Motley Fool Money - Apple, Amazon, and Common Sense Technology

Episode Date: October 16, 2020

Apple unveils its new iPhones. Fastly falls on TikTok concerns. United Airlines CEO predicts flying won’t return to normal until 2024. Amazon reports that third-party sellers brought in $3.5 billion... on Prime Day. Intuitive Surgical deals with headwinds from the pandemic. Johnson & Johnson pauses its COVID vaccine trial. Disney restructures its business around streaming. Coca-Cola pulls the plug on Tab. And Edge Innovations makes robot dolphins a reality. Motley Fool analysts Ron Gross and Jason Moser discuss those stories and share two stocks on their radar: Visteon and Bed Bath & Beyond. Plus, Common Sense Media Founder Jim Steyer talks social media and the shifting technology landscape. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 This episode is brought to you by KolaGard. Do you know what's really scary? Not screening for colon cancer when you turn 45. The KoloGard test is non-invasive, requires no special prep or time off work, and ships right to your door. In just three simple steps, KolaGar takes the scare out of colon cancer screening.
Starting point is 00:00:18 If you're 45 or older and at average risk, ask your health care provider about the KolaGard test. KoloGard is available by prescription only. Learn more or request a prescription today at kolaGar.com slash screen. Everybody needs money. That's why they call it money. From Fool Global Headquarters, this is Motley Fool Money Radio Show. I'm Chris Hill, joining me this week, Jason Moser and Ron Gross. Good to see you, as always, gentlemen. How you doing, Chris? We've got the latest headlines from Wall Street. We will dig into how technology is shaping our lives. And as always, we've got a couple of stocks on our radar.
Starting point is 00:01:04 But we begin with the biggest public company in America. This week, Apple unveiled four new versions of the iPhone 12, including the Mini, the Pro, and the Pro Max. CEO Tim Cook called at the beginning of a new era, and 5G was mentioned constantly throughout this presentation, Ron. Yeah. What stood out to you? Well, I'm going to leave 5G to Jason because I think it's a little bit more hype than reality right now.
Starting point is 00:01:33 We need a nationwide rollout before that becomes exciting. I thought the mini was interesting. I think it's going to be well received at 5.4 inches, a starting price point of $699. I find it fascinating. And I really mean this, how every few years consumers decide to upsize or downsize, depending what happens to be the current trend. And so I kind of think it is smart for Apple to go in that direction, because I think there's going to be a pretty strong demand for this. These events are essential to, Apple. Apple needs to continue to innovate and continue to put up those incredible revenue numbers and therefore cash flow. So it's not necessarily these events, but it's the need to be innovative. And these events, let's face, it have become somewhat of a tradition, although again, going back to the excitement that Steve Jobs used to create around these. The stock never does much around these announcements. In fact, I think the stock tends to sell off more than go up on typical days like this. But it's the innovation that's important. We saw,
Starting point is 00:02:36 We saw some other things, a HomePod Mini, which while I think it looks interesting, I think it's their way to kind of catch up in the smart speaker space, which I think they've kind of been left behind to a certain extent. A couple other interesting things of note. Earpods and power adapters are no longer going to be included with the phones that you purchase, which is a bummer for consumers. It's probably a decent margin boost for Apple itself, but that's offset by, I think, some of the components in these new phones that are kind of pricey. So we might not directly see an
Starting point is 00:03:10 impact to margins there. A few things that people are hoping to see that we didn't. So maybe we have some announcements coming later in the year. AirPods Studio, which is over the head headphones speakers. A cheaper version of Apple TV has been talked about. And finally, there's a silicon powered Mac that is on the horizon, but we haven't seen that quite yet. Jason, we saw Verizon CEO Hans Vesberg joining Tim Cook on stage. To Ron's point, how much should we make out of all the talk around 5G? So, 5G to me, is compelling, yet I think the consumer implications are going to be still a ways out. It's not going to be like hitting a switch. I think a lot of people, you know, the financial
Starting point is 00:03:52 media is having a field day with it. I think advertisers are having a field day with it. And therefore, consumers feel like, oh, 5G is here. Boom, everything has changed. It's not going to be that way. I mean, this is going to be a slow rollout. We need to build out the infrastructure. But it's one step at a time. We need to get the capable devices out there. So it's nice to see Apple rolling out those 5G capable devices. Again, it takes 2 to tango, as they say, Chris. You need the devices and you also need the infrastructure. The infrastructure is still being built. Jason, speaking of 2 to tango, is it fair to say that this could be interesting for Chinese consumers, people based in China since the 5G network is more sophisticated there? Or am I off base here? No, I don't think you're off base at all. I mean, it's certainly the Chinese market. is one that is a little bit ahead of us in regard to the 5G market and its capabilities. I think with Apple, it's just a matter of how they're able to continue getting those devices
Starting point is 00:04:43 out there at the price points that they want to maintain to kind of keep that sort of luxury brand that they command, you know? Shares of Fastly down 30% this week, the Edge Cloud Platform cut revenue guidance for the current quarter because of a reduction in business from its largest customer. Jason, when you're an unprofitable company, people focus on revenue. And when you come out and tell them that revenue is going to be lower, we see stuff like this. Yeah, I mean, this seems totally right. In fact, I'd argue it should have sold off more.
