Money Crimes with Nicole Lapin - CONSPIRACY THEORY: The Mandela Effect

Episode Date: October 12, 2026

In 2009, at a science fiction convention in Atlanta, a paranormal researcher named Fiona Broome discovered that strangers shared her vivid memory of Nelson Mandela dying in prison in the 1980s. Mandela walked free in 1990 and died in 2013. Broome named it the Mandela Effect, and the catalogue grew: a children's book spelled wrong, a logo with a horn that never existed, a Sinbad genie movie nobody made. Believers concluded that reality had been edited and their memories were souvenirs of a lost timeline. Then in 2022, University of Chicago researchers put the phenomenon in a lab, confirmed that huge numbers of strangers share the same specific false memories, and reported no clear explanation for why. In this episode of Conspiracy Theories, Cults, & Crimes, Vanessa examines the false memories millions of people share, the parallel-universe and CERN theories built to explain them, and the uncomfortable question underneath all of it: is it scarier to live in an edited universe or to have a mind that cannot be trusted?For more, follow Conspiracy Theories, Cults, & Crimes wherever you listen to podcasts: https://pod.link/1828469754If you’re new here, don’t forget to follow Scams, Money, & Murder to never miss a case! To hear episodes ad-free, subscribe to Crime House+. Join at crimehouseplus.com or if you’re listening on Apple Podcasts, tap “Try Free” at the top of this show’s page. Scams, Money, & Murder is a Crime House Original Podcast, powered by PAVE Studios.🎧 Need More to Binge? Listen to other Crime House Originals Clues, Crimes Of Reddit, Crime House 24/7, Serial Killers & Murderous Minds, Murder True Crime Stories, and more wherever you get your podcasts!Follow me on SocialInstagram: @CrimehouseTikTok: @CrimehouseFacebook: @crimehousestudiosX: @crimehousemediaYouTube: @crimehousestudios

Hi, everyone. Before today's episode, there's another show I want to tell you about. It's called What the Fact with Connor Tomlinson from Netflix's Love on the Spectrum and Carter Roy. Every week, they take three unbelievable true facts from history and tell you the full story behind them. Plus, Conner's infectious energy that'll make you realize history is the most fascinating thing on earth. Follow What The Fact wherever you listen or subscribe on YouTube at What The Fact Pod. Ask enough people, and you'll find someone who remembers watching it happen. The news breaking out of South Africa sometime in the 1980s, Nelson Mandela, the most famous political prisoner on earth, dead in his cell. They remember the television coverage, the funeral, the crowds mourning in the streets, and the rioting in the cities. They remember his widow giving a speech that broke their hearts. Thousands of people carry that memory. I'm actually one of them. Some can still describe it scene by scene.

The problem is, none of it ever happened. Mandela walked out of prison in 1990, a free man. Four years later, he became South Africa's first black president. He won the Nobel Peace Prize, and when he did die in December of 2013, he was 95 years old, and one of the most celebrated human beings alive. So where did that earlier funeral come from?

Why do thousands of strangers have the same detailed memory of an event that never took place? In 2009, at a sci-fi convention in Atlanta, a woman stumbled onto that question and gave the phenomenon a name. She called it the Mandela Effect, and the deeper people dug the more impossible memories they found. Books spelled wrong, logos that changed, entire movies that never existed. And here's the thing. Most conspiracy theories happen to other people. This one is different. This one works on you. And before this episode is over, you'll likely connect with it too. From UFO cults and mass suicides to secret CIA experiments, presidential assassinations, and murderous doctors. These aren't just theories, they're real stories that

blur the line between fact and fiction. I'm Vanessa Richardson, and this is conspiracy theories, cults and crimes, a crimehouse original powered by Pave Studios. Every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, I'll explore the real people at the center of the world's most shocking events and nefarious organizations. And remember, these Monday episodes will also be on YouTube with full video. You can find them every Saturday. Just search for Crimehouse Studios, and be sure to like and subscribe. These cases are wild, and I want to hear what you think. At the end of each episode, please leave a comment wherever you listen. Be sure to rate, review, and follow so we can continue building this community together.

And if you want even more, subscribe to Crimehouse Plus and get every episode of this show and the rest of the Crimehouse lineup, ad-free and early. Plus at least two bonus episodes every month. To join, go to Crimehouseplus.com. Or if you listen on Apple Podcasts, tap Try Free at the... the top of the conspiracy theories cults and crimes show page. Today, I'm digging into one of the strangest conspiracy theories I've ever covered, because the evidence for it might be sitting inside your own head. It's called the Mandela Effect. Believers say the false memories

millions of us share are something else entirely, leftovers from another timeline, or proof that someone or something has been editing the past. For years, that was a fringe idea. on the internet. Then the science caught up to it. In 2022, researchers tested the phenomenon in a lab for the first time, and they confirmed that huge numbers of strangers share the same specific false memories with no clear explanation for why. So a few times this episode, I'm going to test you. I'll ask what you remember before I tell you the truth. Keep score, because the question underneath all of this is an uncomfortable one. is scarier, a universe that's been edited, or a mind that can't be trusted. All that and more coming up.

