Moonshots with Peter Diamandis - Open AI's Head of Product on the AI Race, Google & the Reality of AGI w/ Kevin Weil & David Blundin | EP #189

Episode Date: August 21, 2025

Get access to metatrends 10+ years before anyone else - https://qr.diamandis.com/metatrends   Kevin Weil is CPO at OpenAI David Blundin is the founder & GP of Link Ventures – My companies: Reverse the age of your skin using the same cream I use at  https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod Apply to Dave's and my new fund: https://qr.diamandis.com/linkventureslanding  –- Connect with Kevin:  Linkedin  X Connect with Peter: X Instagram Connect with David X LinkedIn  Listen to MOONSHOTS: Apple YouTube – *Recorded on Aug 19th, 2025 *Views are my own thoughts; not Financial, Medical, or Legal Advice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

You're like in the middle of the fastest growing, most rapid-changing thing in human history. We don't always even know what the next model is going to be great at. Kevin Weil, the chief product officer. Leads all of the product functions at OpenAI. Coming off the back of a story career in companies like Twitter and Facebook. I think everybody knows you. For those who don't know me, I'm Kevin Wheel. Do you ever look at what the other products are doing and sort of say,

that's a great idea or let's not go there? Google is competition for us. They're moving very quickly and building good models. So is Anthropics or a bunch of other players. It's motivation for us to also go faster. I do have an important last question. Has Open AI fully reached AGI? And what is Johnny I delivering for you? Oh man, I've been waiting to talk about this since we started. All right, so. Now that's the Moonshot, ladies and gentlemen. Everybody, welcome to Moonshots. I'm here with my. Moonshot mate Dave Blundon, and we're here at OpenAI headquarters in San Francisco. We're about to have a deep session with Kevin Wheel, the chief of act officer of Open

AI. So let's dive in. Welcome to Moonshots. Kevin, congrats for GPT5. That is a huge milestone. You know, as Chief Product Officer, I can't think of a bigger product to be announcing to the world. Yeah.

Yeah, it was, I mean, probably the most anticipated AI launch of all time. It would be the most anticipated product launch, because we've been talking about it for a while. but we're super excited. I mean, we put a lot into it. A lot of the things that actually people might not even think about. Like, we did a lot of work on the health side. So I have a lot of health data because one of the things we see is that people are using chat GPT all the time to ask about health data, whether it's, you know, just this thing happened to my kid, what should I do, all the way to, you know, I just got a cancer diagnosis. Here's a bunch of data. How should I think about this? And it doesn't replace a doctor, but it sure is helpful to be to have this super smart thing

that you can talk to 24-7 that can complement. I love that part of the launch, by the way. Yeah, I know everyone on Twitter has got different opinions of that part. I love that part of the launch. Were you a big part of scripting that whole day or how did that work?

Oh, no, we have an incredible team that puts that together. The GPT-5-1 was fun because we had so much to talk about because it wasn't just health. It's also, it's the smartest model we've ever launched. It is an incredible coding model. It can do a lot of highly

agentic things that you may not see as much in chat GPT but are super valuable for developers building on it you can follow very complex instructions make lots of different tool calls to different services integrate things without losing the plot which has been a real area that the whole industry is like making models better so GPT5 is the best across the board in a whole bunch of areas and we wanted to try and figure out how to show all of these things but we needed a lot longer than our normal, you know, 20-minute live streams. And the simplicity of one product serves all is brilliant. Yeah, there's something cool about models that way, right?

It's like the Google homepage, right, when it was simple search bar. Yeah. That's what allowed it to dominate over Yahoo and everybody else. So that simplicity is amazing. Well, it's also complicated because it's so anticipated. Like you said, probably the most anticipated product launch of all all time. But if you think about an iPhone launch, you know, the features are obvious. AI is so open-ended.

You know, you can do anything on that stage. And so trying to script that and make it relevant for this, you know, really wide audience. It's got to be extra challenging for the team here to figure out how to do that. Well, it's the fun thing about working at Open AI, too, because we don't always even know what the next model is going to be great at. You know, you have some sense. You can kind of see it coming through the mist at you a little bit. But other times, there's something emergent and we're surprised. That's the most interesting thing.

The fact that AI's properties and capabilities are emergent. And, I mean, no one predicted any of this two years ago, little in a year ago. Right. Yeah. So you had, you had to have had, you in particular, got all these comments from the world. Yeah. I mean, like, I was a product to Twitter. I'm used to lots of online. I mean, people are like, like super excited and people are critical. And so how do you, how do you deal with all the feedback? And does that feedback actually tie back into how you iterate? Oh, it totally does. Yeah. Because like I said, these, these models are so powerful, so generic. There's lots of things that, you know, we obviously test internally all over the place and we're testing externally in various ways before we launch.

But then you give it to 700 million people and all of a sudden, you know, they're testing all kinds of new ways. So we listen a lot. People have feedback on Reddit, on Twitter, on LinkedIn, all the ways that you'd expect. We have people coming into our customer support. We have friends who are giving us their feedback. And then you're also just looking at the data, right? the data tells a really good story. We had one of our biggest plus upgrade. Oh my gosh. I saw those. I saw those numbers. Stellar. But, you know, there also, we, we heard the

feedback. I think there are a couple things that we didn't quite get right. One is the model's personality was a little bit wooden. And so we iterated and shipped a fix very quickly for that, just like a little bit more of a more warm personality. That is an interesting subject in itself because there's probably not one personality that will meet everyone's needs. By the way, I have to be fairly sort of dynamic to the individual. I've got to say the voice models and the interactivity as a voice on open AI for me is my favorite of all of the large language models. I mean, really, it feels natural. A really cross the tipping point too, where if you're on a long drive, you can talk to it for hours now. You used to talk to it for

maybe a minute or two and then you kind of flip out and move to something else. Now you just go for you know infinite time yeah just it's just engaging and interesting and you know as my kids it's completely natural by the way that they would take my phone and just talk to chat gpc so you're you're a new dad as well how old is you're new born uh no no we have a our oldest is 11 okay and then we have eight-year-old twins oh so we're we're a little bit into it we're kind of middle stage i was looking at the photo on your on your oh yeah yeah yeah that's 10 years old my what's out photo yeah so i mean you got to admit people were expecting a GI. People were expecting GPD-5. We'll get there.

To be, yeah. I know you will. I'm very confident. I'm sure you will. So they had people that were expecting that. And then they got actually a very usable product at like half the price point. Yeah. Which is extraordinary on its own. Yeah, less than half the price point. And also what you said a second ago, I really want everybody to understand. Nobody knows what next year's capabilities or even three months from now's capabilities will be. A lot of people think like, Hey, Noam Brown knows exactly what's going to happen next. Yeah. But it's not true.

Like we, humanity doesn't know what capabilities will and won't exist. Because as you scale, it's not obvious. Are you thinking of consciousness or what? No, no, I wasn't thinking of that.

Noam has a bunch of incredible research ideas, and we have some sense and like things are starting to work. Yeah. And you have a rough sense of the capabilities, but what will that enable? Yeah. You know, that's the kind of thing that only kind of becomes clear

as the model comes together and sometimes not even then to our earlier discussion. Sometimes you launch and then you realize the model has these emergent capabilities that you know. When we were here before I was asking you know

because I teach a class at MIT on foundations of AI ventures of how to build an AI company and all these people want to be at open AI because they want to be in the middle of seeing it happen day to day. Yeah. And so why don't you open an office in Boston

where all these talent is like at the rate that AGI will arrive it won't matter. we're not doing that because it won't matter the timeline doesn't line up we're going to keep the headcount small the AI is going to be the workforce

and by the time we got a building built and got it off populated it wouldn't matter anyway because AI will be here so I don't know if that timeline lines up with what you're saying because you're on the inside you're like in the middle of the fastest growing

most rapid changing thing in human history yeah it I mean we're very we're very optimistic there's also something magical to being in person to the point about you know Boston office

there is you're in person you're like drawing on whiteboards together it's it's a very researching culture i keep on telling my team that it's like you know i want the team to come back together again physically i want you know co-locate as much as possible resume is fantastic but there's the human nature one of the questions i'm going to ask you later is what's not going to change in the next five to 10 years yeah and i think that human nature is part of it every week my team and I study the top 10 technology metatrends that will transform industries over the decade ahead. I cover trends ranging from human robotics, AGI, and quantum computing to transport, energy, longevity, and more. There's no fluff. Only the most important stuff that matters, that impacts

our lives, our companies, and our careers. If you want me to share these metatrends with you, I writing a newsletter twice a week, sending it out as a short two-minute read via email. And if you want to discover the most important metatrends 10 years before anyone else, this report for you. Readers include founders and CEOs from the world's most disruptive companies and entrepreneurs building the world's most disruptive tech. It's not for you if you don't want to be informed about what's coming, why it matters, and how you can benefit from it. To subscribe for free, go to Demandis.com slash Metatrends to gain access to the trends 10 years before anyone else. All right, now back to this episode. Here's a question. So you're constantly creating

increasing capabilities within the open AI ecosystem. And you've got to decide how much of that capability to launch to the public and how much to hold back? How do you think about that? Because I'm sure you have much more capable models and capabilities than are accessible right now. Is that something that's internally sort of constantly meteoring it out at a specific rate? How do you think about that? Not really. I mean, our mission is to ensure that AGI benefits all of humanity. And the way that we do that is to put AGI in people's hands as much as possible. And we believe in this process of iterative development, iterative deployment.

