Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - All Eyes On the Sphere

Episode Date: October 3, 2023

The shiniest thing in Las Vegas is also a publicly traded company.  (00:21) Ricky Mulvey and Nick Sciple discuss: - How consumer spending held up as the economy cooled. - Credit card companies benefiting from a shift toward experiences. - The business behind the dramatic new venue, Sphere. Plus, (9:41) Robert Brokamp interviews Roger Young, CFP and Thought Leadership Director at T. Rowe Price about the company’s research on retirement spending. Companies mentioned: LYV, ABNB, MSGS, SPHR, TROW Hosts:Ricky Mulvey, Robert Brokamp Guests: Nick Sciple, Roger Young Engineers: Dan Boyd, Rick Engdahl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In Toronto, every arrival is a statement, and nothing says it better than this. Cadillac Optic was the number one selling luxury EV in Canada for 2025. Find your rhythm across a seamless 33-inch display and an immersive 19-speaker AKG surround audio system. This city demands agility, and Optic delivers with precision to make every drive extraordinary. Let's take the Cadillac. Find out more at cadillaccanada.ca. Luxury sales claim based on S&P Global Mobility Canadian New Vehicle Total Registrations for calendar year 2025 for the Cadillac definition of luxury. A lot of companies are talking about a tighter consumer, but what's the data say? You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined today by Nick Seipel. Nick, good to have you back. Great to be back here with you, Ricky. I've been out on some leave, spending some time with my new baby, and it's great to be back with you. Obviously, I love time spent in with the family, but it's nice to be back in the saddle, seeing what's going on in the stock market. It'd be nice if the numbers would go up a little bit more, but we'll see how things go. Yeah. Well, I'm sure your spending has changed, and so has it changed for a lot of consumers. Americans spent 6% more in August compared to last year, growing 2% faster than inflation. on these earnings calls, you hear a lot about a tighter consumer, macroeconomic headwinds.

How should investors digest this data? Well, there's certainly concerns about some macroeconomic headwinds on the horizon. Think about student loan repayments beginning this month. But when you look at this consumer data, looking back at August, I'd say don't let a month or two of data let you see a trend that isn't necessarily there. There's some idiosyncratic things going on in the market that I'm sure you have heard about. Believe it or not, Taylor Swift has been on tour this summer, Beyonce as well. That might sound a little trite for me to bring up here, but I'm not the only one mentioning this. You've had economists at Adanska Bank blame Beyonce for surprisingly high inflation back in May because she began her tour back in Stockholm.

Federal Reserve economists have called out Taylor Swift's impact on the economy when it comes to lodging, travel, that sort of thing. The heiress tour alone expected to impact the economy by over $5 billion. Traditionally, you see about every $100 being spent on live performances trickling into another $300 in ancillary local spending. Think about you buy your outfit, you buy your hotel, things like that. You're seeing spending on these tours run even higher. However, these tours came to an end in August. These impacts that we've seen over the past couple of months, abnormal spending that I'm sure you may even know a few friends in your life, Ricky, that have spent ungodly amounts of money on some of these tours. It's not going to repeat going forward.

And we have some new idiosyncratic things taking place, as I mentioned, with student loan payments. So, I think the tighter consumer is still on the horizon, and we have some unique things going on that's driving some of this data. Well, and part of it is, it's not just Taylor Swift, it's not just Beyonce, but it's this preference towards experience, especially after the pandemic, Airbnb growing revenue at an 18% clip in its latest quarter. Ticketmaster sold more tickets at a similar clip for the first half of the year. With this preference, are there any companies that you're watching that may benefit from this boost, this preference towards experiential spending? I would say, looking at investing today, it's really the credit card companies,

the companies that have maybe financed some of this spending over the summer that I think would be the beneficiaries today, to the extent you see folks carrying higher balances. You can think about your live nations of the world and folks like that. But remember, these tours have come to an end. Now it's time to go see the movie. And so some of these impacts we've seen the past couple of months aren't going to repeat until we see the next summer concert season come around next spring. Well, speaking of spending on concerts, last week, the band U2 opened up The Sphere in Las Vegas. It is a concert venue with the largest LED screen on earth. I would encourage everyone to watch the videos of it. Difficult to describe on a podcast, but it's

