Molly White's Citation Needed - Issue 70 – The Cryptocurrency States of America
Episode Date: November 15, 2024Crypto’s efforts to buy the 2024 elections paid off, and we’re in for a bumpy ride. Originally posted on November 15, 2024....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm Molly White, and you're listening to the audio feed for the Citation Needed Newsletter.
You can see the text version of the newsletter online at citation needed. news.
Issue 70, the cryptocurrency states of America.
Crypto's efforts to buy the 2024 elections paid off, and we're in for a bumpy ride.
As you might have already heard, Donald Trump was recently elected to be the next president of the United States.
The cryptocurrency industry is in seventh heaven, happy to ditch their supposedly anti-government pro-freedom ideology in favor of embracing an authoritarian if it means number go up.
And number has gone up. Bitcoin recently hit a new all-time high of nearly $93,000, shattering the pre-election record of around $72,000.
Other cryptocurrencies have also rallied to varying degrees, as they tend to do when Bitcoin prices rise.
Hints of the future crypto-stained presidency are already cropping up.
Donald Trump has announced he plans to create a Department of Government Efficiency,
or Doge, for short, an idea Elon Musk has been promoting with sophomoric Dogecoin memes for months now,
though not nearly as long as he's been toying with the price of Dogecoin by tweeting various memes
and failed references.
Perhaps not trusting Musk with sole leadership of this new department,
Trump says he'll make Musk and fellow crypto enthusiast Vivek Ramoswamy co-head.
Musk's first response to the president-elect's announcement
was to tweet,
The merch will be and then a string of fire emojis,
which is certainly an odd priority for someone who has promised to slash government excess.
Indeed, Doge merch, giving a nod to the meme coin,
has already made its way into Trump's official web store,
which now features a t-shirt emblazoned with Trump's and Musk's faces,
along with a photograph of the Shiba-inu dog that serves as Dogecoin's mascot.
Various other crypto promoters are joining Trump's orbit,
including his transition team co-lead Howard Lutnik,
attorney general pick Matt Gates,
and defense secretary nominee Pete Hegeseth.
All of this to say, I suspect I won't be,
be running out of things to write about anytime soon. If you haven't already subscribed to this
newsletter, consider signing up for a free or pay what you want subscription to receive each issue in
your inbox and to support my work, which is entirely possible thanks to support from readers like
you. In the Courts
The final defendant in the FTX case, co-founder and former chief technology officer Gary Wong,
will be sentenced next week. He's requested a non-custodial sentencing. He's requested a non-custodial
sentence, and I think he's extremely likely to get one based on the government's sentencing
submission. The government notes that Wong, quote, decided to cooperate immediately, even though
he was not involved in many aspects of the criminal enterprise, and there was little documentary
evidence linking Wong to the frauds on FTX's customers and investors. The government also notes that
Wong has since developed a tool for the government to detect fraud in the stock market, the details of which are
redacted from the public record. They write that, quote, Wong is in the process of developing a
similar tool for cryptocurrency markets, which, if he is sentenced to a time-served sentence,
the government hopes it will be able to take advantage of early next year. There's cooperating,
and then there's cooperating. Prosecutors in the FTX case have also filed a forfeiture complaint
aimed at seizing around $16 million in various crypto assets held in a finance account.
The prosecutors say they believe these funds belong to the recipients of a $150 million
bribe to Chinese officials by FTX executives, paid to unfreeze Alameda accounts
containing around $1 billion in crypto assets that had been frozen by Chinese authorities.
Sam Bankman Fried was originally charged with conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions
of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, but as with several charges added after Bankman
Fried was extradited from the Bahamas, it was split into a separate trial, which later was dropped
by prosecutors after Bankman Fried earned a 25-year prison sentence on the first set of charges.
Ilya Lichtenstein, the man behind the 2016 theft of nearly 120,000 Bitcoins from the Bitfinex
cryptocurrency exchange, has been sentenced to five years in prison, after both he and his wife, Heather
Rosal Khan Morgan, pleaded guilty to money-laundering
conspiracy. Rosalcon is set to be sentenced on Monday and is likely to get a lighter sentence
due to her lack of involvement in the original theft. Roman Sterlingoff has been sentenced to
12 and a half years in prison for his role for operating the Bitcoin Fog cryptocurrency mixing
service. He has also been ordered to pay a nearly $400 million judgment, roughly the value
at time of receipt of the more than 1.2 million Bitcoins laundered via Bitcoin Fong.
throughout its operation.
