Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - Meet the Dividend Knights

Episode Date: October 15, 2022

You've heard of the Dividend Aristocrats and the Dividend Kings, but we’d like to introduce you to the Dividend Knights: dividend-paying stocks that have also beaten the market. Ricky Mulvey caught... up with Matt Argersinger and Anthony Schiavone to discuss: - Surprising companies (e.g., Dillard's) that have beaten the market over a ten-year period - Listener questions about dividend stocks - One interesting income opportunity Companies discussed: UNP, HD, DDS, PRI, MTN, YARIY, GOOGL, GOOG, DIS, POOL Find the full list of Dividend Knights here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/1-OPCz9pXOcgFqmbMR3wxREg4O7ws_qWW8RWqKPYn1D4/edit#gid=0 Host: Ricky Mulvey Guests: Matt Argersinger, Anthony Schiavone Engineer: Dan Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 When WestJet first took flight in 1996, the vibes were a bit different. People thought denim on denim was peak fashion, inline skates were everywhere, and two out of three women rocked the Rachel. While those things stayed in the 90s, one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get when WestJet welcomes you on board. Here's to WestJetting since 96. Travel back in time with us, and actually travel with us at westjet.com slash 30 years. I'm really excited. I see a ton of opportunities,
Starting point is 00:00:28 and I look at this short-term volatility we're seeing, and this myopic behavior of moving away from these really high-quality companies into treasury bonds, so to speak, or looking for yields elsewhere, or just in the cash really, I think that's going to be a big mistake in the long run. Chris Hill I'm Chris Hill, and that's Motley Fool's Senior Analyst, Matt Argersinger. If you're an investor who's in it for the long haul now could be a great time to look for opportunities. Ricky Mulvey caught up with Matt and Anthony Chavone for a conversation about a brand new category of investing royalty, the dividend knights. They dig into a few surprising stocks
Starting point is 00:01:11 that have crushed the market and a lot more. Matt Frankel All right. We spoke about a quarter ago. Stock market hasn't done so hot since then, but how have the dividend payers been holding up in comparison to the broad S&P 500 in this tough year? Well, yeah, it has been a tough few months. The dividend payers have not held up as well as I would have thought. In this market, in this bear market, I guess, essentially everything has really been hit hard. That's especially been the case for real estate investment trusts. We've talked REITs before. Generally, in a downturn like this, where there's a lot of volatility, dividend payers REITs will hold up a lot better. But I don't think that's the case this time. If
Starting point is 00:02:02 you look at just how they performed and probably it has a lot to do with the fact that unlike previous downturns, this downturn is really driven by higher rates, higher interest rates. Yeah, the Fed raised interest rates. How does that affect the dividend payers? Because the immediate part of my brain would think that investors would want a dividend-paying stock, cost of capital goes up higher, which makes paying money out to shareholders directly a more attractive opportunity. Right. I would believe that as well. I think what's happening, though, is the rates have come up so much so fast that if you're an investor, you're looking at a dividend-paying company or a REIT that was yielding 3%, 4%,
Starting point is 00:02:45 and all of a sudden, I can get that in a risk-free treasury bond, that suddenly feels a lot better. And I'm worried there's a recession. I'm worried about more volatility in the market. I'm worried about any kind of geopolitical thing that might blow things up. All of a sudden, I'm getting pretty decent yield in treasuries. Why take the added risk of going into equities? I think that's part of the story, but I do think it's really a short-term story. I'm sure Anthony would agree that the valuations we're seeing in the market today with a lot of dividend companies and REITs are just the best we've seen in many years. And so, I'm really excited. I see a ton of opportunities and I look at this short-term volatility we're seeing and this myopic behavior
Starting point is 00:03:27 of moving away from these really high-quality companies into treasury bonds, so to speak, or looking for yields elsewhere or just in the cash, really, I think that's going to be a big mistake in the long run. More broadly, is now the time, as dividend investors, are you looking for the companies that are already paying a high yield? Maybe their stock got hit and you think they can continue to pay that high yield? Or is now when you're looking at companies with more room for dividend growth? You always get this yield versus growth, the question of yield versus growth. Do I go for the high-yielding dividend company or do I go for the dividend company that maybe doesn't have as high a yield, but is able to grow
