Motley Fool Money - Atlassian’s Layoffs are AI-Inspired

Episode Date: March 12, 2026

Atlassian announced that it is letting about 10% of its workforce go today. Management said it was because AI is making the company more efficient, but we’re wondering if there is more to it than that. Plus, some napkin math on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve release and Dollar General’s most recent earnings Tyler Crowe, Matt Frankel, and Jon Quast discuss: - Altassian’s Layoffs - The challenges facing SaaS companies in an age of efficiency - Assessing the impact of the SPR release and how it changes our investing approach - Dollar General’s earnings and its ongoing turnaround project Companies discussed: TEAM, XYZ, DG, FIVE, WMT, TGT Host: Tyler Crowe Guests: Matt Frankel, Jon Quast Engineer: Dan Boyd Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement. We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠megaphone.fm/adchoices⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Layoffs because of AI seem to keep coming. This is Motley Fool Money. Welcome to Motley Fool Money. I'm Tyler Crow, and today I'm joined by longtime Fool contributors, Matt Frankel and John Quast. It's a bit of a smorgasbord of a show today. We're going to look at the math behind the release of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and a little bit of the update on the oil situation in the markets right now. We're going to do a quick check on retail company Dollar General.

But first, we want to take a look at last. Earlier today, the company made a decision that they were going to have a rather large round of layoffs. As we're taping, shares are up about 0.4%. So not really much of a huge market reaction, almost like, yeah, we were expecting this. John, you dug into the numbers for us. Kind of give us a brief rundown of what Atlassian is planning. And what were you like knee-jerk reactions to the decision?

I think most of the time this wouldn't be considered a large layoff necessarily, roughly 10% of the workforce. for Atlassian, this is a massive shift in how it is talked about its employee workforce in the past. I just want to do a little bit of basically go back in time. If you look at the headcount for Atlassian back at June 30th, 2021, the reason I'm choosing June 30th is because its fiscal year is a little bit wonky. That's the end of its fiscal 2021. It had just over 6,400 workers.

By the end of the next fiscal year, it had... over 8,800 workers. That's an increase of 37% in a single year. This was at a time when tech companies were laying off, right? This is coming out of the pandemic. A lot of these companies saying, hey, we overhired. Now we need to right size. And in the 2023 letter to shareholders, Atlassian's management said, tech's labor market is such right now that we're able to hire amazing talent who might not otherwise be available. Essentially, what they were saying is, as these other companies lay off, we are picking up this quality hires that we wouldn't be able to pick up otherwise. And it's kept that ethos in its company, if you will, of hiring, hiring, hiring.

The second quarter of last year, 12,750 workers, now the second quarter of this year that it just reported, over 14,600 workers. That's another 15% increase in a single year, nearly 1,900 hires in the past year. Now they just release a letter saying, hey, We're going to let go 1,600 workers, which is fewer than what they've hired in the past year. But it says we're doing this to self-fund further investments in AI in enterprise sales, but just so interesting that it's a massive, I'd say, reversal of what its hiring policy has historically been. Yeah, and this is one of those like Aya the Beholder sort of things. I think about what they're saying to the market and why they may be actually doing this.

And Matt, I want to ask this to you, is like, this layoff at tech has been a common narrative we've seen over the past year, two years, going back to 2023, as John was alluding to. One of the things I can't quite parse out of this, though, is do we really believe the narrative it's like AI is making this more efficient and therefore we can cut payroll? Or is it more of a, hey, we probably overhired over the past five years? and this is giving us an excuse to do layoffs by just stamping the word AI on top of it. I mean, it's a little bit of both, if you ask me. We've seen this elsewhere recently.

Block is the biggest example that I know of recently. They laid off 40% of their staff in one swoop. Supposedly because of AI productivity gains, yes, there's some of that. AI's automated some tasks that you used to have to pay people to do and combine a few jobs into fewer jobs. Atlassian, like John said, is only letting go about 10% of their workforce. It's less than the amount of workers they added over the past year alone. It does beg the question of whether they hired too aggressively,

especially in a year when really the writing was on the wall for AI advancements, automating tasks, like I just mentioned. So reading between those lines a little bit, I think Atlassian might be in panic mode, just a little bit, and really trying to change the narrative that AI is going to disrupt its business. They're one of the SaaSpocalypse companies. They're one of the biggest victims. The stock is down 70% from its 52-week high, and there's a reason. On a different episode, I grouped all these SaaS stocks that are getting hit

the three general categories. And the one that I said has the most to worry about are companies with one or two good products, but whose products are such that customers can switch to alternatives without major disruptions to their business. Atlasian and their productivity software, they're in that basket. So they might be more worried than they're leading on. I want to share the problem that I've kind of seen for a while. Actually, I want to share a couple of things with Atlassian, right?

