Motley Fool Money - All Roads Lead To Retail

Episode Date: August 18, 2017

It’s Retail-palooza! We dig into the latest results from Walmart, Target and Alibaba. Home Depot builds record profits, while Foot Locker and Dick’s Sporting Goods deliver minor league results. Plus, in the wake of the Chinese government cracking down on multi-level marketing firms we revisit our interview with Ted Braun, director of the Herbalife documentary "Betting On Zero." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you're a small business owner, you already know what it takes to keep everything moving. You're juggling customers, invoices, and about 100 decisions every day. Thankfully, taxes don't have to be one more thing on that list. With Intuit TurboTax, you can get your business taxes done for you with a full service expert. TurboTax matches you with your dedicated tax expert. Who knows your industry understands your business write-offs and gives you the personalized advice your business deserves. Upload your documents right in the app, hand everything off, and still feel like you're in the loop the whole way through. You can even get real-time updates on your expert's

progress right in the app, which makes it so much easier to stay on track. And you can get unlimited expert help at no extra cost, even on nights and weekends during tax season. Visit turbotax.com to get matched with an expert today, only available with TurboTax full service experts. This episode of Motley Fool Money is brought to you by 23andme.com. With 23 and Me's genetic service, you can learn what percentage of your DNA comes from places like Italy, Finland, East Asia, or Africa. Visit 23andme.com slash fool. That's the number two three, A.D.m.m.com slash fool. Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money. From Fool Global Headquarters, this is Muck.

It's the Motley Full Money Radio Show. I'm Chris Helen, joining me in studio this week from from Million Dollar Portfolio, Jason Moser, and from Total Income Ron Gross. Good to see you, gentlemen, as always. Hey, hey. It's not just earnings palozo. We've got Retail Palozo. We're also going to dip into the full mailbag. And as always, we'll give you the inside look at the stocks on our radar. But we start with the two biggest bricks and mortar retailers, Walmart and Target, both with second quarter reports, both putting up profits and revenue higher than expected. The stocks are basically flat. this week, Ron, but this is better news than what we are seeing from some of the smaller

general retailers. I think that's a good way to summarize it. I like both these reports. I think Walmart was a bit stronger than Target, and Walmart has been doing better than Target in general. Walmart's grocery business, not too shabby. Putting up some good numbers. Both companies beat expectations. Same star sales were positive and continuing a nice trend. E-commerce was strong for both companies. Walmart a bit stronger, up 60 percent, versus targets up 32 percent, but either way, you can't complain there. And both companies increased guidance. So they're expecting these trends to continue into the future. And the stocks are not that expensive. I mean, Walmart at 18 times and Target at 12 times, if you wanted to take a flyer on retail,

you could do worse than taking a flyer here, but I'm not recommending that necessarily. there's a lot of uphill battles to be fought still. I'm glad you brought up grocery because I think that's one thing that, I mean, Walmart particularly, I just don't think they get the credit. At least in the public eye, most people I speak with don't realize that really Walmart is the market share leader domestically, at least when it comes to grocery. So to me, I feel like, maybe we're to point, Rick, I feel like we're at peak Amazon, right?

I feel like every week we're always talking about Amazon, Amazon, and it's always, it's always what all boils back to Amazon and how are you going to be able to compete with Amazon. Let's not forget that Target and Walmart are good businesses with very big presences out there already. And they have a lot of what you need in the retail space, and that is retail space. It's just a matter of how you use it, right? They're getting with the program there and figuring out how to employ that big physical presence in a more efficient way in adopting e-commerce. And again, I think Amazon's purchase of Whole Foods, very indicative of the fact that they recognize grocery is such a big opportunity.

