Money Crimes with Nicole Lapin - Stolen Benefits Pt. 2: Profit After Death

Episode Date: April 12, 2026

Investigators uncovered bodies buried on Dorothea Puente’s property. Evidence showed she continued collecting benefits and forging documents after tenants disappeared. This episode follows how her scheme was exposed. If you’re new here, don’t forget to follow Scams, Money and Murder to never miss a case! For Ad-free listening to episodes, subscribe to Crime House+ on Apple Podcasts. Scams, Money and Murder is a Crime House Original Podcast, powered by PAVE Studios 🎧 Need More to Binge?  Listen to other Crime House Originals Clues, Crimes Of…, Crime House 24/7, Serial Killers & Murderous Minds, Murder True Crime Stories, and more wherever you get your podcasts! Follow me on Social Instagram: @Crimehouse TikTok: @Crimehouse Facebook: @crimehousestudios X: @crimehousemedia YouTube: @crimehousestudios To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Hi, listeners, it's Vanessa Richardson. Real quick before today's episode, I want to tell you about another show from Crime House that I know you'll love, America's most infamous crimes. Hosted by Katie Ring, each week Katie takes on one of the most notorious criminal cases in American history. Serial killers who terrorized cities, unsolved mysteries that keep detectives up at night, and investigations that change the way we think about justice. Listen to and follow America's most infamous crimes. Tuesday through Thursday on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you listen to podcasts. This is Crimehouse.

We've all been misled by someone we trusted. Maybe it was our own misguided notions, or maybe they tricked us. Either way, we can usually dust ourselves off and learn from the mistake. But when it comes to someone as cold and calculated as Dorothea Puente, the deceit can leave scars that last a lifetime. Dorothea spent decades perfecting her innocent act. She convinced everyone around her that she was a respectable, charitable woman. Some people even viewed her as a savior. But Dorothea was the opposite. And when she finally crossed paths with someone she couldn't trick, the world learned she was nothing more than a cold-hearted killer. The human mind is powerful,

It shapes how we think, feel, love, and hate. But sometimes it drives people to commit the unthinkable. This is Killer Minds, a Crime House original. I'm Vanessa Richardson. And I'm Dr. Tristan Engels. Every Monday and Thursday, we uncover the darkest minds in history, analyzing what makes a killer. Crime House is made possible by you.

Follow Killer Minds and subscribe to Crimehouse Plus on Apple Podcasts for ad-free early access to each two parts. series. Before we get started, you should know this episode contains descriptions of child abuse, sexual abuse, domestic violence, and murder. Today, we conclude our deep dive on Dorothea Puente, a scammer turned serial killer who posed as a caretaker to gain people's trust and bleed them dry. Dorothya hid her crimes in plain sight, but eventually people caught on to the woman known as the Death House Landlady and the true extent of her heartless crimes was revealed.

As Vanessa goes through the story, I'll be talking about things like how some criminals are able to garner blind trust from those around them, even as they're actively carrying out violent crimes. How some offenders exploit known flaws in the system to manipulate and maintain control over others, and why even the most ruthless killers sometimes can't own up to their own actions. And as always, we'll be asking the question, what makes a killer? By 1982, 53-year-old Dorothea Puente had drugged and killed one of her boarding house tenants, a woman in her 60s named Ruth Monroe. Shortly afterward, Dorothea drugged and robbed a man in his 70s

named Malcolm McKenzie after meeting him at a bar. Dorothya thought she was getting away with her escalating crimes, but in reality, Malcolm, who'd been paralyzed but conscious while Dorothea robbed him, had gone to the police, and so did Ruth's son William. While investigators couldn't prove that Dorothea had killed Ruth, William did hand over paperwork that showed Dorothea had been stealing money from her. So officers geared up to arrest Dorothea on charges of theft, forgery, and parole violation, since she wasn't supposed to be running a boarding house in the first place. However, Dorothea heard through the grapevine that they were closing in on her, so she packed her bags and caught a taxi to the airport,

where she planned to flee to Mexico, the country that she lied about being from. But as Dorothea loaded her baggage onto the taxi and envisioned the new life she was about to embark on, her dreams were quickly dashed. The cab barely pulled away from Dorothea's house before police surrounded her. They arrested Dorothea, and, ultimately, she was charged with multiple counts of theft and fraud. Dorothea didn't bother trying to fight her charges. She pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years in prison with the possibility of parole