So it's been a fantastic revenue growth story. It really has. And you look at the gross margin, consistently been around 90%, almost. This is the kind of business that is supposed to scale incredibly well into profitability. It's supposed to gain operating leverage with growth. because that gross margin is so high. But what we've seen over the years is that its operating expenses go up often just as much as revenue, sometimes even more than revenue.

That was certainly the case in the most recent quarter, operating expenses up 25% and revenue only up 23%. It's a software company. It's supposed to gain operating leverage, but it has continued to hire, higher, higher, and hasn't really been able to gain those operating leverage gains. And so that's been kind of a problem with the business model that I've been a little bit frustrated with looking at Atlassian from the sidelines. But what's interesting about the company is it's saying we're doing this to self-fund further investment. Now, one can make the argument that it's already self-funding because it's free cash flow positive.

But you look at how it hires a lot of stock-based compensation in that gap profitability hasn't been there. In a way, the shareholders are the ones who have been funding the growth all along because it's been, diluting shareholders by issuing so much stock-based compensation. So pulling back on that hiring, now saying we want to get to gap profitability, yeah, we want to sell fund. It's an interesting way to put it. But the other thing I want to point out here is that it is a software as a service company. And I wonder if it's saying, look, we're a little bit concerned here about the outlook for a business such as ours because they sell by the seat. Many of these software as a service company sell by the seat. You look at a company like Block, just.

just laying off 40% of its workforce. Okay, that's less potential seats if Block was an Atlassian customer, right? And so there may be some of these software companies that are integrating AI into their workflows, maybe needing less workers. That means less seats. That means less potential seats to sell for Atlassian. So I don't know. Am I saying that the sky is falling?

I hope that's not what I'm saying. I'm just saying it's a concern of mine for companies such as Atlassian Enterprise Software, software as a service company is going forward. You touched on a point for me, at least when it comes to SaaS companies, software companies, and especially companies with a lot of stock-based compensation, where there's been this promise of scale of, you know, once we reach a certain, you know, threshold, economic scale is going to take a take over. And, you know, the operations are, the cost for operations are going to kind of flatline

and revenue is going to grow and we're going to see scale. But, you know, we're several years into a lot of these companies. and we haven't seen that. And a little bit on the nose here on this idea of companies laying people off that are software vendors, there has to be some realization that your clients are doing it. And Matt, this is what I wanted to ask. How are these companies looking at this and being like, hey, we need to cut for efficiency? How do they not see that with their clients doing the same thing in terms of reductions of seats for these SaaS licenses?

Yeah, it would seem a little contradictory. if they weren't seeing that, right? I mean, as I mentioned a bit ago, some of these SaaS companies, I feel like are in closer to panic mode than they're really letting on. It isn't just Atlassian by any means, but they're a prime example. And it's not just AI disrupting the product itself. I mean, you're spot on. The core customer base is the tech industry. I think they've used the term knowledge workers in the past. And SaaS seat usage could definitely suffer with the layoffs. I feel like if it were not for the story that we're going to hit after the break, we would be covering a lot more of software companies, but this past week has been all about oil, and we're

going to touch on that next. Some of the best lessons don't come from a classroom. They come from experience. On the power of advice, a new podcast series from Capital Group, you'll hear from CEOs, investors, and founders about how they built careers, took risks, and reinvented themselves. If you're starting your own journey, this is the kind of advice you won't want to miss. Available wherever you get your podcast, published by Capital Client Group, Inc. There's a theory in commodity and supply chains called the bullwick effect, where when variability, like a supply disruption, it tends to have amplifying effects down the value chain. And I think the volatility in oil prices over the past few days has been so extreme that

