Motley Fool Money - A Stock To Spice Things Up
Episode Date: February 13, 2024Love can be stubborn and so can inflation. (00:21) Ricky Mulvey and Nick Sciple discuss: - Wall Street’s reaction to the latest inflation print. - Shopify acting like a growth stock. - A new partne...rship for Tiger Woods. Plus, (15:20) Jason Moser and Bill Mann join Alison Southwick and Robert Brokamp to share some Valentine’s Day themed stories about stocks. Stocks discussed: SHOP, GOLF, NKE, CSCO, COST, MKC Get Exclusive NordVPN deal here: www.nordvpn.com/motleyfool It’s risk- free with Nord’s 30-day money back guarantee. Host: Ricky Mulvey Guests: Nick Sciple, Alison Southwick, Robert Brokamp, Bill Mann, Jason Moser Engineers: Dan Boyd, Rick Engdahl Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This episode is brought to you by Indeed.
Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate.
Instead, use Indeed sponsored jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast.
It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate C.
According to Indeed data, sponsor jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs.
So go build your dream team today with Indeed.
Get a $75 sponsor job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.
Terms and conditions apply.
If you need to look at your investments today, yeah, check the one-year chart too.
You're listening to Motley Fool Money.
I'm Ricky Mulvey, joined today by Nick Seiple. Nick, good to see you.
Great to be back here with you, Ricky.
I mean, on Marty Grau as a Mobile Alabama native, the home of Marty Graha in the U.S.
It's a great day for me, and I'm excited to be here with you.
Happy Marty Grau.
Not so happy day for the stock market.
Got an inflation report that it wasn't too, not celebrating quite like they are down in Mobile, Alabama.
and in Louisiana.
Market appears to be taking a breather as the CPI print came out to three, and we got to use
decimals here.
I'm sorry, 3.1% on the year.
The economists wanted 2.9%.
This is a rounding error, Nick.
I mean, is this really a bad report, or is this an excuse to sell?
Maybe both, I guess.
I would answer your question, yes.
Not either or, just yes.
It's a bad report, just in the sense that came in worse than expectations for some market
participants out there. That is a reason to sell. As we all talk about or know, valuations reflect
expectations about the future. The higher those expectations are, the more the market is going to
react when reality fails to mash those. Fulish investors are probably familiar with what happens
when companies report earnings and businesses put out results that are different than the market expects.
We'll talk about an earnings report here in a little bit. Macro also responds to expectations.
In this case, we've seen the market coming in today was up over 5% year to date, in part.
That was driven by expectations that the Fed might be getting ready to cut.
interest rates following today's inflation report, market expectations for a Fed rate cut in March
have fallen down to below 10 percent a month ago. Those expectations were discounting a 70 percent
chance of a rate cut. So that change in expectations, how it affects valuation models really
is what's driving the selling today. I mean, the Fed's not just looking at a 0.2 percent miss.
It's looking for the long-term trends, and that still appears to be good on inflation. I don't
know it always seems like those equity analysts are a little quick on the trigger to me let's look inside
the report there is some good news for people who buy stuff because inflation overall is slowing down
you've got used vehicle prices down about three and a half percent overall grocery prices down
about the same amount apparel down about a little less than a percent the bad news it's always
mixed you got shelter prices up on the month six percent year over year i mean it doesn't look like
a huge deal to me. I saw a headline in the New York Times that said, stock sink is stubborn
inflation resets Fed forecasts. This is alarmist, Nick. You know, it could be if you want to look
on the bright side, the rate of the change is slowing down. We still have inflation coming in at
3.1%. That's slower than what we saw in December at 3.4%. So we're slowly but surely ticking down
toward that 2% target that the Fed goes after. However, I do think, you know, this stickiness
of inflation, this sticking around for longer than the market expects, shows that inflation
is stickier than the market had expected. And I think historically, expectations about inflation
are real drivers of inflation. It could mean that, you know, market expectations maybe have stuck
in. I will say, looking at that shelter price inflation number, we still remain in a market where
real estate is scarce. You see that in the valuations, a
Companies out there in the market, limited resale inventory leads brokers really having a tough
time, but folks selling new homes are at all-time highs and really sitting pretty.
And I think that's part of what we're seeing in that shelter inflation number.
