Molly White's Citation Needed - Issue 71 – (Crypto) banks are not your friends
Episode Date: December 5, 2024Celsius’ Alex Mashinsky pleads guilty to fraud, some Tornado Cash sanctions are overturned, and billionaires complain about “debanking”. Originally published on December 5, 2024....
Transcript
Discussion (0)
I'm Molly White, and you're listening to the audio feed for the Citation Needed Newsletter.
You can see the text version of the newsletter online at citation needed. News.
Issue 71. Cryptobanks are not your friends.
Celsius's Alex Machinsky pleads guilty to fraud.
Some tornado cash sanctions are overturned, and billionaires complain about debanking.
This issue was originally published on December 5, 2024.
For those of you in the United States, I hope you had a lovely Thanksgiving.
I especially hope you didn't have to endure any guests who would read the various
how to talk to your family about crypto this Thanksgiving explainers from crypto media outlets,
most of which sounded like some form of multi-level marketing indoctrination manual,
with bullet points like, quote,
ETFs have made crypto investing simpler and safer,
and, quote, crypto could flourish further under Trump.
Could you pass the gravy, Grandpa, while I tell you about why Elon Musk's brilliant scheme to optimize the government is named after a Shiba-inu-themed meme coin?
Bitcoin has finally surpassed the $100,000 mark, a highly anticipated milestone among Bitcoiners.
After surging past $90,000 post-election, it was merely a question of how soon the token would hit the elusive number.
The purchase of the president-elect and many Congress people, while expensive, has already produced returns.
Cryptobillioners have recouped their spending, and then some.
In the courts, Celsius.
Alex Mishinsky, the co-founder and former CEO of the Celsius cryptocurrency platform, has pleaded guilty in his criminal trial for fraud and market manipulation.
If you need a recap, I wrote an overview of the company's collapse and an ensuing bank.
bankruptcy examiner's report in February 23. The trial was set for late January, and I was curious
about how Machinsky would approach it. Mishinsky is sort of your classic con man, relying on his
charisma and ability to talk in circles to pass off his often highly exaggerated pronouncements,
if not blatant lies, like claiming to have invented decentralized finance, VoIP, and Uber.
The combination of mendacity and narcissism reminds me of Sam Bankman-Fried, who remained convinced
of his ability to talk his way out of his fraud charges until, and perhaps after, his conviction and
sentencing. Their similarities made me wonder if Mishinsky might also take the stand in his own defense.
Mishinsky seems to have proven more willing than Bankman-Fried to listen to the advice of his lawyers,
and he agreed to this plea deal soon after failing to have two of his own.
of the charges against him dismissed before going to trial. In exchange for a guilty plea to two of the
seven charges, commodities fraud and securities fraud, he will forfeit $48 million and face a maximum
sentence of 30 years in prison, though he's likely to get less. As someone who writes a lot about
crypto frauds, I see a wide range of reactions to them. One unfortunately common reaction is to blame the victim,
to say they were greedy for chasing sometimes unbelievably high returns,
or that they should have known the risk,
or that they somehow had it coming for choosing to put money into crypto.
People commonly stereotype those who hold crypto as archetypical crypto-brose,
young, braggadocious trolls trying to get rich quick
by being early enough to a pump-and-dump scheme
that they can later tell everyone else to have fun staying poor from their super yachts.
Reality, as it so often is, is a lot more complicated.
Shortly after Celsius declared bankruptcy, Celsius customers began writing letters to the bankruptcy judge,
telling their stories and explaining how they came to have money in Celsius,
and pleading for him to do everything in his power to return their assets.
I was struck by the diversity of the writers, young people to retirees,
Americans, Europeans, and people in developing countries,
Some who started with a ton of money to put into crypto, and others who scraped together their
portfolios a dollar at a time.
Some were financially savvy, the types of people you might have expected to have known better.
Others had no idea what they were doing, but were convinced to get into crypto by family
or other trusted individuals.
