Mind of a Serial Killer - MURDEROUS MINDS: Jodi Arias Pt. 2

Episode Date: August 7, 2025

Jodi Arias believed she could get away with murder—but her own actions became her undoing. In Part 2, we examine the relentless lies, the twisted psychological games, and the dramatic courtroom revelations that made her trial a national obsession. This is how investigators cracked the case—and how Jodi’s carefully crafted persona finally fell apart. Killer Minds is a Crime House Original Podcast, powered by PAVE Studios. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. For ad-free listening and early access to episodes, subscribe to Crime House+ on Apple Podcasts. Don’t miss out on all things Killer Minds! Instagram: @killerminds | @Crimehouse TikTok: @Crimehouse Facebook: @crimehousestudios X: @crimehousemedia YouTube: @crimehousestudios To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Hi, it's Vanessa Richardson. Crime House is home to the best true crime shows, and you don't want to miss the latest episode of Murder True Crime Stories. Carter Roy is looking into the mysterious, unsolved case of the boy in the box. In one of America's most haunting mysteries, the body of a young boy was discovered in a box in 1957. Join Carter Roy as he walks you through the story. Listen to and follow Murder True Crime Stories every Tuesday and Thursday

on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you listen to podcasts. This is Crime House. As the saying goes, all good things come to an end. It may seem a bit cynical, but most of the time it's true. Vacations don't last forever. You get laid off from your dream job. the love of your life breaks up with you. These are all hard things to move on from,

but eventually we learn to let go. You start saving up for that next trip, you polish your resume, maybe download the latest dating app. But Jody Arias didn't know how to move on, at least not in a healthy way. She was all too familiar with the devastation of a breakup, and she always made the same mistake,

diving headfirst into the next relationship. But then, Jody met the man that she seemed to think was her forever person. For a while, it seemed like he felt the same way. So when things went south, Jody was devastated. This time, though, she wasn't going to move on. And neither would he. The human mind is powerful. It shapes how we think, feel, love, and hate.

But sometimes it drives people to commit the unthinkable. This is Killer Minds, a crime house original. I'm Vanessa Richardson. And I'm Dr. Tristan Ingalls. Every Monday and Thursday, we uncover the darkest minds in history, analyzing what makes a killer. Crime House is made possible by you. please rate, review, and follow Killer Minds. To enhance your listening experience with ad-free, early access to each two-part series

and bonus content, subscribe to Crime House Plus on Apple Podcasts. Before we get started, be advised this episode contains descriptions of violence and explicit sexual details. Listener discretion is advised. Today, we conclude our deep dive on Jody Arias, a young woman who immersed herself in intense relationships throughout her young adulthood, often losing herself in the process. Her growing obsessions led her down an increasingly dark path, one that led to murder. As Vanessa goes through the story, I'll be talking about things like Jody's desire to insert

herself into a murder investigation, her endless stream of lies once she was caught, and her obsession with being the center of attention. And as always, we'll be asking the question, What makes a killer? In the late spring of 2008, Jody Arias went on the road trip of a lifetime. At the beginning of June, the 27-year-old left her grandparents home in Wyrika, California. Her first stop was to see her ex-boyfriend, Daryl Brewer, in Monterey on the central coast. After that, she drove to Mesa, Arizona, to see another ex-30-year-old. 30-year-old Travis Alexander. Jody got to Travis's in the early hours of June 4th. They spent

the day in bed before Jody headed back out. The next day, June 5th, she arrived at her final destination in Utah to see her current boyfriend, Ryan Burns. Ryan had no idea Jody had stopped to see Daryl and Travis on her way from California, or why she got to his house a day later than she was supposed to. When Ryan asked her about it, Jody said she'd gotten lost during the drive and had to pull over to get some sleep. Ryan wanted to believe her, but something about Jody just seemed off. For instance, she dyed her previously blonde hair, brown. On its own, it wouldn't be weird, but Jody hadn't told Ryan about it, and that kind of change seemed like an odd thing not to mention. Not only that, but Jody also had cuts all of