The story of the Mandela effect starts at a party in Atlanta. Every Labor Day weekend, tens of thousands of people, a lot of them in costume, descend on the city for DragonCon, one of the biggest science fiction and fantasy conventions in the country. And in 2009, one of the guests was a woman named Fiona Broom. Broom was a paranormal researcher. She'd been investigating ghosts and haunted places since the 1990s, ran one of the oldest ghost-hunting websites on the internet, and had been a dragon con regular for years. So she'd heard plenty of strange stories, but the one that found her that weekend in the convention's VIP suite was different. A member of the security team, a man who went by Shadow, mentioned something in passing, that other people remembered when

Nelson Mandela died in prison. Broom froze, because she remembered it too. She later wrote about how vivid that memory was. She said, quote, I thought I remembered it clearly, the news clips, the funeral, the morning, the riots. When she first learned that he was actually alive, she reacted the way most of us did. She figured she'd misunderstood something on the news and let it go. But now a stranger was describing her memory back to her. And when she asked around, she kept finding more people who shared it down to the details. Broom couldn't shake it, so around 2010 she launched a website to collect these types of stories, and she named it after the memory that started it all, the Mandela effect. The site struck a nerve. Comments poured in over the years

more than 10,000 of them, and Mandela was just the beginning. Visitors remembered watching the funeral of the televangelist Billy Graham, who was very much alive, and would stay. that way until 2018. They remembered episodes of Star Trek that were never filmed. Still in those early years, the Mandela effect stayed small, a strange little community trading impossible memories with no explanation for why it was happening. Then on August 23rd, 2012, somebody offered one, parallel universes. To understand where that came from, you need to know about a family of cartoon Bears. In 1962, a husband and wife team named Stan and Jen Berenstain published the first Berenstain Bears book. The series grew into a childhood institution

with hundreds of stories about mama, papa, brother, and sister bear, plus TV shows and toys, the works. If you grew up with those books, take the test. Picture the logo. How is the family's name spelled. An enormous number of people remember it as Barron Stein, E-I-N, like Einstein. But the family's name on every cover of every book is Baron Stain, A-I-N. It always has been. But people don't just misremember the spelling. They remember arguing about it as kids. They remember sounding out Steen versus Stein on the school bus, a debate that makes no sense if the name ends in stain. That's the puzzle of physics grad student who went by Reese was chewing on in the summer of 2012 on a little blog called The Wood Between Worlds. And in his post, he offered an explanation.

He proposed, at least half jokingly, that, quote, reality has been tampered with and history has been retroactively changed, end quote. In other words, it was Barron Stein when we were kids. Then something shifted. Some of us slid into a parallel universe where the name had always been Barron Stain, and our memories are souvenirs from the world we left behind. Reese dressed the idea up in physics language, saying there were phase changes across four dimensions, an E-universe and an A-universe trading places. He was actually joking around, but the internet wasn't. The post spread and the Berenstein conspiracy became the Mandel Mandela Effect's flagship case. By 2013, believers had their own community, a subreddit called

R-slash Mandela Effect, where users hunted for new examples and swapped theories. Some took it seriously enough to run experiments. One believer announced a 20-year plan to raise his two-year-old daughter on Berenstain books, never mentioned the debate and see which spelling she remembers as a grown-up. They even came up with a word for their best evidence. When someone Someone turned up an old misprint, a forgotten parody, a stray line in a decades-old newspaper, anything that looked like a fingerprint left behind by the reality we supposedly lost, believers called it residue. For the record, the Berenstain family was not on board.

Mike Berenstain, the son of the original authors, said people are free to believe whatever they want to believe, but that it's silly. His parents' name had been misspelled constantly their entire lives. The debate rolled on anyway, and while the internet argued about cartoon bears, the man the whole phenomenon was named after was still alive, an old man by then long retired from public life. Then on December 5, 2013, Nelson Mandela died, for real this time, at 95 at home, mourned by the entire world. And something strange rippled through social media. Thousands of people had the same reaction. Wait, didn't he die already? Didn't I actually already watch that?

The Mandela Effect wasn't an internet story anymore. It was happening live in the middle of a global news event. And over the next few years, the theory went mainstream. In 2015, the Berenstain debate exploded across Reddit and got written up by major outlets. And in 2016, the internet fixated on the wildest case yet, a movie called Shazam, a cheesy 90s comedy where the stand-up comedian Sinbad played a genie. Hundreds of people remembered watching it. There was one problem.

