Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - Crypto's New Backer

Episode Date: March 5, 2025

BlackRock wants to buy ports; Trump wants to buy crypto. (00:21) Asit Sharma and Mary Long discuss: - How investors can prepare for potential “disturbance.” - BlackRock’s latest acquisition. - The reasons for and against a national “strategic reserve” of cryptocurrency. Then, (14:50), Ricky Mulvey and Mary go to a crypto conference in downtown Denver. Tickers mentioned: BLK, CKHUY, BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL, ADA Host: Mary Long Guests: Asit Sharma, Ricky Mulvey Engineers: Dan Boyd, Rick Engdahl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We're going to Washington. Well, kind of. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. I'm Mary Long, joined today by Asit Sharma. Asit, always a pleasure to have you on the show. Thanks for being here. Mary, thank you for inviting me once again. So we got kind of an interesting, an interesting show today. We're going to focus on a couple different stories that is kind of at the intersection of policy and stuff that's happening in Washington, but that also do have an impact, not just on the economy, but on investors in particular. We'll kick things off with Trump's speech last night. Last night, President Trump delivered a one hour and 40 minute speech to Congress. There were a lot of headlines out there this morning that are covering

this speech. But Politico kind of summed it up this way this morning, saying, quote, this was not a speech that shifted the news dial at all. New policy announcements were few and far between. What did shift the news dial yesterday was really the implementation of tariffs that have been talked about for a while, but finally went into effect yesterday. Trump kind of took yesterday's speech as an opportunity to double down on the rollout of these tariffs. During last night's address, Trump confirmed that new reciprocal tariffs on goods imported from a wide range of countries will begin on April 2nd. Notably, not April 1st, because that's April Fool's Day. There was a bit of a joke. Lest there be any confusion there, right?

Yeah, there was a bit of a joke made about that in the speech itself. Please let it be a joke. Please, we can hope. Ricky and J-Mo hit a lot of the tariff talk yesterday, so we're not going to talk too much about the technicalities of that. Today, I just wanted to hone in on the potential effect of those tariffs, because Trump did address that in the speech last night. Trump himself acknowledged that these protectionist policies may, quote, create a little disturbance within the economy. So, with that, Asit, that little disturbance, quote, stuck out to me because Trump's not necessarily one to address the effects of what might be happening. How can

investors prepare for a potential disturbance to markets and to individual portfolios, but also just to consumer wallets? Investors should be prepared for volatility because uncertainty surrounds these tariffs. They did come down with a hammer this week, but I know as of this morning, Howard Lutnick, who is the Commerce Secretary, is talking about maybe having some concessions that will be wrought out of Mexico and Canada. Potentially, those broad and very vigorous tariffs will find some exemptions or roll back in some ways. The market, I think, hasn't breathed this huge sigh of relief this morning, but you can already see in a little bit calmer action today how that's manifesting. I would say be prepared for that to continue. President Trump has a sort

of volatile negotiating style himself. It's very difficult to predict what side of an issue he'll land on at times. And this is partly by design. It's just the way that he tends to wreak concessions out of partners. And so, as investors, we should just sort of take that as going to be par for the course from now on, where we have issues that affect the markets. And so, I don't think this is a surprise to anybody. The second thing that we need to be prepared for is how narratives are going to shift in the companies we invest in. Just as you and I are trying to figure out what effect this could have on our portfolios, different companies are trying to gauge what the net result will be on their earnings, not just next quarter, but say a year from now. And they have to try to

get things nominally right or directionally correct. In these various boardrooms, they're not really boardrooms anymore, everyone works from home. But anyway, on the Zoom calls, CFOs, COOs, CEOs are trying to game out what happens if, let's say, a certain part of the market which affects their business gets carved out for an exemption, or tariffs get rolled back, Or they're able to find some kind of workaround strategy, say, bringing goods into the U.S. if a manufacturer or a consumer goods company, for example. So, as they do this, they're not going to be 100% right. And we will experience, maybe not in equal measure, some pain in companies we own saying,

look, we got slammed by tariffs this quarter. And then some surprises where a company now is already projecting that they're going to get hit hard. and three quarters from now, they say, look, it isn't as bad as we thought it was going to be. We have a surprise in earnings. That's just something we have to prepare for. And as for wallets, personally, Mary, I don't know about you, but I start from the worst case first and work backwards. So, if you're looking to buy a car this year, you may have already noticed there have been a few viral videos already showing an instant jacking up of prices

for different makes and models. I would assume if I'm making a big ticket purchase that, By the time I'm ready to make that purchase, it'll still be at an elevated cost to me. Now, if concessions come about, negotiations change, that's for the better. But psychologically, it's easier to do it that way than to be a little too optimistic that things will shift very quickly in your favor as a consumer. Tariffs are taking up a lot of the air in the room, understandably. But there are some other policy, economy stories that are maybe slipping under people's radar that I want to take a moment to hit with you.

