Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - Private Assets Meet Public Markets

Episode Date: October 16, 2025

One way or another, companies will find a way to let individuals own private assets in their retirement accounts. At this point, a new news story appears with a big bank or asset manager looking to sell private assets to individuals. This week, we discuss how investors should view private asset opportunities in their investing accounts, big bank earnings, and stocks on our radar. Tyler Crowe, Matt Frankel, and Jon Quast discuss: - Earnings, outlooks, and conference call commentary from the big banks third quarter. -Private asset’s role in an investors portfolio -Stocks on our radar Companies discussed: WFC, BAC, MS, GS, JPM, BLK, BK, TRIP, ABNB, ESRG, SLG, SLM Host: Tyler Crowe Guests: Matt Frankel, Jon Quast Engineer: Dan Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Tyler Crowe. Private markets are becoming the public markets. This is Motley Fool Money. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm Tyler Crowe, joined by longtime Fool contributors, John Quast, and Matt Frankel. Now, we're going to cover the market buzz around private assets that are looking to make their way into retirement accounts and cover stocks on our radar like we do on every Thursday. But first, earnings season is heating up. Yesterday, our colleagues discussed ASML's results, and we were tempted to also discuss Taiwan Semiconductor's strong earnings report and outlook. But I feel like we've discussed AI and the picks and shovels plays a lot lately on our episode of Motley Fool Money. So, we wanted to look at some of the non-AI parts

of the markets, and what better way to do that than with the big banks. The results from JP Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and several others came out earlier this week. So, I don't want to rehash the numbers too much. Instead, I want to really focus on some of the big takeaways from either the outlooks or commentary that we saw in the market. So, Matt, what stood out to you on this most recent round of updates? First of all, all the big banks, including all the ones you mentioned and others, beat expectations for earnings. A strong number so far, but there are some big winners among the group. I'd say, in order, my biggest winners of earnings season so far among the banks are Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, and Bank

of America. With the latter two, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley, they both benefited from a robust IPO and M&A market, which I think John's going to talk about more in a second. This led to investment banking fee growth of 43% and 44% year-over-year, respectively, for those two. Equity's trading revenue was really strong. It beat expectations. And not only that, but Bank of America reported a surprise decline in their credit loss provision, which is going to come into play a little later in our conversation. But in general, investment banking was really strong. And Wells Fargo is particularly interesting because they don't depend as much on investment banking.

and were a big winner. Their stock's up 10% since earnings. One major thing is that management is now expecting 17% to 18% returns on tangible common equity over the medium term, up from the previous estimates, after their Federal Reserve lifted their asset cap finally after seven years. The bank is now going on offense. Charlie Scharf, the CEO, said that Wells Fargo aims to be the No. 1 consumer bank, the lofty goal, and a top-five investment bank, which I don't even think they're a top-ten investment bank right now. Plus, like Bank of America, Wells Fargo decreased their loan loss provision significantly. Some really big surprises so far. Yeah. As Matt points out here, the investment banking market right now is just

red hot. Accounting firm Ernst & Young, they just released a report that showed that merger and acquisition deal values in September up over 110% year over year. Those were some big deals in there. So, I mean, volume was a little bit lower, but even still the activity in September up 41%. And that capped off a third quarter here where value for M&A was up 239% from the third quarter of 2024 and volume was up 164%. So, nearly tripling. So, things are clearly heating up in this space. That was reflected in the banking numbers that Matt was just talking about. Just to drill down into these things a little bit further, JPMorgan CFO Jeremy Barnum said that there have been some IPO deals sitting in the pipes ready to go, and they've just been waiting

for better valuation and lower volatility. The third quarter delivered on that. The same applies to merger and acquisition activity. You also look at some of the comments from Bank of America CFO Alistair Borthwick, said that the fourth quarter is shaping up nicely. Then Morgan Stanley comes out and says they're actually building their business with expectations that the next three to five years are going to show positive trends in this investment banking market. All this is really positive. I guess it goes to show what kind of personality I have, because I focused in a little bit on the one negative market commentary that I think we saw in all of the the banking stuff it was uh during the jp morgan uh conference call

jamie diamond made some uh kind of we could say comments on the state of private credit and lending to private credit this comes on the heels of auto parts manufacturer first brands group and used auto dealer tricolor both filing for bankruptcy these are both private companies and those companies had loans with private creditors who also just uh had low those private creditors had loans with big banks. So, Jimmy Diamond kind of hinted that he thinks the private credit and other of these non-bank financial institutions, lenders to private equity and things like that, a lot of his commentary pointed to being a little bit of a weak point in the market. And I'm trying to sparse between his commentary being like, well, we don't know how good these

