Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - Uber Makes a Profit
Episode Date: August 1, 2023For the first time ever, Uber reported an operating profit. Staying in the green is a different story. (00:21) Ricky Mulvey and Bill Mann discuss: - Uber’s long-term vision. - If the ride hailing... app deserves a victory lap. - A mortgage REIT paying investors a 14% dividend. - Overstock’s “brilliant” rebrand to Bed, Bath, and Beyond. Plus, (15:15) Robert Brokamp and Megan Brinsfield discuss common tax myths for digital nomads. Stocks discussed: UBER, LYFT, ARI, OSTK Click here for the latest Stock Advisor Roundtable episode! Host: Ricky Mulvey Guests: Bill Mann, Robert Brokamp, Megan Brinsfield Engineers: Dan Boyd, Rick Engdahl, Tim Sparks Disclosure: Motley Fool Wealth Management (“MFWM”) is an SEC registered investment adviser. MFWM, an affiliate of The Motley Fool LLC (“TMF”) is a separate legal entity, and all financial planning and discretionary asset management services for our clients are made independently by the financial planners and asset managers at MFWM. No TMF analysts are involved in the investment decision making or daily operations of MFWM. MFWM does not attempt to track any TMF services. Megan Brinsfield is the Director of Financial Planning at MFWM. The comments and ideas presented by the speaker in this podcast are solely those of the speaker and do not necessarily represent those of MFWM or any of its affiliates. This discussion is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment or financial planning advice or recommendations. Certain statements may be deemed forward-looking, however there is not guarantee of any outcome. Past performance does not guarantee future results. MFWM encourages you to seek personalized advice from qualified professionals, including (without limitation) tax professionals, regarding all personal finance issues. While we can counsel on tax efficiency and general tax considerations, MFWM does not (and is not permitted to) provide tax or legal advice. This discussion should not be relied upon as personalized financial planning or tax advice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Stop wasting your nights on a mattress that doesn't get you.
Experience the most comfortable mattress in the world.
The Sleep Number Smart Bed.
At the touch of a button, you can personalize your comfort.
Choose firmer or softer.
Adjust cooler to warmer.
And right now, save up to $2,500 during our massive Labor Day event.
Hurry into your local Sleep Number store today.
Because we have your number.
Did you ever think that Uber could make a profit? The CEO has a message for the
doubters. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined today by Bill Mann. Bill,
good to see you. Hey, Ricky. How are you doing, man? I'm doing pretty well. Thanks for asking.
The big news today, the A headline, Uber reported its first ever operating profit. The ride-hailing
company made about $400 million in the quarter. That beat analysts' expectations and is up from
a $2.6 billion loss in the year prior. CEO Dara Khashrashahi took what I would call a mic drop
on the earnings call for hitting that green operating profit, also $1 billion in free cash
flow. Does Uber deserve to give itself a nice little pat on the back?
I think because they have crossed the line from being negative and losing money into
operating profitability, yes, they have proven to the most negative doubters that Uber is
probably a business that can sustain itself without continually going back to the public
markets. So, this quarter was a surprise, and obviously, the market is rewarding it as a surprise.
I'm not convinced it was as great as all that, though I was someone who,
during the COVID period, was mystified that a company in Uber's business was not yet able to
to make a profit. But yes, they've done it. It's great. Not 100% sure that this is the
mic drop situation that the CEO is suggesting it is.
Yes. The quote from the earnings call from Kasha Shahi is,
many observers over the years boldly claimed that we would never make any money,
and I understood why they felt that way." Because we didn't.
Also, I would say with the earnings call, Bill, man, I think this hit what I'll call
the 2023 triple. Big tech company found its way to profitability. Investors seem to be
responding more to the revenue guidance. The very first analyst question is about large
language models. That's right. We need to hear not so much
about money, but we need to hear about your generative AI program, which is going to revolutionize
your and every other business, which means that it will revolutionize no businesses.
