Modern Wisdom - #1032 - Joshua Citarella - The Dark Subcultures of Online Politics

Episode Date: December 13, 2025

Joshua Citarella is an artist, writer, and cultural researcher focused on internet subcultures and online politics. We’ve all doom-scrolled our fair share of online politics, some of it funny, some unsettling, and some surprisingly insightful. But which internet subcultures are actually shaping political ideas, how serious are they, and do they truly influence real-world policy? Expect to learn what’s happening with young people and politics at the moment and why it’s qualitatively different than the past, the weirdest subcultures on the internet that move politics, how online redicalisation actually happens, how internet subcultures actively produce or accelerates political beliefs and identity formation, why Joshua thinks “conservatism is the new punk rock” and much more… Sponsors: See discounts for all the products I use and recommend: https://chriswillx.com/deals Get a free bottle of D3K2, a Welcome Kit, Travel Packs, plus bonus gifts (US only) when you first subscribe at https://ag1.info/modernwisdom New pricing since recording: Function is now just $365, plus get $25 off at https://functionhealth.com/modernwisdom Get a Free Sample Pack of LMNT’s most popular flavours with your first purchase at https://drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom Get 35% off your first subscription on the best supplements from Momentous at https://livemomentous.com/modernwisdom Extra Stuff: Get my free reading list of 100 books to read before you die: https://chriswillx.com/books Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic: https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom Episodes You Might Enjoy: #577 - David Goggins - This Is How To Master Your Life: https://tinyurl.com/43hv6y59 #712 - Dr Jordan Peterson - How To Destroy Your Negative Beliefs: https://tinyurl.com/2rtz7avf #700 - Dr Andrew Huberman - The Secret Tools To Hack Your Brain: https://tinyurl.com/3ccn5vkp - Get In Touch: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact - Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

I really love what you do. I think it's very interesting, very unique. That's incredible high praise from the greatest cinematic podcast that I think exists. I mean, there's only so many people in the game that produce really beautiful video footage. And I think you seem to be in maybe the top spot there. So it's a great honor. Thank you. Some may accuse me of all style and no substance.

I'll take whatever I can get. How do you describe what you do? you meet somebody at a cocktail party and they say, what is it that you're interested in? What do you say? I suppose I first try to avoid the cocktail party, if at all possible. But I used to say artists because that was what I did. I would show work in galleries and museums.

Now I say artist and internet culture writer. I'm a podcaster, though. Most people know me for podcasting. So about a year ago, maybe a little over a year ago, I launched Doom Scroll. We're now in episode 36, 35, something like that. And so it's a real transformation in that I used to publish to an audience of like 10,000 dedicated intellectuals and now it's like 100,000 weekly viewers and it's just a very, very different game.

And what is it that you're interested in? What is it you focus on? I mean, I guess it goes back to 2018. I wrote this book. It was a self-published book, really a long-form essay called Politigram on the Post Left that was looking at the memetic activity of teenagers, 12 to 17 at that time. Mostly people on what we would then call the post-left. That means a little bit of something different now, which you might associate with like post-liberal, new rights, what have you, previously Bernie supporters,

now people who've gone through that like Bernie to Trump pipeline, that's generally what we call post-left. At that time, it meant eco-anarchy, green anarchy, anarcho-primitivism, people who would reject industrial society and we're 14 years old posting on Instagram, and I wrote a pretty extensive ethnography of how those people got into those politics. That sounds niche.

That sounds so much niche. Yes. Yeah. It was extremely niche. I think it is held up pretty well, considering that was eight years ago now. And it laid kind of the foundation for a lot of the memetic ecosystem that we live in now.

So if you look at those like early, you know, this is all primary sources of people who were meme makers, like teenagers who were shit posting on the bus to school, there are early inklings of how our media environment exists now. So, yeah, I think while it was previously niche to audiences of hundreds or thousands, we now see those same narratives and in some cases literally the same memes posted to audiences in the hundreds of thousands or millions. So the scale on these things, we call it early detection. How do you find something that is going to get big in the future? It's like political trend casting. Wow. Fascinating. What is it that predicts whether something is going

to become big in the future or whether something is going to die or death like most memes probably do? Well, this was part of the debate at that time, whether this was part of a trend cycle that has like a bell curve, right, of early adopters, late adopters, it gets big and then it dies off. And I think the key to that is the underlying analysis of knowing like what is a problem that won't go away or what is a problem that won't easily go away what is the trend line that you're following and if you're looking at downward mobility in the united states for most working people that's been pretty steady for like 40 years so i don't think that's a trend cycle and basically what i was mining at that time was kids in you know this gen z bracket who were looking at a life that is very different

from millennials, very different from Gen X. They don't have that same boomer upward mobility where the future they're looking towards is in some cases pretty grim. And so it was understandable about why they would want to reject technology or get into radical politics and do something to upend the status quo. How do you come to think about what's happening

with young people in politics at the moment? I think I've heard you say that it's qualitatively different than it was in the past. Yeah, there's been, there's been moments where we go through kind of like a correction, you know, it's like, oh, we swung too far in this direction and now we're going to go back this way for a while, right? And we kind of reach this center equilibrium. But, I mean, the biggest questions of like de-industrialization, neoliberalization of the economy, like this stuff is not going anywhere.

And so I think when you see something that reaches, I was a consultant on a project called breaking points, right? Like when do these narratives ultimately hit a point of no return and they have to make a pretty decisive transformation. So I think we're seeing some of that now. And this is kind of the interesting moment that we find ourselves in where like 1980 up until, let's say, 2020, 2024, we were in a pretty consistent period where across the United States, across both parties, across most of the advanced world, there was a general consensus on how you were supposed to run an advanced political economy. And now that has been like completely thrown to the wind. And so there's a period of I think renegotiation that we're going through that has a lot of

you know positive proposals coming out of it what are some of the big trends that you're sort of focused on now you mentioned that there's some that have started going through what are they oh I mean I think the the rise is clear it's right-wing populism across all of the advanced world right like you see this in Hungary Poland Italy like too many countries to name the United States obviously but basically the constituencies that like in my parents' generation, used to vote with the interests of labor, the constituencies that used to form the Labor Party, are now voting for these right-wing populist candidates.

And that trend over the course of 40 years basically tracks with the neoliberal consensus. And so the thing that has come out of it, to the great surprise of people on the left, is not like a renewed trade unionism. And there is a strong push for social democracy, but it is this new international nationalism. We don't yet know what to call it,

but generally the rise of right-wing populism as a pushback to austerity, anti-immigration politics, this kind of stuff. Is that something that you tracked early? Were you seeing this in the subcultures? I mean, and hitting a lot of pushback on it too because I think this will sound wild and crazy to Gen Z listeners,

but like for the period that you and I grew up, the general consensus of like conservative parties was like free market evangelism. they were all economically libertarian. So when I started talking about the rise of right-wing populism, like, eight years ago, and I was like, okay, no one under the age of 25 is a libertarian, that was like people outright dismissed it because it was completely alien to their experience. And now I think if you just look at the general alignment of conservative parties,

very few of them are economically libertarian or perhaps globalist in their orientation. But that was very new when I started talking about it. I think that bet was correct. So going back to your original research, 2018, and then that must have kick-started a little bit of an obsession. And also, once you've paid the price of learning how these subcultures work and sort of the structure of research, I suppose, being able to go down rabbit holes appropriately,

I imagine that the rabbit holes go pretty deep. So what are just how, extreme or bizarre are the depths that you've managed to find online? Yeah, I'll lay out maybe a few different projects here, but just to talk about how really, I mean, incredibly granular this was, which was, you know, I don't think to my credit, I didn't really plan much going into this. I was just kind of following my curiosity. I started with general, let's say, lefty posters who were supporting Bernie Sanders in 2016, previous guests in the podcast. You know, broad kind of, let's say just lefty aligned, you know, not really well-formed politics, but kids that

were 13, 14 years old. And then I follow them over the course of around two years. I watched them through various platform migrations, instances of deplatforming, moving between Discord, Reddit, Twitter, all of these different things. At one point, towards the end of that text, they're gathered in a pretty exclusive, very small discord that's probably around 100 people, and they're distributing writings from active eco-terrorist groups alongside memes that include instructional manuals for how to make improvised explosive devices. So to follow someone's political journey from memetic activity that is reaching audiences of, you know, hundreds of thousands to this extremely niche subculture that, you know, 100 people participate in. There were not

that many primary sources that would just follow the rabbit hole that deep. And what I did during that time was just, mostly because no one else was doing it, I was just spending an enormous amount of time in these communities and trying to catalog how wide the Overton window was. Like, if you're 15,

the acceptable parameters of political debate are not just Democrats and Republicans. It extended to Trump and Sanders. And then it extended to primitivism and transhumanism. And before you know it, you're like zoomed out to some cosmic level. And so the big philosophical questions they were asking, lo and behold, some of those things are just real-world politics now. So it became pretty interesting.

And I'm kind of of the opinion that those 15-year-olds were right in some important ways. How so? They had the foresight to recognize an important transformation, technologically, politically, economically, economically. when the traditional gatekeepers of legacy media, for example, were unable to. So, yeah, I think that that was an important insight, and I'm inclined to agree with them on that. Were you interested in politics at 12 or 13? God, no.

I mean, either. Why would you be? That's the first question that comes to mind, and I don't understand, I don't know, like some patriarch telling the kids to go out and get on their bikes or something. but I don't think I was really even conscious of politics in any real way until probably my early 20s and I still wasn't that engaged. I might be a particularly disengaged person. Is this new? Is the engagement of people in the early tweens in serious political ideas and sometimes like extreme political ideas? Is that novel?

