Megalithic Marvels - Timothy Alberino: the Nephilim World War, Ancient Tech & Mars

Episode Date: March 29, 2023

In this episode I sit down with researcher, filmmaker & author Timothy Alberino. We cover a variety of topics, and start off talking briefly about the Younger Dryas Impact and the ancient world wide flood accounts. Next we get into the subject of the mythical golden age city of Atlantis, which leads us into a deeper discussion of the descent of the Watchers and the corresponding Nephilim world wars. We also discuss the megalithic marvels found around the planet from Egypt to Peru and surmise what technology the ancients may have used to engineer them. Lastly, we end the episode talking about the possible megaliths of Mars. (fair use notice) SHOW NOTES Peru Tour⁠⁠⁠ Follow Megalithic Marvels on the following platforms: Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/megalithicm... Blog - https://megalithicmarvels.com/ Youtube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpiP... Facebook page - https://www.facebook.com/megalithicma... TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@megalithicmarvels Facebook group - https://www.facebook.com/groups/10186... Twitter - https://twitter.com/MegMarvels

Well, I'm excited to be joined by Timothy Albarino today, the explorer, filmmaker, and author of the book, Birthright. Timothy, thanks for joining me again. Hey, thanks for having me back on. So the younger dry ass is, it refers to an abrupt return to ice age conditions after a prolonged period of warming. And this happened between 11,600 and 12,900 roughly years ago. So we're talking somewhere between 9,600. to 10,800 BC. Egyptian records of legendary Atlantis seem to point to the same event.

Can you hit on that real quick? Yeah, so among these cataclysm legends that we find all over the earth, the most famous is, of course, outside of the biblical narrative, would be the Atlantean cataclysm. we all are familiar with, most of us are familiar with the story of Atlantis, which comes almost exclusively from Plato's Critious Dialogue. And in the Critious Dialogue, Plato is relating a conversation between Solon of Athens, his relative actually, Solon of Athens and an old Egyptian priest of the goddess Naith from the city of Saiz in Egypt.

And this priest informs Solon that, first of all, he tells him that the Greeks don't have any history that's hoary with age. In other words, the Greeks are like children. They don't, their memory does not penetrate, penetrate very deeply into the past. Their records don't go back that very far, whereas the Egyptians kept copious records that went into the deep, deep antiquity, into, into deep free history before the cataclysm. And the priest informs Solon that there have been many cataclysms.

And then he begins to relate the story of Atlantis to Solon. And as he unfolds this story of Atlantis, he tells Solon that Atlantis, not only was Atlantis, not only do the Egyptians have a record of the destruction of Atlantis, Egyptians have a reckoning of when Atlantis was destroyed. It was destroyed overnight in a terrible cataclysm, 9,000 years before their present age. And we know that so long visited Egypt in 600 BC. So the Egyptian priest is saying that according to the reckoning of the ancient Egyptians, Atlantis was destroyed sometime around 9,600 BC.

Now, that seems to correspond with the Younger Dryce Impact Hypothesis. I mean, which, by the way, the dates given for the hypothesis are approximate. So you're talking somewhere between 11,600 and 12,800 years ago, or if we really want to round it off between 12,000 and 13,000 years ago. And so that puts us sometime around 10,000 BC. And that's right in the neighborhood of where the Egyptians reckoned, of when the Egyptians reckoned that Atlantis was destroyed in this acquiesed cataclysm. So you have this interesting synchronicity between the legend of Atlantis

and the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. And I find that intriguing. the Atlantis when Atlantis was destroyed what most people probably don't realize about the story of Atlantis according to Plato when Atlantis was destroyed

it wasn't this peace-loving utopia it was an aggressive expansionist empire and it was encroaching it had already conquered seven islands and and held sway over three continents

and it was encroaching on the kingdom of Athens, according to Plato. And Athens was the only kingdom that could stand up to Atlantis, that could rebut Atlantis and hold the tideback of their conquest. And so Atlantis and Athens were locked in a bloody conflict when this catacly. be fell the earth. And both Atlantis and Athens were swept away in the waters of a great flood. So these are details that a lot of people don't realize. It's not just a cataclysm that destroy Atlantis. It seems to be a global cataclysm of which Atlantis was one of the victims. It was utterly destroyed in a very short period of time. And what's interesting is that the priest of Nath begins to tell the story of Atlantis to Solon by describing how the gods, the Olympian gods, had a portion of the earth amongst themselves.

