Megalithic Marvels - Timothy Alberino on Atlantis, Ancient Tech & the Nephilim

Episode Date: July 16, 2026

What if Earth's forgotten past is more mysterious than we ever imagined? In this episode, we explore the Younger Dryas catastrophe, the legends of Atlantis, the Nephilim, ancient advanced technology, and even the very controversial claims of artificial-looking structures on Mars. JOIN ME ON A TOUR

The Hulu original series Furious is coming to Disney Plus, starring Emmy Rossum. Furious follows FBI agent Alice Black on the hunt for a mysterious and calculating serial killer. Both walk their own paths toward justice, and as their lives start to intertwine, the line between right and wrong begins to blur. Don't miss the three-episode premiere of the Hulu original series Furious on July 27th, only on Hulu on Disney Plus. that, it's your money calling. It wants a promotion. Elevate your savings with the Scotia high interest savings account.

Always earn high regular interest rates that grow the more you save and invest. Conditions apply. Visit scotiabank.com slash hisa to learn more. Scotia Bank, you're richer than you think. Well, I'm excited to be joined by Timothy Albarino today, the Explorer, filmmaker, and author of the book, Birthright. Timothy, thanks for joining me again. Hey, thanks for having me back on. Several topics that I'd like to ask you about, and you start out talking about the Younger Dryus Impact Hypothesis, which I think it's a really important discussion to have when trying to reconstruct the events of the prehistoric past. So kind of how does the Younger Dryness Impact Hypothesis correlate with a cataclysmic worldwide

flood from the ages past? Well, the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis is gaining traction, has been gaining traction in the last few years, primarily because of Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson. They have appeared several times on Joe Rogan's podcast, so that really helped to proliferate the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis all over the Internet. So it's becoming quite well-known. and I've been watching over the last few years, I've been watching different lectures and documentaries

and reading the scientific papers, kind of tracking with the Younger Dryas and the impact hypothesis and what people, the ideas that people are beginning to formulate regarding how it is that the climate of planet Earth changed so drastically 12,800 years ago and how the megafauna were extinguished overnight, basically. And that's always been a mystery. And of course, the prevailing ideology for the megafaunal extinction is what's called the overkill theory,

which posits that mankind, we were these voracious hunters. And when we were, when we, when we came across the Bering Strait, the Clovis people, and down into North America, we were just so voracious that we, we destroyed all of them, the megafaunal creatures. We killed. We basically eradicated them all just by over, overkill, over, over hunting. And it's, that's always been a dubious theory. I always thought that was actually, it seemed idiotic, really,

that these primitive hunter-gatherer people could wipe out all of the saber-toothed tigers, all of the mastodons, all of the giant sloths. It's obviously, whatever happened was catastrophic enough to bring a sudden end to these animals. It was a mass extinction event. And certainly human deprivation, I'm sure, has a little part to play in that story. But it was obvious to me there was something grander going on, something that we were missing. And when the Younger Dryness Impact Hypothesis came along, it seemed to really fill in the blanks. Of course, Graham Hancock in his books takes the same approach, has done some great work.

and as I mentioned, Randall Carlson and others, the common impact research groups doing great work. And I think that they have at this point really concretized their case. The Younger Dryst Impact Hypothesis, when they first came out of the gates with it, these geologists and these other scientists who've been working on this, they were ridiculed. The scientific community was rolling their eyes because they could not conceive of a comet impact. 12,000 years ago. It just seemed inconceivable to them.

They were also, they were also, they had subscribed so intensely to the overkill theory that they were building much of their models, much of their models as to how, you know, the Clovis people disappeared and the animals, the megafauna, that this new theory just completely overtax. returned that old theory. And so it was not well, it was not widely received. It was not well received. But that was years ago. Now it's becoming, I think, based on the papers I've read and based

on even some of the mainstream articles that are coming out in support of the hypothesis, the Younger Drives Impact hypothesis, it's sort of turning the tide. The tide is beginning to turn. I think more and more scientists are getting on board with the hypothesis. So it's, it's seemed to me very, and that's a very long-winded answer, but it seemed to me very important. It seemed to be an important piece of the puzzle. And the more you look into it, the more it begins to sync with all kinds of other things that people like me and you study, the megaliths and the biblical, the biblical flood narrative and the cataclysm narratives that you can find all over the world among all of the primary

cultures on earth. And it was always a question, for me, in terms of the biblical flood, it was always a question of, of A, how did it happen, and B, when did it happen? And those two questions seem to be thoroughly, seemed to be thoroughly answered in this hypothesis. And for those who aren't familiar with the Younger Dryass, the Younger Dryass is, it refers to an abrupt return to ice age conditions after a prolonged period of warming. And this happened between 11,600 and 12,900 roughly years ago. So we're talking somewhere between 9,600 to 10,800 BC. Egyptian records of legendary Atlantis seemed to point to the same event. Can you hit on that real quick?

