Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - Alphabet’s New Model & Novo’s Lawsuit
Episode Date: July 22, 2026A new Gemini model is out and the AI world isn’t impressed. But is this Alphabet knowing its business better than anyone else or a loss of the company’s magic? Plus, we discuss Novo Nordisk suing ...Eli Lilly and GE Vernova’s stock falling after a great earnings report. Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Jon Quast discuss: - Gemini’s Model Dud? - Gemini Pro Delay - Novo Sues Eli Lilly - Novo’s Desperation - GE Vernova Earnings - Energy’s Peak Companies discussed: GE Vernova (GEV), Alphabet (GOOG), Novo Nordisk (NVO), Eli Lilly (LLY). Host: Travis Hoium Guests: Lou Whiteman, Jon Quast Engineer: Dan Boyd Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
The heart of earnings season starts today. Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing starts now.
Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm Travis Hoy. I'm joined today by Lou Whiteman
and our special guest, Jon Quast. Guys, earnings season really, I think today is kind of the
day that marks the beginning. We've got Tesla, we've got Alphabet. Both of those stocks are
either going to beat or miss their estimates and their stocks are going to be up and down.
But that's not what we're going to talk about today.
We're going to start with the news from Alphabet, and that is Gemini.
Lou, they released a new model yesterday, Gemini 3.6 Flash, did not get a lot of positive reviews from the AI pundit class.
What was your take on this?
Was this a little bit too harsh or what is going on with Gemini at this point?
First of all, throwing shade on Jamie Dimon and the big bank earnings.
So there you go.
But all right. Look, I mean, you know, big banks, not nearly as exciting as what's going on in tech right now.
Is it? I don't know. But but yeah, so it kind of, as you say, fell on deaf ears, in part because the new super duper model, which I think that's what they're calling it, right?
Gemini super duper. The frontier model is delayed. But here's the thing.
And I think we need to step into normie town here, OK, because, you know, for all of the talk about the frontier models and these cutting edge models, very few people know what's going on there and care.
It's not the percentage that you would think if you scroll on Twitter.
About half the global population is using AI, but the number of people using these frontier models, by some estimates, less than 10 percent.
So, you know, yes, the people who do care are the ones driving spending. So it does matter some if this Google model isn't the latest and greatest that people wanted. But increasingly, it feels like most of the revenue, most of the work is not going to go to and come from the frontier models.
They're just too dang expensive. It's going to come from the most affordable, rational way to do the job. I think there's some cool things here. Alphabet's cyber tool seems very useful. It hunts and patches for vulnerabilities. I don't think that this is a big deal in and of itself. I think Alphabet's job is to just put out a model people are going to use. It seems like that's going on. And the rest of it is sort of just a, it's a fun geek off, but it's a geek off.
Yeah, John, is that what you see here?
Is this a battle of the geeks and the normies?
No, I don't know about that.
See, I think what's really happening here,
I don't think that users are necessarily dissatisfied
with Gemini 3.6 Flash.
I think they are miffed
that they don't have Gemini 3.5 Pro yet.
And I really think what Alphabet is in danger of doing here
is angering its high spend users.
And that's not really a good thing
because there are users who pay for Pro
who were expecting Pro to be released in June
because that's what the company said.
We're going to release Gemini 3.5 Pro in June.
And they were expecting that yesterday.
And instead, what they got was 3.6 Flash first.
And there are some things that this Flash version
can actually do better than the top Pro model right now.
That's actually kind of a problem.
Yeah, it is interesting that they,
as some of these other labs,
open ai and anthropic in particular are leaping ahead on the very very bleeding edge lou i i want
to end with this is this a case of some of these companies just maturing into what they're going to
be long term because we've talked a lot about artificial intelligence spend and all this kind
of stuff but the as the business models are starting to form into shape it seems like
anthropic is winning this kind of coding class the agents the people who are willing to put all
this stuff together and and do whatever it is they're doing with fable but then you got the
regular people who are just using search and are going oh man these these ai overview tools are
pretty cool they answer all my questions and that's flash 3.6 sitting underneath so is this
sort of gemini gemini and google saying hey you know what this is where our money is being a
little bit faster a little bit cheaper is going to be great for the bottom line i don't want to
give them a total pass because the reason pro isn't out there is because pro doesn't work the
way they wanted to period they failed whether or not it matters for the business you know but but
but it is a setback and to john's point the people who really care are going to be miffed i i'm not
sure i'd push back a bit john on you on the idea that the decision makers are miffed because uh
flash is supposed to use 17 fewer tokens and cost less per token i think the actual decision makers
might be fine with that, even if it isn't as powerful. I think the big takeaway is if you
would have asked me two years ago who's winning, it would be opening up. If you would have asked
me a year and a half ago, oh, wow, Gemini is everywhere. This is so new. I know it's a terrible
investor takeaway is we know nothing. But I think it is dangerous to read anything long term and
long term into any one of these announcements. We are still early days and we have no idea what's
going to end up happening. When we come back, we're going to talk about the latest between two
of the biggest GLP-1 makers in the world. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.