Many believed what Celsius and Mishinsky were saying, and that the promises had to be true
because U.S. regulators wouldn't allow a company to blatantly lie to customers or run a scam.
Mishinsky, who engaged directly with customers via weekly video Ask Me Anything sessions,
and even one-on-one phone calls, was viewed more as a trusted friend or financial advisor by many,
who really believed him when he said that he wanted everyone to be able to grow wealthy together using his platform,
rather than lose money to banks and other financial institutions that he portrayed as the enemy.
Some recognized and accepted the volatility risk inherent to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum,
but didn't think there was a risk that the cryptocurrencies they owned might disappear entirely.
Others avoided volatile tokens, instead opting to keep their money in dollars,
or dollar-denominated stable coins like USDC.
They believed their Celsius account was essentially,
a very high-yield savings account, and some even believed that it had the same types of protection,
including FDIC depository insurance, as traditional banks. Others didn't make assumptions,
but instead relied on Mishinsky's own promises that the company held a $750 million
insurance policy for its deposits, and that it didn't engage in unsecured lending, both of which
turned out to be lies. They believed Mishinsky when he said it was impossible for customers to lose
their deposits. While some say that people just have to be on high alert at all times and in every
interaction for possible scams, the reality is that most people just don't expect companies to
lie to their faces, particularly U.S. domiciled companies that they expect to be under the
watchful eye of regulators. Most people don't think twice about whether the bank their
signing up with is likely to collapse, and many people who encountered Celsius didn't understand
that Celsius was meaningfully different from a bank. Even as we reflect on Celsius and the massive
failures of not just financial regulators, but regulators like the FTC who are meant to prevent
deceptive advertising, politicians are boasting about plans to hobble regulators and make them
even less effective in fulfilling their mandates. Should they succeed in these plans, perhaps,
Perhaps some will react by putting their shields up, adopting the degree of suspicion nearing paranoia
that may be required in every person for themselves world without adequate regulators.
More likely, countless more will continue to rely on regulators even in their absence,
and be ruined because of it.
One bit of good news in the Celsius story is that creditors will likely be made substantially whole
as a result of the bankruptcy, with the caveat that some repeat
payments take the form of stock in a new Bitcoin mining company that has already been encountering
some troubles. This is unequivocally a good thing, and the but about to follow is not to suggest
otherwise. But a ton of people lost access to substantially all of their savings when Celsius
collapsed more than two years ago. Some letters to the bankruptcy judge referenced urgent
medical bills, postponing plans like getting married or buying a home, or needing to change career
plans because they could no longer afford education. Even if victims eventually receive full restitution,
there is an enormous amount of damage and suffering during the interim period when companies like
this go under, particularly amid the stress and uncertainty of not knowing whether they will ever
recover any assets at all. Other criminal sentencing. FTCS's Gary Wong was sentenced to
time served for his role in the FTX fraud, an outcome that was largely expected due to his
substantial cooperation with prosecutors. Wong was the last defendant left to be sentenced
among the five executives who were charged. Heather Rosalcon Morgan will be taking an 18-month
hiatus from her burgeoning rap career to do prison time for her role in laundering the funds her
husband stole from the BitFinex cryptocurrency exchange in 2016. Her husband, Ilya Lichtenstein,
earned a five-year sentence last month.
Shortly after her sentencing,
Rosal Khan posted a video on Twitter,
announcing that...
I'm very excited that I will soon be telling my story,
sharing my thoughts,
and telling you more about the creative
and other endeavors I've been working on.
Rousel dazzle.
I'm beginning to think her plea agreement
should have included a son-of-sam clause.
Another cryptocurrency mixer operator,
Larry Harmon of the Helix Tumblr, has been sentenced to prison. He had assisted prosecutors in their
case against the other recently sentenced mixer operator, Bitcoin Foggs Roman Sterlingov. For his cooperation,
and for shutting down Helix two years prior to being arrested, Harmon received three years in prison,
a comparatively light sentence to Sterlingov's 12 and a half years. He was also ordered to forfeit
$311 million in monetary assets, and to forfeit $400 million in seized assets consisting of
crypto, real estate, and monetary assets. His prison sentence will also be shorter than that of
his brother, Gary, who was convicted of wire fraud and obstruction of justice in 2023 after using
Larry's passphrases to help himself to $712 Bitcoin, or around $4.8 million at the time,
shortly after Larry was arrested in February 2020.