Shazam doesn't exist. No footage, no poster, no reviews, no listing in any film database, and Simbad himself had been denying it for years. It didn't matter. That December, a journalist named Amelia Tate published an investigation in the British magazine The New Statesman, interviewing believers who were certain they'd, seen it, and their memories weren't vague. One man said he'd refused to watch a similar movie called Kazam as a kid because it looked

like a rip-off of Shazam. And here's the wild part. Kazam was actually real. It's a 1996 Jeannie movie starring the basketball star Shaquille O'Neal. Another believer, a 52-year-old who'd worked at a video store, remembered ordering two copies of Sinbad's movie for the shelves and only one of Shacks. Meanwhile, the woman who started it all never fully bought the wilder theories. Broome described herself as somewhat skeptical of these alternate memories, fascinated, but not sold. And as the phenomenon ballooned into something bigger than her website, she stepped back, happy to let others take the lead. The Mandela Effect didn't need her anymore, because by then, the theory had revealed the thing that makes it unlike any other conspiracy theory. Most

conspiracy theories ask you to trust something you've never seen. A classified file, a second shooter, a secret meeting. This one asks for nothing. The evidence is already installed in your own head. You don't have to believe a stranger on the internet. You just have to catch your own memory in a lie. Try it right now. Picture the wicked queen in Disney's Snow White standing before her mirror. Now, say the line. If you said mirror, mirror, on the wall, you're with most of the world. But the line in the film is actually magic mirror on the wall. I know. And while we're at it, Darth Vader never says, Luke, I am your father. The line is actually, no, I am your father. So what's going on here? For years, skeptics had a one-word answer. Memory. Human memory is

flawed. Everybody knows that. End of story. But that answer skips over the mystery. flawed memories would mean thousands of people were making thousands of different mistakes. This looks different. Strangers who've never met getting the same details wrong the same way at the same time. Why? For over a decade, nobody could say because no scientist had ever put the Mandela effect under controlled conditions. Then a memory researcher in Chicago decided to try.

And when the results came back, the believers… stopped looking so crazy. In a world where swords were sharp. And hygiene was actually probably better than you think it is. Two fearless historians. Me, Matt Lewis. And me, Dr. Eleanor Yonaga, dive headfirst into the mud, blood, and very strange customs of the Middle Ages.

So for plagues, crusades, and Viking raids, and plenty of other things that don't rhyme, subscribe to Gone Medieval from History Hit, wherever you get your podcasts. In 2009, a paranormal researcher named Fiona Broom discovered that strangers shared her false memory of Nelson Mandela dying in prison. In the years that followed, believers assembled a catalog of impossible memories and a theory to match. Reality itself had been edited. We're going to dive into it, but before we do, let's do what the Internet spent a decade doing and dig into the two most famous cases.

because the closer you look, the stranger they get. Start with Shazam, that Sinbad Jeannie movie that never existed. The believers don't just remember that it existed. They remember the plot. Two kids find a lamp and summon a bumbling genie. There's a wasted wish. In some tellings, there's a little girl who blows one fixing a broken doll. It all wraps up at a pool party.

Believers have hunted for proof for years. One posted a bounty online, $1,000 for anyone who could produce a copy. Another told reporters it felt like, quote, a part of my childhood has now been stolen, end quote. But if it ever even happened, what are all these people referring to? Well, once you lay out the pieces, you can watch the movie Assemble itself. The first piece arrives in 1994. That year, Sinbad hosted a TV marathon of old Sinbad the Sailor Adventure movies,

and he did it in costume, dressed in an outfit a lot of viewers read as a genie. Two years later came the real movie itself, Kazam, two letters off from Shazam, with Shaq as a genie granting wishes to a kid. And that same year brought the detail that ties it all together. Sinbad starred in a family comedy called First Kid, and when First Kid came out on BHS, the tape reportedly included a trailer for Kazam. Millions of kids sat in front of Simbad's movie and watched a genie movie trailer, both on the same physical tape, two memories spliced together in living rooms across America.

But Sinbad had his own theory about what was going on, and he didn't sugarcoat it. When a fan asked him about the genie movie back in 2014, he answered, quote, it was shack, shack, shack, but we all look alike, end quote. He was joking, but there was truth to his response. That part of this false memory runs on people blurring together two famous black entertainers from the same era. Then, in 2017, the comedy site College Humor pulled an April Fool's prank. They released Lost Footage from Shazam, a fully produced fake scene starring The Real Sinbad. It was a joke, and the site said so, but the clip never died.

