Modern Wisdom - #745 - Brad Wilcox - Is Marriage Actually Worth It?

Episode Date: February 15, 2024

Brad Wilcox is a Professor of Sociology at the University of Virginia and Director of the National Marriage Project. Many online discussions are casting doubt on the role of marriage. Is it actually a bad deal for men and women? Is it dangerous for people to get into? What does the evidence actually suggest, especially in the face of widespread skepticism about the institution of marriage? Expect to learn if marriage is a terrible deal for men in the modern era, the correlation between your marital status and financial status, what happens to men and women’s bodies after they get married, why you shouldn’t be scared as a man or woman if you want to get married, the most shocking statistics Brad has come across on marriage and much more... Sponsors: See discounts for all the products I use and recommend: https://chriswillx.com/deals Get a 20% discount on Nomatic’s amazing luggage at https://nomatic.com/modernwisdom (use code MODERNWISDOM) Get the Whoop 4.0 for free and get your first month for free at https://join.whoop.com/modernwisdom (discount automatically applied) Sign up for a one-dollar-per-month trial period from Shopify at https://www.shopify.com/modernwisdom (automatically applied at checkout) Extra Stuff: Get my free reading list of 100 books to read before you die: https://chriswillx.com/books Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic: https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom Episodes You Might Enjoy: #577 - David Goggins - This Is How To Master Your Life: http://tinyurl.com/43hv6y59 #712 - Dr Jordan Peterson - How To Destroy Your Negative Beliefs: http://tinyurl.com/2rtz7avf #700 - Dr Andrew Huberman - The Secret Tools To Hack Your Brain: http://tinyurl.com/3ccn5vkp - Get In Touch: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/modernwisdompodcast Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact - Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hello everybody, welcome back to the show. My guest today is Brad Wilcox, a professor of sociology at the University of Virginia and director of the National Marriage Project. Many online discussions are casting doubt on the role of marriage. Is it actually a bad deal for men and women? Is it dangerous for people to get into? What does the evidence actually suggest at the life outcomes for married people's happiness, especially in a world with rising divorces.

Expect to learn if marriage is a terrible idea for men in the modern era, the correlation between your marital status and financial status, what happens to men and women's bodies after they get married, why marriage rates are declining, whether cohabitation is good enough for raising children, whether you should have a prenup and much more. Interesting conversation. This is a hot topic at the moment. Both sides of the internet seem to say that marriage is a very bad idea and Brad is sticking his neck out saying that he believes otherwise.

Very intrigued to see what the next few years of marriage rates and divorce rates have in store, whether it's going to be another counter-revolution or trends will continue the way that they are. Anyway, this Monday, a brand new three-hour-long podcast episode with Eric Weinstein goes live. So if you are new here or if you're a long-time listener, you might not have hit subscribe and that means you will miss the episode when it goes up. So please navigate to Apple Podcasts or Spotify and hit the subscribe button to ensure that you don't miss episodes when they go up and so that you can support

the show and so that you make me very happy. I thank you. Honestly, the difference in the quality of your life when you have a world-class backpack is pretty hard to describe. Nomadic make the most functional, durable and innovative backpacks, bags, luggage and accessories that I've ever used. The 20-litre travel pack and carry-on classic are absolute game changes. The amount of thought that they've put into every pouch and zipper is incredible. They're beautifully designed and not over-engineered and will literally last you a lifetime because they've got a lifetime guarantee. So if it breaks at any point, they'll give you a new one. They also offer free shipping on orders over $49 in the contiguous United States. And if you don't love your purchase,

you can return or exchange your item 30 days after you've received it for any reason. Nomadic is offering modern wisdom listeners 20% off their first purchase when they go to nomadic.com slash modern wisdom and use the code modern wisdom at checkout. That's nomadic.com slash modernwisdom and modernwisdom at checkout. This episode is brought to you by Woop. I've won Woop for over four years now since way before they were a partner on the show and it is the only wearable I have ever stuck with

because it's the best. It is so innocuous. You do not remember that you've got it on. And yet it tracks absolutely everything 24 seven via something from your wrist. It tracks your heart rate tracks your sleep your recovery all of your workouts Your resting heart rate your heart rate variability. How much you're breathing throughout the night? It puts all of this into an app and spits out very simple easy to understand and fantastically usable data It's phenomenal. I am a massive massive fan ofop, and that is why it's the only wearable that I've ever stuck with.

You can join for free, pay nothing for the brand new Woop 4.0 strap, plus you get your first month for free, and there's a 30-day money back guarantee. So you can buy it for free, try it for free, and if you do not like it, after 29 days, they will give you your money back. Head to join.woop.com slash modern wisdom.

That's join.woop.com slash modern wisdom. This episode is brought to you by Shopify. Shopify is the global commerce platform that helps you sell at every stage of your business. From the launch your online shop stage to the first real-life store stage, all the way to the did we first real-life store stage, all the way to the did we just hit a million orders stage, Shopify is there to help you

grow. Whether you're selling scented soap or offering outdoor outfits, Shopify helps you sell everywhere, from that all-in-one e-commerce platform to their in-person POS system, wherever and whatever you're selling, Shopify has got you covered. Shopify helps you turn browsers into buyers with the internet's best converting checkout. 36% better on average compared to other leading commerce platforms. You would be amazed at how many massive brands you love use Shopify.

Gymshark, perhaps one of the biggest independent sportswear companies in the world uses Shopify. And if it is good enough for them, it is good enough for you. So if you are looking to get started at selling something online, Shopify is the easiest, quickest and most convenient way to do it. Plus, you can sign up for a $1 per month trial period at Shopify.com slash modern wisdom,

all lowercase, that's Shopify.com slash modern wisdom to grow your business no matter what stage you're in. But now, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Brad Wilcox. What do you think about people on the internet who say that marriage is a terrible deal for men and women? Yeah, Chris, you know, I've been sort of playing the marriage horn for a long time, and it's primarily been kind of critiquing folks on the left. And the mainstream media, as you know, I've kind of gone after folks at Bloomberg and

New York Times and elsewhere. What's kind of new is we're getting all these voices from the online right, from the red pill right, like Andrew Tate and Pearl Davis who are saying things like in Pearl's words that marriage is a death sentence for men or Andrew Tate's words that basically, there's no return on marriage. There's zero advantage as terminology for men

when it comes to getting married. So we're kind of getting it now from the left and the right here. I think it's in some ways emblematic of the difficulties that, of course, comes from the women on the left and primarily the men on the right. It's partly a kind of reflection of the difficulties that of course comes from the women on the left and primarily the men on the right. It's partly kind of a reflection of the difficulties that a lot of younger adults are facing in finding a spouse, finding a partner who would be worthy of marriage. And so that's probably kind of an expression of frustration. But I think it also kind of conveys what I call kind of the Midas mindset. And that's this idea that what really matters in life is work, it's money, it's kind of

building your own brand. And I think in different ways, these folks too are kind of propagating this Midas mindset because they think that real action is where your work is at, where your brand is at, where your bank account's at. You definitely see this from the left, women on the left in a perhaps surprising way that you wouldn't have done 50 years ago, whereby it is all about financial security and being a boss bitch and being independent and I don't need no man. And, you know, if he comes to me fine, but I'm not going to go looking for

him. So that seems to be the equivalent that odd horseshoe theory where some elements of the right and some elements of the left end up kind of saying very similar talking points, even though they don't agree on everything else. Yeah. No, what's striking is sort of how similar their message is. I mean, they're kind of encouraging women and men separately to kind of stay free of family encumbrances, stay free of marriage, and to, you know, to pursue individualism, to pursue money, pursue career in different ways. And that that's sort of the pathway towards fulfillment when in fact the data lead us obviously in a very different direction.