There's, yeah, so this is a very important question. I try to approach this. I think there's three kind of primary contributing factors here. So number one is that with the transformation of our media environment, all of a sudden, the infinite world of all text and history becomes accessible to everybody, right? Like our accessibility going to the public library wherever you grew up is substantially limited compared to everything on the internet, right? So number one is access to information. Number two is, I think, the historical grounding,

which is probably the most significant topic to address here. But a previous guest I had on the show last summer, Francis Fukuyama, political theorist works at Stanford, incredibly celebrated one of the most influential political theorists of the 20th century. He, in 1992, published this book called The End of History and the Last Man. What he famously argued in that text is that this is going to be a little bit of an arc here, so bear with me. As far back as Hegel, which is a obscure German philosopher, not really worth knowing about, There's this idea of teleology, and this is the progression of socioeconomic forms that we're familiar with, you know, feudalism, then capitalism, then socialism. There's this kind of linear arc that society moves through. This is later extrapolated on by Marx and so on. And it was kind of the underlying idea that this rise of kind of competitive economic forms was somehow built into the development of human society.

and in 1989 in this essay, and then later in the book in 92, Fukuyama says, no. Actually, the end point of human society, the final form of human government, is liberal democracy. In not just the United States example, but he points to Denmark, European countries, but the idea that socialism was a kind of historical inevitability in the Marxist sense, Fukuyama disagrees with that. And that was right at the fall of the Berlin Wall. you get kind of a heyday there of like, let's say, 89 up until 2008, where there was a general consensus, and I think I'm quite sympathetic to the people who believe this, we grew up in this

world, that there was no other alternative. You know, this is not like the 1920s or 30s or like our parents maybe grew up with actually existing communism, actually existing fascism, that there were other forms of organizing society. And we thought, no, it was capitalism that won, and that was it up until the future, here on, and forever. What happens post-2008 is kind of a splintering of that consensus that ultimately reforms in the leftward flank of Sanders and the right-word flank of Trump in the United States. So you see a similar dichotomy in like every other country of a similar level of development, but growing up in Gen Z, you don't have that 1989 liberal democracy consensus

that this is the final form, this is the way that things are going to be. Instead, you are born into a world that has no political answers for you while you're given the complete archive of the internet to trudge through every possible meme and political text that's ever written

and to kind of hyperbolicly churn these out. The third thing I would just throw in here very quickly is that the way that teenagers are kind of freed from morality and are tempted to shitpost and exaggerate things, all three of those factors multiply to just the most kind of competitive. competitive insane media ecosystem where you have like mega-communism, anarcho-prinivist, caliphatism, queer anarcho-transhumanism, libertarian neomonarchism, just they run ad infinum.

Libertarian neomonochism. That's a more popular one nowadays. Oh, okay. That's a more popular one. That's in the ascendancy. There's a faction of the new right that I think is, yeah, libertarian neomonarchist for sure. Right. Jesus Christ. Okay, so because there wasn't the consensus when Gen Z, who are currently in ascendancy on the internet and have the most time on their hands

and the most screens in front of them, because there wasn't a agreed upon, this is what the future is going to be like, plus probably a little bit of a golden era-ish, back end of the golden era for us, where questions weren't really being asked, I guess, living standards kept on, right, I shouldn't do that.

Living standards. Living standards kept on rising. And that plus the fact that they control through any infinite number of previous potential solutions to worlds that had similar problems where there wasn't an outcome defined this is the direction for the economy for politics for social cohesion etc this is meant that people have a question and a fuck ton of answers and they're now trying to retrofit one of an infinity of answers plus ones that they can create and mutate from existing answers

into the question which is still as yet non-complete. Is that a fair way to assess it? That's perfect. Yeah, that's a great synopsis of it. A friend of mine, the artist Daniel Keller, described this as a GAN, a generative adversarial network, that if you look at the memetic activity of teenagers, they are just brute forcing together combinations like monarchosindicalism. Does this work as a political ideology. No, okay, on to the next one. And just trying to throw spaghetti at the wall to see what can scale to the crises of the 21st century, they're not doing a great job so far. But they have started to form, like there are now, I would say, young political blocks that are pretty influential, right? There's like a paleo-conservative wing of the internet that has like really shifted the Overton window in the U.S., for example.

How so? How have they come into contact with the reality, the paleo-conservatives? The, I mean, you watch the rhetoric of a lot of the right-wing pundits. They now track with stuff that Fuentes was saying like six years ago, for example. What makes that paleo? When I think paleo, I think meat and fruit diet. Oh, so there's, um, paleo conservatism as like a proper political label was something that was used by Pat Buchanan and has been kind of re-adopted by young conservatives that want to differentiate themselves from neoconservatism, which was generally the consensus way of operating.

Okay, okay, okay, okay. Where paleo is a prefix. Honestly, it would not have surprised me if you said, this is a wing of conservatism which is based fundamentally around your diet. Like, it's based around what you eat. You should be eating mostly whole grains, meats, fruits, nuts, and some tubas. And if you do that and you're sort of right of center, you're a paleo conservative. Body populism, I think that's called. Oh, is it?

Okay, that's cool. That's a good one. Good advice, yeah. Holy shit. The context window that you need to keep in your mind. Yeah, yeah To hold all of this shit together Yeah, yeah, mess

One way to put it I was going to be more complimentary But That became part of the game Where I think in a negative aspect This is kind of like Oh, political engagement Is collecting Pokemon

Where there's 150 different ideologies And I'm going to make sure I know all of them And I can name them in like alphabetical order or something And so the type of like In the way that people would Autistically approach Rate Your Music

This encyclopedic encyclopedic knowledge bank of just knowing every album by every musician in a certain year that then replaces the political engagement with this kind of encyclopedic hobby that can be a negative aspect of access to too much information as well yeah you uh you optimize for sort of wrote knowledge as opposed to understood wisdom in that way like there's not really any applicability of this in terms of the understanding if i'm if i'm to ask you about what it is beyond the glossary definition you've got from the other angle or how

it interlinks. So tell me who would be on the other side of this or what would be an example of a time that this has occurred in history or why do you think this came about? All of those questions just sort of bounce off the wiki of this thing and sort of fall to the floor. That's interesting. So you mentioned there, I don't know whether you use the word, but it sounds

almost like a pipeline or a funnel of radicalization of going from whatever the political equivalent of cute fluffy dog and cat memes are to something more serious over time to improvise explosive devices. And then talk to me about that. Talk to me about the extremism radicalization funnel pipeline. Have you tracked this? Have you come up with a way that this sort of fits together? Well, there's, I mean, there are think tank and university researchers that do enormous aggregate lots of data points to kind of plot trajectories through media. And I think that

that terminology is relatively well established. I think it is useful in some cases. The great irony for me writing about these things, you know, I started writing in 2018, but the environment of that time was so incredibly hyper-polarized that we approached politics with this idea that people who were on the progressive side or conservative side were like carved into stone and immovable, right? And so the great irony of like the pipeline metaphor to me was that belief systems are in motion. I think actually all belief systems are in motion. And also the political coalitions and the parties themselves are in motion, right? Like what the Democratic Party was in 1970, very different from 2020. And so I see that actually as an opportunity, right? I think a lot of people have tried to,

I'll be more specific. I think the mainstream media has tried to opportunistically use the analogy of a funnel to lump in a whole variety of stuff that should not be there and to make connections between things that are like totally antagonistic and actually disagree on very important points. And so when they talk about very popular podcasts being a pipeline to extremist politics of people who want to go out and hurt someone in the real world, I think that that is a gross, gross mixed character is. So correctly identifying that there are pathways for people to move through political belief systems, I think accurate. And also an acknowledgement that there are contradictions within the current constellations of political beliefs that people have, where they will hold kind of mutually exclusive positions on certain issues and that cognitive dissidents spurs growth at some point. They have to kind of resolve it. Oh, that's interesting. It seems to me, especially over the last six months, we've seen a lot of friends of mine be accused of being some gateway drug to a more nefarious belief structure online.

Is that an inaccurate characterization in your opinion? I would say that is grossly inaccurate, and those are criticisms being lobbed by people in the high tower who have newly been made precarious in their media positions, and they used to have a complete monopoly. They used to hold the gates for who could publish, and now they can't. So the best that they can do is try to slander everyone else

who tries to compete with them. And quantitatively, these things are enormously popular. I think it's not just because they happen to be on a certain accessible website or whatever. I think it's because they're talking about the right topics and they're asking the right questions. And so, yeah, I think getting rid of those gatekeepers is basically a political necessity

to open up the conversations that we now need to have. And I think if you are going to deploy, this was, I mean, the irony of this pipeline metaphor, if you're going to deploy these things, it is left up to, you know, where you direct that flow of energy and inquiry, right?

It can lead to alternative places. And so I think there's generally a productive line of questioning that we can introduce. And I think if we can't discuss these things, then, you know, how are we possibly going to have consensus in a democratic society? Like, I don't think they really have much of a plan right now. I think basically the media, mainstream media narrative producers,

blue check journalists, for lack of a better term. I think basically they're trying to claw back as much of their precarious position as they can, but it's rapidly, rapidly eroding. Before we continue, I've been drinking AG1 every morning for as long as I can remember now, because it is the simplest way I've found to cover my bases and not overthink nutrition, and that is why I partnered with them. Just one scoop gives you 75 vitamins, minerals, probiotics and whole food ingredients in a single drink. Now they've taken it a step further with AG1 next gen, the same one scoop, once a day ritual, but this time backed by four clinical trials. In those

trials, it was shown to fill common nutrient gaps, improve key nutrient levels in just three months, and increase healthy gut bacteria by 10 times, even in people who already eat well. They've upgraded, formula with better probiotics, more bioavailable nutrients and clinical validation. Plus, it's still NSF certified for sport so you know that the quality is legit. Right now, when you first subscribe, you can get a free bottle of D3K2 and AG1 welcome kit plus bonus AG1 travel packs. And for a limited time, US customers also get a sample of AGZ and a bottle of omega-3s. Just go to the link in the description below or head to drinkag1.com slash modern wisdom. That's drinkag1.com And the Leviathan doesn't go down without a fight or without slinging some mud and shit on the way out.

A lot of it, yes. Yeah, interesting. Well, I'm glad, in some ways, I'm glad to hear you say that because it's a much simpler explanation than some, like, complex political ideology, understanding that I'd maybe assumed, I understand human nature. I understand that the loss of status is something that is tantamount to death, destruction in some sort of a way. the threat from another incumbent as the incumbent the threat from some ascendant new media is a I mean we saw this

even more so now I've noticed that I'll see a story will appear on YouTube beef between two creators the reaction channel pipeline will kick in and that really explodes it right that's the real sort of supernova

of this neutron star in the middle. And now, for the first time ever, I've seen mainstream media, like old school legacy media, writing articles about the original issue and the subsequent fallout. Because previously, the internet would report on what the news was.