And we know that because, obviously, Walmart does so well with it today. So, yeah, I'm not saying I'd get out there and buy Walmart or Target shares today, but I don't know that I'd be shorting them either. I mean, I think these are two still very relevant businesses that have a meaningful presence and should remain relevant for some time. And competition, not only from Amazon, but the German discounters that we sometimes talk about and pronouncing correctly, I'm sure, Aldi and Lydell, are some concern to Walmart, I think, in particular, and they've got their eye on them because these discounters really,

you know, they're coming and guns blazing for market share. So don't count those guys out. I forget who we were talking about recently, but it was some retailer that was relatively late to the online sales game. And in their most recent quarter, their online sales were up only in the neighborhood of barely double digits, something like 12 percent, that sort of thing. And what we were talking about in that regard was, look, if you're new to the game, that's fine. You need to be putting up much bigger comps right out of the gate in terms of online sales. And to that point, as you mentioned, Ron, Walmart's online sales, I know that they're working off of a smaller base than others, but 60 percent plus, if they can do that for a couple

more quarters, then it becomes really interesting. I don't know if they can continue to put up those kinds of numbers. Jet.com, the inclusion of Jet.com is a big part of this. So I think that kind of starts to level off after a certain number of quarters. But still, if you need to buy this distribution channel rather than grow it organically, you need to be there. And you need to do it in a big way. And I think Walmart and Target are both doing a nice job. Let's go back to Target for a second, just because Brian Cornell had such a great first year as CEO. And it seems like at the point that Target decided they were going to sell their pharmacies to CVS health. And yes, they got that infusion of cash. But at the time, Cornell talked about how this is going to enable us,

we can focus better. He talked about clothing. And it just seems like they're not doing badly, but I really expect a little bit more out of Target once they got out of the pharmacy business. Well, I think it really goes to how difficult of a challenge it is for these businesses. I mean, it has been much easier for Amazon to pivot from e-commerce to physical retail versus physical retail going the other way. So for Walmart and Target, a lot of it is boiling down to not just growing out their e-commerce operations, but also figuring out ways to make acquisitions to bring more retail and e-commerce presence into their family. Sojet.com and Bonobos and all of that stuff. Those are probably necessary moves. It doesn't necessarily mean they'll be successful. But yeah, I think it just really targets challenges, just point to really how monumental task it is. And building on the acquisition theme that you just mentioned and Target in particular, they just acquired a company called Grand Junction, which is going to allow them to test same-day shipping in New York City and next day in Denver and Dallas. So keep an eye on that. But I agree with what you said. Easier for Amazon.

to go backwards, then maybe targets to move into Amazon's world. So keep an eye. Shares of Alibaba rising this week, the Chinese e-commerce giant posted first quarter profits of just north of $2 billion. We got a listener email from Reid Rimer who writes in previous episodes. There's always been a factor of be careful because these are Chinese stocks. But I'm curious how careful we need to be if hypothetically I own Amazon and Macado Libre, should I also own some Alibaba to have the world covered? If I own Google, should I also own Baidu? I'm just curious, as it seems like, these Chinese companies are competing against companies I could own, and I wouldn't mind winning in the long term. That's a great question.

Yeah, I like that. It's like having the world covered, right? That's like the Dr. Evil strategy. Just nothing wrong with that. And I love that perspective. And I think with the thinking there in Amazon, Mercado Libre, Right. Yep, Alibaba will give you a lot of share on that side of the world as well. I think that's a good way to look at it. Typically, when we talk about Chinese stocks, I mean, there are a lot of hurdles there that you have to deal with. I mean, they are just, we're never going to get that level of transparency that we're

able to get with companies here. And I think Alibaba in particular, I mean, if you look at its corporate structure, I mean, if it were a Facebook status update, it would be it's complicated. And that's basically it. That's all. You can't make heads or tails of it. You have to go into their knowing that you're just along for the ride. Now, with that said, Jack Ma, who is the chairman of the company, and obviously very driven,

making a lot of smart decisions, looking really to turn China more into an importer, and that's kind of part of the purpose of Alibaba, is to really open that Chinese market up to the rest of the world as well. I mean, I think if you're going to invest in Pure Plays, you need in China, you need to invest in the market leaders. Alibaba, Baidu, are two very good examples of business. is where I think you can have that exposure. Facebook of China is 10-7.