What is happening with current marriage rates? Give me the 30,000-foot view. Yeah. So I think that's certainly one of the pieces of bad news that I convey in the book. The marriage rates come down about 65%. What we're seeing now in the adult population is just under 50% of folks are marriage rates. that's a new record, a new low. And we're projecting- Where would that have been if it's at 50% now or just under, where would that have been 30 years ago, 50 years ago, whatever?

75%, you know, we're talking like, you know, the late 60s, early 70s basically. So, so that's obviously a big change in recent decades. And then we're also projecting to, between 80, 90% of folks would have been getting married, coming of age in the 70s, give or take. Whereas today we're projecting that probably more than one and four young adults in their 20s today

will never get married. This is kind of record demographic territory that we're entering into. And this means there can be a lot of kind of permanent bachelors and permanent bachelorettes, at least when it comes to sort of having put a ring on it in this culture today. What is driving this?

We've talked about some cultural forces that are going on and some memes and some movements and stuff like that. But from my position, they usually seem to be in reaction. It's a cope. Not always. There are people who genuinely believe these things, but there's a lot of people retreating into their inner citadels of, I have struggled to make this work. Therefore, this is the philosophy that I find. And if what you say is correct, that you're going to have more people who are potentially participants of this new party, the people who aren't, that's going to allow it to proliferate more and get more and more popular. But structurally, what's happening? What are the other big dynamics that are causing this increase in lack of marriage? Well, I think, you know, obviously there's an economic story here. On the one hand, as a society, we kind of were very affluent. So we don't depend upon marriage, you know, economically like we did in earlier centuries.

That's part of the story. At the same time, the economy has kind of moved in directions that have made a whole class of men less economically valuable, less needed in today's world. And so they're less attractive as husbands. They're more likely to get divorced if they do end up married down the road. So I think the fact that men who are not kind of oriented towards the information economy are struggling more is part of the economic story. When it comes to policies, a lot of our policies end up kind of penalizing marriage unwittingly, things like Medicaid, for instance.

I've talked to just recently here in Charlottesville. We're having a marriage event at a restaurant, and so one of the waitresses is engaging me afterwards, and she was saying, well, she and her husband are together, but they're not legally married. They've got two kids. I'm like, what's the story? Well, she gets her insurance through Medicaid, where they to get married they move above that threshold And lose access to you know Medicaid for her and for her to her two kids. So there's ways in which are public policies unintentionally

penalized marriage Culturally, I think obviously see a big shift towards individualism since the late 1960s that have you know made us think more about ourselves And less about others and that plays into marriage and family in obvious ways. We've also seen a parallel shift away from religion, which is also a big factor, I think, in the decline of marriage since religion is a big predictor both of getting married and staying married and having children. And then I think there's just been this kind of, what I just described earlier is a kind of a minus mindset where I think in part the rise of the internet,

the rise of smartphones, urbanization as well. There's a lot of good work that's been done on this in Asia from psychologists in Asia. Kind of just basically have made people focus a lot more on status and on kind of their prospects sort of in the mating sector, but less on kind of like actually putting a ring on it and transitioning into having kids and having a family. So there's a kind of arrested, it's not adolescence,

so much as kind of an arrested sort of young adulthood where people, you know, are just focusing on that sort of 20-something stage of life and not transitioning into marriage and parenthood. And that's also, I think, and that's just kind of magnified, you know, accelerated by the way in which technology is allowing people to kind of, you know, live the life, the online life, you know, the Instagram life, and all the kind of, you know, I'd say kind of transient and short term values that are magnified on platforms like Instagram and now TikTok too. What are the self reports saying? You know, this is your assessment looking at the data with your biases and all the rest of it. Sure, right. What are people saying when they are asked by psychologists and sociologists,

why are you not yet married? Why don't you want to get married if you don't want to get married? What's the word on the ground? Well, there certainly are people who are saying, you know, that they're They're they're they're not ready for marriage yet. They're not ready to kind of settle down They're you know enjoying their 20-something years having fun. They're trying to get their job their career kind of Launched successfully. They think there's some kind of obstacle between being married and being focused on their work.

People in the lower income strata, like I mentioned, some of them will talk about the way in which public policy penalizes marriage. A lot of folks say it's hard to meet someone who meets their standards, both in terms of having their stuff together. A lot of women say that men, their lives aren't sufficiently grown up, don't have that clear sense of mission and direction, that kind of capacity to kind of care for themselves and care for others.

There are men who would report to you that the women in lives are too materialistic, they're looking for just a breadwinner or a provider, but not someone who's going to really be a partner to them. So there's just a whole range of different reasons that you hear from people when it comes to why they're either not able to marry or why marriage is not right now appealing to them or why marriage is not even on their longer term horizon Hmm. What about divorce rates? What's the what's the insider? Well, divorce has come So the statistic people sort of think is still, you know, true is that they think that one in two marriages today will end in divorce

But what we actually see in the research is it's probably closer to around 40% a little bit north of 40% of marriage is wanted and divorced today. Divorce rates come down since 1980 by about 40%. It rose dramatically from the late 60s to 1980, you know, basically more than doubled in that era. So I think what's important for people to realize is that sort of all the tumult that we saw with the divorce revolution of 1970s and early 80s has kind of settled down. But that's in line with decreasing rates of marriage. Correct. So we have a selection effect going on here.

Correct. So the kinds of people today who are getting married are more educated, they're more affluent, and they're relatively more religious. They're also in a country like the US, maybe a country too, like the UK, they're more likely to have, you know, the immigrants, you know, non-natives, right? So in my book, I talk about how Asian Americans are disproportionately married in the US. And we've seen a lot of immigrants coming from Asia, obviously in recent decades, for instance, and they're more likely to be married than native born Americans, but just in general immigrants are more likely to be married in the US than native-born Americans are as well.

Yeah, that is interesting. So recent years have seen a rise in unpartnered Americans as well, especially young men, 34% of young women between 1829 a single 63% of young men in that same age bracket are also single So it's not just a no marriage culture. It's a no dating culture as well So we have seen dramatic declines and dating well that statistic that you mentioned has been challenged by my colleague Nick Wolfram He thinks that there's a gap between you know young women and young men There but it's not quite that or young men are more likely to be single But it's not quite that, or young men are more likely to be single, but it's not quite that, that traumatic. And so I talk about the closing of the American

Heart Unfolding, where again, we're seeing for 20-somethings, a record share of them projected never to marry more than one in four. And then when it comes to fertility, we think that there'll be also continued declines in fertility in the US as well. One of the biggest memes, one of the most common memes that you hear about on the internet, especially for men, but also in some regards for women, given that they're socioeconomically more viable on their own now, is that marriage is a bad deal financially. What, what does the data actually say? Yeah. So it was striking that, you know, when I was finishing up this book, um,

Bloomberg had a, you know, an article that said women who get single and don't have kids are getting richer. Um, and it kind of claimed that, you know, women who are kind of foregoing marriage and motherhood were, you know were better off and women who are married. And that's not true. What we do see is that women who are married are markedly more likely to be well off, and they're also much less likely to be poor. So they're about 80% less likely to be poor, even controlling for things like race and

age and education. And then they have about 10 times the assets heading into retirement, you know, in their 50s, compared to their single female peers. So, and the story for men is pretty similar. It comes to assets in one's 50s. in one's fifties. And then men earn between sort of 10 and 25% more as married men than their single peers. Now, part of that's the selection effect where the kinds of men who are getting married are more likely to have the kind of ethic that would lead to financial success. We also see evidence though too from twin studies that men who are married are doing better financially than their twin who is not married. So it's pretty rigorous evidence

that something about marriage per se is associated with men flourishing financially. What do you think is the mechanism? So what actually a colleague of mine here at UVA found was that men who are married are less likely to get fired, for instance, even controlling for things like, you know, race and age and education. She also found too that men who are married are less likely to quit a job without having first found a replacement job. Whereas, soon guys just more likely to say, you know, that's it. I've had it. I'm out of here. And then they're unemployed and struggling to find a job. So I think being married just makes guys more prudent about their approach to, you know, their approach to finding work.