But increasingly now, the news is reporting on what's happening on the internet. Yeah, yeah. That's where we're watching. I mean, this is kind of the irony of the alt media term right it's quantitatively larger yeah how is it alternative yeah and so now there's a thing that's flipped where like instead of uh the internet being the counter narrative to the mainstream newspaper of record it's kind of the the opposite yeah beautiful so are the online

subcultures that you've spent time researching are they actually real political spaces like how much do fringe internet communities shape young people's real beliefs? Like, does this come into contact with reality at some point? Yeah, yeah. So part of the work in, you know, it's been many years now. So I've kept up with a lot of these people that I've interviewed, right? Like some of them want to be in contact, some of them not, but there's a kind of gradation of different outcomes. So part of that is also following how those groups manifest in the real world. One easy example. is that there was a, I won't mention the name of this group because they were very small, but they were a lefty kind of a narco-communist discord organization that during the pandemic,

because they were all non-contiguous spread out over different chapters in the U.S., they turned into many mutual aid food pantry things over COVID. So that's one kind of direct manifestation. I think the other more abstract thing that I think is very interesting to follow and has been kind of my primary point of interest is when these media entities, to use kind of crossover into political organizations. I would say that AFPAC, America First Political Action Conference, this is Nick Fuentes' annual Dinner Get Together and Speeches Conference,

that that is a kind of example of this, you know, reverse downloading life from the Internet rather than uploading your life on the Internet. So I like to point to that. And then also I think Destiny has done some groundbreaking work in this field where I wrote about this for The Guardian. It was six months late to it. I just mentioned it passingly in an article, but during the Georgia Senate runoff, he mobilized

his Twitch followers and had more people canvassing and knocking doors than the capital D Democratic Party. I remember that. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And he got basically no mainstream press for this whatsoever, but that to me is a pretty important turning point where the call to action from a media entity is larger than a proper political party. So, yeah, watching that convergence, I think is really, really important. There's also sorts of ways of measuring the discourse too and who has memetic influence and who's moving the Overton window or whatever. I would point to those things as maybe the best example. I think anything else of like influencers running for office has not been very successful and I'm pretty

negative on that. Okay. So radical online communities or just online communities in general can shape policy. It's not just aesthetics. Yeah, yeah. That's interesting. That is interesting. I knew about the Destiny thing. Destiny's been on the show a bunch. You mentioned the F word, or the N word, I guess, Nick, Fuentes. It seems to me, I mean, Tucker Carlson did a breakdown with someone's son. Like, first off, had Nick on and then had a conversation. With someone's son? Explaining, yeah, fuck, I can't remember who it was. God damn it. Somebody's son came on, young guy, a son of a politician-y type cultural commentator person, to explain why Nick Fuentes is popular and has impact among young people or whatever. If I was to think about

what is sort of internet-first meme-adjacent, like radical shit-post-y subculture that appears to be in the ascendancy, he would be the first person that I would think of. What have you come to he must be a pretty canonical example given sort of what you've been tracking over the last few years or yeah yeah i wrote uh i think it was in 2020 i measured some metrics uh of the top two streamers um on right and left which were at the time hasan piker and nick fentes on their respective platforms and how many monthly active users twitch versus i forget if he was on cozy or Odyssey or whatever one of these things he was. But as per proportionately for the monthly active users of that platform, Fuentes was outperforming even Piker at that point. And so that to me,

on such a small platform that was able to get such an enormous number of proportionate views that demonstrated like, oh, wow, there's a lot of influence in here. I think maybe important to backtrack a little bit of the history is that his particular rise as like the avatar of like the young far right also has to deal with what was on the right described as the optics debate which was in the fallout of we're going way back here but the unite the right rally in charlottesville where a lot of people were just plainly put off by the like literal nsm national socialist movement of people walking around with swastikas and shields like that is pretty grossly. protest to an American audience, and there's a tolerance for racism and stuff like that, but, like, when you start to invoke pagan iconography and, like, European, like, Americans are, we're fucking cowboys, you know, they get turned off by that. And so the optics debate, this kind of infarright dispute, was about how do we further the far-right political project, but not get trapped in the kind of campy, larpy aesthetics of, like, these guys dressing up as medieval

nights with pagan iconography. It's giving me a little bit of the mirroring that some splinter factions of the less insane left seem to be looking at now in the wake of look at how much of an own-goal identity politics was. Kamala is for they, them, Trump is for you, was the most effective ad of the 2024 campaign. We need to create some daylight in between ourselves and that. I think that might be blowing with the wind a little bit more than a principle-based approach. This seems to be some people that were sort of, they had a bit of a revulsion response

or a principal ethical issue with it. But also, if you look around and you go, anyone else find this okay? No, they don't seem to. You'll blow with the wind a little too. But I'm seeing a little, at least somewhat of a cemetery between those two situations. Yeah. I mean, any political group of, you know, small to large is going to have to police and moderate itself about like, all right, well, what are we putting out? Can anybody from this group say anything, right? Is there some form of hierarchy, discipline, or moderation? Like, what do we as a group stand for? Can any single individual just say, okay, yeah, we're all about this now? I guess the primary difference that I would split hairs over here is that the far right group at that time is like small

is probably in the hundreds to thousands, whereas the kind of woke infrared left dispute now is like in the scale of millions where a lot of people, just in the general, election, I think we're really turned off by some of that militant activist rhetoric that has been extremely damaging to the social democratic cause, particularly in the U.S., but it's, the U.S. kind of exports this now, right? Like, everybody has started talking like American college campuses, which is pretty wild. Okay, so you've got Charlottesville, fallout, splinter factions. How does that lead to what we're seeing currently with Nick Pontes? I mean, I think the Israel's genocide in Gaza has really just gassed up his social media presence,

as it has done for a lot of dissident commenters all over the political spectrum. You also didn't have anyone, I think, step into the forefront that was openly antagonistic to the political establishment and the inheritor of the internet zeitgeist that had been kind of bubbling up since basically Gamergate. in like 2013-ish right so you have like at that point good five years of people who have become politicized and are looking for an avatar yeah and then it's just kind of like there's a hoovering effect right of people who are in a similar industry and let's say you have like four competitors media is going to name one person opportunities are going to be given to one person and there's a

kind of like redundancy you know if they're around a similar size and so one person kind of tends to win and then there's just this kind of like avalanche momentum that like, oh, that person continues to grow. So there were other competitors in that field. One of them is now addicted to opioids I saw on Twitter the other day. So he's not important anymore, so I wouldn't name him. Okay.

There were other people that could have gotten in the middle. I mean, we would have seen, had it had been only a few years earlier, you would have seen someone like Milo Unopoulos, would have probably been that, but I guess his cancellation plus a cent. As long as their primary avatar as a gay man that's probably that's what they need for right that's true yeah um who else again all of this has been foreplay for me to get to the real point which is if nick is my i'm like a i'm like a

brown belt normie right so i'm just about i'm just about on the cusp of understanding what's happening in some sort of corners of the internet sure but i'm speaking to somebody who sort of lives and breeds in the cobwebs Yeah, yeah. Who are some of the most politically influential people on the internet that most normies wouldn't know about? Nick being an example of someone I think that's broken through way too much to be said most normies would not know about. Like once you've been on Tucker Carlson and done five million plays,

like I think that you can class yourself as mainstream. New York Times writes about him too. Yeah. So I'm interested in who, not necessarily the new Nick, but that who are the guys that are really and girls that are really politically influential online that most people wouldn't know about yeah yeah okay so um a few a few things will kind of like work our way down as we talk about scale here let's go yeah yeah uh i was a uh jarvin was a huge one you know blogging in like the 2010s that was niche intellectual commentary which now has a you know direct philosophical uh link to some aspect of the administration who's to say whether they're following his advice or how much J.D. Vance takes this into his political program. But there's a kind of creeping influence from these things. I would say that a person who immediately comes to mind as being quietly influential is a Twitter account, Raw Egg Nationalist, actually. I think he's basically propagated a lot of

memes that have been quietly influential and like kind of seeped through. You hear them bubble up a little bit on the podcasting circuit, but he himself is not so much of a media figure. He's kind of just a poster. Yeah, he comes to mind as an example. Like, I don't know what turning point in the internet occurred where I missed it, but bronze age pervert, raw egg nationalist. Alpaca Aurelius, although he's more based in the sort of health and fitness side of this. yeah the anon pseudo anon like sort of poster scenario that's interesting that that's that's broken through it was quietly influential for a long time yeah but now you see like i mean mainstream people are talking about seed oils that is true that is true indeed um you've kept on using the word meme

are you talking about it in the richard dorkins sense or are you talking about it in the made it on Tumblissons. Yeah, so this is like the slippage, right? It's like any academic conversation that you have about memes, it's like, are we talking about square JPEGs? Or are we talking about like a transmittable unit of information or patterns and stories that humans repeat? And I think you kind of have to resort to the Dawkins definition where one way of instantiating

it is very transmittable JPEGs and what have you. But then there's all. also vertical videos. It's basically any transmittable narrative. And as silly as that may sound, that is basically the way, after having done many extensive interviews of young people who are politicized, but then also adults, like, we basically just carry these stories that either a professor told us or our dad told us or, like, were some amalgamation of all of these little tidbits of narrative that we piece together into an ideological view of the world. So, you know, Yeah, the study of memes looks really silly

because the internet is hilarious and silly, but it is actually this kind of deep investigation into how humans piece together a worldview. We do that through narratives. Because if you're ever crunching enormous amounts of data to look at the economy or look at these big abstract patterns, it doesn't really make sense until you tell a short story about it. Right?

Like that's kind of how it's come into contact with reality. it's almost it's almost a layer of abstraction because you need to exclude this is going to get very silly and granular for a second but like there's a general arc you can draw through the data right purely quantitative data is going to be spread over this grid and then there's outliers that to draw coherent synopsis or executive summary of you have to exclude certain data points and so it's um yeah maybe less information but makes it more digestible that's interesting How much of this is shit posting versus being like actually earnest? You know, Poe's law keeps on getting more and more poey. Yeah, yeah. How much is shit posting? I think, well, I think it changed because one of the things that drew me in many years ago was that this was very hilarious and people didn't mean it.

And then now you see this kind of negative polarization and doubling down where a lot of people have kind of irony poisoned themselves in one direction or another. What's that? Irony poisoning is when you float something that is a joke and then you say, this is not what I really believe, but I'm posting it to like piss off the libs or something like that. And then a few years later, you kind of like work your way up to it. And you're like, actually, yeah, this is what I believe.