To this day, believers pass around stills from it as pre-react. proof the movie actually existed. The debunking created new evidence for the thing it debunked. And that's the pattern you'll see again and again with a Mandela effect. Every attempt to kill it just feeds it. These days, even Shaq plays along. In 2020, an interviewer asked him about teaming up with Sinbad for an Avengers-style genie crossover, Kazam and Shazam together at last.

He said, of course he would, for the kids. The Shazam mystery, at least, came with Ingris. you could point to, but the next case is stranger because believers say this one left residue behind, real-world traces of the old reality. And it's a test, so play along. Picture the fruit of the loom logo, the one on the tag of half the t-shirts you've probably ever owned. There's an apple, some grapes, some leaves. Now, behind the fruit, is there a woven brown horn, a cornucopia spilling it all out? If you see the cornucopia, you're not the only one. And for a lot of people who do, the memory is weirdly specific.

Plenty insists the tag is how they learned the word cornucopia in the first place. A kid squinting at a shirt label asking what that strange horn was. But I have bad news. In January of 2022, Fruit of the Loom itself announced that its logo has never contained a cornucopia. When the fact-checking site Snopes dug into it, they searched. the company's ads going back to the 1910s, more than a century of logos. No horn, not even once. Case closed again? This is where the believers say not so fast, because a cornucopia has residue, a lot of it. The case broke open in August of 2018 when a Redditor laid out the evidence in a

post that lit up the Mandela Effect community, and the file has been growing ever since. In 1773, a jazz fluteist named Frank Wes released an album called Flute of the Loom, an obvious riff on the brand. The cover shows food spilling out of a flute shaped like a cornucopia. Decades later, a Redditor tracked down the illustrator's family, who reportedly confirmed the logo was the inspiration. Why else would he have drawn a cornucopia? Stay with me, it keeps going.

A Florida newspaper article from 1994 described the logo as a cornucopia, swollen with fruit. The 2006 animated movie The Ant Bulley included parody underwear, Fruit of the Loin, with a horn on the tag, and a 2012 episode of South Park featured a fake clothing brand called Cornucopia. None of that proves the logo ever changed. What it proves is eerier. People have been misremembering it the same way for 50 years, long before Reddit, long before the web itself existed. Whatever this is, it's older than the online world that named it. And in the last few years, the case has gotten murkier on purpose.

Doctored photos of vintage cornucopia tags circulate constantly, and Snopes has shown that the most famous ones are forgeries. Fruit of the Loom trolled everybody with a fake cornucopia logo on its own website on April Fool's Day, 2022. By late 2025, a secondhand shirt with a cornucopia on the tag, almost certainly a fake, was listed on eBay for over $2,100. The seller had picked it up for a single dollar at a second-hand sale. There's now a small economy built on a logo that never existed, and the cornucopia is far from the only image pulling this trick.

That's three tests so far, so let's make the rest a lightning round. Three quick questions and keep count of how many you get wrong. The Monopoly Man. Does he wear a monocle? He never has. I promise you. Curious George, picture him swinging by his tail. No, he doesn't have one.

He never did. Pikachu's tail. Is the tip black? It isn't. No black tip ever. If you went three for three, congratulations. Most people don't. And for a long time, most people was just a guess, a vibe from comment sections.

That actually changed in 2022. At the University of Chicago, a memory researcher named Wilma Bainbridge runs a lab studying what makes images stick in our heads. She kept seeing the Mandela effect all over Reddit and TikTok treated as a game, and she realized that in all those years no one had ever tested it. So she and a researcher named Dipashri Prasad designed the first controlled study of what they called the visual Mandela effect. Their design was simple. They took 40 famous images, logos and characters, and created two doctored

versions for each one with a small change in each. A feature added, a feature removed, a color shifted. Then they showed all three versions to participants and asked a single question. Which one is real? For most of the images, people did fine, but seven of them broke people's brains. There's C3PO, the golden robot from Star Wars, or rather. the mostly golden robot, one of his legs is silver from the knee down. Curious George, the Fruit of the Loom logo, the Monopoly Man, Pikachu, the Volkswagen logo, and Waldo from Where's Waldo? On those seven, people picked the correct image around a third of the time, or less.

With three options in front of you, a third is exactly what blind guessing gets you, except they weren't guessing blindly. They converged on the same specific wrong answer. the monocle, the cornucopia, the black-tipped tail, and they did it while reporting that they knew these images well and felt confident in their choices. Then the study did something even more interesting. It went hunting for the cause, and it came up empty. Maybe people just never look at the detailing question.

The team ran an experiment, tracking where people's eyes and attention went. Participants looked right at the relevant spots and got them wrong anyway. Maybe the internet is full of wrong versions, so we've all just seen the monocle somewhere. The team scanned the top Google image results for these characters. The wrong versions barely exist out in the world. Almost everything we've ever seen is the correct image. Maybe people only fail when you offer them tricky options. The team asked participants to simply draw the images from memory.

