Moonshots with Peter Diamandis - She Left Google to Build Tech That Could Save Millions w/ Mary Lou Jepsen | EP #142
Episode Date: January 17, 2025In this episode, Mary Lou and Peter discuss how Openwater is using AI and exponential technology to cure strokes, Mary Lou’s trajectory in big tech companies, and how technology has the power to dem...ocratize healthcare for humanity. Recorded on Dec 4th, 2024 Views are my own thoughts; not Financial, Medical, or Legal Advice. 11:53 | The Birth of Open Water 21:04 | The Future of Medical Technology 01:01:31 | Open Source Revolution in Healthcare Mary Lou Jepsen is a renowned technologist, inventor, and entrepreneur who has made groundbreaking contributions to display technology, consumer electronics, and medical imaging. As the founder and CEO of Openwater, she is developing advanced imaging technologies to revolutionize medical diagnostics. Jepsen has held key roles at major tech companies, including CTO of Intel Display Division, Head of Display at Google, and Executive Director of Engineering at Facebook and Oculus. She co-founded One Laptop per Child, designed the $100 laptop for children in developing countries, and founded Pixel Qi Corp to advance display innovations. With over 250 patents, her work spans display technology, virtual and augmented reality, and medical imaging. A Brown University and MIT alumna with a Ph.D. in Optical Physics, Jepsen has been named one of TIME's 100 Most Influential People, CNN's Top 10 Thinkers, and Forbes’ Top 50 Women in Technology, receiving numerous accolades for her pioneering contributions to technology and healthcare. Learn more about Openwater: https://www.openwater.health/ Get my Longevity Guidebook here: https://qr.diamandis.com/book-audiopodcast ____________ I only endorse products and services I personally use. To see what they are, please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors: Get started with Fountain Life and become the CEO of your health: https://fountainlife.com/peter/ AI-powered precision diagnosis you NEED for a healthy gut: https://www.viome.com/peter Get 15% off OneSkin with the code PETER at  https://www.oneskin.co/ #oneskinpod _____________ I send weekly emails with the latest insights and trends on today’s and tomorrow’s exponential technologies. Stay ahead of the curve, and sign up now: Tech Blog _____________ Connect With Peter: Twitter Instagram Youtube Moonshots
Transcript
Discussion (0)
You have had incredible positions around the world.
Google and Facebook, the head of engineering there, the Intel CTO.
You ran the largest consumer product development ever.
And you gave that up. You transformed yourself from that into what?
What's your mission and passion today?
Using all the stuff that's coming down the pike,
maybe we could affect on a cellular level disease states.
These are converging exponentials.
This is the intersection of physics and AI and chip sets.
This laser, for example,
was the size of the room and a million dollars.
And this is allowing us with camera chips
and your smartphone to see blood flow 20 times better
than a multimmillion dollar MRI machine
or CT machine or anything else
we can find published in the literature.
So Vitalik says, listen, if you open source this,
I will give you $50 million.
All 68 of our patents, all of our software,
all of our hardware, AGPL continues open source.
You're about to unleash an entire revolution.
Hi everybody, Peter Diamandis here and welcome to Moonshots.
Today's episode is perhaps one of the most important episodes I've recorded in recent past.
It's with an extraordinary entrepreneur and engineer, a designer, someone who is transforming our medical future. She is the CEO of Open Water, an advanced medical
technologies company that's not only developing diagnostics, but incredible therapeutics to fight
cancer, to fight mental disorders, to fight addictions, to fight strokes. Her name is Dr.
Mary Lou Jepson. You may know of her. She was the CTO of Intel. She was Director of Engineering at Google
and part of Google X, Executive Director of Engineering at Facebook and Oculus. Along with
Professor Nicholas Negroponte, she developed a $100 one laptop per child program, a bachelor's
in engineering, a master's from MIT, a PhD in optical physics from Brown, a professor at MIT.
Jepson was named one of Time magazine's 100 most influential
people, CNN's top thinkers, Forbes' top 50 women.
I can't tell you how excited I am for this conversation.
If you care about your medical future,
if you care about transforming the world, taking huge moon
shots, what it takes to be an entrepreneur that impacts
a billion plus people, Dr. Mary Lou Jepson has your playbook and she's an amazing human being.
By the way, if you'd like to have conversations like this with other people, please subscribe.
I'm excited to serve you.
For me, this is the most important work that I can do to inspire and guide you to show
you people like this who are changing the world.
All right, let's jump in to an incredible episode with Dr. Mary Lou Jepson.
Before we get started, I want to share with you the fact that there are incredible breakthroughs
coming on the health span and longevity front.
These technologies are enabling us to extend how long we live, how long we're healthy.
The truth is, a lot of the approaches are in fact cheap or even free.
And I want to share this with you.
I just wrote a book called Longevity Guidebook that outlines what I've been doing to reverse
my biological age, what I've been doing to increase my health, my strength, my energy.
And I want to make this available to my community at cost.
So LongevityGuidebook.com, you can get information or check out the link below.
All right, let's jump into this episode.
Mary Lou, I cannot tell you how excited I am about this podcast.
You know, you are an extraordinary entrepreneur, technologist, and disruptor.
And I want the world to know what you're doing because you're about to change care for decades ahead.
And so thank you for taking the time.
I want to go deep with you.
I want to talk about how you're reinventing health care, how
you're using exponential technologies to transform
our lives.
Honestly, how you're making the impossible possible.
So thanks for the time today.
Thanks for having me.
And I'm so excited to show everybody what we've
been doing through pandemic. Because it's been a lot. a lot and I really we're gonna unveil some stuff today that
no one's seen. Yeah, you've been for featuring us. You're welcome. You've been on an incredible
mission. I mean you have had incredible positions around the world right? If I were to lay it out, you were at a few different tech
giants, Google and Facebook, the head of engineering there,
the Intel CTO.
You were reinventing everything from holography to VR screens.
I mean, you ran the largest consumer product development ever.
And you gave that up, you transformed yourself from that into what?
What's your mission and passion today?
Using all the stuff that's coming down the pike for next generation consumer electronics,
be it VR, AR, LIDAR, and using the fact that both
infrared light, ultrasound and electromagnetic penetrate our
body. And with the manipulation we can now do using Moore's law
exponential reduction and feature size, we can make
devices. This is why I started this company close to 10 years
ago called Open Water. We're going to talk about it today.
why I started this company close to 10 years ago called Open Water.
We're going to talk about it today.
Using these principles, I thought that maybe we could affect on the cellular level, disease states, like kill the cancer cells without
killing the healthy tissue, fix the stroke, fix the neurodegenerative disease.
And now it's really eight years into this,
feels like 10 though, we have pretty strong results
and we're about to scale out and go into production
of devices anybody can buy to push this research forward
in a whole set of disease states,
including pathogen deactivation like COVID
or other diseases.
So for anybody listening,
what we're about to go on
is a journey, a revolutionary journey,
on how the technologies that Mary Lou has been pulling
together, these are converging exponentials.
This is the intersection of physics and AI and chipsets
that's turning what was once huge, bulky, expensive equipment into software,
into different therapeutics that are, you know, I talk about the 6Ds, Mary Lou, that
when you digitize something, it dematerializes, it demonetizes, and it democratizes.
And that's exactly what you're doing to, you know,
shall we say billions of dollars worth of healthcare tech?
Yeah, I mean, this laser, for example,
was the size of a room and a million dollars.
And this is allowing us, with camera chips
and your smartphone, to see blood flow 20 times better
than a multimillion dollar MRI machine or CT machine
or anything else we can find published in the literature.
It literally makes holograms.
It records the phase of light.
Here's the eight camera chips, the lasers in there.
And it records the phase of light
because the chips in your smartphone are so small
that the pixels are the size of the wavelength of light, which means we can record the waves and the waves of light because the chips in your smartphone are so small that the pixels are the size of the wavelength of light which means we can record the waves and
the waves of light and there's information in that and with that
information with this laser we made this goes into production like literally next
month but we already have been in hospitals for four years with this
technology so this is just one of the kind of modules we're
getting out to everybody. And I want to go into this technology but I guess I
want to I want to preface this if you've ever had anybody for our viewers and
listeners ever had anybody who has had a debilitating stroke which is the second
leading cause of death in the world. If you've ever had anybody with mental disease or addictions
or have had anybody who has an aggressive cancer
like a glioblastoma, the work that you're doing
is the chance to provide not just treatments
but effectively cures for these things.
Potentially a cure.
I mean, we have results just from this week looking at amyloid microplacts with ultrasound
at certain frequencies.
And one of the issues is that the microplacts are too big to go through capillaries.
So it kills off whatever is close to the capillaries that get clogged up with these
microclots. It happens with aging. It happens in
neurodegenerative disease. It happens with acute COVID. It
happens with type two diabetes. We're clearing 80% of them. And
we're reducing the size from an eight micron diameter to a four
micron diameter. And that's a really big deal because capillaries are five to 10 microns wide.
