Moonshots with Peter Diamandis - AI Investor Panel: How Will We Fund the Global AI Revolution? | EP 219

Episode Date: January 2, 2026

Get access to metatrends 10+ years before anyone else - https://qr.diamandis.com/metatrends   Anjney Midha is a General Partner of a16z (Andreessen Horowitz), leading AI and infrastructure transactions. Bonnie Chan is the CEO at Hong Kong Exchanges or HKEX. Dave Blundin is the founder & GP of Link Ventures _ Connect with Peter: X Instagram Connect with Dave: X LinkedIn Connect with Anjney X Linkedin Connect with Bonnie Linkedin Listen to MOONSHOTS: Apple YouTube – *Recorded on October, 2025 *The views expressed by me and all guests are personal opinions and do not constitute Financial, Medical, or Legal advice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

How will we fund the global AI revolution? All the rules are being rewritten about how you fund growth because we just need all the capital we can get. What is the main thing? It is AI. Where does the next invidia-style growth come from? The compute has gotten so expensive. They're going to dedicate massive amounts of capital to this space. I'm the old-fashioned stock exchange. I think our common challenge will be to...

to make sure that we find as many ways as possible that we match the capital with the opportunities. The amount of capital going into the sector way outstrips the venture funds. That trend is now drawing in a huge amount of money, which is why we're talking about it on this stage in Saudi Arabia. The untapped but mobile capital is here in this room, and if it jumps on the opportunity, it's like an opportunity I've never seen before. Now that's the moonshot, ladies and gentlemen. All right, welcome everybody to our AI mini-summit, brought to you by Link Exponential Ventures.

It's a pleasure to have you. We're going to be having a series of 30-minute conversations that look at AI investing, where the next trillion-dollar companies are coming from. We'll be having a session of our Moonshot Summit. And I'd like to open with our first session, which is how will we fund the global AI revolution? To enable this conversation, it's a pleasure to bring on stage three leaders in this field. David Blundon, David is my business partner. He's a serial entrepreneur.

He is the managing partner of Link Exponential Ventures with 23 startups under his belt, a long track record of a 44% IRR, a little over a billion dollars AUM, based on the campus of MIT and Harvard. David Blundon, please come on up. Take a seat here. Thank you, David. Next up is Bonnie Chan, CEO of the Hong Kong Exchange and Clearing H-K-E-X since March of 2024, bringing over 30 years of global capital.

markets, legal and listening transformation experiences. Bonnie, please join us. And finally on our panel this morning is Anjanae Mita, partner at Andresen Harwitz, A16Z, investing in frontier AI open source infrastructure, the man who's backed Anthropic on the board of Mistral. Please welcome to the stage, Anjene Mehta. So how will we fund the global AI revolution, guys?

So I mean, when I think about it, we are seeing today, at least in the United States, a billion dollars deployed per day into AI. The expectations are we're going to see that growing to $3 billion a day by 2030, and I expect it's going to blow through that. In fact, I'm seeing capital flowing to the exclusion of a lot of other things. Let's open with opening thoughts around that. Anjene, I mean, you're at one of the largest venture funds on the planet. What percentage of A16Z is flowing towards AI?

And what are your thoughts about the capital availability to fund this you know, infrastructure, you know, what we call on the Moonshots podcast, tiling the Earth and compute. Right. How much capital is flowing into AI? Basically, all of it, and it's still not enough. Because, you know, the firm was founded to be a verticalized firm.

We have an infrastructure fund, an applications fund, a healthcare fund, and all of those are now AI funds, right? Because AI is a cross-stack thing, whether you're working with teams that were training foundation models or building applications, I don't think anybody is not an AI investor anymore. On the other hand, what's also insatiable

is the need for AI businesses, especially ones that generate tokens that leverage the latest generation and reasoning models, which generate 10 times more tokens than traditional gen AI models before reasoning. We're living through like Javan's paradox every day where no matter how much infrastructure build out we do, no matter how many, you know,

algorithmic efficiencies they are, we somehow just need more compute, more infrastructure to serve the state-of-the-art demand in text, code, image, video. It's just sort of this insatiable explosion of use cases. And I just don't think we've figured out how to change the traditional venture capital stack to fund all this growth. And that's why you're seeing, you know, we try to fund entrepreneurs as much as we can, but then we've got to pull in all the friends we can, whether that's Nvidia as a strategic who invests on the cap tables directly alongside.

us, it might be a data center provider. There's just, you know, whether it's Satya doing a billion dollar investment into Open AI as a nonprofit four years ago, or it's Amazon and Google investing in Anthropic, there's just all the rules are being rewritten about how you fund growth because we just need all the capital we can get.

