Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - The Surprising Truth about Retirement
Episode Date: August 2, 2019The Fed cuts interest rates for the first time since 2008. Procter & Gamble hits an all-time high. Apple gets a boost from services and wearables. Shopify rises. Pinterest pops. And Square stumble...s. Analysts Ron Gross and Jason Moser discuss those stocks and weigh in on the latest results from Beyond Meat, Kellogg, Spotify, and Under Armour. Plus, Motley Fool retirement expert Robert Brokamp shares some surprising truths about retirement and explains why 70 is the new 65. Thanks to DataSiteOne from Merrill Corporation for supporting our show. To learn more and sign up for a free demo, go to to www.merrillcorp.com/fool. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
David Gardner Thanks to our sponsor, Datasite One, from Merrill Corporation,
the market-leading due diligence app for the entire M&A lifecycle, helping companies worldwide
close more deals faster. To learn more and sign up for a free demo, go to merrillcorp.com.
Chris Hill, joining me in studio this week, senior analysts Jason Moser and Ron Gross.
Good to see you, as always, gentlemen. We've got the latest earnings from Wall Street,
retirement expert Robert Brokamp is our guest. And as always, we'll give you an inside look
at the stocks on our radar. But we begin once again with the big macro. This week, we got
the jobs report for July. Unemployment rates stayed at 3.7%. The Fed meeting resulted in
a rate cut of 0.25%. And Jason, we had more talk of tariffs and the trade war with China.
And I'm curious, through all of this noise, I'm not saying there's not some substance
there. But through all of this noise, what do you focus on as an investor? Because I'm guessing
it's not necessarily, say, for example, the quarter percent rate cut from the Fed.
Well, I mean, there's a lot to digest there. And I mean, I think it's a good question. What do you
make of it all? And for me, I mean, we talk often about with the interest rate environment being so
low and the stock market being the only place to be, you know, for me, it all kind of comes back
to the consumer. With everything that's going on, a lot of this comes back to the consumer
for me. I wonder where we go from here, with unemployment rates so low. Clearly, a lot
of people are out there working, yet you look at wage growth, and that's really a problem.
A lot of people are working, but they're not making a lot of money. We are in an economy
right now where it's really easy to do a lot of stuff for pretty cheap, with the exception
to just a few things. Housing, healthcare, those are two things right there. You think
with housing and healthcare, education being a third, those are areas that are becoming
prohibitively expensive for a lot of people. In the face of consumers that are facing a
little bit more of a challenging time, I wonder if there's not a disconnect there. We heard
a lot of the big bank CEOs talk about feeling good about the consumer. I feel like that's
backward-looking. I feel if you look at it going forward, I think there's some challenges
on the horizon for the consumer that could end up playing out on the economy a little
bit more quickly than we imagine? For individual investors, I think for
the most part, you have to ignore most of this macro stuff. We like to talk about it
on the show, because that's what we do each and every day. But for the most part, if you
buy strong companies that you think have a bright future, then it's not going to matter
whether an interest rate is 0.25% higher or 0.25% lower, or whether the U-6 unemployment
rate just dipped to 7% from 7.2%. None of that really matters. And you have to realize that the
economy will ebb and flow. We do go into recessions periodically. Then we do move into growth mode
periodically. The things you want to see are an independent Fed. You don't want the Fed being
political. You want them to make monetary policy. You really want to be what's in the best interest
of the economy as a whole and not subject to any political whims. And then as long as we
buy good companies and hold them for long-term, I think it all works out.
Yeah, I do think that's a good point to reiterate. That's the idea of business-focused investing.
We like to sit here and talk about this stuff, but we're kind of nerds. I mean, let's face it,
we could talk about this stuff all day long. Speak for yourself.
I mean, it really does come back to the idea that business-focused investing is meant to
be able to put this stuff aside, to make it not really a part of the story when you're taking
that longer-term approach. So, as the economy ebbs and flows, like Ron's talking about,
But these businesses may be ebb and flow with it, but over long periods of time, good businesses
are good businesses, and investors benefit from owning them.
Let's get to earnings, and we'll start with an e-commerce stock hitting a new all-time high.
No, not Amazon! Well, I'm sure we'll mention it somehow.
