Money Crimes with Nicole Lapin - INTERVIEW: Nancy Jo Sales, Expert on Bling Ring Burglaries

Episode Date: May 8, 2025

When a group of teenagers began burglarizing the homes of Hollywood’s biggest stars, the world was captivated— and so was journalist Nancy Jo Sales. Nicole Lapin talks with Nancy Jo about breaking... the Bling Ring story, the blurred lines between fame, ambition, and crime, and why celebrity culture made the thefts feel almost inevitable. From navigating clashing accounts to exposing how obsession with fame turned criminal, this is a deep look at the scandal that still haunts Hollywood over fifteen years later. For more on The Bling Ring, check our our episode: CELEBRITY: The Bling Ring on Apple or Spotify. Scams, Money, & Murder is a Crime House Original Podcast, powered by PAVE Studios. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. For ad-free listening and early access to episodes, subscribe to Crime House+ on Apple Podcasts. Don’t miss out on all things Scams, Money, & Murder! Instagram: @Crimehouse TikTok: @Crimehouse Facebook: @crimehousestudios X: @crimehousemedia YouTube: @crimehousestudios To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 This is Crime House. There was a lot of money involved in this. People would actually tweet at me saying things like, good for them, bring me a Birkin bag. There's four kids walking up a hill to Orlando Bloom's house and going inside at night when he's not there. Sure looks like burglary to me. As they say, money makes the world go round. What many don't talk about is the time it made people's worlds come to a screeching halt. Whether it's greed, desperation, or a thirst for power, money can make even the
Starting point is 00:00:46 most unassuming people do unthinkable things. And sometimes, those acts can be deadly. This is Scams, Money, and Murder, a CrimeHouse original. I'm your host Nicole Lapin. Every Thursday we alternate between covering infamous money-motivated crimes and gripping interviews with the experts or those who were directly involved themselves. Crime House exists because of you. Please rate, review, and follow Scams, Money, and Murder wherever you get your podcasts. And for early ad-free access and bonus content, subscribe to CrimeHouse Plus on Apple Podcasts. Morgan Apshur. Every Wednesday Morgan and Katelyn take you deep into the world of the most notorious crimes ever, Clue by Clue.
Starting point is 00:01:48 From serial killers to shocking murders, Clues dives into all the forensic details and brilliant sleuthing of the world's most infamous cases. So if you're looking for a show that has compelling storytelling, crime scene analysis, and a new perspective through some of the world's most puzzling true crime cases, you definitely have to check out Clues. Clues is a Crime House original powered by PAVE Studios. New episodes drop every Wednesday. Just search Clues wherever you listen to podcasts. What's better than a well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue?
Starting point is 00:02:21 A well-marbled ribeye sizzling on the barbecue that was carefully selected by an Instacart shopper and delivered to your door. A well-marbled ribeye you ordered without even leaving the kiddie pool. Whatever groceries your summer calls for, Instacart has you covered. Download the Instacart app and enjoy $0 delivery fees on your first three orders. Service fees, exclusions, and terms apply. Instacart, groceries that over-deliver. Welcome to Scams, Money and Murder. Today we have Nancy Jo Sales, the journalist behind the famous
Starting point is 00:02:52 Vanity Fair article, The Suspects Wore Lubitons, which exposed the real-life Hollywood burglary ring known as the Bling Ring. We covered the story in an episode back in January, and in case you haven't heard that already, we'll drop a link to it in the show notes for this episode. But the TLDR is that the Bling Ring was a group of kids from the LA suburb of Calabasas who between 2008 and 2009 stole from some of the world's biggest celebrities at the time. Think Paris Hilton, Orlando Bloom, and Lindsay Lohan. And my guest today, Nancy Jo Sales,
Starting point is 00:03:25 wrote the definitive story on it for Vanity Fair. Nancy Jo, thank you so much for joining us today. We have so, so much to talk about from celebrity culture to social media to following the money trail, the mindset of these teens. I mean, this is such a wild, wild story that unraveled. If somebody is new to this story, you'll forget more than we will all ever know about the bling ring.