after three. So this sentence is very lenient when you consider the magnitude of what she'd actually done. She actually murdered someone, and they couldn't prove it, and so she essentially got away with it. And that sends a powerful message regarding her effectiveness and a powerful message. and a powerful message and how to refine methods

that aren't as effective to her either. And for someone who is already deeply entitled, detached, and confident in her cleverness, that's reinforcing and boldening. So rather than serving as a deterrent, prison likely set the stage for her escalation when she was released. We talk a lot about criminals' cavalier attitudes on this show,

especially when it comes to offenders who invade justice or receive relatively light sentences. We also know that every criminal we cover is unique. They're all different. So how might Dorothea be different or not? What stands apart in terms of Dorothea from many of the other offenders we've discussed is not just that she's a woman,

though gender absolutely shaped both her methods and her trajectory, but most of the men we've covered used overt violence, coercion, or physical intimidation in their tactics. their crimes were loud. Dorothea's were quiet, calculated, and relational. She weaponized trust, caregiving roles, and social expectations, which are strategies that are statistically more common in female offenders because society gives them different tools and different blind spots to work

within. And they need to use more covert tactics because most generally can't rely on physical dominance to overpower their targets. Dorothea understood that people tend to see Eldon's caregivers, landlords, or maternal figures as safe. She used that to her advantage. While the men we've covered manipulated from positions of dominance, Dorothea manipulated from positions of nurturance. That's part of why she evaded suspicion for so long, like I discussed, her crimes blended into roles people don't question often. But here's another key difference. Her time in and out of institutions actually refined her. Prison gave her structure. It gave her an audience and access to medical manuals. It gave her time to rehearse new identities, test out caregiving personas, and study the

vulnerabilities of others. Most offenders escalate impulsively. Dorothea escalated strategically. And a lot of offenders in fairness that we cover do learn how to refine their tactics or even become more versatile when they are incarcerated because they learn from other incarcerated individuals. But for Dorothea, prison served as dedicated practice time for her, which is markedly different and truly scary to think about. During this latest prison stint, Dorothea didn't reflect on her ways. If anything, she was bored. So she turned to the prison's pen pal program to seek a little companionship. And that's how she met Everson Gilmuth, a 71-year-old widower from Oregon.

And this is exactly what I mean. Instead of using prison as a period of reflection, she treated it as an opportunity and other way of refining her methods. Definitely. Well, Everson was a kind, lonely man who believed Dorothea had only committed some financial crimes out of desperation. The more they wrote to each other, the more they bonded. And soon, Everson was regularly depositing money into Dorothea's commissary account. From there, they started planning their life together. Dorothea was released in late 1985, after serving just three years of her five-year sentence.

When the 56-year-old walked out of the prison gates, her lover was there waiting for her in his red pickup truck. The terms of her parole forbade her from running a boarding home or working with any vulnerable populations like the disabled or mentally ill ever again. But within weeks, Dorothea secured a lease on a house just a few doors down from her former boarding home on F Street in Sacramento. She also opened a joint checking account with him and used the money to reopen her business. It's not clear whether Everson knew Dorothea was violating her parole.

He was just enamored with her determination to help others less fortunate than her. Dorothea's manipulation of Everson is a textbook example of how a seasoned offender exploits loneliness, vulnerability, and unmet emotional needs. As a grieving widower, Everson was isolated and emotionally primed to idealize anyone who offered him nurturance, which is what she is skilled

at performing. Dorothea understood this immediately. She wasn't interested in him as a partner, only as a resource. And the moment she stepped out of prison, she went straight into control mode. Like you said, she opened a joint bank account, accessing his pension and securing housing with his money. But she hid her intentions in the language of compassion. She offered him a role that made him feel important, like he was. also helping people rebuild their life in some way. And in doing so, she's concealing the reality

that he was being financially sort of gutted and psychologically isolated by someone who viewed empathy as a tool. Everson wasn't the only one who admired Dorothea. The city's social workers also continue to support her. They knew that she was violating her parole. And they also knew that the system didn't provide enough housing to the kinds of populations she served. And remember, Dorothea had never been charged for killing Ruth Monroe, so they kept sending people to live with her. Meanwhile, Dorothea was hatching a plan.