Yeah, and I think you need to keep it limited. I mean, I would make them smaller positions than probably companies that we hold over here, but I definitely like that global strategy. Shares of Alibaba, by the way, up more than 90 percent so far in 2017. My guy holding Cushnery, he hung on to his shares. He's feeling pretty good about that now. Let's move on to fashion and apparel. Shares of coach have been having a nice run this year until the company's fourth quarter

report came in with some disappointing guidance as well. And shares of the gap remaining flat for the year despite strong results out of the Old Navy brand, Ron. Yeah, Old Navy continues to be the strength there. Old Navy has increased same-store sales in seven of the past 10 quarters. Strength coming from there, a banana Republican gap, not so much. But I think the reports for both these companies actually were fine. Stocks selling off, you know, notwithstanding. Gaps definitely, they had some better than expected highlights in there. And I was pleased to see it.

And they did raise their full year guidance. So not too shabby. Coach, again, you were right. The guidance, not so much. But the quarter was really fine. It just wasn't just good enough for what investors were expecting. You do have a revenue up 6 percent, adjusted earnings up 13 percent. They recently acquired Kate Spade, which I think will be nice for them.

But the guidance just wasn't there. Yeah. on with Coach. I was looking through that release in the call, and I think it was a decent enough quarter, a decent enough year. But looking forward, I mean, if you look through that release, it's a great, great example of sort of needing to dig a little bit below the surface there, because they called for top line revenue growth of 30 percent, and you look back at you think, wow, 30 percent growth. That's terrific. But, okay, let's remember. There's Kate Spade. There is, what else? There's Stuart White's, I mean, that, all of that is representing that growth. When you

get down to the organic number there, they're calling for organic growth of low single digits. Now, maybe they're being conservative, and if they are, I applaud that, but the burden of proof is on these guys to actually show that these acquisitions are going to result in longer-term organic growth to help these businesses really make that leap into that lifestyle brand. It becomes such a strong global player. Again, to me, I think the burden of proof is on them. Maybe they pull it off. It's been a good year for them so far.

But, yeah, I don't know if this is a stock I really want to be hanging on to right now. I don't think it's your ideal kind of buy-to-hold company anymore. I think you have to really pay attention to valuation, and then you have to be ready to get out when the times are looking pretty good. I think that's fair. The specialty retail graveyard is littered with companies who have had success and then not and then tried to turn and maybe did it a little bit and then didn't go far enough. I mean, these stocks in a vacuum aren't cheap.

Coach it's 17 times, gap at only 11 times. But there's always a reason for that. And that's because of the uncertainty going forward. These are tough businesses with lots of competition. I wouldn't be diving in right now. If I did dive in, I might do a basket of these types of stocks rather than making a specific bet on one. But I'm not there yet.

Why do you think Gap isn't doing more to expand the old Navy presence? Because it really does seem like for a few years running, the brightest part of their business has been Old Navy. I mean, the lower priced edge of that market is not without competition. I mean, you've got your T.J. Maxes of the world who are kind of knocking the cover off the ball. And we see it with Old Navy, too. It's the strength of that company. But it is, without a doubt, a competitive segment of the marketplace. I think of your management, you see that you have a portfolio with brands like Gap and Banana Republic. I mean, you don't want to just turn yourself into a business that's so reliant on, one,

lower price point brand. I mean, if you're good management, then you still look at that as a valuable portfolio of brands and you think there's an opportunity there. Coming up, a few more retailers and a couple of stocks on our radar. Stay right here. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So no buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. Welcome back to Motley Full Money, Chris Hill here in studio with Jason Moser and Ron Gross. Brutal week for Sporee.

Sports retail, footlocker shares fell 30 percent on Friday after terrible second quarter results, and Dick's sporting goods down only, and I put that in air quotes, only 20 percent, on a second quarter report that wasn't as bad as foot lockers. But, Jason, that is probably damning with incredibly faint praise. No, it was just brutal on so many counts. Because after Nike had reported results, and we've seen what Under Armour's doing, these companies are investing very heavily in direct-to-consumer. And what that does is it really presents a serious problem for companies like Footlocker and Dick's sporting goods that sell a lot of Nike and Under Armour stuff. And so, I mean, the short term and the near term is very easy to see the challenges that