New from Nespresso. Blend wellness into your coffee routine with the Coffee Plus range,
infused with functional benefits. Choose the coffee you love with added B vitamins,
like Coffee Plus B12 to help support immune function and Coffee Plus B6 to keep your day
moving or go with the flow and choose ginseng delight our new double espresso with ginseng
extract whatever lies ahead don't change your morning let your morning change you
discover coffee plus on espresso.com welcome back to motley fool hidden gems investing
one of the interesting headlines yesterday was that novo nordisk is suing eli lilly these are
the two big companies in the glp one space ozempic is probably the one that you know
but you got on jiro that there's basically four products that are relatively similar similar but
now we're getting to the point where red or true tide is coming that could potentially be a trillion
dollar drug uh maybe gonna be out next year but john this is a this is a big lawsuit between two
companies that are fighting over a lot of the same market what was your takeaway from these two
going to battle well i think it may be a sign of just how desperate novo nordisk is getting
right now. You know, Novo Nordisk's products, Wagovi and Ozempic, I think they do have better
name recognition in the GLP-1 space. But Eli Lilly actually has a greater estimated market
share at 60 percent. Now, you look at the sales trends for these two companies and Novo Nordisk
expecting maybe a decline this year, whereas Eli Lilly expecting an increase. And so you look at
where things are trending. You look at who has the market share and you look at the growth rate
projections over the coming years for GLP-1 drugs. It's a huge growth opportunity, according to many
of the analysts out there. So Novo Nordisk clearly wants this space. And one of the interesting
things here is that pricing is actually coming down. So the profit margins are getting squeezed
a little bit on these GLP-1 drugs. That means that volume, sales volume really does make a
difference. Market share makes a difference. And Nova Nordisk is losing right now. Eli Lilly is
winning. And so I think it is getting a little bit desperate. Yeah. And Lou, to be clear, they're
suing over the marketing of Eli Lilly's products. This is always kind of one of the weird spaces in
pharma is that you can make a drug or a product and you can sell it to customers, but you also
have to market it correctly. And they're saying, hey, wait a second, you can't say this or that
in your ads. So maybe maybe this is, you know, the kind of battle that we want is fewer ads.
Yeah. I mean, I'm all for that. Right. I'd like to join this as a friend of a court just to get
it might be my age. It might be the fact that I write baseball or watch baseball a lot,
which is old people stuff that the number of pharma ads and do you always have to put a dog
in them? So that part is OK. But look, reading the suit seems like both sides are technically
right here. Lilly is accurately giving the results of comparison trials, but oopsie,
conveniently forgetting to mention that the trials are a bit dated now, that there's an updated Novo
pill that does better in the trials. So yeah, this is, in a way, Novo is desperate, but also why not?
Just like we sort of talked about with AI, both sets of products seem to do the job. Effectiveness
seems to vary by release. Like, you know, the latest model is the best model. So, you know,
Lilly's banking billions right now.
Novo, to the extent that we're talking about it,
Novo's already won this.
And I don't blame them for going at it.
This is a huge gold mine right now.
They want to tap as much of it as they can
for as long as they can.
I don't know if this is a winning court,
but if nothing else, it's just got us talking about,
hey, Novo's got a new product out
and it's a lot better than the old one.
The thing that I think is interesting here
is how much competition,
I can't remember, maybe back when we started to get
different versions of Viagra. There was competition like this. But this space has gone from,
okay, we're going to be able to charge $3,000 a month for these treatments to this is kind of
just a consumer product at this point. You remember earlier this year, we had talked about
Novo Nordisk sued Hims and Hers. That went away really quickly because Hims and Hers has a couple
million subscribers. They need access to those people if they're going to have sales be declining.
So this just seems like another sign that we're entering a new phase in this space where it's going to be, hey, what are the results and what is the price?
That's something that pharma companies are not used to talking about all that much.
You don't remember the bathtub ads?
What are the bath? No, I don't remember the bathtub ads.
No, no. Yes. Trust me. When when those male pills came out, there were plenty of ads.
Yes. In fact, they were the there were Saturday Night Live skits about the number of ads.
So, yeah, look, I don't know if this is different. It may be on the scale, but I can even go back and remember statin ads when when those came out. So this is increasingly the way the way pharma reaches, you know, doctors are in a real pinch here.
OK, because doctors are going and trying to do what's best for the patient, but also it's a business.
And so a patient says, hey, I heard about this. Why don't you give me this?
That can move the needle on whether or not you get a prescription.
This is the quote unquote informing the consumer is how these businesses work, which I guess to Novo's point is why it should be accurate information.
Yeah, it will be interesting to see how the battle plays out, especially as more new products are coming to market.
This is hardly the last new GLP-1, GLP-3, whatever you want to call them.
From an investment standpoint, I think the valuations are interesting.
Novo Nordisk trading for 3.7 times sales and just 16 times forward earnings estimates.
That's what the market is showing you that, you know, that growth slows.
They don't really love that.
Eli Lilly, on the other hand, trading for almost 15 times sales and 32 times forward estimates.
So double the valuation or more depending on which metric you're looking at.