Maybe a reason to look at some home builders.
Let's move to the Shopify earnings.
What a tough day to release earnings that miss a couple of expectations for a growth stock.
The earnings in the stock, though, telling two very different stories.
Usually you hear about, you know, a company beats earnings, but then they, if you're
you softer guidance. So the stock falls. That's the PayPal story from about a week ago.
This time, we've got an earnings beat. We've got a swing to operating profitability. How about
that year for a year of efficiency? Guiding for 20% revenue growth. That's in line with Wall Street
expectations. And the stock is down more than 10% this morning. What's the street so fussy about?
Yeah. So again, it comes down to expectations. As you mentioned, revenue growth,
guidance strong. However, operating expenses are going to come in a little bit heavier.
than the market was anticipating.
As you said, you know, look at this fourth quarter, this quarter just completed.
Really strong performance, hard to argue with any of those numbers.
Revenue up 30% when you exclude the divestment of the logistics business, you know, in 2023.
It was the largest revenue quarter in the company's history.
Gross profit delivered another company record up 33%.
Free cash flow margin at 21%.
Shop pay doing very well.
Gross merchandise volume up 32% year over year.
Now it used on 60% of transactions on the platform.
even offline the company is doing very well. Offline gross merchandise value up over 20% year every year.
So looking backwards, numbers great everywhere. Looking forwards, again, if you look at the revenue number,
great. You cited that 20% revenue growth number. If you exclude the logistics business, again,
which has been divested. You're looking more like a 25% plus revenue growth rate, which is pretty good.
Gross margin expected to expand. That's good. But again, as I mentioned, operating expenses is where
the problem shows up. Guidance calls for a low teens increase in operating.
operating expenses. If you trickle that forecast down, you're looking at an operating income
number somewhere in the $170-plus million versus expectations. We're in the $380-plus
million dollars for analysts out there in the market. You're also seeing free cash flow
margin expected to fall meaningfully down to a high single-digit percentage of revenue
from over 20 percent we just saw in the most recent quarter. It is interesting, though,
driving into those increases in operating expenses. Management said there's two things behind
that increase. One is employee costs, so the company is citing payroll taxes that they're going
to have to manage in the next coming quarter, as well as employee compensation increases. Although
you're not going to increase headcount, folks do have some of these raises that kick in at the
start of the year. But the other one is a little bit more interesting, which is marketing expenses.
The company says it's going to push harder on performance marketing claims to have improved its
performance marketing. Performance saying, quote, it's unlocked some opportunities to reach potential customers at highly attractive
lifetime value to customer acquisition costs and payback periods, including reducing payback,
but over 30 percent through the use of AI and automation.
So, really, they're saying our marketing is performing better than expected.
We think we can get better results than we've seen in the past.
We're going to push even harder on spending.
If they're right, this increased spending today will result in significant returns in the future.
So we shouldn't be upset about this increased operating expenses, but that really time will tell
whether those results pan out.
So just going back to kind of sum it all up, good results,
this most previous quarter. However, the company is spending more than expected, which has
folks selling the stock. But if those investments prove out, this might be a buying opportunity
for long-term investors. So you're telling me a growth company is acting like a growth company?
I guess so. You know, founder-led company willing to invest where they see opportunities out there
in the markets and, you know, willing to take the short-term lumps to make that happen. We'll see
whether those investments pay out. But management has said, we think that there's opportunities here
and we're going to go after them.
Let's take a look at some of the strategy highlights for management.
You tell me, if any, are worth investors' attention.
One is that it's going more into the B-to-B commerce space,
signing a deal with Carrier.
They do some HVAC systems, introducing a ship to store from the shop,
I haven't said Spotify, Shopify point of sale,
which allows brick and mortar locations to ship online orders.
A little bit of a departure from owning warehouses with Flexport.
You've also got, speaking of marketing, Mr. Beast promoting the Shopify app, putting out a video that was by 40 million views larger than the biggest audience for the Super Bowl this year.
You've also got some AI co-pilots. We've got to have AI in there, Nick. You've got AI co-pilots, photo editing tools, that kind of thing.
Any of these strategic initiatives worth investors' attention?