Nike and Under Armour face because they're a part of that sort of network. But longer term, I mean, consumers buy product, right? I mean, that's what drives these sales is product. And Under Armour and Nike are the ones responsible for a lot of that good product and those brands hold a lot of values. So, I mean, you look at Footlockers call. He said on the call, and I quote, when we were on the call in May, we certainly didn't see the business dropping off as rapidly as it did, end quote. So, I mean, it was not back. Boy, you don't want to hear that. No. I mean, that's really not that long ago, right? And so, I mean, this business fell off of a cliff

in short order. And really, it's not looking all that great going forward either. And with Dick's sporting goods on the call, they were talking about extensive consumer research, seeing that customers have told us they feel our prices are not competitive in today's environment. Well, the way you fix that is you cut prices, Chris. And anybody who's anybody knows that typically that's going to affect your profitability. And so when we look at these retail players, kind of like restaurants, I mean, when traffic is great and business is booming, I mean, it's a really nice business to be in because those stores can really witness a lot of operating leverage as you keep that traffic going through the stores. But,

It really switches to the other gear when traffic falls off a cliff, and we're starting to see with Dick's sporting goods. Topline challenges. Operating margins are getting squeezed. And really, it doesn't look like anything on the horizon is going to be there to fix it. So I don't know that I'd really want to be holding either one of these stocks for the next year at least. Agreed.

I think actually Dix was not as bad as Foot Locker. And in fact, Dix, the quarter in and of itself was actually not that bad at all. revenue and earnings were fine. The e-commerce sales for the quarter was up 19%. They had some good stuff going on here, but it's all about the future. And with stocks, let's face it, it's always all about the future. And having to be promotional, having to lower prices, having to increase marketing, in order to like just retain some semblance of market share is going to be a disaster to the bottom line. So in hindsight, last year when Sports Authority declared bankruptcy.

They were just getting ahead of the curve. I was just going to say, instead of looking at Foot Locker and Dixon thinking, oh, what a great opportunity for them. It may have been a warning sign. I think it was a very good warning sign. Home Depot's second quarter profit was a record $2.7 billion, and it just was not enough to keep shares of Home Depot from falling 5% this week. Help me out, Rod. They also raised guidance for the second time this year. This is one where I would ignore the stock, focus on the company and the results. Really strong. Same store sales up 6.6% in the U.S. The big four things we look at, all showed positive trends, and those are big ticket sales, average ticket, number of customer

transactions and sales per square foot, all trending really nicely. They raise their guidance. So as we say, firing on all cylinders for Home Depot, maybe folks are saying, you know, this can't last forever, interest rates aren't going to be low forever, housing sentiment isn't going to be this strong forever. This will ebb and flow, and this type of company will trade in cycles. But if you're a long-term buy and hold investor who can just, you know, withstand those cycles, I mean, this is one that you would be fine to having your portfolio from now until I can't, you know, pretty much forever. Yeah, I couldn't agree more.

I mean, I think Home Depot is sort of that anomaly in the retail space where you can look at it and say, you know what? That's a retail company I would buy and probably hold just indefinitely through thick and thin, because they just, they have a reason to perform in virtually every market. And I think Lowe's, we're going to see Lowe's earnings next week, probably see a lot of the same stuff. It's kind of like just a mini home depot. They're doing a lot of the same things. Very attractive space. About as Amazon resistant of a business we're going to find. All right. No Steve Reuters behind the glass this week, but we will get to the stocks on our

radar. Ron Gross, you're up first. What are you looking at this week? I got LCI Industries, ticker LCII, for those who might know this company. It used to be called Drew Industries. They recently changed their name at the end of 2016. They are a components manufacturer for original equipment manufacturers of RVs and to a lesser extent buses and trailers. They've been rolling up a very fragmented industry. They've bought almost 40 companies over the past 16 years. We've got some good trends. Retiring baby boomers, reasonable fuel prices, stable economy that should drive the expansion cycle for RVs. Significant growth potential overseas recently increased their dividend by 67%. Now has a 2% yield. I think this one looks

pretty good. Jason Moser? What are you looking at? Yeah, I'm going to stick with the retail theme. And next Wednesday, we'll see William Sonoma earnings, ticker is WSM. Decent business, they're doing well with e-commerce. The problem is they are not doing well with their traditional retail, and so it is a business that is really, I think, in a little bit of a

decline. Having gone through Wayfair's most recent results, I think that Wayfair has taken a lot of their business. I don't think these guys have any pricing power. Margins are getting squeezed. Topline challenges exist. Sounds very familiar. I don't think I want to be owning this stock today. I think it's going to get a lot cheaper, and I don't necessarily mean cheap in the good way.

