffee is not that great.

But in Cambodia, they had these little coffee stands everywhere, coffee shops. Speaking of coffee, I just needed a little coffee break. But we had Cassie Coppersmith, by the way, on the tour. I connected with her a couple years ago on our England tour. She's amazing. She's launched a YouTube channel called Secrets in Stone. Everybody go follow it. But it was such an honor to have her on this Cambodia tour with me,

co-hosting, bringing her expertise. And so we captured all kinds of content together, and we're actually going to do an episode together in a few weeks, breaking down the entire trip, showing you anomalies, so look forward to that. So Cassie, thank you for joining me. But I got to say right off the top, probably my two favorite sites that I saw on this trip were the Co-Care Pyramid, which I'm going to have a lot of content coming out about, and another little known site known as the Golden Mountain Temple, otherwise known as Ba Puan. Now let me set up what I'm about to say with the site with a little bit of

context because the mainstream narrative says that most of the temples that we see in the Seam Reap Cambodia area were made by the Khmer, it's pronounced, or Khmer, but most people say Khmer builders, who lived about circa 800 to 1400 AD. And the mainstream narrative basically says that this Khmer civilization built all these temples using huge slave armies, ropes, wooden rollers, elephants, and boats. And it just took them a lot of time and they just eventually built these pyramids. But I and Cassie and a growing group of others believe there is so much more going on here in Cambodia than we've been told. And as you get on the ground and you visit these sites, you see all these anomalies. You see these

metal clamp crevices everywhere. You see 3D ornate carvings. You see depictions of prehistoric and even ice age mammals embedded into the walls. You see these massive moats, also known as berets, which are the largest cut on earth. You see giant precision lingums, precision spindles that literally show lathe marks. You see huge megalithic blocks that look like Legos, featuring 90 degree angles, interlocking nubs, and what even looks like drill holes all over. In 2012 through 16, there was LIDAR scans of Anchor Wat that revealed these incredible grid patterns of the mounds inside the moat at Anchor Wat and massive grid patterns on the outside of the moat that measure like one mile long and literally look like circuit boards from the air.

It's crazy to see. The point is I believe there is so much more to the ancient history of the area, presently known as Cambodia, than we've been told. And one of my favorite sites from the trip, as I said on the outset of this video, was a site that I had never even heard of before, didn't even know it had existed, and it's known as the Bapuwan. And this is a temple located in Anchor Tom. Anchor Tom is a Khmer word meaning the great city as it was the capital of the Khmer Empire which lasted from about 802 to 1431 AD.

But again, as I will share in a few minutes, I believe parts of this site, namely much of the base of the site, could be much older than they're telling us. Again, the site known as the Bapuwan is also called the Golden Mountain in Sanskrit. And Bapawan more or less means something like the divine mountain of the three worlds. Again, a Khmer name that reflects its symbolic role as a temple mountain. It's interesting that all over the world we find these pyramids, we find mounds, and we find in Cambodia these temple mountain pyramids. It's like as above so below. It's this mountain cosmology.

It's where it's like they were trying to reflect heaven on earth almost, if that makes sense, or their version of it. Because as you approach this amazing temple, you realize that it's built on an artificial hill. It's a mound underneath it. And this structure is like a three-tiered pyramid or temple mountain, as they call it. And as you're going to see here, if you're watching by video on YouTube or Spotify, This temple is known for its grand entrance, its huge scale, and the impressive reliefs, especially those on the second enclosure of the top level. And the temple orients to the east, beginning with a Gopora, whose northern end connects

with the terrace of the elephants. Now, this word, Gopura is a monumental gateway. That's what it means, a monumental tower or gateway that marks the entrance to a temple complex or the entrances between enclosures. And this Gopura retains some divata carvings on its western side. Now this word devata means basically a female deity or divine figure carved in stone on temple walls. Now leading from the central portal of this Gopora is a grand terrace that rises up around the sandstone columns and is flanked by basins on either side. and each of the Goporah's on this level features stunning reliefs of Hindu mythology adorning the outer walls.

Now this temple was originally dedicated to Shiva but was later converted into a Buddhist temple. And on the backside of the site, when you look up, it's pretty incredible to see, you see this huge 30 foot tall by 230 foot long statue of a Rakhine. declining Buddha that was built into the West Side's second level. This thing is massive, which probably required the demolition of an eight-meter tower that once stood above it to supply stones for the statue, thus explaining its current absence. Now, archaeologists believe that large portions of the temple had probably already collapsed by the time the Buddha was at.

later. Now what's crazy is that when you take a step back and gaze at this site from afar, which is what I did. I was up close and I was so amazed, but then I went back away just to get perspective. And that's when you realize that this temple appears to sit on this massive, black, like 20 foot tall, nine-tiered, precision sandstone base that look. a lot different and even superior to much of the construction that was built on top of it, especially the giant Buddha area that I just described. Now, the base in the lower areas feature literally this airtight mortarless engineering, whereas the higher temple areas where the reclining Buddha is are different.

They're smaller stones. They're just squared. and you can see the gaps between them like it was added later. So what I saw at this site was very similar to what I've seen in Peru, especially like at Machu Picchu, where you get to the center of the site and you see that the Inca construction, which is this small stone and mortar and even some clay, is built on top of a megalithic base that goes from the ground to about

four feet up. It's this white mortarless, huge granite blocks, precision. And then it's like cataclysm hit, knocked it over, only the foundation survived. And then the Inca came along eons later and built with their inferior construction on top of the megalis. It felt similar to what I saw at this site, Bapuan. Now there was a Chinese envoy named Zhu Daguan who visited the Khmer Kingdom in the late 13th century. And he visited Bapawan and described it as, quote, an exquisite sight with a bronze tower, a truly astonishing spectacle with more than 10 chambers at its base, end quote. Now I find this quote very interesting because he mentions the base of the site like he was astonished by it like I was and I wonder what he means specifically

by ten chambers at its base because when you look at this massive 20 plus foot tall base you can kind of count the different layers precision layers and I count at least nine or ten going from bottom to top so is that what this guy was describing or was there more to it that has been lost Now in 2015, a French archaeological team using the Carbon 14 dating method revealed the construction of Bapuwan was older than previously thought, and can now be considered as the major temple associated with Saravaraman, the first, this Khmer ruler, from about 110 to 150 AD. So that's what the latest mainstream dating of the site is, about 1,000 to 150 AD. Before that, the mainstream told us that this site was from the 16th century. So right here, the site just got 500 plus years older overnight based on new dating methods,

which is kind of interesting. But again, I believe it might be even way older than that, and I'm going to get to it just a minute. But this latest carbon 14 dating seems to confirm that adding the giant reclining Budo wall was related to the later Ayutthayan occupation of Ankur around the 1430s during a major period of political and religious instability. Now here's where it gets really interesting to me. In my research, I found out that this site was first cleared in modern times in 19, by a French guy named Jean Camille or Kamale, I believe. And when he cleared it, the site was mostly in ruin, he states.