Yeah. So among these cataclysm legends that we find all over the earth, the most famous is of course outside of the biblical narrative would be the the atlantean cataclysm we all are familiar with most of us are familiar with the the story of atlantis which comes almost exclusively from plato's critiast dialogue and in the crudius dialogue plato is relating a conversation between Solon of Athens, his relative actually, Solon of Athens and an old Egyptian priest of the goddess Naith from the city of Saiz in Egypt. And this priest informs Solon that, first of all, he tells him that the Greeks don't have any history that's hoary with age.

In other words, the Greeks are like children. They don't, their memory does not penetrate very deeply. into the past. Their records don't go back that very far, whereas the Egyptians kept copious records that went into the deep, deep antiquity, into deep free history before the cataclysm. And the priest informs Solon that there have been many cataclysms. And then he begins to relate the story of Atlantis to Solon. And as he unfolds this story of Atlantis, He tells Solon that Atlantis, not only was Atlantis, not only do the Egyptians have a record of the destruction of Atlantis,

the Egyptians have a reckoning of when Atlantis was destroyed. It was destroyed overnight in a terrible cataclysm, 9,000 years before their present age. And we know that Solon visited Egypt in 600 BC. So the Egyptian priest is saying that according to the reckoning of the ancient Egyptians, Atlantis was destroyed sometime around 9,600 BC. Now, that seems to correspond with the Younger Dryce Impact Hypothesis. I mean, which, by the way, the dates given for the hypothesis are approximate.

So you're talking somewhere between 11,600, and 12,800, 800 years. ago or if we really want to round it off between 12,000 and 13,000 years ago. And so sometime, that puts us sometime around 10,000 BC. And that's right in the neighborhood of where the Egyptians reckoned, of when the Egyptians reckoned that Atlantis was destroyed in this acquies cataclysm. So you have this interesting synchronicity between the legend of Atlantis and the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. And I find that intriguing. The Atlantis, when Atlantis was destroyed,

what most people probably don't realize about the story of Atlantis, according to Plato, when Atlantis was destroyed, it wasn't this peace-loving utopia. It was an aggressive expansionist empire, and it was encroaching. It had already conquered seven islands and held sway over three, three continents, and it was encroaching on the kingdom of Athens, according to Plato. And Athens was the only kingdom that could stand up to Atlantis, that could rebut

Atlantis and hold the tide back of their conquest. And so Atlantis and Athens were locked in a bloody conflict when that was. this cataclysm befell the earth. And both Atlantis and Athens were swept away in the waters of a great flood. So these are details that a lot of people don't realize. It's not just a cataclysm that destroy Atlantis. It seems to be a global cataclysm of which Atlantis was one of the victims. It was utterly destroyed in a very short period of time. And What's interesting is that the priest of Nath begins to tell the story of Atlantis to Solon by describing how the gods, the Olympian gods, had a portion the earth amongst themselves. In other words, they divvied up the earth amongst themselves.

And they chose wives from the daughters of men. And he says that Poseidon, the priest of Naith, says that Poseidon, for his part, for his allotment, he took the island of Atlantis. And he chose to wed Plato, the daughter of Evinor. And he copulated with Plato, a human woman. So this is a god inseminating a human female, and she gave birth to five sets of twin hybrid sons. Now, other ancient manuscripts that relate the Atlantis legend, such as there's a ancient Tibetan manuscript, allegedly called the book of Dizion that Helena Blavatsky references in her book, the secret doctrine, which describes the kings of Atlantis as giants.