We're talking Shopify. Second quarter revenue for Shopify grew nearly 50% compared
to a year ago. Ron, what'd you think? I think it's one of those ones I don't own.
Incredible numbers, really. Continue to put up really, really incredible growth numbers.
revenue up 48%. The gross merchandise volume that flows through them up 51%. Subscription
revenue up 38%. These are very, very strong numbers. Shopify now facilitates approximately
5% of all retail e-commerce sales, and that's placing it third behind, yes, Amazon and eBay.
They're expanding their service offerings to continue to drive growth. That helped their
merchant solutions revenue to be up 56%. Now, they do remain unprofitable. And as I want
to say often, profits do matter at some point, at least let's hope they do for rational investors.
But they're continuing to spend heavily for growth and for expansion. And so, we'll let
them slide for now in terms of not bringing anything down to the bottom line. But they
did increase their revenue guidance. And that also came with increased operating loss guidance.
So, no profits anytime soon, but really impressive numbers.
Shares of Apple down a bit this week, despite third quarter profits and revenue
coming in higher than expected. Jason, the iPhone revenue continues to fall.
And I'm wondering how big a concern you think that is.
Well, this wasn't one of those, who's your daddy quarters.
We're used to Apple really just bringing the noise quarter in and quarter out.
This is a bit more subdued.
But to your point in regard to the iPhone, it now is not the majority of revenue.
As silly as this may sound, I think that's actually a good thing, because we were headed there anyway.
This was exactly the quarter that Apple needed to really show us they can continue this narrative
of becoming something more than just a phone company.
And so, they're doing good things with wearables, with services,
but it's not all pinned on one particular product or service, right?
I mean, AirPods are playing their role. The Apple Watch is playing its role. Apple Music,
Cloud, all that stuff is playing its own little role, and that's good. Phones are obviously
still going to be a big part of the story. We're talking about 5G, that's a nice catalyst.
Soon we'll be talking about 6G, and that'll be another catalyst. I was really excited
to hear all of the talk about augmented reality on the call. That is something they're really
investing a lot in. The ARKit version 3.0 is the dominant platform out there, and Apple
is doing some really cool stuff with it. For example, just Google the Apple AR art exhibit.
They're doing an augmented reality art exhibit where you can sign up, check out anyone in
their stores worldwide. It's just a clever little way they're utilizing the technology,
and I think that's a sign of things to come in regard to that.
The one area I'm probably not as big on, I think Apple Card and Apple Pay. They're fine,
they're nice engagement for device owners there. They're just not really meaningful
parts of the business. So, I would probably encourage investors to temper their expectations there.
But all in all, I think that, again, it was exactly the quarter they needed to
continue the conversation. And they've got this incredible
war chest of cash, which allows them to pay dividends, buy back stock, return lots and
lots of capital to shareholders consistently year after year, and allows them, if they
want to make either tuck-in acquisitions or perhaps big ones. So, it could be bringing
semiconductors and chips in-house, or acquiring whole other kind of business lines, and let's
hope they don't waste that money, as sometimes companies tend to do for the sake of growth.
But I think that Warchest is a competitive advantage.
Yeah. And they did do that. They made that acquisition. They'll be wrapping that
up with Intel's modem chip division there. I mean, that is basically a 5G play, but you
bring that in, you make yourself a little bit more vertical there, get a lot of intellectual
property in the process. That'll be something where I feel like they'll realize some good
returns from that investment. Pinterest's loss in the second quarter
was smaller than expected. You pair that with Pinterest growing its base of monthly active
users and shares up more than 20% on Friday, Ron.
It's really impressive. It really was.
They only went public back in April, if you recall, at $19. Here we are around $34-ish.
That's pretty impressive. As you said, they beat expectations. Revenue is up 62%.
That's a huge number. Monthly active users up 30%, and now 300 million globally.
Global average revenue per user, ARPU, if you will, up 27.5% to $0.88.
Now, what's interesting, though, is international ARPU is only at $0.11, versus U.S. ARPU,
which is $2.80. So, one has to keep an eye on international. Is that business even worth
focusing on if numbers are going to be that low? The U.S. is obviously much more robust.
The company is still not profitable, but they did raise revenue guidance.
Shares of Square down more than 15% on Friday. Jason, second quarter revenue looked good,
but Square's guidance definitely spooked a few people on Wall Street.
