Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - The Trillion Dollar AI Question

Episode Date: August 29, 2025

AI spending is approaching $1 trillion per year, but will there be a return from that spending. And the crew discusses the latest housing trends and how KPop Demon Hunters could change media. Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Tim Beyers discuss: - AI capex trends- Housing prices decline- KPop Demon Hunters and Netflix content- We play “Cut Down Day” Companies discussed: NVIDIA (NVDA), Alphabet (GOOG), Axon (AXON), Netflix (NFLX), Amazon (AMZN), Tesla (TSLA), Shopify (SHOP), Meta Platforms (META), Mercado Libre (MELI), Intuitive Surgical (ISGR), Chipotle (CMG), Palantir (PLTR), Aerovironment (AVAV) Host: Travis HoiumGuests: Lou Whiteman,Tim BeyersEngineer: Bart Shannon Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Could AI spending reach a trillion dollars by 2030? Motley Fool Money starts now. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm Travis Hoyum, joined by Lou Whiteman and Tim Byers. We're going to talk today about housing. We're going to have Lou and Tim cut some of their favorite stocks from a mini portfolio. Well, let's start with artificial intelligence. Morgan Stanley recently said that they expect global data center spending to increase from $307 billion in 2024 to $920

billion in 2030. Data center CapEx is driving companies like NVIDIA, Amazon, Alphabet, but they're not making enough cash to make that investment themselves. So Tim, when you see these huge projections what do you hear and do we actually have enough cash flow from these companies to spend almost a trillion dollars per year on capex we do and we don't um and let's start with the we do um they are committing quarter over quarter travis somewhere in the order of and these are multiple companies somewhere between 50 and 100 million dollars every single quarter that's extraordinary i mean it really is it i'm sorry i said million i meant billion um like this is just a few orders of magnitude yeah it's a few orders of magnitude

bigger i mean this is extraordinary amounts of money so on the one hand yes but on the other um this is a market that is um out of sync it's it's completely out of sync the build out of hardware is so extreme that the infrastructure to support all that hardware just isn't in place yet and i know you've you've covered energy quite a bit over the years travis and i just i don't see how you don't get to a point where there is a little bit of slowdown in the hardware buildout, and then you do some catch up around energy infrastructure, around environmental infrastructure, around like city planning, you know, urban planning, like, how do you get all of this done in a way that actually creates sustainable growth that doesn't seem to be part of these

projections and i i think that's one of the flaws here it does seem like the numbers are just we're going to keep increasing this and going from the chat gpt moment that was in late 2022 to where we are today that's been a massive amount of growth in ai spending in in spending on things like nvidia's chips but we're still kind of learning what these business models are too we talk a lot about chips but there there's more to it than this than just spending money on you know these power-hungry chips, what else are they going to be spending money on? Yeah. And with all respect to Morgan Stanley, and I do think that it's smart research, but humans, we are terrible at recognizing cycles, recognizing pendulums for being pendulums.

So I feel like some of this is just kind of taking what we're doing today and assuming it into the future and not considering a swing back. So we'll see about the actual number, but we're going to spend a lot of money. I do think that at some point, Tim mentioned energy, we're going to have to spend money on ways to be smarter about energy consumption or building out energy so that's part of it i do think you know we've seen all of this hiring this poaching uh maybe the shift a shift from you know building up this hardware to getting the brains that know how to use it i i wouldn't be surprised if at some point just instead of just pure hardware and all this data center spending that even if we still spend a significant amount of money the spending

it spread out in ways that we're just not seeing right now at the initial buildup. Tim, the way that you're talking about this reminds me a lot of the late 1990s and the telecom buildup. And there was sort of a dual bubble. We talk about the dot-com bubble. That was a dot-com stock bubble, but there was also a telecom bubble, which is basically these companies spending incredible amounts of money to build out the fiber that we still use today. I mean, Google bought up a bunch of that dark fiber. That's one of the reasons that they have, as good an infrastructure as they have. What you're saying reminds me a little bit about, you know what? No, the numbers are just going up so fast. Demand is going up so quick. And we hear