over her fingers that she'd bandaged up. She told Ryan she'd sliced them on a broken glass at her waitressing job, which again made sense on its own, but added all up, something didn't feel right. Ryan didn't press the issue, though. Instead, he decided to take Jody at her word, and they spent the next few days enjoying each other's company. Obviously, Ryan's intuition was telling him something. So why didn't he push? Well, psychologically speaking, this is cognitive dissonance and a cognitive bias known as motivated reasoning. Ryan wants to believe her. He wants the story to be innocent. Maybe he doesn't want to seem rude or paranoid or even accusatory. And so he talks himself into accepting her version of events, even though his intuition is throwing

up all of these red flags. This is actually incredibly common. When something about a person or a situation feels wrong, but there's no proof and nothing overtly aggressive happening, our brains often default to minimizing or rationalizing. We don't want to believe that someone we've welcomed into our lives might be capable of deception or worse. So we tell ourselves something that's easier to accept. But here's the clinical truth. Intuition is data. It doesn't always speak in clear words, but it's built on subtle cues like body language or inconsistencies, micro-expressions, tone, even timing. Ryan's intuition picked up on something that didn't feel right, but his desire to be possibly agreeable or trusting or not dramatic, overrode it. And this is something we see

not just in relationships, but in even criminal cases, especially those involving charismatic manipulators or individuals with unstable or deceptive personality traits. The red flags are there, but they're disguised. The danger isn't always obvious until it's too late. Well, Ryan wasn't the only one who realized something didn't feel right. Back in Mesa, Arizona, Travis Alexander's friends were starting to get worried. They were all getting ready to go to Cancun together, and Travis had stopped responding to the group messages and wasn't answering phone calls.

And when they thought about it, no one had heard from him since five days earlier, on June 4th. This silence didn't sit right with them, especially Travis' new romantic interest, a woman named Mimi. So she decided to stop by Travis' house to make sure everything was okay. When she rang the doorbell, she could hear Travis's dog barking inside, but besides that, it was quiet.

There were no footsteps, and Travis didn't answer the door. Mimi didn't have a way to get in, so she left and reached out to a few of Travis's friends to see if they could help. Around 10 p.m. that night, a few of them returned to the house with Mimi. One of them knew the code to Travis's garage. As the door lifted, the group of friends saw his car and bike were still inside. Soon after, they stepped into the actual house, and that's when it hit them, the sickening, unmistakable smell of death. They eventually got to Travis's bedroom, where they found a dark, blood-soaked stain on the carpet that led to the bathroom. Their lying motionless on the shower floor and covered in blood was Travis.

The friends called 911, and police were there within minutes. Upon examination, they concluded that based on the state of Travis's body, he'd been dead for several days. He'd been stabbed 27 times, shot in the head, and his throat had been slit. The investigators could tell the stab wounds seem frenzied. Some were deep, others were shallow, but they were all over his body in a way that indicated whoever did this had lost control. When we're looking at someone being stabbed 27 times, shots, and then having their throat slit, that's not just homicide. That's what we would call extreme overkill. And this refers to the application of far more force or injury that is necessary in order to cause death.

In this case, any one of those injuries, especially the throat wound or the gunshot, would likely have been fatal on its own. But all three is overkill. From a psychological perspective, this does reflect a lot. of emotional control, fueled by overwhelming feelings like rage, betrayal, humiliation, and rejection. This is intimate violence, the kind driven by passion, obsession, or psychological collapse. The variability in the wounds is also significant. Like you mentioned, some were deep, some were shallow, and they were scattered across his body. That kind of frenzy, disorganized stabbing typically suggests an emotionally charged impulsive attack, not a calculated, detached

killing. It often indicates a build-up of internal pressure finally bursting. So what does this say about the killer's mindset? This kind of brutality is characteristic of a narcissistic rage, a state where the attacker feels so wounded, so discarded or betrayed, that the victim becomes a symbol of their pain, and destroying them becomes a form of emotional justice for them. This was symbolic, explosive, and deeply personal. All since Travis had been murdered in a very violent way and his bedroom showed signs of a struggle. The investigating officers believed it was a personal attack and that his killer knew him, just like you suggested, Dr. Engels. And when the police talked to Travis's friends that night, all of them pointed the finger