What do you say to the guys that have serious concerns, getting married is a huge risk because she's going to leave me and take half of everything that I own and I'm going to be stuck paying either her life or child support or something for the rest of my life. Preenups are not even worth the paper that they're written on. You know, I see a lot of this in comments sections and on the internet. What's the truth and what's your take on it? Well, I think the tough thing about this, right, is it's, there's a kind of mindset thing, which I'm sure you're familiar with kind of in a many spheres like, and so if your mindset is kind of revolving around fear. If you're thinking about the D word divorce,

heading into marriage, in your marriage, you're more likely to end up getting divorced, right? So if you get a prenup, my own book indicates that folks who have prenups have lower marital happiness and they're more likely to be thinking that divorce is on the horizon. So it's one of those things where if you have more of an all-in mindset, like I am fully in and you obviously marry someone who shares that mindset where you're not talking about

divorce or not thinking about divorce, you don't really see it as an option, you're much more likely to be not just avoiding divorce court, but flourishing in your marriage because you're going to have a greater foundation of security and trust in your marriage. But beyond that, it's worth pointing out, as I do in the book, that there are ways in which it looks like people can solidify their marriage and reduce their risk of divorce. So we see, for instance, is that people who go on regular date nights over one study had about 25% less risk of getting divorced. People who are religious, especially who attend church together, are between 30% and 50% less likely to get divorced. Folks who don't commit infidelity are more likely to get

divorced. But my point simply is that there are things you can kind of do, right? And if you're not religious, you know, the thing I would say is, is, um, you know, surround yourself with couples who are stably married. You know, from the work of, um, Nicholas Christakis at Yale, for instance, that if your sister gets divorced, if your best friend gets divorced, in the face of kind of ordinary marital difficulties that most of us have,

if we've been married for five, 10, 15, 20 years, whatever, your odds of divorce skyrocket. But if your sister is stably married and has kind of navigated the inevitable challenges associated with married life, if your best friend has, remains stably married of navigated the inevitable challenges associated with married life. If your best friend has, you know, stable, remains stable and married and navigated those challenges successfully,

your odds of getting divorced, you know, go way down. So there's a birds of a feather flock together thing here, right, Chris? And so you need to be really, I think deliberate once you're married or as you're heading into marriage about picking friends who are, you know are with you and for you in your marriage and who are kind of living the kinds of lives that lend themselves to stable families. So if you surround yourself or stir yourself in networks that are more family-friendly, that's also a protective factor as well. Pick your couple's date night partners carefully then is the advice. Yeah, and we've had like, Governor Mark Sanford, that Republican governor in South Carolina,

he was hiking the Appalachian Trail with the story he gave to one journalist. Well, turns out he was in South America, romancing a woman who wasn't his wife because he and his buddies would go every year on some kind of international trip that was just kind of crazy. And so I think in Mark Sanford's case, part of the reason that he ended up divorced was he wasn't good about picking friends who were, you know, going to be kind of leading him down the best path marriage-wise. So the obvious, I guess, criticism or question here that gets opened up is why should I, as

a man or a woman, let go of these things that make me happy? I want to go to South America with my boys. I don't want to spend my time playing fucking backgammon or Scrabble or charades with this bunch of other couples. I don't want to restrict my freedom and my opportunities to choose what I want to sleep with who I want to go where I want to work how I want to leave a job when I want. All of these things sound like restrictions on my freedoms. What's in it for me? Why should I, like if I'm so happy doing all of these things,

why, like what about happiness? What are the happiest people from a relationship status perspective? Yeah, well, I think it's important just to kind of basically stress that, yeah, getting married does mean taking options off the table, both in terms of romantic partners, in terms of your free time. You know, it does mean you're sacrificing a lot in terms of your freedom. But the point that I would make is that we are social animals. That's Aristotle's term. We're hardwired to connect, right? And so it ends up being the case that friendships and family relationships are the things

that are most important for our sense of meaning, purpose, happiness. And there's just no question today that married men, and women, especially married fathers and married mothers are the happiest folks out there in the prime of life. I'm looking at folks 18 to 55 and finding that when it comes to reports of being kind of very happy with your life, that both women and men who are married moms and dads

are about twice as happy with their lives compared to their single and childless peers. So that's a pretty big difference. And then when it comes to kind of a range of indicators from money to career success to sexual frequency, to religious attendance, to self-rated health, these are all things that predict happiness, for ordinary Americans and pretty powerfully so.

But none of those factors, Chris, kind of compares to a good marriage. Women and men who are happily married are about 545% more likely say that they're very happy with their lives. And as I've looked at this data set called the GSS, the general social survey, it's kind of like the gold standard for social attitudes

and behaviors in the US. I can't find any variable in the GSS that predicts global life satisfaction like a good marriage. When I've mentioned that statistic, the pushback that I get from more progressive academics is, well, yeah, it's a selection effect, Brad. The kinds of women and men who are happy are going to be happily married. But my response to that is, well, you would expect them that you would see kind of a similar story playing out for like a career satisfaction indicator in the GSS.

And while it's true that people who are happy with their jobs are also happy with their lives, again, there's no factor that predicts happiness in the GSS, like a good marriage. We see other data sets too, from Harvard, for instance, tracking men longitudinally that come to similar conclusions as well. I think it's just important to underline that, yes, marriage requires sacrifices, lots of them. But there are major returns on that investment for most folks. And the final piece that I would say about the happiness story is that I looked at generosity in marriage a number of years ago. And what I found was that having a spouse, a husband or wife who was generous towards you, boosted your happiness in the marriage in ways that I think expected.

But being generous towards your wife, generous towards your husband, was an even better predictor of your happiness in the marriage. And again, if that's one of the best predictors of happiness overall, it just I think suggests to us that kind of living for others, as long as you make a good choice, and that's obviously a huge caveat, living for your spouse, living for your kids, living for your kin, and

living for your friends to an important extent, these are the things, obviously, that gives our lives meaning, direction, purpose, and a sense of happiness. And living for ourselves, I think often ends up making us miserable. One of the things that people who are reticent about getting married or concerned about it have the same way as the financial concern is, well, I'm rolling the dice. At least if I'm single, my happiness lies exclusively in the power of my own hands. Whereas if I get into a marriage, I am now, my happiness is contingent on this other person. And we try and do our best to screen whoever it is and work out how crazy or not crazy they might be. But we, there is a non zero chance that we get

that wrong. And that now means that I have sacrificed. Okay, singleton-ness for unhappy married-ness. Rolling that dice, that sort of roulette spin is causing trepidation for people. Yeah, Chris, I think it's a legitimate concern. And as we discussed before, about 40% of folks getting married today won't get divorced. So it is a major, I think, concern. But I think there is, you know, there are two

other things that I would say to that kind of person. Number one is that nothing in life worth having, you know, I think doesn't require a measure of risk and, you know, potential for real failure in terms of whether it's professional success, whether it's, you know, being a great athlete, whatever it might be. All these things that I think tend to lend our lives and sense a meaning, direction, and happiness often require risk. And that's true, I think, for love and marriage as well.