She had every intention of returning to her murderous ways, but knew she couldn't keep faking people's suicides. So one day when Everson wasn't around, Dorothea put a plastic tarp underneath their bedsheets. Then for the next few weeks, she started slipping sleeping pills into his food and drinks. Everson started sleeping throughout the day, until finally, one day in December, 1985, he laid his head down on the pillow and never woke up. Once Dorothea was sure he was dead, she wrapped the plastic tarp around him and moved his body to a corner of the room, but she never told anyone that he'd passed away.

In fact, she did the opposite. She wrote letters to Everson's children, who were adults, in his handwriting, pretending to be him. With no one the wiser, Dorothea kept collecting Everson's pension checks. To impersonate a deceased partner so convincingly like this and live with their body in the next room, that requires emotional coldness, detachment,

and a complete absence of empathy. She's not thinking about Everson as a human being who died in her home. She's not thinking about his children as people who might worry about their father. she's thinking about herself and logistics, specifically how she can maintain this illusion long enough to keep the money flowing. Impersonating someone after death is one of the most invasive forms of psychological violation. It tells us she's not only needing control, she needed continued control, even after Everson was gone.

And that level of detachment is exactly what made her capable of escalating in the way she ultimately did. As far as Dorothea was concerned, her new scheme worked flawlessly. There was just one problem she would have to get rid of Everson's body, and soon, because an odor was forming in her bedroom. A couple of weeks after killing Everson, Dorothea contacted a handyman she knew named Ismail Flores and asked him to build a pine box for her. In exchange, she told Ismail he could have Everson's red pickup truck that he no longer wanted.

Ismail agreed and went to Dorothea's boarding house to help her, but if the handyman was suspicious, he kept his thoughts to himself. He built the box, Everson's body was placed inside, then they hauled it into the truck and drove onto the highway. However, as they passed a river, Dorothea suddenly asked Ismail to pull over. They dumped the box onto the embankment, and once again, Ismail didn't ask any questions. When they got back to the house, she not only let Ismail. His smile drive away in the truck, but she also handed him a wad of cash. His smile understood that this was hush money. Dorothea felt like a true criminal mastermind,

and now that she'd perfected her methods, she'd used them again and again. After 19 years, they're back. Frankie Munis, Brian Cranston, and the rest of the family reunite in Malcolm in the middle, life's still unfair. After 10 years avoiding them, Hal and lowest demand Malcolm be at their anniversary party, pulling him straight back into their chaos. Malcolm in the middle, life's still unfair.

A special four-part event. Stream now on Hulu on Disney Plus. In late 1985, 56-year-old Dorothea Puente killed her lover, Everson Gilmuth, in order to steal his pension and life savings. With the help of a local handyman, Dorothea disposed of Everson's body in a river. Now, she believed she'd found the perfect method for getting away with murder. But what Dorothea didn't know was that in early 1986, a fisherman discovered Everson's remains. However, they weren't identifiable, so he was buried in a pauper's grave.

Meanwhile, Dorothea continued to bring in new tenants to her boarding house. Just like she'd always done, she earned their trust by providing them with hot meals and a clean, warm, welcoming home. home. Then she gained access to their pensions, social security checks, and disability benefits. Whenever Dorothea went to the bank to deposit her tenant's checks for them, she siphoned some of the money into her own account. At this point, her income was about $5,000 a month. That's about $14,500 today. But she wanted even more, and she knew she could make it happen. She just had to make sure to keep a steady rotation of tenants. Dorea also pretended to be much older than she was.

She wore large framed glasses and colored her hair white so that she'd appear elderly. This helped her trick people into thinking she was frail and harmless. Dorothea's mind games didn't end there. She also started encouraging some of her tenants to go out and enjoy local bars. She chose people who she knew had struggled with alcohol addiction in the past, and she even gave them cash. Then, after a couple hours when Dorothea, figured they were nice and liquored up, she'd call the police and report a drunk in public,

which they'd be arrested for. They'd usually end up behind bars for 30 days, which was enough time for Dorothea to move someone else into their room and kill them before the original tenant came back. So it's incredibly hypocritical when you look at how much admiration she received, even from social workers, who knew she was breaking the rules. On one hand, I understand why they praised her. Resources for vulnerable populations are scarce, and someone opening their home can appear heroic,

but also it's useful for them. But that praise gets dangerous when the person providing the help is also violating the law. Once someone is willing to cross legal and ethical boundaries for a good cause, you have to ask, where does that boundary stop? They should have asked those questions of Dorothea, but instead of doing that,