Well, the Mr. Beast one stood out to me just because it dovetails with that management and commentary around.
expanded performance marketing, spend ways to reach more potential customers at
attractive prices that this Shopify Mr. Beast video has over 165 million
views help drive a spike in downloads for the shop app. This collaboration
comes after the company did another collaboration with Drake last year, which
presumably must have had some good results to see continued spending. It
could be that the expanded marketing spend the company is talking about what
means we'll see even more of these partnerships to try to juice growth in the
business. And if they're seeing good results and the numbers they're talking about,
that's good spending.
Let's talk about the price for a second.
In 2021, Shopify traded at a 60x-60 revenue multiple.
Now it's at 15x.
I say this firmly with my tongue in cheek.
Are you ready to call this a value stock?
I don't know about a value stock, Ricky, but definitely more in line with where the company
has historically traded, really saw a massive multiple expansion in 2020 and 2021.
That said, multiple has expanded a bit from where we saw.
the company this time last year. I'd just say it's not a value stock. It's a rule breaker.
This is a company that's always traded over 10x sales has always look expensive when you just
look at the trailing numbers, but it's also a business that is undoubtedly the top dog in its
industry, and that continues to expand its market every year. You talk about business to business
sales. I talked about the offline business growing at a 28% rate. This is not just a company
that's captured its market, but is growing, creating new markets year after year.
And I think that's the type of company that can continue to beat the market's expectations.
even when they're very high.
And if they can keep doing that, then its best days are still ahead of it.
Let's talk about a big deal in the golf community, which I know you're following.
So earlier this year, Tiger Woods left Nike.
Now he's got a new brand with Taylor Made golf equipment.
It's called Sunday Red.
Woods is getting his own headquarters, designers, and staffing.
Looks like it's functioning as its own kind of business.
Taylor Made Management confirmed that Sunday Red is planning to launch a golf shoe early next year,
if not sooner. So you told me this was a big deal and really interesting. Why is it? Why is this a big deal?
Sure. Well, obviously, anytime you hear the name, Tiger Woods and golf, it's a big deal. He's the Michael
Jordan of the sport with this Sunday red brand getting built out sounds kind of like the Jordan brand for golf,
which maybe Nike took a crack at doing over the past 27 years, but wasn't able to have the success
that they hope to have. Clearly, it's why they've kind of reduced investment.
in the business. Woods has had a relationship with Taylor Made going back to 2017. That's when
Nike exited the club's business. So this expands Tiger's relationship with Taylor Made into
the apparel area that he had retained the apparel relationship with Nike even after going
to another club manufacturer. But this movement into not just an apparel relationship, but
Taylor made now going to launch a golf shoe as part of this Sunday red brand early next year. If not sooner,
This is a segment that Taylor Made currently doesn't operate in.
If you go to the golf shoe segment of Taylor Made's website, you see like two flip-flops
and one like old out-of-date kind of women's golf shoe from an old collaboration.
So this is really breaking into a meaningful segment of the golf apparel market that Taylor
Made is not traditionally operated in.
I follow a company.
We've talked about here on the podcast, I guess, around this time.
Last year, Cushnet Holdings, Ticker is Golf.
They're really the top dog in this segment with their footjoy brand.
That's one that Tiger had been wearing on tour since kind of separating from the Nike apparel relationship.
You've seen that stock down about 5% this morning.
Concern about, well, with this new brand entering into the market, could that change competitive dynamics in the space?
For my part, I'd like to see the Sunday Red brand prove it first.
Nike really made lots of efforts to break into the golf business and had some issues.
Dedicated golfers tend to stick to the products they like.
They're a pretty particular bunch.
And while dedicated golfers, this group is only about 15% of players.
They spend about 70% of the dollars in the sport.
That's an area where Footjoy already has some really strong relationships.
Unlikely to dislodge those established relationships.
However, for new and beginning golfers, really, this is an opportunity to capture them or
to shift golfers away from some other brands.
One other thing worth mentioning, Taylor-Make.
made an investment in Popstroke, which is a kind of a top golf, but a putt, putt,
a version of that is an area that Tiger's also invested in. You could see some
synergies with the Sunday Red brand and that investment in the way that Topgolf tries
to push Callaway products and Travis Matthew products. You could see this pop stroke
retail location being used as a way to try to push the Sunday Red brand.
If you were in the Taylor Made boardroom, is this a deal you would have gone after?