Starting point is 00:03:48 How would you summarize the whole thing in a couple of sentences? Between 2008 and 2009, a group of teens predominantly in Calabasas, California, Southern California, robbed the homes of celebrities, including Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Orlando Bloom, Rachel Billson, dot, dot, dot, many more. And they stole in excess of $3 million in mostly luxury brands, everything from jewelry to clothing to shoes to bags to Rolex watches. They also stole somebody's gun.
Starting point is 00:04:26 They were a burglary ring. And Calabasas is not the hood. It's not Compton. I mean, Calabasas is a very nice part of Los Angeles. Is that what drew you to this story that the bling ring was such a crazy mash-up of true crime, Hollywood glamour, and these kids? I mean, the suspects were just kids.
Starting point is 00:04:44 Is that how it landed on your radar, that you were like, I have to investigate this mishmash of all of these components? I first heard about it from a friend, a fellow journalist who emailed me or called me or something and said, you got to check out this story in the New York Post. It was not like the cover. It was, you know, page 10 or something. You got to check out this story in the New York Post. It was not like the cover, it was, you know, page 10 or something. You got to check out this story. And I think the way he put it was, it's almost like somebody made up
Starting point is 00:05:13 a parody of a Nancy Jo Sale story. And I think what he meant by that was, at that point, I was known for covering teenagers. Also, I'd done stories on teenagers and crime. I'd done crime stories. And yes, I'd done a lot of and crime. I'd done crime stories. And yes, I'd done a lot of celebrity stories. I actually interviewed some of the people that they robbed, including Paris and Lindsay. So yeah, I mean, I think it was not just a mashup of all of these
Starting point is 00:05:39 things going on in culture and pop culture, but also things I had actually written about. So, in culture and pop culture, but also things I had actually written about. So it seemed like a kind of a no-brainer for me to check it out. It was like everybody wanted to get the story. Everybody wanted to get the kids. There were court dates where every single news outlet would be there, standing outside the courtroom trying to get in because there was limited space. And I was just kind of shocked by the whole thing, like why everybody was so obsessed with this. And that was part of what was interesting about it too, was
Starting point is 00:06:12 that the media was so obsessed with it. But then, you know, for one reason or another, I wound up sort of getting the inside with the kids and the kids' lawyers and everything. But what drew me to it was what you said, this mashup of all of these interesting elements of pop culture that I happen to have been a reporter who covered on a regular basis. Yeah, but you did get the inside scoop. How do you think you got the inside scoop?
Starting point is 00:06:38 How did you get people to trust you? Of course, there was fascination. It had all the elements of something that everybody would be obsessed with. It had all the elements of something that everybody would be obsessed with. It had celebrity culture, it had crime. You know, it felt like these kids almost worshiped the Hollywood lifestyle enough to steal it. There's a kind of famous line in my story that made it into Sofia Coppola's film because she took a lot of actual dialogue that the kid said to me, both in the story and then in my transcripts.
Starting point is 00:07:05 Because when you write a story, it's just like a sliver of your transcripts, you might talk to them for two hours. Then the story represents at most like 10 minutes of dialogue, whereas you spoke to them for hours and hours. So she took all those long-form transcripts and used them in writing her script. And I thought that was so interesting that she did that.
Starting point is 00:07:26 I think it gave the film a lot of kind of authenticity too. Getting back to your question of the lifestyle, that is a quote from Nick Prugo. And that is what he said when I asked him, why did you all do this? I'm paraphrasing him because I can't remember the exact words, but he said something like, we did it for the lifestyle,
Starting point is 00:07:46 the lifestyle that everybody kind of wants. And what he meant by that was the lifestyle that was promoted by so many different shows from the OC to Gossip Girl and all these different shows that were promoting this sort of lux lifestyle that was being shown to teens. And so my story and then my book became this point at which we all started talking about, hey, is this healthy for kids to have this shoved down their throat as like,
Starting point is 00:08:21 this is the greatest life to lead, the celebrity life. And also it's interesting because it was at a time when people were also starting to first talk on their throat as like, this is the greatest life to lead, the celebrity life. And also it's interesting because it was at a time when people were also starting to first talk about the income inequality and the incredible divergence between rich and poor in this country. So it was all taking place and sort of gathering interest culturally on a number of levels.