basically a 20,000-capacity theater that looks like it's inside of a planetarium. There is a business behind this that is publicly traded. But first, Nick, what were your reactions to seeing this opening, the videos and the hype around it? Just amazing, first and foremost. It's like watching something right out of a sci-fi movie. I'm sure folks have seen there. There's a video of a larger-than-life eyeball that you see up there. It looks like something you might have seen in Blade Runner. I guess my high-level thought is, you hear people oftentimes say, we don't build pyramids anymore, we don't build cathedrals. And I would say, yes, we do. The largest spherical structure ever built in the

history of humanity now exists in Las Vegas. They're doing it, and you can invest in it. Yes, you can invest in your very own Death Star, possibly, too. The Sphere is a publicly traded company. Sphere Entertainment Group, which is a spinoff of the Madison Square Garden Group, Looks like James Dolan was trying to separate the sports and the entertainment companies. Focusing on Sphere Entertainment Group, this includes, we'll call it Sphere 1 in Las Vegas that we just described, and a plan to build Sphere 2 in London. You're also getting what is described as a humanoid spokesbot named Aura that welcomes people into the venue and takes questions about engineering and might look a little

bit like the iRobot stuff. Anyway, the thing that's also packed inside of this company, Nick, that not a lot of people are talking about is Madison Square Garden Networks. That's right, you're getting a cutting-edge LED 20,000-seat theater in a legacy cable media company. It's easy to like this company from an entertainment perspective, but how about from the investment side? Seems like an odd couple. Definitely seems like an odd couple. A segment of the market that hopefully we see dozens of these spheres all across the world. In an area, when you look at some of these regional sports and entertainment networks, really been challenged, as we see an evolution in what cable companies are

willing to spend for some of these networks. That has really presented a challenge. The vast majority of revenue today is coming from these existing sports networks. They have two, MSG Network and MSG SportsNet, serving the Northeast. They also have an over-the-top service, MSG Plus, where you can watch your local Rangers games, Islanders, things like that, really driving most of the revenue today. But obviously, the exciting opportunity is that the sphere has just opened, and lots of folks are excited to go. A couple of opportunities for revenue. You might expect, you've got an 18,600-seat arena that they're going to hold events in throughout the year, going to generate revenue from that. Also, an interesting advertising

opportunity. We had the pitch deck for that advertising presentation leak over the past couple of days. The rates are $450,000 a day to run your advertising copy on the Sphere or for a week at $650,000. This includes also working with a group of over 300 designers from that MSG group to help generate the creative you need for this very unique structure. They estimate that they will generate 4.7 million daily impressions, 300,000 of those coming in person, folks walking out on the Strip in Las Vegas or playing on the golf course where you're inside of the Wynn golf course, I guess that's some very valuable real estate, but also 4.4 million estimated social media engagements. Folks like me and you, Ricky, that probably haven't been out to Las Vegas

since this thing opened, I've seen some of those ads out there. If you run those numbers, just into your quick, $450,000 a day times 365 days a year, $165 million a year in potential revenue. If you're fully booked, that could be an interesting opportunity. Certainly, a lot to be proven out when it comes to the advertising sales? Also, is the excitement around this U2 concert going to remain as things move forward? The nice thing that maybe gives the company a little bit of a cushion has $340 million in cash and cash equivalents on their balance sheet and another $270 million in Madison Square Garden Entertainment stock that likely will be used to fund future operations going forward. It's a mix of businesses. The exciting one is the Sphere. We'll see where

where things go. Right now, it's getting a lot of social media attention, certainly a lot of hype. What would you say to investors who are maybe thinking about taking a nibble at what is probably the shiniest object on the planet? I would say that just know that the type of investment, I would say speculation that you're making here today. We've had one concert. We're on the first run of concerts here at this arena. It cost billions of dollars to build one of these, and we've yet to prove out the ROI on that original investment. What are we going to fall back on if this fear doesn't work? We have some challenged regional sports properties. We just saw ESPN have a challenged negotiation. I think we're likely going to see some of these MSG

