Mind of a Serial Killer - Amelia Dyer Pt. 1

Episode Date: November 11, 2024

When it comes to serial killers, few have been as prolific as Amelia Dyer. In 19th century England, Amelia ran a group home for infants called a baby farm. But instead of helping these children, she murdered them. Eventually, her scheme was revealed. But could the police stop Amelia before she murdered again? Mind of a Serial Killer is a Crime House Original. Follow us on Instagram and TikTok @crimehouse for more true crime content. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This is CrimeHouse. call for desperate measures. Generally, we assume that when faced with terrible choices, we'll make the moral one. We won't lie. We won't steal. We won't kill. We're above that. But when there aren't any good choices available to us, there's no telling what happens in our minds. We might make a bad decision, then a second, then a third, until the decisions we're making have turned us into something unrecognizable. The human mind is fascinating. It controls how we think, how we feel, how we love, and how we hate. And sometimes the mind drives us to do something truly unspeakable. When that happens, people wonder, how could someone do such a thing?

Well, on this show, that's what we're going to try and answer. This is Mind of a Serial Killer, a Crime House original. Every Monday, we'll be taking deep dives into the minds of history's most notorious serial killers and violent offenders. At Crime House, we want to express our gratitude to you, our community, for making this possible. Please support us by rating, reviewing, and following Mind of a Serial Killer wherever you get your podcasts. And to enhance your Mind of a Serial Killer listening experience, subscribe to CrimeHouse Plus on Apple Podcasts. You'll get every episode ad-free, and instead of having to wait for each episode of a two-part series, you'll get access to both at once, plus exciting bonus content.

I'm Vanessa Richardson. And I am Dr. Tristan Angles. As Vanessa takes you through our subject's stories, I'll be helping her dive into these killers' minds as we try to understand how someone could do such horrible things. Before we get into the story, you should know it contains descriptions of child murder and suicidal ideation. Listener discretion is advised. This is the first of two episodes about one of the most infamous serial killers you've probably never heard of, Amelia Dyer. Amelia was a late 19th century baby farmer, which meant she posed as a nurse to adopt or care for babies in exchange for money,

but ended up murdering hundreds of infants instead. In today's episode, we'll explore Amelia Dyer's early life and business as a murderous baby farmer. Next time, we'll look at the rest of Amelia's crimes, her ultimate downfall, and as always, ask the question, what makes a serial killer? Amelia Dyer came of age in a comfortable home in Victorian England. She was born outside the city of Bristol in 1837 as Amelia Hobley, the youngest child in a well-to-do family. Her father, Samuel, was a shoemaker, which was an especially respectable trade at the time. He even made enough money to send his six children to school, which was a rare feat in that time period. In the Victorian era, most children, and especially

girls, weren't adequately schooled. But when Amelia was around 11 years old, tragedy struck when her mother, Sarah, contracted typhus fever. This disease can affect the brain, and it caused Sarah's behavior to become erratic. Her speech became dysfunctional, and she suffered from terrible delusions, hallucinations, and manic episodes. To help her get better, Samuel placed Sarah in the care of a respected doctor at the local asylum. And for a while, Amelia's mother got better, and she was able to come home. But this was a mirage. Sarah's underlying disease was still untreated, and she soon became almost entirely vacant and unresponsive. She was dead before Amelia's 12th birthday. Losing a parent at a young age can be very traumatic

and it increases the risk that a child will experience mental health, behavioral, and or academic deficits. However, witnessing a parent's decline in this way can be even more traumatic to a different degree. Seeing a mental status change like Amelia did when you're too young to truly understand it can have really significant impacts. The effects of parental loss on a child can vary by age. A child who's around the age of two, for example, will likely experience more anxiety-related symptoms because they haven't developed an understanding of something called object

permanence. Their parent isn't just gone, they're not coming back. That's what object permanence means. But a child who's 12, like Amelia, for example, understands that this death is irreversible. And at that age, a lot is happening in that stage of psychosocial development. They're trying to learn who they are and discover their identity. And a parent helps to shape that identity. So without that, they're missing a key component. So they're more likely to experience anger and rebellion as a trauma response. And this wasn't even the first death in Amelia's family that she had to