they looked at her like she looked at her victims. They saw her usefulness only and filtered out the rest. And that's exactly why her tactics worked. Dorothea weaponized that contradiction. The image of the benevolent caregiver paired with the reality of predatory behavior. Psychologically, this tells us who she really is. She's someone who is a skilled manipulator and a chameleon, even to the professionals who should be able to see that. That is just utterly cold-hearted. Do you think she views life as a game of survival of the fittest, and so she doesn't feel any kind of sympathy toward others? I think sadly, this is a predictable outcome of a lifetime shaped by danger and deprivation, emotional disconnection, and her personality structure. People who

grow up in environments like her sometimes learn to view the world through a stark binary lens, like, I survive or I don't. And Dorotheo learned early that people were either sources of threat, or sources of utility, and there was no middle ground. So by the time she was running her boarding home, she wasn't seeing human beings. She was scanning for the needs that she could exploit, vulnerability she could capitalize on, and opportunities to maintain absolute control.

Over time, that mindset didn't just, like, harden. It became pathological. Empathy was never something she learned or internalized. Now, to be clear, there are a lot of people who grew up in very scarce environments, who don't, you know, turn out to exploit other people or become the Dorothea's of the world. But Dorothea's pathology is very different.

And that is what's really taking center place right now. Dorothya's tactics only got more diabolical from there. She used former residents' IDs, including Ruth Monroe's, to fill prescriptions for sleeping pills, which she used to drug and kill her victims. Then she rolled their dead bodies up in plastic tarps that she'd placed underneath their bedsheets. Usually, before killing someone, she isolated them from everyone else first. She'd keep people restrained in their bedrooms and tell the others they'd fallen ill.

That way, Dorothea thought no one would be surprised when the person passed away. If other tenants or even the neighbors ever asked about someone who'd gone missing, Dorothea would make up excuses. Sometimes she said they'd moved to another city or that she had to move them into a hospital, At the same time, she knew she couldn't keep hiring people to help her move bodies. Ismail had seemed to know something nefarious was going on, so if she continued to enlist others, it would only be a matter of time before someone notified the authorities. So Dorotheo worked alone.

When the other tenants weren't around or they were sleeping, she dragged her victim's bodies out into the backyard and buried them in the garden. Then she covered their shallow graves with flower pots or even planted new trees. Her home looked immaculate and well cared for. She didn't think anyone would suspect a thing. Again, she weaponizes domesticity and uses biases to her advantage. She knew society would actively trust someone who presented a sweet, kind, harmless, elderly woman, and she capitalized off that.

But at the same time, which is also really disturbing, she used these same. same symbols of care like the garden, flower pots, and trees to hide the bodies of her victims. She just seamlessly blended two very oppositional worlds and turned it into her strategy. What is it about our biases that makes it harder to spot red flags? So there's a couple of things. There's something called the representative heuristic. That's when we judge someone based on how well they match our internal template of a, quote, good person. Most of us are taught to see a maternal woman who, for example, keeps a tidy home,

tends a garden, bakes cookies, and cares for vulnerable people as safe and trustworthy. We are also influenced by a confirmation bias. Once we decide someone is kind or trustworthy, we unconsciously filter out information that contradicts it. Any small red flag gets reframed as a misunderstanding or some kind of like quirk or someone else's problem. Social workers did this. neighbors did this, even the tenants did this. There's also the halo effect. When a person appears more and helpful in one domain,

we assume goodness and generalize that to all other domains. Dorothea presented herself as altruistic, so people extended that trait to everything she did. Put all those biases together, and you get a psychological blind spot, big enough for someone like her to operate in plain sight, undetected for as long as she did. And when a predator looks nothing like our mental image of a predator,

were less likely to notice warning signs, even when they're right in front of us. Dorothy's role as caregiver was her greatest disguise, so great that she not only duped everyone, but she also came to believe it herself. She monitored tenants closely to make sure they were taking their medications, prepared home-cooked meals, and made sure everyone's laundry was pressed and their rooms were tidy. By 1987, when Dorothea was 58 years old, no one had any idea that she'd killed about six people. Everything was going smoothly for her until one of her tenants, 77-year-old Betty Palmer started to give her trouble.

Betty started openly questioning why Dorothea was cashing everyone's checks for them. She even told her bank not to let anyone else cash her checks, which meant Dorothea no longer had access to Betty's money. And without her money, Dorothea had no use for Betty. so she used her usual methods to take Betty's life. However, Dorothea took extra measures when it came to burying her. Dorothea contacted a man who went by the name Chief, who she occasionally hired for odd jobs.