After some of the Bitcoin seized by Larry went missing,
investigators found a photograph of the unemployed Gary
sitting in a bathtub full of around $100,000 in dollar bills
in a Miami nightclub, which perhaps drew some suspicion.
As it happens, that Miami nightclub was called 11,
a popular bar among cryptocurrency enthusiasts
and reportedly the first major U.S. club to accept Bitcoin.
FTX's Ryan Salem was apparent.
also a fan. In October 2021, purchasing a $1.175 million condo in an 11-owned luxury building right next door.
Also, in cryptocurrency mixer prison sentences, Russia sentenced a man to life in prison after courts
determined he had operated the notorious HydroDarknet marketplace. 15 accomplices received 8 to 23
years for producing and selling drugs and operating a criminal organization.
This was somewhat unusual for Russia, which generally doesn't interfere in cybercrime targeting
those in non-allied countries. A California judge ruled that members of the Lido-Dao qualify as
partners under the state's general partnership laws, meaning they cannot avoid liability for the
Dow's actions. Dow's have long purported to be some sort of one weird trick lawyers hate for
organizations to operate without individual liability. But it seems that reality is exposing them as one
weird trick to ensure everyone is liable. Among those deemed general partners in Lido's governing body
are its investors, which include paradigm, Andresen Horowitz, and Dragonfly Digital Management.
Andresen Horowitz is really peeved about it, with a lawyer of theirs calling the decision a, quote,
huge blow to decentralized governance.
Shaquille O'Neal will pay $11 million to settle a class action lawsuit over the defunct Astral's NFT project, which he heavily promoted before abandoning it in 2022.
YouTube influencer Logan Paul is facing even more allegations of cryptocurrency insider trading, this time from the BBC.
After agreeing to an on-camera interview, he sent a rather unconvincing look-alike to do the interview, along with a group of people with megaphones.
who began accusing the BBC of hiring pedophiles after the interviewer asked to speak to the actual
Logan Paul. As is his habit, Paul threatened to sue the BBC for publishing their findings.
Prosecutors charged five hackers who executed fishing and sim swap attacks that netted $11 million
from at least 29 victims, over half coming from a single victim. They also allegedly stole
intellectual property, trade secrets, and personal information. The hackers were reportedly a part of
the Scattered Spider Cybercrime Group that was likely behind the 2023 hacks of the MGM and Caesar's
casinos. In Bankruptcies. The South Korean Delio platform, which suspended withdrawals in June
2023, has been declared bankrupt and will begin liquidation. They owe customers the equivalent
of around $1.75 billion.
In governments, Tornado Cash.
A Fifth Circuit ruling overturned the sanctions against Tornado Cash cryptocurrency mixer smart contracts,
imposed by the United States Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, in August 2022.
The court opined that the smart contracts that comprise the Tornado Cash cryptocurrency Tumblr are,
quote, not property because they are not capable of being owned, and thus cannot be sanctioned by OFAC.