The other thing that I would say, too, is that even when marriages fail, and I certainly have friends whose marriages have failed, both women and men. What I also see though is oftentimes they have kids. And in the immediate aftermath of divorce, that can be extraordinarily difficult both for them and for their children. But as they kind of move into their 50s and 60s and 70s, if they're deliberate about kind of continuing to be a good father, a good mother, these friends of mine have gotten divorced,

derive a tremendous sense of meaning and satisfaction from their relationship, relationships too, with their kids and then their grandkids. So that's also, I think, can be a kind of a consolation for folks who have gotten divorced. And I just, one more thing I would add too is that, again, I think there are, you know, I talk about in the book, four groups of folks who have much greater odds of being kind of both happily married and for the most part, stably married, and those groups are Asian Americans.

They are religious Americans. They're college educated Americans and they're conservative Americans. And so there are things that, again, you can kind of do both as a spouse and in terms of just being cognizant of kind of the communities where you're, you know, where you're... Marry an Asian. Is that your advice? No, I'm just saying, no, the point I would make about kind of the Asian finding is that, right, there's certain kinds of values and certain kinds of communities, right? And so, you

know, what Asians have is, among other things, like a keen recognition oftentimes of how much marriage matters for their kids. And so that sort of conditions how they deal with marital difficulties and challenges, right? They tend to be surrounded by kin who are stably married. They often are kind of taking advice from kin about who to marry, especially obviously from Indian context, right? So you can, if you're not Asian, you can kind of take some lessons there too for your, you know, for your, your your own mural path. How, all of that data that you've just come up with there

to do with happiness and marital status, how robust is it? Are we gonna find out that this is replication crisis in 10 years time? Cause that's obviously, oh, well that data doesn't seem to be sufficiently this or that or the other. How much are you able to bet

that that's accurate and correct? Well, I think when it comes to things like Merrill stability, there's just no, I mean, I've looked at a lot of data sets when it comes to looking at the role of ethnicity. No, no, no, sorry, the relationship between married, whether or not you are married or single, and your happiness in life and your life outcomes satisfaction. you are married or single and your happiness in life and your life outcome satisfaction? Yeah, that's again, lots of data sets, you know, the GSS, the American Family Survey, you know, MIDAS, there are lots of data sets that show that there's a strong association. Now, the question is, whether or not it's causal, I think that's where the debate comes. There's just no question that folks who are married are more likely to see that they're

satisfied with their lives, they're more meaningful lives and less loneliness. And just, you know, in England, the US, Europe, it's definitely a common story. How does this relationship between marital status and life satisfaction, happiness, loneliness, how does that change across time and with age? So I think the best story that I saw, the best study on this that I saw was actually from Britain, where you are from. And I just, what it suggests, it was a kind of like the biggest, there's obviously there's a honeymoon kind of premium where people when they're first married they enjoy kind of Especially kind of large premiums when it comes to happiness But this particular study from the UK which is kind of tracking women and men over time down. There's kind of like a midlife

Peace where the the premium was biggest for folks kind of in midlife. I think in their 40s and 50s That's not even in parts because often there are challenges associated with raising kids, with changes in your, obviously your health, people are becoming aware of their mortality, career changes, all that kind of stuff is all coming out in your 50s oftentimes. And so to have the benefit of a co-pilot, I think, can be really valuable for folks. Yeah. There's this strange smile-shaped graph to happiness and life satisfaction. So for the people that are just listening, if you imagine, it's not a particularly smooth smile.

It's more like a Joker smile. But if you had the beginning of life on the left, I think it's probably like 13 or 16 or something on the left. And then you've got 80 on the right. And it does seem to really dip down, you know, 40s, basically most of your 40s seems to be pretty rough. And then it kind of picks back up through your 50s. I think I'm right in saying there's at least some data that suggests the single biggest risk of suicide,

a suicidality, are men aged 40 to 45. It's this very particular demographic of men. So specifically, again, for men, I'm going to guess that being married is prophylactic against this period of lower mood. Yeah, and one of the biggest factors predicting both suicide and more broadly desidous spare for men is marriage. So married guys are much less likely to end up, you know, dying from drinking or drugs or suicide more directly, right? So what about divorced guys, though? Yeah, they have a higher risk of all those bad things as well. Definitely.

Yeah, they have a higher risk of all those bad things as well. Definitely. So again, we're talking about this, it seems like a bit of a theme. It's this risk-reward ratio. I think that a lot of people are looking at. You sort of hinted at something earlier on with the sat around if your sister or your best friend gets divorced, then the likelihood of you getting divorced goes up too. There is definitely this sort of mimetic thing that's going on. I think motherhood, a lot of motherhood can be laid at the feet of this. If you're not around mothers, you don't see the joy that motherhood brings to mothers. Therefore, what do you see? Well, you see what everyone else sees, which is Instagram, which is a trip to Bali and brunch with the girls and wearing cute heels and not getting

stretch marks and all the rest of the things. So you kind of absorb the aggregate culture as opposed to the microculture because the aggregate culture doesn't optimize for like things that aren't flashy and easily displayed on the internet. And I think that there is, you must have thought of this too, this sort of mimetic nature of the R naught number of marriage being either above or below one based on how many people are getting married at the moment. Yeah. No, I think definitely this goes back to kind of the power of the smartphone, social media and the internet. And I think one reason we have seen marriage come down and fertility come down in recent years is that people don't kind of fully appreciate how much putting a ring on it can matter in positive ways.

So there was a study done recently that was suggesting that today a lot of folks think that, yeah, actually men benefit from marriage, but women do not. And when you look at the happiness story in the general social survey, what you see basically is that, as I mentioned before, married moms are twice as likely to be very happy as a single and childless women. What you see in basically different data sets is that 60% of married moms say that their lives are meaningful most or all the time compared to only 36% of single and childless women. They're also much more likely to say that they're lonely.

So when it comes to things like meaning, loneliness and happiness, what you're seeing on Instagram or TikTok doesn't correspond to what we see in representative population surveys of men and women. But it is difficult to convey that in a 280 character tweet or in a cool TikTok video. There's this interesting trade-off between happiness, pleasure, and meaning and satisfaction in some ways that it's very difficult to portray meaning and life satisfaction through a cool

Instagram post. But it's pretty easy to show pleasure and happiness through that, or at least present pleasure and happiness through that. So yeah, it's a, in that regard, I think anything, and this is anything that's difficult, anything which is a little bit more subtle, if someone can get the gains of appearing to have the thing without having to do the hard work of getting the thing, they're going to optimize for that.