Okay, okay, yeah, yeah. We'll get back to talking in just one second, but first, if you have been feeling a bit sluggish, your testosterone levels might be the problem. They play a huge role in your energy, your focus, and your performance. But most people have no idea where there's are or what to do if something's off, which is why I partnered with function because I wanted a smarter and more comprehensive way to actually understand what's happening inside of my body.

Twice a year. They run lab tests that monitor over 100 biomarkers. They've got a team of expert physicians that analyze the data and give you actionable advice to improve your health and lifespan. And seeing your testosterone levels and tons of other biomarkers charted over the course of a year with actionable insights to actually improve them gives you a clear path to making your life better. Getting a blood work drawn and analyzed like this would usually cost thousands, but with Function, it's just $499, and right now you can get $100 off, bringing it down to $399.

Get the exact same blood panels that I get and save that $100 by going to the link in the description below or heading to functionhealth.com slash modern wisdom. That's functionhealth.com slash modern wisdom. There's one of the reasons that I'm really going to speak to my expertise here. One of the reasons that people go to the gym, I think, is that it's one of their very few suits where in the practice of the thing you briefly see where you will get to with mastery of the thing you get a pump right yeah yeah if i keep doing this in six months time me walking around will look like me right now yeah that's not the same that's true when trying to learn italian

or something like you suck at italian now and you will get better at italian in six months time you don't briefly become you in six months time when learning italian to then revert back to how shit you were yesterday plus one percent um and this is kind of like an equivalent of that, which is, I'm going to project out this thing, which isn't where I am now, or maybe it is, maybe it's like leaky, I guess we're not fully transparent to ourselves. And then you end up arriving at that destination in future, either through fluke or predestination, I don't know. You know, I talked to Dr. Mike on an episode a few months back, and something kind of slipped

out in the podcast and it was a joke, but it was kind of stuck with me. It's that you can't redistribute the gains. And that it is one of the only experiences in your life where you can put in work and gain the full benefit of it to yourself. I mean, if you're maybe you're a small business owner, like you can feel that all the time, but most people are not in that position. And so it is like one of the rare experiences of putting in hard work and then getting all of the benefits. And that is kind of this, you know, self, you know, restoring mechanism that keeps you coming back. The one-to-one relationship of input versus reward is something that is real important. I played a sport for my entire teenager as I was obsessed with the game of cricket.

I played at a very high level. And it took me until I was probably 25 to make the link that if I practice more and more diligently and more frequently, I get better outcomes. I just hadn't made that link. Practice was just something that I did for fun. And I was like working on stuff or whatever, but I hadn't made the, oh, units of effort in equals units of output out. Like, isn't that great? Like, wouldn't that be lovely?

Okay, so shit posting versus being honest, you mentioned that some people test the parentheses of the Overton window and that presumably is. like if you're pushing that is that really where your opinion lies or are you just playing with words and images to see what sort of a reaction occurs so how do you work out whether or not somebody is being earnest and how do you work out what this is going to form itself into over time so there's a few different strategies at play here and i've interviewed some people who are progressive liberal in every walk of life in their job, in their marriage, and how they move through the world. And then they run this anonymous, repulsive shit-posting account that says all sorts of things that they don't even believe, but they know it upsets people.

And so that thing exists. These are not fringe cases. It's kind of common occurrence. And there's some kind of psychological venting mechanism at work there. I think most of those people don't believe these things. or they at least keep it quarantined in a certain way that it doesn't impact their political activity. The other part of this is that in a media environment or in a political environment that is constrained or gate-kept in some way, irony is a great way of kind of testing the fences for changes that kind of need to happen, right?

So there's a lot of political growth. I think this is one of the reasons why comedy has kind of been, exempt from a lot of the speech policing that was so prevalent among liberal circles for a while, because it was one of the only safe places, ironically, as a safe space, in which you could discuss these things, you could transgress, you could break the rules, right? So, like, that is basically a social function of art is to, like, break society's rules to transgress, and then to find out why they were there in the first place and the rules that we should do away with. But I think the kind of final thing to throw in here is that the media environment that we have now is that

people can put out certain opinions that they may or may not believe and entertain different non-overlapping conversations. So it can get really, really messy where, you know, I'll post something that's, you know, ridiculous and conspiratorial. And someone will mention like, oh, this is terrible. How could you post such a thing? I'd be like, yeah, yeah, I only meant it as a joke and then you send me a DM and you're like no bro I'm on the same page and I'm like yeah me too oh and so there's this kind of weird split that people can have with their politics in like kind of secret uh chambers of conversation and eventually those things can slowly come out so yeah that that ability to like test things spurs the transformation I mean man poe's law is very

fucking poey now uh how do you know that young people always blow off steam right whether it was when we were going to school and somebody just writing something reprehensible, you know, scoring it with a compass on the underside of the desk or something like that. Is this markedly different? Is there like more meaning behind this? I don't want to say that your entire body of work

is you looking at compass etchings on the underside of a desk. It's not dissimilar. A good amount of it will be and you're sort of trawling through this stuff looking for what this is an important indication of what's going to come next. Yeah.

And just trying to work out, okay, well, how do you decipher between those two? Yeah, I mean, at risk of being crude, a lot of this early internet activity is people drawing Dix and Sharpie in the school bathroom. And a lot of the arguments that I would have with mainstream journalists at the early years, they would take something as being like, this is definitive proof that this young person holds reprehensible views about subject X, Y, or Z. And I would have to tell them, the skill. is 15, they're drawing dicks and Sharpie in the school bathroom. Let them. Yeah, I think the other thing that is kind of, you know, difficult to deal with now is that

tracing those early inklings of when a political transformation was going to happen, the ones that were important to point out and to talk about and to study, basically the people who were institutional gatekeepers had their own intellectual biases, is that they would not look at those things. And so if you are looking at the work of a young person, the work, I mean, like the memes that they produce, excuse me. I come from the art world. So I'm talking about the uvra of this 15-year-old shit poster. But if you look at the insights that they were trying to relay, and that included saying, like, the liberal democratic model is over, people who worked in mainstream journalistic institutions would be like, that's not important. Clearly, this is, you know, the establishment consensus. And those things are beyond the pale. So they had like all the alarms raised. raised around things that were insignificant, and we're unable to pay attention to the things that were really important at that time. That's fascinating. What are then the ideologies that are in ascendancy that aren't neo-anoco-capitalist monochistic, like fucking paleonism or whatever it is? Yeah, yeah.

What are the ones, I mentioned, who are some of the people that are maybe sort of in the ascendancy, what are some of the ideas that you think are going to be important over the next time? Thanks a few years. I mean, I think we're in a period of productive growth on the left right now where a lot of the militant activist rhetoric has been popularly rejected. And so whatever kind of rise there is of this new social democratic movement is organizing itself in a way that I think is broadly appealing to a lot of people. And it needs to win their votes in a democratic society. The thing that I'm interested in, and I think is less commonly discussed, is that in the heyday of the social democratic period, let's say, you know, post-war up until the mid-70s, kind of the golden age of liberalism, right? Like, people were a lot more comfortable then as compared to the, you know, declining material status of Gen X, Millennials, and now Z. there weren't things like the internet or crypto or, you know, iterations of stateless capital

and a kind of transgressing of borders where the economy is now global, international, and immaterial. So it's a lot more difficult and weird to build those economic models in a world that is completely scattered and patchworked and kind of crisscrossed around the globe. Yeah, so I see basically there's a rise of a few different. different factions, but the meeting of a few of them is this kind of, you know, network state exitarian impulse on the right and where that meets with the kind of rides of renewed social democratic state. And I basically think that that is the meaningful conflict of our time right now. That's interesting. People love to talk about how the left got lost. What's your

perspective on that? I've asked people this question of like, when did it get lost, right? Was it because they'll give you different answers, too. And actually where they pick the answer is important. I think it got somewhat lost in 1968, where we had incredibly privileged boomers who did a summer job and then bought a home and basically retired at age 35. Yeah.

And then really, I think what started to happen in the universities in the 90s is that there was this kind of turn away. from the class conflict, from questions of trade unionism, from wages and all of the material concerns that had constituted discourse on the left towards this identity politics stuff, which is definitionally marginal, but then also was coded in this elite academic rhetoric that was basically used to scare off people who hadn't spent, you know, a quarter of their lives in fancy universities. So the rebuilding work is quite significant what needs to happen. It's probably a

generational project. I don't think it resolves itself overnight because it didn't get that way overnight. But we basically have a lot of intellectual baggage to bring the most popular in an electoral sense, the most popular policies in the world to meet any electoral coalition that could enact them right so how you get from one to the other is a long time of discipline organization i think when at least most normal people consider sort of radicalization they think about far right uh people that are armed uh charlottesville almost certainly would come up as one of those examples and then there was almost a um chicken and egg like you did x so we're going to do why calling out of, look at Antifa, look at black block,

look at sort of the way that people behave through BLM, riots, protests, etc. Given that you've done your deep dives, just how sort of dark does the left go? I think we have a pretty good, it's one of, you know, Jordan Peterson's famous questions, which is we understand when the right has gone too far. Sort of easy for us to define that.

We have kind of some canonical examples of that. What have you learned about sort of the darker, more extreme sides of the left just beyond like boys and girls' locker rooms and stuff like? Yeah, I mean, I often get a question like this about the right. And I think people think of me as being sort of like researcher for right-wing pipelines and stuff like this. But the most extensive thing that I wrote was about people on the left getting radicalized into what I think are really bad ideas. and kind of rejecting general humanist values. And so the eco-extremism, I think, is probably the most likely end point

for people who have not only concluded that there's no possibility for utopia, revolution, reform, basically any chance to improve the world, you're standing in it, all these types of things, but that also we've been on this slow trajectory since the rise of agriculture, since the industrial revolution

that we need to do away with organized society whatsoever. They bring on these kind of anti-natalist politics, this kind of the supremacy of Earth, the planet, and nature over human beings.

There was a kind of dispute in the early era of neoliberalism with Malthus who hypothesized that there would be an overgrowth of the peasantry and the proletariat and all of the underlings

who are not the ruler, the ruling class of society. And he genuinely argued that we were going to run out of food and people would starve to death. And so there's a kind of rise of neo-Malthusian politics where people see the kind of scarcity and the limited carbon budget and so on and so forth. And they, similar to Malthus in like the 1700s, say, well, the solution is to get rid of a lot of people.

Right, okay. And I find that to be a dangerous approach to this. Yeah. That's interesting. Kind of political nihilism. So at least one of the more extreme sides of this has to do with the environment. It has to do with the future of the world from an environmental perspective. For any young person, I think that's a very serious, it's a very serious consideration.

