Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - 0.75 Rate Hike Gets Thumbs-Up From Investors
Episode Date: June 15, 2022The Federal Reserve raised interest rates three-quarters of a percent, the biggest hike since 1994. (0:25) Ron Gross discusses: - The positive reaction in the stock market - Prospects for much lower i...nflation in 2023 - Borrowing costs going higher - Expectations for more rate hikes later this year (11:40) Asit Sharma talks with Pubmatic CEO Rajeev Goel about why his company is becoming more predictably profitable, and the growing opportunity in connected TV. Got a question? Drop an email to podcasts@fool.com! Stocks discussed: PUBM, PG, WPP Host: Chris Hill Guests: Ron Gross, Asit Sharma, Rajeev Goel Producer: Ricky Mulvey Engineers: Dan Boyd, Brandon Gentry Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hey Ontario, come on down to BetMGM Casino and see what our newest exclusive,
The Price is Right Fortune Pick, has to offer.
Don't miss out! Play exciting casino games based on the iconic game show,
only at BetMGM. Check out how we've reimagined three of the show's iconic games,
like Plinko, Cliffhanger, and The Big Wheel, into fun casino game features.
Don't forget to download the BetMGM Casino app for exclusive access and excitement
on the Price is Right Fortune Pick.
Pull up a seat and experience the Price is Right Fortune Pick
only available at BetMGM Casino.
BetMGM and GameSense remind you to play responsibly.
19 plus to wager.
Ontario only.
Please play responsibly.
If you have questions or concerns about your gambling or someone close to you,
please contact ConnexOntario at 1-866-531-2600
to speak to an advisor free of charge.
BetMGM operates pursuant to an operating agreement with iGaming Ontario.
It's the biggest interest rate hike since 1994.
What it means for businesses is coming up next.
Motley Fool Money starts now.
I'm Chris Hill and I'm joined by Motley Fool Senior Analyst Ron Gross.
Thanks for being here. Yeah, my pleasure, Chris.
Let me timestamp this, because normally we record this podcast earlier in the day.
It is 2.49 PM on the East Coast, and we are recording much later than usual
because of the Fed. Because at two o'clock this afternoon, the Fed came out with what we thought
was going to happen, which is always comforting, I find, with the Fed coming out and saying,
we're raising interest rates 0.75%. I think that's what most people were expecting and what
most people were looking for. The headline, of course, is this is the biggest rate hike in 28
years. We'll get into some of the particulars in a minute, but I couched that by saying most,
is this what you expected as well? The market had a 95% chance it had placed that bet
that it would be 75 basis points. As I said to our chief investment officer this morning,
the safe bet is that 75% basis points will be the number. We said back and forth,
if it's 50 basis points, the market's going to be down 4%. If it's 100 basis points,
then you're up to the whims of the market because you can get some people saying,
yeah, way to go, Fed. Way to rip the Band-Aid off. Let's get this done. Then you get the other
half going, oh gosh, this is much worse than we thought it would be. So I wouldn't even know how
to predict what would happen if they had gone to 100 basis points. Just recently, they were saying
50, and that 75 wasn't really on the table. So that gives you some indication of the need that
they feel to really be aggressive here. If you look at their expectations, right now that rate,
that benchmark funds rate is at 1.5 to 1.75. That's after this increase. They see it going
to 3.4% by the end of this year. So it's still a significant amount of hikes on the way.
They also cut their outlook for this year's economic growth. Now they expect just a 1.7%
gain in GDP. That's down from 2.8% from March. So you see the economy slowing. And it's probably
important to note that the inflation projection, as gauged by the personal consumption expenditure
index, also rose to 5.2% this year from 4.3%. What we're having here is you got interest rate
rising because the Fed is taking them there, and then the market takes the two-year, the 10-year
mortgage rates higher as well. We see expectations for economic growth slowing,
which is, by the way, after all the idea here, it's literally what the Fed is trying to achieve
to cool the economy, to bring down inflation. The trick is not to slow us down so much that
we end up in a recession, which many people are already calling for. A so-called soft landing is
the desired outcome where we remain positive on the growth end while at the same time bringing
down inflation. That's not the easiest thing in the world to achieve. They're going to go for it.