this from every AI related company that we're just going to keep building and keep building. At some point, there has to be a business model behind it. There has to be return on investment. If we're talking about a trillion dollars of investment, you got to have some profits coming from that. Most of these companies aren't profitable. So is that a good analogy for thinking about it? Or is there a big difference in this build out versus that telecom build up? You would hope there's a difference. I don't know that there's a difference. And I think there is a genuine fight over the right economic model for AI, particularly any kind of commercial AI. And I think you have two ways to fight the portal fight. And what I mean by the portal fight

is, I think we are getting to a point where the next interface for computing is likely to be a chat interface. It's likely to be some kind of, hey, chat GPT, do this thing for me, or search for this thing, or whatever it is. So some kind of chat interface. Now you're going to have chat GPT, Anthropic, companies like that, that are native to the business of building up a chat portal. That's their primary economic engine. And they want to build things that make that chat engine economically viable. Then you have a competing idea, which is the search model, you know the the traditional web model and then putting on top of that a chat the portal and that is alphabet that is microsoft that's even apple with siri and those two ideas are going to compete

that you know there's there's going to be a real fight to just to figure out who wins in that model And so there's going to be lots of trial and error here, Travis, between like, is it all going to be driven by advertising? Is it going to be driven by data access? Is it going to be driven by new tools to make different kinds of software that run from a chat interface? but those you know those different types of companies sort of converging to fight a battle to win the portal war i think is something we're still in the infant stages of seeing that like it's barely started but that's a big piece of this story that we aren't talking about yet but i promise you in the next 18 months we're going to be talking about it i saw somebody compare the moment that we're in in artificial intelligence to the Motorola Razr moment. And that really stuck with me. That was my favorite phone in, I think, 2005. But that was obsolete two years later,

Lou. I love that phone. This is such an important part of the AI conversation for us as investors to have. Because Travis, to your point, a lot of fortunes were lost on that infrastructure buildup, But it was still value adding over time. So, you know, all of this money is being spent. I think it is adding value. There is a there there. This isn't just kind of crazy spending. But that does not, if history is a guide, that does not translate to every one of these investments will be a winner. And there will be, as Tim says, there will be a period of kind of figuring out who's the winners, who's the losers. I think there could be a lot of winners that aren't spending the money, just kind of one using AI. I mean, just to use one example, MongoDB was up 30% post earnings today on a huge surge of customers attributed to AI. there are going to be a ton of winners they're going to be losers and we are just so early it's it's i if nothing else you just don't put all your eggs in one basket here as an investor can i add something there travis just quickly one of the things that's common about that now we can't be sure that mongo db is going to be a durable winner here but one of the things that's

true at least today about that mongo db result is that they sit in one of the categories that historically over time as these sorts of you you were liking it back to the dot-com bubble the telecom bubble the things that did endure from those periods at least over time it took some time to sort of wash away all of the excess but the companies that didn't go away had real picks and shovels they had real picks and shovels that they could rely on and be and build upon for the revolution to come. MongoDB is in that space. They're not the only ones.

Data management, if we're an investor that's looking to profit from the time that we're in and the excess that we're in, please, for the love of God, don't just look at NVIDIA. Look for the picks and shovels. MongoDB might be one. We can't say for sure that they will be, but they might be one.

Any company that is in successful data management is one to at least consider. One of the problems with the telecom build-out was the debt that those companies ended up taking on that increased the risk of their business. Tim, quickly, do you think... Right now, we have Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta generating almost $500 billion in operating cash flow.