The ruling was carefully limited to the specific Tornado Cash smart contracts, which underwent
a trusted setup ceremony involving 1,100 participants to make around 20 of the services
smart contracts permanently immutable. Unlike many smart contracts, these tornado cash contracts
truly cannot be modified or controlled in any way, short of, say, changing how Ethereum
works, and the court decided that this means they cannot be sanctioned. The verdict has been
celebrated by crypto enthusiasts who felt that OFAC's sanctions were an overreach. But if it's a victory,
I'm not sure it's a decisive one. For one, I'm not really sure it's a crypto versus anti-crypto
fight to begin with, though many in the industry have certainly portrayed it as one. It seems to me
that the Fifth Circuit is saying that OFAC can't sanction a program, that is the lines of code telling a
computer how to perform an action, and that they have to instead sanction a service that runs that
program, or perhaps more precisely, an individual or business that runs a service that runs the
program. This is a reasonable position, I think, aligned with the point I make in my privacy,
human rights, and tornado cash piece from earlier this year about computer viruses. But you can't
sanction this tornado cash smart contract and you can't sanction tornado cash are two very different
statements, and the Fifth Circuit has said the former, not the latter. I suspect that,
that OFAC will continue to pursue sanctions against Tornado Cash, and the question then becomes
how these sanctions are imposed. I think one very real possibility is that OFAC says,
Fine, if we can't sanction the code, we'll sanction the operators of the computers that run the code,
that is, the relays and validators that accept transactions involving the Tornado Cash service.
Already, more than half of the blocks added to the Ethereum blockchain are being created with
relays that censor transactions involving sanctioned wallet addresses by validators that have taken
a cautious approach when it comes to the rather muddy water around blockchain sanctions and who can
be prosecuted for violating them. There is also, of course, the possibility that the Treasury Department
will look to Congress to clarify its authority when it comes to smart contracts. While this is
certainly a crypto-friendly Congress, I'm not sure if it's so crypto-friendly that it would effectively
green light sanctions violations so long as they happen via cryptocurrency rails.
But hey, I've been wrong before.
Finally, there's some question around the durability of the Fifth Circuit's decision.
An appeal in a separate case challenging OFAC's authority has been underway in the 11th Circuit,
leaving the possibility of a circuit split that could encourage Supreme Court review.
In regulators, a California judge rejected Cracken's request to appeal the finding that the
SEC had, quote, adequately alleged that cryptocurrencies traded on the platform were investment contracts
subject to securities laws. Basically, the judge didn't throw it out as a completely implausible argument
during the motion to dismiss stage and is allowing it to proceed. Now the judge is saying they need to
just move forward with a detailed analysis of whether the assets or securities rather than continue
to argue over whether they should do that analysis at all. Cracken had also previously tried to appeal
the judge entire rejection of the motion to dismiss, which he also denied.
In a case brought by blockchain industry advocacy groups in Texas,
a federal judge rejected an SEC rule change that broadened the definition of dealers
to include trading firms performing substantial securities and government securities trading.
This would potentially include cryptocurrency firms, much to their dismay,
and blockchain advocacy groups condemned the change as, quote,
an attempt by the SEC to advance the agency's anti-crypto crusade.
The last ripples of the 2017 crypto bubble are still being felt,
with an SEC announcement that some investors in the defunct Bitclave crypto firm
will receive a combined $4.6 million in restitution.
Bitclave was one of a string of companies that engaged in initial coin offerings,
or ICOs, offerings similar to initial public offerings, or IPOs,
except that the companies wouldn't need to submit to all that pesky SEC scrutiny.
It didn't take terribly long before the SEC clarified that you can't just put your IPO on the blockchain
and pretend it's not a securities offering, but plenty of ICOs happened in the meantime during the 2017 ICO frenzy.
Bitclaves raised $25.5 million from almost 10,000 investors in a period of 32 seconds.
The SEC brought a number of cases regarding ICOs during that time, under the Trump administration, with Jay Clayton as chairman, including one against Bitclave, which was settled in 2020 with an agreement that the company would return the $25.5 million, plus a little over $3.8 million in interest and penalties.
That return has been proceeding very slowly.
It seems that Bitclave has only returned around $12 million thus far, and this far, and this $4.8 million,
payout is the first time investors will receive any portion of the restitution they are owed.
In Political Influence. Justin Sun. Pro tip. If you're one of the shadiest players in the cryptocurrency
industry and you want to avoid mainstream press attention on your $30 million bribe to the U.S.
President-elect via his cryptocurrency grift, just spend another $6 million on a concept art piece
involving a real banana and then eat it. That stunt will land you no fewer than five.