Look, I don't want to sound like a naysayer, but they did also have almost $500 million in
stock-based compensation that does not show up at the top line, and it does not show up in the
cash flow statements. Again, it was a great quarter for them. It actually was. It was one
that was better than I thought that Uber was capable of. I do think that because so much of
their gains came from their investments rather than their operations, you have to be a little
bit careful before you take that full victory lap. How about promising profitability in every
quarter moving forward? I'll point out some more highlights. Gross bookings, that's how much
customers pay, grew 16% over the year. Revenue came in at $9.2 billion. That missed expectations
by a cool $100 million. The chief financial officer is leaving in January, and their freight
revenue declined by 30% year over year. Any of those really stand out to you? We don't have to
talk about stock-based comp. Bill, we adjust for that. We adjust for that.
I don't know that we can adjust for the CFO choosing to leave.
Maybe he feels like, at this point, I did it. We've made it into the green. I've got a new
adventure in front of me. The freight has been their weak point. It is the part of their business
that has, I would suggest, the least logical linkage with the other components of their
business. It is quite a heavily competitive segment. But is that good analysis, Ricky?
We'll leave it at the long-term vision, which I would say I might have a similar response to.
Uber is trying to be a, quote, operating system for your daily life. It's one app for all kinds
of rides, not just car. We've got boats, we've got planes, and delivery services. I know you're
less than enthusiastic, so I'm not going to ask you about your enthusiasm, but they seem to be
doing better than Lyft. They are doing better than Lyft. I am waiting for Uber piggyback rides,
though. That, I think, is the game changer. Forget AI. Someone showing up and giving you
a piggyback ride, that's going to be huge. I don't have a clever response for that,
but I would love to see it. Your eyeballs started just shaking involuntarily
when I went that direction. Here's something we were unprepared for.
All right. Here's the company I really want to talk to you about. It's a small cap and a value
investor bill. It is a REIT. It's called Apollo Commercial Real Estate. They reported earnings
yesterday. It's sub $2 billion. Here's why I want to talk to you about it. It's a complicated story.
It's got about 20% of its book in office buildings, but a lot of those buildings are in Europe with
different back-to-office trends. It's got a lot of real estate in New York City, about a quarter of
it. Almost all of its debt is floating rate. The company trades at seven times earnings. They will
pay you a 14% dividend to wait. The CEO, Stuart Rothstein, says that this floating rate debt is
good because it means more borrowers are paying more to service their debt and shareholders get
more income. What say you? Apollo Commercial Real Estate, it's not just a REIT, it is a mortgage
REIT. It means that they don't go out and buy office buildings, or they don't go out and buy
apartments. It means that they go out and buy primarily the first mortgages. Somebody else has
done the building, and they're going out and buying the mortgage, they're collecting the
interest, they've got servicing rights, which they either can retain or they can sell,
and then they use a lot of leverage. Now, in the case of Apollo, they are not a traditionally
highly leveraged mortgage REIT. They currently have about four times their asset value in leverage.
Now, what that means, I've always described this type of business as vacuuming up nickels in front
of cement mixers. You're going to keep collecting money, and it seems like it's going to work out
just fine. But at some point, if that cement mixer moves in a way that you aren't prepared for,
it could get very bad very, very quickly. Specifically, in this quarter, the stock is
responding to something very specific that happened, and that is a CECL allowance.
Now, I know acronyms are great radio. That's called the Current Expected Credit Loss. In this
case, they are taking a $141 million credit loss allowance against an ultra-luxury residential
property in Manhattan. They own at least one or several really, really big mortgages and really
big pieces of paper that they are suggesting is not performing well. $141 million in an
assumed loss is a really big thing for a leveraged company.
The company also took about an $80 million loss on its actual investments for the quarter,
and that separated the distributable earnings to shareholders before we count the loss,
which they would like you to look at, and then there's a negative amount of income distributable
to earnings after we actually count the investment loss. That's how I'm going to start reporting
my investments to my family. That's right. Here's my checking account.
Now, keep in mind, it is important to note that they are not entirely wrong in wanting
you to focus on that first number. The second number does have a huge amount of variance
in it because it is incredibly sensitive to interest rates, for example. It would make
the company look much more volatile than it actually is if that was the number you focus on.
It's obviously something that you need to note. I always recommend people,
as soon as they start talking about something like adjusted EBITDA, what are you adjusting for?
This is adjusting for the natural variances that happen in the market. It's okay,
but it doesn't mean that the variances themselves aren't meaningless.
Yeah. I want to point out too that the reason I'm looking at this is, office in New York City
is enough reason to scare off a group of investors. We have office buildings and luxury real estate in
New York City, but most of the loan book is in hotels, other residential properties, retail.
