Morning Wire - Friday | October 22, 2021

Episode Date: October 22, 2021

Attorney General Merrick Garland testifies before Congress, police officers in multiple cities fight vaccine mandates, and Biden considers deploying the National Guard to help with the supply chain crisis. Get the facts first on Morning Wire. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Attorney General Merrick Garland faced some tough questions from Congress on Thursday. Many focused on his recent memo directing the FBI to investigate threats against teachers and school boards. Will FBI agents be attending local school board meetings? No, FBI agents will not be attending local school boards meetings. We have details from Garland's testimony and how he's defending his controversial memo. I'm John Bickley with Georgia Howe. It's Friday, October 22nd, and this is Morning Wire. police officers in several major cities are fighting COVID vaccine mandates, arguing that the mandates violate their rights. I've made my status very clear as far as the vaccine, but I do not believe the city has the authority to mandate that to anybody, let alone that information about your medical history.

What cities are seeing the biggest pushback and what actions are officers and city officials taking? And those global supply chain problems you've been hearing about, they are getting worse and will soon lead to even higher. grocery bills. What surprising action is the Biden administration taking to ease those shortages, and will those actions help American consumers? Thanks for waking up with Morning Wire. Stay tuned. We have the news you

need to know. You can get this show and all of the content you love wherever you are, all on the Daily Wire app. Even if you're not a Daily Wire member, you'll be the first to know what's trending with mobile notifications for the latest news, and you'll get content from all your favorite Daily Wire shows. Download the Daily Wire app

and keep up with the facts, no matter where your day takes you. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland testified to Congress on Thursday. One of the most contentious issues was his October 4th memo, which called on the FBI to investigate threats of violence against teachers and school boards. Here to give us an overview of the hearing is Daily Wires Ian Howarth. Ian, set the scene for us here. Why was Garland testifying to the House Judiciary Committee? Well, this is all happening in the context of multiple high-profile cases and arguably some

level of scandal. Texas's heartbeat abortion legislation, voting integrity laws and January 6th were among the many topics Garland was expected to answer questions on. But the main driving factor behind this attention is Garland's recent memo to DOJ employees, announcing that the FBI would investigate threats or intimidation by parents against school boards, with many seeing this as an attempt to silence and intimidate parents who disagree with school policy by labeling them as domestic terrorists. Garland countered the idea that parents would be targeted by the FBI, saying that he supported parents' rights to speak. The Justice Department supports and defends the First Amendment right of parents to complain as vociferously as they wish. That is not what the memorandum is about at all.

Representative Jim Jordan seemed to imply that there was coordination between the White House and Garland's DOJ on several issues. March 25th, Joe Biden criticizes the Georgia election law. Three months later, the Department of Justice challenges it. September 1st, Joe Biden criticizes the new pro-life law in Texas. Eight days later, the Department of Justice challenges it. September 29th, the political organization asked President Biden to involve the FBI and local school board issues.

Five days later, the Department of Justice does just that. And critical race theory was also a feature of this memo, correct? Yeah, which only added to the widespread outrage, given the growing movement on the right when it comes to opposing the teaching of CRT in schools. Garland came under heavy fire

when it came to the subject of Loudoun County, which has been the subject of many CRT-related reports, as well as the sexual assault scandal we've reported here. In fact, Representative Chip Roy questioned Garland on the sexual assault scandal, which we reported last week. Garland repeatedly said he wasn't familiar with the case. Are you aware further that the boy was arrested in charge for the first assault in July, but released from juvenile detention? This sounds like a state case, and I'm not familiar with it. I'm sorry.

So Garland denied knowing much about it. Yeah. Now, yet another factor here is recent news that Garland has an apparent connection to the education sector through his son-in-law, who co-founded a multi-million dollar education consultancy which reportedly pushes CRT. Later, when the subject of CRT in schools came up again during questioning, Garland refused to answer whether or not he saw ethics guidance regarding this family connection. Did you follow that regulation? Did you have the appropriate agency ethic official look into this? Did you seek guidance as the federal regulation requires? This memorandum is aimed at violence and threats of violence.