Starting point is 00:08:43 Who were these kids? An example of the divergence of rich and poor? I wouldn't say that they were poor, they just weren't as rich. Is that part of the draw and the fascination here? Well, no, they weren't that rich. They weren't poor, that's for sure. There was this sort of cultural fascination with rich people.
Starting point is 00:09:01 I mean, that's something that's been part of American culture since the beginning. Kids were just watching a lot of TV and a lot of movies about rich people and rich teens. And whether or not that is healthy for them became a subject of conversation. So even in Calabasas, there was a divide between the haves and the have-nots. I've been covering teams for a long time, and kids and crime for a long time. It's always seemed to me that the kids who were not really the poorest ones, but the ones who were in the middle or the upper middle,
Starting point is 00:09:41 were always the most wannabe. It was just right out of their reach. They went to the same mall as the Kardashians. In fact, one of the first times I ever went to Calabasas to sort of check it out when I was doing the story, I saw Khloe Kardashian like coming out of the Calabasas mall followed by paparazzi. Yeah, I mean, that's what Calabasas is known for,
Starting point is 00:10:00 the Kardashians. Right, but then you have these kids who are not living in a Kardashian-level house. Like, they live amongst that kind of person, but they're living in, like, the condo by the grocery store with a single mom, you know what I mean? So they're seeing this, they're surrounded by this, but they're not of it. I think it creates class resentment and also envy and the desire to have what these other people have. Teenagers are very aware of fairness. Children in general are. Why does she get that?
Starting point is 00:10:32 They would say things to me like, they have enough. Why do they get all that and I don't? And when the story came out, people would actually tweet at me saying things like, good for them. Bring me a Birkin bag. We're surrounded by this culture that says, look at this, and look at what this person has, and look at what that person has, and you don't have it, do you? So it creates this kind of resentment. That's why I think for a while there,
Starting point is 00:10:58 people were sort of almost identifying with them a little bit and sort of celebrating them, which I thought was kind of crazy, because they were thieves. Yeah. And they weren't exactly like giving to the poor. They were just doing it for themselves. Right. They weren't Robin Hood.
Starting point is 00:11:14 And class envy and warfare doesn't always lead to crime. How did it get that bad? I mean, because, you know, I grew up very envious of the rich kids and I'll never forget, like the little Tiffany bracelet with the dangling thing, the sterling silver one that I could never get. And I think that we all kind of feel that way at one point or another, but not all of us go and break into the houses. You're asking a question that's like sort of beyond this story.
Starting point is 00:11:45 The conditions for someone to do something illegal or criminal or harmful or hurtful, that's a very case by case situation. But that doesn't mean that these things don't play into what was happening with them. Like you mentioned being a little girl and seeing somebody having something you didn't have. I remember that somebody, maybe Alexis Nyars herself, told me that when she was little,
Starting point is 00:12:09 she had been at school in Calabasas or wherever they were living, Southern California, rich neighborhood. And she went to school and all of the little girls had fancy designer backpacks. So she goes into Orlando Bloom's house to rob it with her burglar friends. And one of the first things she took was a Louis Vuitton backpack. And so you're right,
Starting point is 00:12:33 not everybody who has a thought, I want that, why do you have it, not me, steals. That doesn't mean that the conditions in the society didn't add to it. That's sort of the story of America in a certain way, is how we're all supposed to be equal, we're supposed to have a democratic society, but we're not all equal. Some people are much less equal than others
Starting point is 00:12:55 and income inequality is and was a growing problem. That's for sure. Hey there, it's Nicole. That's for sure. world of the most notorious crimes ever clue by clue. And I really love the way that they're breaking down the evidence so you can really see how even the smallest things have helped crack some of the most intricate cases wide open. From serial killers to shocking murders, Clues dives into all the forensic details and brilliant sleuthing of the world's most infamous cases. So if you're looking for a show that has compelling storytelling, crime scene analysis, and a new perspective through some of the world's most puzzling true crime cases, you definitely have to check out Clues. Clues is a Crime House original
Starting point is 00:13:55 powered by Pape Studios. New episodes drop every Wednesday. Just search Clues wherever you listen to podcasts. In your reporting, you found they use tools like Google Maps and sites like TMZ to pinpoint when the stars were out of town. They were scouring social media, which was in its nascent stages back then. It felt pretty novel, right, in 2008 and 2009. How critical was this technological coming of age and online information component to their operation in the story? It was a huge part of the story.