New York Times articles, plus a letter to the editor, in the span of eight days, with not a single
mention of the Trump contribution. I will give Justin Sun's backstory as briefly as I can,
but I'm afraid it won't be very brief. In 2017, Chinese citizen and then-resident Justin Sun
launched an ICO for his Tron project, raising $70 million only days after China banned ICOs,
and then fled the country. He bought BitTorrent and
tried to turn it into a cryptocurrency company by merging it with Tron,
shocking BitTorrent executives who realized that Sun's so-called market-making operations
were just blatant insider trading.
He did another ICO.
This time, shopping around for a lawyer who would agree to write a letter he hoped would
shield him from liability if he was later sued by the U.S. SEC.
And he was.
He bought the Poloniacs cryptocurrency exchange from Circle,
after Circle's attempt to turn it from what a former employee called Shitcoin Casino No. Uno
into a legitimate operation, failed upon the realization that the lax standards were the whole selling point.
Sun promised to return it to its original Anything Goes Glory, at one point screaming at an employee
to quote, fake the KYC, or customer verification documents, to speed things up.
He tried to declare as his own a pile of around 300 Bitcoin, or almost 30 million,
dollars at today's prices that had been sent by Polonex customers to the wrong addresses.
When employees expressed concern about a potentially illegal activity, Sun reportedly replied,
quote, what's the big deal? The worst thing may be that I will never come to the U.S. anymore.
And indeed, Sun bought citizenship in Malta, St. Kitts and Nevis, and maybe Guinea-Bissau.
He warmed himself into a role as ambassador for Granada to the World Trade Organization,
thinking it would earn him diplomatic immunity in all of his activities.
It doesn't.
It did, however, grant him the title of His Excellency,
which he used enthusiastically until he was finally forced to admit,
after first lying about it,
that he had lost the position when the party that appointed him lost power.
Justin's son has since amassed an even larger collection of companies,
many of which he pretends he doesn't own or control.
These include the Huobi Exchange,
which he rebranded to HTX, BitGlobal, and the TrueUSD Stablecoin Project.
In September, 2023, Hwobie slash HTX was hacked for $8 million.
In October 2023, TrueUSD either lied about having no affiliation with a mysterious token
called T-Euro, or the True USDA deployer was compromised.
In November 2023, Polonex was hacked for over $120 million.
dollars. Less than two weeks later, Huobi slash HtX and its Hico chain project were hacked for $115 million.
In May 2024, Crypto Critic's Corner put out an episode presenting a rather convincing argument that Justin Sun is insolvent.
They also outlined the incredible shadiness around his company's so-called proofs of reserves,
including the fact that multiple of his companies seem to be counting the same pool of assets as reserves.
The crypto community distrust Sun so much that an August announcement that BitGlobal, and thus Sun,
would be helping to manage custody for wrapped Bitcoin, caused a mass exodus from the token.
MakerDAo enthusiastically voted to stop accepting WBT as collateral,
before changing their minds after receiving some assurance that Sun didn't have as much influence
over WBTC management as they initially thought.
Coinbase announced their own wrapped Bitcoin product,
to use instead and delisted WBTC. Cracken also announced their own wrapped Bitcoin product.
So all this to say, who better for Donald Trump's World Liberty Financial to bring on as its
newest so-called advisor? All it took was Justin Sun's purchase of $30 million worth of World Liberty
financial tokens, which appears to be about as blatant an attempt to get out of the SEC's
crosshairs as the election spending by Coinbase, Ripple, and others. I've mentioned,
World Liberty Financial's disappointing sales in previous issues, and indeed the project had only sold
around $20 million worth of the WLFI tokens in total until Sun came along. So the $30 million
purchase from him certainly caught Trump's attention. World Liberty Financial announced his
advisory position in a tweet that described Sun, as is his preference, as merely an advisor to HTX
and a supporter of BitTorrent. It played up his attendance. It played up his attendance.
at the University of Pennsylvania,
which would have seemed like a bizarre thing to mention
if it wasn't so clear that it was just an attempt
by World Liberty Financial to downplay
that Sun is a Chinese national.