So rather than kind of holding it back and then bestowing it, you know, fully formed upon the world, we want to get AI out to people as soon as we feel like it's ready. Yeah. And we'll do that early and we'll do it often. We want to do it safely, obviously. So that's, that's its own sort of guard. But other than that, like, we'd rather put something that, you know, we'd rather put something out to people earlier and let them play with it and build awesome stuff with it and learn from it. And learn

from it. And then we get their feedback and that helps us build better models. It's not a kind of thing where we're like, there's obviously a bunch of stuff we have internally that's ahead of what we have launched, but that's also stuff that is very much in research mode and development. And we'll make its way into models over time. It's sort of the ability to learn to harness it. But we try and put stuff in people's hands because like the fun thing about, this world right now. I think every service product device we use is going to be reinvented. So that answers the question in terms of, you know, like core model capabilities. But what about just raw speed? Because, you know, I write code with GPD5 every single day.

Yeah. And, you know, you watch the lines of code come out. And it's incredible. I mean, there's a force multiplier, like 1,000x more productive than I would be without it. But I'm watching the lines of code come out. And I'm picturing like when you guys are using it internally, it must be many more GPUs, blazing past, you know, lines of code just pouring out of it. Am I right? Well, we use pretty much the same settings that everybody else does. You're kidding. But that's really just a function of the number of GPUs we have.

So, I mean, right now we are... I heard you have a few. We do have a few. We have a little bit more than a few. But we're also completely maxed out at all times. Yeah. This is one of the reasons that we talk about Project Stargate, where we're going in with a bunch of other groups and building out more than $500 billion of infrastructure.

It's extraordinary. It's a computronium covering the planet. Totally. I mean, just the more, every time we get more GPUs, they immediately get used. Whether it's, you know, we can take them on the product side and use it to, you know, lower latency or speed up token generation or launch new products, you know, take a product that's only available to pro users and bring it to plus users or free users. Or it just means that we can run more experiment.

on the research side. There's basically infinite demand for GPUs within these walls, and that's why we're doing so much to build capacity. I'm really glad you said that, because there is a school of thought out there that GPUs will commoditize, and it's just so wrong. It's so incredibly wrong. We're far from

that moment at the very least, yeah. I think that will never, that will never exist in the world. It's one of those things. It's like the internet, you know? Every bit that we lower latency, increase bandwidth on the internet, people do more things. used to be impossible. Now video is every day because the capabilities are there. The network

can handle it. The more GPUs we get, the more AI will all use. So last year, I made four trips to India. Uh-huh. And, you know, population of 1.41 billion, huge amount of builders there, right? Yeah. There's massive latent talent for building. And I heard, I saw Sam's tweet about building for India. And I'm curious, how do you think about that? Because, I mean, India needs that for education, needs it for health care, needs it for governance, needs it for to help uplift

1.4 billion people. It's the only thing that's going to do that. How does it enter your mission as a chief product officer? Do you think about that differently from just in general? That's a huge priority. I was out there with Sam

and a bunch of people from OpenAI I don't remember four or five months ago. And the reception was just incredible. Everywhere we went, you know, talking to developers, people are using chat chief building on top of our APIs. It's, you know, the biggest country in the world.

There's so much good we can do. The most youthful. Also, you know, one of the things I'm really excited about, talk about coding. Today, there are something like 30 million developers in the world, 30 million people that know how to code. With an AI coding model, we can give a couple more orders of magnitude of people. We can take it from 30 million to 300 million to 3 billion people that effectively know had a code that can create software. And when you can create software, it's such a general purpose

skill. You can do anything. You can build personalized tools. You can build all kinds of stuff. And every time you increase something like that access to a general purpose tool by an order of magnitude, the world changes. So whether you're talking health or education or just frankly the ability to build software, I think, you know, this is why AI is going to be the biggest transformational force in our lives. And I think in places like India, it's like going to be that much more powerful. And, I mean, there are nations that need it more than others. And India is most definitely going to be one of the biggest beneficiaries.

Yeah. We actually just launched this morning a paid plan in India just for India. So it's a much cheaper plan, but it gives Indian users a lot of access to chat GPT, like 10x more access than you get as a free user. but a heavily discounted plan because we're trying to bring as much of the benefit as AI to people in India as we can. So how much do you think that's going to unlock a latent talent base? Because you start in India, you think globally, there's talent everywhere. And a lot of it is latent.

It can't get into a great school. It can't get into a great ecosystem. AI is going to be an incredible leveler of that, starting with coding. So is that part of the motivation of going in with a lower price point in India? Yeah, there's talent everywhere. And there's also like hustle and urgency. So, yeah, we want to bring as much AI as we can. And we've got a, we've got limits on GPUs and all of this.

We have to pay for it one way or another. But we want to put this in the hands of as many people as we can. And so one of the interesting things about Open AI, one of the things that's different about this company relative to anywhere I've ever worked, normally when you build products, you move things behind the paywall. So there's a product that starts out free and then at some point you make it a paid feature to try and get people to pay, you know, more money for whatever you're building. We go the opposite way at OpenAI. Stuff starts in our pro or in Plus, and so you're paying, you know, $20 a month for it.

Our entire goal is to make that a free product because we want to give a more powerful product to more people because we think that makes the world a better place. So if you look at the progression of a lot of our things, deep research started out as a pro feature. And then we brought it to Plus. And now as a free user, you can do a bunch of deep research every month. So our goal is actually to just give the most powerful, make the most powerful product we can

and give it to as many people as we can. So you're probably in charge of balancing the need to create as many GPUs as possible, Stargate, and just you need a massive amount of infrastructure and that takes money. And then you want to balance that against, yeah, but we also want to put this in the hands of as many people as possible, as cheaply as possible. That's got to be incredible tension inside the building trying to figure out how you balance those two objectives. Not so much tension, actually, you might be surprised because we have just a long-term belief.

I have a long-term belief that this is going to be, we're not going to, the idea that we used to live our lives without AI helping us every day is going to feel crazy in a few years. And so if we're building a product that adds a ton of value to people's lives, we're going to put as much as we possibly can available for free. But there are always going to be things that are super heavily, you know, computational and expensive. for us that will be in a plus plan or in a pro plan and if we do our job if i do my job and the team continues to do their job then those features are going to be super valuable they're going to be ever more valuable right hey i is only going to be able to do more for you um and you know while you're sleeping rather than waiting like chat chagipt today is a pretty reactive product you go there you ask a question it can do things for you that would have been crazy two years ago

but you're still asking it first you're still you're still under prompt but you can you can definitely imagine a world where chat GPT is much more proactive because of what it knows about you. You prompted to be proactive. It's actually proactive. Totally. But why isn't it? Why not think 24 hours a day? You're asleep and it's thinking about what it can do for you. So there's just always more that we can do.

My favorite model is still Jarvis. I want Jarvis in my life. Doing things for me all the time. I still want my AI to do surprise and delight. The doorbell rings and something shows up that I'm not expecting. And it says, I bought this for you because I think you'd like it. I heard the conversation you had. Yeah, and that, for me, that's when age...

I'll do that for you. I'm going to ask, I'll ask ChatGBT, GBT, what random thing I should buy you, and it will show up at your doorstep. We'll see what it does. Peter D. Amanda's edition. Fantastic. I love that.

By the way, what happened to your hand? So, um, I just had an RFID chip implanted today. As one does. As one does. I was over at Frontier Towers. That's amazing. Over at Frontier Towers, a guy named Cass that runs their sort of longevity. and biohacking.