and that obviously sinks with the biblical narrative and this was more specifically the Book of Enoch. So you have these hybrid kings ruling over the rest of the rest of the human populace on these seven islands and over the continents that they conquered. And it was this, it was what I call, it was an empire of the gods

on planet earth in which the gods each of them had divided the earth amongst themselves and they were each of them ruling over their own little kingdom, established their own little kingdom and produced their own hybrid progeny, who became the kings of their kingdoms. And this, this, I believe, was a global phenomenon, which would have meant that there would have been a universal civilization all over the earth with the basic knowledge, the same basic knowledge, the same basic technology. and I think that that that

sinks with the megalith phenomenon that we see all over the earth because the megaliths, the really large one, I'm not, the really impressive ones, not Stonehenge and not some of these other smaller megalith megaliths that could have been devised by

primitive people. I'm talking about the really big ones, the really impressive megalithic constructions, the foundations of Balbeck, the walls of Saxe-Waman, and so forth. And even in China, there's some absolutely mind-blowing megaliths in China that most people are not familiar with. And they all seem to share the same features. They all seem to have those nodules on them. And those nodules are sometimes inside of the structures,

they're not always on the outside of the blocks, which sort of negates the idea that they were placed there for certain things, certain features that that would have been convenient on the outside of the blocks. There's all kinds of theories regarding those nodules. But the point is you see the same kind of stuff, the same kind of cuts made in the rock all over the earth. It seems there seems to have been a ubiquitous technology that was being used to cut this hard rock. And so that bespeaks a ubiquitous, a universal civilization.

And I think this notion of an empire of the gods solves that question of how it is that we have megaliths all over the earth that appear to have been made by the same civilization with the same technology. And that is, I don't know whether Atlantis is veritable history or not. I mean, it may be veritable history. Plato may have been relating the history of an actual city that existed in the antediluvian world. But at the very least, I'm convinced that Atlantis, represents that Atlantis is an allegory of the golden age, Zeptepi, as the Egyptians called it, when the gods walked among men, the first time when the gods lived among men and copulated with

their daughters and set up this empire. It's almost a one-to-one match, the story of Atlantis, to the story related in the book of Enoch. The book of Enoch, this book of Enoch, this, describes these godlike beings, these extraterrestrial entities that descend to the earth. They descend to the summit of Mount Hermon. They're called the Watchers in the Book of Enoch and indeed in the Bible. They're also designated as watchers. And these watchers, most people are familiar with this story. Now, they chose wives from the daughters of men, and they copulated with their wives,

and their wives conceived and gave birth to hybrid giants. So we have this parallel right away with the story of Atlantis and the Book of Enoch. And the Book of Enoch doesn't say this exactly. It doesn't say this in exact terms, but it insinuates it. It insinuates that the watchers did exactly what the Olympian gods did in the Atlanta's story. They divided the earth amongst themselves. they appointed their hybrid sons to rule over their individual kingdoms. But see, they were, they were, it was a unified empire.

So each of the gods, so to speak, were ruling over their own kingdom in this empire of the gods. And that that persisted in the earth for some time until, according to the book of Enoch, God incited the giants who would have been the kings of these kingdoms. He incited the giants to war with one another. And so there was this global Nephilim world war happening in the antediluvian world, where the giants were going at each other, not just, you know, people always imagine giants. They think of the Disney, the big, dumb Disney.

knee giants with clubs over their shoulders and and drooling from the mouth. That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about demigods. We're talking about the hybrid offspring of the watchers. And these entities would have been exceedingly intelligent and incredibly powerful physically and in terms of their intelligence. And they would have been equipped with the armaments of these extraterrestrial entities. They would have been certainly equipped with their knowledge

because the book of Enoch says that the watchers taught mankind, basically the implements of civilization, just like the Egyptians believe happened in Zeptepe, that the gods taught mankind, a civilized mankind. This is kind of the idea in the story of Atlantis too, because Poseidon founds the city of Atlantis and builds this empire, this civilization. And so across the board, you have the gods, civilizing mankind, building these kingdoms. And by the way, Plato's in the Atlantean legend, according to Plato,

one of the first things that the gods did after they apportioned the earth amongst themselves is they built, they had temples raised to their honor and they instituted sacrifices. So I think that's exactly, again, what the Book of Benox insinuates about the watchers, that the watchers wanted to be worshipped. They wanted their sons to be the kings of their respective kingdoms. And this lasted for some time until the empire was fractioned and these giant kings and their kingdoms engaged in a world war. And I think it was a technological world war. I think that it was that this war, there's hints of it in the mythologies and written records of many ancient cultures, including the ancient Indians and the ancient Indian epics, the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, specifically, that talk about this epic war that took place between gods, demigodas,

and mortal men. And there and it wasn't it was this wasn't just a conventional Bronze Age war where they were going at each other with swords and shields and spears and so forth. These Sanskrit texts describe remarkable technology that was being deployed. Vimanas for example these these mercury vortex engine flying machines that were being deployed in these conflicts and we're equipped with advanced armaments that are reminiscent of modern missiles or directed energy weapons. Whether life serves you an ace or an unexpected backhand, the high-protein yogurt, Oikos Pro, is there to feed your strength and help you turn every challenge into a smash.