Now Sun is telling reporters,
quote, in terms of the friendly level for the crypto business,
I think we could even say the best jurisdiction
is the United States.
He's certainly hoping to make it so,
especially for his incredibly sketchy brand of crypto business.
Trump's political appointments. Trump has named former SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins to replace Gary Gensler as SEC chairman.
Atkins is more of an establishment figure, rather than an outsider tasked with dismantling the agency from within, like some of Trump's other recent selections.
That's not to say he's likely to maintain the SEC's trajectory, or anything close to it, though.
He's strongly advocated for deregulation even before he left the agency.
agency to enjoy the revolving door, and will no doubt enthusiastically sign on to the Trump
deregulatory agenda. And of course, he loves crypto, co-chairing the Token Alliance at Crypto Advocacy
Group, the Digital Chamber since 2017. Dennis Kelleher, president of the financial reform non-profit
better markets, described Atkins as a, quote, deregulation zealot and industry cheerleader, who as
commissioner at the SEC from 2002 to 2008 supported deregulation that contributed to the devastating
2008 crash. Trump is also reportedly considering another member of the Digital Chamber for
CFTC Chair, founder and CEO Perry Ann Boring. In my recent video on the crypto industry's
election spending, I quoted her statement that, quote, the crypto voter block has made its voice
heard, and we now have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world.
I didn't realize at the time that she might have meant she would do so by taking over the agency
that the industry hopes will be made its primary regulator, and then ensuring its already
limited resources to go after crypto malfeasance are spent on nothing of the sort.
Her other credentials include executive producer on a movie called God Bless Bitcoin, which, quote,
interviewed Bitcoin experts and religious leaders to explain how Bitcoin is a new money that would
allow everyone to use the gifts God gave them, and as a television anchor on the American branch of
the Russian state-controlled RT News Network. In other words, she is highly qualified for the role.
Other rumored candidates in the running for the position are one of two current CFTC commissioners,
Caroline Fam, and Summer Mercinger. Both have been friendly to the cryptocurrency industry and
have more traditional backgrounds in law compared to boring.
Trump transition team lead and tether enthusiast Howard Lutnik seems to have been skipped over
for the coveted Treasury Secretary role, with Trump instead nominating Scott Bessent for the spot.
Lutnik's consolation prize is Commerce Secretary, tasked with carrying out Trump's aggressive
and potentially self-destructive tariff agenda.
Lutnik says he'll divest from his trading firm Cantor Fitzgerald, which owns a stake
in Tether, custody is a substantial portion of Tether's reserves, and is currently in talks to have
Tether back Cantor Fitzgerald's planned Bitcoin collateralized lending program. However, this,
quote, divestment apparently involves simply passing responsibility for the Tether deal over to his
20-something son. Everything else. Tech Bigwig's favorite word recently has been debanking. It all kicked off
with Mark Andreessen's appearance on Joe Rogan's show, which at
some point morphed into a series in which Joe Rogan just makes a very surprised face and says,
whoa, for several hours and is disgustingly wealthy and powerful guests, as they complain about
all the ways they're being disadvantaged and discriminated against. Debanking refers to when a bank
shuts down a person's or a company's account, or denies them when they try to open one.
Andresen also spoke about Operation Choke Points, an Obama-era initiative to scrutinize banks,
doing business with sectors at high risk for money laundering, including firearms.
The initiative formally ended in 2017.
Debanking is a real challenge for those affected by it.
In particular, sex workers are regularly debanked,
even those who operate in the completely legal zones of sex work,
like pornography or erotic dance.
Companies in those areas also face banking access issues,
as demonstrated by the events that led up to only fans announcing,
and then quickly rescinding a ban on adult content on their platform.
Similar issues have plagued the cannabis industry,
and more recently, pro-Palestine activists,
who have lost access to financial services on platforms like Venmo and GoFundMe
when trying to aid those in Gaza.
