Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - The $1 Trillion Club Gets a Little More Crowded
Episode Date: May 27, 2026Micron has had a turnaround for the ages, going from a free cash flow negative company to a $1 trillion valuation in a little over a year. What does it tell us about the AI buildout? Plus, we get to E...li Lilly’s incredible trial results, acquisition spree, and growth plans before ending with Zscaler’s earnings and why the stock fell 30% today.Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Rachel Warren discuss:- Micron’s trip to $1 trillion- Eli Lilly’s Winning Streak- Zscaler earningsCompanies discussed: Micron (MU), Eli Lilly (LLY), Zscaler (ZS).Host: Travis HoiumGuests: Lou Whiteman, and Rachel WarrenEngineer: Austin Morgan, Bart Shannon Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
We have a new member of the $1 trillion club, Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing starts now.
Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. I'm Travis Hoyum, joined today by Lou Whiteman
and Rachel Warren. Guys, we have a new member of the trillion dollar club. I believe there's
now 14 companies that are worth over a trillion dollars. This used to be a really big number,
And now it seems like we get a new company every week.
But Lou, the company that we're talking about is Micron.
Passed a trillion dollars.
I thought it was interesting to look back at their financials.
Five quarters ago, they were free cash flow negative.
Now they are the hottest stock on the market.
This is a cyclical industry, typically a cyclical industry,
but this is now also one of the most valuable companies in the world.
Is this time around different from Micron?
Maybe.
But let's pause for a second and look at kind of what they've done.
This was a $350 billion company on January 1st.
Guys, it's still May.
They've had a heck of a career in a couple of months, right?
Gained 19% yesterday, basically on an analyst price target move.
These are not normal times.
That said, there is a there there.
These AI models need memory.
Micron has done a decent job shifting its business just away from this brutal commodity
cycle and towards a higher value product.
So they are, I think, special among memory.
The note in question, the note that triggered this move over a trillion dollars, that analyst
sees long-term contracts in place through 2029.
If that's correct, and I do think they're directionally correct anyway, this is not
a fluke.
This is not a one-time thing.
This is the market responding to real demand.
And with AI, just the numbers are all huge, but the demand is huge.
Yeah, Rachel, it does seem like this time is a little bit different.
they are in maybe a little bit higher value segment of the market, but there's also more
players coming into the market at the end of the day. Memory is the kind of thing where supply and
demand ultimately matters, but free cash flow does too. And it seems like they're going to have a
really good year. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, it's kind of interesting to take a step back, right?
Because historically memory was sort of this unglamorous sort of brutal corner of tech. So
companies like Micron, they made standard DRAM for PCs and smartphones. And so, you know, demand
would dip, inventory piles up, prices crash. It was a really pure commodity cycle. And there has
been a lot that's changed over the last few years. And a lot of that goes back to high bandwidth
memory. So modern AI accelerators, you think of NVIDIA's Blackwell chips, for example,
they can't function without massive amounts of premium ultra-fast memory stacked directly next
to the processor. And Micron has pivoted from selling, you know, what was essentially in
comparison a cheap commodity to selling this very high margin highly customized strategic asset so
we're really seeing the physical reality of chip manufacturing is creating a massive bottleneck
as well and that actually benefits micron right they've sold out their entire high bandwidth memory
chip supply for all of 2026 under fixed long-term contracts the ceo is saying that they can only
fulfill about 50 to 67 of current customer demand and because building these semiconductor fabs
takes years, right? So new supply from their domestic expansions won't even hit the market
until 2028. So that is creating tremendous tailwinds for the business. And I think we're
seeing a lot of that enthusiasm bear out, certainly in that analyst note, and of course,
in the broader markets response.
Lou, I want to just touch on their valuation too. This is one of those companies that
you look at the stock at a very low price to earnings multiple, especially on a forward basis.
It has been even in the low single digits, not just single digits, but four or five as
recently as a few weeks ago.
I think we're a little bit over that now.
But historically, we're trying to give a little bit of historical context here.
