Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - Walmart Warns, Shopify Stumbles
Episode Date: July 26, 2022Retail (physical and digital) is squarely in the spotlight. (0:22) Jason Moser discusses: - Walmart cutting guidance for the quarter and full fiscal year - The ripple effect for shares of Amazon, ...Costco, and Target - Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke's memo to employees about layoffs - Whether Shopify's falling stock, close to a 3-year low, looks like a buying opportunity (14:41) Robert Brokamp talks with financial psychologist Dr. Brad Klontz about why we're all a little crazy about money. Stocks mentioned: WMT, TGT, AMZN, COST, SHOP Host: Chris Hill Guests: Jason Moser, Robert Brokamp, Dr. Brad Klontz Producer: Ricky Mulvey Engineers: Dan Boyd, Rick Engdahl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
When WestJet first took flight in 1996, the vibes were a bit different.
People thought denim on denim was peak fashion, inline skates were everywhere,
and two out of three women rocked the Rachel.
While those things stayed in the 90s, one thing that hasn't is that fuzzy feeling you get
when WestJet welcomes you on board.
Here's to WestJetting since 96.
Travel back in time with us and actually travel with us at westjet.com slash 30 years.
Walmart went down and took a bunch of retailers with it. Motley Fool Money starts now.
I'm Chris Hill. Joining me today, once again, back by popular demand, Motley Fool Senior
Analyst, Jason Moser. Thanks for being here. I don't know about the popular demand,
but thank you for having me. How about this? Coming out of
the bullpen, Jason Moser. Whatever it takes, right?
We got to talk about retail because that is the story of the day. We'll start with
Walmart. Walmart doesn't report earnings until mid-August, but shares are down 8% this morning,
which for a company of its size is an enormous move. Walmart cut guidance for the current quarter
and the full fiscal year. They say higher prices are causing customers to buy less,
so Walmart is cutting prices to reduce inventory. It's not just Walmart, Jason. This is a retailer
of such size and importance that it is dragging other major retail stocks down with it, Target,
Amazon, and Costco, just to name three. Jason Moser. I think this really does
speak to the pernicious nature of inflation. It's something that we talked for a long time,
for many, many years. It just felt like at some point or another, inflation was going to have to
rear its ugly head, and then it just sneaks up on you. Now, all of a sudden, it's what we've been
talking about here for most of the year. It doesn't look like it's a discussion that's going
to be ending anytime soon. The interesting thing here in regard to Walmart is they're actually
and calling for U.S. comp sales to clock in a little bit higher than initially guided
for. They're seeing positive action on the sales side, the revenue side of the business,
but the costs involved are weighing more and more on the overall business. Operating margin
is expected to clock in at around 4.2% now for the second quarter and somewhere in the
the 3.8% to 3.9% range for the fiscal year. This is Walmart. It's a company that operates
on razor-thin margins already. When you see any cost pressures like this, it's understandable
the reaction from the market, although I would argue it feels to me like it's a bit short-sighted.
But we're in a period now where uncertainty is high, and we know that when uncertainty
is high, you typically see reactions like this from investors and that puts us to where
we are today. You have to assume that somewhere
in the back of management's mind is what happened recently with Target, where Target came out
and was forced to say, we completely blew the inventory mix, and we saw the huge reaction
downward for Target stock. And with Walmart, it's not so much about the inventory mix,
but just the inventory piling up. And so, clearly, they wanted to get out ahead of this,
because when they report in mid-August, there are going to be, understandably, a lot of
questions about back-to-school shopping, about early indications around the holidays. They're
taking a hit today, and I guess the calculus is better we take this hit now and get out ahead of
it. I think that makes perfect sense. I think if there is a silver lining to this,
they continue to gain share in the grocery space. I think a lot of folks, they don't
don't think about Walmart through that lens, but really, Walmart being one of the nation's
leading grocers, and that's something that looks like it is continuing to become more
and more the case. They run into a situation of food inflation at double digits. It's higher
now than it was at the end of the first quarter. No surprise, I think we're all feeling that.