And I had done this, if you can feel it right here, there's a little ship in there, but cool. It's made by a company called Dangerous Things, which is got a great, great marketing, right?

Yeah. But this is the more advanced one, so I put it in, I can open my Tesla with it and, like, you know, wave in front of the elevator. Wow. And yeah.

Check out with Apple Pay. Exactly. You know, actually, I will not put my, my crypto keys on this because then my hand is at risk. Yes. Yeah, very much.

Yeah, yeah. The hammer attack. Yeah. A $5 wrench attack. Exactly. I'm curious. Wait, how big is the chip? Oh, it's surprisingly big.

You want to see the photos here? Yeah, I do. So this is that what it looks like, right? Okay. This is, they actually put this giant needle in your head, like a size of a straw, makes some space, and then they slip it in. Yeah.

Yeah. Nice. It will heal on there. I'll put this up on the, on the video. And then how long will the back? batteries last. Oh, it's not, it's not battery. It's, uh, it's a near field. So basically an electric current comes in. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Right. Right. Right. Yeah. So, uh, anyway, that was, that was, that was fun. It was an hour ago. So if you guys had keep it compressed. Conversations internally. I have to

believe that you, I mean, opening eye is like the most progressive, but, you know, between Gemini, Anthropic and Grock and everybody sort of, it used to, used to wonder, would it be a hard takeoff and it would be one company that just takes off across everybody else. And it looks like there's really a leveling up continuously across the pack. Do you ever look at what the other products are doing and sort of say, that's a great idea or let's not go there? Yeah, for sure. I mean, there's so much, there's so much, A, there's a lot of innovation happening, right? And there are smart people within these walls and there's a lot more smart people outside of these walls. So we, you know, It's, we, we watch what other folks are doing.

We also look at how people are using our own models and get a lot of feedback about, you know, things they wish they could do, things they love about our models. So I kind of think of that all as part of the feedback that you take in. Yeah. But what matters at the end of the day is, are we executing? Because I think we have the best people in the world. We have a very clear mission. People are here because we want to build AGI and we see a path to it.

So like at the end of the day, it's about our own execution. But I think we'd be crazy if we weren't. like watching what's happening and trying to learn from it. So I met your EA outside and the asterist, Mark Zuckerberg called and recently. Marks after researchers. That's got to be crazy. I would love to ask you some questions that will help. We have this huge ecosystem of startups that are building AI companies.

You know, it's funny. You were there when the internet, you know, was everything. And if you're trying to build an internet company, it's pretty obvious that, you know, TCIP stack isn't going to change. You're going to be right on top of it. Yeah. Compare that to AI today. and you're like, wow, it's such a moving target

that you're building on top of. Oh, yeah. And so if you can help the teams in any way understand, like, you know, are we going to build our own, like, windsurf cursor type capability or is that an available market? Meaning where is OpenEI not going to go that leaves space for the entrepreneurs to build? Yeah, exactly, exactly. And I'll give you a case today.

So, Mark Ornberg, the chairman of MIT, really wanted Sam to come to campus and meet with the president, Sally Cornblis. And Sam said, yeah, I'll come and do you. that if you introduce me to 50 startups back to back. And so Mark said it all up and they did the 50 back to back meetings and then Sam was on stage. But you know, Sam genuine like Y Combinator background. It absolutely cares about the startup economy thriving on top of open AI. So the mission is right on right in alignment. But then knowing what's going to happen next is harder than anything I've ever seen before. Yeah. So any, any insight you can give on like what's your advice to

entrepreneurs wanting to build on top of open AI? You know, we've seen a lot of open AI wrap in the past, what's your advice thought? So here's the context that I think is most important. Every single product we use, every single service that we use today, every single device that we use, all of them, practically all of them, were pre-AI, any of the ones that are at scale, we're pre-AI. They're all going to be reinvented. It's like any electricity to every mechanical thing.

Exactly. It's a really good analogy. everything is going to be reinvented. And, you know, sometimes, sometimes the incumbents are going to figure out to do it themselves. If history is any guide, not many of them are going to figure it out, right? And that's a huge opportunity for startups, for entrepreneurs, because we're in this complete transformation.

So that's super exciting. I think it's an awesome time to be an entrepreneur. Certainly, we're going to try and do some of that reinvention ourselves. But no matter how big we get, how many things we do. I mean, I'm talking everything is different, right? And it's not just tech. It's also the way you interact with your doctor is different. You know, so material science is different.

So we're only going to be able to do this much. And so what we say to the developers is if you're building, like, right at the edge of what the models can do, you're so far at the bleeding edge that, like, the models can't quite do the thing you want, but you can just see little glimmers of hope. That's a great place to be building. Because two months from now, we're going to launch a new model. And the thing that you've been just barely getting to work is going to sing. And that's going to be awesome.

If instead what you're doing is like covering, you know, patching a problem with the current model and you're afraid of the next model launch that we are going to come out with because it's going to, you know, disrupt it's going to, it's going to, like, obviate the need for the thing you're building. Like, don't do that. Assume that the models are going to keep getting better at a crazy pace. and build something that's just at the edge so you're excited about the next model because it's going to make your thing awesome. Yeah, Arvin Shunabas over at Perplexity Talks. He calls that AI Complete when he was designing

the Perplexity Business Plan. It had to be AI Complete, which I think he just made up, nobody. But it means that exactly what you just said, it rides the wave, it doesn't get swamped by the way. Yeah, that's a much more concise way of saying what I was saying. I have a question in Dynne ask you. as the chief product officer,

what does AGI look like as a product? That's a good question. Is it just look like the chat GPT, but it can do anything better, faster? Well, I mean, chat is such an interesting format because it, I mean, it mimics like how do humans communicate. I can text you, we can write on the keyboard, but I can also talk and we can, you know, look at each other and tech, like a chat interface

kind of gets at that full generality. So it's really powerful as a backdrop, but it's not the only interface. I think when you have AGI, your, your model is going to be in real time creating UI on the fly to build the most like economical, you know, sensible solution for the thing that you're trying to accomplish. And you're going to have all kinds of software being. created and like being thrown away because you can just produce it again in an instant. Yeah, that's the, the vision when it's, when you're just talking to it, it's really obvious that it's going to be super empathetic. It's going to, it's going to be, but then, you know, you start to see the video generation. You're like, oh, wait. Yeah. Now I'm, my mind is blowing.

Because it can create scenes for me in real time, create images. It can create, you know, like entertainment, but also if I'm designing something, it can, like Jarvis, you know, create the design in thin air. And so now I'm thinking, okay, Johnny Ive is going to be working on something. Well, let's, let's talk about. Let's talk about that one second. I always come back, by the way, to the, if you've read Ender's game. Yeah, of course. You know, like the jewel in your ear, it can see what you see.

It can hear what you hear, but it also is super intelligent and connects back to, you know, the information across the galaxy. Yeah. Like, that's kind of, I think, wherever we're going. Yeah, they lost that in the movie, actually. You got to read the book. Yeah. So I think we're going to, you know, this multimodal world where there's video capturing everything and you're always being seen in your environments. And where AGI becomes anticipatory.

it knows what you likely want, right? And it's making the world automagical is the term I use for that. So I'm just still trying to dig into what does AGI as a product from OpenEI look like? Is it fully anticipatory? Is it just like doing things you don't expect it to be doing?

I guess you could turn that feature on. Yeah, and I think it's also, and I don't even know that we need to be fully at AGI for this, but I think you want the product to be taking Everything it knows about you. Whatever AGI is. Yeah. And just doing, I mean, you think about the number of things that you do every day.

You wake up in the morning and you have a whole bunch of emails. A lot of those are mechanical. Probably some of them are like ones that you really want to type out every word of response. Most of them are mechanical. They're scheduling. They're responding. I want my AI to have already done all of those for me before I wake up. Yeah.

Maybe every once in a while I need to say, yeah, that's right. Or I'm going to edit that sentence. But mostly it's just like. be done. Yeah. And you're going to have that across, how much of your browsing is semi-mechanical. You've got to get the thing done,

but you actually don't care about reading the words on the page and waiting for things to load and clicking links. You're just trying to get a job done. All of that should be gone. Yeah. What do you think about the future of media? Because, you know, one thing that's really interesting about media in general is that everything competes with everything else.