Bonnie, when I see an offering being made by Elon for XAI or by Anthropic or by Open AI, instantly it's filled. I mean, people are full. fighting to get into these deals. And no one's asking, is the valuation, is the deal going to make sense? They're just throwing capital at this. How are you seeing it from your perspective?

Well, first of all, I do agree with the comment that Anjay made, which is the insatiable demand, right? I mean, just everyone wants to pour money into it. But I must say, Peter, it's very interesting how you put together this panel. Because, you know, as I see it, I'm sort of, you know, stuck in the middle of these two gentlemen. represent the private side, shall we say, the VCPE community, I'm the old-fashioned stock exchange. I do public offering. I do IPOs. And so, you know, how are we going to fund it? I think there are many different ways. But suffice to say, you know, given that, you know,

Hong Kong stock exchange, obviously we're in Asia. And I would say, given the demographics, there is an emergence of a lot of, well, a big, population of retail investors. We tend to now call them pro-tale investors with technology. Now everyone have their own trading theories and strategies and whatnot, and they can execute in a rather sophisticated manner. So I must say that, you know, from my vantage point, I still think whatever ways is available which can bring as many different pockets of demand, right, from different investors at all corners of the world, will probably be a good way to support the development of AI on the one hand and really quest that

insatiable demand on the other hand. So to put things in context, we've done quite well this year in the IPO space. In fact, Hong Kong is now number one on the global IPO league table this year. We have we have 300, 300 deals in the pipeline waiting to get done. We have already done about 80 year to date and I would say of the 80 which has been completed and the 300 which is still waiting in line about probably half of it has something to do with AI now there are a different manifestation but I would say especially with the companies and the Chinese mainland these days if you are not already doing something with AI or being you know at the very center of the AI development, you're probably quite unable to compete and be successful in

your business. So this is sort of my answer to your question. I think really just given how much capital is needed to support the growth, whether it's private, whether it's public, whether it's credit, whether it's equity, does not matter. I think our common challenge will be to make sure that we find as many ways as possible that we match the capital with the opportunities. David, at Link, you're seeing and investing in companies as the first check. Yep.

Companies born out of MIT, out of the, you know, Seale, Computer Science, AI Lab, and out of Harvard. What are you seeing as the growth of companies going into AI that is feeding the pipeline at the early stage? Well, I'll tell you, there's a reason Bonnie's on this panel, and sandwiched between the startup guys because the amount of capital required coming into these companies,

like you said, $3 billion a day coming up. US venture is $200 billion a year. So it's not even close. Five times more money needs to come from somewhere. And so as Ange said, some of it comes from Nvidia, some of it comes from corporate venture. But these companies like Mercor, one of the ones in our portfolio, valuations

went founding 30 million, 300 million, 2 billion, 10 billion. In what time? Two years. Two years. So, first of all, the $10 billion number is unprecedented in eight or ten years. And what used to be incredibly rare is now incredibly abundant. But the amount of capital going into the sector way outstrips the venture funds. And so what we generally see is the corporate money, the invidia money, comes in to fill the void. But the people working there, Ange types, they say, well, this is really fun. made that anthropic investment,

but I'm gonna go do my own fund. So the talent tends to eventually come out of the corporations and go into the two and 20 private sector to fill the space. So I think that that trend is now drawing in a huge amount of money, which is why we're talking about it on this stage in Saudi Arabia. The untapped but mobile capital is here in this room,