When these cyclical companies get to this point where everyone can see that they're
incredibly cheap, that's also when things are really dangerous for investors because
the E part of the price to earnings multiple is typically starting to peak.
what should we be looking for in these commodity markets? I know it's not a commodity. HBM isn't
a commodity market today, but it's potentially commoditizing over the future. There are things
that customers can do to use less HBM to be less reliant on companies like Micron. So the market
will react at some point. What should we be looking for as investors? I mean, I feel like
we go back to a conversation we had 24 hours ago about how something has to give here, right? Not
know, everything can keep going straight up. And where does it give? I do think, yeah, when you're
looking at this market right now, it's like, how do customers react? It may be that they can't for
now, but that for now does a lot of work in that sentence. This whole thing, I think I could say
with great confidence that it won't go on forever. So what we're looking for is when will that turn?
And all we really know right now is not now.
There is a sustainable there there through this year.
You don't get rich calling a bubble.
Nobody got rich declaring a bubble.
They got rich acting on it.
And a lot of people didn't get rich because they acted at the wrong moment.
Right now, I think this sustains until it doesn't.
To kind of say the obvious.
And just any sort of sign of a pivot one way or the other or more capacity coming online
or just, I still think it's going to be the CFOs and some of the hyperscalers saying,
we're just going to tap our brakes ever so slightly. But I think we need to see a flinch.
And until we do, the standoff just continues. Yeah. The long-term contracts sound really great.
I have followed the solar industry for a very long time. And those long-term contracts,
that was silicon and a little bit different kind of silicon, but kind of the same concept where
you need to get this supply. You've got to lock it up long-term. And that became really problematic
for actually both sides. The companies that were signing those long-term deals signed them at
really high prices that ultimately led to some of their downfall. If your customers are no longer
buying those products, then that leads to problems for the manufacturers as well. So yeah, I think
you're right, Lou, that this is not going to be the same forever for at least the foreseeable
future for the next few quarters. It seems like memory is going to be a business that's going
gangbusters. We'll see when it turns. When we come back, we're going to turn our attention to
the pharmaceutical space and what's going on with Eli Lilly. You're listening to Motley Fool
Hidden Gems Investing.
And what better way than with a delicious Pratt organic coffee,
starting at just $1 all day, every day, now until December 31st.
I'm participating A&W locations in Ontario.
Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. We got some really potentially big news from Eli
Lilly, who seems to be absolutely on fire right now. They introduced some trial results, some
early trial results that could impact the future of heart disease. Rachel, this is all a little
bit over my head. So explain this trial and exactly what they're doing to me, like I'm my
nine-year-old son. Okay, sounds good. So Eli Lilly, they just released phase 1b trial data,
right? So we're in the early stages of testing at this point on a gene editing therapy, which
is unnamed right now. So it's just called Verve 102. They acquired this asset last year from a
company called Verve Therapeutics. They purchased Verve Therapeutics for about $1 billion. This is
a candidate that the FDA has already fast-tracked. So that could mean that we see it developed and
hit the market at a much faster pace. Phase two trials are scheduled to begin by the end of this
year. But why is this candidate so notable? So in this early trial, a phase 1b trial, you had a
single intravenous infusion that slashed LDL cholesterol, remember that's the bad cholesterol,
slashed it by up to 62%. And there was a durable reduction in bad cholesterol lasting up to 18
months and counting in trial participants. The drug uses a very precise form of CRISPR technology
called a vivo-based editing. It basically uses these tiny nanoparticles that travel right into
the patient's liver cells. And once there, acts like a genetic eraser, actually changes a single
DNA letter to permanently turn off a gene that otherwise holds the liver back. And that way,
the liver can clear the bad cholesterol from the blood naturally. Why is this so important? Well,
historically, managing heart disease, it means taking a statin every single day for the rest
of your life. Data from this early trial showed that about half of all patients stopped taking
other daily cholesterol meds. And so this therapy is really completely shifting the medicine that
could be available for these patients from continuous chronic management to a permanent
one-time preventative measure. It's still very, very early days. We will have to follow this
closely, but it is really exciting news. Yeah. I saw one comment say that this could
eliminate heart disease. That's probably going to the extreme extent, but it seems like the
doctors who are looking at this are just incredibly impressed with the results the other thing you
know and you mentioned but i want to i want to highlight it this was one infusion this was not
taking a pill every day this is not doing an injection every day this is a one-time infusion
that lasts at least you know a year 18 months we're still still early and what this would actually
look like in commercial patients but this is potentially the kind of thing that could have a
dramatic impact on people's lives and longevity with relatively minimal invasiveness.