Now, it's really hard to track down old photos. But in 1960, someone named BP Grosslier began an ambitious restoration program of dismantling the ruins of Bapuan in order to resolve the structural issues that they believed were inherent in its original plan. And so they were going to take the temple all apart, and then they were going to put concrete stabilizers in it, in beams, and then they were going to reconstruct the site. It sounded like a good plan, right?

So this guy, Groslier and his team start to dismantle this temple. They take some 300,000 blocks apart and lay them in the jungle grass around the site. Again, their plan was to rebuild it. But then guess what happens? The communist Khmer Rouge party sweeps to power in 1975. You guys have probably heard of the killing fields and the horrible atrocities that happened in Cambodia.

That was during this time. And so therefore, work stopped until a French-led team of archaeologists finally began to reassemble the temple in 1995 under the guidance of a guy named Pascal Royer. Now, without the benefit of Groslier's original plans from 1960, this guy, Royer, had to figure out how to reassemble the 300 stone blocks that were laid out on the ground from scratch. and it only took him, guess what, 16 years to solve the massive puzzle. And then the site eventually reopened in 2011.

Now, when Royer first showed up with his team in 1993 to begin work on the project, he describes how it was just all grass and jungle. It had grown over most of the site, and Bapawan was basically just covered in jungle. and he spent much of 1994 just trying to figure out how to approach this insanely complicated job. And Royer stated this, quote, The archive of the numbering system for scattered stones was stolen and destroyed by the Khmer Rouge. So we had to face a kind of jigsaw puzzle without the picture how to rebuild it.

Reconstruction required measuring and weighing each block. as well as numerous drawings to figure out how each part fits. Each block has its own place. It can't be replaced by another one because there's no mortar between them and you will not find two blocks that have the same volume and the same dimensions. So that's quite a statement from the lead archaeologist piecing the temple back together that not one stone was the same. Now I found it interesting.

I found an old UNESCO article from around 2012 concerning Bapawan's restoration, and I found this statement very interesting. The article says, quote, the cause of its ruin was easy to understand. The Bapawan had manifestly been badly built. The high sandstone plines enclosed the quantity of sand feeling needed to build the three-story structure.

But the proportion of the mix was not, right and could not ensure long-term stability. The result was severe stress, which led to structural distortion, slanting walls, and occasionally to collapse of the structure at a very early stage, end quote. So essentially, UNESCO here is saying that this incredible temple was, quote, badly built, end quote. Now, after seeing this side in person up close, after traversing through it, and also after scouring all these old photos that I found from the 60s era restoration. I can see how the upper part of the structure, the temple, was in ruins and, you know, was falling apart. And I can see how they, from that they would get that it was, you know, badly built.

But when I look at the photos from the 60s, I don't necessarily see, the base ripped apart and in ruins dilapidated. I see a precision base, just like I saw a few weeks ago. I saw an upper temple that was clearly inferior to the base structure, and therefore I can imagine how the upper portions, again, would have been falling apart if they were just added later. So my point is from these old photos and from what I saw with my own eyes, it looks like the restoration team from the 60s did take apart the upper portions of this structure, but they did not take apart the whole base or much of the base from what I can see, but only would have been built on top of it. So with all of that, I would submit to you this question.

And I would love to see you answer on YouTube or Spotify with a comment. Let me know what you think. Is the base of this site much older to your eye than the rest of a site that appears to me to have been built on top of the base? Was the base engineered by an earlier lost civilization who possessed sacred knowledge and ancient technon? And then did the Khmer builders arrive, circa 800 to 1400 AD, find this incredible base and say to themselves as the Inca did in Peru, this thing is otherworldly. This is superstructure, this base. Instead of just building our temple on the jungle floor, let's build our temple on top of this epic base and repurpose the site. and claim it as our own and improve upon it or what they thought was improving upon it

with the best they could. Again, the base of this site is made of sandstone. And something important to point out that Cassie pointed out on our tour was that the sandstone, which is what the most incredible pieces are made of in Cambodia at these sites, the megalithic pieces that look superior

to the other upper portions. is made of sandstone. But the sandstone in Cambodia is a harder sandstone than you might find in Egypt. The sandstone in Egypt, I believe, is like a three or four on the Moes scale, but the sandstone that comes from Cambodia is closer to a six or seven on the Moes scale, almost approaching the hardness of granite, which is why I believe these giant megalithic looking blocks appear to be in such great shape, despite what I believe is that the hardness, believe is very old age and weathering. So again, you have a base that's sandstone, this harder material. And then a lot of the temple structures built on top are made of laterite, which is a much

softer stone that almost kind of looks like coral. You see lots of pockmarks in it. And it's like a three on the Moes scale. But again, if you're watching this on video via Spotify or YouTube, you're going to see the mind-blowing video footage as I walk around the corners of this base, which is at least 20 to 25 plus foot tall. I was literally blown away by the precision corners and edges of this base. I mean, they're pointed. They're sharp. It's like artistically nine or ten layers high.

And so leave me a comment. everybody on YouTube on Spotify, do you believe the base of this structure predates the, uh, what appears to be the temple built on top of it? All right, let's go from Cambodia to Nevada to talk about the spirit cave mummy. Now long before Columbus discovered America, this land was thriving with ancient people and shall I say ancient humanoids as, well. Some of which were of gigantic size, which I'm going to talk about later, some of which were described as hybrid or even chimeric-type entities that had strange horns and other anomalies, and some that were just anomalous because of their Caucasian-like features or super old age

as documented by countless published reports like the New York Times going back to the 1800s. The Smithsonian also published all kinds of articles on stuff like I'm describing. And these discoveries back then, before all the political correctness, were considered pretty much normal, which is why they were constantly published in big-time newspapers, like the New York Times, like the Smithsonian, like the scientific American. Now, a long history of pre-Columbian, European, and Asian contact is evidenced. all over the continent as seen in the artifacts and again in the discoveries such as what's known as the mummy of spirit cave which at minimum is dated to be 9,400 years old but the latest dating

is saying this thing's actually over 10,000 years old like 10,700 years old making the spirit cave mummy, one of the oldest known mummies on planet Earth. And yes, I'm guessing that many of you have never even heard of Spirit Cave mummy or Spirit Cave man until now. So let me tell you all about him. Now, let me ask you a question. What do you think the international reaction would be to news that mummies were found in Egypt that predated the earliest mummies ever discovered there by more than 5,000 years. We all know this would be surely front page news from one end of the planet to the other, right? Yet the news that a 10,000-plus year old mummy was unearthed in America has elicited barely a whisper.