If that investment number does go above that, they're spending about $365 on CapEx. That's a projection for this year. They're using almost all of their operating cash flow. on CapEx, in other words. Are we going to get to a point where they're going to be going into debt to build out more AI solutions? They might, but I mean, they certainly have the cash flow to service that kind of debt. You could see it. But I think my prediction on this, I'll make a reckless prediction on this, Travis, you won't see that. You will see a relentless focus on

efficiency first, because there is a software side of the AI equation that we just haven't, we haven't figured out yet. Right now, most of these models are very dumb. They use a lot of tokens. They just burn through all kinds of energy. And almost indiscriminately, that can't last. There is real engineering work that is happening and will continue to happen to make models, tools, far more efficient. And you, I mean, I expect, Travis, that you're going to see a lot of focus on that at, you know, like in the, you know, the labs at AWS and Google Cloud Platform and at Microsoft. I just don't see how they get around that because, you know, ultimately those companies want to see more software built. And if you want to build more software,

You need better tools. And that just requires, there just is no way to get around the need for clever, efficient software engineering. That's just common. Lou, what's the big picture here? So, you know, the big picture I'm watching, we're talking about all this spending and I mean, arguably AI spending is keeping the whole economy afloat right now. I mean, I think that's a little bit of hyperbole, but not too much. The economist, venture capitalist, nature hiker, Paul Kudorski, great guy. He put out something last month that was really interesting. AI spending is about 1.2% of GDP. That's higher than it was back in the telecom boom, higher than the internet. you have to go back to the 1880s, Travis, with railroads to find a time when one sector had that large of a role. You know, at a time when we're talking about tariffs, so the consumer looks pressured, is AI spending just kind of the only thing keeping us afloat? And if so, and some of these pressures do build or, you know, what could that mean? I can't answer those questions, but kind of as just a broader investor, those are the things that kind of, I don't know, they keep me up

at night. But those are the things I'm really, really watch. We could talk about this all day, and I'm sure this will be a continuing topic, but we do need to take a quick break. And when we come back, we're going to talk about housing prices and the trends that we're seeing there. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. Starting with just $1 all day, every day, now until December 31st. You gotta try breakfast at A&W. At participating A&W locations in Ontario. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money.

We got a reading from the Case-Shiller Index this week for July. This measures the value of home prices throughout the country, and there's regions all over the country. Housing is always a regional sort of dynamic, but we are seeing declines in home prices, especially in some of the hotter areas like Florida. Housing is the biggest asset for most Americans. So, Tim, what should we take away from the potential that home values are going down? Not a lot, but at least a little bit throughout the country. it's healthy i i look at this travis and to me it feels like a very healthy reset because we badly need more supply in in this country we just don't have enough and we haven't had enough homes for for quite a long period of time and when you inject supply into the market you may see a little bit of pressure on pricing pricing comes down a little bit you know as if demand just keeps going

unrelenting, the prices go way, way up. As supply comes into the market, prices go down a little bit. This feels like exactly what we need right now. So I'm very happy to see it. Now, what I'd be looking for is what kind of homes are we talking about here? Are we getting more planned communities? Are we getting more urban housing? I, in particular, think a bit of urban investment is probably the right thing because that has economic knock-on effects. Not that I don't, you know, like, hey, I live in a suburb. Suburban investment is great. But urban investment where there's a lot of businesses, there's a lot of concentrated economic activity. If you get some of this housing influx, right, new supply, Travis, then I think you may have some knock-on effects

that are very good for the US economy and very good for consumer facing businesses. So I'm hopeful here, but I might be a little bit naive. What do you think, Lou? Yeah. So I think healthy is a good word. I don't want to read too much into this. I think this is a sign of just things are getting back to normal. We had a huge price shock, housing slowed dramatically as we saw rates go up and just we weren't ready for it. I think what we're seeing in this data is buyers and sellers returning to to market a lot of that added supply are just people who have been sitting on their home and are just now saying okay we just have to suck it up and sell and that's because housing is a very sticky yeah thing like you if you buy a house and your in the interest rate goes up uh you go okay

i could double my mortgage payment by moving to a similar home but that doesn't make any sense brad oh it is a sort of a strange business well here's the thing too that kind of is interesting I think because, look, there's a lot of macro headwinds that are like new supply. Homebuilders are under a lot of pressure in a lot of different ways now between labor, raw materials, all that. I said if we're just finally adjusting to the rate hikes, there's a lot of talk now of rates coming back down. I don't know. I mean, the conventional wisdom is that would juice sales. But does that set unrealistic expectations?