And those used to be politics that were impossible to discuss on the right. but now environmentalism on the right is a rising current. Is that right? Is it correct? Yeah, I mean, I think there's a kind of rising understanding that the influx of climate refugees is going to be one of the main thing that like American nationalists or European nationals are going to be dealing with. We're interested in climate as soon as climate comes into contact with immigration.

Exactly, exactly. Right, that's interesting. Isn't it funny how, you know, I don't think that I would have predicted, again, I'm completely an idiot in most of this stuff, but how horseshoey the horseshoe has got over the last few years, anti-big pharma vaccines, stuff like that, I think that was a surprise for people, that was one of the first ones that I noticed, the Middle East conflict. I'm like, you guys could not be further apart, and yet you're right next to. each other somehow. You have nothing to agree on except for the thing that you both find

to be the most important thing in the world. It's just, it's, it's, it's real interesting to me. The modular nature, perhaps, of people's beliefs, got this thing, and it sort of slots in here. And I arrived at it from one direction, and you arrived at it from a completely other direction. But I do find that very interesting. So having done, So many of these interviews with young people who are looking at, let's just say, counter narratives, right? Like things from the left, right, up, down, sideways, all over. They will be genuinely sympathetic to a lot of explanations so long as they are not at the establishment center. And I think that's very hard for people.

What does that mean? As long as you are not part of the general bipartisan consensus, the neoliberal hegemony, for lack of a better term, how most people have thought about politics who are in, you know, government or positions of the ruling elite, if you're giving them a counter-narrative from either the right or the left, a lot of people will listen to both

and they'll find points of truth. I think a great example of this is breaking points, the news show. I love Crystal. Crystal and Sager are fantastic. Yep. And them having a crossover audience should not exist, and yet it does.

And it's not just a niche slice of the pie. this is a top 10 politics podcast. So the degree to which most people in a democratic society are open to these explanations from either right or left is, I think, not insubstantial. And basically the problem that we've been troubleshooting is that our political mechanisms, the people who are in office,

have been able to insulate themselves from the democratic will. And then you get these surprising election results where somebody who is, you know, we just had Mamdani election. in New York City, and I was slicing through the numbers, and this enormous shift of young men towards Trump in 2024, Mumdani has a plus 40 margin with men 18 to 29. So there is a non-insignificant portion of the population that voted for Trump in 2024 and Mumdani in 2025. Wow.

Those people exist. That's so crazy. And so they're open. They're open to a lot of ideas. Thread the needle of that Venn diagram for me. anybody who represents the Clinton consensus, let's say, the establishment status quo, those people cannot be trusted because they've overseen 40 years of downward mobility for Americans, and I'm open to anybody who tells me they're going to change it. So anti-establishmentarianism over specifically right or left. In other news, you've probably heard me talk about Element before, and that's because I am frankly dependent on it.

And it's how I've started my day every single morning. This is the best tasting hydration drink on the market. You might think, why do I need to be more hydrated? Because proper hydration is not just about drinking enough water. It's having sufficient electrolytes to allow your body to use those fluids. Each Grabbingill Stickpack is a science-backed electrolyte ratio of sodium, potassium, and magnesium. It's got no sugar, coloring, artificial ingredients, or any other junk. This plays a critical role in reducing.

muscle cramps and fatigue while optimizing brain health, regulating your appetite, and curbing cravings. This orange flavor in a cold glass of water is a sweet, salty, orangey nectar, and you will genuinely feel a difference when you take it versus when you don't, which is why I keep going on about it. Best of all, there's no questions asked refund policy with an unlimited duration. Buy it, use it all, and if you don't like it for any reason, they give you your money back and you don't even have to return the box. That's how confident they are that you'll love it. Plus, they offer free shipping in the US. Right now, you can get a free sample pack of elements most popular flavors with your first purchase by going to the link in the description below.

heading to drinklmnt.com slash modern wisdom. That's drinklmnt.com slash modern wisdom. Right. That's so interesting. Again, like the horseshoe, dude. Like how the f- and that's one person, right? It's one guy jumping from one side of the horseshoe to the other. Well, so a lot of people in my corner of the political spectrum would say that that's a problem and we need to get the right-wing media stuff. out of their media diet out of their newsfeed and whatever. And I've made the very unpopular argument for like almost a decade now that actually this represents an opportunity to build the coalition

that will win the policies that you want, right? Because it allows you to absorb more people than just already kind of agree with you but might not quite agree with you. You actually get to take from the other side. Exactly, exactly. Yeah. How do we get a single payer, you know, national health service in the United States? Are we going to do that with a minority of votes of people who are all ideologically on the same very narrow page?

No, we're going to need an overwhelmingly broad coalition. A lot of those people now are Trump voters or Marjorie Teller Green voters. You know, they're ready to just no longer, yeah. But they're ready to dissent from the status quo. And they need to be won over. They need to be persuaded. Yeah, and not lambasted or shamed into sort of changing their beliefs because they're in insufficiently pure or well-educated or understanding of this particular thing.

Like people, it's much easy to just align the incentives. And I think if you have someone like Mamdani that comes in and says, looks like you're being screwed over. I felt screwed over. You speaks to me because that was exactly what Trump said. Just again, two people arrive at it's a much better example than my fucking vaccine one. Two people arriving at very similar sort of sounding rhetoric from the complete opposite side of the spectrum.

So I guess if you were to think about like the meme president would be Trump, right? I saw a video the other day. Yeah. I saw a screen recording was on Sam Harris' show of the White House, the White House website

tracking the development of the West Wing or something and in it is Clinton getting a blowjob and Hunter Biden doing crack on the offensive. official white house website oh yeah they they do they have all these elaborate graphically designed things as well we got to know i mean at the end of this administration like who is the you know department of posting over there right because they have to be employing graphic designers

just point them in a different direction yeah they're i mean they're posting a lot of material it's hyper literate in all of the aesthetics like they made these kind of you know snappy videos and shit like that. So there's somebody over there who's a very talented poster. Trump himself is maybe one of the greatest posters of all time. I think the power of that is actually very underestimated. Well, that was the reason that I said it, that you have somebody who is maybe the meme president. Has the internet lead speak being shown by the guy that has the most power? Has that legitimized or galvanized the communities that you guys are seeing more? I have to assume it would do.

The last few years has lent a lot of credibility and importance to these things that were maybe casually toyed with before, often dismissed. I'm trying to think if there are people who are now organizing themselves with that in mind, there have been totally. targeted meme campaigns a few years ago, like something called a baking kit, for example, which is a zip file that gives you transparent P&Gs that you can drag and drop into different meme formats. Andrew Yang was an example of this where you'd get a discord of like 100,000 to 1,000 people and be like, all right, today we're making memes about X topic and then they flood the internet with it.

Those things exist. I wouldn't be surprised if they're happening now, but I think, you know, if the actual government is doing it. The seat of power is a little bit different. So we have this meeting between Mamdani and Trump. And I think a lot of politics feels like k-fabe, right? It's this playing of the game, the pretending of the pantomime as the real. But for a moment, we saw kind of maybe because Trump was in a good mood.

And that did seem a little disarming that day, like not taking. making things so personally, we saw kind of the real push the K-Fabe to one side. It's okay, you can call me a fascist, I can call you the communist, it doesn't matter. But to do that, they will go back to within the space of a week, saying that each other is the biggest threat to democracy or the future of America. But at the time, they're almost able to break the fourth wall and call out what the meta is that sits above it all. Does that make sense?

And I just thought that was so interesting to see the game break briefly in like a before our eyes. And then you do know that within the space of two weeks it's going to be. He's the biggest threat to da-da-da-da-da-da-da. Yeah, I couldn't really wrap my head around. Maybe you've got a theory about this, but I was like, I expected some kind of like, you know, big clash and sparks or something. Yeah, yeah. And then they did the exact opposite. there's got to be some brilliant art of the deal strategy

or just fucking up people's expectations. I don't know. There must be a name for this, but do not attribute to pre-planned genius that which can be explained by a good night's sleep. You know, just I woke up on the right side of the bed that day. Like I was feeling pre-regulated. This thing happened.

And I just thought, you know what? Like, it's okay. And that's on both sides. And it becomes recursive as well. Right? You've been in the room. Well, I'll learn this wonderful idea a couple of weeks ago called vagal authority. So vagal? Vagal authority. Like the nerve. Vega's nerve. Okay. So vagal authority describes in any room that somebody walked into or any interaction that somebody's having, one person's nervous system is dictating the rats. So you walk into a room, you're calm,

somebody else gets angry. Do you get angry too? Do you follow their authority, their vagal authority, or does your calmness seep into them? The wonderful idea that you have so much spare regulation in your system that other people can almost borrow it from you, that you're able to, and this isn't always good, right? You have so much spare anger in your system that you can encourage people to be angry, you have so much spare excitement or agitation in your system, et cetera, et cetera.

And I don't know which direction the authority was coming from in the sort of Mamdani Trump interaction. I'm not saying that this is Trump, you know, like dictating the nervous system of the room but it was interesting and I just get the sense that maybe the guys were both

oh you know what's the fucking point of shouting and hooting and hollering and also you don't look silly you don't look petty there will be a lot of gamesmanship in that yeah yeah I think Crystal said that he likes a winner

it could be a simple yeah yeah I gotta respect him first place yeah I mean it was what did somebody right it as there were just two guys I don't know whether they're from the Bronx, but wherever they're from. Like, they're just two guys from New York just shooting the shit. I shouldn't think of that, but yeah, yeah. There's two guys from New York just shooting the shit.

I mean, it seems like there's a big crossover that happens to, like, both of them. So, yeah, I think there's a lot of potential in there. I've heard you say that young people are highly ideological and politically ineffective sometimes. That sounds like something I would say, yeah. Greta, regularly in the news. Would she be an example of somebody highly ideological and politically, at least attention-grabbing? You know, I didn't follow her. So it was a comparison that was made very early on because I wrote about all these kids that were super concerned about climate change.