In other words, they divvied up the earth amongst themselves. And they chose wives from the daughters of men. and he says that Poseidon, the priest of Naith, says that Poseidon, for his part, for his allotment, he took the island of Atlantis. And he chose to wed Plato, the daughter of Evanor. And he copulated with Plato, a human woman. So this is a god inseminating a human female, and she gave birth to five sets of twin hybrid sons. Now, other ancient manuscripts that relate the Atlantis legend, such as there's a ancient Tibetan manuscript, allegedly called the book of Dizion that Helena Blavatsky references in her book,

The Secret Doctrine, which describes the kings of Atlantis as giants. and that obviously syncs with the biblical narrative and more specifically the Book of Enoch. So you have these hybrid kings ruling over the rest of the rest of the human populace on these seven islands and over the continents that they conquered. And it was this,

it was what I call it was an empire of the gods on planet earth in which the gods each of them had divided the earth amongst themselves and they were each of them ruling over their own little kingdom, established their own little kingdom and produced their own hybrid progeny, who became the kings of their kingdoms. And this, this, I believe, was a global phenomenon, which would have meant that there would have been a universal civilization all over the earth with the basic knowledge, the same basic

knowledge the same basic technology. And I think that that that sinks with the megalith phenomenon that we see all over the earth because the megaliths, the really large one. I'm not the really, the really impressive ones, not stonehenge and not some of these other smaller megalith, megaliths that could have been devised by primitive people. I'm talking about the really big ones, the really impressive megalithic constructions, the foundations of Balbeck, the walls of Saxe-Wamun, and so forth. And even in China, there's some absolutely mind-blowing megaliths in China that most people are not familiar with. And they all seem to share the same features.

They all seem to have those nodules on them. And those nodules are sometimes inside of the structures, or not always on the outside of the blocks, which sort of negates the idea that they were placed there for certain things, certain features that that would have been convenient on the outside of the blocks. There's all kinds of theories regarding those nodules. But the point is you see the same kind of stuff, the same kind of cuts made in the rock all over the earth. There seems to have been a ubiquitous technology that was being used to cut this hard rock.

And so that bespeaks a ubiquitous, a universal civilization. And I think this notion of an empire of the gods, solves that question of how it is that we have megaliths all over the earth that appear to have been made by the same civilization with the same technology. And that is, I don't know whether Atlantis is veritable history or not. I mean, it may be veritable history. Plato may have been relating the history of an actual city that existed in the Antediluvian world. But at the very least, I'm convinced that Atlantis represents that Atlantis, represents that Atlantis is an allegory of the golden age.

Zepteptepe, as the Egyptians called it, when the gods walked among men, the first time when the gods lived among men and copulated with their daughters and set up this empire. It's almost a one-to-one match, the story of Atlantis, to the story related in the book of Enoch. the book of enoch describes these godlike beings these extraterrestrial entities that descend to the earth they descend to the summit of mount hermon they're called the watchers in the book of enoch and indeed in the bible they're also designated as watchers and these watchers they most people are familiar with this story now they they they chose wives from the daughters of men and they copulated with their wives and their wives conceived and gave birth to hybrid giants. So we have this parallel right away with the story of Atlantis and the Book of Enoch. And the Book of Enoch doesn't say this exactly.

It doesn't say this in exact terms, but it insinuates it. It insinuates that the watchers did exactly what the Olympian gods did in the Atlantis story. divided the earth amongst themselves. They appointed their hybrid sons to rule over their individual kingdoms. But see, they were, they were, it was a unified empire. So each of the gods, so to speak, were ruling over their own kingdom in this empire of the gods. And that that persisted in the earth for some time until, according to the book of Enoch, according to the book of Enoch, God incited the giants who would have been the kings of these kingdoms.