You like value investing, you like small caps. Is there a misunderstanding here or does the market
seem to have a good understanding at a seven times earnings multiple with a 14% dividend?
I think that they pretty much got it right. A lot of times with mortgage REITs,
what you're receiving in the form of the dividend is also a return of capital.
It's a little bit deceptive for it to be a 14%. You're not getting a 14% return. But I think the
market in this case has it right. Just keeping in mind that because they own mortgages and they
don't own the real estate itself, their cost structure is very, very different than what
you might think of when you think New York commercial real estate.
Let's move on to a more fun story than mortgage REITs. Back in June, Overstock acquired Bed,
Bath & Beyond's intellectual property for about $22 million. Bill Mann, Bed, Bath & Beyond is
back from the dead. Today, Overstock has rebranded as Bed, Bath & Beyond. If you go to
overstock.com, it will take you to Bed, Bath & Beyond. In terms of rebrands, what do you think
of this one? I think, actually, this one is brilliant. Overstock.com, over its time,
has had such a poor brand positioning, and it had almost no brand credibility. Bed Bath & Beyond,
probably the most valuable thing that they had at the end of the day, was actually that intellectual
property, which Overstock got on the cheap. Whatever else it is that you think about Bed Bath & Beyond,
it is very much thought of as being a good brand. For almost nothing, Overstock is getting to
recast itself as an old-line, credible retailer. You and I talk about business almost every day.
There are a lot of people out there who might not have even noticed that Bed Bath & Beyond
filed for bankruptcy. I think this is very smart on behalf of Overstock.
Yeah. Most of the time, when you hear about a rebrand, usually it's to a new name that
nobody knows and the business would like you to be familiar with. But in this case,
they're going back to a company that, as you said, people know well, but there will be some
key changes. First of which is that Overstock does not own its own inventory, so it's going to be
be relying on those third-party suppliers to ship. They claim that the classic 20% off coupon is gone,
still on the website today. Gone-ish.
Gone-ish. Well, there's a lot of gone-ish. Overstock claims that it doesn't want to sell
these one-off, inexpensive items, such as a $4 spatula with free shipping. As of today,
you can get a $4.50 spatula with free shipping. Anyway, let's say, Bill, that they have brought
you on as a highly paid consultant to give a PowerPoint presentation on what they should do.
What advice are you giving them about this rebrand? Keep in mind that they only bought
this in June. I think probably you're seeing the first step rather than the last step.
I am looking at, because you're exactly right, and as you said it, I started thinking about
some of the best rebrands that I've ever heard. Maybe the best, and I'd be interested in your
thoughts was when SBC bought AT&T and then rebranded the entire company AT&T. Everybody
had heard of AT&T, but AT&T was a much smaller company by that period of time than SBC. SBC
didn't really have a brand outside of the Southwest. Sometimes it really does make some
sense. In the case of Overstock, yes, they probably haven't gotten to the point where
they want to be in terms of operations, taking on Bed Bath & Beyond from six weeks ago,
they haven't had time to get there yet. I think they would get an incomplete at this point,
but they will actually probably need to shift quickly. The thing about intangible assets
like a brand is that it's really easy to ruin them.
Yes, it is. As we wrap up, we're in the dog days of earnings season and the dog days
of summer. What's a trend, company, storyline that you find interesting right now?
You pointed it out earlier. It's the incredible number of companies that seem to be name-checking
some form of AI or chat GPT that they are considering or are actively bringing into
their businesses. I think we've seen so far, this has been an incredibly benign earnings
season so far. One thing to keep in mind, though, is that the S&P 500 in particular
is more concentrated amongst its top companies. The top seven are about 25% of the total market
capitalization of the S&P. If one of them misses, it is going to feel much worse across
the board than it would have nearly at any point over the last 50 years.
Bill Mann, appreciate your time and your insight!
Thanks, Ricky. Before we get to our next segment, I wanted to let you know that the latest episode
of Stock Advisor Roundtable is now on Spotify. The show is available to members of Stock Advisor,
Epic Bundle, and our Advanced Investing Services. I'll put a link in the show notes. Motley Fool
co-founder and CEO Tom Gardner catches up with Chief Investment Officer Andy Cross to talk
market valuations, Tesla, and Nvidia. Now, if you work remotely, then you can work from anywhere,
right, but that flexibility can come with a cost. Robert Brokamp has more.