Oikos Pro helps build strong muscles and support muscle recovery with high protein and contains no added sugar because true strength isn't about being able to take the hits. It's about being able to bounce back. Oikos Pro. Feed your strength. Visit oikos.ca for more details. The first ever all-electric 2026 Subaru Trail Seeker is the EV for the trail obsessed. With up to 444 kilometers on a full charge and DC fast charging from 10 to 80% in about 30 minutes in ideal conditions.

Plus, ample ground clearance and symmetrical. all-wheel drive, make the 2026 trail seeker the most capable EV Subaru has ever built. Test drive it at your local Subaru dealer or visit Subaru.ca. Hey, y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair. Ever order furniture online and wonder what if? Like, what if doesn't hold up? That sofa was four days old. You should have ordered from Wayfair. With Wayfair, there's no what if. Just style you love and quality you can trust. Visit wayfair.ca. Wayfair, every style, every home. Do you think this was the ancient Indians, obviously, world view of just the overall golden age?

Or was it more relegated to their region, the wars that they talk about and the technology of the Vomanas? I'm sure that, well, you know, I don't know. That's a good question. I'm not sure. I'm not sure if in the Indian epics we're looking at a regional common. or if we're looking at a world conflict. That's a good question. But as you know, each culture will regionalize things that are clearly global in scope.

For example, a cataclysm, a cataclysm that destroyed a certain people in free history. And then you find out that this other culture that's on the other side of the earth has a very similar, cataclysm mythos, well, then you can, then you can, you can, I think, assume then that they're, they're describing the same global cataclysm, the same global cataclysm that destroyed both of their civilizations at the same time. But, but these, you know, so things tend to get regionalized, so, from the perspective of each ancient culture. So, but that's a good question. I'm not, sure if the Ramayana and the Mahabharata are described a regional conflict or one that engulfs the entire world as they knew it perhaps there's a few sites such as it i think it's called

barbar caves and elsewhere in india that to me is some of the most mind-blowing megalists i've seen it features absolute precision laser like uh kind of rock-cut temples straight out of straight out of a single rock, right? And there's the one at Barbar Caves, which is literally 3DN dimension. It looks a lot like what you'd see in Peru where there's these false doors that are multi-layered. Right.

But I mean, precision cut. Do you think those might predate a lot of the temples we see? Yeah. I generally speaking, I would say that the most impressive megaliths, again, these ones that are displaying extremely precise cuts and very hard rock, the ones that utilize extremely large stones, not the primitive megaliths, but the really, really impressive ones. I would say that those megaliths collectively date to somewhere around 10,000 BC.

And the reason why I say that is because a lot of them seem to be aligned to certain celestial phenomena that archaeo astronomers have dated some of some of these monuments based on this phenomenon. I have a friend, for example, in Kusko, who's an archaeostronomer. His name is Andres Saddazmi. In fact, he appears in my show. He's a good friend of mine. And Andres has done some work in Kusko. And as you know, Kusko has some of the most impressive megaliths on the planet, including

Soxai Waman, which is only a mile outside of the city. Really, it's within the city limits of Kusko. And based on the certain alignments with the Southern Cross and other things, other celestial events, the Milky Way, Andres has hypothesized that the megalithic city of Kusko, not the Inca city of Kusko, the pre-Inca the megalithic city of Kusco was founded sometime around 10,000 BC. And I actually go through this data in the first episode of this series. And I concur with Andres. I think he's correct that not only the megaliths in Kusko,

I would guess that the megalithic foundations of Balbeck probably also date back to 10,000 BC. Thereabout somewhere in the neighborhood of 10,000 BC. words somewhere in the in the vicinity of the younger dryest impact the comet impact event that created this global cataclysm and that would have universally destroyed all of these civilizations and and reduced most of what they built to rebel except maybe the megalithic foundations that are left standing to this day. Now, as you know, cultures, later cultures, when they discovered these megalithic foundations, they attributed them to the gods or to the, or to the offspring of the gods. Surely the gods must have built these walls or this foundation because look at the size of the

stones or they must have been built by giants. And so what did these cultures do? They built on top of them. They wanted to inherit the works of the gods. And then also just in a practical sense, Why wouldn't you use those megalithic foundations as the foundations of your new building or your new temple? You're not going to build anything better than that. So you might as well build on top of it. You might as well incorporate it into your temple, into your palace or whatever. And that is, of course, what these ancient cultures did, these post-iluvian cultures that arose in the earth after the cataclysm. Yeah, it's absolutely fascinating.