He incited the giants to war with one another. And so there was this global Nephilim world war happening in the antediluvian world, where the giants were going at each other, not just, you know, people always imagine giants. they think of the Disney, the big, dumb Disney giants with clubs over their shoulders and drooling from the mouth. That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about demigods. We're talking about the hybrid offspring of the watchers. And these entities would have been exceedingly intelligent and incredibly powerful physically and in terms of their intelligence. And they would have been equipped with the armaments of these extraterrestrial entities.

They would have been certainly equipped with their knowledge because the Book of Enoch says that the watchers taught mankind, basically the implements of civilization, just like the Egyptians believe happened in Zeptepe, that the gods taught mankind, a civilized mankind. This is kind of the idea in the story of Atlantis too, because Poseidon founds the city of Atlantis and and builds this empire, this civilization. And so across the board, you have the gods, civilizing mankind, building these kingdoms.

And by the way, the Plato's in the Atlantean legend, according to Plato, one of the first things that the gods did after they apportioned the earth amongst themselves is they built, they had temples raised to their honor and they instituted sacrifices. So I think that's exactly, again, what the Book of Benox insinuates about the watchers, that the watchers wanted to be worshipped. They wanted their sons to be the kings of their respective kingdoms. And this lasted for some time until the empire was fractioned. and these giant kings and their kingdoms engaged in a world war.

And I think it was a technological world war. I think that it was that this war, there's hints of it in the mythologies and written records of many ancient cultures, including the ancient Indians and the ancient Indian epics, the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. specifically, that talk about this epic war that took place between gods, demigods, and mortal men. And this wasn't just a conventional Bronze Age war where they were going at each other with swords and shields and spears and so forth. These Sanskrit texts describe remarkable technology that was being deployed.

Vimana's, for example, these mercury vortex engine flying machines that were being deployed in these conflicts and were equipped with advanced armaments that are reminiscent of modern missiles or directed energy weapons. Do you think this was the ancient Indians obviously worldview of just the overall golden age? or was it more relegated to their region, the wars that they talk about and the technology of the Vomanas? I'm sure that, well, you know, I don't know. That's a good question. I'm not sure. I'm not sure if in the Indian epics

we're looking at a regional conflict or if we're looking at a world conflict. That's a good question. But as you know, each culture will regionalize things that are clearly global in scope, for example, a cataclysm, cataclysm that destroyed a certain people in free history. And then you find out that this other culture that's on the other side of the earth has a very similar cataclysm mythos. Well, then you can, then you can, I think, assume then that they're describing the same global cataclysm, the same global cataclysm that destroyed both of their civilizations at the same time.

But these, you know, so things tend to get regionalized. So from the perspective of each ancient culture. But that's a good question. I'm not sure if the Ramayana and the Mahabharata are. describe a regional conflict or one that engulfs the entire world. As they knew it, perhaps. It's really incredible to see the depictions of, you know, these Vamanas. It's basically, you know, again, these are ancient depictions of ancients flying around in what looks like craft, right?

And I just saw the other day a researcher posted a photo. Again, this is at least probably a thousand years old, I'm guessing, of an ancient Indian. Indian depiction of, and it's in a temple somewhere in India at one of these sites, of the ancients literally riding what looks like a bicycle with wheels and spokes and everything. Yeah. And so it's incredible. And then I wanted to ask you, like a lot of the ancient Indian temples, I think they're on average dated really no more than a couple thousand years old by archaeologists, which is not nearly as old as what we would believe. believe the pyramids are great pyramids or the megaliths of Peru. Yet, there's a few sites such as it, I think it's called Barbar Caves and elsewhere in India,

that to me is some of the most mind-blowing megaliths I've seen. It features absolute precision laser-like kind of rock-cut temples straight out of, straight out of a single rock, right? And there's the one at Barbar Caves, which is literally three-d-d-dimensional. It looks a lot like what you'd see in Peru where there's these false doors that are multi-layered. Right. But, I mean, precision cut. Do you think those might predate a lot of the temples we see?