one of those stories is that BlackRock has agreed to buy a majority stake in two of the four major ports along the Panama Canal. So, BlackRock is going to be acquiring these ports from the Hong Kong-based group CK Hutchinson. The total price tag for this deal, and it includes more than just these two ports in the Panama Canal, the total price tag for this is about $23 billion, and it allows BlackRock and Co., so a crew of other investors that they've rallied together, to gain control of, in addition to these two ports in the Panama Canal, more than 40 other ports across 23 countries around the world. But most folks know BlackRock as an asset manager. Is this company new to the port business, and why is it trying to enter into it?

Well, they're not exactly new to this business, believe it or not. BlackRock has an infrastructure arm. For them, when you manage $11 trillion-odd in assets, of course, most of that is in ETFs and stocks and fixed income assets, you have a lot of money to put to work. The infrastructure practice has been a thematic practice for BlackRock for some time. They have really changed a little bit of their philosophy of being a passive manager in these events to being a bit more active. To do this, they purchased a leading infrastructure fund last year. This is Global Infrastructure Partners. This is a business that also invests a bit passively, but it takes direct interest in different types of infrastructure from ports

to airports. They own part of Gatwick, for example. Great timing for them. If you're thinking maybe this is a political move by Larry Fink and BlackRock, actually, I don't see it that way. They've been preparing to make some big deals in the port space. That transaction, which is only now a few months closed, which was a big investment on BlackRock's part, they borrowed about $3 billion to pull off this deal. Now, they can go ahead with what is sure to be a lead partner out of that consortium, their own GIP, Global Infrastructure Investment Partners, and be more of an active participant. Going to an operator-owner type model, this is something that's good for their margins, but it does introduce a little bit of volatility into

their business model, which until today has been very passive and fee-based. We talk a lot about, how do you value a company? How do you put a price tag on this? How do you value a deal like this one? Is $23 billion a good deal for over 40 ports around the world? Funnily enough, the way you evaluate a port is not that different from some other industries that we're all familiar with. Most buyers take an income approach, so they want to understand what the future cash flows the port can generate are going to derive. You do this by looking at a few things like the geography of the port, you evaluate its infrastructure. You do a lot of due diligence to understand if there are any environmental issues. You conduct a strategic

review to see if a port might be able to be automated. So there are so many factors that go in, but at the end of the day, you're doing the same exercise that we do when we buy a stock. And when I hear that price tag, to me, I think they probably have done a pretty good job. the group I mentioned, GIP, is particularly good at due diligence. I think they may have a very decent handle on what they can extract out of those ports. Keep in mind, these are very, very long-term assets. If you stay good with the government, you can operate a port for a long time. It probably is a reasonable price, even though the price tag seems very big. That's a lot of breakfast cereal for me, $23 billion. Our third policy-adjacent story of the day

that we'll close out on, Trump has also unveiled a plan for a strategic crypto reserve. Now, this is slightly different than what's been floated in the past. Previously, we'd heard about plans for a Bitcoin-only reserve. This newer proposal includes not only Bitcoin, but also Ether, XRP, Solana, and Cardano. What is the benefit of the U.S. having a crypto reserve at all? Why is this being pushed forward? Mary, it's being pushed forward because It is an alternative asset to Bitcoin. Let's focus on Bitcoin for a second. It is an alternative asset. Theoretically, it has value vis-a-vis maybe an eroding dollar. This is one reason it could be important. It's also something that mirrors what the U.S. has done in many

other areas, although I will say that it's differentiated here. The U.S. has strategic reserves in different places. Oil is one. We've all heard of the strategic reserve in oil. We've got a helium reserve. We have a bullion reserve at Fort Knox. But each of the assets I mentioned has intrinsic value. And this is where we start to get on a little bit of a gray area, because Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. So when we create a reserve, what we are positing is that the value of Bitcoin is either going to remain stable or increase. Otherwise, why would you invest in something which has such a fluctuating price point. Those are the positive or pro-arguments for the reserve. What are the downsides for the reserve?