And she came out right around the same time. Oh, wow. It was like the fucking hunger games for eco people and she won. Well, she was basically, if you were talking about, this topic, she was the pop culture association of a young person, you know, climate activist, I think she has gotten much more like properly politicized where I think, you know, a few years ago, like Amber Lee Frost, previous guests in the podcast, she makes this great point in her book that we often look to young people for political solutions. And if you would approach that

in any other context, like in, you know, a job environment, in a university, it's like, wait, these are the people who know the least. Why are we putting the people who have the least experience in charge of the most important job in the world? What a wonderful idea. And so, yeah, I don't hold it against her that the early stuff was like a little bit silly in activism, but she does seem to be, to her clear material detriment, very committed to the causes she's involved in now. So she's kind of won me over. yeah but she did die the rivers of venice green this week i didn't see that yet yeah so why are they green uh to protest europe's lack of removal of carbon-based fuels fossil fuels um so they she was in venice

and poured you would love it it was it was performance art they had these people these i mean it probably looks pretty good yeah well that looked good and then there were all of these people dressed like geishas they represent something i don't know what is this like a extinction rebellion production type thing right yeah yeah there was music and they were sort of walking and doing this yeah their hands back and forth doing that and they were all they were draped they had the white faces the masks and stuff she wasn't one of those she was on the sideline she wasn't trusted to be one of the performance um but yeah they dumped uh 10 rivers around italy um venice being the the sort of a real pinnacle example.

Why isn't it like red with blood? Why is it green? I don't know. It was apparently eco-friendly, but they got a 48-hour ban and a $170 fine. $170. It's very affordable. I do it every day.

It's a cost of doing business. Do you know what I mean? I'm, I should say I'm a little, I haven't seen this particular example, but I'm pretty negative on climate activists, like doing these stunts destroying artworks. Well, I imagine that that must be soup over a bango. Huge controversy in the art world.

I mean, you take climate as a very serious issue, but like these are public goods, right? Like we should not celebrate people, and obviously just behind glass is not damaged and whatever, but like we should not celebrate people destroying something that is like held in the public's trust and is available to people. Like this is something that we all have a shared history.

Even the sacredness of it, right, regardless of whether or not there's real damage done. There is an essence of this thing. It's like spitting in the face of a public treasure. Yeah, yeah. And, yeah, there were people who came down on different sides of that. I was one of the more outspoken. This should not be tolerated and definitely not encouraged. Yeah, look, I had this conversation with Rogan, and I said, I think, I understand why.

Do you ever see the movie, Don't Look Up? Leonardo DiCaprio. Yeah, there's a meteor. Correct. There is a media, well remembered. It was a little bit of a forgettable film, but you got some of it. You got the big bit. Things come into words earth.

You can use that as a stand-in for any existential risk or looming crisis that you want. Meteor is coming toward Earth. Educated scientists-y people say this is a big deal. The media makes light of it, makes jokes. of it, they're not paying sufficient attention, they're not treating it with the appropriate level of scrutiny and care that it needs and, you know, drama. And what happens over time,

there's a scene halfway, two-thirds of the way through the movie where they're on a news story, a news station, and they're sort of trying to explain how big of a deal this is, and the newscasters are just sort of making more jokes about it. It's pop culture reference after the half-me, ironic speech, shit post after da-da-da-da. And then one of the characters just like starts screaming on TV.

I remember this, yeah. And goes, you need to listen. You're not listen. It just completely breaks the frame, right? They're playing in improv, you would say that they punked the game. Yeah. So you're no longer playing tennis. You hit the ball in the air or you whack it out of the stands or whatever.

And they break the whole frame of the thing. I understand why people behave like that. And if you really, really care about an issue, if you believe in an issue, you a lot and people aren't listening you talk more loudly and listen and not listening so you talk more loudly and it just keeps on going keeps on going the problem with this is that as you said before it's very important to understand that we need to get people to move cognitively one step at a time going to sort of track you through this understanding as opposed to taking you from zero to 10 yeah Because if I do that, you don't have all of the requisite steps in between to be able to understand how I got there.

And if I do that, you're probably going to dig your heels in more. Very few people get scoffed, patronized, or mocked into changing their mind. In fact, if anything, that causes them to dig their heels in. And I saw this with Richard Reeves, who's sat there. And American Institute of Boys and Men, I think he's wonderful, very policy wonky, you know, like, publicly acceptable face of boys and men. And I realized that a lot of the guys that talk about men's issues online feel like they're not being listened to, so they dial up the volume and the vociferousness of the way that they speak.

And they might be doing it in a slightly different way, but it's the exact same dynamic that causes Greta to dye the rivers of Venice green. people aren't listening to me I must speak louder people still aren't listening to me I'm going to speak even louder and the problem is that if you start shouting and ranting and raving

you look like a lunatic to a lot of people and it turns lots of them off so I think that if you really care about changing minds even though it's less sexy and even though you need to do some regulation yourself because you're like there's a fucking asteroid

you need to listen you're not listening it is in your interests to remember how behavior change and belief change happens which is one step at a time it's rarely a sky's opening and I saw at that moment the earth was going to it's not you take people along one step at a time and I think that throwing soup over a vango

or gluing yourself to the M25 or pouring green dye into the rivers of Venice I think that those things do the opposite I think that you're taking somebody from 1 to 10, as opposed to just keep on working away. Because you have to assume if the argument is fundamentally compelling, if you get somebody from 0 to 1 or 2, the pipeline of their belief will continue,

the momentum, the inertia will get them to roll downhill in any case. And yeah, I just, if you want to change minds, that's not the way to go about it, I think. This is maybe, what you brought it before, about young people being politically ineffective, is that I think a lot of the politics that people have now are basically adapted from the university and from elite media positions

where in those halls you can pretty effectively shame someone and kind of force them to shift their rhetoric or beliefs because you have like a total monopoly on where they're employed and they spend their time and all things like that. But when you try to take that outside of the university setting, people are like, oh, I'm just,

I'm just going to leave. Like, this is not for me. And so if you join some political organization and all they can tell you is like, well, no airplanes, no hamburgers, we're going to take stuff away from people. And you're like, I'm already going to work every day and trying to just make ends meet.

I don't want to have less stuff. This is actually not for me. That doesn't work anymore. And so they voluntarily just exit those types of movements. And so I think we're basically right now grasping for like, what is an actual lever of power in society? And going back to some of these early foundational questions, I think power is, well, one, it's at the voting booth, but two, it's in the workplace. And we have not had a lot of power in the workplace in the United States

for basically as long as I've been alive, the past 40 years of 1980 up until 2020, 24, this neoliberal block. So, yeah, I mean, you shouldn't be surprised at like these kind of activist performance, art stunts are not politically effective. A quick aside, you've probably heard experts like Dr. Ronda Patrick talk about the benefits of omega-3s. They reduce, hello, omega-3s, there they are. They reduce brain function. No, they don't.

They support brain function, reduce inflammation, improve heart health, and are backed by hundreds of studies. But here's the thing, all omega-3s are not made the same. Most brands cut corners. They use cheap fish oil, skip purity testing, throw in fillers, and call it a day. But with Momentus, you know you're getting the highest quality omega-3s on the market. They're NSF certified for sport and they're tested for heavy metals and purity. So you can rest easy, knowing anything that you take from Momentus is unparalleled when it comes to rigorous third-party testing.

What you read on the label is what's in the product and absolutely nothing else. Most of all, Momentus offers a 30-day money-back guarantee. So you can buy it and try it for 29 days. If you don't love it, they'll just give you your money back. Plus, they ship internationally. Right now, you can get 35% off your first subscription. description and that 30-day money-back guarantee by going to the link in the description below or heading to live momentous.com slash modern wisdom and using the code modern wisdom a checkout.

That's L-I-V-E-M-O-M-O-M-T-O-U-S dot com slash modern wisdom and modern wisdom, a checkout. You did, speaking of other pipelines, I suppose, sort of the man problem, the stuff that Richard Reeves talks about, I've spoken about a good bit too. what has been your perspective on the state of young men at the moment, especially if you're paying a little bit of attention to the left. We often talk about the left's problem with masculinity, with men, why they're so ineffectual at talking to and galvanizing men to be able to be seen. I certainly think that there's some pretty strong evidence that there are big blind spots,

not even blind spots, a purposeful sort of omissions. Right? Because if we were to pedestalize this particular group, it would look like we're taking it away from some more deserving group. What have you learned? What are you seeing? What's the cutting edge of how boys and men are doing on the internet at the moment? Yeah, yeah. There's a lot of talk about this, right? Of like the problem for like men on the left. And, you know, I think whatever we have today that constitutes today's left, take it or leave it. I don't think that thing has room for men. I don't think it has room for much of anybody. It's a few people in kind of their academic or media positions

desperately clawing on to eroding power. I like to call them mangoes, media academics, and NGOs. Elite sectors of society. But the left that I see that is scalable and has one, historically the demands of the left, is more similar to what existed in the 1970s, which was robust trade union organizations, people on their shop floor.

And we had a historic high union density at 31% in the U.S. Right now, it's 11, you know. You look at the divergent wages and productivity like it happens right around the 1970s, around the neoliberal turn. And yeah, it's no surprise why there hasn't, the left, so to speak,

this kind of niche click of academics, has not been able to invite in the people that they necessarily need to win over. And this was just such incredibly an uphill battle for the last few years. But I was writing and interviewing these people. And, you know, I talked to people from all across the political spectrum, all different backgrounds. But there are a lot of young men in there. And I would hear just because I participate in these elite circles, endless kind of casual misandry and these people's political needs are not important.

And it's their turn to take a back seat. And it's like, this is really going to bubble over. This is not good. they are actively, I'm literally interviewing them and watching them move. Like, I've had relationships with these young men over the course of years. I've watched them drift further and further into these other political worldviews. And in some cases, they would try to join left-wing groups and be like, I want to organize my workplace.

I want to learn about this stuff. And they would just be met with, like, this kind of vicious activist rhetoric that was meant to basically scare them off from joining the meeting or the reading group or the organization, what have you. And so, yeah, against the odds socially, that was an unpopular opinion, but I think it was right. And then post-2020-election results, now that has been the thing that everyone is talking about, how to win these people over. But they haven't come up with a solution.

They haven't come up with the solution because I think the 1970s, let's say, New Deal liberalism in the American model or social democratic organization in the European model, that is very antagonistic to the immense concentration of wealth that we have right now. So, yeah, there's a few politicians outside of maybe the Sanders-Mumdani variety that are actually going to be able to build together that coalition. We also have, not to belabor this, but we have an economic problem of offshoring the types of jobs that men used to do and the types of jobs that were organizable, where you can organize your shop floor, you can't organize your Slack channel in the same way. You know, when people are remote and working from home and they're doing knowledge work, like moving numbers on an Excel

spreadsheet or something, that's a lot more difficult than when people are unloading crates, for example. You know, so there's just types of work that can be organized and can lift the floor of wages and it can improve people's material well-being. And there's other types of jobs that just are not. And so I think there's, you know, you have to kind of approach these things in the long term and sequentially. Otherwise, yeah, I don't think that young men are going to kowtow towards a political coalition that puts their interests at the end of the priorities.