And so if it's eight, it may not get through.
If it's bigger, it can't get through.
It's clogged.
And so the potential is very strong.
Again, this is just lab work we're doing, but what we're looking at doing is
basically taking something like this, putting it behind your knee.
And you're holding up something the size of a cigarette pack basically.
Yeah so this in it has a transducer, an ultrasound transducer that's an eight by
eight array and we're able to focus wherever we want to using antenna theory
but it we're able to make resonant frequencies
that allow us to selectively attack the microclots.
Like an opera singer can stimulate
or even break a wine glass,
but harm nothing else on the room when she sings.
So I wanna slow this down.
Doing this, by the way,
this is a diagnostic level of ultrasound. So yes, you want to slow it down.
I want to slow it down for everybody because there's so much here.
But what you're about to hear is what I think is the most important revolution in health care
that we're gonna see over the next few years
with a chance to really
democratize this at a
extraordinarily affordable cost. I mean, right it says this is and the chance to really democratize this at an extraordinarily
affordable cost.
I mean, this is, and I'll ask everybody
to put in the comments here if you agree,
this is so revolutionary that I want
to get your name out there before you win your Nobel
Prize so that people know about this.
That's the goal.
So I want to start.
The goal is to change health care.
I know it is.
And put it on this track of other things.
The 20 to 40 year moats are anti-innovation
for the thing that kills us.
And we've got to speed it up.
And yes, we've got great technology.
I think the business model we're using to speed it up
is even more compelling.
And we want to bring other
Technologies into this suite so we can do more and we'll get there. So I want to tell your story to begin with
Your brain tumor survivor, right? How much of that is your motivation? You mind telling that story?
And where does it begin?
Yes kid and where does it begin? Oh, I was a kid.
I was pretty sick and in the hospital a lot.
And that got me really good at being on time
because I knew I likely end up in the hospital.
Anyway, I was finally diagnosed.
I dropped out of my PhD in physics in Ivy League school
because I was in a wheelchair.
I was really sick.
I couldn't move half my face.
I was sleeping 20 hours a day.
But then it got really bad because I couldn't even subtract. And so I didn't think I deserved a PhD
in physics from the Ivy League school. I had already worked. I'd been a computer science
professor. I had a degree from MIT. I was at Brown doing my PhD. And I called up my parents and asked them if I could, you know, come home and die
because Brown had a medical school. They let me see the professors there. No one could figure out
what I had. This is 1995 ish. But as I was headed out, this professor said, you know,
you've got really bad headaches, right? Like, yeah, very bad headaches.
So he sprung for the cost of an MRI. They found my tumor.
MRIs back then, let's describe what an MRI was for comparison, because
exactly the same size and shape. It's just 10 times more expensive today.
Yeah, it's a giant.
Which is Moore's law spelled backwards.
Best we call it, Moor's Law, which is Moor's Law spelled backwards. It's a giant room, I would say.
It's like 20 by 20 foot minimum, shielded in an electric cage with a large electromagnet
and helium cooling.
A power center by the most expensive room in hospitals and also the highest margin,
90% gross margin. It's where hospitals make their profit.
And so they're charging thousands of dollars for this MRI.
Right.
I didn't know I needed it.
I would have.
Sorry.
Go ahead.
So it wasn't that you couldn't afford it.
You didn't know that you needed it.
And when something is...
Yeah.
I didn't know that I needed it.
They found it.
Then I sprung, found a really good neurosurgeon.
Luckily only needed one,
have taken a dozen medications every day
for the rest of my life and will.
But I've, you know, every once in a while,
you sort of look at that,
I put them all in the same bottle
and I've got some shots and things,
but you look and you think,
boy, you know, I had to really fight to get these.
You have to fight for your life often.
And it just focuses you when we're here now,
what do we want to do with our lives?
And so there's maybe a positive outcome for that.
So, yeah, I try.
You go from that recovery of a brain tumor.
Where did you launch first into your career?
Well, I'd already had some bit of a career,
but I went to finish my PhD,
and myself and two other students
got $4 million from DARPA
to commercialize our PhD technology.
So we started a company called Micro Display.
We were the first people to make micro displays
for, we were trying to make a wristwatch video,
VR, early smartphones, a lot of projection
stuff, had mass production, set up a manufacturing line in Richmond, California, just north of
Berkeley and shipped in a few years.
And we were shipping in all kinds of novel devices, basically something that looks exactly
like Google Glass, but in 1998.
Looks the same. I mean, the software improved, but the hardware
was there then with a collaboration
with an optical company called Micro Optical.
I need to be clear about that.
We made the screen part.
They made the optics.
So I did that for a while and got recruited at Intel
to be the CTO of their division.
I like smaller companies better.
I don't like the sharp elbows as much.
I like everybody sort of in the same little rowboat
helping each other to do the impossible rather than,
I don't know, like why do you need a thought?
The goals in big companies seem to be having,
how big is it, means how many people you have working on it.
Where the ideal for me is sort of like WhatsApps,
$19 billion, 50 people like that.
Yes.
That seems like a much more interesting way to go.
A good exponential company.
Did you see the movie Oppenheimer?
If you did, did you know that
besides building the atomic bomb
at Los Alamos National Labs,
that they spent billions on bio-ense weapons, the ability to accurately
detect viruses and microbes by reading their RNA.
Well, a company called Viome exclusively licensed the technology from Los Alamos Labs to build
a platform that can measure your microbiome and the RNA in your blood.
Now, Viome has a product that I've personally used for years called Full Body Intelligence, which collects a few drops of your blood, spit
and stool, and can tell you so much about your health. They've tested over 700,000
individuals and used their AI models to deliver members critical health
guidance, like what foods you should eat, what foods you shouldn't eat, as well as
your supplements and probiotics, your biological age and other deep health insights.
And the results of the recommendations are nothing short of stellar.
You know, as reported in the American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine,
after just six months of following Viom's recommendations,
members reported the following.
A 36% reduction in depression, a 40% reduction in anxiety,
a 30% reduction in diabetes, and a 48% reduction in IBS.
Listen, I've been using Viome for three years. I know that my oral and gut health is one of my
highest priorities. Best of all, Viome is affordable, which is part of my mission to
democratize health. If you want to join me on this journey, go to Viome.com slash Peter. I've asked Nave Naveen Jane a friend of mine who's the founder and CEO of I own to give my listeners a special discount
You'll find it at Viome comm slash Peter
But you ended up in Intel and and that was an extraordinary
Sort of resurrection from from surgery to Intel
Yeah, and Microsoft finishing the PhD even, you know, was a lot.
Sure.
And then I left because Intel only has rail-to-rail processes
and I ran into the CEO, the new CEO just left.
I heard.
And explained why we can never make as good silicon as anybody else
because all our processes by rail-to- rail, it's either zero or a voltage.
But to get the best thing for a screen,
because we want to see grayscale,
you need radiation and voltage.
So I'm like, look, we could use anybody's silicon.
We're Intel.
Come into my office.
So anyway, I effectively pointed out in two sentences,
literally in an elevator with a CEO, the fundamental flaw.
And so anyway, I needed a job.
I was happy.
I saved them a few hundred million dollars a year
of something that could not be Intel Silicon.
Everybody hated me.
Anyway, I put my resume online because I
did have that PhD in physics.
And I'd already been a professor.
I had taken a break after my master's degree
and was a computer science professor in Australia
and then worked as an artist,
a multimedia artist in Germany.
I want to get back to that later.
I want to hear about your art career, your music career.
Yeah, I only got a callback at one place.
It was MIT, which is pretty good.
I applied to like 35 schools. But I ended
up with Nicolas Negroponte. I had been a student at the MIT Media Lab in the 80s. I did a master's
degree there and made the world's first holographic video system with a team of graduate students and
loved the place. And in the final interview, it was supposed to be like 20 minutes with Nicolas Negroponte, the legendary founder
of the MIT Media Lab and many other things.
We started One Laptop per Child.
And so I started that in parallel
and co-founded it with him and became the only other employee
for the first year and basically lived on a plane with Nicolas
while we made a prototype of the laptop, Kofi Annan,
the then head of the UN.
And for those who don't know, one lap per child really,
it was the objective of how do you get
a thousand dollar laptop down to a hundred bucks,
and you launched the entire tablet industry
as part of that.
Netbook and tablet came out,
that became a bigger thing.
I actually actually have one right over here.
Let me grab one.
I can see it on the wall.
Yeah, the beautiful green one lap, one laptop design.
So this thing, and it wasn't just a stripped down laptop.
It was lowest power laptop ever made,
lowest cost laptop ever made,
first mesh now work laptop ever made.
We wrote the first keyboards in Amarik and a whole bunch of other languages.
No reading required to use it because it's for kids that don't know how to read.
How many of those were produced in total?
Millions. I mean, we created a multibillion dollar
not for profit open source.
And the lasting legacy is a few things.
We transformed what a minister of education could do
for the children of the country.