So, you know, you don't really think of sports as competing with news, but it does. because it's, it's all competing for mindshare. Yeah. And clearly AI is going to take a huge amount of our mindshare. It's just so engaging. And so, you know, that's got to come from somewhere. That time and that mind share has to come from somewhere.

Do you guys think through, like, how is this going to affect internet media, TV, movies, all of that? Attention economy, sure. I mean, it probably becomes hyper-personalized, right? You know, today. And there are good and bad things about that. There's something magical to every single person in the U.S. watching the same, you know, two news shows at night. And we don't have that anymore.

there's something cool about the shared experience and we can all, you know, the same movies in the theater for all of us at the same time and we can talk about it. But there's also something pretty cool about this movie is, you know, totally personalized to me and I'm the only one that it matters to. So, I mean, you've got to think

that kind of thing starts to become possible. Also, probably, though, there's always a sort of you go to extremes. The other extreme is then you value the thing that was created by humans that much more. It's like sports are the last thing on the, you know, the last business model in TV that still really works well. You're an outdoor marathon or you'll still be doing that.

What's not going to change in the next 10 years? I mean, we can list so many things it will. Yeah. Well, I think humans are still going to be humans, right? We're still like, us connecting in person is really going to matter. The feel of this is very different, us doing it here, sitting around a table relative to us doing it through, you know, Zoom or something. So that's still going to matter, you know,

A handwritten note is still going to matter. Personal connection is still going to matter. I would think it's going to matter a lot more, actually. The way things are true. You mentioned earlier, you just love having everybody here in the building. It's just different. Yeah. And since you have so many AI force multipliers,

you actually don't need regional offices all over the world. And so the relative importance of communication inside the team is probably higher than any company you've been in before. I got run my Abundance Summit virtually through the year, but we're five days together in March. Yeah. And then those five days are, you know, just magical in terms of the energy. Yeah.

So what do you guys think? What, what stays the same and what does AGI look like? I think one thing that after that GPT5 launch that occurred to me, you know, up until this point, you think about, you know, I had my kids working with GPT2 writing content and then GPT3 and then GPT4. And they've been watching this crazy progression. Now it's pretty clear that the AI community is going to try and not change too many things too quickly. Like let the AI become super intelligent. let it solve healthcare, let it solve, you know, like, but don't go rampaging across San Francisco tearing down buildings. Because actually, that's creating more problems than good. And it's now

becoming clear to me. The AI community is really small as a fraction of the world. And the last thing it needs to do is change everything tomorrow, even though it potentially could. So it's starting to feel to me like, you know, the physical world won't change as much as people might think, while the virtual world will change at warp speed. I think the importance of purpose is still going to be, right? Because one of my biggest concerns about the future of, you know, the endpoint here is when everything is being done for you, it can be done for you. And you can just sit back and be, you know, a couch potato. The thing that's going to make you live in a Star Trek universe, not a Mad Max universe, is purpose.

Yeah. Like, so that importance. And, you know. Yeah, I completely agree with that. I always have a hard time with the futures that people paint when it's like, oh, we're all just going to sit back and, you know,

eat grapes and write poetry and receive our UVI. Because I just, I don't think that's what drives us as humans. If you go back and look at, we don't have to like, you know, cross the United States on a, in a covered wagon.

We don't have to hang our laundry on clothes lines as, you know, very much anymore. There's probably, if you go back 100 years ago, people look at our lifestyle today and they're like, oh my God, everything is done for you.

What are you talking about? But, of course, we take those time savings and go do more interesting stuff with it. Yeah. It's all about time savings, right? One thing that's true is every single human, eight billion of us have seven days in a week, 24 hours in a day, right? 365 in a year. And it's what you can do with that time that defines wealth, success, impact everything. Yeah. And AI is the greatest, you know, time multiplier, period. And I think it's the most, one of the most powerful parts. of human nature that we all strive for something bigger than ourselves and you want to leave the

world a better place than you found it and yeah like that's so innate to humans it's not going to change that it's just going to supercharge it so without you know i want to ask you now to tell me what johnny ives is is building for you okay uh but uh we are going to interact we are going to interact with um with ai in different ways how do you think about how do you think about that future besides it's been typing and now voice voice is amazing yeah i mean the the the jewel in your ear thing is is the model in so many ways because you don't want to take chat gpte right it's just one of many ai products that we'll all use but uh you don't want chat gpt to just like sit inside of a phone app or a browser waiting for you to go there you want it to be wherever you are you want

to effectively see what you see and have all the context that you want to give it so that it can be smarter and act more proactively for you. And it shouldn't wait for you to open a phone app to do stuff for you. It should be just sort of constantly chugging away behind the scenes, speaking about GPUs, but it should be constantly chugging away behind the scenes, taking action for you and saving you time. So that's going to be much more of the future than today where you like go to a website and, you know, ask you questions. Can we come back to GPUs for just one second. Yeah. And let's talk about Stargate too. Yeah, Stargate. So Chase Lockmiller is walking around, like he's our MIT classmate alum. And, you know, he's walking around

Abilene, Texas with Sam and, you know, there's concrete and pipes and stuff everywhere. Yeah. And but it's not up and running, right? None of the functionality is, is delivering yet. It's getting closer. Is it getting closer with it? Is it very soon or is that all secret? Yeah, I don't remember what's public and what's not, but we're very excited for that to come online because we could use all the GPUs we can get. I'm sure. And then all we know is, is in the Oval Office, there's a $500 billion budget. So it gives us a sense of the budget. Why stop there?

I mean, I don't think we will. No. Yeah. It was about 18 months ago that I partnered with one of my closest and most brilliant friends, Dave London, to start Link exponential ventures. At Link, we manage about a billion dollars of seed stage money based at a Kendall Square in Cambridge right between MIT and Harvard. When Dave and I both graduated from MIT, each of us immediately started companies.

But at that age, everything is working again. against you. You have an idea, you're challenged to raise money, and you can't afford rent, and even with all the accelerators out there, you're competing against thousands of other startups for the same pool of investors. Both Dave and I have spent a big chunk of our lives focusing on how do we inspire and support founders to knock down those barriers, to go big, to create wealth, to impact the world, to build and scale as fast as possible, especially in today's AI Everything world. We're seeing so many companies reaching multi-billion dollar valuations, in just two to three years faster than ever before.

Some companies are adding millions or tens of millions of dollars of value in just weeks. So we started asking ourselves, how do we help these founders go faster and not skip a beat? As an example, a couple of months ago, we bought an apartment building adjacent to MIT where a graduating entrepreneur can move in immediately without slowing down their tech build while they search for a place to live. And so we're doing everything we can to accelerate builders and their super smart teams. Of course, funding is part of it, mentoring is part of it, connecting them with my personal network of abundance-minded CEOs and investors as part of it. We house 66,000 square feet of purpose-built incubator space and 26 AI startups call Link XPV their home.

And the returns have been amazing. I have nothing to ask, but if you are building a company in the AI era, check us out at linkventures.com. Now back to the episode. So I just got back from Brazil. So I was there delivering five keynotes, talking entrepreneurs, builders, and they're all asking how, what will AI, what will sovereign AI look like for us? How do we make sure we're not passed over, right? Same question being asked probably in India and other parts of the world.

Speaking to those entrepreneurs and they're extraordinarily passionate, what's the advice to the leadership in those regions, South and Central America? I mean, a part of this is why we try and offer everything. I mean, ACHIPT is a free product. Yep. Download it from the app store or on the web. You don't even need to sign in. You can just go and get access to the greatest intelligence the world has ever seen for free on your phone at all times.

And like you said, we launched GPT5. We cut prices dramatically. If you look at prices today relative to what, you know, GPT forecasts when it came out, even as models have gotten way more intelligent, they've gotten like 100. next cheaper. So you're on this crazy cost curve and we want to keep going because the more intelligence we can put in people's hands, the more they can do with it. Do you feel like that ever would have happened if Open AI hadn't forced the timeline? Because you know, you've been at meta, you've been at Twitter, you've seen like if, you know, if this stuff had stayed inside

Google's labs and open AI hadn't come into the world and said, hey, we're going to make this available right now. Because right now, you know, Google is throwing it out there the same way open has, but that's because it's a reaction. It's a reaction, right? So you think, where do you think we would be if open AI hadn't existed in this? Would it all be hidden somewhere still? We wouldn't even have access to it. I mean, we shouldn't, we wouldn't be where we are, right?

