Morning Wire - Reshaping the Deep State: Trump’s Buyouts & Reforms | 2.22.25

Episode Date: February 22, 2025

Daily Signal's Tyler O'Neil discusses how President Trump is dismantling the “deep state” which has infiltrated the federal government to advance a progressive agenda. Get the facts first on Morni...ng Wire. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 60% of the vans on Amazon come to vander independent like SACMagic. Hello, here Camille of Sack Magic. Our compresses, show of fraud are fabriced in Quebec, and our presence on Amazon enlarge our clientele
Starting point is 00:00:10 to the world entire. Trouvee de petitions like another. On Amazon.ca. We are saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars with this buyout. In fact, I can confirm
Starting point is 00:00:25 that more than 77,000 federal employees accepted this very generous buyout offer from the Trump administration. That was White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt announcing the number of federal employees who have accepted the Trump-Douge buyout. Thirty days into his second term, President Trump has taken aggressive steps to reshape the executive agencies by forcing out tens of thousands of federal
Starting point is 00:00:49 workers. Part of a personnel is policy approach designed to remove those who'd block his America First Agenda. In this episode, we speak to Daily Signals, Tyler O'Neill, about the deeply entrenched Washington bureaucrats that he documents in his new book and what it's going to take to fully revamp the federal government. I'm Georgia Howe with Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief John Bickley. It's Saturday, February 22nd, and this is a weekend edition of Morning Wire. Joining us now is the Daily Signal's Tyler O'Neill, author of The Woktipus. Tyler, thanks so much for coming on. Hey, my pleasure. Thanks for having me. So I wanted to start by noting an article that you wrote for the New York post discussing a concerning poll of federal employees. Can you tell us a little bit about what that
Starting point is 00:01:40 poll found? Yeah, so this was a really shocking poll. It found that 64% of Washington, D.C. based federal bureaucrats who voted for Vice President Kamala Harris in the last election said that they would not follow a lawful order from Trump if they considered it to be bad policy. I think back in the first administration, you had some Republicans or some who identified as Republicans who would still oppose Trump from within. Thankfully, that seems to be less of the case. But the fact that anybody who works in the executive branch would decide and really gear up for not following the legal orders of the sitting president is a really shocking development. Now, did this ever exist in the reverse? So, for example, do we know if Republican partisans engage in this kind of obstructionist behavior,
Starting point is 00:02:37 or is this culturally more entrenched on the left? It's definitely more entrenched on the left-wing side. This broader phenomenon dovetails very much with my new book, which is called The Woktopus, the Dark Money Cabal manipulating the federal government. And in my book, I talk about, you know, the left's vast influence campaign that's propped up by a dark money network led by people. people like George Soros, who now his son, Alex, is heading the Open Society Foundations. So in the Biden administration, the influence of this left-wing network really exploded.
Starting point is 00:03:14 And we saw what I call the woktipus revealing itself in its true form, showing how far its tentacles had reached into the federal government when it came to staffing and advising and really brainwashing and weaponizing the government to achieve its woke purposes. But even under Biden, we saw many bureaucrats gear up against the sitting president. And these were left-wing bureaucrats gearing up against a left-wing president because they didn't support his rhetorical stance on Israel. And many of us who know the issue of Israel and the Middle East and Iran in general
Starting point is 00:03:54 will know that Biden was by far not the most reliable president. When it comes to standing for Israel, he loosened. the sanctions on Iran that enabled the rogue state to fund Hamas and likely led to the October 7th terrorist attack. But as soon as that attack happened, Biden came out and said, to Israel, we will never fail to have your back. And that messaging didn't comport well with some of the activist groups. And so you saw this gearing deep state move against a Democratic president from the left because they wanted him to focus on securing a ceasefire deal and essentially not allowing Israel to protect itself
Starting point is 00:04:42 and prevent another October 7th terrorist pogrom. How long has this been an issue in the federal government? I mean, did you track when the deep state became a real player in national politics? Yeah, that's an excellent question. We know that there was a large influence in the Obama administration as well. I think the phenomenon I describe as the woketopus came into its full flower in the Biden administration, but it had been growing over years, but only recently did some of the more aggressive woke groups. I'm thinking like the human rights campaign. And of course, the Southern Poverty Law
Starting point is 00:05:23 Center had a little bit of an advising role years and years ago. But only under Biden, their access tripled, quadrupled, expanded in this administration. There was this one moment where the human rights campaign, you know, the Biden White House released a statement, and this was just last year, they released a statement weakening their stance supporting sex change operations for children. And they had language that suggested, oh, we're not actually going to go full bore into this. We think that maybe it could be a good idea sometimes, but we want to withdraw our full support. The human rights campaign created a pressure campaign on the White House. The White House changed its messaging just a few hours later.