Every time I go to the grocery store, I'm a little bit taken back by how much it costs
just to buy stuff to make one dinner now. It is something that's impacting everyone,
but it forces us as consumers to make different choices. When we talk about inflation, how
to deal with recessionary times, there is no silver bullet. Sometimes it really just
boils down to, sometimes you have to make different choices. You have to sacrifice a
little bit here and there during the tougher times. If food obviously be a need as opposed
to a lot of the other things that Walmart sells, which are oftentimes considered just
wants. We learned about that in grade school. You got to make those choices between the
needs and the wants. Right now, the needs are clearly winning out. I agree with Walmart's
decision here to go ahead and take the hit on the pricing to keep this inventory moving,
because at that scale, number one, Walmart, we mentioned they operate on such razor-thin
margins. What comes with that is they rely on volume. They just need to keep moving stuff.
keep that inventory turn rate going. The longer they let inventory sit on the shelves, the
more they play into that inventory becoming obsolete, and then they have to write off
even more. Take a little pricing now, because they know that still people are shopping,
it's just they're having to change the mix of that basket, so to speak. Again, this is
a timing thing. It's not something that will last forever, but it is something that's going
to be playing out here over the course of the next several quarters. I do think it's
really interesting to think now the implications of what's going on in regard to inflation and
how that is going to play out this holiday season. Because we're knocking on August's door here,
man, the holiday season is right around the corner. We're going to start having more and
more of these conversations. It's going to be really interesting
when they report, when we hear from Target, Costco, all the bricks and mortar retailers,
it's going to be really interesting to hear what they all say about traffic.
because part of the calculus for Walmart is, we're going to cut prices and maybe that affects the
average ticket, but we got to make sure the traffic stays the same or increases. We have
to continue to be the place that our customers come to for value. Yeah. I think that's a great
point. That's something to remember when we focus on these retailers. You look at restaurants as
well. But anywhere from Walmart to Home Depot and anything in between there, you focus on
not only the size of the ticket, the amount of money each ticket represents, but how many
tickets, the number of transactions. You look at the size of that ticket, the number of
that ticket, and that gives you an idea of how traffic is going and how people are spending.
Because if you remember back a year and a half, two years ago, with a lot of stockpiling
going on, a lot of pantry stuffing going on. You would see lower numbers of transactions
with far larger tickets. People were going in there and just buying a lot at once, which
was a bit abnormal. Definitely something to pay attention to in the coming quarters is
both the number of transactions and the dollar value of those transactions.
Shopify reports Wednesday morning, but it's in the headlines today because CEO
Toby Lutke sent a memo to employees saying the company will be laying off 1,000 people,
roughly 10% of the workforce. He wrote that he misjudged the boost that Shopify got from
the pandemic, and I'm quoting from the memo here, we bet that the channel mix, the share
of dollars that travel through e-commerce rather than physical retail would permanently
leap ahead by five or even 10 years. It is now clear that bet did not pay off. As a Shopify
shareholder. I genuinely appreciate LootKey saying, I blew this, the buck stops with me.
This is also a pretty astonishing and rapid fall from grace that this business has had when you
think about where it was a year ago in terms of its share price and the planning that they made.
made. Lutke went on Twitter, posted the memo after this story was reported, even went so
far as to say, we've got some really great people at our company, and unfortunately,
we have to say goodbye to them. He included an e-mail address saying, if you're hiring,
drop an e-mail to us and we can put you in touch with some of our employees. All of that
is great, but I'm really stunned at how quickly the tide has turned for Shopify.
Yeah. I guess given what we've seen with so many of these other stay-at-home stock
names, I'm not as surprised as perhaps I would have been if Shopify was one of the first
shoes to drop. But really, we've seen this play out with a number of these businesses
over the last several quarters here, where this stay-at-home stock mania has fizzled
out. Ultimately, a lot of growth gets pulled forward, but that doesn't necessarily imply
a new standard going forward. Sometimes it's just growth that's pulled forward and then
things start to normalize a little bit, and that's what we're seeing now. I definitely
cannot blame them for a decision that didn't work out. I too am a Shopify shareholder and
recommended the stock in one of my services. I remain optimistic with where the company
is headed. I appreciate Toby's transparency, his honesty, his empathy. He really did get
out in front of this. I think that's what you want to see with a leader, particularly
a leader that continues to tout that the company is so mission-driven. I think he sees well
beyond just the financials, at least that's the message he communicates. I think it was
reasonable to think at the time that the acceleration in e-commerce was real and would continue.