How did trying to become hypermasculine go? You tried to do the physical first. I only got so far. You tried to do the physical first to right-wing pipeline. Tell me about that. I mean, in the world that I come from where everyone's like an artist or an academic, The bell curve goes from like twink to skinny fat.

So if you go to the gyms at all, there's a marked difference. But yeah, I mean, generally the meme goes something like, you know, having left wing political beliefs or orientation is a personal failure on your side where you haven't challenged yourself enough. And if you did lift these weights and eat this way and do whatever, then you would realize that you've been incorrect about, you know, whatever, a whole slew of different things. So I just did all that stuff.

I still work out. I, you know, lift four times a week. I sunded my balls. I took the InfoWars supplements. I did mewing. I just experimented one by one. I published this piece called auto experiment hypermasculinity.

And it's probably like five years ago now. But anytime I have a piece that appears in legacy media or do an appearance somewhere else, first question is like, so what was sending your balls like? Oh, I see. You've got to be careful what you make a name for, dude. Well, it was very memorable, especially in the corners of my world where a lot of people were like totally blown away by that stuff and had not heard of it before. But I guess, you know, at the end of this, my political position was basically unchanged. I think the thing that I'm interested in now is the unique ways in which a social democratic organization of the economy, having a national health service, for example, certain kids.

industries, natural monopoly is being nationalized, the ways in which those things are more competitive than the neoliberal economy. So that sounds a little bit abstract, but basically through going through this process of lifting all these weights, you're going to realize that you were wrong and that the redistribution of resources, that was because you were at the bottom of the hierarchy, which was your own personal failure. And so I think there's actually an argument now, which is a pretty narrow window to go through, but this is what I'm trying to focus on in a few key podcasts, is that the NHS, for example, is more competitive than the U.S. model as a percentage of what each individual in the society expends for their health care,

meaning that two to one in the United States, we outspend most of our European counterpoints that are a similar point of industrialization and development. Yeah. So how is redistribution of resources actually more competitive and cost-saving? I think that there's... there's a strong argument to be made there. And it's basically going to be a necessity for like doing social democracy again in the 21st century. Yeah, well, look, I understand the idea of agency, of internalizing your locus of control is something that particularly speaks to young men that have an upward aim, right? I don't feel like life's very good.

Every young person, especially young guy that's got big dreams, doesn't and if the first answer is unlucky for you dude you have no control over that you're oh right right uh that doesn't seem very reassuring to me that doesn't make me feel very good whereas if it's well depending on how hard and how thoroughly pick your bootstraps up you can go wherever you want uh i understand why that would be a significantly more compelling narrative I think that it makes sense that the other way around would be Well it was possible also

Right like the other thing was off limits And that there was this general erosion Of the welfare state For lack of a better term And so the only route that you had To improving your stake in the world Was by bootstrapping And so that was often good advice

Because that was the only possible advice That you could implement But I think what is really interesting and this was what I wrote in a project in 2020 where I interviewed 10 young people from the left, 10 from the right, kind of extensive ideological map. But they had shifted in their political orientation,

their economic policies from libertarianism to populism. So when the right is saying that the market organization of society's resources is too asymmetrical, there's too much inequality, that's a pretty big sign that like something is going on. um yeah so i i i guess when you're doing this kind of work you're kind of searching for these weak signals that you think are going to be important having a little bit of foresight about what will you know in a few years from now be proportionally much much larger uh that was one of those

i think really um you know that's fascinating yeah you're like a you're like a like a like a like a bleeding edge cultural qualitative nate silver you know what i mean Like, what's the most important trend? We'll piece these things together in this very particular way, and then out pops some prescientness. Did you ever hear of Normcore? No. It was a meme that spread, like, probably, I mean, many years ago now,

but, like, friends of mine were, like, trendcasters, consultants for advertising, for all sorts of trends, like, you know, what genes are going to be popular, what music's going to be popular. And in my corner of, like, art and academia, we just kind of drifted into politics where now a lot of those people write about, like, what is the new memetic trend that's rising, analyzing aesthetics and ideas and stuff like that. I saw cottage core communism. Okay, nice. I saw that one.

I also saw what else was interesting to me? Tradwife nationalism. Okay. So a lot of these things, a lot of that going on. A lot of these things seem to be like aesthetic movements first, as opposed to sort of some underlying ethical or political movement. Yeah. Well, that is the question that's underlying a lot of this stuff,

of what is the role that aesthetics play in politics, and what is the substantive difference that, you know, two nearly identical policies might have with each other two nearly identical candidates, but one who's like willing to be brash, right? Or one who like post certain memes or Gavin Newsom maybe as an example of this, where he's basically posing the like neoliberal slop that every other Democrat is proposing, but he's doing it in an edgy way. And for some people, that's kind of enough.

I don't think it's going to be enough. I came with a question for you, though, if you're open to it. I wanted to ask about your head. health. Because that's something I've been following. And I had a similar experience when I was younger that I had Lyme's disease undiagnosed for like six, seven years. And so I wanted to, if, how in your understanding has that experience of having to struggle more impacted your worldview for politics, philosophy? What has that experience? been like. Great question. Um, health stuff's up and down, dude. Some weeks it's good,

some weeks it's bad. And, um, yeah, it's strange to be in your 30s and to feel like your sort of better self is slipping through your fingers. Um, it's so, all of the clichés about health are so trite in the fucking, uh, well man wants a thousand things, the sick man only wants one. Um, but it is so front and center of your experience that if you are dealing with something especially something that affects your energy or your cognition or your mood like it's the window through which you experience the world it's like looking at the world through a dirty window and um it's it's fucking kick me in the nuts uh it's given me a huge appreciation for good days it's made me an awful lot more empathetic to people um you know

anybody that's in good health most of the time it takes a degree of sort of self-righteous self-development glow from their own health as if they authored it themselves which in many ways you do you have an awful lot of impact over that but then there's other stuff that comes on like I didn't choose to get fucking Lyme disease dude neither did you

I didn't choose to be in a house that was filled with mold I didn't choose to have the genetics that mean that that's something that I'm particularly susceptible to. Yeah. And it starts to get you to see the lives of other people, especially people that are going through unfortunate circumstances. I'm already, I'm pretty high on the empathy scale as it is, but this really sort of brought it into reality.

It wasn't just an abstract idea. It was something that really sort of had grown corn. In terms of my sort of political opinions, I still, mercifully, comedians have that I'm just a comedian thing. I have that I'm just an idiot or I'm just a bro thing. I wouldn't say it's influenced my politics massively. It would influence some policy stuff. I've always been, especially coming from the UK, has been the single biggest determining factor in terms of how I think about health care. I think that it's fucking barbaric that every country doesn't have a nationalized health service.

for me to I remember I went to New Orleans 2019 and I was given this ghost tour from this lovely man and it was so fun and we finished up and he was telling me about how him and his girlfriend have both got cracked teeth or something and he was working you know like a good bit of tips working like a pretty good job and he has a day job and he said if you get hit by a bus you'd better walk it off

and what he was highlighting is something I would learn like five years later which is the number one reason for bankruptcy see in America is medical. Yeah. Right. And I'm like, okay, so you get injured and you need to decide whether or not you get fixed. That seems insane. And for me, you know, I'm very fortunate that I've got time and resources and friends that I

can text to help me work out how to deal with complex environmental illness. But not many other people do. And that really sort of highlighted to me, well, fucking hell. Like, I'm in such a fortunate position that I've, you know, I clambered my way one half rung at a time up to. And even I have had my ass kicked by this thing. Yeah. So it really, uh, really brought into land just how much more work needs to be done,

I think, to try and help people with regards to that. In terms of my worldview, trying to see small victories and small pleasures as big wins, uh, not being ashamed by the smallness of my life. if I see a golden retriever, and that's the best part of my day. Like, that's worthwhile. Like, that's cool. It's pretty good. Yeah, that's pretty good, as opposed to, like, holding my happiness hostage

until I play the main stage at Glastonbury, or I sell out a tour, I get to sit down with Joshua, I get to do the hit 4 million subscribers, yin, yin, y'ing it. Like, it's just trying to see and enjoy more beauty in every day, I think. to touch with something approximating like mortality and you go oh fucking hell like I didn't stare into the abyss

but I sort of peered over the top a couple of times and it wasn't very nice yeah well I mean I'm sure you hear this all the time but you're performing at I mean the highest level in the world for what you do so to hear that you were suffering so extensively was a great surprise to many of us still am yeah yeah yeah

and I guess It's those moments in which, and I felt like either side of this at different points, but one, wow, this suffering is so intense. There must be other people going through this all the time of which I was previously unaware, right? Because now I know how extreme it is. And then on the flip side, it's, well, I'm performing this high and I'm suffering this much. Everyone else must really suck. Like those people, they're not, because I'm pushing through all of this. And so people get even more kind of ruthless about their beliefs.

Wow, I've never even thought of that. I've watched people come out on either side, too. That's a fascinating. That's a fascinating perspective. No, that's the first time I've ever thought about it. I can see how you do it. That I am able to keep doing the thing that I've been doing and I feel this shitty.

Other people feel less shitty than me and can't do the thing that I can do. Therefore, they're losers. Exactly. How interesting. No, I've, that was not a part for me. almost exclusively just like an increase in softness and empathy. People have different tolerances for these things,

and you don't know what somebody's experience is like. And you get perilously close here to opening the door to a victim mindset, right, that some people have bigger stomach, some people have more ghrel in release, some people don't like exercise, some people need more sleep. Those people are going to be fatter. those people are going to find it harder to lose weight. Yeah, yeah.

Fine. Does that mean that you have no control over your body weight? No, does that mean that some people find it harder? Yes. And managing to work out how to balance those two things in the same way as this, which is like some people's tolerance for discomfort is just less or more than others. And in some ways, we pedestalize the person that's more of an outlier on the side of a positive trait. Wow, look at how much pain that.

person can endure. Right, right. Why not? Wow, look at how little pain that person can endure. It's not, like, majestic, right? And I suppose that one of the reasons for this is that you can fake sadness and negative emotions, but you can't fake results. So you can pretend to be in lots of pain, but you can't pretend to be successful.