Starting point is 00:14:29 It seems so obvious now. It's just so obvious that screens are with us all the time. I never thought I would be that person who looks at their phone every five minutes, but we've all been roped in. We've all been made addicts by these social media companies. But then it was still very nascent, right? I remember actually sitting with Sophia Coppola in some restaurant, like downtown, when we were talking about the story,
Starting point is 00:14:56 and we were talking about the film, and I was consulting on the film and everything, and we were talking about kids and this aspect of social media. She just had little kids at the time. She didn't have teenagers yet. Her kids were like four or five years old or something, if that. And my daughter was a little older, she was 12.
Starting point is 00:15:12 But I interviewed kids and I was around kids because of the stories that I was writing. And I saw them being more and more screen attached and screen dependent. And I remember telling Sophia at this meeting that we had, there's never not a screen dependent. And I remember telling Sophia at this meeting that we had, there's never not a screen on. There's like a screen all the time now, whether it's the TV screen or the video screen. iPhones had just come out. iPhones came out in 2007. Androids came out in 2008. So they were just
Starting point is 00:15:40 breaking through. I think that if you look at the data, I'm not exactly sure, but I think by 2012, we're seeing most kids having phones. But it was very, very beginning, you understand? Yeah, I was there. I mean, also, Facebook was just coming out of college campuses. Right, exactly. So I remember telling her this and her just sort of shaking her head and saying like, really? And she understood and incorporated it into the film. I think the bling ring was actually one of the first movies to depict that shift because kids are with the digital natives, right?
Starting point is 00:16:15 So they knew about things like celebrity aerial address. I don't know if it still exists, but I remember it was a site where you could find the celebrities address. There's so many sites where you can find these things exists, but I remember it was a site where you could find the celebrities address. There's so many sites where you can find these things now, but at the time it seemed like, whoa, they can not only find their address, they can go and Google Earth and see like where all the doors are and all the windows and where the shrubbery has maybe a hole in it to crawl through. where the shrubbery has maybe a hole in it to crawl through. And yeah, that was all very, very new at the time. And they knew about it and they knew how to utilize it
Starting point is 00:16:50 because they were kids and kids just know these things about technology, the first adapters. Well, it's kind of crazy too that it was used in both ways because eventually the same tools helped catch them, right? Some of the security footage that was posted online, the cops even used Facebook. Did you see the bling-waring as an early harbinger about oversharing on social media or a cautionary tale about how our digital footprints can empower criminals? Absolutely, because you know there's a
Starting point is 00:17:21 whole genre of like crime stories and for want of a better word, stupid crooks. Like the stupid, the things stupid crooks do. You know, you'll see in the New York Post or tablets or whatever, criminal went and robbed the home and fell asleep on the bed. There was sort of a stupid crooks element to the story too, which is that they were going on Facebook and posting a picture of themselves. I think this literally happened wearing Lindsay Lohan's necklace with a caption that said something like,
Starting point is 00:17:50 missing something, Lindsay. It was that sort of brazen kind of, I guess you could call it oversharing that was so striking at the time. And so the cops, they got tips from different people about what was going on. And there's, I wasn't able to definitively report this out, but there is a lot of suggestion in the story that one of them told the cops on another one.
Starting point is 00:18:15 And that led to that person being caught too, because it was another stupid crook thing to do. You know, he did it. Well, you did it too. They were teenagers, they were kids, they were stupid crooks. They had the internet, they were advertising their crimes on the internet. Sounds like group dynamics played a big role in this.
Starting point is 00:18:33 And part of why we're still so fascinated by this story, you know, there was a group of friends. Do you think any of these teenagers would have broken into celebrity homes on their own? Or was it a product of group mentality or peer pressure? In a group dynamic like that, especially if it's like a little band of thieves or a gang or whatever, yeah, there's usually someone or maybe a couple who kind of instigate things. And there was definitely a group dynamic going on for sure.