He was big and strong, the perfect person for the manual labor she needed done, and he was also an unhoused ex-convict who likely wouldn't go to the police. She brought him up to Betty's room, where her body was, and asked Chief, to dismember her. Chief did, as Dorothea asked. Then they buried Betty's remains in the backyard,

and that apparently wasn't the end of Dorothea's plan because soon after, Chief went missing. And since he was a bit of a drifter, there were no official records of him, which meant the authorities had no way to find him. I think this moment marks a major escalation for Dorothea. It's the first time that she's enlisted someone in a way that couldn't be,

concealed or reframed. There was no handyman unknowingly hauling a seal box. There's no, like, ambiguous odd job. This was explicit. Chief saw exactly what she was doing. And because Dorothea's worldview was entirely transactional, both Betty and Chief had reached the end of their usefulness to her. So at that point, they aren't human beings to her anymore. They were liabilities. Anyone who could question her, expose her, or simply knew too much. became a threat to her survival and her control. And threats were meant to be eliminated. So for Dorothea, control, again, was the only form of safety that she ever believed in and the only thing she placed her trust in. So when someone compromised her control, she responded the only way her

psychology allowed, and that's by removing them entirely. Does Chief's potential murder suggest that Dorothea, probably paranoid. And if so, has she gotten in over her head? Or does she think her actions are maybe justified, even if they are punishable by law? So it absolutely suggests she's paranoid, but I don't think it's necessarily in a clinical delusional sense, but rather one that's rooted in hypervigilance in a lifetime of believing that the only safe person is herself. So in that sense, it's functional paranoia, the kind that reinforces her belief that she's smart enough, careful enough, and justified enough to keep going. Has she gotten in over her head?

From the outside, looking in, absolutely. She's juggling fraud, multiple victims, forged letters, a backyard full of victims, people starting questioning her. It's a house of cards, but from her perspective, she's maintaining control. She believes her actions are justified because the rules she's following aren't legal rules. They're her rules in her society that she's living in, that she's constructed, and that she's the authority.

authority over. At the end of the day, Dorothea's desire for control overpowered everything else. The fewer people who knew what she was up to, the more in control she felt. But what she didn't realize was that there were people out there who were more determined than she was to protect the city's at-risk populations. And soon, they'd beat Dorothea at her own game. Uh, where are my gloves? Come on, heat.

Any day now? Winter is hard, but your groceries don't have to be. This winter, stay warm. Tap the banner to order your groceries online at voila.ca. Enjoy in-store prices without leaving your home. You'll find the same regular prices online as in-store. Many promotions are available both in-store and online, though some may vary. When a birthday party in suburban San Jose turns deadly,

18-year-old identical twins are arrested for suspected murder. One of them spends nearly two years in jail before the truth comes out. Authorities locked up the wrong twin. How could one brother let his twin take the fall? And why would the other give up his freedom for a crime he didn't commit? Blood will tell is a modern-day Shakespearean saga about what we're willing to sacrifice for the people we love, and whether our most tragic mistakes

are worthy of redemption. Listen to Blood Will Tell, a new series from Audible and Campside Media, wherever you get your podcasts. By 1987, 58-year-old Dorothea Puente had killed about seven people, maybe even more. She'd buried most of her victims in the backyard garden of her boarding house,

where she still cared for elderly and disabled tenants. Then in 1988, Dorothea met the tenant who would change her life forever. That year, a social worker named Judy Moise was looking for a new home for her client, 52-year-old Alvaro Montoya, who went by the nickname Bert. Bert suffered from schizophrenia. He sometimes heard voices, and on top of that, he mostly spoke Spanish, which made it harder for him to find stable, long-term care, until Judy found Dorothea. Judy felt extremely protective of Bert, and Dorothea was one of the only people she trusted to care for him.

When they met, Dorothea instantly agreed to take Bert in. She told Judy that he reminded her of herself when she was young, struggling to learn English and integrate. This, of course, was a complete fabrication. But like everyone else in Sacramento at the time, Judy was familiar with Dorothea's story and believed it. Dorothea took Bert to get a haircut, bought him new clothes, and cooked up warm, nutritious meals for him. She also helped him develop a sense of routine by giving him some simple household chores.