Understand that. Excuse me, did you seek ethics counsel before you issued a letter that directly relates to the financial interest of your family? Yes or no? This memorandum does not relate to the financial interests of anyone. It's against my time. I take that as a no. Even Hunter Biden's artwork made it into the testimony with Representative Ken Buck asking about ethics concerns. It turns out that in 2019, Hunter Biden couldn't find a gallery to list his art.

And what happened in 2020 that changed all that? His dad became president in the United States. Now a single piece of art from Hunter Biden sells for more than the average American home. I have sent a letter to the Department of Justice before your tenure asking them to appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden. I have today sent a letter to you, and I am asking you now, will you appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden? I'm not unable to discuss any investigations pending or otherwise with respect to any citizen of the United States. So a lot of questions but not many direct answers. Yeah, it doesn't seem that way.

Thanks, Ian. DailyWire's Ian Howard. As vaccine mandates go into effect at police departments in several major cities, some officers are pushing back. Daily Wire investigative reporter Marade Allerty is here with more. So, Mairead, it seems like police unions are pushing. pushing back against these vaccine orders. Is that right? Yeah, that's what we're seeing. Officers in major cities like New York, Chicago, San Francisco, and Seattle are refusing to comply with the mandate, which puts their departments in the awkward position of potentially having

to lose valuable officers over this. So in New York, the city announced a vaccine mandate on Wednesday, and New York's largest police union said it will initiate legal action. Less than 70% of the New York Police Department is vaccinated. And in Chicago, city employees were required to report their vaccination status on Friday, but more than 3,200 Chicago cops are refusing to do so, according to the Fraternal Order of Police. So more than 3,200 officers in just Chicago haven't submitted paperwork yet? Yeah. As you can imagine, it's a significant problem for the city. Chicago mayor, Lori Lightfoot, was so frustrated with the situation that earlier this week, she lashed out at the police union president. Lightfoot actually accused union leadership

of trying to, quote, induce an insurrection. What we've seen from the Fraternal Order of Police and particularly the leadership is a lot of misinformation, a lot of half-truths, and frankly flat-out lies in order to induce an insurrection. And we're not having that. The Fraternal Order of Police and the City of Chicago have sued each other over the mandate. The police union president, John Kattanzara, is arguing that the vaccine mandate is illegal because the city did not negotiate its terms with the police union. The reality is the city acknowledged from the beginning their obligation. to bargain in good faith over this subject. They have refused.

And because they have refused and put a line in the sand and said it's taken or leave it pretty much, that's why we're at where we're at. And what about San Francisco? What's going on there? So San Francisco was the first major city to require that all of its employees get vaccinated.

As of Wednesday, 40 San Francisco police officers were on leave because they haven't received a COVID vaccine. That's according to the San Francisco police officer. Officers Association. In total, as of Tuesday, 93 officers hadn't submitted proof of vaccination, including 46 active duty officers. The police union said last week that no religious or medical exemptions had been granted so far. Unvaccinated officers will be suspended without pay on November 1st, and then they get a hearing before they're actually fired. So as we reported earlier this week, in Seattle, around 70 officers had not submitted their proof of vaccination as of Sunday, and that was

the day before the vaccine mandate was due to start. What happened there? Right. The latest statement from Seattle PD is that all but six officers submitted paperwork, which may include applications for exemptions, and the firing process for the remaining six has begun. Remember, Seattle is a city that has lost hundreds of police officers since the George Floyd riots last year. Right. At the same time, Seattle and these other cities are dealing with crime spikes and officer shortages. The police unions have pointed out that it's certainly not in the city's best interest right now to fire seasoned officers over a mandate. The San Francisco Police Officers Association actually put out a statement saying that, quote, San Francisco is experiencing a shooting and retail theft epidemic and fewer officers will only

make things worse. Well, we'll definitely be watching this. Marade, thanks for coming on. Of course, anytime. That's investigative reporter, Marade Allorty. As worldwide supply chain delays continue to worsen, the Biden administration is considering deploying the National Guard to help alleviate backups at ports around the country. The news comes as the nation's largest food manufacturers warn of an even sharper increase in grocery prices. Here with the latest on what Americans can expect as inflation rises and supply chain backups persist is Daily Wire Managing Editor Cabot Phillips. So Cabot, you don't typically think of the National Guard being deployed for something like this. but what can you tell us here?