Yeah. Generally speaking, I would say that the most impressive megaliths, again, these ones that are displaying extremely precise cuts and very hard rock, the ones that utilize extremely large stones, not the primitive megaliths, but the really, really impressive ones. I would say that those megaliths collectively date to somewhere around 10,000 BC. And the reason why I say that is because

a lot of them seem to be aligned to certain celestial phenomena that archaeo astronomers have dated some of these monuments based on this phenomenon. I have a friend, for example, in Kusko, who's an archaeostronomer. His name is Andres Saddazmi. In fact, he appears in my show. He's a good friend of mine. And And Andres has done some work in Kusko. And as you know, Kusko has some of the most impressive megaliths on the planet, including

Soxaywaman, which is only a mile outside of the city. Really, it's within the city limits of Kusko. And based on the certain alignments with the Southern Cross and other things, other celestial events, the Milky Way, Andres has hypothesized that the megalithic city of Kusko, not the Inca city of Kusco, the pre-Inca, megalithic city of Kusco, was founded sometime around 10,000 BC. And I actually go through this data in my,

in the first episode of this series. And I concur with Andres. I think he's correct that not only the megaliths in Kusko, I would guess that the megalithic foundations of Balbeck probably also

date back to 10,000 BC, thereabout, somewhere in the neighborhood. 10,000 BC. In other words, somewhere in the vicinity of the younger Dryas impact, the comet impact event that created this global cataclysm and that would have universally destroyed all of these civilizations and reduced most of what they built to rebel, except maybe the megalithic foundations that are left standing to this day. you know, cultures, later cultures, when they discovered these megalithic foundations, they attributed them to the gods or to the, or to the offspring of the gods. Surely the gods must

have built these walls or this foundation because look at the size of the stones or they must have been built by giants. And so what did these cultures do? They built on top of them. They wanted to inherit the works of the gods. And then also just in a practical sense, why wouldn't you use those megalithic foundations as the foundations of your new building or your new temple? You're not going to build anything better than that. So you might as well build on top of it. You might as well incorporate it into your temple, into your palace, or whatever. And that is, of course, what these ancient cultures did, these post-Eluvian cultures that arose in the earth after the cataclysm.

Yeah, it's absolutely fascinating. I remember being in Kusko and seeing exactly what you're describing. You're walking downtown and you just, you know, you see these nice, you know, Spanish-looking buildings and you scroll from top to bottom and you realize the bottoms of these buildings are absolutely prehist historic megaliths, moralist precision. Yeah, like a different, a different brain built the bottom of this structure than the top of it. A different level of intelligence, a different level of technology. And it's crystal clear in Kusko. Kusko is one of the best examples because in Kusko, you've got at least three different cultures involved in the constructions there. You have the earliest, which would be the megalithic, then you would have, then you have the Inca, which the Inca were very, very good stone masons, really, really good stone masons.

But they weren't as good as those who came long before them. the ones that I believe laid the foundations of Soxai Waman, laid the foundations of Ojontai Tombo, laid the foundations of Machu Picchu and some of the other megalithic sites in Peru. And then, of course, you have mixed into all of this, you have the ugliest and least impressive constructions, which are the Spanish constructions. They simply disassembled the other constructions and then built their cathedrals and so forth. And by the way, we've mentioned this, I think we mentioned this last time on your show. There have been many documented earthquakes in Kusko.

And during a few of these earthquakes, almost all of the Spanish constructions would crumble to the ground. Some of the Inca palaces, what were left of them, would crumble to the ground. But those ancient megalithic structures, they don't fall because they were literally designed to withstand cataclysm. to withstand extreme seismic activity. I want to let you know about our megalithic marvels of Peru tour coming this October, 2nd through the 12th, 2023. This is going to be the expedition of a lifetime,

an 11-day adventure to the heart of Peru, where we are going to explore the amazing megalithic ruins in the Kusco area. And we're also going to learn about the amazing Inca Empire. We're going to see all the major sites like Machu Picchu, Wajonte Tambo, Soxay-Waman. But then we're going to visit probably 20-plus, what I would call Megalithic gems, sites that you may have never heard of before, but that are equally incredible. And so space is limited to about the first 25, I believe. You can go to Megalithic marvels.com slash tours to get all the info and to register and reserve your spot.

and I really hope to see you there. Not only does it predate the technology of the Inca, it's also far superior in some sense to what they were able to do. Now, again, the Inca were a very, very impressive culture, but I don't believe that they built the foundations of Soxai Wamaan.