Does that actually slow sales temporarily because we're just getting used to the status quo? We're changing again. And look, whatever the Fed does, I think everything going on in the world, all signs are the longer term rates and the mortgages are tied to the 10-year. I don't know if a Fed rate cut really moves the 10-year and moves the mortgage rate the way in Econ 101 we were told. So if those headlines are there and people aren't seeing the mortgage adjustment, I have no confidence that this continues. I think there could be another different shock right around the corner, and then we'll have to adjust to that.

And for perspective on the 10-year, the 10-year yield has not changed basically since Election Day. It's basically flat. So I think there has been two rate cuts and another one rumored for September. The other thing I want to bring in here, and this comes down to some of the unemployment numbers that we've seen recently, and the Fed talked about this in their Jackson Hole speeches, that part of the issue with the headline number, the number of jobs added or not added in the recent revisions was that there's just fewer people in the labor market. so that could help housing prices but that's the other side of the supply and demand is there just tim is that a piece of it that there's just fewer buyers in the market than there used to be

partly because of less immigration i mean that could be uh i i don't know but i i think lou made an important point so i want to double underline it here this is very complicated there are a lot of moving parts um the unemployment numbers are going to be important here we are we have continued to see layoffs uh travis so like i think the thing that i don't want and kind of i hope i'm not you know just just you know taking out of context what you were saying here lou but the way i think about it is that if there's artificial stimulus that comes in at the wrong time, just when we're seeing a healthy sign come into the market, if you muck with that with more artificial stimulus, let's say like a poorly timed rate cut, you sort of start

to lose some of the benefits you would get by seeing the market return to health. So I want the market to just be healthy. Yeah. Bottom line is, you know, as an investor, housing looks like even a bigger long-term trend to me than AI, but it's just, it scares me right now. I don't know how soon that comes. Well, next up, we're going to get to a few stocks that we like, or maybe don't like in our game called Cutdown Day. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. What better way than with a delicious Pret Organic Coffee? Starting with just $1 all day, every day, now until December 31st. You gotta try breakfast at A&W.

At participating A&W locations in Ontario. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. The NFL has just completed its cut down day. Roster's a bit gotten down to 53 players. So today's game that we're going to play is a little bit similar. I'm going to give Lou and Tim three stock portfolios, just three stocks in the portfolio. We're going to hopefully get through all four of these. They're going to have to cut one of their favorite stocks or foolish favorite stocks. So put on your best Dick Vermeule hat and shed some

tears for some of the stocks that you probably love. The first portfolio is foolish favorites. Tim, I want to start with you because I know that you have a long history with a lot of these companies, Netflix, Amazon, and NVIDIA. If you own all three and you have to cut one from your portfolio, which one gets the boot? This is going to be very unpopular, very unpopular. Oh no. And it's going to be NVIDIA. NVIDIA has got to go. I'm sorry. I'm sorry, NVIDIA. I'm sorry, Jensen. And the reason NVIDIA has got to go is because this is a business that is highly cyclical. It has been an absolute stone cold winner and it could continue to be a stone cold

winner. But for me, one of the ways that I practice portfolio management, Travis, is I don't want to sell everything off of a stock. But let's say in this particular case, I'm selling like 75% of my NVIDIA and I'm redeploying some of that capital. And if I have to sell all of it, I will, because what I want to do is always keep moving forward. And in a portfolio, sometimes you let go of those darlings in order to keep building and moving forward. And in this case, you know what? You've been great, NVIDIA, but your time has come. Got to give a rookie a shot. All right, Lou, which one, Netflix, Amazon, or NVIDIA? I think Tim has the right answer here. But just to have fun, I do want to give a shout to Cutting Amazon. And again, I'm glad we don't actually have to do these. But look, Amazon, their AI performance to date hasn't matched what the cloud, we're not seeing the same, oh my gosh, growth we've seen elsewhere. I think Microsoft and even Google has a better portal to the customer in a lot of ways, which I don't know. And also, you do have a fantastic retail business, but it's a retail business.