According to prosecutors, Bitcoin fog was a, quote, go-to service for criminals to launder their
cryptocurrency, a process by which dirty tokens linked to scams, thefts, or other various
criminal activities are made more difficult to trace on the otherwise highly traceable
public ledgers known as blockchains.
Throughout the trial, Sterlingov maintained that he did not run Bitcoin Fog, but was merely a
user of the service.
Prosecutors sought a 30-year sentence, but the judge opted to go lower, stating that he wished to balance deterring other would-be criminals, while also matching Sterlingov's degree of culpability.
The judge and Celsius's founder Alex Michinsky's criminal trial has denied his January 2024 motion to dismiss two charges, meaning that absent further dismissal for other reasons,
Mishinsky will face all seven original charges when his trial begins in January 2025.
South Korean police have arrested 215 people, suspected of stealing the equivalent of around $228.4 million,
in a crypto scam that impacted around 15,000 people.
Victims were promised high returns, while the group manipulated the markets for the tokens to artificially inflate the prices.
Indian police have arrested a man they believe may be linked to the $235 million Wazier X hack in July.
It doesn't seem that the man was himself behind the hack, but instead had opened an account on Wazir X under an alias and then sold it to another person.
Hackers regularly attempt to fraudulently obtain credentialed accounts on platforms that require know-your-customer verification,
and this legal action demonstrates the risk that people selling such accounts may find themselves in hot water for the actions of their customers.
In Bankruptcies
Former Alameda Research co-CEO Sam Tribuco has agreed to forfeit assets to the FTX estate as part of a settlement.
As a refresher, thanks to either great timing or the knowledge that things were about to go belly up,
Tribuco resigned from Alameda Research in August 2022, only a few months before the FTX Empire collapsed.
He has remained a member of my conspicuously missing list, of FTX adjacent power players who were rarely
mentioned in the criminal trial. For a while, many wondered if he might be hiding out in international
waters on his $2.5 million 52-foot yacht, purchased for him by the company and christened Soak My Deck.
The real story is likely less interesting. He's just been living in San Francisco, keeping a low
profile and periodically interacting with government and bankruptcy representatives via his lawyers.
This is supported by the conversation I had with Ryan Salem last month, who, when I asked about
Trebuco, replied, he's living his life in his apartment in San Francisco. I see him from time to time,
maybe once a quarter. You know, I think he's just waiting until everything shakes out.
Tribuco has agreed to forfeit two San Francisco apartments that he purchased in June 2021 for a combined
$8.7 million, claims on approximately $70 million in assets on FTCs, and,
Sadly, for him, his beloved Soak My Debtors have determined that during his tenure at Alameda,
Tribuco received the benefit of approximately $40 million in potentially avoidable transfers from the debtors.
FTX has also unleashed a flood of 36 adversary cases, seeking to recover assets from various entities and individuals.
They make for very informative reading, as far as the kind of shady business that was happening not only,
within FTX, but within the broader orbit of other cryptocurrency companies, customers,
investors, and various other vendors doing business with them. Because of the quantity, I think
they deserve their own standalone issue, so stay tuned for that. In Governments and Regulators.
The meteoric rise of the crypto-betting platform polymarket, the billions of dollars placed in bets
on the outcome of the United States presidential election, and rumors of market manipulation and other
malfeasance seemed to have culminated in various investigations against the platform.
One, from France's gambling regulator, seeks to, quote, examine polymarkets operation and compliance
with French gambling legislation. French law requires gambling platforms to register with and
submit to oversight from the country's gambling authority, as well as pay rather hefty taxes.
Polymarket has not done any of these things, and so is likely to be shut down in the country.
Although France's gambling regulator has reportedly been eyeing the platform for a while now,
the headline making bets on a Donald Trump win from a trader who claims to be French may have hastened things along.
Over here in the U.S., the FBI raided the apartment of Polymarket CEO Shane Coplin on November 13.
Although Polymarket is based in the United States, it is not meant to be available to U.S.-based betters,
following a 2022 wind-down order and fine from the CFTC.
However, Polymarket, like many crypto platforms,
does the bare minimum to pretend they're putting in effort
to prevent prohibited users from using the platform.