Absolutely. And the other thing that I think is important to note is Eli Lilly has been
on an acquisitive streak, right? And one other sort of a note to what I was saying,
they just announced that they're acquiring three new companies. You know, they are flush
with cash from the GLP-1 successes that they have enjoyed. Of course, they have a broad
portfolio outside of that. But they're spending up to four billion dollars on three clinical stage
vaccine developers. One is a company called Curevo that's developing a next generation vaccine for
shingles. Another company is really designed to buy out their vaccine against the Epstein-Barr
virus. There's no approved vaccine for this virus. It causes mononucleosis. It's been linked to
chronic conditions like multiple sclerosis. And third, they're acquiring a company called
Lematech Biologics. It's a Swiss firm, and they focus on developing vaccines against severe
bacterial pathogens. So the company is really, really on a run up right now. But if you look
at what they're doing with their business, with the profitability and cash they have on hand,
it's really, really strategic use of their capital.
Lou, this seems like the kind of thing where they're on a roll and they're just building a
moat around their business. We didn't even talk about Reddit True Tide, which is potentially
coming in the next year or so. I think they're in phase three. That is a GLP-3 is what they're
calling it. Just phenomenal results for that. So it seems like everything is going incredibly well
for Eli Lilly right now. Yeah, I don't know if they're building a moat because I don't know what
that would look like, but they are building optionality and that's what's really important.
I mean, look, Verve 102, I hope for the best here. I've been on a statin since I was in my 20s.
Okay. So, I mean, I get this. It's not going to cure heart disease. The heart breaks in a lot
of different ways, but it could really, really help in one of the leading causes of death. And
that's what matters. Also though, this was a study of 35 patients over 18 months. So as Rachel said,
we have a long ways to go. We'll see. The thing is, and this is what Rachel was focused on,
and it's absolutely right. There's this, there's all of these acquisitions. Verve was just an
acquisition a year ago. Lilly has just this ton of cash because of JLPs, and they are making sure
they are buying options on the future to a time when patents go off or when GLPs aren't the next
big thing. They are making a lot of strategic bets, smart bets. They're just not throwing money
at the wall, but they are buying promising technologies. Truthfully, if one of these four
turns into a blockbuster, they will have done better than most. So it's almost hard to invest
on any one of these things, but for a pharmaceutical company with all of the risks, with all of the
hurdles that come with this business, with all the patent expirations, what you want is for them to
take in times when they have the cash to expand their portfolio and find good uses of that cash.
And Lilly gets really, really high marks on that. Yeah. We talk about building portfolios at the
Motley Fool, diversifying your risk. That's exactly what Eli Lilly is doing. So it seems
like things are going incredibly well on multiple fronts. We'll see if that continues for investors.
When we come back, we're going to talk about Zscaler's results and the market's reaction.
You're listening to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems, Investing.
the delicious Pret Organic Coffee,
starting with just $1 all day, every day,
now until December 31st.
You gotta try breakfast at A&W.
At participating A&W locations in Ontario.
New from Nespresso.
Blend wellness into your coffee routine
with the Coffee Plus range,
infused with functional benefits.