It's very important. Right, and that's the problem with being online too much, right? Chris, obviously, you know, there's some work done by a famous psychologist at Toronto. And I'm forgetting his name right now, but it's sort of just basically talking about how folks who are kind of experiencing both a lot of suffering, which wouldn't surprise us, but also like virtually no suffering are the worst off and folks who kind of experience some kind of that middle range of suffering are actually the best off They're like the most emotionally resilient kind of the best spirit So we were actually were built to some extent right to experience some degree of pain some degree of

You know of suffering some drama in our lives. If all you're doing is eating well, drinking well, and spending all your day on this device, doesn't actually end up buffering you longer term is the point. How does being married change or impact mental and physical health? Well, yeah, in terms of things like depression and anxiety tend to go down, happiness goes up, as I said before, loneliness goes down.

When it comes to physical health, there are the stories a little bit more complicated. On one indicator in particular, women and men who are married do worse. And that is their weight. When you're married, you're off the market and you're, you know, you're kind of eating it, maybe eating at home more and whatever it may be snacking more, et cetera. So you're not, you're not kind of like making that same effort to, you know,

to keep the pounds off. And so we do see that's why. But generally speaking, folks who are married are doing better health-wise. For instance, studies I'm looking at indicate that people are more likely to recover and do okay in the wake of some kind of cancer diagnosis. If you have parents, older parents, been to the hospital, you see that oftentimes that spouse is really kind of working the nurses and doctors in ways that tend to read down to the benefit of her husband or his wife.

So there's just no question that folks who are married Do better on the vast majority of health outcomes and live longer and especially true for guys And they think it's what's the stats that's that eight nine years is what I've what I've read and And work done by Linda Wade and Maggie Gallagher You know that men who are stably married live in eight to nine years longer than their peers who don't get married or who get divorced. So and women who who are married live longer too, but

they don't enjoy the same kind of premium as married men do. That's the part we think too, because, you know, men who are are single are just much more likely to do crazy things, like ride motorcycles, getting fights in bars on a Friday or Saturday night, what have you. So men are just more prone to engaging the kinds of risky behaviors that put them at risk of an earlier death. But married men tend to steer clear of a lot of those behaviors. And there must be a mediating effect of loneliness here as well. I had Robin Dunbar on the show a while ago, and he was talking about this inner circle. He says that you can keep around about

five friends in the inner circle, but a relationship takes up two of those five slots. So if you have a partner, a significant other, you've maybe only got space for three other people. But the most common answer at the moment when people are asked, how many close friends do you have to call on an emergency, is zero. That's not the average, but it's the most common. It's more common than any other number is zero. I think the number of men who say that they have no close friends triple, no, five X from

3% to 15% from 1990 to 2020. So, you know, in the wake of this atomized, individualized, bleep bleep, Cyberpunk 2077 hellscape, having one person that's always going to be in your boat with you rowing seems like a pretty good fallback. Yeah, that's right. I mean, there's, you know, there's certainly been sociologists and psychologists who who want to sort of talk up the virtues of living single. And obviously not everyone is single is doing badly. Plenty of folks are doing great. And there are plenty of

folks who are married or miserable, but on average, I think that's because we're hardwired to connect people who are married and more likely to be to be flourishing. That's sort of the average story. What role does wanting kids have in encouraging people to get married? Have you been able to pass out someone early on knows that they want kids, therefore they get married in order to be able to have kids? Is that like a predictor? Yeah, I think we do see today in a more secular world, people are less motivated to kind of get married, you know, just for religious reasons or to kind of, you know, legitimate their relationship,

you know, in terms of living together, whatnot. So I think once they begin to think about having kids, they're more likely to think about doing that in the context of marriage, wanting to kind of give their kids the gift of married parents. And we see even in Northern Europe where marriage is sort of much more optional, that after, either after the first child or before the first kid, as folks kind of think about parenthood or they want to kind of give their kids that experience of married parents, they'll get married. So I think there's still a way in which people who are kind of more child-centered think

about marriages as the ideal place to bear and rear kids. And of course, they're right. There's just no question that kids are more likely to be benefiting when their parents are married than kids who are in other situations. What impact do kids have on marriage, marriage success, and then on happiness as well? So there's no question that kind of having a baby is a hugely stressful thing for couples. And so, you do see marital quality dip, especially after the first child comes along. But I think what often happens is that kind of couples reach a kind of equilibrium, you know, some six months, year, whatever it might be after

the baby comes, and they begin to adjust to this new creature and this new reality. Now, I think this adjustment can be harder for people who've spent a very long time living without children because kids do take a lot of time and energy and effort, and, you know, they can be obviously extremely difficult and frustrating in different ways so I think the transition to parenthood is certainly a challenge but what's interesting though Chris is that there was a lot of research before kind of 2000 that indicated that parents were less happy than their childless peers. And since 2000, we've seen that relationship switch so that parents today are happier than

childless adults. And of course, no group of parents are happier than married parents. So again, when you look at the general social survey, what you find is that the happiest group of women and men, particularly kind of in midlife and sort of 30s, 40s, 50s are married parents. And I think what's happening here in part might be that childless adults have fewer of those sort of resources, social resources or connections, you know, school connections, sports connections for folks who are religious, religious connections that tend to flow from being a parent. So I have a lot of kids and my days are often very busy and, you know, I can be stressed out, but I'm never lonely, you know, I'm going to a, you know,

basketball practice, I'm dropping off kids at school in the morning, going to church with a family on Sunday morning. So there's all this social stuff happening. I'm seeing sociologists that's worth noting. And my peers who are single and childless, they don't have those child-related activities. And then when it comes to just kind of like free time too, you can't spend too much time on a device if you're halfway

decent husband, wife, father, mother, right? So I think that's also- So you're saying that getting married or having kids is a anti-phone use technology? Totally. Totally saying that. I think so. I think the rise of smartphones and screens the last decade or so, I think maybe, and I haven't seen any really good evidence on this, but my hypothesis is that married parents may be less likely to get sucked down that electronic rabbit hole, then folks who are single and childless. What about the reverse relationship? What are the differences and outcomes for kids from married versus non-married homes? There's a lot of people that would say, well, I don't need to get married in order to be able to raise a child. It's useless.

It's just a piece of paper in any case. Look at how many people get divorced. What's even the point? of paper in any case. Look at how many people get divorced. What's even the point? Yeah, there's been, I think, really since the 1970s, Chris, with the dramatic rise in divorce and non-mental childbearing, a lot of folks have been kind of making the argument that what matters for kids is not, you know, their parents' marriage, but, you know, just, you know, getting love and maybe money as well. So kind of what matters for kids is not is not marriage, but it's it's money and, you know, and a loving family. And that can take many different forms. I was raised by a single mom and I think I turned out okay. My sister turned out okay.

You know, many kids turn out okay, you know, from different family forms. But I'm also a sociologist and on average, what I can tell you is that kids are more likely to flourish, you know educationally, socially and emotionally when they have the benefit of married parents. I think, you know, in my book probably the most striking statistic that I came up with just in kind of running the numbers with my colleague Wendy Wong is that we find in the National Logitunals Survey of Youth that young men today in America are more likely to spend some time in prison or in jail before they turn 30, than they are to graduate from college if they're from any kind of non-intact family.