at one suspect, Jody Arias. They described her as obsessive, controlling, and manipulative. In fact, they claimed that Jody had previously slashed Travis's tires, broken into his home on many occasions and even stalked him. Mesa police homicide detective Esteban Flores took these claims extremely seriously, and he didn't have to work hard to track Jody down because within hours of the investigation beginning, Jody called him herself. According to Detective Flores, Jody said one of Travis's friends had told her he was dead. She claimed that she hadn't been in Mesa since April, but she'd talked to Travis over the phone on June 4th the last time anyone had heard from him. Of course, this was a lie. Jody had been with Travis that day, but Detective Flores didn't know that. Although Jody was certainly

a person of interest at this point, Flores needed to know more before jumping to any conclusions. So he asked Jody if she knew about any weapons in his home. Jody laughed and said the only weapons she knew of were his two fists. She meant it as a a joke about Travis's apparent strength, but it was a strange remark to make, especially by someone whose ex-boyfriend, someone she claimed to love, had just been killed. When offenders initiate contact with police, it's often for a few reasons. First, they want to appear innocent and helpful. That's a common one. Another is that they're testing what investigators know. And lastly, they're trying to shape the narrative by planting details or lies hoping to steer

suspicion elsewhere. And for some, though, they're seeking recognition. I think what stands out about this from a psychological lens is her comment about his two fists. This was a man who had just been found brutally murdered. Most people would be in shock, expressing sadness, confusion, even fear. Joking is emotionally incongruent and possibly even a projection or minimization of what she knows happened. That kind of emotional flatness or a dark humor in the wake of such a violent death can be indicative of someone who's either emotionally detached, suppressing guilt, or attempting to reframe the victim in a less sympathetic light, which offenders sometimes do in order to justify their actions internally. Now, humor is a defense mechanism. So it could be

that she's just using humor to, you know, fight against uncomfortable feelings, but in reality, it's extremely incongruent and extremely callous to say something in that nature to a detective. following such a brutal crime. Is there a performative aspect to this? Like Jody feels that as his ex, she should be calling in order to avoid suspicion? Yes, absolutely. So by calling first,

she's performing the role of concerned ex before anyone else can assign her a different one. It's a psychological tactic. We often see in offenders with manipulative or narcissistic traits, control the narrative early, perform innocence, and appear cooperative. It's the emotional equivalent of saying,

why would I be guilty if I'm the one calling the cops? But again, the affect is incongruent with the context. Travis was brutally murdered and she is joking. She's acting casual and she's lying to the police about the last time she was in Mesa. She's staging a version of herself. But this is what she does. Image and impression management is what she is good at.

It's her pattern. She is someone highly concerned with how they're going to be perceived and will perform whichever role protects them best in the moment, whether it's the victim, the lover, the spiritual seeker, or in this case the concerned ex-girlfriend just trying to help. She's defaulting to that same pattern she's had in every relationship she's been in. Well, if Jody thought it would throw the authorities off her scent, she was definitely wrong.

She was firmly on Detective Flores's radar, and as the investigators kept combing through Travis's home, they uncovered several crucial pieces of evidence, clues that would eventually tell investigators Jody was lying about everything. On June 9, 2008, Travis Alexander's friends discovered his body at his home in Mesa, Arizona. The 30-year-old was found lying on the floor,

killed in a vicious, brutal attack. As the investigation got underway, Detective Esteban Flores spoke to Travis's ex-girlfriend, 27-year-old Jody Arias. She claimed she hadn't seen Travis since April, but when police scoured the crime scene, they found evidence that placed her at Travis's home much more recently than she claimed. In the hallway just outside the bathroom, investigators found a bloody handprint on the wall. It was quickly sampled and sent for forensic testing so they could determine if it was made by Travis or someone else.

Additionally, they found some strands of long brown hair near the body. The same shade Jody had just dyed hers. But the most damning evidence of all was discovered in a place no one expected. The washing machine. Inside, investigators found a digital camera. It seemed like someone had tried to destroy it by running it through a wash cycle with clothes. But when it was pulled out and analyzed, investigators found that the memory card was undamaged.