Yeah, it spooked them. I think typically when they turn in these types of results,
Wall Street's expecting them to raise guidance a little bit, and they didn't do that this time.
They didn't ratchet guidance down, either. It just left everything status quo.
So, hey, the market being a little irrational, go figure.
One of the great things about this business is, I think it's becoming more apparent the
two-sided effect that it has, where it's not only helping out sellers, but it's really
helping out buyers as well. We saw strong results, again, when we talk about gross payment
volume going through their network, $26.8 billion. That was up 25%. I always like to
compare this to PayPal's numbers because it just gives you some context. PayPal's total
payment volume was $172 billion. So, considerably higher. I think that shows a lot of opportunity
there for Square. But again, I talked about the two-sided effect there with not only sellers
but buyers. Talking about the Cash App, the Cash App drove $135 million in revenue for
the quarter. And that's essentially up from nothing just a few years ago. So, we're seeing
a lot playing out there with the network they're building on the buyer and seller side.
A lot of attention there with the sale of Caviar. I have to say, I love the fact that
they did this, because while Caviar is a neat business, I guess it's the lower margin of
business of their entire model anyway. Right. We're not talking about the
delicacy, right? Yeah, we're talking about the food
delivery app. And it ultimately just doesn't really go in line with the rest of the business.
I think it took away from focus. It took away from investing those dollars in the wisest way.
So, to see them sell that off, I think, makes the most sense. And let's just put some context
in here for listeners as far as this drop in share price today. Last quarter, Square shares
closed at $73.62 the night before earnings. The next day, the stock closed at $67.74,
and we saw it hit $62.39 in subsequent days, all based on the same exact thing here,
guidance that perhaps didn't quite meet up to expectations. They're not profitable yet. They're
getting there. But when you have a stock that's not based on fundamentals, this volatility happens.
Still a very good business. I still own it myself. Coming up, the first name in household products
is having a surprisingly good year. Details next. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.
Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Chris Hill here in studio with Jason Moser and Ron Gross.
Kellogg is best known for its line of breakfast cereals, but it was the snack division that drove
second quarter results, pushing shares of Kellogg up nearly 10%. Meanwhile, Procter & Gamble hit an
all-time high this week after a strong fourth quarter report. P&G also raising guidance for
2020 run. Yeah, I think P&G is the stronger story here. Beat expectations, organic sales up 7%,
strongest in 13 years. Strong demand for some of their beauty products. Organic sales in all of 10
of P&G's global categories grew. Very important price hikes really were important here. That's
part of their new strategy to help offset increased freight and raw material costs.
Gross margins widened. Excluding items, EPS was up 17%. Now, they did take a big whopping
$8 billion charge in the Gillette business. I think the writing was on the wall for some
time about that because, obviously, the shaving business is not what it used to be. Lots of
competition out there at cheaper price points. But overall, a really strong quarter. That
stock is up 26% this year. It's nice for Kellogg shareholders
because the narrative for so long has just been about the steady decline of breakfast
cereal, so it's nice that the snack division is pulling its weight. But Procter & Gamble,
you just think about this company as this solid blue chip, it's up more than 40% over
the past year. This is like a growth stock. They've done a great job of getting
rid of so many of their product lines that just weren't getting it done. Then moving
to a strategy of, we're going to stop the discounting strategy, we're actually going
to raise prices when we need to because our margins are demanding it, and if we don't
do something, our profitability is going to continue to wane. And it's all kind of worked
out nicely. For Kellogg's, they're doing a good job, too. It's not as robust. Net sales
up 3%, for example. If you recall, they sold their Keebler Biscuit business for about $1
billion back in April. But they are spending money, conversely, on some selective acquisitions
to fuel some growth. And their earnings were pretty solid, up 8%.
I've heard the word cereal too many times, where I'd feel remiss if I didn't offer
my opinion on a recent cereal that I tried. I was out of town, I got back, I found out
my daughter bought the Sour Patch Kids cereal. On the face of it, I was like, I can't imagine
that's really good. I tried a bowl, you know what? Not half bad.
Sour? Yeah, a little bit sour,
but then sweet. They maybe own something. That sounds like a stock that goes
into a quarterly report with super low expectations and then beat by a penny.