Starting point is 00:05:16 Mind you, that's not a condemnation of the business. It's just one of those hypergrowth stocks that's been getting a lot of attention. As you noted, it's not profitable. It's not cash flow positive. It's not the only game in town, and it trades for 40 times sales after this sell-off. So, I mean, this is just not a buy at any price business. With that said, FASI, for those who don't know what it does, it's a content delivery network, essentially CDN. It lives on the edge, literally.
Starting point is 00:05:42 It's playing in that edge computing market. It's about getting stuff to us more quickly and more securely. They did offer up preliminary results this week, and that was the disappointment. They expect third quarter revenue to total somewhere between 70 and 71 million dollars versus the guidance that they set of 73. to $75.5 million. So, anytime you see a hypergrowth company pull back on guidance like that, yeah, that's really, really concerning. I don't know that it's a long-term concern necessarily, but you do need to keep in mind, as you mentioned, it's top customer, Bight Dance, which is the Chinese firm that owns TikTok. That is, you know, that's responsible
Starting point is 00:06:22 about 12 to 13 percent of the company's total revenue. They didn't spend as much as expected. It remains to be seen if that's a blip or a trend. But regardless, this is one of those companies. You got to take the good with the bad when you invest in these types of businesses. United Airlines' third quarter loss was bigger than expected. The CEO said he does not expect flying levels to get back to normal until 2024. Ron, go in any direction you want. You can certainly dig into the numbers.
Starting point is 00:06:51 I'm still focused on the fact that the CEO of a major airline says, we are four-year-old. years out. Yeah, I think the comments here are more important than the actual numbers. And these results are kind of a metaphor for really the entire industry. I don't think air travel demand gets back to anywhere near normal until a vaccine comes about sometime, let's hope, next year or the first half of next year, if we keep our fingers crossed. But the comments are interesting because they're indicating that the worst actually may be over and bookings are returning slowly, but it's that business demand that they're saying is going to take a while. and maybe as far as 2024, what you said is that that's a ways out.
Starting point is 00:07:32 But they are doing whatever they can do now. So for United example, they've reduced their cash burn to $25 million a day. Now, let me repeat that, $25 million a day cash burn. But that is down from 40 a day in the previous quarter. Scott Kirby, CEO of United thinks that they will be cash-to-positive sometime next year. Happy to see that. His quote is, we've got 12 to 15 months. of pain, sacrifice, and difficulty ahead, but increasingly the light at the end of the tunnel
Starting point is 00:08:02 is visible. Clearly, government stimulus, additional government stimulus would be nice. So far, has not happened. But all of these companies have managed to shore up their balance sheets pretty nicely by taking advantage of the first stimulus program, doing creative things like mortgaging their frequent flyer programs, mortgaging their planes, raising capital. So I think we might be in a better, a significantly better situation from a liquidity standpoint versus where we thought we maybe were in April and May. So this is going to take a while. Hopefully, these folks are going to survive, lots of layoffs, 13,000 furloughs at United. We feel the pain for those folks for sure. But hopefully sometime next year, this starts to get better.
Starting point is 00:08:47 Amazon's prime day event appears to have gone off without a hitch. And the company announced during the two-day prime day period, three and a half billion dollars in sales for third-party sellers. And Jason, I was struck by that because in the past, we've seen Amazon announced sort of total sales. It really feels like they're making a concerted effort, in part with their marketing and their paid advertising, to really push the idea that it's not just this tech behemoth, it's also a platform for small businesses and third-party sellers.