The downsides are, we are running a large deficit. When we think of where the U.S. can place its money, it becomes curious if we're putting money into an asset which is so volatile, because we have to raise money to bring the deficit down. 90% of the funding for the U.S. government comes in the form of taxes. So, payroll taxes, personal taxes, corporate income taxes, the rest is a mishmash of other stuff. So, in the future, if this comes up, just like any other reserve, it's going to be funded from taxpayer dollars. Now, the so-called crypto czar said, wait a minute, hang on, tweet it out. Don't assume that this is going to come from some big spending program or taxes up front. Wait till you hear the details. But inevitably,

once we establish reserves, future additions to the reserves are based on tax revenue money coming in. So one of the arguments is that we are potentially taxing U.S. citizens to invest in something where we can lose value. And there are some other assets that have been floated. but I know, Mary, you had a question about that as well. It's not just Bitcoin we're talking about. Interestingly, some crypto leaders have come out against this idea of having a crypto reserve that includes more than just Bitcoin. Ether is a pretty legitimate coin. It's another big name that probably even the crypto ignorant will likely recognize. But what is the deal asset with XRP, Solana, and Cardano? How do they get early inclusion into this potential strategic

crypto reserve list? There are a lot of people scratching their heads on why these smaller cryptocurrencies, digital assets, have been included. One theory is that David Sachs, who is the crypto czar I mentioned, has a background in promoting a lot of different crypto assets. He is very positive about the industry and wants to broaden out any kind of governmental or sovereign investment in digital assets. And this has caused, as you mentioned, sort of a rift in the crypto community. Even those who are very pro-Trump and pro-crypto are scratching their heads, many of them, at this inclusion. So, this brings up more of the cons of the argument if this goes through, because you could potentially, with your tax dollars,

one really great characterization I read, be bailing out some crypto bros so they can cash out as your hard-earned tax dollars go into the reserve. This is something, of course, that still has to be put into or onto paper. It's maybe jumping the gun to say this is how that reserve is going to pan out. But if this comes to pass, I think we're going to hear more discussion, a lot more debate around what exactly this reserve is supposed to achieve. Is it really all about creating the strategic asset for the United States, or is it something else that lets one industry sort of capitalize on a lot of interest from the very highest levels of the U.S. government? We'll end it there for now. But if anyone listening is craving more crypto talk,

we do have it coming up for you right after this. Later on today's show, as Ricky and I debrief our time at ETH Denver, which is a crypto conference that came to our very own backyard. Until then, Asit, thanks for coming on to the show. Always great to talk to you and to get some of your insights into what's going on in the world. Same, Mary. Thanks a lot. Last week, the crypto world came to Denver. My colleague, Ricky Mulvey, and I decided to take a little field trip to check it out. We saw lots of flashy people and products, including Doge-covered sports cars, magicians, spiritual guides, and an NFT backpack. But amid all that, did we find anything worthwhile for investors? Up next, Ricky and I debrief on our time at ETH

Denver. Mary, a few days ago, we got back from ETH Denver, which was a cryptocurrency conference in our backyard. This is not a world that we play in much, but I think it was kind of interesting getting a peek into the world of crypto. Some good, some bad. But when you think back on your experience at this conference, this gathering of cryptocurrency enthusiasts, speculators, investors, business people, what were your high-level takeaways from visiting this Denver? Ricky, you say some good, some bad. I say all interesting. I think my highest level takeaway was just, it is one thing to read about and think that you have gotten a glimpse into the other world, the culture that is crypto. It's another thing to really see it and be walking through it.

And something that really stuck out to me is truly just how crypto broadly feels like a whole other language to me. And so a big thing that I walked away from was, as we're passing through these different booths on the convention floor, and you and I are trying to figure out what matcha.xyz or gelato or the world of Newton, these are names of different booths that are exhibiting there. As we're trying to figure out and we're talking to people to figure out what it is that these platforms do, we're kind of struggling to get answers. One of the things that I kept thinking to myself was, how is one of these platforms differentiated from another? And so that got me thinking a lot about moats and how we think about them in more traditional businesses, in kind of the traditional world of equities, and how we think about them in this crypto world.