All right. Jason Moser, Ron Gross. Thanks for being here. Thanks, Chris. This week, shares of Herbalife took a hit after the Chinese government pledged to eradicate multi-level marketing firms. Up next, we'll revisit our interview with Ted Braun, director of the Herbalife documentary, Betting on Zero. Stay right here. This is Motley Full Money. All right, before we get to the interview with Ted Braun, I want to say thanks to 23 and me.com. 23 and me.com is a genetic service that can help you discover where your DNA comes from around the

world. You can learn what percentage of your DNA comes from places like Italy, Finland, East Asia, Africa, and more. And with your 23 and Me reports, you can explore your connection to the world in a whole new way by traveling to the places that reflect your DNA. Visit 23andMe.com slash fool. That's the number 23, A.ND, N, N, and, What will be your DNA destination? And now, let's talk Herbalife. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Chris Hill. The biggest showdown on Wall Street over the past few years has been about Herbalife,

a company in the business of nutritional supplements. Herbalife has been called the best managed pyramid scheme in the history of the world by hedge fund manager Bill Ackman. And that battle between Ackman and Herbalife is the subject of the new documentary film, Betting on Zero. Joining me now from Los Angeles is the film's director Ted Brond. Ted, thanks so much for being here. Pleasure to be with you, Chris. Thanks for having me on. Your first documentary film was about genocide in Darfur. What got you interested in making a film about the battle between a hedge fund manager and a company like Herbalife?

I came back from Sudan, oddly enough. I'm curious about the place of money in American life. I was in a country where an entirely different set of values were operating people, were motivated by very deep desire for a functioning justice system, they were motivated by a desire for the international community. And all of that made me appreciate in a way I didn't quite fully understand how central money was to our sense of ourselves as Americans, to our way of resolving dispute class, and in many cases even our sense of self-worth. And that had just been kind of rattling around inside of me for a couple of years and Glenn Zipper, the producer of this film, approached a line on financing a film set in the world of American corporate, a host of different ideas

that we were considering two or three sentences about Bill Ackman and his fight with her. And that conflict, which pitted two against each other, seemed to have the makings for a good substantial feature documentary that would also allow me to explore this in place of the American dream. I want to get to Ackman in a second, but you've got people in this film who are involved in Herbalife. And Herbalife is, I mean, if you asked someone at Herbalife, tell me about the business, they would talk about nutrition and how this is a company all about helping people lead healthier lives. Watching your film, it is clear that largely, if not entirely, it is a company that is a multi-level marketing company. It is all about recruiting other people to sell herbal life products and the profits

flow up that way. And what blew me away was just the very, very personal stories that you tell here with people in big cities like Chicago, but also smaller towns in Oklahoma who get involved with herbal life and end up, in some cases, losing their life savings. Those are stories they counterbalance their financial dream. Making this film was meeting claims about what the company had promised it was holding out to them as alluring was. And so the film can take viewers on a... You mentioned the American Dream, and that's one of the things I was thinking about during

a scene in your film, and yours is a documentary film. And yet I was reminded of a scene in the movie The Big Short, where in the Big Short, the American Dream is represented by American housing. Everyone wants to own a home. And you have people in the big short who are selling homes to people who really have no business owning a home. They just don't have the financial means to do so. And in your case, in your film, it's Michael Johnson, the longtime CEO who stepped down as CEO last year. He's still chairman of the board. But video of him talking about how we're all about recruiting. This is an internal video where he's telling him we're all about recruiting.