Right. And they never claimed to. Yeah. They said giants built them. The ink actually, and I've heard, yeah, I've heard you say that before, I've heard some others. Do we actually have, like, script or writings that actually spell that out?

Or is it more oral tradition? No, the Inca didn't have any writing. The Inca had Kippus, which was the system of knots. And the Inca, they did have legends, though. And when the Spaniards arrived to Kusko and they beheld these walls, the Spanish themselves thought they must have been built by giants or demons or some supernatural force because they were I mean you've been there they're just mind-blowingly impressive and what we see today is only a fraction of what was there when the Spaniards arrived the walls were almost twice as high when Pizarro arrived the when they would inquire of the natives and today to this day to this day If you go to Peru into the Andes and you talk to the Ketua people, the old Ketua people who still remember the legends. And you ask them, who built the walls of Soxaywaman?

They're going to tell you the walls of Saxiwaman were built by giants. Or they'll tell you they were built by the gods or they were built by the offspring of the gods or the Veracotia. You're going to get some variation of those things. but in most cases what I've heard is the giants or the varicotia or a combination in both. And so that's, you know, Ketua was the language of the Inca. And so these Ketuan-speaking peoples, their legends go back to the Inca and some of them pre-Inca. They're even pre-Incan legends. And so any, any Inksian people,

and king, at least in my mind, any Incan emperor that would go through the immense effort, the trouble to build those walls, let's be specific, at Sachsaiwaman, would surely have stamped his name somewhere, somehow, this glorious work that was accomplished. You would want people to remember that it was you who did it. And yet we know the temples were the palaces that were built by the Inca, who built them and who they were built for? That's not the case with Soxai Waman. It's guesswork. Archaeologists guess.

They assume that Sachsai Waman was built by a particular Pachakutek, by a particular Incan king. They assume that Machu Picchu was built by a particular Incan king. And Machu Picchu certainly was much of it was built by the Inca. There's no doubt about it. But again, just like the streets of Kusko, just like the megaliths in Peru and other parts of Peru, the Inca built on the foundations,

on these megalithic foundations, because they believe that this was the habitation of the gods. Machu Picchu, the word in Ketua, and it escapes me right now. Ijampu. Machu Picchu was called Ijampu by the natives. And Ijampu means the repose of the gods or the resting place of the gods or the abode of the gods. That's what the native people thought about Machu Picchu. The gods lived here.

I mean, obviously they would think that, right? Isn't that what we would expect them to think? If they stumbled upon these incredible megalithic stones, they would have thought the same things that we think today. How could you have cut this? How could you, it would have taken 20,000 men to move this stone up this mountain or something? Who could have done this? And the answer was clear to them, the gods or the offspring of the gods.

The Veracosha must have built this or giants. And that's what they thought. And by the way, it's the same all over the earth. I mean, that's the case with all of the native people around the world who live in the vicinity of megaliths. I wanted to ask you about Giel Palmer. And kind of get your take on Egypt a little bit. And then I want to end with asking you about Mars, which will be fun. So obviously the Geo Palmer movement's really taken on steam.

I mean, it seems like every time I make a poster video about megalis, it's like the top comments are always, this is Geo Palmer. I mean, ancient concrete. Right. Ancient concrete, you know, which is kind of where they say they ground down the rock and turned it into the slug. lorry and poured water on it and put it in these molds. And while maybe there, I guess I want to get your take. How do you, where do you stand with the Geo Palmer versus what I would call, you know, precision machine type tech like we see in Peru or Egypt where you see literal core drill

holes in laser like saw cuts? How do you reconcile the two? It might have been a combination of all of those things, just like we do today. we use cement for certain things, but then we'll also use cut stone. We'll use granite when we want to do something really nice. We'll use cut granite. We'll cut it with obvious with, we obviously will use diamond saws and hydraulic saws and all kinds of modern tools to cut really nice blocks of stone, pink granite or whatever.