And by contrast, you know, guys from intact families are, you know are about four times more likely to graduate from college than they are to land in prison or in jail. That's kind of probably the most dramatic statistic. But it kind of just gives you a sense of like how much a stably married family matters socially and emotionally, especially for our kids. I've been a fan of your Twitter for quite a while and some of the stuff that I've seen over the last couple of years, I think, from you. Young black women from intact two-parent families are more likely to graduate from college 36%

versus young white women from one-parent families, 28%. Young black men from intact two-parent families are less likely to be incarcerated 14% than young white men from one-parent families. Boys who grew up, apart from their biological father, are about two times more likely to land in prison or jail by age 30. Fatherlessness is a better predictor of incarceration than race or growing up poor, and 95 percent of upper-income mums are married, 76 percent of middle upper income mums are married, 76% of middle income mums are married and 35% of lower income mums are married. So fascinating.

Yeah, these are the statistics. And it's important, I think, to just remind folks that oftentimes the biggest privilege that kids have is not how much money their parents make, but whether or not their parents are married in a decent relationship. It's important to kind of add that caveat. Important to acknowledge that kind of a decent marriage or a great marriage is the best context

for our kids. What role does political affiliation have here with seeing an increasing amount of data talking about young Gen Z, Gen A boys, uh, skewing, skewing aggressively right and that the girls are kind of going left. But when we get into the older age brackets, what, what's the political affiliation role? Well, Chris, you know, when it comes to marriage, a lot of folks in the media and the academy understand and appreciate

that, you know, education and money matter, the folks who are college educated folks who are in that upper middle class bracket are more likely today to get married and stay married. What they don't realize though is it's not just class, it's also culture. So a majority of college educated Americans in the US and then 1855 bracket are married, but also a majority of folks who are religious

and a majority of folks who are conservative. Whereas the majority of folks who are not religious are not married and majority of folks who are conservative, whereas the majority of folks who are not religious are not married, and majority of folks who are either self-ideated as moderates or liberal are not married as well. So what I'm saying to you, Chris, is that it's both class and culture today that predict who is getting married and who is staying married. Now on the sort of politics point more concretely, what we see is that for single adults, about one in five young adults under the age of 30 are not going to be able to find someone at least right now

who kind of shares their ideological commitments. And so what that means more concretely to is that, you know, liberal women are going to have difficulty oftentimes finding enough liberal men and conservative men who are single are going to find, you know, or have difficulty finding enough conservative women who are kind of sharing. There's an increase in an unpreparedness of people to date across the aisle as well. I saw you tweet about that. Yeah. And so I think the hard thing about this too, right? Is that I think, um, particularly when it comes to sort of how you think about work

and family and how you want to organize the division of labor in your own household, you know, how much you think it's important for moms to care for young children, for instance, or for, you know, for men to, to be good breadwinners. Um, couples who are not on the same page on those issues really struggle. So what I would say to couples who are dating is, it's fine to date someone who doesn't share your politics, but it's really important to kind of come to

roughly common ground when it comes to thinking about how you wanna raise your kids and divide up work and family. Because those things are very real issues for couples today once they have children. Yeah, so you could have somebody who doesn't share your particular political ideology, but does agree with you about how family life should be set up inside of the house. And that might just make for spicy Thanksgiving day dinners, but outside of that, the structure of how all of this stuff is put together is interesting. I had a conversation with a friend who I'm not going to name. intention of sharing publicly that the current dating and mating crisis is good in overall cultural evolutionary terms. Many are called to propagate their genes beyond the demographic pinch point few are chosen.

Whoever manages to propagate their family in the face of a structurally anti-natalyst, anti-culture will manage to do so by virtue of having developed strong enough immune response to toxic messages. A celibate clergy is good because it screens out a propensity for fanaticism out of the gene pool. And that's from Carl Sagan. Yeah. I mean, the only thing that I will say there, I think is that, you know, I'm

conservative as you know, but I think, um, and I would certainly acknowledge that, you know, in the last, uh, seven years, there are plenty of things that conservatives, you know, cannon should be concerned about in their own tribe, right? I think what progressives don't appreciate though, is that they have their own challenges in their own tribe, right? And I think what, for progressives,ives, some of their biggest challenges surround marriage and family. And so we do see, in my book and elsewhere, some evidence when it comes to getting married and having

children, that not only is there a gap between conservatives and liberals, in their likelihood of getting married and having kids, but that that gap is growing. Because I think progressives for a wide number of different reasons are less oriented towards marriage and less oriented towards parenthood. And they have fewer of the kind of the norms, you know, that would sort of steer them into marriage

in the first place and then allow them to sort of, more easily navigate marriage in the second place. So one concrete example of what I'm talking about is we've seen, for instance, in recent years growing kind of interest and polyamory or support for polyamory, and less kind of support for like the classic marriage norm that you should be faithful in marriage. And we see in the data in the General Social Survey that couples who are husbands and wives who believe that sex outside of marriage is always wrong, are more likely to be happily married. And I certainly see there are also more,

in other data sets, they're more stably married. So I think the challenge for progressives is that some of the newer ideas, some of the newer norms that have kind of filtered into their tribe, into their camp in recent think progressives have fully kind of wrapped their heads around. And that is the way in which a lot of their newer commitments are making it more difficult for them to find a spouse, to prioritize getting married, and then to have a family. Yeah. And also, there's a good chunk of data that suggests people who are left of center are more unhappy. Presumably, this could be done whilst controlling for marital status as well.

So you have someone whose worldview or psychology or lifestyle predisposes them to being less happy than their centrist and right of center counterparts. It also discourages them from getting precisely the kind of union that seems to be very robust in improving their level of happiness. And then for the people who are doing it for the movement, because I want to be sort of a good liberal whatever that means, because political orientation is moderately genetically heritable, like all of our traits are, if you are someone who genuinely

cares about propagating liberal ideology long term, but you are anti-natalists in your philosophy you are creating a dying future for the philosophy that you say that you care about which is this sort of it's still as far as I can see that because also people left of center reject behavioral genetics largely a lot of the time. reject behavioral genetics largely, or a lot of the time. That is a hammer blow that I think hasn't hit yet properly. And I think that if people on the left fully understood and realized that, they would have a different approach. So, a couple of things I would say in response to that. One is that I have looked at the sort of gap and happiness

between conservatives and liberals and do find that a large minority of that gap can be attributed to differences in the likelihood of being married and the likelihood of being happily married. So that's certainly a real thing. That there's a kind of conservatives are happier in general and part of the reason that they're happier in general is they're more likely to be married in the first place and then happily married in the second place and they're progressive peers. And in terms of kind of like the long-term implications of all this, I think that obviously the one fly in the ointment for conservatives is

that many of their kids end up kind of know, kind of leaving the, you know, the tribe once they hit, you know, young adulthood. And so there are plenty of obviously progressives out there who are raised in conservative or religious homes who are now, you know, no longer conservative and or no longer religious. So that's where we do get obviously kind of new waves of progressives and new waves of more secular folks kind of emerging. But again, what's striking about some of the newer data on marriage and fertility is that the gap seems to be growing between conservatives and liberals in ways that might have long-term implications for the ideological makeup of a place like the United States.