and if it jumps on the opportunity, it's like an opportunity I've never seen before. Can we talk about the two sides of AI? One is the build out of AI infrastructure, right? And the other is AI applications and the build-out of those applications. Where do you see the capital split between those and the attractiveness to venture funds or public markets for those two things? Ange? It's a really interesting question because the last few years, basically three, four years were dominated by the infrastructure build-out, right? So

most of the capital that was going into startups was being converted directly. to GPUs. What's interesting now is you have a whole category of super exciting application businesses, you know, we got Amjad right here, building one, right, in the coding space. And to build application businesses like that, you're not, sometimes you need GPUs,

but other times you need tokens from other foundation models. That's now a raw ingredient as well. So the capital stack was just raw cash. Then came, you'd convert raw cash to GPUs. And then the foundation model teams converted the GPUs to tokens. And that's an input now into application developers.

Which is, if you think about it, way more of a scarce resource, high quality tokens from foundation models, is a much more scarce resource than raw GPUs. And GPUs are much more scarce commodity than raw cash. And so that's the preft stack, I would say, of compute. Do you see the demand for infrastructure build out continuing and accelerating or topping out?

accelerating and not accelerating fast enough because now the fundamental constraint is energy. We literally just don't have enough power density in most of the legacy data centers in most regions of the world. And you've gotta go retool these data centers for GPUs. If you look at the new blackwells from NVIDIA, you know, all the research scientists I talk to

are really excited because it's got the NVL 72 networking stack, which means you can do a bunch of great big memory intensive training runs like video models. And then you get down to the brass stacks of when can that data center actually go live, when can we get it cabled, when can we get the energy permits, and that's way after when the chips can actually get there.

And so the infraspan, the infrared needs are largely driven by demand forecasting. As we discussed earlier, demand is completely uncapped. And meanwhile, the compute supply chain is caught up, but the energy constraint hasn't. The energy supply hasn't. And so what we're living through right now is this frenzy for energy contracts

where compute providers are trying to outbid each other to buy literally just energy supply. So depending on which part of the infrastack you're talking about, I don't see things slowing down from a funding perspective. Like the CAPEX going into this, into infra, is not slowing down. But what we may be faced with a hard wall on is just energy scaling. We just don't have enough electricity to power the chips.

Bonnie, what are you seeing in the public market? in terms of energy, data center build-out, chip build-out, application companies? Well, it is all of the above, right? But I do want to make a slightly more nuanced point. I think at the moment the money that has been put into AI, the $2 billion a day, a lot of it is probably put into these different opportunities on the premise that there is. a promise, that somehow it's going to translate into things which are much easier to evaluate,

right? So at the moment, people just want a piece of AI. They don't care whether it's infrastructure, applications, energy, does not matter. But eventually, I think as the journey continues, I see a point where people will start to be a little more focused in terms of how we put a value on all these different opportunities. So from my vantage point, for example, And I think you raise a very interesting point. The energy bit is a million dollar, multi-billion dollar question. Because without that, you really cannot go that far.

And therefore, if I look at my pipeline, for example, I think China, as a lot of you know, has been quite advanced in terms of coming out with new energy solution. And it's not only generating that new energy, is storing. And, you know, I mean, China's a massive country, right? So how do you make sure that, you know,

you have all the grits talking to one another, and then you can generate, you know, with the western and the northwestern part of China, abundance of sunshine, wind, and everything, right? You have the geographic or geological conditions to help generate that green energy. How do you make sure that you can disperse that, right, into data centers, again, at every corner of the country

so that, you know, you can support all the data center, the infrastructure, and all that. Now, with that as the building block, you therefore can proceed to the next level and talk about the compute, the applications and all that. Again, I would say that China has an advantage because it is still a very big

and dominant manufacturing hub. And with that, it's actually quite easy to think about possible applications and how you embed AI into production processes. I would also say that where I'm seeing a lot of activity is really the data intention So just to cite an example, we are now beginning to see a lot of companies, you know, in the drug discovery,

business for example, right, embedding AI, which is, as you could imagine, right, the traditional way of drug discovery, you have to go through clinical trials, you have to select samples, and, you know, and all of that is data and intensive, but if you can speed it up, right, with AI, you can imagine you are going to, you are going to, accelerate the pace of drug discovery so much. You have a friend of mine going public on your exchange in silica medicine in the next... I'm not allowed to comment on any specific... Yeah, well, anyways, but I think you see my point there, right? Any data-intensive business will be a darling, you know, in this regard.