Starting point is 00:09:23 Oh, yeah, absolutely. And I do. I like that focus. I like them getting that message out there because in this world where big tech is really under the microscope, that's their opportunity to really prove their relevance in the overall economy. You know, I personally have always been a little confounded by Prime Day. I mean, it's just never felt like, I've never felt all that compelled by the offerings.
Starting point is 00:09:49 I mean, much like death taxes and people, though. I mean, people just want more stuff. And so, Amazon is there to scratch that itch. As a shareholder, I applaud the effort, and I want to keep on doing it. To your point about third-party sellers, you noted the $3.5 billion in sales, that was up 60% from a year ago. And it's really, you know, if you go back a couple of years and you look at Jeff Bezos's letter to shareholders, he noted the chronology there, the timeline of how third-party
Starting point is 00:10:19 sellers have continued to take up more share of that platform. And so today, third-party sales make up about 60% of the physical gross merchandise sales on an annual basis. So you can take those numbers and then you can make some guesses as to how Prime Day may have done overall. But any way you cut it, I would say it was another success. And again, I do love to see them focusing on that small to medium-sized business message because that really, really is important, particularly now. Coming up, Disney gets a big shakeup and Coca-Cola kills off an iconic brand. Stay right here.
Starting point is 00:10:54 You're listening to Motley Fool Money. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. Chris Hill here with Jason Moser and Ron Gross. Third quarter of profits for intuitive surgical came in higher than expected, but procedures involving the company's Da Vinci surgical robot system still are not back to pre-COVID levels, Jason. No, they are. All things considered, I think this business is weathering the situation quite well. And while it's primarily a U.S.-centric business from a revenue perspective,
Starting point is 00:11:25 still we're seeing the benefits of its global reach. Procedures were up 7% from a year ago, particular strength this quarter in China. They are seeing a lot of diagnostic procedures, things like colonoscopies, for example. Those are still being delayed, and that is a point of weakness there. Speaking of the procedure growth, if you go back to just March of this year, We were talking about on the show global procedure growth was 19%. So you can see that was a considerable drop-off from earlier in the year. This is all leading to weaker demand, and it's certainly playing out in the third quarter, likely even further out. They are seeing weaker demand in actual capital requests as well.
Starting point is 00:12:07 I mean, they installed 195 new systems for the quarter. That's comparing to 275 installs from a year ago, 177. 18 installs just a quarter ago. You know, it's not all doom and gloom. I mean, this is a stock that's done very well for the year. All things considered is up around 25%. It's a leader in the space. They continue to innovate.
Starting point is 00:12:29 The headwinds are certainly understandable. And if we view those headwinds as temporary, which I do, then I think this is a business that will be poised for success to resume the growth that it's witnessed to this point once we get past this pandemic. Shares of Johnson and Johnson down a bit this week, despite the fact that third quarter profits and revenue came in higher than expected. Ron, is this about Johnson and Johnson's valuation? I mean, this was a really good quarter they put up. Yeah, I think the quarter was solid. I mean, we'll get to some of the numbers. Didn't
Starting point is 00:13:03 like knock the cover off the ball, but certainly solid. But I think eyes are mostly on the potential for a vaccine, as they are with many of these companies, similar companies, hitting some of the numbers, revenues up 1.7%. So, I mean, you know, nothing right home about, but you did see strength in consumer products and pharmaceuticals. Now, interestingly, jiving with what Jason just said about intuitive surgical, there was weakness in the medical device unit as people put off elective surgeries. And certainly we think that will come back. And this unit will once again put up some positive numbers. Adjusted earnings per share up 3.8 percent. Still solid, fine. Not gangbusters, though. Bigger news out of the week for Johnson and Johnson is that they pause the clinical
Starting point is 00:13:46 trial of their experimental coronavirus vaccine because of an unexplained illness in one of the volunteers. As I think we've seen over the last month or two, this type of thing is a normal part of a phase three process or a clinical process in general, but they need to be taken seriously. They need to be investigated because we obviously have to feel secure about the vaccines that eventually come to the public. This week, Eli Lilly, for example, positive trial for a potential therapeutic due to safety concerns. So we've got to let the science dictate where these companies go. But for now, Johnson & Johnson is on firm footing and we'll keep an eye on the vaccine news. And again, still paying that dividend and one of the few companies
Starting point is 00:14:29 during the pandemic that actually bumped it up. You got it. Yep, for sure. Earlier this week, Disney CEO Bob Chapick announced a reorganization with a goal of prioritizing Disney's streaming video business. Jason, there's a There's going to be three content groups, one for sports, one for general entertainment, one for movies, and Chapic has made it very clear. He is focused on putting the customer first. You have to love leadership when that's their North Star, focusing really on what the consumer wants.