If a person tries to place bets
while connected from an IP address that geolocates to the United States,
the site prevents them from doing so.
However, IP-based location spoofing is an incredibly easy task,
and many Americans have been using this technique to get,
gain access to betting on the site.
As is becoming the norm for crypto-related platforms or people in platforms associated with the
American right when scrutinized by law enforcement or regulators, Pollymarket was quick to condemn
the raid as, quote, obvious political retribution by the outgoing administration against Pollymarket
for providing a market that correctly called the 2024 presidential election.
In Elections and Political Influence, Cryptopact.
While the cryptocurrency industry failed to convincingly prove their many claims that there was a flood of single-issue crypto voters just waiting to hit the polls,
they proved that they didn't actually need people to care about crypto, so long as the billionaire industry executives had enough money to throw around.
And they sure did. The cryptocurrency industry spent roughly $190 million on this cycle alone.
While some individual cryptocurrency industry executives contributed to the presidential race,
crypto-focused super PACs steered clear, instead sticking to congressional races.
Seven executives from the crypto world directly contributed more than $100,000 apiece to back Trump,
while only one put funding behind Harris.
Trump's backers were Mark Andreessen, who contributed $5.35 million,
both Winklevoss twins, who contributed $1.3 million a piece,
Peacons Jesse Powell, who contributed $1 million, Sequoia's Doug Leone, who also contributed $1 million,
Ripples Stuart Alderati, who contributed $300,000, and multi-coin capitals Kyle Samani, who contributed $300,000.
They were all outspent, however, by the single donor to Kamala Harris,
Ripple co-founder and executive chairman Chris Larson, who contributed $12.6 million.
As for the congressional races, the CryptoFocus Super PACs spent in 68 races across 35 states.
$70.9 million went to support Republicans and $48.3 million backed Democrats.
Only 10 races failed to go their way.
Eight, if you exclude, two races were candidates they backed in the primaries withdrew.
And in both of those two races, the Crypto Pax chose new candidates to support who later went on to
win. Fifty-eight races went how they wanted them to go, with either their supported candidate
winning the election, or candidates they spent to oppose, losing. The remaining two races,
California's House District 45, and Alaska's House at Large District, have still not
been called as of writing. Certainly, some of their success comes down to the PAC's willingness
to shell out massive amounts of money. The Crypto-Pax put $40 million behind Ohio's Republican
senatorial candidate, car salesman and one-time blockchain entrepreneur Bernie Moreno,
and the tight margins in his race against Democratic incumbent and crypto opponent, Sherrod Brown,
means that it's quite possible that it was the crypto spending that made the difference.
However, it's important to note that the cryptocurrency packs were largely going with a back-the-winners
strategy in this cycle, exemplified by their spending on candidates like Jim Justice,
a Republican who won West Virginia's Senate race,
and John Curtis, a Republican who won the Senate race in Utah,
who were all but assured to win their races
and whose races were called moments after polls closed.
Although it took a while for me to realize this,
there were times when I wondered why the crypto packs
were supporting some candidate when their opponent seemed roughly
equivalent in their crypto-related stances,
the strategy later became clear.
As I noted in an earlier issue, a whopping 32,000,
32 of the 39 candidates endorsed by Coinbase's advocacy group, Stand with Crypto,
had been assigned a 75% or more chance of winning their respective races.
I wrote then that the crypto industry seemed to be, quote,
setting themselves up for a guaranteed post-election victory lap by betting on the winners.
Now, a week after election day, they're still circling the track and hollering about their
victory, long after most of the spectators have gone home.
They've sent out emails, shamelessly boasting about buying the elections,
with lines like Crypto's Big Bet pays off, and the crypto army is striking.
This strategy of betting on the winners was partly to ensure loyal advocates in Congress,
but it was also because the crypto industry spending was as much a show of force
as it was about actually achieving their desired outcomes.
They revealed this during the primaries, when they dumped $10 million in opposition spending
against Katie Porter in California, $2 million against Jamal Bowman in New York, and $1.4 million against
Cory Bush in Missouri. Although none of these candidates were particularly outspoken against crypto,
that wasn't really the point. Instead, the crypto industry used those races to send a message,
fall in line, or we might deploy our millions against you, too. It didn't really matter if the industry
spending directly caused their targets to lose their races, so long as there was a plausible argument,
that it played a role. In both Bowman and Bush's races, crypto industry money made up only about
20% of the opposition spending. We can expect the industry to do the same in future elections.