The divorce with UPS means they weren't giving their easy deliveries to UPS guys. They were giving the ones that were hard for the internal. So I think there's going to be some cost pressure on the internal logistics. Look, great company, but I do think they could come under pressure in a bunch of different ways. up ahead but netflix is the stock that you both want to keep i think i think that's interesting given netflix is actually losing time spent to youtube uh so why is that one tim the one that is the winner out of these three because i think it's a two-horse race between netflix and youtube and i think you don't think disney stands a chance and i say and i say that because sports is really

the only sort of uncaptured territory in streaming and you know what guess what netflix just did they wrote a new deal and this time they picked off uh two things from major league baseball that are events that are going to capture a global audience they're going to have the world baseball classic between the u.s and japan and they're going to have the home run derby for the all-star weekend so they're going to under commit on capital and get in you know the likely outcome is you're going to get some rabid fans who are going to show up for just these things and they don't have to over commit on a giant contract to have the to be the exclusive home of major league baseball they're very smart about this travis they are really good users of capital and i'll just

remind everybody this is still the only global tv network that across the world has a direct relationship with every single one of its subscribers it's the only one yeah and i just add of these three and again this is a best of show you know these are all you know top top companies netflix to me feels the most stable in their most important market in terms of volatility the cash flows would support that by the way yeah i guess there's no real argument for me i guess netflix would probably be number one for me as well uh let's do portfolio number two that is the hidden gems these have all been phenomenal performers in hidden gems tesla shopify and meta platforms formerly facebook i still think they should change their name back to facebook

or maybe just call themselves instagram uh lou which one of these three would you cut from your portfolio so i again this is hard i have to go with tesla just on the core business here because you know sometimes i feel like i like tesla's automotive business more nilan musk i you know but it is it does need some we still don't have a roadster no no no and it does need so i mean honestly they just need someone from detroit to come in and kind of just detroitify it just a tiny bit but there are questions about that business there is still a great long-term future story to be had with automotives and out so i don't want to be too hard on it but i look at shopify i look at them just beginning to conquer all worlds and i see a lot of potential from there

meta i zuck i love you i i mean i can't quite always figure out what zuckerberg is doing but it works and they have a cash printing machine which i am just going to bend bend the knee and be in awe of tesla to me is the one that i think i can ask the most questions about so again in a best to show where really fascinating companies they're the ones one that i lean to what about you tim i'll give you one number and it's gonna this will describe why i'm saying what i'm about to say nine mark zuckerberg is giving out nine figure packages to ai engineers no thank you you're gone you're out you're out as soon as you start going to a hundred million dollar packages to try to get to AI super intelligence when there's still so much we don't know? No, thanks.

I mean, none of this makes very much sense to me. Now, to be fair, they generate a ton of cash. It's not like they can't do it. They can do it, but they are going to dilute investors on the way to this. And I think this smacks of more desperation than strategy. See ya. So do you have the same criticism for Alphabet? Because Alphabet bought Character AI basically to reacquire one person, the person who invented the CPU. I do have the, yeah. So this is not unique in Silicon Valley, especially today. I 100% Travis, like you could level this criticism at lots of different companies at lots of different times, especially the Silicon Valley companies. alphabet absolutely deserves criticism for that there's no question now would i rather have

alphabet than i would meta yes i would because i feel like the data advantage that alphabet has is extraordinary it is also global it is significant and you can build a lot once you have you know so much search data so much geographic data they just have a massive data moat that i think they can build off of but yeah no they do not escape criticism i think it's a fair point travis the spending spree will probably continue uh a lot at least as long as the market is giving these kind of multiples for anybody that has some sort of ai story uh let's go to let's go to our rule breaker stocks uh this is three popular and very very high performing rule rickers mercato libre intuitive surgical and chipotle tim out of those three which one gets