Starting point is 00:14:58 That tells you everything you really need to know in my mind. This really is the opportunity for Disney to become one of the ultimate direct-to-consumer businesses. They already are super direct-to-consumer in so many ways, right, with the parks and whatnot. So, I like the move, I like the focus streaming. We know is not some kind of fat. I mean, this is the new model for distribution. So making those investments accordingly makes sense. We talk a lot about the blueprints that other businesses have left out there that others can go by. So the company that comes to mind immediately is Netflix. When you look at Disney
Starting point is 00:15:29 versus Netflix, Disney has three times the revenue of Netflix. Normally, it's far more profitable. It's got multiple revenue streams, complementary businesses. So why does the market value Netflix more highly than Disney, right? I mean, that's, I think, a very fair question. And you just look at what can Disney emulate there. I think that by nature, it's going to be a little bit more of a complicated offering in the sense that it has Hulu and ESP and a Disney Plus. But, you know, they also have more IP. They have the potential to deliver far better, more compelling content on a more sustainable basis. So I think looking at a lot of the things that Netflix has done to date will be wise. You know, I mean, you talk about the innovators and then the imitators, and I think, you know, Disney could imitate in certain ways here.
Starting point is 00:16:16 To me, I think there's a tremendous opportunity, and we already know how successful the remainder of the business can be in normal times. And we'll get back to somewhat normal times eventually. You know, Jason, last week we started the show by talking about the entertainment industry. And one of the things we talked about was the dire straits that movie theaters are in. If you're AMC Entertainment, if you're Cinemark and you're hearing these comments from Bob Chappick, you've got to be concerned, right? Oh, yeah. I mean, these businesses are already out there talking about the threat of running out of
Starting point is 00:16:49 capital by years end if things don't change. We're already seeing consumer behavior changing in the way that we consume content. There are more substitutes out there than ever before for our entertainment dollars. And I think the longer that this drags on, the more difficult. to be for those theaters to really convince consumers that they need to come back because we're going to see, you know, like they say, there's more than one way to skin a cat, so to speak. I do think I applaud Disney's move here. I think it's out of necessity the right thing to do, but it's not a slam dunk here. There's a lot of revenue that they're going to need to replace
Starting point is 00:17:24 as they kind of restructure and focus on streaming. And so not only do you need to increase your member base of Disney Plus, but you need to play with pricing and see how much pricing power you have, now and over the years because there's a lot of revenue in that top line that's probably going to go away and needs to be replaced. Last month, Coca-Cola announced plans to cut the number of brands that it has in half. This week, we learned that one of the brands being cut is Tab. The iconic Diacola first launch in 1963 rose to prominence and then started to fade in the early 1980s with the arrival of Diet Coke.
Starting point is 00:18:04 It's the end of an era, guys. I mean, who doesn't remember Tab? Man, you come for the pink can, but you stay for the unpleasant aftertaste. I mean, that's a business model right there. Smart move by Coke. They've got to stream down their offerings for sure. I'm amazed at how long they kept this going, because you go back 20 years and the market chair for Tab had plummeted to almost zero.
Starting point is 00:18:29 But apparently, Jason, the people who love Tab are pretty passionate. They are, and I do understand that to an extent. I mean, nostalgia is very powerful. If there were a book made from this, I mean, perhaps it could be Farewell Tab. We hardly knew Yi, semicolon, or a colon, rather, the ultimate story of disruption. Because really, Coca-Cola kind of disrupted themselves here, right? All right, guys, we'll see you later in the show. Up next, a conversation with Jim Steyer, the founder and CEO of Common Sense Media about how technology shapes our lives.
Starting point is 00:19:01 Stay right here. This is Motley Full Money. Well, there's a crazy daddy-oh. Everybody loves him so. He's got a little ice cream shop on the corner of the block. Oh, with the jukebox playing loud. Welcome back to Motley Fool Money. I'm Chris Hill.