witness. Her older sister had died when Amelia was only four years old, and a baby sister passed away when Amelia was eight. Sadly, this was normal during this time period. In fact, infant mortality has been recorded to be as high as 16% of infants in some parts of Victorian England. It wasn't uncommon for children to experience the death of a sibling, or even the death of a parent. And although it must have been absolutely devastating to experience, she had to keep moving forward. Following Sarah's death, Amelia's older siblings took on the bulk of the household work and income-earning labor, allowing Amelia to continue in school. She was smart and had an aptitude for literature and poetry. Stories and words likely provided comfort from painful memories of her mother. And by 14, Amelia seemed to have adjusted to society reasonably well. She moved out of her

father's house and lived with her aunt in Bristol. There, she worked as an apprentice for a corset maker. It wasn't making her much money, but at least she had her health, something the rest of her family wasn't blessed with. A day before her 22nd birthday, Amelia's father died of bronchitis, but there's no indication that she was affected beyond the typical grief that comes with losing a parent. By now, she may have been used to all the death. Amelia seemed to continue with life as usual, and that meant finding a husband. She moved out of her aunt's house and rented a room in a lodging home, which was basically a cheap, short-term apartment.

While Amelia was living there, she met her first husband, George Thomas. George was a widower and worked as a master carver and gilder. He was also much older than Amelia. 34 years older, in fact, and even in a time where large age gaps were common, it was abnormal enough that they had to lie about it to get married. There's a lot that can be inferred from this. Amelia was certainly of age, of consent, but she was also vulnerable in those days. Without a father and without a husband, she was an easy target for predatory men. It certainly makes you wonder about the motives of George or the relationship between them. And little is known about what happened behind closed doors in their relationship,

like whether their marriage was a loving one or something else. But we do know that during that time, Amelia took up work as a nurse. Then shortly after, she became a mother. In 1864, Amelia gave birth to a baby girl named Ellen, but her job as a nurse was relentless. We're talking 16-hour shifts at all hours of the day. It wasn't exactly a profession conducive to motherhood, and George's income wasn't enough to support the family on its own, which is a lot of pressure on a new mother. There's a lot to unpack here, Vanessa.

Yes. It seems like Amelia could have been under a lot of pressure alone just to get married, and that would explain why she married a widower decades older than she was. And given that time period, that is what women were taught to aspire to do. And now there's financial pressure to return to work. And new moms not only need time to bond with their child and heal from childbirth, but it's also an important period for them to monitor, at least now, any postpartum blues or postpartum depression. After giving birth, there's a significant decrease in estrogen and progesterone,

which contribute to feelings of sadness. In addition to that, there's an increase in cortisol from childbirth, which we know as the stress hormone. And so given Amelia's exposure to so much grief and loss so early in her life, I would say that she's a greater risk of developing postpartum depression and a greater risk of developing postpartum depression and a greater risk of a heightened anxiety about her baby's health. So it's hard enough for new mothers to feel comfortable going back to work as it is, but she's returning to work as a nurse, working unpredictable hours. And we now know that jobs in healthcare are very high stress, and jobs with inconsistent hours, like graveyard shifts, can have significant impacts on someone's physical and emotional health. And add being a new mother to that.

True, and that's a lot even today, but imagine back in 1800 Victorian England. Yep. So we know Amelia was going through a substantial physical transformation. And even if her hormones were steady, and even if her brain chemicals were sound, she would have likely been looking for different work, something she could balance with a baby. Which is precisely what happened. A chance meeting with a midwife named Ellen Dame during those early years of motherhood would change her life forever, and set the stage for Amelia's later crimes.