Claim responsibility for the outcomes of all the races where they spent money, even if those outcomes
were likely not impacted much by crypto industry involvement. Given various candidates'
willingness to buy the industry manufactured myth about blocks of single-issue crypto voters,
I worry that candidates in future elections may also fall for this story
and choose to submit to crypto industry pressures rather than risk millions in opposition spending
next time they stand for re-election.
And the industry is already scrambling to ensure politicians have no doubts about the wealth
crypto packs might muster against them,
refilling the super pack war chest with another $25 million from Coinbase
and $23 million from Andrieson Horowitz.
As for the losers, the crypto industry's $2.3 million in spending wasn't enough to get incumbent
Democrat Yadira Caraveo re-elected in Colorado District 8's extremely close race.
As ranking member of the House's Digital Assets Subcommittee, Caraveo had been a strong ally to the
cryptocurrency industry, and she was one of several sitting Congresspeople to appear during a
Crypto4 Harris event in August. In Oregon's District 15, 1.5 million.
wasn't sufficient to secure a win for Republican incumbent Lori Chavez-Darmerer,
who had written in response to stand with crypto that, quote,
it's clear that there is a space for the digital asset ecosystem in the free market of the
United States.
Republican incumbent Mike Garcia lost re-election in California's District 27,
despite $1 million in cryptocurrency industry backing, which he earned with a promise to, quote,
be a champion for crypto in Congress.
And finally, long-shot crypto candidate, John Deerec,
Eaton failed to oust crypto's number one enemy on the hill, incumbent Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren,
who, as predicted, easily won a third term.
This race was one of the clearest indicators that the major industry packs were more concerned
about appearing to back winners rather than risk losses to support those with whom they were
strongly ideologically aligned.
They didn't put assent towards this race, despite Warren's permanent presence in the industry's
crosshairs.
and despite Dieton running on an explicitly pro-crypto platform.
Instead, Deaton's $2.1 million in backing came from a completely separate super pack,
called the Commonwealth Unity Fund.
The vast majority of the funding for this pack, in turn, came from the same wealthy donors
who backed Fairshake and the bigger industry packs,
the Winklevoss twins, Ripple, and Phil Potter of Potter Ventures.
However, by splitting the spending into a separate committee,
fair shake is able to sweep Warren's landslide victory under the rug.
Not only will Warren return to her seat to continue her push for strict regulations on the
cryptocurrency industry, but she will also become the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee,
following Sherrod Brown's loss in Ohio and Mark Warner's choice to remain the top-ranking Democrat
on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Amusingly, in ousting Brown, the cryptocurrency industry may have handed more power to an even more
aggressive enemy. Trump's political appointments. Trump has been announcing new additions to the
Trumposphere at a rapid-fire pace, seemingly making ever more horrifying selections every time.
While Senate rejections of presidential cabinet appointments are rare, Trump seems to be challenging
his newly Republican Congress to defy him with some of the picks. However, he's also announced
that he wishes to be permitted to make resets appointments, which would enable him to bypass the
normal Senate hearing and confirmation process.
First to discuss is Trump transition team co-chair Howard Lutnik, who also heads the
Cantor Fitzgerald financial services firm.
Cantor Fitzgerald has just wrapped up hosting its own crypto, digital assets, and AI
infrastructure conference in Miami, and offers crypto services of its own.
Lutnik has also personally vouched for the shady stablecoin issuer tether, which has been proven
to have lied about the stable coin being fully back.
by dollars and dollar-like assets, but now insists that we should all just trust them,
that it is now, even if it wasn't then.
Rather than produce legitimate audits, Tether instead leaned on Lutnik to vouch for them.
Quote, they have the money they say they have, he stated earlier this year.
That's basically an audit, right?
Apropos of nothing, Tether has minted $7 billion in new tokens since Trump's win.
Tether is also reportedly still under investigation by the Department of Justice, though that
investigation is only one of many whose futures are uncertain given the new administration.
Anyway, Lutnik is in a serious position of power with his role on the transition team where he
helps to staff Trump's future administration, and the cryptocurrency industry knows it, with
Coinbase CEO and political megadoner Brian Armstrong reportedly seeking to secure meetings with Lutnik.