Now, this original discovery of the mummy was made in 1940, yet it's a time. It's taken more than 60 years to fully start coming to light. And a big reason for this is likely because the skeleton was never originally turned over to the Smithsonian. But it was kept instead by the Nevada State Museum. If it had been turned over to the Smithsonian, I would wager to say it would have conveniently disappeared. never to be seen again. It would have been lost. It would have never been able to be tested and dated. We wouldn't probably know about it today. But thank God, the Nevada State Museum kept onto it, and the rest is history, as they say. Now, there's a great book by Richard Dewhurst called The Ancient Giants

Who Ruled America. And I'm going to read a couple of excerpts from it for you. regarding Spirit Cave Man and Richard says this. The original find in 1940 of two amazingly well-preserved mummies was made by Sydney and Georgia Wheeler, a husband and wife, archaeological team working for the Nevada State Parks Division, who were commissioned to study the archaeological effects that guano mining was having on any possible historical remains

to be found in the arid caves scattered across the Nevada, wastelands. Bat guano is mined because it contains salt pepper which is used to make fertilizer and is the main ingredient of gunpowder. Let me pause and say that I've done several episodes before on the Lovelock Cave Giants. The Lovelock Cave artifacts and skeletons were actually found not far from this Spirit Cave mummy and again they were only found because people were in that cave mining out the bat guano or the bat dung to use for fertilizer and while they were doing so they started to find all these incredible artifacts in skeletons and so being that there were so many outfits back in the day of early 1900s scouring all these nevada caves for bat guano

the state of nevada was getting worried that they were going to lose precious artifacts which they were. So that's why they were sending Georgia and Sydney Wheeler out to caves that they figured miners hadn't been in yet to try to save whatever might have been in there before the caves got messed with. So that's what this Sydney and Georgia Wheeler are doing. So the site was appropriately called Spirit Cave and it's located about 13 miles east of Fallon, Nevada. Now in order to find the mummies and the 67 related artifacts associated with the burial, the wheelers had to dig through several feet of the guano droppings that covered the base of the cave and preserved what lay underneath. Let me just pause and say, do you know how bad bat guano smells? Having just been

in the ancient temples of Cambodia, there was bat guano everywhere because these temples are covered in bats. So these two human mummies they found were expertly wrapped in this highly sophisticated weaving made of tool matting that exhibited extremely fine nodding and hand weaving not thought to exist until thousands of years later. Because the mummies were sealed in this bat guano, the weavings are extremely well preserved, and they are arguably the greatest evidence of ancient weaving in the world. Yet close to nothing is generally known about them. Now the male mummy was in better condition and was found lying on a flat blanket dressed in a twisted skin robe with leather moccasins on his feet and a twined mat sewn around its head and shoulders. A similar mat was

wrapped around the lower portion of the body and bound under the feet. The skin remained on the back and shoulders as well as a small tuft of straight dark hair, which changed to reddish brown when exposed to light and air. The age of the mummy was estimated at 45 years and its height well in excess of six feet. The original dig in 1940 was led by the wheelers with the help of local residents and the two mummies, and again 67 related objects were taken to the Nevada State Museum where they were examined and dated at that time between 1,500 and 2,000 years old. They were then transported to the museum's storage facility in Carson City and promptly forgotten about. In 1996, the mummies came to the attention of Irv Taylor, an anthropologist at the University of California Riverside,

who decided that new breakthroughs in what's known as mass spectrometry dating, could reveal the true age of the mummies, especially in light of the extremely good condition of the tool, diamond-plated mat wrappings, and the excellent preservation of the mummified bones and associated assorted relics. One can only imagine Taylor's stunned reaction when the results came in. The mummies were dated to 9,400 years before the present, in what is scientifically referred to as uncalibrated radiocarbon years before present. Yet instead of this momentous news, shattering the world of archaeology to its very roots, the Bureau of Land Management stepped into the breach and shut down all news of the discovery in 1997,

when it ruled in favor of a claim by the Paiute Shoshone tribe of Fallen, Nevada, that the bones belonged to them by rights of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, otherwise known as Nagpra, which I'll talk about in a minute. So although no DNA testing was allowed at the time of Taylor's dating, the Paiute Shoshone tribes claim held until pressure from the academic community forced the courts to reconsider the claims of the Bureau of Land Management related to the Indian's ancestral claims. Then in 2006, the courts overturned the findings of the Bureau

and the Paiute Shoshone tribes and allowed DNA testing of the mummy by Douglas W. Owsley. Owsley was the division head of physical anthropology at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, and Richard L. Lance, an anthropology professor at the University of Tennessee Knoxville. The tests revealed that the mummy was of a Caucasian origin with a long face and cranium that most closely resembled either Nordic or Ainu ancestry

and bore no ancestral relationship to either the Paiute or Shoshone tribes. Now, although these findings were made public and extensively covered by the local media, this brown breaking news has received barely a glimmer of attention in the outside world. Now, in order to put this fine in its proper context and understand other related and equally amazing finds in this part of the Western United States, like the Lovelot cave artifacts and skeletons, it's imperative that we reconstruct the local topography of this area as it existed some 10,000 years ago. as Richard states, although this knowledge should be commonplace to most school children, the true map of ancient America remains a complete mystery to most all of its citizens.

As it turns out, much like the Sahara region prior to 6,000 BC, the western United States, prior to the gigantic Lasson volcanic explosion, posited at sometime around 5,000 BC, was home to one of the biggest freshwater freshwater, lakes in the world, then contained a lush biodiversity that one geologist has characterized as abundant in every respect. Perhaps the lushest in the world at the time, with every kind of plant and animal necessary for human life. The area of this ancient lake was immense, covering approximately 8,500 square miles in the northeast section of Nevada, bordering on California and Oregon.

Its name is Lake Lahontan. And at its peak, around 11,000 years ago, it was almost 1,000 feet deep in places and was fed by the Humboldt Walker Truckee and Carson River Systems. Remnants of this dried out lake can be seen at Pyramid Lake, Lake Russell, and Lake Tahoe. At its peak, the lake's resting waterline was at approximately 5,200 feet. And consequently, many of the finds around its ancient shoreline. line are found at least at that height. So the point here is that when we understand that these desert regions were once home to abundant life that was thriving with lush rivers and giant lakes,

the other related prehistoric archaeological finds in this area become understandable and even expected as we are no longer looking at an isolated desert remains devoid of logic and contextual understanding. This is why the Lovelock Cave artifacts featured these incredible elaborate duck decoys that are the most elaborate on earth. They're now, I believe, on display at the Smithsonian in New York city. And they were found in Lovelock Cave, not far from Spirit Cave, these elaborate duck decoys, because the ancients were a part of this thriving lush culture. Okay, back. Back, to Spirit Cave Man or Mummy. So he's found in 1940 wearing these incredible moccasins on his feet.