Starting point is 00:19:24 Common Sense Media is a nonprofit organization that provides education and advocacy to families to promote safe technology and media for kids. CEO Jim Steyer started common sense media nearly 20 years ago. Recently, he talked with Motley Fool host Dylan Lewis about his new book on the ways in which technology shapes our lives. They also talked about the potential for new regulatory standards for tech companies. Here, Dylan gets the conversation started by talking about the current environment for social media. It does feel like we're having a bit of a moment when it comes to the awareness around these
Starting point is 00:20:02 issues and around these platforms. I mean, just thinking back over like the last year or so, there's the Netflix documentary of The Social Dilemma that came out. Which we were part of, which we were part of and helped make, right? And that's a cultural phenomenon. That created a lot of conversations online. The Great Hack came out in 2019. Correct.
Starting point is 00:20:18 Do you think that the tides are turning a little bit on this? Definitely. And by the way, we were part of both of the, so we know the guys who the social dilemma was filmed. We did a bunch of the events with Tristan Harris, one of the guys who's in the film. He, his off, we gave him office space. and he worked out of our offices. And we worked with the guys who made the film because we thought it was important
Starting point is 00:20:41 to talk about the attention economy and the arms rates for attention and the fact that there was manipulative design, particularly aimed at kids, by the way, but at all people. And we worked, the guys in that movie, Roger McNamey who went to high school of me and my brother, Tristan, Sandy Parakellas,
Starting point is 00:20:57 all the people. They are all colleagues of ours. It's a small group of people, quite frankly. And I absolutely feel, and then we know the great hack people very well. I did a bunch of things. But what happened was, I would say eight years ago, we were sort of lone voice in the wilderness, Dylan, right? And it's interesting because I'm a Luddite.
Starting point is 00:21:17 I can barely turn on my computer, right? So, but I get the basics and our organization, common sense, gets the basics of what it can do to kids, particularly their social, emotional, and cognitive development. I'm assuming you're not a parent. or you would have said you are. But here's the deal. What I really energized me about it was I could see the impact of my kids, particularly my daughters when they were preteens and teens and all the body image stuff and all the comparative stuff on Facebook and Instagram and Snapchat. It's really unhealthy, right? So you can see that as a parent. And what happened was we realized there were no regulatory structure because I was running the biggest child advocacy group in the United States.
Starting point is 00:21:55 This is what I do for a living, right? And my brother's pretty smart about politics. You go, look who's on the board, look who my friends are. We know the people in Washington, Sacramento, all's fair. We finally said, fine, we're going to write some laws. And what's happened is you could start to see the tide turn, I'd say, 2016, 2017, and then you really saw things happen. In 2018, when Cambridge Analytica happened. And that's where we decided to write the California Consumer Privacy Act, which is the law of a land. Because effectively, by passing that law in California, and GDPR passed in Europe at that time. That's the European privacy law. We regulated privacy on behalf of you and everybody in the audience today, and you should thank us and send us contributions.
Starting point is 00:22:41 But we did. On behalf of the audience, I'll thank you right now. I think you for doing it. But you could feel absolutely you've seen it see change, because in those days, they glorified all the tech executives. They basically put them up on a pedestal. And this was the engine of our economy, which it is, you guys are a business show, and they're driving, untold success financially and in stock market prices, but there are huge consequences from what some of the companies have done with absolutely unchecked power and nobody regulating them. And common sense has led the way, and I'm proud of that.
Starting point is 00:23:15 And by the way, the momentum is completely on our side. And wait to you see 2021, because in 2021, man, we are going to really step up what we're going to, we're going to have a really major regulatory framework on multiple issues. And the book is a precursor for that. The reason I wrote the book, I'm shameless putting it up. You have to plug it. You have to plug it.
Starting point is 00:23:36 I do. I got to plug which side of history comes out next week. But it's a campaign for us. It's not really a book. So it's 50 people. And it's everybody from Mark Benioff to Sasha Barron Cohen to Mike Bloomberg, to Khaled Hussaini, to Michelle Alexander, you name it. I got really smart people to write about the impact of tech on society.