And again, I think that that acceleration is real, it's still likely to a degree, but
again, we go back to this normalizing. He published a chart, a graph in the letter on
their investor relationship site, which I encourage anyone to go read it, because I
I think it's very well-written and it gives you just an idea of what kind of leader he's
trying to be. But it just shows this nice smooth lineup of e-commerce capturing retail
share over time. Then you see this little blip over the past couple of years, this little
mountain that just forms on that line. That is what we've seen with a lot of these businesses.
They saw this unique stretch of time over the last couple of years where they pulled
a lot of success forward, but that wasn't necessarily normal. We're getting back to
this normalization. They are far from the only company to overhire during this stretch.
I think in their line of work, it's very reasonable to make that mistake of overhiring. There
are a lot of businesses out there where overhiring was not the best idea in the world. Depending
on what market you're pursuing, it's understandable in their case. I also look at a company like
Amazon as a comparable here to think, well, Amazon is dealing with this to an extent as
well. Not necessarily the same way, but Amazon overbuilt, they're dealing with all of that
excess warehouse capacity. We've discussed that on these shows before, where they felt
like a lot of that traffic was going to be the new normal. That turned out to not be
the case. Now they're stuck with all of this excess capacity that they're looking to sublease
out for a time until they can grow into that capacity, which they undoubtedly at some point
will. The difference between Amazon and Shopify is that you can't fire warehouses. That's
the difference. Shopify in a little bit of a different position, they do have to right-size
the workforce as the economics demand. It's unfortunate, but I also do appreciate the
angle from which Tobii is approaching this? I'm holding on to my shares of Shopify.
I think there are enough questions for me personally that I don't see this as a buying
opportunity. I understand anyone who thinks that way, because particularly in the context of
the stock has fallen, let's call it 80% from where it was a year ago. But for me personally, not now.
I want to see some things turn around. I'm with you. As a shareholder,
it's not my largest position by a long shot. It's a position I hold in the context of a well
diversified portfolio. I sleep well at night. This 15% hit today isn't going to make me lose
a wink of sleep. I do think there is plenty of opportunity for the business, but I also think
you have to keep in mind, even with the pullback, even with this fall from grace, I mean, Shopify is
far from what we would call, conventionally speaking, a cheap or even reasonably priced
stock. It's still just a very expensive-looking stock. I think part of that is based on the market
opportunity that it pursues. But I do think you need to keep that in mind, as we like to say,
price does always matter. So, I too am hanging on to my shares. But yeah, I think I'd want to give
this one a little time to see how they're going to be approaching the next several quarters with
this business and how they're going to reassess the growth strategy going forward as e-commerce's
gain in the overall retail market starts to normalize.
Jason Moser, appreciate you being here again. Thanks.
Thanks. Thank you.
You could have all the right information and still make bad financial decisions.
Robert Brokamp talked with Dr. Brad Klontz, a financial psychologist,
about the fundamental reasons behind why we're all a little crazy when it comes to money.
Have you ever looked back at your life and wondered why you make less than ideal financial
decisions. You quite possibly knew better, but you just couldn't do better. Here to explain why
almost everyone is imperfect when it comes to money is Dr. Brad Klontz. He's an associate
professor of practice at Creighton University, the co-founder of the Financial Psychology Institute,
managing principal of your Mental Wealth Advisors, and the author or co-author of six books,
including Mind Over Money and Mammoth Money. Dr. Brad, welcome to Motley Fool Money.
Thanks so much for having me.
So let's start with you explaining one of the main lessons of your research, and that is,
when it comes to people making better financial decisions, information is often not enough.