As a midwife, Ellen Dame's job was to help deliver babies, but she had a very particular clientele. Ellen was known for working with women who, for one reason or another, needed absolute secrecy with their pregnancies and births. Either they'd had an affair, or they couldn't take care of the child, or in some cases, they'd been raped. And there weren't many options for unmarried pregnant women in Victorian England. Abortions were illegal and considered dangerous, and if you did keep the baby, it was nearly impossible to find decent work because you were considered to be immoral.

And sending the baby to an orphanage was difficult, too, because they were extremely crowded and didn't always take babies from unwed mothers. To make matters even worse, there was a law called the Poor Law Amendment Act, which made it so fathers of illegitimate children didn't have to support their children or the mothers. But there was help available to them if they were willing to look for it. People like Ellen Dame would take these women in when they were too far along to be disguised. They stayed with her for some time, up to six months,

and they paid a good amount of money for Ellen's services as a midwife. But there was another income stream that followed the birth. Baby farming. So baby farming worked like this. For a small weekly fee, or a larger one-time payment, Ellen took in babies whose mothers could not care for them. Sort of like a for-profit orphanage or, in theory, an around-the-clock daycare. It was quite lucrative and could be done from the comfort of your own home while you raised your own children. It was the kind of work

that would have been appealing to someone like Amelia Dyer. The problem was that some women, like Ellen Dame, had questionable ways to increase their profits. They did so by reducing costs like food and medicine. The more babies you took in, and the less you spent on them, the more money you made. Basically, neglect equaled profit. And if a baby happened to die, as long as the baby farmer got payment up front, that was the most profitable kind of client. Well, initially, it sounds like Ellen Dame was a feminist wanting to help women in need. And I imagine that any woman who went to her thought that was her motive as well. But really, she's anything but a feminist. This is someone who found a way to capitalize off of the exploitation of vulnerable women and children, as if women

weren't already oppressed enough in those days. Someone like Ellen likely justified what she was doing by convincing herself and anyone who helped her that these were unwanted babies and their mothers were immoral stains on society. Therefore, neither had any value outside of making her money, which allowed her to justify what she was doing. Her lack of empathy toward her clientele sounds like a lot of projected anger and resentment. It makes me wonder if Ellen herself ever married or had any children of her own. And if not, she may have looked down upon women who were unmarried and projected that anger onto them, just like she was angry with herself. So regardless of the morals, quote unquote, surrounding baby farming, Amelia was willing to do whatever it took to

support her family. George died in October 1869, leaving Amelia desperate for money. So she copied Ellen's corner-cutting business model and started her own baby farming operation. But before the business could really get going, Amelia hit pause on it. By 1871, she'd taken a break from baby farming and was working as a nurse in an asylum. She even sent out her daughter, then six years old, to a different baby farmer so she could take the job. It's interesting that she diverted from baby farming to working at an asylum, which is where her mother once received treatment. Maybe it was desperation. Maybe Amelia felt like she needed more stable work at the time, or maybe she just felt like

getting into baby farming was too risky. The authorities had started monitoring the number of deaths under Ellen Dame's care, and as a result, she fled the country. Another baby farming associate of theirs was hanged for murder. But despite these dangers, Amelia couldn't help herself. Or she decided the reward was worth the risk. In 1872, 35-year-old Amelia married Thomas Dyer and became Amelia Dyer. She had two more children, and her first daughter, Ellen, returned to the family. After three or four years, Amelia had a husband and three children to feed. So she got back into midwifery and her baby farming business. Then she added another service.

Her younger daughter, Polly, later recalled hearing the noises that came with childbirth. But she wasn't all that familiar with the cries of newborn babies, because when childbirth ended, Amelia often emerged from the room with a dead infant, declaring it a stillbirth. But that wasn't really what happened. The newborn had been murdered. And it was Amelia's doing. serial killer, then you'll love another crime house show called Money Crimes, hosted by bestselling author and entrepreneur Nicole Lappin. Money Crimes is all about the dark side of finance and how to protect yourself from it, especially when it ends in murder. From cunning Ponzi schemes to cutthroat politics and killer con artists, you'll learn that the finance world is more dangerous than you ever imagined. Follow Money Crimes, a Crime House Studios original now. New episodes