And so just as today, we'll use the materials that are convenient and we'll use different materials based on the prestige of what we're building. If we're building a monument, for example, we're going to try and make it as regal as possible. I think they did the same thing. And so I could imagine them using a geopolymer. But at the same time, clearly they were cutting these stones. They were clearly cutting some of these stones. I don't think there's any doubt about it whatsoever. If you've gone anywhere in the world and put your hands on some of these megaliths,

you can even see the cut marks. In Egypt, you can see them on the stones. In Peru, you can see them on the stones, particular stones. There's even one up in Ojantaitamba where you can see they were cutting through the stone and they stopped. It's really remarkable. And it's hard to explain it any other way. Unless that was done in modern times with the diamond saw and, and nobody knows about it.

Maybe archaeologists were trying to cut it, move it out of the way. I don't know, but I doubt it. I highly doubt that that was the case. It appears that, you know, in the midst of all these other stones that were being dressed and that were being finished and polished, you have a stone there that clearly has this, in my estimation, has a straight line cut, saw. It looks like a saw blade, and it just stops. So I think they were clearly cutting these stones.

Now, with what kind of technology, I don't know. And then I would also add, I think that they were melting the stones. I think that they were able to melt the stones and make sort of a molten stone composition that they could mold. And one thing we know for sure today, even though archaeologists have not yet contemplated this as they think about the construction of the megaliths, but we know today that you can take a parabolic lens and you. you can melt rock. Just focusing the rays of the sun. 100% for sure you can do it. You don't need high technology.

You don't need electricity. You don't even need manpower to do it. All you need to do is to be able to make a parabolic lens and make it out of gold or make it out of brass, some kind of a shiny metallic substance. And if you can make a parabolic lens, you can melt stone. And you can pretty much burn through anything. much burned through anything. There's, I've seen documentaries that were made in the last,

certainly in the last decade, which they're, in which they're experimenting with parabolic lenses. And they, I remember seeing this one, I wish I could remember to give him the attribute, but it was this, this young man was in a, was in a laboratory, and they had a parabolic lens on the, on the roof of this facility. And they had a beam of light coming. down and you couldn't see it. You had to like spray water and then you could see it. And all it was was sunlight. That's it. It was just sunlight. But it was focused into an intense beam. And again, you had to spray it with water with a mist of water to see it. And anything, and I mean anything, that you passed through that beam of light, that focused sunlight, was instantly set ablaze

or melted. And they were trying all kinds of stuff. As soon as you would put a stick, you would just pass a stick through it, boom. would go up in flames. You take a piece of rock and you put it under that focused sunlight and it melts. Metal, anything. It just is, it's amazing what focused sunlight can do. And again, you don't need any technology to do it. All you need is a parabolic lens and know how to focus it. So I think that, and by the way, you can use that.

You can use that focused sunlight as a laser to cut through stone and make straight cuts through stone. And I think that the antediluvians, not the ancient Egyptians, not the Inca, not the Aztec, not the Mesopotamians. I'm talking about the people who lived before the catacons. I think that they were using the power of the sun to melt and cut stone. I think that they were focusing parabolic lenses and they were using it as a basically as a laser to melt and cut stone. And you can use it. And all you have to do, by the way, you can move this apparatus anywhere. It's you don't you you don't need a humongous parabolic lens. It could probably be carried by two or three guys.

And so if you're cutting stone up in a quarry on the side of a mountain, you can bring this parabolic lens up there, as long as you have a clear view of the sun. And you can position it and cut the stone right out of the side of the mountain, which is apparently what they were doing. And that's one of the hardest part. of this whole procedure of cutting these stones and then dragging them and placing them is not cutting them on site. It's extracting these blocks from the mountain side.

I mean, from my untrained eye, that would seem to be the most difficult part of this and then, of course, moving it. But getting the big block out of the mountain side to begin with. I mean, how do you get the saw? How do you cut the back part of it? and they're extracting blocks out of these things. They're not like extracting little pieces that are broken up. They're literally pulling blocks out of the side of mountains and quarries. And that's always baffled me.