The errors showed up spontaneously. About half the people familiar with the Monopoly Man drew him a monocle unprompted. And then there was the strangest result of the whole paper. When people who said they were unfamiliar with the Monopoly Man were shown the real image and asked to draw what they'd just seen, nearly one in four gave him a monocle anyway. Even the obvious psychological explanation that we fill gaps with stereotypes only goes so far. A monicle fits a cartoon tycoon, sure. But as Bainbridge put it, we see fruit every day. day of our lives, but when do we ever see a cornucopia? The team did notice one pattern, though.

The images that warped tended to be simple ones with a couple of odd, memorable quirks. And the more often people had seen an image, the more certain they were of the wrong version. Familiarity didn't protect anyone. It actually made things worse. But as for why it happens, Bainbridge's conclusion after four experiments was refreshingly blunt. The visual Mandela Effect is real, it's consistent, and there's, quote, no one clear explanation for it. One honest caveat before anyone gets carried away, this was one lab with modest sample sizes, but in 2024, an independent team re-ran the study with nearly four times as many participants. All seven images failed again.

This is not how debunkings usually go. Science looked at the Mandela effect and confirmed the Believers' quote. core claim, millions of strangers share the same specific false memories, and the easy explanations don't actually explain why. Confirmed, but not explained. The gap between the two is exactly where a conspiracy theory grows best, because while the scientists were saying, we don't know yet, the believers already had an answer. It involves the fabric of reality, a hole punched in it, and a machine buried 100 meters under the border between France and Switzerland. Hey, Ontario, come on down to BetMGM Casino and see what our newest exclusive

the Price is Right Fortune Pick has to offer. Don't miss out. Play exciting casino games based on the iconic game show only at BetmGM. Check out how we've reimagined three of the show's iconic games, like Plinko, Clifhanger, and the Big Wheel into fun casino games. features. Don't forget to download the BenmGM Casino app for exclusive access and excitement on the Price's Right Fortune Pick. Pull up a seat and experience the Price's Right Fortune Pick only available at BetMGM Casino. BetmGM and GameSense remind you to

play responsibly. 19 plus to wager. Ontario only. Please play responsibly. If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you, please contact Connects Ontario at 1866-531-26-6. to speak to an advisor, free of charge. BEDMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario. Amid the chaos of a medieval battlefield, one man raises the crown. But out of the carnage, Henry Tudor plans to give the realm he's conquered hope. A new king, a new era, a new dynasty.

England is about to fall under the spell of the Tudors. Join me, Dan Jones, for the unmissable story. of a family you'll never forget. This is history, the Tudors. Watch on Spotify, YouTube, or listen, wherever you get your podcasts. By the mid-2020s, the Mandela Effect had traveled

from a VIP suite at DragonCon, all the way to one of psychology's top journals. The shared false memories were confirmed, but the explanation was missing. And the theories poured into that gap. Theory number one, parallel universes. This is a very important. Reese's Barronstein idea all grown up, and believers will tell you correctly that it's rooted in

genuine physics. The many-world's interpretation of quantum mechanics is a serious, respected idea. It says that every time something can go more than one way, the universe splits and both versions play out. Somewhere out there, in this view, are endless other worlds where things went differently. The Mandela Effect version says those branches sometimes touch. universes merge or people slip between them and when they do they carry their memories with them. So under this theory, you're not misremembering your childhood at all. You're remembering it all correctly from a universe you no longer live in. Your memory isn't broken.

It's just imported. It's an elegant idea, but it runs into one problem. Even under many worlds, the branches don't work that way. They split. They don't recompense. line, and nothing crosses between them, not people and not memories. When MTV News asked the quantum physicist Howard Wiseman about the Berenstain theory, his answer boiled down to this, because memory is fallible.

The whole thing is a lot easier to explain with psychology than with people slipping between parallel universes. In other words, the theory borrows physics for credibility, then breaks its rules. Theory number two, tries to fix that problem by naming a machine that could do the crossing. It's the big one, CERN. CERN is the European Physics Laboratory outside Geneva, and it runs the large Hadron Collider, a 17-mile ring buried underground, where protons get slammed together at nearly the speed of light. It switched on in 2008, and in 2012, it helped discover the Higgs-Boson,

a missing piece in our understanding of matter itself. You can, see why conspiracy theorists chose it. If you believe reality has been edited, CERN is the one machine on Earth that sounds capable of doing the editing. Scientists deep underground, smashing the building blocks of the universe, probing for extra dimensions. So a mythology grew. Every time the collider powers up, reality shifts and the Mandela effects are the scars. When the LHC, the large Hadron Collider restarted in July of 2022 after a long upgrade, the panic went viral. Posts warned that we were, quote, switching timelines the moment the machine turned on. TikTok accounts claiming CERN was opening portals to other dimensions racked up millions of views. One viral post swore the Collider's