I mean, maybe that's it. I don't know what's first on the grocery list for me.
I liked it better than I thought I would have. Shares of Under Armour down more than
20% this week. The sports apparel company lost money in the second quarter and lowered
guidance in North America. I mean, Jason, Nike had challenges in North America and turned
it around, but Under Armour is still having them.
Chris has been beside himself all week with this one. I get it. Listen, I mean, I think
we were talking about this. You see Under Armour stuff everywhere, and yet the stock
is in the tank. The disconnect here is that Kevin Plank made a bad business decision a little while
back in trying to raise inventory levels to get more stuff to more people more quickly. That
didn't work out. Now, I think he's atoned for that somewhat. He has some checks in place to
get the business headed back in the right direction, namely in COO Patrick Frisk.
But to give you some numbers around this, we talk about North America sales. This year,
the first two quarters, they're down 3%, down 3%. A year ago, it was flat and up 2%. Inventory,
though, I think this is really interesting. You look at inventory, this quarter was down
26%. Last year, same quarter, it was up 11%. First quarter this year, inventory was down
24%. A year ago, it was up 27%. They're doing the right things to get the financials back
in order. It's just going to take some time. Something to consider. Lululemon, a company
we gave a really hard time over the past several years. Lululemon is a $24 billion market cap now
with $3.4 billion in sales. Under Armour is a $9 billion market cap with $5.2 billion in sales.
So, you can see there is a big discrepancy there, and it's on the earnings side.
Under Armour can turn this around. If they do, I think there are going to be a lot of nicer days
ahead for investors. Beyond Meat announced second quarter results, as well as a secondary stock
offering, and shares of Beyond Meat fell 22% this week. Ron, this soon? We're going with
a secondary offering? Yeah. Forgetting about the stock for a second,
let's just talk about the business. Really getting it done. Net revenue up 287% as they
continue to move into restaurants and other retail chains. They're actually kind of profitable
if you take out non-recurring items. For example, adjusted EBITDA was about $6.9 million.
So, the company, for all its high-flyingness and all its newness, is actually growing and
is making money, adding partners like Dunkin' Brands, for example, a Beyond Sausage breakfast
sandwich being tested. So, really interesting. Now, they wanted to make room for some of
their former investors and their CEO, for example, to get liquid. So, they announced
a secondary offering at a pretty severe discount to where the stock price was. And that's why
you saw the stock take that hit. Not just regular dilution, but you price it at a discount,
the stock is going to adjust to where you priced it. But the stock has rebounded, not
all the way, but a significant amount since then. It'll give the company some extra money
to use for growth. Short interest remains pretty high on this one, because even though
they're slightly profitable, the valuation is pretty enormous.
Spotify's second quarter report featured higher revenue, more paid subscribers.
But Jason, considering this is the market leader in streaming music, this stock really
hasn't gone anywhere since they went public in early 2018.
Well, it's had a nice, interesting range there. But you're right, it's kind of where it started.
I think the bottom line for investors is that streaming is the future. Industry data shows
clearly that physical music is on the way out, and digital and streaming is the way it's going.
And I think that Spotify is building the entertainment platform of the future where this is concerned.
A lot of forward thinking there, a lot of early bets and things like podcasts and whatnot
are starting to pay off. Like you said, users grew considerably, 232 million. They have
premium subs of 108 million now, up 31%. And we talk a lot about this with Disney's new
streaming services. I think Spotify did a really good job on the pricing side here because
they have some room to raise prices as things go forward. And when you see Sirius making
that acquisition with Pandora, that was a very defensive move. Nobody even listens to
Pandora anymore, I don't think. So, I think Sirius could be in a little bit of a spot
of difficulty there as streaming continues to take over. If I'm going to ding Spotify
for one thing, it is the share repurchases. They bought back around $187 million worth
of shares over the quarter. Just invest that money elsewhere, don't buy back more shares.
Alright, guys, we'll see you later in the show. Up next, Robert Brokamp is going to
help you rule your retirement. Stay right here. This is Motley Fool Money.