David, you're seeing companies at inception. You're seeing entrepreneurs, brilliant entrepreneurs. I think you've commented that the number of... of startups coming at MIT and Harvard in the AI world is like quadrupled in the last few years. Yeah, more than. What kind of distribution, what are you seeing, where are they going into?

Application layers, compute, what are you seeing as the categories? The companies coming out of MIT and Harvard are overwhelmingly going into vertical use cases and then also some foundation model companies like Liquid AI will be on stage right after this. So there are a few of those, but many, many more vertical use cases. use case companies, and the success rate of those is near 100%.

And so they're attracted to, first, they're not super capital intense. 100%. Well, so far for us, MIT and Harvard teams that fit a profile are 100%. I've never seen anything like it before. And it's because the use cases are so abundant relative to the talent pool. So if you have the talent, and you'd have to be crazy to go after a bad use case right now. You can use AI for so many things.

It's very, very different from critical. which was the last wave, more similar to the internet. The internet is incredibly flexible. It can use it for many, many things. And you saw, you know, when I started investing in the late 1990s, everything you invested in succeeded. Why? Well, because the internet can do almost anything.

And so unless you're insane and going after something really dumb, you're going to succeed. So I haven't seen that again in my lifetime until now, and now it's the same thing, and the value is enormous, and the teams are thriving every single time. but they're really attracted to the vertical use cases because they're not as capital intensive as building out an entire data center.

Now they're, you know, Chase Lockmiller is doing Stargate. So there's one guy who's an exception to that. There's a $500 billion build out. So, but that's relatively rare. Most people go after the use case. And how quickly are you seeing the valuations in those kind of company scale? I mean, it's in like Chase Lockmiller or like.

No, in the companies and they're doing the vertical in the Link Studios. I mean, typical entry valuations or what they've always been, maybe 20, 30 million dollars. First funding will be 100 to 300 million. And then within two years, if you're gonna be a unicorn, you're gonna get there in two years now. Which means the founders now are still 23, 24 years old.

So that's a new thing in the world too. We have a bunch of people that I can name. I think about my entire lifetime of investing can name like three or four people that I knew or invested in that hit billionaire under the age of 30. Now I can name eight that we've invested in in just the last few years.

That's like, there's this new class of person roaming around that barely has a driver's license but has a billion dollars in liquidity. So we have to kind of adapt to that. It used to be a billionaire, being a billionaire was a big deal. Now we're just gonna wait for the trillionaires to start. We're all born in the wrong age. Yeah, yeah.

You know, I wanna understand what you guys consider the biggest risks over the next year. Is it compute cost inflation? Is it talent scarcity? Is it regulatory intervention? We've been on this incredible inflationary and exponentially growing curve on all things AI. Just like used to be ad.com on the end of your company. Now it's like, oh, we use AI.

Anj, what are you seeing as the risks? So on fundamental progress of capabilities, we already talked about the one energy, which I'm concerned about. Double-click on that. So will these companies have access to sufficient electrons to run the data centers? Is it what is the scarce resource in the chain? In the United States, I think that's a direct function of whether the permitting regulations that the current administration is working on end up getting executed on.

So there was a big plan that was introduced, the AI Action Plan about two months ago, which I think was a fantastic start. And if you go sort of line by line through that, it really is a very precise, methodically laid-out document that says, here's what we need to do to unblock progress. And I think if we can operationalize it and execute it, then we should be good. But rarely has that ever happened at scale

without a ton of bureaucracy. And this is my second actually concern, which is without a ton of, I think, civil blowback. Because the reality is putting these massive data centers down, cabling, reallocating parts of our power grid, from other things, results in tough tradeoffs you've got to make as a society. And I just, I wanna respond to the previous point