experiments back in 2012 had caused the first wave of Mandela effects and begged the lab not to open whatever portal it was opening this time. It got loud enough that scientists at CERN started answering directly. A particle physicist named Clara Nellist, who works on one of the Collider's main experiments, went on to TikTok herself to explain what the machine does and doesn't do. Her message, which is also the lab's official position, was simple. Smashing subatomic particles together cannot rewrite history, and it cannot reach into your memories.

Did the debunking work? Well, judge for yourself. On June 29, 26, CERN switched the collider off for a planned overhaul that won't finish until around 2030. Within days, a wave of posts declared that reality was snapping back, that the Mandela effects were reversing now that the machine had gone dark. Beyond CERN, the same family of ideas sprawls out in

every direction. We're living in a simulation, and the Mandela effects are glitches in the code. A time traveler changed the past, and the misspellings are the ripples. Some believers even tied the Berenstein switch to the old internet legends about a time traveler from the future. Every version has the same core. Your memory is fine. The world is what changed. Now the other side, because while the believers were watching CERN, memory scientists had spent a century building the countercase one experiment at a time. The foundation goes back to 1932, when a psychologist named Frederick Bartlett showed that memory doesn't work like a recording, it works like a reconstruction. You don't play back the past, you rebuild it. Every single time

you remember it out of fragments and expectations, and every rebuild is a chance for an edit. Then, starting in the 1970s, a researcher named Elizabeth Loftus proved how easy those edits are to make. And Loftus isn't a fringe figure. Her research on eyewitness memory made her one of the most influential psychologists alive, and she's testified in hundreds of court cases. In one famous experiment, Loftus showed people footage of a car accident. Then she asked how fast the cars were going when they hit each other, or for other participants when they smashed into each other.

The people who heard smashed remembered the cars going faster. A week later, they were also far more likely to remember the broken glass at the scene. There was no broken glass. One word planted after the fact had written a detail into their memory of an event they watched with their own eyes. In another experiment, people watched a car pass a stop sign. afterward, a question casually mentioned a yield sign. When they later recalled the scene, many remembered a yield sign that was never there.

In Loftus' best-known study, lost in the mall, her team convinced roughly a quarter of adult participants that, as children, they'd been lost in a shopping mall and rescued by a stranger. It never happened to any of them. But some didn't just accept the false memory, they embellished it, adding sensory details, Nobody had suggested. When researchers re-ran the study decades later with a bigger sample, the number climbed to 35%. So memory is editable.

But that still leaves the sharpest question of this whole episode. Why do millions of strangers make the same edit? Three reasons. And they stack. First, our brains fill gaps with the most expected pattern. In English, names ending in Stein are everywhere. Einstein, Frankenstein, Goldstein, names ending in Stain are almost unheard of. So when your brain reconstructs that book cover, it reaches for the common ending, and everyone's

brain reaches for the same one. Same with the Monopoly Man. The top hat and mustache belong to a familiar cartoon tycoon costume that usually includes a monocle. There's even a specific suspect for where the monocle came from. Mr. Peanut, another old mascot in a top hat who, who really actually does wear a monocle. Second, real memories get filed under wrong labels. Take Ed McMahon, Johnny Carson's longtime sidekick on The Tonight Show. Plenty of people are certain he was the man who turned up on doorsteps with those giant

publisher's clearinghouse checks. He never actually worked there. But almost every piece of that memory is something people really did see. McMahon spent years on television holding up oversized sweepstakes. checks for a rival company called American Family Publishers. The doorstep surprises were real, too, but that was Publishers Clearinghouse's own prize patrol. And McMahon really did turn up at Stranger's front doors with a giant check, but as a running joke on sitcoms, like Roseanne and The Nanny. The two companies ran nearly identical campaigns at the same time, and a publisher's clearinghouse

executive has said viewers simply mixed the ads up. Every piece of that memorandum of that memorandum of is real. The label on it is wrong. And Shazam works the same way. A real genie movie, a real costume, a real trailer on a real VHS tape, all filed in our memories under one title that never actually existed. And third, false memories are contagious. When someone tells you they remember the cornucopia, they're describing the exact mistake your brain was already primed to make. So it sounds right, and the moment it sounds right, their memory becomes yours. The psychologist, Stefan Lewandowski, has studied how this snowballs. Once enough people share a belief, it becomes a social norm that others adopt, and the internet, in his words, provides a great amplification machine.