Starting point is 00:19:03 But this thing is happening on different levels, right? You have the societal level, which we talked about. And then you have the personal level. And I think both things were happening at the same time as they always are. A lot of these dynamics were interesting because, you know, while you were reporting on teen and celebrity culture, it's hard to get teens to open up to you. Can you take us behind some of your reporting and researching and piecing together this complicated story? How did you gain
Starting point is 00:19:33 their trust to convince them or their parents or their lawyers to talk? People always ask me this. I've even had other reporters ask me this. I wish I knew the answer. I don't know. Every reporter does what they do the way that they do it. You use your own set of experiences and your own personality. There's no one way to report and get people to open up to you. I wish I could tell you the answer. You're a reporter. You're an interviewer. How do you get people to open up? How are you getting me to open up right now? Like you just do what you do based on your instinct. So I don't know how I did it, but all I know is that I saw a bunch of people outside this courtroom, right? NBC and ABC and they're all fighting with the lady who
Starting point is 00:20:16 had the ability to let you into the courtroom. I'm like, well, that looks ridiculous. That doesn't look like the way to go about this. And then I looked down the hall and I see this camper crew and I see this young girl who I recognize as Alexis Snyders from the photographs that had been taken. And I was like, Oh, there's one of them right there. Look, there's all these reporters fighting to get into the courtroom, but actually there is one of the burglars right there.
Starting point is 00:20:47 They're just not paying attention. And she was having makeup put on. And she had this camera crew around her. Did she have a reality show? Yes. That was the reality crew for Pretty Wild. And I was like, OK, that is so much more interesting than what's going on over there.
Starting point is 00:21:04 So I just went down there, and she was sitting on this bench and I just sat next to her and just started talking to her and said, what are you doing? And she just started talking to me and telling me stuff and we just took it from there. So whatever magical form of connection, you developed a bond with them for sure. You inspired them to open up
Starting point is 00:21:25 to you. To be fair, they weren't shy. They definitely relished in this sort of moment, but they also told conflicting stories, right? Yeah. In your article, you say that Alexis's story of the Orlando Bloomberglory was different than Nick's story of her role in it. So as a journalist, how did you decide who or what to believe? There were two main conflicting stories, Alexis and Nick. And so I just sort of like put one against the other as I wrote the story.
Starting point is 00:21:58 Well, she said this, he says that. You know, that's sort of how the story begins. And he says, that's not what happened. I mean, criminals often tell different... It's not the first time they would have told different things. Also, another thing that was going on is that the lawyers for these kids wanted publicity, and they did them real disservice in encouraging them to talk to me once I got to know them and started finding out who their lawyers even were. They just wanted to be known.
Starting point is 00:22:31 Also, Alexis's lawyer encouraged her to talk to me. That is in my book, the guy is quoted as saying, I think it would be in her best interest to dispel all of this bad press that she's getting. Well, was it really in her best interest? I don't know, but I'm just reporting whatever I can report, right? Like you have to get the story. So if they want to tell their client to talk to me, of course I'm gonna talk to them. It's not my job to protect them. It's my job to find out what happened. Who do I believe?
Starting point is 00:23:00 You don't have to believe one or the other. You don't have to know for sure what happened. She says this, he says that. Let's see what the surveillance tape says. You know, that's another thing. I was talking to police. I had a police source very close in the case and he showed me the surveillance footage. And let's see what the police reports say. Let's see what happened when the police went to the house and searched the house. Oh, look, here's Lindsay Lohan's handbag under her bed. It's not rocket science. It was a pretty straightforward investigation. And then there was so much evidence and there was Facebook posts of them posing with the items. That's why whenever people say like, oh, it wasn't clear that they did it. Um,
Starting point is 00:23:47 I don't know, security cameras kind of don't lie. You know, like there's four kids walking up a hill to Orlando Bloom's house and going inside at night when he's not there. Sure looks like burglary to me. Or here's two other kids like coming to Lindsay Lohan's house and ringing the bell and she's not there and then suddenly there's a broken window and all her stuff is gone. LESLIE Yeah, it doesn't take a forensic expert to piece that together. JADE Exactly. That's why it's so funny to me when I hear like, well, we don't know what really happened. Well, they did plead guilty to burglary and went to jail. So do we really not know what happened?