Lutnik has selflessly put his own name in the running as a potential pick for Treasury Secretary
and is reportedly one of two candidates Trump is considering.
The other is Scott Bessent, a fellow Trump megadoner and crypto enthusiast.
Bessent has been a proponent of integrating cryptocurrency into the broader economy,
and of course of broader deregulation.
While perhaps the only blessing in the 2022 cryptocurrency wipeout was that people without
cryptocurrency investments were pretty much entirely insulated from the carnage,
unlike other historical financial collapses, such as the one in 2008, I fear we may soon wave
goodbye to such a firewall, as Trump's crypto-enthusiastic administration and the new Congress
allow crypto to enmesh itself within the broader financial and banking systems.
As far as things to keep an eye out for and mobilize on, this is a big one,
Although hopefully Elizabeth Warren on the banking committee will provide somewhat of a bulwark.
Trump's cabinet stands to have a substantial number of pro-crypto members should his nominees pass Senate approval,
although some are destined for roles where they are likely to have little in the way of direct influence over crypto policy.
Bitcoin enthusiast Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for example, has been selected to lead the Health and Human Services Department.
But his Bitcoin beliefs fall well behind his opinions on vaccines, fluoride, and infectious disease studies
when it comes to beliefs that are concerning for a public health official.
Although I personally wouldn't put it past him to support some of the hairbrain schemes I've seen to put medical records on a public blockchain.
More consequential might be Trump's pick for Attorney General,
who will advise him on legal matters and oversee the country's entire legal system.
Matt Gates, who at least appears to share Trump's proclivity for breaking laws, including
but not limited to those prohibiting sexual abuse, is also a big Bitcoin fan.
Among other things, this summer, he proposed a bill that would allow people to pay federal
income tax with Bitcoin for some reason.
Trump selected crypto enthusiast Tulsi Gabbard for the Director of National Intelligence,
likely thanks to her shared desire to root out the, quote, deep state.
She used a 2023 speech at the annual Bitcoin conference to condemn a, quote, elitist cabal that she believed was working to undermine Trump, and claimed that lawmakers who oppose Bitcoin don't understand it, but, quote, know enough to know they shouldn't like it because it will undermine their ability to control us.
Trump's nominee for Secretary of the Interior, Doug Bergam, will have a major role to play in Trump's plans to ramp up energy production.
Bergum is a product of the tech industry, having founded a software company and software-focused venture
capital firm. He's also been a proponent of Bitcoin mining in his home state of North Dakota,
much to the chagrin of nearby residents whose energy prices spiked by $12 million after the mining
operation moved in. Fox and Friends co-host Pete Heggseth has been tapped as Secretary of Defense.
Hegsetth has praised Trump for, quote, making Bitcoin great again, and has boasted a
his own Bitcoin holdings. Trump has once again nominated former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton as the
U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, a district that regularly prosecutes financial
crimes, as well as other high-profile cases, such as the sex crimes cases against Diddy and
Gilae-Maxwell, or corruption cases against former Senator Bob Menendez and current New York Mayor Eric Adams.
The current U.S. attorney for the Southern District, Damian Williams, has
has prosecuted a number of high-profile cryptocurrency cases, including those against Sam Bankman-Fried
and the other FTX executives, the ongoing case against Celsius CEO Alex Machinsky,
and the ongoing case against tornado cash developer Roman Storm.
Trump tried to nominate Clayton once before in 2020, while attempting to oust U.S. attorney Jeffrey
Berman, who was in the process of investigating Trump allies, including Rudy Giuliani.
Berman initially refused to leave, objecting to Clayton's complete lack of experience as a prosecutor,
but later stepped down when it was determined he would be replaced by a deputy.
Instead of obtaining prosecutorial experience in the meantime,
Clayton has spent the years since his December 2020 SEC departure enjoying the revolving door,
taking the typically lucrative advisory positions,
with crypto- or crypto-adjacent firms including electric capital, fireblocks,
River Asset Management, now owned by Coinbase, and Apollo Global Management.
The biggest excitement for the cryptocurrency world is the prospect of an SEC no longer headed
by Gary Gensler, who has over the past few years worked to enforce existing securities regulations
against the industry, much to its shock and horror. Many of the heavy spenders in this election
cycle are themselves locked in court battles with the SEC, including Coinbase, ripple, and
and the millions of dollars they paid to install crypto-friendly politicians may well pay off in
legal savings down the line. Traditionally, SEC chairs resign when a new administration is elected,
and Gensler will likely not buck tradition. Despite the fact that Trump likely won't have the
opportunity, not to mention the fact that he's not legally allowed, Trump has courted the
crypto-faithful, with brash promises of firing Gary Gensler, quote, on day one.
