Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing - Would You Buy the SpaceX IPO?
Episode Date: December 15, 2025Bloomberg and Reuters are now both reporting that SpaceX plans to go public in 2026 at a valuation that could reach $1.5 trillion, making it the biggest IPO of all time. Would you buy the SpaceX IPO? ...Leave a comment to let us know. Rick Munarriz, Karl Thiel, and Tim Beyers: - Talk about the prospective SpaceX IPO. - Debate the company’s status as a Rule Breaker. - Make a call on whether we’d buy the SpaceX IPO. - Answer listener Mindset questions! Companies discussed: RKLB, SpaceX Host: Tim Beyers Guests: Rick Munarriz, Karl Thiel Producer: Anand Chokkavelu Engineer: Annie Pope, Dan Boyd Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Would you buy the SpaceX IPO? You're listening to Motley Fool Money.
Welcome, Fools. I'm your host, Tim Byers. And with me are two old friends and teammates,
Rick Minares and Carl Thiel. We've been on Rule Breakers together. Guys, give it a couple more
years and our tenure on Rule Breakers will be retirement age. That's real. Should we be signing
up for AARP? I don't know. But we're looking at the youth today. So I hope you're fully caffeinated
because we got to talk about SpaceX here and the prospective IPO. Bloomberg has reported that the
company could go public at a $1.5 trillion valuation. We'll talk a bit more about that
report and then answer some mindset questions you sent us. But first, we need to start with
the SpaceX news. So let's quickly review what we've heard. But I'm going to start with a question
for each of you before I give you some data. What do you know about SpaceX? Carl, I'll start with
you? Like, what do you think this thing is? So SpaceX is obviously the, you know,
closely associated with Elon Musk, you know, certainly gets a lot of publicity for its rocket
launches. Sometimes they go great, sometimes not so much, but they certainly capture a lot of
attention. What maybe isn't quite as widely known is that about 70% of SpaceX's revenue comes from
Starlink. And Starlink is the network of satellites that allows people to essentially make
an internet connection, even when they are not near the infrastructure that usually allows that
to happen here on firm Earth. Yeah, it's satellite internet. Rick,
how about you? What's your indelible memory of SpaceX? Yeah, again, you think of the spaceship
because that's what we see in the news. But Starlink is up to eight plus million subscribers
now. It was just like a million just a few years ago. So it's a fast-growing global telecom
platform. So that's definitely a viable part of the story. The whole space part of it, yeah,
there's payload to take up there. But frankly, I'm not 100% sold on the whole throwing AI data
centers up into space or colonizing Mars when there's no beachfront property, Tim. Tim, there's
no beachfront property on Mars. I think you need to know that right from the get-go. So my travel
agent lied to me. But yeah, it is a very wide, varied company with a lot of optionality,
surprisingly enough. But it's not just this one-dimensional company. We launch spaceships
into skies, and that's it. Let's talk a little bit more about what this is. The closest comparable
from a public market perspective, I think, would probably be Rocket Lab. Rocket Lab,
is ticker RKLB, is a much smaller company at a market cap of just about $30.3 billion. As of
this recording, SpaceX wants to go public, if Bloomberg is to be believed, at a market cap of
$1.5 trillion, trillion with a T. That would be the biggest of all time, raising somewhere over
$30 billion. There are three pieces to this business. And the most interesting one to me,
you both mentioned the rocket launches. So they do launches for NASA, for example. They do a lot
of payloads. They get satellites up into space. They get paid for that. They get paid for Starlink,
satellite, internet. But the thing that's most interesting to me, and I'm going to have a
follow-up question about this for each of you, is this idea of the spaceship. The spaceship
which is you go up, you launch, and then you come back down and you land and you have a reusable
rocket. That is not something we have had in rocket science ever. Like everybody's working
on this. SpaceX is working on this. Um, we hope that, you know, at least a couple blue origin is
a competitor. That's also working on this, but presumably SpaceX thinks they can do this,
that they can take down. I'm just looking at a number here, which I found somewhat remarkable
that the payload launch cost is somewhere around, I believe it is $1,500. Yeah, here it is.
I said spaceship. It's starship. I got that wrong. Apologies. $1,500 per kilogram for payload.
if you have a reusable rocket, if you have a reusable Starship, they believe they could get
that down to less than $100 per kilogram. That's insane. That's some serious economic power here.
So given that, Rick, I'll start with you. SpaceX, this is a big IPO, but is it a rule breaker?