drop every Monday. Again, that's Money Crimes. Follow now wherever you get your podcasts. And for early ad-free access, subscribe to Crime House Plus on Apple Podcasts. It's important to note that in the 1870s, Amelia Dyer was, first and foremost, running a business dictated by the desires of her clients. Some mothers dropped infants at a baby farm intending to return once they had enough money to care for them, though many weren't interested in coming back. Amelia's clients who didn't want their babies had two options. The first was they could pay Amelia to take out an ad in the newspaper putting the child up for adoption. Or they could arrange for a so-called stillbirth. Amelia had a way to smother the baby before it was entirely out of the birth canal. That way, the newborn wouldn't discolor and show signs of asphyxiation, and the death would be registered as a stillbirth, something neither the midwife nor the mother would be at fault for.

It allowed the mother to save some money and for Amelia to make a lot of it. I think we need to make a very clear distinction here. This is murder. Even if the mother wanted to relinquish all rights to her child, what Amelia is doing is murder, and the act of killing another with intention or premeditation is the legal definition of murder, and it became illegal in England since the Murder Act of 1751. She knows what she's doing is illegal, but she somehow is able to rationalize this. She is somehow able to convince herself she's doing a good thing. And it seems like it's a combination of things that allow her to remain disconnected from this callousness. One, she's far too comfortable with death given her history and how much she's been around it

and been exposed to it. Two, she's desperate for her own family and their financial needs or some form of psychopathy. And maybe it's a little bit of all three. Does that normalize death in a way? I think it desensitizes her. And it's not just the amount of exposure she's had, it's also the time. The infant mortality rate was 16%. And that's extremely high. The longevity of human life is a lot shorter than it is today. So death is a regular experience, I think, in those days. So at this point in Amelia Dyer's life, we know, we see she is a bona fide killer. And we do know that her physical health was suffering also during this period. She had frequent toothaches from past pregnancies and took a small dose of opium to soothe them.

And maybe that made Amelia unfit to take care of children, because even when the babies she cared for survived childbirth, they still faced severe health risks. In 1879, about 10 years after now 42-year-old Amelia started her baby farming business, she took in a baby named Alfred. Shortly after he was born, Alfred suffered from diarrhea. Amelia's biological children did too. It wasn't uncommon during this time period. So Amelia did what she likely did for her own children. She contacted a doctor and gave Alfred medicine. But it didn't matter. Alfred didn't survive his sickness.

And neither did one of her own children. Later, the doctor testified that the illness was likely the result of poorly maintained drains at the Dyer's house. Basically, it was from the spread of bacteria, a natural cause, and there was no evidence of criminal neglect. But then there was another baby in Amelia's care named May Walters. By the time May was two months old, she was too small for her size, nearly emaciated, and had rashes and sores all over her body. And Amelia needed more room in her household. She'd promised the space to a pregnant woman from Dublin, and that meant May needed to go.

She contacted a friend named Mrs. Williams and farmed out not just May, but another newborn too, an infant named Bessie. Amelia told Mrs. Williams to feed the children a mixture of corn flour, bread, and condensed milk, a kind of rudimentary formula. She insisted this was her process, and she'd be back for the children soon. But when Amelia went to collect May from Mrs. Williams, the little girl was in even worse shape. She'd refused the food and was more emaciated than ever. The homemade formula recipe had been questionable, to say the least. Amelia

called a doctor to her home to help little May, but two days later, May died. The doctor declared the cause of death as convulsions and intestinal disorder. He'd found a great deal of that formula in her stomach. This discovery itself didn't set off alarm bells with the authorities. What did was the way Amelia chose to register the death, giving the name Annie Mae Walters Dyer. Even though Mae wasn't Amelia's biological child, even worse, an investigator figured out the child was actually named Dorcas Walters, born to a domestic servant from London. After Annie died, the doctor alerted a local coroner. The coroner then alerted the authorities. They discovered that at least two other children in Amelia's care had died around the same time and from similar