folks underwriting is, which it's either like a commentary on the market or just Diamond trying to talk up JP Morgan's book, which, you know, that's obviously his job a little bit. It certainly gives me something to follow up in the coming quarters as to whether or not it was, again, just Jamie Diamond talking it up or, you know, if there's actually really something here. So let me pass this back to you. What were the questions that you were left with on this most recent earnings call and what do you want to follow up on? Well, yeah, I would say that the investment banking commentary says that the economy is really in a healthy place, or at least it's on the right track. My question is,

what changes that and how secure is that? Investing is a lot to do with risk management. If I was to rewind the clock, go back to 2019, I just remember that economy feeling like a freight train in late 2019. And just asking, what would possibly change that? Well, a once-in-a-century pandemic. But this time, it doesn't quite feel like a freight train to me. It does feel a little bit more fragile. And maybe that's reflected in some of the comments you just brought out from Jamie Dimon. It feels like we're just a social media post away from changing some investor sentiment dramatically. And so, I'm just looking at this. I'm saying, okay, the numbers are saying that the economy is very healthy, or at least going in the right direction.

what would it take to change that? Yeah, look, I have mixed thoughts, just like Tyler does, mainly because the sharp declines in the loss reserves from both Bank of America and Wells Fargo really seem to contradict Jamie Dimon's statement on credit quality. I agree, and I've been saying for a long time that the auto lending industry, especially the subprime market, could be a bit of a house of cards. It is far too easy to borrow, say, $50,000 to buy a depreciating asset. Right now, it's harder to get a mortgage, which is a safer form of a loan. But that doesn't mean that all private credit is necessarily set for a collapse. It could just be specific to the auto lending industry. It's definitely worth monitoring over the next

few quarters. But over the past few years, since 2022 when the bear market happened, pretty much every fear about deteriorating credit hasn't materialized as much as we thought it would. Coming up, private assets want to be in your retirement, and it could really affect the way we invest. Admittedly, discussing first brands and tricolors bankruptcy in the last segment isn't really exactly the best lead-in for this next discussion, but not every transition could be perfect. The drumbeat around private assets becoming more available to the investing public is getting louder and louder.

More and more asset managers are exploring ways to package private assets, either as private equity or private credit, into taxed advantage accounts like 401ks. Now, I myself have a lot of conflicting thoughts about this. On the one hand, making private assets available to individuals gives us a lot more investing choices, which most of the time, more choices is better. Conversely, I can see asset managers that own these assets and trying to get them to individuals as a way of just charging high fees for the privilege and access to private funds that they don't have anymore because low-cost index funds and ETFs eroded a lot of fees that

former mutual funds and asset managers used to enjoy. I'm going to put it both to you because there's a lot of stories out there of companies like Blackstone, BlackRock, all of these companies and are looking to find a new way to package private investments into 401ks or other types of retirement accounts. How do you see private assets fitting into your investment strategy? Well, I mean, personally, I'm a big fan of fewer regulations from Uncle Sam. So on principle, I like the idea of being able to add private assets to my retirement account. There are some companies that I would have loved to in recent years. And one that comes to mind is Neuralink from Elon Musk. That's just a fascinating company to me. I would love to be able to invest in it in

my retirement account. I find it extremely interesting. That said, as I look about this from a broad perspective, opportunity without education is like giving a small child a box of matches. They can get hurt and they can break things. I think there's a smart way to open this up. I think that there's a bad way to open this up. Hopefully, we do it the smart way and not the way that creates a lot of problems, especially financially for people, just getting involved in something that they don't really understand. Tyler, you're right that so far, all of the deregulation around any type of private assets have allowed managers and investment platforms to charge high fees to investors. We've talked about this privately before, but there are funds

out there that give investors exposure to private companies like SpaceX and OpenAI and charge, let's say, ridiculous fees. But like you, I'm conflicted. It's both an opportunity and a threat to the retirement security of people in these 401k plans. And the statement from the executive order that the president signed allowing this is misleading, that the standard products like S&P 500 index funds are, quote, are not letting people achieve secure retirements. The S&P 500 has been a great wealth builder over the long term. The problem is that the average person doesn't save enough for retirement. It's not that they haven't had opportunities to build wealth. So, I have conflicted feelings about this. Like John said, there is a right way and a wrong way