I remember being in Kusko and seeing exactly what you're describing. You're walking downtown and you just, you know, you see these nice, you know, Spanish-looking buildings and you scroll from top to bottom and you realize the bottoms of these buildings are absolutely prehistoric megaliths, moralist precision. Yeah, like a different, a different brain built the bottom of this structure than the top of it. a different level of intelligence, a different level of technology. And it's crystal clear in Kusko. Kusko is one of the best examples because in Kuska, you've got at least three different cultures

involved in the constructions there. You have the earliest, which would be the megalithic, then you would have, then you have the Inca, which the Inca were very, very good stone masons, really, really good stone masons. But they weren't as good as those who came long before them. the ones that I believe laid the foundations of Soxai Waman, laid the foundations of Ojanthai Tambo, laid the foundations of Machu Picchu and some of the other megalithic sites in Peru. And then, of course, you have mixed into all of this. You have the ugliest and least impressive constructions, which are the Spanish constructions.

They simply disassembled the other constructions and then built their cathedrals and so forth. And by the way, we've mentioned this, I think we mentioned this last time on your show. There have been many documented earthquakes in Kusko. And during a few of these earthquakes, almost all of the Spanish constructions would crumble to the ground. Some of the Inca palaces, what were left of them, would crumble to the ground. But those ancient megalithic structures, they don't fall, because they were literally designed to withstand cataclysm.

to withstand extreme seismic activity not only does it predate the technology of the inca it's also far superior in some sense to to what they were able to do now again the inca were a very very impressive culture but i don't believe that they built the foundations of saxiwaman the inca they did have legends though and when the spaniards arrived to kusko and they beheld these walls um they the spanish themselves thought they must have been built by giants or demons or some supernatural force because they were i mean you've been there they're they're just mind-blowingly impressive uh and and what we see today is only a fraction of what was there when the spaniards arrived uh the walls were almost twice as high when pisaro arrived um the when they would inquire

of the natives. And today, to this day, if you go to Peru into the Andes and you talk to the Quechua people, the old Quechua people who still remember the legends, and you ask them, who built the walls of Soxaiwaman? They're going to tell you the walls of Soxaiwaman were built by giants. Or they'll tell you they were built by the gods, or they were built by the offspring of the gods, or the Veracotia. You're going to get some very variation of those things. But in most cases, what I've heard is the giants or the varicotia, or a combination in both. And so that's, you know, Ketua was the language of the Inca.

And so these Ketuan-speaking peoples, their legends go back to the Inka, and some of them pre-Inca. They're even pre-Incan legends. And so any, any Incan king, at least in my mind, any Incan emperor that would go through the immense effort, the trouble, to build those walls, let's be specific, at Sachsaiwaman, would surely have stamped his name somewhere, somehow. This glorious work that was accomplished. You would want people to remember that it was you who did it. And yet, we know the temples were the palaces that were built by the Inca, who built them and who they were built for. That's not the case with Soxai Waman. It's guesswork.

Archaeologists guess. They assume that Sachsai Waman was built by a particular Pachakutek, by a particular Incan king. They assume that Machu Picchu was built by a particular Incan king. And Machu Picchu certainly was much of it was built by the Inca. There's no doubt about it. But again, just like the streets of Kusco, just like the megaliths in Peru and other parts of Peru, the Inca built on the foundations, on these megalithic foundations, because they believed that this was the habitation of the gods.

Machu Picchu, the word in Quechua, and it escapes me right now. Ijampu. Machu Picchu was called Ijampu by the natives. And Ijampu means the repose of the gods or the resting place of the gods or the abode of the gods. That's what the native people thought about Machu Picchu. The gods lived here. I mean, obviously they would think that, right? Isn't that what we would expect them to think?

If they stumbled upon these incredible megalithic stones, they would have thought the same things that we think today. How could you have cut this? How could you, it would have taken 20,000 men to move this stone up this mountain or something? Who could have done this? And the answer was clear to them, the gods or the offspring of the gods. The Veracosha must have built this or giants. And that's what they thought.