Competition is great. As a friend of mine likes to say, capitalism is undefeated. Like, this, it's amazing to have competition. By the way, Google is competition for us. They're moving very quickly and building good models. So is Anthropics or a bunch of other players. And that, that, you know, it's motivation for, for us to also go faster.

Do you remember the moment? Consumers and businesses benefit. It's great. Do you remember the moment in your life when you first said, I want to go work at Open AI? I need to go get in that building and meet Sam and get there.

Yeah, so I've known Sam for a bunch of years, not super close, but just, you know, we were friends, we could text, that kind of thing. And I would call him whenever I was like thinking about going from one job and, you know, doing something next because he's such, an incredible thinker and futurist and you know he's highly connected but he's also just

involved in interesting things so i'm a physicist by background and um before my previous job is like four or five years ago i called him and he introduced me to uh some companies building fusion and i almost went and and worked at one of those companies so i just you know periodically would talk to sam and this last time i called him he said well actually uh and so i you know I hadn't even really thought about it. And then I came in, met a couple people and was just like, this is the most interesting thing I have ever seen. Like, I will work for free.

Please just let me in the door. So you could literally be working on magnetic containment for a fusion reaction somewhere completely unrelated. I mean, it's pretty amazing, right? Like 37 venture-backed fusion companies. I would have never imagined. Are there 37? Yeah.

That's, I mean, I love hearing that, by the way. I'm so glad that there has been a renaissance in deep tech and investment. Yeah, it's like, you know, their venture-back rocket companies and fusion companies. Yeah. Fusion companies. It's like, you know, okay, this stuff is becoming real. Yeah, we need more of it. Exactly.

How do you, how can you possibly keep up with the speed of change? I mean, I think in your role, trying to keep up with how rapidly the tech is progressing. How do you think about that? Part of it is staying, it's connected to our research teams as we possibly can. How big is the research team here? I don't know. Order of magnitude. A few hundred, you know, something like that.

So it's a very, it's a very, so it's a very independent, what you're saying before, it seems very independent, right? People can work on a project and, and sort of begin to launch features. Yeah, it's, I mean, there's kind of a spectrum. Parts of the research team are super academic. They're doing like, you know, novel research that may or may not, may or may not work out, may or may not see the latter day for a while. Because this is such a new field.

There's a lot to discover. You're not just productionizing things that somebody else figured out. You've got to figure out this stuff from scratch. And then there are parts of the research team that are much closer to product where you're taking a model and helping to post-train it and making sure that it's good at certain things that are really important for our customers in various shapes. And you kind of have everything in between.

So one of the things that I think differentiates OpenAI is how closely product and engineering and research all work together. Because like I said, there are parts of research that are very, they're very separate, but the parts that when we work closely together and we get a tight iteration loop from like building model capabilities, turning that into a product, getting feedback, taking that feedback back, improving those model capabilities and iterating that way, like that's how we built deep research. That's how we build agent functionality. Like the best stuff comes from that. So in your role, you know, so here's research, you know, ultrasound, and then here's product features and functions, you know, this voice, this, this button. Then over here, you got data centers. Do you span all of that as a CPA? No, no. Just the products that you use.

So think the API, I think, our business products. Mark Chen is overseeing all the... Yeah, Mark leads research. Greg leads everything, sort of data center, infrastructure, scaling, all that kind of stuff. Got it. Okay. Yeah, there's a lot going on.

So we divide and conquer. You know the feature I'm looking forward to? Is my BCI Connect. Oh, yeah. Yeah. So a friend of mine is involved in, you know, Merge that was just announced, leaked, I guess. So, you know, we have 100 billion neurons, 100 trillion synaptic connections. Yeah.

And being able to have a feature set that lays on top my neocortex. Do you actually, do you think that far ahead in your conversation? Is Merge, by the way, is Merge doing, are they going invasive or is it sitting on your scalp or how are they doing it? So I know the details of the company. I don't know what I can say about it. But there are multi-heter companies that are invasive and the number that are external. And there are those that are subcranial, but above the dura brain. So lots of different players there.

I'm super excited about that too. Oh, yeah. I mean, I would do it in a heartbeat. Would you? No, no, absolutely not. But that's only because, well, look, I use AI literally six, seven, eight hours a day. Yeah. And it's getting so far ahead.

There's, you know, the original vision there was I need to increase the bandwidth of communication between my brain and this really slow laptop. Uh-huh. But now the AI moves so fast that it's clear that I can give it a concept and it can just run with it. And I haven't had the next concept yet. Like the increasing the bandwidth between my brain and the laptop no longer matters. The AI is just, just way too fast. So listen, Alex Weiser Gross, who's one of our friends and partners, was on my stage at the Abundance Summit. And he was talking about the importance of coupling. Like if AI is taking a real takeoff

and humans are linear can we couple with them, right? And that coupling is going to need to have this kind of an interface. So here's the question to you. Would you do a BCI coupled to Open AI? I would personally do it. I would personally do BSI. Yeah, so would I.

Like when it's safe, I'll do it in a heartbeat. Yeah. I mean, I tend to do experimental things in the first place. Yeah, I was going to say, says the man with a RFID chip in his hand, but no, I would totally do it. I think it'll be amazing when you can access the world's information not by like typing into one of these things but at the speed that you can think and then you have like this i mean we will be a different species it'll be super

cool yeah and we are going to speciate um and there'll be those who decide they want to you know like it the way it is i don't want that in my head and others that i want to see this i want to understand quantum physics i want to have infinite knowledge i want to be able to be i don't see it i'm shocked i don't see it being that for like yeah i understand understand what you're saying completely like you got the Amish over here and you got the technophiles over there that's not what I'm saying okay I'm saying that when you surround me by monitors yeah and it's creating things on those monitors at the speed of AI right now there's no there's no bandwidth increase beyond well I can't absorb any more information than that anyway I'm at

the limit of what I can think about but maybe not with your eyes and not maybe not when you have to type it in to a thing and then you know but we've heard all to jane but it's really hard to be but we've Talked about the fact that visually you can look at an image and get whether the data is correct or not, right? Versus if you have a text, you have to read every line. So, anyway, we'll see. We're going to find out. Yeah, well, I guess you and I will be the A-B test and we'll be the A and he'll be the B. You'll be the A.

Yeah. If you're still alive, you'll be the B. If I'm still alive, yeah. Yeah, Peter's having it done tomorrow. I might wait a year and then we'll see how that goes. Yeah, as long as you can upgrade. You don't want to get version one. That is true.

So, you know, you've worked at some amazing companies. You know, I love what planet's doing as well. Yeah. Putting a layer of imagery on top of the planet. But there's, I can't imagine that the speed of iteration of products is any place faster than it is here. Yeah. Nothing in my experience is compared to opening eye. Yeah.

I thought Facebook, Instagram when I was there, moved quickly, and they do. Yeah. but nothing compares to open AI. Do you feel like, so you're doing, what, a $10, $20 billion capital rate? Is it $500 billion, something like that? I'm just reading the news, I don't want to. No, you're just reading the news. You tell me.

Okay. But do you feel like, you know, Google's got about $100 billion of free cash flow, you know, Amazon's huge, and they have massive data centers in advance? Do you feel like there's a vulnerability at the raw compute and budget level? I mean, it's why we are so focused on building out our own capacity. They've got big data centers. They've been doing this for a long time. They've built great technology.

They also support a whole host of things. They also, you know, they, Google builds a lot of products that we all use. We build one product. We have one mission. Building AGI is existential for us. I think that's an advantage. I love that simplicity, right? It really goes back to Google's earliest routes where they were just a search engine,

just a box on a white page. Mm-hmm. Right. There's something, you know, if you're a researcher, there's lots of places you can go work that'll pay you a lot of money. But if you want to work at a company that is maniacally focused on getting the AGI, you work at Open AI. Yeah, I asked GPT, how many core researchers are there at Google?

You know, just in the AI team core, Jeff Dean, and Demasasasas. And it's like 5,000, roughly, assuming GPD is right. So it's a much bigger force. But then it feels like they're working on protein folding. They're very dispersed in what they're working on. and it wasn't clear to me how many just like right down the fairway working toward AGI

there were relative to because it feels like with that GPT5 launch the coding completely caught up or passed everything else out there at a fraction of the price so the momentum seems to be great but the headcount is got to be smaller yeah but that's I mean that's every startup's advantage right

agility yeah it's all about agility yeah we've had some conversations conversations on the Moonshots podcast about benchmarks. How much do you think about benchmarks? Because it looks like many of the benchmarks are getting saturated and reinventing benchmarks. You've created a healthcare benchmark that you use. And one of the questions we talked about was creating some benchmarks that are around AI's ability to solve grand challenges, solve fundamental problems. Yeah, I love that idea. Yeah. And so we call it a series of abundance benchmarks. Like, is it, you know, and measure all of the AIs against something, like it's a proof of work,

right, instead of a proof of state, yeah. Yeah, it's a really interesting thing. It's really important, too, because we've had all of these different benchmarks that we've used for, you know, the last bunch of years in AI, and they're almost all saturated now. Crazy. It shows how good the models are getting very quickly, but it also means that we need harder benchmarks. And there are a bunch of these things that are Frontier Math and Arc AGI and some of these.