Trump has not yet indicated who he might install as a replacement, but the crypto industry has been salivating over which crypto-friendly regulators they'd like to see him choose.
Coinbase's Brian Armstrong has proposed SEC Commissioner Hester Pierce, who the industry has weirdly dubbed Cryptomomom for her support of cryptocurrencies and her regular dissents from various proposals and lawsuits targeting the industry.
However, some in the crypto world were disappointed with his suggestion, criticizing Pierce's
for past decisions they felt benefited major institutions at the expense of individual crypto holders.
As I wrote in July, quote,
it's interesting to me that even some on the more ideological end of crypto
see billionaire executives and VCs spending money on politicians and go,
yes, good, they're fighting for me.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has proposed three other options.
Former CFTC head Chris Giancarlo, who now enjoys several advisory roles to prominent crypto firms,
former acting comptroller of the currency, Brian Brooks, who was later, briefly, the CEO of
Binance U.S., or former SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher, who is chief legal officer at the stock
and crypto trading firm Robin Hood. So anyway, things are about to get pretty buckwild out there.
If nothing else, I will be here to chronicle it.
Bitcoin Strategic Reserve
Bitcoiners, but also some mainstream media articles, have been making much of the potential
for a Trump win to usher in the creation of a, quote, Bitcoin strategic reserve, to the point that I think
the idea has earned some debunking. It harkens back to the Bitcoin conference this past July,
although it was not Trump who first brought it up. It was his then opponent Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
To quote from issue 63, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s biggest promise by far, announced to thunderous applause,
was that he would establish a strategic reserve of four million bitcoins,
$225 billion at today's prices and amounting to around 20% of the total Bitcoin supply,
which he did not disguise as a promise to pump the audience's bags.
Quote, the cascading impact from these actions will eventually move Bitcoin to a valuation of hundreds of trillions of dollars, he concluded.
Note that the $225 billion estimate was July prices.
With recent price movements, 4 million Bitcoins would be priced at around $350 billion today.
RFK Jr. so thoroughly upstaged Trump the day before Trump was scheduled to speak that Trump seemed to shoo-horn in his own promise of a, quote, strategic national Bitcoin stockpile in order to try to keep up.
However, I think many who are picturing a strategic reserve now are picturing not what Trump described, but rather RFK Jr's fever dream.
Trump's version was a far cry from RFK Jr's plan to spend 5% of the national budget pumping Bitcoin, but it was still,
weird. He promised that the stockpile would consist of the crypto assets seized as a result of various
law enforcement activities, which they normally sell in batches once the assets have been formally
forfeited. A practice, Trump says he would stop. As the final part of my plan today, I am announcing
that if I am elected, it will be the policy of my administration, United States of America,
to keep 100% of all the Bitcoin the U.S. government currently holds or acquires into the future.
We'll keep 100%. I hope you do well, please.
This will serve in effect as the core of the Strategic National Bitcoin Stockpile.
As you know, most of the Bitcoin currently held by the United States government was obtained through law enforcement action.
You know that. They took it from you.
Let's take that guy's life.
Let's take his family, his house, his Bitcoin, we'll turn it into Bitcoin.
It's been taken away from you because that's where we're going now.
That's where this country is going.
It's a fascist regime.
And so as I take steps to transform that vast wealth into a permanent national asset
to benefit all Americans.
It's not entirely clear to me whether Trump was merely acknowledging there that many of the
seized crypto assets or seized from crypto thieves, who themselves wrongly stole crypto from the types of
people likely to be in the audience at Bitcoin 2024, or if he was stating that law enforcement had no
right to, say, seize assets from the perpetrators of the 2016 BitFanex hack. Either way, he fails to
acknowledge that much of the time when the government seizes crypto assets and then sells them
later on, the proceeds are returned to the victims of the crime. Trump's plan, at least as elucidating,
on stage in July is to put a stop to this practice and instead hold on to those assets that he
himself stated had been stolen from people like those in the audience. It's a weird plan,
but I also hold a lot more skepticism that he will follow through with it than many in the
crypto industry, who are in turn being heavily quoted by media with little scrutiny of their claims.