I mean, Tiger is so, I would say, is still very, is synonymous with Nike.
And now you have the tailor made and their owners, which is the hilariously titled private equity firm,
Centroid investment partners, credit where credit is due to their creativity.
You know, Tiger's got some risks.
He's on the tail end of his career.
And it's going to be really expensive to get him to wear your shoes.
Is this, you know, is this going to be worth the money?
Well, we'll see.
I certainly would have kicked the tires on it if I was, again,
Centroid, if I was tailor-made, Tiger is the most influential, famous golfer in the business,
is going to be the one who's most likely to move the needle for you. It all depends on the price.
There are some real risk, though. You mentioned Tiger being at the end of his career. Folks
might not remember three years ago, really seriously injured himself in a car accident.
You know, could have ended his career there. It's had some issues in the past, you know, with
operating a motor vehicle. So not only the career coming to an end, you know, there are some
risks that some unexpected things could happen with Tiger. But I think, you know,
You know, private equity managed business, looking to make a big splash.
Maybe this company would like to go public at some point in the future.
All these types of the tiger relationship would be helpful for that.
Let's just say that.
So, you know, there's risk to the deal, but I think it's the type of thing that you kind of have to go after if it's presented to you.
Nick Seiple.
I'm glad you're not at Centroid Investment Partners.
I'm glad you're right here at the Motley Fool.
As always, appreciate your time and your insight.
Yeah, happy to be here with you, Ricky.
all about quality over quantity, especially in my closet. If it's not well-made and versatile,
it's just not worth it. That's honestly what I love Quince. The fabrics feel elevated,
the cuts are thoughtful, and the pricing actually makes sense. Quince makes high-quality wardrobe
staples using premium fabrics like 100% European linen, silk and organic cotton poplin. They work directly
with safe ethical factories and cut off the middlemen so you aren't paying for brand markups
or fancy stores, just quality clothing. Everything they make is built to hold up season after season and is
consistently rated 4.5 to 5 stars by thousands of real people like me who wear their clothes every day.
The Quince, Mongolian Kashmir Kru Neck sweater may be the most comfortable one that I own.
It's light, soft, and it was a lot more affordable than you think quality Kashmir would be.
Stop waiting to build the wardrobe you actually want.
Right now, go to Quince.com slash Motley for free shipping and 365-day returns.
That's a full year to wear it and love it.
And you will.
Now available in Canada, too.
Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last.
Q-I-N-C-E.com slash Motley for free shipping and 365-day returns.
Quince.com slash Motley.
What was your first love?
I'm talking about stocks, of course.
Allison Southwick, Robert Brokamp, Jason Moser, and Bill Mann caught up for some stock-themed Valentine's Day stories.
Valentine's Day is tomorrow.
Maybe you're planning to spend it with loved ones.
Maybe you're planning to scrunch up your face and say it's a stupid made-up holiday designed to sell chocolates and greeting cards.
Or maybe like us, you're going to pour yourself a glass.
of something, sit back and reminisce about the big loves of your life. The ones that got away,
the ones that broke your heart, but stocks. So Bill Mann and Jason Moser are analysts here at
The Motley Fool, and they are joining us today in studio to share some of their big loves
and losses in their investing in life. Hi, guys. Thanks for joining us.
I have a question. Here we go. We're already going off the radio. Didn't even say hi.
I have a question. I'm just so happy to be here. That's not a question.
I know.
Okay.
So today is Mardi Gras, and tomorrow is Valentine's Day, which means tomorrow is Ash Wednesday
and Valentine's Day at the same time.
What do our friends in Mobile and New Orleans do?
Which is more important.
Well, for some people, it's a day of fasting, so that does not make for a very romantic
Valentine's meal.
This is my point.
Sorry, I was thinking about that earlier, and I thought that I would bring it to the Grand
counsel. Thank you. I have no answers for you, but I'm sure someone in our audience does. All right,
no more questions, except the ones coming from me. Are you ready?
Yes, ma'am.
All right, here we go. First thing I want to know about is your first love, by which we mean
the first stock you ever bought. Jason, tell us about that first love.
Oh, the first love, the one that I bought first. So the first stock I ever bought, let me think
about this for a minute. Bill Mann, why don't you go first? He didn't do his heart. He didn't do
So my first love was impetuous. It was irresponsible. It was a little company called Midcom that I thought was going to go to the moon. And it went to the moon in a very aggressive way. And what did they do? What did they do?