Alright, before we get to Robert Brokamp, quick thanks to DataSite One from Merrill Corporation,
the market-leading due diligence app for the entire M&A lifecycle, helping companies
worldwide close more deals faster. When you're looking to execute due diligence,
Data Site 1 has what you need. It's quick. New projects can be set up in minutes. It's got
ironclad security. Multi-level controls and permissions prevent accidental information
sharing. And you definitely don't want that when you're doing due diligence on M&A deals.
It's also got advanced watermarking that provides added security to documents.
And if you need a little help, no problem. Customer service is 24-7 every day of the year,
provided in 14 languages with expert input as a global industry leader. And their mobile-enabled
platform extends data room access and user permissions beyond the desktop.
To learn more about DataSite 1 and sign up for a free demo, go to merrillcorp.com. You can speak
to an expert at DataSite 1, like our team did, and learn how to accelerate your due diligence.
Again, that's M-E-R-R-I-L-L-C-O-R-P.com slash fool to sign up for a free personalized demo.
And thanks to Merrill Corp for their support.
Now, on to Robert Brokamp.
Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Chris Hill.
When it comes to retirement, do you want solid advice or do you want sizzle?
That was the opening line of the very first issue of The Motley Fool's Rule Your Retirement newsletter,
which debuted 15 years ago this summer. Joining me in the studio is the author of that line,
The Motley Fool's resident expert on retirement, certified financial planner, Robert Prokamp.
Thanks for being here.
Robert Prokamp. Such a pleasure. Such a great line. Don't you think, huh?
I do think it's a great line. And there are things about retirement and money in general
that I want to get to. But I do want to start with this first issue that you wrote 15 years
ago, because it leads to a part of your past that I had forgotten, which is that there
was a brief stint of time that you were on Wall Street where sizzle was very much part
of the culture.
Yes, it's right up there with me being a seminarian and being a pole vaulter that people find
surprising to know about me.
But yes, there was a time where I wore a suit every day and went into a branch of Prudential
Securities and was a traditional broker.
And where did the sizzle part come in?
The sizzle came from, so I joined an existing group of guys at Prudential.
One of the main guys there was my high school English teacher's husband, who was a great guy.
And another guy was a guy I used to play football against in high school, and I went to elementary school with.
So these were really good guys.
But I did have to go through financial training with Prudential up in New York.
And we'd learn from the various folks during the day.
but at night we had to cold call people. And one of their lines was like,
you've got to provide more sizzle, more sizzle, more sizzle. And that's where that comes from.
I just like that you went to New York for financial training,
but really a big part of it was just salesmanship training.
That's absolutely what it was. I mean, here's the deal about that whole experience. I was never
really taught how to be a good financial planner, how to pick a good investment,
what are the principles of asset allocation. I was taught who to contact in the firm for that.
My job was to go out and acquire clients and acquire assets.
All right, let's get to the financial landscape in America, because the last time you were on
the show, earlier this year, we talked about a couple of troubling numbers in terms of
student loan debt, which continues to rise. The number of Americans in the millions who
are late on their car payments. When you look out across this country, what do you see that
troubles you? Because I'm assuming those two things are, certainly, student debt is still
very much an issue. Is there anything that you've seen in the last couple of months that
you think, boy, not a lot of people are talking about this, and this is a legitimate problem.
Yeah. So, to piggyback on that part, it is the debt that Americans have,
but particularly older Americans. One of the stats I had mentioned when I was on the show
in February, because I don't want to go into too much detail on this, was basically that
the debt of folks who are 60 and older is up 84% since 2010. That can hurt your retirement
plans in a couple of ways. First of all, it's harder to save money when you owe so much money.
But secondly, having debt payments in retirement increases your expenses, which means you have
to withdraw money from your retirement accounts, which increases the chances you're going to
run out of money, but that also drives up your tax bill.
So it's definitely one of my goals to go into retirement debt-free.
But the other thing I would say that is among the biggest mistakes that people make when
it comes to retirement is basically just retiring too soon.
We all know that on average the typical American is not doing a great job of saving for retirement.
depending on what study you look at, something like 25% to a third of Americans have nothing
saved for retirement. And according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
My alma mater.
That's right. And home of America's oldest collegiate improv group, My Mother's Fleabag.
Yes.
Something you know about.
I know a little something about that.
That's right. So the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College has found that
50% of Americans who retire at age 65 would basically have to cut down their lifestyle.