Starting point is 00:06:10 And then the head of the human rights campaign went to her donors and said, look, this is tremendous impact, and we have to keep doing this. So I don't have the receipts on every way that these activist groups achieved their goals in the Biden administration. But there are moments like that that really, you know, peel the government. the curtain back and show that, yes, this vast influence campaign achieved many of its goals and in sometimes shocking degrees. Now, what do you make of Trump's decision to cut off security clearances for the people who signed that letter that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation? Is that an effective start, or is that more of a symbolic move? Yeah, I think it's a very effective,
Starting point is 00:06:55 mostly symbolic move. Some of the people have already lost their security clearances and some of them have passed away. But I think it really, it sends the message that it will not be tolerated for current or former government officials who have these security clearances to weaponize their security clearances. That example was Exhibit A of Big Tech and the Deep State colluding in order to suppress. a very true news story that, you know, we now know the Hunter Biden laptop was real. The New York Post was correct. All of this rhetoric about it being a Russian influence campaign was itself disinformation and of the worst sort. So when Trump did this, it sent the message loud and clear that the deep state should not be meddling in our elections like this. It's really important for Trump to send this message. By choosing Tulsi Gabbard as his Director of National Intelligence, by putting Cash Patel at the FBI, by putting Ratcliffe at the CIA,
Starting point is 00:08:06 Trump is sending very clear messages that he is going to bring the deep state to heal. Now, do you think that the people he's putting in his cabinet now have the capacity to really turn this around in a four-year period? Yeah. I have great confidence in them, and I have great confidence in Russ vote over at OMB, but actually dismantling the deep state is a really difficult problem and not going to disappear. So when Trump won, a lot of these activists in the Biden administration,
Starting point is 00:08:41 they had gone to many of these activist groups. They'd worked at an activist group like the Natural Resources Defense Council and then gone to the Biden administration and then gone back to a similar sort of activist group. So what you have is a revolving door, and the woktipus acts as a government in exile right now. And so what you see is this threat doesn't go away. These activists are not giving up. And some of them are staying inside of the administrative state, you know, as we noted in that poll,
Starting point is 00:09:16 64% of those who voted for Kamala Harris, who were federal bureaucrats in D.C., said they would oppose a Trump order. These people are hunkering down, and we've seen people change their job titles to hide the fact that they were hired for DEI reasons. So there's a deep state, and then there's a government in exile, and preventing them from undermining the president's agenda is a really tall order. And so I have confidence in the people that Trump is picked, but I also think you need structural reforms. One of the things that I constantly talk about is public sector unions, especially in the federal government, because they pit public servants against the people's elected representatives. And what that does is it creates an
Starting point is 00:10:07 adversarial relationship that makes government less accountable to the people. you have the American Federation of Government Employees that represents federal bureaucrats across the administration. And it's because the rules were changed. I think it was under the Jimmy Carter administration. But we need to have Congress reexamine these rules and say whether or not public sector unions can represent federal workers. I think the answer should be no. And I really hope that in the current round of reconciliation, they consider this sort of reform, because if you have these public sector unions, I mean, they are part of the infrastructure
Starting point is 00:10:49 that is fighting back against the people's elected president. I think Congress needs to do it. I think Trump's administration is off to a really excellent start. But some of these things have to be structural and they have to be long term to defang this threat. All right. Well, Tyler, thanks so much for coming on today. Hey, my pleasure. You can find the woketipus on Amazon.
Starting point is 00:11:11 You can also go to woketipus.com, my substack where I have the news about all of these important issues. That was the Daily Signals, Tyler O'Neill, and this has been a weekend edition of Morning Wire.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.