Intel and Microsoft nearly killed us.
There was a 60 minute session.
They spent like exponentially more than we spent
to stop it.
But you know, eventually they-
Yeah, there's a lot of undue criticism
on one laptop per child, but what you did was
extraordinary.
But so we changed the equation of that.
We also, you know, Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google, cites this.
I mean, the Chromebook is its grandson, granddaughter, whatever, grandk kid, in terms of what we can do for education to make
something quite usable for children so they cross the digital divide and also useful in pandemic.
When did you get addicted to moonshots? Because that was probably, was that your first moonshot?
Probably holographic video. I think like when the Nobel laureate stood up
when I gave my first talk and said that's poppycock
and it'll never work.
And it was probably just two minutes of insult.
It felt like I was yelled at in front of everybody.
First talk.
Yeah, 20-something.
This is the equivalent of R2D2 projecting for Princess Leia.
And I remember I had the courage after sort of going back to my hotel room and not being
happy.
Probably crying.
I went up to him at the reception and I said, you know, we all fit, you know, we all, you've
done impossible things in your life.
And like, if there's an issue with this, like, could you explain like, it's not sufficient to just say it with this like could you explain like it's
not sufficient to just say it's impossible could you explain why it's
impossible. So let me let me understand me set the setting here so you're giving
a presentation on holographic video. My first presentation on this research
project I'm undertaking for my master's degree at MIT as a first year student.
And a Nobel laureate stands up and says it's crazy.
Right, it'll never work.
Impossible.
And I remember talking to my advisor at the time, Steve
Benton, who ran the holography group at the Media Lab.
And he said, when somebody tells you it's impossible, what it
means is they're a little bit jealous.
And I can't remember the other thing, but it was a little bit jealous. And I can't remember the other thing,
but it was a little bit jealous.
I think it means it's impossible for them.
Right, they tried before, but you can look at it with new eyes
and find new ways through it.
And so yeah, so that's what we did.
You went on to build that.
Yes, we did.
Built the world's first fully computer-generated whole ground with a micron size pixels in 1987, which was hard to do then.
And computer generated on a supercomputer then, which looks a lot like Nvidia now, but it was a connection machine, which was earlier, early parallel.
So that's your first moonshot. Would you consider one laptop your second? Yeah I think we really did transform
things. People don't remember it now but the kids do and they're still working in the field. By the
way these laptops have been working for 20 years because they're so low power too. And durable.
It's incredible architecture.
I designed it around the screen.
Nobody does that.
Like, who cares if the CPU is on?
The CPU people, like Intel, they think they're the brains
behind the operation.
And like, there could be little green men inside the laptop.
You care if the screen's on, if it responds to a stroke.
You can shut the whole mother bar down a vast majority
of the time and then bring it back up in a single digit number of milliseconds and it seems like it's on.
And so that's really important because kids in the developing world at that time, half of them lacked steady ready access to power. Also, had a screen, I'm a screen designer,
that was the better resolution than the Apple Retinal display.
Same time.
$100.
And this is a $100 laptop.
And the computers at the time cost $2,000.
Laptops cost $2,000.
Andy had to buy $2,000 as a software for him.
People forget.
So it was a massive change in cost structure.
What kind of battery life did it have?
Oh, extraordinary battery life and the life of the batteries.
We were the first ones.
I went to BYD.
Wow, back then.
And made lithium ferrophosphate battery
because the lithium ion batteries were burning.
And lithium ferrophosphate burns at 100 degrees C.
And we conditioned it so that it could last through 2000 charge
recharge cycles, which was like 10, 20 times what normal lithium
ion batteries could do at the time.
So here's out of this right now.
But yeah, so there was a lot of innovation.
We're talking dozens of hours of battery life.
Oh, yeah, it lasts for a day or two. But you could hand crank it
because it's so low power or a small solar cell would recharge it and we gave
those out too. What a beautiful design. So thank you for that work. So after one
laptop, where do you go next? I start a company called Pixel Qi because I
thought I sort of gave up my job thinking
that the laptop's built. Why don't we
get somebody that knows about education coming in?
Here's where being a woman in tech,
they think I know about education.
Well, I know children.
I was.
I didn't go to school.
But it's time to bring in education experts.
And so I decided to help the industry design
more interesting stuff.
So I left MIT because I was more excited about what
I could use with the multi-billion dollar fabs
of Asia, despite the best postdoc I could maybe
make one thing once, but then not
be able to repeat it for a year because of the contamination
and whatever happened in the beautiful MIT labs.
I moved to Asia, started a company called Pixel Qi,
and made really innovative screen technology
as the first fabulous screen maker.
I made a lot of screens for tablets and laptops
and smartphones, but then other unique screens
until Sergey Google fell in love with it.
And also, I was trying to work on brain computer interface
and they were starting Google Labs.
We'll come back to BCI for those listening.
There's a BCI story here.
Google App hired the whole company in Bits and Start.
So you end up with Sergey at Google
in their moonshot factory.
Right.
Because Sergey wanted a lot of stuff.
But I'm working on innovative consumer electronics,
levering Android and many other abilities of Google.
So I'm doing things that Larry and Sergey want me to do.
You can read about what I'm not supposed to ever say what I did there.
You can read about it.
I know what you did there.
Yes.
So there are some very cool projects and then-
Large holographic walls included?
Yeah, sure. And you know, screens on every surface.
How do you do that? And then why would you do that?
I mean, they weren't holographic though, they were flat.
Something I've been doing in pandemic is I think everybody wants a million dollar view.
So all you have to do is make the screen an optical infinity, meaning, and then anybody
could feel like they were someplace else when they got home. A lot of people spent time.
I was just at a friend, I was just at Mark Pinkus' home and he has a beautiful home overlooking the San Francisco Bay and the Golden Gate Bridge there.
And it was, you know, floor to ceiling, 30 foot, 40 foot wide windows and it was breathtaking view.
And I was like, I would love that on a screen.
Why can't anybody, and the 3D is very important.
Yes.
Screens are now about $10 a square foot.
Windows are more expensive.
It's amazing what's happened.
Morphosilicon is also the substrate for solar panels.
It's just mass abundance.
So if you've got that, how do you use that
and our tools, the software,
they are like, but we have all of these photos of everything. And yeah, you can have updates.
Do you think you could create a large scale video wall that looks identical to a view out the window? Well, yes.
And that's like a side project.
I call it my Venice Biennale project.
I don't know if I'll get into Venice Biennale.
Can I join you on that one?
I love that idea.
Yeah, I'd love to do it as an art project
and then just get it into,
get someone else to the startup, honestly.
Or maybe you can think of somebody,
but it's a lot of work. I've got someone in mind.
Yeah. But yeah, this is a side project. I have lot of work. I've got someone in mind, yeah.
No, I mean-
But yeah, this is a side project.
I have a little studio.
I work on that sometimes on the weekends,
just to clear my head.
And you can flip the switch
and you can be on the surface of the moon or Mars.
Right, wherever, looking over the Eiffel Tower.
It's much easier if you're at optical infinity,
meaning if you close one eye and the other eye,
you see a disparity, a difference between the views,
but if something's far enough away,
it's easier to compute.
Yes.
Everybody's winking their eyes right now, left and right.
It's easier, so anyway, there's all this steps,
but I walked away from screen technology.
I just miss it sometimes,
particularly in the isolation of pandemic.
So you're with Sergey, you're in the moonshot factory there, which was an exciting time.
I mean, you know, with Astro, were you there when Astro was there or just before?
It did overlap a bit with Astro, yeah.
And then on to Oculus from there.
Yeah, Mark recruited me.
He had bought this company for a bunch of money. They'd never
shipped anything particularly distinguished by the screens and the optics. It kind of bought me like
I was a company. I didn't actually want to go. Some things happened to Google that pissed me off
that, sorry, I shouldn't go into detail because never speak ill. But you know, it really was
lucrative. My most successful project up till then had been the not for profit, you know, it really was lucrative. My most successful project up till then had been the not-for-profit, you know.
So it was quite lucrative to go.
I probably shouldn't have gone.
I liked Google better despite the new business.
I love Google as a culture.
And I mean, they've done so much.
It's been better.
People don't know how much Google has done for the world
in so many ways, the investments, the projects they've done.
Yeah, I liked, and I loved working for Sergey. He was fantastic to work for.
Hi Sergey.
Anyway, so you go and you join the team at Oculus. You're reporting directly to Mark.
Were you in the in Facebook?
It moved around. They called me game changer. Whatever. I had another title too, but I was supposed to sort of
figure out how to change the game from what we were doing.
But it was, I knew that it was a rocky road.
I mean, they were, they'd just gotten bought,
they were trying, you know, whatever.
So I did what I could and invented some very cool
sunglass VR AR systems and a bunch of things
that hopefully we'll see the light of day. So let me take it aside there one moment because you
are the the screen goddess and the miniaturization goddess. How far do you
think we are from wearable AR VR specs like you're wearing right now that are
light and and enjoyable.