He even dug a hole in the backyard for a peach tree Dorothea was going to plant there. Slowly, Bert started speaking to other people more, both in Spanish and English. When Judy came to check on him and saw the progress he was making, she was overjoyed. Judy had no idea that Dorothea had also taken Bert to the Social Security office and listed herself as his cousin in order to receive his government checks. And after Judy left, Dorothea thought she was gone for good. So she started dosing Bert's food with sleeping pills. Unlike the tenants before him, Bert quickly realized that something was wrong and he tried

to tell someone. One day, Bert visited another care facility where he used to live. Dorothea accompanied him. When Bert got a moment alone with one of the nurses, he told her that Dorothea had been giving him medicine that was making him feel sick. Dorothea overheard what he was saying and immediately interjected. She told Bert that if he wasn't happy, he could stay at that facility and sleep among rows of people on cots. apologized profusely, and Dorothea let him go back to the boarding house with her.

Dorothea knew exactly where to hit him, right in the center of his lived experience. Bert knew what institutional living felt like. And she weaponized that instantly. She hid him where it hurts because she knew it would, on a personal level. It taps into his shame, his fear of abandonment, and his desire for stability. And just like that, the power dynamic snapped back into place. Dorothea was conditioning him. She reminded him that she controlled not just as present, but also his options, and that any attempt to seek help could result in a return to a life he wanted to avoid. This is coercion rooted in intimate knowledge of a person's history. It's not impulsive. It's strategic. And it shows how expertly she exploited the very

vulnerabilities that made her tenants trust her in the first place. And it's more disturbing, when you consider that Dorothea herself knows what it's like, not to be cared for, to fend for yourself, to live on cots, and be dependent on others for your next meal. So thinking back to Betty, how would someone like Dorothea feel after they realize that someone they have power over is trying to undermine them? So someone like Dorothea would experience that as a direct threat to her survival. It makes her feel exposed and betrayed, which are two emotions that instantly heighten her hypervigilance. So when she's fearful, she becomes tactical because in her worldview, losing control of one person can feel like losing control of everything, her whole operation.

That's the point where she converts fear into justification for elimination, which in this case is murder. It's also important to consider the entitlement that's driving her because she provides care, even if it's purely performative. She likely believes she's owed some kind of blind loyalty and unquestioned gratitude as a result. So anytime someone challenges her, she isn't just threatened. She gets enraged. In her mind, undermining her authority is a violation, and that's something that she needs to correct. The situation with the nurse had set Dorothea off. She couldn't accept Bert trying to criticize her like that again. So that evening, back at the house, Dorothea poisoned Bert with enough pills to kill him.

She kept his body in her bedroom overnight, and the next morning, the peach tree that Bert had dug the hole for arrived. Dorothea buried Bert's body in the hole and planted the tree on top. Then in front of the other tenants, she pretended to be inconsolable after learning that Bert had left in the middle of the night to go live with his sister without saying goodbye. However, over the next few months, Dorothea told Judy, as well as another social worker, Peggy Nickerson,

inconsistent stories about where Bert was. Sometimes she said he was visiting family in Utah, other times Mexico. But Judy and Peggy knew that Bert didn't have any family in Mexico. Continuing to build her web of lies, Dorothea then said that Bert wanted to stay with his sister and her husband and live with them permanently in Utah. She was racking her brain for ways to keep them off this case. Despite Dorothea's efforts, Peggy then insisted that she needed

to talk to Bert's family. In response, Dorothea called in a favor with yet another former convict she was acquainted with. She asked the man to pretend to be a member of Bert's family when Peggy called. He agreed, and Dorothea gave Peggy the man's phone number. Still, the call only raised more questions. Peggy had a hunch something was wrong when she heard the man on the line. First, the man referred to Alvaro as Bert, but he had no reason to call him by his relatively new nickname, To make matters worse, the man used his own name instead of the one Dorothea told him to give. Now Peggy was fed up with Dorothea's games. She tapped into her network and quickly identified the man on the call as one of Dorothea's ex-con associates.

Peggy was left with no other option than to call the police. Detective John Cabrera answered her call. He'd just solved a serial killer case in Sacramento, and when he arrived at Dorothea's boarding home on F Street, he found a cheerful scene with smiles, music, and food. Dorothea let Detective Cabrera look around and even interview each resident in private. During his conversations with them, they all said the same thing. They didn't know anything about Bert, and everything at the home was fine. Just as Detective Cabrera was getting ready to wrap up this investigation, one of the tenants

approached him and shook his hand goodbye. In that moment, Cabrera noticed that the man had slipped him a note. He waited until he was in his car to read it. When he did, it read, quote, She is making us lie for her. Now Cabrera knew something was wrong. So the very next morning, on November 11, 1988, he returned to the boarding home. This time, he brought back up with him.