networks have some challenges as well. Just keep in mind that for this investment to work out, you're going to need to see many multiples of these fears being deployed in the world. This is almost like a venture capital investment where you shouldn't be surprised if you lose a decent chunk of your cash. But if things work out, you can tell a story where things work out great for you. So, you know, that should be reflected in the weight that you put on this stock in your portfolio. All right. Well, we'll see what too many spheres make. Nick Seipel, appreciate your time and your insight. Great to be here, Ricky. Before we get to our next segment, just a quick reminder. If you've got a question, take, maybe there's a company you'd like us to cover. Shoot

us an email at podcasts at fool.com. That is podcasts with an S at fool.com. If you like the show, leave us a review or rating on your favorite podcast app. All right. What could change your spending in retirement? The biggest culprit might not be healthcare. Robert Brokamp caught up with Roger Young, a certified financial planner and the thought leadership director at T. Rowe Price to talk about how retirees actually spend and how you can plan for it. You just found out that your sales team is at risk of missing quota. Don't panic. Just ask Rippling AI.

Since it's built on your real-time people and business data, Rippling AI can pull metrics from Rippling and Salesforce into a meeting-ready dashboard showing quota attainment, headcount plan, and monthly revenue to quota by region. In seconds, you'll see exactly what's behind your quota risk and fix it before it's missed. Question answered. Action taken. Crisis averted. When you have critical business questions that need answers, don't just file a ticket and wait

weeks for an outdated report. Describe what you need and have Rippling AI build it instantly from your live people and business data. Whether it's a dashboard with detailed charts or automated workflows with the right triggers, conditions, and approvals. Ready to rule your business? Head to rippling.ai slash fool to get the only AI built to give you full visibility and take complex actions across your entire organization. That's R-I-P-P-L-I-N-G dot A-I slash F-O-O-L. Sign up for exclusive access today, rippling.ai slash fool. Retirement planning starts with having an idea of how much annual income you'll need when you stop working. And people have likely heard that they need anywhere between 70% and 85%

of their pre-retirement income. You wrote a report on this topic. What figure is a good starting point, and how did you determine it? Well, before I launch into the specific number, a couple things to get out of the way. First, though, I do want to define that term, what we call income replacement rate. And I think you described it well, but I want to make sure we're talking apples to apples, and it's income before taxes that we're talking about. So, comparing post-retirement to pre-retirement. We're not mixing this up with spending versus income or pre- or post-taxes. Before taxes, your gross income, most people have a sense of what their gross income is. I make X thousand dollars per year. Of course, remember, this is all a rule

of thumb. Everyone's different. It makes sense to do a more detailed planning as you approach retirement. Now that the caveats are out of the way, our analysis showed that a 75% income replacement rate is a good starting point for a lot of people. And you might immediately say, well, why shouldn't it be close to 100%? Why do I need so much less income? And very briefly, three main reasons. One, you no longer have to save for retirement when you're in retirement. So people are hopefully saving, we recommend 15%, or maybe they're saving 5% or 10% or 15% or whatever. You don't have to allocate that portion of your income anymore. Second, most people, not everyone, but most people spend less on average in retirement. And then third,

due to those factors and some other things, like not having payroll taxes anymore, most people are going to have lower taxes in retirement. So you add those things up, and a lot of people, the number is around 75 instead of 100. And the tax part really is remarkable. I don't think people appreciate how much their taxes will go down for many reasons. One is that a lot of the income that retirees have, like Social Security, is at least partially tax-free. You get a higher standard deduction when you're 65 and older. A lot of other sources of income, withdrawals from a Roth, for example, or long-term capital gains, it's all taxed at lower rates. For many people, their tax bill will drop dramatically. Yeah. With that 75% number, we're assuming

that to get from 100 down to 75, 8% of it is not saving for retirement anymore. And again, that varies by person. Five points of it, we attribute to people spending less. And the other 12%, we attribute to lower taxes. And I think we're being even hopefully conservative on that because of reasons you mentioned, like Roth and other things that are taxed less. We don't even assume people have Roth accounts when we come up with that number. So, yes, the taxes, it's an area where people don't have a great understanding of it. And so, by doing things on a before-tax gross level, hopefully, we're telling people a message of, we're doing the tax calculations for you. You don't have to do that. Just take our word for it. Hopefully, you're going to be incurring