causes. One of those children was Bessie, the other baby under Mrs. Williams' care, and an eight-month-old girl named Evelyn Townsend, who'd been sent out elsewhere. So in August 1879, the coroner launched an investigation into Amelia Dyer. In response, Amelia swallowed two large doses of opium, possibly in an attempt to take her own life. It's very interesting that she created this attachment with little Annie Mae and listing her last name on there, but was able to remain detached from all of the other infants in her care. And it's also interesting that she actually called a doctor into her home to help Annie,

but played doctor with all of the other children, including her own. Mm-hmm. There's a very big contrast here. And I'd really like to understand a little bit more about what it was with Annie Mae Walters Dyer, previously known as Dorcas Walters, and why there's that attachment. But this also shows that I think Amelia has been suffering from some addiction to opium for a length of time. This isn't the first time I think it's been brought up. The swallowing of two large doses does sound like an impulsive attempt to take her own life. She realized that she was under investigation. She saw this happen with her mentor, Ellen. And I think she realized that there might be very little she could do about this. Clearly, she's got some sort of guilt going on. Yeah. It's a very large contrast to how she's

been acting with her business and how premeditated it's been and how calloused and how absolutely just egregious she has been up until this point. Well, regardless of her intentions, Amelia was revived by doctors after her suicide attempt. And almost immediately after she was healthy, she was put on trial for those infants' deaths. But this wasn't a black and white case. Because again, plenty of infants died in Victorian England. Sanitation was poor. Malnutrition was widespread. It was hard to determine whether the deaths could be explained by natural causes, or if there was a component of neglect, or if you could even call it murder. Amelia's daughter's testimony blurred the lines further. According to Amelia's daughter Ellen, who was then 16, Amelia gave the infants five drops of a substance called Godfrey's Cordial every night.

This was a medicine containing opium and was the same drug Amelia took in her possible suicide attempt. But it was also a substance commonly given to infants of the era. It's kind of like today's version of giving a sick baby Tylenol to help them sleep, which sounds crazy to say, but it's the truth. So again, you could call Amelia's behavior pathological, but it was really typical of the times. But what wasn't typical was Amelia's rate of death. According to her daughter, nine children had died in their house in the past year alone. The coroner did make the case that Amelia was overwhelmed. She'd taken in too many children, and this caused her to neglect them, leaving Amelia partially at fault. He said he had, quote, no moral doubt that these children were hurried to their grave by improper food and drugging.

He also condemned the practice of baby farming. But he couldn't provide direct evidence that Amelia purposefully caused any of the children's deaths. There was no evidence of opioids given beyond a standard amount, not near enough to be fatal. Nor was there evidence that Amelia actively wanted the children to die. After all, she had called doctors when their illnesses got worse. Her biggest offense seemed to be the false name on May Walter's death certificate, the one that had gotten her in trouble in the first place. In the end, Amelia was found not guilty of manslaughter. The jury declared the deaths death by natural causes. She was found guilty only of neglect and violating the Infant Life Protection Act. This act stated that any person taking in children under the age of 12

months and for more than 24 hours was required to register with the police. As punishment, she was sentenced to six months in prison as, quote, a warning to others. She's a very interesting case. I have a lot of questions about her. Although there's obvious evidence that there's been premeditated murder occurring with infants whose mothers did not want them to survive and that she hid that. So she knew there's an element of knowing that there's criminal responsibility here. She knew that she would be criminally liable if it was found out that she did this. So she did it in a way where it could be hard to determine, as we talked about. But yet she did care in a way where it could be hard to determine, as we talked about.