The phrase digital nomad may conjure up images of a modern-day cowboy going from town to town
on horseback armed with nothing but a laptop and a Bluetooth dongle. Their battle cry is asking,
can you hear me? On Zoom while jockeying for the best Wi-Fi signal. You may have spotted them at
your local coffee shop, maybe in a co-working space, or just posting work selfies from the
beach. I ask these digital nomads are defined as workers that are able to do their jobs remotely
and take advantage of their mobility to explore different states or even countries
as their chosen workplace. But what does all this mean from a tax perspective?
Joining us to debunk the top three tax myths of the digital nomad lifestyle is Megan Brinsfield,
Director of Financial Planning for our sister company, Motley Fool Wealth Management,
and someone who's done a little digital nomading herself. Megan, welcome back to the show.
Why, hello. And if you've listened to shows I've been on before, you know I carry with me
this heavy bag of disclosures that I must share with you all.
Everything stated here today represents my own thoughts and not necessarily those of Motley
Fool Wealth Management or its affiliates. My comments are informational and should not be
considered recommendations. Any examples are for illustrative purposes only. While wealth advisors
can counsel on tax efficiency and general tax considerations. Motley Fool Wealth Management
does not and is not permitted to provide any tax or legal advice. Consult with a wealth or
tax advisor prior to making any financial decisions. And finally, Motley Fool Wealth
Management, a sister company of The Motley Fool, operates independently from The Motley Fool.
Thank you for that, Megan. And I will just emphasize that since we are talking about taxes,
this is a situation where I really do think getting some help helps out. All right,
Let's talk about the first tax myth of being a digital nomad, and that is, if I don't live there,
I don't have to pay taxes there, or maybe some variations, such as, as long as I stay less than
six months, the state can't tax me. That's right. This is the often-cited
six-month rule, and this is really for states to consider you a resident of the state.
Pretty much any state that has an income tax is going to have a rule to collect non-resident
income tax. And so, you can kind of consider yourself joining the elite taxpayer group that
includes people like athletes, performers, entertainers that have to pay what's known as
a jock tax or a tax that's collected by the state wherever they perform the services for which
they're being paid. The jock tax is probably surprising to people. We talked about it earlier
this year when we interviewed Jonathan Scott, who played in a Super Bowl for the Pittsburgh
dealers. That is, basically, in many states, as the team travels to that state, they have
to pay a tax. I read in one article that California alone collects $200 million in taxes from
people who come to compete in its state. It's not just the athletes, it's the coaches, the
trainers, and everyone. The athletes probably have the money, but not everyone on the team
has to do this. Basically, what you're saying is, this no longer applies just to your favorite
NFL team. It could apply to you if you work in another state.
That's correct. Yes. All income that you earn through a job, whether it's self-employment
or W-2 employment, has what's known as a source, and it's linked to the location where you're
taxed. Essentially, wherever your butt is when you're doing the work is the state that has the
right to tax you on it. Each state will calculate their right to tax you based on the proportion
that you earned in that state. Just a quick example, if I normally live in Florida,
soaking up the sun, not paying any state income tax, but I spend two weeks working in Virginia,
I now have 10 workdays out of roughly 250 workdays spent in Virginia, and Virginia can tax
4% of my income. Okay. That doesn't sound very fun. Are there ways to mitigate the risk?
You don't associate taxes with fun?
I mean, I don't know.
You're the CPA, so what am I talking about here?
Yeah, of course.
There are some ways to mitigate your risk.
I have three top strategies.
One is to situate strategically by working from states that do not impose an income tax.
There are what I like to call 8.5.
You've got Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming
that do not collect a personal income tax from its residents or non-residents. And then New Hampshire
only taxes interest and dividends. So if you're earning income from employment, that's not going
to apply to you. So if you are working in any of those states, you don't really have to worry about
this requirement. And now you might start to see things clicking as to why all these singers do
their residencies in Nevada and Las Vegas. I just saw Garth Brooks. Every time he performs there,
he does not owe a state income tax to Nevada, which would be different if he was doing the
Taylor Swift heirs tour methodology. Is there anything to the idea that if you don't stay in
a state for very long, you don't have to worry about it? There is. Each state has a de minimis
calculation that says, if it's below this threshold, we're not going to chase you or
worry about it. And that is defined separately by each state. If you just Google the term
income tax filing threshold, along with the state that you're interested in, you should get a pretty
quick result there for what is the tax filing threshold in that state. All right, let's move
on to tax myth number two. And that is, I'm smarter than whatever state you're staying in
and their tax department, they can't catch me anyways.