But increasingly, we're also looking at these sort of, I'll call them softer benchmarks, which is a challenge in itself. But like the health bench, we've got benchmarks that, you know, they're around. Can you build a financial model for a company? You know, can you do, because when you talk about AGI, one of the ways that we define AGI is can you do, can you do economically valuable tasks? And you look at what people are doing every day, if they're a doctor, a lawyer, a banker, et cetera, and you're looking at, can you do those tasks? But they're also, they're also sort of softer. It's not, it's not obvious. There's not one way to build a model for a company, like a financial model.

There's, you could do it in a bunch of different ways. For you're doing a math problem, there is one right way. And you can grade it very easily. So at the same time as models are getting smarter, we're saturating the things that are sort of easy to grade. were off in these harder problems that are also a little bit tougher to grade. And they don't have to be deep science or anything. You can also look at creative writing. How do you grade creative writing?

There's way more than one way to write a story about any particular thing. So true. So true. And that's increasingly important. Right? Yeah. Like, yeah, the stuff is running wild in areas where the e-vals can be built. And then, you know, it can't run wilds in areas where there's no e-vail because

it's just unable to self-improve. But any place you could score yourself. I saw some recent metric on its ability to predict the future. Okay. So I found that fascinating, right? I mean, this is going back to sort of Asimov's, you know, work in the Foundation trilogy. Like, can you, is there enough clues out there? Right.

That you can gather to predict what society is going to do in the next 12 hours or 12 days or 12 months. Uh-huh. Yeah. Peter wrote a book that the future is faster than you think. I don't know if you read it. It's my favorite of the Peter, but there are many great Peter books, but it's my favorite because it talks specifically about concurrent technology that nobody's figured out how to glue together.

And, you know, normally there will be two or three things like, oh, we have lithium batteries and we have, you know, we have control systems, let's make EVTOL, you know, two or three things. But with AI, there are so many things that got cracked in the last six months. Yeah. That haven't been glued together yet into product, services, or whatever. And it's just accelerating. And, you know, there's this flaw in human psychology where something is mind-blowing.

And then you take it for granted, like three days later. Yeah, yeah, totally. And then you miss the center. You miss the mental breakthrough that, wait, I can glue that together with it. Snapchat is my favorite example. It's like that company, 20 billion dollars. Well, John Jarvie from MIT is that he's, his favorite story is how he, Evan, Evan Spiegel was a roommate of his son. Yeah.

Or frat brother of his son. at Stanford. And he got first look at it. And he said, that's just too simple. There's no way. And there's a $20 billion IPO. Yeah. The biggest mistake of his investing group, probably the only big mistake of his investing career. But it was like, look, the phone has a camera. The camera is high resolution. This functionality is just the assimilation of texting in camera. Yeah. That's all you had to realize. But, you know, those two things kind of grew in parallel and people didn't stick them together. Now you've got 40 things you can do with AI that you couldn't do just a few months ago that can be glued together in all these different ways. You know, all the commentatorics

are interesting products waiting to be invented. Yeah. And I think where AI is today, if it, if it just stopped, if progress stopped, where, you know, GPT-5, you'd still have a complete transformation of society over the next decade. Yeah. It's so true. But it's not going to stop. It's going to keep going and it's going to probably keep going on the same exponential or exponential and yeah. Yeah. Should update the book. Well, the next book that's coming out in March, I'm releasing at the Abundance Summit, is called We Are as Gods. And it's a realization that what we do between breakfast and lunch is godlike to our ancestors.

Right. I mean, and we take it so much for granted. But our ability to manifest the future, to literally know anything, anywhere, connect with anybody for free. I mean, it's crazy. You know, AI is one of the first things, the transformation that it'll bring about. and you've got to think it's just the beginning that you kind of grow up and you're thinking back to when your grandparents grew up

and you're like, oh, I'm so glad that I'm living at the time that I'm living because you get all the best time to be a lot. But AI is the first time you look at like what's happening in biotechnology and all these other things, brain computer implants. And it's the first time I've been like, man,

I am jealous of my kids. Yeah. Because the year of 2016 is going to be so cool. Well, you'll be here. I mean, I hope I'm here. Well, I mean, come on. This is why I mean, the work you're doing, I hope I'm here in 2100, right? I mean, it's the reason for me was, you know, I grew up passionate about space.

I wanted to see space play out. You know, NASA never did it. You know, Elon's gone heads down and, you know, Bezos and others and so. It's fantastic. But when I read Ray's book, The Singularity is Near, it was like, holy shit, this, this convergent these technologies is going to blow everything away and accelerated. So yeah, I want to see the interstellar missions. I want to see what uploading consciousness looks like. I want to see all of these things. And there is, I don't think there's any limitations beyond the laws of

physics as we know them of what we're going to be able to do. And it's going to keep accelerating. Yeah. Talking about your twins are whole now. Eight, almost nine. And mine are 14. Okay. And so I think about their future, and I am, let's, you know, speaking to the parents listening, how do you think about educating kids today in an age of AI? You know, I'm just livid about the schools that are saying you can't use AI at all. Oh, yeah. It's like, you know, listen, my kids are going to be using it the moment they graduate every place, everywhere. And I think one of my challenges is that if you give a 8th grader, you know, eighth grade homework to do with AI, it's meaningless. But if you give them, like, graduate level work to go and, you know, design a starship and, and figure it out,

I mean, that's amazing. Yeah. That's what we should be doing. Yeah, like, assume that chat GPT exists and use it to take, to make students, A, learn how to use the technology, but B, go deeper than they ever would have been able to do in a classroom setting. Yeah. Like, they should emerge stronger with using AI with their education. Actually, the best book that I've read on this, at least, is by Ethan Mollock. Have you ever read his book? It's called Co-Intelligence, I think. Okay, great.

Short book, it's like a 90-page read. You do it in an hour, but he's a professor at UPenn, I think he's a warden. Try that now for you guys. And just a great quick read, super practical. The way he uses AI, he leans into it. He's actually a very good Twitter follow as well. Nice. But he's incorporated into his class and has just sort of changed the way he teaches

to assume that everyone is using AI and to use that to take them way deeper into a topic than they would have been able to do and raise the expectations on the final work product as a result. Exactly. And I think that's true for all of society. You know, so as we get to, let's forget about AGI and we talk about ASI, right? with intelligence is a million-fold or a billion-fold more capable, what do we do with that? And so I was inspired by Star Trek and Apollo.

Those two things lit my fuse. And my first, what I call massive transfer to purpose was making humanity, multi-planetary, built a whole bunch of companies, built the university in space, and then focused on other areas. I, you know, as we start this incredible capability, humanity needs to go for these grand challenges. We need to have these epic visions. I couldn't agree more.