Starting point is 00:24:31 Yeah, I don't know if there's so much a question about what happened. It's more of the color that's surrounding it. Your Vanity Fair article, The Suspects War Lubutants, you know, really went into all that was around the story because the crime was pretty cut and dry, but it was all of the color and the texture and the contours of the story that made it
Starting point is 00:24:50 really interesting and juicy. Did you ever get a sense that the kids or the parents, it might not be in their best interest to talk to me, they did anyway. Do you feel like they were playing to the cameras or were they concerned with their image because there was so much press watching? I mean, Alexis had a reality show
Starting point is 00:25:10 which probably would have never gotten on the air if she hadn't been in Vanity Fair. A million shows get shot every day. How many of them actually make it onto a platform? Very few. And how do they get there? Well, things like the star is arrested for burglary on the first day of filming.
Starting point is 00:25:30 They were going to do this reality show about two party girls in LA, Alexis and her fake sister, Tess Amber. Tess has gone off and she's just like happily has a whole other life. And I don't really want to talk about her because she doesn't really like to be part of this at all. But I had to say or just to identify,
Starting point is 00:25:52 it was supposed to be about Alexis and Tess and their party girl life. They were not famous. There was no reason to have this be a thing at all. But then they come to film them. On the first day, Alexis gets arrested. Boom, the cops show up. There's no reason to have this be a thing at all. But then they come to film them. On the first day, Alexis gets arrested. Boom, the cops show up. Now they've got a story.
Starting point is 00:26:11 Then this Vanity Fair reporter shows up talking to her and they're filming her like at her court date. And they say to me, what are you doing? What are you talking to her? I said, well, I would like to interview her. But who do you work for at Vanity Fair? They said, you can interview her if you'll appear on camera interviewing her. And I was like, oh, let me go ask my boss.
Starting point is 00:26:30 So I called my editor at Vanity Fair, a guy named Dana Brown, and I told him about the situation. And he said, oh, yeah, do it. That show will never get picked up. Who's going to watch that? So I go and interview her, like, on camera. But they said there were certain things I go and interview her like on camera, but they said there were certain things I couldn't ask her. I couldn't ask her about the case. All right. They say
Starting point is 00:26:51 you can't ask her about the case. I'm like, Oh, goodness, what am I going to, how am I going to do this? So if you watch the interview, I asked her all these questions sort of around the case. I say like, you like handbags? Right, exactly. And I think we started talking about shoes. And she goes, Oh, I have such a big shoe collection. I have all these shoes. And she starts listing all the names and Louis Vuitton's. Where'd you get those? Yeah, right.
Starting point is 00:27:17 Louis Vuitton's are one. I swear to God. I said, how did you afford those? And she says, I afforded them from working at Jamba Juice. Yeah, those highly paid Jamba Juice employees. Those $1,500, $2,000 shoes, those Louboutins she paid for with Jamba Juice. She started talking about how she follows the secret, which
Starting point is 00:27:41 is a kind of a law of attraction. Yeah. She says, I have this great karma because I'm such a good person, something like that. And I was like, okay, what does that mean karma wise if you get arrested for burglary? I was trying to have the conversation with her without asking her about the case, which I wasn't allowed to do. Yeah, it's like, tell me you're a criminal without telling me you're a criminal. Exactly. But one thing I do remember in that interview, which is in the book,
Starting point is 00:28:07 and it goes back to what we started this conversation about, she talked about how she and her friends, like, really looked up to Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, and all of these young women who were getting arrested all the time. And I remember, I was on CNN live when Paris Hilton was leaving jail, and we were reporting on that. It was glorified.
Starting point is 00:28:30 Right, exactly. It was, you know, talk about layers. There's all these layers of like misogyny baked into how these young women were being portrayed and how they were being covered and all this stuff. They're trying to get attention through doing stuff like that because that puts them back in the public eye. And I actually talked to Lindsay about that and she was talking about how, yeah, it was weird, like at a certain point, and I'm paraphrasing, we were just trying to get in tabloids.