That's right. I mean, we all are crazy when it comes to money. This is the diagnosis I'm giving
everybody, all of our listeners. And what's strange about financial behaviors when it comes
to psychological terms is that anyone is doing anything right to begin with. We are just not
wired to manage money appropriately. And a lot of this comes from just conceptualizing how we have
spent 99.9% of our time on the planet. And we were doing that in a cave person sort of mentality in
a small group of 100 to 150 people banded together fighting for survival. And so all of our natural
instincts are related to increasing our survivability in that environment, not in modern
society, especially around something that is so abstract as money? Right. So we're not designed
to delay gratification. We are designed to make sure that we have a certain standing within the
tribe, because if we don't, we could be kicked out of the tribe, which is essentially a death
sentence a thousand years ago. That's absolutely right. And so we're wired to respond to threats
immediately, not to delay taking action, because that would have picked off your ancestors. So we
didn't get those genes. It's sort of trite and funny when I hear people say, oh, you shouldn't
care about what other people think. Well, all of the people who didn't care about what other people
thought, they died out a long time ago, getting expelled from the tribe. Even the concept of
saving would have been frowned upon because it would have been seen as being a selfish activity
because we needed to share everything with the entire tribe to survive. And so just the mere
act of saving goes against some of our hardwiring. And for those of us who grew up in lower income
environments, it is sort of hardwired into that even now, where it's like, hey, you need to share
what you have. It's an expectation. Yeah. So, when you look back on our
suboptimal habits and decisions, and surprise, surprise, they come from our childhoods,
there could have been things our parents taught us deliberately or accidentally or other experiences
we had. You call the most significant experiences financial flashpoints. Explain what those are.
Right. So built on this craziness that everybody has, we have our own individual craziness,
if you will, based on our experiences we have around money. And so financial flashpoints are
those typically early life events that have a profound impact on our psychology around money,
because we're trying to make sense of what happened to us. And these things can be anywhere
from things that are quite traumatic. Like, for example, I found out in looking into my
family psychology around money that my grandfather lost all of his money in the Great Depression.
That is a financial flashpoint experience. He goes to the bank one day, all his money is gone.
And so that shaped his entire psychology around money the rest of his life. And big surprise,
he walked away with this belief, you can't trust banks with your money. And so these things go from
dramatic and traumatic to being very simple things. Another example is a client I had
who I asked him why he didn't go to college. I was teaching at Kansas State at the time,
and his wife went to Kansas state. His parents went to Kansas state, his siblings went to Kansas
state. So I was like, what year did you graduate? He's like, I didn't go to college. And I thought
this was curious. I was like, why didn't you go to college? He's like, well, I wanted to be an
entrepreneur. I said, hold on a second. I'm not going to let you off the hook. I'm a psychologist.
Where did you get that belief and that understanding? And he thought about it for a
while and he traced it back to playing the game of life. Do you remember the game of life where
you take a little, yeah, right. So a little blue and pink pegs. That's right. That's right. And
he learned as an 11-year-old, if I skip the little college track, I can go straight to making more
money. He built his entire approach to education and business around the game of life. That is a
financial flashpoint, one that he didn't even remember, but it had a profound impact on the
rest of his life. That is quite something. We all have these experiences. You mentioned Kansas
State. I first came across your work by getting my graduate certificate in financial therapy at
Kansas State. One of the assignments was to talk to our parents and grandparents, if they were still
alive about their money histories, their earliest money memories, and things like that.
And you say that from these experiences, we create our money scripts. So what are those,
and what are the four types? In our attempt to make sense of those financial flashpoint
experiences, and quite frankly, the experiences of our parents, our grandparents, sometimes our
great-grandparents, we develop a set of beliefs around money. And really, we're just trying to
make sense of things. So for my grandfather, the belief is you can't trust banks around money. Now,
he passed that down to my mother to, you can't trust financial institutions around money. So my
mother never invested, which is one of the reasons why we were low income and low net worth for much
of my life. We have these set of beliefs that we get based on those experiences. And in our studies,
and we've studied, I think, upwards of 100,000 people at this point, we have found distinct
patterns of money scripts. And they drive our financial behaviors. For most of us, since money
is somewhat of a taboo topic. We don't talk about these things, but we found four main categories.