His body's wrapped in this rabbit skin blanket covered with reed mats. And when you look into the history, Spirit Cave Mummy was paraded at the Nevada State Fair the following summer before being handed over to the Nevada State Museum in Carson City where he was literally forgotten about until the 1990s rolled around. And again, Spirit Cave Mummy was dated at a minimum to be 9,400 years old. Now at this point, representatives from this fallen Paiute Shoshone tribe request that the body be returned right to Spirit Cave under this Nagpra Repatriation Act. They were identifying the mummy as an ancestor whom they called the Solution.

storyteller and tribal leaders claimed a direct genealogical connection to this ancient individual known as a spirit cave mummy or spirit cave man now let me stop for a minute and talk to you about nagpra again that's the native american graves protection and repatriation act now let me pause for a moment and talk about nagpra nagpra stands for native american graves protection and Repatriation Act. This is a law that was passed in 1990 and I've actually covered this on some other episodes when you look at this law in a nutshell, this law basically states that any ancient specimen that was or is found in the United States of America is essentially Native American and should be removed from public display and buried according to the traditions of the individual tribes. Now let me say clearly and emphatically, the Native Americans are the First Nation people. They have an amazing history.

They are an amazing culture. And any specimen found that is genetically there should 100% be repatriated back to them. However, at the same time, there seems to be a myriad of ancient skeletons and specimens. found that genetically don't seem to be related to them. Some of you may have heard about what's known as Ken Oak Man, and I'm going to do future episodes on him. And there's been so much controversy surrounding Kenowickman that was discovered in Washington State,

where a lot of the research and data and DNA says it's not related to the Native American tribes. And then again, we've got Spirit Cave Mummy. We've got the Lovelot cave schools who last I heard were hidden in the back room of the Humboldt State Museum in Nevada, and the curator of the museum even said, yes, these are not on public display because the state does not recognize their legitimacy. And that's because they're not related to the piutes of Nevada. The point is, we've got a lot of these kind of examples. And again, it's not me saying this.

This is archaeologists and scientists like Owsley from the Smithsonian who said Spirit Caveman was not related to the Paiutes, right? So we have these examples from archaeologists themselves who state these specimens are not Native American, therefore they should not disappear from public display. yet because of this nag pro law, that's always what seems to eventually happen. At some point, there's another DNA test that's done that says, actually this is kind of related to the Native Americans, and guess what happens? Immediately the skull or specimens are grabbed,

and there disappeared never to be seen of again. So many theorize that there seems to be a deliberate plan to hide anything that's discovered that doesn't fit into the standard theory that Native Americans cross the Bering Strait and settled here. And it's basically forbidden to talk about or look into artifacts that people believe might have predated the Native Americans in North America. So again, the local Shoshone-Payute tribe requested that the body of spirit man be returned under the Nagpah laws,

but the Bureau of Land Management surprisingly refused to comply for a while based on the findings that the skeleton was not essentially Native American. And this went on for two decades until the Fallon Paiuchashashoni tribe kept arguing their case eventually winning the legal battle in 2018. When the Spirit Cave Mummy's DNA was analyzed, again by a scientist named Professor Eske Wilslev, who worked with the University of Copenhagen. Now, I ran out of time to really dive deep into all of his DNA results, but apparently they showed an unbroken genetic lineage linking the mummy with not only present-day Native Americans, but South Americans as well. So there was still a lot of new confusion that came out of his new DNA study.

But because he linked the Spirit Cave Mummy to Native American ancestry, guess what happened next? The controversial mummy was immediately disappeared. It was immediately repatriated back to the Shoshone-Payute tribe, closing a quote, Seven decades long legal dispute with anthropologists who fought for it to remain on display in a museum, end quote. Now, what's interesting to me when I looked deeper into this is that this professor Willerslev himself attended the reburial of the mummy. And here's what he told the reporters, quote, it involved people crying, singing and praying as the mummy was put inside a casket and offered farewell gifts. The event was similar if you and I were burying a very close relative.

It's that emotional even though we are burying a mummy that was living 10,000 years ago, end quote. Now, I have no problems with emotions at a funeral and reburying a skeleton. I get all that. What I find interesting and where the critical side of my brain kind of starts to let off some red alerts is that this professor is at the funeral to repatriate this mummy right after his supposed analysis proved that it was linked to the Native Americans, which triggered the legal battle for them to get it.

and bury it. I just find it interesting that this guy is so into this that he's flying from Copenhagen to the middle of nowhere in Nevada to be a part of this burial. It just, it seems all so convenient to me and interesting. I'm trying to be careful if you know what I'm saying here. I think this next statement by this mainstream scientific publication sums up perfectly what I'm trying to say I feel might have been going on here. This mainstream publication states this quote, The burying of this skeleton marks the end to what have been deemed outlandish claims and puts to bed arguments that indigenous groups often fight for repatriation of remains in order to gain a political voice. Again, am I the only one that thinks it kind of seems odd or all too convenient that

after we had the 1990s test results from the Smithsonian scientist himself, Douglas Owsley, that this ancient mummy was not only 9,400 plus years old, but had Caucasian origins. Does anybody else find it interesting that all of a sudden in 2018, we have this other guy come along with different DNA results? Okay, so all of this led me to do some deep. digging into the original 1996 pathology report and tests by R.L. Jantz and Douglas W. Auxley, the scientist who worked for the Smithsonian Institute. And here's the biggest takeaways, as I read through the entire 25-page article.

I'm giving you literally verbatim the interesting parts that jump out to me that you're not going to hear in any mainstream article. And all of these, by the way, are direct quotes from the report. I'm literally reading from it. Quote, the Spirit Cave Mummy was examined by scientists from the Smithsonian Institution in the University of Tennessee as part of a systematic survey of the human skeletal collection curated by the Nevada State Museum. The hair is medium brown in color with reddish tones. Let me pause there. Okay. So we just learned that this thing had reddish-colored hair. Interesting. I continue, quote,

some of the longer strands are 150 to 198 millimeters long, indicating that it was at least shoulder length. Some of the hair was cut angularly, which suggests that some type of blade was used to groom the hair. It continues, quote, the cranial vault is long and narrow with a moderate vault height. Let me pause there and say this. Now, if you're watching on video via YouTube or Spotify, you've seen all kinds of photos or drawings of the Spirit Cave Mummy. But what do you notice? Nowhere do you see a real old vintage photo of the skull, nowhere that I can find. Even though, as we're going to read, that the skull was in incredible shape.

Why can't we see the skull? Why can't you find any photos of the skull? I want to see the skull. Does anybody else want to see the skull? The only picture we have of Spirit Cave Mummy, it's conveniently covered over with that read mat. But as we're learning right here from this 1990s report, the cranial vault is long and narrow with a moderate vault.

height. It continues, quote, the brow ridges are only moderately developed and the frontal bone is long and curved. The height of the face is relatively short and is fairly gracile. I think that's how you pronounce that word, especially considering the large size of the skull, end quote. It continues, quote, at the time of his death, this individual was recovering from an injury to the left temple that is evidenced by a circular impact site. Another unusual anomaly of the spinal column is the presence of the 13th thoracic vertebrae instead of the usual 12. Okay, let's pause there. I think we got something here. I don't know about you, but to me this is saying this guy has an extra rib or an extra vertebrae. He's got not 12, he's got 13. Again, very interesting that we can't get a shot or photo of the vertebrae.