They should not have done this metaphor of love in dating her stocks.
They lost money is what they did mainly. They were super good at it. The second,
I learned from the first, and the second was Berkshire Hathaway.
Okay.
All right.
That worked out.
That was a good rebound.
That was a good rebound.
So I think this is interesting because the first stock I personally bought, it's not the first stock I ever own because I got gifts from my father along the way.
The first one I ever purchased on my own was Cisco.
The Forks and Knives Company?
No, no, no.
I'm saying it was the tech company, Cisco.
And it was back in 2000-ish.
So you can do the math.
It wasn't really an opportune time to be.
purchasing. But everyone was talking about it. You turned on CNBC and it was like, Cisco,
Cisco, Cisco. That was the first one I ever purchased on my own. And I did that with the
assistance of my, at the time, Edward Jones account representative, when my dad had opened up that
brokerage account. So he introduced you guys. He introduced us. He facilitated the relationship.
He was the matchmaker. Little did you know that he was actually talking about the Forks and Knives
company? And you just didn't pay attention. And do you still own it?
I do not.
Because I think it's still down from that.
I don't think it has ever recovered its price from then.
That's a long-term buy and hold and cry.
And we will come back to this one a little bit later.
Oh, will we?
Okay, a little foreshadowing.
All right.
Our next question is, what's your number by which we mean?
How many stocks do you own today?
My number is complicated.
It's complicated.
He's giving a status update here.
I'll give you a status. It's complicated. Well, I mean, because they're the stocks that you own for your kids and so things of that nature.
But my number, my number is 26. Really?
Which I understand to be more than some and fewer than most.
I mean, it feels a little low, but I mean, I know you're an upstanding guy and a good investor.
So I think those are going to be quality 26, right?
I will tell.
20 of them are good, six I'm angry at.
Yeah, and I've owned most of them for a very long time.
How long is a very long time?
Well, Berkshire Hathaway was the second stock that I bought, and I still own it.
So that's more the case than not the case for me.
All right, Jason, what's your number?
Yeah, my number right now, it's 35 different publicly traded companies.
Now, I will say I own stock in the Motley Fool because we are fortunate enough to be able
to do that.
So 36 technically, but that's not really true, because most people don't have that opportunity
to own shares in such a wonderful business as ours.
So, 35, and I kind of like, Bill, I've always felt like that number could be lower,
but as I get older, I kind of default to not selling, right?
I just, if it's not working, it's not working.
I still want to give it a chance, but it's not something I'm adding to, right?
So the number does seem to kind of grow a little bit as I get older as well, so 35.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I feel like our listeners would be surprised to know that you guys are,
that's how many stocks you own.
Because you work at a company that recommends buying stocks, I would think that you would
just be constantly like adding, adding, adding.
But I don't know.
Well, that'd be nice if we could, but I think it's also always worth remembering that
we have internal trading guidelines here that make it a little bit more difficult for us
to just be able to buy and sell whenever we want, right?
So because we're in the business of offering advice and writing about those companies, we have those
internal guidelines that just make it a little bit more difficult for us to be able to transact
like our members can.
Allison, let me tell you a love story.
I want to hear it.
That's why we're here.
This is how this works.
Yes, we do recommend companies all the time.
But I find it's the ones that you know for a really long time that sometimes turn out to
be better opportunities than the brand new thing, which you don't know as well.
It's just shiny and beautiful, and you have not figured out it's false just yet.
Yeah.
Fools gold.
Fools gold.
Yeah.
Dota curiosity, are those the only investments you own, or do you also complement that with mutual funds,
index funds, anything like that?
I do not.
Well, I guess I actually do own a little bit in an S&P index fund, but that tends to be
kind of a vehicle.
It's, other than that, real estate, I think, you know, and that's kind of where it draws.
No crypto, no gold for me, just, you know.
I've got the usual, you know, Panamanian farmland and allibdenum and things like that.
I've got some funds.
On a podium.
Yeah.
Those sorts of things.
All right.
Our next question is, what's the one stock that you've married?
By which we mean a stock that you never see yourself selling out of entirely?
Well, I'm sure everybody would be just absolutely flabbergasted to hear that I'm going with McCormack.