It's a matter of will. I mean, they've spent a hundred billion dollars.
I know, it's a lot of money.
And it's surprising how little of whatever they have in the labs, if they've pursued that, has seen the light of day.
It's not that efficient. I mean, I think, you know, Reid Hoffman wrote a book about it, Blitzscaling, like when you spend a ton of
money, it's not that efficient. It's not maybe supposed to be. It makes their taxes
come out right, whatever. But it's a lot of money. Mark really deeply believes in
it. I don't know. I think, I didn't like the face bug. I don't... You know, like
covering your face with a giant mask ski goggles.
That's why I want the million dollar view. I don't want to have to wear it.
But different, you know, all of this is true of any technology.
I've got a bunch of different opinions and they mix and match.
And this has been going on since the late 60s with VR and AR and different...
Since the human interface labs up at Seattle. Yeah. They were, yeah, but you know Scott, boy I can't think of his name. I'm thinking
of guy at MIT as well. But you know and Jaren Lanier and you know the different
waves of it and move forward and what we did in holography too. So I want to set
the picture here. You have been at the top of the entire tech stack, the industry,
at Intel, at Google, at Facebook, and you witnessed digitization, dematerialization,
demonetization, democratization. You've seen the power of these technologies. What was the
moment that you decided I need to focus on reinventing healthcare because it's
so broken? When I left Intel in 2004 and pitched at the Media Lab and got the
faculty position, but I got distracted with a hundred dollar laptop and thought
well I can get that to work faster. Even though everybody thinks it's impossible,
I thought it was much faster.
Then I got hooked into that.
And when I went into Google, I was supposed to work on this.
But then when I got in, Sergey said, no, we just
wanted to know you were creative.
Because I had all these ideas for brain computer interface
and health care.
And when I got in, he really needed me to do other things where I was actually
pretty happy to be working there on the things that I was doing.
So that took a backseat when I went over to Facebook and interviewed with Mark.
I swear his feet didn't touch the ground when I started talking to him about
brain computer interface, we had the whiteboard in the room and what we could do for healthcare.
And I'm like, this is it, he gets it.
And then I come and he's like, well, you know,
he got to fix his near thing first.
I spend a lot of money, I spend billions of dollars on this.
I know, but this is before, this is like, whatever.
This is 2015, like nine years ago.
I think I started there.
So a year later, 2016.
I left. You left year later, 2016, I left.
You left.
What was that?
What happened?
You said, it's time for me to go
and build my dream company.
Well, it's the fourth company
and I've been in startups now for, you know,
half of my life.
So I'm good at the startups.
I think,
when you have so many people with so many different opinions, I mean, one
thing I did for Facebook and for Google, since the core
competency of the executive management was really optimizing
click through revenue for ad sales, because let's face it,
it's hard to say that, yeah. It's true.
Whatever, Gmail or getting social,
a lot of things like that.
But it wasn't on these new technologies.
So one of the things I tried to bring in
is a wide variety of expertise that we
could share what we're doing and just take feedback.
And it's just frustrating because the, you know,
educating these, the software giants in this other thing,
it was actually faster and easier just to start your own
and build the thing without all the politics.
And I'm not, you know, it's just, it's, look, moonshots.
You know, you could call NASA a moonshot,
but it was like part of the Cold War.
The Wright brothers was a moonshot.
Yes. The invention of the birth control panel was a moonshot.
There are small teams that did it, you know, somehow and I think it's just easier, honestly, to do it that way.
Everybody, I want to take a short break from our episode to talk about a company that's very important to me and
could actually save your life or the life of someone that you love.
The company is called Fountain Life and it's a company I started years ago with Tony Robbins
and a group of very talented physicians. You know, most of us don't actually know what's going on
inside our body. We're all optimists. Until that day when you have a pain in your side,
you go to the physician in the emergency room and they say, listen I'm sorry to tell you this but you have this
stage three or four going on. And you know it didn't start that morning. It
probably was a problem that's been going on for some time but because we never
look we don't find out. So what we built at Fountain Life was the world's most
advanced diagnostic centers. We have four
across the US today and we're building 20 around the world. These centers give you a
full body MRI, a brain, a brain vasculature, an AI enabled coronary CT looking for soft
plaque, a DEXA scan, a grail blood cancer test, a full executive blood workup. It's
the most advanced workup you'll ever receive.
150 gigabytes of data that then go to our AIs and our physicians to find any disease
at the very beginning when it's solvable.
You're going to find out eventually.
Might as well find out when you can take action.
Fountain Life also has an entire side of therapeutics.
We look around the world for the most advanced therapeutics that can add 10, 20 healthy years to your life.
And we provide them to you at our centers.
So if this is of interest to you, please go and check it out.
Go to fountainlife.com backslash Peter.
When Tony and I wrote our New York Times bestseller, Life Force, we had 30,000 people reached out to us for Fountain Life memberships.
If you go to fountainlife.com backslash Peter, we'll put you to the top of the list.
Really, it's something that is for me one of the most important things I offer my entire family, the CEOs of my companies, my friends.
It's a chance to really add decades
onto our healthy lifespans.
Go to fountainlife.com backslash Peter.
It's one of the most important things I can offer to you as one of my listeners.
All right, let's go back to our episode.
All right, so it's 2016 and you found Open Water, which is the extraordinary company
we're about to dive into.
Where does the name Open Water come from?
Peter Gabriel.
Tell me about that.
Peter's amazing.
Peter Gabriel, the rock star human rights activist extraordinaire, started calling me.
I knew him from my art school multimedia days in the 80s,
90s.
And I ran into him at a conference
and told him what I was doing.
He started calling me every day saying,
you've got to leave Facebook.
You have to do this outside.
And he started writing.
He wrote this essay about open water,
about our thoughts flowing like water
and having to take swimming lessons to learn how
to deal with it because it would really change how we interact with each other if we are
sort of transparent in all of our human weaknesses and seven virtues and seven, you know, whatever,
all the issues that one has if it was transparent. So he really strongly encouraged me and kept calling.
We had all these great conversations.
So I said, okay, great, let's do it.
Can I use the name?
And he let me use the name.
So he's got sweat equity.
He's also an investor.
Yeah.
And I have to say a full disclosure
to everybody listening and watching.
I am an investor through my venture fund.
I'm a proud advisor of Open Water. disclosure to everybody listening and watching. I am an investor through my Venture Fund.
I'm a proud advisor of Open Water, so I'm totally and completely biased and I'm sharing
this with you because of the extraordinary work that Mary Lou, as you shall soon see
and have seen, is doing. So I want to make sure that disclosure is out there in the open.
So I love that and Peter Gabriel's probably greatest contribution to society will be the
fact that he pushed you to get the company going.
I stunned so much.
All right, one of us.
It continues to, as do you.
So what was the vision here?
So let's now dive in because the tech you have built and you are now rolling out is
going to save millions of lives. Just to put a number on this, I don't think people realize that near 25% of the US economy
is going towards healthcare expenses.
Right.
Insane.
30% for hospitals, another 20% for doctors, that's half of it, 6% for R&D.
Insurance is only like 8 or nine percent, but it's huge.
And it doesn't move forward.
Like as you say, so articulate, sick care, you know, it's not moving the needle fast enough.
We need to do something better if we care about people's lives.
I don't think we're counting the 55 million people that die every year globally.
Can you describe the state of the medical industry today?
I just want to have, I want to set the comparative objective
that you're about to crush, kill, destroy.
It's the cycle time. I mean, there's some good cures,
but you know, you've got one of those diagnosed, you know, what, you know, 30% of
us are taken out with cardiovascular disease, another 25% with cancer day in, day out, you
know, neurodegenerative disease takes you out if you late last long enough.
There's the pathogens, there's the other chronic diseases like diabetes and so forth.
And the the treatments don't change that fast. It's now 26 years and close to $3 billion
for a new drug approval, capitalized cost.
The shocking thing for a medical device,
a novel medical device, it's close to $700 million
and 13 years capitalized cost.
To get to go from an idea to developing it
and getting it approved by the FDA.
Just for approval, let alone reimbursement
and becoming standard of care,
which takes out to about $1.5 billion.
So say you do that for a single rare disease
because it's faster, costs less
because you don't need as many patients.
You spent a billion.
Let's say you save some money,
it costs 700 million.
A few thousand people have it.
What do you charge per patient?
Yeah.
So, yeah.
That's zeroes in it, doesn't it?
A few thousand people divided by the 700 million
or 700 million by the people.
So, if you're looking for things like,
it's a understatement to say the vast majority
of humanity can't afford that cost.
So, what are we doing?
Why are we funding this?
The biggest funders of health care R&D,
nine out of every 10 health care dollars in the US
comes from NGOs and GEOs.
And they're funding things that's like,
maybe trickle down economics works eventually.