And by the way, it's the same all over the earth. I mean, that's the case with all of the, the native people around the world who live in the vicinity of megaliths. Twizzlers keep the fun going. Yeah, I know. I just stopped whatever you were listening to to tell you that Twizzlers keep the fun going. Well, irony isn't my forte, but twisty, chewy, yummy Twisler sure is. So think of Twizzlers as a little palate cleanser for whatever's queued up, which, by the way,

should be coming very soon. Like any second now. Okay, Twizzlers, time to keep the fun. going. I wanted to ask you about Geel Palmer and kind of get your take on Egypt a little bit. And then I want to end with asking you about Mars, which will be fun. So obviously the Geo Palmer movements really take on steam. I mean, it seems like every time I make a poster video about Megalus, it's like the top comments are always, this is Geo Palmer. I mean ancient concrete.

Right. Ancient concrete, you know, which is kind of where they say they ground down the rock and turned it into the slurry and poured water on it and put it in these molds. And while maybe there, I guess I want to get your take. How do you, where do you stand with Geo Palmer versus what I would call, you know, precision machine type tech like we see in Peru or Egypt where you see literal core drill holes and laser like saw cuts? How do you reconcile the two? It might have been a combination of all of those things, just like we do today. We use cement for certain things, but then we'll also use cut stone. We'll use granite when we want to do something really nice. We'll use cut granite.

We'll cut it with obvious with, we obviously will use diamond saws and hydraulic like saws and all kinds of modern tools to cut really nice blocks of stone, pink granite or whatever. And so just as today, we'll use the materials that are convenient and we'll use different materials based on the prestige of what we're building. If we're building a monument, for example, we're going to try and make it as regal as possible. I think they did the same thing. And so I could imagine them using a geopolymer. but at the same time, clearly they were cutting these stones.

They were clearly cutting some of these stones. I don't think there's any doubt about it whatsoever. If you've gone anywhere in the world and put your hands on some of these megaliths, you can even see the cut marks. In Egypt, you can see them on the stones. In Peru, you can see them on the stones, particular stones. There's even one up in Ojantaitamba, where you can see they were cutting through the stone and they stopped. It's really remarkable. And it's hard to explain it any other way. Unless that was done

in modern times with the diamond saw and nobody knows about it. Maybe archaeologists were trying to cut it, move it out of the way. I don't know, but I doubt it. I highly doubt that that was the case. It appears that, you know, in the midst of all these other stones that were being dressed and that were being finished and polished, you have a stone there that clearly has this, in my estimation, has a straight line cut, saw, it looks like a saw blade, and it just stops. So I think they were clearly cutting these stones. Now, with what kind of technology, I don't know. And then I would also add, I think that they were melting the stones. I think that they were able to melt the stones and make sort of a molten stone composition that they could mold. And one thing we know for

sure today, even though archaeologists have not yet contemplated this as they think about the construction of the megaliths, but we know today that you can take a parabolic lens and you can melt rock. Just focusing the rays of the sun. 100% for sure you can do it. You don't need high technology. You don't need electricity. You don't even need manpower to do it. All you need to do is to be able to make a parabolic lens and make it out of gold or make it out of brass, some kind of a shiny, metallic substance. And if you can make a parabolic lens, you can melt stone. And you can pretty much burn through anything.

I've seen documentaries that were made in the last, certainly in the last decade, in which they're experimenting with parabolic lenses. and they I remember seeing this this one I wish I could remember to give him the attribute but it was this this young man was in a was in a laboratory and they had a parabolic lens on the roof of this facility and they had a beam of light coming down and you couldn't see it you had to like spray water and then you could see it and all it was was sunlight that's it it was just sunlight but it but it was focused into an intense beam and again you had to spray it with water with a mist of water to see it. And anything, and I mean anything, that you passed through that beam of light,

that focused sunlight was instantly set ablaze or melted. And they were trying all kinds of stuff. As soon as you would put a stick, you would just pass a stick through it, boom, the stick would go up in flames. You take a piece of rock and you put it under that focused sunlight and it melts. metal, anything, it just is, it's amazing what focused sunlight can do. And again, you don't need any technology to do it. All you need is a parabolic lens and know how to focus it. So I think that, and by the way, you can use that, you can use that focused sunlight as a laser to cut through stone and make straight cuts through stone. And I think that the antediluvians, not the, not the ancient Egyptians, not the Inca, not the Aztec, not the Mesopotamians. I'm talking

about the people who lived before the cataclysm. I think that they were using the power of the sun to melt and cut stone. I think that they were focusing parabolic lenses and they were using it as a, basically as a laser to melt and cut stone. And you can use it. And all you have to do, by the way,

you can move this apparatus anywhere. It's, you don't, you don't need a humongous parabolic lens. It could probably be carried by two or three guys. And so if you're, you're cutting stone up in a quarry on the side of a mountain, you can bring this parabolic lens up there, as long as you have a clear view of the sun, and you can position it and cut the stone right out of the side of the mountain, which is apparently what they were doing.