They don't have enough saved and the interesting thing about that is most people are not retiring at 65
Most people are still retiring at 62 or 63
The solution for this really is just working longer
There was a study released last year that found that just working six months longer
Would have the same impact on your standard of living as if you had saved 1% more over the previous 30 years of your life
Because that's the power of delaying Social Security, which increases your benefit
You're going to have a bigger 401k and IRA because it's more years for that to grow,
and you're going to be putting more money in it.
And it's because you're frankly going to have a shorter retirement because you've retired later.
Then you're going to end up with fewer years you need to spread your money across.
So the bottom line is really, in this country, 70 is the new 65 when it comes to retirement.
Another study by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College found that if people
in America retired at age 70, around 90% of them would be perfectly fine.
Really? The compounding is that powerful?
It is that powerful, really. A big part of it is Social Security. So, for every
year you delay, around between 65 and 70, your benefit goes up about 8%. The great thing
about Social Security is, it's immune to the ups and downs of the stock market, and the
the benefit is increased for inflation every year. It really is the perfect source of retirement
income. And for every year you can work longer and increase that benefit, the better off
you're going to be. You recently turned 50?
It is true, yes. Welcome to the club!
Thank you very much! As you get, maybe not close to retirement,
but closer to retirement, you've been doing this a while, what has been the biggest shift
in your thinking when it comes to your own retirement?
First of all, I have to say I was insanely happy that for years writing about how people who are 50 and older
can contribute more to their 401ks and IRAs, I'm finally able to do it.
Very happy to be able to join that club.
So, a couple of things.
One is related to that previous point of working longer.
And I know for a lot of people that's probably discouraging.
But the truth is, there's a lot of research that indicates that retirement may not be healthy or even that interesting.
So, the average retiree watches four to six hours of TV a day.
Retirees are 40% more likely to become depressed than those who are working,
because a lot of people get purpose from their jobs, a lot of people get social interaction from their jobs,
and when you retire, it can be isolating.
Something like 25% to 40% of people who retire eventually go back to work.
Now, half of those people are doing it for money, but the other half is, frankly, they were just bored.
So, when I look at my own retirement plan, what my wife and I have been talking about is,
all right, I think we're the type of people who will want to work well into our 70s.
But that doesn't mean we want to put off everything that we want to do in retirement.
So we have the classic vision of riding around the country in an RV.
So what we are planning on doing in a few years, once we're empty nesters,
is getting an RV, driving around the country, but figuring out how we can do our jobs in an RV.
Please tell me you're going to video that, because I would watch the hell out of that series.
Well, another thing I'll add, too, is my wife is almost 50, and she's now earning her Ph.D.
So she's preparing for a new phase of her career.
And I think anyone who is not happy with their current job and thinks the idea of working to their 70s basically makes them feel ill,
they should think, well, what kind of job do I want to do until my 70s, especially if you haven't saved enough yet?
And then what do you have to do to get that job?
Because you might be perfectly happy working well into your 70s if you just change careers.
She's not totally changing careers, but she's adding a different aspect to it that she thinks
is going to make her feel more satisfied with it all.
Now, as you're planning for this retirement, I don't want to get overly personal, but you're
also preparing for college for your children.
That is something that I think a lot of people struggle with to some degree when they are
thinking about balancing the financial requirements of paying for children to go to college
with putting away money for their own retirement. How should people be thinking about weighing those
two things? By far, the number one thing you should do is take care of your own retirement
first. There are so many ways for kids to go to college at a reasonable price, whether it's in
state, community college for a couple of years, or even just going to a normal, a regular college,
but taking care of a lot of the electives at a community college in the summers. There are lots
of ways to cut the costs. And even if you have to take out a loan, it's not unreasonable as long as
it follows a good rule of thumb, such as you shouldn't borrow more than the amount you will
earn in your first year after college. So there's ways to go to college if you haven't saved. But
If you haven't saved for retirement and you reach your 60s and 70s, you can't take loans,
you can't get a scholarship, you just can't retire.
So, it's definitely more important to save for retirement first.
Obviously, saving for retirement is the No. 1 problem in terms of what a lot of
Americans struggle with. What's No. 2 on the list?
What's the most common mistake that people make other than just not saving enough for retirement?