However, Operation Choke Point has also become a popular conservative hobby horse,
and the true history of the program's scale, purpose, impact, and ongoing existence
is heavily exaggerated.
Much of the exaggeration was seated by the gun lobby,
which pushed overblown claims to portray a narrative
where democratic lawmakers and bankers
extrajudicially discriminated against gun owners and dealers.
In February 2023, Bitcoiner and venture capitalist Nick Carter
published an article in Pirate Wires,
titled Operation Choke Point 2.0 is underway,
and crypto is in its crosshairs.
Its subtitle, quote,
detailing the Biden admin's coordinated ongoing effort across virtually every U.S. financial regulator
to deny crypto firms' access to banking services laid out the thesis, which he rather grossly decides constitutes redlining.
Andresen went even further to blame the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB,
an agency established post-financial crisis to supervise a broad range of financial firms,
including banks, fintechs, lenders, and so on.
He even tried to pin the entire 2022 crypto collapse on debanking,
and not, oh, I don't know, the massive fraud among companies that were leveraged up to their eyeballs.
These debanking gripes echoed after Andreessen's Rogan appearance by other cryptocurrency
and fintech executives sharing their debanking stories are an egregious attempt by those
profiting from predatory financial practices to redefine plain consumer protection.
as redlining and discrimination. It is challenging to sympathize with billionaires like
Yandreason Horowitz whining that they or their portfolio companies were discriminated against
for engaging in high-risk, predatory, or unlicensed practices. When Tyler Winklevoss
complains that, quote, I was debanked because I'm in crypto, as was Gemini, for example,
he conveniently forgot to mention the unbelievable risk that Gemini was taking on.
in programs like its Earned Program, which would later go on to blow up to the tune of nearly
$1 billion. This so-called debanking may even refer to Gemini's reported loss of bank accounts
at J.P. Morgan in March 23, after Gemini earns failure, which seems like a reasonable
choice for a bank when their client just lost a billion dollars in customer funds and was
charged with violating financial laws. I have written before about the importance of the
firewall between banks and the cryptocurrency industry and the crypto industry's efforts to attack
this firewall. Here is one such example. Andresen's rogue in appearance illustrates just how out of
touch these billionaires are with reality, and the whole conversation is just one eyebrow-raising
claim after another. The icing on the cake was a tweet from Andresen in which he condemned, quote,
unconstitutional direct administrative pressure applied by unelected bureaucrats and freelancing politicians
with no due process, no transparency, and no way to appeal.
He tweeted this only six days after the Washington Post reported his involvement
with the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency.
I don't remember Mark Andreessen on my ballot, do you?
The Web 3 is going just great recap.
There were seven entries between November 15 and December 5th, averaging 0.4 entries per day,
$35.48 million was added to the Gryftainter.
The Hucktwa mean coin immediately crashed, and I hate that she made me read that aloud.
The Clipper Decks suffered a $450,000 hack.
The Cryptoexchangexti.com suffered a $1.7 million hack.
A 13-year-old rug pulled a crypto token and then faced retaliation.
Around $20 million in losses was reported by users of decks.
Poulter Finance was exploited for $12 million, and Thala Labs lost and then recovered $25.5 million.
In the news, I spoke to Rolling Stone about the strategy behind the cryptocurrency industry spending this election cycle, and what it was they were hoping to buy.
That was an article titled The Crypto Industry emerged as a political money death star in 2024.
The Register wanted my thoughts on upcoming changes for the cryptocurrency industry as a result.
of Trump's win and crypto's newfound representation in Congress.
We touched on topics including the storied Bitcoin Strategic Reserve
and Bitcoin industry attempts to green up their image, among other things.
That's all for now, folks. Until next time, this has been Molly White.
Thanks for listening to this issue of the citation-needed newsletter.
To learn how to support my work, visit mollywhite.net slash support.
If you'd like to read the text versions of these episodes, sign up for
to receive the newsletter in your email, or support my work on a recurring basis, go to
citation needed.news.