The saddest thing, and I know you've said this,
is what percentage of drugs
that are subscribed uh prescribed for you actually work oh oh yeah um the the numbers quite low I
I don't have like 20% it's for me personally they work I check that because I don't know
yeah but it's you assume that when the doctor in that case, I'm missing part of my brain. It's a pituitary
gland. I molecularly replace that age and sex appropriate
doses. But but for most people, yeah, do they work or not? And
do they cause harm? It's a thing. Yeah, for sure. And you
know, like, it's it's 5040 to $70,000 per patient in a
clinical trial, and it takes70,000 per patient in a clinical trial.
And it takes years to get them through.
For a bigger disease like mental disease or neurodegenerative,
you've got to do 10,000, 100,000 patients.
So the cost becomes increa- and the time becomes prohibitive.
So we have to somehow change this if we want more innovation
and to leverage the tools of our time. Yes, AI,
but also Moore's Law are two of those big exponentials. So there's others as well,
which you can list for us because, you know, but clinical trials are, they're
exponentially slower and exponentially more expensive over time, as has been well-graphed.
And they call it Moore's law backwards, Eamon's law.
So that's the big problem that I think
you have to change, which enables you to enable low cost,
but also get more data.
If you can get more data than we've ever had before,
you can, it's less risky for a regulator
to approve a new treatment or medical device or so forth.
But it's also safer for a doctor and patient
to make a decision for their healthcare.
So why not just collect more data?
We're really good at crunching data.
We're gonna learn even more through crunching the data with the AI tools than we have.
But for that, it's very hard if you're making a new drug that's never physically existed before
and putting it in somebody's body to get that kind of scale quickly because you got to go through
some tests first. So what Mary Lou is talking about is using physics and AI and chipsets
to just not only diagnose but treat disease.
It is 60s, it is dramatically dropping costs by not 10x.
We're talking about potentially, you know, hundreds and thousands of
x reduction in cost. Yeah. And putting this technology in potentially every village throughout
Africa. Mary Lou, let... I've been with billionaires all through my... It's interesting on Thanksgiving
in the U.S. You end up getting calls, the family gets together, they find my name Somebody's got a disease. So that's where I spent my Thanksgiving weekend. It's everybody like yes
It's by economic level and borders and it's like consumer electronics
We all have like so Mary let's let's jump into some of the some of the graphics you have here
I want people to internalize and understand the incredible
to internalize and understand the incredible tech you have built and what the implications are because people need to see this to understand it and believe
it because it is it's as impactful as the as the mobile phone has been.
So yeah we started in labs like these and worked to develop different designs, modulating the phase of light and sound,
and then came to build out these carts
in about the year 2020 and get them in the hospitals.
And we got really great results in sensitivity
and specificity.
We were able to...
So slow it down here one second,
because what you've been doing is utilizing and miniaturizing
ultrasound and lasers and cameras to be able to impact things.
Yeah, so I'll show more a little bit later.
We've got great results and I can go about that.
So we've now shrunk these down.
How big were these things before?
Because they're the size now of something like a headband.
Right?
They were the size of a room.
The thing blacked out.
That's what we started with in 2016
with the size of the room
and manipulating the phase of light and sound
so we could steer it wherever we wanted to in the body.
We could interfere it to create wave structures,
and we could resonate it to selectively affect
different cells with different structures,
like an opera can affect that wine glass.
So that was the premise to start the company using what
I know about analog chip design,
not the digital software that Intel does, but using various voltages and frequencies and...
So this desktop image you have here is basically the breadboard,
the proof of concept that the physics works.
Yeah, these are big optical tables that float on nitrogen gas
and allow you to do experiments
where you can see the phase of light.
And if you had to say how much it got miniaturized
in scale and price between 2016 and today,
well, give me some orders of magnitude.
These are multimillion dollar systems.
We went down to the carts,
which were 100 to $500,000.
And then we went down to this side.
So I have it with me.
Like here is the console.
That was the cart.
Okay.
That starts production next to this one.
And here's, you know, the headset for it
that comes in different sizes.
We have a six pack of ultrasound for the abs,
3D print, whatever you want,
strap it to any part of your body.
We envision this going on the back of your knee
to do both pathogen deactivation
and also senescent cell rejuvenation
as well as amyloid micro clot removal.
We have some very good results
in research for that right now.
So there's that and I've shown you the box
for our imaging system is this is the console for it.
And it shrunk a lot.
So it looks like 100X or 1000X reduction in volume.
And the cost, we're selling these for 10k, but at volume, this goes to the cost of a smartphone.
So what would that, give me a number here.
1000x reduction in price.
Oh, sorry, the actual device.
No, but from where it was in 2016.
But you can treat something for the cost of a phone call then.
Wow.
Which becomes really interesting as you
think of cost structures.
And there's no shortages, which are really a huge problem also
right now in medical.
So yeah, it's a device with pan disease impact.
Well, let's dive into the major ones here because let's start with-
Well, I can show you some of that.
Sorry, I've got-
Yeah.
So this is the waves and we steer the waves.
So here's like cancer cells in glioblastoma.
We did have some great results with glioblastoma.
And the problem is the surgeon can't get
the whole tumor out.
Some cancer cells hide out amid the neurons.
You can't scoop out all the neurons.
But what we do...
But just so people to know, glioblastoma is right now a death sentence.
100% of people do not survive it.
I had a friend recently who passed.
And if you've ever heard of someone having a deadly brain cancer, it's the last diagnosis you want to hear.
And there's very little you can do.
And from the time of diagnosis, typically, it's months,
maybe a year that you have left.
Yeah, it's not long.
But all cancer, all aggressive cancer cells
share a mechanical property that normal cells don't have, which
is the definition of metastasis. They've got a big nucleus, a small cytoplasm. The big
nucleus-
Because they're growing so fast.
They divide. The DNA isn't there. Fast, because they want to grow and kill you. So we exploit
that like an opera singer can ping this wine glass, match the frequency, and destroy that wine glass and harm nothing else in the room.
So we did that first with 16 different types
of glioblastoma and grew them up in organoids
and went through sound sweeps over many octaves
and many rhythms to find the ones that
killed the glioblastoma cells and didn't
harm the healthy tissue.
So you found the resonance frequency.
Yeah, and then we did that in mice.
So here are the mice.
This is the size of the tumor without treatment.
Here are our top three treatments.
We gave one two-minute dose at a diagnostic level.
That means lower than used on pregnant women and their fetuses in
the Western world on billions of them
for the last 50 years.
Diagnostic level, destroyed the tumor,
needed another dose at day five, two minute dose,
10% duty cycle, 150 kilohertz.
That's the frequency of a fish finder.
This is the best one, we tried a bunch of them,
but then we had some trouble getting into humans because safety and whatever.
Safety, literally, people know the death sentence.
At a time that's too terrible.
That kills me.
I hate that part.
It's used with 10 billion people.
Right.
Okay.
So we switch it up to 400 kilohertz, over firing neurons.
Like a lot of things cause severe depression.
These people, we did a study of 20 people at University of Arizona, with severe depression, really severe depression.
And we took fMRIs of them, we saw the over firing neurons here in the front, you can see the over
firing neurons, fMRI shows the use of oxygen and that correlates to over firingine neurons and we quelled them and nearly half of our patients just for study,
not even tuning the dosages right, went into remission.
Of severe depression.
Of severe depression.
And what's the best drug to do for us today?
Much, much less, much.
That's crazy.
How long did this treatment take? We did it for five minutes a day.
Every day for the first week five days and then the second week three days and
the third week three days and five minutes are still in remission. So you
could have this device at home and do it that way. We also showed on stage how we
make sure that we align it.
Because what we're doing is focusing sound
to that exact place.
And so I'll show you how we align it a little bit later.
We take a cell phone, take a lot of pictures of your face,
and then make that into a mesh and register the bone structure
onto the MRI.
But we do that while you're wearing this
so we know exactly where the transducers are
so we can focus at exactly the right spot.
This can also be useful for addiction.
I was gonna say, I heard you say that.
I mean, so someone who has an addictive personality,
addicted to drugs, addicted to gambling,
addictions, all addictions?
We can see the overfiring.
I want a glass of wine in the evening.
You know, so I'm working on it.
It's not that bad.
But still, you know, like whatever it is that your addiction is,
like how do you downregulate it?
But also, I mean, this basically LeapFrog's transcranial magnetic stimulation,
which is also approved for neurodegenerative diseases and other things.
And then we're also now, I mentioned,
have some early preclinical work showing amyloid microclots
and sort of ability to destroy them.
So it just goes on.
It's a multipurpose machine.
But yeah, it can do this.
Also, we think neurodegenerative disease treatments as well as other mental
diseases.
So the results are pretty spectacular.
And you developed this early on for strokes as well.
Oh, right.
Stroke detection.
So the stroke...
Let's not forget about your first application.
Right.
So the stroke detection, that's this unit, that's the optical laser with the high
quantum efficiency camera chips that are shipping in smartphones that cost a buck apiece.