Well, I think a lot of people, especially now when times are good, they take what has
happened in the recent past and extrapolate it to the future. Unemployment is very low.
I don't think anyone is now thinking about, like, I'm worried about losing my job.
But everyone should have a plan B. Because at some point, there's going to be something
that happens that's not as good. You're going to get laid off, something's going to happen
to your company, the stock market is going to drop. You may have heard a stat from the
Federal Reserve that 40% of Americans couldn't cover a $400 expense. It's a little bit of
controversy about how accurate that is, but we do know the bottom line is most people
don't have, well, I should say a lot of people don't have a sufficient emergency fund.
A very high percentage of people don't have enough life insurance. The majority of people
don't have an estate plan like a will and stuff like that. So I would say, generally speaking,
just take a little bit of time to think of what could be, I wouldn't say a worst-case scenario,
but what are some things that could torpedo your financial plan and take steps now to protect yourself from those.
Well, and you touched on something that we've talked about before amongst our colleagues here at The Motley Fool
for the last couple of years, which is, you look at the bull market run now in its 10th year,
And it can be hard sometimes to remind yourself, like, oh, right, a downturn is coming.
It is absolutely coming.
In terms of retirement planning, is there a general rule of thumb in terms of a number
to reasonably, if you're looking to project out how your money can grow for the next 10,
20 years, is there a general rule of thumb number we should use?
Right. The way the ups and downs of the stock market really matter to me as a retirement
planner is that I am always using retirement calculators to determine whether I've saved
enough. The evidence is clear that when you start at a point where the stock market has
a high valuation, the returns over the next decade or so are going to be below average.
I think anyone that uses any kind of calculator to determine whether they're saving up for
retirement, for college, any other financial goal, should assume that the stock market's
returns over the next decade, we don't know what it'll be over the next year or two or three,
but will be lower. I mean, closer to 5% or 6% rather than the long-term average of 10%
and the 15% we've seen over the last decade. Do you think, as we wrap up,
do you ever think about the alternate universe? The alternate universe where you stay on Wall
Street. You're great at the sizzle. You stay on Wall Street. I feel like in that universe,
you have a lot more money, but you don't look as good as you do. You're probably not as healthy.
Thank you very much. And your soul is just pretty empty. That's what I think.
So again, the guys I was working with are just such great guys. Really, the one guy who was my
high school English teacher's husband, hey, Joe, really was a father figure to me. So I think I
could have been happy. It would have meant that I continued to live in Florida, where I grew up,
but I actually am happier here in Virginia. I like the seasons. I like the mountains.
I think I still could have been happy. I would have gone to more Tampa Bay Bucks games,
for example. But I'm pretty happy being a Fool. You can get a weekly dose of Robert Brokamp by
listening to Motley Fool Answers, the free weekly podcast from The Motley Fool. He's a certified
financial planner. He runs Rule Your Retirement. We love him and hopefully he's going to be working
here until he's well into his 70s. Brokamp, thanks for being here.
Brokamp I love you too, Chris.
Coming up, we'll give you an inside look at the stocks on our radar.
Stay right here. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.
As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about,
and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks
based solely on what you hear. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money! Chris Hill here in studio
once again with Jason Moser and Ron Gross. Our email address is radio at fool.com. Question
from Eric Davis, who writes, I just listened to the analysis of Bed Bath & Beyond on another
podcasts. And he adds parenthetically, sorry, I sometimes listen to non-Motley Fool podcasts.
That's fair. All the positive things they said sounded
good, but I have a hard time getting over my personal opinion that this is just a bad
business. I'd love to hear your team's thoughts. Ron, what do you think of the business of
Bed Bath & Beyond? I think we dump on this company a lot,
and for good reason. I mean, it's been a tough, tough go with all the competition out
there. And certainly, Amazon is the big one there. I think Jason will disagree, perhaps.
I don't think it's over yet. I think there's a place for Bed Bath & Beyond. You've got
three separate activist investors in there trying to get things done. I think you can
shrink the footprint, close underperforming stores, clean up the stores. The merchandising
is horrendous. How about less SKUs, less products offered? And I think there's a place for a
profitable Bed Bath. What do you think, Jason?