Three of them are bad for you. One of them is good for you. The first category, money avoidance.
This is where we think money is bad. Rich people are greedy. There's virtue in having less money.
No big surprise that that's not great for your financial health and people have lower income,
lower net worth. And the problem with these money scripts is we can identify right now,
we can even name names of people who are rich and wealthy and are terrible human beings.
That's the problem.
There's an element of truth in all of these money scripts, but they become problematic
when we don't see the subtleties and the context and realizing that they're only partially
true.
The second belief we found in our studies we call money worship or money focus.
This is where we think more money, more stuff's going to solve all of our problems.
Probably no big surprise that leads to overspending, higher credit card debt, because we're trying
to fill this emotional need around that with money and stuff that we really can't fill that way.
The third category we found is money status, which is the keeping up with the Joneses psychology. So
this is where if people ask us how much money we make, we say we make more than we actually do.
It's we won't buy something unless it's new. This is our desire to show our status to other people
so that they will love and accept us. This is also associated with terrible financial outcomes.
and growing up lower income is actually associated with that. And then the fourth category is the
good one. This is money vigilance. This is where you believe that it's important to save for a
rainy day. Ironically, these individuals will actually downplay how much money they have.
And this is something that I really ring the bell on a lot on social media, trying to educate people
on what actual self-made millionaires, how they actually live their lives, how they describe
themselves. And they describe themselves as frugal and they sort of downplay how much money they have.
they do the opposite of what young people are seeing on Instagram. So those are the four
categories we found in our studies. Now, you took a look at the differences
between ultra high net worth people and more of sort of middle wealth people. And you found the
ultra net worth people have like 20 times the wealth, but they only spend maybe twice as much.
That's exactly right. I'm impressed with your knowledge of that study. I was shocked. I was
absolutely shocked. We looked at a group that had $11 million in net worth on average, and we
compared them to a group that had about $500,000 in network, you would expect them to be spending
at a multiple compared to what they have, but that's not at all what we found. It was only
twice as much. It's pretty shocking. By the way, if you want to get an idea
of what your money script might be, you could take the Klontz money script inventory at
moneyscripts.com. From our money scripts, that's our attitudes, our history, and then there's our
behaviors. Some behaviors aren't so good, and you call those money disorders, which you define as
persistent, predictable, often rigid patterns of self-destructive financial behaviors.
So, in your experience, what are some of the most common money disorders?
So, there are money disorders. I kind of look at them on a continuum. They're the really severe
ones that would require you, frankly, to get into psychotherapy to fix. We're talking about
gambling disorder or hoarding disorder or compulsive buying disorder. So, those actually
affect a significant portion of the population, around 6% roughly, for each one of those
categories. But I think the average American tends to have a money disorder in terms of our
savings rates, our relationship with credit card debt, our lack of planning for the future. This
is something that we struggle with. And I think that's what most Americans historically have been
struggling with, undersaving and overspending. So, some of the disorders you term as relational.
And a couple that I found particularly interesting are financial dependency and financial enabling,
which I think a lot of people wouldn't think of. They're probably familiar with compulsive buying
and all that, but the relationship you have with money in regarding to your other relationships
can have a big impact on your net worth as well as their net worth.
That's right. Some of our studies have suggested that people who are most vulnerable to giving
money away in ways that hurt themselves and perhaps hurt the other person, a lot of those
individuals tend to be higher income, but come from lower socioeconomic environments. And this
goes back to that tribal sort of mindset, which is certainly where I came from growing up lower
income. It's where you're supposed to share everything. And so we feel this real desire.