And that's one of the hardest parts of this whole procedure of cutting these stones and then dragging them and placing them is not cutting them on site. It's extracting these blocks from the mountain side. I mean, from my untrained eye, that would seem to be the most difficult part of this and then, of course, moving it. But getting the big block out of the mountain side to begin with. I mean, how do you get the saw? How do you cut the back part of it? And they're extracting blocks out of these things.

They're not like extracting little pieces that are broken up. They're literally pulling blocks out of the side of mountains and quarries. and that's always baffled me like, okay, I guess you can explain that they were using primitive saws or whatever to cut these stones with sand as a friction and, you know, all the conventional explanations, but how the heck did they get it out of the side of the mountain? Out of the bedrock. And a parabolic lens explained is one potential explanation because you can, you can. can bring it up there. You can move it around. It's very mobile. You can position it however you need to. You can slowly move it and keep it aligned so that the rays of the sun are hitting it and you can watch that cut, just like we would today with a hydraulic saw or with a laser. You can be very, very, very precise with those cuts.

And then it also explains, you know, some of the phenomenon that we see on the blocks, that the edges of a lot of the blocks seem to be melted. And I don't know if you've seen this, but in the streets of Kusko, I probably mentioned this, you know, last time we were talking about the megaliths in Peru. But this seems to escape a lot of people's attention, but I find it to be really fascinating. In the streets of Kusko, you have, as you said, you have just these beautiful megalithic walls everywhere around the plaza of Kusko. and there's parts where there's big blocks are missing underneath. And where the blocks are missing underneath, you can run your hand under the block that was on top. That's still there, but the block underneath is now gone.

So you can run your hand along the ridge on the bottom, and you'll feel a little ridge line. There's a little ridge line. It wasn't cut exactly. It was sort of like marshmallowing over the side of the block below it. So it was like it was pressed together. Not exactly cut to fit flush. It was like it was pressed together.

Like if you took two pieces of dough and smashed them together, that's how those blocks fit together. That little ridge line, I mean, they're not going to cut that little ridge line in there with a saw. That little, and it's on all the blocks that are, that fit together like that, this little ridge line. And that's not a design feature. a result of the way that these rocks were placed together and the mechanism that was used to do it.

And I think that those rocks might not have been entirely solid. Those stones may not have been entirely solid when they were pressed together. So there's another theory that that postulates that they were putting chunks of stone into a mold and then focusing these lasers using these parabolic lenses and melting the rock and basically making it a molten substance. And then they could shape the rocks and they could press them together. They could shape these stones and then fit them exactly how they wanted to. So we know that you can do this with a parabolic lens.

I mean, that's not a theory. That's a fact. You can do it with a parabolic lens. So the only question is, did they? Did they know about that? They had parabolic lenses. The Inca were able to craft huge circular discs of gold and silver and bronze. All they would have had to do was make that disc concave and then polish it.

And they could have focused the rays of the sun and used it to cut rock. Now, did the Inca know how to do that? I don't think they did, but they had the technology to do it. But the question is, did they have the knowledge? They had the technology, this simple parabolic lens, but did they have the knowledge? Did they know that they could do that using a parabolic lens? I don't know.

I don't think so. I don't think the Inca knew how to do that because if they did, the Spanish would have certainly found out and copied that technique. Why wouldn't they have? If the Inca were using some advanced technique to cut stone, the Spanish would certainly have adopted it in the building. of their cathedrals, and they didn't. Their cathedrals are ugly in terms of the stonework compared to what the Inca were doing,

which means that the Spanish, they couldn't, that the Inca could not replicate what was done in the megaliths, because if I'm a Spaniard, I'm an archaeologist, I'm sorry, I'm an architect, if I'm a Spaniard and I'm an architect and I arrive to Kusco, and I see the walls of Soxay-Wama, and I see the exquisite stonework. at Ojanthaitambo and the other places in the in the in the Cote Conche and so forth, what am I going to do? And the Spaniards had architects to build their cathedrals. What am I going to do?