Because it's one thing for me to articulate what the difference is between, say, Coke and Pepsi. I understand those products as a consumer. I understand the difference between them as a marketer, as an advertiser. I can compare the fundamentals of the businesses. It's another thing for me to walk through the differences of, again, I'm just going to pull out two random names of exhibitors there, Gelato and the World of Newton. Those are businesses that I don't really understand. I don't understand what to grade them on because I'm not deep within that world of crypto. So it's a harder thing for me to evaluate. Though, after being there, I do think,

okay, there are probably people that could articulate that difference. I just don't speak the language well enough to do it. Yeah. And one of the things that struck with me, we would go to these booths and ask what's going on with these, like essentially play to earn video games. There was like a robo advising products that was very odd. A couple of tokens that we didn't quite understand. You would talk to the person at the booth. And then once you asked basically two questions, they would say, Oh, well, I'm not, I'm really not the person to talk about this product in that level of detail. You should talk to someone else. and there were parts of it that were cool i'm glad that i'm thinking more about things like

ai agents from this but so much of this felt like unnecessarily complex we went to one booth that was like allegedly a type of financial advising product there's a big wheel in the back that you spin to earn credits for this thing you don't understand and you know this there's like a couch and i'm sitting on the couch and one of the like the workers at the booth she like sits right up next to me and asks like how much of your life is predetermined and how much is free will which was odd and i don't i still don't know what the product is i go i go basically 60 40 predetermined i grew up in a two-parent household in a good part of america you can't discount that and then i find and then i get a 20-sided die and then they and then you figure out that this is for some ai agent

that allegedly invests cryptocurrency on your behalf that that i still don't quite understand And to me, that was one of the biggest themes is like, even for someone who's into the world of investing, there is this deliberate obfuscation of a lot of what this stuff actually is and does. I think that booth in particular looms so large in my takeaway from this event, because it was so much about showmanship. And I think broadly, when we talk about crypto, we think a lot and talk a lot about how it kind of represents the gamification of everything, right?

And you see that on a very real level in these products and these platforms that make up the world of crypto. But you also see it in the real world when you go to a crypto conference and you see the whole booth that's supposed to be advertising and drawing attention to this product is not actually centered around explaining to you, potential user, investor, whoever, what the product is. the whole booth is centered around this game, this quasi-meme where the employees can't actually articulate, oh, we do X, Y, Z. Instead, they're all dressed in black and they're speaking this language of, are you ready to embark on a journey? How much of your life is predetermined? Touch the crystal, here's a die. And you and I are left going, sorry, what did we just experience? Is that supposed to make me want to give you money? The other thing that kind of struck with me is one of the big themes in crypto that I don't really think about is these like play to

earn video games. And honestly, that made me a bit cynical about the utility for a lot of, a lot of cryptocurrency stuff. We went to one booth where we ended up playing some sort of crypto game where there was no explanation for how the game worked. Your character would like bump into another character and then nothing would happen. Or you'd like jump on a treasure chest and then nothing would happen. And then the game just goes off after a minute and you have no idea what happened that's in one case in the other case there's literally a whole booth for like crypto video games and you're thinking what is that well in this case and for a lot of these games they are these basically play to earn games where you start with characters and through

the game you're able to build up the skill and health in these characters and then you can turn them into nfts which then you can then sell for money and it just struck me as like first of all there's an unfairness associated with, with this. You're, you're kind of playing a game that's rigged. If a lot of people are starting with players that are better than you, in this case, it was a soccer management game. And then secondarily, I was also thinking that for a lot of these games, I'm not even allowed to demo them. I can't, I can't go in. I'm watching this guy like click around and explain how we could possibly earn money by playing this soccer management video game where we can play matches, win them, and then use those points to increase

the health of these players, which we can then sell on an open NFT market. Yeah. The thing that sticks out to me about that game, because it's so interesting to your point, Ricky, you have these screens and you think, oh, of course I'm going to be able to try this game out. And in fact, you are not able to try that game out. That just hits home, that obfuscation point that you made about, okay, there's a visual offering here, but try to dig a little deeper and actually play the game yourself, ask questions to figure out what it is. And you come up very, very short with that game. You know, I kept thinking, okay, managing a soccer team. I liked playing Sims when I was a teenager. I get this idea. That sounds fun to me. The NFT piece is