And by the way, this is a beautiful thing, actually, too, this concept that I want to
share what I have with other people. It becomes enabling when it's financial help that actually
hurts. So there's financial help that can help. Financial enabling is when it hurts. And this is
when we're giving away money that we can't afford to give away, so it's hurting ourselves and our
family. But more importantly, perhaps, it's creating possibly dependence in the recipient
of that money. And by the way, this is the same psychology around multi-generational welfare
families as multi-generational trust fund families. There's a dynamic around being dependent
on non-work income that can be really destructive. And our studies have found that it leads to
a lack of creativity, a lack of passion, a lack of drive, and resentment towards the source of
the money. That's what we want to avoid, is that financial dependence. We've touched a little bit
on the role of trauma. People think of trauma, think of something really violent like an assault
or you were in a war, but it doesn't have to be that. It could be something just very emotionally
charged, especially to a kid. In some of your work, you discussed about how trauma actually
can physically change the brain. And what's interesting about that is a lot of these
money disorders, if you see them in other people, you kind of just want to shame them and blame
them and say, it's just a matter of willpower or weakness, but there's actually could be some sort
of physical component going on there. That's absolutely right. And what's frightening is that
some of this trauma can get passed down from your grandparents and your great grandparents and from
your culture. And you might not even know the story. All you know is you have this intense
anxiety or mistrust, or you have some emotional response to a financial situation, and you're not
even sure why. And that's what trauma does. Trauma is anything where you're feeling that your life
is threatened. You're not sure if you're going to be able to care for yourself. And I mean,
growing up poor, especially in poverty, is just a series of traumatic events where you're constantly
worried about your own survival. And that has a profound impact on our relationship with money.
As a financial advisor, I work with a lot of ultra-high net worth individuals, and some
of them who are self-made and really, really driven, when you look back into their past,
they come from a poverty background, and they have this mindset like, I am never going to
be poor again.
And it has so much energy associated with it that it becomes somewhat dysfunctional.
And so they're really, really good at saving money and accumulating assets, but they live
life like Ebenezer Scrooge of almost like a poverty-type lifestyle where they're denying
themselves. They're basically eating gruel, not heating their house. It's just that Ebenezer
Scrooge mindset, which is not healthy either. But yeah, trauma can have a profound impact on
our lives. Also in the markets, too. We did a study back in 2008 where we saw financial planners
were having post-traumatic stress symptoms based on the market declines. And that's another thing
we need to watch out for, because people will then approach investing in harmful ways in the future
based on this emotional experience they're having right now.
So, let's say someone does some research, does some reflection, they've determined their money
scripts, maybe identified their disorders, or at least just ways they could be better about money.
Now what? How does someone go about actually changing?
What's so fascinating is that sometimes just connecting the dots can radically change your
life. So you're struggling with, for example, too much credit card debt, and you realize that
you're starting to pay attention to your thinking because you just listened to this podcast. You're
like, what are my money scripts? And you might have this fear that there'll never be enough
money. And you can connect that to, oh, well, that's because I grew up poor, or my parents
grew up poor. And I can just objectively kind of look at my situation and be like, well, I'm okay
now. Maybe I can enjoy some of my money. That's part of it, right? Part of it is saving for the
future and join today. You need to have both to have financial health. So sometimes just being
aware of your money scripts and your financial flashpoints, you can sort of like de-shame
yourself. And it's like, of course, I made this boneheaded mistake around money. It's based on
where I came from. And now I know better. Sometimes, however, you have really strong
emotion connected to it. And I'll use my grandfather's example that you can't trust
banks with your money. That was such a deep wound for him. He died at age 94. He never put a dollar
in the bank the rest of his life. I mean, that's when it becomes dysfunctional. And so if you
know better and you understand why you're doing what you're doing and you have that sort of
awareness, but you just can't change this behavior, then it's time, I think, that you
should consider seeing a therapist who can help you with probably some trauma and working through
some of the emotions related to either a financial flashpoint you experienced directly or something
that your ancestors went through. Well, this has been fascinating. Dr. Brad, thank you for joining
us. Thanks for having me. My pleasure.
As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and
The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks
based solely on what you hear. I'm Chris Hill, thanks for listening, we'll see you tomorrow.