Starting point is 00:23:58 but the truth is, for me, it's a campaign and for our organizations, it's a campaign, because I think it's a fair question to say to Sundar or to Peshai or Mark Zuckerberg or Jeff Bezos or even Brian Robertson, Jeff Schell at Comcast, or any of the big media and tech players, which side of history do you want to be on? I'd like to ask that to most politicians today as well, because to me, as a citizen, we are at a crisis moment in our democracy. And tech has played a role in that. That's why I wrote about democracy, even though common sense is largely a kids and family organization.
Starting point is 00:24:35 Since you mentioned the book, and I was absolutely shocked with the roundtable of names that you had as contributors for this thing, you listed off a bunch earlier. But is there anyone that really surprised you with their take on the tech industry or anyone that really introduced something new to the conversation that you hadn't thought about? So I actually think, so there's a Harvard Business School professor Shoshana Zuboff, who wrote who wrote a book called surveillance capitalism, which I think is the definitive work. And everyone who watches Motley Fool
Starting point is 00:25:03 and who knows Motley Fool ought to read her stuff. I took a piece of that. I had to do a very short synopsis, basically book for it. I think that some of this stuff, I actually think Mike Bloomberg wrote a really interesting piece about how climate change could be solved using technology. Bill Gates was going to do a piece about that too, actually,
Starting point is 00:25:26 actually, and he was great about it. But he's now writing a book about that that's coming out next year, and he didn't want to sort of, he didn't want to undercut his own book, which is coming out next year. I thought, I think, for business people, Mark Benioff, who's my good friend,
Starting point is 00:25:41 who's the CEO and founder of sales force. So Benioff has a really powerful piece about corporate responsibility among tech executive. Mark's been out there more than anybody else in a lot of ways. And he basically calls Facebook cigarettes and should be created, treated and regulated like the tobacco industry. So that's a pretty gutsy thing for the CEO of one of the major tech companies in the world to say. And there's a lot of people writing that. But it's, so it's,
Starting point is 00:26:08 and basically I asked a lot of my friends to write visas. And they did because they realized that tech, whether we like it or not is everywhere in their lives. So you were pretty critical of Facebook in the intro of the book too. You said, no company has ever known so much or learned so little in such a short time. And I'm curious, you know, if you have kind of a timeline in front of you, what should have happened with Facebook that didn't happen? Well, I think they have been by far the most irresponsible and damaging of all the major tech company. And it's why we, we as an organization, and I personally have such a complicated relationship with the people who started the company and have for many years. Look, they have, first with Facebook and now with Instagram,
Starting point is 00:26:51 because from the kids standpoint, Instagram is way more and what's happening. And what's are way more important than Facebook, right? That's where. So first I went, we were really concerned about how they were impacting the social, emotional, and cognitive development of children, right? All the comparison culture, the like culture, all the stuff. If you watch the social dilemma, the guy who did the like button is on there. You know, he used to work out of our office after he left Facebook.
Starting point is 00:27:14 And, you know, you realize they've really, really manipulated society in a really bizarre way. And honestly, Mark's old mantra back in like 2010 about frictionless sharing and everybody's you share all aspects of their lives. What total BS that is. What an absurd philosophy that makes no sense. And in truth, it was just a monetization. They learned how to basically monetize your personal information and sell it to advertiser. So it's a brilliant business, and I give them incredible credit. So as someone who has spent a lot of time thinking about this, if you could, with a just wave of the wand, create the rules, what would they look like for these social media companies. I'd base it, well, number one is I would treat in this, I would treat the platforms in the same way
Starting point is 00:27:57 we treat broadcast television, cable television, and newspapers. I would have standards and I would actually hold them accountable for what they publish, including user generated content. The user generated content is a little more complicated. You'd have to, you'll have to, but I would basically hold them accountable and have the same kind of standards we've had for media in general because they are media public. They're the biggest media publishers in the world. They're way bigger than ABC, NBC, etc. Right. So I'd hold them accountable. I'd have basically the same rules the road for all media in the United States. Second, I'd have really strong consumer privacy laws, right? Third, I would take antitrust action against some of these companies. I would force Facebook to divest itself of Instagram and WhatsApp.