cut really hurts me to say this i mean this is very painful i have to say chipotle which just kills me because i love a chipotle burrito but at this moment in time i think that chipotle is still figuring out the next phase of of its growth and i'll i'll be back when you figure out the next phase of your growth i'll i'll be back but you know robot surgery is only going to grow more important over time ricotta libre is i mean they've barely tapped the you know the the opportunity they have across latin america um chipotle burritos are amazing i will continue to eat them and i will be back when chipotle figures out their their next phase if you want to hear about painful story about chipotle i sold my shares in 2008 so that is painful that was that

was a mistake uh selling which anybody who's invested for a long time your your worst mistakes are usually your sales, not the stocks that you necessarily miss. Lou, MercadoLibre, Intuitive Surgical, or Chipotle, who gets cut from your portfolio? You know, I really wanted to find something else, but Tim's right on this one. And just to underline a couple more things, I mean, MercadoLibre in some ways is a consumer business, but not in the same way. They're just by the nature of the industry. There's so much more choice.

It's so much hard to feel growth in a restaurant business versus the other two. the other two it's not as simple as just kind of keep doing what you're doing and the business will come but especially on intuitive it sort of feels that way uh and you know like tim said wall street pays for growth wall street does not pay for just hey you're a good performer just continue what you're doing i think they may be able to answer the question i mean it's almost a running joke it's like you know the apple car and breakfast at your party right so you know Maybe, maybe they'll get there. Maybe it'll happen.

But I do think that their path forward from here is harder than the other two. Now, having said that, Travis, like super, super quickly, if the Chipotle lanes take off across that network, look out, like, you know, if volumes across each unit, like if Chipotle materially increases the volume they can do per store by virtue of those drive through Chipotle lanes, look out, man. there could be some real some real wins there but we're not seeing that yet yeah that's the basically the only way that i use chipotle today i don't want to get the kids out of the car we're going through that chipotle lane and everybody's going to have their food finished by the time we

get home uh final group of stocks i love them all but they all make me a little nervous for one reason or another axon palantir and aero environment loo which one of those three is cut today so i'm going to invert the game here and say the one that i'm not going to cut is axon okay uh you know look all of the price the price doesn't make you nervous i mean valuation all over the place here but just axon's ability i i mean i'm an owner of this one and i keep saying oh they can't do it again and yet they do i'm going to give the benefit of the doubt given their ability not just to add new customers but they have done such a great job of continuously just layering on new products, you know, from tasers to body cams, to software, to now drones

and cameras, just, I, you got to pick someone. I just, I believe in them to continue. Aero environment, I think could have a really tough time over the next few years, but I love the long-term potential. So I'm not going to cut them. Palantir, I love the technology, but I mean, I'm an old school government guy and all of these guys, all of these companies have government ties. Palantir is still over 50% government. I know the way government allocation works. There is no way you can justify that valuation of the government. So they have to really just grow that commercial like nobody's business.

I think they have it in them, but I am guessing, you know, just like Netflix, just like Amazon, this really looks like a company where both things can be true. It's a big long-term winner and there's massive drops along the way. So I'm going to say goodbye to Palantir here. Tim, same. I mean, I'm not sure I can say it better than that. I will only add that we should consider, in my opinion, Palantir a deeply cyclical business, and it trades like it's not a cyclical business. And that, I think, should make investors nervous. Well, some very interesting picks from all of you and some great insights on at least, you know, why we should be thinking about valuation and growth for some of these companies. Next up, we are going to get to stocks on our radar. You're listening to Motley Fool Money.