a little bit where it is true, we are seeing enormous wealth creation amongst this generation, right? Anthropic has gone from a company that was, you know, a couple hundred million in valuation just four years ago to $183 billion in 488 months. But I don't think we should be celebrating

that as much as we kind of are right now because at the end of the day, the public is not participating in that wealth creation. The vast majority of wealth being created by Frontier AI is locked up inside of private capital, like our funds. It's locked up inside a small group of talent that is super mission-oriented, but I don't think we've really figured out what happens

when the rest of the public goes, well, where is my piece of the future? Yes. And I don't think we're ready. I don't think we're talking about it enough. And I don't think governments are doing enough to realize how dire it's about to get when 30% of your IT services GDP sector gets vaporized by tokens.

If you're India, for example, where double-digit percentages of your GDP are literally IT services, what do you do when Claude and GPT-5 tokenize vast portions of that flow? I think we love to talk about productivity growth, and we don't talk about how to manage the short-term transition pains. And that's going to be ugly. So you're adding that to our risk profile civil unrest. Absolutely.

Well, a good example of that too. Just a few months ago when Sam Malman said, hey, I'm going to give everybody in the company a $1 million retention bonus. Everybody. And the intention was for that to be cool. The reaction worldwide was, that's not cool. And so now you're seeing the AI leaders. It comes up on the Moonshots podcast a lot.

The AI leaders are really downplaying the rate of progress because the people that are picketing outside the door at Open AI headquarters are lined up eight deep now. And they're like, look, all this wealth, you guys are all billionaires. What about everybody else out here on the street? They don't need that. And it's, you know, just to put a finer point on that, I know a number of the technology leaders and investors in Silicon Valley

who have been getting death threats. Yeah. And then they lock down their companies. They lock down their homes. And this is before, we're seeing the CPI of electricity going up, but this is before we're seeing the real, layoffs that will occur. Well, so I think this is important.

I think AI is going to get blamed for a lot of layoffs that have nothing to do with AI. A lot of the layoffs we're seeing today from big tech companies are really just people correcting overhiring during the ZERP era of 2010 to 2020. Well, also the print money era of COVID. So the easy money is gone and a number of big tech companies that just thought they could keep

chasing returns by over hiring, which which was a fairly rational thing to do then. In fact, the government was paying you to go higher. Exactly, right? But the incentives have changed. So one, I just want to call on, there will be a lot of boogie manning around AI that has nothing to do with AI.

Agreed. Okay, but once we're through that era, what happens is people are going to start asking, why aren't my, why isn't my pension fund, my sovereign fund, my retirement plan, participating in the AI wealth creation opportunity? And that's why I think to the point of this panel, which is how do we fund the future of AI, we should be asking,

how do you connect the frontier AI growth to public wealth creation? And there's a bunch of institutions whose job it is to steward our wealth. Sovereign funds, pension funds, state funds, why aren't they investing on the cap tables? Why is it family offices? Why is it high net worth individuals?

When we rent out to raise the seed round for Anthropic, I made 22 introductions to them up and down Sand Hill Road. They got 21 nose. So we had to scrape together 100 million bucks, which sounds like a lot of money, which was a lot more money back then. Now actually, to David's point, it may not be that much. But really, that founding ground had to be pieced together from angels

and height net with individuals. And I'm still shocked at how often today, traditional sovereign funds, traditional pension funds are not being aggressive enough in managing the steward, taking their job as a steward of public capital and exposing it to frontier AI wealth creation. It's just not happening fast enough. Dave, do you want to add on the risk side?

Yeah, yeah. I completely agree with what I'm said. And I'll give you another parallel risk, which is that, you know, the core AI companies that do things like customer support, white collar automation, just killing it. I mean, adding immense amounts of value. And the investment community coming in has started to extend that to, oh, tech is a good place. Let me put $200 million into fusion energy. You're like, well, that's not AI.

Well, but it's going to create the electricity about four or five, six years from now to fund it to, so it's related to AI. I'm like, well, okay. But that's very capital intensive. and you're not sure it's going to work. And so I think it will work, and I think it's a good area to invest, but if it doesn't work,

that's where you're going to have this, what happened to the Internet in 2000. The Internet was very real, and if you waited long enough, it came roaring back, but everybody lost confidence in 2001. Why? Because of some really bad peripheral investments.