Like, okay, I guess you can explain that they were using primitive saws or whatever to cut these stones with sand as a friction and, you know, all the conventional explanations. but how the heck did they get it out of the side of the mountain, out of the bedrock? And a parabolic lens explained is one potential explanation because you can bring it up there, you can move it around, it's very mobile, you can position it however you need to, you can slowly move it and keep it aligned so that the rays of the sun are hitting it,

and you can watch that cut, just like we would today, with a hydraulic saw or with a laser. And you can be very, very, very precise with those cuts. And then it also explains, you know, some of the phenomenon that we see on the blocks, that the edges of a lot of the blocks seem to be melted. And I don't know if you've seen this, but in the streets of Kusko, I probably mentioned this, you know, last time we were talking about the megaliths in Peru, but this seems to escape a lot of people's attention.

But I find it to be really fascinating. In the streets of Kusko, you have, as you said, you have just these beautiful megalithic walls everywhere around the plaza of Kusko. And there's parts where there's big blocks are missing underneath. And where the blocks are missing underneath, you can run your hand under the block that was on top. That's still there, but the block underneath is now gone. So you can run your hand along the ridge on the bottom. and you'll feel a little ridge line. There's a little ridge line.

It wasn't cut exactly. It was sort of like marshmallowing over the side of the block below it. So it was like it was pressed together. Not exactly cut to fit flush. It was like it was pressed together. Like if you took two pieces of dough and smashed them together, that's how those blocks fit together. That little ridge line, I mean, they're not going to

cut that little ridge line in there with a saw. That little, and it's on all the blocks that are, that fit together like that, this little ridge line. And that's not a design feature. That's a result of the way that these rocks were placed together and, and the, the, mechanism that was used to do it. And I think that those rocks might not have been entirely solid. Those stones may not have been entirely solid when they were pressed together.

So there's another theory that that postulates that they were putting chunks of stone into a mold and then focusing these lasers using these parabolic lenses and melting the rock and basically making it a molten substance. And then they could they could shape the rocks and they could press them together. They could shape these stones and then fit them exactly how they wanted to. So we know that you can do this with a parabolic lens. I mean, this is not, that's not a theory. That's a fact. You can do it with a parabolic lens.

So the only question is, did they? Did they know about that? They had parabolic lenses. The Inca were able to craft huge circular discs of gold and silver and bronze. All they would have had to do was make that disc concave and then polish it. And they could have focused the rays of the surface. sun and used it to cut rock. Now, did the Incan know how to do that? I don't think they did, but they had the technology to do it. But the question is, did they have the knowledge?

They had the technology, this simple parabolic lens, but did they have the knowledge that they know that they could do that using a parabolic lens? I don't know. I don't think so. I don't think the Inca knew how to do that, because if they did, the Spanish would have certainly found out and copied that technique. Why wouldn't they have? If the Inca were using some advanced technique to cut stone, the Spanish would certainly have adopted it in the building of their cathedrals. And they didn't. Their cathedrals are ugly in terms of the stonework compared to what the Inca were doing, which means that the Spanish, they couldn't, that the Inca could not replicate what was done in the megaliths. Because if I'm a Spaniard, I'm an archaeologist,

I'm sorry, I'm an architect. If I'm a Spaniard and I'm an architect and I arrive to Kusko and I see the walls of Soxay-Wama and I see the exquisite stonework at Ojanti Tambo and the other places in the Cote Concha and so forth, what am I going to do? And the Spaniards had architects to build their cathedrals. What am I going to do? What's the first thing I'm going to do? Because we're all flabbergasted. All of the Spaniards were flabbergasted by this. stonework. What's the first thing you're going to do as an architect? We need to find the people.

We need to find the masons who did this. We need to learn this knowledge. And furthermore, we need to employ or enforce these Incan Masons to build our cathedrals like this. Why wouldn't you do that? Of course you would, especially when there's earthquakes and their stuff falls down, but the other stuff doesn't. Of course you would have. And the reason why, they didn't is because the Inca didn't know. They probably said, hey, we're the masons who built these walls. And the Inca said, those were the Veracotia who built those walls or giants built those walls. So nothing else makes sense to me. Nothing else makes sense to me. Architects, those Spanish architects were not stupid. They were remarkable architects. I mean, the cathedrals are in Kusko

are inferior to the megalithic constructions, but they're by no means. simplistic buildings. They're very elegantly built cathedrals. So these were skilled architects, Spanish architects. And so that tells me, that demonstrates to me, that the knowledge to build the megaliths was not present when the Spanish arrived. Otherwise, it would have been co-opted.