Yeah. So, one of the things that we haven't necessarily spoken about here are the dynamics when it comes to choosing a mate. What's the soulmate myth? So the soulmate myth is this idea that what really matters when it comes to love and marriage is finding someone who kind of fits you perfectly and who is going to kind of make you happy and fulfilled almost all of the time. Kind of it's a very romanticized view of love and marriage. It's one that you kind of get in, you know, sometimes Taylor Swift songs. It's one that you can get in plenty of movies. It's one that you get in books like Eat, Pray, Love, right? And so the problem, of course, with this with this idea,

with what I call the soulmate myth, is that we know just physiologically, the butterflies, Chris, fly away within a few months or within a year or two of, you know, of either dating or marrying someone. There's just kind of like, there's physiologically a high when you first meet someone, when you first connect with someone. And a lot of those hormones just kind of like, you know, go away after a period of time. And so that sort of that magic that you first experience in a romantic relationship begins to dissipate. And so the challenge is how do you kind of move beyond that and recognize that there are other things that connects you to that person. So I think having a, you know, a more realistic view of marriage, that yes, you kind of try to cultivate

the romance in your relationship. And that's why regular date nights are really valuable, for instance. But you also recognize that marriage is about more than just those feelings. It's about things like money, things like companionship, things like kids. But beyond that, I would say it's kind of a recognition that love is about not feelings, but seeking the good of the other. And so couples who kind of have that, I think, richer view of marriage,

one that's not as romanticized, are more likely not just to kind of go the distance to avoid divorce court, but they're also more likely to enjoy a higher quality marriage because they just have a richer view of what marriage is all about. They're not as sort of likely to be susceptible to the ebbs and flows of those romantic feelings in a relationship. Did you see Mia Khalifa trended, I think it was about two or three months ago, on TikTok for saying marriage is nothing special, it's a piece of paper, and if the person that you are with isn't helping you grow, then it is time for you to move on.

I didn't see that particular comment. But again, I think this is the hard thing for people who are kind of, who have that mentality to wrap their heads around. If that's your view, then your odds of failing at marriage are extremely high. But if your view is instead that you love this person and that you're committed to this person and that you will the good of this person, come hella high water. Your odds of making it are extremely high.

But, and your odds of actually being happy within the marriage and life more generally are gonna be high too most of the time. The problem is that we are not able, it is very difficult to make ourselves believe something. We can make ourselves do things all the time. You know, you can stay in a marriage, there are millions and billions of people probably that have stayed in unhappy marriages, but believing that marriage is not supposed to be what a recent guest taught me is the confluence era.

For as long as you can benefit me and I can benefit you, this relationship works, and at the moment that that stops happening, the confluence is gone, and therefore we don't need to stick about. So it's all well and good saying, look, the thing that is best for you is to believe that marriage is supposed to be more than just about this confluence or about the butterflies or whatever But we are inextricably linked to the culture and the cultural moment and the memes and the trends that we find ourselves in and Extricating ourselves from that is difficult Completely agree with you I think the challenge here Chris and this is why my book is subtitled defy the elites

that's part of the the subtitle right and You know, I've gotten pushed back on that from folks that, well, the elites are actually the ones who are, you know, more likely today to get married in the first place and to be stably married in the second place. And my own data indicates to be reasonably happy, right? And that's, I think, in part because they talk left and walk right. Oftentimes, right? They talk left, walk right. It's what I mean by that. It's a luxury belief. It's a... oftentimes, right? They talk left, walk right. It's what I mean by that. It's a luxury belief. It's a...

Yeah. So, there's... They don't live the kind of individualistic lives that they kind of propagate in on Twitter or if they're heading up a school board or in some kind of mainstream media publication. They actually... They're more likely to sort of honor some of these older traditions that tend to reinforce strong and stable marriages in their private lives. So, you know, so for instance, I, you know, I mentioned like the importance of fidelity, that would be one example, or we could talk about, you know, for instance, joint checking accounts. These things are linked to happier marriages, more stable marriages.

They even have experimental evidence. It's a really fascinating study in the university found that couples who randomly assigned to join accounts and then other couples who ran with sign to separate accounts. You know, the folks who were assigned to join accounts did much better in the first few years of marriage than those who were assigned to the, you know, the individualistic kind of more, you know, often I think elite kind of strategy that we're hearing today. Whereas, you know, kind of a lot of the traditions that we have about, you know, marriage and family kind of grew up for reasons that there was a kind of social utility to them, a wisdom to them that emerged. So yeah, I think the challenge is that culturally, you have to defy many of the elite messages that are more individualistic, You have to defy many of the elite messages that are more individualistic, more me first kind of thinking, both in media and then online and social media today. If you can kind of steer clear of a lot of that me first thinking and a lot of those

me first norms in your marriage, you're more likely to flourish in your marriage and to have happily married husband or wife on the journey. How important is male income and provide a ship when it comes to being an eligible mate? Obviously, this is one of the meta-memes of the internet. And I tried to sort of meme it into existence with an idea of the tall girl problem that socioeconomic success amongst young women means that there is an ever-decreasing pool of eligible mates for them in the male side. But just how important is it? Like what is it? What makes women happy? What are they want?

Well, there's just no question that men's sort of status as breadwinners is very important in both kind of predicting entry into marriage, into marriage, marital stability and marital quality. Although it has changed in recent years, kind of in this way. So what I'm kind of seeing in the more recent data is it's not necessarily sort of who earns how much money in the marriage, so much as he is stably employed full time. Okay. That's what seems to predict, for instance, marital quality and marital stability in important ways. What I found was that the precise division of who earns what was not as important in predicting her marital happiness, as it has been in some previous research on this topic, then when it comes to divorce, what we see is that when she loses her job, there is no effect on the stability of their marriage. This is work done by Sasha Kilowall at Harvard in sociology there. But when he loses his job,

his risk of divorce increases, I mean, their divorce increases risk by about one third. So there's something about kind of that stability, that sense of identity, I think, for men that comes from full-time employment, the respect that often I think accrues them from their wife. And when he doesn't have that full-time job, it's just much more likely to be a problem, both in kind of getting a relationship started and sustained. So I think people don't appreciate that there still is a very gendered story when it comes to work and marriage. And that story is that women are looking for and respect men who have, you know, a decent job. And men who are not employed, you know, full time. Or I think, you know, just having much greater difficulty even today and still, you know, navigating marriage successfully. Do you have, you've said you might have quite a few kids as some of them sons, are they all girls?

Paul Sotner I have sons and daughters, yes. Pete Sautner Cool. So, I don't know how old they are, but at some point, your sons are going to begin dating, they're going to enter the dating market. Given the current world of men's advice and the current state of the dating environment, what are you going to tell your sons? Or what would you tell a struggling young guy who reads too much of the internet about how to be as eligible of a mate to the opposite sex as they can be? Well, Chris, it's interesting. You know, one of the things that I would say both to my

sons, but just to young men, and I do say to young men more generally, is that, you know, there are a lot of complaints that we're getting. You know, there was a critique of my kind of thesis in the New York Times recently from, you know, a journalist, and she was saying, there just aren't any good men out there. And so, you know, my response to that kind of idea is, I think there are some legitimate concerns. We have to understand the why. Why aren't you finding enough good men out there? I think it's a part because we're not kind of giving young men enough kind of concrete advice about what is appealing and attractive to women. And so one of the things that I find also in my chapter on gender is that women are happier when, you know, they're rating the men in their lives to be physically stronger, right? So what I would say to young men who are interested kind of in dating and getting married is that, you know, get in shape physically. I'm not, I'm not as you might guess, I'm not a big athlete, but I swim regularly.