And now we're seeing that, and I don't want to throw too many things under the bus, but some things like robotics is very capital-intensive, fusion energy is very capital-intensive. it's not the obvious win of AI, it's a peripheral investment. Some of those will be good, some of them are going to consume a ton of money and turn into losses, and that may scare off the entire investment community. And so that would be tragic because if you look at things like,

just if you look at AI voices doing sales and customer support, that's half a trillion dollars of payroll worldwide today. The AI does it better than anyone on the phone already. Like existing tech, we just need to deploy that half trillion. If you invest in that, you cannot go wrong. But if you get sold in investment in something that's kind of like, well, quantum computing also might work,

maybe, maybe it will, maybe it won't, but much more speculative and very, very capital intensive. Please, honey. And I do wanna chime in there. I think, listening to all this, right? I mean, one part of me is saying, I wanna democratize these investment opportunities, right? Let more people partake in the party.

But on the other hand, Right, just given, you know, how the current ecosystem has built out, the valuation, right, has already, you know, hovering somewhere up here. Opening the door for, you know, investors, especially retail guys, to partake in, and the public markets also cause me concern, right? Because, you know, I mean, for all, I know, they could be the last one, right, being handed the, you know, being the last one, at the party before the whole thing collapses. So I think, you know, I would call that as a risk, right? How do we actually find that new equilibrium where these opportunities are not just monopolized by a very small group?

How do we make more sense out of the valuation which we are seeing, which is, again, right, being established by a very small and rather opaque in some instances, price discovery mechanism? But, you know, to your original question about risk, I do see the energy piece as one which is very difficult to solve. Because, I mean, even at my company, right, we're exploring with, you know, what we can do with AI. And we have come up with a few cases, right,

that we were experimenting with. And the next thing you know, I come, you know, the electricity bill arrives and you started scratching your head, right? I thought AI is going to help me with productivity and make things faster, easier, you know, more accessible. Yes, but there's always a cost there, right? So I guess, you know, people just need

So we have a minute left for closing thoughts from each of you, Anjene? I think the answer lies in institutions who represent the public, sovereign funds, wealth funds. You're right, opening up the markets to retail investors who may not understand what's going on. It is not the answer, but I think institutions who represent the public are the answer. And it's our job to educate them and make them more aggressively, I think, take a position in the wealth creation opportunity that's happening. Otherwise, the public will get left behind. Bonnie, closing thoughts on who's going to fund. I will agree with that. I really think everyone in this ecosystem needs to work together to find that new equilibrium.

It shouldn't be wealth creation for a tiny fraction of the world's population, and we need to find the right way to get it done. All right, Dave. I think the most important thing that I heard on this stage today was what Anjais, Anjne Ange, saying the story of how Anthropic got funded. So many people are not getting in the game, and Silicon Valley investors that are, just walking down the street and investing each other are killing it and running away with all the gains because it's just not that hard. You just need to get into the loops, get into the places that are making these investments and get in the game. And then the pro rata rights on that deal alone would have allowed you to invest a follow on of probably what, four or five, ten billion dollars of follow on. But you just had to be there in the game at the outset. Every week, my team and

I study the top 10 technology metatrends that will transform industries over the decade ahead. ranging from humanoid robotics, AGI, and quantum computing to transport, energy, longevity, and more, there's no fluff, only the most important stuff that matters, that impacts our lives, our companies, and our careers. If you want me to share these metatrends with you, I writing a newsletter twice a week, sending it out as a short two-minute read via email. And if you want to discover the most important meta-trends 10 years before anyone else, this reports for you. Readers include founders and CEOs from the world's most disruptive companies and entrepreneurs building the world's most disruptive tech.

It's not for you if you don't want to be informed about what's coming, why it matters, and how you can benefit from it. To subscribe for free, go to Demandis.com slash metatrends to gain access to the trends 10 years before anyone else. All right, now back to this episode.

Thank you.