even the biggest bullwip effect disciples of economic theory are watching this and going, dang, I don't even think I was planning on that. This week alone, we kind of started before the week Sunday. Oil prices were probably in like the $70. barrel range. They whipped all the way up to 110, I think it was on Monday or Tuesday, back down to 80, and today we're back up to $95 a barrel as we tape. Now, all this is related to the closure or the extremely limited transport of crude for the Strait of Hormuz and several other commodities because of its proximity to Iran and the conflict that's going on there today. Now, earlier today,

the United States and several other countries announced that they would release crude oil from their strategic petroleum reserves as a way to kind of fill the gaps, if you will, with this closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Now, John, you're the numbers guy for today. I want to see, what does the math behind the announcement of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve release actually mean? Well, I thought it was going to be a big deal as far as improving the price, and the immediate reaction was the price of oil started going up again.

So it started doing a little bit of digging. Essentially, yes, there are countries that are releasing the strategic petroleum reserves. USA is one of them. Roughly about half of what is agreed on to be released is coming from the USA. 172 million barrels from the U.S. Now, that sounds like a lot, but here is some of the detail here. Over 120 days, this is being released. And so that's about 1.4 million barrels a day.

that's only about 1% of daily global consumption of oil. And for more perspective, almost 21 million barrels go through the Strait of Hormuz daily, if things are normal. Things are not normal. Obviously, nothing's going through or very little right now. But assuming that normal pace of 21 million, you look at the $1.4 million a day that is going to be released from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, that's only about 7% of that supply choke points. So it really, because of how it's being spread out, it doesn't make as big of an

impact as you might think. And so that is, I think, why the market is reacting why it is, the price of oil hasn't dropped very much since the announcement. Yeah, there's these, a lot of on-the-margin things that we're trying to do with strategic petroleum releases. There's the pipeline that goes across the Saudi Arabian Peninsula that we can maybe up production there. There was an announcement that Iraq was going to start sending by a pipeline into Turkey, Syria and into Turkey, to just basically finding ways to avoid the Strait of Hormuz by any means possible. And countries are trying to react in some way because we're seeing some pretty violent price actions here. Matt, this is one of those, like, what does this all mean?

For a lot of investors, this can be really like a hard to wrap their minds around, not just for like people who are investing oil, but just investing in the markets in general because there's a lot of things that this is going to have knock-on effects or, you know, the ripples through the entire market, as you will. So it's really hard to pin down, like, especially when we're operating with kind of a lack of information, or even when we do get information, they do seem to be conflicting stories depending on who's delivering the information. Now, I know that oil isn't exactly your cup of tea when it comes to investing. What are some of the sectors of the market you are looking at as a result of what's going on right now?

How could they be affected? You know, I mean, oil has, as we've seen, has kind of like ripple effects throughout the market. It's not just oil stocks that are moving, for example. I see this as a potential helpful move and some of the other things you said, but they're not game changers. There's been no solution that's going to, you know, up the world's oil production by 20% anytime soon. The U.S., they also appear set to be to suspend the Jones Act, for example. That would make it easier for foreign flagged vessels to bring oil to the U.S. So that's one other thing to keep in mind.

And that's priced in, too. It's not really moving the market that much, and that's for a reason. It's not just that we don't have a lot of information or that the information's conflicting. It's that the information, it constantly changes, not just with the steps that are being taken to potentially fix the supply chain disruptions, but with the trajectory of the conflict itself, is it going to be over next week? Is it going to be over next week? Is it going to be over next year?

Is that even too soon? We hope not. I mean, one politician will come on TV and say it'll be very quick. Someone else, a general or something, will come on TV soon and say this could drag on. We don't know. And that's a long way to say that I don't think that the volatility that you mentioned, going from 70 to 110 to 95 and back again, I don't think that's going to go away anytime soon. If we do get extended supply disruptions, it could be a bad thing for consumer prices in general. So many industries are sensitive to fuel costs. like grocery stores have to get their product there on trucks that run on diesel fuel.