You see the market almost immediately traded down on the headline news of a 75% basis point
increase. Now you see the market rallying significantly. As we speak, the Nasdaq is up
3.5%, the S&P is up 1.13%, not as robust, but still strong, and the Dow up 1.5%. The market
is digesting this. They think they like what they see. Powell came out and actually spoke.
I'm trying to decipher all this on the fly while we're talking, but I think obviously he made some
comments that people were happy to see. Even in the statement, the Fed was pretty optimistic,
or at least they pretended to be, saying things like overall economic activity appears to have
picked up. Job gains have been strong. Unemployment remains low. Inflation is elevated, reflecting
supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic, higher energy prices, broader price
pressures, quote, broader price pressures, lots of them happening that we all see in
our everyday world. But this is important. They did see inflation moving sharply lower
in 2023 down to 2.6%. That's almost normal. They also reiterated they're committed to returning to
that 2% inflation objective that they've had for so long. But if they're right, and we honestly
don't know if they are, we're going to get close to that by the end of 2023, which is probably what
the markets are reacting to. Chris Hill
All right. There's a lot there and a couple of reactions to what you just said. First,
first, I appreciate that you reminded everyone that, I don't want to say this is an about-face
by the Fed because it's not, but the last time we were in this situation, J-PAL was
asked directly about a 7.5 rate hike and basically said, no, that's not something we're considering.
And clearly, in between then and now, they have considered it because they've done it.
The inflation for next year, I think, is really important. And again, thank you for doing
this because you and I are slightly disadvantaged by the fact that Jay Powell's press conference
is going on as you and I are speaking, so more information is going to come out. But
on the balance, this does seem to be good. I'm wondering, who is this bad for? This is
one of those situations where it appears to be what needs to happen, cooling off the economy.
As you indicated, there are a lot of macroeconomic data points that are strong. You look at unemployment
wages, consumer spending in general, all those things are strong. A rate hike of this size
with more to come most likely later in 2022, who's not happy about that?
Well, in general, businesses, companies are not happy. Borrowing costs are now significantly
higher and going higher still. Again, that's the point. That will slow the economy. That
is the goal here. It doesn't mean you have to like it, but it is necessary because inflation
is more troubling than a slower economy is. You have to just accept that. If you're buying
a home, you're probably not the happiest camper in the world. Interest rates used to be 3%
seemingly overnight, we're above 5%, maybe even approaching 6% at this point on the 30-year.
That's not great. You can afford less of a home. I'm not necessarily seeing house prices
come down as a result, but I think that's bound to happen. We've even seen some real estate
companies like Compass and Redfin announced layoffs in the recent days. That's interesting.
But if you're sick of paying $5 a gallon of gas, or forget about sick of it, if it's
really troubling you and it's very burdensome to your family, you need to see these prices
come down. Same with food. You need to see these prices come down, even if that means
we're going to have to live with slower growth for a while. Again, hoping that it doesn't turn
into negative growth, which would be a recession. But even if that happens, we'll get out of that
too. I'm an optimistic realist. The way I think of it is even if we do go into a recession for
a short period of time, we will build our way out of it. We always have, sometimes it takes
longer than others, depending on what decade and what the reason is, but we will return
to some normalized growth. The market will move higher. We just have to be patient and
be long-term focused. Just real quick on the housing. You're
right. Across the board, we haven't really seen housing prices come down. We have, as
you indicated, we've seen layoffs in the industry due to the fact that activity, buying and
selling itself seems to be dropping off. Presumably, that makes its way to prices at some point.
In terms of the Nasdaq, and then I'll let you go. Are you surprised that the Nasdaq
is reacting the way it is? Because we had seen earlier in the year, part of the sell-off
of particularly younger Nasdaq tech companies that aren't yet profitable, part of that sell-off
was due to the narrative like, well, look, if interest rates go up, the cost of borrowing money
is more expensive for these companies, and it's harder for them to raise money,
or it's more expensive for them to raise money. Given all that, are you surprised that the NASDAQ
is, at least in the time since Jay Powell started talking, at 230, has rebounded the way it has?