And with that, we took these put them on heads.
Can we set this up a little bit?
So the second leading cause of death worldwide is strokes.
It's large vessel occlusion, the stroke specifically.
Because the large vessels block more flow downstream.
So you've got a two hour window to get yourself to the right hospital, but even in the US,
only 5% of the hospitals can do the procedure.
So by law, you go to the nearest hospital, so your odds are 5% on getting to the right
hospital for the treatment you need to live.
So for heart attack, there's an EKG.
Put on your test, find out if you've got a heart attack, it's down.
You can put an EKG on your forehead, that won't tell you if you're having a large vessel
occlusion stroke.
So we created a system so far with 151 patients at Penn and Brown in the cath lab.
That's what they call the place they do the thrombectomy.
A thrombectomy is basically you snake a catheter up your carotid artery and pull the clot out.
It literally is a plumbing problem.
The drugs don't work because it's too big of a clot.
And the implications of that large vessel being occluded for too long, if you've got a two hour window,
if not, if you do live,
you're probably not gonna walk or talk again
or have a job again.
And the brain tissue dies.
Yeah, the brain tissues,
you lose a third of a hemisphere on it easily.
And so your device there can actually determine
whether there's a clot, where the clot is.
We're able to see it with this specificity and sensitivity, this purple line now.
Using AI, 151 patients, brown and pan,
in the cath lab with mimics.
We can also see seizures.
They have a different mimic.
We're also looking at capillary blood flow as well with this
because we can see blood flow very accurately.
So we funded that for a few years.
And the vision here is put this device in every ambulance
because it's cheap.
Yeah.
And the ambulance can know this guy's got a stroke going.
Take him to this other hospital that can put him in a cath lab.
Right.
And call the cath lab while you're at it
so they can set it up while the patient is in process. Seriously, those doctors
know more about their Uber Eats orders than when they're going to get the next patient in
life-saving treatment. So we can use technology to improve that. So yes, we've got that working
to that extent. We've finished that level of clinical trials. We send it to the FDA. They
want 10,000 more patients. And you're like, it's $40,000 to $70,000
per patient is a lot of money.
So what do you do?
Get stuck on this.
That's why I say we've got great technology, really
great technology, but the business model
is also necessary.
Maybe all startups are great technology combined
with a new business model.
So how do you play with that?
Let's talk about that because,
so first of all, I just wanna frame this.
The technology that you have, you brought together,
it's just converging exponential technologies.
This is new chips, cameras, AI, 3D printing.
It's basically the materialization of physics that enable you to see and manipulate what's going on inside your body, inside your brain.
That's going to impact stroke, the number two killer in the planet.
It's going to allow us to address glioblastomas and other aggressive cancers, the cancers that are killing us very rapidly that we don't have cures for, it's going to now enable us to support those with mental disorders and with addictions.
I mean, that's a massive moonshot, my friend.
And you've made it.
Harming healthy cells.
Without. Yes.
So these blinds all went through autopsy at Charles River.
And unlike chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even surgery,
they could find no healthy cells harmed because they don't have the same resonant frequencies.
So you're selectively picking up the cancer cells or the neurons without selecting the others. And
of course we can also focus where we wish to in the body, unlike a drug that spreads all over.
I love that.
And what people don't know is one of your early visions here.
And we'll get to that eventually,
is that you can use this technology
to read and write onto neurons.
So it is a version of brain computer interface
without drilling holes in your head.
Right.
Which we're doing.
We're writing neurons now.
We're writing them for mental disease, but we go to thoughts.
Real quick, I've been getting the most unusual compliments lately on my skin.
Truth is, I use a lotion every morning and every night, religiously, called One Skin.
It was developed by four PhD women who determined a 10 amino acid sequence that is a synovitic that kills senile cells
in your skin.
This literally reverses the age of your skin and I think it's one of the most incredible
products I use it all the time.
If you're interested, check out the show notes.
I've asked my team to link to it below.
All right, let's get back to the episode. So I think the business model, which goes to the name Open Water,
is you recently took in a large grant
from a well-known crypto technologist.
Talk about that.
Talk about this new approach to business
that has really given you wings.
He reached out to tell you.
He is who?
Vitalik Buterin, who is the founder of Ethereum and a math genius.
And it's a very successful cryptocurrency.
He's the most visible person.
The guy Satoshi with Bitcoin, he's disappeared.
Vitalik is a face of it. He had a bunch of Shibu Inu coin and he sold it when Elon went on Saturday
Night Live in 2021 because he realized he had like $10 billion worth of it. And he dumped a lot into
dead wallets. But anyway, he was looking for help on COVID. So he called me,
I'm like, if I could have done any help on COVID, I would have dropped everything in early 2020.
He's like, no, I think he can do it. So it just started talking to him like 10 o'clock,
Friday nights, my time zone, I don't know where he was. And, you know, he'd asked these really
good questions. So I'd end up spending the weekend thinking about it, write a few pages.
And it just continued where we realized
we should take the company open source
and maybe we could help with COVID and long COVID
and many other diseases.
The disease is accelerated by COVID.
If you look at some of the early data that
has come in, like a study of 54,000 veterans, it's amazing.
The risk of neurodegenerative disease doubles if you've had long COVID.
The risk of heart failure goes up 173%, stroke 164%, et cetera, et cetera. And also,
we think we can help with long COVID because we can see blood flow. If you drop COVID into
a vial of blood, you get these microclots. Since they're 10, since they're 10 to a hundred microns in size,
they're not making it through the capillaries.
Again, I'm just a physicist,
but it seems to make sense to me there's an issue there.
So, any rate, so we decided to open source the company
and we took a $50 million.
You decided to, I mean, it's very important here.
This is going open source with your fundamental technology.
Right. All 68 of our patents, all of our software, all of our hardware open source,
AGPL. So it continues open source. And what I think that does is break this
$658 million
as the average capitalized cost to get a new device,
just a regulatory approval in the US
as averaged over every single one that's done it
in the last 30 years, but in 2024 dollars.
It's staggering.
And what's really interesting here is that 85% of that cost is actually the device development.
It's not the trials.
If you take that, there's another 7% if you share safety data.
But if you can create a platform, a low-cost platform that we could...
So we have those carts a year ago.
We've now reduced them to this size and cost.
Those carts were 100 to a half a million dollars.
These are $10,000 going to $1,000.
People can buy them.
Open source is a distribution model, but it's a trust model.
So we have everybody, lots and lots of people
buying these things for R&D to get their regulatory approval.
The regulatory approval become like apps on an Android phone.
So those companies can make some money on it,
but everybody keeps everybody honest.
Will they make any money?
Guess what?
Consumer electronics and technology make money.
Literally, 20 years ago, the top five companies in the world
were oil and gas.
They're now tech, the magnificent seven.
We can make money on it,
but why not make it up on volume
and save more lives for less money?
It's obvious.
So Vitalik says, listen, if you open source this,
I will give you $50 million.
Essentially, although there was a lot more discussion
of how we could help in COVID and other things,
and it was a long discussion.
I went to Zuzulu a couple of times. That was his...
Anyway, it was fantastic. But he's his Shibu Inu coin. That's ZipriKey. Didn't sell any Ethereum.
People had gifted when you're sort of famous crypto. He had gotten it and he wanted to use it for
his charities. We're not a charity, but we are open sourcing all of our technology.
We're not a charity, but we are open sourcing all of our technology. But I think one of the reasons one laptop per child couldn't succeed is we had no way
to make money because we sold it at cost, so we couldn't sustain.
Where if we just added an extra $10, that could have solved it too.
But I think a for-profit entity that's open source is maybe a better solution.
And I wanted to try that.
So I convinced all my investors to say yes at the same time.
And at the beginning, I literally had to hold the phone really far away because
they thought open source equals charity.
Yeah.
But it's not any way I could do the business model.
It was a 10 X to 100x more revenue with this 10x to 100x more margin than any other approach
I could find because I mean, it feels like we were talking in September at dinner.
It feels like Logan's run.
Like nobody actually makes it.
Like it takes too long.
Everybody dies.
Like getting these things out if you're a small company
but a medtronic or a GE or you know Phillips
They can take a hundred a thousand shots on goal
so even if somebody has trouble like they think some of them get through and I think you need through the regulatory process because it's
Biology is unpredictable. We want more data about biology. This is a way to get more data on the same platform.
ISO 1345, low cost.
I mean, right now people make a cart,
get regulatory approval on it and then have to shrink it
and then they have to go through the same process again.
They go through it for like 20, 30 years.
I love a few things you've said.
I've heard you say that you're basically about to use
silicon and software to replace drugs.
Yeah, Silicon Hospital, we think.
Silicon Hospital.
Is in reach.
And we've got some good data on cancers and mental disease
and neurodegenerative disease, also longevity stuff,
and chronic diseases like diabetes and so forth,
by basically being able to activate certain cells
and also monitor and see.