Starting point is 00:28:35 I would go after, I would look very seriously at some of the other big tech companies and have them broken up. I think that would increase competition. Actually, it'll increase the value of the companies if you broke them up in a smaller entity. And then I would, I would, also required, I would really, really look at ways in which the platforms could restore some of the democratic norms that have been undermined in the past few years. So I think there's a huge, really important agenda for the tech industry right now and that we should pursue it. So you mentioned before, watch the Motley, who follow the Motley Fool should pursue because it's in your interest. You mentioned before that you're a parent and I am not, but I would love to get,
Starting point is 00:29:20 your advice to the parents that are out there watching on how to navigate social media, how to navigate YouTube, all these different things with their children and have what feel like productive conversations about these things? Well, A, conversation is a really good world because I think as your kids go to all, you just have to talk with them about it on a daily basis. I mean, I would say basically delay, delay, delay in terms of giving your kids cell phones and access. Look, an iPhone is essentially a mini computer in your pocket.
Starting point is 00:29:49 Why are you giving that to an eight-year-old? It allows you to have access to anything. So I would think about several things. One, don't give your kids access to devices and platforms until way later. We've really been strict. We don't let our kids have a phone until they go to high school. And by the way, they wind and cried about it a little, but they're all fine. And now they're very grateful to mom and dad that we did that.
Starting point is 00:30:11 I would say limit time. You know, be very specific about time limits like boys love video games. I have two sons. They would play video games. hours a day if we let them, particularly when they were teenagers. I wouldn't let them do that. I would set time limits. I'd find healthy balance. It's really hard during COVID-19 because kids are in front of a screen, way more time. But I'd limit screen time. And then I'd be really careful about the content that they're exposed to. That's why common sense is there. We are the people,
Starting point is 00:30:37 we're the universal rating system for all content. So I'd be, number one, I'd delay devices and platforms until you thought your kids are age appropriate. No matter what other kids in their school are saying and the peer pressure they feel at age 10 to have an iPhone. Number two, I would limit the amount of time and number three, I'd really regulate the content. And I would have daily conversations because these kids are digital natives. They grew up with it. I mean, Dylan, you're not a digital native. You're closer to one than I am.
Starting point is 00:31:06 But it affects every aspect of their lives. And they need to understand the pros and the cons of technology and the content. Jim Steyer's new book is Which Side of History, How, How Towers, How, and It's, How, and Ier, Technology is reshaping democracy and our lives. And if you want to hear the latest on technology stocks, then check out our daily podcast, Industry Focus. It's a different industry every day, and on Fridays, Dylan Lewis analyzes the latest tech news.
Starting point is 00:31:35 You can find industry focus wherever you get your podcast. Stay right here. Ron Gross and Jason Moser are coming back with a couple of stocks you're going to want to put on your watch list. You're listening to Motley Full Money. As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. So don't buy ourselves stocks based solely on what you hear.
Starting point is 00:32:24 Welcome back to Motley Full Money, Chris Hill here once again with Jason Moser and Ron Gross. Edge Innovations is an engineering company that has several divisions, including one focused on animatronics and special effects. And guys, I can't really think of an artful way to say this. So I'm just going to say, this company has built a robot. Dolphin. The cost for the robot dolphin is somewhere in the neighborhood of three to five million dollars. And once you get past the idea that it's a robot dolphin, Ron, the business implications start to get pretty interesting if you think about theme parks, movies, aquatic research.
Starting point is 00:33:02 Sure. So I'm all in favor of getting dolphins out of captivity. I think I read maybe there's 3,000 in captivity. And I think it's great if we can we can set them free. I don't think a robot would replace the experience at a theme park of swimming with the dolphin. You would just probably pass. You'd be like, no, I'm good. I'll just stay dry and I don't need to do that. I do like your comment about movies, television, and how we could replace dolphin actors, for lack of a better word, with their robot brethren. But I don't know, these things, three to five million is pretty expensive. Jason, you sound like you're not a fan. Well, I mean, I am and I'm not. I mean, I do agree with Ron. I mean, I like the angle of being able to focus on fewer animals in captivity.
Starting point is 00:33:50 I mean, as someone who has swum with the dolphins before, I mean, listen, that's a priceless experience. And unfortunately for us, the facility that we were able to do that through this was this was about bringing dolphins in that were in trouble, right? Helping them recover and then ultimately setting them free. So there was, it seemed like it was a better message that they were espousing there. It sure seems like for movies' sake, technology can really take the place here and just give us some cool CGI. And in regard to actually going to SeaWorld, I mean, if you know that you're going to go see robot dolphins and killer whales and whatnot, I mean, that absolutely takes away from the experiences. Like, why even bother? So, yeah, it's, I can see both sides of it there.