But yet, she did care for her children. She did care for some of the other children. So there's an element of her that she really did care. That's what struck me. It's almost like Jekyll and Hyde. She clearly has a connection to her own children and having become a mother and gone through that process. And it just baffles me. I think a lot of this has to do with just a cluster of things. Like we've always talked about the nature versus nurture aspect. There are some individuals who are born with

biologically based brains or brains that have structural abnormalities that lead to psychopathy. And there are some that who are created. And I think that Amelia sounds like somebody who is more created to become known as a serial killer. I think she's a bit of an anomaly in a way though, because it doesn't seem like her lack of empathy or her remorse even is uniform. She still had that for her own children. She still had that for Annie, little baby Annie. She very clearly had a bond with Annie. And I'd really like to know more about where that came from. If she was here, I'd be asking how old she was. I want to know about the mother of Annie. Did she connect with the mother? Did she identify with the mother? Are they of the same race? You know, I want to know a lot of things. I want to see where that came from to understand her better. When it comes to punishments, so her punishment was, you know, a deterrent for individuals with that type of pathology, then we wouldn't have that pathology at all, right? do think for those who genuinely wanted to open up a business where they helped unwed mothers or

children without homes and create an orphanage and actually do it in a very pro-social way. So I think it sends that message to those people. But I think for people who have that sort of pathology, consequences have never been a deterrent. So after being released from prison, Amelia did take a break from baby farming, but it didn't last for long. Despite improper baby farming being prosecuted more frequently in Victorian courts, Amelia returned to the practice.

It would seem as if her prison stint only taught her one thing. She needed to get better at hiding from the law. In 1879, 42-year-old Amelia Dyer spent six months in prison doing hard labor for the crime of neglect. Prisons were challenging places in Victorian England. Tiny windows in the cells, no talking amongst inmates, a hard wooden bench for a bed, and frequent trips to solitary confinement. But when Amelia emerged in February of 1880, she may have had some remorse for her wrongdoings because for a few years, she turned to the work she'd done when she first left her childhood home so many years ago, corset making. whether it's six months to several years to decades, is once they're released, the world has changed quite a bit. You would be surprised. But also, they're getting released with absolutely

nothing. And you've likely lost everything that you left behind, your home, your belongings, because you're not there to take care of them. You're not there to continue paying your rent or your mortgage or whatever it might be. So you're starting over. And so one of the biggest indicators for recidivism is not being able to meet your basic needs. So Amelia comes out of prison, having spent six months there. And I'm very curious what that must have been like for her in the Victorian era, because nowadays, women who go to prison who have harmed children, not very well received by the other populations. So we're curious about that. But she's leaving prison with absolutely nothing and having to start over.

Where's her family? She doesn't have parents. She doesn't have her mom. She doesn't have her dad. We haven't heard much about her husband throughout all of this. And she is starting over with nothing. So she needs to meet her basic needs for herself, which is shelter and food. And she also has children that she has to care for. So initially, she's going for a more

pro-social employment, which is corset making. But she left corset making before for a reason. It didn't make enough money for her. So now she's trying to not only maintain, but get back to where she was, let alone ahead. It's probably harder for her. So it makes sense to me why she would divert back to her old ways. This is why we see recidivism occur so often in society. Now, when this happens in general, when people are released into the public again, are they aware that what they did was wrong? Do they normally or tend to learn from this time incarcerated?

It depends on the individual. It's definitely a case-by-case basis. I wish I could say it was uniform. It's not. And that's why recidivism is such a big factor and that plays into it for a majority of the cases. Not all, certainly not all. I've definitely seen a lot of successful experiences

where doing their time and coming out has really changed them, helped them understand their impact, the ripple effect of their crime, and has inspired them to really do better for themselves because they don't want to experience that ever again. On the other side of that, I've seen far more that was not really a deterrent to them at all. Just in case someone out there is like, what is recidivism? Oh, sure. That's the rate of reoffending. For Amelia, whatever remorse and self-control she might have had didn't last long. By 1884, 47-year-old Amelia and her family were poor again.

Her work as a corset maker wasn't exactly paying the bills. Amelia took up baby farming again, determined to avoid scrutiny and make even more money. And this is the exact example I was mentioning, right? She went right back. She's not able to make enough money. Her family was poor again. And any pro-social way in which she could go about that was not effective or quick enough for her. Yeah. And she moved her family to a new town and began attracting wealthier clientele, sometimes charging up to 50 pounds, which was a huge increase from what she charged back in Bristol.