We have some imaging technology we put on the back shelf for a while because we could
realize we could ship these faster.
But we also think like ultimately we can replace the MRI machine with also a wearable that's
low cost that leverages a lot of the technology we're building out in these two units right
now.
So I want to set the vision of where things are going,
because I think what's beautiful here is
the same technology, the same physics,
the same chip sets that are in those materials,
in those devices you've identified,
with different software can give you different therapeutics and
different diagnostics. Right. And so if you can put those, your tech, Open Waters tech,
into the hands of thousands of labs and scientists around the world, they'll find novel uses for it,
new approaches. And governments.
So we're working with governments,
the ministries of health, and big companies
and little companies, and they can trust it.
Like, whatever, if we overcharge or try to gouge them for us,
they can go to another manufacturer and get it made.
We still have a really good business.
You know, right now, nobody can make these. We've made the plans, but you know, right now, nobody can make these.
We've made the plans, but you know, Elon open sourced his patents for the rockets.
Like, go ahead, spend the money on the rocket.
And open source his patents for the charging stations for Tesla.
Yeah.
Or, you know, just Boeing could open source all of its stuff.
Like, it's still hard to make this stuff and design it.
So we're just pushing the envelope.
But the problem is people are dying in the process.
We can make it up on volume.
Let's just work together like we do in consumer electronics.
It seems really obvious.
We've got some data that's very promising.
There's a million papers, scientific papers,
published in the last 20 years about using infrared light,
ultrasound, and electromagnetics to treat
hundreds of different diseases.
It's literally a rounding error to say zero, zero,
get into the health care system.
And that's because of the $658 million in 13 years.
And so we have to break that mold, too,
to move it onto a different pathway. I'm from consumer electronics
We ship me every year or two
Honestly a complex projects a two-year project. So when will we see when will we see these being sold?
to labs and governments
We're taking order reservations on our website because we can't sell a non FDA approved thing without a
document
Because this is a research device, but we're selling on them the reservations on our website
The first one will ship out this month. So and the 24 early production and Q2
Amazing
Of the shrink thanks to Vitalik's gift. we were able to take the money and shrink it
down. We thought it was important because it seems like a general purpose platform.
I love, remember the movie Brainstorm? Yeah, I do. And they had this giant device for being
able to read and write onto neurons and they shrunk it down to some small device you'd
stick on your head. And I viewed that as what you're what you're doing. I mean, you're about to unleash an entire revolution.
Yeah, so what else what else haven't we covered that you want to do a few other things in the
personal? Yeah, I've got this presentation, I can sort of get rid of it. But I think this is the
idea is flip it on its side side so many people like different companies,
different organizations, health cares
can treat hundreds of diseases in parallel.
That lowers the cost of hardware
and it gets us more safety data on that platform
that we all get to share so we can make it more safe.
Safety and efficacy are important,
but you don't get approval.
So this open source thing, it's really, it enables volume. We make money, it's a crass thing. People ask, they're like, you're nuts. I mean, like, well,
if you make more of something, it's cheaper. It's approximately for every 10x more you make something,
it's a slight exaggeration to say it's 10x cheaper. We enjoy a portion of that savings as our profit.
That's it. It's Android as data. It's Android story.
It's what Android did.
Yes, yes.
Or quality.
There's nothing quality about a 10 unit build.
That's what the FDA considers a 10 unit build.
Literally 20 years ago, as you mentioned,
I was CTO of Envisioned and Intel.
Our minimum sample size build was 10,000 units.
Like, it's just, but this enables innovation because the best products go through the most
iterations and you can leverage the product and it also engenders trust. And you get a massive amount
of data, just a massive amount of data. Yes, we get to use the tools of our time for AI too
to see more things and different people will do better and we'll, you know, it'll move back and forth. But we break this cycle, this anti-innovation cycle of 20 to 40 year moats in healthcare
while people are literally dying by the millions of these diseases. So that's where I get to like,
how do we, and so there's so much talent. How do we try this? So yes, Vitalik helped us try it.
And I convinced all of our investors to say yes at the same
time and we signed the deal. So it's done. We're open source
now and forever.
Open waters, open source, how appropriate. That's great.
Yeah, I'm trying to think what I'll say. So here's a couple of
personal questions here, if you don't mind. I want to know
about your childhood.
Your dad, I heard you say once,
your dad helped you learn how to fix things,
how to build things.
Right, he had to.
Talk to me about that.
I grew up in a farm, and that wasn't enough money,
so my dad started this automotive repair business.
He rebuilt car engines.
So I was a little kid, and I could shimmy under the car
and probably get child protective services now,
but you know, you figure stuff out.
And you know, I, we plowed, I grew up in New England.
We plowed the neighbor's driveways when it snowed
and that ended up me and me trying to figure out
how to get the tractor to start up
and get the plow on and all, you know, just all that stuff.
So you just sort of learn how to do that stuff.
You learn how to tinker and build.
Yeah, my dad was that, he grew up on a farm, you know,
like everybody didn't have jobs there.
So he was in that transition as Americans went out of,
many of them, and especially in New England, you know,
the Midwest lasted longer, we didn't have.
Who taught you art, Mary know, the Midwest lasted longer, we didn't have. Who taught you art?
Mary Lou was your mom?
Oh, I loved art.
To me, it was the same thing,
and that's where I came to in engineering.
I just loved it.
There was actually, literally,
the governor of Connecticut's sister
was my art teacher in elementary school.
Random, Ella Grasso had just come in.
My parents hated Ella Grasso.
They didn't like the art teacher either.
I liked the art teacher.
And I thought it was fun.
And I went to one of these schools that, not to date
myself, but I started, I think, kindergarten in 1970.
I'm sorry, in 65.
Literally, they had started this, the public elementary
school in my district.
And we weren't in a rich or fancy town.
We weren't rich.
It was continuous progress.
You could just do what you wanted, be how you feel.
And I just did math and art.
And that's what I wanted to do.
So I was doing, like, I think calculus by fifth, sixth grade,
but then I'd spend a lot of time in the art room
cause I like enjoyed that too, like,
cause math is visual.
I know there's the music genius, music, math geniuses
that think of it in terms of music.
I just really like the art.
You also were music, you played in the band, didn't you?
I did, but not, I wasn't good.
What did you play?
Were you a singer or did you play an instrument?
I was in a couple of small punk rock bands.
Punk rock, I can see you as a punk rocker.
Well, it's their age, it was fun.
And then I heard you met Andy Warhol.
When was that?
Oh yeah, well I took all these art classes
when I started college.
My parents didn't grow up rich
and they wanted me to be able to support myself.
So they said they'd help me get pay
for the best college I could get into if,
and only if, I majored in electrical engineering.
I said, sure, I like that.
I started and I thought it would have killed any ounce
of creativity I ever had, I might have had,
and I'm not saying I had much.
It was so dry.
It was so boring.
Like inclined planes, they just go through like six.
It's just so, like you spend a whole semester
on F equals zero, then you spend the next semester
on F equals MA, and it's the next semester on F equals MA.
And it's just, it's boring.
I found it very boring, very dry.
So I started taking these art classes.
I was at Brown as an undergraduate,
RISD is next door.
Everybody says the best part, it's a famous art school.
The best part about Brown is RISD,
the best part of RISD is Brown.
I think they're both great.
But I started taking them and it turns out,
like I just did it to maintain my sanity.
It's not like I could afford therapy or anything like that. I took art courses
and I ended up finishing all of the classes for a second degree in art but they wouldn't give it
to me because I had to pay for five years. I only paid for four. But later after I got the PhD,
I then got an honorary PhD and they gave me the art degree then.
I didn't have to pay for it and I got the honorary PhD.
I think that is well well.
I was saved back because I already had a real PhD.
It's not a big risk.
Well well deserved.
You know, one of the things I talk about is going from success to significance.
And the, you know, so much of entrepreneurs measure themselves by their stock price or the amount of money they raised
or a bunch of different elements.
Can you just speak to the entrepreneurs who are listening,
who want to do big, bold, significant things in life?
What's your advice to them?
Figure out a new way to do it.
I just was thinking about people keep asking first principles. I always thought it was the first
principle thing, Maxwell's equations, but I think maybe the bigger answer to this is read history.
Read history of science. To fund my PhD was totally unfundable. This stuff I didn't explain
what I did, but it was unfundable.
I had to get whatever RA I could.
I got one with a history of science professor for a while.
And I was building equipment, creating kits for the students.
And then later, got NASA to do this for elementary schools
in Rhode Island, et cetera, of a Newtonian telescope,
a Galilean telescope.
There's reasons people didn't believe
Galileo. They were hard to look through. When you look at what the greats walked through,
Faraday, Galileo, Franklin, Ben, or Rosalind, you have this impression that it was easier
than or something. It was never easy easy and people just decided to do it
and you just work on it because you love it,
you're passionate about it and you think you're gonna die
if you don't.
And if you're not, you don't for that.