to do it. Yeah, there's been a lot of deregulation of access to things like this. I mean, it started with the 2012 JOBS Act. It's something I can think of. And I think ultimately, and this is, I give my concluding thoughts, I guess, moves like this feel like an appeal to the inattentive investor. You know, the ones that sign up for whatever plans your company's 401k signs up for. And to that, the good marketing of like private equity isn't subject to the whims of the market or something like that for long-term investments. I mean, you can see the marketing, it writes itself. But, you know, individual investors like us who put the time and effort into, you know, finding individual stocks to buy and hold over the long-term, you know, I don't know if we'll

see as many benefits from this because we want to do our due diligence. And that's, you know, We'll see how this shakes out, but I think that's where I'm going to end up landing, unless somebody really blows me away with a really interesting offer in private capital. After that, we'll do stocks on our radar. November 31st. Guys, unfortunately, none of us were the recipients of that $300 trillion stablecoin fat finger that happened at PayPal either yesterday or today. I think we're just going to have to keep on building wealth the old-fashioned way with some buy-and-hold stocks. With that in mind, what's actually on your radar this week? John, we're going to start with you.

Yeah. So on my radar this week is a company called TripAdvisor, symbol T-R-I-P. And at Hidden Gems, we value misunderstood companies, something that has something that the market's not appreciating. And TripAdvisor certainly has that, in my opinion. It's not just the TripAdvisor brand that you get here. You also get another brand, which is called Viator. Now, I want to just talk about Viator because I believe that the real value here, and this goes along with our discussion regarding investment banking. I think that TripAdvisor has something more valuable in Viator than what TripAdvisor is itself, and spinning it out or IPOing it in some way may unlock that value. So you just look at Viator by itself for a moment.

It's generated $882 million in trailing 12-month revenue. It's growing at 11%, which is double digits, high gross margin. It is profitable on a standalone basis. You look at something like Airbnb, a price-to-sales ratio of seven. Let's give Viator half that valuation at three and a half times sales. Viator would have a $3 billion market cap on a standalone basis. And you look at TripAdvisor right now, it has a $1.8 billion market cap. So potentially more value in Viator as a standalone business than what it is right now under TripAdvisor. I think this is kind of an underappreciated thing and why it's on my radar. Yeah. So I'm going to talk about one of my longtime favorite real estate companies to follow, Empire State Realty Trust, ESRT.

They own the Empire State Building and a portfolio of about two dozen other primarily office buildings in Manhattan. Not only is the stock about 35% below its 52-week high, despite pretty strong performance from its business and the observatory on the Empire State Building, but I'm seeing signs that the New York City office market could be stronger than most experts think. Just consider that competitor SL Green just agreed to buy a 36-story office tower right near Park Avenue for $730 million. It's a big bet that the New York City office market will strengthen in the years to come. If that valuation is, if it turns out they're paying the right price, the Empire State Building alone could be worth more than the current market

cap of the company. Forget the other two dozen properties. Talk about a hidden gem. I think if the New York City office market does what SL Green thinks it's going to do, that Empire State could be a bargain. On the deregulatory thing, there's been another story about the Trump administration looking to privatize its portfolio of student loans, which I don't know if it's going to happen or not, but it gives me a pretty lame excuse to talk about SLM Corp. Ticker is SLM. People might also know it as Sallie Mae, which is basically the bank similar to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, but focused on student loans. It is actually a publicly traded company. One of the things that makes it so appealing to me is if you actually look at the credit quality that it has, you think

of student loans, they tend to be a relatively secure sort of loan in the sense of paybacks are default rates are relatively low. They actually can't even be discharged in bankruptcy. They also get things like high rates of co-signed with parents and things like that. And a lot of what they actually have on their books is for masters in business or pre-med or law or something like that. So, it tends to have very high amounts with also good credit quality for future payments. And it's just a business, to me, that looks incredibly well. If you look at things like net interest spreads, which is the difference between the interest rate on the loans and how much its depositors get, it's quite high compared to most other banks. You get a secure payment at

a high net interest rate. This is a business right now that's trading for about 11 or 12 times earnings. And I think people are worried about credit quality, but I think that might be a little overblown for a business that, if we talk about hidden, it really is quite hidden out there in a very quality business for something of the long term. Matt, John, that's all the time we have for today. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stock they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are

sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks again to our producer Dan Boyd for keeping us on schedule. For Matt, John, and myself, thanks for listening, and we'll chat again soon.