You've got to try breakfast at A&W. You've got to try breakfast at A&W. And what better way than with a delicious Pratt Organic Coffee, starting with just $1 all day, every day, now until December 31st. You gotta try Pratt first at A&W at participating A&W locations in Ontario. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear all personal finance content follows

mindful editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only to see our full advertising disclosure please check out our show notes we do need to touch on the hottest movie of the week that is k-pop demon hunters lou and tim did either of you see this movie i didn't know about it till you asked apparently not the target demographic for this movie uh but what's unique about this and i think is interesting for our investment discussion is this is a movie made by sony that ended up on netflix and became just an absolute hit i i can't avoid it with my kids uh we have not watched it but but it pops up every single time we open up netflix and now it ended up in theaters and it's

been a smash hit in theaters i had no idea it was coming except for multiple parents brought it up over the weekend are you seeing k-pop demon hunters so tim is this one is this sort of a new model for the industry and two i think it's interesting that no one saw this coming including netflix it seems like they're throwing content at the wall and they don't know what's going to hit but every once in a while they hit k-pop demon hunters or squid games so is that the strategy for them? Well, it is. I mean, the strategy for Netflix is to build a long tail. And the longer the tail is, the more opportunity you have to get unexpected hits. And the thing that really makes Netflix sing and what drives that cash flow is you have a hit that goes across multiple

territories. So Netflix is not, they are the opposite of the max strategy where you're going to invest in a very big franchise name and you're gonna have to put a lot of money behind that franchise name and then you hope that it delivers just huge returns netflix does the exact opposite of that lots of seeds and then something grows into just this giant beautiful flower um that you know just you you just can't help but admire it um and we've seen this over and over and over again the queen's gambit did this squid game did this wednesday did this um there are some others that are multi-territory hits that are on a smaller scale well i'll recommend it to you uh travis department q great like there's little things like that so it is a deliberate strategy

it's going to keep happening and it's one of the reasons why we should believe in netflix lou do theaters matter and does the order matter theaters first or streaming first i don't think the order matters anymore. I think we've evolved to a point where it's a very different experience. One is more of a communal and one is more just kind of at home. I think that the same property can work depending on, you know, what you're trying to accomplish. It kind of depends on the group, but more and more, I don't think it matters. It's just, you put your assets in front of, in the ways where it generates money and it all works out in the end. All right. We're going And with the stocks on our radar, and I'm going to play the role of Dan Boyd today.

So Tim, what are you bringing to us for our radar stocks? I'm bringing you Orby Parker. So the glasses maker that originally made a tay for selling glasses online, you could get a big package in the mail. You could try on several sets. You use your computer camera to check the fit and check your prescription. They have since moved dramatically from that, Travis. And so now they have just under 300 stores across the country.

Those stores are highly profitable. And over the trailing 12 months, even when you strip out the stock-based compensation, they're still generating free cash flow. This is a business that's getting more and more efficient over time. I'll give you one stat on this to kind of highlight that. In the most recent quarter, revenue up 13.9%, operating expenses up 3.3%. This is a business that's getting better and better and better. And I think it's one for the for the future. Look out. We're seeing clearly with Warby Parker.

Lou, what are you bringing to radar stocks today? So I'm watching CSX at the railroad and only watching stocks about 10 percent down this week, it seems, because no one wants to buy them. CSX is primary rival Norfolk Southern. They are going to be acquired by Union Pacific. That puts CSX in a really tough position. And conventional wisdom is that they would get bought by Burlington Northern. However, Berkshire Hathaway, and this does sound like a soap opera, I know, but Berkshire Hathaway, which owns Burlington Northern, Warren Buffett says, no, thank you. I don't want to buy another railroad. Canadian Pacific said no, too.

This is a mess, guys. And the market's reaction to sell-off CSX makes sense. But this story is far from over. For one, we don't even know if that deal will get through. It's possible regulators will carve out rules that make it interesting for everyone. I'm not ready to jump in here, but I feel like there might be an opportunity if the market overreacts to their seemingly getting left at the altar. So one to watch. As much as I like these transportation stocks, Lou, Warby Parker, I think, is interesting in the deal with Target.

We'll see if that gives them a little bit more more legs, a little bit more growth. I think it's interesting, these DTC companies making these retail partnerships. I don't know if they all win, but if they can, they can get a little bit more exposure. It could be a big win for them. For Lou Whiteman and Tim Byers, thanks for joining me today. And our production magician, Bart Shannon and the entire Motley Fool team. I am Travis Hoyum. Thanks for listening to Motley Fool Money.

We'll see you tomorrow.