If it can achieve that, of course. I mean, the whole Starship, formerly known as Jefferson
Airplane, if Starship can actually get this to happen, obviously, the cost dynamics of everything
and the fact that everything's reusable, it's a game changer, of course. But again,
saying you want to get there and being able to actually prove you can do it are two different
things. But yeah, definitely, it would be a game changer. And it's how quickly can the competition
and catch up. Not that there are that many competitors doing this anyway, but yeah, I'm
still skeptical, but definitely an interesting wrinkle. And again, you know, turning this
ceiling into, you know, a retractable roof sometimes. Right, right. Carl, let me give you
some numbers and then the same question. So this is, I pulled these numbers, bear in mind,
this came from Gemini, so let's not call it perfect. These are estimates, but the sourcing
that Gemini gives me is that in 2020, SpaceX had $1.4 billion in revenue and net loss and a private
market valuation of $44 billion. As of this year, the estimate is for $15.5 billion. So five years
later, $1.4 billion to $15.5 billion, positive cash flow, and an $800 billion private market
valuation. So they want to go public at about double that private market valuation. So same
thing now. Presuming that scale is roughly right, is SpaceX a rule breaker?
SpaceX is sort of synonymous with breaking the rules. I mean, the idea of a reusable rocket is
a massively rule-breaking idea. It's obviously disrupted its industry. I don't think we're
really going back in the foreseeable future to government-funded, completely government-sponsored
space program. In that sense, it's absolutely a rule breaker. That does not mean I'm necessarily
interested in the IPO. You mentioned $15 billion in revenue. A $1.5 trillion valuation on IPO would
mean that they're trading at 100 times sales. I don't think that there's anything remotely in
a company as it exists today that justifies that. I don't even think that if you take the current
trends and project them forward linearly, it justifies that. To justify that, you need to see
a meaningful acceleration of a number of trends, which means that you need to be betting that
things that have not happened are going to happen, and they become increasingly riskier.
I mean, the, the, the one big thing is that Starship needs to work and Starship is the
fully reusable rocket, right?
So, so yeah, Falcon nine, um, which is, you know, commercially used, uh, is partially
reusable.
Uh, Starship is supposed to be entirely reusable.
And if that happens, it's a game.
I mean, the, the, the two things about Starship is, you know, one, it's entirely reusable
and two, it's absolutely massive, can carry a huge payload.
and critically, can carry satellites into space that currently cannot be carried by Falcon 9.
So, that becomes a game changer for the company. And can SpaceX do that? You know, I believe they
can. I mean, this isn't just on paper. This is actually being tested. I mean, it's not sort of
fully ready for primetime, but they've had some successful tests with Starship. And so, I believe
they can get to that part of it in all likelihood. And that itself is kind of a game changer.
The second part, though, really involves taking Starlink to a new level that I have some doubts
about, and we can talk about that further, Tim. Maybe you can talk about this in your answer,
because the final question on this, and I'll give you a lead-up to this, Rick.
Carl said 100 times sales. Now, that would be 100 times 2025 sales, but the projected revenue for
2026. The target date for the SpaceX IPO would be like summer 2026. And the implied revenue growth
from what I'm seeing here, again, these are Gemini estimates pulled from different sources,
between $22 and $23 billion in annualized revenue, so about 65x forward sales.
So there's your multiple. We've talked about the business. Are you a buyer?
of the SpaceX IPO, Rick. And this multiple is just for Starlink? Or you're talking about
Starlink and everything else that's there? No, that is all of SpaceX.
Yeah, all of SpaceX. So, yeah, I mean, I'm hesitant to say yes. Add a $1.5 trillion valuation.
Because paying 65 times for a global telecom company is not something very smart. But again,
it's all these unknown variables, again, that the story will change over time. And we see this even
with Tesla company. The stock has pretty much doubled since April. But if you bought it a year
earlier, you're not doing so well. So I think it's a matter of finding the right spot to get into
SpaceX. There's going to be a lot of hype when the IPO happens. But out of the gate, knowing that
there'll probably be an IPO pop and take it even higher, at least temporarily, I'm not into chasing
that kind of rocket. Yeah, I agree with that, too. And I will say, just to take a populist
bent here for a moment. The question of will you buy the IPO is largely an irrelevant one for us.
You can't really buy the IPO in all likelihood. You can buy the post-pop IPO. I would say for
most people, it probably makes sense to just sit back and see what happens for a while.
It could continue to go straight up, but I would suspect that there would be a better
opportunity if you're interested in the company. I think if you want an opportunity in this,
And again, not that this is, but I mean, again, so 10 years ago, Google, Alphabet, through
Google Ventures, paid $900 million, got a 7% stake, a little more than a 7% stake in
SpaceX.
If it is a $1.5 trillion company, this is basically a 100-plus bagger, 120-bagger,
$110 billion stake that Alphabet will have in SpaceX.