Au contraire. Things have really come a long way in the world of tax auditing, particularly
high-tax states like California and New York. They've got a lot to lose by you leaving their
state or not reporting your income there. They've developed pretty advanced audit methodologies.
One easy flag in their system is, if you're a resident of their state and then you report that
you moved to a zero tax state, that can be tracked really easily by their tax department. And they
will probably send you a little inquiry, considering a housewarming gift, that asks you,
hey, just want to make sure you've really severed ties with our state. And these can sometimes look
innocuous. It's just like, fill out this little questionnaire. Make sure if you work with an
accountant, you're always providing that sort of thing to your accountant so you don't inadvertently
step into trouble there. I've seen a lot of California residents that moved to Nevada or
New York residents that moved to Florida. And New York to Florida is so common that the New York
state auditors actually started doing things like looking in people's refrigerators, looking at
their veterinary bills, seeing where their dentist is. Yes. So I pulled up an article and this was
from, I believe, 2014. It wasn't even recent where a client won their case of non-residency
because when the auditor went and opened the refrigerator, the stuff had been in there for
a year and a half untouched. So, kind of crazy to know that that is the type of thing that auditors
are looking for. But more than that, the state is aware of high-profile events happening in their
state, things that are public are increasingly fair game for audit purposes. So if you are an
athlete by chance, thanks for listening, or a high profile CEO or something like that, someone
who's traveling for board meetings, or if you're just posting all over social media where you are
and how much you earned in a given month, you might be getting a little note from the state
tax department. Very interesting. And maybe a little scary. Let's move on to tax myth number
three. If my company doesn't report it, I don't need to either. This is a common myth that if I
just get my W-2 from my employer and I put that stuff into my tax preparation program, everything's
going to take care of itself. And the problem with that is that the burden is on you as the
taxpayer to keep track of these things and report appropriately. Another kind of interesting tidbit
is there is a statute of limitations that says the state only has so long to come after you.
But in order to start that statute, you have to file a tax return. So, if you never file in a
given state, your statute of limitations is basically forever. You would need to consult
a lawyer and confirm all of that, but that is what I've seen in practice previously.
But the fact of the matter is that you are responsible for reporting these extra days
that you're traveling, at least notifying your employer. A lot of payroll departments do have
the capability to withhold taxes for a brief period of time in a state other than your home
state. But so many payroll departments just haven't caught up with the times. There's very
little software out there that is integrating the HR record, the payroll record, the corporate tax
filing record, and all of these things are so intertwined and hairy. If you're traveling all
over, I know for accountants in particular who have to go on-site to do audits, those payroll
systems are tracking where they are and accumulating a tax in all of the relevant states.
Wow. All right. That's all the tax stuff. But as I mentioned at the beginning of the show,
you've actually done this yourself. You have personal experience with digital nomading.
So just give us your personal tips, tricks, reflections, maybe things you wish you knew
before you started trying it.
The few things to consider are technological.
Make sure that you're going to a place that has a really strong Wi-Fi connection.
There's nothing that puts a hitch in your step, like not being able to connect to the
meetings or tools that you need.
So if you're staying somewhere, make sure you're confirming your Wi-Fi speed or connectivity
generally if you're using your phone as a backup.
up. And then the other thing just practical is time zone. Usually your employer is not going to
care if you are nomading around as long as you're sticking to your normal schedule. And so I have
never gone to Hawaii to work my East Coast hours. I think that would be pretty miserable. But I have
gone to Florida and it's nice to get off work and take a walk on the beach when my normal walks are
just the city streets. So, sometimes a change of scenery is all that you really need to
re-engage with what you're doing anyway.
As always, people on the program may own stocks mentioned, and The Motley Fool may have formal
recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell anything based solely on what you hear.
I'm Ricky Mulvey. Thanks for listening! We'll be back tomorrow.
you