After they downloaded the contents, they found a series of time-stamped photos taken on June 4, 2008, the last day that anyone ever heard from Travis. The first ones they saw were from 1.40 p.m. and showed explicit pictures of Travis, naked and in several sexual positions, with Jody.

The next image was taken a few hours later, at 5.29 p.m. This one showed Travis standing in the shower. He was naked, still wet, and appeared to be glaring at the person taking the photo, Jody. Then there was a photo taken just three minutes later at 532 p.m. This one showed a blurry, bloody body on the bathroom floor. Also in the lower part of the frame was a woman's sock-covered foot. So when someone's able to engage in physical intimacy and then almost immediately commit a gruesome hands-on murder, it suggests a very unstable psychological state, possibly dissociation or what we call splitting, which is sometimes also referred to as value, devalue. That's when a person can't tolerate complexity in others or in themselves. In one moment, Travis is idealized or valued, someone she desires, wants to possess, maybe even worships.

But when that emotional high crashes and she feels rejected or disposable, he becomes the enemy. He's then devalued. And that rage that follows isn't rational. It's primitive and it's overwhelming. This is also why we talk about overkill in this case. It wasn't just about eliminating him. It was about erasing the emotional injury she felt. The violence becomes symbolic.

It's as if she needed to destroy him to destroy the part of herself that felt unwanted. But let's talk about the camera. Taking those photos likely gave Jody a sense of power. Travis was naked, vulnerable, standing in the shower, and she's behind the lens. She's directing the moment. And that fits with her pattern. This need to control the narrative, the image, the relationship.

She's been holding on to damning things about Travis for a long time. This is no different. She was able to capture him exposed in the way she may have felt emotionally. Then there's the fantasy part of it. Jody didn't just want connection. She wanted significance and destiny. Taking pictures of him might have been a way for her to preserve their intimacy or to justify what came next.

It's clear, though, that she wasn't thinking clearly or thinking ahead. If she wanted to preserve those memories of Travis, she would have kept the camera or the card. Instead, she's attempting to destroy it in a very careless way. And that feels reactionary, which in fairness, all of this feels rare. because Jody is a very emotionally reactive individual. Do you think it's possible that Jody maybe subconsciously wanted the police to find that camera? Yeah, it's entirely possible.

People who commit violent crimes from a place of narcissistic injury or emotional fragmentation often experience something we call leakage, where their desire to stay hidden competes with their need to be seen, understood, or even validated in the aftermath of a crime. It's not always conscious, but it does show up in rage reactions or in this case, how they talk, what they leave behind, how they re-insert themselves into the investigation, and this is Jody's need to erase a crime, but at the same time, needing to be recognized

as central to it in some way. I just don't think she realized it would be her demise. Well, from the moment the camera was found, Jody wasn't just a suspect. She was the only suspect. Over the next nine days, the authorities carefully built their case against her, and on June 19th, they were finally ready to bring Jody in for questioning.

When she arrived, her demeanor was calm, cooperative, and even polite. Presumably, she didn't know the police had recovered the photos on her camera. Because as the questioning began, Jody insisted that she hadn't been in Mesa since April. According to her, she'd been in Utah with her boyfriend Ryan Burns in the days before Travis's body was found. To make the trip, she'd rented a car in California. California, where she stopped in Monterey to explore for a few days, before continuing on to Utah. When asked why she'd rented a car instead of using her own, Jody said she didn't think hers could make the 2,000-mile round trip.

As for why she didn't arrive in Utah until June 5th, a full 24 hours later than she'd originally planned, she told the police the same thing she told Ryan. She'd gotten lost while driving and was too tired to keep going. So she pulled over and slept. Jody went on to tell the officer questioning her that during her time with Ryan, and even after returning to California, days later, she called Travis's phone several times and even left him voicemails expressing concern that she hadn't heard from him. Here's what's really interesting about Jody's alibi. It's almost too detailed.