Again, all we see is this body, this mummy covered in a reed mat. It continues, quote, The Spirit Cave Male classifies as Anu on these 12 variables. Groups with high scores are Polynesians and East Asians, including Anu. The Spirit Cave male is clearly aligned with the three. this last group of populations and not with American Indians. Unlike Indians, the Spirit Cave Cranium does not have a flat frontal configuration. It is most similar to East Asian and Europeans in this regard, end quote. Okay, so is this part of the tale? Is this why we're not allowed to see the

skull? This literally says, quote, unlike Indians, the Spirit Cave Cranium does not not have a flat frontal configuration. Is this why they don't want us to see the skull? Is this why you can't find any photos of the skull? And by the way, if you do find photos of the skull, please let me know because using AI and using the powerful Google image search tools that I use, I can't find it. Okay, a couple more quotes here. It continues concerning the facial forwardness. It says, quote, the two closest groups related to the skeleton are both European, but Norse has a much higher posterior probability than any other group. Regarding the face, height, breadth, and projection, it says this, quote,

The Spirit Cave Male clearly has a very strong European resemblance on the facial variables. It continues, quote, the excellent quality of the preservation of the hipation of the head, parts of the body and the artifacts was recognized even then. It's talking about 1940. It continues, quote, the remains were exhibited at the Nevada State Fair for three days, a few weeks after excavation. Over time, Spirit Cave Man's remains were placed in a wooden box, covered with naphthalene crystals, and stored in the general collections area of the Nevada State Museum. It seems that, other than the preliminary report, published by S.M. and Georgia Wheeler,

little to know research was performed on the mummy until it was carbon-dated in 1994. So now you know everything that I know about the infamous spirit cave mummy man. This thing was discovered in Nevada in an incredible cave in 1940. In fact, I'm going to try. It's on my bucket list to go find this cave. I've been to Lovelock Cave. I want to go to Spirit Cave. So what do you think?

Do you smell a cover-up? Do you think Spirit Cave Man predated the Native Americans was of a more Caucasian origin? I mean, everybody agrees that this guy is at least 9,400 years old. But what do you think about the latest DNA test that came out in 2018, which then triggered the legal battle back to the tribe which triggered the repatriation which re-triggered the burial now spirit cave mummy is disappeared never to be seen again and again am i the only one that finds it odd that you can't find a photo that features the skull of this specimen this incredible specimen or the ribs i want to see the 13 ribs um anybody think there's a cover up here leave me a comment on youtube or

Spotify and let me know what you think. Okay, let's travel to Arizona and talk about the Kingman UFO crash retrieval. Now, if you've been following me the past few years, the story of vintage crash retrievals is something that I've gotten more into. I've always been open-minded concerning UFOs and UAPs, having had several sightings in my life going back to about 10 years old. And so, being that I'm a nerd of history, when it comes to UFO crash retrievals, these stories really get me, and this one known as the Kingman UFO crash retrieval is one of the best that I've come across. Now let me set this up by saying that during the spring of 1953, the Atomic Energy Commission and the Department of Defense conducted a series of nuclear weapons tests at a Nevada

test site known as Operation Upshot Not Whole. And at 505 a.m. local time on May 19, 1953, what they call, what they refer to as shot hairy was detonated atop a 300-foot tower at the area 3 Nevada test site. And the explosion had a yield of 32 kilotons. The hairy shot came to be known as dirty hairy because it resulted in the heaviest radioactive fallout contamination of downwinders, which is the civilians living downwind of the Nevada test site. This was the worst fallout of any U.S. Continental Test. Now, four separate trajectories were plotted for the radioactive debris cloud

from the Harry shot. And it's interesting to note when you look at the maps, the 30,000 foot trajectory known as C-track and the 40,000 foot trajectory known as D-track both moved southward from Nevada over central Arizona during May 19th and 20th, 1953, which is when about this supposed UFO crash took place. Now, the public knew nothing about the Kingman crash at the event of the time, which basically seems to have remained a cover-up for decades after. The earliest reference of a crash near Kingman, Arizona, had been made to Mufon researcher Richard Hall in April 1964. The case of the Kingman UFO retrieval was then brought to the public attention

by a guy named Raymond Fowler, who was known as a respected UFO researcher in June of 1973. That's when he started to write about it. Fowler stated that his information came from engineer named Arthur G. Stansel. Stansel signed a legal affidavit vouching to the honesty of his testimony, which was released by Ray Fowler in the UFO magazine April, 1976. Now this engineer, Arthur G. Stansell, was employed by Air Material Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. Stanzel was a mechanical engineer testing Air Force aircraft engines.

Stanzel was also working for the Atomic Energy Commission and was designated as a project engineer on some of the atomic bomb tests referred to as Operation Upshot Not Hole, which I had just told you about previously. So the location of these tests was at Frenchmen's flats at the southern end of the Nevada test site. Now when you look into the Kingman UFO crash, the dating is always somewhere between May 18th and May 21st of 1953. You'll see some different dates. But according to this source that I found the most trustworthy, it says on May 21st, 1953 Stanzel was called away by his boss and told to report for a special assignment at the Indian Springs Air Force Base.

where he joined about 15 other specialists. I've also read that there was upwards of 40 other engineers or specialists that were called in to observe this crash site. They were flown by military plane to Phoenix where they boarded a bus with blacked out windows and rode for an estimated four hours. When they arrived at their destination, somewhere southeast of Kingman, Arizona,

They were met and briefed by an Air Force colonel who told them they were to investigate the crash of a super secret test vehicle. Stanzel and others on the bus were told not to speak to each other under any circumstances. Stanzel's job was to determine the forward and vertical velocities of the vehicle when it impacted in the sand. Stanzel was then escorted to the site by military police. Stanzel states that as he approached the site, there were these two military arc lights illuminating the saucer that was embedded into the sand and the earth. He said it was approximately 30 feet in diameter and about 14 feet tall. The saucer, again, was embedded in the sand about 20 inches.

And after making measurements and later studying the crash site, Stanzel concluded that the craft had struck the ground at approximately 1,200 miles per hour, but it was strangely undamaged and definitely not human made. Stansell said, quote, the object was not built by anything, obviously, that we know about on Earth, end quote. Stanzel describes how the craft was constructed of this dull, silver-like metal, brushed aluminum. It had a series of slots going around the outer circumference of the disc, and the scientists were told that the material the craft was made out of was classified. Apparently the craft featured a curved entry hatch, but it had no hinges whatsoever. When they opened the hatch, they saw inside an oval interior cabin with two swivel seats and many instruments.

Now here's where it gets even stranger. Stanzel and others corroborate this, that they saw at least one body that had been recovered from the crash. And they never really used the word alien, but they say like humanoid. It was a humanoid that was about four feet tall with brownish skin wearing a silver metallic-like flight suit. and Stanzel also claimed to see the body. There's some different variations of the story, whether Stanzel saw it in the craft.