Maybe. I mean, I'd probably take the other side of that bet. I do feel like it's a bad
business, generally speaking. I think it's just one that's being displaced
through time and technology. So, for investors, there probably is something here in an acquisition
or some type of value-realizing event. The problem is, if you want to jump in there and
try to participate as a retail investor on our level, it's very difficult to do so because you
have to know something, right? Otherwise, you're just kind of flipping the coin. And when I get
to that point, well, there are just a lot of great opportunities out there. So, I wouldn't
even put this one on my list of consideration. Question from Sal, who writes,
I'm looking for a stock suggestion to hold for the future in the segment of auto parts.
Research shows that the No. 1 cost for auto repairs is sensors. I believe that as new car
sales slow and the increase of autonomous vehicles is on the horizon, a good long-term holding will
be in the manufacturers of these auto sensors, if I'm not too late. Do you have any recommendations
for stocks to consider?" I like how he's thinking there.
That makes perfect sense. I think that thesis is a good one. When I think of auto parts
manufacturers, four names just popped into my head. Advanced Auto, O'Reilly, Genuine
Parts, and AutoZone. I think AutoZone is probably the better of the four. The better position,
certainly the better historically, from both a price perspective as well as an operational perspective.
It's only 17X forward earnings, so not even expensive at this point.
Also, AutoZone has a really good track record in terms of buying back their own stock.
I'll probably take it in a little bit of a different direction, check out Nvidia.
Nvidia's Drive platform, just Google that up, and they are autonomous vehicle development platforms.
They're developing chips that are really helping steer, no pun intended, that autonomous
Nice, I like that.
Alright, before we get to the stocks on our radar, if you're looking for even more
stock ideas and recommendations, you can check out our flagship service, Stock Advisor.
You'll get stock recommendations from Tom and David Gardner. You'll get their Best Buys Now
and a lot more. Just go to radarstocks.fool.com. That's radarstocks.fool.com. And yes, of course,
we've arranged for a nice discount for our dozens of listeners.
Let's get to the stocks on our radar. Our man behind the glass this week,
MarketFoolery producer Dan Boyd sitting in. He's going to hit you with a question.
Ron Gross, you're up first. What are you looking at?
I'm going to go back to Waste Management, WM, which really hasn't moved much
since I last talked about it. Obviously, a trash removal and recycling company helping
residential, commercial, industrial and municipal customers. A dominant company and a very essential business.
Limited outside threats. They have a strong competitive advantage in that they're
entrenched in North America's largest network of landfills. They've got organic growth,
they've got acquisition-based growth. They've increased their dividends for 16 consecutive years.
Dan, question about waste management?
Yeah, Ron, I got a hypothetical question for you. Let's say somebody is going
through your trash, what are you worried about them finding?
That's interesting, because every time my wife says,
shouldn't we be shredding the bills and shredding this and that? I go, no, it's fine.
So, now the whole country is going to be digging into my garbage.
Jason Moser, what are you looking at this week?
Yeah, new company on the radar here. Haven't talked about it much. Teladoc Health.
Mac, that was for you. Earnings out this week for Teladoc, another good quarter.
A couple of leadership additions there with Mala Murthy coming on as CFO and David Sides in the position of COO.
So, rounding that executive team out is a good thing. Strong metrics continue with members
and visits growing nicely, resulting in strong utilization. And there's some good catalysts
on the horizon here as Medicare Advantage comes into play into 2020, which is going
to open them up to a very large additional membership opportunity. And then the CVS and
Aetna relationship just continues to develop. A lot of positive language on the call there.
So, a lot of things going on with these guys. And the ticker?
Ticker is T-D-O-C.
Dan, question about Teladoc?
Yeah, Jason, what procedure are you not interested in Skyping your doctor about?
You know, that would probably be something like a hernia operation.
I've actually, believe it or not, had a couple of hernia operations.
I'm over it.
But I feel like you've got to be face-to-face.
I really want to know he's giving us the appropriate attention.
You've got a stock you want to add to your watch list, Dan?
I'm breaking the streak.
No, just kidding, Ron. Sorry, I'm going with Teladoc.
All right. Jason Moser, Ron Gross, thanks for being here.
Thanks.
That's going to do it for this week's edition of Motley Fool Money. Our engineer is Dan
Boyd. Our producer is Matt Greer. I'm Chris Hill. Thanks for listening. We'll see you next week.