She doesn't just say, I took a wrong turn, like she told Ryan, her boyfriend, when he asked her why she was a day late. Instead, she gives detectives this whole narrative. She's building a timeline. And the more elaborate the story, the more it suggests cognitive rehearsal, meaning she thought it through in advance. And that matters, because impulsive crimes, especially ones fueled by raw emotion, are usually followed by messy, inconsistent alibis. And in Jody's case, the lie is structured, rehearsed, and designed to cover a critical 24-hour window, which is the exact time frame during which Travis was murdered. Now let's talk about premeditation.

I'm not an investigator, but it certainly does seem like this was premeditated. Not only did she rent a car, but she gave herself two alibis, both of which were far from the scene, and Travis was sandwiched between them. That seems like someone who anticipated being suspected and put together a plan to avoid detection. Is this kind of confidence? She seems very confident. Is it typical of someone who fits her psychological profile? Absolutely. When we look at Jody's demeanor during and after the crime, it can seem almost bizarrely confident, but from a psychological standpoint, that confidence is actually consistent for someone with her kind of profile.

What we're likely seeing is a combination of narcissistic defense and compartmentalization. People with narcissistic traits often believe they can outsmart others, especially law enforcement. They think they're the exception. They rely on charm, storytelling, and emotional manipulation to keep control of the narrative, and Jody was no different. She thought she could talk her way out of murder. And as a critical reminder, Jody had spent years constructing false identities

to match her partners, so slipping into the role of the concerned ex or the wrongly accused woman would have been natural to her. Well, at this point, the police still weren't ready to make an arrest. When they were done questioning Jody, they let her return to her home

in Wyrika, California, where she lived with her grandparents. But the investigators weren't done, with her yet. They knew she was lying about not being in Mesa and had the photographic evidence to prove it. And soon, the forensics confirmed their suspicions. On July 3rd, detectives got confirmation that the bloody handprint found near Travis' bathroom was a match to Jody Arias. Six days later, Jody celebrated her 28th birthday, and another six days after that, on July 15th, She was arrested in Wyrika and charged with first-degree murder.

Jody's mugshot quickly became infamous. Her long brown hair was perfectly styled. Her head was tilted slightly, and she had a soft, almost sweet smile on her face. She looked completely unbothered, harmless even, which only made the image more haunting as the details of the case continued to emerge. After her arrest, Jody sat through a lengthy interrogation. The investigators on the case, including Detective Flores, walked her through their evidence piece by piece. This is what they believed.

Jody had rented a car so her own vehicle wouldn't be spotted. Then she drove to Monterey and borrowed two gas cans from her ex-boyfriend, Darrell Brewer. Shortly after, she purchased a third can, giving her enough fuel to drive to Mesa and beyond without stopping for gas. That way, Jody theoretically wouldn't be seen or recorded. And she might have gotten away with it if she hadn't taken those pictures of her and Travis. That's when the police finally showed Jody the photos they'd recovered from the camera, including the explicit sexual poses, the picture in the shower, and the blurry, blood-soaked photo of his body on the floor with Jody's foot visible in the frame.

The police told Jody they knew she'd called Travis. Travis' phone several times after the murder, and that she had left voicemails to make it look like she thought he was still alive. The officers also claimed Jody had accessed Travis's voicemail system after his death to delete any messages that didn't line up with her story. Then they pointed out that by the time Jody returned her rental car in California, she'd put 2,800 miles on the vehicle. That was way more than there should have been if she'd just gone to Utah and back. An employee of the car company would later testify that upon returning the car, the floor mats were missing, and there were several red stains on the car's front and back

seats. But even with the mountain of evidence laid out in front of her, Jody didn't budge. In fact, when the detectives kept pressing her, she blurted out, if I was going to ever try to kill somebody, I would use gloves. I have plenty of them. And that wasn't even the strangest moment of her interrogation. At one point, she was left alone in the room and proceeded to do a headstand against the wall. Later, she began singing the popular Christmas Carol, Holy Night. Okay, so I think most people, and I say most, because obviously there's going to be outliers and other variables that can explain this. But most people in her position, we would expect to see as distraught, panicked, and shut down.