You need to recruit people to sell our products no matter who they are. And I thought, well, gosh, that's kind of like the big short. Only it's recruit people to sell, even if they have no business being in the business of selling anything. Recruiting and its place in Herbalife's business was a central question that is central to a definition of a pyramid scheme. and whether Herbalife's profits are drawn principally from recruiting new members or from retail sales outside of the. The dramatic question, Ackman pressed throughout his long campaign against Herbalife, and one that ultimately the Federal Trade Commission in their settlement with Herbalife last summer, came down with a very clear verdict about, and the verdict was quite damning.

They found Herbalife in violation of federal law. They charged their life with four counts of false decept. And the centerpiece of the complaint was this issue of recruiting versus retail sales. And they found that the company recruiting people. And in that way, vindicated what Mr. Act. Bill Ackman, for those unfamiliar, is a billionaire hedge fund manager. And he gets involved because he sees a company stock that he thinks is ripe for shorting and gets involved.

It's first in kind of a small way with a small short and then increases his position. And it's interesting to watch this play out in your film because Ackman is so convinced he is right, which, and we talk about this on the show from time to time, it's one thing to buy shares of a company and bet on it to go higher. You almost need a stronger conviction and a stronger stomach to short a stock and bet on it to go down because you can be right in the long run, but in the short run, you can get crushed. And in the case of Bill Ackman, right out of the gate, he's looking very much correct, both in terms of his conviction and in terms of what's happening with the money, with the hundreds of millions of dollars that he has put

at stake on this short. And then it's not too long before he starts to lose in a very big way. When you were going through this process of making the film of following Bill Ackman, what did you observe about his temperament throughout the process as this begins to go very badly for him and for his investors? Markably steadfast and unwavering in his convictions. In the most challenging hours of this conflict, you know, stay the course. and that conviction and steadiness, I think, was one of the more fascinating parts of him as a character. And it's something that I think the film probes and explores. Where does this conviction come from?

To some extent, you know, it comes from an enormous amount of confidence in his analysis. Though the phrase never made it into the finished film, at one point in an interview with me, He said he felt that, you know, in most cases, investments, you know, involve a certain degree of uncertainty. But in this case, he felt that his analysis, you know, was solid to a degree of absolute certainty. It was also to him a moral dimension of this investment, a belief, a conviction that he was doing something that was good, not just for his investors, but for the country as a whole, which elevated the conflict and incited the ire of a number of, in particular from Michael Johnson, the CEO of Herbalife, who at one point very, and it actually led him to say that even if he were to get out of the investment, he would continue to pursue Herbalife. That makes for a very unusual and interesting character in a film and a very unusual and interesting Wall Street figure, you just don't see that every day. Yeah, I mean, Bill Ackman, beyond the fact that he's a billionaire, has a reputation for being arrogant.

So the fact that you've made a reportedly arrogant billionaire come off as a sympathetic character that the audience is largely rooting for is a pretty amazing accomplishment. Speaking of billionaires, this is a story that gets more interesting when a billionaire jumps in on the other side of the equation. And that's Carl Icahn, who, and this is part of why the investment, the short of herbal stock begins to go badly for Bill Ackman is because Carl Icon comes in and buys about 10, 12% of the company. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the main reason Carl Icon buys the stock is not because he believes this is an amazing business that's changing the world for good.

I think he just hates Bill Ackman's guts. That's certainly the view of William Cohen, the Vanity Fair writer who has observed both men at close range and written about both of them at length. He wrote about their battle for Vanity Fair and a famous piece published in 2000. And I think there's a lot of evidence to support that. Mr. Icon claims that this is nothing more than a good investment for him, that he believes in the company and thinks that he's made simply a smart and shrewd decision about where to invest his research. The timing of his stock. purchase. The fact that it occurred very shortly after he had a famous battle with Ackman