Starting point is 00:34:35 But, I mean, ultimately, let's just go back to the rise of the machines, Chris. We talk about this all the time. I'm scared of hackable dolphins, right? I mean, this army of dolphins all of a sudden, let's talk about the implications there for a second. Water and electricity scare me. That's another great point right there. Yeah, technically, I think it would be an armada of robot dolphins. Before we get to the stocks on our radar, our email address is Radio at Fool.com. Question from Tyler Winkler. If you only had one investment to make today and give to your kids in 20 years, besides an index fund, what would it be? Real quick, Ron, let's help Tyler out with a couple of investment ideas
Starting point is 00:35:16 for 2040. Very hard question to answer. Putting my money where my mouth is, I opened up two rough IRAs for both my children earlier this year, and I put Microsoft into both of them. I like it as an investment for the next 20 years. Jason? Yeah, let's go war on cash style here. I think You got to look at a company like PayPal and think that is going to be one that is only more relevant 20 years from now. I'm going to go with a company that is near and dear to my heart and taste buds, Starbucks, because drinking coffee in 2040 is going to be exactly the same as it is today. Let's get to the stocks on our radar. Our man behind the glass, Dan Boyd, is going to hit you with a question.
Starting point is 00:35:55 Jason, you're up first. What are you looking at this week? Yeah, a new one I think to the show here, Vistion. Ticker is VC and Vistion Designs and Manufacture. Automobile Cockpit Electronics and Connected Car Solutions for vehicle manufacturers worldwide. Main focus is really on audio and infotainment offerings and displays. But for me, I'm actually really interested in its heads-up displays that's building out. These are displays that use augmented reality of overlay graphics in the driver's line of sight,
Starting point is 00:36:27 right, to represent objects in the vehicle's path all on the windshield. So you're going to be able to get information as a driver on the windshield. as opposed to having to kind of look around the car. The safety implications are obvious there. It's got a large and diverse customer base with companies like Ford and Mazda, General Motors, Volkswagen, Jaguar, Honda, BMW. Ford is its largest customer, but this is a small cap company restructuring the business a little bit, which could weigh on the stock in the near term, but definitely want to dig it into.
Starting point is 00:36:53 Dan, question about Vistion? Yeah, certainly, Chris. Jason, how much heads-up display is too much heads-up display? Because a lot of these things, they seemed like they could be a little distracting. It could be. And I think, you know, you hear talk of Tesla allowing for streaming video in the car. I think when you're streaming Netflix on your heads-up display, we got a problem. Ron Gross, what are you looking at this week? Danny, I'm going back to Bedbath and Beyond. B, B, B, B.Y. Shares are up almost 100% over the last month.
Starting point is 00:37:26 As relatively new CEO, Mark Tritten, formerly of Target, continues to make moves to turn the company around this week. Company announced it will sell 80 Christmas tree shops. Who knew there were 80 Christmas tree shops? But there are, Dan. And they're going to sell a distribution center for $250 million. That's in addition to lots of shakeups at the executive level, raising money by selling personalization mall to $100 flowers. They're doing a lot of great things to both turn the business and shore up the balance sheet. And it's still a big short interest here, Dan. So if they continue to execute, I think those shorts are going to have to cover sending the stock higher. Dan, question about Bedbath and Beyond?
Starting point is 00:38:06 Certainly, Chris. Ron, I rag on you constantly for your stock picks on this show. And today is no, no exception. Bed Bath and Beyond is the boringest place on the planet. And I don't think I've ever gone there willingly. Why did you bring this to me? Because I want to make you money, Dan. And that's all I'm here to do. You should spend some time in the Beyond section because I think that's really where you'll shine. Dan, two stocks. You got one you want to add to your watch list? I tell you what, Ron, his choice is compelling, because the way the stock has moved in the last year, but I'm going to go with Vistion because I'm really quite interested in automotive technology,
Starting point is 00:38:44 and I'm excited to see where that kind of stuff brings us. All right. All right, Jason Mose, Ron, Gross, guys. Thanks for being here. That's going to do it for this week's edition of Motley Fool of Money. The show is Mixed by Dan Boyd. Our producer is Matt Creer. I'm Chris Hill.
Starting point is 00:38:59 Thanks for listening. We'll see you next week.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.