less in the way of taxes in retirement. A big variable in the calculus of retirement is Social Security, and the amount that that is going to replace of your pre-retirement income depends on a lot of factors. Explain how marital status and household income will play into how much Social Security is going to help you. Following on the conversation about replacing your income in retirement, it's interesting, when we did the analysis, marital status and income level don't have a huge impact on that replacement rate, that 75% rule of thumb I mentioned. It goes up a little bit as your income level increases, but not too much. What does change significantly is what you pointed out, how much of that income is going to be

replaced by Social Security. As your income increases, Social Security replaces less. And that's just how the benefit formula works. And if you think about it, it's also consistent with how you're taxed, right? Up to a certain level, you have the Social Security tax. Over that level, you don't have that portion of the FICA tax. That goes away. Now, marital status also affects your Social Security benefits. And one key way is that if you're married, you can benefit from the spousal benefit, even if you're a sole earner couple. So, you know, that spouse who doesn't work can get some Social Security benefits in their name in addition to the primary earner. There are some nuances there. I wouldn't say that that's necessarily as big an impact as

the income side, but it does make some difference. Yeah, I'm going to put some numbers on that because it is interesting. Just pulling some numbers from your report, assuming a household has $100,000, for the single person, Social Security is only going to replace 28% of that. A married household, but only one earner, 42%. And married, dual income, 36%. So, the people who are doing the best are the people who are married, only one income earner. The single person, only getting a 28% replacement rate, which is really shocking. In fact, this is one of the reasons why being single is actually a little bit more financially challenging.

So, certainly understanding how Social Security is going to play into your retirement is crucial. Yes. Now, of course, the single people, they only have one income, so they might have a lower income than a dual-income married couple. But yeah, comparing a single person to a sole earner married couple is a more direct comparison. And yeah, there is definitely a difference in how much you'll get in Social Security for the same level of household income. Okay. So, we talked about how to estimate the amount you need in your first year of retirement. But I often say that retirement isn't one goal, but it's a series of annual goals. The amount you need in that first year, the amount you need in your second year, the amount

you need in your third year, from the day you retire to the day you expire. T. Rowe Price recently published a report about spending in retirement. So, what do we know about how expenses change as you go through retirement? Yeah, my colleague, Shadip Dibbanerjee, has done a lot of work on spending in retirement. And it's very important, as you point out, a lot of the rules of thumb we talk about, things like the 4% rule people have heard about in terms of being able to withdraw 4% of your assets sustainably, that's kind of based on a flat spending level. Our income replacement rate that I just talked about, that was based on a flat spending level. So those are not a complete

picture of reality. It goes back to that initial caveat. These are rules of thumb. you need to think about what your situation is going to look like. What Shadib Dobanerji, my colleague, found is that on average, real spending, so spending excluding the effect of inflation, that tends to go down by about 2% per year in retirement. Now, people might be thinking, well, I'm going to spend a lot more in medical costs. And that generally is true and certainly has potential to be big numbers, especially late in retirement. But generally, other expenses tend to go down, and those tend to outweigh the increase in medical costs. That was the overall finding. There's other work that he's done in the field as well.

Yeah. Basically, really what it comes down to is, as we get older, we just do less, we eat less, we travel less, we spend less, we buy less. We may enter retirement with a mortgage. That goes away. Sadly, we may enter retirement married, but a spouse passes away, expenses drop another 10% to 20%. This assumption that many people make that expenses actually go up every year with retirement overstates how much we may need, although it really does depend on your situation. In terms of healthcare costs, the more your healthcare costs rise, it's often offset by other things. The worse your health is, the less you can travel, the less you can go out to eat, the less you're probably driving your car. Expenses go down on average, but that's

the average. And this is a key part of the report, which found that there's actually a good bit of volatility in retirement spending. So, what kinds of ups and downs did the research show? Yeah. I mean, there's a fair amount of volatility out in the real world when it comes to retirement spending. Our work, Shadipdo's work, found that looking at people over two-year periods, roughly one quarter of households see spending go down by 20% or more, roughly. And then another quarter of people will see an increase in that two-year period of roughly 17% or more. So those are significant changes in spending for roughly half of the population. His research found that that tends to be true for people across the various ages in retirement. So

Whether you're talking about people just retired in their 60s to people late in retirement in their 80s and 90s, you can still see those spikes. It's not necessarily just one thing that causes it, like having to go into a nursing home or something like that. There is that potential for significant spending changes throughout your retirement. I think one of the most surprising takeaways from this report is, and you touched on it, Most people would probably think it's healthcare, but actually, 25% of the variability in spending was due to home-related expenses, only 5% due to healthcare and 3% due to transportation. Yeah, I do think that that's the area where Shadip does research was somewhat surprising.