where I, and this, these are my biases up front, but that's where I get lost a little bit because again, I think back to what I liked about playing the Sims and it was just the act of creating and like living this life, managing the soccer team. I can theoretically understand the appeal of playing a game and making money off of it. But then my question is, how do you know when you're playing the game, when you're playing the game, not just for the joy of creating, playing, et cetera, but instead to turn a profit. It's one thing if you know how to turn that profit, if you know what the value of these NFTs and what your players are based on, but there aren't any rules. So it's still kind of a crapshoot. And that's another thing that

kind of just was echoing through my brain of, wait, what is the value here? And I was asking myself that as we're looking at the soccer management NFT game, as we're looking at the booths. Wait, hold on. If you're an investor that wants to put money into these platforms, what are you basing that judgment on? What are you looking for? Are you betting on the founder? Are you betting on the product? If you're a player in an NFT game, how are you trying to build your soccer players to create a more valuable NFT? I don't know the answer to any of those questions. And this is kind of pulling back the curtain a little bit. I went into this conference and still have, I would say a large amount of skepticism and distrust, you know,

there was a version of this where I was like, Oh, we could find some interviews and put them on the show. But then I thought, Mary, and I think we kind of came to agreement on this. Like we don't know this well enough to know if we'd be putting a scammer on the show. And when I'm thinking about like going through that conference, I'm, I'm, I'm still not like, Oh, I wish I grabbed that interview to present this to the listeners of our show. And you know, one of the things I went in with is like, if I invest in crypto, how should I do it? Or speculating crypto would be a more, maybe a more accurate way of putting it. I kind of came away thinking just like do a little bit and do it simply. Like if you just buy a little Bitcoin enough that it can't hurt you, maybe

that's a good idea for the next five to 10 years. Yes, it could be a tulip bulb thing, but a lot of people seem to be accepting it as a sort of digital gold. But then once you get more complex than that, I think there's so many ways that you can step in a pothole. They asked me to host this panel about the next billion dollar idea in crypto? And of course I said, yes, because I thought it would be fun. And you've learned something. Yeah. I basically came away from that with just being like, all right, you should just like maybe buy a little Bitcoin. Cause I don't understand the rest of it. Like one of the questions I had for, for the panels, they kept talking about these like defy loans and staking

the ideas. You can take stable coins, coins that are attached to the value of a U S dollar or US treasuries and then lend them out and then get an APR. And I looked at one of these offers when I got back. There's one stable coin offer where you get these stable coins and you lend them out onto the blockchain and you can get about 6.5% per year. So if that's your goal is to just generate income on the assets you own, I don't see the reason to do that versus just buying a large basket of high-yield corporate bonds, especially if you're an American investor. USHY, it's backed by BlackRock, it'll pay you about 7%. And I asked this to the panel, and the explanation was basically like, well, not everyone has access to invest in that. And moreover, you're investing in

these cool projects that allow people in developing parts of the world to build and create things. And for me, as an investor that I'm trying to protect my capital and generate income on some of it. I didn't find that exactly satisfactory. Well, totally. I think the access point is a really great one because access sounds awesome and in a lot of ways is awesome. But just because you have access to something doesn't mean that you should invest in it or that it is the next billion dollar idea. And so knowledge is important too. And just because any investor, anyone on the planet might have access to all these different crypto platforms, coins, blockchains, fill in the blanks. I still think access is one step, but you need some knowledge in order to act upon that

access in a wise way. There was one honest moment, too, I think, of that convention. We went to the crypto booth and we basically asked, what are the use cases for all of this? And the guy told us, he goes, yeah, it's stable coins and gambling. What did you take from that interaction? Well, one, I was so stoked to have found seemingly the one person at this conference who could actually explain a use case for this to us after we had asked so many people very similar questions. So immediately, this person had won a little bit of my trust.