So definitely a higher valuation and Eli Lilly has been taking advantage of that by buying a whole bunch of potential products that will grow the company in the future.
When we come back, we're going to talk about the latest in energy earnings.
You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.
like coffee plus B12 to help support immune function and coffee plus B6 to keep your day
moving. Or go with the flow and choose ginseng delight, our new double espresso with ginseng
extract. Whatever lies ahead, don't change your morning. Let your morning change you.
Discover Coffee Plus on Nespresso.com. Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.
One of the earnings reports that did come out this morning was from GE Vernova. I want to lodge
my complaint for this being one of the worst named companies and we don't even need to explain
it apparently it has to do with green energy but the real business is is selling natural gas
turbines which we'll talk about but lou results came in pretty good they almost doubled their
free cash flow guidance for this year uh you know i heard comments about people paying a little extra
to cut in line to get their gas turbines this is the demand coming from data centers what do you
see in the results yeah so they'd love to talk about uh wind and renewables and all that but
right now as you say uh gas turbines are driving the bus i was actually wind isn't doing too well
right now but that's something else but yes this is all about data center energy needs and all of
that um you know it's this i mean travis gray quarter stock is down and it gets to the kind
of awkward question we've seen this with nvidia with memory and now energy all these things we
all know what's going on here. Data center demand is off the charts now. Growth has been amazing.
But there's two questions. For one, will it keep growing? And that's where I, that question,
I think investors are starting to say, okay, well, maybe it just plateaus. And that's fine
for the business. That's great for the business because as you say, cashflow is up, but it's not
great for a forward-looking market that always wants growth. The other question with all of
these suppliers is, do they have the capacity to meet that growth? And on that note, at least I
think for Nova is trying, they're going to spend $11 billion across the business in CapEx over the
next four years. That's not all turbines, but a lot of, some of that, a good part of that is just
to boost capacity. By comparison, they were spending about a billion dollars a year in past
years in CapEx. So they are kind of more than doubling in the near term. That does imply that
they can kind of hit that backlog faster than they could at status quo. So that is somewhat good. But
I think the real question here isn't, you know, isn't will it last forever? I think it can last
for a while, but can it continue to grow from here? And that's where the market's sort of in a
quandary. Yeah, John, this is one of those interesting spots because it makes sense that
there's a ton of demand for energy, but we're asking this almost every day. Is this time
different. And in the energy space, it seems like we're going to go back to some sort of normal. So
is this sustainable, this level of profitability and free cash flow? Yeah, I mean, GE Vernova
shareholders certainly hope that it's sustainable because, as Lou pointed out, they are investing
capital expenditures into increasing their capacity. And when you look at the
turbines in particular, looking to increase that production capacity by 50 percent by 2030.
And so basically, they can't make enough turbines right now.
So looking to be able to make 50% more annually.
And if the demand is there, then great.
But if the demand goes back to whatever we call normal, that's actually kind of a liability
because now we have a higher operating base in our cost basis.
And so that's kind of an issue.
I will say when you look at the backlog numbers here, it's very, very promising for GE Vernova.
us. So basically a $176 billion backlog right now. It's expected to increase to $200 billion
by next year. This is a company that only has $40 billion in annual revenue. So a $200 billion
backlog is remarkable. So that does bode well for shareholders.
Lou, John gave a few of the numbers there, but this is one of those enterprise value to sales is
six price earnings multiple is 28 this has been one of the best stocks in the market to be clear
since march 2024 shares are up 665 i did not have that on my bingo card so is this something
investors should be excited about or a little little leery of right now so i want to extend
this past just for nova i think it's true for nova but all this we love to talk about picks
and shovels and the idea is you know the famous story is fools that nobody got rich off the gold
rush of 1849, but a lot of people got rich selling the picks and shovels to the people
trying to get rich. And so the idea is to, if AI, you can either buy the hyperscalers or buy the
company supplying the hyperscalers. The thing about this is that is always an inefficient way
to gain exposure to a trend. Okay. You're not buying directly into the trend. You're buying
the kind of, you know, the supply chain into the trend. The only reason to do that is, is if the
trend is so overpriced it's just a way to get exposure to something without paying up in
valuations right now by my looking this morning for nova is trading at 65 times expected earnings
okay that's triple the multiple of an alphabet or a microsoft or some of these just pure play
companies this is true across the board with picking shovels right now if you want to invest
in ai right now heck given the waiting you could probably just buy the sp500 but i think the
hyperscalers, the core companies are actually a more appealing value than any of these picks
and shovels right now. Again, you only do this when you're getting a discount and it's a way
to get exposure on the cheap. You're not getting that exposure on the cheap. Yeah. And if we go
through some sort of downturn where spending on AI comes down, the cash flow of those hyperscalers
goes up. They're the ones spending the cash. So ironically, the risk is in a different place than
it was a couple of years ago, but definitely has been a phenomenal run for a lot of these companies.
As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about,
and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against,
so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content
follows The Motley Fool's editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements
are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our
full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. For Lou Whiteman, John Quast,
and Dan Boyd behind the glass, I'm Travis Hoem. Thanks for listening. We'll see you here tomorrow.
Thanks for watching!