Starting point is 00:28:56 So then you have little Alexis, Lindsay's like maybe 20 something at that time. You have little Alexis who's like 16, 17 at that time, watching Lindsay trying to get into tabloids for breaking the law. It's a weird vicious cycle of misogyny and all kinds of crazy stuff that somebody should write a book about. In fact, I think there is a book about this coming out, about early 2000s, mid 2000s media treatment of starlets and young women. I remember Alexis talking about that,
Starting point is 00:29:25 about how that was all like sort of informing their desire to kind of be bad, you know? Yeah, of course. It impacted them. They were looked at as, you know, so-called role models to them. And it's very much a part of American culture, the sort of fascination with gangsterism and being an outlaw.
Starting point is 00:29:44 Well, not only that, but there was, you know, the fascination of gangsterism and being an outlaw. Well, not only that, but there was the fascination of a reality TV and reality shows was on the rise as well. Alexis was really young when she had this reality show. Do you know if she got paid for it or did any of these kids get paid for the movie adaptation? Not every single one of them, but some of them including Alexis, did get paid for life rights.
Starting point is 00:30:05 I don't know what they got paid for pretty well. I imagine a lot less because I don't think reality TV pays a lot. You mentioned Sofia Coppola a few times in this conversation, just casually. If we just step back for a second, open the aperture, that's pretty cool. She's a genius, so to even like have a conversation with her is pretty cool. But yeah, we worked together on the movie and met a whole bunch of times and she's great. The Blink Ring is a brilliant movie. It is a perfect iteration of the mid-2000s. If an alien came to Earth and said, well, what were the 2000 teens like? Show them the Blink Ring. Yeah, it was the rise of TMZ, it was the rise of reality TV, it was Facebook just becoming
Starting point is 00:30:48 big, it was all the screens that you talked about. I think this whole story, whether it's the culture or the actual characters themselves, still fascinates people today. There was even a Netflix documentary recently. And there was one on HBO too. So many documentaries. Well, they both asked me to be in them, the HBO one and the Netflix one, and I refused. I rarely talk about the bling ring
Starting point is 00:31:12 just because I just feel like it's lame to talk about stuff you already did. Like I'd rather talk to you about what I'm doing now. And I hope someday I can talk to you about that. It's not come out yet, but I just like to move forward and do the next thing. I think that people who keep showing up and talking about something they did 10 years ago, I just think it's kind of lame. Well, you could probably reframe that too and say,
Starting point is 00:31:34 a decade later, people still are talking about this and that's a cool legacy. It's not every day that your work gets turned into a Sofia Coppola movie. It's not every day that you have such a big impact on such a story that rips people 10 years later. What about that instead? Well, yes. Thank you. I can use that self-esteem boost. I got you.
Starting point is 00:31:59 No, I think it's cool. Of course, it's cool. That's why I didn't do those documentaries. I love Sofia's movie and the article is, you know, whatever. I actually think I've written way better articles for Vanity Fair and other places. I had very little time to do it. The reporting was, I think, you know, I was out ahead of the other reporters. That's true. Graydon Carter, my boss at Vanity Fair, did not want to do that story. He was like, eh, it's just a bunch of kids and the celebrities are like, be less so why do we want to do that?
Starting point is 00:32:29 I said, well, because it's all these things. It's what we were talking about in the beginning of this, what you've so aptly characterized as all the different elements and layers going on in this story. So I said that and he said, he wasn't going to do it. So I said, well, okay, so I will go do it for Rolling Stone. Oh.
Starting point is 00:32:48 And then he said, okay, you can do it. It felt like the zeitgeist. In that sense, it is kind of cool because it was a moment in time. And you're the combination of all of these stories that came before and of course, all of the stories that will come. But do you think the bling ring makes you more cynical
Starting point is 00:33:05 about the price of fame, more sympathetic to teenagers and how they're feeling in this celebrity saturated world? What do you think the takeaway was from this time in your life and this coverage to how you approach stories now and how you will in the future? Well, I have so much sympathy for teenagers. And you know, after the bling ring came out,
Starting point is 00:33:26 I did a book called American Girls, Social Media, and the Secret Lives of Teenagers. I was really the first person to write about how social media was really hurting girls. Years before the Facebook whistleblower released all of those internal studies where Facebook knew that Facebook and Instagram were hurting girls.