But not Jody. She's oddly calm. That's emotional detachment bordering on delusional self-confidence, and it's very callist. So what's going on here? First, like we talked about, there's a performative aspect. Jody likely believed that acting this way would throw off the investigators, as it would make her seem too composed to be guilty in her mind. And that's a tactic we sometimes see in people with narcissistic traits who use charm or eccentricity

to manipulate how others perceive them. But it could also be a maladaptive coping mechanism, too. In high-stress situations, especially when someone has a fragmented sense of self, they may dissociate or regress. So the behavior becomes almost childlike, like doing a handstand and singing, a return to control through performance, routine, or attention-seeking. What do you make of her comment about the gloves? Would that be a deflection or maybe a kind of admission? Does it seem like Jody's fully aware of her situation at this point? She seems delusional. Yeah, the comment about the gloves speaks to the concept of leakage that I outlined previously. It's a moment where the subconscious seeps through the performance.

She's trying to sound clever, like she's above suspicion. But instead, she's revealing that she actually has thought about what it would take to kill someone and what she would do to get away with it. And that is very telling, especially to investigators. So I don't think that she's delusional. I just think that she has an error of arrogance. where she truly does believe that she can outsmart detectives and use charm and use her appeal, her attractiveness, the halo effect in order to appear as somebody who is not guilty,

somebody who is genuinely concerned and helpful to investigators. However Jody was feeling at this point, she stuck to her original story throughout the first day of her interrogation. But on day two, something changed. Finally, Jody told Detective Flores that she had been with Travis at the time of his murder. She claimed that the two of them spent the day together. They had sex, took a nap, and then Jody decided to take photos of him in the shower. And then, according to her, all hell broke loose.

What's up, Little Psychos? I'm Investigator Slater, host of the Psychopedia podcast. Psychopedia is a true crime podcast delivering raw, real, and absolutely gripping episodes every single week. I dig deep to uncover fascinating details of heinous true crime cases while exploring criminology and psychology theories. I take you into the absolute darkest corners of the human psyche, my favorite territory, and present cases like you've never heard them before. Follow and listen to Psychopedia everywhere you get your podcasts.

On July 15, 2008, 28-year-old Jodi Arias was arrested and charged with the murder of her ex-boyfriend, 30-year-old Travis Alexander. The evidence against her was overwhelming. Not only could Jody be placed at the crime scene, but she'd taken a picture of Travis's body, seemingly only moments after he was murdered. But Jody insisted she hadn't killed him. After her arrest, Jody was questioned by Detective Esteban Flores of the Mesa Arizona PD. In her version of events, Jody claimed that while she was with Travis in the shower, intruders wearing ski masks had burst into the home and attacked them. Jody said she remembered Travis screaming as they jumped on him. She got hit in the head during the chaos, which she thought knocked her out. That was why her memory of what

happened that day was hazy. She also claimed that one of the intruders held a gun to her head and threatened to kill her. But for reasons Jody couldn't explain, the intruders let her live, allegedly telling her that they were only there for Travis. Before the masked assailants fled the scene, they told Jody they'd kill her entire family if she talked about the attack. Not wanting to risk the safety of her loved ones, Jody said she left Travis's house alone,

frightened and traumatized. She apparently got in her car and drove to Utah, never telling a soul what had happened, until this moment. Even though the story was totally outrageous, Jody was committed to it. While she told her story, she started crying. It was the first time during any of the interactions she had with police that she showed any emotion. So Jody's backed into a corner, and her previous lies aren't working, so she defaults to what she's been good at,

and that's fabricating a story to emotionally regulate the threat. That's reflexive for her. Jody can't psychologically tolerate being the villain in her own story. So even when she's forced to admit that she was there, she creates a version of events where she's still the victim. And it's what we call trauma scripting, and that's when someone inserts themselves into a traumatic narrative in a way that explains their presence but erases their accountability. So what does this shift say about her mental state? It shows a few things, a need to control the narrative, a lack of psychological integration, meaning she can't hold the reality of what she's done and who she wants to be at the same time, and a deteriorating defense system. She's trying to stay afloat emotionally as the evidence is piling against her. It's self-preservation and not unlike what many people like her do in moments like this for varying reasons. Well, Detective Flores wasn't buying it. After Jody finished her story, he told her it was one of the most far-fetched things he'd ever heard and that she wasn't doing herself any favors by sticking by it. But