Otherwise, we will fade into insignificance. Yeah. There's a, oh yeah, it's another book that's that I really loved is by Robert Zubrin, the case for space. Yeah, Bob's been a friend for many, many years. He makes this point very eloquently in the book about like the human need for frontiers. Yeah, exactly. why space is so important because there are, you know, the bottom of the ocean is kind of still

a frontier on Earth, but there aren't that many of them left. And when there's a frontier, no matter how you screwed up wherever you live, on the frontier, you can start again. Yeah, yeah. Space for innovation and refresh and renewal and like, yeah, so when do you think that we will be multi-planetary? So, listen, well, we'll see there's a, hopefully a Starship 10 launch this Sunday. You know, Starship will get us to the moon on a recurring basis by hopefully end of 26, definitely 27. And then Mars, you know, my

guess is boots on Mars by 2030, but there'll be optimist robot boots on Mars. And then... And you're limited in your iteration speed there because you only have a, you know, you are, but you're going to launch once every 18 months or so. But you're going to send robots in advance. You'll send

the robots to the surface of the planet. You'll send robots to the asteroids to go in mine materials. And the way I think about it, right, everything at the end of the day is one way or another driven by economics and everything we hold the value on earth metals minerals energy real estate is an infinite quantities in space yeah and so you know the the earth eventually will be a crumb in a supermarket filled with resources right and that's a beautiful it's a beautiful thing that's not gonna evolve because you know mars is an obvious target now everyone's been working on it i like and then

where do you go and better personally be better than mars yeah i mean it's like a stepping stone or is a place to set up people living. Go start a city. You know, there's these lava caves under the surface of the moon where you get protection for radiation. If you fill them with air, at one sixth gravity, you can strap on wings and you can fly. That's awesome. I think it's on my foot. It's much fun. How bigger the caves? Is it a massive cave system? There are huge caves, yes. You could build, you can have thousands, millions of people in there? I don't know that. I mean, I can easily imagine thousands or 10 to thousands. And then of course the recent announcement that NASA's planning to go put a nuclear reactor on the South Pole of the Moon. So cool, right, in order to literally hydrolyze

the ice that's on the South Pole and create water and oxygen. And yeah. So, I mean, we're finally living into that science fiction future. And it's accelerating. Yeah. And hopefully fusion soon. And hopefully fusion. So solve a lot of problems here on Earth and open up new vistas for space So, Sam is like, what, 2028 for Helion, I think is the current target dates. And Cambridge is coming on in 2030 thereabouts. So it's amazing how a lot of these things bust loose when there's a single person that's just got an idea and they're incredibly passionate about it. And now with AI as a force multiplier, the odds of those passionate people becoming empowered and actually achieving that mission is so much higher than it was two years ago. Yeah.

And then you get the right density of startups and you have competition, you have different approaches, the ability to learn from different approaches and the probability of success grows. And just trying to outdo each other and have fun. And in this future, like, where it really is a Star Trek future instead of a Mad Max future, it's like what, what ambitious, super cool thing can you go for? And it used to be just small number of people. It used to be just the kings and the queens and the robber barons could do anything impacting people.

Now it's anybody using these tools. Yeah. It's amazing. So I have a question. As a cheap product officer, who names your models? Ouch. Because it's like, you know, okay, I'm trying to understand the logic and the rhyme and reason. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

We take a lot of well-deserved flack for the naming of our models. Sorry to give you the... Yeah, by the way, no, it's totally fair. We lean into it. The fact that we had both 04 Mini and 4-0 Mini... At the same time, it's something to be proud of. And then make the user choose those if they have any. And then on the other side, there's just chatyPD.

Simplicity. Yeah. That's good. Yeah. You know, in all seriousness, because by the way, we deserve all sorts of flack for that. So totally, totally acknowledged. But one of the reasons that you have that is the philosophy of iterative deployment. We could have waited.

You have some new capability, like reasoning, for example. You know, up until we launched GPT4O and it could do a bunch of new things like, you know, you could speak to it rather than just type to it. It's amazing. Yeah. We'd been working on the ability for models to reason, right? To not answer right away, but to actually sort of think through the problem, try a bunch of different approaches, test them out, you know, just the way you would if I asked you to do a crossword puzzle or a Sudoku or something, right? You would, you don't just like spout out the answer. you've got to try things.

You're like, okay, if that was a, that was a, you know, six-letter word starting with A there, but it's got to have a B and this, okay, it could be that. No, not the A, right? And you're testing hypotheses, refuting some of them, accepting some of them, and then kind of moving on. It took a while to teach the models that. It was one of the big, you know, breakthroughs from coming from Open AI. The first model that could do that was 01.

And it was easier for us. faster for us to launch a model that just did that and like wasn't an ideal model to ask for relationship advice or to you know ask who is the third right holy roman emperor or whatever like all the all the sort of normal things that you can ask you at gbt it was easier for it to be a very specialized model it was very good at like thinking hard about you know scientific problems in particular and launching it as a separate model allowed us to iterate faster and allowed us to put to put this thing in people's hands and see what they did with it. and what they wanted to do and, you know, what its shortcomings were and where it excelled.

And so then we iterated a bunch that way. So you have GPT4, you have 01 and then O2 and all that. And then you have the mini models, which are sort of smaller, faster versions of those things. And GPT5 for us was the moment where we kind of brought all of this stuff together and had one experience. Elegant is. But I expect in the future that we'll have other things where we have some new capability and we want to test it out faster than we can like integrated into one massive thing. So I wouldn't be surprised if we have these kind of offshoots again in the future.

And then we integrate them as they work and we kind of gain mastery over them. Eric Schmidt talks about learning loops, right? The speed of innovation is the speed of which you get learning loops. Put it out there, see how people think about it, give you feedback. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, especially with these, we're all kind of uncovering what these models can do. So it's especially valuable for us to get it out in people's hands and let them build.

Yeah, the reasoning was just shocking. actually I don't know if was that true here too like nobody prior to 01 would have thought the chain of thought reasoning it was going to be such a huge unlock yeah I mean it's just he starts with iterative reprompting which just worked far better than anyone ever would have guessed and that evolved into 01 and then 03 and I guess O2 was oxygen I don't know what happened oh two of that yeah trademark issue trademark yeah yeah but yeah I'm sure there'll be other offshoots because it because again the capabilities are always surprising like even even the best researchers in the world don't know exactly exactly what's going to come next. So I'm curious. It's interesting, right? We just cruised through the passing of the touring test and didn't notice. Isn't it amazing? It's crazy. It was held up for

like 50, 60 years as this pinnacle and then we just like whooshed by it. Well, that's the effect. We don't talk about it anymore. Like so quickly and they missed, they missed the implications because they're already on to the next, oh, I took it for granted. Like, no, you've got to think about what the question is. It's like right here in our hands.

Will we pass through AGI the same way. It was like, oh, yeah, it happened. I think so. I really think so. Because arguably, AGI is here. Yeah. It's just unevenly distributed. Yes. Right. And there are lots of ways where the model is way smarter than me already. And I would never choose myself over the model. And then there are lots of places where the model is definitely not smarter than me yet. And I would choose myself. But over time, I'm kind of staying, you know, I'm improving a little bit, hopefully. But the model's getting better a lot faster. The level of water is rising. So I just saw GPT5 Pro was measured at an IQ of like 148. Okay. Just raw IQ. On the Mensa, on the Mensa, Norway Mensa scale. Wow.

That's impressive. Yeah. I mean, it won a gold medal at the IMO, right? Congratulations. This second at the programming competitions. I mean, I have to, so it, yeah, I was interesting, right? So I looked at the IMO, the international math Olympiad stats. And, you know, the U.S. came in second. And I think it's out of, how many, is that, 36 points, I think. Yeah, 36 points. Oh, no, no, 402. Out of 42.

And the U.S. had, like, between 32 and 36. Yeah. And the Chinese team that came in first had perfect score across all six Olympiads. Wow. Mm-hmm. That was impressive. So our podcast made Alex Wisner Gross, who's total genius. he's been tracking that IMO score as the benchmark for self-improvement.

Because, you know, solving those problems is very, very correlated with also iterating through the algorithm. Yeah. So I think there's a lot of belief now that we're going to go into this really rapid acceleration of capability because of self-improvement until the GPUs run out. You know, some... Yeah, yeah. Some, but...

Or the electricity runs out first. Well, I think, yeah, interesting, because the GPUs are constrained. The electricity won't run out quite yet because... because we can't make the GPUs fast enough to keep up. But the software improvement is unconstrained, right? There's this period of time. I think it's coming right now. The algorithmic improvement that we swagged it on the podcast at between 100,000 X.

But recently there's some new news coming out that indicates maybe it's even higher than that. Yeah. I don't know if you guys have a theory on that internally or not. Well, there's now, there's two dimensions now that we're scaling intelligence, right? One is via pre-trained, which is kind of the traditional thing. And now it's test time. How long are you willing to give the model time to think? And how long can you kind of keep it on track as it does?

Yes. So with 01, 03 in chat GPT, you kind of get, you know, the model will think for like 60 seconds. And then it'll come back and give you an answer. Most people don't want to wait too much longer than that. Deep research, though, will take sometimes 20, 30 minutes to go do a bunch of research and iteratively compile everything that it gets, figure out what it's missing, go back and get more. But there's no reason that you can't have a model thing for two days, two weeks, two months, two years, you know, Andrew Wiles didn't solve Fermat's last theorem by thinking for five minutes.