There are a lot of examples where price increases could be passed on to the consumer. So hopefully it will be a short-lived conflict, but if it's not, we can start to see kind of trickle-down effects throughout a lot of our portfolios. I just want to weigh in here for the everyday listener like myself. When we see the price of gas go up at the pump, right, we might not expect that because the U.S. is a net exporter of oil. And so why is it that things going through the Strait of Hormuz are affecting prices here domestically? The thing that we have to remember is that domestic prices are based on global supply and demand, not domestic supply and demand. And what I mean by that is when you have a

disruption in one part of the world, those countries that now aren't getting their oil, if they get their oil from oil that's coming through the Strait of Hormuz, they still need it from somewhere. And so now they're going to start sourcing that somewhere else, or at least trying to. And so that does raise the prices globally. And yeah, the U.S. oil, of course, it goes up in price because that's how it works, right? And so we do see those effects here domestically. And so I'm thinking about this, you know, I'm not so much interested in the oil industry. I think that that's just not my cup of tea, as you pointed out, Tyler, but I am curious about the knock-on effects, specifically in technology because we already see, for example, technology hyperscalers, they're already impacting

energy prices. And it's already been a topic with the current administration, hey, who's going to foot the bill for this rising cost of AI and trying to get these hyperscalers to ensure that they're going to make sure that the price, they're going to pay their more than fair share for the energy, right? What happens when the energy market is further disrupted in that environment? Are the hyperscaler is going to be forced to kind of slow down, depending on how long the conflict drags out. What does that mean for hardware orders that are already ordered, but maybe not service yet? What does this do to the backlog of work? Does this create an oversupply? I'm curious about the second order, third order effects of a thing like this.

Last question before we head out here, Matt, it's to you, because John kind of answered it already. So I'm not going to have let make him repeat himself on investing in oil and gas or commodities or some of the things we're talking about the straight of Hormuz affecting fertilizer, aluminum, things like that. A lot of investors are probably thinking, like, should I get into it now? Because if we expect higher prices, maybe it's going to be like bumper crops for a lot of these sort of commodities with things like that. Is it worth looking at them, investing in them today? Or do you still view this as like, this is a hot stove? I really don't want to touch it. Well, I mean, if we get, you know, $150 oil, of course, you know, energy stocks are you look foolish.

for not buying them right now and things like that. But the opposite could be true if you bought them now and they crashed, oil crashed back to $60. I don't like to go near commodities in com time, so I'm probably the wrong one to ask here. But if you're not already a big energy investor, you don't already understand the supply demand dynamics of that market. Now probably isn't the best time to dive right in just for the sake of adding some exposure to your portfolio. But that's my take, Again, I get that I'm biased because I'm not the biggest energy investor, even like when markets are calm. Yeah, I can certainly sympathize with that as someone who has studied the oil market probably

a little bit more. I've always been like a, hey, if you don't like it when the price of oil is really, really cheap, then you probably don't want to be involved in when it's really expensive either. Coming up after the break, we're going to talk about dollar general and the market reaction to its most recent earnings report. The old adage goes, it isn't what you say. It's how you say it, because to truly make an incident. impact, you need to set an example and take the lead. You have to adapt to whatever comes your way.

When you're that driven, you drive an equally determined vehicle, the Range Rover Sport. The Range Rover Sport blends power, poise, and performance. Its design is distinctly British and free from unnecessary details, allowing its raw agility to shine through. It combines a dynamic sporting personality with elegance to deliver a truly instinctive drive. Inside, you'll find true modern luxury with the latest innovations in comfort. Use the cabin air purification. system alongside active noise cancellation for all new levels of quality and quiet. Whether you prefer a choice of powerful engines or the plug-in hybrid with an estimated range of 53 miles, there's an option for you. With seven terrain modes to choose from, terrain response

to fine-tuned your vehicle for the roads ahead. The range rover event is on now. Explore enhance offers at range rover.com. So on a slightly lighter topic than strategic propolium reserves and the Strait of Hormuz and things like that, shares of dollar jibes. General are down about 5% as we taped today after the company reported earnings. Now, John, turning to you as the numbers, a guy again, the numbers look solid. So what was the fly in the ointment that the market didn't like here? Yeah, let me start with what the numbers were and then I'll address the fly. If you've been following Dollar General for the last couple of years, you realize what's

been going on. So basically, coming out of the pandemic, the company was super excited, bought, way too much inventory. Inventory piled up. Sales didn't keep growing the way that they had. And now they've been working through all this inventory for quite some time. It's been damage. It's been stolen. It's been marked down just to get it out of there. That kind of put a damper on the business for a little bit. It's climbing back out of that. Traffic was up in 2025. That was so good to see. It's projecting same store sales growth here in 2026. You want to see that as a shareholder. The earnings are making massive jumps.