Jody was committed to it. At her arraignment on September 11, 2008, she pleaded not guilty. Days later, she told her intruder story to the nation when she gave a jailhouse interview on the news program Inside Edition. In the interview, Jody was calm and collected, poised even. When asked about Travis, she spoke of him fondly before recounting the same mystery killers story she had told Detective Flores. She stuck to it with complete. complete confidence before she went on to utter the words, No jury will convict me because I am innocent. Despite her bravado, Jody eventually changed her story as her trial approached.

In August of 2010, she admitted that she did kill Travis, but she claimed it was self-defense. According to Jody, Travis had been physically, emotionally, and sexually abusive. She painted a picture of a relationship. defined by fear and manipulation, one that ended in a violent outburst after she accidentally dropped his camera on June 4, 2008. In that moment, she claimed Travis was so enraged, she feared for her life and had to fight back. It was a stunning twist for Jody's defense. By claiming she was a battered woman, Jody thought she was able to justify killing Travis, and that maybe a jury

might show her mercy. Armed with this updated lie, Jody went on to do multiple interviews from jail before her trial began, and even went on air with Inside Edition again. Doing pretrial media interviews is not normal, especially for someone facing first-degree murder charges. Most defendants are advised by attorneys not to speak out

and to keep a low profile so as not to affect their legal proceedings, but Jody did the opposite, and from a psychological perspective, it's just more data that shows she is once again trying to curate an image. External validation became more important to her than her legal strategy. And she's once again had a massive narrative shift. First, she hadn't been to Mesa in a while, then it was intruders, and now finally this self-defense story.

Claiming abuse is her attempt to gain sympathy show complexity and tragedy. But genuine victims of domestic violence don't usually seek out national attention immediately after killing your abuser in self-defense. They're often traumatized, conflicted, and quiet. Jody's eagerness to go on camera speaks to a very different motivation, and again, it's about controlling the narrative. She's always been about image control, and if that image starts to crack, she's going to go to great lengths to rebuild it.

Well, Jody could only argue her case in the Court of Public Opinion for so long. In January of 2013, the now 32-year-old finally went on trial in the trial. a court of law. In the four and a half years since Travis's murder, Jody had drastically changed her appearance. She now wore glasses and had a new hairstyle, long with wispy bangs that skimmed her forehead, giving her a meek, almost childlike appearance. News of her trial and her new look was everywhere, from front-page tabloids to morning talk shows and the nightly news. At this point, Jody had made it clear. She didn't mind the spotlight. In fact, she was, she might have welcomed it, because on February 4, 2013, she did something most people

being tried for murder, like to avoid. She testified in her own defense. For 18 days, Jody talked about abuse she allegedly endured as a child, manipulation she'd experienced in past relationships, and ultimately the trauma that Travis's supposed violence had caused her, which she claimed she was able to keep hidden from the rest of the world. Jody went on to explain that Travis controlled her, degraded her, and called her terrible names. She said he'd choked her, and during their final violent encounter, she feared if she didn't fight back, she wouldn't survive. During Jody's testimony, she had all sorts of excuses for repeatedly changing her story, including that she was ashamed about the alleged abuse and that she didn't want to damage Travis's reputation.

She also claimed to have no memory of the killing itself. It seemed Jody's recollection had simply vanished at exactly the right time, a case of convenient amnesia. But under cross-examination, Jody was confronted with all of her previous lies and had to admit that even she couldn't keep them straight. She'd been lying for so long it wasn't clear if she knew what the truth was anymore. Yeah, let's talk about these child abuse allegations that her favorite. family has denied and that there doesn't seem to be evidence of. This is important because it shows a

pattern again. When Jody's cornered, she doesn't just deny or deflect, she rewrites the backstory to justify her present behavior. And that can be referred to as retrospective victimhood, recasting your history to excuse your current choices. Jody was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder by one evaluating psychologist. And a large percentage of individuals with this condition do have a history of abuse or neglect. However, it's not the case for all. There is still a substantial minority of individuals who have no history of abuse or sexual trauma with the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. The reality is this condition is very complex and it develops from a combination of genetic, environmental,