To me, it seems like a hastily tacked-on promise likely to fall by the wayside with many others
made by presidential candidates, as they seek to court voters and donors on the campaign trail.
Everything else.
Hilariously, despite Trump's win and the crypto market's enthusiastic response,
Trump's own crypto project continues to limp along.
Trump's World Liberty Financial crypto project has sold only 1.33 billion of the 20 billion
reduced total token supply, or around 6.7%.
Much of the lackluster response can probably be blamed on the strict limitations around token resale and remuneration to token holders, and availability only to accredited investors, limitations which were rather obviously crafted to try to dodge securities enforcement.
If Trump succeeds with his plans to defang the SEC, I expect these limitations to swiftly change, likely significantly financially benefiting Trump and his family, who receives 75% of the SEC.
of net protocol revenues in addition to the initial allocation of 22.5 billion World Liberty
Financial tokens. Elsewhere in crypto. There's been more violence in the cryptosphere, in what
seems to be a worsening trend in recent months. The CEO of a Canadian cryptocurrency company called
WonderFi was kidnapped off a street in Toronto and held until he agreed to transfer one million
Canadian dollars, or around 720,000 U.S. dollars.
Over in Montreal, a missing cryptocurrency influencer and suspected pump and dump scammer named
Kevin Marshahi was found dead in a park after disappearing in June.
Mershahi had been under investigation by Quebec's financial authorities and had been ordered by
the regulator to cease some financial and social media activities.
In Thailand, a Ukrainian tourist was kidnapped and threatened with violence until he had
agreed to transfer $250,000 in the tether stablecoin. A list of violent attacks against cryptocurrency
holders maintained by prominent bitcoins Jameson Lop shows 17 incidents this year, with 11 of them
occurring in the second half of the year alone. The Web 3 is going just great recap. There were
three entries between November 3 and 14, averaging 0.3 entries per day. 36.93 million dollars was added
to the grift counter. Delta Prime lost $4.8 million in a second hack. A trader revealed he had lost
$28 million to a bad copy paste, and the Meadowin Casino was hacked for $4 million. Worth a read.
Ed Zichron wrote a really kick-ass piece on the election, the tech industry, and the media's
broad approach to covering tech developments. He ends it on a hopeful but pragmatic note that I really needed.
It's titled Lost in the Future, and it's published in his Where's Your Ed at newsletter.
If you're looking for other hopeful but pragmatic election-related reading,
you should also read Ken White's, and yet it moves in his Popat newsletter,
and Rusty Foster's Election Day, in Today on Trail and republished in the Washington Post.
The Columbia Journalism Review published a piece titled,
Trump Threatens New York Times, Penguin Random House, over critical coverage.
Trump is continuing to issue legal threats against newsrooms that dared to criticize him.
Perhaps the Columbia Journalism Review editors decided it went without saying,
but it feels worth mentioning that if his appointments go as planned,
he will have the entire judicial branch to bring to bear on journalists,
not just his wacky lawyer neighbor.
This is really something to keep an eye out for.
In the news, Michael Hiltzik wrote a really lovely profile
of me focused on my recent sparring match with Coinbase and my I Am My Own Legal Department
article. It's titled Molly White's message for journalists going freelance, be ready for the pitfalls,
and it's published in the Los Angeles Times. I was rather amused to discover from this article
that Coinbase's Paul Greywall actually claimed that no legal threat was implied by his tweet that
continuing my reporting would be dot dot, dot, unwise. CNN, quote,
me in an article titled, A Trump Bitcoin Promise is what crypto fans once fought against.
They love it anyway. It's about how the crypto world's embrace of Donald Trump is completely
incongruous with the original ideology many of them still claim to espouse.
Finally, in a quick store update, I've added a few new items for those wanting to show their
support for reading, libraries, and access to information more broadly.
These stickers, shirts, and sweatshirts are based on a line of cut print, I,
created earlier this year. You can check them out at store.mollywhite.net. That's all for now, folks.
Until next time, this has been Molly White. Thanks for listening to this issue of the citation
needed newsletter. To learn how to support my work, visit mollywhite.net slash support. If you'd like to
read the text versions of these episodes, sign up to receive the newsletter in your email, or support
my work on a recurring basis. Go to citation needed. News.