Not going to move a lot, need a lot in Malfoy's massive world, but at least that's a safer
way to potentially play SpaceX.
so rick with the reckless prediction here your other bets line item in the next alphabet
earnings call is gonna look a lot better yeah i think i'm with you guys but we want to know
what you think let us know leave a comment are you buying the spacex ipo up next we are going
to answer some mindset questions you're listening to motley fool money the 2026 chevrolet trax is
the stylish suv for those on the move and with the standard chevy safety assist package you have
the backup to handle every turn with confidence the 2026 tracks start your build at chevrolet.ca
all right fools welcome back tim byers with carl teal and rick munarez and we're going to talk
mindset uh thank you so much for answering the call for mindset questions as a reminder this
occasional segment will be aimed at helping you master the most important skill in investing,
keeping the discipline to get in the market and stay in the market for the long term.
So we've got a question from Mark. I hope I'm pronouncing your last name correctly here.
I'm going to say Mark Degner, but Mark is asking, Rick, what's the harm in sprinkling a few dollars
on FOMO stocks as long as it's done with funds I'm not relying on to fund my retirement?
and can afford to lose in the worst case. What's the difference between FOMO? For those who don't
know what that is, FOMO is fear of missing out. So fear of missing out investing and seeking a
bright future for a company whose stock is gaining momentum. So Rick, what advice do you have for
Mark? I want to say that again, at Rule Breakers, we tend to swing for the fences. So FOMO, I know
it almost seems like a demeaning thing, but it's not necessarily a bad thing. Fear of missing
out. But the caveat here is fear of missing out is one thing. Oh, I want to buy this because I
want to keep up with the Joneses. I see something shiny. I have to chase that before it gets away
from me. That's bad. But to me, FOMO, what it really needs is FOHO, which is fear of homework
omission. So if you're going to just buy FOMO without doing your due diligence, that's where
you get messed up. So FOMO without FOHO is a no-no in my book. But FOMO, as in finding an
exciting stock and you want that to be part of your portfolio, I do not have a problem with that,
especially with a small part of your portfolio. Swing for the fences just next time you're up
to plate. Maybe try to be a contact hitter to balance things out. I like this. FOMO without
FOHO is a no-no. Carl, what do you got for Mark here? I guess not saying anything radically
different than Rick, but just calling it a FOMO stock implies that you are buying it for no reason
other than that you are chasing momentum and you're fearful. And the same stock might actually
be a good investment if you have a thesis that you're watching play out. So basically the same
thing Rick is saying, have a reason that you're buying it. And then I don't think there's anything
wrong with that. Yeah. I mean, the main issue here, Mark, is if you are interested in a stock,
What you want to know is what you want to see so that you can follow the stock accordingly.
If you go in like, I don't know, this thing could be amazing. I have no idea what I'm getting into.
That's probably suboptimal. But if you have an idea of what it is you think you're going to see,
so then you can measure it and follow it and be a curious investor, then I think you might
be rewarded keep sending in your mindset questions i am at t buyers at fool.com so that's t-b-e-y-e-r-s
at fool.com and you could be featured in a mindset question on a future show up next we're going to
preview tuesday's show with emily flippin you're listening to motley fool money all right welcome
back fools for tuesday emily flippin has jason hall and san mateo so you are going to want to
be sure to tune in as we start putting the wraps on not only another earnings season, but also
another year. How did 2025 treat your portfolio? Let's just go around the horn on that. I feel
like I did okay. Rick, how has 2025 treated your portfolio so far? A lot better than I thought it
would be in early April of this year. So, yes, I'm pleasantly surprised with how my portfolio went up
on a year I was braced for the worst. So, yes, well done. Well done, portfolio. Well done,
markets. Yeah. Carl, how about you? It's been a pretty good year overall. I own a lot of biotech
stocks in number, not necessarily a huge part of my portfolio. They're not, but I do own a fair
number of them. It's been a banner year for biotech. That's been helpful. Yeah. I like the
way you do this, by the way, just as a pro tip on our way out here. Carl does, I think, what I like
to do. Like I own a lot of tech, but I like to buy really small and then build positions up over
time. So I don't think you're like overwhelmingly over-indexed on tiny speculative biotech. And I
neither am like not over-indexed at all on tiny speculative tech, but I do have a fair amount of
it. Fools, thank you for tuning in to Motley Fool Money. We hope you're getting ready for a fantastic
holiday break. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about,
and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based
solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards
and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational
purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes.
fools this is a uh we're getting down to the last few shows here so thank you for tuning in
our engineer today was annie pope our producer is anand chakbalu thanks very much to our guests
carl teal and rick minares i am your host tim byers stay tuned for emily flippen jason hall
and sammy deo tomorrow full on everyone see you soon
Thank you.