and psychological factors. And to be clear, and I mentioned this in part one, borderline personality disorder does not make someone violent, manipulative, or dangerous. But her pattern of playing the victim and the martyr, like asserting she had been victimized and protecting Travis's reputation, are patterns commonly seen with individuals with borderline personality disorder. It goes back to image management due to fear of abandonment or rejection. She has a deep fear being seen as the villain or of being seen as unworthy or unlovable. So instead of accepting a difficult truth, they may rewrite the story to protect their identity from that shame. And the easiest rewrite is becoming the victim. But not just any victim, the tragic, misunderstood, loyal victim. And to Jody,

she genuinely believed that to be true because she was, in her mind, committed in every way to Travis. So much so, she fused her identity with his. Can fear and shame genuinely motivate someone to create these elaborate lies or is just another cover? And based on Jody's psychology, is there any chance she was able to tell the truth at this point? So fear and shame, can absolutely motivate someone to lie, especially someone with an unstable identity or deep abandonment wounds, like we often see in people with borderline personality traits. Lying in that context becomes a defense mechanism, not just to avoid consequences, but to protect a fragile self-image that can't handle the truth.

But here's the key difference. Most people who lie out of shame or fear show some level of emotional congruence, like hesitation or regret, even discomfort, or a desire to tell the truth, but not know how. With Jody, what we see is different. Her lies are strategic, multi-layered, and constantly evolving to fit whatever version of reality benefits her most in that moment. So was she capable of telling the truth at that point? Technically, yes, but psychologically probably not. She had too much writing on this version of herself that she'd constructed, the loyal acts, the battered woman, the misunderstood survivor, and telling the truth would have meant a total ego death for Jody.

Well, the jury didn't have too much trouble deciding what the truth was. On May 8, 2013, they reached a verdict after 15 hours of deliberation. They found Jody Arias guilty of first-degree premeditated murder. The question now was, what would her punishment be? When it came to her sentencing, Arizona law required the jury to unanimously decide between life in prison or execution. But they couldn't reach a consensus, which meant a new jury had to be brought in to hear the entire case all over again. The second jury also found themselves divided, which meant the final decision was left up to the judge who sentenced Jody to life in prison. As of this recording, Jody remains incarcerated at the Perryville, Arizona State Prison Complex in Goody

where she works as a library aide. Her sentence is final and can never be appealed. Jody Arias once told the world that no jury would ever convict her. She'd spent years convincing the world that she was a kind, gentle person. But in the end, Jody's true nature was revealed by pictures she'd taken herself. Her obsession with love led her down an increasingly dark path, and in the end it was her own words, the truth she twisted over and over again that showed the world who she really was. A murderer. Thanks so much for listening.

Come back next time for a deep dive into the mind of another murderer. Killer Minds is a Crime House original powered by Pave Studios. Here at Crime House, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support. If you like what you heard today, reach out on Instagram at Killer Minds. And don't forget to rate, review, and follow Killer Minds wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference. And to enhance your listening experience, subscribe to Crime, Homehouse Plus on Apple Podcasts.

You'll get every episode of Killer Minds ad-free, along with early access to each thrilling two-part series and exciting Crime House bonus content. Killer Minds is hosted by me, Vanessa Richardson, and Dr. Tristan Engels, and is a crimehouse original powered by Pave Studios. This episode was brought to life by the Killer Minds team, Max Cutler, Ron Shapiro, Alex Benadon, Lori Marinelli, Natalie Pertzowski, Sarah Camp, Kate Murdoch, Marky Lee, Sarah Tardiff, and Carrie Murphy. Thank you for listening. Looking for your next listen from our crime house slate of shows, don't miss murder true crime stories. Carter Roy is looking into one of the most haunting, mysterious unsolved cases, the boy in the box. Listen to and follow Murder True Crime Stories every Tuesday and Thursday on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you listen to podcasts.