Not all of her clients wanted to part with their children forever. Amelia still took in babies whose mothers had hoped to return for them. But as far as we know, throughout the 1880s, only two babies made it more than a few days in the Dyer home. Though it's not clear if they returned to their mothers, or if they died. To this day, we don't know what happened to them. Whatever happened, nobody caught wind of it. The dyers moved a few times, and Amelia sometimes used aliases to avoid detection. So for nearly 10 years, her family lived in relative peace. Mothers came in, they paid, babies were born,

but were gotten rid of quicker than they could eat Amelia's formula. When they did die, Amelia often called in a funeral undertaker who assumed the infant's causes of death were natural. And so Amelia continued in her practice with zero scrutiny or regulation. Thanks to her business, Amelia's family became quite well off. They rented a sizable home and had paid off all of their debts. Finally, they'd moved into the middle class with all of its comforts. You know, when people obtain more money, they feel that they obtain more power. And I think now it's emboldened Amelia even more to continue with this business. One, because it's successful.

Two, she's learned how to be more antisocial with it in a very cunning sort of way. She knows if she goes into this business, these children were already unwanted. The mothers are not going to report them. Who's going to report her? It's very much of an anatomy of a setup. I got info on you. You've got info on me. If you tell, I tell. And so it's a balance in the playing field. And it allows her to continue doing this. And it gives her a sense of not just control, but confidence in what she's doing, safety, invincibility. And now she is in the middle class. She's paid off all her debts.

She has a sizable home that she's rented. And she might have some savings where if necessary, she could start paying people off. For example, the funeral undertaker, if they start asking more questions, well, hey, I can pay you to do this and keep quiet. In the beginning, it felt like it was a survival thing. Right. She just did it to purely survival. And now it feels like. And desperation. Yeah.

Now it's just the greed. It's more, it feels more. Exactly. It's an instant gratification. Of course, that making won't get her there as quickly as she wants to get there. So however Amelia felt about baby farming, her business hit a snag in 1890 when she was 53. It began with a governess, which was like a private teacher slash nanny. She wrote to Amelia, saying she had a problem she wanted to take care of.

The father came from a wealthy, respectable family. Some sources say he was the oldest son of her boss. They'd had an affair, and now she needed to get rid of the evidence. This was, of course, Amelia's specialty. Amelia agreed to take care of the governess during labor and delivery, and per the terms, if the baby survived labor, Amelia would adopt it. The whole thing would cost the governess 15 pounds, with the final installment due two months after delivery. This was a transaction Amelia had likely done hundreds of times over the course of multiple decades. It was also a pretty sizable amount

of money, maybe close to a year's salary for the average worker. And the governess had no reason to turn Amelia in. The child's father had been shipped off to mainland Europe after the affair. The governess was without a job, and if she didn't get rid of the baby, she'd be an unwed mother with very few prospects. So it was kind of like what you were saying. Mm-hmm. She's starting to really meet the criteria of somebody with antisocial personality disorder. She really is. This lack of remorse, the lack of empathy, the lack of conforming to societal rules and norms,

and becoming more versatile in her criminality, knowing who to target, knowing who she can exploit if necessary. Just she's very, she's becoming much more versatile, which is scary. And Amelia must have thought that this particular instance was a no-brainer for her. So Amelia took the governess in during the spring of 1890. The governess was likely still in her first trimester. She wasn't showing yet. Over the next few months, Amelia was as charming and caring as a nurse and midwife could be. Her daughter Polly and son William were teenagers in the house, putting on a good front for the governess,

showing her that Amelia was perfectly capable of raising competent humans from birth. So she's exploiting her own children now. She's now groomed her children and brought them into her own criminal enterprise and using them as sort of pawns to show everyone that look we have a very warm nurturing home. I've raised two great children. You're safe here. Sometime in the late fall of 1890 the governess went into labor. Amelia had done this many times and though there was no arrangement to conjure a stillbirth, the thought must have crossed Amelia's mind as the baby crowned. What if she could just kill it right there, right now? But she didn't. The governess gave birth to a baby with a distinctive birthmark on its hip.