He hoped Dorothea would let him and his colleagues look around, despite them not having a search warrant. And she did. Inside the house, Cabrera and his colleagues found a few suspicious objects, including drug reference books with notes on pages that discussed sedatives, and a prescription bottle for Dorothy Miller, which Dorothea offered an excuse for, but Cabrera still found it strange, not to mention he noticed a foul odor in Dorothea's bedroom, but he couldn't place it. So instead, he took it. turned his attention to the garden. Cabrera and his team started digging, and when they realized they were short one shovel, Dorothea let them borrow one of hers. I think her decision to let

officers in her home or even give them a shovel to dig up her yard is her once again performing. I think she was betting that this performance of cooperation would override suspicion. There's also an element of psychological misdirection. When someone invites you to search the very place that you should be suspicious of, it can be disarming. Like, surely she wouldn't let us dig if she had anything to hide. But frankly, there's a degree of denial or naivete woven in as well. This was her domain, a world she had engineered and managed without interference, and I believe that led her to miscalculate the risk of this and overestimate her cleverness. It's as if she believed she could manage the investigators the same way she managed all of her tenants and everyone else.

If Dorothea was panicked at all, she didn't show it. She stood calmly and looked on as the officers started with what seemed to be the newest patch of turned soil. They dug around and found some pieces of cloth and plastic. Then they pulled on something that seemed to be a root, but it wouldn't relent. They kept digging around it until they could finally tug it free. And that's when they saw what it really was, a human shin bone. When the officers looked back at the hole they'd just dug, they also spotted a shoe with a severed foot inside of it.

The policeman froze. They turned to face Dorothea, who wore a look of shock and horror. However, Detective Cabrera wasn't immediately suspicious. He'd seen dead bodies before, and he could tell these remains had been here much longer than, Bert had been missing. Cabrera knew something terrible had happened here, but he still didn't think Dorothea was guilty of anything. So he told his team to pack up and made plans to return the next day with a full forensic team. This allowed him to obtain a full search warrant of the

property in the meantime. When they returned the next day, Dorothea welcomed them onto her property again, but instead of lingering in the backyard, she went upstairs to her bedroom. As she went Watched them from her window, reality started to dawn on her. They were going to find the bodies, some of which may still be recognizable. She had to get out of there. Dorothea stuffed $4,000 in cash into her purse and walked out to the garden. She asked Detective Cabrera if she was under arrest, and he reassured her she wasn't. Then she asked him if she could go to a nearby hotel to grab a cup of coffee to calm her nerves.

Cabrera offered to drive her himself. When he dropped her off, he told her to call him when she was ready to be picked up. Dorothea thanked him, and as soon as he drove away, she booked it to the airport. She bought a ticket to Los Angeles, but she knew that detectives would discover this, so instead of getting on the plane, Dorothea took a bus to L.A. instead. No one had any idea she was on the run, and over the course of the next several hours, investigators dug up seven more bodies in her backyard. One of the bodies, which belonged to a woman,

was wearing a wristwatch that was still ticking. Unlike a lot of the other remains, the detectives realized that she hadn't been dead for very long. In fact, she seemed to have died during the time that Dorothea lived at the house. Detective Cabrera realized he'd made a huge mistake by letting Dorothea go. He immediately launched a search for her, and enlisted the help of the FBI. Meanwhile, Dorothea had arrived in L.A.

and her first stop was a bar where she sought out a man she could potentially rob. She ended up meeting a man named Charles and they made plans to see each other again in a few days. However, their meeting would never happen because after that night at the bar, the next time Charles saw Dorothea was when her face was plastered across the news.