But so I will.
It's just such an easy answer for me because it's a stock that I've been.
for a long time. It's one that I've continued to add to. As I get older, it fits only more and
more into my retirement strategy with dividends. Dividend aristocrat. I assume that at some point
here, it will be a dividend king. I will cook as long as my body and mind allow, which means
that my kitchen will always be just stocked with McCormick spices and flavors and whatnot.
Jason Moser, by a number of hours, how long has it been since you've consumed something that McCormick makes?
Well, I mean, I had dinner last night.
That's not a number, but okay.
I'm not so good with math, Bill.
All right, Bill. How about you? Which stock have you married?
Jason, can you guess mine? I could have guessed.
Imagine Berkshire Hathaway or Costco.
Thank you.
Costco.
Costco, a couple weeks, I went in, my wife and I went in to get one item, and we came out with 29.
Yeah, yeah.
And it's just the two of us now, so this isn't, you know, we're not buying useful things for kids running around.
We just came out with 29 items.
And I think about that a lot.
But they were well-priced and take up a lot of space.
These both are true.
All right.
So this week, because Valentine's Day is tomorrow, we're talking about.
love. And so our last question for today is, who taught you the most about love? And I'm looking
for a stock that taught you your most valuable investing lesson.
And it all comes full circle because I go back to Cisco.
Okay. Let's hear this tale of love.
I wrote about this years back when I first got here, your biggest investing mistakes, right?
One of my biggest investing mistakes was ultimately investing in something that I didn't even know. I didn't understand. I didn't.
I did what this representative told me to do, and I just took it at blind faith and just said,
okay, no, that sounds great.
And in hindsight, obviously, it didn't work out so well, right?
It was not the right thing to do.
So Cisco always stood out to me, and whenever I see that ticker, it's a reminder to me,
make sure you know what you're getting into, right?
And so I look at Cisco as one of those ones that always stands out.
Can I provide a Cisco-related lesson from someone else?
A fellow who used to be our tax expert on our discussion boards, Phil Marty, sadly passed away a few years ago.
But he talked about how he held on to Cisco through the dot-com days because he didn't want to pay the taxes on it.
Well, the market took care of that because it took care of all his gains.
So he didn't have to pay any taxes.
Fixed it.
Yes.
So the lesson there, of course, is if it's the time to sell something, don't let taxes deter you from what is the right move for your situation.
If it's time to break up with someone, right?
with this, we've got to, like, torture this metaphor.
Yeah.
This metaphor has gotten off too easy.
Mine is also a tale of woe, and it is basically this.
When someone tells you who they are, you should believe them.
The company is called Nuance Communications.
It was purchased a few years ago.
But it was a company that I bought and held forever because they had all of the licenses
and technology for voice recognition technology.
Back in the day when this was the shiny new thing
and you didn't expect your refrigerator to respond to you,
they owned, and to this day, their successor company owns all of it.
So they get paid, but their executive team made sure
that all of that money stayed within the building of nuanced communications,
and they paid themselves so much money that,
really nothing ever trickled down to shareholders.
And after a while, you just have to realize, and this is what I realize from this relationship,
that you have to understand that a management team that does not seem willing to pay down to shareholders,
you should believe them and move on.
Right?
I mean, you're putting so much into that relationship, and you got nothing out of it.
Nothing.
Nothing.
And they told us, they told me.
That's what was going to happen.
Personally, they told you personally, they're like, Bill, man, I'm sorry.
Listen, yeah, in the middle of the conference call, and Bill?
No, no.
You looked to me like I was serious.
I'm totally not serious.
No, they tell you in things like the proxy statement, and that's their love letter, and it was all about them.
Yeah, that's a good one.
All right, well, again, this week we're talking about love.
Next week, you're going to be coming back to talk more about loss.
We're going to talk about the stock that got away, the stock you should have dumped early,
the stock that really broke your heart. And that one time you cheated. Yeah, that's right, Jason.
I don't understand why you're looking at me.
Okay. You're the one that made the most guilty face. So maybe work on that.
Nervous tick.
All right. Thanks, guys. We'll see you next week.
Thanks.
As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about.
And the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against.
against. So don't buy or sell anything based solely on what you hear. I'm Ricky Mulvey.
Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.