Starting point is 00:04:07 their dividend at a faster rate over time? It all really comes down to your time horizon. Anthony and I have done some research that really shows that dividend growth companies tend to be the ones that outperform over long periods of time. You can see that if you run through a quick hypothetical example. Let's say you had one stock that was yielding 4%, percent and you think, okay, the share price is going to grow 6 percent, it's yielding 4 percent, I'm getting roughly a 10 percent total return, or I have stock B here, which is same share price, let's say, its dividend yield is only 2 percent, but it can grow its share price at 7 percent. How does that work out over time? By the way, the stock B can grow its dividend at 12 percent,
Starting point is 00:04:51 stock A, the high-yielders, only going to grow its dividend at 4 percent. Those are really two realistic scenarios you can find in the market. What's interesting, after five years, the high yielding dividend payer is outperforming, also paying you more dividends. At the 10-year mark, those two scenarios are equivalent, stock A and stock B. They both returned about the same, they're both yielding about the same, even though stock B, of course, started with that really low dividend yield. At the 15-year mark, stock B, the low dividend yield is clearly outperforming, paying you more dividends. And then the 20-year mark is when things really work out. Not only is stock B vastly outperforming stock A, its dividend payout per year is almost three times that of
Starting point is 00:05:31 stock A. So again, it's in your time horizon, but the longer you can invest, dividend growth is where you want to be. Long time, look for the dividend growers. That makes sense. And this is one of those times where I wish that we could just broadcast that chart onto your phone or, well, maybe not car screen if you're driving right now, but this is one of the limits of audio podcasting. Definitely come to bear. Let's talk about labels because the dividend companies sure like their labels. You got your achievers, you got your aristocrats, you got your champions, you got your kings. We can walk through what those mean. The achievers, that's 10 years of raises. The aristocrats, 25 plus years of dividend raises and in the S&P 500.
Starting point is 00:06:11 and then your Kings have raised dividends for 50 plus years, which is a long time. You guys have a brand new jam, Anthony and Matt. But before we dive into your new flavor that have beaten the market, is there a particular screen that you guys like to use? Yeah, I'd love to get Ant's thoughts as well on that. But what I tend to think, I love the list, by the way. I love the aristocrats. I love the Kings. I'm so interested in these remarkable companies that just can pay a dividend and increase their dividend for so many consecutive years. It's remarkable. But I think what's missing from a lot of those lists is that I love getting dividends, I love seeing companies grow their dividends,
Starting point is 00:06:52 but what I want to see, are these companies beating the S&P 500? Are they beating the overall market? Are they generating a total return that's outperforming the market? Because, of course, as an investor, I always have that choice. I always have the choice of investing in a very cheap index fund. That is one particular thing that I screen for. Okay, a company is paying a dividend, great. They're growing that dividend, great. They have a low payout ratio, great. But have they beaten the market? Is the management team running that company allocating capital well and outperforming the broader market? I think that's really important. As far as my screening process goes, I tend to keep my screens fairly simple.
Starting point is 00:07:32 and look for companies with a strong history of earnings per share growth, dividend per share growth. And then sometimes I'll also screen for a dividend payout ratio that's typically less than 60%, because I think that leaves more room for the dividend to grow in the future. And then from there, I like to take more of a qualitative approach and look for companies that have some sort of recurring revenue model, because my thought is that consistent revenue generation will lead to consistent dividend growth. And then finally, I look to see how the businesses have performed during prior economic downturns, just to get a sense of how resilient and cyclical the company is. That's the quick screen that I do.