We do tend to think of expenses in a couple different buckets, the discretionary or non-discretionary. We're looking at it a different way, kind of optional versus essential. And those essentials would include things like housing, healthcare, transportation. And you might think that, okay, those essentials are somewhat fixed, like a mortgage payment. But you pointed out earlier, people can get rid of a mortgage payment. What Shadipto found is for people at lower income levels, the non-discretionary expense categories, primarily housing, actually are what cause most of the spending volatility. So people change where they live, and that affects a lot of that expense.

Now, as you move up to higher income levels, the discretionary expenses drive more of the volatility. So you think those households have more flexibility to decide, maybe my portfolio's done well over the past year. Let me plan another big trip. Let me buy another expensive guitar, Robert, right? Things like that. A lot of the upticks are temporary, but in at least 15% of the cases, a household is still spending at that elevated level after four years. How should retirees plan for this possibility that their expenses will spike for two to four years or longer?

Well, a few ways. First, I guess, maybe a quick reality check. We think of volatility as bad. spending increases are bad. And I think having a mindset, well, those spending increases aren't necessarily a bad thing. It could be nice if you have some growth in your portfolio and that leads you to a higher level of discretionary spending. One of the things Shadibda found is that changes in discretionary spending are highly correlated with changes in your level of satisfaction from a financial standpoint. So it can be good, but it can also be a shock that you weren't prepared for. So that potential for unexpected changes is definitely something you want to plan for. A clear takeaway from our report is you want to have some liquidity in retirement. So

liquidity meaning assets that you can get to in a hurry that aren't really volatile, that will generally hold their value pretty well. Cash, obviously, is very liquid. Most people in retirement don't tie up all of their resources in a guaranteed income-type product that locks in the ability to have income, but at the same time doesn't have that liquidity. You can't access that money anymore. We do think it's good, what most people do, that they don't tie up all their assets in that way. Within your investment portfolio, you also want some mix of things. So you want some investments with growth potential and others that are more conservative. One way to frame this is finance researchers have thought a lot and written a lot about investment volatility and

volatility of your returns. I think there's been less said about this spending volatility issue. You want to protect yourself against both of those, and especially both of those going against you at the same time. If you get hit with one of these spending shocks, your spending is up 25% over two years, and at the same time, the stock market has had a downturn, that can be painful if you're having to take money out of stocks that have gone down. It really helps to be able to draw on cash or investments that probably didn't go down as much. And I'm going to throw in one more type of diversification that I've done a fair amount of work on, tax diversification. So what does that mean? That means having some assets in different types of accounts that have different

tax treatments. You mentioned earlier Roth accounts. That's a great example. If you have some Roth assets, you might draw on those to cover some of your unexpected expenses instead of taking distributions from a tax-deferred or traditional account where all of that money is taxable and it could push you into a higher tax bracket. So there are a lot of things to consider in terms of preparing yourself for changes that are unexpected. Yeah, that's a whole other aspect of retirement in that you have somewhat control of your tax situation, but that if you are forced to take out money from a traditional IRA or sell something at a capital gain, that's going to drive up your tax bill, which then come April 15th,

you have to come up with more money to pay those taxes, which means you have to take more money out of the account and sell more assets. It's kind of like this tax snowball. But if you have some money in that Roth account, you can take that out tax-free and cut that off right there. Yes. That's a good way of putting it. I hadn't thought about the snowball come April 15th. But yes, if you don't plan ahead for the fact that you're taking money out that has to cover the taxes as well, that can be a rude awakening. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against,

so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Ricky Mulvey. Thanks for listening! We'll see you tomorrow! We'll be right back.