Others say he actually saw it in a tent, on a medical tent near the craft. And the creature was supposedly wearing some kind of skull cap and again in a silver one piece suit. And I actually found this written testimony by Arthur Stanzel, which he wrote for, UFO researcher Raymond Fowler. And it states, quote, this, I, Arthur Stanzel, do solemnly swear that during a special assignment with the U.S. Air Force on May 21st, 1953, I assisted in the investigation of a crashed unknown object

in the vicinity of Kingman, Arizona. The object was constructed of an unfamiliar metal, which resembled brush aluminum. It had impacted 20 inches into the sand without any sign of structural damage. It was oval and about 30 meters in diameter. An entranceway hatch had been vertically lowered and opened. It was almost three and a half feet high and one and a half feet wide. I believe he's describing the hatch only there. He continues, quote, I was able to speak to someone on the team who did look inside only briefly.

He saw two swivel seats, an oval cabin, and a lot of instruments and displays. A tent pitched near the object sheltered the dead remains of the only occupant of the craft. It was about four feet tall, dark brown complexion, had two eyes, two nostrils, two ears, and a small round mouth. It was clothed in a silvery metallic suit and wore a skull cap of the same type of material. It wore no face covering or helmet. I certify the above statement is true by affixing my signature to this document this day of June 7, 1973, end quote. Now, in 1977, UFO researcher Leonard Stringfield received a supporting account from a National Guard member at Wright Patterson. The witness described a 1953 delivery from an Arizona crash site involving three bodies,

each about four feet tall with large heads and brownish skin packed in dry ice. So researcher Stringfield believes that that came from this Kingman crash. So maybe there was not one entity, but three. Now the scientists were only allowed to stay on the site for about one hour as a group, and then they were then quickly loaded back onto the bus and left. Back on the bus, all the members apparently were made to sign what was called the Official Secrets Act and were warned not to ever discuss what they had seen with anyone. Now, a few years ago, I saw a video by Richard Dolan, who's another UOO researcher whom I respect.

He does things the right way. He was discussing the Kingman Crash with a fellow researcher, and I gleaned this information from that video. Again, his YouTube channel is called Intelligent Disclosure. And they were describing how, from their research, in a hurry to clear the crash site, the Army Corps of Engineers brought in an M25 tank transporter with a long 18-wheeler tractor trailer behind it. They built this large wooden cradle and then propped up the craft onto it. They quickly headed toward the Hoover Dam, where they then said, strung a huge cable across the Colorado River.

They then brought a barge down the river and attempted to drive the tank transporter onto the barge. But get this, as the transport started to cross the river, the cable snapped and at one point the outer wall of the disk literally hits the Hoover Dam. And eventually they somehow found another. way to cross the river. Okay, this is so fascinating. Who wouldn't love to go with me to the Hoover Dam and look for a huge scrape on it where this craft might have scratched it. Now,

according to researcher Harry Drew, they eventually bring the craft to a remote operating facility at Groom Lake. And again, this is in 1953. This is before the U2 spy planes first took flight in 1955. Now, this other researcher, Harry Drew, he interviewed somebody named Colonel Wendell Stevens, who was apparently also part of this crash retrieval operation for the Kingman Crash.

And this Wendell Stevens described, to Harry Drew as seeing at the crash site a pyramidal looking rock outcropping. I think he was describing a natural rock outcropping that kind of just went up in a pyramidal shape. And he says he saw this in the 1953. Well, according to Harry Drew, he later went to the site and claims that he literally found this pyramidal looking rock outcropping, which was proof to him that this Colonel Wendell Stevens was telling the truth that he was at the operation at the crash retrieval, which to him means there's a lot of teeth to this story, which I of course find very interesting. Because now I want to go to Kingman, Arizona. I want to try to find this crash site, and I want to take pictures of the pyramidal looking rock outcropping. because if it's truly there, then again, it seems like there's more credibility to this story.

In closing, it's important to point out, as many of you have heard with the latest age of disclosure, just in July of 23, right? 70 years after the alleged Kingman UFO incident, we had this guy named David Grush testifying before Congress about the reality of Elon. legal special access programs being operated without official congressional oversight. And David Grush asserted that what he described as non-human biologics and recovered craft were in the possession of these black budget programs that were operating from within the defense contractors to the United States. Many suspect Lockheed Marks.

Raytheon and others. So again, very interesting. This whistleblower David Grush, who's worked all over in the Intel community and military, literally under sworn testimony, says there are black budget government programs that for decades have been retrieving. Recovered craft, you know what he called biologics, basically meaning if you want to call them human, humanoid entities or aliens. They've been retrieving these and obviously taking them and disappearing them and studying. In my research, I came across what appears to be legitimate 2020 declassified emails between a senior government official named Christopher Mellon and some other official. And I'm literally going to read from you from these screens.

shots of these emails, again declassified, some of them still have redactions, but they are talking about, it appears they're talking about the Kingman, Arizona crash, which if these emails are true, this again, just brings even more validity to the story. Check this out. But at the top, it's redacted, and then it says, Blank and I are making huge progress getting into the CR program. He plans to meet with you at some point. Then the next statement says the blank would be slack-jawed if they found out what we now know. Okay, those statements were made by the senior U.S. official. And then this guy named Christopher Mellon replies and it's all redacted.

And then the senior U.S. official replies to him and says this, quote, right now we haven't gone that far back. We're dealing with the recovered UAP that landed in K.S. Kingman, Arizona in the 50s. We're vacuuming up info as blank gets read in. We now know the management structure and security control systems and ownership of the CR. We also know who recovers landed or crashed UAPs under and under what authorities. Oh, and by the way, when they say CR, I believe that means crash retrievals. We also know that a still highly classified memo by a secretary of the United States Air Force in the 1950s is still in effect to maintain the cover on

UAPs. So again, this exchange was released between a guy named Christopher Mellon and an unknown government employee working to access the UAP or crash retrieval program. This conversation occurred in 2020. So that is the 1953, Kingman, Arizona UFO, Retrieval Story. What do you think? Do you think it really happened?

Do you think it's all made up? I'd love to know. Leave me a comment on YouTube. Leave me a comment on Spotify regarding this topic. And if you think this crash really happened. All right. Let's end this episode. It's sticking in North America.