Starting point is 00:08:10 Matt, to your earlier point, the previous screens, none of them look for market beaters. Not just have you paid a dividend, but can you increase it by one penny? That's the only thing that it looks for and that doesn't necessarily matter to investors if you're not beating the market in a meaningful way. Absolutely right. I think a lot of the aristocrats, although they're wonderful companies, a lot of them love to just hold on to that status. This always drives Anthony and me crazy. You'll find a company that raises their dividend by a penny because, of course, that counts as an increase, so it keeps their dividend increase streak alive and keeps them in those aristocrat or king rankings. Let's talk about
Starting point is 00:08:50 the new screen. Are you guys ready to get into the dividend nights? Let's do it. All right. This is a screen that you set up, so I'm not taking any thunder on this. How do you screen to find the dividend knights? Right. It really goes back to what I was talking about earlier about beating the market. We have these dividend achievers out there and these dividend aristocrats, but I wanted to find companies that paid a dividend for 10 consecutive years that have grown the dividend, but not just grown it by 1%, 2%, or 5%. I want companies that have grown their dividend by more than 10% annually over the last 10 years. And it's kind of like the rule of 10. All these things are 10-year increments. And I want them to have beaten
Starting point is 00:09:32 the market, beaten the S&P 500 total return over the last 10 years. So you paid a dividend for 10 consecutive years. You've grown that dividend by more than 10% annually over 10 years. And you've beaten the S&P 500's total return over the last 10 years. And I threw in a few other factors just to control for quality. I wanted each company to have at least $1 billion in annual revenue, had to be traded on a major U.S. exchange, so we're not dealing with a lot of international companies or pink sheet companies. The PE ratio had to be less than 30 for companies on this list, just to control for quality. You run this screen, and then most of what you get when you're looking at the list is just a bunch of boring companies. You got Nike, Microsoft, Kroger, Allstate.
Starting point is 00:10:16 There you go. Are you still listening? Right. Hopefully, we didn't lose any listeners, but it does. It returns about 133 companies. A lot of companies, they're very much like the ones you mentioned. UPS is another one that's on the list. Companies we all know that are fairly boring, that we see almost every day in life. You've got companies like Microsoft that you mentioned, Starbucks is on there, Target, Vail Resorts, JP Morgan. These might be boring and steady companies, but they delivered an average annual return of 17.6% over the last 10 years. That crushes the overall market. The S&P 500 over the last 10 years is up less than 12% annually. These might be fairly obvious companies,
Starting point is 00:11:05 but they've done extraordinarily well for investors. Each of you picked one obvious dividend night to spotlight. Actually, let's shake it up a little bit. Anthony, you want to go first? Yeah. The one that was obvious to me was Union Pacific. This is a company that's paid a dividend for, listen to this, 123 consecutive years. Since the 1800s, this company has paid an annual dividend every single year. Just think about all the challenges that the railroad industry has faced over those years, including strict regulatory hurdles and disrupt those forces like the creation of the interstate highway system, also with the rise of air freight as well. But over that time, Union Pacific has still been able to raise that dividend.
Starting point is 00:11:49 And I think one of the main reasons why it's a dividend night is that they essentially own a duopoly with BNSF Railroad for the western half of the United States, and that the barriers to entry in this industry are just massive. And I think that creates a strong economic moat where they can really focus on improving efficiency, reducing costs, and that ultimately improves profitability. And management, the management team has done a great job of returning that capital to shareholders through dividend increases as well as share repurchases. So yeah, this one wasn't very surprising to me at all. You're really throwing it back when Dwight Eisenhower's interstate highway plan is your disruptor. I just want to say, Union Pacific,
Starting point is 00:12:29 it's amazing. Over the last 10 years, they've returned over 15% to shareholders. They've grown their dividend by almost 16% annually. At a company that's over 120 years old, to be able to put up that kind of growth is so impressive. So my obvious one, and it's one we've talked about before the show, but the Home Depot, right? I think a lot of us say, okay, the Home Depot has been a very successful company. It's grown. It's delivered a heck of a return to investors, almost 20% annually over the last 10 years. But I don't think a lot of investors know or appreciate that it's grown its dividend, and it's paid a dividend for decades, but just in the last 10 years, it's grown its dividend by almost 21% annually. And that really, what's
Starting point is 00:13:13 amazing about, if you look at all these companies in aggregate, on average, they've delivered a total return of 17.6% for the last 10 years. On average, they've grown their dividend by 17.4%. The total return is really highly correlated to the rate at which these companies have grown their dividend. You see that up and down. Again, we talked earlier about dividend growth. That really is one of the key factors. If you're looking to beat the market over time, how fast can this company grow its dividend? If you have a good idea of that, if it's say double digits, it's highly likely that stock is going to return double digits as well. Not every single company on the dividend nights list is as obvious as, let's say,