Starting point is 00:33:44 Years before that, I put out this book. Five years before that Facebook and Instagram were hurting girls. Years before that, I put out this book. Five years before that, I put out this book. So I am absolutely always on the side of kids and I never am anything but sympathetic to them. They are victims of our society, even the blinding-bling kids. If you read the story, yes, it has them saying some outrageous stuff, but at the same time, there's a lot of pathos in this story, I think. Do you think something like this could happen again? I think it has. I think there've been a few other gangs of kids.
Starting point is 00:34:20 I had a really good friend named Donald Suggs, who sadly passed away. He's my friend since college. He was a black man, brilliant man, gay rights advocate and activist. And I remember driving around in LA one night when I was out there doing the bling ring. And I called Donald to talk and told him what I was doing.
Starting point is 00:34:41 And he said, yeah, you know, if those kids had been black, it would be a whole different story. Which was so true. And what he meant by that was that they are being treated like celebrities themselves because they were mostly white. Like Rachel Lee, who was allegedly one of the instigators, the ringleaders, she was an Asian teenager. But Alexis was white, Nick was white. It was seen as a story about white kids, right? They weren't the richest kids, as we've said, but they were not poor either. And I think what Donald was trying to point out was this would be a whole different story if these were kids from Compton and Rob's, Orlando Bloom's, Rolex's. Who knows if they would still be in jail today? Because our criminal justice
Starting point is 00:35:26 system is unequal. Meanwhile, Alexis spent 30 days in jail on a 180-day sentence. And I think Nick spent a little more time than that, and Rachel maybe a little more time than that. But they were not given the sentence that they would have been had they been of a different demographic. I think that that also speaks to the inequality in our society. Do you think they should have gotten more? I think we need to recalibrate the criminal justice system so that it's fair and equal, and it certainly isn't at this point.
Starting point is 00:35:58 It's funny, your podcast is called Scams, Money, Murder. Yes. Okay. Well, there was no murder involved in this one. And there was a lot of money, actually. Over $3 million is a significant haul, you know, for a burglary ring, especially a bunch of kids. There was a lot of money involved in this. But then the money keeps on spiraling out into other things, which is so interesting because the way the money kept flowing is a reality show, a movie, a Netflix documentary,
Starting point is 00:36:34 an HBO documentary, which I'm sure they were paid for also. Yeah, influencer work that they're doing. Right, exactly. So I think what's so interesting is how they did profit off of this. I'll leave our listeners with this. If we can step back more than a decade later, what do you think the legacy of The Bling Ring is? And why do you think the story has had such a lasting grip on us? Well, you know, a lot of people did the story.
Starting point is 00:37:00 Sophia had many choices of people who wrote this story to choose from and she picked the Vanity Fair one. And I'm not really sure we would even be talking about it right now if that Vanity Fair story hadn't come out. Because I wouldn't have gotten a book, she wouldn't have gotten a movie. And I think that is why we're talking about it now. There are so many stories in the news cycle and even back then, that your story did make this lasting impact in the world of celebrity, money, and crime.
Starting point is 00:37:33 But Nancy Jo, thank you so much for taking the time. Thank you. I appreciate you. Thank you so much for listening. I'm your host Nicole Weppen. Scams, Money and Murder is a Crime House original. Join me every Thursday for a brand new episode. Here at Crime House, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support.
Starting point is 00:37:56 If you like what you heard here today, reach out on social media at crimehouse. Don't forget to rate, review and follow Scams, Money and Murder wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference. And for ad-free listening plus early access and bonus content, subscribe to Crime House Plus on Apple Podcasts. Scams, Money, and Murder is hosted by me, Nicole Lapin, and is a Crime House original powered by PAVE Studios. This episode was brought to life by the scams, money and murder team. Max Cutler, Ron Shapiro, Alex Benedon, Stacy Warnker, Sarah Kamm, Paul Libeskin and Victoria Asher. Thank you so much for listening.
Starting point is 00:38:34 ["Skills and Faces"] How can one tiny clue change everything? Well, Kaylin Moore and Morgan Absher break it all down in their new show, Clues. New episodes drop every Wednesday. Just search Clues wherever you listen to podcasts.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.