What's the first thing I'm going to do? Because we're all flabbergasted. All of the Spaniards were flabbergasted by this stonework. What's the first thing you're going to do as an architect? We need to find the people. We need to find the Masons who did this. We need to learn this knowledge. And furthermore, we need to employ or enforce these Incan Masons to build our cathedrals like this.

Why wouldn't you do that? Of course you would, especially when there's earthquakes and their stuff falls down, but the other stuff doesn't. Of course you would have. And the reason why they didn't is because the Inca didn't know. They probably said, hey, we're the Masons who built these walls. And the Inca said those were the Veracotia who built those walls or giants built those walls. So nothing else makes sense to me. Nothing else makes sense to me.

Architects, those Spanish architects were not stupid. They were remarkable architects. I mean, the cathedrals are in Kusko are inferior to the megalithic constructions, but they're by no means simplistic buildings. They're very elegantly built. cathedrals. So these were skilled architects, Spanish architects. And so that tells me, that demonstrates to me that the knowledge to build the megaliths was not present when the Spanish arrived. Otherwise, it would have been co-opted. Certainly, certainly would have been co-opted.

My God, could you imagine the cathedrals that could have been built in Europe with that knowledge? even surpassing the beautiful cathedrals that still stand today even surpassing if they could build them like the megalithere built it doesn't make any sense to me you don't you don't you don't just forget or lose important knowledge a culture doesn't lose knowledge that's really important to it that knowledge is passed on until it's no longer of any use until it's exhausted its utility. Only then is that knowledge forgotten. The only thing that can bring such an utter and sudden forgetfulness of this important knowledge from the past would be an utter and sudden destruction of the culture that built these edifices. So whether it's a so-called face on Mars, I think in the Sidonia region or the various photos

that have appeared on the internet of what looks like very ancient, very weathered structures, pyramids, do you believe there are ruins of megaliths on Mars? And if so, were these possibly, you know, again, the watchers, if they descended to Earth, did they also come to Mars and did they create these things somehow? Of course, this is pure speculation, but I do believe that there are megaliths on Mars. I do believe that there are structures on the moon and under the moon. And I would say also in the interior of Mars, there's probably some underground stuff going on there.

I think that Mars, that there was a civilization inhabiting that planet and that it was absolutely obliterated in some kind of a cosmic catastrophe. And the same might be said for nearly all the planets in our solar system. there seems to have been an ancient cosmic cataclysm that was unbelievably destructive that that laid waste to Mars and maybe some of the other planets in our solar system and and I personally believe that that cataclysm was the explosion of what was likely a planet between Mars and Jupiter.

What the Bible calls Rehab. And that explosion, let's just imagine an entire planet erupting, exploding in orbit. It would just absolutely devastate everything in our solar system. It would bombard the planets with the shards of this planet, would just bombard these planets, with meteors. And what do we see when we look at these planets, when the ones that don't have an atmosphere and we can see the surface? They look like they've been absolutely bombarded, such as Mars. I believe that nearly all of the planets in our solar system are once inhabited, if not all of them.

They may not have been on the orbits that they are today or the distance from the sun that they are today. They might have been pushed out from a cosmic explosion that occurred in our solar system, the destruction of rehab, the explosion of that explosion of that planet. between Mars and Jupiter. And furthermore, I believe that this was a result of a pre-ademic conflict that the breadcrumbs of this conflict, I believe, can be found in the Bible, in the narrative of the Hebrew Bible. And I talk about that in my book, Birthright. that I tell the story of what might have happened according to these insinuations in the text. And it really is quite amazing to think about.

But certainly Mars, I'm fully convinced that Mars was inhabited. We know that now that Venus could have sustained life. We know that now. And so something happened, in my estimation, something, catastrophic beyond imagining happened in our solar system sometime in the very, very deep past. Fascinating to consider for sure to everybody listening, watching, make sure and get Timothy's book Birthright to go in-depth more on that. Timothy, thanks for your time today. What's the best way for people to follow you, find your book, and keep up today with all your research?

The best way to follow me is on my website, sign up for my mailing list. Subscribe to my YouTube channel, Timothy Albrino, and you can find me on Twitter and Instagram. Just Timothy Albrino. I'm the only Timothy Albrino on Twitter and Instagram, as far as I know. And that's the name of my YouTube channel. So those are the best ways to track with me. You can get my book on Amazon.com, Walmart.com.