And so if you're not like an athlete, you know, you can find things, you know, to do run, swim, bike, go to the gym, whatever, but get in decent physical shape. Like that's one thing that I would say to them because women do value, you know, physical strength and they value guys who are, who are, can take care of themselves physically. That's, that's one thing that I would say. I would say also kind of have a sense of mission in life. You know, I'm want to do this jobwise. It doesn't matter what it is really, I don't think, but just to have a clear sense of like, I'm learning this thing to do this job. And that might change over time, that's fine. But to have a sense of like, professionally,

like you want to do something and you have like a plan and a purpose basically. That extends, of course, to things that are of a more civic character. I think women also kind of have a tremendous respect for guys who are volunteering in their communities as well. They want to, same thing applies to religion, if you're in that religious subset. So I think a sense of mission matters as well. And then I would also say to young men that when it comes to dating, to really take the initiative initially, I ask my women in my large family classes at UVA kind of, what's your preference, you know, when it comes to that first date, is it that you take the initiative to ask someone out on the date or that he takes the initiative? And about 80% of the women in my classes, I've got large classes at UVA would say it's their preference that he takes the initiative.

It's a sign of his interest in them and it's also a sign of like his willingness to to engage in risk and healthy ways as well. So, so I would, you know, I talked to young to young men about the importance of taking initiative, the importance of having a sense of mission, especially when it comes to something related to school or work, to being upon their stage of life, and the importance of being in decent physical shape. Because these are all things that women appreciate. And I think we're not telling men enough and adolescent males as well that you've got to get off the Xbox You've got to get off your phone You've got to get out there and hit the gym or do something

Get more serious about your studies or your skills, you know, your training Tech whatever it might be, you know get a job and tech, whatever it might be, get a job and make a mark. And if you do those kinds of things and develop competencies, obviously, in certain kinds of areas, then you will garner the respect and the interest of women in your milieu. Yeah. I mean, it's the competence that women, I think, largely are looking for. And if you were to just ask someone, would you rather have a competent or an incompetent partner? Not clarifying in what domain, by how much, who wants to be with a useless partner that doesn't have any agency, that doesn't have any intentionality,

that isn't able to enact change that they want in any area of their life or even in specific areas of their life. If you're unable to get in shape, it identifies that in some regard, you aren't competent at being able to control your own body and your own physicality. If you aren't able to hold down a job, it shows that you aren't competent at being able to show up on time or be reliable or be disciplined or be whatever the thing is. And Jordan Peterson was on the show a couple of months ago, and he said, women use wealth as a proxy for competence. It's not the wealth that they're after. It's just the most reliable rough hewn rubric signal that they can find to say, here is a rank order starting with fucking Elon

Musk or whoever's at the top now, some Arab shake and going all the way down. Here is a rank ordered list of 3.5 billion men, and you can work out a kind of a comp... It's the best video game ever made. It's the best video game ever made. Yeah, I think a keyword you mentioned there is, of course, agency. I think there's so much passivity among young men today and among teenage boys today. Way too much screen time, way too much video games. And at a certain point, women notice that and it's a big turnoff, especially when it comes to marriage because they want a guy who has a sense of agency and who exemplifies that in his life in a variety of different domains. What do you think about most of the advice coming out of the manosphere? Obviously, there is this huge market for speaking to men.

As you've identified, we're not necessarily telling men the right things. Is the manosphere getting anything right or what are the things that it gets most wrong? What do you wish that you could sort of get a sponge from it? Yeah. I mean, I certainly think some of the things we've talked about just in the last few minutes are articulated in different ways by people like Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate. I think what's problematic is that on parts of the hemisphere,

it's a very kind of self-centered, self-oriented approach to masculinity, particularly people like Andrew Tate, obviously. And there's also kind of a, there's a way in which women are talked down and you know are described in very you know degrading or demeaning or or negative ways. So I think it can cultivate a certain sense of suspicion, needless suspicion, the part of men.

Obviously we all have both women who have to be discerning because there are people out there who are bad actors or who've got vices, they're going to make them bad spouses or there's just not a good fit for a particular person and you have to kind of figure out, do you have the capacity for friendship with this person? Do they have some key virtues that will make them a good husband, a good father, a good wife and a good mother? But I think parts of the man is fear of are painting an obviously an overly negative view of women in marriage and are encouraging men to be selfish in ways that will make them bad romantic partners and reduce their odds of succeeding in marriage as well.

Which ultimately results in them dying on average eight or nine years earlier, being more likely to commit suicide. Right. Alcohol abuse. And this is, again, this is what Pearl Davis and Andrew Tate don't really acknowledge or appreciate is that, yes, marriage is a risk, no doubt. But the guys who are not married today, never married and guys who are divorced are just much more likely to be, especially if they're not

college educated, if they're not kind of doing well professionally, you know, at the top of some game, they're just much more likely to be floundering and to, you know, end up, yeah, sad, lonely, and vulnerable to these deaths of despair. What about from a woman's side? It's not something that I often see coming from the right or from anybody sort of right or far left, bits of dating advice for women. Women who want to get married, who want to find a partner, who want to be discerning with their mate choice, but who also know that in a post-MeToo world men are maybe more reticent about approaching them, they're maybe more concerned about, they maybe don't have quite the same, like patriarchy-fueled agency that perhaps our great-grandfathers would have done. What do you say to women when it comes to attracting, selecting a male partner?

So I think for both young men and young men, I would certainly say, you know, given the challenges that people are facing today is, number one, if you have, you know, friends who are kind of wise and discerning and roughly your age or a little bit older, or even, you know, a lot older, kind of just let it be known that you're interested in getting married and have them kind of, you know, do the sort of mating game, you know, crowdsource the potential matchmaking, you know is is you know, I regularly introduce students That I know are sitting getting married or young adults, you know to one another just so and you know, that's that can be fruitful I think so you know letting it be known to people you trust judgment you trust. I think if you have a religious bone in your body Go to church, synagogue,

mosque, temple, whatever. The folks who are in those communities are much more marriage minded than the folks who are not. And that's worth kind of, you know, taking seriously if you have any kind of religious interest or background. I would say also kind of for women in particular, kind of given the fact that a lot of guys are worried about the me too, you know, suspicion, you know, signaling with a, with a smile, with a compliment, with extra attention, you know, cultivating receptivity is a hugely overlooked way of doing this. I was reminded of the, I guess it would have been the, the aristocracy during the Renaissance would drop a handkerchief. You need a nonverbal cue equivalent of dropping a handkerchief. Yeah, all that I think is valuable. And then, you know, some folks are just not going to have any success in person, right? And so, you know, I certainly know folks who are happily married

today who met on, you know met on some dating service, but just be kind of discerning about the service you pick. So obviously Tinder is probably not the best option. There are newer sites that are kind of cultivating a more marriage-oriented approach that are accessible online, for instance, that can be helpful. So I think if you're going to seek out a dating site, pick one that is oriented towards marriage, oriented towards serious relationships. Brad Wilcox, ladies and gentlemen. Brad, I've been a massive fan of your work for a long time. I'm really glad that you've dug into the deepened, dark,

murky data that's sort of borne all of this stuff out. Where should people go? They want to learn more about your work and the book and keep up to date with what you do. Where should they go? They can type and get married and that'll go to Harper for the book. I'm on Twitter at Brad Wilcox, IFS,

and then on the web oftentimes at FamilyStudies.org as well. Those are three places to look me up. Brad, I really appreciate you. Thank you for that day. It's great to be with you, Chris. Thanks for having me on. Brad Wilcox, IFS, and then on the web, Oftentimes at FamilyStudies.org as well.

Those are three places to look me up. Brad, I really appreciate you. Thank you for a day. It's great to be with you, Chris. Thanks for having me on.