Yeah. NASDAQ's actually up 2% now, so a little bit of the steam has come off. But
I'm a little bit surprised. It's a balancing act. Higher interest rates are definitely
detrimental to growth companies whose stock prices and valuations are dependent on future
cash flow streams. It is bad. Interest rates negatively impact that. However, an economy in
shambles is worse than that. You just have to pick your poison and you pick the least lethal,
I think. Plus, tech, NASDAQ, innovative tech has been hurt so bad that perhaps where the market
is telling you we're somewhere close to a bottom, I don't know if it's now or within 5% or even 10%,
or it's happening already. And it's okay for these stocks to come rebounding, even with higher
interest rates affecting valuations, because some of these stocks are down 30%, 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%.
So I think that's probably what we're seeing as we see a rebound.
Ron Gross, really appreciate the time, particularly late in the day.
My pleasure, Chris. Thank you.
One part of the economy where spending continues to rise is advertising, and one of the companies
benefiting from that trend is Pubmatic. Pubmatic helps publishers sell advertising using automated
systems. If you're playing a free mobile game, there's a good chance Pubmatic is selling those
ads. They process more than 340 billion ad impressions every day. Asit Sharma caught up
with Pubmatic CEO Rajiv Goel to talk about why his company is becoming more predictably profitable
and the growing opportunity in connected TV. Rajiv, I wanted to ask you about
this most recent quarter that you all reported. Interesting to me, last time we spoke,
I asked you about your long-term growth cadence. One of the things you mentioned was,
you had an increasing confidence level in being able to predict results. Back in December,
you said, hey, we'll be growing next year somewhere around 25% year-over-year. Between
then. We've had, I think, another little surge, mini surge in the coronavirus pandemic around that
time. We have a lot of geopolitical turmoil. Interest rates have spiked. And yet, the first
quarter was largely according to plan. One of the reasons you cited about your confidence was the
increasing importance of something called supply path optimization. Could you explain that concept
again, I noticed that in this quarter that you reported that played a large role. It was 27%
of activity on the platform. Almost seems like a way to look at more predictable cash flows
when you look at this business. So could you explain this concept to us and the
increasingly important role it has in Pubmatic's future? Yeah, absolutely. And to your point,
we had a terrific Q1. We were right on target with revenue growth, 25% year over year at $55
million. And we beat on profitability. Just at EBITDA was $17 million or 31% of revenue.
Gap net income was 9% of revenue. And importantly, I think particularly in this environment,
$19 million of cash flow from operations. And so I think, again, you see that really strong
balance of revenue growth and profitability that we have historically delivered and continue to
deliver even within a challenging environment. Now, one of the things that one of the dynamics
in the business, as you mentioned, is supply path optimization. And this is a process by which
the major buyers of advertising. So think of big advertisers like a Procter and Gamble or agencies
like a group M WPP and others, they are consolidating their ad spend onto fewer larger
technology platforms like Pubmatic. And they're doing this because, you know, particularly in
this environment, you know, everybody has to become more efficient, uh, as well as becoming
more effective, you know, when the economy is, is facing, you know, some of the headwinds that,
that you mentioned. Uh, and so if you're a major buyer of advertising, you're looking at your
digital advertising supply chain and saying, okay, how can I achieve the goals that I want to
achieve, but do it, you know, with fewer partners, partners that are more innovative that can help me
with bigger parts of my business and partners that are going to deliver, you know, more value
in the future than they've delivered in the past. And that's exactly the position that we have put
our company in, which is to really be known as a leader in driving increased ROI. Uh, so return on
investment for the buyers of advertising such that they go out into the market and say, you know
what, I want to spend more with Pubmatic. And we do that through technology integrations, through
automating workflows, through data, through the efficiency of our platform. And so, you know,
to your point, you know, two years ago, Q1 of 2020, 10% of the activity on our platform was
via supply path optimization. And at the end of Q1, it was 27%. So obviously huge share gains in
just two years. And that's in a business, you know, that, you know, grew over 50% last year,
right? So the underlying rate of growth is very significant. And so that's a key driver of revenue
visibility for us because we know that, you know, these big advertisers and agencies,
they spend on a pretty consistent basis year in and year out on advertising. And as we grow that
portfolio, you know, that smooths out the volatility even further. And it does give us,
you know, increasing visibility into our revenue growth. You all cited that revenue from connected
TV grew, I think it quintupled versus the quarter, quarter. Can you talk a little bit
about this opportunity as it relates to Pubmatic specifically? Yeah. So connected TV is obviously
a very exciting high growth area of the ecosystem. It's a roughly 30 to $35 billion opportunity in
the next couple of years. And obviously there's, you know, consumer time is shifting from linear
TV to streaming. And so then the ad dollars need to follow. Now, the reality is that the vast
majority of how connected TV transactions are done today are through the traditional or old school
insertion order process, right? Where a buyer and a seller connect and they do a deal. And that's a
very non-automated or non-programmatic way of transacting. And there's nothing wrong with it
other than the fact that it doesn't create as much value for the buyer or for the publisher
as can be created via modern methods, via programmatic methods of transacting.