Now, but that's from a relative basis because earnings have been way down as it's worked through this inventory problem. So, yes, earnings are up on a year-over-year basis, but still down from peak. It's still climbing out of the hole that it dug itself. But inventory down again in 2025, you want to see that down 7% on a per store basis. You know, the dividend is stuck. It hasn't been raising. It didn't repurchase any shares.

Here's what the fine, the ointment is, as far as I'm concerned. Right now, it trades at about 20 times forward earnings. I would say that's about right for a dollar general, based on its growth, based on how its profits are right now. I'd say it 20 times earnings is about right. And so I think the market is just looking at this and saying, okay, the numbers are fine, but what is this business worth? It's worth about 5% less. This has certainly been a fascinating story to follow over the past 15, 16 years. I mean, this was a company.

It was an absolute darling coming out of the Great Recession and through much of the 2010s. But it started to face some troubles around like 2020, you know, perhaps guns. out over its skis in terms of expansion of its footprint with new stores. And now it's been trying to turn things around, as John indicated, excuse me, with inventory down, trying to clean up the store experience, things like that. Based on the stock performance of the past year, it looks like this turnaround is working. I know we talked about 5% down for the day, but over the past year, it's up like 88%. So kind of thinking about all these things and putting these numbers in context of the quarter,

the stock performance, and the valuation, things like that, Matt, was this a quarter, this past quarter, excuse me, a sign that the turnaround is working, or would you say the jury's still out here? I mean, yes, and no. I think the turnaround is working in the sense that, yes, it's a great thing for inventory to be right-sized. It's a great thing for, you know, it's becoming a more efficient business, clearly, when earnings are growing that fast compared to 3% same sales growth. But you mentioned how much of a darling they were in the Great Recession,

and I have to wonder if they're having kind of the Walmart effect going on here. because consumers are feeling squeezed. Dollar General is a place that tends to do better when consumers start to feel squeezed, which you mentioned the Great Recession. They were absolutely one of the winners of that era. So I got to wonder if some of that is because of what's going on just in the economy and people are cutting back and looking for lower-cost alternatives to things. But no, they're making a lot of the right moves.

I can't really fault them. I don't know if the stock deserves to be up 88% over the past year, whatever you guys just said it was, but it's going in the right direction. All right, so I'm going to put you both on the spot here when it comes to Dollar General, and it's stock because I think that's, we're going to make it actually a, not a stocks on radar, but we're going to make you make a pick here. Based on the performance, stock valuation and what we saw this most recent quarter, do you see this as a buying opportunity for Dollar General? And if not, what is a retailer that you'd like more?

I should preface this by saying Dollar General is one of the larger positions in my own portfolio. this is a rare thing where I bought a lot of shares pretty much right at the bottom. I know we're not into market timing, but I was fortunate in buying shares over the last couple of years at very reasonable prices, and I'm still continuing to hold because it does have plenty of opportunity to continue to improve these earnings as it continues to work through some of these operational challenges. And I like what I just saw in 2025. I will say if you like growth, and I do like growth as an investor, five below, I think would be something that is a very important. a little bit of a better long-term play right now, in my opinion, because Five Below is really

firing on all cylinders when it comes to its pricing power in its stores. That's something I did not think that Five Below had. It's a chain for teens and pre-teens at $5 or less the merchandise, but it's proving that, you know what, it doesn't really matter. They can charge better, higher prices so long as the merchandise is perceived value. And so it's able to grow, same store sales really at an impressive rate right now, still has plenty of opportunity to open up new stores around the country, debt-free. I like five below for the long term. To John's point, if I already owned it, I wouldn't sell right now, but I don't own the stock at almost 20 times earnings. I wouldn't exactly call Dollar General cheap right now.

Fairly valued, as Tyler put it, I'm not rushing to buy. Honestly, I'm watching Target right now. I think Target roughly 14 times earnings and kind of an earlier stage turnaround play, I think it could be like buying Dollar General when John did if things work out. So, that's a business I'm watching very, very closely. So it sounds a little bit of middle of the road. Hey, it's pretty good, but not the most screened buy for right now. As always, people on the program may have interests in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against.

So don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards, and it's not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content provided for informational purposes only. See our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Thanks for our producer Dan Boyd and the rest of the Motley Fool team. For Matt, John and myself, thanks for listening and we'll chat again soon.