Starting point is 00:13:57 Microsoft or Union Pacific. There were a couple of extraordinarily surprising companies to me on that, one of which was Primerica, which let's get 50 of your closest friends and family together to sell some life insurance. Market beater and pays a dividend. And then when you get home or if you're able to right now, imagine what you think the stock chart for Dillard's would look like and then pull up DDS, because that has been an absolute market crusher that also pays a dividend. And then Activision Blizzard, which tech video game company, I wouldn't have assumed that it paid a dividend. Any of those surprises that you want to talk about or particularly highlight? I think Dillard is definitely a surprise to me. I would never have imagined a department store,
Starting point is 00:14:42 mostly, I think a mall-based department store would show up on a dividend nights list for the screen that we just did over the last 10 years. But yeah, its total return is over 15%. It's grown its dividend annually by almost 16%. And I can't explain it other than the fact that maybe it's a geographic thing. A lot of their department stores are located kind of in the South and Midwest. Hasn't been maybe as affected as sort of the online shopping and e-commerce tailwinds that we've seen over the last 10 years. And maybe they've just done a great job of managing the store and the experience there. I'm fascinated by it. Yeah. Sometimes on Motley Fool Buddy, it's okay to say, I don't know. I could make up some reasons. I think when I looked at their
Starting point is 00:15:22 income statements, it looks like they've done a better job at keeping SG&A costs down compared to some of their peers like Macy's. They own a lot of their stores, which was good going into the pandemic. It looks like they fended off some short squeezes. That can help with stock price too, but it's one that absolutely befuddles me. I listed some surprising ones there. Anyone that you want to particularly put the spotlight on for the dividend nights? Yeah. So one that jumped off the page to me was Vail Resorts. They're the largest owner of ski resorts in North America. And I was surprised to see this one on the list because they actually suspended their dividend during the pandemic since the resorts were forced to close. However, they still made a dividend
Starting point is 00:16:04 payment in 2020 prior to COVID and they've raised it since then. So that's why they still made the dividend nights list. And I'm glad they did because they've been such a great dividend payer prior to the pandemic. I believe they've grown their dividend at an annualized rate of 26%, which is very impressive. And the fact that they had to suspend their dividend wasn't necessarily management's fault. There was nothing they could do about that. So I like the fact that they're included on here. If you look at any type of dividend growth list, they're probably not going to show up because they suspended that dividend. But I think they definitely deserve to be on the dividend growth list. That is, I think, the beauty of dividend
Starting point is 00:16:41 knights of our approach versus the dividend achievers or dividend aristocrats is because there are some great companies that just for whatever reason, because they're being conservative or they're worried about capital allocation, they might temporarily suspend their dividend or cut their dividend. And if you do that, automatically you're right off all those other lists. But you can still be on dividend nights because the growth of your dividend, even if you cut it a bit, might still be over 10%, even if it's flat or you cut it. It still makes our list, which I think is the powerful thing. I don't care if a company cut its dividend, but if it's still grown its dividend by 10% annually over the last 10 years, I'm still very interested. Let's talk a little bit about
Starting point is 00:17:23 REITs because when you're screening for price earnings, that unfortunately leaves a lot of REITs out of the equation. So first of all, Matt, how dare you? Second of all, what do you get when you run a funds from operation, which is the preferred metric for REITs versus that price to earnings screen? This was surprising. So 72 companies kind of were in this, made the initial screen, but only six REITs, believe it or not, six REITs have both beaten the market and raised dividend by an annual rate of 10% over the last 10 years. It's a really exclusive list. The list is American Tower, CubeSmart, Equity Lifestyle Properties, Extra Space Storage, Life Storage, and Prologis. It's like industrial self-storage-dominated REITs that make our
Starting point is 00:18:18 dividend nights list, but I was surprised it was so few. Podcastsatfool.com is the e-mail for the show. We appreciate your questions. I've been getting some questions about dividends in particular, so I thought I'd run it by you. This one comes from Jason in Great Britain. He asks, I was wondering if you could talk about Yara International. I was put onto this by a friend in the agricultural sector. It's got a great dividend yield of 8.25%. With fertilizer in high demand and the stock beaten down, is now a good time to open a position. Thanks, Jason. I took a quick look at this one. It's an interesting company. It's got a good history. I think it's based in Norway.