Let's talk about ancient American mounds, artifacts, tetroglyphs, and yes, entities. You know, the European colonists who discovered the new world not only found a thriving culture previously settled by the Native Americans, but as their wagon trains pushed westward, especially during the Gold Rush era, it appears that the colonists also began to discover the remains of another culture

that seemed to predate the Native Americans by at least thousands. of years. Giant earthen mounds constructed with an ancient knowledge and mathematics had withstood the ages of time. Now while most of the ancient mounds have sadly since been decimated by the Smithsonian and others, luckily there are still several mounds that can still be seen today. There is the Miami'sburg mound in Miami'sburg, Ohio. This thing is like 60 feet tall. We've got mounds at the Mississippi Winterville complex, several mounds there. There's mounds in, again, Ohio. There's still some mounds that you can see, I believe, in Louisiana. Again, Tennessee, if I didn't mention that. So there are still some mounds that can be found. Now, as the

colonists and settlers would come across these mounds, as is human nature, they would become curious. and they would often begin to excavate in these mounds, dig inside of them, and to their amazement, find the remains of not just skeletons, but sometimes skeletons measuring from seven to eight plus feet tall. These skeletons were often found wearing copper ornaments, shields. Sometimes they featured what looked like double rows of teeth and had strange, robust skulls. Now, right up until the early 1900s, newspapers like the New York Times and the Scientific American and even the Smithsonian documented these discoveries. In fact, anybody can go to the Library of Congress and search for these articles. There's a website called chroniclingamerica.org. That's an arm of the Library of Congress. It's free.

anybody can go in there and put in the keywords, 7 foot skeleton or 8 foot skeleton, whatever your keywords are, and you'll see all these articles pop up from reputable newspapers of their day talking about this. In fact, in a little bit I'll read you a couple of them. Now, today the Smithsonian asserts that there were basically no giants in the ancient world,

But again, in their actual published mound excavation reports, they detailed the discovery of all kinds of anomalies and skeletons that, again, measured 7, 8 feet tall. I found some that are 9, 10 feet tall. So it appears that the American continent was home to a powerful population of large entities or hybrids. And it's interesting that we have all these Native American letters. of the thunder people that were said to be like man-like giants often with wings. Now in my humble opinion, it seems like the further we go along here and the more research comes out, more research and more findings seem to even be pushing mainstream archaeology to bend to this idea

where they are now admitting the idea of hybrid. descendants of an extinct group of what they call the Denisovans who they say migrated from Siberia and some believe came all the way to North America but what's what's more when you do research on the Denisovan cave where they first found the Denisovan remains guess what they found in this cave giant body parts They found a molar that's twice the size of a human molar. If you're watching on video, you're going to see a photo of it right now. Okay, if there's a molar twice as big as a human molar,

it means it belonged to a body that was likely twice as big as an average human body. So my point here is it's almost like Denisivins is becoming an interchangeable word with the Nephilim. I've done a lot of talking in episodes and guest appearances on other shows regarding the Nephilim and what Genesis 6-4 says of the Nephilim, what the book of Enoch says about the Nephilim. It basically says they were this hybrid race with genetic anomalous features. They were huge. The most famous Nephlem giant in the Bible was Goliath, who at all conservative estimates, was nine feet tall. I believe he was closer to 11 feet, but if we want to be conservative, we'll call him

nine feet tall. The Bible describes six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot. The Bible describes King Og of Bashan, who had a bed that was 12 or 15 feet long. One of those. The point is these were genetic hybrids. We have the elongated skulls in Peru that have 30% more cranial mass than our skulls do. They have two, many of them have two odd holes in the back of the skull. Larger eye sockets. The point is, this is genetics. I believe those skulls are descendants of the Nephilim.

Or if you want to say the Denisovans. The point is even the mainstream academia is talking about larger hybrids now, and it's almost under the guise of this safer phrase. denizivans. So did these tall, large entities, skeletons that were found all over North America, often in these mounds, descend from the Nephalim? I think it's very likely. And it's crazy when you get into the oral traditions and the legends of the ancient mound builders. It's like they use shamanic rituals and altered states of consciousness, combined with the natural earth energies that the mounds and earthworks were built on and the giant overlords

that ruled the mass population who were probably just humans right but these giant overlords of the mounds i'm talking about the seven and eight footers were likely hybrids according to legends they could create portals for communication with non-human intelligences and other worldly realms. And shout out to Dr. Gregory Little and Andrew Collins, both of whom I've done interviews with here on this pod. Yes, you can go back and watch my interviews with him. But they've both co-authored and written their own books that dive deeper on the ancient mound builders and the legends and all of the stuff that I just mentioned. Now, when you see the old vintage photos of some of these artifacts that were pulled from these mounds, it boggles the mind.

And here's just a couple that I'll show you if you're watching on video. You're going to see photos of these. In one mound that was flattened in Ohio, they got to the very base bottom of it. And what did they find? This perfectly squared cube that was probably five or six feet tall, squared and wide. And this thing was immovable. It was part of the rock ground and they couldn't move it. So they just heaped earth back over it and left it.

They found these incredible intricate tablets with these fascinating designs all over them in several mounds. They found these incredible what looked like weapons, which almost look like pick axes but aren't really. They're more artsy. but was like some kind of sceptor used by the ruling elite. Some of my most favorite artifacts are these stone humanoid pipes that were pulled out of the Ohio adenamounds. There's one that's eight inches tall. And this thing is like luminescent. It's kind of this greenish, almost jade or graniteiteite stone, at least it looks like that.

But if you came here from Mars, you would say that is a Mayan artifact. That was pulled out of a Mayan temple. But it wasn't. It was pulled out of an Ohio mound. And the details on it are incredible. Another amazing stone pipe was pulled out of an Oklahoma mound, known as Spiro Mound or Spiral Mound. It's known as the Lucifer effigy pipe. Lucifer, because this thing looks demonic like it's

got this freaky looking face, but it's so detailed. And then there's all these pottery heads that have been pulled out of mounds. But these things are, it's basically a bowl or a pot where one side is an entire face, but there are these menacing, detailed faces. And all of these were pulled out of mounds in the United States. And just as an example here, here's a 1920 report that talks about a Carnegie Museum curator pulling something strange from a Pennsylvania mound. And this was published in a Minnesota newspaper on November 19th, 1920 known as the Bemegi Daily Pioneer, if I'm saying that right. And here's literally what it reads. At the top, it says unearthed skeleton of giant. The subheading says bones of supposed mound builder, those of man,

8 or 9 feet high. And then the article reads this. Quote, Dr. W.J. Holland, curator of the Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, and his assistant, Dr. Peterson, a few days ago, opened up a mound of the ancient race that inhabited this section and secured the skeleton of a man who, when in the flesh, was between 8 and 9 feet in height, says a Greensburg, Pennsylvania dispatch to the Philadelphia inquirer. This mound, which was originally about 100 feet long and more than 12 feet high, has been somewhat worn down by time. It is on the J.B. Seacrest Farm and South Huntington Township.