Choose the coffee you love with added B vitamins,
like Coffee Plus B12 to help support immune function,
and coffee plus b6 to keep your day moving or go with the flow and choose ginseng delight
our new double espresso with ginseng extract whatever lies ahead don't change your morning
let your morning change you discover coffee plus on espresso.com welcome back to motley
fool hidden gems investing zscaler reported earnings after the market closed yesterday
and Rachel, the stock is down 30% as we're recording. The numbers didn't look terrible,
but investors are looking at guidance here and that's what they didn't like. What did you see
in the quarter? Yeah. So they beat their quarterly expectations on both the top and bottom line.
They delivered adjusted earnings per share of $1.08, $850.5 million in revenue. That top line
figure, that's 25% growth year over year. So not bad to be sure. They actually are forecasting Q4
revenue between $875 million and $878 million. That would be 22% growth year over year. Now,
the top end of that range missed Wall Street's expectations just slightly, right? So again,
the top end of that guidance, $878 million. Wall Street was looking for $879 million.
I think what the market did not like was the fact that Zscaler cut its full year free cash flow
margin guidance from about 26.8% down to 23%. And this is because they're spending heavily on
AI CapEx, right? I mean, rising data center and hardware costs to power their new AI tools. They
also had two key sales executives that departed right at the end of the quarter. I mean, the core
business is still really healthy. They're seeing a lot of generous growth from AI bookings. You
know, their data security annual recurring revenue topped 500 million. We're seeing a lot of software
phobia in the market right now. And I think punishing really any company that displays
sort of a temporary speed bump, I think that's what we're witnessing here. I'm not a buyer of
this stock. But this was not a bad quarter. This is not a company that's flailing by any means.
So kind of interesting to see how the market's responding.
Lou, we talked about the increase in prices or margins for some of the memory companies earlier.
This is the downstream impact is you're hitting things like the cash flow for hyperscalers,
for Zscaler. So is this just sort of the ebbs and flows of the market? I also wanted to note
that the stocks skyrocketed over the past month or so. And so this is just undoing that return
from the SaaS apocalypse. So it just seems like nobody really knows what to think about these
companies long-term. And that's the bottom line, right? Because look, this is an overreaction
today, period. The results were not bad enough to justify 30% down. However, I'm not sure there was
any rational move by this stock in the last few years, like you say. So, you know, we can't now
certify the market for not being rational today when we've just been in a weird market for a
while. I don't know if Zscaler will quadruple from here or go to zero, but I do know that these
results aren't worth 30% down. Rachel mentioned it, data security growth solid. There was a lot
of weird sales things. Here's the bottom line for me. I don't know what AI is going to do
to software, but I will be very, very surprised if the first thing CEOs look to replace is
cybersecurity. I feel almost certain that it's going to be something less mission critical or
at least less dangerous to replace. So I don't think this idea that Zscaler is just going to
go away because we can do this with AI tomorrow is going to happen. The question for me and the
question I can't answer, and I've talked to some cybersecurity people, I don't think they know the
answer yet is, will AI fundamentally change the threat in a way that makes the incumbents vulnerable
to newcomers? Will Zscaler get replaced by an AI-focused Zscaler? It seems kind of far-fetched
to me, but I do think that's the bigger risk here. I think caution here and caution throughout
software makes sense, but I don't think down 30% because, you know, they're investing in the
business and they might've just had a choppy sales cycle. I can't tell you that makes sense.
It's interesting to look at some of these valuations too. You talked about the market
being irrational and the enterprise value. So the stock is down significantly today. It's also down
from a high of over $300 at the end of 2025. But still, it's trading for six times sales and 30
times forward earnings estimates. So this is despite the fact that the stock is down as much
as it is still not necessarily a cheap stock. So lots of things for investors to weigh. But I think
you're right. Cybersecurity has a bright future, just a matter of who's going to be the winners
there. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about in the
Motley Fool and they have four more recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based
solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows the Motley Fool's editorial
standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided
for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show
notes. For Lou Whiteman, Rachel Warren, and Austin Morgan behind the glass, I'm Travis Hoyum.
Thanks for listening. We'll see you here tomorrow.
Thank you.