But also, yeah, I bought it. I mean, again, before we went to that booth, we had been checking out these games that are kind of scattered around the convention area. And so I'm thinking about, okay, the game, I can see that crypto is kind of like, it's the extension and potentially the end of the gamification of everything. That theme is kind of running through my mind. And then to wind up at the end of the day at this booth where basically you have this guy going, yeah, no, a use case for this is gambling.

and just like the implementing this into games. I thought, yeah, sounds about right. And I think that that can work for a lot of people. Like there is a conversation about crypto that paints it as the future for everyone. And I wonder, I don't know that that is the truth, but is it a future for some people? Yeah, totally. I can buy that, but that doesn't mean that it's going to be the next thing that takes over the entire world, it can still be an important piece for some people that exist within that culture and choose to interact with that world. Yeah, I think that's the disruption that I came away from thinking about is the gaming element. You have these sportsbooks right now, you think about DraftKings, FanDuel,

that kind of thing. There's a take rate that they're taking on bets going in between during a game. One could imagine a crypto market where there are smart contracts being used and there's more visibility into the markets where people are betting on certain things that I think could absolutely be disruptive. And you can even imagine a sports league like the NBA having a sort of NBA token where people can bet on games with it. It's an open market. And then maybe the league is taking between 2% and 5% is profit.

The league wins, there's a more open market, and it becomes more efficient as well. The problem with that, I found one league that was doing it and I wanted to check it out, but I immediately got locked out of my account. I had no way of going back in to try to check out the token. And then I'm being told that it's not a gambling thing. It's a play to win thing, which means you can't lose your tokens. You can only win them, which means that when you win, there's a slightly inflate, the word was slightly inflationary supply that you have to worry about. So then you don't really know the value of the token. I'm like, all right, this is, this is too difficult. I don't want to deal with it. So maybe a good idea, but the execution is

still incredibly, incredibly tough. One more use case, potential use case that you and I mentioned before. I think a lot about the loneliness epidemic. You and I talk a lot about the loneliness epidemic. One other use case might just be friendship, Ricky. It is very odd. There is this, you know, the idea of speculation intermingled with friendships. And that seems to be the promise of a lot of these coins. You're not just buying something. You're joining a community. And I had kind of this odd moment where I was walking in on, on the second day and I'm seeing these people exchange phone numbers. And one of the guys said like, Oh, we were friends on the internet, but now we're friends in real life. And the guy just

kind of like shrugged them off a little bit. And I realized that like, you can try to find shortcuts for friendship, but you, you don't just find someone and then decide that you're friends forever. Now I found it, I found it very odd, but also maybe a good representation of a lot of the like ways that human relationships are made in this space. Last thing, as we close out, we're going to do high, low Buffalo. I think we've gotten to some highs and lows. High was definitely the sleight of hand magician. We saw a sleight of hand magician that almost explained what was going on at a booth, but did some like sick card tricks. That was my, That was a great high. I think the lows we've gotten into, but let's do a Buffalo.

What was a Buffalo for you at this cryptocurrency convention? Well, I know we talked about this one booth with the Wheel of Fortune type exhibition, but truly, that was my Buffalo. I saw there a Doge-covered McLaren, a Doge-covered Cybertruck. Those were all kinds of things that I expected to see. There were these weird mascots walking around. Also kind of expected to see that. But this witchy Wheel of Fortune booth where I got to walk into a journey and I came away with a 20-sided die, that I think was and forever will be my Buffalo from Eve Denver. What about you? You didn't want to give them your savings? I didn't. Yeah, despite the fact that they swore they would retain no ownership of my assets,

I said, nah, I think I'll stick onto those things. My Buffalo came at, uh, they had a combat sports event called karate combat and shout out karate combat. The boys and I had fun. Sometimes you got to take the boys to the fights. If you get it, you get it. My Buffalo there was, there was a guy walking around with a led backpack that was displaying all of the NFTs that he owned, which I thought was probably the most interesting answer to the question. When you buy NFTs, How do you show them off to people? And the answer, Mary, is that you buy a backpack with an LED screen and then you walk around a professional fighting event and try to show them off to every single person who is in the building. Makes perfect sense to me, Ricky.

Even if we're not loading up on shares of these different crypto platforms, maybe a backpack is in our future. Let's end it there. Thanks for your time and your insight. Appreciate you going to ETH10. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and are not approved by advertisers. For Asit Sharma and Ricky Mulvey, I'm Mary Long. Thanks for listening, Fools. We'll see you tomorrow.