So we know that, okay, when we use data, when we automate things, when we move to an auction
type of format to support the scale of thousands of different apps that are supplying inventory,
and then tens of thousands of advertisers that want to buy it, that creates a much more efficient
efficient and effective market where advertisers can get higher ROI. And when they get higher ROI,
they're willing to spend more. And so publishers can generate more revenue. And so that's really
our vision for how CTV will be transacted. And that's exactly the platform that we built.
And so within this, you know, high growth auction environment, we have now 176 publishers as of the
end of Q1, up from zero two years ago. You know, the growth rate, as you mentioned, is significant.
And so we have, you know, hundreds of publishers inventory representing, you know, even greater
number of apps.
And we, we highlighted in the earnings call, you know, the, the variety of different types
of content.
We have content owners like the TV manufacturers.
So we're working with three of the top five manufacturers.
We have tier one broadcasters.
We have more niche apps that are more specialized, slightly smaller audiences.
We also have the free ad-supported TV folks, right, where you can watch for free a variety
of different programming content.
So we have built a marketplace for all of these folks.
And I think what you're seeing is strong validation of that approach, where, again, that publisher
growth, the overall growth rate, our GroupM supply path optimization announcement, all
point to the fact that this is the future of how CTV will be transacted.
And our approach is really resonating in the market.
What would you say to an investor who's a little worried about the current macro environment?
I mean, we've seen interest rates rising, inflation is creeping up and hitting the
consumer in the pocketbook. So for the investor who's a little worried about what this might
mean for the digital advertising agency over the near term, how would you frame that if you're
having a conversation with an investor? Yeah, absolutely. So I think there's a couple
things that investors should keep in mind. First is that what we've seen in prior, let's say,
economic dislocations or periods of stress is that there's actually a shift towards more
accountable, more measurable forms of advertising. Advertiser budgets may be in flux. Obviously,
they don't go to zero. What do advertisers do? They think and look at what are all the channels
of advertising that I'm engaged in can be traditional, you know, means like radio or
linear TV, uh, can be digital means of course. And they say, okay, well, which are the areas
that are the most flexible, uh, that I have clearest measurement of the return on investment,
uh, where I can clearly see, is this working or is it not? And they tend to shift more of their
ad budget into those environments. And we saw that, you know, real-time bidding arguably came
out of the 08, 09, you know, uh, timeframe, 2010, you know, financial stress. And we saw that again,
you know, uh, midway through the last decade, this type of, uh, acceleration towards digital
and programmatic. Uh, the second thing I would say is that, you know, my focus is really on
how do we continue to innovate, deliver value for our customers and use these periods as market
share gain opportunities. Uh, so there's, you know, there's going to be a, whatever the economic
environment is going to be. We obviously go into this environment with a very healthy business,
you know, no debt, 175 million of cash on the balance sheet, long track record of profitability,
you know, significant, uh, EBITDA margins, you know, well over 30%. Um, so I think we come at
this from a position of strength to really say, Hey, look, you know, whatever the near-term
dynamics are, that's what it's going to be. How do we find the right path to continue to invest
given the strength that we have and keep innovating so that when the market does become
more stable, we can use that as a market share gain opportunity. And by the way, we did exactly
that two years ago during COVID, where in Q2 of 2020, we had a 4% shrink in terms of our revenue
growth rate. Others were down about 20%, but we still delivered mid-teens EBITDA margin.
I think you would be challenged to find any technology company back in Q2 of 2020
that could still deliver that level of profitability, even with revenue coming down.
Chris Hill. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk
about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy
or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Chris Hill. Thanks for listening. We'll
see you tomorrow.
Thank you.