Certainly, certainly would have been co-opted. My God, could you imagine the cathedrals that could have been built in Europe? with that knowledge. Even surpassing the beautiful cathedrals that still stand today. Even surpassing if they could build them like the megaliths are built, it doesn't make any sense to me. You don't, you don't, you don't just forget or lose important knowledge.

A culture doesn't lose knowledge that's really important to it. That knowledge is passed on until it's no longer of any use, until it's exhausted its utility. Only then is that knowledge forgotten. The only thing that can bring such an utter and sudden forgetfulness of this important knowledge from the past would be an utter and sudden destruction of the culture that built these edifices.

So whether it's a so-called face on Mars, I think in the Sidonia region, or the various photos that have appeared on the Internet of what looks like very ancient, very weathered structures, pyramids, do you believe there are ruins of megaliths on Mars? And if so, were these possibly, you know, again, the watchers, if they descended to Earth, did they also come to Mars? And did they create these things somehow?

Of course, this is pure speculation, but I do believe that there are megaliths on Mars. I do believe that there are structures. on the moon and under the moon. And I would say also in the interior of Mars, there's probably some underground stuff going on there. I think that Mars, that there was a civilization inhabiting that planet and that it was absolutely obliterated

in some kind of a cosmic catastrophe. And the same might be said for nearly all the planets in our solar system. There seems to have been an ancient cosmic catacept. that was unbelievably destructive that laid waste to Mars and maybe some of the other planets in our solar system. And I personally believe that that cataclysm was the explosion of what was likely a planet between Mars and Jupiter, what the Bible calls Rehab. And that explosion, let's just imagine an entire planet erupting, exploding in orbit. It would just absolutely devastate everything in our solar system.

It would bombard the planets with the shards of this planet, would just bombard these planets, meteors. And what do we see when we look at these planets? when the ones that don't have an atmosphere and we can see the surface, they look like they've been absolutely bombarded, such as Mars. And perhaps the Earth looks like that as well beneath the oceans. And if you were to remove the terrain as it is on Earth, you might see the same kind of phenomenon in terms of that, the cratering. Do you think the explosion of Rehab, so maybe it literally takes out life on these other planets, and then does that correspond to possibly, you know, the gap theory where maybe the Earth, there was predomac life, and with the fall of Lucifer or this explosion, it knocked out, you know, it brought desolation to the Earth, and then that's where we see in Genesis 1, 2, maybe this recreation.

I believe that nearly all of the planets in our solar system were once inhabited, if not all of them. It may not have been on the orbits that they are today or the distance from the sun that they are today. They might have been pushed out from a cosmic explosion that occurred in our solar system, the destruction of rehab, the explosion of that planet between Mars and Jupiter. And furthermore, I believe that this was a result of, a pre-adamic conflict that the the breadcrumbs of this conflict, I believe, can be found in the Bible, in the narrative of the Hebrew Bible. And I talk about that in my book, Birth Ride.

I tell the story of what might have happened according to these insinuations in the text. And it really is quite amazing to think. think about. But certainly Mars, I'm fully convinced that Mars was inhabited. We know that now that Venus could have sustained life. We know that now. And so something happened, in my estimation, something catastrophic beyond imagining happened in our solar system, sometime in the very, very deep past. Fascinating to consider for sure to everybody listening and watching, make sure and get Timothy's book Birthright to go in-depth more on that.

I think next time we do an interview, I want to really focus in on this topic. It's just fascinating to me. Timothy, thanks for your time today. What's the best way for people to follow you, find your book, and keep up today with all your research? The best way to follow me is on my website, sign up for my mailing list. subscribe to my YouTube channel, Timothy Albrino, and you can find me on Twitter and Instagram.

Just Timothy Albrino. I'm the only Timothy Albrino on Twitter and Instagram, as far as I know. And that's the name of my YouTube channel. So those are the best ways to track with me. You can get my book on Amazon.com.