So every viral Mandela effect post doesn't just describe the false memory, it installs it, which leaves one last case to solve. The first one, the funeral of a man who hadn't died. Memory researchers have long pointed to a possible answer, and it deserves to be told with care because it isn't a fun fact. It's a man's life. His name was Steve Biko. In the 1970s, Biko led South Africa's black consciousness movement

and was one of the most prominent anti-apartheid leaders of his generation. In August of 1977, police arrested the 30-year-old at a roadblock, accusing him of violating a government order that restricted his movements. In custody, officers beat him so brutally that he suffered massive brain injuries. Then they loaded him naked and shackled into the back of a police vehicle and drove him more than 600 miles to a prison in the city of Pretoria. He died on September 12, 1977. The police claimed he died from a hunger strike.

The world erupted. Some 15,000 people attended his funeral, including foreign diplomats. Riots broke out. In 1980, Peter Gabriel turned the story into a protest anthem called Biko. In 1987, Hollywood put his life and death on screen in the film Cry Freedom with Denzel Washington playing Biko. So for millions of people around the world in the late 70s and 80s, The story of a famous South African anti-apartheid leader, dying brutally in custody, followed by global mourning, was real.

They saw the coverage, they felt the grief. It just wasn't Nelson Mandela. For decades, the two men's names were spoken in the same breath, and Mandela's was the bigger name. Researchers suggest that in millions of minds, the death got filed under the more famous man. Some writers push the point harder, arguing that the mix-up itself is uncomfortable evidence of how carelessly the world watched. There's also probably an aspect of what Sinbad had said about his own

Mandela effect. Biko and Mandela were both black activists, and the rest of the world didn't care enough to differentiate between them. Either way, one thing is worth saying plainly. The founding memory of the Mandela Effect wasn't conjured out of nothing. A man died. The world mourned him, and then somehow most of the world forgot his name. Nobody was ever held accountable for Biko's death. Just last year in 2025, South Africa reopened the inquest into it 48 years later. So where does all of that leave the Mandela effect? Both sides got something wrong. The believers are wrong about the cause, nothing crossed over from another universe, but the skeptics are wrong that there's nothing left to explain.

The science of memory explains a lot. The gap filling, the wrong labels, the contagion. But remember what the Chicago team found. They tested the easy versions of those explanations, the attention theory and the exposure theory, and the data didn't fully cooperate. People barely familiar with the Monopoly Man, added the Monocle minutes after looking at the real monocle-free image.

Something about certain images, makes human brains across cultures and generations invent the exact same ghost. And as of today, nobody can tell you precisely what. That's the honest state of it. No edited universe, but a genuine open question about the machine in your head. And that's the part I keep coming back to, because there's a strange trade at the center of it. The conspiracy version of this story is, weirdly, the comforting one. If timelines merged, that means you're memory is perfect and the universe takes the blame. The documented version is harder to live with. The machinery that writes your past is reconstructive, suggestible, and social. It fails the

same way in all of us because we're all running the same machinery. If you lost even one round of today's tests, you felt that vertigo, the moment where you'd have sworn and you would have been wrong. want to hear from you on this one. What's your score from today's tests? And more importantly, what's your Mandela effect? The memory you'd still swear on, evidence be damned, because plenty of people might hear everything I just laid out and still say, no, I definitely remember that cornucopia. And the bigger question, which is more disturbing? A universe that's been edited, or a mind that can't be trusted. Please leave a comment wherever you're listening. I have a feeling this comment section is going to be a wild one, and I cannot wait to read everyone.

Let me bring this back to where we started. When Fiona Broom stood in that VIP suite in 2009, trading memories of a funeral that never happened, she sensed that something real was going on, and she was right. All these years later, scientists agree the shared false memories are real, measurable, and stranger than anyone expected. Where she and the believers went wrong was the direction of the edit. Nobody rewrote the world. The world stayed put. We rewrote ourselves, the way we always have, one reconstruction at a time. But an episode about false memory can end with one act of true remembering. The funeral at the top of this show, the morning, the riots, the anti-apartheid leader dead in a prison cell. That actually happened. It happened to Steve Biko in

1977, and it happened because men in power killed him for what he believed. Mandela honored him, and he never softened the truth of it. He said, quote, they had to kill him to prolong the life of apartheid, end quote. Your memory will keep editing itself. That's what it was built to do, but there are a few things you can choose to remember on purpose. Steve Biko should be one of them. Before we go, let's dive into the rabbit hole. This whole episode has rested on one quiet assumption that Mandela effects happened by accident. Nobody designed the Berenstein spelling or planted the cornucopia.