Starting point is 00:18:53 What I worry about is it's had a really big surge recently in both its profits and its margins. I suspect that's obviously because of higher fertilizer prices, higher commodity prices, greater agricultural demand, especially in places like Europe right now where there's a lot of supply constraints. Typically, a company like Yara will tie its earnings to dividends. and what's happening recently is earnings have surged and so has its dividend and therefore you get this really great dividend yield. But I could see that dividend coming down as commodity prices reverse, their earnings come down. It might be a great company, I would just not rely on that dividend yield you're seeing to make a judgment on whether
Starting point is 00:19:32 or not to invest in the company because it's likely that the earnings are a bit inflated right now. Next question comes from Lechu. I've always leaned towards value over growth and pick stocks with a low debt-to-equity ratio. For this reason, I've stayed away from Home Depot with a ratio of 319. Do you think Home Depot's debt load could impact its ability to pay a dividend in the future? Is it still a quality company?" That's a great question. Home Depot's debt-to-equity ratio is a bit misleading right now. The company has been aggressively buying back its shares, which reduces shareholders' equity and tends to inflate that debt-to-equity ratio. If you want to look at a better balance sheet measure, I would look to debt to EBITDA,
Starting point is 00:20:12 or essentially you're looking at debt to the company's pre-tax operating earnings. If you do that, you get a multiple of 1.7 right now. That's only slightly higher than the multiple HD had five years ago. So from an operating basis, I wouldn't get worried at all about their balance sheet. And yes, as you know, we talked about Home Depot, we talked about earlier in the show. I think it's a really well-managed company. It's got a low dividend payout ratio, which can help it absorb any shocks to earnings if we do head into a recession. Last question comes from Sandra in Georgia. Are there any non-dividend paying companies that are mature enough that you think they should start paying one soon?
Starting point is 00:20:49 Yeah. So I'm going to cheat a little bit here, but I'm going to go with Walt Disney. The company suspended its dividend at the beginning of the pandemic, mostly due to the uncertainty in the economy and the fact that their theme parks were closed. Since then, business has picked up pretty steadily, but management has been more focused on reinvesting earnings back into the business to help grow Disney Plus and some of their other growth initiatives. If I'm not mistaken, I think Disney is one of only three companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average who doesn't pay a dividend. Management has said that dividends remain a part of their capital allocation strategy. I think once we see some more normalization
Starting point is 00:21:24 in the economy and that uncertainty fizzles out, I think we might see a dividend reinstatement from Disney. Sounds like the theme parks are all way back. We'll see if they get one for the dividend. Matt, what do you got? Yeah, Disney is a great one. I would go with Alphabet, Google. That one always comes to mind to me as one that I think will start paying a dividend pretty soon. I think it's going to follow in the steps of Apple, Microsoft, and some of the other big tech companies. The business is just so reliably great now from a cash flow perspective. I wonder at some point if they're going to say, you know what, we invest a lot of capital into these far-flung ventures,
Starting point is 00:22:01 a lot of them don't work out. Some have, but we're producing a lot of excess cash flow. Let's start returning some of that to shareholders. I expect, I want to say within the next three years, Alphabet starts paying a dividend. We'll check up on it. All right, let's wrap it up. On the Dividend Show on Motley Fool Live, you guys always like to highlight an interesting income opportunity. What do you have for the listeners of Motley Fool Money? Well, there have been so many interesting discoveries with this new dividend nights list that we're putting together. So, for example, there's a company simply called Pool Corporation, P-O-O-L, and that's the ticker as well. And as you might guess, they specialize in pool equipment, pool maintenance, landscape
Starting point is 00:22:41 products around your pool. It's been a monster performer. It's up 24% annually since 2012. It's raised its dividend annually by more than 20%. I'm just fascinated by this, by the business. I mean, it seems so simple. And I think sometimes it goes to show, we spend a lot of time as investors looking for complex companies or companies that are growing at X rates and disrupting other industries. And here's a simple company that just specializes in pool equipment, and it's been a monster. If you put $10,000 in pool 10 years ago, you'd have almost $100,000 right now. And that's beautiful to me. We got pool companies, we got Dillard's, we got Primerica, we got Kroger, we got Home Depot, and that has been The Dividend Show.
Starting point is 00:23:26 Anthony Chavone, Matt Argersinger, thank you so much for your time. Thanks, Ricky. Thank you. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. I'm Chris Hill, thanks for listening. We'll see you tomorrow.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.