He worked out for seven years. And we see continued evidence that the longer the models think, the smarter they get, the harder the problems they can solve. So, I mean, there's this other dimension of scaling that today, at least, we don't see any. Do you have a whole, like we see a lot of continued growth there. Yeah, there's a lot of work going on for a custom chip design that's designed by AI to specifically. Do you have a whole strategy around that? Are you working with that's, I mean, that's one of those areas where you can let the model think and it's a pretty well-constrained problem. Yeah, totally. There's an organization that you can climb on and you can run tests and understand if your layout is better than the previous layout. Yeah. And the more time you

give the models to think about it, the more breakthroughs they make. So I actually, I'm with you, I think that's one of the areas where we're going to see, I mean, we already are seeing real innovation, right? I believe Google has been public about the fact that they've designed their TPUs and improved them with AI. You know, we're doing similar things. I think if you, if you talk to Noam Shizier or anybody over there, the historically, the TPU team has been way the hell over here, and the algorithms team is way the hell over there and trying to translate your algorithmic idea into something that the hardware guys understand is just a nightmare. So that's been a very slow process. But now, because the AI will do it for you, it'll do the chip design right off your

software design, that's going to be the big unlock. I don't know if it's like this month. It's not more than what. Oh, I think it's already happening. Yeah. And it's already happening. And you have a, do you have a team here doing specifically that? Yeah, we're working on our own chips.

And we would be crazy if we weren't also using AI to improve our chip design and lay out and everything. Do you have all the manufacturing and fab all figured out too? That's that. We're working with partners on that for sure. But, uh, but, uh, but yeah, it's, it's, there's this class of problem where you have a fairly well, it's a specific problem, and you have a way

that you can grade it, in this case, you know, speed of the chip that you design. And in problems like that, you have these well-specified problems, you can just iterate and iterate and iterate and apply arbitrary amounts of GPU. And so far, I think we're going to see arbitrary amounts of

improvement. I totally agree. It's crazy exciting. Is that fertile area for startups, or should they stay away from that because it's just where the big boys play? I totally think it's fertile area. It takes a lot of technical talent to do it. Yeah. But I think that's an interesting spot. I know some startups doing some exciting stuff there, material science and others. Yeah, material science, unsung hero. And it will be a huge unlock. Yeah. Yeah. Everybody, there's not a week that goes by

when I don't get the strangest of compliments. Someone will stop me and say, Peter, you've got such nice skin. Honestly, I never thought, especially at age 64, I'd be hearing anyone say that I have great skin. And honestly, I can't take any credit. I use an amazing product called OneSkin OS01 twice a day every day. The company was built by four brilliant PhD women who have identified a 10 amino acid peptide that effectively reverses the age of your skin. I love it and like I say, I use it every day twice a day. There you have it. That's my secret. You go to Oneskin.com and write Peter at checkout for a discount on the same product I use. Okay, now back to the episode. Oh, it would be amazing. Yeah. Lieutenant Colonel Leo.

Yes. June 13th, you're inducted into the Army. Yeah. Super excited about it. Super excited. Did you go through Army basic training? We did a version of basic training. It was kind of an accelerated version.

I mean, you're an ultramarathon or so, I mean, probably not. Probably open. Yeah, so, but, you know, we went and we've, we've all passed our Army fitness tests. So tell us about that. How did that materialize? Do you get a call one day? Yeah. I got a call from Sean Sankar, who leads, he's a CTO of Palantir.

He's been there forever. And he and some of the folks at the top of the Army were thinking about this program. I mean, it's really smart. I mean, I was impressed. Yeah. And kudos to the Army for being willing to take a risk on some crazy people like us. But I think it's awesome. You, and by the way, I hope there's four of us today.

Yes. So it's myself. It's Sean. it's Boz, is the CTO of META, and then Bob McGrew, who used to be the head of research here, the idea is to bring us in and basically to create a group,

like bring tech and the military, the DoD closer together. Take a bunch of expertise that you get from, you know, working in the tech industry, a bunch of expertise that you get from being in the DOD and doing all the incredible things that the Army does and merge them together so that, because we will be better together.

I mean, I imagine the Navy, the Air Force, you need to do something very similar. Yeah, and there's a huge push across the DoD to integrate AI, as they're very well should be. Like, does us no good to have the best models in the world if they're sitting on the shelf while the, you know, the PLA uses inferior models, but integrates them everywhere. Yeah, no doubt. So it's super, super important. The idea here was, because there's lots of efforts, you know, to bring AI across the D&D, but the idea here was like, Palmer Lucky's a friend and he's been doing an amazing job. Oh, totally. Yeah. Thank God for them.

But, you know, you could have done this as a consultant, but I think getting us in on the inside, first of all, I mean, wearing the uniform, you feel a responsibility, you go hang out with people who are, who are, I mean, literally giving their lives. But also just it's such a, it's such a incredible institution that you wouldn't get that sense on the outside. I didn't have that sense before. You know, I respected it, obviously. but being on the inside is a different thing. Obviously, I have a ton to learn. We're just getting started. But I think us being on the inside will allow us to be more effective.

And when we go to wherever they would like us to go to help, we'll have that much more of a sense of how everything works and will be a part of the team as opposed to being a consultant from the outside. Yeah. So I'm very excited. You have to go through the whole top secret clearance process and all the back. background checks and all that? Was that a... I had one already.

Yeah, did all work? You have it already? Not all of us, but yeah, they had us go through. So then once you're inside, you know, on base, whatever, just access to everything? How's that work? I mean, it's still very, you know, when top secret stuff is pretty heavily compartmented, so there's a need to know basis for most things. Yeah.

So they certainly don't just, you know, open up everything. But it's weird. But things that are important for us to know, we can know. And we can help in deeper ways than if we didn't have that access. Is there a schedule where, like, you go once, whatever? It's a little more ad hoc than, you know, normal reserves duty. You're kind of like a weekend a month and two weeks in the summer. And this is much more, just because of the jobs, it's harder to be a weekend a month.

But it's also we can go, you know, maybe deeper, longer for specific things. We're also each going to take our own kind of focus that obviously we have to watch out for conflicts. And so they've designed our focus areas based on that. Oh, what's your focus? What's your focus on is one of the things I'm going to focus on is like physical performance. And how, because you can imagine a lot of ways to use AI to monitor and improve physical performance. For sure. You know, like I've got a whoop.

I've got an aura. I've got an Apple watch. By the way, which gives you better sleep data, do you think? Or a woof? You know, they disagree. I never quite know. I've got an eight sleep as well. I got one of my best nights.

sleep last night. I got a 94 score. Oh, wow. Yes, that was great. That's amazing. The one thing might agree on is I need to sleep more. And deep sleep more. Yeah. Yeah. Let's wrap with advice for entrepreneurs right now. So a lot of entrepreneurs, a lot of builders here, you know, as a chief product officer and they're building products, how would you, how, what, what stage advice do you have for them? Oh, man. I think lean into the AI in every way possible and assume that it will continue on the super sharp, steep curve that it's on. And if you're... Build, experiment. Just imagine things that should be true and are not possible today. And I think a lot of them are going to be possible to build six months from now, a year from now, two years from now. And the people that see

that and are building for that future, counting on the models to get there, like, that's going to pay off because the models are going to get there. Yeah. All right. I do have, I do have an important last question for you. And it's this. Has OpenAI reached, fully reached AGI, and what is Johnny Ives delivering for you? Oh, man. I've been waiting to talk about this since we started. Really? Okay. All right. So. That's a cut, ladies and gentlemen. So that's a wrap.

Obviously, we didn't get information from Kevin that's exclusive on Johnny Ives or AGI, as much as I would love to. But hopefully, if you're a builder and entrepreneur at home, this was super useful for you. I know it was for me. Every week, my team and I study the top 10 technology metatrends that will transform industries over the decade ahead. I cover trends ranging from humanoid robotics, AGI, and quantum computing to transport, energy, longevity, and more, there's no fluff, only the most important stuff that matters,

that impacts our lives, our companies, and our careers. If you want me to share these metatrends with you, I writing a newsletter twice a week, sending it out as a short two-minute read via email. And if you want to discover the most important metatrends 10 years before anyone else, this reports for you. Readers include founders and CEOs from the world's most disruptive companies and entrepreneurs building the world's most disruptive tech. It's not for you if you don't want to be informed about what's coming, why it matters, and how you can benefit from it. To subscribe for free, go to Demandis.com slash Metatrends to gain access to the trends 10 years before anyone else. All right, now back to this episode.