Yeah, this should give people a sense of just how serious the problem is right now. According to reports, the White House has considered having states deploying National Guard units to help unload cargo ships at ports and offer logistical support to manufacturers. They've even looked into get this, the legality of having troops serve as truck drivers. Incredible. Yeah, that's because there are currently 80,000 trucking positions unfilled right now. So even if stuff does get unloaded at ports, at the moment, there's no one to actually deliver around the country. Now, it's important to note that this is just being discussed at the moment, but even the fact that it's a possibility is noteworthy.

And more than anything, it shows just how desperate the situation has gotten with this backup. So they're considering deploying troops to help get things going. What other tangible actions have they taken so far? Well, this has become really a top priority for the government right now. The White House actually created a supply chain disruptions task force back in June. They've taken a few tangible steps since then. First, the Department of Transportation is working with states to loosen the requirements for a trucking license. That would mean more drivers.

The White House also announced last week that they're rolling out a new plan to keep ports in Los Angeles operating 24-7. And the USDA announced they'd be sending $3 billion to companies in the food industry, which they can spend on increased transportation costs, labor, and expanded meat and poultry production. So the USDA is involved. Can you tell us a little bit more about that? So farmers have been hit really hard by the shortage for a few reasons. First, they're heavily reliant on truckers and seasonal workers, two groups and sorts apply at the moment. And also because of the delay for vehicle parts. We've talked about how used cars are selling at record prices because people can't find car parts. Well, the same thing is happening for tractors.

But the difference is, if there's a delay on getting a new part for your car, it just means you've got to find a ride for a few days. But if there's a delay on getting a part for a tractor or a combine, food doesn't be harvested, much more serious there. And that's bad news when it comes to grocery prices as we look forward. Yeah, you know, what is the bottom line here? How much is this all impacting the average family? According to one poll this week, a lot. 54% of Americans say they've experienced delays or shortages when trying to buy common products. So it's already pretty widespread.

But the reality is, even if people don't realize it, they are still impacted by the backlog. Food prices are up almost 5% compared to this time last year. and food prices globally are actually at a 10-year high. And cover your ears, but it doesn't look like the problem is going to be getting better anytime soon. Large companies like Kraft, Nestle and Pepsi have all warned this week that they've been hit hard by inflation and these supply chain shortages, and they're going to be raising prices even more in the coming months. Not what people want to hear. Not what they want to hear, just to stay afloat.

So buckle up because our prices are more likely to be the norm here for at least the next few months. and a lot of experts don't have a ton of optimism about when that's going to let up. Can't say this is what I wanted to hear this early in the morning, Cabot. But thanks for coming on. Any time. That's Daily Wire Managing Editor, Cabot Phillips. Other stories we're tracking this week? San Francisco temporarily shut down in-and-out burger this week to punish the popular burger chain

for refusing to enforce the city's vaccine card mandate. The mandate requires some private businesses, like restaurants, to enforce the vaccine check at the door. We refuse to become the vaccination police for any government, in-and-out, chief legal and business officer told the press. It is unreasonable, invasive, and unsafe to force our restaurant associates to segregate customers into those who may be served and those who may not. And an update from Daily Wire Sports Reporter, Joe Morgan. An attorney representing recently fired Washington State football coach Nick Rolovich has stated that the former coach intends to sue the school, saying that the termination was, quote, unjust and unlawful. Rolevich, a devout Catholic, was fired due to the state of Washington's vaccine mandate and was denied a religious exemption.

If you like this episode and are interested in hearing more, subscribe to Morning Wire on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you're listening, and give us a five-star review. That's all the time we've got this morning. Thanks for waking up with us. We'll be back tomorrow with the news you need to know. This show is sponsored by Relief Band. Relief Ban is the number one FDA- cleared anti-naja risk ban clinically proven. to relieve and prevent nausea and vomiting while remaining 100% drug-free. It's the only all-natural, over-the-counter wearable device used by professionals to treat nausea and vomiting. Stop suffering. Use code Wire 20 for 20% off and pick up your relief ban today.