Then, once she was well enough, she said goodbye, leaving Amelia with the baby. Now, everything we know about Amelia's following actions is speculation based on our research. But from what we know about Amelia so far, it's likely she didn't care about the baby the second it left the womb. She likely assumed the governess didn't either. Since she'd asked for it to be adopted, even if the governess returned with the final payment, there was no way she would care about the child's well-being. So for Amelia, things were likely business as usual. The newborn got a steady concoction of homemade formula and Godfrey's cordial for sleep. This combination of malnutrition and opium likely caused its death.

However, two months later though, the governess actually returned and asked for her baby, Amelia must have been nervous, but she'd likely been through this before. She just had to bring out a healthy baby and the governess would be satisfied. So with the governess waiting anxiously at the door, Amelia went into the house and snagged the first baby she could find. So Amelia at this point has been very much of a chameleon. She's been trying to fit in and put on facades to everybody that comes to her for quote business. And so in this panic, it's okay, I need to maintain this facade. And in the moment, I'm panicking to make that happen. I don't think she's panicked

in that she thinks she's been caught. I think if anything, she might've been thrown for a loop because to this date, no one's probably come back to see their baby. It's always been a done deal for them. So this is a turn of events for Amelia that her complacency and her arrogance sort of faulted her. And whatever Amelia was feeling at that moment,

the governess had a feeling something was off. She told Amelia the baby she'd brought out wasn't hers. Nerves might have sunk into Amelia at this point, but she tried to salvage the situation. Amelia told the governess she was mistaken. Babies change so much in their first months of life. Like you said, she's trying to outsm told the governess she was mistaken. Babies change so much in their first months of life. Like you said, she's trying to outsmart the governess. They don't look exactly like they did just at birth. It was her baby. It had just changed. So the governess showed Amelia

the baby's hips. There was no birthmark, and those don't change. Amelia asked for a tiny bit of the final payment and told the governess to come back in a couple of weeks. Then she would have the baby and could show her it was alive and well. The governess refused to pay, but agreed to come back. Amelia might have thought she was in the clear, that there was no way the governess would return. But during that intermediate period, the governess reunited with the baby's father, who had gained permission to marry her and wanted to

be a father to his child. So the next time the governess knocked on Amelia's door, Amelia opened it to find not just the mom, but both parents. And they wanted their baby. Terrified, Amelia slammed the door, saying nothing to the couple, and they eventually went away. But she had no doubt the governess and father would be going to the police, and that Amelia would have to explain what happened to the child. She had to do something. She didn't want to go back to prison. She certainly didn't want to be hanged. In March of 1891, the police knocked on Amelia's door, but there was no baby. And worse, Amelia Dyer had disappeared. Thanks so much for listening. We'll be back next Monday as we finish the story of Amelia Dyer.

Mind of a Serial Killer is a Crime House original powered by Pave Studios. Here at Crime House, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support. If you like what you heard today, reach out on social media at Crime House on TikTok and Instagram. Don't forget to rate, review, and follow Mind of a Serial Killer wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference. And to enhance your listening experience, subscribe to Crime House Plus on Apple Podcasts.

You'll get every episode of Mind of a Serial Killer ad-free, along with early access to each thrilling two-part series and exciting bonus content. We'll be back next Monday. Mind of a Serial Killer, a Crime House original We'll be back next Monday. Fact-checked by Claire Cronin and included production assistance from Paul Liebeskind, Sarah Carroll, and Kristen Acevedo. Mind of a Serial Killer is hosted by Vanessa Richardson and Dr. Tristan Engels. CrimeHouse has a new show called Money Crimes.

It's all about the dark side of finance, and most importantly, how to protect yourself from it. Follow Money Crimes, a Crime House Studios original now. New episodes drop every Monday. Again, that's Money Crimes. Follow now wherever you get your podcasts. And for early ad-free access, subscribe to Crime House Plus on Apple Podcasts.