This farm has been in the Seacrest name for more than a century. The most interesting feature in the recent excavation was the mummified torso of the human body, which the experts figured was laid to rest at least 400 years ago. Portions of the bone dug up and the bones in the legs, Professor Peterson declares, are those of a person between eight, nine feet in height. The scientist figures that his skeleton was the framework of a person of the prehistoric race that inhabited this section before the American Indians. The torso and the portions of the big skeleton were shipped to the Carnegie Museum. Dr. Holland and Peterson supervised the explorations on the Seacrest mound with the greatest of

care. The curators believe the man whose skeleton they secured belonged to the mound builder class. So this is such a fascinating article and really such a forbidden article for mainstream archaeology today because it's saying all the forbidden things. It's talking about a mound builder class that predated the Native Americans. It's talking about an eight to nine foot skeleton being pulled from a mound. I mean, this is interesting. And I wonder what happened to the skull. Here they said the skull was shipped to the Carnegie Museum. I guess my best guess is it has long since disappeared conveniently. But what if? What if we could go find this museum? Go to the basement and inside start looking through boxes.

and we find a skull to an eight-foot skeleton. So that's just one example of countless strange anomalies, artifacts, and skeletons of large size that were discovered in the late 1800s, early 1900s, often in mounds. There's often all kinds of stuff found in caves. Here's just a few headlines. I've documented there's a 1903 report, strange skeleton pulled from an organ grave.

and when you read it, this thing had horns. 1867 report, large four-fingered skeletons and earthed in a quarry that was in Connecticut. A 1915 report, skeleton of a horn man discovered near Arizona cave. I wonder if this Arizona cave was anywhere near Kingman, Arizona. Did you know that Abraham Lincoln, our 16th U.S. president. When recounting the beauty of Niagara Falls, he wrote the following.

When, quote, when Columbus first sought this continent, when Christ suffered on the cross, when Moses led Israel through the Red Sea, nay, even when Adam first came from the hand of his maker, then as now, Niagara was roaring here. the eyes of that species of extinct giants whose bones fill the mounds of America have gazed on Niagara as ours do now, end quote. That's a real legitimate quote from Abraham Lincoln.

You can Google his Niagara Falls, quote. You're going to find that quote in his own handwriting. Abraham Lincoln, as I read that, He's blown away having visited Niagara Falls, its power, its beauty. And what's he doing as he reflects on the beauty and the power of Niagara Falls? He mentions a species of extinct giants whose bones fill the mountains of America have gazed on Niagara as ours do now. So the context is, man, Niagara Falls is so powerful and so ancient.

that even the ancient powerful race whose bones fill the mounds of America also gazed on Niagara. So we've got mounds, we've got large skeletons, we've got these strange artifacts that look like they're Mayan. Now let's talk about petroglyphs for a moment. When you look at the ancient rock art, especially of like the Anasazi, especially the newspaper rock petroglyphs in Utah, you see the crazy. craziest things, strange spiral vortexes, what looks like portal stargates, what appears to be entities that might have come through them. You see what looks like humanoids, chimeras, horned giants, and even six-toed footprints. Those are some of my favorite, the newspaper rock petroglyphs.

You literally see these giant six-fingered footprints what look like they're chasing normal little human footprints. Now, much of this rock art is guesstimated to date from about 1,000 BC to 1,000 AD, around the same time that the anisaze seem to have disappeared. So what really happened to the anisazzo? Now, the mainstream narrative theorizes that they basically just absorbed into other tribes like the Navajo and the Hopi. But when you kind of look into the oral traditions of the other Four Corners tribes, they seem to believe that the Anasazi just disappeared. Now, late researcher and author Tom Horn, he wrote a book about a lot of this,

and he visited the Four Corners area and some of the Anasaze sites. He had some interesting discoveries. He documented how the University of Eastern Colorado was excavating down at the San Canyon Pueblo, archaeological site several years ago now. This was probably 15 to 20 years ago now. And they were excavating an Anasazi community that appeared to have been attacked suddenly

and whatever happened to them didn't compare to any other kind of tribal war that they had previously excavated. In that, these people, these Anasaze were literally mangled and ripped to shreds all over the site. They even found different parts from same bodies, get this that had been carried away for over 200 miles in distance.

Now the Anasazi were more of a smaller people that stood about five feet tall, I believe. Yet although most of the bodies there were in shreds, guess what also these archaeologists discovered. two very large complete seven plus foot long skeletons. And all this was documented on the University of Southeastern Colorado's website at the time. I'm guessing it's all disappeared now. But I found this so interesting.

And so does this story of what happened at this site give us a hint as to what might have happened to the Anasaze? Did they disappear because a much larger enemy tribe, let's say measuring seven, eight plus feet, tall, maybe possessing six digits, super strength, speed exterminated them? Was this some type of hybrid Nephilim, or if you want to say Denisovan tribe that was taking dominion of the desert southwest? And is this why the anisazzae went through the painstaking process? of building their villages in the cliffs. I mean, that had to be an incredible, mind-blowing, hard, severe engineering project

to build your dwellings up in the cracks of the cliffs when you could have just put them on the canyon floor. And then when we go to Utah, we see what's known as the Great Gallery and there's literal life-size depictions of entities that are dated at 4,000 years old. And the most impressive of these barrier canyon rock art panels is what we see here at the Great Gallery.

And again, these anthropomorphic figures that rise, guess what? Over seven feet tall. And one guy which looks like the leader is dwarfing the others. Who was this guy? There's some other incredible. rock art depictions that you can find here in Utah's Barrier Canyon. They're pictographs, actually.

And these are guesstimated, again, to be about 4,000 years old. And again, thanks to my friend Abby. She's on Instagram known as Abby's out there. I think that's her handle. But she took these photos and has given me permission to use them previously. But notice this photo of this insectoid figure that appears to be shooting something from its hands. crazy it's got bug eyes and a square head antennas and then when you look at the other scene next to it what in the world is going on here because you see these two hovering entities or floating

entities and it appears that they are inserting something down into something it almost looks like it's depicting something genetic on a cellular level. Are they growing chimeras in an artificial womb? What in the world's going on here? And then we've got my favorite one, which I call Utah's ancient six-fingered Bigfoot. Again, this is in Utah's Uintah Basin. These are the dry fork petroglyphs,

and they feature very, scenes of chaos with anthropomorphic figures with these intensely decorated horned heads. Many are holding severed heads and the severed heads have pecked trails of tears flowing down their faces. So it's just intense. That's the only word to describe it. But the most fantastic figurine of all of these, again, is what's literally known as the Bigfoot for obvious reasons. because not only is he wearing what some say is an elaborate headdress, I think it's actually an elongated skull with horns. But what's more, his left hand clearly features six fingers.

I think the other hand may as well, but it was defaced. But then when you look down at his feet, he's got these huge monster feet. So the big question is, might this be depicting a hybrid, demigod from the old world that descended into the American Southwest in ages past. Were the ancients painting what they heard about in their ancient legends or what they saw with their own eyes in their day? Who actually created this artwork? Was it to ancient humans or was it the ancient entities? Well, there you have it. There is so much to our incredible history in the United States of America.

All the great history is not just in Egypt or Peru or Cambodia, but we've got amazing history here as well. And now you know a lot about the mound builders and the ancient hybrids that may have once ruled this land. What do you think? Do you believe ancient hybrids that were seven to eight foot tall once ruled North America and were buried? in the ancient mounds that once dotted the landscape in the United States.

Leave me a comment, let me know. But the one thing I do know is there is so much more to history in America than we have been told. And I believe Abraham Lincoln even gave us the heads up on that. Well, I hope you really enjoyed this episode. And until next time, keep exploring.