They grew naturally out of the ordinary glitches of human memory. But that era isn't ending because it turns out these memories can now be manufactured on purpose. Remember Wilma Bainbridge, the Chicago researcher who proved the visual Mandela Effect was real, she said her next interest is reverse engineering what makes an image stick, to the point of potentially creating brand-new Mandela effects on purpose. She wants to do it for science, but she won't be the only one who figures out how. Her co-author, DiPasheri Prasad, has pointed at the darker half of the same idea. Misinformation, repeated often enough and presented as truth, could plant false memories,

or at least leave people doubting their real ones. And the tools are already here. Elizabeth Loftus, the researcher who implanted the shopping mall memories back in the 90s, recently teamed up with MIT to ask a new question. What happens when artificial intelligence does the implanting? The results should stop you cold. In one study, people who viewed AI-edited images and videos of events developed false memories at roughly double the rate of people shown the originals,

and they held those false memories with more confidence. In another, participants watched a video of a crime, then got interviewed by an AI chatbot that slipped in misleading questions. More than a third of their answers were successfully warped. A week later, the false memories were still there, held just as firmly. And one more finding makes it worse. labeling the content as AI generated didn't stop the effect. People formed the false memories anyway.

Now, connect that to the world we live in. If you heard our episode on the dead internet theory, you know the web is filling up with machine-generated images, articles and video. Every subtly wrong logo that slides past you, every AI-generated old photo with a detail that never existed, is a tiny rehearsal for a false memory. It took a genie movie, a costume, and a shared VHS trailer 20 years ago to build Shazam by accident.

The same thing can now be built on purpose, at scale, by anyone. For 17 years, people have asked whether someone was editing reality. The answer, as far as anyone can prove, is no. Nobody was. But the tools to edit the next best thing, what everyone remembers about reality, exist right now. and they work. We treated the Mandela effect as a mystery about the past, but it might turn out to be a preview of what's coming.

Thanks so much for listening. I'm Vanessa Richardson, and this is Conspiracy Theory's Cults and Crimes. Come back next time. We'll hear another story about the real people at the center of the world's most notorious cults, conspiracies, and criminal acts. Conspiracy theories, cults, and crimes is a crimehouse original powered by Pave Studios. Here at Crime House, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support.

If you like what you heard today, reach out on social media at Crime House on TikTok and Instagram. Don't forget to rate review and follow Conspiracy Theory's Cults and Crimes wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference. And to enhance your conspiracy theories cults and crimes listening experience, subscribe to Crimehouse Plus. You'll get every episode of this show and the rest of the Crimehouse.

lineup, ad-free, and early, plus at least two bonus episodes every month. To join, go to CrimehousePlus.com. Or if you listen on Apple Podcasts, tap, try free at the top of the Conspiracy Theory's Cults and Crimes show page. Conspiracy Theory's Cults and Crimes is hosted by me, Vanessa Richardson, and is a Crimehouse original powered by Pave Studios. This episode was brought to life by the Conspiracy Theory's Cults and Crimes team. Max Cutler, Ron Chipp. Piro, Mara de la Rosa, Claire Swartlander, Alex Benadon, Natalie Pritzowski, Lori Maranelli, Alyssa Fox, Sarah Camp and Michael Langsner. Thank you for listening. Hi, I'm Connor Tomlinson. You might know me from Love on the Spectrum.

History is my thing, and I have been waiting my whole life for a show like this one. And I'm Carter Roy, and this is What the Fact? Every week, three facts, each one with a whole story. behind it. The worst years anyone has ever lived through, the golden age of pirates, the movies that almost never got made, the discoveries that rewrote everything we thought we knew. Carter sets the scene. Conner brings the facts, the tangents, and the genuine belief that this is the most interesting subject in the world. It is. The wildest stuff is real, and the real stuff is wilder than you think. New episodes every Wednesday, follow What the Fact on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or subscribe on YouTube at What The Fact Pod.

A woman once survived a fall for more than two miles up because she crashed landed on a nest of furious fire ants. A 13th century pope once condemned black cats as these servants of Satan. A lumberjack once survived near decapitation by his own chainsaw. These aren't tall tales. They aren't urban legends. They're real. events. I want to take a quick moment to tell you about the unbelievable, a new podcast from the History Channel and Rewind Studios. Adapted from the hit TV show, every episode opens a cabinet of curiosities to uncover the strangest but true stories in human history, then digs into the historical record to show you exactly how and why they happened. Strange people,

odd places, peculiar events. When it comes to history, the truth is always more unbelievable than you think. Follow The Unbelievable on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. If you're looking for your next podcast, check out What the Fact, with Connor Tomlinson from Netflix's Love on the Spectrum and Carter Roy. Every week they take three unbelievable true facts from history and tell you the full story behind them. Follow What The Fact wherever you listen

or subscribe on YouTube at What The Fact Pod.