I hope you're gonna go there because I do think
that if you're gonna do something
that's big, bold and significant,
I like to say there are overnight successes
after 11 years of hard work, you have to love it. And you have... If you don't love the job, you should do something else,
because you do have to spend all your time on it. So, you know, I get up in the... I can't sleep. I
get up to work and love the work. So you just keep... If you don't like it, you're not going to
do a good job on it. I work all the time. I love it.
It's hard to stop me from working.
Well, you're not working.
You're playing, you're having fun,
you're fulfilling your purpose in life.
Right, what can you do?
So you should feel that way about it.
And then I guess, you know, another question.
So yeah, first principles.
What are first principles?
Like Oxford gave a fine if you diverged
from Aristotelian theory at the time that Galileo
and Newton were making their breakthroughs.
Good thing they weren't at Oxford, right?
We still have rules against thinking.
It's just crazy.
But so you have to find, there's always these barriers you have to find.
And it's not first principles.
It's sort of looking at what's been overlooked.
And so when I work at something, I look, I go way back
as far as I can go to present day, go back 50 years, and see
what people have missed. The first principles things, well,
there's a lot of principles. And so which ones do you pick? And
which? How do you see it? Can you find a new way through it?
Given what we have now, all that we have access to now, people abandoned it 20, 30, 50 years ago.
Can we pick that back up, mash up different things?
That's one thing.
The other thing that bugs me is the common thing people ask you as a startup, they say,
how big is your company?
Well, how do you measure big?
And they usually measure it one way, how many employees you have.
It's the wrong question.
It's the wrong answer.
I just tell them, but it is the wrong answer.
It shouldn't be the number of employees.
What should it be?
How big you are.
Is it the scale of your desired impact?
Number of people you're touching.
Yeah, how big?
Maybe they wanna know,
I suppose if they're interested in the company,
they'd like to know revenue and income
should be the total shareholder return,
you know, if you're on a board or something.
But in terms of the start and the potential,
I suppose it should be measured with the potential
and what the roadmap is.
It would be interesting, more interesting.
But maybe they're trying to assess burn rate because that is a good measure with the number
of employees and where they're based, I suppose.
Are you glad that you didn't pursue open water straight out of Intel or straight out of one
laptop and you waited till now?
Or till 2016? It seems like the tech became enabled in the last few years. It's really the
convergence. You know, the theme, so you're going to be on stage with me at the Abundance 360 Summit
in March, which I'm excited about. And the theme this year is convergence. And if I think about a technology
which is the embodiment of convergence,
I would say what Open Water does is that.
Wow, thanks.
Yeah, I think we could have made some impact in 2004
when I finally had my feet underneath myself
after my brain tumor.
It took years, honestly, to recover that
and design a better me. And it's a
longer story. But on the medications that I take and getting those right, it was a big fight.
I could have started it then. It was such an opportunity to partner with Nicholas and then
the opportunity to work with Nicholas and then the opportunity to
work with Sergey and Google and then with Mark were such big opportunities.
And we were supposed to do it.
It's just the reality is a business where they run, they were responsible for these
big business.
So I understood.
So I love, I enjoy the work.
I just knew that it could be applied to the body.
And I suppose yes, by waiting. Yeah, more as we've
gotten more cycles of Moore's law. So it's easier to make these things. And also, the manufacturing
infrastructure is easier to use than ever before. But because I've been through it so many times,
like you don't need actually a lot of people because you use contract manufacturing for a
lot of it. And you have these teams all over the place
and this communication that transcends,
I think, the traditional build your own factory,
build your own everything.
It takes a long time to build those.
And so you can turn it on and turn it off quickly
and move to different factories should you find issues.
But that's a detail.
Mary Lou, heartfelt thank you for all that you're doing. This is one of the many chapters
in a multi-volume book called Dr. Mary Lou Jepson. I'm excited. People can find out more
about OpenWater by going to openwater.com?
Openwater.health.
.health, okay, openwater.health.com.
And are you on social media?
I'm on Twitter, X, Facebook.
And what's your handle there?
Twitter, MLJ, MLJ, MLJ.
Okay, MLJ it is.
Three MLJs.
Three MLJs in a row.
Again, thank you for your brilliance.
Thank you for your perseverance.
And thank you for who you are.
I know very few entrepreneurs who've
got the spirit, the mindset, the perseverance,
and the brilliance that you do.
So I'm grateful to call you a friend.
And thank you for your time today.
I'm, I don't even know how to respond
to such a generous thing,
but I'm in awe of all that you're doing
and a huge fan of what you're doing.
I'd keep trying to support
and a member of A360 and all of that.
So I'm, I've learned so much from you,
particularly through pandemic.
That's when I joined because I was so isolated
and sort of how do you get back to the positivism?
The thing that you talk about, the mindset is so critical.
It's an incredible world ahead.
It truly is a world, you know, I think people need to see,
you know, hear about all of the problems and issues
that are just plaguing society and all the epidemics and obesity and all.
And yes, those things are true.
And yes, we have to solve the healthcare crisis.
And yes, we have people and technology like you
and Open Water that are giving us brand new tools,
giving us wings.
Thank you so much for highlighting us.
And I think it's gonna be a much bigger story.
We have those million papers.
We need to bring them in and all this talent and just support them.
You're going to give the scientific crowd a new iPhone equivalent?
Yeah, that's the thing.
To build apps on top of.
And that's another reason why it's open source, because they're like,
well, I don't trust you.
It's competitive. Everybody has access. Everyone can use it. And that's another reason why it's open source, because they're like, well, I don't trust you.
It's competitive. Everybody has access. Everyone can use it.
And we haven't talked about the implications of AI on top of all of this, right?
Because these systems are going to generate massive amounts of data.
You might be able to understand a lot more about biology, and you'll certainly understand a lot more about safety and efficacy.
And the brain, right? And the brain and read, write, you know, brain computer. about biology and you'll certainly understand a lot more about safety and efficacy.
And the brain, right?
Panthers and the brain and read, write, you know, brain computer.
A hundred billion neurons, a hundred trillion synoptic connections, and it's still very
much a black box and you're building the telescope.
I'm going to call it, that's what I'm calling it, the telescope for the brain or the microscope
into the brain.
It really is.
You can see, I mean, I showed live on stage at TED, I think in 2018,
focusing through bone and flesh.
We didn't get to use real bone and flesh
because it's in Canada, there was a rule against it.
So we used phantom tissue, but we focused to a micron,
live on stage.
And what does a micron buy you in terms of a neuron?
A single neuron.
A single neuron.
Or we can groups of neurons.
Groups of neurons are really useful for mental disease,
and neurodegenerative disease.
So that is the focus of our first products.
But we have a lot of technology that we've opened to the world.
People can push it forward.
We'll help.
We can do lots of different things.
I can't wait for my. I mean, I can imagine everybody
having one of these systems at home,
and they can find the app, I want to be happier,
I want to get better sleep, I mean, there's going to be
anything that your brain implements or impacts.
Right, and you can get through clinical trials easier
because everybody can have this at home
so you can try it more easily.
We have surveillance systems in our home,
like cameras and microphones,
so we can see how the effects are and measure them
and collect more.
Like my watch tracker, my heart rate monitor,
it's accurate to plus or minus 25%.
But if you imagine that across millions,
rather than, you know, you look at clinical trials,
people do 20 people, 70.
I was looking at a company last night,
they've done, 10 years old, they've done 76 patients.
It's insane.
That's it.
Yeah.
Like, how can you draw as many-
Minimal conclusions, yes.
Right, or have the impact, given how much they've spent.
Whatever, they spent $100 million, they've done 76 patients,
and they've got a long road to hoe
to get through approval processes, which probably
will need 10,000 patients.
And so you're just stuck.
We can't get any therapies
unless we can get more people to try it.
How do you make sure it's safe?
I mean, I think there's many of these things
that look safe.
People say, well, you're using a different frequency.
You're only using one frequency.
What if, what if?
And it's like, well, yeah, okay, great.
What should we do?
Should we, do we have to do this all in the hospital? do we have to do this all in the hospital?
Do we have to do this all in a university? I mean, that's where you get to spending $40 to
$70,000 per patient and then the numbers become astronomical. Or do you work with the Ministry of
Health of a middle income country who would like to own the regulatory?
Or do you get $10,000 of these? Yeah.
$10,000, $100,000 of these units out there and people say,
I want to be part of that trial.
Right. And then they send them to their homes and so forth.
And they can do the trial there or they can do it at the
Ministry of Health who then owns the regulatory approval and then
they do what they feel has been done to them by Big Pharma,
for example.
So, you know, it gets interesting
And a country can own the regulatory approvals and I can't wait to see where you are in March and then
Next year. I want to come back and go deeper into the early results and talk about
Writing and reading onto neurons of your brain
So open water dot health and on X MLJ, MLJ, MLJ
is your handle there.
Have a amazing day.
Thank you again for everything.
Thank you, Peter.
Take care, my friend. See you soon. you