on CNBC television, a battle that I'm sure many of your listeners are familiar with. One of the most colorful episodes in business television ended in name-calling and a lot of really nasty has led a lot of people to be like to vengeance and feud. A colorful film. Coming up, we'll talk about just how badly herbal life does not want you to see this film. You're listening to Motley Fool Money. Welcome back to Motley Full Money, Chris Hill, talking with Ted Braun, director of the new documentary, betting on zero. One of the things that you show very vividly in your documentary is something that you've alluded to, and that is Michael Johnson, the CEO of Urban Life, and the reaction to Bill Ackman's short. It would be one thing if Ackman was not so public about it, but he's very public that this is not just what he believes

to be a good business decision. He makes it very personal. And Herbalife doesn't just sit on their hands feeling insulted. They go after Bill Ackman. They do everything they can to boost their profile, bringing in high-profile athletes to promote the Herbalife brand. They don't sit still when they feel like they're being attacked. All of that, Ted, is prelude to this question. Now that your film is out, what is Herbalife's reaction to your documentary? Well, I had no agenda when I set out to make this film.

I thought the antagonists in this battle had competing and very interesting claims, and I was interested in dramatizing this problem. You said you found it surprising to, to feel sympathetic for Bill Ackman. And I think one of the goals of good documentary filmmaking, as with any kind of good storytelling, is to get the audiences into shoes of people they would not otherwise know or understand.

And I very much had the goal of getting the audience into the shoes of both her campaign and Herbalife and its executives. Ultimately, despite, you know, two plus years of conversations with Earbalife, that continued right up until the time that we, we locked the picture that we stopped editing the film, they declined to participate in the film. You know, we engaged in conversations. I spoke with a number of their executives, Michael Johnson, their distributors, a lot of off-the-record conversations tell me understand what the going on with the company. But ultimately they declined to participate. Fair enough, no way I can understand that.

But within weeks or two of announcing that the film was premiering at Tribeca, film theft last year, one of their lobbyists in Washington, D.C., Hillary Rosen, tweeted to Jane Rosenthal, Robert De Niro's partner, that the Tribeca Film Festival's reputation was at stake because they were screening this film that the film had been bought and paid for it by Bill Ackman. This was not true. This was a falsehood. And Ms. Rosen tweeted this without disclosing the fact that she was paid, and her firm, Knickerbocker, was a paid consultant, the lobbyist for her life. This sort of intimidation went on after the film premiered. And then these, you know, opened the film to prevent people from seeing it reached a sort of crazy culmination in October when we were screening at the double exposure film festival in Washington, D.C.,

a festival devoted to investigative filmmaking. And Friday afternoon, the festival discovered unusual the film had sold out well in advance of the screening. And it turned out 173 seats. Exactly half the house at the National Portrait Gallery had been purchased by, Another Herbalife lobbying group, Heather Podestan partners, 10 members of Heather Podesta partner, 173 seats. Ultimately, they didn't claim the seats leaving the theater, which would otherwise have been sold out, half empty. It was a film devoted to investigative filmmaking, and so there were a lot of investigative journalists at the screening, and this undermined caught the attention of a lot of the press there and ended up being a story in Politico.

But these are troubling actions on the part of a company that had an opportunity to participate in the film, and most of them were taken without ever having seen the film as a sort of reflex they felt was threatening to them. I don't think it's very undermining films that the conversation about. So where do you think this is going in terms of Herbalife's business and therefore in terms of Herbalife's stock price? One of the things that you establish very early in the film is that Bill Ackman, when it comes to shorting a stock, is nothing if not patient. In one example, he waited seven years for a short of a stock to pay off. And he's a lot younger than Carl Icon. So I'm just curious if you have any gut feeling of where this is going over the next couple of years.

The initial that the FTC had settled, Herbalife had settled along charging Herbalife with. And as part of that, it'll be a very, very different count first shorted. I go out of that is betting on zero is indebting on zero is. theaters around the country now and is available on iTunes in April. For more information, you can go to betting on zero movie.com. Ted Braun, thank you so much for being here. Chris, a great pleasure. Thanks for talking about the film. I'm glad to enjoy it and hope your listeners do, too. That's going to do it for this week's edition of Motley Full Money. Our engineer is Steve Broido. Our producer is Matt Greer. I'm Chris Hill. Thanks for listening. We'll see you next week.