You can only be successful. It's a difference between what's referred to as a cheap and an expensive signal, a reliable signal of authenticity. And I suppose that the typical things people are attracted to, resilience, overcoming obstacles, motivation, discipline, orderliness, conscientiousness, rah, rah, and even empathy, like, it's very hard to fake empathy. And I think this is why when people like Ellen DeGeneres or whatever get called out as sort of being all nicely nicely up front, but they're, you know, fucking Dolores Umbridge behind the scenes, uh, people have an issue with that. And yeah, I can see how that might be the case, but for me, no, I have not used the fact that I haven't stopped going, doing the thing that I do as an excuse to say that other people are being pussies.

Do you think that, okay, so there's like an uneven distribution of how hard people have to try it a certain thing, right? So that's true for careers. It's also true for fitness. And I can think of, I'm thinking of fitness primarily here, but like I have a friend who will, he'll always tell me that, oh, I'm on the lower end of the distribution. Like, I can't put on that much mass. Like, it's very hard for me to work out. And I think there's some intangible thing that just, maybe it's how he carries himself or something like that, that although people may look indistinguishable, when one person has to be. to try harder. There's some kind of air about it where it's like, oh, I know he's like he's

really putting in the work. And that is a very like impressive feature where someone else who has almost the identical physique but is not working very hard for it. They don't have that same intangible air about them. Well, because all of us want the belief that with sufficient effort, we too can overcome whatever our shortcomings are. And what you're seeing with the guy that just, you know, I left a, I live once a week, dude. Like, you look great. It's like, yeah, yeah, yeah. You're the genetic equivalent of a napo baby.

Yeah, yeah, literally. And we don't like seeing people that have gotten something that it doesn't, that we don't think that they earned. And because, like, largely, what's the story that you take away from that? There isn't really a story that you can take away from that. one that is encouraging to yourself. And maybe this is, maybe it would be different if it wasn't a meritocracy, but that's the world that we live in, right?

If your successes are yours to bear, then what does that mean about your failures? And if you see somebody who, it seems, sort of managed to climb up one of the ladders, meanwhile, you had to move one square at a time, and everybody else did. Right, right. A bit of an ache around that. Yeah, yeah.

I mean, I felt like that at different. times you know like growing up sick it was harder to do certain things and I was you know I was I was thinking about that in advance of this where like there have been periods in my life where I have not worked very hard and I've fucked off and it has not worked out very well but also there's been periods where I've been like superhumanly productive and so I wonder if that kind of just regular day-to-day struggle of having to push through more fatigue and more pain and you know brain damage and shit like this if that somehow gave me the resolve to try harder later oh wow how interesting yeah yeah like those athletes that run with parachutes behind them and then they take the

parachute off and they can run faster right yeah yeah was all of that kind of struggle at the beginning just getting you in good shape to perform when it really mattered well it's a wonderful way to alchemize something that's horrible into something that's beautiful right what a what a great way to say you didn't get me and i'm going to use you as fuel to make sure that i have an even better life afterward i think that's what people hope for you know that's why the story of the soldier that comes back and his friends have been blown up and there's an iED and he needs to do his rehab and then he wins the thing he gets the girl he does whatever so that's why those stories are compelling because you see somebody who had it lost it and got it back and fuck what a what a

narrative that is, I think it's great. But yeah, certainly getting kicked in the nuts a lot will either cause you to keel over or sometimes give you the resilience to be able to be kicked in the nuts in future. And sometimes both, right? Like, that's certainly something else that I've learned that, like, there's been times where I've broken down, there's been times where I've cried, there's been times, like lots and lots and lots of times. I've just stared at the ceiling fan in my bedroom for like hours while I haven't been able to sleep I've been worried about this thing happening yeah and uh like that's it's not romantic it's not cool it's not sexy there's no fucking rocky montage music playing in the background right it's just kind of the earning of

the keep of health can be a little bit of a wiggly thing sometimes and the path isn't straight and uh yeah when you look back you don't see a massive amount of glory in there It wasn't you fighting off some fucking alien hoard or a bunch of orcs or something. It was you dealing with your own internal doubt, your own sort of lack of self-belief, your own fears. And yeah, it's a... It makes for an interesting reframe, I think.

Well, that was... If you don't mind, this is not the job that I signed up for, you know, 20 years ago when I moved to New York, you know. And I have had to ask a lot of questions on the show of like literally the guests I'm talking to, but then also of myself of like, do I know enough to do this? Like I'm in a field that, you know, there's university researchers and shit like this, but like they're coming up with bad results. Like their studies don't make sense. like when when do you accumulate enough uh enough confidence and wisdom to know that you're correct by

i guess just having these like long form conversations right you're like you kind of build up the stamina and uh confidence and um yeah the faith in the strength of your answer to withstand different critiques uh but maybe there's a there's a connection here where of like the self-dealth out and having to try really hard, like, um, I have just kind of uncovered these big open questions that are like unresolved. Well, I think there's a difference. There's a difference between, uh, being a person who comes up with answers and being a person who identifies questions.

Uh, and you seem pretty good at doing both, but particularly good at the questions thing. And I'm not too bad at the questions thing, too. I've had some all right ideas about like the state of signaling behind body positivity movement and what happened when Ozemp came in

like mismatch function from fucking evolutionary psychology these are not world changing insights but what I'm not bad at is saying huh there's like a membrane this is what it feels like

in a conversation sometimes to me and I wonder whether you've had this too it's like running your hand across the top of a balloon and every so often there's a little divot in the balloon or there's a little hole or there's a little bit of grit

And you go, huh, what's that? And it's usually the intersection of two or three or four different things. And you go, hang in a second. Like, Mamdani and Trump, isn't that an interesting horseshoe just like the horseshoe that we just said there? Well, what do we think about? Well, K-Fabes is, you know, like build these things together and then why, right? Like, it's not, I don't think that it is necessarily, and it is for lots of people, lots of content creators online proselytize about their thing.

This is my position, and I am doing that. there's some stuff that I like hold really really strongly but for the most part I'm just like trying to ask good questions the I'm just asking questions excuse I'm aware is a difficult one but I think that that became a meme because people who said I'm just asking questions we're asking questions with an agenda as opposed to just genuinely following their curiosity sure the problem is that you can't ever tell whether somebody is doing it with an ulterior motive or whether they're doing it in a genuine manner well I'm and this is an unpopular opinion but in my corner of the left and of politics,

I think that those are necessary things to be interrogated, basically, right? Just to give it a specific example here, if you were to talk about the potential earnings of young men in the labor market that are, you know, losing market share to young women, that would be off limits as a discussion. But then here I am, I'm just literally seeing the young men to which that applies. And then they're trying to get involved in left-wing movements, and then they're being told that their needs are not possible to address.

And so I think if we do not allow those conversations to happen, there's no way to build the coalition to get the stuff that I want. So I think the pathway actually runs through very unpleasantly for the way that the academic left has been organized basically for my adult lifetime. But we need to be able to discuss those things in an open forum or we're just simply going to lose the coalition that we need to build. Well, there's a, especially, if I was to give advice to the left, I think the purity spiral thing is just so self-defeating. Like to bind your group together over the mutual scapegoating and shaving off of people who are insufficiently pure to be a part of it.

Like, it's a self-destructive, like inherently self-destructive. Like you're reducing your coalition. The way that you bind your coalition together is by reducing it. Right. which can only last until the one purest person left on planet. And then utopia. Yeah, I don't fully understand how that would work. So the purity thing, because think about how many people do the why I left the left pivot, right?

Lots of people that used to be on one side will go, can you name anybody that's done a why I left the right pivot? There was one guy a few years ago, but I don't think he was really that right leaning. I think he was just, like, if you scroll back far enough in YouTube, everybody was annoyed by, like, SJWs on Tumblr. So I don't think there's that many. I think, again, with that, it's just, it's not particularly welcoming. It doesn't seem very welcoming, right? Forget what the policies are, but it's like if you're unprepared to accept somebody

who maybe has a fetid past, or you would consider to be a fetid past, that would be a pretty bad idea. And, yeah, look, I don't think, at no point have I ever claimed, thankfully, to be an expert on really anything. But after you do a thousand conversations, you end up being able to ask people questions that they maybe haven't thought of before because you're starting to draw together

20 similar conversations that you've had in the past. And you go, huh, isn't that interesting? Why is that the case? Or why is whatever the case? And sometimes you end up asking something that you're like, oh, yeah, this is one of the most important, which also kind of means one of the most obvious, questions that somebody needs to,

but maybe it's coming at it from a slightly different angle. or whatever so yeah i mean a thousand is it's unimaginable right now but that's um yeah i guess you to draw a kind of shitty crypto analogy here like how do you know that the answer is right um you just show proof of work yeah leading up to it um the other the other anecdote this made me think of his friend of mine j reg was in this group chat over uh covid which was like pretty big uh at the beginning and then people started drifting towards like you know they're sharing a lot of shit posty memes or whatever and then group chat's getting more and more right wing and it's getting more and more racist

and then they slowly started to like people would just quit leaving it and towards the end of it it was just like three racist people in a group chat together as they're like shedding everyone else for being a fucking subhuman. Wow!

So there's ways in which people narrow down their splinter groups on the other side too. How funny. They're quite good at it too of like what specific strand of English heritage or Scottish or whatever, Gaul. I'm sure that even I would be insufficiently pure. No one can meet it. Until it's just you, left in the group chat.

I actually am the Chris supremacist. That's correct. Yeah, I would be top of the tree. Joshua's sitting around, ladies and gentlemen. Josh, I think you're fucking fantastic, dude. I love your work. I love your presentation. I think you're very, very well researched.

And, yeah, I adore your show. Where should people go? They're going to check out all of the things that you do. do. Yeah, I think the best place here on YouTube, um, Doom Scroll podcast, we're, uh, putting out episodes every week, every other week. I'm also on substack and Patreon. Um, yeah, this has been fantastic. I'm just, I'm such an immense fan and it's the best looking podcast. And as someone who studied photography, I have a degree in this stuff. It really is extraordinary. Oh, I've got a seal of approval. The conversations you're having are worth being recorded in this quality. So I really,

really admire that. And it's been a great pleasure to be here. I appreciate you. Until next. Chris next time.