Charles alerted the police and soon, officers and reporters had Dorothea surrounded at her hotel. Once she was in handcuffs, Dorothya quickly admitted to stealing from her tenants, but she denied killing anyone. Dorothea is a master at rewriting her story and herself. It started as survival as we outlined from her childhood, but it transitioned into manipulation and a sense of power and identity. If you recall, she also would get deeply upset whenever her boyfriend,

past was mentioned. So she has this enduring pattern of detachment from that part of her life. So it's deeply ingrained. And because of that, it's not surprising that she's unable to own up to the worst of her actions. That would require confronting the darkest, most irreconcilable truth about who she really is. So instead, she retreats to the part of the narrative that still allows her to preserve some dignity. Thief is a survivable offense, and at the same time committing theft could be framed as survival itself. It also fits with her curated persona, someone who is resourceful or even misunderstood, but you can't spin murder, especially multiple. Do you think Dorothy is admitting to some things to make it seem like she's owning up like a way to try and face later consequences?

or is she unwilling to admit that she's becoming just as bad of a person as those who once hurt her, if not worse? So it's not uncommon for offenders like Dorothea to admit to partial truths. In fact, partial admission is a classic strategy among individuals with antisocial traits. It allows them to appear cooperative without actually surrendering control of the narrative. By confessing to a lesser offense like theft, Dorothea signals just enough compliance to seem reasonable while still distancing herself from the more damning accusations. So in that sense, it most certainly is a strategy to mitigate consequences. But as I mentioned, there's really a deeper layer here, too,

with regard to outrunning the truth of who she really is and how, like, to the core, how she is potentially just as bad or worse than the people who harmed her. Dorothy's lies had brought her this far. it was the end of the road. She was initially charged with one count of murder. However, investigators soon identified all seven bodies. The victims were Alvaro, Bert Montoya, Betty Palmer, and Ruth Monroe, as well as Benjamin Fink, Dorothy Miller, Leona Carpenter, Vera Faye Martin, and James Gallup. In addition, Everson Gilmuth's body was soon identified. This brought Dorothy as murder charges up to

nine counts. Now, Ruth's family finally learned the truth about her death, and Judy and Peggy learned the truth of what happened to Bert. And while all the families now had closure for their missing loved ones, the reality was nonetheless devastating. All of Dorothea's victims had entered her home in search of peace and stability. Instead, they were robbed and murdered. After a series of delays, Dorothea's trial began on February 9, 1993, when she was 64 years old. The proceedings ended up being the longest trial in California history at the time. The prosecution had decided to drop the fraud charges against her because they didn't want to confuse the jury, so they focused exclusively on the murder charges.

However, there were still more than 150 witnesses and thousands of pages of documents to present to the court. Dorothea's lawyers tried to rely on character witnesses who reiterated the goodwill Dorothea had built in the community and the number of people she had helped. The jury ultimately deadlocked on most counts, but convicted Dorothea on three. For much of the jury, the circumstantial evidence and the heavily decomposed remains made them hesitant to draw certain conclusions. However, they felt certain about three victims.

They found Dorothea guilty of first-degree murder for two of two of the same-degree murder for two of her tenants, Dorothy Miller and Ben Fink, because the planning and profit were clearly evident. Then they concluded she committed second-degree murder for Leona Carpenter. They all agreed Dorothea killed her, but they couldn't prove she'd planned it beforehand. In the end, Dorothea was sentenced to life without parole. In the women's prison at Chowchilla, California, Dorothea would continue to claim her innocence. She was a bit of a celebrity, and she relished in the attention and notoriety. Finally, on March 27th, 2011, at the age of 82, Dorothea Puente died of natural causes. Of all the things she ever claimed to be, Dorothea never owned up to becoming the monster

that she was. Thanks so much for listening. We'll be back next time for a deep dive into the mind of another killer. Killer Minds is a crimehouse original powered by Pave Studios. Here at Crimehouse, we want to thank each and every one of you for your support. If you like what you heard today, reach out on all social media at Crime House. And don't forget to rate, review, and follow Killer Minds wherever you get your podcasts. Your feedback truly makes a difference. And to enhance your listening experience, subscribe to Crimehouse Plus on Apple Podcasts. You'll get every episode of Killer Minds ad-free, along with early access to each thrilling two-part series.

Killer Minds is hosted by me, Vanessa Richardson, and Dr. Tristan Engels, and is a crime house original powered by Pave Studios. This episode was brought to life by the Killer Minds team. Max Cutler, Ron Shapiro, Alex Benadon, Lori Marinelli, Natalie Pritzowski, Sarah Kamp, Sarah Batchelor, Inez Renique, Sarah Tardiff, and Carrie Murphy. Thank you for listening. Thanks for listening to today's episode. Not sure what to listen to next?

Check out America's most infamous crimes hosted by Katie Ring. From serial killers to unsolved mysteries and game-changing investigations, each week Katie takes on a notorious criminal case in American history. Listen to and follow America's most infamous crimes now wherever you listen to podcasts.